X 阅读

2026-10-24

31 条已保存原文 · 时间显示为 Toronto 当地时间

保存说明:除条目另有标注外,正文尚未人工核对 · 图片未保存 · 引用或对话上下文可能不完整。

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@gxd92743348 😂
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114200003346665952
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:09:19.941Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2114194744800928213 · https://x.com/i/status/2114194744800928213

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@gxd92743348 我今天不在办公室啊~~
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114194354105626809
保存时间:2026-10-27T00:02:08.077Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2114190632168395190 · https://x.com/i/status/2114190632168395190

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Michellewv11 @tigeryu2001 @TJ_Research 不卖,我说的是市场钱买labs问题
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114146694124519439
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:09:19.941Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2114140179149799691 · https://x.com/i/status/2114140179149799691

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Theta_Ops @tigeryu2001 @TJ_Research 对~~我觉得他们会卖semi因为software不会被定价成AI rel,感觉会去冲anthropic的钱大部分是AI信仰票
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114146539262406671
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:09:19.941Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2114144323298299952 · https://x.com/i/status/2114144323298299952

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Ocean42668833 Well, never say never Take a look at Cursor — they used to distribute over 60% of Anthropic’s token
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114146056896422048
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:09:19.941Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage Linked or quoted context may not be saved

REPLY_TO: x:post:2114137026543174024 · https://x.com/i/status/2114137026543174024

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Michellewv11 @tigeryu2001 @TJ_Research nbis 财务和crwv完全不同啊
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114141981953986956
保存时间:2026-10-26T00:01:07.682Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2114140179149799691 · https://x.com/i/status/2114140179149799691

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@chengchuan123 平行的市场观点,不是链条关系
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114134972168827174
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:09:19.941Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2114132409407193391 · https://x.com/i/status/2114132409407193391

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
A cyber attack immediately gets priced as a tailwind for PANW and CRWD. Markets default to linear thinking. But what if Anthropic or OpenAI launches a cybersecurity product?? In such case, entire SaaS sector could get re-priced — regardless of whether it actually impairs any of their business Cybersecurity is simply one visible expression of a broader shift — data processing is being systematically converted into model inference As models replace humans in coding, not only cybersecurity but also code review, testing, and even invoking these systems all become model-driven. All the old workflow has to be rebuilt by AI
保存的原文 · 长文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114134734242734177
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:09:19.941Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

QUOTES: x:post:2114046397897150901 · https://x.com/i/status/2114046397897150901

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@pingchuan0125 长端利率在没有Fed干涉情况下可以对标nominal GDP(不一定要到) 现在美国nominal GDP= 6.5%
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114128994404819239
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:10:21.613Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2114018572293099991 · https://x.com/i/status/2114018572293099991

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@tigeryu2001 @TJ_Research 卖半导体买labs
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114128313631609042
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:10:21.613Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2114125660167995799 · https://x.com/i/status/2114125660167995799

美研芒格君 @Kay2289123
原帖 ↗
Kimi3.1 有在大范围的让博主做宣发,固定话术,定向叙事。是真是假,大家自行评判 Kimi2.7 的时候,我发帖说曾被联系(不知道是否是外包)买夸赞贴文,要求定向夸赞Kimi的前端能力,但我拒绝了,因为我没用过。 当时我发出来被骂惨了。 下图是其他博主的爆料,我没有立场,不做评判。因为我确实没用过Kimi
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114119997723464030
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:09:16.281Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

QUOTES: x:post:2113903850641842589 · https://x.com/i/status/2113903850641842589

投资TALK君 @TJ_Research
原帖 ↗
@QiekeShiyi65278 你不适合看我内容,感觉取关吧
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114048169541619958
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:09:18.045Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113999185146007945 · https://x.com/i/status/2113999185146007945

Tigris | 会讲课教授是好老师 @tig88411109
原帖 ↗
为何“软硬,硬软” 软件SaaS逆势上涨,而半导体硬件大跌。这个就是简单明了的解释和预测。回顾复盘必读,理解认知差价值,理解AI整个生态的价值,而不是空头天天鼓吹什么内部循环融资。随便看看 $NOW 和 $PLTR 都是底部反弹70%。下一步硬件仓位平衡机构调整后一样会回流轮动到硬件。
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114037091797811280
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:09:21.888Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

QUOTES: x:post:2036104169040535964 · https://x.com/i/status/2036104169040535964

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@nuoyi7777777 应该会的 会才是正常市场
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114007495777870157
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:10:21.613Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2114007133301993954 · https://x.com/i/status/2114007133301993954

