---
area: "society-thinking"
category: psychology
companies_orgs:
- Weibo
- Xiaohongshu
- Bilibili
date: '2025-03-08'
draft: true
guest: ''
insight: ''
layout: post.njk
media_books:
- The Sublime Object of Ideology
- Abnormal Man
- Yongzheng Dynasty
- Zhu Yuanzhang
people:
- Foucault
- Zhu Yuanzhang
products_models: []
project: []
series: ''
source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wMEQyhigq4
speaker: Anthony看世界
status: evergreen
summary: 本视频深入分析中国社会中权力与个体心理的复杂互动。探讨了为何人们在面对权力时，会通过夸大审查的恐怖性或认同权力规则来缓解焦虑，并从中获得一种虚假的享乐。文章指出，这种看似批评实则强化了权力全能性的心理机制，以及在专制体系下，所谓的“生存智慧”如何成为一种低效的心理慰藉，最终促成了意识形态的再生产。视频引用福柯和齐泽克的理论，揭示了这种无意识的自我审查如何让个体深陷权力逻辑。
tags:
- anxiety
- power-dynamic
- psychology
- society
title: 解读中国社会的隐形自我审查：权力、焦虑与意识形态的享乐机制
---
### 中国社会中的权力与享乐机制

大家好，我是Anthony，欢迎来到我的频道。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Hello everyone, I am Anthony<br>Welcome to my channel</p>
</details>

今天的视频，让我们继续分析中国社会的**享乐机制**（Hedonic Mechanism: 指人们从特定行为或情境中获得快感或满足感的方式）。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Today's video<br>Let us continue to analyze the hedonic mechanism of Chinese society.</p>
</details>

在之前的视频中，我们讨论了为什么假装领导视察的短视频在中国互联网上非常流行。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">In the previous video<br>We discussed<br>Why pretend to be a leader's inspection short video<br>Very popular on the Chinese Internet</p>
</details>

并且提到，许多在中国社会流行的幽默都有一个共同点，那就是观看弱者在权力面前情绪崩溃、暴露本能的**条件反射**（Conditioned Reflex: 指经过学习和训练，由特定刺激引起的非自主反应）。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">And mentioned<br>Many humors popular in Chinese society<br>There is such a commonality<br>That is to watch the weak in the face of power<br>Emotional breakdown, revealing instincts<br>Conditioned reflex</p>
</details>

例如，看到有人在被领导视察时惊慌失措的样子。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">for example<br>Seeing someone in a panic when being inspected by the leader<br>Panic look</p>
</details>

又例如，有些父母喜欢通过吓唬孩子来让他们哭泣，然后觉得开心和好笑。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">For example<br>Some parents<br>Likes to make children cry by scaring them<br>Then I feel happy and funny</p>
</details>

这种中国式的幽默模式是无意识的，甚至主角本人也可能无法察觉到笑声的来源。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This Chinese humor pattern is unconscious<br>Even the protagonist himself may not be able to notice<br>The source of laughter</p>
</details>

我们也得出结论：首先，这种幽默源于中国是一个**权力关系**（Power Relations: 指社会中不同个体或群体之间权力分配和行使的方式）紧张、**等级关系**（Hierarchical Relationships: 指社会或组织中不同层级之间的地位和权力差异）森严的社会。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">We also concluded:<br>This kind of humor<br>First, China is a country with tight power relations.<br>A society with strong hierarchical relationships</p>
</details>

每个人都经历过面对权威时的尴尬和紧张时刻，但由于对**官僚体制**（Bureaucracy: 指一种通过严格规则、层级结构和非个人化程序来运作的组织形式）的批评是不可言说的，加上人们想避免感到脆弱，所以人们自然而然地发展出对权威的模仿，作为严肃生活的减压阀和对权力体系的微妙反叛。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Everyone has experienced<br>Awkward and tense moments facing authority<br>But due to the criticism of the bureaucracy<br>It is unspeakable<br>Plus people want to avoid feeling vulnerable.<br>So people naturally developed a parody of authority.<br>As a pressure relief valve for serious life<br>and a subtle rebellion against the power system</p>
</details>

