If there was a real bubble, it happened in 2023 and 2024, when a single early model like GPT-3 or GPT-4 was enough to send Nvidia up tenfold and push valuations into triple-digit territory. That period was speculation driven by imagination rather than earnings. What we are seeing in 2025 is the opposite.
This year has been about validation, not excess. The AI buildout is now funded by four real buyers with real cash flow, like Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta and their collective valuation sits near 26 times earnings, far below the seventy times we saw in the dot-com era.
The market is also no longer treating AI as a single trade. Dispersion is everywhere. Google, which finally aligned hardware, software, and infrastructure, delivered a genuine rerating after years of underperformance and posted roughly fifty percent annual returns.
In contrast, Amazon’s high multiple and slowing growth, and Meta’s strong growth but weak AI cloud monetization, left both stocks flat for most of the year. This is not what bubbles look like. This is what a rational repricing looks like when earnings momentum and monetization pathways decide who wins.
Across all the downturns I’ve lived through, I have never seen a correction as orderly and disciplined as 2025. AI Capex is still expanding, and the business models are only beginning to show real commercial traction.
You don’t disprove a technology cycle while the infrastructure is still being built. If anything, this phase is where high-quality names offer the best risk-reward, and these prices start to look more like a Black Friday sale than the end of a trend.
保存的原文 · 长文
X 阅读
2025-11-21
3 条已保存原文 · 时间显示为 Toronto 当地时间
保存说明:除条目另有标注外,正文尚未人工核对 · 图片未保存 · 引用或对话上下文可能不完整。
If you want to size $GOOG, you need a range, not fantasies. Investors get lost because they listen to every “10x” pitch and forget the math.
Here’s how I look at it.
We’re entering a 10 to 20 trillion AI value cycle. Alphabet can reasonably take 1 to 2 trillion of that. Moving from 3T to 4–5T is not storytelling. It’s value shifting toward whoever controls the workflow.
The upside is never about the multiple. It’s about earnings velocity. If Google embeds AGI into Search, Android, and enterprise operations, the business model changes.
You stop selling ads. You start charging an access fee to the digital labor economy. That means higher intent capture, higher ad yield, and a larger enterprise mix.
Run the tape.
If commercialization works, 2028 can land near 15 EPS.
Put a 30 multiple on that, and you get a 450 stock and a 5.5T company.
Of course there are risks.Regulatory breakups. AI cannibalizing core search. One headline can take the stock down 15 percent.
But with Buffett anchoring the floor around 250, anything short of an extreme shock is just volatility, not a thesis break. In this market, you don’t follow stories.
You follow earnings acceleration. And right now, Alphabet still has a real shot at owning the next leg of productivity growth.
保存的原文 · 长文
I lived through every crash since 1987. They all looked different on the surface, but the pattern never changed.
They arrived faster than anyone expected and wiped out what looked safe. Real investing was never about guessing moves. It was about building a system that protects you from yourself.
Know the business, pay a fair price, and always keep a margin of safety. 2025 reminded everyone that high multiples without rising profits do not survive. Amazon proved even giants get punished when earnings lose momentum.
This is not bearish. It is markets becoming rational again. Hype fades. Fundamentals stay. And investors who respect discipline are the ones who walk out stronger.
保存的原文 · 长文