拥抱不确定性的启示
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 有一本书我非常喜爱,并且经常反复翻阅,叫作**《与不确定性共处》(Comfortable with Uncertainty)。它的作者是佛教老师佩玛·丘卓**(Pema Chödrön),她还写过很多广为人知且深受喜爱的书,比如《当生命陷落时》(When Things Fall Apart)和《欢迎不速之客》(Welcoming the Unwelcome)。
但这本书特别让我产生共鸣,部分原因是它的标题。我生命中一个重大的感悟是,我发现自己曾经是多么无法忍受不确定性。有多少地方我没去,有多少事情我没做,有多少对话我避而不谈,仅仅是因为我无法控制结果。仅仅是感到不确定,感到一点点恐惧,就足以让我完全逃避。
但随着年龄增长,你会意识到有很多事情是无法逃避的。不适感迟早会找上门,无论你愿不愿意。人们很容易沉溺于一种幻觉,认为自己可以控制周围发生的一切,认为只要做出一系列正确的决定,找到对的人、对的伴侣、对的工作或某种成功,就能保全自己。但随着你继续老去,你会发现这不会发生。事物会不断塌陷,然后重组,接着再次塌陷。
最终,并没有什么稳定的地面可以让你站立。所以,你必须与不确定性、不适、疼痛、痛苦和丧失建立某种真正的关系。我发现佩玛的书和作品比其他任何东西都能更好地迫使我建立一种更真实的这种关系——即承认成长和智慧之路就是让自己去感受它。
佩玛有一本新书叫**《另一种自由》**(Another Kind of Freedom),探讨了这些主题。这为我创造了一个绝佳的机会,去采访这位让我受益匪浅的人。这是一场非常美丽的对话,对我很有帮助。我希望对你们也有帮助。
佩玛·丘卓,欢迎来到本节目。
Original English
Ezra Klein: There's this book I love and I go back to and back to called Comfortable with Uncertainty. It's by the Buddhist teacher Pema Chödrön who's also written really really really well-known beloved books like When Things Fall Apart and Welcoming the Unwelcome. But this particular book resonates with me in part because of the title. It has been a real revelation of my own life how uncomfortable I was with uncertainty. How many places I didn't go, how many things I didn't do, how many conversations I wouldn't have because I just couldn't control the way they would turn out. And just knowing that, just feeling uncertain, feeling a little afraid was enough for me to avoid the thing altogether. But you get older and you begin realizing how much there is that you can't avoid. You realize that discomfort is going to come for you whether you want it or not. I think it's easy to go pretty far with the illusion that you can control what is happening around you. That there is some set of decisions you can make or choices you can make. Find the people, the partner, the job, the success of the whatever. They'll keep you safe and then you keep getting older and you realize it's not going to happen. That things are going to keep falling apart and coming back together and then coming apart again. That there's no stable ground in the end to stand on. And so you have to have some real relationship with uncertainty, with discomfort, with pain, with suffering, with loss. And I've just found Pema’s books and work to be maybe better than anything else for trying to force at least me into some more truthful relationship with that which is not the illusion that I can make it not happen or that with enough meditation or wisdom or anything else I won't feel it, but actually the recognition that the path to growth and to wisdom is letting yourself feel it. Pema has a new book out, Another Kind of Freedom, which is on these themes and many others. And it created for me this wonderful and unexpected opportunity to interview somebody from whom I have learned so much. It's a really beautiful conversation. I found it really helpful. I hope you do too. Pema Chödrön, welcome to the show.
佩玛·丘卓: 谢谢。
Original English
Pema Chödrön: Thank you.
与不适感建立“友善”的关系
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 能请到您真是太荣幸了。我想从您在《与不确定性共处》中提到的一点开始,因为那本书对我非常重要。您在那儿写道,核心问题不在于我们如何避免不确定性和恐惧,而在于我们如何对待不适感。为什么?
佩玛·丘卓: 嗯,我想如果你要生活在我们这个时代,不适感是贯穿每个人所有事情的一条线。一个大主题是如何摆脱它,如何不感到不舒服,不感到不确定,不感到不安全。佛教采取的方法是,有一种表达叫“唯一的出路就是穿过它”。
这就是核心思想。我最近常说的一句话是,让你的神经系统习惯某些事情。如果你试图去改变外部环境——当然,我也为那些为此努力的人鼓掌——但这更多是一种处理外部环境引发你内在反应的方法。那么工作就变成了“与它交朋友”。我想找一个最准确的词,但基本理念是你不是在试图摆脱它,而是试图与它变得亲密。
事实证明这完全正确:如果你靠近它,熟悉那种不安感,让我们从“不安”开始。好吗?如果你熟悉不安感的感觉——不是关于不安的那些故事线,故事线只是诱因,它们引发的是你体内的物理反应。如果你能接触到那种感觉——事实上,在和很多人一起工作的过程中,接触它并不难。如果你问:“你太阳穴或太阳神经丛那儿有什么感觉?”人们立刻就能感觉到。然后你问:“那是什么感觉?”人们通常会说感觉“收缩”或“紧绷”。
这听起来可能不太像什么灵性修持,但实际上,如果你能变得舒适,或者说,愿意完全彻底地待在那儿,带着一种无条件的温暖去感受你正在经历的一切,这似乎就是出路。不是说你摆脱了这种感觉,而是它变得非常“可操作”了。
Original English
Ezra Klein: It is such a pleasure to have you here. I want to begin with something you say in your book, Comfortable with Uncertainty, because that book is important to me. And you write there that the central question is not how we avoid uncertainty and fear, but how we relate to discomfort. Why?
Pema Chödrön: Well, I think if you're going to live in this age that we live in, discomfort is an ongoing thread for everybody through everything. And a big theme is how to get rid of it, how to not be feeling uncomfortable, not to be feeling uncertain, how to not feel insecure. And so the approach that Buddhism takes is that there's this expression about the only way out is through. So that's really the sort of the idea and one of the things that I've started saying is that to get your nervous system used to certain things. If you try to just go about trying to change the outer circumstances, which of course I applaud people that try, but this is more an approach of working with what the outer circumstances trigger in you and then the work becomes befriending or trying hard to find exactly the right word, but the idea is that you're not trying to get rid of, you're trying to become intimate with and this turns out to be completely accurate that if you approach things and kind of become familiar with what it feels like to feel insecure, let's just start with insecure. Is that okay? Mhm. If you become familiar with what it feels like to be insecure, not the story lines particularly around insecurity, but story lines are like triggers and what they trigger is something physical in your body. And so if you can contact that and actually in working with a lot of people it doesn't seem very hard to contact because it's kind of like if you say like what are you feeling in your solar plexus? People can go right there and then what do you say? What does it feel like? And there's some version of contracted and tight is what people usually say. So this sounds like doesn't sound all that spiritual or anything but actually if you can become comfortable or let's say what would the word be? It's not accepting exactly. It's more like willing to be there fully and completely with whatever it is you're feeling with kind of a unconditional I would say warmth is the word I would use. Unconditional warmth towards whatever you're feeling that seems to be the way not so much that you get rid of the feeling but that it all becomes very workable.
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 您有时会用的一个词对我很有帮助,就是“安住”(abiding)。我们在录音前也聊过,我有时会对“臣服”或“放下”这些动词感到困惑。但对我来说,不适、不确定、不安,这些都是非常具体的物理感受——我花了很长时间才看清这一点。它们是太阳神经丛的收缩。我花了很长时间才意识到我曾多么本能地逃避这种感觉,并试图让它消失。
佩玛·丘卓: 完全正确。这就是人们所做的,你可以打包票。
Original English
Ezra Klein: One word you use sometimes that really helped me is abiding. I we were talking before this began about how I sometimes have trouble with the verbs here surrendering and letting go and...
Pema Chödrön: Right. Right.
Ezra Klein: But for me discomfort, uncertainty, insecurity, they are very, it took time to see this, but they are very physical. They are a contraction in the solar plexus. And it took a long time to see how reflexively I ran from that and tried to make the feeling go away.
Pema Chödrön: Absolutely right. That is what people do. You can kind of count on it.
如何“友善”地对待愤怒与伤痛?
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 请跟我说说“交朋友”和“温暖”这两个词。在您的著作中,这分为两个阶段。第一是:不要逃避。你会感到不舒服,你会有不适感,那是生命中无法铲除的一部分。但接着有下一步:您有时说“对它微笑”,“与它交朋友”。我不确定自己是否完全掌握了这一步。
举个例子:想象有人正和伴侣吵架。他们愤怒、受伤,在脑海里演练所有该说的话,或者准备要说的话。他们的胸口很紧。他们无法停止思考这件事。那么,“与那种感觉交朋友”意味着什么呢?
佩玛·丘卓: 首先,我们要走一下具体的步骤。首先,你得想要这么做。然后问题就变成了你的那个问题:我实际上该怎么做?
第一步是通过冥想产生某种停顿。你在冥想中学到的基本功之一就是我所说的“放下叙事线”(letting the story line go)。如果你冥想时有一个回归的对象,你就会开始体验到,所有的想法和叙事线都是可以被打断的,你可以从中回来,而不必一直跟着它们走下去。就像你看到自己正走向一个兔子洞,你决定:没门,我不要进那个兔子洞。
那接下来呢?我不进兔子洞,该怎么办?接着回到你的身体,找到那种痛苦在体内的位置——你抓着的怨恨、复仇感、后悔没说对某句话的感觉。你不需要给它命名,只需问自己:你现在感觉如何?不是概念上的感觉,不要说“我很生气”之类的话。而是:你感觉到了什么?在身体里找到那个感觉。
你会发现一种收缩,某种紧绷,甚至像个疙瘩。通常是在太阳神经丛、喉咙或胃。一旦你待在那儿,对待它的态度就不是“这东西需要被铲除”,比如“让我们找到它然后扔掉”。态度更像是——我喜欢用“柔情”(tenderness)这个词。你向它传递温暖。
每个人做这件事的方式不同。如果你想把它概念化,你可以说你向它传递无条件的爱、无条件的温暖、无条件的柔情。就像你对自己不离不弃。
Original English
Ezra Klein: Really tell me about the the term befriending the warmth because there there's sort of two stages as I read you to to what you're saying here. One is the don't run from it. You are going to feel uncomfortable. You are going to have discomfort. That that is not an eradicable part of life. Right? But then there's this next move. You sometimes say smile at it, befriend it. I wouldn't say I've quite figured that one out. You know, and maybe I'll use an example like imagine somebody's in a fight with their partner. They're angry, they're hurt, they're rehearsing all the things they should have said or all the things they're going to say. Their chest is tight. They can't stop thinking about it, right? What what does it mean to befriend that feeling?
