地缘政治巨震:委内瑞拉的剧变与美国战略重塑
2026年1月3日,新年伊始,全球地缘政治格局便迎来了一场“地震”。美国总统特朗普成功“移除”了委内瑞拉总统马杜罗,这一事件无疑是本周地缘政治领域最重磅的消息。此次行动不仅标志着美国在中美洲及南美洲地区影响力的一次强势扩张,也预示着全球力量平衡可能发生的深刻调整。
此次行动的背景是委内瑞拉长期以来严峻的经济和人道主义危机。作为拥有全球最大已探明石油储量的国家,委内瑞拉本应是地区强国,但由于长期的经济 mismanagement(管理不善)和左翼政权的治理不力,其石油产量锐减,经济几近崩溃。据联合国统计,约有20%的委内瑞拉人口(约700万人)已逃离国家,形成了严重的人道主义灾难。马杜罗政权在近期一次选举中本应落败,却通过非法手段巩固了其事实上的独裁地位,并与俄罗斯、伊朗等国保持紧密联系,与“特朗普团队”背道而驰。
此次军事行动由美国特种部队执行,目标直指马杜罗的住所,并成功将其及其妻子逮捕,随后被送往纽约接受美国法院审判。行动过程高效且几乎零伤亡,展现了美国军事力量的精准打击能力。此举直接导致了马杜罗政权的垮台,并实现了委内瑞拉的“政权更迭”。虽然这与特朗普“美国优先”的孤立主义口号有所不同,但它符合其“特朗普主义”的核心——即加强美国在拉丁美洲的控制力。此次行动的动机被认为是双重的:一是巩固美国在拉丁美洲的影响力,二是获取委内瑞拉丰富的石油资源。特朗普政府明确表示,此次行动不会耗费纳税人资金,而是将通过控制委内瑞拉的石油资源来收回成本。
Original English
Hello my friends. Today is January 3rd,I want to wish everyone a happy
new year. Now before we begin, I want to
bring to your attention that I've
noticed that some of you are not
receiving weekly updates from my blog
posts. I've looked into this and
discovered that this is a technical
problem and hopefully I will have this
resolved by Monday. But remember, you
can always access my posts on my website
and of course whenever I have a new
post, I will tweet about it on Twitter.
Okay, so this week I actually had
initially planned to make it a
geopolitical episode since we had so
many big things happening in the world
of geopolitics the past week. Little did
I know what we would have this huge huge
event that happened this morning where
it seems like President Trump has
successfully taken out President Maduro
of Venezuela. So this is definitely an
earthquake in the world of geopolitics.
So we got to talk about uh what happened
and what it all means for the economy
and for markets. And also we have to
talk a little bit about silver as well.
So silver totally imploded uh in the
beginning of the week. There are some
concrete causes for that although it did
recover a little bit more. So first
though let's talk about what happened in
the world of geopolitics.
So I think there are four theaters in
the world and in each geopolitical
theater we had some pretty big
developments from the far east to Latin
America to Europe to the Middle East.
Starting with the Far East. So earlier
in the week, last week, we had China
make pretty big military exercises all
around Taiwan. And what they seem to be,
you know, kind of projecting is that
they could easily blockade Taiwan. And
if they were to blockade Taiwan, again,
Taiwan is an island, so it's not
self-sufficient in many things like oil.
Uh the ch the Taiwanese economy would
easily crumble and um it would be the
end of that pretty quickly. Now the
broader context of course is that not
too long ago you had Prime Minister
Tekachi of Japan make supportive
statements for Taiwan that really
angered the Chinese and you know
President Trump actually seemed to
reportedly intervene to maybe just
politely suggest the Japanese prime
minister to maybe moderate her stance a
little bit. Although by all reports uh
Japan still stands in support of Taiwan
in case of potential military conflict.
For context here, uh Taiwan was once a
Japanese colony. Many people in Taiwan
remember that period positively and look
upon Japan in a very positive light. But
of course, if you recall from the United
States's most recent national security
strategy, the US is basically viewing
the world as multipolar where every
country has your sphere of influence.
Very clearly the United States will have
a Trump correlary to the Monroal
doctrine. Latin America, North America
will be under the United States. And you
know, I think the the implication of
course is that the Far East, at least
when it comes to Taiwan, will be under
China and maybe Russia will have
Ukraine.
Now, moving on to Eastern Europe.
Earlier in the week, uh Russia loudly
complained that uh Ukraine will actually
launched a very mass-cale assassination
attempt on President Putin. Apparently,
there was a large fleet of Ukrainian
drones launched and Russia alleges that
these drones were targeted towards where
where President Putin was and it was an
assassination account. Putin actually
complained to Trump which then
complained to President Zalinski. Now,
the US it seems that reports suggest
have determined that this actually was
not an assassination attempt that maybe
they were targeting other military
installations in in Russia. But at the
end of the day, if Russia is claiming
this and perceiving this, then again,
that is an escalation in the Russia
Ukraine war and suggests that peace
talks are not going well and maybe it
could serve as a pretext for further
military escalation by the Russians.
Moving on to the Middle East, also
another very interesting development.
Now, you had Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu of Israel basically just, you
know, fly down to Mara Lago, hang out
with the president the fifth time. He's
done this this year. That's kind of a
record. And what usually happens, of
course, is that after these discussions,
you have some kind of geopolitical
escalation.
Now, it's no secret what Prime Minister
Netanyahu would like is to have more
military action on Iran, but of course,
they can't do that without the support
of the United States. Last time they
attacked Iran, Iran retaliated with
missiles and a lot of those missiles
were intercepted by US um US support.
