如何直面内心评判:阿努·古普塔谈消除偏见之路 TED 2026-04-08

偏见:被视作“想法”而非“真人”的痛苦

阿努·古普塔: 在德里长大时,我的小镇经常处于警察封锁状态。因为种族紧张局势,我们无法离开家。在学校里,我会问老师:“为什么会这样?”他们会说:“因为那些人是坏人。”等等,他们哪里坏了?“他们和我们不一样。他们是另类。”

搬到纽约后,我成了“那些人”。显然,我是崇拜牛的人。显然,我很愚蠢、肮脏、丑陋。在我开口说话之前,这些定义就被当作事实接受了。一切都仅仅基于我的长相。于是我决定尽快同化,成为一名美国人。我改变了口音,改变了穿着方式。我甚至用了“安迪(Andy)”这个名字。然而,仅仅走在街上或坐地铁时,我还是经常听到:“嘿,奥萨马(Osama),滚回你来的地方去。”每当我听到这些,我的心都碎了。我已经改变了关于自己能改变的一切。

多年来,我一直选择无视它。我在科学中寻找安慰。高中时,**人类基因组计划(Human Genome Project)**证明了种族只是一个故事,无论外表如何,人类的基因 99.9% 都是相同的。但在情感上,我开始感到与同龄人以及这个我称之为家的国家脱节。随着时间推移,我无法想象这样生活下去。于是,八年前,我站在 18 楼窗户的边缘,打算跳下去。

当我站在那里看着下面像甲虫一样小的汽车时,我脑中闪过一个念头。**人们把我简化成的那些刻板印象只是“想法”,它们不是真的。我意识到人们并没有看到我——我的荣誉、我的创业、我的律师身份。人们看到的是关于我的“想法”,正是这些想法让我这些年来一直处于抑郁和偏执之中。我意识到我并不孤单。我不想生活在一个我们生活在彼此“想法”中的世界。我想生活在一个我们生活在彼此“真实存在”中的世界,面对真实的人。这就是我致力于消除偏见(Breaking Bias)**的原因。

大家好,我是阿努·古普塔(Anu Gupta),《消除偏见》一书的作者。这本书由**达赖喇嘛(Dalai Lama)**作序。我还是 Be More 公司的创始人,这是一家旨在培训个人和组织在工作场所和社区中建立归属感的初创公司。

Original English

Anu Gupta: When I was growing up in Delhi, my town was often under police lockdown. We couldn't leave our homes because of ethnic tensions. So at school, I'd ask my teachers, "Why is this happening?" They'd say, "Because those people are bad." Wait, what's bad about them? They're not like us. They're different.

After moving to New York, I became those people. Apparently, I worshipped cows. Apparently, I was stupid, dirty, ugly. These definitions were accepted as fact before I even said a word. All based on the way I looked. So I decided to assimilate and become American as quickly as possible. I changed my accent. I changed the way I dressed. I even went by the name Andy. Yet all too often, just walking down the street or riding the subway, I'd hear, "Hey, Osama, go back to where you came from." Every time I heard that, my heart sank. I'd already changed everything I could possibly change about myself.

For years, I just ignored it. I took comfort in the science. When I was in high school, the Human Genome Project proved that race is a story, that people are 99.9% genetically identical, regardless of what we look like. But emotionally, I began to feel disconnected from my peers and the country I now called my own. Over time, I just couldn't imagine living this way. So, eight years ago, I found myself on the ledge of my 18th floor window, contemplating jumping off.

As I stood there looking at the teeny tiny cars below, I had a flash of insight. The stereotypes people reduce me to are just ideas. They're not true. I realized people aren't seeing me. Honor, entrepreneur, lawyer—people are seeing ideas of me, and it was those ideas that kept me depressed and paranoid all these years. And I realized I wasn't alone. I don't want to live in a world where we live in ideas of one another. I want to live in a world where we live in the presence of one another, the real people. This is why I've committed my life to breaking bias. Hi, my name is Anu Gupta and I'm the author of Breaking Bias, with a foreword by His Holiness the Dalai Lama, and I'm also the founder of Be More, a startup company that trains individuals and organizations in building belonging within workplaces and communities.

