动荡时代下的领导力挑战
BRENE BROWN: 我感觉我触及到了一些东西,它既给了我一种真正的稳定感,也为我提供了完成他要求我做的事情所需的力量的跳板。 因此,“坚实根基”(Strong Ground: 一种内心稳定、价值观明确的状态)成为了我的座右铭,不仅在健身房里,也在重要会议前、与首席执行官(CEO)进行辅导前、甚至与我自己的教练交谈前。 它非常明确地告诉我:好的,坚实根基。 找到你的运动姿态(athletic stance: 身体保持平衡、随时准备行动的姿势),在你的价值观中扎根,这不仅是为了稳定,也是为了敏捷。 因此,我认为,鉴于当前变化的速度和节奏,我们现在需要找到我们的根基。
View/Hide Original English
BRENE BROWN: I felt like I had tapped into something that both gave me a sense of real stability, but also a springboard for some power that I needed to do what he was asking me to do. And so "strong ground" became my mantra, not just in the gym, but also before a hard meeting, before coaching with a CEO, before talking to my own coach. It was very much, OK, strong ground. Find your athletic stance, get grounded down in your values, not just for stability, but also for agility. And so, I think, right now, given the velocity, this pace of change, we need to find our ground.
ADI IGNATIUS: 大家好,今天我们请到了休斯顿大学的研究教授、畅销书作家、《Dare to Lead》播客的主持人布琳·布朗。 她的最新著作是《坚实根基——勇敢领导力的教训、悖论的韧性与人类精神的智慧》。 感谢您做客《IdeaCast》。 BRENE BROWN: 很高兴能和您在一起。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: So I'm here with Brené Brown, a research professor at the University of Houston, a best-selling author, and host of the Dare to Lead podcast. Her latest book is Strong Ground--The Lessons of Daring Leadership, the Tenacity of Paradox, and the Wisdom of the Human Spirit. Thank you for being on IdeaCast. BRENE BROWN: I'm excited to be with you.
ADI IGNATIUS: 我们正处在一个我认为是“动态”的时刻,我指的并非是积极的意义,而是充满了波动和重大转变。 我感觉几乎一切都悬而未决,有点像20世纪60年代,尽管非常、非常、非常不同。 当根基似乎发生如此剧烈变化时,好的领导力应该是什么样子? BRENE BROWN: 是的,我认为这很有趣。 “动态”这个词很有趣。 我个人感觉是巨大的不稳定性和不可预测性。 即使我们短期预测的能力也完全被颠覆了。 我认为现在好的领导力在于“稳住球”。 我将直接使用一个体育比喻。 您能理解吗? 我的意思是——
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: So we're in a moment that, I guess, I would call dynamic, and I don't mean in the necessarily positive sense, but where you have volatility, but also major shifts. And I feel like almost everything is up for grabs. A little bit like the 1960s, although very, very, very different. What does good leadership look like when the ground seems to be shifting so dramatically? BRENE BROWN: Yeah. I think, it's interesting. The word "dynamic" is interesting. I think what I'm feeling personally is massive instability and unpredictability. Even our ability to forecast in short increments of time has been completely disrupted. And I think good leadership right now is about settling the ball. I'm going to jump right into a sports metaphor. Are you going with me? I mean--
ADI IGNATIUS: 我理解,我理解这个比喻。 BRENE BROWN: 是的,我认为这就像——我最近一直在思考的比喻是,我脑海中浮现出我的两个孩子五岁时踢足球的画面。 看五岁孩子踢足球真的很有趣,因为球会非常快、非常用力地飞过来,高度正好在头部。 一个孩子会把脚抬到空中,试图在头部高度把球踢到一个聪明的地方,但结果总是把球踢出场外。 但我认为,现在很多领导者都在做同样的事情。 球又快又猛地飞来,高度不可预测。 我们没有跳起来用胸部接住球,把球放到地上,用脚踩住球以保持控球权,然后观察球场,进行战略性思考,根据训练和技能预判人们的位置,而是正在做出非常快速、非战略性的决策。 有时这是因为我们处于稀缺模式(scarcity mode: 资源或时间有限,导致思维受限、决策仓促的状态),没有运用我们拥有的技能。 而更多时候,我认为,我们现在根本没有所需的技能。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: I'm good. I'm good with that. BRENE BROWN: Yeah, I think it's about--the metaphor I've been thinking about lately is a visual that I have of both my kids when they played soccer when they were five. And five-year-old soccer is a really fun thing to watch because balls come in really fast and hard at head height. And a kid sticks their foot up in the air and tries to kick it somewhere smart at head height, and invariably, it goes off the field. But I think that's what a lot of leaders are doing right now. Balls are coming in hard and fast, unpredictably high. And instead of jumping up and catching the ball with their chest, dropping the ball to the ground, putting their foot on the ball to maintain possession, looking down the pitch, thinking strategically, thinking and anticipating where people are going to be based on training and skill, we're just making really fast, non-strategic decisions that sometimes are because we are in scarcity mode and we're not deploying the skills we have. And more often, right now, I think, we don't have the skills we need.
