---
author: TVO Today
date: '2026-10-30'
guest: ''
layout: post.njk
source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lyfI4lfOlM
speaker: TVO Today
tags:
  - municipal-election
  - fiscal-policy
  - provincial-politics
  - legislative-affairs
title: 2026年安大略省市政选举盘点与秋季经济报告解读
summary: Steve Paikin与John Michael McGrath复盘了2026年安省市政选举，重点剖析邹至蕙连任多伦多市长、密西沙加市Alvin Tedjo爆冷胜选及多地现任市长落选现象；同时解读了安省最新秋季经济报告中的赤字扩大与第140号减负法案。
insight: ''
draft: true
series: ''
category: politics-society
area: society-thinking
project: []
people:
  - Steve Paikin
  - John Michael McGrath
  - Olivia Chow
  - Brad Bradford
  - Alvin Tedjo
  - Bonnie Crombie
  - Carolyn Parrish
  - Doug Ford
companies_orgs:
  - TVO
products_models: []
media_books:
  - '#onpoli podcast'
status: evergreen
---
### 开场与闲聊

**Steve Paikin**: 欢迎大家收听OnPaly播客。我是Steve Paikin。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
Welcome
 everyone
 to
 the
 OnPaly
 podcast.


I'm
 Steve
 Pacen
</details>

**>>**: 我是John Michael McGrath。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> and
 I'm
 John
 Michael
 McGrath.
</details>

**>>**: 在今天的播客中，2026年的市政选举已经尘埃落定。我们将一起梳理这个具有历史意义的夜晚的高潮与低谷。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Today
 on
 the
 pod,
 the
 municipal


elections
 for
 2026
 have
 come
 and
 gone.


We'll
 sort
 through
 the
 highs
 and
 lows
 of


an
 historic
 evening.
</details>

**>>**: 虽然有些城市完全避免了变革——没错，多伦多、渥太华、宾顿（Bmpton），我们说的就是你们——但另一些城市则毫不留情地把现任者赶下了台。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> While
 some
 cities
 avoided
 change


altogether,
 yes,
 Toronto,
 Ottawa,


Bmpton,
 we're
 looking
 at
 you.
 Others


kicked
 out
 incumbents
 with
 extreme


prejudice.
</details>

**>>**: 省议会已经复会，财政部也公布了秋季经济报告。我们会告诉大家它反映了安大略省财政账目怎样的状况。在你的专栏——我的专栏里，我将聚焦全省各地市长选举中掀起的那股现任落选潮。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> The
 legislature
 is
 sitting
 again
 and
 the


Ministry
 of
 Finance
 has
 released
 its


fall
 economic
 statement.
 We'll
 tell
 you


what
 it
 says
 about
 the
 state
 of
 the


province's
 books.
 In
 your
 column,
 my


column,
 I'll
 focus
 on
 that
 wave
 of


incumbents
 who
 lost
 mayor's
 races
 around


the
 province.
</details>

**>>**: 而我则专注于报道这四十多年来市长选举中见过的最令人震惊的爆冷门事件。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And
 I'm
 focused
 on
 perhaps
 the
 most


shocking
 upset
 I've
 ever
 seen
 in
 more


than
 four
 decades
 of
 covering
 those


mayoral
 races.
</details>

**>>**: 今天是2026年10月30日，星期五。让我们马上开始吧。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> It's
 Friday,
 October
 30th,
 2026.
 So,


let's
 get
 to
 it.
</details>

**>>**: JMM，今天先聊点市政话题开个头。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> JMM,
 a
 little
 municipal
 to
 get
 us


started
 today.
</details>

**>>**: 没问题。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Absolutely.
</details>

**>>**: 我们今天穿的都是什么？这件T恤上面印的是任天堂原版红白机（NES）的手柄。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> What
 are
 we
 wearing
 today?
 So,
 this
 uh


is
 a
 t-shirt
 featuring
 the
 controller


for
 the
 original
 Nintendo
 Entertainment


System,
</details>

**>>**: 复古老派。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> old
 school.
</details>

**>>**: 嗯，老派，自1985年以来的怀旧风。你看，我们提到了市政政坛出现了一批新面孔。至少其中有些人现在和我同龄。我挺喜欢这种趋势，像我这样年长的千禧一代政治人物赢得了重要职位。所以，向Alvin Tedjo这样只比我小几岁的人致敬。那些还记得任天堂原版游戏机NES的人——顺便说一下，在我的市议员选区海滩-东约克（Beaches East York），赢得席位的也是一位缩写为NES的人：Nate Erskine-Smith。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Um,
 old
 school,
 kicking
 it
 old
 school


since
 1985.
 And,
 uh,
 you
 know,
 there
 was


a
 we
 mentioned
 a
 wave
 of
 new
 faces
 in


municipal
 politics.
 And
 at least
 some
 of


those
 people
 are
 now
 my
 age.
 Uh,
 and
 so


I
 I
 I
 like
 this
 trend
 of
 uh,
 politicians


who
 are
 elder
 millennials
 like
 me
 uh,


winning
 important
 offices.
 And
 so,
 uh,
 a


shout
 out
 to
 people
 like
 Alvin
 Ted,


who's
 just
 a
 few
 years
 younger
 than
 I


am.
 Uh,
 people
 who
 remember
 the


original,
 uh,
 Nintendo
 Entertainment


System,
 whose
 initials,
 of
 course,
 are


NES.
 Uh,
 and
 a
 different
 NES
 won
 his


seat
 in
 my
 council
 award
 of
 Beaches
 East


York.
 Nater
 Smith.
</details>

**>>**: 瞧瞧，可不是嘛。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> There
 you
 go.
 There
 we
 go.
</details>

**>>**: 厉害。年长千禧一代赢得了要职。我个人倒比较喜欢年长者赢得要职，因为那更能引起我们这一代人的共鸣。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> There
 you
 go.
 Wow.
 Um,
 elder
 millennials


winning
 important
 jobs.
 Yes.
 I
 I
 I
 kind


of
 like
 it
 when
 just
 elders
 win


important
 jobs
 because
 that
 sort
 of


speaks
 more
 to
 my
 generation.
</details>

**>>**: 话虽如此，但变革正在到来，Steve。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh
 well,
 yes,
 but
 changes
 are
 coming,


Steve.
</details>

**>>**: 是啊。密西沙加市的人口我记不清了，大概75万左右吧。安大略省一个重要大城市的市长竟然比你还年轻，这感觉会不会有点奇怪？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah.
 Yeah.
 Does
 it
 feel
 weird
 that
 a
 I


forget
 the
 population
 of
 Missaga
 now,


something
 like
 750,000.
 Does
 it
 feel


weird
 that
 there's
 a
 a
 mayor
 of
 a
 big


important
 city
 in
 Ontario
 who's
 younger


than
 you?
</details>

**>>**: 我几年前就接受了这个现实，岁月不饶人，每天都有比我更年轻的人涌现出来。好了，现在轮到我让你猜猜看：我这件衣服上写着“I heart Hazel（我爱Hazel）”。大家看到了吧？我的T恤上写着“I heart Hazel”。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh
 I
 mean,
 I
 accepted
 this
 a
 few
 years


ago
 that
 time
 moves
 on
 and
 there's


there's
 younger
 people
 coming
 up
 behind


me
 every
 day.
 Ah,
 okay.
 Now
 I
 am
 going


to
 get
 you
 to
 guess
 what?
 I
 heart
 Hazel.


You
 see
 it
 all
 there,
 everybody?
 Okay.


My
 shirt
 says
 I
 heart
 Hazel.
 Yes.
</details>

**>>**: 这还能指的是谁呢？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Who
 could
 that
 possibly
 be
 a
 reference


to?
</details>

**>>**: 我觉得在安省政坛，按规矩讲只有一个“Hazel”，那就是已故的密西沙加市长Hazel McCallion。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I
 mean
 that
 I
 think
 by
 law
 there
 is
 only


one
 Hazel
 in
 reference
 to
 Ontario


politics
 and
 that
 would
 be
 the
 late


mayor
 of
 Missaga,
 Hazel
 Mall.
</details>

**>>**: 没错，确实如此。尽管她去世快四年了，但在密西沙加这次市政选举中，她依然扮演着举足轻重的角色，我们稍后还会详细讨论。

过去这一周半到两周的政治局势真是令人着迷，简直疯狂。比如不列颠哥伦比亚省提前宣布省选。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes
 indeed.
 Yes
 indeed.
 Who
 even
 though


she
 died
 almost
 four
 years
 ago
 was


actually
 still
 a
 bit
 of
 a
 significant


player
 in
 this
 municipal
 election
 in


Missaga,
 which
 we're
 going to
 talk
 about


more
 later
 as
 we
 go
 along.


It
 has
 been
 a
 really
 fascinating
 last
 I


mean
 week
 and
 a
 half,
 two
 weeks
 for


politics.
 It's
 been
 crazy.
 The
 British


Columbia
 election
 call.
</details>

**>>**: 简直匪夷所思。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Oh,
 absolutely
 nuts.
</details>

**>>**: 我觉得这会树立一个新的标杆……
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I
 think
 it's
 going
 to
 set
 a
 new
 standard


for
</details>

**>>**: 就像网球里说的什么来着？非受迫性失误。简直成了非受迫性失误的新标杆。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> you
 know
 what
 do
 you
 call
 that?
 Unforced


errors
 in
 tennis.
 You
 know,
 it's
 for


unforced
 errors.
</details>

**>>**: 我觉得这太耐人寻味了。BC省省长David Eby提前宣布选举，结果惨败。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And
 and
 I
 find
 it
 so
 fascinating.
 You


know,
 Premier
 Eevee
 in
 British
 Columbia


early
 election
 call
 got
 crushed.
</details>

**>>**: 道格·福特（Doug Ford）在四年任期的第二年也做过同样的事，以特朗普以及“必须保护大家免受特朗普关税侵害”为借口提前大选，结果赢得了连续第三个多数党政府。当然，早在1990年，David Peterson在四年任期进行到第三年时提前大选，结果也输掉了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Doug
 Ford
 did
 the
 same
 thing
 two
 years


into
 a
 four-year
 mandate.
 using
 Trump


and
 I
 have
 to
 protect
 you
 against
 Trump


tariffs
 as
 his
 reason
 for
 calling
 the


election
 got
 a
 third
 consecutive


majority
 government
 and
 then
 of
 course


David
 Peterson
 back
 in
 1990
 went
 three


years
 into
 a
 four-year
 mandate.
 He


called
 the
 early
 election
 and
 he
 lost
 as


well.
</details>

**>>**: 有时候，运气好确实胜过能力强。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Some
 days
 it's
 better
 to
 be
 lucky
 than


good,
 you
 know.
</details>

**>>**: 是的。我还想补充一点，福特虽然提前举行了大选，但没有Eby那么早。而且当时正好碰上所谓的“解放日”关税，以及特朗普开始谈论第51个州之类的胡言乱语。这种时间上的邻近性，我认为对福特的帮助远大于对Eby的帮助。更何况，我们必须提到BC省保守党内部当时的那种混乱局面。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.
 Well,
 I
 will
 add
 that
 you
 know
 Ford


did
 have
 the
 advantage
 of
 uh
 calling
 the


election
 Yes.
 early,
 but
 uh
 not
 quite
 as


early
 as
 EIE.
 And
 uh
 it
 really
 was
 right


at
 the
 same
 time
 as,
 you
 know,
 the
 the


liberation
 day
 tariffs
 and
 Trump


starting
 to
 talk
 about
 the
 51st
 state


and
 all
 of
 that
 nonsense.
 And
 so
 there


was
 a
 proximity
 in
 events
 that
 I
 think


helped
 Ford
 uh
 more
 than
 it
 helped
 EIE


who
 was
 really
 un
 and
 we
 have
 to
 mention


the
 context
 of
 the
 uh
 chaos
 inside
 the


uh
 BC
 Conservative
 Party.
</details>

**>>**: 这确实让Eby提前大选的决定显得……我想可以说是有极其功利的投机嫌疑。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> That
 really
 did
 make
 EB's
 election
 call


look
 um
 I
 guess
 I'm
 allowed
 to
 say


crassly
 opportunistic.
</details>

**>>**: 这么形容很贴切。有趣的是，当胜利看起来就在前方仅仅25米处时，所有那些分散的保守力量竟然不知怎的凝聚到了一起，在John Rustad的带领下同仇敌忾，就这样，蓝色阵营赢得了多数政府，这可是100年来的第一次。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Well,
 those
 would
 be
 the
 right
 words.