当你看到别人替你经历焦虑时，你也会感到一种释放感。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">When you see others experiencing anxiety on your behalf<br>You will also feel a sense of release</p>
</details>

因此，观看权力运作已成为威权社会中的一种享乐机制。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">So, watch the power in action<br>It has become a kind of enjoyment mechanism in an authoritarian society.</p>
</details>

我们今天要讨论的另一种享乐机制也与权力有关，那就是通过**权力话语**（Discourse of Power: 指权力通过语言、符号和叙事来构建、维持和传播其合法性和影响力的过程）规则，或无意识地认同权力来缓解焦虑。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Another pleasure mechanism we are going to discuss today is<br>It’s also about power<br>That is through the discourse of power rules<br>Or unconsciously identify with power to relieve anxiety</p>
</details>

在视频开始之前，我想说，如果你有任何想和我讨论和咨询的话题，可以通过我的电子邮件联系预约。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Before the video starts, let me say<br>If you have anything you want to discuss with me<br>And consulting topics<br>You can contact my email to make an appointment</p>
</details>

### 互联网上的“小心”评论与审查的幻象

那么，让我们回到今天的话题。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">So let's get back to our topic today.</p>
</details>

我对这个话题的兴趣源于我对中国互联网的观察。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Interest in this topic<br>Originated from my observation of the Chinese Internet</p>
</details>

中国互联网上经常出现这种现象：一位博主发表了他对中国社会阴暗面的分析，例如揭露某些利益链，或分析政府政策和目标，或批评一些社会不公，或关注某些底层群体的生存困境等等。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This phenomenon often occurs on the Chinese Internet:<br>A blogger published his<br>Analysis of the dark side of Chinese society<br>For example, revealing certain interest chains<br>or analyzing government policies and objectives<br>Or criticize some social injustice<br>Or pay attention to the survival difficulties of certain lower-class groups<br>etc.</p>
</details>

在评论区，经常能看到这样的声音：“小心，我真怕有一天你就不见了。”

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Such voices can often be seen in the comment section:<br>Be careful<br>I'm really afraid that one day you'll be gone.</p>
</details>

如果博主在海外，就提醒他回国要小心。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">If the blogger is overseas<br>Just remind him to be careful when he returns home.</p>
</details>

有些人会说：“我真想给你点赞，就怕血溅到我身上。”

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Some people will say: I really want to give you a thumbs up<br>I'm afraid the blood will splash on me.</p>
</details>

其他网友会使用这种句式，例如：“你现在都不满了，以后想干什么？我都不敢想。”

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Other netizens will use this sentence pattern:<br>For example, "You are now dissatisfied<br>What do you want to do in the future?<br>I don’t even dare to think about it.”</p>
</details>

这是一种模仿当权者语气的调侃，当然是以开玩笑和夸张的方式，含蓄地表达对权力不满。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This is a tone that simulates the tone of those in power.<br>Of course, in a joking and exaggerated way<br>Implicitly expressing dissatisfaction with power</p>
</details>

有些网友会说：“你不如说得更清楚一点。”

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Some netizens would say<br>"You might as well put it more clearly"</p>
</details>

这也是一种经典的群体幽默，即大家都知道什么话能说，什么话不能说，用这句话更多的是调侃这种语言环境，而不是真的要求对方说得更清楚，从而达到一种心照不宣的效果。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This is also a classic group humor.<br>That is, everyone knows what to say.<br>What can't be said<br>Use this sentence<br>More of a joke about the language environment<br>Rather than really asking the other party to speak more clearly<br>Thereby achieving a tacit effect</p>
</details>

不得不承认，这些话语中清晰地包含着对权力不满，以及对言论环境的讽刺和嘲弄。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Have to admit<br>These words clearly contain dissatisfaction with power.<br>And the satire and ridicule of the speech environment</p>
</details>