达赖喇嘛的“精神护盾”与内在修习

主持人: 我想我们先从序言开始。一本书能请到达赖喇嘛作序是非常不寻常的。这一定是很高的荣誉。这是如何实现的?

阿努·古普塔: 的确如此。我觉得这是这项工作的“精神护盾”。我们正生活在一个非常不确定的时代,不仅在美国,全世界的两极分化和分裂都在加剧。我想圣尊在读完这本书后,真切地感受到了这一点和这本书的潜力。他愿意为此署名,因为和他一样,我坚信 21 世纪不仅仅关乎技术创新,更关乎内在发展,特别是“热诚之心(warm-heartedness)”的培养,以及我在书中提到的其他工具。

主持人: 尤其是在当前的政治环境下,感觉“热诚之心”或者“多元、公平与包容(DEI)”似乎并不顺风顺水。目前这些理念似乎并不占据主流地位。你如何适应这种从广泛的文化支持到现在的文化压制的转变?

阿努·古普塔: 对我来说,这真是一份礼物,尤其是利用正念佛教心智科学神经科学。这项消除偏见的工作关乎“深度时间(deep time)”和人类意识的进化。我就是这样看待它的。我也非常了解历史,了解我们物种不仅在一百年前,而且在千年前、万年前的处境。了解那种“深度时间”真的给了我安慰,让我知道这正是我们成为更好的人的方式。消除偏见不仅仅是一条植根于社会正义或公平的路径,它实际上是通往更高利润、成功、归属感和疗愈的路径。

Original English

Host: I guess let's start with that, which is it's pretty unusual for a book to have a foreword by the Dalai Lama. That must be a big honor, and also how did that come about?

Anu Gupta: Indeed, I feel like it's a spiritual shield for this work. You know, we're living in these quite uncertain times where there's just such rise of polarization and division, not just in the US, but around the world. And I think His Holiness, after he read the book, really felt that and the potential of this book. And he wanted to lend his name to this work because, like him, I believe that the 21st century isn't just about technological innovation. It's really about inner development, particularly a development of warm-heartedness and other tools that I talk a lot about in the book.

Host: It is not a moment in the world, especially politically, where it feels like warm-heartedness or diversity, equity, and inclusion... they don't have, let's put it, the winds behind them. The wind is not in the sails of those concepts at the moment. So how do you adjust to going from a time where there was kind of broad cultural support for these ideas to now broad cultural repression of these ideas?

Anu Gupta: I think what's been a real gift for me, particularly using the mindfulness and the Buddhist mind sciences and the neuroscience, is that the gift of time... this work of breaking bias, it's really about deep time and the evolution of human consciousness. I look at it that way. I'm also really aware of history and where our species has been, not just a hundred years ago but a thousand years ago, 10,000 years ago. So knowing that deep time really gives me comfort that this is really how we become better humans. Breaking bias is not just a path that's rooted in social justice or fairness. It's really a path to more profitability, to success, to belonging, to healing, and so many other things.

偏见与生态:从地质尺度看待人类

主持人: 在你的书《消除偏见》中,有一点非常有趣:你没有仅仅把偏见局限于“我们现在该做什么”的狭窄框架,而是追溯到了数百万年前。你甚至谈到了地球的地质形成。这可不是我预想中的关于偏见书籍的内容。

阿努·古普塔: 是的,很有意思。当我们思考偏见时,往往只想到人类之间的关系,但我们也必须转变我们与自然、与生命地球、与所谓的“非人生命(more than human beings)”——动物、鸟类、鱼类、昆虫,整个生态系统的关系。我们正生活在“人类世(Anthropocene)”,人类变得如此强大,以至于给生态造成了巨大的破坏。

所以我认为,当我们思考偏见时,当然会想到种族主义、性别歧视、反犹主义、伊斯兰恐惧症、跨性别恐惧症等标准的人类偏见,但我们也必须包括“生物恐惧症(biophobia)”——对地球的深层仇恨、统治地球的欲望,以及“物种歧视”。那些与我们共享星球的其他生命呢?回到地质时代,观察我们作为一个物种是如何进化的,真的很有帮助。这让我们把所有其他生物视为我们的亲人。消除偏见不仅能改善人际关系,它还是我们面临的每一个个人、地方和全球问题的根源解决方案,无论是气候变化、生态破坏,还是两极分化、虚假信息和民主制度的崩溃。偏见,正是所有这些挑战的基础。

Original English

Host: So your book Breaking Bias, one of the things that I think is so interesting about this is that instead of it just looking at bias and how to be more inclusive in a kind of narrow framework of "what do we do right now?" I mean, you quite literally go back millions of years. We're talking about like the geological formation of the earth, which is not what I expected from a book about bias.