It's
 funny
 though
 when
 when
 victory


looks
 like
 it's
 just
 about
 25
 meters


down
 the
 road,
 how
 all
 of
 those


desperate
 conservative
 forces
 managed
 to


somehow
 come
 together
 and
 sing
 Kumbaya


under
 Lauren
 Dirkson
 and
 uh
 there
 you


go,
 majority
 government
 for
 blue.
 First


time
 in
 a
 100
 years.
</details>

**>>**: 至少在美国军方有一句我前几年经常听到的俗语：“敌人也有投票权（决定权）”。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> There
 is
 a
 uh
 a
 saying
 in
 in
 at
 least
 in


the
 US
 military
 uh
 that
 I
 heard
 a
 lot
 in


a
 prior
 decade
 uh
 the
 enemy
 gets
 a
 vote
</details>

**>>**: David Eby似乎忘了对手也是有投票权的，而这一次，保守派联合了起来，他们投出了自己的票。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> and
 David
 Eie
 seems
 to
 have
 forgotten


that
 the
 enemy
 got
 a
 vote
 and
 in
 this


case
 the
 conservatives
 came
 together
 and


they
 voted.
</details>

**>>**: 可不是嘛。对了，我想致敬一个人。上周我去四季演艺中心参加了加拿大歌剧团（COC）的晚宴。那是一场令人赞叹的盛会，整晚歌声美妙。席间一位年轻的服务生走到我的桌前上菜，她名叫Michelle Ezel（拼作E-z-e-l）。这位年轻女士走过来把晚餐放到我面前，对我说：“希望我这么说不会显得不专业，但我真的很想告诉您，我有多喜欢OnPoli播客。”她是我们的忠实听众。我完全没想到去参加歌剧晚宴，中途居然会聊起安省政治或我们这个节目，但事实就是碰上了。Michelle，正如省长所说，你真棒，非常感谢你的赞扬，我们希望你继续收看或收听。我有预料到会在歌剧院谈论安省政治吗？谈《阿依达》会，谈《弄臣》会，谈《特里斯坦与伊索尔德》也会，但谈OnPoli，确实没想到，不过事情就这么发生了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> No
 kidding.
 No
 kidding.
 Now,
 I
 wanted
 to


give
 a
 shout
 out
 to
 somebody
 cuz
 last


week
 I
 was
 at
 a
 Canadian
 Opera
 Company


gala
 at
 the
 Four
 Season
 Center.


Incredible
 event,
 wonderful
 singing,
 as


you
 can
 imagine,
 throughout
 the
 evening.


And
 a
 young
 server
 came
 over
 to
 my
 table


to
 serve
 me
 dinner.
 Her
 name
 was


Michelle
 Ezel.


It's
 spelled
 E.


young
 woman,
 lovely
 young
 woman,
 walked


up
 to
 me
 and
 she
 placed
 her
 my
 dinner
 on


the
 table
 in
 front
 of
 me
 and
 she
 said,


"Oh,
 I
 hope
 you
 won't
 think
 this
 is


unprofessional
 if
 I
 say
 this,
 but
 I


wanted
 to
 tell
 you
 how
 much
 I
 enjoyed


the
 OnP
 podcast."
 She's
 a
 regular


listener.
 I
 did
 not
 suspect
 that
 going


to
 a
 COC
 gala
 at
 some
 point
 in
 the


evening,
 Ontario
 Politics
 or
 this
 show


would
 come
 up,
 but
 it
 did.
 Michelle,
 as


the
 premier
 says,
 you're
 a
 champion
 and


uh
 thank
 you
 very
 much
 uh
 for
 your
 kind


comments
 and
 uh
 we
 do
 hope
 you
 will


continue
 to
 watch
 or
 listen.
 So,
 did
 I


expect
 to
 be
 talking
 Ontario
 politics
 at


the
 opera?
 Uh
 Aayita,
 yes.
 Rialletto,


yes.
 Tristan
 Solda,
 yes.
 On
 Polly,
 not


exactly,
 but
 there
 you
 go.
</details>

**>>**: 惊喜无处不在。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Surprises
 abound.
</details>

### 议题一：2026年安省市政选举复盘

**>>**: 确实如此。言归正传，进入议题一。随着安大略省各地的市政选举落下帷幕，这是我们最后一期的“市政选举观察”。首先从省会城市多伦多开始，市长邹至蕙（Olivia Chow）以绝对优势击败挑战者Brad Bradford成功连任。JMM，请先为我们介绍一下背景。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes,
 they
 do.
 And
 with
 that,
 let's
 get


to
 issue
 one.


with
 local
 elections
 across
 Ontario
 now


done.
 This
 is
 our
 final
 edition
 of


Municipal
 Election
 Watch.
 So,
 let's


start
 in
 the
 Capitol
 City
 where
 Toronto


Mayor
 Olivia
 Chow
 of
 course
 remains
 on


the
 job
 with
 the
 decisive
 victory
 over


challenger
 Bradford.
 JMM,
 a
 little


background
 as
 we
 go,
 please.
</details>

**>>**: 好的。让我们把视线稍微拉回一下，回到庄德利（John Tory）辞职后举行的2023年补选。在那场竞选中，邹至蕙以37%比32%相对微弱的优势战胜了Ana Bailão。因此，在本届选举前，她的基本盘意味着哪怕比三年前的胜选大幅改善了表现，在紧咬的两人对决中依然存在失利的可能。上周有那么一阵子——你我在上周的播客里也谈到了——民调似乎一度收紧，至少有一项民调显示两人差距在误差范围内。

然而计票结果出来时，实际上毫无悬念。邹至蕙以54%对Bradford的41%获胜，而且这场选举的投票率创下了自2014年以来的新高。我觉得Bradford的表现也值得一提，这并非要贬低邹至蕙的胜利，而是说即便Bradford败选了，这基本上也是自大合并以来，多伦多现任市长遭遇的最强劲挑战。怎么说呢，任何现任者面对软弱的对手都能轻松拉开比分，但邹至蕙面对的是一位强劲的挑战者，却仍然拿下了超出所有民调预测的胜幅。周日晚上各大主流民调机构公布了最后一批密集数据，预测最大的领先幅度也不过是领先Bradford 10个百分点，而她最终领先了大概13个点。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Right.
 So,
 I'm
 going
 to
 just
 zoom
 back


for
 a
 second,
 take
 folks
 back
 to
 the


special
 election
 in
 2023
 that
 followed


John
 Tor's
 resignation.
 In
 that
 race,


Olivia
 Chow
 won
 a
 relatively
 narrow


victory
 over
 Annabauo,
 37%
 to
 32%.
 Uh,


so
 her
 starting
 point
 in
 this
 election


was
 that
 she
 could
 substantially
 improve


her
 performance
 over
 uh
 the
 election
 win


from
 3
 years
 ago
 and
 still
 could
 have


lost
 in
 a
 close
 twoerson
 race.
 And
 for
 a


few
 moments
 last
 week,
 you
 and
 I
 talked


about
 this
 on
 the
 podcast
 last
 week,
 the


polls
 did
 seem
 to
 tighten
 a
 little
 bit.


At least
 one
 had
 shown
 it,
 you
 know,


within
 the
 margin
 of
 error.
 um
 when
 the


votes
 were
 counted
 in
 fact
 uh
 it
 was
 not


particularly
 close.
 Uh
 Chia
 won
 54%
 of


the
 vote
 to
 Bradford's
 41
 and
 that


happened
 in
 an
 election
 that
 also


happened
 to
 have
 higher
 turnout
 than
 any


election
 we'd
 seen
 since
 2014.
 Um
 I
 do


think
 uh
 Bradford's
 performance
 is
 worth


mentioning
 here
 not
 to
 uh
 diminish


Chiao's
 victory
 here
 uh
 but
 to
 say
 you


know
 Bradford
 mounted
 what
 was
 even
 in


defeat.
 It
 was
 you
 know
 substantially


the
 strongest
 challenge
 that
 uh
 an


incumbent
 mayor
 in
 this
 city
 has
 seen


since
 amalgamation.
 And
 how
 to
 put
 this


any
 incumbent
 can
 run
 up
 the
 score


against
 a
 weak
 opponent.
 Uh
 Chiao
 faced


a
 strong
 challenger
 and
 still
 posted
 a


win
 that
 was
 larger
 than
 any
 of
 the


polls
 had
 projected.
 We
 we
 got
 that
 last


big
 dump
 of
 polls
 on
 Sunday
 night
 from


all
 of
 the
 major
 pollsters.
 Uh
 the
 the


most
 that
 they
 projected
 was
 a
 10-point


uh
 uh
 win
 over
 Bradford.
 She
 ended
 up


with
 uh
 13,
 I
 guess.
</details>

**>>**: 嗯。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Mhm.
</details>

**>>**: 所以这对邹至蕙来说是一场极其稳固的胜利，对省会城市而言也是意义重大的结果。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> So,
 a
 very
 substantial
 win
 for
 Chiao.
 Uh


and
 a
 very
 consequential
 one
 uh
 for
 the


provincial
 capital.
</details>

**>>**: 确实。在我看来，围绕这场竞选最大的未解之谜始终是：如果庄德利决定参选会怎样？因为直到他决定不参选的最后一刻前，他看起来都绝对要重新加入战局夺回旧职。毫无疑问，这本会改变竞选的动态。我不知道会怎么变，你对此有什么想法吗？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Indeed.
 Now,
 to
 me,
 the
 great
 unknown


surrounding
 this
 race
 is
 always
 going
 to


be
 what
 if
 John
 Tory
 had
 decided
 to
 run,


right?
 Because
 he
 looked
 like
 he
 was


absolutely
 going
 to
 throw
 his
 hat
 back


into
 the
 ring
 to
 try
 to
 reclaim
 his
 old


job
 right
 up
 until
 the
 moment
 when
 he


did
 not.
 And
 I
 mean,
 of
 course,
 it
 would


have
 changed
 the
 dynamic
 of
 the
 race.
 I


don't
 know
 how.
 Do
 you
 have
 a
 thought


about
 how?
</details>

**>>**: 我觉得这里面其实隐含了两个问题：一是庄德利是否会参选；二是如果庄德利参选，Brad Bradford是否会退选？我推测对Bradford来说，这是一场孤注一掷的博弈。当盛传庄德利可能参选的流言漫天飞时，他也表达过类似意思，当时有人问他，他说：“不，我不会退选。”而如果他们两人同时参选，那只会让邹至蕙赢选变得更加容易，因为那会分流保守派的选票。不过这确实是一个无法验证的假设，也是那种令人遐想的“如果”。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> So,
 I
 think
 you
 you
 actually
 have
 two


questions
 implied
 in
 there.
 One
 is,


would
 John
 Tory
 have
 entered
 the
 race?


And
 the
 other
 is
 would
 Brad
 Bradford


have
 dropped
 out
 of
 the
 race
 if
 Tori
 had


uh
 had
 entered?
 Um
 I
 suspect
 that
 for


Bradford
 this
 was
 an
 all
 or
 nothing


proposition.
 Uh
 he
 had
 said
 as
 much
 when


uh
 the
 rumors
 were
 flying
 that
 Tory


might
 get
 into
 the
 race.
 He
 he
 was
 asked


and
 he's
 like,
 "No,
 I'm
 not
 getting
 out


of
 the
 race."
 Um
 and
 uh
 that
 if
 if
 the


two
 of
 them
 had
 stayed
 in
 the
 race,
 that


would
 have
 simply
 um
 it
 it
 would
 have


made
 Olivia
 Chow's
 job
 even
 easier.
 it


would
 have
 divided
 the
 the
 conservative


uh
 field.
 Um
 truly
 an
 unknowable


scenario
 though
 and
 and
 yes,
 one
 of


those
 great
 whatifs.
</details>

**>>**: 话虽如此，我理解你的观点，但早在2014年，庄德利、道格·福特和邹至蕙都曾参选市长——两位保守派对上一位新民主党人。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Although,
 you
 know,
 I
 mean,
 I
 take
 your


point,
 but
 back
 in
 2014,
 John
 Tory
 and


Doug
 Ford
 and
 Olivia
 Chow
 all
 ran
 for


mayor.
 Two
 conservatives,
 one
 new


Democrat.
</details>

**>>**: 两位保守派并没有分流选票，他们分别包揽了第一和第二名。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> The
 two
 Tories
 didn't
 split
 the
 vote.


