AI基础设施建设狂潮:数据中心、能源与“卖铲人”的投资机遇 Bloomberg Podcasts 2025-10-06

欢迎来到Odd Lots

[音乐]

Bloomberg音频工作室,播客、广播、新闻。

View/Hide Original English

[Music]


Bloomberg
Audio
Studios
podcasts,
radio,


news.


[Music]

Tracy Alloway: 大家好,欢迎收听新一期Odd Lots播客。我是Tracy Alloway。

View/Hide Original English

>> Hello
and
welcome
to
another
episode
of


the
All
Thoughts
Podcast.
I'm
Tracy


Aloway

Joe Weisenthal: 我是Joe Weisenthal。

View/Hide Original English

>> and
I'm
Joe
Weisenthal.

Tracy Alloway: Joe。

View/Hide Original English

>> Joe,

Joe Weisenthal: 是的。

View/Hide Original English

>> yes.

Tracy Alloway: 你有没有想过参观数据中心(Data Center: 存储、处理和分发大量数据的物理设施)?

View/Hide Original English

>> Have
you ever wanted to tour a data


center?

Joe Weisenthal: 嗯,我很想去。

View/Hide Original English

>> Uh,
I'd
love
to.
Um,

Tracy Alloway: 我觉得一部分原因是我认为如果真的进去,可能会很无聊,因为它可能只是一堆重复的电缆,一遍又一遍。但另一部分原因是我觉得仅仅看到它的规模就会很惊人。

View/Hide Original English

>> part
of
me
thinks
it
would
be
really


boring,
like
if
you
actually
went


inside,
cuz
it
would
just
be
a
bunch
of


the
same
cables
like
over
and
over
and


over
again,
but
part
of
me
thinks
just


seeing
the
scale
of
it
would
be
amazing.

Joe Weisenthal: 你知道如果我参观数据中心,我会做什么吗?我会仔细查看那些电缆、每一个螺母、螺栓、真空泵、加热设备,并记下整个设施中每一个小部件的品牌名称,然后看看这些品牌中是否有任何是市场尚未真正认识到的AI相关公司,比如在这个操作中使用的任何随机螺丝刀,它叫什么名字?它是否上市公司?

View/Hide Original English

You
know
what
I
would
do
if
I
tooured
a


data
center
is
I
would
look
at
those


cables
and
every
nut
and
bolt
and
vac


and
um
and
heating
thing
and
get
every


brand
name
I
could
on
any
little
piece


of
equipment
in
the
entire thing
and


then
see
are
there
any
of
these
that
are


AI
plays
that
the
market
doesn't
real


you
know
any
random
screwdriver
that's


being
used
in
this
operation
what
is
the


name
is
it
publicly
traded

Tracy Alloway: 所以,这真的是在寻找卖铲人(Picks and Shovels: 指在淘金热中,那些通过销售工具而非直接淘金来获利的公司或行业)的投资机会。

View/Hide Original English

>> so
literally
picks
and
shovels

Joe Weisenthal: 是的,完全正确。哦,这里有一家公司生产门挡,它们是AI概念股吗?因为他们需要大量的门挡来应对所有这些门。我就会这么做。

View/Hide Original English

>> yeah
just
lit
exactly
oh
here
is
here


there's
a
company
that
makes
the
um
you


know
the
doors
stop
is
are
they
an
AI


play
because
they're
going
to
need
a
lot


of
doors
stops
for
all
these
doors.


That's
what
I
would
do.

Tracy Alloway: 好的,所以,我想Joe的超大规模(Hyperscale: 指能够以极高的效率和弹性扩展计算、存储和网络资源的能力,常用于描述大型数据中心)数据中心ETF最终会进入你附近的市场。那会是个好主意。

View/Hide Original English

>> Okay.
So,
uh
I
guess
the
the
Joe
Hypers


scale
data
center
ETF
um
coming
to
a


market
near
you
eventually.
That
would


be
a
good
idea.

Joe Weisenthal: 那是个绝妙的主意。

View/Hide Original English

>> That's
a
great
idea.

Tracy Alloway: 好的,今天我们将和一位真正去实地考察过这些数据中心的人,讨论一些关于数据中心以及更广泛的AI话题。

View/Hide Original English

>> Well,
today
we're
going
to
talk
about
uh


some
of
these
data
centers.
Yeah.
with


someone
who
has
actually
gone
on
a
field


trip
and
looked
at
them
and
then
we're


going
to
talk
about
broader
AI
because


of
course

Joe Weisenthal: 鉴于市场仍基本处于历史高位,人们普遍担心估值过高。我们看到这些融资交易让我头疼,因为要追踪谁借钱给谁,谁从谁那里购买,以及所有这些复杂的关系,所以我们应该谈谈这个问题。

View/Hide Original English

>> with
markets
still
you
know
basically
at


records
there's
a
lot
of
concern
that


valuations
are
getting
out
of
hand
we've


had
these
financing
deals
which
just
do


my
head
in
in
terms
of
like
trying
to


track
who's
lending
to
who
and
who's


buying
from
who
and
all
of
that
so
we


should
talk
about
it

Tracy Alloway: 完全正确,因为有两点:第一,我们知道AI对股市有多么重要;第二,随着这些复杂的融资交易和数字每天都在变化,就在今天,我们得到消息称OpenAI允许其部分员工以5000亿美元的估值出售股票。这似乎是持续不断的融资,数字每天都在攀升。对本周期资本支出将达到多少的各种估计似乎也在不断上升。我觉得我们真的需要每个月都进行一次这样的对话,因为情况变化太快,而且风险似乎非常高。

View/Hide Original English

>> totally
because
I
mean
two
things
which


is
one
we
know
how
important
AI
is
to


the
stock
market
two,
you
know,
as


there's
all
these
sort
of
complicated


financing
deals
and
the
numbers
change


by
the
day.
So
just
today
we
got
news


that
in
the
latest
Open
AI
is
allowing


some
of
its
employees
to
sell
shares
at


a
half
a
trillion
dollar
valuation.
It


just
seems
like
it's
constant
fund


raise,
constant
numbers
that
go
higher


and
higher
and
higher
every
day.
Various


estimates
for
how
much
capital


expenditure
is
going
to
happen
in
this


cycle
seem
to
go
up.
I
feel
like
what
we


really
need
to
do
is
have
one
of
these


conversations
every
month
and
just
get


for
real
like
we
need
to
keep
uh
like
it


changes
so
fast
and
the
stakes
seem
so


high.

Joe Weisenthal: 是的,你确实需要频繁更新。当然,另一个背景因素是AI建设对整体经济的重要性,对吧?这就是问题所在,我想德意志银行实际上就此发布了一份报告:整个美国经济现在是否正被AI支撑着?如果AI真的建成并转化为实际资金,那可能不是问题。但你可以想象,如果这是一个泡沫,那就会很糟糕。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah,
you
definitely
need
frequent


updates.
The
other
thing
of
course


hovering
in
the
background
is
the


importance
of
the
AI
buildout
to
the


overall
economy,
right?
And
this
is
the


question
like
is
the
I
think
Deutsche


Bank
actually
put
out
a
note
on
this.
Is


the
entire
US
economy
being
propped
up


by
AI
right
now?
Maybe
that's
not
a


problem
if
you
know
if
the
AI
stuff


actually
gets
built
and
materializes


into
real
money.
But
you
can
imagine
if


it
is
a
bubble
then
that
would
be
bad.

Joe Weisenthal: 在我看来,这基本上有两种结局。一种是事实证明这是一个泡沫,我们经历一场大规模衰退,然后我们都失业。另一种可能性是AI不是泡沫,我们实现了通用人工智能(AGI: Artificial General Intelligence: 能够像人类一样理解、学习和应用知识解决各种问题的AI),然后我们都失业。所以我很好奇哪条路会发生。嗯,我得说还有一些其他的可能性。你看到达拉斯联储的图表了吗?

View/Hide Original English

>> The
way
I
see
it
is
there's
essentially


two
ways
this
is
going
to
end
up.
One
is


it
turns
out
it
was
a
bubble
we
have
a


massive
recession
and
we
all
lose
our


jobs.
And
the
other
possibility
is
that


AI
is
not
a
bubble.
We
have
AGI
and
we


all
lose
our
jobs.
And
so
I'm
curious


which
of
the
two
paths
is
going
to


happen.
Well,
I
got
to
say
there
are


some
alternate
possibilities.
Did
you


see
the
uh
Dallas
Fed
chart?

Tracy Alloway: 啊,我没看过那个。

View/Hide Original English

>> Uh
I
haven't
seen
that
one.

Joe Weisenthal: 它显示了人均GDP,其中一条线是针对AGI的,它直接向上飙升。

View/Hide Original English

>> So,
it
showed
GDP
per
capita
and
one


line
was
like
for
AGI
and
it
just
goes


straight
up.

Tracy Alloway: 直接向上。简直是垂直上升。

View/Hide Original English

>> Straight
up.
It
just
literally
vertical.

Joe Weisenthal: 是的。但另一条线是如果机器人接管世界并杀死所有人,那条线就直接向下。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.
But
then
the
other
line
is
what
if


the
robots
take
over
the
world
and
kill


everyone
and
that
line
went
straight


down.

Tracy Alloway: 所以,是的。

View/Hide Original English

>> So,
yeah.
So,

Joe Weisenthal: 好的,好的。

View/Hide Original English

>> okay.
Okay.

Tracy Alloway: 这里有很多好结果。

View/Hide Original English

>> Lots
of
good
outcomes
here.

Joe Weisenthal: 是的。好的。所以我们请来了完美的嘉宾,一位我们之前采访过的嘉宾,他撰写了关于AI的非常出色的研究报告,并且深入挖掘了每一个细节。我们将与James Van Geelen对话。他是Catrini通讯的作者。James,感谢你再次光临。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yes.
All
right.
Uh
so
we
have
the


perfect
guest,
someone
we've
spoken
to


before,
uh
who
writes
absolutely


phenomenal
research
about
AI
and


actually
digs
into
literally
the
nuts


and
bolts
of
everything.
We're
going
to


be
speaking
with
James
Van
Gilan.
He
is


the
author
of
the
Catrini
newsletter.


James,
thanks
for
coming
back
on.

James Van Geelen: 谢谢邀请。我觉得上次我们来这里的时候,我们也在讨论AI是否是泡沫,现在我们又要再讨论一次了。

View/Hide Original English

>> Thanks
for
having
me.
I
feel
like
uh
the


last
time
we
were
here,
we
were
also


discussing
whether
AI
is
a
bubble
or


not,
and
now
we
get
to
do
it
again.

Joe Weisenthal: 总有一天会是对的。分析师进行实地考察是我最喜欢的研究类型之一。向我们解释一下你是如何做到这一点的。

View/Hide Original English

>> One
day,
one
day
it'll
be
right.
Right.


Analysts
going
on
field
trips
is
one
of


my
favorite
genres
of
research.
Explain


to
us
how
you
managed
to
do
this.

AI数据中心:Stargate的超大规模建设

James Van Geelen: 无人机已经变得非常商品化。世界上任何地方距离拥有无人机的人超过10英里半径的可能性都极低。

View/Hide Original English

>> So


drones
have
become
very
commoditized.