Pema Chödrön: Well, first of all, it means let's let's go through the sort of steps, you know? First of all, you have to want to. And then the question becomes just I think it's your question. Well, h how do I actually do that? So, the first thing would be some kind of pause through meditation. One of the things you learn to do uh it's kind of very basic to meditation is something that I call letting the story line go. If you meditate and you have an object of meditation that you keep coming back to, then you begin to experience all your thoughts, storylines as something that you can interrupt, something that you can come back from, that you don't have to keep following it and keep following it, keep following it. So, it's like you see yourself going down a rabbit hole and you decide, no way am I going to go down that rabbit hole. So, then what? So, how do I not go down the rabbit hole? And then you go to your body and you find where in your body the pain it's you're holding the grievance or the sense of revenge or the sense of uh regret that you didn't say the right thing. You don't really have to name it, but you ask you say go to what are you feeling like right now? What are you feeling? You don't not conceptually don't say you don't have to say mad or anything like that. What are you feeling? And then find that feeling in your body. So what you find is a contraction, some kind of tightness, a knot almost. And you can ask a person, well, where is it? Some people will say it's all over my body, but usually they'll say like it's in my solar plexus. It's in my throat, my stomach, wherever. It doesn't really matter. But once you're there, the attitude towards it is not that it's something um that needs to be eradicated, you know, oh, let's find it and then we'll throw it out or something like that. The attitude more is that you send I I like to use the word tenderness towards it. You send warmth towards it. People do this differently. People find their own way to do this. If you want to conceptualize it, you would say you send it unconditional love. You send it unconditional warmth, unconditional tenderness. It's like you're not going to give up on yourself.
从身体感知开始:不只是概念
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 如果你对自己感受不到无条件的爱怎么办?
佩玛·丘卓: 没问题。那你就向“感受不到无条件的爱”这种感觉传递温暖。我的意思是,那是什么感觉?
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 我试着想一下我的感受。对我来说,对这种情绪拥有“无条件的爱”的想法太陌生了,甚至难以描述,因为我习惯的环境就是想让某些感觉消失。
佩玛·丘卓: 是的。那你就是一个典型的人类。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 确实如此。有一件事我随着时间的推移做得更好了,就是安住在那些感觉中,并意识到它们会改变。如果我让它们坐在那儿,它们会发生更深层的变化。但我肯定还没对它们产生“温暖”。我可能只是更善于“照料”它们了。
您在有些地方提到,把这种感觉当作一个提醒关注的铃声。这一点我做得好一些了。比如我发现自己和不确定性有一种物理上的联系,当我感到不确定时,我会觉得这是我该观察的东西,而不是试图摆脱它。但当人们说“延展无条件的爱”时,我还是觉得很难。
佩玛·丘卓: 那如果只是一个动作呢?比如用手触摸它?
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 那确实有帮助。我会那样做。
佩玛·丘卓: 远离概念和词汇,只是把手放在那儿。这可能非常有力量。有时人们通过触摸头顶来表达对自己的慈爱——我不希望这听起来太矫情,但它是一种“觉得自己没问题”的感觉。
Original English
Ezra Klein: What if you don't feel unconditional love towards them?
Pema Chödrön: If you don't feel unconditional love towards it, not a problem. Then you send then you send the warmth towards what does it feel like to not have unconditional love? I mean, what does that feel like? And then what would you say that would feel like to not have unconditional love?
Ezra Klein: Let me try to think through how it feels for me. I think the idea of how it would feel to have unconditional love is so for a feeling like that yes is so alien that even trying to describe it is hard because that the the water I swim in is wanting certain feelings to go away.
Pema Chödrön: Yeah. Right. And you're a typical human being.
Ezra Klein: I am a typical human being. And you know, one thing that I have gotten better at over time has been abiding in those feelings and then recognizing that they will change.
Pema Chödrön: Exactly.
Ezra Klein: And that they will change more profoundly if I let them sit there.
Pema Chödrön: That's right.
Ezra Klein: But I certainly have not found warmth for them. I've become maybe better at attending to them. Mhm. I think in some places you talk about sometimes noting feelings like that as a a bell to pay attention. And I've gotten a little bit better at that. Like I have a like a physical relationship to uncertainty, which when I feel it, I now feel that is something that I should look at as opposed to try to get rid of, right? But I have a lot more trouble when people say extend unconditional love.
Pema Chödrön: What about what about just a gesture like touching it with your hand?
Ezra Klein: That does help me. I do do that.
Pema Chödrön: You know, in other words, get away from concept and words alto together and just put your hand there. That can be very very powerful to just do that. And sometimes people they just express affection for themselves by, you know, maybe touching the top of their head or I don't I don't want to get too corny with this, but some sort of sense of being okay with yourself.
“同意”现状,而非对抗
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 您如何帮助人们学会感受身体里的感觉?我花了很多年的治疗和冥想才意识到,我经常根本没感受到身体里正在发生什么。我只是在对它做出反应,它在那儿,但我没有察觉。
我曾有一位治疗师帮我处理过这个问题。她发现我谈论某事的方式和我的感受非常不同。她会让我停下来,说:“停。重新说一遍,但要把手放在胃部。把手放在心脏的位置。”这是一种非常强大的练习,因为感觉会开始渗入我所说的话中。
佩玛·丘卓: 是的。所以你发现肢体动作在让你“变柔软”方面非常重要。摸摸心脏,或者摸摸收缩的地方。把手放上去,并让这只手带上友善的感觉。心脏似乎是最能触动人的地方。你走在街上,有人可能因为你做的某件事而心生欢喜,他们会摸摸自己的心。这是一种非常甜美的交流方式。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 为什么感受自己的感觉这么难?
佩玛·丘卓: 很多时候与创伤有关。人们在很小的时候就因为某件事关闭了心门。所以这就像试图打开一个闸门,人们可能害怕一旦打开就会被淹没。实际上,一下子打开闸门确实不是好主意。更好的办法是钻一个小孔,让它一点点、逐渐地开启。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 您有一句话我非常喜欢。您问过禅宗大师乙川弘文(Kobun Chino Roshi)他如何对待恐惧,他说:“我同意。我同意。”(I agree. I agree.)
佩玛·丘卓: 是的。那是多么美丽的回答。那是我们所谈论的一切的缩写。我强调温暖和友谊,因为人们似乎很需要那个。但最根本的是:你是在“同意”还是“不同意”?是在接受还是在拒绝?是留下来还是逃跑?
我们可以用其他的词:呼吸、允许。“允许”(Allowing)是一个好词。允许而不是否定或批评。我喜欢这种方法的原因在于,无论你处于过程中的哪个阶段,你都可以和那个阶段交朋友。
比如很多自尊心低的人,他们听到冥想指导,结果又成了鞭策自己的新工具:“我永远做不到那个。”如果我有机会和这样的人密切共作,我会说:“那我们就从‘觉得自己是个失败者’或‘永远做不对’时你身体的感觉开始吧。让我们穿透这些词汇,看看‘觉得自己总是在搞砸’或‘自己根本不可爱’这种物理感受是什么。”
直接触及功能障碍的核心。我们都需要很多帮助才能开始“同意”自己身上发生的事,而不是因为不舒服就排斥它。每个人都需要很多时间、意愿和意图,才能持有更多的不适,持有更多的疼痛。
Original English
Ezra Klein: How do you help people learn to feel what they're feeling in their body? It has taken me many years of therapy and meditation to even realize that I often wasn't feeling what was happening in the body that I didn't have awareness of it. I was reacting to it. It was there.
Pema Chödrön: Right. Right.
Ezra Klein: I had a therapist once who was actually one of the people who really helped me work with this. What she realized about me was that the way I would talk about something and the way I would feel about it were very different. And she would start telling me when I was talking about something, she'd say, "Stop. Tell me the same thing, but have your hand on your stomach. Tell me the same thing, but have your hand on your heart." It was a very powerful practice because the feeling would start to come into what I was saying.
Pema Chödrön: Yes. Okay. So, you're saying that for you the the physical gesture is actually very very important in terms of...
Ezra Klein: It certainly helped me. Yeah.
Pema Chödrön: Yeah. Yeah. Well, I found this exactly the same thing. And that's where I've come to find out that if people just use gestures that it helps a lot to sort of soften up the situation, touching the heart or touching where the contraction is. Put your hand where that is and like like uh have a sense of that hand being friendly. And the heart seems to be the one that is the, you know, really gets to people. You know, you could be on the street and then someone for some reason they like something you just did or something, they'll just touch their hearts. And I I find it's such a sweet thing, you know, a way to communicate to people you don't know on the street.
Ezra Klein: Why do you think it's so hard to feel what we're feeling?
Pema Chödrön: A lot of times it's trauma related that people uh close down at a young age around something or other. And so uh it's like trying to uh open up a floodgate and maybe people are scared for one thing, you know, to open up that floodgate. And actually it's not such a great idea to open up a floodgate. it's more a good idea to sort of like uh put a little hole in it in a tiny hole so that the whole thing is a gradual opening.
Ezra Klein: So, so let's say you're there and you are feeling how you're feeling, you know, and maybe you don't like how you're feeling, but you're at least there with it. You have a line that I find very evocative. You said, "I once asked the Zen master Kobanchino Roshi how he related with fear. you said, 'I agree. I agree.'"