The
 two
 Tories
 came
 first
 and
 second.
</details>

**>>**: 是的。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.
</details>

**>>**: 邹至蕙排在第三。当然不可否认，到了2026年，她已经是一位远比2014年更优秀、更令人敬畏的候选人了。但无论如何，我觉得大家还会长久探讨很多假设。刚才提到了Bradford的落败，我想借此谈谈所谓的“精神胜利”，因为我认为Bradford完全有资格说：虽然我没赢，
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And
 Olivia
 Chow
 came
 third.
 Now,


admittedly,
 in
 2026,
 she
 is
 a
 much


better
 candidate,
 a
 much
 more
 formidable


opponent
 than
 she
 would
 have
 been
 back


in
 2014.
 But
 anyway,
 I
 think
 there's
 a


lot
 of
 whatifs
 that
 people
 are
 going
 to


ponder
 for
 a
 long
 time.
 You
 talked
 about


um
 the
 defeat
 of
 Bradford
 and
 and
 I'm


going
 to
 talk
 about
 moral
 victories
 here


for
 a
 second
 because
 I
 think
 Bradford
 is


entitled
 to
 say,
 you
 know,
 I
 didn't
 win


this
 thing,
</details>

**>>**: 但我确实展现出了一场极其亮眼的对决。想想三年前的补选，他的得票率甚至不足2%。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> but
 I
 sure
 gave
 it
 a
 hell
 of
 a
 show.
 You


know,
 if
 you
 consider
 three
 years
 ago
 in


the
 bi-election,
 he
 didn't
 even
 get
 2%


of
 the
 vote.
 Yes.
</details>

**>>**: 而今年他把得票率推高到了41%。我是说，反邹至蕙的阵营在他的旗帜下实现了相当规模的集结。这至少向我表明，如果他想凭借这次选举中相对强势的表现继续在政坛有所作为，机会是完全存在的。

另外我还想在此记录一件事：邹至蕙在这次选举中获得的票数，超过了加拿大历史上任何一位政治人物。她获得了超过53.2万张选票。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And
 he
 knocked
 that
 up
 to
 41%
 this
 year.


I
 mean,
 that
 is
 quite
 a
 significant


that's
 quite
 a
 significant
 coming


together
 of
 the
 anti-chow
 forces
 in
 his


camp.
 And
 it
 certainly
 suggests
 to
 me


anyway
 that
 if
 he
 wants
 to
 have
 a
 future


in
 politics
 based
 on
 his
 relatively


strong
 showing
 in
 this
 election,
 he's


got
 one.
 The
 other
 thing
 is
 I
 wanted
 to


um
 I
 wanted
 to
 put
 on
 the
 record
 here


that
 Olivia
 Chow
 got
 more
 votes
 in
 that


election
 than
 any
 politician
 ever
 in


Canadian
 history.
 She
 got
 north
 of


532,000


votes.
</details>

**>>**: 这是有史以来最高的票数。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> That
 is
 the
 biggest
 ever.
</details>

**>>**: 甚至Bradford在落败的情况下，
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Even
 Bradford
 in
 losing,
</details>

**>>**: 没错。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> yes,
</details>

**>>**: 也凭借40多万张选票，拿下了加拿大历史上第四高的得票总数。所以，不管你怎么看，这些数字都令人惊叹。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> got
 the
 fourth
 highest
 total
 of
 votes
 in


the
 history
 of
 Canada
 with
 more
 than


400,000
 votes.
 So


take
 take
 that
 what
 you
 will,
 but
 it's


these
 are
 impressive
 numbers.
</details>

**>>**: 是的。多伦多市长是全国单一职位吸票最多的岗位，对吧？面向整座大城市的单一职位，又是全国最大的城市。所以假以时日，随着城市人口的增长，肯定会有人打破邹至蕙本周创下的纪录。不过在另一方面，这也可能需要一两届选举周期，因为尽管这次选举投票率相对较高，但仍未突破50%。为此我得稍稍叹一口气。但如果接下来的两届选举投票率较低，那么这个纪录可能在相当一段时间内都是安全的。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah.
 The
 mayor
 of
 Toronto
 is
 the
 single


most
 uh
 vote
 collecting
 office
 in
 the


country,
 right?
 It's
 biggest,
 you
 know,


the
 the
 single
 office
 for
 the
 whole
 city


and
 it's
 the
 biggest
 city.
 And
 so,
 you


know,
 in
 time
 uh
 somebody
 will
 exceed


Olivia
 Chow's
 uh
 uh
 record
 uh
 that
 she


set
 this
 week
 as
 the
 city's
 population


uh
 grows.
 But
 on
 the
 other
 hand,
 it


could
 be
 an
 election
 cycle
 or
 two


because
 if
 we
 have,
 you
 know,
 it
 was
 a


relatively
 high
 turnout
 election.
 It


still
 did
 not
 crack
 50%.
 So,
 I'm
 going


to
,
 you
 know,
 shed
 a
 single
 tear
 for


that.
 But,
 um,
 you
 know,
 if
 we
 have,


say,
 two
 more
 elections
 with
 lower


turnout,
 uh,
 that
 record
 might,
 you


know,
 be
 pretty
 safe
 for
 a
 while.
</details>

**>>**: 我觉得还是值得再重申一遍。Bradford在这次败选中获得的票数，比庄德利两次胜选时都要多，比罗伯·福特（Rob Ford）胜选时多，比David Miller两次胜选时都多，也比Mel Lastman在1997年大合并选举中胜选时的票数多。所以这些战果可以让Bradford在评估时自豪地说：虽然我没赢，但我表现得相当不错。

之前我听过很多传言，说这场竞选多么乏味，说两位主要候选人完全不够火候，甚至有人质疑“这就是多伦多能拿出的最好阵容了吗？堂堂全国最大城市，这竟然是我们能推选出的最具才华的人选？”可结果呢？这场竞选吸引的人数远超我们的预期。正如你指出的，46%的投票率，创下了2014年以来的最高纪录，许多人都出来投票了。

我觉得像你我这样的政治狂热爱好者眼中的趣味，与普通选民眼中的趣味存在着有趣的对比。如果你问我们这行的人，2023年和2026年哪场选举更有趣，大多数人肯定会说2023年，那时的各种背景与前因后果毫无疑问都更精彩。然而，获得更高投票率的反而是今年这一届。部分原因我认为是选民也意识到了市议会的控制权面临重组，而市议会确实发生了一些重大变化，我们稍后可以聊聊。但不可否认的是，大量选民认为这是一场必须发出自己声音的重要选举。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I
 think
 it's,
 again,
 I
 I
 I'm
 going
 to


repeat.
 I
 think
 it's
 worth
 putting
 on


the
 record.
 Bradford
 got
 more
 votes
 in


this
 election
 in
 defeat.


>> Yes.
 than
 John
 Tory
 got
 in
 two
 elections


that
 he
 won.
 That
 Rob
 Ford
 got
 in
 the


election
 he
 won.
 Then
 David
 Miller
 got


twice
 in
 the
 two
 elections
 he
 won.
 Then


Mel
 Lman
 got
 in
 the
 1997
 election
 that


he
 won.
 So,
 these
 are
 things
 that


Bradford
 can,
 you
 know,
 I
 I
 think
 he
 can


check
 a
 few
 boxes
 and
 saying,
 um,
 you


know,
 I
 didn't
 win,
 but
 I
 did
 pretty


well.
 For
 all
 the
 talk
 I
 heard
 about
 how


uninteresting
 this
 campaign
 was
 and
 how


not
 ready
 for
 prime
 time
 the
 two
 main


candidates
 were,
 and
 is
 this
 the
 best


Toronto
 can
 do?
 You
 know,
 the
 biggest


city
 in
 the
 country,
 the
 these
 this
 is


the
 most
 talented
 uh
 field
 we
 can


possibly
 produce.
 Well,
 you
 know
 what?
 I


guess
 the
 race
 captivated
 a
 lot
 more


people
 than
 we
 thought
 because,
 as
 you


point
 out,
 46%
 turnout.
 That's
 the
 best


since
 2014.


and
 a
 lot
 of
 people
 vote.
 I
 think


there's
 an
 interesting
 contrast
 here


between
 like
 what
 political
 sickos
 like


you
 and
 I
 think
 is
 interesting
 versus


what
 you
 know
 the
 general
 population


what
 the
 the
 electorate
 thinks
 is


interesting
 because
 if
 you
 had
 to
 say
 to


somebody
 in
 our
 line
 of
 work
 like
 which


was
 the
 more
 interesting
 election
 2023


or
 2026
 I
 think
 most
 people
 would
 say


2023
 the
 circumstances
 of
 it
 the
 context


right
 bar
 none
 a
 more
 interesting


election
 and
 yet
 this
 was
 the
 one
 that


got
 substantially
 more
 turnout
 uh
 now


some
 of
 that
 is
 because
 I
 I
 think
 uh
 you


know
 it's
 people
 may
 have
 also


understood
 that
 uh
 the
 control
 of


council
 was
 also
 up
 for
 grabs
 and
 so
 we


actually
 saw
 some
 important
 changes
 in


council
 which
 we
 can
 talk
 about
 in
 a


minute
 um
 but
 no
 I
 mean
 clearly
 a
 lot
 of


voters
 saw
 this
 as
 an
 important
 election


that
 they
 were
 going
 to
 make
 themselves


heard
 in
</details>

**>>**: 我特别想看看其中两个选区的数据。第一个是北怡陶碧谷（Etobicoke North）。你知道北怡陶碧谷在安大略省议会的议员是谁吗？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> there
 were
 two
 writings
 in
 particular


that
 I
 wanted
 to
 look
 at
 the
 numbers
 of


the
 first
 was
 Atobbico
 North


>> do
 you
 know
 who
 the
 member
 of
 the


Ontario
 legislature
 for
 Atobbico
 North


is
</details>

**>>**: 这个名字我可听过不止一次了，那是道格·福特。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I
 have
 heard
 this
 name
 uh
 on
 more
 than


one
 occasion
 That
 would
 be
 Doug
 Ford.
</details>

**>>**: 正是安大略省省长。谁赢下了他的选区北怡陶碧谷？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> That
 would
 be
 the
 premier
 of
 Ontario.


Who
 won
 his
 writing


>> at
 Tobico
 North?
</details>

**>>**: 天哪，我该查查这个的。是Bradford赢了吗？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh
 oh
 gosh,
 I
 should
 have
 checked
 this.