And so they really need the US to
protect them to be able to attack Iran.
Now reporting suggests that right now
what u Netanyahu is saying is that you
know Iran they have these ballistic
missiles. They can attack Israel. They
are a threat to us. We got to go and
take out that capability. Now notice now
that the goalposts are moving. initially
was that Iran could never have nuclear
weapons and so we need to take that out
and you know President Trump went and
bombed the nuclear facilities in Iran.
Now the standard is being lowered. It's
not that Iran can have nuclear weapons
is that they can't have ballistic
missiles and if uh the president agrees
with that lower standard then yes that
he's greenlighting more military attacks
in the Middle East.
But of course, the most interesting
geopolitical action we have is in Latin
America. Remember, not too long ago, the
Trump administration told the entire
world that Latin America belongs to us.
So, we are going to call the shots here.
Now, earlier in the week, uh the
president surprised the world by
revealing that the CIA actually carried
covert operations on Venezuelan soil.
Now, everyone knew that the US had a
Navy presence right outside of
Venezuela, that they had been blowing up
Venezuelan boats, but until earlier in
the week, they had not uh done anything
on Venezuelan soil. So, that was a very
clear escalation. A CIA bombing
facilities in Venezuelan ports.
This morning, it was revealed that
around 2:00 a.m., US forces basically
flew in uh to where President Maduro of
Venezuela was staying. uh basically
kidnapped him and his wife, put him on a
ship, the USS Euima, and that ship is
now on route to New York where uh
President Madura will face the US
courts. Now, throughout this operation,
uh it was it was only a few hours. There
were reportedly zero US casualties. One
US helicopter was hit, but that US
copter continued to fly when it's able
to return uh to to its uh to the ships.
So this was an amazing amazingly precise
attack and amazingly successful.
Now by orchestrating this it all by
guarantees that the Maduro regime has
collapsed and that there will be regime
change in Venezuela.
So, uh, this is definitely not in line
with the America first ethos that
President Trump often campaigned on
where the US would not, um, you know,
intervene in foreign wars, nation
building and all that. But it does fall
under the Trump coralary of having more
power over the Latin America. Now, why
does Trump doing this? I think some some
context is helpful here. So, Venezuela,
if you look on a map, is actually a
pretty large country. uh it's in uh
South America. It's the land mass is
about say 20 30% larger than Texas and
has a population of about 30 million
about the same population as the state
of Texas. Venezuela of course is most
known for having a lot of oil. According
to studies it has the most uh the
largest oil reproven oil reserves in the
entire world. So it has the potential to
be an oil superpower. However, if you
look at its output data over the past
decade, you'll notice that Venezuela is
actually outputting much less oil today
than it did a decade ago. So, that
decline in oil output largely has to do
with just the tremendous tremendous
mismanagement of the Venezuelan economy.
If you look at a chart of Venezuelan
GDP, you know, a decade ago, things were
actually going really well. Now, oil
prices were going up. uh Venezuela was
pumping a lot of oil and the country the
people were getting much wealthier. Now
that all ran into problems when the oil
price of oil collapsed and then you had
new change in regime a more left-wing
regime came to power in Caracus and they
did not do a very good job and what you
see is the complete implosion of the
Venezuelan economy. According to the
United Nations, about 20% of Venezuelans
actually fled the country. Now, that's
like 7 million people. Uh, viral videos
at the time would show that many
Venezuelans were basically starving. You
can see them throwing rocks at cows,
trying to kill the cow to eat them. It
was very much a humanitarian disaster.
Now, you had Venezuelan refugees flood
the entire world. You have Venezuelan
refugees in Chile, um, in Colombia,
Mexico, and of course in the United
States. Uh this was a tremendous
tremendous catastrophe. You had a
country that was doing on the upswing
just just totally destroyed and of
course the people Venezuelans did not
like that and ideally there would be a
mechanism for the people to change
course to have a new government. Of
course that was naturally through the
ballot box. Now Venezuela did recently a
few years ago have an election by all
accounts. President Maduro lost that
election in a big way for obvious
reasons. Um but uh you know he just
decided that he didn't want to leave and
so basically became a de facto dictator
of Venezuela. So this is a guy who did a
terrible job ruined the lives of
millions of people ruined his country
and it's just not very popular. However
though and of course he's uh not friends
with the Trump administration is friends
with Russia, Iran and China. basically
friends with people who are not uh with
team Trump, team USA.
So it seems like the motivation for this
uh move is twofold. One of course is to
strengthen US influence in uh Latin
America
and secondly of course is for oil. Now,
in his uh in his press conference after
his president is is totally blunt. You
know, it's it's not like President Bush
going into Iraq and then not so much
telling you about the oil, although a
lot of US companies having big oil
contracts. It's that the US president is
telling you today, President Trump is
telling you today that Venezuela has
lots of oil and the US is going to have
control over it and it's this uh
operation in Venezuela is not going to
cost taxpayer money because uh the US is
going to get paid through oil. So, it's
very open about it. The US would like to
have more control over Venezuelan
resources. Now, a coup attempt has
always been telegraphed. Again, you had
that military flotillaa outside of
Venezuela. You also had the US
intelligence operations smuggle out
Venezuelan opposition leader Machado
smuggled her out into um to Sweden where
she could get her, you know, Nobel Peace
Prize, have more international
legitimacy. But I think the US has
basically changed its mind on that. She
was, you know, probably a plan B or plan
A or plan C or something like that. But
maybe looking at how successful the
operation was today, the president very
openly told everyone that actually the
US will run Venezuela.