Pema Chödrön: Yeah. It was such a beautiful answer. You know, it was sort of shorthand for this whole thing that we're talking about. I I I stress the warmth and the friendliness because people seem to need that a lot. But the fundamental thing, if you're saying, "What are we actually trying to do here?" It's like agreeing rather than disagreeing, accepting rather than rejecting, staying with rather than running away. Uh what are some other ways we could say... breathing into... allowing... allowing is a good word. Yeah. Allowing rather than uh disapproving or criticizing. And the thing is uh what I like about this approach and what seems to be attractive to people is it doesn't matter where you are in the process you can make friends with that. So, so like for instance, it might very common for people who have low low self-esteem, which is many many many many people that they hear a meditation instruction and then it's just another thing to beat themselves up on because I could never do that. So then if I was had an opportunity to work closely with someone, I would just say, "Well, then let's just work with uh what happens in your body when you feel like you're a loser or you feel like you're can never get it right or uh let's go under the words of what is let's get at what it feels like physically to feel like I I'm always messing up or I'm inadequate or there's something fundamentally unlovable about me, you you know, so you so somehow um getting right to the kind of core of a lot of the dysfunction that they might be feeling. So getting back to the original thing is I think we all need a lot of help to start to agree with what's happening with us rather than feel that it's because it's uncomfortable that it has to be rejected. Everybody needs a lot of time and willingness and intention to uh be able to hold more discomfort, hold more pain really. You know.
冥想的目的不是为了“变好”
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 我花了很长时间才意识到,我冥想时试图做的不是改变我的感受。我刚开始冥想是因为我有焦虑和压力,当时我正准备开一家公司,我想让自己感觉不同。多年来,我一直处于一种试图让自己感觉与现状不同的练习中。这是一个非常微妙且困难的转变。
佩玛·丘卓: 我相信你和乔·卡巴金(Jon Kabat-Zinn)共作过,他的减压项目(MBSR)的一个大前提就是:你必须放弃“这会有助于你”的想法,必须放弃那个“目标”。我们只是为了正念本身而正念。
这个想法很难放弃,对吧?但他非常成功,因为这个项目已经进入了所有医院。但这是非常重要的一部分:你不是在试图“改进”。这些人大多患有严重的背痛,医生都束手无策。所以所有的练习都只是为了安住,而不是为了摆脱它。我知道这很难,但介绍这个想法会有帮助。人们有时会被这个想法吸引:原来除了“试图摆脱它”之外,还有另一种选择。为什么?因为他们已经花了一辈子的时间试图摆脱它,但并没起作用。所以,为什么不试试别的呢?
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 是什么吸引您走向这一面的?纵观您的书名:《当生命陷落时》、《与不确定性共处》、《如何生,如何死》、《另一种自由》,还有一个接一个的……
佩玛·丘卓: 《欢迎不速之客》。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 是的,一种真实的吸引力。在这种“有时会疼”的想法中……
佩玛·丘卓: 是的,让我们接受这种疼痛。我的老师创巴仁波切总是说:“向锋利处倾斜”(Lean into the sharp points)。那是一个伟大的短语,它表达了我们要“倾斜进去”而不是“缩回来”。
有时这纯粹是物理上的。你意识到这真的很疼。有些人会说,所以我倾斜进去。另一些人会说,我停止抵抗。对我来说,这就是停止抵抗。我学会了任何不愉快的事情发生时,我都能感觉到自己在抵抗。我不想要它发生。然后我经历了这个我已经做过无数次的程序,也就是在这个过程中放松。不是物理上的对抗,比如解开胃部的结。
Original English
Ezra Klein: It took me, it is still taking me a really long time to realize that what I'm trying to do when I meditate is not to change how I'm feeling. Right? I started meditating because I had and have a fair amount of anxiety and stress and I started really seriously when I was starting a company and I was trying to feel differently than I felt, right? And for years and years and years and years, I was there in a practice of trying to feel differently than I felt. And and I do think it is a very subtle and difficult shift and one I've only begun to recognize needs to be made, right, to to this place of agreement that you're that how you feel might change, but you're not trying to change it that you're trying to like be in a space of accepting how you feel.
Pema Chödrön: So, uh I I believe you work with Will Cabinson. So one of the big things about why the stress reduction program that his father has uh John Kabits in uh one of the premises is you he says to people you just have to give up the idea that this is going to help you in any way. You have to give up the idea that there's like a goal here. We're just going to be mindful of what's happening for itself for its own. such a hard idea to give up, but he must have a lot of success doing it, right? Because it's in all the hospitals and everything. So, but that is a very important part of it is you're not trying to improve. And these are people with severe back pains mostly that no doctors could help. So, so all the exercises are for themselves alone and not to try to have get rid of the things. I'm sure it's very hard, but uh I think that let's just say it helps to be introduced to the idea and people sometimes get kind of fascinated by the idea that there's an alternative to well to it trying to get rid of it. Why? Because they've spent how many years they're alive trying to get rid of it and it hasn't helped. So let's try something different. Don't you think so?
Ezra Klein: What attracted you to this side of it? I mean something if you go through your book titles... Yeah. just that right I know it's like when things fall apart comfortable with uncertainty how we live is how we die um you know a different kind of freedom that you know one after another welcoming the unwelcome... welcoming the unwelcome.
Ezra Klein: There's been a real attraction in for you in this idea that it's going to hurt sometimes.
Pema Chödrön: Yeah and and that let's just let's let's be okay with it hurting sometimes like Trumpete Cham trumpet my teacher he always used to say lean into the sharp points and that was a that's a great phrase I think you know lean into the sharp points because it expresses what we're trying to say here about leaning in rather than pulling back you know so sometimes it's just really physical you sort of have the idea okay this is really hurting And so uh some people would say I so I lean into it. Uh other people would say I stop resisting. That's what for me that's what it is. I've learned that anything unpleasant I I can feel that I'm resisting. I don't want it to happen. And then I just go through this process which I've done so many times now that I can actually do it. But I go through this process of relaxing with it. you know, say not physically not resisting like unnoding the stomach.
与现实合作:雨中漫步的隐喻
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 请带我走一遍那个过程。我知道您有背痛。当您感到疼痛时,您该怎么办?您的一部分肯定是不想感受到疼痛的。那时候您的身心发生了什么?
佩玛·丘卓: 好吧,我会站起来拉伸,做物理治疗。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 所以您不仅仅是接受它,您也在试图改变它。
佩玛·丘卓: 我在做那些聪明的事情,医生推荐的事情,那些很有帮助。在处理物理疼痛方面,我是物理治疗(PT)的超级粉丝。但态度是最主要的。我放弃了“疼痛也许会消失”的想法,转而接受“这将是我余生都要与之共处的东西”。这是一种完全不同的、更放松的态度。
你做物理治疗,但你的态度是——我们也许可以称之为“同意”或“交朋友”。我捕捉到的是当我开始“这样”的时候,当我抵抗的时候:“我不想要,我不想要。”我能从身体上感觉到那种抵抗,然后我“倾斜进去”。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: “倾斜进去”是什么意思?
佩玛·丘卓: 举个例子,创巴仁波切曾做过一次演讲,主题是“与现实合作”(Collaborating with reality)。他举了个例子,是我在冬季的新斯科舍省非常熟悉的:在冬天的风雪中行走,雨雪打在脸上,极其不舒服,你的整个身体紧绷得就像坐在牙医的椅子上。
“倾斜进去”意味着你在物理上停止抵抗正在发生的事,你让自己在其中放松。因为抵抗与放松之间的对比是如此巨大,以至于这样做并不难。抵抗是非常具体的,我能感觉到体内的一切都在推开,而那是徒劳的。而当我让现状就是现状,不再对抗它紧绷时,一切就变得完全没问题了。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 当我和孩子们一起走回家时,我会想到这一点。我住在纽约,会下雨。昨天我们冒雨走回家,我坐在那儿努力不让自己淋湿,而他们却在跳每一个水坑。我经常因为不想被淋湿而全身紧绷,但我终究会被淋湿的。
他们在雨中玩耍。他们在“与现实合作”,而我在“抵抗现实”。我不想要淋湿,而他们觉得:“这儿有这么多水,太好玩了!”
佩玛·丘卓: 这是一个微妙的转变。对于孩子来说,这是自然的,不知为何我们长大后就失去了这种能力。但你可以找回来。你可以开始对正在发生的事感到更喜悦。我曾有过在雨雪中的经历,我开始觉得自己正和风暴共舞。那变得很有趣,像走进了一幅《纽约客》的漫画。这就是你说的,你的孩子在水坑里是享受,而你是战斗。“斗争”是一个很有用的词。当你发现自己在斗争,你就停下来,找到不斗争的方法。
Original English
Ezra Klein: Walk me through that process. I mean, I believe you have back pain.
Pema Chödrön: I do.
Ezra Klein: We were talking about back pain a minute ago, too. When you're in pain, what what do you do, right? Some some part of you must not want to feel the pain. What then happens in your mind body?
Pema Chödrön: I uh All right. So I I do, you know, I I stand up, I stretch, I do physical therapy, things like...
Ezra Klein: You're not just accepting it and letting the pain be there. You are trying to change it too.
Pema Chödrön: I'm I'm doing those smart things, you know, or what the doctors recommend and and those things are really helpful. I'm a big PT fan around physical pain, but the attitude is the main thing. So, I've given up the idea that uh maybe it's all going to go away and I'm lived more with the idea like this is what I'm going to be living with uh for the rest of my life. So, that's a whole different kind of more relaxed attitude about it. You don't you you do do the physical therapy and things like this but the attitude is um you might you know me we might say agreeing you might say making friends with but for me the what I catch what I catch is when I'm going like this when I resist I I don't want I don't want and I can feel that physically and then I lean in and I lean in. So what does lean in mean?
Pema Chödrön: Um, okay, I'll give an example. I don't know if it's going to answer your question, but Chimam Trumper once gave a talk and the topic of the talk was collaborating with reality. And he gave the example, this is what what he gave the example that I was very familiar with in living in Nova Scotia in the wintertime of walking in the winter when the snow and sleet is coming in your face and it's extremely unpleasant and and your whole body is as if you're in the dentist chair. You're just like tensing up. So leaning in means you physically stop resisting what's happening and you you more like relax with it. You sort of relax with it. It's like you the thing is that the contrast is so great between resisting and then relaxing that somehow it's not that hard to do because it's so so tangible this resisting thing because I can feel everything in me is like pushing away and that's like fruitless. I mean it's not going to it's not going to help at all. Whereas as when I sort of just let it be what it is, let's just that's another way to say it. Just let it be what it is and stop tensing against it, then it becomes totally fine.