系统思维与战略性决策
ADI IGNATIUS: 我认为还有一件事,就是在不确定性、高度不确定性时期,有一种思潮认为你必须果断,对吧? 不要成为受害者。 你必须——所以存在一种偏向行动的倾向。 所以我感觉其中一个悖论是,这与系统思维(systems thinking: 一种整体性思考方法,关注事物之间的相互联系和动态变化)的回归形成了对比,对吧? BRENE BROWN: 是的。 ADI IGNATIUS: ——而相反的建议是,不。 你刚才说的。 放慢速度。 全面思考一个决定将如何影响一切——整个公司,整个组织。 那么,您如何看待这两种必要的做法发挥作用? BRENE BROWN: 嗯,作为系统理论(systems theory: 研究系统的一般模式和行为的跨学科领域)的忠实拥护者,我很高兴看到——我认为它从未消失,但我很高兴看到这种语言和思维方式的复兴。 我认为我们现在所做的一切的基础性战略思维必须是系统理论。 内部系统如何受到我们行动的影响,以及这如何反作用于外部系统。 在系统理论中,我们了解到为了使系统运行,系统的边界必须是可渗透的(permeable boundaries: 允许信息、能量或物质在系统内外自由流动的边界)。 因此,反馈信息流入和流出系统,带来新的信息。 我们进行重新校准。 我们发出信息。 所以系统周围存在渗透性,无论是生物系统还是领导力系统,这都无关紧要。 当我们没有这些可渗透的边界,并且系统周围的墙壁关闭时——你现在出于自我保护而在各地看到这种情况——最终发生的是系统变得自我参照(self-referencing: 系统只根据内部信息和逻辑运作,忽视外部反馈)。 一个例子是,一位首席执行官(CEO)感到巨大的压力,需要制定并实施一项人工智能(AI)战略。 但由于稀缺性,系统壁垒,他们没有花时间获取反馈。 他们没有进行红队演练(red teaming: 一种模拟对抗性思维的练习,旨在识别计划中的弱点和漏洞)。 他们没有进行事前验尸(pre-mortem: 在项目开始前假设项目失败,并分析可能导致失败的原因)。 他们没有仔细思考业务战略和技术战略的一致性。 他们没有提升员工的技能。 因此,最终发生的是该系统变得自我参照。 在这种气候下,这是会失败的。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: So I think there's one other thing, which is that in periods of uncertainty, hyper uncertainty, there is a school of thought that you have to be decisive, right? Don't be a victim of this. You have to-- so there's a bias toward action. So I feel like one of the paradoxes is that versus systems thinking is having this of comeback, right-- BRENE BROWN: Yeah. ADI IGNATIUS: --where counter advice is, no. You were saying. Slow it down. Think holistically about how a decision will affect whatever it is--the entire company, the entire organization. So how are you seeing those two imperatives play out? BRENE BROWN: Well, as a big fan of systems theory, I love to see--I don't that it ever went away, but I love to see the renaissance of the language and thinking about it. I think the foundational, strategic thinking of everything we're doing right now has to be systems theory. How internal systems are impacted by what we're doing, how that bounces off external systems. In systems theory, we learn that in order for systems to operate, the boundaries of a system have to be permeable. So feedback flows in and out of systems bringing new information. We recalibrate. We send out information. So there's a permeability around systems, and whether that's biological or leadership systems, it doesn't matter. When we don't have those permeable boundaries and the walls around a system close, which you're seeing everywhere right now out of self-protection, what ends up happening is a system becomes self-referencing. So an example of this is a CEO feels a ton of pressure to develop and implement an AI strategy. But because of scarcity, the system walls, they're not taking time for feedback. They're not red teaming. They're not doing a pre-mortem. They're not thinking through alignment of business strategy and technology strategy. They're not skilling up their people. And so what ends up happening is that system becomes self-referencing. And in this climate that's losing.
人工智能战略与“富有成效的紧迫感”
ADI IGNATIUS: 具体到人工智能(AI),我们都读过麻省理工学院(MIT)的那份报告,报告称95%的人工智能项目没有产生正向投资回报率(ROI),无论其方法是否准确,无论进行此类研究是为时过早还是为时不晚,我与许多认真对待这份报告的人交流过,他们正在放慢脚步,特别是在人工智能方面,采用更多的系统方法。 我们知道它能产生价值,但仅仅是尽快推出第一个产品已经不再是可行的策略了。 BRENE BROWN: 是的。 这是我在这本书中似乎正在做的一件事,就是选取许多我们使用的结构和概念,然后给它们添加一个形容词。 所以,是的,紧迫感,但要是富有成效的紧迫感(productive urgency: 强调行动要带来实际影响,而非仅仅是快速行动)。 是的,冒险,但要是战略性风险承担(strategic risk taking: 经过深思熟虑、与目标一致的风险行为)。 我感觉我正在使用每一个——我正在暂停一下,给人们感受到的每件事都添加形容词。 所以,是的,我们需要有紧迫感,但没有成效的紧迫感总是行动优先于影响。 我认为当你审视麻省理工学院(MIT)的那项研究时——是的,人们正在就此提出很好的问题,但它不应该被忽视。 我是一个技术乐观主义者。 我并不乐观的是人们在稀缺模式下的反射性决策。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: On AI specifically, that report that we all read from MIT that said, 95% of AI projects do not have a positive ROI, whether that's the methodology was accurate, whether it was too soon or not too soon to do research like that, I've talked to a lot of people who are taking that to heart and are slowing things down, applying more of a systems approach, specifically to AI. We know it produces value, but just kind of getting the first thing we can out there is no longer the viable approach. BRENE BROWN: Yeah. It's one of the things that I seem to, in this book, be taking a lot of constructs and concepts that we use and adding an adjective to them. So yes, urgency, but productive urgency. Yes, risk taking, but strategic risk taking. I feel like I'm using every--I'm taking a battery, a pause, adjectives and adding it to everything that people are feeling. So yes, we need to be urgent, but unproductive urgency is always action over impact. And I think when you look at that MIT study--and yeah, people are asking very good questions about it, but it should not be ignored. And I's a tech optimist. What I am not is optimistic about people's reflexive decision-making when they're in scarcity mode.
领导者的真诚与价值观
ADI IGNATIUS: 谈到真诚(authenticity),无论我们喜不喜欢这个词,我们都经历过这样一个时期:领导者们,或者说许多优秀的领导者,都乐于公开表达他们的价值观,比如可持续性、多样性、长期思维等价值观。 突然之间,至少在美国,许多曾经这样表达的首席执行官(CEO)现在不敢再这样做了,因为这些话题变得充满争议。 在似乎能产生我们所钦佩的领导力的真诚或脆弱性(vulnerability: 承认不完美、展现真实自我的能力)的背景下,在这个突然高度政治化的商业时刻,我们是否正在看到真诚领导力的缺失? BRENE BROWN: 我认为我们看到的是恐惧。 我不认为一个可以根据政府更迭而放弃的价值观是真正的价值观。 它可能是一个营销或品牌理念,但一个根据谁入主白宫而放弃的价值观,并不是真正的核心价值观。 价值观的表达方式可能会随着时间而改变,也应该如此。 例如,现在有很多公司将诚信作为一项价值观,但当他们将这项价值观付诸实践时,他们从未考虑过数据治理。 他们从未考虑过隐私。 他们从未考虑过政治上真实的表达。 因此,我认为,领导者的职责是围绕使命,无论政府如何更迭,都能为产生影响而领导。 他们在这方面没有喘息的机会。 领导者的职责还在于不放弃公司的价值观。 因此,在一个长期发展的世界里,这是一种非常短期的博弈。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: So on the topic of authenticity, whether we like that word or not, we've lived through this period where leaders were comfortable, or many leaders, the best leaders were comfortable with being outspoken about their values and values like sustainability, like diversity, like long-term thinking. Suddenly, in the US, at least, a lot of the CEOs who spoke that way now don't dare do so because these topics have become controversial. And in the context of the authenticity or vulnerability that seems to produce the leadership we admire, are we seeing an absence of authentic leadership now in this suddenly highly politicized business moment? BRENE BROWN: I think we're seeing fear. I don't think of value that can be abandoned based on an administration is a value. It might be a marketing or branding idea, but a value that's abandoned based on who's in the White House is not really a core value. The expression of values may change over time, and they should. For example, there are a lot of companies right now who have integrity as a value, but when they operationalize that value, they've never contemplated data governance. They've never contemplated privacy. They've never contemplated authentic voice politically. And so, I think, it's a leader's job to be able to lead for impact around mission, regardless of the administration. They don't get a break there. And it's also a leader's job not to abandon the values of the company. And so that is a very short-term game in a long-term world.
