X 阅读

2025-12-10

2 条已保存原文 · 时间显示为 Toronto 当地时间

保存说明:除条目另有标注外,正文尚未人工核对 · 图片未保存 · 引用或对话上下文可能不完整。

Tigris | 会讲课教授是好老师 @tig88411109
原帖 ↗
分享一个我常看的指数,市场上钱多少比听鲍威尔和看头条靠谱。 只要是负值,趋势还不变,不用担心什么AI泡沫和Capex投资小作文,市场上钱多还是会追和托底高杠杆、高 capex、押注 AI 远期现金流的资产。
保存的原文

媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED, NONE

来源与保存记录

Post ID: 1998665417334907325
保存时间:2026-09-27T12:30:38.116Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED, NONE
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Reply and quoted-post context may be partial; only the returned post record was saved.

QUOTES: x:post:1998664267944403445 · https://x.com/i/status/1998664267944403445

QUOTES: https://x.com/tig88411109/status/1998664267944403445 · https://x.com/tig88411109/status/1998664267944403445

Tigris | 会讲课教授是好老师 @tig88411109
原帖 ↗
Forget Fed's rate cut and Powell's script. In the Trump–Fed knife fight he is basically a caretaker on borrowed time. If you want to know whether risk still has a bid, you watch Chicago Fed’s NFCI and ANFCI, not the press conference. Both indices are sitting around −0.5. Zero is “normal,” positive is tight, negative is loose. NFCI, a composite index of risk, credit and leverage that maps the real liquidity regime. NFCI < 0 already tells you there is no broad credit crunch, no systemic “funding winter.” ANFCI is even more negative, which means that after you strip out the macro cycle, financial conditions are still looser than the economy alone would justify. Translate that into plain portfolio language: high policy rates do not equal tight financial conditions. As long as NFCI and ANFCI stay below zero, the system is still willing to fund stories with long duration cash flows and heavy capex. The AI capex wave, the four-to-five-hundred-billion-a-year data center buildout, high-multiple semis and software names all sit on top of that liquidity bedrock. So my playbook for tomorrow is simple. After the meeting, I am less interested in whether Powell sounds “hawkish” or “dovish” and more interested in where NFCI and ANFCI drift over the next few weeks. If they stay negative while the Fed is already cutting, then monetary easing is not being neutralized by markets, it is being amplified. That is how you extend an equity boom, not how you kill it.
保存的原文 · 长文

上下文状态:UNKNOWN

来源与保存记录

Post ID: 1998664267944403445
保存时间:2026-09-30T15:25:48.141Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:UNKNOWN
已知缺失:Media references were not archived with this snapshot.