@Joho198510 @haiyangboy1 卖股票,买跑车….
保存的原文
Herman Jin · X 阅读
按原发时间浏览 · 时间显示为 Toronto 当地时间
保存说明:除条目另有标注外,正文尚未人工核对 · 图片未保存 · 引用或对话上下文可能不完整。
@goodsent2 他们处在不同阶段的公司,Jensen完全可以卖股票chill
fighting will 是截然不同的
保存的原文
@Rickylu88 他chill就好了,又不缺钱
保存的原文
@Sophief211 一边深情人设的才真渣
保存的原文
@TShirtnJeans2 @diyas_1989 Trump will veto
保存的原文
@diyas_1989 @TShirtnJeans2 😂
保存的原文
@Trader_Yui1 Me too 了解下
保存的原文
@TShirtnJeans2 There is NONE who can replace Jensen
保存的原文
@realMengyangLin American Dream rewards entrepreneur to take risk and success
保存的原文
@haiyangboy1 因为议会弹劾总统门槛比几个董事开个会罢免CEO高得多
保存的原文
@TShirtnJeans2 Jensen is an invaluable asset to NV, not a liability
保存的原文
Jensen is irreplaceable for $NVDA because only a founder who has weathered decades of near death cycles would have the determination and leadership to TAKE RISKs required to keep the flywheel spinning
He takes risk betting full resources on aggressive technical roadmaps, takes risk locking in massive supply chain commitments, takes risk undertaking neocloud investment, takes risk using NV’s b/s to guarantee residual value on its chips, and even takes risk driving cooperation with China
All of the above is not something any professional managers would have the guts to do
However, Jensen will almost certainly be forced out because he crossed a hard red line of US corp governance: a workplace sexual relationship and an affair that involves public co conflict of interests. For years the entire US corp ecosystem, from suppliers and customers to institutional investors, has collectively woven and operated inside this governance framework, and it simply leaves no room for this kind of personal conduct violation.
保存的原文 · 长文
@XiaKe_FanJin 参与
保存的原文
@UDmezEvrQYIfKeX @BabybusFL 是啊是啊~~我情绪性不当表达
保存的原文
@majia84314310 LBT和Hock Tan年级比较大,相对安全一点?🤔
保存的原文
@freedom9090980 投中国?照黄乐标准给安排一个排给
保存的原文
@QCCCCCCCCCCCC 第一天order book基本确定了
保存的原文
@tigeryu2001 @BabybusFL 20年前美国和现在完全不同
想想me2小仙女们天天去情愿
保存的原文
@tigeryu2001 @BabybusFL 他控制权高
保存的原文
@SupplyRadarX @Alisvolatprop12 华尔街挖产业链信息搞不过华人
挖花边新闻肯定更强
保存的原文