ADI IGNATIUS: 是的,我喜欢这个观点。 我写过一篇类似的文章,将达沃斯人(Davos man: 指全球化精英,通常在达沃斯世界经济论坛上聚会)与海湖庄园人(Mar-a-Lago man: 指美国前总统唐纳德·特朗普及其支持者,象征着民粹主义和民族主义)对立起来,并指出这是一个澄清的时刻。 如果你真的相信这些事情,现在就是加倍努力的时刻。 如果你不相信,就像你说的,那只是表演性的,也许那不是一种价值观,也不是你或你公司的本质。 BRENE BROWN: 是的。 而且,如果那只是表演性的,而你又没有找到一种方式来以你的诚信向前迈进,那么就不要对消费者的强烈反弹感到震惊。 ADI IGNATIUS: 绝对如此。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: Yeah, I like that. I wrote a piece along those lines, pitting Davos man versus Mar-a-Lago man, and just said, this is a clarifying moment. If you really believe in these things, this is a moment to double down. If you don't, as you were saying, it was just performative, maybe that's not a value and that's not who you are or who your company ism so. BRENE BROWN: Yeah. And also if it was performative and you're not finding a way to move forward in your integrity, then don't be shocked by the consumer backlash. ADI IGNATIUS: Absolutely.
“坚实根基”的起源:匹克球的启示
ADI IGNATIUS: 所以这本书叫做《坚实根基》,让我们给那些还没读过它的听众简单介绍一下,什么是“坚实根基”? 显然,这是一本大部头书,但简而言之,“坚实根基”是什么? 您是如何决定这就是您真正想要确定并推动这本书的核心概念的? BRENE BROWN: 当然,它始于匹克球(pickleball: 一种结合了网球、羽毛球和乒乓球元素的球类运动)。 ADI IGNATIUS: 当然。 BRENE BROWN: 是的。 我打了30年网球,嘲笑匹克球两年,然后只用了两场比赛就让我开始每周打六天。 所以—— ADI IGNATIUS: 我也会打,但我对匹克球来说太年轻了。 BRENE BROWN: 我昨天被几个20多岁的年轻人打得很惨。 所以它肯定有它的时刻。 我受伤了。 当我去看教练时,他告诉我我没有核心力量,而且我—— ADI IGNATIUS: 哎呀。 BRENE BROWN: 是的,这很粗鲁,但他说,他让我做了一个测试,他说,得了10分(满分22分)。 我说,当然,我得了10分。 他说,不,是22分中的10分。 抱歉。 他说你的生理年龄像77岁。 我说,哦,天哪。 他说,而且—— ADI IGNATIUS: 完美的10分。 BRENE BROWN: 是的。 ADI IGNATIUS: 22分中的完美10分。 BRENE BROWN: 是的,没错。 你不需要是研究员也能知道,这很糟糕。 所以他基本上说,我受的是代偿性损伤(compensatory injury: 身体为了弥补某个部位的弱点或功能障碍,过度使用其他部位而造成的损伤),我没有在球场上做我想做的事情所需的大而强壮的肌肉。 所以我使用了效率低下的肌肉群,结果受伤了。 他谈得越多,我就越想到我合作的那些领导者。 他说,我们会慢下来,我们会深思熟虑,我们不会在功能障碍的基础上进行建设。 所以在一个非常严肃的时刻,当我试图找到我的背阔肌(lats: 背部最大的肌肉群之一)时——我当时很困惑,我没有——他看着我说——他叫我“布朗”。 他是一个非常严厉的人。 他说:“布朗,找到根基。” 我说,你是什么意思? 他说:“找到你的根基。” 于是我低头看地板,他说,不,不是地板。 找到你的根基。 用你的思想连接你的身体,感受脚下的地面。 我花了一分钟,但当我做到时,我感觉我触及到了一些东西,它既给了我一种真正的稳定感,也为我提供了完成他要求我做的事情所需的力量的跳板。 因此,“坚实根基”成为了我的座右铭,不仅在健身房里,也在重要会议前、与首席执行官(CEO)进行辅导前。 它非常明确地告诉我:好的,坚实根基。 找到你的运动姿态,在你的价值观中扎根,这不仅是为了稳定,也是为了敏捷。 因此,我认为,鉴于当前变化的速度和节奏,我们现在需要找到我们的根基。 既要提供稳定性——我的意思是,阿迪,问题是这样的。 我们的大脑神经生物学结构并非为现在发生的一切而设计。 我们的神经系统、我们的大脑讨厌不确定性。 它让行动偏见看起来微不足道。 现在,我们只是解决、解决、解决。 所以我认为根基就是那个地方——就像书中有关于臀部推球(tush push: 国家橄榄球联盟中一种通过团队协作,将持球人向前推进的战术,类似于橄榄球中的“争球”)的一章一样,我认为,根基的物理学原理正是我们现在所需要的。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: So the book is called Strong Ground, and, let's give it--listeners who haven't read it yet, what is Strong Ground exactly? Obviously, it's a big book, but, the short version, what is Strong Ground? And, how did you decide that was the concept that you really wanted to identify to drive this book? BRENE BROWN: It starts with pickleball, of course. ADI IGNATIUS: Of course. BRENE BROWN: Yeah. A tennis player for 30 years, I scoffed at pickleball for two years, and then it took me two games to start playing six days a week. So-- ADI IGNATIUS: I would do it, but I'm too young for pickleball. BRENE BROWN: I got whipped up on yesterday pretty bad by a couple of 20-year-olds. So it has its moments, for sure. I got injured. And when I went to a trainer, he told me I had no core, and that I was-- ADI IGNATIUS: Aw. BRENE BROWN: Yeah, which was rude, but yeah, he actually had me take a test, and he's like, scored a 10 out of 10. And I was like, of course, I did. And he said, no, a 10 out of 22. Sorry. And he said your physical age is like 77. I was like, oh, my God. And he said, and-- ADI IGNATIUS: A perfect 10. BRENE BROWN: Yeah. ADI IGNATIUS: Perfect 10 out of 22. BRENE BROWN: Yeah, exactly. And you don't have to be a researcher to be like, damn, that's bad. So he basically said, I had a compensatory injury, that I didn't have the big, strong muscles that I needed to do what I wanted to do on the court. So I was using inefficient muscle groups and I was getting hurt. And the more he talked, the more I thought about the leaders I work with. He said things like, we're going to go slow, we're going to be thoughtful, and we're not going to build on dysfunction. And so in a very serious moment, while I was trying to find my lats-- which I was confused, I didn't have--he looked at me and he said--he called me "Brown." He was a very tough guy. He said, "Brown, find the ground." And I said, what do you mean? He said, "Find the ground." So I looked down at the floor and he said, no, not the floor. Find your ground. Use your mind to connect with your body and feel the ground under your feet. And it took me a minute, but when I did it, I felt like I had tapped into something that both gave me a sense of real stability, but also a springboard for some power that I needed to do what he was asking me to do. And so "strong ground" became