Ezra Klein: I think about this when I walk home with my kids, you know, half the days of the week I do pickup. And I have a four-year-old and a seven-year-old. And we live in New York and it rains. Like yesterday when we walk home in the rain, what happens is I'm sitting there trying to not get wet and they're like puddles and they're trying to jump in every puddle and if they have their rain boots on that's great and if they don't I'm like don't get your feet wet and you don't get your shoes wet. But I'm often tensed up against getting wet and I'm going to get wet one way or the other and they're playing in the rain. They're collaborating with reality. That's right. And I'm resisting reality. I don't want to get wet. And they're like, "There's so much water here. That's so fun." Uh see, it is a subtle shift and mentally, I think. And so for the kids, it's natural. And then somehow we lose it, right, as we get older, it seems like. But then you can kind of go back. You can you can begin to be more joyful about what's happening. I mean, I just had this experience with the sleet and everything and and I always used this image. So, I was I I began to it did feel like I was in a dance with the storm, you know, there was something very joyful about it. Funny. I think that's what it was. It became sort of funny, like I felt like I was in a New Yorker cartoon or something. And uh but it's but it's more like your kids with the the puddle that becomes enjoyable rather than a battle. So struggle is a helpful word. I think you find yourself struggling and and and basically you pause and uh you find your way to not struggle.
疼痛与受苦:必要的与可选的
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 您有一句话非常有意思:“当我们抵抗改变时,那叫作‘受苦’(suffering)。” 佛教老师常区分“疼痛”(pain)和“受苦”(suffering)。
佩玛·丘卓: 是的。疼痛是你把手指放在炉火上,那种疼痛让你缩回来。我也有背痛。疼痛是直接的体验。而受苦则是我们叠加在上面的所有叙事线。我称之为“不必要的受苦”。在这种情况下,受苦是可选的,因为它基于你告诉自己的故事。
当人们问关于背痛的灵性讨论时,他们好奇如何在没有叙事线的情况下与体验共处。因为他们正在对自己说:“这会变得更糟,我会残废”,或者“我将无法工作”。各种灾难场景给他们带来了巨大的痛苦,而那部分是可选的。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 我觉得这是您的教导中非常重要的一部分。我在这层“对现状的抵抗”中挣扎得非常厉害。当我在一个无法改变的处境中,比如我已经排好了日程,或者我有背痛。或者我在担心未来的某件事,虽然它还没发生。
我之前在加利福尼亚参加一个论坛,在飞机上我一直担心自己会失声。我最后没失声,但我担心了很久。这种试图让现状变得不同的冲动非常深层且是反射性的。我好奇,在战术层面,你如何放下那一层?
佩玛·丘卓: 如果你不用叙事线去喂养它,它还能持续下去吗?
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 当您说“喂养”它时,我觉得不是我在喂养它。叙事线自己在喂养自己。我需要巨大的心理能量才能不让那些担忧的想法自我喂养。我不想思考这些,我不是故意的。
佩玛·丘卓: 担忧的想法确实会自我喂养。创巴仁波切在书中谈到过一点对我影响很大:背痛没问题,担心未来也没问题。问题在于他所说的“负面的负面性”(negative negativity)。也就是在担心之上,又有了对担心的评判。这会让你掉进深不见底的兔子洞。
你冥想时有回归的对象吗?
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 我通常做“标号”(noting)。我会持续说出(大声或在心里)我那一刻意识到的东西。比如:我意识到正在看您,我意识到在听声音,我意识到手指正互相接触。让一切进入意识,但不做任何处理。
佩玛·丘卓: 不做任何处理,对。让我提个建议。如果你尝试轻轻地留意呼吸的进出,意图是尽可能全然地与呼吸同在。担忧的想法就像磁铁,像海妖赛壬在召唤你,不断把你拉走。
没关系,那就发生吧。然后我们不断回到对呼吸的察觉上。你正在训练自己察觉自己跑偏了,然后回来。你正在训练中断它。你只是在掌握那种“不继续叙事线”的感觉。也许当你落地旧金山时,你会发现你的焦虑水平、强迫性思考发生了一些转变。你更准备好进入一个没有希望和恐惧的境地,因为你一直与当下同在。
Original English
Ezra Klein: You have a line that I think is interesting where you say when we resist change it's called suffering. And I often find Buddhist teachers make this distinction between suffering and pain.
Pema Chödrön: Right. And I'd love you to talk a bit about that. Pain is you put your finger on the burner and there's pain you pull away that's that and there's many many examples like I have back pain you know or whatever it is so that's pain that's like uh direct experience then there's suffering which is all the story lines that we lay on top of it and I call that unnecessary suffering actually but suffering in this case is uh optional because it's based on the story lines you're telling yourself about like I talk to people say people are curious we talk about back pain you know spiritual spiritual discussions about back pain but one of the things is um just uh people are curious about uh how to be be with the experience without all the story lines because they're saying to themselves things like uh this is going to get worse and I'm going to be disabled or I'm not going to be able to do my work because of this or all sorts of disaster scenarios which are causing them so much suffering that that's optional that part.
Ezra Klein: I take this as a very important part of I mean Buddhism generally but but your your teaching in particular working with this layer of resistance to what's happening and and I I struggle with this a tremendous amount and it's something I'm trying to work on where I'm in a situation that exists. It's not a situation at this point I can change. I have, you know, created the schedule. I'm going to the thing I'm, you know, I have back pain, too. I'm feeling the back pain. Or there's something in the future that I'm worried about happening, but it may not happen. I was just doing a governor's forum in California, and I was worried on the flight out that I was losing my voice. I didn't end up losing my voice, but I worried about it a lot. And there's this like layer of experience that for me is resisting. Trying to make it different than it is when I can't. And on the one hand, I think I become more attentive to how much suffering comes out of that. But I'm curious again in a very sort of physical or tactical way how you drop that layer because for me the impulse to try to solve every problem or to treat even every moment like a problem to solve or to perfect is very deep and reflexive. Right.
Pema Chödrön: Now would you say though is it possible to keep it going if you don't keep feeding it with story line? Is it dependent on story line?
Ezra Klein: You when you say to keep feeding it, it to me I the I uh am not feeding it. The story line feeds itself. It takes an enormous amount of mental energy for me to not have worried thoughts feed themselves. I don't want to be thinking about this. I'm not trying to do it. That's worried thoughts do feed themselves. Absolutely. And um part of the book the uh another kind of freedom which is that commentary on Trumpish's book there is this part which may had a big effect on me where he talks about there's nothing wrong with in this case it was negativity but let's just say nothing wrong with back pain or nothing wrong with worrying about the future. Nothing wrong. And but the problem is what he called negative negativity. That's on top of worrying then there's judgment about worrying and it gets very it goes way down the rabbit hole right so coming it's almost like I think in your case like on the airplane it would be almost like meditating getting back to meditation where you I don't know what you do when you meditate exactly but do you have an object of meditation often? Uh, no. I tend to do noting. I sort of continuously speak either aloud or or mentally what I'm aware of at that moment and from which sense. So, I'm aware of looking at you. I'm aware of hearing the sound as you sort of affirm what I'm saying. Yes. Right. I'm aware of feeling my fingers touch each other right now and just sort of letting everything come into awareness but doing nothing about it.
Pema Chödrön: But doing nothing about it. Right. Okay. So let me just propose um I think I could work with noting too in in terms of this but just in terms of more familiar ground for me. So if you what you did was uh say okay I'm going to uh gently note or aware of my breath going out and coming in. And uh my intention here is to just as much as possible stay fully present with the breath going out and the breath coming in. Nothing forced just natural breathing. Okay. So then what happens is you the worry thought is like a magnet. It's a very seductive like the sirens you know calling you. It keeps pulling you off. So fine that's what happens. So then we just keep coming back to uh being present with the breath going in and breath going out and then it pulls you away again. But you're training in noting that you're going off and then coming back. You're training in noting that you're going off and coming back. So you interrupt it. I guess you could say you just get the hang of what it feels like to not continue with the story line. And then you might find but by the time you land in San Francisco or wherever you're going that uh that uh there's been a shift in your anxiety level, a shift in your uh obsessive thinking part, you know, and that you're more ready to just go in without hope and fear into the situation. You're in a different place with the whole thing because you've stayed so present with what's going on.
让万物如其所是:放下“解决”的能量
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 我对自己身上那种“做事的能量”和“允许事物存在的能量”之间的差异非常感兴趣。对我来说,担忧带来的很多疲惫实际上来自于试图思考:“我能做点什么?”我需要吃喉糖吗?我该去看医生吗?试图去“解决”它,而不是仅仅让它在那儿。
当然,生活中有些事情是我们想要改变的。您做物理治疗,我工作是为了促成政治变革,而不是让一切维持原样。但另一方面,我意识到自己受过多少“改变、解决、行动和优化”的能量训练。这让我意识到,对我来说,“让事物如其所是”的能量是多么陌生且缺乏训练。
佩玛·丘卓: 我敢肯定那非常陌生。但你被它吸引吗?
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 是的,如果我不被它吸引,我们就不会有这次对话了。这已经成为我冥想练习中的一个重大转变。
佩玛·丘卓: 焦虑经常出现。来这儿之前我也很焦虑。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 什么让您感到焦虑?