We don't want to be involved with uh
having somebody else get in and we have
the same situation that we had for the
last long period of years. So we are
going to run the country until such time
as we can do a safe, proper and
judicious
transition. Eventually,
Trump is saying that he will give
Venezuelan back, but uh you know, this
could be years or decades, and no one
knows when.
So, it looks like overnight it's not
just it was regime change of Venezuela,
but the US has a new territory. It will
be run by um you know, who knows, new
governor, new prime minister, protector
of Venezuela. I'm not sure. But for the
foreseeable future, uh, Venezuela will
be under US control and eventually it
looks like there's going to be more
investment into Venezuela and there's
going to be more oil flowing out. So,
this this is a big big big geopolitical
move and it has some winners and losers.
The clear winners of course are the US
oil companies. They're going to be able
to go in and uh operate on those
resources. Chevron was already there.
Uh, it looks like other people are going
to come in as well. So that's very good
for the US oil industry. It's going to
be very good for inflation and the
global consumer. If you have Venezuela
there with all this oil, but just kind
of not having the infrastructure to be
able to extract it. Now the supply of
oil is going to go up. That's going to
mean down pressure on oil prices. Not
immediately, of course. It's going to
take time to be able to have the
facility set up, but you know, in a few
years, you can easily see the supply of
oil go up, oil prices uh go down. So
this is u good for again the war on
inflation. If you remember in January of
2025, Trump actually openly said that
his plan to get inflation lower is to
get more oil and you have OPEC pump more
oil. You have oil prices down a lot and
now it looks like this is um this is
maybe another part of that.
You do have clear losers as well. Now,
of course, aside from President Moduro,
who is now, it seems, on a ship, uh,
you know, it seems like if you look at a
chart where Venezuela was selling its
oil, a lot of was going to China. Now,
Venezuela was a staunch ally of China,
of Russia, and of Iran. And so now that
team is losing a big ally. Now, China is
still going to be able to get oil from
Venezuela. Now, the president was very
clear that, you know, we're going to
pump more oil and we're going to sell it
to everyone. So, China is still going to
get more oil, but they probably won't
get it at the same discounted price.
Venezuelan oil was sanctioned. It really
couldn't go to the global market. And
so, they had to sell it at a discount to
other people, similar to what Russia
does, right? Russia oil was sanctioned.
They sell it at a discount to other
countries. And so, uh, China was getting
discounted oil. Now, they're not getting
discounted oil anymore. China was
friends with Venezuela. In fact, reports
suggest that they had a Chinese
delegation being sent to Venezuela just
in a few hours before the operation.
Now, it looks like they've lost a key
ally in Latin America.
Um, this of course could also point to
trouble for uh allies of uh President
Maduro, say Cuba, for example, longtime
thorn in the side of the US. You know,
doesn't have any oil but uh not friends
with the US. And of course, um,
Secretary of State Marco Rubio is of
Cuban descent. And of course, uh, the
Cuban community in the US really doesn't
like what's happening in Cuba. And so I
think he should be a little bit worried.
If you are Iran, you could probably be
upset as well. You're losing another
ally. But it also tells you very clearly
that the president is a man of action.
He says many things, but he also has
done many things as well. um many things
other presidents would not have done
right directly strike Iran bombs huge
huge clampdown on illegal immigration
everywhere in the country of course
strikes on Venezuela but he's also said
other things that he hasn't done yet so
let's say that you are the prime
minister of Denmark who of course
controls Greenland president has said
that you know Greenland is very very
important to us from a national security
standpoint so does that increase the
probability that you know maybe one day
Greenland will have to change hands as
well. Of course, the president also made
comments about Canada and we we don't
know what will happen there. One thing
to note though is that strategically
speaking, the oil that Venezuela pumps
is heavy crude. That's the same stuff
that Canada pumps to as well. And right
now, Canada has one captain consumer,
the United States. And the United States
is relying upon Canadian heavy crude as
well. That's what the refiners are
optimized for. If you have another
source of heavy crude come online from
Venezuela, that really really decreases
the bargaining power that Canadian oil
companies have. And of course, that is a
big problem from a geostrategic
way for for Canada and maybe why Prime
Minister Mark Carney is eager to
greenlight another pipeline so that they
have other outlets for Canadian oil.
So, one other thing, of course, we have
to think about is that what other thing
has Trump um kind of obsessed about over
and over again, um that's lower interest
rates. And as I wrote last week, my
blog, the market is really not pricing
in that Trump will get his way. I the
market really doesn't seem to think
that, you know, prices interest rates
the same way they did months ago. So
they don't really place probability on
President Trump actually getting his way
and able to lower interest rates even
though the president has you know done a
lot of really obvious moves to try to do
that. So I think that continues to be a
significant mispricing of the market. So
uh president has a track record of uh
acting on things that he cares a lot
about. So markets will be exciting this
next week. Guessing that you know I
since it was so effortless. Maybe not
even that big of an impact, but you
know, if you have lower oil prices in
the future, maybe that's a little bit
downward pressure on inflation.
Okay, the second thing that I want to
talk about, of course, is silver. Now,
last week we talked about how silver was
absolutely surging, was up 10% a week.
Last Friday, when you do something like
that, it looks like an obvious obvious
blowoff top. And earlier in the week, we
did see silver totally, totally implode.
