X 阅读

2025-12-11

2 条已保存原文 · 时间显示为 Toronto 当地时间

保存说明:除条目另有标注外,正文尚未人工核对 · 图片未保存 · 引用或对话上下文可能不完整。

Tigris | 会讲课教授是好老师 @tig88411109
原帖 ↗
Full Alphabet IC memo (Gumroad): Written for people who already know $GOOG is a core asset, but refuse to trade the tape like a mood swing. It does three things: -Pins scenario valuation ranges on GOOGL so +10% / -10% is context, not drama -Ties those ranges to explicit assumptions and catalysts, so you know what has to be true -Marks the zones where price and fundamentals decouple, which is where alpha lives, not comfort Link:
保存的原文 · 长文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 1999203167276347548
保存时间:2026-09-27T12:30:38.116Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Media references were not archived with this snapshot. Reply and quoted-post context may be partial; only the returned post record was saved.

REPLY_TO: x:post:1999202867916206170 · /content/clippings/x/posts/1999202867916206170/

Tigris | 会讲课教授是好老师 @tig88411109
原帖 ↗
There is a little pattern in the tape that has become almost funny. Every OpenAI launch triggers the same reflex: the demo drops, the timeline melts, and Google trades down like it just lost another limb. If you think every OpenAI launch means Google is dying, you’re trading the surface story. OpenAI and Google aren’t even valued on the same axis anymore. One is drifting toward frontier infra plus agent layer economics. The other still earns its keep as the world’s biggest attention marketplace. The tape reacts as if OpenAI is taking Google’s lunch; in reality they are barely playing the same game. And yet Google is not some cornered incumbent. It runs its own stack end-to-end: silicon, models, cloud, distribution. When the frontier moves, Google isn’t just a victim of the headline. It’s also a beneficiary of the underlying economy the model boom feeds: more tokens, more workloads, more infra demand, including on its own cloud. The real question for investors has nothing to do with “coolness” or who grabbed the news cycle. It’s whether the market is still pricing Google purely as an ads machine, or whether you’re getting its entire AI optionality for free every time panic selling hits the tape. If you can tell the difference between a narrative drawdown and an actual earnings threat, you’re at least playing the stock on the right dimension.
保存的原文 · 长文

上下文状态:PARTIAL, UNKNOWN

来源与保存记录

Post ID: 1999202867916206170
保存时间:2026-09-27T12:30:38.116Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL, UNKNOWN
已知缺失:Media references were not archived with this snapshot. Reply and quoted-post context may be partial; only the returned post record was saved.