然而，当我们重新审视这些话语时，我不禁思考：提醒别人要小心、要注意安全，这种提醒的意义何在？

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">However, when we re-examine such words<br>I can't help but think<br>Remind others to be careful<br>Be safe<br>What's the point of this reminder?</p>
</details>

它的全部意义似乎只是为了提醒作者，你所写的内容违背官方意愿，这是一件可怕的事情。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Its entire meaning seems to be just to remind the author<br>What you wrote goes against the official will.<br>It's a terrible thing</p>
</details>

但这根本不需要任何提醒，作者既然能写出这样的文章，又怎么可能不知道这一点呢？

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">But this doesn't need any reminder<br>The author can write such an article<br>How could it be possible not to know this?</p>
</details>

所以，这条评论似乎是在交流，但实际上更像是一种自言自语。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">So this comment seems<br>It is communicating<br>In fact, it is more like a self-talk</p>
</details>

在这里，存在着当事人自己都未察觉到的东西，那就是在言语中夸大和渲染审查的**全能性**（Omnipotence: 指拥有无限的权力或能力）和恐怖性。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Here<br>There are things that the parties themselves are not aware of.<br>That is to speak and exaggerate<br>The omnipotence and terror of censorship</p>
</details>

即使是以开玩笑和调侃的方式，但在潜意识中，他仍然勾勒出这样一幅画面：审查权力不仅能迅速识别和侦测到所有反对的意图，而且会对这种反对施加最严厉的惩罚。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Even in a joking and teasing way<br>However, in the subconscious<br>He still sketched out such a picture<br>Censorship Power<br>Not only can it quickly identify and detect<br>Every intention of opposition<br>And will impose the most severe punishment on such opposition</p>
</details>

### 审查制度的复杂性与局限性

然而，这严重不符合事实。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">But<br>This is seriously untrue.</p>
</details>

首先，审查权力不可能准确识别所有反对的意图。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">First, the power of review<br>Accurate identification is impossible<br>Every intention of opposition</p>
</details>

尽管有关键词过滤和人工审查，但语言本身是具有创造性的，人们总能发明新的比喻、谐音和别名来规避审查。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Although there are keyword filtering and manual review<br>But language itself is creative.<br>People are always able to invent new metaphors, homophones, and aliases<br>To circumvent censorship</p>
</details>

此外，自然语言的复杂性使得一个正能量的词语在不同语境下完全可以表达反对和讽刺，即使是人工审查也可能无法判断。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Moreover, the complexity of natural language<br>Make a positive energy word<br>In different contexts<br>It is perfectly acceptable to express opposition and sarcasm.<br>Even manual review may not be able to judge</p>
</details>

而且，审查权力并非铁板一块，它不是一个统一行动和信息共享的系统，而是由无数机构、部门和公司组成的临时团队，它们有各自的利益和目标。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">And the power of censorship is not monolithic.<br>It is not a system of unified action and information sharing.<br>It is composed of numerous institutions, departments and companies<br>A makeshift team<br>Have their own interests and goals</p>
</details>

微博、小红书、Bilibili、知乎这些社交媒体平台，以及警方和**国家互联网信息办公室**（Cyberspace Administration of China: 中国负责互联网内容管理和审查的最高机构）的审查目标并不一致。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Weibo, Xiaohongshu, Bilibili, Zhihu<br>This social media platform<br>The censorship targets of the police and the Cyberspace Administration of China<br>Not consistent</p>
</details>

警方关注的是是否影响真实秩序的稳定，例如某个地方的警方对涉及当地的负面舆情非常敏感，但对于批评某些系统性和全局性问题可能就不那么在意。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">The police are concerned<br>Does it affect the stability of the real order?<br>For example, the police somewhere<br>Very sensitive to negative public opinion involving the local area<br>But for criticizing certain systemic and global issues<br>I may not care</p>
</details>