佩玛·丘卓: 哦,来到这里,这是一个未知。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 原来您也不习惯这种不确定性。
佩玛·丘卓: 实际上我并没有具体的叙事线。只是胃里有蝴蝶乱飞的感觉。我女儿问我:“你在怕什么?”我说:“我不知道。我只是有‘蝴蝶’。”但我并没有觉得“有蝴蝶”是一个问题。它只是一种自动反应。没关系。它没有升级成一个宏大的叙事线,比如“我会表现得很糟糕”、“他问我问题而我答不上来”。
我们都有这些旧的习惯性反应。有蝴蝶,没大不了的。担忧也没大不了的。但一旦它开始升级、升级、升级,真正的、不必要的受苦就会变得强大,并在生理上影响你。所以只需回到它在太阳神经丛里的感觉,带着幽默感、温暖,觉得“没大不了”。你正在中断那种升级的倾向。你实际上是在练习“不抵抗”(non-resistance)。
Original English
Ezra Klein: I I become very interested in and this is just my own experience with myself but the difference between energy of doing something and energy of just allowing something to be there. And to me a lot of the exhaustion from worrying, right? He's actually trying to think about like, well, what can I do about it? You know, do I need to be uh you know, sucking on a throat lozenge? You know, when I go there, should I see a doctor? and the the kind of trying to actually solve it versus and this is true in a lot of areas of my life versus just it's there like the thoughts are there I might lose my voice and that I mean of course there are things in life that we want to change you do physical therapy for your back I work in politics I'm trying to affectuate change not just allow things to be the way they are right and on the other hand the you can for me at least how much I've trained the energy of trying to change things and solve problems and act and optimize. It's made me realize like how untrained for me and unfamiliar actually the energy of just letting things be.
Pema Chödrön: I'm sure I'm sure it's very unfamiliar. But uh are you attracted to it?
Ezra Klein: Yeah, I wouldn't be having this conversation if I weren't attracted to it.
Pema Chödrön: Uh and so do you find that you can do it sometimes? just be so is the thing I'm starting to try to learn how to do. It's been a big shift in my own meditation practice.
Pema Chödrön: So I do think you know you I think probably anxiety comes up a lot like I was anxious about coming over here. So uh what about it made you anxious? Oh coming here unknown.
Ezra Klein: It's so unknown. You weren't comfortable with the uncertainty.
Pema Chödrön: Actually I didn't have a story line particularly. Uh-huh. My daughter asked me, "Well, what are you afraid of?" And I said, "I I actually don't know. I'm just I just having butterflies." But I wasn't having a problem with having butterflies. I think that's what I'm trying to get at. It was just a automatic response. Um, nothing wrong with it. wasn't escalating into a big storyline or I'm going to be a big flop or uh you know he'll ask me and I won't be able to talk or you know it didn't go any of those places and so it just was I think you know we have these just old habitual responses to things butterflies no big deal butterflies is what I'm thinking in this case so in terms of the worry that's no big deal either but somehow it escalates and escal escalates and escalates and that's when the real unnecessary suffering gets strong, right? And affects you physically and uh so just coming back to it what it feels like in my solar plexus or whatever uh with a feeling of sense of humor, warmth, uh no big deal, something um more along those lines. You're interrupting the tendency to escalate. So, you're actually kind of practicing non-resistance.
在不适中成长
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 我们谈了很多关于不适的关系。那关于“舒适”的关系呢?
佩玛·丘卓: 我爱舒适!但这有一个重要的问题。让我们把舒适谈论为“舒适区”。每个人都需要一些待在舒适区的时间,因为你的神经系统需要它。在海里游泳,所有那些抚慰你的事物都是必要的。但在舒适区里没有成长。
成长发生在不舒服的地方。我们称之为“挑战”,因为我们触及了自己的边缘。你希望你的边缘能扩张。如果今天你的边缘是那条人行道,那么到明年这个时候,你希望自己能走五个街区。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 曾有人对我说,你能实现的成长量,与你愿意忍受的不适感直接相关。
佩玛·丘卓: 说得太对了。那个人非常有智慧。这就是绝对的真理。所以,在我们可以感受到不适的程度上,我们就能成长。成长意味着让自然的改变和演化发生,而不是冻结在那些让你一生停滞不前的见解和观点中。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 冥想一直穿插在我们的谈话中。对您来说,冥想的目的是什么?您在练习什么?
佩玛·丘卓: 答案有很多。我认为它是一种深入、亲密、无畏、带着友善的态度去了解自己的方式。
一个去参加禅修营的人,可能以为那是关于平静和喜悦的,但不可避免地,会有东西浮现出来:痛苦的回忆、遗憾、闪回。我曾向创巴仁波切提问:“我冥想了几年,我发现我得到了很多证据,证明我是一个相当糟糕的人。”他回答说:“好,那就靠近‘我是一个糟糕的人’那种感觉。”
我的一位老师索甲仁波切(Sogyal Rinpoche)有一种表达:“对‘没问题’感到‘没问题’”(being okay with not being okay)。我很喜欢这个说法。看清自己的习惯、情绪反应、自私、傲慢、愤怒,这是一件无畏的事情。对我来说,与自己交朋友就是与所有这些未解决的东西交朋友。冥想提供了一个论坛,让你非常清楚地看清自己,然后指导是与你所看到的达成一致,而不是排斥它。
Original English
Ezra Klein: We've talked so much about the relationship to discomfort. Mhm. What about the relationship to comfort?
Pema Chödrön: I love it. Well, here here's this is a really important question. So, let's talk about comfort as comfort zone. That's the expression that people use. Are you familiar with that expression? So everybody needs some time with the comfort zone because your nervous system needs it. Swimming in the ocean, all these things that the things that soothe you need you need some soothing listening to music that you love and all these things. But there's no growth in the comfort zone. growth happens where it's more uncomfortable and we call it challenge because it's uh we've come up against our edge a little bit there. And so you you want your edge to expand. In other words, if today your edge is the the sidewalk, then by this time next year, you want to be able to walk five blocks or something like that.
Ezra Klein: Somebody once said to me that the amount of growth you are capable of is a direct correlate of the amount of discomfort you're willing to tolerate.
Pema Chödrön: Oh, that's right on. That person was very wise and said that to you. That's absolutely absolutely true. So, I guess what we're talking about then is to the degree that we can feel discomfort to that degree we can grow. And grow means uh let the natural change in evolution happen rather than get frozen in views and opinions that keep you stuck in the same way for your whole life. Really?
Ezra Klein: Meditation has been coming in and out of this conversation. And what is the purpose for you of meditation? What are you trying to practice?
Pema Chödrön: There uh there's could be a lot of answers to that question. I think of it as um a a way to get to know yourself deeply, intimately, um fearlessly um uh with an attitude of of friendliness. So a person who say meditates goes on a meditation retreat let's say where you do more hours and then what it inevitably things start floating up like maybe they think this is all about getting calm and blissful but then when they go on the meditation retreat a lot of painful memories uh regrets uh um flashbacks all all kinds of stuff comes up. For instance, I once raised my hand with Chimam Triumper and I said, "Remember, you're always talking about making friends with yourself, but I've been meditating now for a couple of years and I think I'm getting a lot of ammunition and proof, but that I I am pretty messed up person." And then he said, "Okay, so move closer to the feeling of me messed up." That's what he that was his answer. One of my teachers is called Sonia Rimpiche and he has this expression being okay with not being okay which I think I like that a lot because it's very pathy. It's kind of a fearless thing to see your habits to see your emotional reactivity to see maybe selfishness pride um rage about things that you thought had worked through and all this kind of stuff. So the to me making friends with yourself is making friends with all of that all of that unresolved and stuff like this. So meditation it provides a u a forum or something like this for you to be able to see yourself very clearly and then the instruction is to make friends or you know to to to agree with what you're seeing to not reject what you're seeing.
“凉爽”的无聊
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 有些人的冥想体验是——意识到自己甚至无法在思想飘走前完成10次呼吸。
佩玛·丘卓: 那没关系。创巴仁波切在《自由的迷信》(Myth of Freedom)中有一章专门讲“无聊”(boredom)。他说无聊是一件多么美妙的事情,因为它完全不喂养自我(ego)。
他鼓励人们,如果你开始感到无聊,那是一个优秀的信号,说明你的冥想正在进步。坐过“燥热的无聊”,直到它变成“凉爽的无聊”。
“燥热的无聊”是我们熟悉的:焦躁、想逃、想跑。“凉爽的无聊”是你坐在无聊的感觉中,没问题。
我以前听到这些教导时完全不懂。后来我去墨西哥看望母亲。我父亲去世了,我母亲喜欢关上所有的百叶窗坐在屋里,而窗外阳光明媚、充满活力。我当时很年轻。我去那儿陪她,前两天我感到非常无聊和坐立不安。然后我意识到,我是大老远跑来陪母亲的。在某个时刻,我放弃了斗争,只是和母亲待在一起。
后来发生了非常神奇的事:我开始觉得我就坐在一个舞台上。偶尔门会打开,一个朋友进来聊天,然后门关上。我们就处于这个“无事发生区”。我只是坐在她身边,听她说话,整件事变得非常迷人。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 这和您之前说的很像——痛苦来自于抵抗。
佩玛·丘卓: 没错。痛苦来自于抵抗。于是我学会了,我说:“哦,这就是‘凉爽的无聊’。我只是待在这儿,没有抵抗。”
Original English
Ezra Klein: What about for someone whose experience with meditation, which I think is very common, is not that they get these fireworks of self insight, right? But they just realize they can't take 10 breaths without their mind burning away from them.
Pema Chödrön: Yeah. That's true. That's okay. Yes. Absolutely. I was kind of jumping ahead, I guess, a little bit in terms of what I was saying. One of the things Trump says in myth of freedom is he has a whole chapter called boredom. And the chapter is about what a wonderful thing boredom is. Why is it a wonderful thing? He says because it doesn't feed the ego at all. There's nothing about it that feeds the ego. And so he was really encouraging people that if you start getting bored that is an excellent sign that your meditation is progressing and that uh uh sit okay sit through the hot boredom until it becomes cool boredom. And so hot boredom is what we're familiar with, which is like um you want to jumpiness. You you want to get out of there. You want to boredom has this quality of just wanting to bolt, you know. And cool boredom is you just you sit there with the feeling of boredom. No problem. And uh I would hear these teachings on cool boredom and honestly I had not a clue what they were talking about. So I went to Mexico where my parents had uh uh retired. My father had died. My mother liked to sit inside with all the windows shades closed in Mexico. We're outside of her door and the windows was like blazing with color and action and everything's happening and I'm young, you know. And so I go there to be with her and everything in me wants to be outside there. So for the first two days I was so bored and restless and then I realized I came all this way to be with with my mother. At some point I just gave up the struggle and I was just there with my mother. And then it was so remarkable because I began to feel like I was sitting in a on a stage and every once in a while the door would open and someone would a friend would come in or something. They'd have this conversation and then the door would close and then we were in this like nothing happening zone and I just sat there with her and then she'd start talking and then that's what was happening and the whole thing became kind of fascinating.