The
likelihood
of
anything
in
the
world


being
more
than
a
10
mile
radius
from


someone
with
a
drone
is
extremely
low.

James Van Geelen: 我们有点利用了这一点,因为我们一直坐在屏幕前,看着绿色的数字不断上升。他们把它命名为“Stargate”也不是我的错,这有点让人觉得不那么严肃。

View/Hide Original English

>> And
we
kind
of
use
that
to
our
advantage


because
we've
been
sitting
in
front
of
a


screen
watching
green
numbers
go
up
and


up
and
up.
And
it's
not
my
fault
that


they
named
it
Stargate.
It
kind
of
lends


itself
to
not
taking
it
as
serious
as
as


one
otherwise
might.

Tracy Alloway: 有人发推文说:“嗯,证据在哪里?可能应该有证据吧?”

View/Hide Original English

>> And
someone
I
read
a
tweet
that
said,


"Well,
where's
the
proof?


There
probably
should
be
proof,
right?"

James Van Geelen: 所以,我们查看了一些卫星图像,然后我们说:“好的,一年前这里还是一片泥土,现在这里有这么个东西,它有下曼哈顿那么大。”

View/Hide Original English

So,
we
looked
at
some
satellite
images


and
we
went,
"Okay,
a
year
ago
this
was


dirt
and
now
there's
this
thing
and
it's


the
size
of
lower
Manhattan."

Tracy Alloway: 哇。

View/Hide Original English

>> Wow.

James Van Geelen: 所以,

View/Hide Original English

>> So,

Tracy Alloway: 它在德克萨斯州,对吧?

View/Hide Original English

>> it's
in
Texas,
right?

James Van Geelen: 它在德克萨斯州的阿比林。而且,这实际上是其中一个较小的。我的意思是,如果你看看路易斯安那州Meta的Hyperion,它的占地面积将从中央公园顶部一直延伸到Soho区。

View/Hide Original English

>> It's
in
Abalene,
Texas.
And
and
the
the


I
mean,
this
is
actually
one
of
the


smaller
ones.
I
mean,
if
you
look
at


Louisiana
Meta's
Hyperion,
it
would


start,
the
footprint
would
start
at
the


top
of
Central
Park
and
it
would
go
down


to
Soho.

Tracy Alloway: 哇。

View/Hide Original English

>> Wow.

James Van Geelen: 所以,

View/Hide Original English

>> So,

Joe Weisenthal: 这就是为什么他们称之为超大规模。

View/Hide Original English

>> that's
why
they
call
it
hypers
scale.

James Van Geelen: 所以,为了澄清Stargate,这就像是特朗普、甲骨文以及可能还有软银参与其中的项目。这个综合体是什么?它背后是谁?就是你参观并获取了无人机影像的这个地方。它本质上是甲骨文、OpenAI的混合体,英伟达也有一些参与,沙特通过MGX也有兴趣,还有一些融资参与其中。这只是目前计划中的五个数据中心之一,总投资达5000亿美元。这就是我们去实地考察它的原因,因为当你真正思考时,这可能代表着自二战以来最大规模的基础设施建设和投入。

View/Hide Original English

>> So,
just
to
be
clear
with
Stargate,
this


is
like
the
thing
that
like
Trump
and


Oracle
and
probably
SoftBank
is
in
the


middle.
Like,
what
is
this
complex?


Who's
behind
it?
This
thing
that
you


went
and
uh
toured
and
got
some
drone


footage
of.
So
it's
essentially
a
mix
of


um
you
know
Oracle,
OpenAI,
there's
some


involvement
from
Nvidia,
there's
Saudi


interest
with
MGX,
there
is
some


financing
involved
and
it
is
just
one
of


uh
currently
five
uh
data
centers
that


are
planned
with
a
half
a
trillion


dollars
of
investment.
That's
why
we


went
and
looked
at
it
because
when
you


really
think
about
it,
this
represents


probably
the
largest
infrastructure


buildout
and
effort
since
World
War
II.

Tracy Alloway: 他们的能源从哪里来?

View/Hide Original English

>> Where
are
they
getting
the
energy
from?

James Van Geelen: 所以,那是最棒的部分。那是我们在无人机中看到的第一件事,你飞过去,

View/Hide Original English

>> So,
that's
the
that's
the
best
part.


That
was
the
first
thing
we
saw
in
the


drone
is
you
fly
over
it

Tracy Alloway: 他们刚建了自己的天然气发电厂。

View/Hide Original English

>> and
they
just
built
their
own
natural


gas
plant

James Van Geelen: 然后我想,Joe,好主意,去看看所有这些小东西,但你也要看看大东西,对吧?而且,如果没有,

View/Hide Original English

>> and
going
like
Joe,
great
idea.
just


going
and
looking
at
all
the
but
you
got


to
look
at
the
big
stuff
too,
right?
And


and
without
uh

Joe Weisenthal: 我的意思是,没有电力,这些就只是一堆金属。

View/Hide Original English

>> I
mean
without
power
these
are
just
kind


of
you
know
hunks
of
metal.
So

James Van Geelen: 所以,在Stargate Abilene外面,有10台天然气涡轮机,有趣的是,这些并不是那种非常好的天然气涡轮机,因为如果你想要——天然气涡轮机分为简单循环和联合循环——这些是简单循环的,每台35兆瓦(Megawatt: 衡量功率的单位,等于一百万瓦特),这在低端非常常见。其中一半来自GE Vernova,另一半来自卡特彼勒(Caterpillar)旗下的一家名为Solar Turbines的公司。之所以它们不是——你可能会想,哦,你花了5000亿美元在这些东西上,你大概可以买到最好的,但那需要七年时间。

View/Hide Original English

you
have
outside
of
Stargate
Avalene
10


natural
gas
turbines
and
the
interesting


thing
is
these
aren't
like
the
really


good
natural
gas
turbines
because
if
you


wanted
so
natural
gas
turbines
follow


along
simple
cycle
combined
cycle
these


are
simple
cycle
they're
each
35


megawatt
which
is
very
much
on
the
lower


end
uh
half
of
them
are
from
G
Vernova


half
of
them
are
from
Caterpillar
a


company
that
Caterpillar
owns
called


solar
turbines
and
the
reason
why


they're
not
you
would
think
oh
you're


spending
half
a
trillion
dollars
on


these
things,
you
could
probably
get
the


best
thing
ever,
but
that'll
take
you


seven
years.

Tracy Alloway: 哦,对了。因为天然气涡轮机确实短缺。顺便说一句,这是个头条新闻。今天彭博社有一篇Matthew Griffin的文章,标题是《在人工智能淘金热中寻找赢家,目光落在了意想不到的目标上:老牌工业设备制造商卡特彼勒公司》。所以,你必须关注每一个供应这些设备的品牌。卡特彼勒的股价今天上涨了很多,而且表现非常好。那么,除了这些大型涡轮机,当你参观这个设施时,你还看到了什么?

View/Hide Original English

>> Oh,
right.
Because
there's
a
there's
a


natural
gas
turbine
Yeah.
shortage.
By


the
way,
there's
a
headline
speak.
So,


there's
a
headline,
an
article
on
the


Bloomberg
today
by
Matthew
Griffin.
The


hunt
for
winners
in
the
artificial


intelligence
gold
rush
has
landed
on
an


unlikely
target.
Oldline
industrial


equipment
maker
Caterpillar
Inc.
So,
you


got
to
look
at
every
one
of
these
brands


that's
uh
supplying
it.
And
Caterpillar


is
up
a
lot
or
it's
up
today
and
the


stock
is
uh
done
very
well.
So,
okay,


Caterpillar,
who
else?
What
are
some
of


the
What
else
do
you
see
besides
these


big
turbines
when
you
go
out
and
tour


this
facility?

James Van Geelen: 所以,

View/Hide Original English

>> So,

Joe Weisenthal: 哦,这只股票就像火箭一样。现在是40。

View/Hide Original English

>> oh,
this
stock
is
a
rocket.
So,
that's


at
40.

Tracy Alloway: 你看到有人,比如保安吗?

View/Hide Original English

>> You
see
any
people
like
security
guards?

James Van Geelen: 很多人。

View/Hide Original English

>> So
many
people,

Tracy Alloway: 嗯?

View/Hide Original English

>> huh?

James Van Geelen: 我的意思是,它就在那里。

View/Hide Original English

>> And
I
mean,
it's
there.

Joe Weisenthal: 我不知道。你可能看过《硅谷》那部剧,里面有个场景,数据中心里只有一个人,他说:“是的,你知道,白天黑夜在这里没什么区别。”就只有一个人在运行。

View/Hide Original English

>> I
don't
know.
you've
seen
like
Silicon


Valley
and
there's
that
scene
where


there's
like
one
guy
in
the
data
center


and
he's
like,
"Yeah,
you
know,
night


and
day
don't
really
matter
much
down


here
and
it's
just
one
guy
running."
But

James Van Geelen: 在建设过程中,我的意思是,阿比林100英里半径内的每一个暖通空调(HVAC: Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning: 供暖、通风和空调系统)技术员,或者知道如何铺设光纤、电气或管道的人,他们都在那里。有7000人在建造这个设施,这只是一个工地。而且,是的,

View/Hide Original English

>> in
the
buildout,
I
mean,
there
are
every


single
HVAC
technician
or
guy
that
knows


how
to
lay
fiber
or
guy
that
knows


electrical
or
plumbing.
Uh


within
a
100
mile
radius
of
Abene,
those


are
they're
all
there,
right?
There's


7,000
people
working
on
building
this


and
this
is
just
one
site.
And
uh
yeah,

Joe Weisenthal: 所以人们已经谈论AI投资的“卖铲人”阶段有一段时间了,但看起来建设仍在进行,而且还有进一步发展的空间。我最喜欢的一种市场设置是,你有一个市盈率反映了某种错误现实,或者没有完全融入一个长期趋势,然后你又经历了一个非常糟糕的周期。所以,无论是机器人供应链贯穿整个汽车周期,如果你知道的话,那一直是一场噩梦。然后,你看到一些公司,很多公司在特朗普当选时经历了非常显著的下跌,

View/Hide Original English

>> so
people
have
been
talking
about
the


picks
and
shovels
fa
phase
of
AI


investment
for
a
while
now,
but
it
seems


like
stuff
is
still
getting
built
and
it


has
further
to
run.
my
kind
of
favorite


we
can
you
know
and
I'm
sure
we
will


discuss
whether
this
is
a
bubble
or
not


but
at
the
end
of
the
day
the
money
is


getting
spent
and
my
favorite
kind
of


setup
in
the
market
is
you
have


something
that
has
a
multiple
that


reflects
kind
of
a
wrong
reality
or


doesn't
really
fully
integrate
a
secular


theme
and
then
you
have
a
cycle
that's


really
bad.
So
whether
it's
kind
of
the


robotic
supply
chain
goes
throughout
the


automotive
cycle
and
if
you
guys
are


aware
that's
been
a
nightmare.
Uh
and


then
you
have
some
of
these
a
lot
of


these
companies
took
really
significant


draw
downs
when
Trump
got
elected

Tracy Alloway: 因为,

View/Hide Original English

>> because
uh
the

James Van Geelen: 这并不是真正的科技资本支出。它更类似于液化天然气(LNG)终端的资本支出。

View/Hide Original English

>> this
isn't
really
tech
capex.
It's
much


more
similar
to
like
LG
terminal
capex

Joe Weisenthal: 那种支出涉及到与**《通胀削减法案》**(IRA: Inflation Reduction Act: 美国一项旨在通过投资清洁能源、降低医疗成本和增加税收来应对气候变化和通胀的法律)受益公司相同的公司。哦,有意思。

View/Hide Original English

>> that
kind
of
entails
the
same
companies


that
were
benefiting
from
the
IRA.
Oh,


interesting.