Anu Gupta: Yeah, it's interesting, right? Because when we think about bias, we think about our relationships with each other as human beings. But we have to also shift our relationship with nature, with the living earth, with what's known as "more than human beings"—you know, animals, birds, fish, insects, the whole ecology of things. And we're living through a time of the Anthropocene, right? Where human beings have become so powerful that we have caused so much destruction to ecology. So I think for me, when I think about bias, of course we think about racism, sexism, anti-semitism, islamophobia, transphobia, and the standard human-based biases. But I think we also have to include biophobia—like deep hatred of the earth, the need to dominate the earth, speciesism... you know, what about the other beings with whom we share this planet? And I think for me going back into geological time and just seeing how we as a species have evolved has really been helpful to really think about all these other living beings as our kin and how breaking bias isn't just something that will enhance human relationships, but it's really the root cause or root solution to every single problem we face individually, locally, and globally. Whether it's climate change or ecological destructions or of course polarization, misinformation, breakdown of democracy, bias is really the building block of all these challenges.

从剑桥到生死边缘:偏见的个人代价

主持人: 你是因为自己的背景和身份才投入这项工作的。请讲讲你的个人经历。

阿努·古普塔: 我是美国的移民。10 岁随家人搬到这里。很多谩骂指向我,说我是异教徒、野蛮人、恐怖分子。9/11 之后,我在纽约,街上有人叫我“奥萨马·本·拉登(Osama bin Laden)”,让我滚回老家。作为一个年轻人,我不知道如何应对。这些话题并不光鲜,所以我选择了压抑。我想,只要我在学术和专业上表现卓越,我就能在新家取得成功。我也确实做到了。我读了大学,去了剑桥大学读研究生,以全班第一名的成绩毕业,然后去了法学院。

在那段日子里,我一直在探寻:什么是偏见?为什么人们仅仅因为彼此的存在就如此残忍?我用法学院学习人权法、民权法,研究那些塑造了我们的案例法、立法和国际规范。但每当我谈到自己遭受偏见的经历时,得到的往往是死寂、尴尬的停顿,甚至经常是“煤气灯操纵(gaslighting)”——对我情绪的否定。那时我才 20 出头,从未接受过心理咨询或任何疗愈,我完全沉溺在自己的大脑中。我开始相信,也许人们说的关于我的一切都是真的。

那不仅仅是社会对我多重交叉身份的叙述,还成了我对自己的理解。因为我当时正试图摆脱“棕色人种”、“移民”和“同性恋”这些身份。我还没出柜。就在法学院二年级开学前,我站在 18 楼窗户的边缘准备跳下去。那天晚上最奇怪的是,我确实跳了。但我无法解释这是为什么,感谢上帝,我还活着。因为我没有向前倒,而是向后倒回了公寓里。

在那一刻,我想起给一个朋友打电话,她是一位远在哈莱姆区的亚裔美国酷儿朋友。如果你了解纽约的话,我当时在中城,她住在哈莱姆区,但那个时刻她刚好走在我家那条街上。她乘电梯来到 18 楼,在我的公寓里坐了几个小时。第二天,我开始了我的“消除偏见”之旅。我心想:“天哪,我差点就不存在了。”

Original English

Host: You've come to this work because of who you are and your background. Tell me about that. What is the personal history that brings you to this?

