TED2026 奇迹现场:11位创新者如何用思想重塑全球未来 TED 2026-04-16

开场:全球奇迹的搜寻之旅

[主持人] 凯莉·斯坦西尔 (Kelly Stencil): 各位早安!大家好。我是凯莉·斯坦西尔。

Original English

Kelly Stencil: Good morning y'all. Good morning everybody. Hi, I am Kelly Stencil.

[主持人] 凯莉·舒 (Kelly Shu): 我是凯莉·舒,我们是本场“世界级奇迹” (World Class Wonder) 环节的主持人。

Original English

Kelly Shu: And I am Kelly Shu and we are your hosts for this session, World Class Wonder.

凯莉·斯坦西尔: 此时此刻,无论你是在现场还是通过直播观看,这都是最值得关注的地方。凯莉在 TED 负责 YouTube 业务,刚庆祝完她的入职一周年。而我算是这里的元老了,虽然离职几年,但从未真正离开。这周回到这里,感觉就像回到了家。最近,我们联手进行了一场全球搜寻,寻找今天将与大家见面的演讲者。我们发布了全球征集令,并与全球 9 个 TEDx 团队合作,在各国举办了特别的创意搜寻活动。最终,我们从每个城市挑选出了一位杰出的演讲者来到这里。

Original English

Kelly Stencil: And hey, if y'all are watching in the loop or in Simocast, come on in the theater. We got some seats in here and this is the place to be right now. So Kelly leads YouTube for TED and she just celebrated her first workversary here at TED, right? Go Kelly. Um, I'm a bit more of a veteran of this place. Um, and I I haven't been on staff here for a few years, but I've also kind of never really left at the same time. Um, and you know, being here this week to me just really feels like being home. and Kelly and I got to team up recently and we went on this global search that led to the speakers for this session and we're so excited to share some of the people that we met with y'all today. So, Kelly and I went on a bit of a mission to find these speakers. We put out this global call for applicants and we partnered with nine TEDx teams all over the world. Together, we held these special idea search events in each of these countries to hear from finalists. And in the end, we chose one standout speaker from each city to come here to speak at this session.

凯莉·舒: 是的,我们访问的每个地方都像是通往另一个 TED 宇宙的门户。我们看到这些社区围绕 TED 和 TEDx 聚集,每个地方都有独特的文化,演讲者们通过不同的视角阐述思想如何改变他们的世界。今天,这场活动正在 YouTube 上全球直播。目前在日本墨西哥葡萄牙印度意大利台湾等地都有观看派对,全球各地都有许多人在家中观看。

Original English

Kelly Shu: Yeah. I mean, each place we visited was like a portal into another TED universe. We saw these communities gathering around TED and TEDex, each with distinct culture and speakers with different lenses on how ideas can change their part of the world. And you know, we got to work with the most amazing TEDex teams in every single country that we visited. And then today this session is being live streamed on YouTube. Plus there are watch parties happening right now in Japan, Mexico, Portugal, India, Italy, Taiwan and more. And then also our whole big global TED community is all like so many people watching from their homes today.

跨越分歧:从中立转向客观

凯莉·斯坦西尔: 我们的第一位演讲者来自芝加哥。他是一位广播新闻记者,通过工作,他学会了如何与他人建立联系,即使是在充满挑战的时期。让我们热烈欢迎 约书亚·约翰逊 (Joshua Johnson)

Original English

Kelly Stencil: Our first speaker comes from our very first event at TEDx Chicago. He's a broadcast journalist and through his work, he's learned a thing or two about how to connect with others. Yes, all others, even during challenging times. So, y'all, let's please give a big giant warm welcome to Joshua Johnson.