my mantra, not just in the gym, but also before a hard meeting, before coaching with a CEO. It was very much, OK, strong ground. Find your athletic stance, get grounded in your values, not just for stability, but also for agility. And so I think, right now, given the velocity, this pace of change, we need to find our ground. Both to provide stability--I mean, here's the thing, Adi. We're not neurobiologically wired for what's happening right now. Our nervous systems, our brains hate uncertainty. It makes an action bias look like nothing. Right now, we're just solve, solve solve. So I think the ground is that place--it's like if there's a chapter in the book on the tush push, just the physics of the ground, I think, is what we need right now.
牛顿物理学与领导力的隐喻
ADI IGNATIUS: 对于我们非常全球化的受众,我们将解释“臀部推球”是国家橄榄球联盟(National Football League)中的一种战术,但它涉及精密的团队合作,并且异常成功。 但无论如何,我只是—— BRENE BROWN: 它非常成功。 如果你不在美国,或者不是国家橄榄球联盟(National Football League)的球迷,我可以告诉你,它起源于英式橄榄球的争球(scrum)。 所以,这是一群人通过扎根于草地并共同推动来创造力量以移动球。 我之所以喜欢它作为领导力的隐喻,是因为它几乎难以防守,因为我们的想法是,如果我们越过这群人,他们正在创造力量并移动,那才是聪明的做法。 但教训,即牛顿物理学(Newtonian physics: 经典力学的基础,描述宏观物体运动的物理学理论),告诉我们当你与地面失去接触时,你的力量会完全耗尽。 因为力量不仅仅是你的体重,而是你的体重乘以对抗地面的推力。 所以我认为牛顿物理学对于我们现在所需的领导力来说是一个非常好的隐喻。 一个组织中的一群人坚定地扎根于他们的价值观,对使命非常清晰,对目标非常明确,朝着同一个方向努力,并且不脱离根基。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: For our very global audience, we will explain that "tush push" is a play in the National Football League, but it's a play that involves elaborate teamwork and is inordinately successful. But anyway, I'm just-- BRENE BROWN: It's very successful. And if you're not in the US or not a fan of the National Football League, I can tell you that where it came from is scrum in rugby. So it's a bunch of folks creating force to move a ball by grounding into the turf and pushing together. And why I love it as a metaphor for leadership is it's almost hard to defend because our thinking is if we go over this mass of people creating force and moving, that's smart. But the lesson, Newtonian physics, is when you lose touch with the ground, your force is completely depleted. Because force is not just your body weight, but your body weight times pushing against the ground. And so I think Newtonian physics is a really good leadership metaphor for what we need right now. A bunch of folks in an organization firmly planted in their values, very clear on mission, very clear on goals, pushing in the same direction, and not becoming untethered.
领导者的“口袋站位”
ADI IGNATIUS: 所以我们经常问领导者,你们希望从《哈佛商业评论》(HBR)得到什么? 我们能提供最有价值的内容是什么? 答案通常是,我们想看到其他人的例子,甚至是我们的竞争对手在某个关键时刻或解决某个问题时的例子。 人们说这就像看比赛录像(game tape: 体育比赛中用于分析战术和表现的录像)。 BRENE BROWN: 是的。 ADI IGNATIUS: 对吧? 这就是他们从中得到的。 所以你有一个短语——你使用“口袋站位”(pocket presence: 橄榄球中四分卫在传球时,在进攻锋线形成的“口袋”中保持冷静、观察和移动的能力)这个短语来形容领导者,我喜欢这个短语,因为它抓住了这个高度不确定、高度波动的时刻,以及你必须如何执行。 谈谈口袋站位。 BRENE BROWN: 是的,这很有趣,因为我成长在一个非常关注高管风范(executive presence: 指领导者在言行举止、形象气质等方面展现出的权威感和影响力)的时期。 作为一个研究者,对我来说,那是一个非常模糊的构造。 我不太——在最好的情况下,我也不完全理解它的含义。 在最坏的情况下,我认为它给“我们认为领导者应该是什么样子”引入了大量的偏见。 在这个非常有趣的时刻,我必须分享我给亚当·格兰特(Adam Grant)发了短信,我们是很好的朋友。 我说,嘿,我在书里批判高管风范可以吗? 我只收到了iPhone上的三个点,我心想,哦,不妙。 ADI IGNATIUS: 你有麻烦了。 BRENE BROWN: 是的,他会告诉我,别这么做。 他说,是的,绝对可以。 这是歧视内向者和女性的借口。 然后两秒钟后,他又说:“既然你都这么做了,能把魅力也批判一下吗?” 口袋站位是非常可观察、可衡量和可教授的。 它又是一个来自国家橄榄球联盟(National Football League)的术语。 它关乎一种集体能力。 在国家橄榄球联盟、大学橄榄球或高中橄榄球中,当四分卫接到球时,保护他的人大约有三秒钟的时间来保护他,然后大约1500磅的防守队员就会冲撞进来,他能否在非常短的时间内决定如何将球推进? 是跑、传球、还是交给队友,无论是什么。 在这个术语之下,我认为是我们今天所需要的。 第一,预判性思维(anticipatory thinking: 预测未来事件并据此做出决策的能力)。 他不会把球传给接球手所在的位置。 他会阅读球场,根据接球手的训练,把球传到接球手在一两秒后将要到达的位置。 第二,时间感知能力(temporal awareness: 对时间流逝和时间限制的准确感知和管理能力)。 我们完全低估了领导者的这项技能。 关于时间感知能力,有传言说,汤姆·布雷迪(Tom Brady),这位多年来新英格兰爱国者队(New England Patriots)的四分卫,拥有一个如此精确的内置时钟,他知道何时该放手传球。 他可以通过脚下场地的震动来判断周围保护他的人的位置。 我的意思是,这就是时间感知能力。 领导者需要时间感知能力。 我到底有多少时间? 如何在不失去紧迫感的情况下让我的团队放慢速度? 所以,预判性思维、时间感知能力,第三个重要的一点是——我认为这很难——那就是情境感知能力(situational awareness: 对周围环境、事件及其未来状态的理解和认知)。 我的团队在我们的组织内、在市场中、在地缘政治世界中处于什么系统? 这如何影响我们每天做出的决策? 所以我喜欢口袋站位作为团队的集体能力。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: So we often ask leaders, what is it you want from HBR? What is the most valuable kind of content we can give you? And the answer's often, we want to see examples of other people, of our competitors even, in some crucible moment or solving some problem. And people have said it's like watching game tape. BRENE BROWN: Yeah, ADI IGNATIUS: Right? That's kind of what they get out of it. So you have this phrase--use this phrase "pocket presence" for leaders, which I love that because it gets at this hyper uncertain, hyper volatile moment, but how you have to execute. Talk about pocket presence. BRENE BROWN: Yeah, it's interesting because I came up during a period of time where there was a lot of focus on