中央政府可能允许地方负面新闻被公开讨论。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">The central government<br>It may allow negative local news to be discussed publicly.</p>
</details>

企业审查的目标主要是出于商业考量，尽量减少被罚款的风险，避免政府压力。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Corporate censorship goals<br>Mainly for commercial considerations<br>Minimize the risk of being fined.<br>Avoid government pressure</p>
</details>

因为政府审查是单个打击，力度强但覆盖面有限，不可能监控一切。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Because government censorship is an individual strike<br>Strong but limited coverage<br>It’s impossible to monitor everything</p>
</details>

平台是言论的第一道防线，这意味着平台往往比政府更具攻击性，可以通过算法和人工进行批量过滤。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">The platform is the first line of defense for speech<br>This means that platforms can often be more aggressive than governments<br>It can be done by algorithms and manual<br>Batch Filtering</p>
</details>

这导致审查范围比政府更广，并且会预防性地删除帖子。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This results in a wider scope of censorship than the government<br>And will preventively delete posts</p>
</details>

最重要的是，并非所有违背官方意愿的言论都会受到最严厉的打击。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Most importantly<br>Not all statements that go against official will<br>will be hit hardest</p>
</details>

我们可以大致将打击言论分为线上惩罚和线下惩罚。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">We can roughly strike down speech<br>Divided into online punishment and offline punishment</p>
</details>

从轻到重依次是：删帖、禁言、封号。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">From light to heavy, they are: post deletion, ban, account suspension</p>
</details>

线下打击包括所谓的“喝茶”，即要求你承诺不再发表此类言论。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Offline crackdowns include so-called tea invitations<br>That is to ask you to promise<br>I will no longer say such remarks.</p>
</details>

最严重的是拘留。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">The most serious is detention.</p>
</details>

显然，线下惩罚更具杀伤力，但成本更高。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Apparently<br>Offline punishment is more lethal<br>But the cost is higher</p>
</details>

平台审查范围更广，但惩罚相对较小。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">The scope of platform review is broader<br>But the punishment is relatively small</p>
</details>

平台会进行严格的**自我审查**（Self-censorship: 指个体或组织在没有外部强制的情况下，主动限制自己的言论或行为，以避免触犯权威或社会规范）。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">The platform will conduct strict self-censorship<br>This is of course very bad.</p>
</details>

这当然非常糟糕，但从另一个角度看，如果你在平台上发布内容并被网友看到，这实际上反而不容易遭受最严重的打击。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">But from another perspective<br>If you publish content on the platform<br>And was seen by netizens<br>This is actually<br>On the contrary, it is not easy to suffer the most serious blow.</p>
</details>

因为真正敏感的内容，你基本上发不出去。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Because the really sensitive content<br>You basically can't send it out.</p>
</details>

你能发布的内容，不太可能是最敏感的。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">What you can publish<br>It is unlikely to be the most sensitive</p>
</details>

许多网友似乎已经默认，只要发布不符合官方意图的评论，就会触发最严厉的惩罚，错误地认为“只要帖子被删，发帖人就危险了”。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Many netizens seem to have acquiesced<br>As long as you publish comments that do not conform to official intentions<br>The most severe punishment will be triggered<br>Mistakenly thought that "as long as the post is deleted<br>The person who posted it is in danger.”</p>
</details>

但事实是，大多数帖子被删除只是因为平台不想惹麻烦，并不意味着政府会追究发帖人。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">But the fact is<br>Most posts were deleted<br>Just because the platform doesn't want to cause trouble<br>It does not mean that the government will pursue the poster</p>
</details>

总的来说，我们可以发现，审查权力是一个非常复杂、有缺陷的系统。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Overall<br>We can find<br>The power of censorship is a very complex one.<br>A flawed system</p>
</details>

它不是一个不知疲倦、拥有无限权力的全能存在。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">It is not a tireless<br>An almighty being with unlimited powers</p>
</details>