约书亚·约翰逊: 蠢人无处不在。有些人会用他们的观点、态度或政治立场把你逼疯。作为一名拥有 20 多年经验的新闻记者,我打过交道的难搞的人数不胜数。后来我发现,主持这些艰难对话其实很简单——虽然不容易,但很简单。诀窍就是去一个你不太想去的地方:离得更近一点

距离会让情况变得更糟。我出身于公共广播电台,受过老派记者的训练,他们教我中立的艺术:中和你的观点,压抑你的情绪,这样你就能在不翻白眼的情况下完成大部分对话。但这在涉及私人情感的话题时,中立会显得虚伪。

我曾在 NPR 主持一个名为 《1A》 的节目。早期采访过一位南方联盟士兵的后裔,他认为应该保留联盟纪念碑。作为一名黑人,我感到巨大的中立压力,所以我决定只关注他的论点,而不是他本人。他的逻辑很站不住脚,我当众揭穿了他。最后他垂头丧气地说:“我说什么其实都不重要。”那一刻,我知道我失败了。我赢了理,却错失了真正履行职责的机会。我的中立让我审讯了他的信仰,但距离阻碍了我去理解他为什么相信这些。

如果我问更好的问题呢?比如:“是谁对你形成这些观点的影响最大?”或者:“假设我们让这些雕像保持现状,这对你意味着什么?”了解他的故事可能会让我看到标签背后的他。

当你觉得某人不可理喻时,有一种更好的处理方式,能让你保持理智,甚至建立联系。这听起来很疯狂:走得更近。不是为了拥抱他们,而是像医生研究样本一样去探究他们。你需要的是显微镜,而不是望远镜。

我后来意识到,我必须从中立 (Neutrality) 转向 客观 (Objectivity)。它们并不一样。客观是指你暂时放下情绪,在不带评判的情况下学习。我不必喜欢它,我只是来了解它。中立是抹杀你的观点,假装你没有判断。你们真的相信我对种族问题没有任何看法吗?注意,我说的是“放下” (Park) 你的观点。当你把车停在车库时,你并没有抛弃它,你还会回来找它。所以你可以选择向内关注你的想法,还是向外关注你能学到什么。这种脆弱性是开放的信号,而缺乏开放性的对话是毫无意义的。

这里有三个小贴士:第一,挖掘故事,特别是关键的决定和转折点。一个人相信什么并不重要,重要的是他如何选择去相信。第二,保持问题简短,最好控制在 10 秒以内。长篇大论听起来像陷阱。第三,使用思想显微镜。尽可能近地观察。记住,你不必喜欢它,但要从中学习。现在是时候重新建立联系了,甚至是和你受不了的人。

Original English

Joshua Johnson: Idiots are everywhere. Some people drive you right up the wall with their opinions, their attitudes, their politics. I dealt with all kinds of people in my 20 plus years as a broadcast journalist. Eventually, I found moderating tough conversations with whatever kind of difficult people you just thought of kind of simple to do. Not easy, but simple. The trick is to go somewhere I know you'd rather not be: closer.

Distance makes things worse. I came up in public radio trained by old school journalists who taught me the art of neutrality. You neutralize your opinions, dead in your emotions, and you can get through most conversations without rolling your eyes. But when the subject matter felt personal, neutrality felt phony. I used to host a national talk show on NPR called 1A. And in one of our early programs, I interviewed a descendant of Confederate soldiers. He argued that Confederate monuments should be historically preserved. Now, as a black man, I felt enormous pressure to remain neutral, so I decided I was just going to focus on his arguments instead of on him. His logic felt kind of flimsy, and I called him on it. And eventually he just folded and he said, "It really doesn't matter what I say." And the moment he said that, I knew I had failed. I may have had a point, but I missed a huge opportunity to really do my job. See, my neutrality allowed me to interrogate his beliefs, but the distance prevented me from seeing why he believed them.

What if I had asked better questions? Like, who influenced you the most in forming these views? Or suppose we let all of these monuments and statues stand just as they are. What would that mean to you? Getting his story might have shown me him behind his canned arguments.

When you consider someone problematic, there's a better way to deal with them, keep your sanity, and maybe even connect. And it sounds insane. Move closer. Not to embrace them, but to explore them like a doctor studying a sample. You need a microscope, not a telescope.

I had to shift from neutrality to objectivity. And no, they're not the same. Objectivity is just when you park your emotions and learn without judgment. I don't have to like it. I'm just here to learn from it. Neutrality negates your opinions as if you have no judgments. Does anyone here honestly believe I have no opinions on race right now? Notice I said park your opinions. When you park your car, you don't abandon it in the garage. You're coming back for it. That vulnerability is a sign of openness. And a conversation that's not open is pointless.