Um,
 did
 Bradford
 win
 it?
</details>

**>>**: 不是。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> No.
</details>

**>>**: 邹至蕙以一个百分点的优势赢下了道格·福特的选区。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Olivia
 Chow
 won
 Doug
 Ford's
 writing
 by
 a


single
 percentage
 point.
</details>

**>>**: 哎呀。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Well,
 hey,
</details>

**>>**: 但福特之前确实算是背书过她，对吧？算是吧，但其实也不算完全背书。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> but
 he
 did
 endorse
 her,
 right?
 Yes,
 sort


of.
 Not
 really.
</details>

**>>**: Brad Bradford以前在市议会代表的是你的选区吧。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Brad
 Bradford
 used
 to
 represent
 on
 city


council
 your
 writing.
</details>

**>>**: 海滩-东约克。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Beaches
 East
 York.
</details>

**>>**: 海滩-东约克。谁赢下了他的选区？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Beaches
 East
 York.
 Who
 won
 his
 writing?
</details>

**>>**: 邹至蕙大幅领先，赢了34个百分点。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh,
 Olivia
 Chow
 by
 some
 margin.
 34


points.
</details>

**>>**: 没错。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.
</details>

**>>**: Bradford在自己的老选区海滩-东约克输给邹至蕙整整34个百分点。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Bradford
 lost
 his
 own
 writing,
 Beaches


East
 York,
 to
 Olivia
 Chow
 by
 34
 points.
</details>

**>>**: 是的。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes,
</details>

**>>**: 这太震撼了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> that
 is
</details>

**>>**: 确实很伤人。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> profound.
 That
 hurts.
</details>

**>>**: 是啊。旧多伦多市东端的两个选区——多伦多-丹福思（Toronto-Danforth）和海滩-东约克，是Brad Bradford在全市得票率最差的选区之列。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.
 Um
 the
 uh
 the
 the
 two
 uh
 ridings
 of


the
 old
 city
 of
 Toronto's
 East
 End,


Toronto
 Danforth
 and
 Beaches
 East
 York


were
 some
 of
 uh
 Brad
 Bradford's
 uh
 worst


performing
 uh
 wards
 in
 the
 city.
</details>

**>>**: 好的。你刚才提到了多伦多市议会的人事变动，变动确实不少，给我们讲讲吧。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> All right.
 You
 hinted
 at
 this
 a
 second


ago,
 the
 changes
 on
 Toronto
 City


Council.
 There
 were
 many.
 Take
 us


through
 it.
</details>

**>>**: 好的。这里面的某些差异其实更加微妙，并不完全是保守派与进步派之间的决裂。但对于即将到来的新一届市议会任期，可以说是出现了一些重要变化。在大学-玫瑰谷选区（University-Rosedale），Mike Leighton在暂别政坛一段时间后成功重返市政舞台。他取代了该选区的Dianne Saxe。Dianne Saxe曾任安大略省环境专员，后来当选为多伦多市议员。当Leighton参选时，她看出了风向不对，对自己不利。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Right.
 So,
 some
 of
 the
 differences
 here


are
 a
 bit
 more
 nuanced.
 It's
 it's
 not


all
 uh
 you
 know,
 a a
 hard
 break
 between


a
 a
 conservative
 and
 a
 progressive.
 Uh


but
 there
 are
 some
 arguably
 important


changes
 coming
 for
 uh
 this
 uh
 incoming


council
 uh
 term.
 Uh
 so,
 in
 University


Rosedale,
 uh
 Mike
 Leighton
 has


successfully
 returned
 to
 municipal


politics
 after
 a
 bit
 of
 a
 a
 hiatus,
 I


guess
 you
 could
 say.
 Uh
 he
 replaces


Diane
 Saxs
 in
 that
 ward.
 Diane
 Saxs
 was


of
 course
 the
 former
 environmental


commissioner
 of
 Ontario.
 She
 had
 become


a
 Toronto
 city
 councelor.
 When
 Leighton


entered
 the
 race,
 she
 saw
 which
 way
 the


wind
 was
 blowing
 and
 not
 her
 way.
</details>

**>>**: 确实不利。于是她转战多伦多-丹福思选区，结果输给了Sarah Heart（我记得她是叫这个名字）。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Not
 her
 way.
 And
 so
 she
 tried
 to
 make
 a


run
 in
 Toronto
 Danforth.
 She
 lost
 there


to
 I
 believe
 Sarah
 Heheart
 is
 her
 name
</details>

**>>**: 在帕克代尔-海柏公园选区（Parkdale-High Park），接替Gord Perks的激烈角逐由Diana Chan McNally胜出。公平地说，她被视为选票上主要候选人中最进步派的一位。在约克南-韦斯顿选区（York South-Weston）——我一直密切关注这个选区——Frances Nunziata被Chiara Padovani击败。Padovani曾在2022年大选中挑战Nunziata，当时差距非常微弱，而这次Nunziata仅排在第三位。正如我之前提到的，Nate Erskine-Smith在海滩-东约克击败Natalie Johnson获胜。当然还有很多其他议席选举，我们无法逐一展开，毕竟现在没时间把整个多伦多市议会都梳理一遍。

总体而言，我认为市议会选举的整体影响是让议会朝邹至蕙的立场稍稍靠拢。她多了一两位进步派议员，取代了以往更具敌意的议员。对邹至蕙来说，用Nate Erskine-Smith换下Brad Bradford显然是一场纯粹的胜利。而且即使在一名进步派接替另一名进步派的情况下，某些变化在我看来最终也是有利于邹至蕙的。我不认为她在议会已经拥有稳固的绝对多数，因为多伦多市的主体依然是郊区板块，而郊区选民通常更倾向于选出保守派议员。但平心而论，进步派在多伦多市议会的掌控力确实比选举之夜前更强了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> in
 Parkdale
 High
 Park.
 Uh
 a
 competitive


race
 to
 succeed
 Gourd
 Perks
 was
 won
 by


Diana
 Chan
 McN.
 I
 think
 it's
 fair
 to
 say


she
 was
 seen
 as
 the
 the
 most
 progressive


uh
 of
 the
 the
 the
 major
 candidates
 on


the
 ballot.
 Uh
 in
 York
 Southwestern,


this
 one
 I
 was
 keeping
 a
 close
 eye
 on.


In
 York
 Southwestern,
 uh
 Francis
 Nunata


was
 beaten
 by
 Kiara
 Padavani.
 Padavani


had
 run
 against
 Nunata
 in
 the
 2022


election
 and
 had
 come
 very
 very
 close
 uh


to
 beating
 Nunata.
 Then
 uh
 Nunata
 now


came
 in
 third
 in
 this
 most
 recent


election.
 Uh
 I've
 alluded
 to
 this


before.
 Nate
 Erskin
 Smith
 won
 in
 Beaches


East
 York
 uh
 beating
 uh
 Natalie
 Johnson


there.
 So
 there
's
 other
 of
 of
 course


many
 other
 council
 races
 and
 uh
 we
 could


go
 over
 them
 all,
 but
 we
 don't
 do
 not


have
 time
 for
 the
 entire
 Toronto
 City


Council
 uh
 right
 now.
 Um
 I
 I
 think


broadly
 speaking,
 I
 would
 say
 that
 the


overall
 effect
 of
 the
 council
 races
 uh


has
 been
 to
 move
 council
 a
 little
 bit


closer
 to
 Chiao's
 uh
 own
 position.
 uh


she
 has
 one
 or
 two
 more
 uh
 progressive


uh
 counselors
 who
 have
 replaced
 uh
 uh


you
 know
 let's
 say
 more
 antagonistic


counselors
 swapping
 Brad
 Bradford
 for


Nan
 Smith
 is
 obviously
 if
 you
 are
 Olivia


Chow
 that's
 just
 a
 pure
 win
 right
 um
 and


then
 even
 in
 cases
 where
 you
 had
 like
 uh


you
 know
 one
 progressive
 replacing


another
 uh
 these
 are
 in
 some
 cases
 these


were
 still
 changes
 that
 I
 think
 will
 end


up
 benefiting
 uh
 Olivia
 Chow
 I I
 don't


think
 she
 has
 a
 really
 uh
 a
 confident


majority
 on
 council
 outright
 because
 of


course
 the
 majority
 of
 the
 city
 of


Toronto
 is
 um
 still
 the
 suburban
 city
 of


Toronto
 and
 uh
 they
 tend
 to
 elect
 more


conservative
 uh
 members
 of
 council


generally
 speaking.
 Um
 but
 I
 do
 think


it's
 fair
 to
 say
 that
 progressives
 have


a
 stronger
 hand
 on
 Toronto
 city
 council


than
 they
 did
 uh
 before
 election
 night.
</details>

**>>**: 我不觉得这是夸大其词，即便你想指责我夸张也没关系，但我仍认为自己有充分依据：我们刚刚见证了安大略省市政政治史上最大的一次冷门。就在多伦多西边的密西沙加市，比你年轻的Alvin Tedjo，
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I
 don't
 think
 this
 is
 hyperbole,
 but
 you


can
 accuse
 me
 of
 it
 if
 you
 want
 to.
 But


I
 still
 think
 I'm
 on
 solid
 ground
 with


this.
 I
 think
 we
 just
 saw
 the
 biggest


upset
 in
 municipal
 political
 history.


Yeah.


>> In
 the
 province
 of
 Ontario,
 just
 west
 of


here
 in
 Missaga,
 Alvin
 Tedjo,
 younger


than
 you.
</details>

**>>**: 没错。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.
</details>

**>>**: 成为了那里的新市长，同时击败了现任市长Carolyn Parrish和前市长Bonnie Crombie。稍后在“你的专栏，我的专栏”环节我会多聊聊这个，但在继续之前你好像想提两点。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Is
 the
 new
 mayor
 there,
 besting
 both
 the


incumbent
 mayor,
 Carolyn
 Parish,
 and
 the


former
 mayor
 Bonnie
 Crombi.
 I
 am
 going


to
 talk
 about
 this
 much
 more
 later
 in


the
 your
 column,
 my
 column
 part,
 but
 I


think
 he
 wanted
 to
 make
 a
 point
 just


before
 we
 go
 on.
</details>

**>>**: 我想说两点。第一，当Alvin大概在今年四月宣布参选时，我写过关于他的报道。当时有一两个人写信问我：“你搞什么？怎么会关注这家伙？”现在我看谁还笑得出来。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh,
 so
 two
 points
 if
 I
 could.
 one
 um
 I


wrote
 about
 Alvin
 when
 he
 launched
 his


campaign
 in
 I
 guess
 April
 of
 this
 year


and
 I
 had
 one
 or
 two
 people
 write
 me
 and


say
 like
 what
 are
 you
 doing
 pay


attention
 to
 this
 guy
 and
 I
 said
 now


who's
 laughing
</details>

**>>**: 平心而论，你写专栏的时候他的民调只有4%。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> well
 in
 fairness
 he
 was
 at
 4%
 when
 you


wrote
 the
 column
</details>

**>>**: 确实如此。第二点，在竞选最后几天发生了一个奇怪的插曲。这里我指的是Bonnie Crombie接受Ahmed El-Bayoumi采访一事。Ahmed创办了一份名为《Poli Corner》的时事通讯，本周早些时候他也上了我们的节目。他发表了对Crombie的专访，Crombie在采访中某种程度上撇清了自己担任安省自由党领袖的经历。我直接引用文章的原话，她说自由党的品牌“并不总是适合她”，并且说“坦率讲，我的政策非常保守，但我却作为自由党人参选”。这次采访让很多现任自由党人感到震惊错愕。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> it's
 true


um
 and
 yes
 um
 there
 was
 an
 odd
 moment
 uh


in
 the
 the
 final
 days
 of
 this
 race
 and


uh
 here
 I'm
 going
 to
 refer
 to
 uh
 an


interview
 that
 Crombi
 uh
 conducted
 with


uh
 or
 or
 or
 sat
 down
 with
 uh
 Ahmed


Albayumi
 uh
 who
 publishes
 a
 newsletter


called
 Poly
 Corner
 and
 he
 was
 actually


on
 the
 rundown
 earlier
 this
 week.
 Um
 he


published
 this
 interview
 with
 Crombi


where
 she
 kind
 of
 disavowed
 her
 time
 as


liberal
 leader.
 Uh
 I'm
 going
 to
 quote


from
 the
 article
 here
 saying
 you
 know


she
 said
 that
 the
 the
 liberal
 brand


wasn't
 always
 a
 good
 fit
 and
 she
 said


quote
 my
 policies
 were
 very
 conservative


frankly
 and
 yet
 I
 was
 running
 as
 a


liberal.
 And
 then
 that
 interview
 uh
 left


a
 lot
 of
 liberals,
 current
 liberals
 uh


kind
 of
 reeling.
</details>

**>>**: 而且好像是在大选前一天发布的。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> It
 was
 the
 day
 before
 the
 election
 too,


I
 think,
 that
 it
 dropped.
</details>

**>>**: 是的，好像是周六发表的。现任自由党临时领袖John Fraser（虽然他当临时领袖的时间也不会太长了）对她的言论做出了回应。用比我更年轻的观众懂的流行语来说，他狠狠地公开抨击了她，说政治关乎的不是个人舒适感，而是要清楚自己的信仰并做出艰难的抉择。

我不太确定Crombie当时说这些话想达到什么目的。从理论上讲，你或许能想象这是一种聪明的政治手腕，试图在最后关头向偏保守的选民示好，但这一招没有奏效。计票结束后，她仅排在第三名。好了，正如我所说，节目后半部分我们还会回到这个话题。但现在让我们快速浏览全省其他一些值得关注的选战。

首先是汉密尔顿市（Hamilton）。大约两个月前，我还以为这会是全省最精彩的市长竞选，结果差距并没有想象中那么小。汉密尔顿“一届市长”的魔咒还在延续，一位名叫Keenan Loomis的人当选了；而人们熟知的安省新民主党前党魁Andrea Horwath，作为现任市长仅排在第三位，而且是差距巨大的第三位，得票率只有16%。我查了一下，自1997年以来汉密尔顿举行了9次市长选举，现任市长仅仅胜选过1次。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah,
 I
 think
 it
 was
 published
 Saturday.