James Van Geelen: 所以每个人都卖掉了它们,现在看来这有点像马蹄铁理论,对吧?你可以。

View/Hide Original English

>> So,
everyone
sold
them
and
now
it
turns


out
it's
kind
of
like
the
horseshoe


theory,
right?
You
can

Joe Weisenthal: 不,这太有趣了。就像这些老牌工业公司,它们在奥巴马政府时期表现非常好,因为我们谈论的所有工厂和那些东西,然后就像是,好吧,我们要停止这些了,但现在却有一股巨大的资金浪潮。顺便说一句,卡特彼勒在4月2日,也就是解放日之前,股价是334美元,那是一个我们应该作为基准的日子。现在是486美元,创历史新高。你还看到了哪些其他公司?不,说真的,就像。

View/Hide Original English

>> No,
that's
super
interesting.
Like,
it's


just
these
sort
of
like
oldline


industrials
and
they
did
very
well
under


the
Obama
administration
because
of
all


the
factories
and
all
that
stuff
that
we


talked
about
and
then
it's
like,
okay,


we're
pulling
the
plug
on
this,
but
now


there's
just
this
title
wave
of
money.


By
the
way,
Caterpillar
was
a
$334
stock


on
April
2nd,
right
before
Liberation


Day,
which
is
sort
of
where
we
should


benchmark
things.
now
486
at
an
all-time


high.
What
are
some
of
the
other


companies
you
see
out
there?
No,
for


real,
like

Tracy Alloway: 最好是那些还没涨的,对吧?

View/Hide Original English

>> preferably
the
ones
that
haven't
gone
up


yet,
right?

Joe Weisenthal: 是的。但说真的,还有谁从中分了一杯羹?

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.
Well,
but
seriously,
like
who
else


is
uh
who
else
is
getting
a
piece
of


this
action?

James Van Geelen: 所以,我一定要提一下,为了给整个事情定个调,如果你看建筑工地的规划图,上面有所有数据大厅的名字,它们真的每一个都叫“Ludicrous Building”(荒谬大楼)。所以,是“Ludicrous Building One”,“Ludicrous Building Two”。等等,Ludicrous是不是带K的?

View/Hide Original English

>> So,
uh
something
that
I
want
to
make


sure
I
mention
just
to
frame
this
whole


thing,
uh
if
you
look
at
the
building


site
plans,
they
have
the
names
of
all


the
data
halls
and
they
are
literally


each
called
Ludicrous
Building.
So,
it's


Ludicrous
Building
One,
Ludicrous


Building
Two.
Wait,
is
it
Ludicrous
with


a
K?

Tracy Alloway: 不。

View/Hide Original English

>> No.

Joe Weisenthal: 哦,那太棒了。

View/Hide Original English

>> Oh,
that
would
be
great.

James Van Geelen: 我的意思是,正确拼写的Ludicrous也很棒,但是。

View/Hide Original English

>> I
mean,
Ludicrous
spelled
correctly
is


also
fantastic,
but

James Van Geelen: 竞争,我的意思是,我真的鼓励任何人去看这个视频,因为看着绿色数字上升,比如卡特彼勒的股价上涨,你会觉得“哦,酷,是的。”但当你亲眼看到它时,你会感到震惊。我的意思是,他们有数百排干式冷却器和绝热冷却器,用于液冷技术(Liquid Cooling: 使用液体而非空气来散热的技术,在数据中心中效率更高)。

View/Hide Original English

>> uh
the
compet
I
mean


really
I
would
encourage
anyone
to
go


and
look
at
this
video
because
the
the


it's
it's
just
a
there
is
such
a


disconnect
between


looking
at
green
numbers
going
up
like


like
caterpillar
going
you
okay
cool.


Yeah.
And
then
you
see
it
and
it
is


mind-blowing.
I
mean
they
have
rows
of


uh
dry
and
adiatic
coolers
that
are
you


know
hundreds
and
hundreds
for
the


liquid
cooling
loops

Joe Weisenthal: 然后你有各种暖通空调、发电和输电系统。

View/Hide Original English

>> and
then
you
have
uh
the
kind
of
uh
all


the
HVAC
the
power
generation


transmission.

James Van Geelen: 我们整理了一份包含大约200家公司的清单,其中50家我们高度确信它们是这次建设的一部分。有趣的是,你有这些跨国原始设备制造商(OEMs: Original Equipment Manufacturers: 为其他公司生产产品或部件的公司)。这个项目的规模如此之大,你可以打电话给其中一家公司说:“好的,我们想用三菱重工的产品,或者我们想用伊顿(Eaton)的产品。”他们会说:“好的,我们可以完成其中60%。”

View/Hide Original English

>> We
compiled
a
list
of
basically


200
companies
50
of
which
were
high


confidence
in
in
kind
of
seeing
as
part


of
this
buildout.
And
the
interesting


thing
is
you
have
these
multinational


OEMs.


The
scale
of
this
project
is
so
large


that
you
can
call
one
of
them
and
say


okay
we
want
to
go
with
uh
you
know
uh


Mitsubishi
heavy
or
we
want
to
use
uh


eaten
for
for
this
thing
and
they
will


say
yeah
okay
well
we
can
do
60%
of
it.

Joe Weisenthal: 我的意思是,世界上最大的公司都在,是的。

View/Hide Original English

>> I
mean
it
it
the
biggest
companies
in


the
world
are
are
yeah

James Van Geelen: 他们不需要互相竞争,因为这块蛋糕太大了。稀缺性如何?你知道,全国各地一直存在这种紧张关系,比如数据中心是否有足够的能源?水怎么办?政治因素怎么办?我们看到这些市政厅会议,当地人仍然想要一个数据中心。像阿比林这样的地方有多稀缺?我的意思是,德克萨斯州有很多空地。你觉得会有更多的Stargate或更多的阿比林在等待,公司可以简单地说,你知道吗,我们要建造自己的基础设施。我们要建造自己的天然气发电厂,我们就在德克萨斯州的沙漠里做,这样我们就不必担心邻避效应(NIMBY: Not In My Backyard: 指居民反对在自己社区附近建设可能带来负面影响的设施,即使他们承认这些设施的必要性)或当地政治或其他任何事情。这会是很多这类东西的未来吗?

View/Hide Original English

>> they're
just
fighting
they
don't
have
to


fight
with
each
other
because
the
pie
is


so
big.
how
scarce,
you
know,
there's


all
this
um
around
the
country
there's


been
all
this
tension
like
is
there


going
to
be
enough
energy
for
data


centers?
What
about
the
water?
What


about
the
politics?
People
we
see
these


uh
town
halls
where
the
locals
still


want
a
data
center.
How
scarce
are


locations
like
Abolene?
I
mean,
there's


a
lot
of
empty
space
in
Texas.
Could
you


see
are
there
more
Stargates
or
more


Abalines
out
there
waiting
where
the


companies
can
just
say,
you
know
what,


we're
just
going
to
build
our
own


infrastructure.
we're
going
to
build
our


own
natural
gas
plant
and
we're
just


going
to
do
it
in
the
desert
in
Texas


where
we
don't
have
to
worry
about


nimbies
or
local
politics
or
anything.


Is
that
the
future
for
a
lot
of
this


stuff?

James Van Geelen: 是的,德克萨斯州沙克尔福德(Shackleford)已经计划建设另一个设施,离阿比林不远。阿比林本身也计划再扩建600兆瓦。我的意思是,我们现在衡量数据中心就是用兆瓦和吉瓦(Gigawatt: 衡量功率的单位,等于十亿瓦特)。在路易斯安那州,Meta正在建设Hyperion。你还有一些未识别或未宣布的中西部设施,很可能在俄亥俄州。基本上,是的,任何能获得天然气、电力和土地的地方。印第安纳波利斯也曾计划建设一个。你提到水很有趣,因为我们前段时间也写过关于水的问题,我们当时是根据现有数据中心的水消耗量来做预测的。但液冷技术(Liquid Cooling)的进步改变了很多。所以之前曾有很大的争议,说这个数据中心会消耗大量的水,但如果你看看印第安纳波利斯的情况,它的用水量与一千户家庭大致相同,因为现在都是闭环液冷(Closed-loop Liquid Cooling: 一种冷却系统,冷却液在封闭循环中重复使用,减少了水的消耗),水只是被回收和过滤。所以,

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah,
there's
already
another
uh


facility
that's

planned
in
Shackleford,


Texas,
which
is
not
too
far
from


Abalene.
Abalene
is
already
planning
on


expanding
by
another
600
megawatts.
I


mean,
that's
how
we're
measuring
data


centers
now
is
is
just
in
megawatts
and


gigawatts.
Uh
in
Louisiana,
that's
where


Meta
is
building
Hyperion.
you
have
uh


some
uh
unidentified
or
unannounced


Midwest
facility
that'll
probably
be
in


Ohio.
Uh
basically,
yeah,
anywhere
that


you
can
get
the
gas,
anywhere
you
can


get
the
power,
anywhere
that
there's
the


land.
Uh
there
was
one
planned
in


Indianapolis.
And
it's
interesting
you


bring
up
water
cuz
we
wrote
about
water


a
little
while
ago
as
well,
and
we
were


basing
our
projections
off
of
what
the


water
consumption
of
like
existing
data


centers
were.
The
advancements
in
liquid


cooling
have
changed
that
a
lot.
So


there
was
a
huge
kind
of
uproar
about


well
this
data
center
is
going
to
use
so


much
water
and
if
you
look
at
it
this


was
in
Indianapolis
and
if
you
look
at


it
it's
about
the
same
amount
of
water


as
a
thousand
households
because
it's


all
closed
loop
liquid
cooling
now
the


water
just
gets
recycled
and
and


filtered
back.
So,

James Van Geelen: 真正的问题仍然是电力和获取这些涡轮机,而且它将越来越成为一种表后发电(Behind-the-meter Power Generation: 指在用户电表之后,由用户自行建设和运行的发电设施,不依赖或较少依赖公共电网)的模式。

View/Hide Original English

it's
really
just
something
where
the


constraint
is
still
power
and
getting


these
kind
of
turbines
and
it's
and
and


it's
going
to
increasingly
become
a


thing
where
it's
behind
the
meter
power


generation.

Joe Weisenthal: 他们将自己建造发电厂,而不是依赖电网。你们还记得2021年德克萨斯州发生埃里卡事件时的情况吗?是的,你不能将其作为数据中心的承保条件。

View/Hide Original English

>> They're
just
going
to
build
their
own


power
plants.
They're
not
going
to
rely


on
the
grid.
You
guys
remember
what


happened
in
Texas
in
21
with
Erica?


