Herman Jin · X 阅读

按原发时间浏览 · 时间显示为 Toronto 当地时间

搜索这位来源的原文

保存说明:除条目另有标注外,正文尚未人工核对 · 图片未保存 · 引用或对话上下文可能不完整。

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@LIWEI_TWCapital 😂😂😂😂😂@photonjaeger
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115355307958521897
保存时间:2026-10-29T00:02:29.505Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115240556637155332 · https://x.com/i/status/2115240556637155332

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Jason_GalaxyM31 @Victory_1919 因为他们是分析师
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115354103387984013
保存时间:2026-10-29T00:02:29.505Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115336148784750850 · https://x.com/i/status/2115336148784750850

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Victory_1919 不能光看Ant手上现金、盈利多少 但同理,也不能只看Ant和OAI赚多少钱吧?两家labs一共才分了新增算力得27%,另外73%算力赚的钱怎么被大家忽视了呢? 而且200b投入不是纯capex,不觉得他们自己能经营好物理云设施。更加可能得是他们是拿来给预付款,锁定算力,这样会带动大得多得资金投入
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115331824599933162
保存时间:2026-10-29T00:02:29.505Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage Linked or quoted context may not be saved

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115278372809199816 · https://x.com/i/status/2115278372809199816

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Straits_Trader6 2000年没有一家公司是赚钱得,所有钱得源头全部都是VC 现在源头是真实使用盈利啊
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115330293641216501
保存时间:2026-10-29T00:02:29.505Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115329759194280113 · https://x.com/i/status/2115329759194280113

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@paofanyang @Pathusa 怎么可能尊重希特勒,但我同样也不会尊重绿教
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115329934881329349
保存时间:2026-10-29T00:02:29.505Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115327240938705306 · https://x.com/i/status/2115327240938705306

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Polaksky matter of time
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115329719445110832
保存时间:2026-10-29T00:02:29.505Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115328701567221971 · https://x.com/i/status/2115328701567221971

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@ZengQingli22668 正在写~~
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115322556983218580
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115321772585463873 · https://x.com/i/status/2115321772585463873

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@BerteeLee67277 @rickawsb 纯数学也是文科,一个跑不了
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115321919692230956
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115316370921717925 · https://x.com/i/status/2115316370921717925

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Kwinll1 emm 暂时trading不是很容易被取代,因为trading其实是要接单得,特别是大单不敢直接交给AI ie有人丢个2 yard order过来,你敢让程序报价么?即使敢也需要人旁别看一眼负责得
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115309745838141878
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115275734520648020 · https://x.com/i/status/2115275734520648020

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Pathusa 不说德国,感觉整个欧洲都快没救了
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115283881985548782
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115254390210867676 · https://x.com/i/status/2115254390210867676

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@hello_mirr89197 那是quant干的 quant编程其实就是实现数学模型,也是AI辅助。Jane str Jump这些程序都AI化了
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115275537375691021
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115273278235574475 · https://x.com/i/status/2115273278235574475

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@chhung3 基金研究员可以裁个70%吧
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115273299626533073
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115272135354806466 · https://x.com/i/status/2115272135354806466

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
反驳下过去的自己 大家都跟我在找到了Anthropic这命门了,但是有个catch: 极端的semi需求取决于两个愿意花$50/watt买算力的labs会不会继续 IPO之后Ant手上拿着将近200b现金,运营现金流盈利。觉得会缩手吗? 真正命门是labs像00年—靠着融资花钱,融资停、花钱停、公司死。现在labs赚钱且缺算力 只要看他们能否赚钱,有没有钱
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115272476758577191
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

QUOTES: x:post:2061747648764530968 · /content/clippings/x/posts/2061747648764530968/

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@Rickylu88 对 癌症最后肯定要死人的
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115266270933479855
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115266148333937085 · https://x.com/i/status/2115266148333937085

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@yzq37006542 那是贯彻elon意识形态不想管
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115266129920970826
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115091303247835519 · https://x.com/i/status/2115091303247835519

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@nuoyi7777777 不发展都够取代大部分人了
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115265723593584805
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115264741962879194 · https://x.com/i/status/2115264741962879194

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
因为批斗trading 猴子干不了,所以需要初中生
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115265400980336854
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115265213243297890 · /content/clippings/x/daily/858124064476479488/2026-10-27/#x-post-2115265213243297890

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
你们知道高盛一个ops多少钱一年吗? 这活猴子都能干,还有时候会整错 risk 整体哪个定价模型点一下run,然后过来批斗trading,这活可能需要个初中生吧
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115265213243297890
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115264073827057697 · /content/clippings/x/daily/858124064476479488/2026-10-27/#x-post-2115264073827057697

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
不要只盯着硅谷,还有金融 大银行都很早就与模型公司合作AI化后台了,只是他们流程容错率比较低、钱比较多,行动比较慢 但过程就是个时间问题,ops, compliance, audit, risk, KYC/AML, finance, treasury…猜猜有多少人 这些事情highly tedious, zero-error,对人很头大,对AI毫无压力
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115264073827057697
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

QUOTES: x:post:2114954368143466718 · /content/clippings/x/daily/858124064476479488/2026-10-27/#x-post-2114954368143466718

Herman Jin @ShanghaoJin
原帖 ↗
@EndLeftwingHate I agree, but what I was pointing is that the mkt current reaction is too linear: cyber incident — immediate positive for CRWD/PANW. That simplified framing is what’s currently supporting the valuations
保存的原文
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 2115261983738212703
保存时间:2026-10-28T06:09:25.826Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved Provider results do not establish exhaustive archive coverage

REPLY_TO: x:post:2115253645227020620 · https://x.com/i/status/2115253645227020620