𝕏 原文阅读 · 帖子

Tigris | 会讲课教授是好老师 · 2025-02-28 · 帖子

保留来源原文。时间显示为 Toronto 当地时间;未保存的配图与引用请前往 X 查看。

返回 X 阅读

保存说明:除条目另有标注外,正文尚未人工核对 · 图片未保存 · 引用或对话上下文可能不完整。

Tigris | 会讲课教授是好老师 @tig88411109
原帖 ↗
From the perspective of the entire event, Zelensky’s actions did not appear to be a mere emotional outburst but rather a carefully orchestrated negotiation gambit. He knew that he cannot accept a compromise, so he chose to actively sabotage the negotiations to ensure that Ukraine does not sign an agreement under his leadership, leaving the responsibility of compromise to the next president. This not only positions him advantageously in domestic politics but also potentially secures more leverage for Ukraine. In other words, his goal may never have been to “reach an agreement” but rather to ensure that “an agreement cannot be reached under his leadership.”
来源与保存记录

Post ID: 1895588212275650595
保存时间:2026-10-04T20:19:03.176Z
正文状态:UNVERIFIED
媒体状态:NOT_ARCHIVED
上下文状态:PARTIAL
已知缺失:Linked or quoted context may not be saved

REPLY_TO: x:post:1895532618545823813 · https://x.com/i/status/1895532618545823813