因此，不加区分地提醒对方要小心、要警惕，并竭力夸大言论的恐怖后果，即使只是开玩笑，不仅毫无帮助，而且客观上强化了权力的全能性和不可挑战性，从而以另一种方式强化了现有的**意识形态框架**（Ideological Framework: 指一套由信仰、价值观和观念组成的系统，用于解释世界并指导社会行为）。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Therefore, reminding the other party without distinction<br>Be careful, be vigilant, and try your best to exaggerate<br>The terrible consequences of speaking and speaking<br>Even if it's just a joke,<br>Not only is there no help<br>And objectively<br>Strengthens the omnipotence and unchallengeability of power<br>Thus in another way<br>Strengthening the existing ideological framework</p>
</details>

这似乎是在批评权力不公，但它也强化了这种**宿命论倾向**（Fatalistic Tendency: 指相信所有事件都已被预定，人类无法改变命运的观念）：即反对是徒劳的，任何反对者都将被彻底击败。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">It seems to criticize the injustice of power<br>But it also reinforces this fatalistic tendency:<br>That is, opposition is futile.<br>Anyone who opposes will be thoroughly defeated.</p>
</details>

发言者不仅没有真正反叛任何事物，甚至没有让自己成为一个**独立主体**（Independent Subject: 指具有自主意识、能够独立思考和行动的个体）的“表象”，清晰地表达自己的想法。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Not only does the speaker not really rebel against anything<br>Not even making myself a<br>Independent subject "appearance"<br>Express your ideas clearly</p>
</details>

他们似乎在表达某种对权力不满，但这种不满却以“重复权力威胁”的形式呈现，最终没有形成独立的声音，反而让自己完全嵌入了权力的逻辑之中。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">They seem to be expressing some kind of dissatisfaction with power.<br>But this dissatisfaction<br>But it is presented in the form of "repeated threat of power"<br>In the end, no independent voice was formed.<br>But let yourself<br>Fully embedded in the logic of power</p>
</details>

### 齐泽克与意识形态的享乐机制

那么，我们如何理解这种心理机制呢？

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">So how do we understand this psychological mechanism?</p>
</details>

这涉及到我们，即在一个权力关系不平等的社会中，无意识地谈论权力的存在，是一种逃避焦虑的方式，也是一种快乐的来源。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This involves us<br>That is in a society with unequal power relations.<br>Unconsciously speaking of the existence of power<br>It is a way to escape anxiety<br>It is also a source of pleasure</p>
</details>

正如齐泽克在《意识形态的崇高客体》（The Sublime Object of Ideology）中所说：意识形态的功能是为我们提供一个逃离**创伤**（Trauma: 指由极度痛苦或威胁性事件引起的心理或情感上的伤害）现实核心的途径。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">As Zizek says in<br>In The Sublime Object of Ideology:<br>The function of ideology<br>Providing us with an escape from a traumatic<br>The core of reality</p>
</details>

创伤是无法**象征化**（Symbolize: 指将抽象概念或情感通过具体的符号、形象或语言来表达和代表）的东西。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Trauma is something that cannot be symbolized.</p>
</details>

象征性的和语言性的东西，例如在威权社会环境中，人们无法理解官方话语，也无法找到谈论恐惧的方式，无法预测它何时会降临。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Symbolic and linguistic things<br>For example, in an authoritarian social environment<br>People cannot understand the official discourse<br>Finding a way to talk about fear<br>Unable to predict when it will hit</p>
</details>

我们共同遭遇了一些不好的事情，因为**象征秩序**（Symbolic Order: 指社会中由语言、法律、文化规范等构成的结构，它赋予意义并组织现实）不允许人们讨论这种未被象征化的恐惧，它变成了一个无形的幽灵，一个令人不安但无法言说和预测的裂缝。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">We encountered some bad things together.<br>Because the symbolic order doesn't allow people to discuss<br>This unsymbolized fear<br>It became an invisible ghost<br>A disturbing<br>But the cracks are unspeakable and unpredictable</p>
</details>