Here are three tips to get you started. First, get the story, particularly the key decisions and the turning points. What someone believes is not as important as how they chose to believe it. Second, keep your questions short. 10 seconds tops. And third, use that mental microscope. Look as closely as you can. Remember, you don't have to like it, but learn from it. It is time to reconnect, even to the people you can't stand.

打破沉默:非言语者的尊严

凯莉·舒: 我们的下一位演讲者是在悉尼发现的。洁丝 (Jess) 是一个非言语者,她是一位极具创意的“瑞士军刀”式人物,正努力确保全球所有的非言语者都能被听到。欢迎 杰西卡·欧文 (Jessica Irwin)

Original English

Kelly Shu: Our next speaker comes from our very first event at TEDx Sydney, and let me tell you, the crowd went absolutely wild for this one. Jess is non-verbal and she is just a creative Swiss Army knife and she is working extremely hard to make sure all non-verbal people around the globe are heard. Let's please welcome Jessica Irwin.

杰西卡·欧文: 大家好,我是杰西卡·欧文。我这辈子从未说过一个字。甚至无法说出自己的名字,也无法说出关键的“停”。

事实是,我有太多想说的话。在我的脑海里,总是有许多机智的反击。通过在沟通设备上打字,我只能表达我想说的 25%,剩下的 75% 都困在脑子里。这是因为我有脑性麻痹 (Cerebral Palsy),我的嘴部肌肉不允许我进行物理说话。我用沟通设备打字的速度只有每分钟 7 个单词。机器人般的声音无法表达我的机智,在紧急情况下也来不及反应。想象一下,如果你看到小侄女要碰火炉,你大喊“停”,但我做不到。

许多非言语者在医院里会感到恐惧。医疗系统在某些方面很出色,但并没有受过“听取”我们声音的训练。当我们躺在床上时,突然就失去了声音。想象一下,护士没看病历,准备直接把你翻转到受伤的髋部。你无法喊停,你只能开始哭泣,但止痛药的副作用让你显得易怒,护士误以为你在无理取闹。这不是假设,而是我经历过的恐怖现实。

这就是为什么我要在医院引入沟通培训。解决方法其实很简单:假设病人是聪明的。问“是”或“否”的问题,让他们向上看表示“是”,向下看表示“否”

让我们一起试一下:向上看表示“是”,向下看表示“否”。太棒了。就这么简单,我们完成了一次对话。这也适用于复杂场景,甚至可以 spelling(拼写)出单词。这四个简单的步骤可以拯救生命。

脑性麻痹是脑损伤,但脑损伤不等于智力残疾。我们也有观点和知识要分享。人们常常对我们大声说话或像拍小孩一样拍我们的头。我建议:就像对待坐在你旁边的人一样对待我们,看我们的面部表情和眼神。通过幽默来观察我们是否发笑。你握有把声音还给别人的权力。请记住,我远不止我的外表。我是摄影师、艺术家、作家和演讲家。我跟你们一样,是一个完整的人。

Original English

Jessica Irwin: Hi, I am Jessica Irwin and I have never spoken a single word in my life. Even to say my name, nor the vital word of stop. Through typing on my communication device, I can express about 25% of what I want to say. The other 75% stays trapped inside my head for only me to hear. This is because I have a level of cerebral pausy that means my mouth muscles simply won't allow me to physically talk. The robotic voice outputs what I'm saying, but it doesn't express my quick wit.

Many non-verbal people spend a lot of time in hospitals. We enter a system that is brilliant at some things but untrained in hearing voices like ours. Imagine lying in a hospital bed with an injured hip and nurse comes up to your bed and goes to roll you straight onto your injured hip. You can't say the single word stop. This is misinterpreted by the nurse as the patient is just fussing. This is not hypothetical. It has been my horrifying reality.

This is why I'm bringing communication training into hospitals. This problem is solvable. All it takes is knowing one simple thing. Assume the patient is intelligent. Ask yes and no questions and ask them to look up for yes and look down for no. Let's try it together. If you're with me, look up for yes. Now look down for no. Awesome. Just like that, without a single spoken word, we've had a conversation.