Ezra Klein: Feels very similar to what you were saying earlier about the the suffering was coming from resistance.
Pema Chödrön: That's right. The suffering was coming from the resistance. And so I learned I said, "Oh, this is cool boredom. I'm just here with it and it's and and there's no resistance."
时间的维度:在行动前创造空间
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 我觉得时间是一个非常有趣的维度。我们谈论的是:愿意在不采取行动的情况下,感受那种状态更久一点。
您有一句话:“耐心的反面是侵略性。”(The opposite of patience is aggression.)那种跳起来、移动、推开我们的生活、试图填满空间的欲望。您谈到“克制”(refraining)是成为修行人的方法。我不认为这意味着永远不行动,而是在行动之前,花更长的时间去观察。这对我来说是一个非常重要且具有转化性的洞见。
佩玛·丘卓: 这意味着你变得非常耐心。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 请告诉我您是如何理解“耐心”的。
佩玛·丘卓: 首先从“不耐烦”开始。我体验到的是焦躁,就像我说的无聊——想离开那儿,想离开那个“火盆”。那么耐心就是与那股焦躁的能量静静坐在一起。这就是我理解的耐心。在焦躁的能量中坐定,就像在我母亲的客厅里那样。这又回到了:增加你持有不适感的能力。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 您觉得这种能力是否已经削弱了?您曾写道:“克制是一种不因感到一丝无聊就立刻抓取娱乐的品质。这是一种不在出现空隙时就立刻填满空间的练习。”
以前我们无法填满每一个空隙。你在堵车时,没什么可做的。你在超市排队,没什么可看的。而现在,我们的指尖就有整个分心的世界。耳朵里塞着耳机。连每天被迫与无聊共处的必要性都消失了。
佩玛·丘卓: 太对了。而且我觉得这不是往好的方向改变。这让我们更少地接触到世界的丰富性。
我常鼓励学生,每周找一个早上或一段时间,完全离线。去杂货店时不带手机,坐地铁时不带手机。全身心地投入正在发生的事。
坐地铁时,每个人都在别处。所以我鼓励他们放下设备,即使是很短的一段时间。我孙女上大学时,老师说教室里不准带设备,连静音都不行,因为会振动。所以必须留在门外。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 如果我感觉到口袋里的手机,我的注意力就会不同。当我进行访谈时,手机在地上,不在口袋里。因为即使我知道它是静音的,我也不会去查,但只要它在口袋里,我对您的注意力就会不同。
佩玛·丘卓: 没错,我孙女也是这么说的。她说:“我从未意识到我是在训练自己去分心。”在口袋里和完全不在身边,感觉完全不同。
每个人都可以通过花点时间离线来给自己帮个大忙。你可能会说那是你会感到无聊的时候,但你也可以说,那是你更有生命力的时候。地铁就是一个迷人的例子,那里发生了那么多事,有时是你希望没发生的事,但依然迷人。
Original English
Ezra Klein: I actually think time is a very interesting dimension. Yeah. Of all of this that you know when you talk about being I mean everybody feels uncomfortable sometimes but really in a way what we're talking about here what you're talking about is being willing to feel like that for longer without acting. You have a line where you say the opposite of patience is aggression. The desire to jump and move to push against our lives to try to fill up space. Um, you talk about refraining as a method of becoming a dharmic person and and in some ways I don't understand any of this as never acting but as taking a longer space before acting.
Pema Chödrön: Before acting. Yeah, absolutely.
Ezra Klein: And that's been a very important and transformative distinction insight for me. And I'm I'd be curious to just hear more from you on on this dimension of of time and action along the lines of what I was just saying. It would mean that you um a lot you're very patient.
Ezra Klein: Well, just tell me about how you understand patience.
Pema Chödrön: Well, first let's start with impatience because like might as well start where we are, right? Uh I experience as restless and uh like I was saying about boredom. Uh wanting to get out of there, wanting to move to to just get off the hot seat sort of. And then patience would be sitting still with that restless energy. That's how I would think of patience. Sitting still with the restlessness of the energy. Just sitting there with it, you know, like in my mother's living room that uh that's how I experience patience. So again, it's uh growing your capacity to hold discomfort. Patience is part of it would be a necessary uh tool, I guess you could call it.
Ezra Klein: Do you think that that as a general capacity has as weakened and and I'm thinking of something you wrote that that I think about a lot. You wrote refraining is very much the method of becoming a dharmic person. It's a quality of not grabbing for entertainment the minute we feel a slight edge of boredom coming on. It's a practice of not immediately filling up space just because there's a gap. And we didn't used to have the ability to fill the space of every gap. Yeah. You know, you were sitting in traffic and there wasn't a lot to do. you were in line at the supermarket and there was nothing really to look at and now we have the world of distraction at our fingertips. We have, you know, AirPods in our ears. Just the daily necessity of sitting with boredom even has dissolved.
Pema Chödrön: That's so true.
Ezra Klein: And I think it changes us.
Pema Chödrön: It's so true. And not for the better, I would say. you know, uh, less in touch with the richness of the world. So, um, you were discussing with me earlier about going on the subway without without your earpods, you know, and just sitting there and how rich an experience it was of just being there, the sights and sounds and what what was happening, the drama and the just the whole experience as being very rich. And uh sometimes with students very often these days I'll really encourage them to uh one day a week or one morning a week or take an opport time when they just go offline and uh and go to the grocery store offline ride on the subway offline all your activities but be there fully for what's happening because you're not uh engrossed in a movie or or on a podcast or anything.
Ezra Klein: Let's not let's not get crazy here.
Pema Chödrön: And put you out of business, Ezra. Uh so, uh but you know how it is. You you go on the subway or anywhere and everybody is somewhere else. And uh so I encourage them to be present without their device. But, you know, I'm trying to be realistic and just say, "Do it this short period of time, every Wednesday or every Wednesday morning or something like that." And uh yeah, it's like my granddaughter when she was still in college and her teacher said, "No, no devices in the room." And I said, "Couldn't you just turn the sound off?" She said, "No, because it vibrates." So then, you know, so they had to leave them outside.
Ezra Klein: My attention is different if I can feel my phone in my pocket.
Pema Chödrön: Yep. So when we do when I do conversations, my phone is here. It's not in my pocket right now. It's on the floor near me, right? Because my attention to you would be different if it were in my pocket. Of course, even knowing that the sound is off, even know I'm not going to chug.
Pema Chödrön: Right. Exactly. That's what she said. And then she said, "I never realized how I was training myself to be distracted." that was her vocabulary in and because it was so so different being in class without it even with just in her pocket as you say. So yeah, I I think everybody can do themselves a big favor by spending some time offline and seeing what that's like for them. And you know, you could say, well, that's when you get into being bored. But you could say Pal maybe that's when you get into being alive more alive because there's I mean the subway is such a great example of of fascinating really totally fascinating to just be there because of the people if nothing else there's so much happening from when you get on to when you get off there is so much I mean sometimes things you wish weren't happening but nevertheless but...
冥想不是为了逃避烦恼
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 您有一句很可爱的话:“冥想不是为了逃避烦恼。”(Meditation is not a vacation from irritation.)
佩玛·丘卓: 没错。我第一次接受冥想指导时,那位女士就是这么对我说的。后来我发现它是出自创巴仁波切的《自由的迷信》。这句话对我影响很大。尽管我第一天就接触到了这个观点,但我还是花了很多年才让它真正渗透进我的内心:那是一条“不抵抗”之路。 种子种下了,但我并不是立刻就能对发生的一切敞开心扉。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 请描述一下那个过程。对于听众来说,您是一位著名的尼师,从从未冥想过到达到您现在的境界,似乎非常令人生畏。您的冥想经历或您与冥想的关系经历了哪些阶段?
佩玛·丘卓: 我从未仔细想过。但我还记得第一次学冥想的情景。我连两秒钟都守不住呼吸。但看到“原来我的心是那样的”,这本身就是一个启示。我没有因此感到气馁,因为老师告诉我:冥想不是为了摆脱想法。 想法永远会有,但你不需要跟着它跑一个半小时。
在头几年,也许是头五年,我的心非常狂野。但我坚持了下来。我们有长达一个月的禅修。后来发生了一件非常重要的事。创巴仁波切常谈论“间隙”(the gap)。你可以称之为静谧、开放或新鲜。我不懂他在说什么。他说,也许在每一次呼气结束、下一次吸气开始前,都有一个间隙。
我还是不明白。后来我在一次禅修中,房间里有一个大风扇一直在响。风扇的嗡嗡声变成了背景噪音。我坐在那儿冥想,风扇在响,突然,它停了一秒钟。
我说:“那就是‘间隙’!这就是他在说的东西!”
我明白了“间隙”的意思。那是所有的噪音,然后突然间出现了沉默。就像你处在一个漆黑的口袋里,突然出现了一个细缝,你意识到:哦,外面有一个巨大的空间。
他建议在每次呼吸结束时停顿一下,去体验那个间隙。就像那个风扇,声音在持续,然后停止了。在喋喋不休的思想中也是如此。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 但你并不是在试图“更偏爱”那个间隙。
佩玛·丘卓: 你只是在发现,在所有杂乱的想法和情绪(前景)背后,还有一个背景(背景)。那个背景是你随时可以连接的。
Original English
Ezra Klein: To to just expand that we were uh earlier off the microphone about uh one thing I've been trying to do for the last month or so is just do nothing on the subway and just be aware of what's happening around me. And it's interesting because a lot of the times I don't really love what's happening around me. It's a rich experience but it's a boom box. It's you know somebody uh like trying to grab my attention with music I don't really want to be listening to. It's the screeching of the brakes. But there's just a lot going on and dropping the effort of trying to find exactly the right music or podcast or thing on my Kindle to distract myself in the right way and try to maintain a kind of like a hermetic comfort. It's easier to stop. That that's been my big lesson from it. It's not so much that I love every moment on the subway, but I didn't quite notice how much energy I was expending trying to block it all out.