Yeah.
They
you
cannot
underwrite
that
as


a
data
center.

James Van Geelen: 就像,你不能离线。

View/Hide Original English

>> Like
uh
you
you
just
can't
be
offline.

James Van Geelen: 所以,这就是我们正在走向的方向,这个电力和能源的瓶颈就是瓶颈。我们遇到的一个更有趣的事情是,你看看XAI的数据中心,我们查阅了所有这些不同数据中心的大量备案文件。它们被允许使用15台35兆瓦的涡轮机。

View/Hide Original English

So


that's
kind
of
where
we're
headed
is


this
power
and
energy
kind
of
bottleneck


is
the
bottleneck.
The
mo
one
of
the


more
interesting
things
we
ran
across
is


you
look
at
XAI's
data
center
and
we


went
through
a
lot
of
the
filings
of
all


these
different
data
centers.
are


permitted
for
15
35
megawatt
turbines

Joe Weisenthal: 现场有热成像显示他们正在使用35。

View/Hide Original English

>> and
there's
thermal
imaging
of
the
site


that
shows
they're
using
35

James Van Geelen: GE Vernova是另一个,它曾是330美元的股票。

View/Hide Original English

>> H
gnova
another
one
that
was
a
330

Joe Weisenthal: 你只是在输入股票代码。

View/Hide Original English

>> you're
just
typing
tickers.

James Van Geelen: 是的,那只股票在4月2日是330美元。现在是69美元。所以看看西门子能源(Siemens Energy)。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah,
that
was
a
$330
stock
on
April


2nd.
That's
a
$69
stock.
So
check
out


Seaman's
Energy.

Tracy Alloway: 谢谢你,Joe。哦,他正在做。

View/Hide Original English

>> Thank
you,
Joe.
Oh,
he's
he's
doing
it.

Joe Weisenthal: 你可以继续。

View/Hide Original English

>> You
could
you
could
keep
going.

Tracy Alloway: 好的。我有一个问题,这不是一个必要的问题,但是。

View/Hide Original English

>> All
right.
Um
I
have
kind
of
this
isn't


an
essential
question,
but

Joe Weisenthal: 好的,等等。我明白了。嘿,Sean。我知道这会发生。我知道。西门子能源在4月2日是56美元的股票。现在是108美元。那是一条直线。好的。

View/Hide Original English

>> Okay,
wait.
I
got
it.


Hey,
Sean.
I
knew
this
was
going
to


happen.
I
know.
Seaman's
Energy
was
a


$56
stock
on
April
2nd.
That's
108.


That's
a
straight
lineup.
Okay.

Tracy Alloway: 好的。显然,有人在赚钱。

View/Hide Original English

>> Okay.
Clearly,
someone's
making
money.

Joe Weisenthal: 是的。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.

[音乐]

View/Hide Original English

[Music]

AI基础设施的安全性与环境影响

Tracy Alloway: 这些设施的墙壁有多高?安保措施到底是什么样的?因为,你知道,我们谈论人们对能源价格上涨感到不满。我理解其中一些公司可能正在建设自己的能源产能,但是,你知道,在民粹主义思潮(Populist Mindset: 一种政治意识形态,通常将社会分为“普通民众”和“精英阶层”,并主张普通民众的利益)下,人们可能仍然对AI感到不满。仍然不满AI会抢走工作等等。它们可能会成为攻击目标,对吧?

View/Hide Original English

Like
how
big
are
the
walls
of
these


things?
And
what
does
security
actually


look
like?
Because,
you
know,
we
talk


about
people
being
upset
about
higher


energy
prices.
I
understand
that
maybe


some
of
the
some
of
them
are
building


out
their
own
energy
capacity,
but
you


know,
in
a
populist
mindset,
people


might
still
be
upset
at
AI.
Still
upset


that
AI
is
going
to
take
jobs
and
things


like
that.
They
could
become
targets,


right?

James Van Geelen: 是的,绝对会。我的意思是,显然安保措施还不足以击落无人机。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah,
absolutely.
I
I
I
mean,
apparently


security
isn't
tight
enough
to
shoot


down
a
drone
yet.

Tracy Alloway: 哦,当然。是的。但是当你谈到墙壁时,有趣的是,这个数据中心里的一切都不能像建造房子那样随便建造。

View/Hide Original English

>> Oh,
of
course.
Yeah.
But
when
you
talk


about
the
walls,
like
the
interesting


thing
is
everything
in
this
data
center


has
you
can't
just
build
it
like
a


house.

James Van Geelen: 每一样东西都需要有正确的防腐蚀和绝缘性能。你不能只是散失热量。你已经在冷却上花费了大量的钱。所以建筑围护结构(Building Envelope: 建筑物外部的物理屏障,包括墙壁、屋顶、窗户和地板,用于隔离室内外环境)中的每一样东西也都是它可能达到的最昂贵的东西。

View/Hide Original English

>> Everything
needs
to
have
the
right,
you


know,
anti-corrosion,
uh,
insulation.


You
can't
just
be
losing
heat.
You're


already
spending
so
much
money
on


cooling.
So
everything
in
the
building


envelope
is
also
kind
of
the
most


expensive
thing
it
could
be.

Tracy Alloway: 我想它就像一个密封的围护结构。

View/Hide Original English

>> And
I
assume
it's
like
a
sealed


envelope,
I
guess.

James Van Geelen: 是的,完全正确。而且,如果你真的相信那些正在建造它的人,那么它的规模将会有多大?这是一种有趣的动态,超大规模云服务商(Hyperscalers: 指提供大规模云计算基础设施和服务的公司,如Google、Amazon、Microsoft)有点陷入了囚徒困境(Prisoner's Dilemma: 博弈论中的一个概念,指两个理性个体在无法沟通的情况下,为了自身利益最大化而做出选择,最终导致双方都无法达到最佳结果)。我们无法判断他们是否真的相信,但官方说法是我们在建造“机器之神”。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah,
exactly.
and
and
uh
the


the
opportunity
of
just


how
how
big
is
this
going
to
be
if
you


actually
believe
the
the
the
people
that


are
building
this
uh
and
this
is
kind
of


an
interesting
dynamic
of
the


hyperscalers
are
in
somewhat
of
a


prisoner's
dilemma.
We
can't
speak
to


whether
they
actually
uh
believe
or
not,


but
the
party
line
is
we're
building


machine
God.

James Van Geelen: 如果我们正在建造“机器之神”,那这有点像宗教狂热。所以三年前,大多数这些超大规模云服务商都承诺到2030年实现净零排放(Net Zero: 指通过减少温室气体排放和/或通过碳抵消等方式,使排放量与清除量相抵,达到净排放为零)。那是不可能发生的。那不可能发生。也许他们会购买碳抵消(Carbon Offset: 通过投资于减少温室气体排放的项目来抵消自身排放的行为),但这不会发生,因为如果你现在需要这样做,你就会使用天然气。

View/Hide Original English

>> And
if
we're
building
machine
God,
then


that's
kind
of
a
religious
zealatry.
So


uh
3
years
ago
most
of
these


hyperscalers
were
making
net
zero
by


2030.
Uh
that
is
not
happening.
There's


no
way
that's
happening.
Uh
maybe
they


buy
carbon
off
it
but
that's
not


happening
because
if
you
need
to
do
it


now
you're
using
natural
gas.

James Van Geelen: 然后你会说,一旦我们创造了“机器之神”,“机器之神”就会解决问题。

View/Hide Original English

>> And


then
you
say
well
once
we
create
machine


God
machine
God
will
fix
it

Tracy Alloway: 对。

View/Hide Original English

>> right

James Van Geelen: 你可以为很多事情辩解。

View/Hide Original English

>> and
you
can
justify
a
lot
of
stuff.

AI泡沫与融资结构

Tracy Alloway: 等等。好的。那么,我们来谈谈AI是否处于泡沫之中。因为当我们谈论那些字面意义上被称为“荒谬大楼”的建筑,以及“机器之神将解决我们所有问题”时,听起来确实有点泡沫化。

View/Hide Original English

>> Wait.
Okay.
So,
let's
talk
about
is
AI


in
a
bubble?
Cuz
when
when
we're


conversing
about
buildings
that
are


literally
called
Ludicrous
and
we're


talking
about
machine
God
will
solve
all


our
problems,
sounds
a
little
bubbly.

James Van Geelen: 是的,这些事情你回过头来看,就会说:“哦,是的,那就是顶峰。”

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah,
that's
the
kind
of
stuff
you
look


back
on
and
say,
"Oh,
yeah,
that
was
the


top."

Tracy Alloway: 我知道我们必须谈论这个问题,这需要一些数据,所以我有一些笔记。但有趣的是,你可以为任何一方辩护,这取决于我们处于周期的哪个阶段,而不是AI未来会是什么样子。如果问题是AI是否是一个泡沫?是的,很可能。它是一项新技术,令人兴奋。每次我们看到铁路、互联网泡沫,如果它不是泡沫,它也将会是,而且可能已经形成了。

View/Hide Original English

>> I
know
that
we
we
have
to
talk
about


this
and
that
requires
some
numbers,
so


I
have
some
notes.
But
the
interesting
I


mean
you
can
make
a
case
for
either
side


and
it
kind
of
hinges
on


not
so
much
what
AI
looks
like
in
the


future
but
more
where
we
are
in
the


cycle.
If
the
question
is
is
AI
a


bubble?
Yeah,
probably.
It's
a
new


technology.
It's
exciting.
Every
single


time
we've
the
railroads,
the
you
know


com


if
it's
not
a
bubble,
it
will
be
and
it


probably
is
already.

Tracy Alloway: 但我们处于泡沫的哪个阶段?这对投资者来说是很有趣的。所以,如果你看看,

View/Hide Original English

>> But
where
are
we
in
the
bubble?
That's


the
interesting
thing
for
investors.
So


if
you
look
at
kind
of

James Van Geelen: 我们在融资方面处于哪个阶段?在互联网泡沫(Dot-com Bubble: 20世纪90年代末,互联网公司股票价格飙升,随后在2000-2001年崩溃的经济泡沫)时期,一个大问题是,你们熟悉暗光纤(Dark Fiber: 已经铺设但尚未被激活或使用的光纤电缆)吗?

View/Hide Original English

where
are
we
in
the
financing
side?
When


we
had
the.com
bubble,
the
big
thing
uh


are
you
guys
familiar
with
dark
fiber?

Tracy Alloway: 不。

View/Hide Original English

>> No.

James Van Geelen: 所以本质上,他们当时正在为互联网建设这种基础设施,当时的共识是互联网将成为世界上最大的事物。这是正确的。而铺设的光纤中有97%被称为暗光纤,因为它没有被点亮。它只是躺在那里,因为我们最终会需要它。现在情况并非如此。每次这些数据中心上线时,利用率都是100%。没有暗光纤。而且我们持续需要更多。我的意思是,我不知道你们是否看到了Sora 2(Sora 2: OpenAI开发的视频生成模型),我们消费的内容中有超过70%是视频。

View/Hide Original English

>> So
essentially
they
were
building
out


this
kind
of
infrastructure
for
the


internet
and
uh
the
the
conviction
of


the
day
was
the
internet's
going
to
be


the
biggest
thing
in
the
world.
Correct.