Cerebral pausy is a brain injury. And when people hear the words brain damage, they automatically jump to intellectual impairment. My case affects movement, not intelligence. Being non-verbal doesn't mean we don't have opinions and knowledge to share. We often get loudly spoken down to and patted on the head. So, here's a tip. Speak to us like you would the person sitting next to you right now. Try humor to see if we laugh. You hold the power to give someone back their voice. My name is Jessica Irwin. I am a photographer, artist, author, keynote speaker and a human being. I am just like you.

时尚与历史:印度布料如何定义世界

凯莉·斯坦西尔: 下一位演讲者将带领我们领略印度时尚如何塑造世界历史。欢迎 苏基蒂 (Sukiti)

Original English

Sukiti: Our next speaker, Sukiti, seven minutes, seven outfit changes, and the 4,000 year saga of how Indian fashion shaped world history.

苏基蒂: 准备好了吗?我将用 7 分钟时间展示 7 次换装,讲述印度时尚如何塑造了 4000 年的世界历史。

回到公元前 2000 年的古埃及,法老虽然画着眼线,但他最喜欢的衣服其实来自印度的古吉拉特邦 (Gujarat):那是像云朵一样柔软、色彩斑斓的棉布。直到今天,考古学家还在古埃及古墓中不断发现古吉拉特棉布的残片。

公元 77 年,古罗马指挥官普林尼抱怨印度正在掏空罗马的国库,因为印度棉布太受欢迎了。罗马人称这种布料为“织出的风” (Woven Wind)。在没有空调的时代,凉爽的棉布和昂贵的丝绸一样令人垂涎。

再看我们的扎染丝绸。在 15 世纪的印尼、马来西亚和泰国,只有皇室成员才被允许穿着这种工艺复杂的进口布料。

转到加勒比海,这种充满节日气息的格子裙,其实是来自南印度小镇马德拉斯(现称钦奈)的马德拉斯格子布 (Madras checks)。它不像欧洲那种厚重的毛料,而是像一道凉爽的彩虹,被采纳为许多国家的民族服饰。

进入美国西部,牛仔脖子上的方巾 (Bandana) 这个词源于印地语单词“Bandhana”(意为扎染)。甚至连工装背带裤 (Dungaree) 也是以我故乡马哈拉施特拉邦的东格里 (Dongari) 镇命名的,那里生产这种耐磨的棉布。还有泡泡纱 (Seersucker),它源于波斯语的“Milk and Sugar”,这种凹凸不平的纹理确保布料不会粘在皮肤上。

最后是印花布 (Chintz/Kalamkari)。这种 23 道工序的复杂工艺让这种布料像一幅水彩画。1680 年,英国东印度公司每年运回上百万件印花布,席卷了整个英国。英国国会也因为进口量太大而感到恐慌。

这促使英国人提出了一个关键问题:我们要付出什么代价才能自己生产这些布料?请记住,英国工业革命的第一批产品不是汽车或武器,而是纺织机。印度手工需要 5 万小时完成的工作,英国机器只需 2000 小时。

印度这个曾经为全人类提供服装的民族一度面临消亡,直到甘地出现。他是一位真正的时尚先锋,他在集会上亲自纺棉,提倡手工织物 Khadi,甚至将纺车放在印度旧国旗的核心位置。今天,印度手工艺人正以更环保、更可持续的方式重新回归世界舞台。

Original English

Sukiti: Seven minutes, seven outfit changes, and the 4,000 year saga of how Indian fashion shaped world history. 2000 BC, ancient Egypt. An Egyptian pharaoh reaching for his favorite fit from Gujarat, India. Cloudsoft, colorful, beautifully decorated cotton. Excavation into ancient Egyptian tombs keeps throwing up scraps of Gujarati cotton. 77 AD, ancient Rome. Plenny growlingly calls India the world's gold sink because our cotton is so popular. The Romans have nicknamed this "woven wind".

In 15th century Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, only royalty wears our magnificent silk tie-dye. Move to the Caribbean. You might recognize this as a carnival dress, but it is actually Madras checks from the south Indian town of Madras. The American bandana comes from the Hindi word "bandhana". The dungaree is named for the town of Dongari, which first produced this rough and tough cotton weave. Seersucker literally comes from "milk and sugar" (sir sakar).