Anu Gupta: I am an immigrant to the United States. My family moved to the US when I was 10 years old. A lot of the slurs became directed at me for being a heathen, being a pagan, being a terrorist. You know, after 9/11, I was in New York City and I would just have people call me Osama bin Laden on the street and ask me to go back to where I came from. As a young person, I didn't know how to deal with any of these things. These things weren't sexy to talk about. So, I would just repress them. I would just be like, "Okay, well, let's just ignore them. They're just ignorant." And go about my way. And the way I thought I could really succeed in this new home of mine was to excel academically, professionally, which I did. You know, I went to college, I went to grad school at Cambridge, graduating top of my class, then went off to law school. And throughout this time, I was kind of following the thread of what is this thing called bias? Why are people cruel to one another just for no other reason than they're being? And it was in law school to study human rights law, civil rights law, and we're studying like all of the case law that has made us who we are, civil rights legislation, international human rights norms. But whenever I would talk about my own experiences with bias, I would just meet dead silence, awkward pauses, and often times gaslighting, basically denial of my own emotions. So I was a young 20-some year old person and never been to therapy, had never done any kind of healing work. I was just in my head and I started believing that maybe everything what people are saying about me is true. It wasn't just the societal narratives about my humanity because of my intersectional identities, but it was actually my own understanding of who I was because I was trying to go away from being brown, being an immigrant, being gay. I was still closeted. And it was actually right before the second year of my law school, I found myself on the ledge of my 18th floor window about to jump off. And the interesting thing about that night is I did jump. But I have no explanation for this, but for the grace of God, I'm alive. Because instead of falling forward, I fell backwards into my apartment. And within that moment, I just thought to call a friend, another queer Asian-American person and who lived quite far away from me. If you all know New York, I was in Midtown and she lived in Harlem, but she happened to be walking on my block that very moment. She just took the elevator up to the 18th floor, sat in my apartment for hours. And the next day, I began my own breaking bias journey. I was like, "Whoa, I can't believe I was almost not going to exist."

PRISM 框架:重构大脑的五个工具

主持人: 你提到这些“技术”,这些我们已经拥有了数千年的技术,能举些例子吗?

阿努·古普塔: 好的。对于帮助消除偏见的模式,我称之为 PRISM,这是由五个工具组成的首字母缩写。这是一种基于正念、结合身体感知的练习。

  1. M - Mindfulness(正念): 即对当下的察觉。仅仅去注意接踵而来的事物,无论是呼吸、念头、情绪,尤其是身体的感觉。偏见实际上存在于身体里,在我们的身体得到治愈之前,我们无法真正建立归属感。所有古老的技术——即智慧传统,无论是基督教、犹太教、印度教还是伊斯兰教,都说过:“静默,并知道我是(Be still and know that I am)。”
  2. S - Stereotype Replacement(刻板印象替换): 当刻板印象出现时,社会化让我们习惯性地感到羞耻、内疚、责备。但我们只需要给它照亮光:噢,那是刻板印象。不要让它停留在那里,用一个**反面案例(正面案例)**来替换它。对我来说,这非常强大。每当那个内心评判者出现说“你很笨”时,我会停一下:我听到了,但我也是完全相反的——我也是善良的、有魅力的。这就是我们在重连大脑神经回路。
  3. I - Individuation(个体化): 带着好奇心和兴趣,与此时此刻的他人及自己同在。意识到我们和他人都是在不断进化的。
  4. R & P - Pro-social behaviors(亲社会行为)与 Perspective taking(视角切换): 这些是基于心灵的练习。包括同理心、慈悲心、喜悦、利他主义和想象力的积极培养。这就是达赖喇嘛所说的“热诚之心”。

我们通常被教导这些工具是天生的。其实不然。就像偏见是习得的一样,归属感也可以习得。我们可以通过这些练习来重新布线。这就是过去 10 年我向成千上万专业人士教授的内容:如何重新布线我们的神经系统?如何重新布线我们的大脑,从而与自己、他人、自然以及我们的想象力建立更健康的关系。

Original English

Host: When you say technologies, these technologies that we've had, what are some examples of those technologies that you're talking about?