And
97%
of
the
fiber
that
was
laid
was


called
dark
fiber
because
it
wasn't
lit


up.
It
was
just
laying
there
because


eventually
we're
going
to
need
it.


That's
not
the
case
right
now.
Every


single
time
that
one
of
these
data


centers
comes
online,
you're
at
100%


utilization.
There's
no
dark
fiber.
And


we're
continuing
to
need
more.
I
mean,
I


don't
know if
you
guys
saw
Sora
2,
more


than
70%
of
the
content
that
we
consume


is
video.

Tracy Alloway: 所以,视频模型非常有意义。它也更耗费计算资源。

View/Hide Original English

>> So,
a
video
model
makes
a
lot
of
sense.


It's
also
way
more
computensive.

James Van Geelen: 而且聊天AI的最终形式不是聊天机器人。它将是视频。它将是使用视频模型的机器人。所以这有点像看涨的一面,但我完全明白,我这里有一些数据。所以我们有一些循环交易。

View/Hide Original English

And
the
the
final
form
of
chat
AI
is
not


chat
bots.
It's
going
to
be
video.
It's


going
to
be
robotics
which
use
video


models.
So
that's
kind
of
like
the
the


bullish
side,
but
I
totally
see
I
have


some
numbers
here.
So
we've
had
some
of


these
circular
deals.
Um

James Van Geelen: 而且,

View/Hide Original English

>> and
uh

James Van Geelen: 到目前为止,我的意思是,有数千亿美元用于此。大部分融资结构更像收费公路或液化天然气终端。Meta的Hyperion项目耗资290亿美元。其中260亿美元是PIMCO的债务,然后Blue Owl提供了30亿美元的股权。这是一种表外安排,在互联网泡沫时期也相当流行。然后还有像以GPU为抵押的特殊目的载体(SPVs: Special Purpose Vehicles: 为特定目的设立的法律实体,通常用于隔离风险或进行特定融资)。Coreweave有一个75亿美元的黑石SPV。现在有一个大约110亿美元的GPU抵押贷款市场,与基础设施项目相比,我可以理解,但那些GPU会贬值。

View/Hide Original English

>> so
far
I
mean


there's
hundreds
of
billions
of
dollars


for
this.
Most
of
the
financing
is


structured
much
more
like
toll
roads
or


or
LG
terminals.
The
Meta
Hyperion
was


$29
billion.
uh
26
billion
of
that
was


PIMCO
on
debt
and
then
Blue
Owl
with
3


billion
of
equity.
An
offbalance
sheet


arrangement
which
also
was
pretty


popular
during
the
com
bubble.
Then
you


have
stuff
like
GPU
collateralized
SPVS.


Coreweave
has
a
7.5
billion
Blackstone


SPV.
There's
like
an
11
billion
dollar


GPUbacked
loan
market
now
which


compared
to
the
the
infrastructure
thing


I
can
get
the
that
it's
like
those
GPUs


are
going
to
be
worth
like
they
will


depreciate.
So

Joe Weisenthal: 那是资产支持证券(ABS: Asset-Backed Securities: 以资产池(如抵押贷款、信用卡应收账款等)为抵押发行的证券),对吧?那就像资产支持证券。好的。

View/Hide Original English

>> that's
that's
ABS,
right?
That's
like


asset
back
securities.
Okay.

James Van Geelen: 是的。但当你看看我们所处的周期,

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.
But
when
you
look
at
the
where
we


just
saying
where
are
we
in
the
cycle?


Well,

James Van Geelen: 已经有很多这种表外安排。但就我们谈到的囚徒困境而言,没有人会退缩,因为那样他们可能就无法创造“机器之神”。大多数超大规模云服务商的债务股权比并不疯狂。当然,

View/Hide Original English

>> there's
been
there's
been
a
lot
of
these


off
balance
sheet
arrangements.
But
in


terms
of
that
prisoners
dilemma
that
we


spoke
about
where
nobody's
going
to
back


off
because
then
maybe
they
risk
not


creating
machine
God.
The
debt
to
equity


ratio
on
most
of
the
hyperscalers
is
not


crazy.
Sure,

James Van Geelen: 甲骨文的最高,但他们仍有很大的空间来杠杆化以实现这个目标。英伟达有趣的动态是它为客户提供融资,然后客户购买英伟达的GPU,然后,你知道,是的,那是一个明显的泡沫动态,循环融资,但需求是真实的。嗯,这是我的,我想这是问题所在。如果需求是真实的,为什么像英伟达这样的公司要为他们的客户提供融资呢?对吧?直觉上你会认为,好的,英伟达的芯片需求已经达到最大了,对吧?然后直觉上你会认为,那么其他地方有很多钱。那么,你对为什么英伟达被迫投资OpenAI、投资Coreweave有什么猜测吗?它长期以来一直是Coreweave的投资者等等。是的,我可以采取非常怀疑的观点,或者不那么怀疑的观点。不那么怀疑的观点是,对英伟达来说最好的事情是我们实现AGI。所以,它能做的任何事情,只要能让我们更接近实现AGI所需的大规模基础设施,对他们来说都是好事。

View/Hide Original English

>> Oracle
has
the
highest
and
but
they


still
have
a
lot
of
room
to
lever
up
in


pursuit
of
this
goal.
The
interesting


kind
of
dynamic
of
Nvidia
finances
its


customers
and
then
its
customers
buy


Nvidia
GPUs
and
then
you
know
that
yeah


that's
a
bubble
dynamic
that's
that's


visible
circular
financing
and
and
but


the
demand
is
real.
Well,
this
is
my


this
is
I
guess
the
question.
If
the


demand
is
real,
why
are
the
Nvidia
of


the
world
financing
their
customers,


right?
Intuitively,
you
think,
okay,


Nvidia's
the
demand
for
chips
is
maxed


out,
right?
Then
intuitively,
you
think,


well,
then
there's
plenty
of
money


elsewhere.
So,
do
you
have
a
uh
guess


for
why
Nvidia
is
impelled
to,
you
know,


invest
in
OpenAI,
invest
in
Corewave?


It's
been
a
long
time
investor
in


Cororeweave
and
so
forth.
Yeah,
I
I


could
I
could
take
the
very
skeptical


view
or
the
kind
of
not
skeptical
view.


The
not
skeptical
view
is
the
best
thing


for
Nvidia
is
that
we
accomplish
AGI.


So,
anything
that
it
can
do
to
get
us


closer
to
that
massive
massive


infrastructure
that's
required
for
that


is
great
for
them

Tracy Alloway: 越快越好。

View/Hide Original English

>> as
quickly
as
possible.

James Van Geelen: 越快越好,因为每一年你没有实现AGI,它就变得越不可能。所以,这也许是核心因素。然后还有。

View/Hide Original English

>> As
quickly
as
possible
because
uh
every


year
that
you
don't
achieve
AGI
becomes


less
likely.
So,
uh,
that
is
maybe
the


core
factor.
And
then
there's

Tracy Alloway: 这对他们有好处,而且,

View/Hide Original English

>> it's
good
for
for
them
and,
uh,
the
the


and
playing
into
that

James Van Geelen: 因为这不一定像互联网泡沫,因为互联网泡沫有光纤,然后有Pets.com和亚马逊等等。这几乎都是资本支出,对吧?科技再次成为资本密集型产业,这意味着破产不一定会像互联网泡沫那样,给真正的参与者时间发光发热。如果因为市场下跌而导致资本支出停滞,那将是世界上最糟糕的事情。所以,从某种意义上说,确保这种情况不会发生也符合他们的利益。

View/Hide Original English

>> the
because
this
this
isn't
necessarily


like
the
dot
bubble
because
the.com


bubble
had
fiber
and
then
it
had,
you


know,
pets.com
and
and
Amazon
and
all


that
stuff.
This
is
all
pretty
much


capex,
right?
Tech
is
capital
intensive


again,
which
means
that
it's
the
bust


won't
necessarily
be
like
the.com
bubble


where
it
gives
the
real
players
time
to


shine.
If
the
capex
spending
grinds
to
a


halt
because
the
market
goes
down,


that's
the
worst
thing
in
the
world.
So,


in
a
way,
it's
also
it's
in
their


interest
obviously
to
make
sure
that


that
doesn't
happen.

Meta与Coreweave的合作及泡沫预警信号

Tracy Alloway: 另一个问题,我现在想问,因为我可能会忘记。本周早些时候又有一个头条新闻,几乎每天都有头条。你能解释一下为什么Meta,一个正在建设超大规模数据中心的公司,拥有大量数据中心容量,为什么他们需要与Coreweave达成交易?我看到Meta将支付数十亿美元,大约140亿美元,用于Coreweave的容量。这些新云服务商能带来什么,以至于老牌公司会说,你知道吗,我们想要你们的一些容量?

View/Hide Original English

Another


[Music]


question
actually
but
and
I
want
to
ask


it
now
because
I
might
forget.
Um
there


was
a
headline
I
think
earlier
this
week


again
headlines
almost
every
day.
Can


you
explain
why
Meta
which
is
building


out
which
obviously
hyperscaler
they


have
tons
of
data
center
capacity.
Why


do
they
need
to
do
a
deal
with


coreweave?
So
I
saw
that
meta
is
going


to
uh
pay
a
few
bill
14
billion
some


number
for
capacity
on
core.
What
can


the
what
do
the
neoclouds
bring
to
the


table
such
that
the
legacy
is
like
you


know what
we
we
want
some
of
your


capacity?

James Van Geelen: 我会说,基本上,任何能让你将资本支出从自身转移出去的事情都是好事。对吧?如果你现在,很多这类东西都是由现金流资助的,是的,我们开始看到债务融资取而代之,但是,如果你正在经营一家已经存在了一段时间,并且是世界上最大的公司之一,是的,你可以为承担过度的风险来做这件事辩解,但就像其他人一样,如果你有一个目标,并且可以转移一些风险,因为如果Coreweave破产了,对Meta来说,那不是世界上最糟糕的事情。你会关注什么迹象来判断泡沫是否破裂,或者说资本支出的水龙头是否开始关闭?

View/Hide Original English

>> It's
basically
I
would
say


anything
you
can
do
to
shift
that
capex


away
from
yourself
is
is
great.
Right?


If
if
you're
if
you're
right
now
a
lot


of
this
stuff
is
funded
from
cash
flow


and
yeah,
we're
starting
to
see
debt


financing
take
its
place,
but


if
you
the
the
you're
running
a
company


that's
existed
for
a
while
and
is
one
of


the
biggest
companies
in
the
world
and


yes,
you
could
justify
taking
inordinate


amount
amounts
of
risk
to
do
this,
but


just
like
anyone
else,
if
you
have
a


goal
and
you
can
kind
of
shift
away
some


of
that
risk
to
because
if
you
know,
if


Cororeweave
goes
bankrupt,
Meta's
not


it's
not
it's
not
the
worst
thing
in
the


world
for
Meta.
What
would
you
be


looking
out
for
for
signs
of
the
bubble


bursting
or
I
guess
the
capex
um
faucet


starting
to
turn
off?