Um
 and
 uh
 so
 uh
 the
 current
 uh
 interim


for
 a
 little
 bit
 longer.
 Liberal
 leader


John
 Fraser
 uh
 reacted
 to
 her
 uh


comments.
 Um
 uh
 for
 viewers
 even
 younger


than
 me,
 I'm
 going
 to
 use
 some
 slang.
 uh


he
 put
 her
 on
 blast
 uh
 saying
 that
 uh


you
 know
 politics
 isn't
 about
 comfort,


it's
 about
 knowing
 what
 you
 believe
 and


making
 tough
 choices.


I'm
 not
 quite
 sure
 what
 Crombi
 was


hoping
 to
 accomplish
 uh
 with
 these


remarks.
 In
 theory,
 you
 could
 imagine
 it


being
 like
 a
 smart
 political
 maneuver,
 a


bit
 of
 a
 late
 political
 genius
 to
 to


appeal
 to
 uh
 uh
 more
 conservative-minded


voters.
 Um
 it
 did
 not
 work.
 Uh
 she
 ended


up
 in
 third
 place
 uh
 when
 the
 votes
 were


all
 counted.
 Okay,
 as
 I
 say,
 we're
 going


to
 come
 back
 to
 that
 later
 in
 the
 show,


but
 for
 now,
 let's
 you
 and
 I
 just
 sort


of
 go
 back
 and
 forth
 here,
 and
 we're


going
 to
 drop
 in
 on
 some
 noteworthy


races,
 starting
 with
 what
 I
 thought
 was


going
 to
 be
 the
 most
 exciting,
 uh,


mayor's
 race
 in
 the
 province,
 uh,
 about


two
 months
 ago,
 uh,
 turned
 out
 to
 be
 not


that
 close,
 the
 city
 of
 Hamilton.
 But


where
 the
 trend
 of
 one-term
 mayors


continues,
 as
 a
 guy
 named
 Keenan
 Lumis,


was
 elected,
 Andrea
 Horvath,
 a
 name


people
 will
 remember,
 the
 former
 leader


of
 the
 Ontario
 NDP.
 She
 was
 the


incumbent
 mayor.
 She
 came
 third
 and
 a


very
 distant
 third.
 She
 got
 16%
 of
 the


total
 vote.
 I
 looked
 this
 up.
 Since


1997,
 we
 have
 had
 nine
 elections
 for


mayor
 in
 the
 city
 of
 Hamilton.
 The


incumbent
 has
 won
 once.
</details>

**>>**: 哇。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Wow.
</details>

**>>**: 九次里仅一次。在那里赢得连任真不容易。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> One
 out
 of
 nine.
 That
 is
 a
 tough
 town
 in


which
 to
 win
 re-election.
</details>

**>>**: 担任了46年米尔顿（Milton）市长、此前还在议会任职20年的Gord Krantz，他的市长生涯宣告结束了。接替他的是George Minakakis，而Minakakis去年才通过补选进入米尔顿市议会，在议会仅任职一年便当选了米尔顿市长。之前我们提到过Krantz和Zeynab Asim一起拍的竞选广告，他们录制了一段很温馨的视频，一边吃冰淇淋一边强调竞选期间保持文明政治的重要性。可惜这并未能帮到他们中的任何一人，Asim得票也远远落后，位列第三。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh
 Gourd
 CR
 uh
 who
 had
 been
 mayor
 of


Milton
 for
 46
 years
 uh and
 he
 had
 been


on
 council
 for
 another
 20
 years
 before


that.
 Uh
 he
 uh
 his
 time
 as
 mayor
 of


Milton
 has
 come
 to
 an
 end.
 He
 will
 be


succeeded
 by
 uh
 George
 Makikas
 uh
 who


won
 a
 bi-election
 to
 Milton
 Council
 only


last
 year.
 He's
 been
 on
 council
 for
 just


a
 single
 year.
 He
 is
 now
 going
 to
 be


mayor
 of
 the
 council
 of
 Milton.
 Uh
 we


had
 mentioned
 an
 ad
 that
 Crance
 and
 uh


Zanabazim
 uh
 had
 uh
 filmed.
 They
 did


this
 charming
 uh
 video
 where
 they
 uh


shared
 ice
 cream.
 Uh
 talked
 about
 the


importance
 of
 keeping
 uh
 politics
 civil


during
 the
 election.
 Uh
 unfortunately


did
 not
 help
 either
 of
 them.
 Azim
 came


in
 a
 pretty
 distant
 third.
</details>

**>>**: 不过我觉得我们以后还会听到她的消息。她很有活力，23岁，戴头巾的年轻穆斯林女性，沉着自信，极具个性。我敢打赌，如果她想在政坛继续发展，绝对大有可为，虽然这次没赢，但她已经崭露头角、被大家记住了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Do
 you
 know
 what
 though?
 I
 suspect
 we're


going
 to
 hear
 from
 her
 again.
 She
 was
 a


dynamo.
 23
 years
 old
 um
 Muslim
 young


woman,
 wore
 a
 hijab.
 Um,
 lots
 of
 poise,


lots
 of
 personality.
 I'm
 betting
 that
 if


she
 wants
 a
 future
 in
 politics,
 she


could
 probably
 have
 it
 because
 she


didn't
 win
 this
 campaign,
 but
 she


showed,
 you
 know,
 she's
 on
 the
 map
 now.


She's
 on
 the
 map.
</details>

**>>**: 是的，就像我们刚才提到的Chiara Padovani，第一次挑战Frances Nunziata虽然输了，四年后卷土重来，现在当选了市议员。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And,
 you
 know,
 I
 just
 point
 back
 to
 the


example
 of
 Kiara
 Padani,
 who
 we
 just


mentioned,
 who,
 you
 know,
 yes,
 she
 lost


that
 uh
 first
 race
 against
 Francis
 Nuni,


but
 she
 came
 back
 four
 years
 later
 and


now
 she
 will
 be
 a
 counselor.
</details>

**>>**: 没错。带我们去西南部看看吧。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> There
 you
 go.
 Take
 us
 down
 Southwest.
</details>

**>>**: 温莎市（Windsor）选出了新市长Fred Francis。他接替了Drew Dilkens。我们之前在播客里常聊到Dilkens，相信福特对待手下都一视同仁，但Dilkens绝对是福特最看重的人之一。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> So,
 Windsor
 has
 chosen
 a
 new
 mayor
 with


Fred
 Francis
 coming
 into
 the
 role.
 Uh,


he
 replaces
 Drew
 Dilickens,
 who
 we've


spoken
 about
 before
 on
 the
 podcast.
 One


of
 Doug
 Ford's
 I'm
 sure
 he
 loves
 all
 of


his
 children
 equally,
 but
 truly
 Drew


Dilkins,
 one
 of
 Doug
 Ford's
 favorites.
</details>

**>>**: 是的。我们在此可以列一长串名单了，因为本周一晚上全省各地有大批现任市长落选：奥克维尔（Oakville）的Rob Burton、尼亚加拉瀑布城的Jim Diodati、金斯顿（Kingston）的Bryan Paterson、蒂明斯（Timmins）的Michelle Boileau、剑桥（Cambridge）的Jan Liggett、滑铁卢的Dorothy McCabe、伊利堡（Fort Erie）的Wayne Redekop、萨尼亚（Sarnia）自1988年起担任市长兼省议员的Mike Bradley。这还用说吗？在同一个选举日，这么多重要城镇的现任者集体落败是极不寻常的。人们总说在市政政治中现任身份和知名度最重要，因为没有党派政治——谢天谢地没有。你看我们在YouTube上的“政治极客（Nerds on Politics）”栏目就知道，他在市政厅层面喜欢政党政治，而我不喜欢。总之，因为通常没有自由党、新民主党、保守党等党派标签，知名度几乎决定了一切。但那天晚上知名度却没能拯救一大批人。所以说，知名度并非万能。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah.
 Now,
 we're
 going
 to
 make
 a
 bit
 of


a
 list
 here
 because
 there
 were
 a
 lot
 of


mayors
 who
 were
 defeated
 this
 past


Monday
 night
 all
 over
 the
 province.


There
 was
 Rob
 Burton
 in
 Oakville,
 Jim


Daddy
 in
 Niagara
 Falls,
 Brian
 Patterson


in
 Kingston,
 Michelle
 Buau
 in
 Timmons,


Jan
 Liot
 in
 Cambridge,
 Dorothy
 McCabe
 in


Waterlue,
 Wayne
 Reticop
 in
 Foreri,
 Mike


Bradley
 in
 Sarnia.
 Mike's
 been
 the
 mayor


there
 since
 1988
 and
 an
 MPP
 as
 well.
 It


is
 I
 mean,
 do
 we
 need
 to
 say
 it?
 It
 is


highly
 unusual
 for
 so
 many
 incumbents
 in


so
 many
 major
 centers
 to
 lose
 all
 in
 the


same
 election.
 Uh,
 we
 are
 constantly


told
 incumbency
 and
 name
 recognition
 is


so
 important
 in
 municipal
 politics


because
 there
 are
 no
 party
 politics.


Thankfully,


that's
 a
 little
 aside.
 Watch
 our
 nerds


on
 your
 jab
 there.
 A
 little
 jab
 cuz


watch
 our
 nerds
 on
 politics
 segment
 on


YouTube.
 That's
 um


>> he
 likes
 party
 politics
 at
 city
 hall.
 I


don't
 anyway.
 But
 because
 there's
 no


party
 policy


as
 liberals,
 new
 Democrats,


conservatives,
 generally
 speaking,
 and


and
 as
 a
 result,
 name
 recognition
 is


everything.
 And
 it
 didn't
 help
 a
 whole


bunch
 of
 people
 the
 other
 night.
 So,


it's
 not
 everything.
 That's
 for
 sure.
</details>

**>>**: 确实，这个夜晚的非同寻常怎么强调都不为过，与以往的先例截然不同。然而在某些地方，正如我们提到的多伦多，延续性依然是主轴；渥太华市长Mark Sutcliffe成功连任；宾顿市长Patrick Brown赢得第三任期；基奇纳（Kitchener）的Berry Vrbanovic连任；巴里（Barrie）的Alex Nuttall轻松连任；伦敦市的Josh Morgan和旺市（Vaughan）的Steven Del Duca也双双连任。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> No.
 And
 uh
 it's
 difficult
 to
 overstate


how
 remarkable
 this
 evening
 was
 because


it
 is
 such
 a
 break
 from
 past
 president.


And
 yet
 uh
 somehow
 continuity
 was
 the


name
 of
 the
 game
 in
 in
 Toronto,
 as
 we've


mentioned.
 Uh
 Ottawa
 saw
 Mayor
 Mark


Suckliffe
 reelected.
 Uh
 Bmpton,
 Patrick


Brown
 won
 a
 third
 term.
 Uh
 Kitner
 saw


Barry
 Verbanovic
 re-elected.
 uh
 at
 Barry


with
 Alex
 Nutal
 again
 re-elected
 quite


handily.
 Uh
 and
 then
 uh
 London
 and


Vaughn
 saw
 Josh
 Morgan
 and
 Steven
 Deluka


also
 reelected.
</details>

**>>**: 我这里还有一个例子，我都不确定以前是否发生过类似的事。2018年，帕里湾区（Parry Sound）Joly的居民选出Tim Bryson担任市长；到了2022年下届选举，同样在帕里湾区的Strong（那个地方的名字就叫Strong）的居民又选出Tim Bryson当市长；而在本周早些时候举行的2026年选举中，你猜猜帕里湾区的Sundridge居民选了谁当市长？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Now
 I
 have
 an
 example
 of
 something
 here


that
 I'm
 not
 sure
 has
 ever
 been
 done


before.
 In
 2018,
 the
 residents
 in
 Jolly


Ontario,
 that
 is
 in
 the
 district
 of


Perry
 Sound,
 elected
 Tim
 Bryson
 as
 their


mayor.
 The
 next
 election
 in
 2022,
 the


residents
 of
 Strong,
 Ontario.
 That's
 the


name
 of
 a
 place.
 Strong,
 Ontario.


>> Strong.


>> Yeah.
 In
 Perry
 Sound
 district
 elected


Tim
 Bryson
 as
 their
 mayor.
 And
 the
 next


election,
 2026,
 which
 took
 place,
 you


may
 have
 heard,
 just
 earlier
 this
 week.