Pema Chödrön: Do you feel more relaxed?
Ezra Klein: I do. Yeah. I pick up my kids and I'm more present with them. Because I just spent the last 35 minutes practicing being present. As opposed to practicing finding somewhere my mind would rather be.
Pema Chödrön: So it's interesting because I would call that a form of meditation. Uh that just you're just present. It's just it's interesting because we didn't used to have all these devices. You know, I I grew up before television even. So uh but now that we have the devices it's very helpful actually to feel the contrast you know somehow it it it's richer.
Ezra Klein: You have a lovely line I think it's the a line somebody told you that meditation is not a vacation from irritation.
Pema Chödrön: That's right that's right the first thing I was when I first time time I ever went for meditation instruction that's what the woman said to me and then I later I saw that it was from myth of freedom that Trump chim tr said that she was she plagiarized but anyway it made a big impression on me because that's that's right meditation not a vacation from irritation it's just another way of saying the same kind of thing you know but I I have to say even though I was introduced to this view or this attitude from the day one took me a lot of years to really uh somehow have it penetrate and get to me that the path of non-resistance. It was in there. The seed was in there, but it wasn't that I immediately uh uh was open to everything that was happen.
Ezra Klein: Narrate that progress for for a minute because I mean somebody listening to this here here you are. You're a you know a famed nun. Um and the idea of moving from I've never meditated to whatever you must be experiencing seems very intimidating. like what what how would you describe the stages your experience of meditation or your relationship to it have gone through?
Pema Chödrön: That's a difficult question to answer because I've never actually given it a lot of thought. But let me just go back to remembering the first time I was taught to meditate. Well, yeah, sure. I I could hardly stay with the breath for two seconds, you know. But then that was like what uh I was saying earlier. It was just a revelation to see how I had no idea that my mind was like that. And instead of being discouraged by that because of what my teacher at the time was telling me and so forth, I was told just expect that that that actually meditation is not about getting rid of thoughts. There's always going to be thoughts, but you don't have to follow them for an hour and a half, you know. Uh, and um, so, so I would say in the beginning, uh, my very wild mind and, um, and when I say beginning, I don't just mean, you know, what first month or something. I guess for a couple of years, maybe maybe five years. I I don't know how long. But but of course, I kept at it and I did some long meditation practices. We we had these month-long meditation practices and I did that kind of thing and um uh then what started to happen more was a very important thing was I um Trump remembers used to talk about something he called the gap. You could call it a stillness. You could call it a openness uh freshness. And again, I I didn't really know what in the world he was talking about, but he said, you know, it could be possible that at the end of every breath, there's a gap before you breathe back in again. And he heaven sometimes gave a meditation like just natural breathing out and then pause like create a gap and then come back in. So he called that the gap and it had supposedly very profound and but I didn't didn't have a clue really what he was talking about. And then I was in a meditation retreat uh um and we had a big fan that was going all the time. And so the hum of the fan became just background new noise that was always there. So I was sitting there meditating doing my practice and the fan is going and all of a sudden It went off for just a second. I said, "That's a gap. That's what he's talking about." So then I understood what he meant by gap. He meant there's all this noise and then suddenly there's silence. It's sort of like being in a use the image of being in a sack or something like that and it's dark and then there's this little slit and you suddenly realize oh there's there's a whole big space out there. It's it's sort of like that. Someone used this example that they were in a room with this teacher in Nepal and had his window was covered with uh black plastic and he said um that's like uh all think of that as just all the discursive thoughts. this black plastic. It's just covering over and then you just make a pin prick in it and then the light comes through and that's like oh there's there's there's a background here to this whole thing.
你很完美,但仍有改进空间
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 我在读您和创巴仁波切的书时,总是在一种悖论中摇摆。一方面,教导说“没有好,没有坏”。思想的喋喋不休并不比开阔静谧的心更糟,看那块遮光塑料并不比看透进来的光更糟。一切都很好。
但另一方面,似乎又在描述某种“更好”的状态。那为什么还要谈论“间隙”呢?
佩玛·丘卓: 没错,你是对的。这时候幽默感就派上用场了,你要有能力与悖论和模糊性共处。
如果你始终抱着一种“我必须变得更好”的想法,那往往源于一种“我最初就不够好”的感觉。铃木俊隆(Suzuki Roshi)曾对他的学生说:“你们都很完美,现状就很好;而且,你们还有一点改进的空间。”(You are all perfect just as you are and you can use a little work.)事实就是那样。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 您如何理解他这句话的意思?
佩玛·丘卓: 我理解那是我们本质上都有“佛性”。每个人都有从混乱的睡眠中醒来的潜力。如果你看一个房间的人,你会看到一房间的佛。他们已经觉醒了,只是还没意识到。所以你想:我也是其中之一。我想更多地认出我的本性。
但如果你想通过“摆脱混乱”、“摆脱自我”来认出本性,那是行不通的。让混乱减少的唯一方法,就是与原本的自己变得亲密——即便那个自己充满了混乱、狂野、无聊和所有那些东西。如果你认为这些东西都不是问题,你就能明白你的根本自性是“基本善”(basic goodness)。工作只是为了揭开早已存在的东西。
Original English
Ezra Klein: So he said that you could at the end of every breath you could pause and there would you could experience that gap the gap of well in the tense of the fan it was just the sound was going and then it stopped. So you could say in terms of chatter it would be chatter chatter chatter chatter chatter chatter chatter chatter chatter chatter chatter chatter chatter. But you're not trying to prefer the gap. You're just trying to discover that behind all of in say if if the discursive thoughts and emotions and everything are foreground, there's also a background to the whole thing. and that that that you could connect with at any moment.
Ezra Klein: So, I have a question about this, like a pretty I I think a question I really struggle with when I read his books, when I read your books. I feel like there's like a shifting back and forth a little bit between this instruction of there is no good, there is no bad. It is not better to have mental chatter. It is not better to have spacious mental quiet. It is not better to see the light coming through the pinhole in the black uh plastic over the chatter of the mind. It is not better to be looking at the the black plastic. There's this non-dualism. Everything is totally fine and in some ways the same because it's all the ground of experience and also and maybe it is better. So why do we even talk about gap then? Um because it's there I guess. I guess because it's there. But I think I'm asking at the underlying thing that that is there I feel like sometimes there is a conversation about better and worse or that nothing is better and nothing is worse and then sometimes something seems to be being described that is better.
Pema Chödrön: Yeah, you're absolutely right about that. And uh uh well that's where sense of humor comes in and and an ability to like uh be okay with paradox and ambiguity and things not always being so neat and tidy like that. Because if you know the basic thing that struggle and uh and uh polarization dualism you know pitting one thing against another trying to get better which comes from the place of feeling that you're not good enough to begin with you know that as long as you have the idea that we're moving in the direction of... you're okay just the way you are and that that's a Suzuki Roshi joke. Suzuki Roshi was a Zen master in San Francisco, started the San Francisco Zen Center and he had this expression. He looked out at the audience of his students and he said, "You are all perfect just as you are and you can use a little work." and it is sort of like that, you know.
Ezra Klein: And how do you understand what he meant?
Pema Chödrön: I understand that fundamentally we have Buddha nature. I guess you that would be the uh kind of uh traditional way to say it. But you could say fundamentally uh everybody comes from a a uh has this potential for uh a awakening from the sleep of confusion. Let's call it that. You know, kind of glamorous language. But um everybody has that potential and uh you look out and you see you see a room full of Buddhas. You know, you see a room full of people that are awake but just don't realize it. something like that. And so you begin to say, "Okay, I'm one of them." You know, uh, and uh, I want to recognize more my true nature, I guess you could say. But the thing is, if you want to recognize the true nature by getting rid of the confus, getting rid of the ego, let's say, it doesn't work. The only way to actually have the confusion lesson is to become familiar intimate with yourself just as you are which is a lot of confusion and and wildmindedness and boredom and the all those things you know and so if you have a view that there's nothing problematic with any of that then you can understand that my fundamental nature is uh one of is basic goodness. Uh but uh I'm not recognizing that and so the work is kind of uncovering what's already here. Something like that.
行动与安住的平衡:什么时候该离开?
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 刚才我们谈到“无条件的爱”。这让我想到了我作为父亲的感觉。我一点也不想让我的孩子变得与现状不同。我爱他们原本的样子。同时,我也希望他们成长,学会做数学题,学会自己穿裤子。这两者是共存的。
佩玛·丘卓: 没错。你可以试着这样看待自己。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 关于“安住”与“行动”的关系。如果我们被伴侣粗鲁对待,我说“我不反应,我只是坐在这儿感受情绪”。但治疗师可能会说:“你的故事(叙事线)在这里很重要。也许你不该接受这个现状。”我担心“放下叙事线”会变成一种接受不该接受的境况的方式。
佩玛·丘卓: 我明白你的意思。经常有身处虐待关系中的女性来找我,我总是说:“尽可能快地离开那儿。”
曾经有一位女性站起来,描述她多年来被丈夫虐待。她说:“所以我试着通过深入感受身体来处理它。”我告诉她:“忘掉那些,立刻离开那段关系。离开并保持距离,这是对你丈夫和你自己最慈悲的行为。”这不是坐在那儿感受身体的时候,这是带上孩子赶紧走的时候。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 那么,如何辨别什么时候该采取行动,什么时候该认真对待叙事线,而什么时候该安住、感受能量呢?