James Van Geelen: 所以,就预警信号而言,首先,监控二手GPU价格,我认为是了解情况的好方法。观察合同重新谈判、私人信贷的豁免新闻,以及一个重要的信号是电力供应的任何延迟。这会导致你为某个项目提供融资,但它却无法运行。

View/Hide Original English

>> So,
in
terms
of
like
the
uh
warning


signs
first,
monitoring
used
GPU
prices,


I
think
is
a
great
way
to
to
see
what's


going
on.
Seeing
like
contract


renegotiations,
waiver
headlines
from


private
credit,
and
also
a
big
one
would


be
any
delays
in
delivering
power.
uh


make
it
so
that
you
finance
this
thing


and
then
it's
not
going
to
be
able
to


work

Tracy Alloway: 对。我确实认为,你真的必须将AI公司产生的收入纳入考量。我不知道你是否看到OpenAI最近宣布他们基本上允许你通过应用程序内一键购买商品。嗯。

View/Hide Original English

>> right.
I
do
think
that
another
in
you


really
do
have
to
kind
of
index
to
the


revenue
that's
being
generated
by
the
AI


companies
as
well.
And
I
don't
you
saw


OpenAI
recently
announced
that
they're


uh
basically
allowing
you
to
buy
things


with
one
click
from
the
inside
the
app.


Mhm.

James Van Geelen: 我认为这也是路由器的一个重要驱动因素,他们将你的模型路由到它,这正在为广告做准备,因为前几天我问Google一个非常简单的问题,它直接给了我答案。

View/Hide Original English

>> And
I
think
that
that
was
also
a
big
uh


driving
factor
in
the
router
where
they


kind
of
route
your
model
to
the
it's


it's
it's
setting
it
up
for
advertising


cuz
the
other
day
I
asked
Google
a


pretty
simple
question
and
it
just
gave


me
the
answer

Tracy Alloway: 没有给我任何广告。所以我们需要,我认为杀手级应用已经出现或即将到来,但这必须快速发生。

View/Hide Original English

>> with
no
advertisements
delivered
to
me.


So
we
need
to
I
think
that
there
is
the


killer
apps
kind
of
are
here
or
coming


but
that
has
to
happen
fast.

Joe Weisenthal: 是的,互联网依靠广告运行这一事实是我们世界中一个被低估的现实,我们很久以前就做过一期节目讨论过。有没有办法,如果我想接触AI的好东西,那些实际花钱的地方,但又不喜欢所有的循环融资安排。有没有办法对冲这种特定的风险?

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.
the
um
the
fact
that
the
internet


kind
of
runs
on
ads
is
an


underappreciated


reality
of
our
world
and
we
did
an


episode
on
it
way
way
back
in
the
day.


Is
there
any
way
if
I
wanted
to
get


exposure
to
like
the
good
stuff
of
AI,


the
actual
money
being
spent,
but
then
I


don't
like
all
the
circular
financing


arrangements.
Is
there
a
way
to
hedge


that
particular
risk?

James Van Geelen: 是的,你可以购买所有正在建设这种数据中心的实体公司,然后做空Blue Owl和那些从事融资方面的私人信贷公司,因为如果情况变糟,它们的上行空间有限,下行空间几乎无限。如果这种情况继续发生,那些真正建设它的公司将拥有无限的上行空间,而且就像你说的,这些老牌工业公司仍然有核心业务可以回归。

View/Hide Original English

Yeah,
you
could
uh


you
could
uh
buy
all
the
real
companies


that
are
building
this
kind
of
uh
data


center
and
then
you
could
short
Blue
Owl


and
the
private
credit
companies
that


are
doing
the
kind
of
uh
financing


aspect
of
it
because
if
it
goes
bad,


they
have
limited
upside
and
kind
of


unlimited
downside.
And
if
it
continues


happening,
the
companies
that
are


actually
building
it
have
unlimited


upside
and
they're
still
like
you
said,


these
old
line
uh
kind
of
industrial


that
like
they
still
have
a
core


business
to
go
back
to.

Joe Weisenthal: 你怎么看OpenAI宣布的新Sora项目,Tracy有一个代码。Meta宣布了它的Meta AI,很多人觉得这很糟糕,我不想卷入关于这是否都是垃圾的争论。我有点觉得是,但这并不是我真正感兴趣的问题。我感兴趣的问题是,看待这些事情的一种方式是,你知道,这些视频、这些AI视频将成为我们追求AGI过程中非常重要的商业收入驱动因素,而另一种观点是,如果他们接近AGI,他们就不会把时间花在这些“垃圾工厂”上。这就是问题所在,我很好奇从你的角度来看,所有这些努力背后的真正逻辑是什么,去创造这些,你知道,愚蠢的,比如一个宇航员骑着马在太空中戴着牛仔帽的视频,或者其他什么。

View/Hide Original English

What's
your
take


on
so
OpenAI
announced
its
new
Sora


thing
that
Tracy
has
a
code
for.
Meta


announced
its
Meta
AI
which
a
lot
of


people's
like
this
is
slop
and
I
don't


we
don't
need
to
get
into
a
debate
about


whether
this
is
all
garbage.
I
kind
of


think
it
is
but
that's
not
actually
the


question
I'm
interested
in.
The
question


I'm
interested
in
is
one
way
to
view


these
things
is
you
know
what
these
are


going
to
be
these
video
these
AI
videos


are
going
to
be
really
important
sort
of


business
revenue
drivers
in
our
pursuit


to
AGI
and
the
other
view
is
look
if


they
were
close
to
AGI
they
would
not
be


devoting
time
to
the
slot
factories
and


this
is
the
sort
of
question
and
I'm


curious
from
your
perspective
what
do


you
think
is
the
real
logic
behind
all


of
this
effort
to
create
these
sort
of


you
know
dumb
like
oh
a
video
of
a


astron
not
riding
a
horse
through
space


with
a,
you
know,
cowboy
hat
on
or


whatever.

视频模型与机器人技术

James Van Geelen: 视频模型将成为其中最重要的部分。例如,大型语言模型(LLMs: Large Language Models: 基于深度学习的AI模型,能够理解和生成人类语言)并不能真正与世界互动,

View/Hide Original English

>> Video
models
are
going
to
become
the


most
important
part
of
this.
You
uh
you


need,
for
example,
LLMs
don't
really


interact
with
the
world,

James Van Geelen: 但我们开始看到机器人AI模型与世界互动。所以你有这些视频语言行动模型(Video Language Action Models: 结合视觉、语言和行动能力的AI模型),你可以对其进行结构化,最近有一篇关于档案的有趣论文,你知道,视频模型如V3是涌现式零样本学习和理解器(Emergent Zero-shot Learners and Understanders: 指模型在没有特定训练数据的情况下,能够理解和执行从未见过的新任务或概念),这意味着你可以给它大约一秒钟的上下文,然后它就可以推断出超出这个范围的情况,这对于机器人技术来说变得极其重要。你可以构建这些视觉语言行动模型,其中有一个像你的意识思维一样的慢速推理模型,它决定需要做什么,然后有一个快速模型来实际执行动作等等。AI扩展到以下领域:

View/Hide Original English

>> but
we're
starting
to
see
in
robotics
AI


models
interact
with
the
world.
So
you


have
these
video
language
action
models


and
you
can
structure
it
so
that
there


was
a
interesting
paper
on
archive


recently
that
uh
and
you
know
this
is
uh


video
models
like
V3
are
emergent


zerosot
learners
and
understanders
and


what
that
just
means
is
you
can
give
it


uh
basically
like
a
second
of
context


and
then
it
can
extrapolate
about
what's


going
on
beyond
that
becomes
extremely


important
for
robotics
and
you
can


structure
these
vision
language
action


models
where
you
have
uh
like
a
slow


reasoning
model
that
is
kind
of
like


your
conscious
mind
and
determines
what


it
needs
to
do
and
then
you
have
like
a


fast
model
that
actually
does
the


movements
and
stuff.
AI
kind
of
extends


into
the
realm
of

James Van Geelen: 你需要生成尽可能多的数据,并且拥有视频数据,知道什么是好的,什么是坏的也非常重要。但是,是的,回到你的问题,OpenAI可能确实想展示他们正在赚更多的钱。我毫不怀疑那里有人真正相信他们正在建造“机器之神”。我也不怀疑他们意识到,如果他们想有机会做到这一点,他们需要市场配合,他们需要不断增长收入。所以我认为有很多很好的反驳论点,比如我们是否处于泡沫之中?是的。泡沫结束了吗?对此有很好的论据。我不认为,哦,他们正在倾向于这种“垃圾”产品,你知道,这是一家公司。他们会尽一切可能赚钱。这就是资本主义。

View/Hide Original English

you
need
to
generate
as
much
data
as


possible
and
having,
you
know,
video


data
and
knowing
what's
good
and
what's


bad
is
also
very
important.
But
yeah,
to


your
question,
Open
AI
probably
does


want
to
show
that
they're
making
more


money.
And
I
don't
doubt
that
there
are


people
there
that
truly
believe
that


they're
building
the
machine
god.
And
I


also
don't
doubt
that
they
realize
if


they
to
have
a
shot
at
doing
that,
they


need
the
market
to
play
along
and
they


need
to
keep
growing
their
revenues.
So


I
think
there's
a
lot
of
really
good


counterarguments
about
like
not


necessarily
are
we
in
a
bubble?
Yes.
Uh


is
the
bubble
over?
Like
there
are
good


arguments
for
that.
I
don't
think
one
of


the
I
don't
think
that
oh
well
they're


leaning
into
like
kind
of
this
slops


that
you
know
it's
a
company.
They're


going
to
do
whatever
they
can
to
make


money.
That's
capitalism.

Joe Weisenthal: 嗯,你知道,我想到的一件事,我们当前时代的另一个现实,这有点相关,但如果我们谈论视频数据,YouTube的持久力一直非常惊人,对吧?它已经存在了几十年了,我们还没有真正看到任何成功的竞争对手。

View/Hide Original English

>> Um,
you
know,
one
of
the
things
I
think


about
another
reality
of
our
current


time,
this
is
kind
of
related,
but
if


we're
talking
about
video
data,
YouTube


staying
power
has
been
like
phenomenal,


right?
It's
been
around
for
decades
now,


and
we
haven't
really
seen
any


successful
competitors.

Tracy Alloway: 反正,

View/Hide Original English

>> Anyway,

Joe Weisenthal: 嗯,既然我们想谈论上涨的股票,我知道。

View/Hide Original English

>> well,
since
uh
we
wanted
to
talk
about


stocks
that
are
going
up,
I
I
know

Tracy Alloway: 那是另一个。

View/Hide Original English

>> that's
another
one.

James Van Geelen: 人们有点忘记了视频比文本占用更多的存储空间。如果我们开始只是随意地发布视频,那么半导体领域中唯一被忽视的领域之一就是存储。不是内存,比如RAM之类的,而是硬盘和固态硬盘,比如西部数据(Western Digital)和,你知道。

View/Hide Original English

Uh


people
kind
of
forgot
that
video
takes


up
a
lot
more
storage
than
text
does.