Guess
 who
 the
 residents
 of
 Sunundridge,


Ontario,
 in
 Perry
 Sound
 district
 elected


as
 mayor?
</details>

**>>**: 我猜是Tim Bryson。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I'm
 going
 to
 guess
 Tim
 Bryson.
</details>

**>>**: 猜对了，你怎么猜到的？没错，帕里湾区有三个不同的村镇，他把这三个地方的市长全当了一遍。坊间一直有传闻，说以后可能会将这些地方合并成一个区域。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> You
 are
 right.
 How
 did
 you
 guess
 that?


Yes.
 There
 are
 three
 different
 villages


in
 the
 Perry
 Sound
 area
 and
 he
 has
 now


won
 the
 merry
 of
 all
 of
 them.
 At
 some


point
 down
 the
 road
 there
 is
 whispers.


There
 is
 talk
 of
 amalgamating
 them
 all


into
 one
 area.
</details>

**>>**: 如果真合并了，Bryson市长完全有资格说自己能代表所有人，因为他把全区都赢遍了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And
 if
 that
 ever
 happens,
 I
 guess
 Mayor


Bryson
 has
 a
 pretty
 good
 claim
 that
 he


could
 represent
 everybody
 cuz
 he's
 won


them
 all.
</details>

**>>**: 像集宝可梦一样。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.


>> Uh
 like
 Pokemon.
</details>

**>>**: 没错。我想感谢道格·福特政府的厅长、帕里湾-穆斯科卡选区省议员Graydon Smith。他前两天打电话给我说：“Steve，你也许该把这事放到OnPoli播客上讲讲，因为我觉得以前从没见过这种事。”在帕里湾-穆斯科卡横扫全场，真不简单。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Exactly.
 Right.
 Exactly.
 So
 I
 want
 to


thank
 Graden
 Smith
 who's
 a
 minister
 in


Doug
 Ford's
 government
 and
 who
 is
 the


MPPP
 for
 Perry
 San
 Muskoka.
 He
 called
 me


a
 couple
 of
 days
 ago
 and
 he
 said,


"Steve,
 you
 might
 want
 to
 put
 this
 on


the
 on
 Pauly
 podcast
 cuz
 I
 don't
 think


I've
 ever
 seen
 that
 happen
 before."
 And


that's
 pretty
 good.
 Running
 the
 table
 in


Perry
 Sound,
 Muskoka.
 Not
 bad.
</details>

**>>**: 我必须开个玩笑：他不再是Strong的市长了，这意味着他不再是一个“强市长（strong mayor）”了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I
 I
 have
 to
 make
 this
 joke.
 Un
 he
 is
 no


longer
 the
 mayor
 of
 Strong
 Ontario,


which
 means
 he
 is
 no
 longer
 a
 strong


mayor.
</details>

**>>**: 哎呀，太冷了，纯纯的烂梗冷幽默。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Oh,
 that's
 lame.
 That
 is
 such
 dad
 humor.
</details>

**>>**: 哈哈，我毕竟是个中年父亲嘛。不过最后让我们看看那个差点选不出任何人的市镇：Fauquier-Strickland。在这个小镇上，当八月某个周五下午提名截止时，市长和市议员席位竟然没有一个登记候选人。最终，Pierre Lévesque在八月作为唯一的候选人直接自动当选市长。他即将领导的市议会中只有一名连任议员，外加三张新面孔——对他而言倒也不算生面孔，其中包括他的妻子Nicole Lévesque。Pierre上届就是议员，原本不打算连任。这对夫妻如今占据了这个在2021年人口普查中只有467人的市镇管治机构整整40%的席位。今年早些时候，这对夫妇告诉CBC，他们决定参选是出于对地方事务的担忧，如果没人参选，社区该怎么办？

所以我想向他们的公民精神致敬，尤其是坦率地说，Fauquier-Strickland面临着真正的财政困境。新当选的议员们必须面对艰难的抉择和繁重的工作，他们挺身而出，并且在这类地方任职，很难以此作为跳板进入省或联邦级更高政坛。他们做这项苦差事纯粹是出于对社区的热爱。因此，祝愿新当选的Fauquier-Strickland市议会好运，祝贺全省各地的胜选者，也感谢让竞选充满悬念的各位挑战者。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.
 Yes.
 Uh
 well,
 I
 am
 a
 middle-aged


dad.
 Um
 but
 let's
 finish
 on
 the


municipality
 that
 almost
 elected
 nobody


at
 all.
 Uh
 we
 are
 going
 to
 return
 to
 the


results
 in
 Foki
 Strickland,
 the
 small


township
 that
 when
 nominations
 closed
 on


that
 Friday
 afternoon
 in
 August,
 did
 not


have
 uh
 a
 single
 registered
 candidate


for
 any
 of
 its
 mayor
 or
 council
 races.


Um
 as
 it
 happened,
 Pier
 Laang
 was


acclaimed
 as
 the
 sole
 candidate
 for


mayor
 back
 in
 August.
 Uh
 and
 he
 will
 now


preside
 over
 a
 council
 with
 a
 single


returning
 incumbent
 and
 three
 new
 faces


including
 well
 I
 guess
 not
 new
 to
 him
 uh


his
 wife
 Nicole
 Laantang.


Uh
 Pierre
 was
 a
 counselor
 in
 the
 prior


term
 who
 initially
 was
 not
 going
 to
 run


uh
 for
 reelection.
 The
 married
 couple


will
 now
 make
 up
 a
 full
 40%
 of
 the


governing
 body
 of
 the
 township
 that
 had


a
 a
 census
 population
 in
 2021
 of
 467


people.
 Earlier
 this
 year,
 the
 La


Mountains
 told
 CBC
 they
 opted
 to
 put


their
 names
 on
 the
 ballot
 out
 of
 a
 a


civic
 concern
 about
 what
 would
 it
 mean


for
 their
 community
 if
 nobody
 ran
 for


election.
 So,
 I
 want
 to
 um
 salute
 their


civic
 spirit
 if
 I
 can.
 Uh
 not
 least


because
 if
 if
 I
 can
 be
 blunt
 about
 it,


FIA
 Strickland
 uh
 you
 know
 it
 faces
 some


real
 financial
 hardship.
 uh
 each
 of


these
 uh
 incoming
 members
 of
 council
 are


are
 facing
 frankly
 some
 really
 difficult


choices
 and
 a
 tough
 job
 that
 they
 are


going
 to
 have
 to
 do
 and
 they
 volunteered


for
 it
 in
 a
 place
 where
 they
 are
 not


likely
 to
 parlay
 this
 political


experience
 into
 necessarily
 higher


office
 at
 the
 provincial
 or
 federal


level.
 This
 is
 uh
 a
 tough
 job
 that
 they


are
 doing
 really
 purely
 for
 the
 love
 of


their
 own
 community.
 So,
 uh,
 I
 want
 to,


uh,
 wish
 good
 luck
 to
 the
 newly
 elected


council
 of
 Fier
 Strickland
 and


congratulations
 to
 the
 winners
 around


the
 province
 and,
 uh,
 you
 know,
 thank


you
 to
 the
 challengers
 who
 kept
 them


honest.
</details>

**>>**: 说得好。听你聊这个时，我脑海里搜索了一下，依稀记得夫妻俩同时当选同一个市议会的先例。那还是在20世纪80年代初我担任市政厅记者时，在合并前的北约克市议会，有一对夫妻叫Bill Sutherland和Betty Sutherland。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Right
 on.
 Now,
 as
 you
 were
 sitting
 there


talking
 about
 that,
 I
 thought
 to
 myself,


I'm
 sure
 there's
 been
 an
 example
 of
 a


husband
 and
 wife
 team
 both
 getting


elected
 to
 the
 same
 council
 at
 the
 same


time.
 And
 I
 was
 just
 doing
 the
 Google


search
 in
 my
 brain
 and
 I
 seem
 to
 recall


when
 I
 was
 a
 city
 hall
 reporter
 back
 in


the
 early
 1980s


on
 North
 York
 City
 Council.
 This
 is


before
 amalgamation
 of
 course.
</details>

**>>**: 好的。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> There
 was
 a
 couple
 named
 Bill
 and
 Betty


Sutherland.


>> Okay.
</details>

**>>**: 他们当时同时在市议会任职。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And
 they
 were
 both
 on
 council
 at
 the


same
 time.
</details>

**>>**: 是的。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.
</details>

**>>**: 我记得他们的儿子Paul后来也接替了其中一人的席位。在这个行当里，有时真可谓是全家上阵。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And
 I
 believe
 their
 son
 Paul
 succeeded


one
 of
 them
 on
 council
 as
 well.
 So
 boy,


some
 days
 it's
 all
 in
 the
 family
 in
 this


business,
 isn't
 it?
</details>

**>>**: 确实如此。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes
 indeed.
</details>

### 议题二：省议会复会、秋季经济报告与第140号法案

**>>**: 好的，进入议题二。经过长达21周的夏季休会后，省议员们重返女王公园。政府迅速行动，已经推出了两项重大法案。本周早些时候，政府提出了最新的减少繁文缛节法案；周四，财政部长Peter Bethlenfalvy提交了全省秋季经济报告。JMM，我们先从这里聊起，财政账目表现如何？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> There
 we
 go.
 And
 with
 that,
 let's
 move


on
 to
 issue
 two.


MPPPS
 have
 returned
 to
 Queens
 Park
 after


a
 21-w
 week
 summer
 break.
 And
 the


government
 has
 hit
 the
 ground
 running


with
 two
 major
 bills
 already.
 Earlier


this
 week,
 the
 government
 introduced
 its


latest
 red
 tape
 reduction
 bill.
 And
 on


Thursday,
 the
 finance
 minister,
 Peter


Bethlin,
 presented
 the
 province's
 fall


economic
 statement.
 Okay,
 JMM,
 let's


start
 there.
 What
 do
 the
 books
 look


like?
</details>

**>>**: 账面情况以前比现在好得多。事实上，我得先在这里承认打脸。本周早些时候我在节目里做短评时还说，通常而言，省府的账目在财年内是逐步改善的。春季预算案往往基于非常保守的假设，到了秋季经济报告通常会好转。然而你猜怎么着？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh,
 they've
 been
 better.
 Uh,
 in
 fact,
 I


want
 to
 start
 off
 by
 eating
 some
 crow


here.
 Earlier
 this
 week,
 I
 did
 a
 short


segment
 on
 the
 rundown,
 and
 I
 said
 that


in
 general,
 the
 government's
 books


improve
 over
 the
 fiscal
 year,
 right?


They
 start
 with
 some
 very
 conservative


assumptions
 in
 the
 spring
 budget,
 and


then
 things
 generally
 get
 better
 uh
 by


the
 fall
 economic
 statement.
 Uh
 well,


guess
 what?
</details>

**>>**: 我猜这次并没有好转。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh
 I'm
 going
 to
 guess
 that
 didn't
 happen


this
 time.
</details>

**>>**: 确实没有。自春季预算案以来，全省的财务数据出现了显著恶化。这不仅关乎我在电视上被打脸，更关乎各种公共政策考量。春季预算案预测今年的赤字为138亿加元，现在预计将达到169亿加元，恶化相当严重。不仅如此，明年的赤字原预计为61亿加元，现在预计翻倍不止，达到127亿加元。到2028年，原本预计实现预算平衡，现在却预计赤字67亿加元，并表示“或许”能在2029年实现平衡。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> It
 did
 not.
 the
 province's
 numbers
 have


gotten
 uh
 measurably
 worse
 uh
 since
 the


budget,
 which
 is
 of
 course
 important
 for


all
 sorts
 of
 public
 policy
 reasons
 and


not
 just
 because
 it
 made
 me
 look
 foolish


on
 TV.
 Um
 in
 the
 spring
 budget,
 this


year's
 deficit
 was
 projected
 to
 be
 13.8


billion.
 They
 are
 now
 projecting
 it
 to


be
 16.9
 billion.
 So
 substantial


deterioration
 there.
 Uh
 it
 gets
 worse.