executive presence. And that's a really gauzy construct for me as a researcher. I don't--at its best, I don't understand exactly what it means. At its worst, I think it introduces a ton of bias into what do we think a leader should look like. In this very funny moment, I have to share that I texted Adam Grant, and we're really good friends. And I said, hey, OK if I take down executive presence in the book? And I just got the three dots on the iPhone, I was like, oh, uh-oh. ADI IGNATIUS: You're in trouble. BRENE BROWN: Yeah, he's going to tell me, don't do it. And he said, yes, absolutely. It's cover for discriminating against introverts in women. And then two seconds later, "And while you're at it, could you take down charisma, as well? Pocket presence is very observable and measurable and teachable. And it's a term out of again, the National Football League. It's about a collective competency. A quarterback is said to have pocket presence in the National Football League or College Football, high school football, when he gets the ball, the folks who protect him have about three seconds to protect him before, like, 1,500 pounds defenders come crashing in, and can he, in a very short amount of time, make decisions about how to move the ball down the field? Run it, pass it, hand it off, whatever it is. And underneath this term is what I think we need today. One, anticipatory thinking. He doesn't throw the ball to where the receiver is. He reads the field and throws the ball to where the receiver is going to be in a second or two seconds, based on their training. Two, temporal awareness. We completely underestimate this skill set for leaders. Temporal awareness, the rumor has it, that Brady--Tom Brady, the quarterback for the Patriots for many years--had an internal clock that was so precise, he knew exactly when to let go of the ball. And he could tell where the people were around him, protecting him by the shaking of the field through his feet. I mean, this is temporal presence. Leaders need temporal presence. How much time do I really have here? How do I slow down my team without losing a sense of urgency? So anticipatory awareness, temporal awareness, and the third big one is--and this is, I think, a hard one--which is situational awareness. What system is my team sitting in within our organization, within the market, and within the geopolitical world? And how does that impact our decisions that we make every day? So I love pocket presence as a collective competency for teams.
培养模式识别与“扎实的自信”
ADI IGNATIUS: 所以这其中一部分也必须是模式识别(pattern recognition: 识别和理解数据或事件中重复出现的规律或特征的能力)。 你一遍又一遍地做这件事。 我最喜欢的四分卫——我是华盛顿指挥官队(Washington Commanders)的球迷,所以杰登·丹尼尔斯(Jayden Daniels)——他是个孩子,他才第二年,他令人难以置信。 但他似乎与众不同的一点,一项独特的技能是,他基本上使用一种虚拟现实(VR)设备(VR set: 一种提供沉浸式虚拟体验的头戴式显示器),这样——他一整天,即使不在球场上,也没有其他人可以一起玩,他基本上都在体验你所描述的一切:你只有几秒钟的时间,1500磅的敌人向你压来,然而你却能看到整个球场。 我很感兴趣,高管们是如何培养——他们是如何获得这种模式识别能力的? 我的意思是,你必须在工作中学习。 你不能真的假装做到。 但他们是如何培养这项技能的? BRENE BROWN: 这是这本书中最大的一章,也是我职业生涯中写过的最难的一章——我写过很多书和很多章节,但——这一章是关于我所说的“扎实的自信”(grounded confidence: 一种基于自我认知、价值观和技能的稳定自信)。 我之所以达到这个结论,是通过最初关于勇敢领导力的领导力研究,我的假设完全错了。 我一生中从未错得如此离谱。 我们研究了150位变革型领导者(transformational leaders: 能够激励和鼓舞追随者超越自身利益,为组织目标而努力的领导者),我们通过以下方式定义并实践了变革型领导者:他们创造了令竞争对手羡慕的业绩成果,并且拥有人们乐意工作的文化。 这让我感到震惊,因为在我30年的定性研究生涯中,这是第一次,当我们询问全球150位来自不同行业的领导者:“领导力的未来是什么?” 他们给出了相同的答案。 那就是,我们必须拥有更勇敢的领导者和更具勇气的文化。 我的假设(hypothesis: 基于现有知识对某一现象提出的可验证的解释)是,勇敢领导力的最大障碍是恐惧。 阿迪,我告诉你一个我永远不会忘记的时刻。 它深深地刻在我的脑海里。 我当时坐在其中一位领导者对面,向他反馈研究结果。 他说,让我非常清楚地说明。 如果你正在创建一个勇敢领导者的名单,并且你将其定义为不感到恐惧的人,请不要把我列入你的名单。 我每天都感到害怕。 我当时想,什么? 所以,恐惧并不是勇敢领导力的障碍。 结果是盔甲(armor: 个人为了自我保护而采取的防御机制或行为模式)。 那是我们害怕时保护自己的方式,当我们没有情绪觉察(emotional awareness: 识别和理解自己情绪的能力)来表达时,天哪,我现在很害怕。 我正在做出基于稀缺的决策。 我没有充分思考。 所以我们用扎实的自信来取代盔甲。 而扎实的自信的一项重要技能——它是由30项技能和心态组成的集合——就是模式识别,正如你所说的。 换个说法,它就是直觉(intuition: 不通过逻辑推理而直接获得的洞察力或判断力)。 关于我们是应该听从直觉还是使用数据,存在很大的争议。 我最近看到杰夫·贝佐斯(Jeff Bezos)说,如果数据和我的直觉发生冲突,我会选择我的直觉。 但实际上,直觉和模式识别并非如此运作。 它是一个认知过程(cognitive process: 大脑处理信息、获取知识和解决问题的过程),你的大脑会非常迅速地筛选数百个文件,以识别你以前遇到过的模式——你是如何处理的,以及什么是成功的? 领导者培养模式识别能力最好的方法之一——因为我们不看录像。 没有什么可看的。 这在体育运动中更容易——是确保当某个决定、战略或绩效指标出现失败、挫折或失望时,能够公开讨论。 而且,这种讨论是关于学习和巩固学习的。 因为你正在做的是创建一个心理文件系统,它能磨练模式识别能力。 所以,如果你想提高模式识别能力,围绕艰难的学习进行开放式对话是关键。