Our final fabric is chintz (Kalamkari). By 1680, the British East India Company is sailing home a million pieces of chintz every year. British Parliament is horrified. Britain asks: What would it take for Britain to make these Indian fabrics? The first products of the British industrial revolution were not cars, not weapons. Spinning jenny, power loom. What took Indian hands 50,000 hours was made by British machines in 2000.

India teetering on extinction until one dude came along. Gandhi was a legit fashionista. He spun cotton at rallies, championed handmade fabrics like khadi. Today in re-emerging India, our artisans are creating again and creating smarter. I cannot wait to see how we reshape history.

未来治理:自下而上的社会重塑

凯莉·舒: 接下来是来自新加坡的演讲者,他曾在政府工作多年,致力于打破传统的顶层设计模式。欢迎 李鸿毅 (Li Hongyi)

Original English

Kelly Shu: Our next speaker comes to us from Singapore and he's worked in the Singaporean government for many years. He is fighting to do something radically different. Let's please welcome Lie Hong Yi.

李鸿毅: 提到政府,你会想到什么?庞大、缓慢、官僚。 几年前,我在新加坡政府启动了一个实验团队。理念很简单:不再采用传统的自上而下 (Top-down) 的决策模式,而是建立赋权的专业小团队,去发现并解决公共领域的实际问题。

政府之所以低效,是因为其结构基于军事化的指挥与控制模式。如果你已经知道要做什么,这种模式很有效;但如果你需要弄清楚该做什么,这种模式就会失效。中央决策会导致“智能交通堵塞”:信息涌向中心,而决策者既没有足够的时间,也缺乏实地情境。所以政府能做几十亿的建筑项目,却还要反复问你的生日。

我们的实验是:如果我们将政府设计为自下而上 (Bottom-up) 的结构呢? 一个小团队去消防站调研,发现消防员每天要背着厚重的纸质登记册检查设备,于是我们开发了一个简单的 App,现在全纳新加坡的消防站都在使用,每月节省数千小时。 另一个团队发现社工每与客户沟通一小时,就要花另一小时写个案笔记,于是我们开发了自动生成报告的工具。 还有一个团队与急诊科医生合作,优化排队管理系统,将急诊等待时间缩短了 20%。

到目前为止,我们已经完成了 40 多个项目。这些项目如果按传统流程,通常需要数年时间并耗资数千万,而我们通过 5 人的小团队,只需 6 个月就能上线。

政府不应该是公共领域的守门员,而应该是我们相互赋权的工具。当我们消除“智能瓶颈”时,每一个问题都能得到所需的关注并被解决。这关乎我们的治理结构,我们要把权力从中心下放到想象力丰富的人民手中。

Original English

Li Hongyi: When you think about government, what do you think of? Big, slow, bureaucratic. A few years ago, I started an experimental team in the Singapore government. Instead of the usual top-down decision-making, we build small teams of skilled practitioners and empower them to seek out and solve problems.

Governments traditionally based on a military structure, optimized for command and control. You end up with an intellectual traffic jam. Ideas get stuck as they flow towards the center, waiting for attention from people with not enough time and even less context. This is why government can do billion-dollar construction projects but still has to keep asking you for your birthday.

What if instead of a top-down structure, we design government from the bottom up? Small teams close to the ground getting things done instead of waiting for instruction. One year a team visited a fire station and saw how firefighters spent so much time taking inventory with paper log books. So, we built a simple app. It saves thousands of man hours every month. Another team built a tool for social workers that automatically generates usable case reports. Another team worked with ER doctors, reducing emergency room wait times by 20%.

So far, we've done over 40 different projects. Similar government projects normally take years and cost tens of millions of dollars. We're able to consistently launch new systems in just six months with teams of just five people. Government should be the means by which we empower each other. We can have a society that's driven by the imagination of its people.