Next
 year's
 deficit
 was
 supposed
 to
 be


6.1
 billion.
 It
 will
 now
 be
 12.7


billion,
 more
 than
 doubled.
 Uh
 and
 then


in
 2028,
 the
 budget
 was
 actually


supposed
 to
 be
 balanced.
 Uh
 they
 are
 now


projecting
 a
 $6.7
 billion
 deficit
 and


maybe
 balancing
 it
 in
 2029.
</details>

**>>**: 这听起来是我听过的最关键的一个词了——“或许”。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> That
 sounds
 like
 the
 most
 operative
 word


I've
 ever
 heard.
 Maybe.
</details>

**>>**: 是的，充满不确定性的“或许”。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah.
 Loadbearing
 maybe.
</details>

**>>**: 那么，财政恶化的原因是什么？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah.
 Okay.
 Uh
 what's
 the
 explanation


for
 the
 deterioration
 in
 our
 finances?
</details>

**>>**: 这对大家来说并不意外：经济增长慢于预期，应对特朗普关税及其他外交政策选择的影响，以及全球整体经济动荡。全省原先预计实际GDP增长率为1%，现在将今年的预测下调至仅0.5%。虽然预计后续年份会有所回升，但这给今年和明年的预算造成了沉重打击。

此外，政府决定向应急基金注资，这也记为额外支出。他们尚未分配这笔资金，但预计会用掉。他们关注的问题之一是，从技术层面上讲，原本有一整批新关税定于1月1日生效——特朗普针对我们的报复性关税采取的再报复措施，这是政府担忧的。如果这笔钱没花掉，将用来偿还债务并缩减赤字，但目前他们预计会花光所有的额外应急资金。

我还想提另一件事：另一个重大的经济变量是二手房市场的下滑，销售量和转售价格均出现萎缩。这很有意思，因为至少有一部分责任可能在政府自己。他们之前大肆宣传要削减新建房屋的合并销售税（HST）。政府承认，市场上出现了一定程度的从二手房转向新房建设的转移，部分原因正是他们在春季出台的税收措施。当然这并非全部原因，二手房板块本身就疲软。但这又是政治中的典型教训：今天的问题往往是上周的解决方案造成的。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh
 well,
 this
 won't
 come
 as
 a
 galloping


shock
 to
 anybody,
 but
 slower
 than


expected
 economic
 growth
 reaction
 to
 uh


Trump's
 tariffs
 and
 uh
 let's
 say
 um
 some


other
 foreign
 policy
 choices,
 general


economic
 chaos
 globally.
 Uh
 the
 province


had
 been
 expecting
 real
 GDP
 growth
 of


1%,
 they're
 now
 forecasting
 uh
 only
 0.5%


growth
 for
 this
 year.
 uh
 that
 is


expected
 to
 catch
 up
 in
 later
 years,
 but


it's
 a
 big
 hit
 to
 the
 budget
 uh
 for
 this


year
 and
 and
 the
 next
 one.
 Uh
 there
 was


also
 a
 decision
 to
 top
 up
 the


government's
 contingency
 fund
 and
 that


gets
 booked
 as
 more
 spending.
 Um
 they


are
 they
 haven't
 allocated
 that
 money


yet,
 but
 they
 expect
 to.
 One
 of the


things
 that
 they
 are
 keeping
 their
 eye


on
 is
 that
 at least
 technically
 uh
 there


are
 a
 whole
 bunch
 of
 new
 tariffs
 that


were
 supposed
 to
 get
 applied
 on
 January


1st.
 uh
 you
 know
 retaliatory
 tariffs


from
 Trump
 retaliating
 to
 our


retaliatory
 tariffs.
 Um
 so
 that
 is


something
 that
 the
 government
 is
 is


worried
 about.
 Uh
 if
 that
 money
 is
 not


spent
 it
 will
 then
 be
 used
 to
 pay
 down


the
 the
 debt
 and
 uh
 would
 would
 result


in
 a
 smaller
 deficit.
 Uh
 but
 at
 the


moment
 they
 say
 they
 expect
 to
 to
 spend


all
 of
 that
 uh
 extra
 contingency


spending.
 I
 do
 want
 to
 mention
 one
 other


thing.
 the
 uh
 another
 big
 uh
 change
 in


the
 economic
 variables
 was
 a
 decline
 in


resale
 homes
 uh
 which
 shrank
 both
 in
 the


number
 of
 sales
 and
 also
 the
 resale


price
 uh
 of
 homes.
 Um
 this
 one's
 an
 an


interesting
 one
 because
 at
 least
 a


little
 bit
 of
 this
 might
 actually
 be
 the


government's
 fault.
 Um
 they
 of
 course


made
 a
 big
 show
 about
 um
 cutting
 the
 HST


on
 new
 uh
 homes
 uh
 that
 are
 are


purchased
 uh
 like
 new
 construction.
 Uh


and
 there
 is
 some
 shift
 uh
 the
 the
 the


government
 sort
 of
 acknowledged
 that


there
 has
 been
 some
 shift
 in
 the
 market


away
 from
 resale
 homes
 and
 to
 the
 new


construction
 um
 in
 part
 because
 of
 the


tax
 measures
 that
 they
 brought
 in
 uh
 in


the
 spring.
 It's
 not
 doing
 all
 of
 the


work.
 the
 the
 resale
 home
 sector
 was


already
 soft
 to
 begin
 with.
 Um
 but
 you


know
 it
 it's
 one
 of
 those
 lessons
 in


politics
 that
 sometimes
 the
 cause
 of


today's
 problems
 was
 last
 week's


solutions.
</details>

**>>**: 确实，这种事屡见不鲜。既然出现这么多财政赤字，政府打算怎么应对？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Indeed,
 we
 see
 that
 all
 the
 time.
 Okay,


so
 lots
 more
 red
 ink.
 What
 does
 the


government
 intend
 to
 do
 about
 it?
</details>

**>>**: 财政部长已经表示既不加税，也不削减医疗支出，这就没有剩下多少其他选择了，毕竟医疗支出是公共开支中最大的单项。在这份秋季经济报告中——我手头正好有这份报告，题为《保护安大略的计划》，这也是预算案的标题，近几年似乎一直是这个标题——我们看到的是非常严厉的开支紧缩，涉及除医疗以外的几乎所有政府部门。

看几个具体数字：到2030年，安省在医疗领域的支出预计比今年增加80亿加元；而在其他所有广泛公共支出类别中——教育、高等教育、司法部门、交通等等，总计都将面临开支削减。各部门的情况当然会有所不同，但总体而言，如果你不在医疗系统工作而是在公共部门供职，接下来的几年日子将会过得比较艰难。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> So
 the
 finance
 minister
 has
 said
 that
 he


will
 not
 be
 uh
 raising
 taxes
 and
 he
 will


not
 be
 cutting
 healthcare
 spending
 and


that
 does
 not
 leave
 a
 lot
 of
 other


options.
 the
 healthcare
 spending
 being


the
 single
 biggest
 chunk
 of
 uh
 public


spending.
 Uh
 so
 what
 we
 see
 in
 this
 fall


economic
 statement
 and
 sorry
 I
 should


say
 we
 have
 the
 fall
 economic
 statement


right
 here.
 Uh
 it
 is
 once
 again
 called
 a


plan
 to
 protect
 Ontario.
 Uh
 that
 was


also
 the
 title
 of
 the
 budget.
 I
 think


that's
 been
 the
 title
 going
 for
 a
 few


years
 now.
 Um
 what
 we
 see
 in
 the
 fall


economic
 statement
 is
 a
 pretty
 sharp


spending
 restraint.
 Uh
 basically
 every


other
 part
 of
 the
 government
 aside
 from


healthcare.
 Uh
 just
 to
 put
 some
 numbers


on
 this,
 Ontario
 is
 projected
 to
 spend


an
 extra
 eight
 billion
 dollars
 in
 the


health
 sector
 by
 2030
 relative
 to
 this


year.
 Every
 other
 broad
 category
 of


public
 spending,
 you
 know,
 education,


post-secondary,
 uh
 the
 justice
 sector,


uh
 transportation,
 everything
 else,
 uh


in
 aggregate,
 uh
 you're
 going
 to
 see


cuts
 in
 spending.
 Uh
 now
 that's
 going
 to


vary
 from
 ministry
 to
 ministry
 of
 course


but
 overall
 basically
 if
 you
 do
 not
 work


in
 healthcare
 uh
 and
 you
 work
 in
 the


public
 sector
 uh
 there
 is
 going
 to
 be


some
 lean
 years
 coming.
</details>

**>>**: 我们下周还会就此深入讨论。届时本节目的老朋友、多伦多大学蒙克全球事务与公共政策学院的经济学家Brian Lewis会加入我们，对这些数据展开更深度的剖析。不过刚才你还提到了减少繁文缛节法案，那具体是怎么回事？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> We
 are
 going
 to
 talk
 about
 this
 more


next
 week.
 We'll
 expand
 on
 some
 of
 the


numbers
 that
 you
 just
 gave
 because
 uh


economist
 friend
 of
 the
 show
 man
 about


town
 of
 the
 monk
 school
 of
 global


affairs
 and
 public
 policy
 at
 uft
 Brian


Lewis
 who's
 been
 here
 before
 he's
 going


to
 join
 us
 and
 we're
 going
 to
 do
 a


little
 deeper
 dive
 into
 the
 numbers


then.
 But
 you
 also
 mentioned
 the
 red


tape
 reduction
 act.
 Okay.
 What's
 that


all
 about?
</details>

**>>**: 这指的是第140号法案，即《加速建设安大略法案》（Building Ontario Faster Act），由负责减少繁文缛节的厅长Andrea Khanjin提出。这类法案通常每年出台一到两次，往往汇集了各种各样的措施，而这一部法案规模尤为庞大。它包含23个独立的附表，修改了包括《司法审判法院法》、《环境评估法》、《都市联通法》、我最喜欢的《规划法》，甚至还有《蜜蜂法》。没错，安大略省真的有部《蜜蜂法》。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> So
 this
 is
 bill
 140,
 the
 building


Ontario
 faster
 act
 which
 was
 introduced


by
 the
 minister
 for
 red
 tape
 reduction,


Andrea
 Kenjen.
 Uh
 these
 bills
 happen


about
 once
 or
 twice
 a
 year
 and
 they
 are


always
 a
 grabag
 of
 different
 measures.


Uh
 and
 this
 one
 is
 kind
 of
 a
 big
 grabag.


Uh,
 it
 has
 23
 separate
 schedules


including
 changes
 to
 the
 Courts
 of


Justice
 Act,
 the
 Environmental


Assessment
 Act,
 the
 Metro
 Links
 Act,
 the


Planning
 Act,
 my
 favorite,
 and
 the
 Bees


Act.
 Yes,
 Ontario
 has
 a
 bees
 act.
</details>

**>>**: 《蜜蜂法》？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Bees
 act.
</details>

**>>**: 对，用来监管蜂蜜的生产和安全运输。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah.
 To
 like
 regulate
 the
 uh
 uh


production
 and
 like
 the
 safe


transportation
 of
 honey.
</details>

**>>**: 原来如此。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Oh,
 okay.
</details>

**>>**: 毕竟蜂蜜是食品，肯定得受监管。第140号法案对23部不同的法律做出了重大修改，我们不会逐一讨论，但挑几个重头的说说。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Right.
 It's
 it's
 a
 food.
 You
 want


regulated,
 right?


>> Um,
 so
 yes,
 I
 think
 that's
 wonderful.