Now, there are two concrete drivers of
this. One of course uh is that well
actually one concrete driver of this and
another thing we'll talk about and that
is of course higher margins from the
CME. So professional speculators in
silver usually trade through futures and
when you trade through silver futures
you're operating on an regulated
exchange. Your counterparty is the
exchange. So a standard future futures
contract for silver gives you control
over 5,000 ounces of silver. So that's,
you know, about 30 uh $350,000 worth of
silver.
Now, in order to have control over a
silver contract, you have to put up a
little bit of margin with the w with the
exchange. The reason for this is that
the exchange wants to make sure that you
have money uh to pay in case the
contract goes against you. So let's say
that you bought one silver contract and
then suddenly the price declines. How
does the exchange know that you are able
to uh um you you are able to pay the
exchange uh in the case in case that uh
you know you continue to lose money or
you're underwater in your contract. So
the exchange collects a little bit of
margin uh just to make sure that uh you
don't default. Now the amount of margin
the exchange has to connect collect is
in proportion uh to the size of the
market value of the contract and also to
the volatility of the contract. as
silver prices went from say50 to $75 in
a very volatile way. You know there you
need to put down more margin uh because
from an exchange standpoint there's a
higher probability that you could have
big big volatile moves suddenly leaving
the exchange exposed to counterparty
risk. That is to say you could default
if silver were to suddenly implode.
So exchange very naturally raises
margins and what that means that you
have to put up more money to be able to
have control over a silver contract. Now
if you look at the margin hikes it looks
like it went from you know 20ome,000 to
30 some thousand. Uh when you raise the
margin some people say you're a DGEN who
has been levered up uh with silver
futures will have to put up more money
to be able to maintain their position.
Sometimes they don't have that much
money and so when that happens they get
liquidated and when they get liquidated
you know the price of the contract goes
down maybe that also compels other
people to get liquidated as well. So
ultimately it's kind of a mechanical
thing where you have u basically a
liquidity squeeze where the really
really big dens are squeezed out and
this happens a lot if you look at any
type of um speculation in the 1980s when
you have the Hunts brothers squeezing
silver to dizzying heights the exchanges
also continue to raise their margin
again this is not necessarily some sort
of conspiracy or anything like that it's
just totally mechanical the exchange you
is dealing with a more volatile
commodity. It's trying to protect itself
from defaults and so it obviously has to
raise margins. There's nothing uh
nefarious about it. Sometimes there is
back in the 1980s uh they try to um they
changed the rules so that you can not
buy silver, you could only sell. And so
of course that's putting that put a lot
of downward pressure on silver prices
and did ultimately precipitate a huge
implosion. They're not doing that today.
So far by all accounts it's just normal
functioning of how an exchange works.
And obviously when you have an exchange
hiking margins that's going to put
downward pressure on the prices. How
much is going to depend on how levered
it was. And obviously if you're going up
10% a day that's a lot of leverage. And
so you also imploded 10% a day.
The second big news came out of China
and that China is going to more exercise
more control over how it exports silver.
Now, China has already been doing this
with all sorts of commodities. Remember,
they have their, you know, control over
rare earth and so forth. Now, it seems
like they're extending this export
control regime to silver. I don't think
this should be a surprise, because China
is the largest manufacturing power in
the world. and silver, it's not just for
speculation, it's also a key industrial
input. And so if you have all these
speculators in the west kind of making
silver prices really high, that has a
real impact on the Chinese economy,
Chinese businesses and so forth, it
makes uh it makes basically things like
solar panels more expensive. And so if
there is a potential shortage or some
kind of weird speculation, of course,
the Chinese are going to be a bit more
careful since this is um maybe even a
national security issue. Now, China is
the second largest uh minor of silver,
the largest is Mexico. So when they put
on these expert controls on silver, so
what that means is that in order to sell
expert silver, you're going to have to
have a license from the Chinese
authorities. They're going to have more
control over this. What that means is
very clearly that outside of China maybe
the supply of silver is going to be a
little bit less uh because the Chinese
export of silver is going to be more
controlled. Now the immediate impact of
this should be to have a wedge in silver
prices where Chinese silver prices are
going to be a little bit lower and
global price of silver a little bit
higher since you have less Chinese
supply. So this is a a bullish
development for silver prices but was
not able to overcome of course the uh
implosion you had from higher margin
rates. Now there is always a question
whether or not the US or maybe other
countries will also declare silver to be
uh you know commodity of national
importance and then also put on their
own bears. So that's something to watch
out as well. So if you look at silver
prices, they classically follow this
formation where they kind of surge to uh
comically high levels and then just
implode. There is a possibility that
this is what's happening right now. We
could just totally implode. Uh but my
gut says that, you know, and I hate
saying this, that maybe there's
something about different this time. And
so I I personally think that the highs
for silver are not yet in for the year.
Although when you have all this
technical damage, you do usually need to
digest a while. Not necessarily a long
time. Remember when gold had that big
blowoff blowoff, it came down a little
bit, steadied, steadied, and then just
recently made new all-time highs. All
right, so that's all I prepared for
today. Again, this is just year one in
the Trump administration. We have three
more years. Maybe the map, the global
map in a few years will be different
than the one today. All right, talk to
you guys next week.