Anu Gupta: Yeah. Well, I think for me, one of the things about the modalities that help break bias, I call it PRISM, and PRISM is an acronym for these five tools. And we start at M and move our way up to P. And it's really a mindfulness-based sematically informed practice. So we start with Mindfulness which is just present moment awareness. You know just noticing what happens one after another whether it's our breath whether it's our thought whether it's our emotions but especially our body sensations. Bias really lives in the body and we can't really begin to belong in the body until we heal that in our bodies. You know, every ancient technology which is basically wisdom traditions, whether it's Christianity or Judaism or Hinduism or Islam, they've all said awareness, "be still and know that I am." That's where we begin. That's mindfulness, a foundation. Then we move to Stereotype replacement for us, which is really when stereotypes arise. You know, so socially we've been like conditioned to think that, oh my god, I'm bad. And then kind of then you feel shame, you feel guilt, you feel blame. But actually all we have to do is shine a light on it. Oh, that's a stereotype. Okay. But instead of letting that just stay there, we replace it with a counter example, a positive example. For me, this was a really powerful tool. Like every time I had that critic come in and still does, you know, you're silly, you're stupid, you're dumb, like whatever. I take a moment, okay? I hear you. And I'm also the exact opposite. I'm also kind. I'm also sweet. I'm also charismatic. And constantly doing that. That's how we're rewiring the brain. That's how we're rewiring the nervous system that's been wired with all these biases. And then we move to I, which is really about Individuation, curiosity, interest, being with the person, being with ourselves just as we are in this moment. And lastly, we move to Pro-social behaviors and Perspective taking, the R and the P. And these are really heart-based practices. This is active cultivation of empathy, compassion, joy, altruism, imagination. This is what the Dalai Lama calls warm-heartedness.

偏见是习得的习惯:从医生到警察

主持人: 你在书中提到偏见是一种习惯。能多谈谈这一点吗?

阿努·古普塔: 当我开始研究偏见时,社会学文献和很多培训师会说,这是生来就有的生存本能。我们的杏仁核充满恐惧,将自己划分为内群体和外群体。但我心想:等等,当我的侄女和外甥出生时,他们并不觉得男孩比女孩好,也不觉得皮肤白比皮肤黑更美。这是被教导出来的。

没错,我们有生存本能。我们需要区分可爱的小狗和狮子,因为有危险。但如果有两个完全属于同一物种的人,为什么我们要区别对待他们?这就是习得的部分。我给偏见的定义是:**一种扭曲了我们感知、推理、记忆和决策方式的习得性习惯。**最后一部分——“决策方式”——至关重要。

当你作为一名医生,在决定开什么药、诊断病情和制定治疗方案时;当你作为一名老师,在管教学生时;当你作为一名招聘经理,在雇用人才时,你正在做出影响他人生计的决策。这些微观决策在机构和系统层面汇聚成差异、不公平和巨大的痛苦。

比如美国的警察暴力,或者法国、德国的情况。那些警察的神经系统里发生了什么?为什么他们看到某种表型的人——黑人或棕色人种,突然就感到恐惧?那种恐惧储存在身体里,而他们没有接受过相关训练。这就是我所说的消除偏见:它本质上是与自己和他人的断连。我们的神经系统处于失调状态。而 PRISM 工具能帮助我们调节身体。

Original English

Host: A way that you talk about this in the book is that bias is a habit. So can you tell us a little bit more about that?

Anu Gupta: You know, when I started my own breaking bias journey, I was like, well, what is bias? And I would go to the literature, the sociological literature, and a lot of the common trainers on this topic, and they would say that, oh, we're just born with it. It's a survival instinct in us. You know, our amygdala brain is fearful, and we kind of divide ourselves into ingroups and outgroups. But I was like, wait a minute. When my niece was born or my nephews were born, they didn't think that, you know, boys are better than girls. They didn't think that light-skinned is more beautiful than dark skin. This was taught to them. And the more I went into the neural mechanisms of how bias is learned, I was like, whoa, bias isn't inherent. Because yes, we have the survival instinct. We need to know a difference between a cute little puppy and a lion because of danger. But if we have two human beings who are exactly part of the same species, why is it that we treat them differently? That's the learned part. So the way I define bias is it's a learned habit that distorts how we perceive, reason, remember, and make decisions. So I think that last portion about making decisions is really essential and important. For me, it becomes nefarious when you're a doctor and you're making decisions around the types of medications you're going to prescribe or diagnosing a treatment and creating a treatment plan for them. If you're a teacher disciplining students, if you're a hiring manager, hiring certain people, you're making decisions that affect other people's livelihoods. And those micro decisions then aggregate at an institutional level at a systemic level into disparities into inequities, inequalities and so much human suffering.