And
if
we're
going
to
start
just
like


throwing
out
the
slop
on
video,
the
part


basically
one
of
the
only
areas
of


semiconductors
that
has
gotten
ignored


has
been
storage.
Not
like
not
like


memory
like
like
uh
RAM
and
stuff,
but


like
hard
drives
and
solid
state
discs


like
Western
Digital
and
uh
you
know.

Joe Weisenthal: 好的。所以希捷(Seagate)。

View/Hide Original English

>> Okay.
So
Seagate.

James Van Geelen: 是的。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.

Joe Weisenthal: 这就是我们正在谈论的。所以这只股票在三月底是84美元,现在是254美元。这就是你说的方向,对吧?好的。

View/Hide Original English

>> That's
what
we're
talking
about.
So
this


was
a
this
was
a
$84
stock
in
late
March


and
now
it's
a
254.
That's
where
you're


going,
right?
Okay.

James Van Geelen: 是的。是的,有一个疯狂的,有一个疯狂的图表。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.
And
yeah,
there's
a
crazy
there's


a
crazy
chart,

Tracy Alloway: 但它已经引起了关注,但你认为它还会继续上涨。

View/Hide Original English

>> but
it
has
gotten
attention,
but
you


think
it
could
go
up
more.

James Van Geelen: 我认为会。我认为为了说明这种将持续发生的动态。基本上,你只需要不断地关注那些人们说“哦,你知道,X过剩,所以这不会从AI中获胜”的东西。然后最终,X的过剩就不重要了。这就是英伟达在这一切开始时发生的情况。加密货币GPU过剩,现在没有人关心,你上次听到有人因为加密矿工太多而看空英伟达是什么时候?

View/Hide Original English

>> I
think
so.
And
I
think
that
uh
to


illustrate
that
dynamic
that's
going
to


keep
happening.
Basically,
you
just
keep


looking
at
stuff
where
there's
people


say,
"Oh,
well,
you
know,
there's
a


there's
a
glut
of
X
and
that's
why
this


isn't
going
to
win
from
AI."
And
then


eventually
the
glut
of
X
doesn't
matter.


It's
a
that
that's
what
happened
to


Nvidia
in
the
beginning
of
all
this.


There
was
a
glut
of
crypto
GPUs
and
now


nobody
car
like
when's
the
last
time
you


heard
someone
bearish
on
Nvidia
because


there's
too
many
crypto
miners.

Joe Weisenthal: SanDisk在4月2日是48美元。现在是126美元的股票。相当疯狂。这些只是工具,只是存储,只是基本的。是的。

View/Hide Original English

>> SanDisk
was
$48
in
April
2nd.
That's


$126
stock.
Pretty
crazy.
These
are
just


these
are
like
just
the
tools
are
just


store
just
basic.
Yeah.

James Van Geelen: 是的。疯狂。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.
Crazy.

James Van Geelen: 确实如此。而且,我想你可以为此担心,或者你可以说这不一定像英伟达在一个月内翻倍,对吧?这只是人们在发现。我认为这是一个很好的晴雨表,在泡沫中很重要,人们仍然非常密切地关注。

View/Hide Original English

>> It's
it
is.
And
uh
it's
it
I
guess
you


could
be
worried
by
that
or
you
could


say
this
isn't
uh
this
isn't
like
Nvidia


doubling
in
a
month
necessarily,
right?


That
it's
just
people
discovering
I


think
it's
a
good
barometer
which
is


important
in
a
bubble
that
people
are


still
paying
very
close
attention

James Van Geelen: 而且,当每个人都投入到思科(Cisco)的全部业务中时,你就会开始担心。但这些是拥有真实产品的真实公司。当然,有一些愚蠢的事情正在发生,但不仅仅是愚蠢的事情。这不是2021年,你知道,

View/Hide Original English

>> and
uh
you
start
to
get
worried
when


everybody
just
goes
into
the
Cisco
of
it


all.
But
these
are
real
companies
that


have
real
products.
Of
course,
there's


some
silly
stuff
that's
happening,
but


it's
not
only
silly
stuff.
It's
not
2021


with
the,
you
know,

Tracy Alloway: 是的。

View/Hide Original English

>> yeah,

James Van Geelen: 我不需要。

View/Hide Original English

>> I
don't
need
to.

机器人训练数据与中美竞争

Tracy Alloway: 所以,说到实地研究,或者我应该说空中研究。说到机器人,你有一只机器狗,对吧?那种非常先进的。

View/Hide Original English

>> So,
speaking
of
on
the
ground
research,


or
maybe
I
should
say
in
the
sky


research.
When
it
comes
to
robotics,
you


had
a
robot
dog,
right?
One
of
those


like
really
advanced
ones.

James Van Geelen: 我们有一只宇树科技(Unitree: Unitree Robotics: 一家中国机器人公司,以其四足机器人而闻名)的机器狗。它非常令人印象深刻。当它用后腿站起来时,也令人毛骨悚然。

View/Hide Original English

>> We
got
a
unitry
robot
dog.
It
is
super


impressive.
It's
also
incredibly
creepy


when
it
stands
up
on
its
hind
legs.

Tracy Alloway: 是的。你看到视频了吗?

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.
Have
you
seen
the
video?

James Van Geelen: 是的,我看到了你的视频。是的。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah,
I
saw
your
video
of
it.
Yeah.

James Van Geelen: 是的,我们还去参观了宇树科技。我见过波士顿动力(Boston Dynamics)的Spot机器人,它实际上更令人印象深刻。它也可能杀死你,而且宇树科技有趣的地方在于,是的,这个机器人感觉像一件武器。它很重等等,但即使是人形机器人,它也举不起超过8磅的重量。而且,宇树科技并不专注于制造大脑。他们只想制造硬件。你去那里,

View/Hide Original English

>> It's
uh
and


Unitry.
We
went
and
visited
Unitry,
too.


And
it's
I've
seen
Boston
Dynamics
uh


you
know,
spot
robot,
which
is
actually


more
impressive.
Also
could
probably


murder
you
like
and
and
the
interesting


thing
about
Unitry
is
yeah,
this
the


robot
kind
of
feels
like
a
weapon.
It's


very
heavy
and
stuff,
but
it's
even


they're
humanoid
like
it
can't
lift
more


than
8
pounds.
And
also,
Unitry
is
not


focused
on
like
making
the
brain.
They


just
want
to
make
the
hardware.
And
you


go
there
and

James Van Geelen: 他们会问:“你的激光雷达(LiDAR)是从哪里来的?”哦,我们需要这个特定的东西,所以我们就自己做了。

View/Hide Original English

they
were
like,
"Where's
your
LAR
from?"


Oh,
well,
we
needed
this
specific
thing,


so
we
just
made
it
ourselves.

Tracy Alloway: 嗯。

View/Hide Original English

>> H

James Van Geelen: 好的。那你的执行器(Actuators: 将能量转换为机械运动的装置,如电机、液压缸等)呢?嗯,我们也是自己做的。他们不自己制造的任何东西,都会在距离他们总部90公里半径范围内采购。

View/Hide Original English

>> Okay.
Where
what
about
your
actuators?


Well,
we
made
those
ourselves,
too.


Anything
that
they
don't
make


themselves,
they
get
within
a
90
km


radius
of
their
headquarters.

Tracy Alloway: 等等,他们的总部在哪里?在杭州。

View/Hide Original English

>> Wait,
where's
their
headquarters?
It's


in
uh
Hanghao.

Joe Weisenthal: 不错。

View/Hide Original English

>> Nice.

James Van Geelen: 所以,这是一种情况,你真的看到了我们美国与中国之间的竞争。

View/Hide Original English

>> So,
it's
something
where
you're
really


that's
the
competition
that
we
have


stacked
up
against
us
in
the
US
versus


China.
And

James Van Geelen: 我认为他们采取的有趣路线是,

View/Hide Original English

>> I
think
the
interesting
route
that


they've
taken
is

James Van Geelen: 它非常先进。你可以在上面编程。你已经可以看到人们购买它们并让它们做特定事情的视频。但他们把它们做得不是超级危险,比如它不会杀死你。这是一个获取大量训练数据的好方法,因为我们没有足够的关于如何在世界中移动的训练数据。我们有所有人类知识的总和历史,这些都被记录下来用于文本模型,但我们需要更多用于机器人技术的数据。我认为这是一个有趣的方面,他们只是把这些机器人送入世界,以便他们能够获得足够的数据,使其足够安全,可以在你家里拥有一个机器人。

View/Hide Original English

>> it's
super
advanced.
You
can
code
on
it.


You
can
you
can
already
see
videos
of


people,
you
know,
buying
them
and
making


them
do
specific
things.
But
they
made


them
not
super
like
it's
not
going
to


kill
you.
And
that's
a
great
way
to
get


a
bunch
of
training
data
because
we


don't
have
enough
training
data
of
what


it's
like
to
move
around
the
world.
We


have
the
sum
history
of
all
human


knowledge
that's
been
recorded
for
text


models,
but
we
need
more
data
for


robotics.
And
I
think
that
that's
like


an
interesting
kind
of
thing
where


they're
just
kind
of
sending
these
out


into
the
world
so
that
they
can
get


enough
data
to
actually
make
it
safe


enough
to
have
a
robot
in
your
house.

Tracy Alloway: 任何人都可以买到宇树科技的机器狗吗?它们在线销售吗?

View/Hide Original English

>> How
can
anyone
buy
a
unit
dog?
Like
are


they
for
is
for
sale
online?
Yeah,
there


there's
a
lead
time,
but
uh
I
can
get


around
it
if
you

Joe Weisenthal: 等等,它们多少钱?

View/Hide Original English

>> Wait,
how
much
are
they?

James Van Geelen: 嗯,它们起价3000美元,然后我们买了一个超先进的,可以连接机械臂,这样它就可以操纵环境,那个是8000美元。然后他们的人形机器人是16000美元,这比一辆二手本田车的价格还低。

View/Hide Original English

>> Uh
so
they
start
at
uh
3,000
and
then
uh


we
got
the
the
super
advanced
one
that


you
can
attach
a
robotic
arm
to
so
it


can
manipulate
its
environment
and
that


was
$8,000.
And
then
their
humanoid
is


16,
which
is
like
less
than
the
cost
of


a
used
Honda.

Tracy Alloway: 那还不错。

View/Hide Original English

>> That's
not
bad.

Joe Weisenthal: 嗯,3000美元也是一只非常好的纯种狗的价格。

View/Hide Original English

>> Well,
3,000
also
the
price
for
like
a


really
good
purebred
dog.

Tracy Alloway: 嗯,我正要说这个。人们为真正的狗花很多钱。所以,是的,看起来。

View/Hide Original English

>> Well,
that's
what
I
was
going
to
say.


Like
right
there
people
pay
a
lot
of


money
for
actual
dogs.
So
yeah,
it
seems

Joe Weisenthal: 你为什么看着我?

View/Hide Original English

>> Why
are
you
looking
at
me?

Tracy Alloway: 你觉得我为什么看着你?

View/Hide Original English

>> Why
do
you
think
I'm
looking
at
you?

Tracy Alloway: 好的,James,太有趣了。非常感谢你来分享你的实地考察见闻。

View/Hide Original English

>> Okay,
James,
that
was
so
much
fun.
Thank


you
so
much
for
coming
in
and
uh
sharing


with
us
your
your
field
trip


observations.