全球地缘政治格局与经济联动
除了委内瑞拉的重大事件,本周全球其他地缘政治热点也涌现出重要动态。在远东地区,中国围绕台湾举行了大规模军事演习,其潜在的封锁能力对台湾经济构成了严峻挑战。日本首相此前对台湾的支持言论激怒了中国,尽管有报道称美国总统特朗普曾建议日方缓和立场,但日本仍坚持对台支持。这一系列事件反映了美国国家安全战略中关于多极世界和势力范围的设想,即美国将主导北美和拉丁美洲,而中国可能在远东地区拥有其势力范围。
在东欧,俄罗斯指责乌克兰策划了针对总统普京的暗杀行动,尽管美国调查认为并非如此,但这一事件无疑加剧了俄乌冲突的紧张局势,并可能为俄罗斯进一步军事升级提供借口。中东地区,以色列总理内塔尼亚胡与特朗普的会晤预示着可能针对伊朗采取军事行动,尽管目标已从阻止核武器转向限制其弹道导弹能力。这些地缘政治的动荡与全球经济紧密相连,尤其是在通胀压力持续的背景下,任何区域冲突的升级都可能对能源供应和全球供应链造成冲击。
Original English
So I think there are four theaters inthe world and in each geopolitical
theater we had some pretty big
developments from the far east to Latin
America to Europe to the Middle East.
Starting with the Far East. So earlier
in the week, last week, we had China
make pretty big military exercises all
around Taiwan. And what they seem to be,
you know, kind of projecting is that
they could easily blockade Taiwan. And
if they were to blockade Taiwan, again,
Taiwan is an island, so it's not
self-sufficient in many things like oil.
Uh the ch the Taiwanese economy would
easily crumble and um it would be the
end of that pretty quickly. Now the
broader context of course is that not
too long ago you had Prime Minister
Tekachi of Japan make supportive
statements for Taiwan that really
angered the Chinese and you know
President Trump actually seemed to
reportedly intervene to maybe just
politely suggest the Japanese prime
minister to maybe moderate her stance a
little bit. Although by all reports uh
Japan still stands in support of Taiwan
in case of potential military conflict.
For context here, uh Taiwan was once a
Japanese colony. Many people in Taiwan
remember that period positively and look
upon Japan in a very positive light. But
of course, if you recall from the United
States's most recent national security
strategy, the US is basically viewing
the world as multipolar where every
country has your sphere of influence.
Very clearly the United States will have
a Trump correlary to the Monroal
doctrine. Latin America, North America
will be under the United States. And you
know, I think the the implication of
course is that the Far East, at least
when it comes to Taiwan, will be under
China and maybe Russia will have
Ukraine.
Now, moving on to Eastern Europe.
Earlier in the week, uh Russia loudly
complained that uh Ukraine will actually
launched a very mass-cale assassination
attempt on President Putin. Apparently,
there was a large fleet of Ukrainian
drones launched and Russia alleges that
these drones were targeted towards where
where President Putin was and it was an
assassination account. Putin actually
complained to Trump which then
complained to President Zalinski. Now,
the US it seems that reports suggest
have determined that this actually was
not an assassination attempt that maybe
they were targeting other military
installations in in Russia. But at the
end of the day, if Russia is claiming
this and perceiving this, then again,
that is an escalation in the Russia
Ukraine war and suggests that peace
talks are not going well and maybe it
could serve as a pretext for further
military escalation by the Russians.
Moving on to the Middle East, also
another very interesting development.
Now, you had Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu of Israel basically just, you
know, fly down to Mara Lago, hang out
with the president the fifth time. He's
done this this year. That's kind of a
record. And what usually happens, of
course, is that after these discussions,
you have some kind of geopolitical
escalation.
Now, it's no secret what Prime Minister
Netanyahu would like is to have more
military action on Iran, but of course,
they can't do that without the support
of the United States. Last time they
attacked Iran, Iran retaliated with
missiles and a lot of those missiles
were intercepted by US um US support.
And so they really need the US to
protect them to be able to attack Iran.
Now reporting suggests that right now
what u Netanyahu is saying is that you
know Iran they have these ballistic
missiles. They can attack Israel. They
are a threat to us. We got to go and
take out that capability. Now notice now
that the goalposts are moving. initially
was that Iran could never have nuclear
weapons and so we need to take that out
and you know President Trump went and
bombed the nuclear facilities in Iran.
Now the standard is being lowered. It's
not that Iran can have nuclear weapons
is that they can't have ballistic
missiles and if uh the president agrees
with that lower standard then yes that
he's greenlighting more military attacks
in the Middle East.
白银市场动荡:保证金飙升与中国出口管制
本周,白银市场经历了剧烈的价格波动,从早些时候的飙升转为大幅下跌。这一“崩盘”现象主要由两个因素驱动。首先是芝加哥商品交易所(CME)提高了白银期货合约的保证金要求。当白银价格剧烈波动时,交易所会提高保证金以规避交易者违约风险。此次保证金的显著提升,迫使大量高杠杆的投机者追加资金或被强制平仓,从而引发了连锁反应,导致价格加速下跌,这是一种典型的市场流动性挤压(liquidity squeeze)现象。
其次,中国宣布将加强对白银出口的管控。作为全球最大的制造国,中国视白银为重要的工业投入品,而非仅仅是投机工具。西方投机者推高白银价格,会直接影响到中国太阳能电池板等产品的生产成本。因此,中国收紧出口管制,要求出口商获得许可,旨在更有效地控制白银供应,这可能导致中国以外的白银供应减少,并推高全球白银价格。尽管这一因素对白银价格构成利好,但其影响被CME保证金提高所带来的技术性抛售所掩盖。
尽管近期白银价格出现技术性损伤,但演讲者认为,从长远来看,白银的上涨趋势尚未结束,其高点可能尚未到来,这与黄金近期创下历史新高的情况有相似之处。然而,市场对特朗普政府降低利率的预期似乎存在显著的误判,这可能导致未来市场出现波动。
Original English
So we got to talk about uh what happenedand what it all means for the economy
and for markets. And also we have to
talk a little bit about silver as well.