这时，**意识形态幻象**（Ideological Illusion: 指意识形态所创造的一种虚假现实或信念系统，它掩盖了社会矛盾和权力结构，使人们接受现状）就发挥作用了。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This is when the ideological illusion comes into play.</p>
</details>

它弥合伤口，填补漏洞，让人相信社会是可预测、可理解和可控的。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">It closes wounds and fills holes<br>Make people believe<br>Society is predictable, understandable, and controllable</p>
</details>

即使这种意识形态是压迫性的，但真正可怕的是混乱和无序。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Even if this ideology is oppressive<br>But what is really scary is chaos and disorder</p>
</details>

因此，人们更愿意接受权力是全能的幻象，因为这至少能给他们某种可理解的“确定性”，即通过想象所有抵抗都将被击败，通过不断谈论最可怕的后果，来获得对现实的控制感和稳定性。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Therefore, people are more willing to accept<br>The illusion that power is omnipotent<br>Because of this<br>At least<br>It can give them some kind of understandable "certainty"<br>That is, by imagining that all resistance will be defeated.<br>By constantly talking about the most terrible consequence<br>To gain a sense of control and stability over reality</p>
</details>

这象征性地掌控了局面，这是一种虚假的幻想，但它可以弥补现实中不确定性的焦虑。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Symbolically taking control of the situation<br>This is a false fantasy<br>But it can make up for the anxiety of uncertainty in reality</p>
</details>

结果，即使政府的控制并非绝对全能，并非所有批评者都会被清除，但这些评论通过重复“你会惹麻烦”、“再见勇士”等言论，相当于提前将这些人推入了象征性的死亡。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">result<br>Even though the government controls<br>Not absolutely omnipotent<br>Not all critics will be purged<br>But these comments are repeated by repeating "you will get into trouble"<br>"Goodbye Warriors"<br>This is equivalent to putting these people in advance<br>Pushed into a symbolic death</p>
</details>

让所有人默认：任何批评都将被压制。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Let everyone default:<br>Any criticism will be suppressed</p>
</details>

最终，即使没有那么多的压制，他们也已经在社会语境中“死亡”了，个体也可以通过自我审查而沉默。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">In the end, even without so much repression<br>They have been "dead" in the social context<br>Individuals can also be silenced by self-censorship</p>
</details>

因此，意识形态的再生产实际上就完成了。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Thus, the reproduction of ideology is virtually completed.</p>
</details>

### 认同权力与“生存智慧”的幻象

我们上面讨论了通过言语或夸大权力的可怕后果来缓解焦虑的心理机制。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">We discussed above<br>Speak or exaggerate the terrible consequences of power<br>Psychological mechanisms to relieve anxiety</p>
</details>

另一种缓解焦虑的方式是，通过说出威权社会的一些**潜规则**（Unspoken Rules: 指在特定群体或社会中，虽未明文规定但被普遍遵守的行为准则）或**生存智慧**（Survival Wisdom: 指在特定环境中为了生存和适应而发展出的经验和策略），获得暂时的智力优越感。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Another way to relieve anxiety<br>is<br>By speaking out some unspoken rules of authoritarian society<br>Or survival wisdom<br>Gain a temporary sense of intellectual superiority</p>
</details>

在言语中，这个人觉得自己与权力融为一体，而不是站在权力的对立面，从而获得秘密的快感。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">In the speech<br>The person feels that he is one with power<br>Rather than standing against power<br>Get the secret pleasure</p>
</details>

中国古装剧更适合提供这种优越感。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Chinese costume drama<br>It is more suitable to provide this sense of superiority</p>
</details>