语言的力量:人类存在的多元想象

主持人: 除了偏见,我知道你非常喜欢学习语言,是个多语言使用者。你学过多少种语言?

阿努·古普塔: 流利使用的有三种:印地语、乌尔都语和英语。但我一生中研究过十几种,包括波斯语、阿拉伯语、韩语、日语、法语等。学习语言非常美妙,因为它让我进入了不同的宇宙观和想象世界的方式。在当今时代,我们每 14 天就会失去一种人类语言。随着语言的消失,那座关于如何与自己、与周围元素相处的“智慧图书馆”也在消失。

主持人: 语言里总有一个概念框架。在一种新语言里,总会有一些无法直译的特定词汇,或者一种不同于英语的架构方式。这让我意识到世界不是只有一种固定的方式。

阿努·古普塔: 我给你举个迷人的例子。我曾研究二元性别是如何产生的,我发现印度尼西亚有一个布吉人(Boogis)部落。在他们的语言里,有五种性别。他们所有动词词尾的变化都基于这五种性别。按我们的语言理解,这包括顺性别男性、顺性别女性、跨性别男性、跨性别女性,以及一种中性人(通常是双性人)。尽管经历了殖民化和伊斯兰化,这仍然是他们语言和对人性构想的一部分。这种性别的“存在(isness)”并没有错。正是语言给了他们想象这种可能性的许可。

在英语和其他罗曼语系中,我们也开始创新。比如在英语中用“they/them”来指代非二元性别。这是一种实验,它让许多人终于感觉到他们在沟通方式和对存在的概念化中找到了归属感。这就是语言之美。

Original English

Host: From reading the book and from doing some research about you, I believe that something that you really enjoy is learning languages and being a polygot. How many languages do you speak?

Anu Gupta: Fluently I speak three—Hindi, Urdu and English—but I have studied like a dozen others over the span of my lifetime. You know I've studied Persian, Arabic, Korean, Japanese, French and a few others. And I feel like for me learning languages has been really beautiful because it's given me access to different cosmologies, different ways of imagining the world. We're living through a time where we're losing a human language every 14 days. So basically with that library of wisdom of imagining what it's like to be in relationship with ourselves and the elements around us.

Anu Gupta: I'll give you an example that I found so fascinating. I was studying again how gender and binary gender in particular came around and I discovered a tribe in Indonesia, the Boogis people. In their language, they have five genders. So like everything that they conjugate is based on those five genders. You know, basically what in our language it would be basically a cis man, a cis woman, a trans man, a trans woman, and an androgynous person, generally intersex people. And you know, despite colonization, despite Islamization, that's still part of their language, their conception of humanity. And there's nothing wrong with the isness of these five genders of humans. And it's just so beautiful, right? And it's because of language. Language gave them permission to imagine that.

祖母的故事:二元教条与精神智慧

主持人: 你的个人故事中有一点很打动我,就是关于你祖母的两次互动。一次是她严厉地告诉你不要像女孩一样跳舞;另一次是她向你解释一种文化理念:性别是广阔的,灵魂只有一粒,只是穿上了不同的“衣服”。同一个人给了你这两种截然不同的互动,这非常揭示人性以及偏见的本质。

阿努·古普塔: 理解这一点对我来说至关重要。我开始审视她的人性,看偏见是如何灌输给她的,尤其是作为女性对自己持有的偏见。她 13 岁就被嫁了出去,15 岁开始生孩子。她如此聪明睿智,却仅仅因为身体构造和在保守的印度社会出生而被剥夺了所有机会。

她回到了她古老的精神智慧,即 Shiva-Shakti(湿婆-夏克提)。这类似于阴阳,认为所有人类都有这两种能量——阳刚与阴柔。当我还是个小男孩时,我注意到印度社会中的“第三性别”,即 Hijras(海吉拉)。他们通常是双性人或跨性别女性,穿着女性服饰。我出于深层的好奇问她:“男人穿成女人那样是可以的吗?”她说:“是的,当然可以,因为那是他们体内主导的能量。”