So silver totally imploded uh in the
beginning of the week. There are some
concrete causes for that although it did
recover a little bit more. So first
though let's talk about what happened in
the world of geopolitics.
Okay, the second thing that I want to
talk about, of course, is silver. Now,
last week we talked about how silver was
absolutely surging, was up 10% a week.
Last Friday, when you do something like
that, it looks like an obvious obvious
blowoff top. And earlier in the week, we
did see silver totally, totally implode.
Now, there are two concrete drivers of
this. One of course uh is that well
actually one concrete driver of this and
another thing we'll talk about and that
is of course higher margins from the
CME. So professional speculators in
silver usually trade through futures and
when you trade through silver futures
you're operating on an regulated
exchange. Your counterparty is the
exchange. So a standard future futures
contract for silver gives you control
over 5,000 ounces of silver. So that's,
you know, about 30 uh $350,000 worth of
silver.
Now, in order to have control over a
silver contract, you have to put up a
little bit of margin with the w with the
exchange. The reason for this is that
the exchange wants to make sure that you
have money uh to pay in case the
contract goes against you. So let's say
that you bought one silver contract and
then suddenly the price declines. How
does the exchange know that you are able
to uh um you you are able to pay the
exchange uh in the case in case that uh
you know you continue to lose money or
you're underwater in your contract. So
the exchange collects a little bit of
margin uh just to make sure that uh you
don't default. Now the amount of margin
the exchange has to connect collect is
in proportion uh to the size of the
market value of the contract and also to
the volatility of the contract. as
silver prices went from say50 to $75 in
a very volatile way. You know there you
need to put down more margin uh because
from an exchange standpoint there's a
higher probability that you could have
big big volatile moves suddenly leaving
the exchange exposed to counterparty
risk. That is to say you could default
if silver were to suddenly implode.
So exchange very naturally raises
margins and what that means that you
have to put up more money to be able to
have control over a silver contract. Now
if you look at the margin hikes it looks
like it went from you know 20ome,000 to
30 some thousand. Uh when you raise the
margin some people say you're a DGEN who
has been levered up uh with silver
futures will have to put up more money
to be able to maintain their position.
Sometimes they don't have that much
money and so when that happens they get
liquidated and when they get liquidated
you know the price of the contract goes
down maybe that also compels other
people to get liquidated as well. So
ultimately it's kind of a mechanical
thing where you have u basically a
liquidity squeeze where the really
really big dens are squeezed out and
this happens a lot if you look at any
type of um speculation in the 1980s when
you have the Hunts brothers squeezing
silver to dizzying heights the exchanges
also continue to raise their margin
again this is not necessarily some sort
of conspiracy or anything like that it's
just totally mechanical the exchange you
is dealing with a more volatile
commodity. It's trying to protect itself
from defaults and so it obviously has to
raise margins. There's nothing uh
nefarious about it. Sometimes there is
back in the 1980s uh they try to um they
changed the rules so that you can not
buy silver, you could only sell. And so
of course that's putting that put a lot
of downward pressure on silver prices
and did ultimately precipitate a huge
implosion. They're not doing that today.
So far by all accounts it's just normal
functioning of how an exchange works.
And obviously when you have an exchange
hiking margins that's going to put
downward pressure on the prices. How
much is going to depend on how levered
it was. And obviously if you're going up
10% a day that's a lot of leverage. And
so you also imploded 10% a day.
The second big news came out of China
and that China is going to more exercise
more control over how it exports silver.
Now, China has already been doing this
with all sorts of commodities. Remember,
they have their, you know, control over
rare earth and so forth. Now, it seems
like they're extending this export
control regime to silver. I don't think
this should be a surprise, because China
is the largest manufacturing power in
the world. and silver, it's not just for
speculation, it's also a key industrial
input. And so if you have all these
speculators in the west kind of making
silver prices really high, that has a
real impact on the Chinese economy,
Chinese businesses and so forth, it
makes uh it makes basically things like
solar panels more expensive. And so if
there is a potential shortage or some
kind of weird speculation, of course,
the Chinese are going to be a bit more
careful since this is um maybe even a
national security issue. Now, China is
the second largest uh minor of silver,
the largest is Mexico. So when they put
on these expert controls on silver, so
what that means is that in order to sell
expert silver, you're going to have to
have a license from the Chinese
authorities. They're going to have more
control over this. What that means is
very clearly that outside of China maybe
the supply of silver is going to be a
little bit less uh because the Chinese
export of silver is going to be more
controlled. Now the immediate impact of
this should be to have a wedge in silver
prices where Chinese silver prices are
going to be a little bit lower and
global price of silver a little bit
higher since you have less Chinese
supply. So this is a a bullish
development for silver prices but was
not able to overcome of course the uh
implosion you had from higher margin
rates. Now there is always a question
whether or not the US or maybe other
countries will also declare silver to be
uh you know commodity of national
importance and then also put on their
own bears. So that's something to watch
out as well. So if you look at silver
prices, they classically follow this
formation where they kind of surge to uh
comically high levels and then just
implode. There is a possibility that
this is what's happening right now. We
could just totally implode. Uh but my
gut says that, you know, and I hate
saying this, that maybe there's
something about different this time. And
so I I personally think that the highs
for silver are not yet in for the year.