James Van Geelen: 谢谢,Rob。

View/Hide Original English

>> Thanks,
Rob.

[音乐]

View/Hide Original English

[Music]

宏观经济影响与未来展望

Tracy Alloway: Joe,我想也许是我作为一个记者的犬儒主义,但当我们开始说“这次不一样”时,我就会非常紧张。

View/Hide Original English

Joe,
I
think
maybe
it's
the
cynical


journalist
in
me,
but
I
get
really


nervous
when
we
start
saying
it's


different
this
time.

Joe Weisenthal: 是的。我的意思是,它总是不同的,它也总是一样的。当然,你知道。是的。我的意思是,看,这很疯狂,而且涉及大量的资金,而且仍然,你知道,我们一直在播客上问人们,你从这项技术中获得了什么样的使用价值?它仍然非常模糊。嗯,

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.
I
mean,
it's
always
different.


It's
always
the
same.
It's
sort
of
there


certainly,
you
know.
Yeah.
I
mean,
look,


it's
crazy
and
it's
a
lot
of
money
and


it's
still,
you
know,
we've
been
asking


people
on
the
podcast,
what
kind
of
use


value
are
you
getting
out
of
this


technology?
And
it's
still
very


ambiguous.
Um,

Joe Weisenthal: 我不知道。我没有。这不是我的工作来把握市场时机。所以,我很高兴不必对所有这些事情发表看法。但我确实认为。

View/Hide Original English

>> I
don't
know.
I
don't
have
It's
not
my


job
to
time
the
market.
So,
I'm
glad
I


don't
have
to
have
a
view
on
all
of
this


stuff.
But
I
do
think

Tracy Alloway: 那是推卸责任,Joe。

View/Hide Original English

>> that's
a
copout,
Joe.

Joe Weisenthal: 不,我确实认为,我确实认为。好的,你的,好的,给我们你的,给我们你的目标价。你,那是一个。好的,给我们你的目标价。好的。嗯,我确实认为这发展得太快了,每天的数字都非常庞大,而且所有这些的风险都非常高,所以确实感觉我们需要定期更新这个领域投入了多少资金,以及最终的回报会是什么。

View/Hide Original English

>> No,
I
do
think
I
do
think
for
Okay,


what's
your
Okay,
give
us
your
Give
us


your
price
target.
You
That's
a
Okay,


give
give
us
your
price
target.
Okay.


Um,
I
do
think
this
is
moving
so
fast


and
every
day
the
numbers
are
so
big
and


it's
the
stakes
are
so
high
for
all
of


this
that
it
does
feel
like
we
just
need


regular
updates
on
the
state
of
how
much


money
is
being
spent
in
this
area
and


what
the
eventual
payoff
will
be.

Tracy Alloway: 我希望有人能画一张巨大的信息图,展示所有融资细节,因为我认为你可以做一张非常有趣的图。

View/Hide Original English

>> I
want
someone
to
draw
a
massive
like


infographic
of
all
the
financing
details


because
I
think
you
could
make
a
really


interesting
one.

Joe Weisenthal: 是的,你肯定可以。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah,
you
definitely
could.

Tracy Alloway: 那可能会很有启发性。就此而言,我确实认为James的建议很有趣,那就是做空私人信贷参与者,然后做多实际的物理硬件公司。

View/Hide Original English

>> That
would
probably
be
illuminating.
On


that
note,
I
did
think
James'
suggestion


of,
you
know,
shorting
the
private


credit
players
and
then
going
long
the


actual
physical
hardware
ones.
That
was


interesting.

Joe Weisenthal: 是的。不,这真的很有趣。另外,我之前没有意识到,我的意思是,繁荣或泡沫,无论你怎么称呼它,我不太喜欢用“泡沫”这个词,因为它暗示了某种东西,但无论繁荣或泡沫,它们蔓延的方式都非常有趣。对吧。所以英伟达在2022年末Chat GPT让人们大吃一惊时一飞冲天,他们说这太不可思议了,而且它是由所有这些英伟达芯片驱动的,然后人们就开始寻找其他东西。就像还有什么?即使在今天,2025年10月,这种蔓延过程仍在继续。所以,好的,在过去的几个月里,也许是像卡特彼勒这样的公司,或者突然人们意识到那些老式的电脑存储将会非常热门,但我们仍然处于这个阶段,随着人们对这些事情的关注,这种蔓延仍在继续。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.
No,
it's
really
interesting.
Also,


I
had
not
realized
I
mean,
it
is
very


interesting
the
way
booms
or
bubbles,


whatever
you
want
to
call
it.
I
don't


like
using
the
word
bubble
because
that


applies
whatever
booms
or
bubbles,
the


way
they
spread
out.
I
just
think
that's


extremely
interesting.
Right.
So
Nvidia


takes
off
in
late
2022
when
people
are


blown
away
by
Chat
GPT
and
they
say
this


incredible
and
it's
being
powered
by
all


these
uh
Nvidia
chips
and
then
people
go


on
the
hunt
right
for
other
things.
It's


like
what
else?
And
even
still
today
in


October
2025,
that
spreading
out
process


continues.
And
so,
okay,
in
the
last
few


months,
maybe
it's
like
a
caterpillar
or


maybe
suddenly
people
realizing
that


just
sort
of
old-fashioned
computer


storage
is
going
to
be
very
hot,
but


we're
still
in
this
phase
where
as


people
open
their
eyes
to
these
things,


the
spreading
out
uh
continues
to
this


day.

Tracy Alloway: 对。嗯,也有一个预期,最终,你知道,普通公司也会从中受益,变得更高效等等。

View/Hide Original English

>> Right.
Well,
also
there's
an
expectation


that
eventually,
you
know,
normal


companies
are
going
to
benefit
from
it


as
well
and
become
more
efficient
and


all
of
that.

Joe Weisenthal: 我刚刚想起来,我本来想问James的一个问题,但我可以把它作为一个推测性问题提出来。所以,他提到了所有正在建造这些东西的工人。你能不能问问所有这些工人?这确实让我思考挤出效应(Crowding Out Effect: 指政府或大型项目的大量支出导致私人投资或消费减少的经济现象)的可能性。想象一下,如果你在阿比林有其他业务,你现在正试图雇佣一名暖通空调工人,因为暖通空调,你知道,你就像,“哦,餐馆正在和OpenAI竞争。”

View/Hide Original English

>> I
just
remembered
I
the
one
question
I


was
going
to
ask
James,
but
I
could
just


throw
it
out
as
sort
of
a
speculative


question.
So,
he
mentioned
all
of
the


workers.
Could
you
ask
all
of
the


workers
that
are
out
this
are
building


these
things?
And
it
does
make
me
wonder


about
the
sort
of
crowding
out


possibility.
Like
imagine
if
you
imagine


if
you
had
some
other
business
in


Abelene
and
you're
trying
to
hire
an


HVAC
worker
right
now
because
HVAC,
you


know,
you're
like,
"Oh,
restaurant


competing
with
like
Open
AI."

Tracy Alloway: 是的。你就像,你在阿比林开了一家餐馆,你心想:“你知道吗?我需要更新我的空调或其他什么,你会怎么做?因为所有的暖通空调工人都去了那个大型的Stargate项目。”我确实认为这是一个非常有趣的宏观问题,涉及到各种各样的事情,那就是所有这些回报不确定的支出,将在多大程度上对经济的其他部分产生挤出效应和潜在的通胀效应。

View/Hide Original English

>> Yeah.
You're
like
you're
you
have
a


restaurant
in
Abene
and
you're
like,


"You
know what?
I
need
to
update
my
air


conditioner
or
whatever
or
what
and
what


are
you
going
to
do
because
all
the
HVAC


workers
are
at
that
uh
big
Stargate


operation."
And
I
do
think
this
is
a


very
interesting
macro
question
on
all


kinds
of
things,
which
is
the
degree
to


which
all
of
this
spending
with


uncertain
payoffs
will
have
a
crowding


out
and
potentially
inflationary
effect


on
the
rest
of
the
economy.

Joe Weisenthal: 嗯,大概“机器之神”最终会设计出暖通空调机器人。所以,问题就会解决。

View/Hide Original English

>> Well,
presumably
machine
God
will


eventually
design
HVAC
robots.
So,


problem
will
be
solved.

Tracy Alloway: 问题就会解决。

View/Hide Original English

>> Problem
will
be
solved.

Joe Weisenthal: 好的。我们就在这里结束吧?

View/Hide Original English

>> All
right.
Shall
we
leave
it
there?

Tracy Alloway: 就这样吧。

View/Hide Original English

>> Let's
leave
it
there.

Tracy Alloway: 这是Odd Lots播客的又一集。我是Tracy Alloway。你可以在@TracyAlloway关注我。

View/Hide Original English

>> This
has
been
another
episode
of
the
Odd


Thoughts
podcast.
I'm
Tracy
Aloway.
You


can
follow
me
at
Tracy
Aloway.

Joe Weisenthal: 我是Joe Weisenthal。你可以在@thestolwart关注我。关注我们的嘉宾James Van Geelen,他的账号是@catrini7。关注我们的制作人Carmen Rodriguez,账号是@CarmenArman;Dashel Bennett,账号是@D-bot;以及Kalebrooks,账号是@Kalebrooks。更多OddLots内容,请访问bloomberg.com/odlotss。

View/Hide Original English

>> And
I'm
Jill
Weisenthal.
You
can
follow


me
at
the
stalwart.
Follow
our
guest


James
Van
Gilan.
He's
@
catrini7.
Follow


our
producers
Carmen
Rodriguez
at
Carmen


Arman
Dashel
Bennett
at
D-bot
and


Kalebrooks
at
Kalebrooks.
For
more


OddLots
content,
go
to


bloomberg.com/odlotss.

Joe Weisenthal: 我们有每日通讯和所有节目,你可以在我们的Discord频道discord.gg/odlots上24小时7天讨论所有这些话题。

View/Hide Original English

We
have
a
daily
newsletter
and
all
of


our
episodes
and
you
can
chat
about
all


these
topics
247
in
our
Discord,


discord.gg/odlots.

Tracy Alloway: 如果你喜欢OddLots,如果你喜欢我们谈论AI的物理现实,那么请在你最喜欢的播客平台上给我们留下好评。请记住,如果你是彭博社的订阅用户,你可以完全免费收听我们所有的节目。你只需要在Apple Podcast上找到彭博频道并按照说明操作即可。感谢收听。

View/Hide Original English

>> And
if
you
enjoy
OddLots,
if
you
like
it


when
we
talk
about
the
physical


realities
of
AI,
then
please
leave
us
a


positive
review
on
your
favorite
podcast


platform.
And
remember,
if
you
are
a


Bloomberg
subscriber,
you
can
listen
to


all
of
our
episodes
absolutely
adree.


All
you
need
to
do
is
find
the
Bloomberg


channel
on
Apple
Podcast
and
follow
the


instructions
there.
Thanks
for


listening.

[音乐]

View/Hide Original English

[Music]

关键字: ai-infrastructure data-center-buildout geopolitical llm market-bubble-concern