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
我的观点长期以来其实非常一致 1. 长端利率需要逐步上升justify growth 2. Credit spread需要变宽反应持续供应需求 3. 基础推动力是:AI的普及——真实💰的需求,高ROI与坚决抢跑般的capex(1-10我们大概在2~3) 4. 虽然股市multiple会别压缩、变得苛刻,但是AI公司增长会更加惊人
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114006970391003541
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:09:19.941Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

QUOTES: x:post:2062499738709340167 · https://x.com/i/status/2062499738709340167

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
冤大头=AI债务投资人 其实credit 市场对“冤大头”缺货短期反应过分了。除了供应预期,很多投资人不愿意IR波动很大的时候下手 早就觉得利差会变宽,但我不同意有关AI funding会延缓capex的说法 债的恐惧蔓延到股市,流动性不足下 Anth/OAI/meta又竞争性融资 但如果债反应过度,那么股反应严重过度 等等写篇东西总结下
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2114003386626642223
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:10:21.613Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

QUOTES: x:post:2078148136959451367 · https://x.com/i/status/2078148136959451367

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@marc__8005v @Boiler_techer Im not sure, their margins hv peaked
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113979695150862625
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:10:21.613Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113967193973309658 · https://x.com/i/status/2113967193973309658

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@QCCCCCCCCCCCC 融资变紧影响多大担心有点过了
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113979418356146377
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:10:21.613Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113975017235165411 · https://x.com/i/status/2113975017235165411

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@QCCCCCCCCCCCC 不能卖了
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113979214651326932
保存时间:2026-10-25T06:10:21.613Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113975766765760679 · https://x.com/i/status/2113975766765760679

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@RYANHINGSHING 中国公司都这尿性
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113939170196656465
保存时间:2026-10-25T00:00:04.021Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113909084957401536 · https://x.com/i/status/2113909084957401536

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
Paying for PR pieces is standard practice in China Regardless of this mess up Kimi works pretty well
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113902482636382308
保存时间:2026-10-25T00:00:04.021Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

QUOTES: x:post:2113710752741892476 · https://x.com/i/status/2113710752741892476

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@CHJ0d67 不太相同,公司质量相差很大
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113891424311919088
保存时间:2026-10-25T00:00:04.021Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113878476264493122 · https://x.com/i/status/2113878476264493122

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@bilcheng77 @morningtigert 不让卖出清不了啊
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113874576509964711
保存时间:2026-10-24T06:09:21.126Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113864633287409958 · https://x.com/i/status/2113864633287409958

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@tigeryu2001 你担心的是订单虚报,然后实际需求不足,就好像2000年这样? 华尔街就在这样定价了,但是实际情况是使用率基本满负荷,而2000年才个零头
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113861882817978661
保存时间:2026-10-24T06:09:21.126Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2094413057615093845 · https://x.com/i/status/2094413057615093845

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@morningtigert 那不然呢….
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113861447092728317
保存时间:2026-10-24T06:09:21.126Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113858722002833789 · https://x.com/i/status/2113858722002833789

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@KFan494557 很难忍住啊
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113857032709427705
保存时间:2026-10-24T06:09:21.126Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113852663595172051 · https://x.com/i/status/2113852663595172051

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@brksbrksbrks yes, a bubble which net position is already in short?
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113850148782739766
保存时间:2026-10-24T06:09:21.126Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113847187105059122 · https://x.com/i/status/2113847187105059122

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
中国量化7月大募资,然后被拔线一把闷 他们自动配置的多头都是高科技仓位,等于被迫追高,接着一路被迫斩出来 险资也是同期进去的,一直在剁。因为证监会规定不能“净”卖出— 硬买农业、买招商银行 现在好了,不装了,把“净”给去掉了 继续看多(请原谅~公开场合我只会看多)
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113849288086446343
保存时间:2026-10-24T06:09:21.126Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

QUOTES: x:post:2113709114367025163 · https://x.com/i/status/2113709114367025163

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@success_cw 是的,先进模型经常这样太扩散不收敛
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113847561958400059
保存时间:2026-10-24T06:09:21.126Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113809543646093618 · https://x.com/i/status/2113809543646093618

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@shawnyinmr 说明你以前看的数据被收集了
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113847416634097922
保存时间:2026-10-24T06:09:21.126Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2113590102941426101 · https://x.com/i/status/2113590102941426101

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
People FUD AI should revisit the software narrative earlier — pricing vibe coding to replace real enterprise software service Same lazy straight-line thinking. Now “semis are done” because AI funding and token prices Look at your cards& run your odds. Ignore the table talk https://t.co/gRLwvfUzyr
保存的原文 · 长文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2113845263865647477
保存时间:2026-10-24T06:09:21.126Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

QUOTES: x:post:2113804804640354452 · https://x.com/i/status/2113804804640354452