𝕏 原文阅读 · 帖子

Tigris | 会讲课教授是好老师 · 2025-11-22 · 帖子

保留来源原文。时间显示为 Toronto 当地时间;未保存的配图与引用请前往 X 查看。

返回 X 阅读

保存说明:除条目另有标注外,正文尚未人工核对 · 图片未保存 · 引用或对话上下文可能不完整。

Tigris | 会讲课教授是好老师 @tig88411109
原帖 ↗
If you want to size $GOOG, you need a range, not fantasies. Investors get lost because they listen to every “10x” pitch and forget the math. Here’s how I look at it. We’re entering a 10 to 20 trillion AI value cycle. Alphabet can reasonably take 1 to 2 trillion of that. Moving from 3T to 4–5T is not storytelling. It’s value shifting toward whoever controls the workflow. The upside is never about the multiple. It’s about earnings velocity. If Google embeds AGI into Search, Android, and enterprise operations, the business model changes. You stop selling ads. You start charging an access fee to the digital labor economy. That means higher intent capture, higher ad yield, and a larger enterprise mix. Run the tape. If commercialization works, 2028 can land near 15 EPS. Put a 30 multiple on that, and you get a 450 stock and a 5.5T company. Of course there are risks.Regulatory breakups. AI cannibalizing core search. One headline can take the stock down 15 percent. But with Buffett anchoring the floor around 250, anything short of an extreme shock is just volatility, not a thesis break. In this market, you don’t follow stories. You follow earnings acceleration. And right now, Alphabet still has a real shot at owning the next leg of productivity growth.

媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED, NONE 上下文状态:PARTIAL, UNKNOWN

来源与保存记录

Post ID: 1992091755123187991
保存时间:2026-09-27T12:30:38.116Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED, NONE
上下文状态:PARTIAL, UNKNOWN
已知缺失:Reply and quoted-post context may be partial; only the returned post record was saved.