例如，电视剧《雍正王朝》中有这样一个片段：**年羹尧**（Nian Gengyao: 清朝雍正年间的重要将领）作为一名将军，带领手下觐见**雍正皇帝**（Emperor Yongzheng: 清朝第五位皇帝）。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">for example<br>There is such a clip in the TV series "Yongzheng Dynasty"<br>Nian Gengyao as a general<br>Lead his men to meet Emperor Yongzheng</p>
</details>

雍正让这些将军脱下盔甲，将军们无动于衷，年羹尧一声令下，他们才立即照做。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Yongzheng asked these generals to take off their armor<br>The generals were indifferent<br>Nian Gengyao gave an order<br>They did so immediately.</p>
</details>

于是雍正非常不高兴，后来他想杀掉年羹尧。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">So Yongzheng was very unhappy<br>Later, he wanted to kill Nian Gengyao.</p>
</details>

另一个非常相似的情节来自电视剧《朱元璋》，**朱元璋**（Zhu Yuanzhang: 明朝开国皇帝）和**蓝玉**（Lan Yu: 明朝开国将领）一起边走边聊。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Another very similar plot<br>It is from the TV series "Zhu Yuanzhang"<br>Zhu Yuanzhang and Lan Yu walking and chatting together</p>
</details>

朱元璋随后让蓝玉的随从离开，随从表面答应，但仍然紧随其后，直到听到蓝玉的命令才退下。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Zhu Yuanzhang then asked Lan Yu's followers to leave.<br>The follower agreed superficially<br>But still follow closely<br>He did not retreat until he heard Lan Yu's order.</p>
</details>

于是朱元璋用一种怪异的语气说：“你的命令比我的圣旨还管用。”

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">So Zhu Yuanzhang said in a weird tone:<br>Your orders are more effective than my edicts.</p>
</details>

后来，蓝玉死得很惨。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Later, Lan Yu died miserably.</p>
</details>

这种情节是专制帝国的独特逻辑，即天下所有土地都属于君王，每个人本质上都是皇帝的奴隶，不允许任何人分享皇帝的权力。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This kind of plot is unique to autocratic empires<br>The logic is that all land under heaven belongs to the king<br>Everyone is essentially a slave of the emperor<br>No one can be allowed to share the emperor's power</p>
</details>

然而，在这些片段的评论区，许多人会不断分析这些将军和他们的下属太无知了，这简直是自取灭亡。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">However, in the comments section of these clips<br>Many people will constantly analyze<br>These generals and their subordinates are too ignorant.<br>It's just a way to kill yourself</p>
</details>

他们还分析了很多职场心理学。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Also analyzed a lot of workplace psychology</p>
</details>

实际上，当他们研究这些“生存智慧”时，会感到非常愉悦。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Actually<br>When they were studying these "survival wisdoms"<br>It's very pleasurable</p>
</details>

作为拥有上帝视角的旁观者，他们知道皇帝的意图，也能看到大臣和将军的错误。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">As a spectator with a God's perspective<br>They knew the emperor's intentions.<br>I can also see the mistakes of ministers and generals.</p>
</details>

因此，他们认为自己清楚谁拥有最大的权力，所以觉得故事中的人物非常愚蠢。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">therefore<br>They think it is clear who has the most power<br>So I feel that the people in the story are very stupid</p>
</details>

当人们热衷于分析“谁更懂政治？”“谁更能猜透**圣意**（Divine Will: 指君主的意图或决策，常被神化为不可违抗的旨意）？”时，他们的切入点往往是皇帝，而不是那些被处决的官员和下属。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">When people are keen on analyzing "Who is more knowledgeable about politics?"<br>Who can better guess the divine will?<br>Their entry point is often the emperor<br>Rather than the executed officials and subordinates</p>
</details>

这种替代是一种无意识地认同权力。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This substitution<br>It is an unconscious recognition of power.</p>
</details>

这似乎是只要我学会这些规则，就能在现实中更好地生存。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">It seems that as long as I learn these rules<br>To survive better in reality</p>
</details>