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: So part of this has to be pattern recognition, too. You're doing it over and over again. So my favorite quarterback--I'm a Washington Commanders fan, so Jayden Daniels is--he's a kid, he's in his second year, and he is incredible. But one of the things that seems to differentiate him, differentiated skill, is he basically uses a kind of a VR set thing, where--so all day long, even when he's not on the field and he doesn't have anybody else to play with, he's basically experiencing everything you're describing, where you have a couple seconds, 1,500 pounds enemies is bearing down on you, and yet, somehow, you see the whole field. And I'm interested, how do executives develop--how do they get that kind of pattern recognition? I mean, you got to learn on the job. You can't really do it. pretend. But how do they develop that skill? BRENE BROWN: The biggest chapter in the book and was the hardest chapter I've ever written in my career--and I've written I've written a lot of books and a lot of chapters, but--it was a chapter on what I call "grounded confidence." And how I got there is through the initial leadership study on courageous leadership, where my hypothesis was completely wrong. I've never been more wrong in my life. So we studied 150 transformational leaders, and we defined and operationalized transformative leaders by leaders who created performance results that were enviable by their competitors and had cultures where people wanted to work. And it was shocking to me because it was the first time in my 30-year career as a qualitative researcher that when we asked 150 leaders across the world, different industries, "What's the future of leadership?", they had the same answer. Which is, we must have braver leaders and more courageous cultures. My hypothesis was the biggest barrier to courageous leadership is fear. And, Adi, I'll tell you just a moment that I'll never forget. It's just etched in my mind. I was sitting across from one of those leaders, kind of playing back the findings to him. And he said, let me be very clear. If you're creating a list of courageous leaders, and you're defining that as people who don't feel fear, don't put me on your list. I'm afraid every day. And I was like, what? So it's not fear that is the barrier to courageous leadership. It turns out that it's armor. It's how we protect ourselves when we're afraid, when we don't have the emotional awareness to say, shoot, I'm in fear right now. I'm making scarcity-based decisions. I'm not thinking fully. So what we replace armor with is grounded confidence. And one of the big grounded confidence skills--it's a collection of 30 skills and mindsets--was pattern recognition, just what you named. And by another name, it's intuition. There's a big debate about whether, do we use our gut or do we use data? I just watched something recently where Jeff Bezos said, if it comes down to data or my gut, I'm going with my gut. But it's actually not how intuition and pattern recognition works. It's a cognitive process where your mind filters through a hundred files very quickly to recognize a pattern where you've been there before--how did you handle it and what was successful? One of the greatest ways that leaders can develop pattern recognition--because we don't watch tape. There's nothing to watch. Makes it easier in sport--is to make sure when there's a failure or a setback or a disappointment around a decision, a strategy, or a performance metric, that there's open discussion about that. And that, that discussion is about learning and embedding the learning. Because what you're doing is you're creating a mental file system that sharpens pattern recognition. And so if you want to increase pattern recognition, open conversations around hard learnings is key.
卸下盔甲:拥抱恐惧与自我觉察
ADI IGNATIUS: 太棒了。 是的,我的意思是,看,我们都想成为史蒂夫·乔布斯(Steve Jobs)。 我不需要那些讨厌的焦点小组(focus groups: 一种市场研究方法,通过小组讨论收集目标受众的意见和反馈),对吧? BRENE BROWN: 是的。 ADI IGNATIUS: 但我认为你所谈论的是,有一些过程可以让你更聪明,让你的机构更聪明。 不过,我想回到你关于盔甲的说法,因为我认为这很重要。 打破盔甲的想法,我的意思是,这是青少年心理学(adolescent psychology: 研究青少年时期心理发展和行为的学科)、神经生物学、英雄之旅(hero's journey: 神话学中描述主人公经历一系列冒险、成长并最终回归的普遍模式)等经典主题。 BRENE BROWN: 是的。 ADI IGNATIUS: 但盔甲会回来,对吧? 我们用盔甲把自己包裹起来,是的,为了感到安全。 我想,我很想听听你关于如何将恐惧视为积极因素的看法? 我一直认为,如果你感到焦虑,那意味着事情很重要,并以此为基础发展。 但盔甲会回来,你如何持续地尝试打破那些阻碍你成为领导者的盔甲? BRENE BROWN: 在过去的六年里,我们通过“敢于领导”(Dare to Lead)的勇敢领导力项目培训了来自45个国家的15万名领导者。 我们从中学到了很多数据,因为我们收集所有数据。 这看起来很简单,但也很困难,需要勇气。 如果你不知道你的盔甲是什么,并且不认识你使用或寻求它的情境,你就无法有效地开始剥离你的盔甲。 我想说——你提到英雄之旅和青少年心理学很有趣。 我想说,中年(midlife: 人生中期的阶段,通常指30多岁到60多岁)最大的发展里程碑(developmental milestone: 在特定年龄段预期达到的重要发展成就或能力)是一个时刻,我们所有人都会说这不再有用了。 这在我小时候保护了我。 它在我二三十岁时,在我获取和积累、试图弄清楚我是谁的那些年里保护了我。 但它很紧,很重。 我甚至不知道这里面是谁了。 而且它不起作用了。 所以,我认为,作为领导者,我们做的第一件事就是让他们经历一个过程,你必须识别它是什么? 比如,对我来说,我的盔甲——我有很多盔甲。 强度。 我变得超级紧张。 因为我是一个创始人兼首席执行官(CEO),当我变得超级紧张时,我周围的人就会安静下来并走开。 这与我做出正确决策所需的一切恰恰相反。 但我正在自我保护。 我微观管理(micromanage: 对下属的工作进行过度细致的控制和干预)。 我进入了你从未见过的最糟糕的创始人模式。 我会选择字体。 我会检查你的电子邮件。 我会选择颜色。 我变得非常完美主义。 我变得过于果断,这很奇怪。 所以很多人都有分析瘫痪(analysis paralysis: 因过度分析而无法做出决策的状态)。 我只是坐在会议里说,不,我们不做那个。 移动那个。 改变那个。 那些承认,不,我们在这里转向。 不要那样做。 然后我会抬头说,哦,天哪。 我想我有点害怕了。 我们不要做那些事情。 我的团队对此回应说,当你这样行事时,我们什么都不写下来。 是的,但我认为,如果你有一个你真正爱和信任的同事以外的人,问这个问题是勇敢的。 当我感到恐惧并穿上盔甲时,我会有哪些行为?