生态与希望:科学拯救物种

凯莉·舒: 早些时候我们听到了来自芝加哥的演讲。那里还有另一位演讲者的创意让我们念念不忘。他是一位化学家,正开创一个保护物种的新领域。欢迎 蒂姆·塞尔纳克 (Tim Cernak)

Original English

Kelly Shu: So earlier in the session, we heard from Joshua from Chicago. Well, guess what? There was another speaker in Chicago whose idea we just could not get out of our heads. He is a chemist and he is pioneering a whole new field that will bring us new tools for the fight against extinction. Let's all please welcome Tim Cernak.

蒂姆·塞尔纳克: 现在,某处的某只海龟正死于癌症。 这很奇怪对吧?我们生活在人类医学史上最伟大的时代,但也正经历着生物多样性危机。我要谈论的是一个新领域:保护化学 (Conservation Chemistry)

当我们发现海龟搁浅的主要原因是癌症时,我震惊了。两年前,我遇到了一只全身长满肿瘤的海龟。利用现代的 AI 蛋白质折叠技术,我能够分析海龟癌症的蛋白质结构,并利用发现人类药物的所有工具来寻找对策。

不仅仅是海龟,我们还失去了阿根廷 95% 的象海豹幼崽(死于禽流感)。而目前地球上最严重的流行病是一种真菌感染,它已经导致数百种青蛙灭绝。在我的实验室里,我们正专门为青蛙患者优化药物。

我还遇到了希拉毒蜥“卵石” (Pebbles),它感染了隐孢子虫寄生虫。具有讽刺意味的是,现在风靡全球的减肥药,最初竟然源于希拉毒蜥的唾液。我们利用这种动物的生物学特性建立了价值数十亿的医药帝国,却无法救它。

我的实验室建立了一个 AI 智能体,搜索整个医学文献,寻找相关的分子。最终,经过治疗,卵石已经康复并稳定了一整年。

化学家可以成为物种保护的先遣队。精准医学的工具并不在乎病人是两条腿、四条腿,是有羽毛还是有壳。让我们把这些工具投入使用,为猛禽研发抗病毒药物,为受真菌威胁的金蛙优化抗真菌药。我们生活在医学的黄金时代,也生活在物种大灭绝时代。保护化学拒绝同时接受这两者。

Original English

Tim Cernak: Somewhere right now a sea turtle is dying of cancer. Strange thing, isn't it? We're living in the greatest era of medicine in human history, but we're also living through a biodiversity crisis. I'm here today to talk about a new field called conservation chemistry.

I run a drug discovery lab. Using modern protein folding AI, I'm able to look at protein from sea turtle cancer and plug in all the tools of modern drug discovery. Sadly, it doesn't end with sea turtles. We lost 95% of elephant seal pups to avian flu. The greatest pandemic this planet has ever known is a fungal infection driving the extinction of hundreds of frog species.

When I met Pebbles, the Hila monster, she was infected with a parasite. Those weight loss drugs you keep hearing about? The first one came from the saliva of a Hila monster. How is it that we built a multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical empire on the biology of this animal, but for Pebbles, there was nothing? My lab built an AI agent that could scour the entire medicinal literature. Pebbles is now stable.

Chemists can be first responders in the fight against extinction. Today's modern tools for precision medicine, they don't care if your patient has two legs, four legs, feathers, or a shell. Conservation chemistry is what happens when you refuse to accept a golden era of medicine and a mass extinction at the same time.

结语:让思想流动

凯莉·斯坦西尔: 演讲嘉宾们,再次感谢你们!在直播结束前,我想告诉大家,6 月 13 日我们将举办关于民主未来的特别项目。

Original English

Kelly Stencil: Thank you speakers one more time. Before we say goodbye to the live stream, I do want to tell you about an event that we have coming up on June 13 about the future of democracy.

凯莉·舒: 很遗憾时间到了。我们要向直播间的朋友们和全球各地的 TEDxers 告别了。再见!

Original English

Kelly Shu: And I am so sad because I think it's time to say goodbye to our live stream friends. Bye live stream friends. And thank you to all the TEDexers who are watching. Bye TEDexers.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

公司/组织: TED, TEDx, NPR, Resource Justice Network

产品/模型: 1A, SOFA

关键字: social-innovation collective-intelligence system-design conservation-chemistry human-centered-design