但同样的女人,当我六七岁在客人面前模仿宝莱坞歌曲跳舞时,她把我拉到一边,告诉我只要她还没死,我就绝不能那样跳舞。她执着于那个被灌输了一辈子的故事——二元性别:男孩必须是男人,女孩必须是女人。这就是规则。规则关乎我们的身体和身份。我们每个人习得这些偏见的方式都是通过社交接触、我们所处的环境、我们的信任圈、教育以及媒体。

Original English

Host: You have these two interactions that you write about very movingly with your grandmother. One is where she quite aggressively tells you to not dance like a girl. And you feel really shut down. But then there's this other time where she explains to you the cultural idea that there's a vastness of gender, that there's just one spirit that puts on many different clothes.

Anu Gupta: And it's kind of drilled, you know, for me making sense of that was really because I began to look at her and her humanity and how bias was drilled into her, particularly bias toward herself as a woman. She was married off when she was 13 years old. And then she started having children at 15 and a lifetime of being othered. Someone who was so wise, so smart, but just wasn't given any opportunity for no other reason than her body parts. Again, she went back to her ancient wisdom, her spiritual wisdom which basically says that Shiva-Shakti... that's her idea of yin-yang that all human beings have these two energies, masculine and the feminine. For me that really came up when I was a young boy, I started noticing the third gender in Indian society, what are known as Hijras. I was like, "is it okay for them to dress like a woman?" And she was like, "yeah, of course, because that's the energy that's predominant in them." But that same woman also, I remember dancing to a Bollywood song as like a six or seven-year-old in front of some of her guests and she took me aside and really told me that I will never dance like that over her dead body until she dies—and I never did. She was really attached to a story that was drilled into her through a lifetime of experiences of a binary gender.

结语:倭黑猩猩的启示与道德想象力

主持人: 有人说,伤害他人和争斗是自然的。但我曾采访过一位研究**倭黑猩猩(Bonobos)**的科学家,她说倭黑猩猩解决问题的方式是通过爱,而它们的近亲黑猩猩则更多采用暴力。我们总是被告知黑猩猩是我们最近的亲戚,却很少听说倭黑猩猩。这似乎支持了你的观点:爱和包容与暴力一样,都是“自然”的。

阿努·古普塔: 没错。科学表明,慈悲、善良和宽容实际上更符合本性。但我们被社会化成厌恶这些情感,结果我们把它们堵在了身体里,造成了焦虑、压力、抑郁和自杀倾向。我最喜欢的一句话是:**“自然允许,文化禁止。”**我们的本性允许我们去爱任何我们想爱的人,允许我们尝试新事物,但我们建立的文化却禁止了它。

这些故事限制了我们的潜力。偏见在四个层面运作:内部层面、人际层面、机构层面和系统层面。这就是我们本世纪的工作:真正打破这些偏见。

如果我们能想象殖民火星,为什么不能想象在没有偏见的地球上生活?我们的道德想象力怎么了?这正是这个世纪在呼唤我们去做的事情。

Original English

Host: I was interviewing a scientist who studies bonobos. She said that we are just as closely related to bonobos as we are to chimpanzees. However, chimpanzees have in the wild quite a violent society. Bonobos are a society run by the females, and the way that they solve problems is through love. We have always learned in school that chimpanzees are our closest relatives, and most people have really not heard about bonobos. Her point was the idea that to hurt people and to fight is natural is actually no more natural than it is to love and be inclusive.

Anu Gupta: Right. That's right. And you know, the science is showing that actually it's more natural to be compassionate, to be kind, to be forgiving. But again, we've been socialized to be averse to those emotions and as a result, we've blocked them in our own bodies. One of the beautiful quotes that I love is "Nature permits. Culture forbids." So our nature allows us to be in love with whomever we want. It allows us to try new things. But it's the culture that we build around it that forbids it. If we can imagine colonizing Mars, why can't we imagine living on Earth without bias? What's happened to our moral imagination? I feel like that's what the century is really calling for us to do.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

人物: Anu Gupta

公司/组织: Be More, TED

媒体/书籍: Breaking Bias

关键字: bias-reduction mindfulness neuroscience inner-development social-justice