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: That's great. Yeah, I mean, look, we all want to be Steve Jobs. I don't need no stinking focus groups, right? BRENE BROWN: Yeah. ADI IGNATIUS: But I think what you're talking about is there are processes that can make you smarter, can make your institutions smarter. I want to get back, though, to what you said about armor, because I think that's important. The idea of breaking down armor, I mean, it's a classic of, I don't know, adolescent psychology, neurobiology, the hero's journey, all these things. BRENE BROWN: Yeah. ADI IGNATIUS: But the armor comes back, right? And we wrap ourselves in armor, yeah, to feel safe. And I guess, I'd love your thoughts on how do you embrace fear as a positive? I always thought if you're anxious, that means it matters and build on that. But the armor comes back and how do you perpetually try to break away the armor that holds you back as a leader? BRENE BROWN: Over the past six years, we've taken 150,000 leaders across 45 countries through the Dare to Lead programming around courageous leadership, the training. And we got a lot of data from that, because we collect data on everything. And it seems simple, but it's also difficult and requires courage. You cannot effectively start peeling off your armor if you don't know what it is and you don't recognize the situations in which you use it or reach for it. I would say--it's interesting that you mentioned the hero's journey and adolescent psychology. I would say that the greatest developmental milestone of midlife is a moment meant where all of us say this no longer serves. This kept me safe as a kid growing up. It kept me safe in my 20s and 30s in my years of acquisition and acquirement and trying to figure out who I am. But it's tight and it's heavy. I don't even who's under here anymore. And it's not working. And so I think, one of the first things that we do as leaders is we take them through a process where you have to identify what it is? Like, for me, my armor--I have lots of armor. Intensity. I get super intense. And because I'm a founder and a CEO, when I get super intense, the people around me get quiet and move away. The exact opposite of what I need to make good decisions. But I'm self-protecting. I micromanage. I go into the worst kind of founder mode you've ever seen. I will pick the font. I will check your email. I will pick the color. And I get very perfectionistic. And I get overly decisive, which is weird. So a lot of people have analysis paralysis. I just sit in a meeting and go, no, we're not doing that. Move that. Change that. The admissions, no, we're pivoting here. Don't do that. And then I'll look up and say, oh, crap. I think I'm in some fear. Let's not do those things. To which my team responds, we don't write anything down when you're acting this way. Yeah, but I think, if there's someone that you really love and trust outside of work, it's a brave question to ask. What kind of behaviors do I engage in when I'm in fear and I'm armoring up?
领导力与管理为何依然艰难?
ADI IGNATIUS: 《哈佛商业评论》(HBR)已经存在了一百多年。 您几十年来一直在撰写关于我们珍视的许多主题的畅销书。 还有数百万来自其他来源的好想法,它们基于研究,并且经过测试。 为什么我们在领导力和管理方面仍然做得不好? 我们可以指出一两个例子,这个人确实做得很好。 但大多数例子都是反面指标。 为什么我们对这些您和我花费如此多时间研究、撰写、试图分享最佳实践等的事情做得不够好? BRENE BROWN: 因为我们是谁,决定了我们如何领导。 我不在乎学者是谁,也不在乎方法是什么,如果你没有非常显著的自我觉察(self-awareness: 对自己的思想、感受和行为的理解)、情绪颗粒度(emotional granularity: 能够识别和区分自己不同情绪状态的能力)、情绪觉察、系统思维,我认为,领导起来会非常非常困难。 而且我认为我们宁愿做任何其他事情,也不愿弄清楚我们是如何阻碍自己的。 所以,要带领一群人,带着一个非常严肃的目标、一个严肃的使命、巨大的压力、大量的外部和内部复杂性,让这群人带着力量和目标朝着同一个方向前进,这是一件长期以来非常非凡的事情,它需要真正了解自己以及人类是如何运作的。 我认为你可以在短期内通过权力、恐惧和外部奖励来挤出良好的绩效和增长,无论你的衡量标准是什么。 但如果你想要长期和有意义的东西,它必须是内在的,它必须关乎自我觉察,我认为这很难。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: HBR has been around for more than 100 years. You have been writing best-selling books on a lot of the topics we hold dear for decades. And there are millions of ideas coming from other sources that are good ideas, and they're research-based, and they're tested. Why are we still not very good at leadership and not very good at management? We can point to one or two examples of this person really nails it. But most of the examples are counter indicators. Why are we not better at these things that you and I spend so much time researching, writing about, trying to share best practices, et cetera? BRENE BROWN: Because who we are is how we lead. And I don't care who the scholar is or what the approach is, if you don't have a very significant level of self-awareness, emotional granularity, emotional awareness, systems thinking, I think, it's very, very tough to lead. And I think we'd rather do pretty much anything other than figure out how we're getting in our own way. And so to take a group of people with a very serious goal, a serious mission, a lot of pressure, a lot of external and internal complexity, and get this group of people to move in the same direction with power and purpose is an extraordinary thing to do over a long period of time, and requires really understanding yourself and how human beings work. And I think you can squeeze good performance and growth, whatever your metric is, on a short-term basis with power over fear, external reward. But if you want something long-term and meaningful, it's got to be intrinsic, and it's got to be about self-awareness, and I think that's hard.