Although when you have all this
technical damage, you do usually need to
digest a while. Not necessarily a long
time. Remember when gold had that big
blowoff blowoff, it came down a little
bit, steadied, steadied, and then just
recently made new all-time highs. All
right, so that's all I prepared for
today. Again, this is just year one in
the Trump administration. We have three
more years. Maybe the map, the global
map in a few years will be different
than the one today. All right, talk to
you guys next week.
经济政策焦点与市场预期
特朗普政府一直以来都高度关注降低利率,并将其视为刺激经济和对抗通胀的关键手段。然而,市场似乎并未充分定价特朗普实现其利率目标的可能性,对未来利率走势的预期与总统的意愿存在显著差异。这种市场定价的偏差可能预示着未来市场将出现波动。
此外,特朗普政府将“对抗通胀”视为核心任务之一。通过增加石油供应,特别是利用委内瑞拉丰富的石油资源,被认为是降低油价、进而抑制通胀的重要策略。虽然短期内油价不会立即大幅下降,但从长远来看,增加全球石油供应有望为抑制通胀提供动力。这些经济政策的走向,将是未来市场关注的焦点。
Original English
Now the Trump administration told the entireworld that Latin America belongs to us.
So, we are going to call the shots here.
Now, earlier in the week, uh the
president surprised the world by
revealing that the CIA actually carried
covert operations on Venezuelan soil.
Now, everyone knew that the US had a
Navy presence right outside of
Venezuela, that they had been blowing up
Venezuelan boats, but until earlier in
the week, they had not uh done anything
on Venezuelan soil. So, that was a very
clear escalation. A CIA bombing
facilities in Venezuelan ports.
This morning, it was revealed that
around 2:00 a.m., US forces basically
flew in uh to where President Maduro of
Venezuela was staying. uh basically
kidnapped him and his wife, put him on a
ship, the USS Euima, and that ship is
now on route to New York where uh
President Madura will face the US
courts. Now, throughout this operation,
uh it was it was only a few hours. There
were reportedly zero US casualties. One
US helicopter was hit, but that US
copter continued to fly when it's able
to return uh to to its uh to the ships.
So this was an amazing amazingly precise
attack and amazingly successful.
Now by orchestrating this it all by
guarantees that the Maduro regime has
collapsed and that there will be regime
change in Venezuela.
So, uh, this is definitely not in line
with the America first ethos that
President Trump often campaigned on
where the US would not, um, you know,
intervene in foreign wars, nation
building and all that. But it does fall
under the Trump coralary of having more
power over the Latin America. Now, why
does Trump doing this? I think some some
context is helpful here. So, Venezuela,
if you look on a map, is actually a
pretty large country. uh it's in uh
South America. It's the land mass is
about say 20 30% larger than Texas and
has a population of about 30 million
about the same population as the state
of Texas. Venezuela of course is most
known for having a lot of oil. According
to studies it has the most uh the
largest oil reproven oil reserves in the
entire world. So it has the potential to
be an oil superpower. However, if you
look at its output data over the past
decade, you'll notice that Venezuela is
actually outputting much less oil today
than it did a decade ago. So, that
decline in oil output largely has to do
with just the tremendous tremendous
mismanagement of the Venezuelan economy.
If you look at a chart of Venezuelan
GDP, you know, a decade ago, things were
actually going really well. Now, oil
prices were going up. uh Venezuela was
pumping a lot of oil and the country the
people were getting much wealthier. Now
that all ran into problems when the oil
price of oil collapsed and then you had
new change in regime a more left-wing
regime came to power in Caracus and they
did not do a very good job and what you
see is the complete implosion of the
Venezuelan economy. According to the
United Nations, about 20% of Venezuelans
actually fled the country. Now, that's
like 7 million people. Uh, viral videos
at the time would show that many
Venezuelans were basically starving. You
can see them throwing rocks at cows,
trying to kill the cow to eat them. It
was very much a humanitarian disaster.
Now, you had Venezuelan refugees flood
the entire world. You have Venezuelan
refugees in Chile, um, in Colombia,
Mexico, and of course in the United
States. Uh this was a tremendous
tremendous catastrophe. You had a
country that was doing on the upswing
just just totally destroyed and of
course the people Venezuelans did not
like that and ideally there would be a
mechanism for the people to change
course to have a new government. Of
course that was naturally through the
ballot box. Now Venezuela did recently a
few years ago have an election by all
accounts. President Maduro lost that
election in a big way for obvious
reasons. Um but uh you know he just
decided that he didn't want to leave and
so basically became a de facto dictator
of Venezuela. So this is a guy who did a
terrible job ruined the lives of
millions of people ruined his country
and it's just not very popular. However
though and of course he's uh not friends
with the Trump administration is friends
with Russia, Iran and China. basically
friends with people who are not uh with
team Trump, team USA.
So it seems like the motivation for this
uh move is twofold. One of course is to
strengthen US influence in uh Latin
America
and secondly of course is for oil. Now,
in his uh in his press conference after
his president is is totally blunt. You
know, it's it's not like President Bush
going into Iraq and then not so much
telling you about the oil, although a
lot of US companies having big oil
contracts. It's that the US president is
telling you today, President Trump is
telling you today that Venezuela has
lots of oil and the US is going to have
control over it and it's this uh
operation in Venezuela is not going to
cost taxpayer money because uh the US is
going to get paid through oil. So, it's
very open about it. The US would like to
have more control over Venezuelan
resources. Now, a coup attempt has
always been telegraphed. Again, you had
that military flotillaa outside of
Venezuela. You also had the US
intelligence operations smuggle out
Venezuelan opposition leader Machado
smuggled her out into um to Sweden where
she could get her, you know, Nobel Peace
Prize, have more international
legitimacy. But I think the US has
basically changed its mind on that. She
was, you know, probably a plan B or plan
A or plan C or something like that. But
maybe looking at how successful the
operation was today, the president very
openly told everyone that actually the
US will run Venezuela.