佩玛·丘卓: 这是一个非常好的问题。在抗议不公时也会遇到。我总是说:如果你被强烈的情绪控制,被愤怒席卷,你是没有效率的。首先你无法沟通。别人只会听到你的愤怒,而不会听到你的话。
所以我鼓励人们继续他们正在做的事,但不要在被强烈的毁灭性情绪(藏语中叫 kleshas)控制时去做。在这个过程中,他们可以回到身体,感受它,作为一种方式,让自己能推开门,去进行一场不来自那个地方的对话。这样你才会真正好奇对方要说什么,才不会被恐惧控制。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 您说“不被恐惧控制”很有趣。当我变得不那么害怕感受那种不适时,我能采取的行动范围就扩大了。有很多对话或行动,以前因为我不敢面对其中的不确定性而根本不在选项范围内。
变得**“能习惯不舒服”**(comfortable being uncomfortable)为我打开了更广阔的行动空间。
佩玛·丘卓: 没错。你可以想想:一年后,或者五年后,你想在哪儿?你还想被困在同样的地方吗?这是一个成长的过程,你在改变自己的“基因”。研究显示,冥想会在大脑中开启新的神经通路。每当你停下来考虑另一种选择,你就开启了一条新的道路。这非常令人乐观。
Original English
Ezra Klein: Earlier in the conversation you were talking about unconditional love. And what you were saying there as I was trying to absorb it made me think of it that the thing that came to mind is how I feel as a parent. I don't want my children to be any different than they are. I love them just the way they are. And also I want them to grow and there are ways that they can grow but it doesn't have any it doesn't come from a desire to change them. Like I really do. Like I really love them as they are and I want them to grow and you know learn how to do more math and you know all the things you do as a person and put on their own pants. Um tie their own shoes. But so they're both there. It was funny. It was the only it was the only experience I could come to that that had both of those in my head.
Pema Chödrön: Yeah. Yeah. So it's a good one. You could think of yourself that way, you know, just think of yourself that way. Does that make sense?
Ezra Klein: Yeah, that would be nice.
Pema Chödrön: Yeah, you could. You used to be that little, you know. And uh but you don't have to think of yourself necessarily as a little kid, but you could think of yourself as fine just as you are. And yet at the same time uh let's just say not wanting to harm people with my speech, not wanting to harm people with my actions, not wanting to be so critical minded about everything. So it is paradoxical but the basic view is that there's nothing wrong here.
Ezra Klein: How do you think about the relationship between abiding and acting. We've talked about abiding in difficult emotions and right and I think that a question that comes up for people and that's come up for me is you know you think about if your partner treats you badly and you think okay I you know I'm having these difficult emotions I'm going to sit here and I'm not going to be reactive and I'm going to you know work with the texture of them and and drop the story line and touch the energy of the emotion. Yeah. And yet your your therapist would say, "Well, maybe the story here is important. Maybe, you know, this person is not treating you well. Maybe you're allowing it because you don't love yourself enough. But there is something about the dropping of story lines that can become or at least I fear it can become also a way to accept situations that shouldn't be accepted. the responsibility for change. I hear you.
Pema Chödrön: Well, one I I I frequently get uh women in abusive relationships and I always say get out of there as fast as you can. You know, like they like like one woman tell stood up and she was saying uh that she has she described it as an abusive relationship with her husband who for many years and she said so I try to work with it by just you know going to the feelings and all of this and that. So what you're saying there I said uh forget about all of that just get out of the relationship. you you need to get out of the relationship and get some distance from it and that's the that is the most compassionate thing you could do for your husband and also for yourself. So I said you know this is not the time to sit there and you know contact what it feels like in the body. this is time to get just get out, take take the kids and go and just start exploring how you could do that, how you practically could do that, you know, go to your mother's or whatever.
Ezra Klein: So how then do you discern when you should be acting when you should be taking the story line seriously versus when you should be abiding, feeling, touching the energy without the story line.
Pema Chödrön: Yeah, that's a really good question. And uh uh this comes up a lot with um uh protesting injustice in various forms. And uh so that conversation I've had with a lot of people uh and I always say you know I say what they already know but then we have a discussion about it and that is that you're not effective if you're caught in uh strong emotions and you're being carried away by the energy of anger or something like this that you just can't be effective. First of all you're not able to communicate. Someone's only going to hear your anger. they're not going to hear your words and it's there's no possibility of change. So I I first of all I say try to experiment with ways that actually start to communicate to the heart of the people that you're trying to influence for change. Try it when you're angry. Try it when you're not angry. Like find out for yourself, you know, that's the only way it really lands in the body. So I'm encouraging the people to continue with what they're doing but not not when they're caught up in in their clacious that's a Tibetan word for strong destructive emotions and then in that process they might go to the body feel what they're feeling get in got in touch as a way of uh being able to then walk through the door and have the conversation that doesn't come from that place and is actually curious to hear what they have to say and is actually open to hearing what they have to say and isn't uh controlled by fear.
Ezra Klein: It's interesting when you say isn't controlled by fear. One of the things I've experienced with some of your work and and some of this is that there were a lot of actions I was not willing to take because I was afraid of feeling the discomfort the uncertainty associated with them right and it was only when I became less afraid of feeling that right that I could take those actions right. Getting more um comfortable being uncomfortable has opened up a wider range of space in which I can act.
Pema Chödrön: You know, I think a really good way to go about this is uh think like um okay, where do I want to be in one year time or how about five years? You know, like do I want to be stuck in exactly the same way, you know, on this day 2027 or on this day in 2027? Well, I feel that like, okay, I'm I'm able to sit with discomfort a little bit more than before. In other words, it's like it's a growth process and and I think you're actually changing the DNA and some kind of way like it's really fundamental what's what's being changed.
“当下性”与深层的满足
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 我想以您老师书里的一句话作为结束。他写道:“一个人的全部修持,都应基于你与‘当下性’(nowness)的关系。”
佩玛·丘卓: 我非常喜欢这个词。“让当下性的线索贯穿你的整个人生。”
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 与“当下”建立关系意味着什么?
佩玛·丘卓: 简单来说,意味着你就在这儿,而不是被拽到别处。这种“在场”本身就能带给你一个宏大的视角。就像宇航员从太空俯瞰地球,他们会有令人惊叹的精神体验,因为他们从无限空间的视角看到了地球。
当回到地面,你的习惯模式又会切入,陷入斗争。而“当下性”意味着你开始拥有那个大视角。你只是一个小点,地球是一个小点,在无尽膨胀的宇宙面前,你微不足道。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 如果承诺的不是痛苦的结束,不是永远的快乐,那冥想承诺的是什么?
佩玛·丘卓: 满足感(Contentment)。
即使面对令人不安的展开,也能感到没问题。这并不意味着你不行动,而是你不再与生命的展开相对抗。
由于你不再对抗,那种满足感是非常深沉的。你让生命展开,然后微调它,去认出心性的开阔和博大,而不是被琐碎的恩怨、批评、好恶所困。于是,好恶依然存在,但它们有足够的空间共存。你可以说,你与你的体验之间的隔阂越来越少。
我可以肯定地说,我对我的生活深感满足。这并非来自外部环境,而是来自冥想练习。它让你知道,心既有让你受苦的力量,也有让你保持清醒和活力的力量。
Original English
Ezra Klein: Let me as we come to a close here, ask you about a very lovely line in one of your teachers books. He writes, "One's whole practice should be based on the relationship between you and nowness."
Pema Chödrön: Oh, I love that. Yeah. nowness is a word I really love. And another place he says like let the thread of nowness run through your whole life.
Ezra Klein: But but I would just be curious on on hearing your reflection because this can all feel so abstract, but just what does it mean to have a relationship with now?
Pema Chödrön: Oh, well, it means that you Okay, basically that you're present instead of drawn off and uh and that being present itself can tune you into a bigger perspective on your life. It's like that I was talking about foreground and background. It's like uh an example might be the difference between being all caught up in your thoughts and going to the window and looking at the sky and uh you know it's like the astronauts experiences. They're all out there and they're having these amazing spiritual experiences just because they're seeing the earth from the perspective of vast space. And then you get back down on earth and right away all that your habitual patterns and things click in. You're already stuck in in in fighting, you know, struggle and so forth. So in a way I I guess what it means with nowness is that you begin to have more that big perspective that puts everything in in perspective and um and then you just go about your life but all the time you know at at the same time uh you're a little dot the earth is a little dot and you are t nothing in the you know really tiny tiny in the face of this vast universe that just expands forever and does not have an end.
Ezra Klein: If you do this practice in a committed way, if what is promising is not an end to pain. If what it's promising is not that you'll always feel radiant joy or equinimity, what is it promising?
Pema Chödrön: Contentment. Um being okay with how things unfold even if even if it's disturbing. In other words, okay with how things unfold doesn't mean that you wouldn't act, but it does mean that you aren't struggling against what's happening. H contentment so deep because there's you're not struggling against the unfolding of your life. You're more like letting it unfold and then doing things to uh fine-tune it or uncover uh your your uh the openness and and vastness of your mind and and not not be all caught up in the smallalness of petty u grievances and criticisms and uh likes and dislikes and um So somehow then all of that likes and dislikes and everything just have a lot of room to exist and uh so there is a sense of less and less separation between you and your experience and that is a very has a lot of contentment in it. I would say I can say definitely that I uh am deeply contented with my life and I do feel it comes from not from the outer circumstances but from uh the meditation practice and working with my mind and knowing that mind has so much power to uh make you suffer or to help you stay awake and alive to your life.
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 这是一个非常美好的结尾。最后照例请您推荐三本书。
佩玛·丘卓: 我推荐:
- 《香巴拉:勇士的神圣之路》(Shambhala: The Sacred Path of the Warrior),作者邱阳·创巴。
- 《禅者的初心》(Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind),作者铃木俊隆。
- 《觉悟的流浪者》(Enlightened Vagabond),作者马修·里卡德(Matthieu Ricard)。这本书收集了一位19世纪佛教大师的故事,非常风趣且富有哲理。
埃兹拉·克莱恩: 佩玛·丘卓,非常感谢您。
Original English
Ezra Klein: I think that's a lovely place to end. Then always our final question. What are three books you'd recommend to the audience?
Pema Chödrön: I recommend Shambala, the sacred path of the warrior by Choim Trish, and I recommend Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind by Suzuki Roshi, and I recommend this book um called Enlightened Vagabond by uh Matthew Ricard. He collected stories about this 19th century eccentric Buddhist master but very eccentric and the stories are totally delightful and very you it's like every story has a moral so to speak but funny very very funny and and the man was a fabulous character so I love those stories and uh Matthew Ricard collected them over many many many many years hearing them from his teachers and things. So those are the three books that I recommend.
Ezra Klein: Pema Chödrön, thank you very much.