成为更有效领导者的实践建议
ADI IGNATIUS: 对于那些正在听这个节目,并认为“是的,尽管这听起来像是一段漫长的旅程,但如果我想在这些领域取得进步,人们现在可以做些什么,可以思考些什么来成为更有效的领导者?” BRENE BROWN: 我会从这里开始。 我认为人们现在过得不好,阿迪。 我认为我们现在集体失调(dysregulated: 情绪或生理系统失去平衡和调节能力)、不信任(distrustful: 缺乏信任)和脱节(disconnected: 感到与他人或环境缺乏联系)。 我认为这使得现在的领导工作特别困难。 如果我能挥舞魔杖改变一件事,改变领导者拥有的一项技能,我会说,弄清楚如何在没有时间的情况下创造时间。 弄清楚如何深呼吸,挑战自己的思维或行为,或者你如何表现。 当做出重大决策或制定战略时,你如何深呼吸并让房间慢下来,以便深思熟虑? 对正在发生的事情进行事前验尸(pre-mortem: 在项目开始前假设项目失败,并分析可能导致失败的原因)? 邀请红队(red team: 模拟对抗性思维的团队,旨在识别计划中的弱点和漏洞)来审视你的决策? 让自己平静下来。 深呼吸,让周围的人也平静下来。 我认为这是一个挑战,但如果你能从那里开始——没有自我反思,没有自我觉察,没有明智的战略,没有人工智能方法,没有扎实的思考,就什么都没有。 所以,深呼吸,放慢速度——我指的是几分钟,而不是几个月。 最让我害怕的是——老实说——这在我现在接触的公司中非常普遍,我现在在四个不同行业的公司工作。 其中三家——是的,三家——一家是美国本土的。 其中三家是全球性的——我一遍又一遍地听到的一件事,可能导致我给出这个答案,那就是:我没有时间思考。 我的意思是,这很危险。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: To people who are listening to this who are thinking, yeah, although this sounds like quite a journey, if I want to make progress in these areas, what are some things people can do, can think about right now to become more effective leaders? BRENE BROWN: I would start with this. I don't think people are OK, Adi. I don't think we're OK right now. I think collectively, we are dysregulated, distrustful, and disconnected. And I think that makes leading particularly difficult right now. If I could wave a magic wand and change one thing, one skill set that leaders had, I would say, figure out what it takes to create time where none exists. Figure out how to take a breath and challenge your own thinking or your behavior or how you're showing up. When there's a big decision or strategy being made, how do you take a deep breath and slow a room down to be thoughtful? To run a pre-mortem on what's happening? To invite a red team in to take a look at your decision-making? Settle yourself. And take a deep breath and settle the people around you. And I think that's a challenge, but if you can start there--there's no self-reflection, there's no self-awareness, there's no smart strategy, there's no AI approach, there's nothing without grounded thinking. So to take a deep breath and slow things down--and I'm talking about minutes. I'm not talking about months. And what really scares me the most--and this is, to be honest with you--very ubiquitous with the companies I'm in right now, I'm in four different companies right now across different industries. Three of them--yeah, three of them--one is US-based. Three of them are global--and the thing that I hear over and over, which probably led me to this answer to your question was, I don't have time to think about it. I mean, dangerous.
寻找个人与职业的“坚实根基”
ADI IGNATIUS: 您现在觉得自己站在坚实根基上吗? BRENE BROWN: 一直都吗? 不。 我是否越来越善于识别我何时不在坚实根基上,以及这对我个人和职业造成的代价? 是的,我清楚自己何时站在坚实根基上,也清楚何时不在。 大约一个月前,我与一支橄榄球队合作。 我请了几位进攻线队员上来。 我让他们踮起脚尖,然后单脚站立。 我说,我要推你们。 我推了他们的肩膀,他们就倒下了。 当然,他们的队友都说,天哪,她把你搞定了。 然后我说——我问每个队员,告诉我你们的价值观。 你们的两个主要价值观是什么? 他们告诉我了。 我说,把你的左脚放在一个价值观上,把你的右脚放在另一个价值观上。 我说,我想看看我能不能移动你们。 那就像推一堵混凝土墙。 所以,我们再次处于失调、不信任和脱节的状态。 而我们需要开始调节、信任和重新连接的第一个地方是,将自己与比我们更大的事物连接起来,它同时提供稳定性和敏捷性。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: And do you feel you're on strong ground now? BRENE BROWN: All the time? No. Am I getting better at recognizing when I'm not and the cost of that to me, personally and professionally? Yes, I am aware of when I'm on strong ground, and I'm aware of when I'm not. I was working with a football team about a month ago. And I asked a couple of the offensive linemen to come up. And I asked them to get on their tippy toes, and then on one foot. And I said, I'm going to push you. And I pushed them into the shoulders and they fell over. And of course, all their teammates were like, damn, she got you. Then I said--I asked each of the players, tell me your values. What are your two big values? And they told me what they were. And I said, plant your left foot in one value, plant your right foot in the other value. And I said, I want to see if I can move you. And it was like pushing into a concrete wall. And so, we are, again, dysregulated, distrusting, and disconnected. And the first place we need to start regulating, trusting, and reconnecting is ourself to something bigger than us, that provides stability and agility at the same time.
ADI IGNATIUS: 我会带您去康涅狄格州新伦敦,和我的垒球队谈谈。 您可以告诉我们如何在每次跑向一垒时都不拉伤腿筋。 BRENE BROWN: 哦,天哪。 是的,我的意思是,那就是会发生的事情。 那是真实的。 ADI IGNATIUS: 布琳·布朗,感谢您今天做客《IdeaCast》。 BRENE BROWN: 非常荣幸。 谢谢您的邀请。
View/Hide Original English
ADI IGNATIUS: I'm going to bring you down to talk to my softball team in New London, Connecticut. You can tell us how to run to first base without pulling a hamstring every time. BRENE BROWN: Oh, God. Yeah, I mean, that's what happens. And that's real. ADI IGNATIUS: Brené Brown, thank you for being our guest today on IdeaCast. BRENE BROWN: What a pleasure. Thank you for having me.