但事实上，这种内斗的智慧在威权体制下，是一种低效和短视的生存技能。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">But in fact, the wisdom of this internal struggle<br>Under an authoritarian system<br>An inefficient and short-sighted survival skill</p>
</details>

这种每个人都服从一个领导的军事系统，效率也相当低下。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This<br>A military system where everyone obeys one leader<br>It’s also quite inefficient</p>
</details>

例如，在高度**中央集权**（Centralized: 指权力或控制集中于一个中心点或少数人手中）的宋朝，中央政府为了防止地方叛乱，大大削弱了地方自治和作战能力。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">for example<br>In the highly centralized Song Dynasty<br>The central government tried to prevent local rebellion.<br>Greatly weakened local autonomy and combat capabilities</p>
</details>

结果，宋朝确实实现了军事上的中央集权，但在蒙古入侵面前却崩溃了。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">As a result, the Song Dynasty did manage to centralize military power.<br>But it collapsed in the face of the Mongol invasion.</p>
</details>

相比之下，在中世纪的欧洲，由于军事模式更加分散和独立的防御体系，封建欧洲比亚洲国家更能抵抗蒙古的攻击。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">In contrast<br>In medieval Europe<br>Due to the more centralized military model<br>and independent defense system<br>As a result, feudal Europe is more centralized than Asian countries.<br>Better able to resist Mongolian attacks</p>
</details>

所以我们说，在威权社会中，一些看似无害和中立的知识和讨论，实际上仍然服务于权力结构的合理化。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">So we say<br>In an authoritarian society<br>Some seemingly harmless and neutral knowledge and discussion<br>actually<br>Still serves to rationalize the power structure</p>
</details>

它更像是一种无脑的娱乐和心理按摩，即让观众觉得自己能看透一切，这消除了权力的荒谬和暴力，使人们更容易在心理上接受它。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">It's more like a mindless entertainment.<br>and psychological massage<br>That is to make the audience feel that they can see through everything.<br>This eliminates the absurdity and violence of power.<br>Make it easier for people to accept it psychologically</p>
</details>

### 结语与联系方式

关于权力与享乐的话题就到这里。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">That’s all for now on the topic of power and pleasure.</p>
</details>

本视频基于福柯的《异常者》和齐泽克的《意识形态的崇高客体》。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This video is based on Foucault's "Abnormal Man"<br>and Zizek's The Sublime Object of Ideology</p>
</details>

如果你有任何困惑或问题，想与我交流，可以直接通过我的电子邮件联系。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">If you have any confusion or questions<br>Want to communicate with me<br>Just contact my email directly</p>
</details>

例如，你想和我讨论一篇文章、某个段落、某个视频、某个社会现象，或者你的日记，你可以提前把相关文本发给我，我会在正式交流前阅读。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">for example<br>You want to discuss an article with me<br>A certain paragraph, a certain video, a certain social phenomenon<br>Or your diary<br>You can send me the relevant text in advance.<br>I will read it before the formal communication</p>
</details>

或者你想和我讨论你的生活经历、困惑和情感，都是可以的。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Or you want to discuss your life experience with me<br>Confusion and emotion<br>All are possible</p>
</details>

如果你对隐私、安全、支付和沟通方式有任何疑问，也请及时告诉我。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">If you are concerned about privacy, security<br>Any questions about payment and communication methods<br>Please also tell me in time</p>
</details>

如果你无法支付或加入会员，也请联系我，我将提供其他方式。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">If you are unable to pay or join the membership<br>Please contact me too<br>I will provide other ways</p>
</details>

详情请参考这张图片。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Please refer to this picture for details</p>
</details>

我将把这个视频放入“心理学与教育”的列表中，也推荐大家查看我这个列表中的其他视频。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">I will post this video<br>Put it in the list of "Psychology and Education"<br>Also recommend to everyone<br>Check out my other videos in this list</p>
</details>

感谢观看，再见！

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Thank you for watching<br>goodbye!</p>
</details>