We don't want to be involved with uh
having somebody else get in and we have
the same situation that we had for the
last long period of years. So we are
going to run the country until such time
as we can do a safe, proper and
judicious
transition. Eventually,
Trump is saying that he will give
Venezuelan back, but uh you know, this
could be years or decades, and no one
knows when.
So, it looks like overnight it's not
just it was regime change of Venezuela,
but the US has a new territory. It will
be run by um you know, who knows, new
governor, new prime minister, protector
of Venezuela. I'm not sure. But for the
foreseeable future, uh, Venezuela will
be under US control and eventually it
looks like there's going to be more
investment into Venezuela and there's
going to be more oil flowing out. So,
this this is a big big big geopolitical
move and it has some winners and losers.
The clear winners of course are the US
oil companies. They're going to be able
to go in and uh operate on those
resources. Chevron was already there.
Uh, it looks like other people are going
to come in as well. So that's very good
for the US oil industry. It's going to
be very good for inflation and the
global consumer. If you have Venezuela
there with all this oil, but just kind
of not having the infrastructure to be
able to extract it. Now the supply of
oil is going to go up. That's going to
mean down pressure on oil prices. Not
immediately, of course. It's going to
take time to be able to have the
facility set up, but you know, in a few
years, you can easily see the supply of
oil go up, oil prices uh go down. So
this is u good for again the war on
inflation. If you remember in January of
2025, Trump actually openly said that
his plan to get inflation lower is to
get more oil and you have OPEC pump more
oil. You have oil prices down a lot and
now it looks like this is um this is
maybe another part of that.
You do have clear losers as well. Now,
of course, aside from President Moduro,
who is now, it seems, on a ship, uh,
you know, it seems like if you look at a
chart where Venezuela was selling its
oil, a lot of was going to China. Now,
Venezuela was a staunch ally of China,
of Russia, and of Iran. And so now that
team is losing a big ally. Now, China is
still going to be able to get oil from
Venezuela. Now, the president was very
clear that, you know, we're going to
pump more oil and we're going to sell it
to everyone. So, China is still going to
get more oil, but they probably won't
get it at the same discounted price.
Venezuelan oil was sanctioned. It really
couldn't go to the global market. And
so, they had to sell it at a discount to
other people, similar to what Russia
does, right? Russia oil was sanctioned.
They sell it at a discount to other
countries. And so, uh, China was getting
discounted oil. Now, they're not getting
discounted oil anymore. China was
friends with Venezuela. In fact, reports
suggest that they had a Chinese
delegation being sent to Venezuela just
in a few hours before the operation.
Now, it looks like they've lost a key
ally in Latin America.
Um, this of course could also point to
trouble for uh allies of uh President
Maduro, say Cuba, for example, longtime
thorn in the side of the US. You know,
doesn't have any oil but uh not friends
with the US. And of course, um,
Secretary of State Marco Rubio is of
Cuban descent. And of course, uh, the
Cuban community in the US really doesn't
like what's happening in Cuba. And so I
think he should be a little bit worried.
If you are Iran, you could probably be
upset as well. You're losing another
ally. But it also tells you very clearly
that the president is a man of action.
He says many things, but he also has
done many things as well. um many things
other presidents would not have done
right directly strike Iran bombs huge
huge clampdown on illegal immigration
everywhere in the country of course
strikes on Venezuela but he's also said
other things that he hasn't done yet so
let's say that you are the prime
minister of Denmark who of course
controls Greenland president has said
that you know Greenland is very very
important to us from a national security
standpoint so does that increase the
probability that you know maybe one day
Greenland will have to change hands as
well. Of course, the president also made
comments about Canada and we we don't
know what will happen there. One thing
to note though is that strategically
speaking, the oil that Venezuela pumps
is heavy crude. That's the same stuff
that Canada pumps to as well. And right
now, Canada has one captain consumer,
the United States. And the United States
is relying upon Canadian heavy crude as
well. That's what the refiners are
optimized for. If you have another
source of heavy crude come online from
Venezuela, that really really decreases
the bargaining power that Canadian oil
companies have. And of course, that is a
big problem from a geostrategic
way for for Canada and maybe why Prime
Minister Mark Carney is eager to
greenlight another pipeline so that they
have other outlets for Canadian oil.
So, one other thing, of course, we have
to think about is that what other thing
has Trump um kind of obsessed about over
and over again, um that's lower interest
rates. And as I wrote last week, my
blog, the market is really not pricing
in that Trump will get his way. I the
market really doesn't seem to think
that, you know, prices interest rates
the same way they did months ago. So
they don't really place probability on
President Trump actually getting his way
and able to lower interest rates even
though the president has you know done a
lot of really obvious moves to try to do
that. So I think that continues to be a
significant mispricing of the market. So
uh president has a track record of uh
acting on things that he cares a lot
about. So markets will be exciting this
next week. Guessing that you know I
since it was so effortless. Maybe not
even that big of an impact, but you
know, if you have lower oil prices in
the future, maybe that's a little bit
downward pressure on inflation.