Uh,
 Bill
 140
 makes
 substantial
 changes


to
 23
 different
 laws.
 And
 uh,
 we
 are
 not


going
 to
 uh,
 talk
 about
 each
 of
 those,


but
 we
 are
 going to
 go
 over
 some
 of
 the


biggies.
</details>

**>>**: 好的。首先聊聊每两周就与省会城市各家各户息息相关的一项：蓝盒回收。具体有什么新动向？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes,
 we
 are.
 We're
 going
 to
 start
 with


one
 that
 touches
 on
 every
 household
 here


in
 the
 capital
 city
 every
 couple
 of


weeks
 or
 so,
 and
 that
 is
 bluebox


recycling.
 What
 can
 you
 tell
 us?
 So
 over
</details>

**>>**: 过去十年左右，全省逐步从由市政当局负责垃圾回收的旧体制，过渡到目前由生产商和零售商出资运营蓝桶回收的体系。这被称为“生产者延伸责任”，减轻了市政当局回收这些物品的成本。但零售商和生产商开始抱怨新体系的成本过高，希望政府能放宽要求，最好能降低成本。政府正考虑满足这一诉求，预计将就如何处理极难回收的物品（如在回收流中很难处理的特定塑料）展开公众咨询。

但退一步来看，我们最初为什么要回收？首先是因为垃圾填埋场的寿命有限，回收有助于延长填埋场寿命。政府正从两方面着手解决：一是放宽新建或审批垃圾填埋场的限制；二是放宽对现有废弃物焚烧的处理要求。从技术上讲，他们称之为“垃圾能源化”，对普通人而言，其实就是焚烧不可回收物来发电。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
the
 last
 decade
 or
 so,
 the
 province
 has


slowly
 transitioned
 from
 the
 old
 system


where
 municipalities
 ran
 uh
 recycling


collection
 to
 a
 current
 system
 where


manufacturers
 and
 retailers
 pay
 to


operate
 the
 blue
 bin
 collection.
 Uh
 this


is
 called
 extended
 producer


responsibility
 and
 it
 relieves


municipalities
 of
 the
 costs
 of


collecting
 those
 items.
 But
 retailers


and
 manufacturers
 uh
 have
 started


complaining
 that
 the
 costs
 of
 this
 new


system
 are
 too
 high
 for
 them
 and
 they


want
 the
 government
 to
 make
 it
 easier


and
 ideally
 uh
 cheaper
 for
 them.
 So
 the


government
 is
 considering
 doing
 uh
 just


that
 with
 public
 consultations
 expected


about
 what
 to
 do
 with
 particularly
 hard


to
 recycle
 items
 uh
 certain
 kinds
 of


plastics
 that
 um
 uh
 really
 don't
 work


well
 in
 the
 recycling
 stream.
 Um
 but


we're
 going
 to
 zoom
 out
 for
 a
 moment


here
 and
 say,
 you
 know,
 why
 do
 we


recycle
 in
 the
 first
 place?
 Well,
 the


reason
 we
 recycle
 in
 the
 first
 place
 is


because
 landfills
 have
 a
 finite
 uh


lifespan
 and
 recycling
 uh
 is
 one
 reason


to
 do
 it
 is
 because
 it
 helps
 extend
 the


lifespan
 of
 those
 landfills.
 And
 the


government
 is
 also
 addressing
 that
 in


two
 ways.
 Uh
 they
 are
 making
 it
 easier


to
 build
 or
 at least
 to
 approve
 new


landfills
 and
 they're
 making
 it
 easier


to
 start
 incinerating
 uh
 existing
 waste.


Uh
 technically
 they
 are
 calling
 it


energy
 from
 waste.
 To
 the
 rest
 of
 us,


this
 is
 simply
 burning
 non-recyclables


to
 generate
 electricity.
</details>

**>>**: 我想追问一下：你提到放宽新建垃圾填埋场的审批。在几年前的2020年，政府赋予了市政当局一项前所未有的权力，即有权拒绝在辖区内建设新的垃圾填埋场，拥有否决权。这一规定变了吗？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Let
 me
 do
 a
 follow-up
 on
 that.
 You


mentioned
 easier
 to
 build
 new
 landfill


sites.
 Few
 years
 ago,
 back
 in
 2020,
 the


government
 gave
 municipalities
 something


that
 they
 had
 not
 had
 before
 and
 that


was
 the
 power
 to
 say
 no,
 we
 don't
 want
 a


new
 landfill
 site
 in
 our
 jurisdiction


and
 we
 can
 veto
 that.
 Has
 that
 changed?
</details>

**>>**: 确实变了。他们正在废除《环境评估法》中的相关条款，而该条款正是现任政府在短短六年前亲自制定的。市政当局将失去阻止在本地建设填埋场的权力。技术上讲他们仍有权提出反对，但仅限于作为环境评估程序的一部分。换言之，市议会的权利将变得与你我或任何环保NGO完全一样：你可以通过咨询程序向政府提交意见书，而我相信政府给予这套意见的关注度和权重也会和普通公众意见毫无二致。

这在你看来是否又是省政府进一步侵蚀市政权力的例证？法律中向来存在某些豁免条款，比如《规划法》中明确规定某些权力不适用于X、Y、Z等类别。典型例子是过去的安省水电局（Ontario Hydro），以及现在的安省发电公司（OPG）和第一水电（Hydro One）：市政当局无权对发电站进行分区规划。如果OPG想在你的城市建电厂，形式上并不需要获得许可；作为负责任的公有企业公民他们通常会表现得很客气，但法律上他们不需要市政规划许可。对市政权力的例外规定一直存在。这其实是个显而易见的问题：填埋场虽然不招人待见，但大家都承认必须要有，也承认没人希望它建在自家后院，可垃圾总得有去处。所以在2020年之前的很长时间里市政当局并没有这个权力，随后几年法律赋予了他们这项权力，现在又被剥夺了。我更倾向于认为，最初赋予这个权力本身可能就是个错误，但道格·福特在2018年大选中许下了诺言，觉得必须兑现，而现在他们开始意识到这并不是个好主意。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> It
 sure
 has.
 Uh
 they
 are
 repealing
 the


section
 of
 the
 environmental
 assessment


act
 uh
 that
 this
 government
 itself


enacted
 uh
 only
 six
 years
 ago.
 Uh


municipalities
 will
 lose
 the
 power
 to


stop
 landfills
 in
 their
 own
 areas.
 uh


technically
 they
 will
 still
 have
 the


power
 to
 object.
 Uh
 it
 will
 only
 be
 as


part
 of
 the
 uh
 environmental
 assessment


process.
 So
 the
 the
 municipal
 council


will
 have
 exactly
 as
 much
 right
 as
 you


or
 I
 or
 any
 environmental
 NGO
 for


example.
 You
 can
 file
 your
 commentary


with
 uh
 the
 government
 through
 their


consultation
 process
 and
 I'm
 sure
 they


will
 give
 it
 exactly
 as
 much
 uh


attention
 and
 weight
 as
 they
 do
 all


those
 other
 comments.
 Is
 this
 uh
 in
 your


view
 another
 example
 of
 how
 the
 province


is
 sort
 of
 making
 a
 further
 incursion
 on


municipal
 power?
 They
 have
 always
 been


sections
 of
 the
 law
 uh
 and
 and
 some
 of


these
 are
 very
 clear
 in
 the
 planning
 act


where
 they
 say
 you
 know
 uh
 none
 of
 the


powers
 in
 this
 law
 apply
 to
 you
 know
 uh


categories
 x
 y
 or
 z
 right
 and
 so
 one
 of


the
 the
 classic
 examples
 is
 you
 know


back
 when
 it
 was
 Ontario
 hydro
 and
 now


uh
 Ontario
 power
 generation
 and
 um
 hydro


1
 uh
 municipalities
 cannot
 zone
 for


electrical
 power
 uh
 uh
 stations
 uh
 they


they
 just
 If
 OPG
 wants
 to
 build
 a
 power


plant
 in
 in
 your
 city,
 it
 does
 not


formally
 need
 permission
 as
 good


publicly
 owned
 corporate
 citizens,
 they


like
 to
 be
 nice
 about
 it,
 but
 uh
 they
 do


not
 require
 uh
 municipal
 zoning
 to
 do


it.
 There
 have
 always
 been
 some


exceptions
 to
 to
 municipal
 powers.
 And


this
 one's
 kind
 of
 an
 obvious
 one,


right?
 Where
 like
 it
 not
 pretty,
 but


we
 all
 acknowledge
 that
 we
 need


landfills
 and
 we
 also
 all
 acknowledge


that
 nobody
 wants
 one,
 but
 they
 need
 to


go
 somewhere.
 And
 so
 for
 a
 very
 long


time
 up
 until
 2020
 uh
 municipalities
 did


not
 have
 that
 power
 and
 now
 for
 a
 few


short
 years
 they
 had
 that
 power
 in
 law


and
 now
 they
 are
 losing
 it
 again.
 I
 sort


of
 see
 this
 more
 as
 it
 was
 probably
 a


mistake
 in
 the
 first
 place
 but
 Doug
 Ford


made
 a
 promise
 in
 the
 2018
 election.
 He


felt
 the
 need
 to
 keep
 it
 and
 now
 they're


kind
 of
 realizing
 that
 it
 was
 not
 a


great
 idea.
</details>

**>>**: 好的，休会后议会复会的第一周，让我们快速梳理一下出现的其他几个议题。私立职业学院，昨天在质询环节引发了激烈讨论，具体情况如何？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> All
 right,
 first
 week
 back
 for
 the


legislature
 since
 the
 break.
 So,
 let's


do
 a
 bunch
 of
 quick
 hits
 here
 on
 some
 of


the
 other
 issues
 that
 came
 up.
 Private


career
 colleges,
 it
 was
 big
 at
 question


period
 yesterday.
 What
 can
 you
 tell
 us?
</details>

**>>**: 整个行业仍在受到仓促宣布的安省助学金（OSAP）资格调整的冲击。反对党批评人士要求Quinn厅长辞职，但厅长表示绝不辞职。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh,
 the
 sector
 is
 still
 sort
 of
 reeling


from
 the
 hastily
 announced
 changes
 to
 uh


OSAP
 qualifications.
 Uh,
 the
 opposition


critics
 are
 calling
 for
 Minister
 Quinn


to
 resign.
 Uh,
 he
 says
 he
 will
 not.
</details>

**>>**: 省政府暂停向这些私立职业学院注资，确实导致大量学生陷入困境。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> It's
 a
 lot
 of
 students
 being
 left
 high


and
 dry
 though
 with
 the
 fact
 that
 the


province
 has
 now
 put
 the
 brakes
 on
 any


more
 money
 going
 out
 to
 these
 private


career
 colleges.
</details>

**>>**: 是的，资金何时能重新恢复发放目前完全未知，这些学生的受教育权益在某种程度上是否能得到弥补，现在全都是悬念。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah.
 And
 we
 don't
 know
 really
 uh
 when


the
 that
 money
 will
 start
 flowing
 again,


whether
 these
 students
 will
 uh
 get
 uh


you
 know
 whether
 their
 educations
 will


uh
 be
 made
 whole
 in
 some
 sense.
 It's


it's
 all
 up
 in
 the
 air
 right
 now.
</details>

**>>**: 疑团重重。那么多伦多的自行车道呢？有什么最新进展？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Lots
 of
 questions.
 How
 about
 bike
 lanes


here
 in
 Toronto?
 Latest
 on
 that.
</details>

**>>**: 省府聘请的承包商仍在拆除那些自行车道。由于抗议者的极力阻挠，工程进展缓慢。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> The
 uh
 provinially
 hired
 contractors
 are


still
 working
 on
 uh
 removing
 those
 bike


lanes.
 It's
 been
 slowgoing
 because
 of
 um


very
 motivated
 protesters.
</details>

**>>**: “极力阻挠”这词用得挺委婉，过程中有几个人被捕了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh
 that's
 a
 nice
 way
 to
 put
 it.
 very


motivated
 protesters.
 Few
 people


arrested
 along
 the
 way.
</details>

**>>**: 确实有几个人被捕，他们至少成功让工期拖延了几天。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> A
 few
 people
 have
 been
 arrested
 and
 and


they
 they
 managed
 to
 slow
 the
 work
 down


by
 a
 few
 days
 at
 least.
</details>

**>>**: 再看一条：苏圣玛丽（Sault Ste. Marie）省议员Chris Scott的指控有了处置结果。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Let
 me
 do
 one
 more
 here.
 The
 member
 of


the
 legislature
 for
 Sue
 St.
 Marie,
 Chris


Scott,
 has
 had
 his
 charges
 dealt
 with.
</details>

**>>**: 也许你可以为我们更新一下最新情况。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Maybe
 you
 should
 bring
 us
 up
 to
 date
 on


that.
</details>

**>>**: 好的。这显然是一桩非常严肃的事件。Scott此前被指控涉嫌家庭暴力。检方目前已经撤回了这些指控。当指控公布时，Scott作为进步保守党议员当选，随即被逐出进步保守党党团。尽管面临新民主党和地方工会的辞职压力以及要求举行补选的呼声，他仍一直以独立议员身份履职。目前他继续担任省议员，但政府已经表态不会欢迎他重返进步保守党党团。政府议会领袖Steve Clark本周明确表达了这一点。我知道Scott原本期望指控撤销后能重返党团，但事实并非如此。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Right.
 And
 so
 this
 is
 obviously
 a
 very


uh
 serious
 story.
 Uh
 Scott
 was
 accused


of
 um
 domestic
 violence,
 I
 guess,
 is
 the


best
 way
 to
 put
 it.
 Um
 those
 charges


have
 been
 withdrawn
 by
 the
 crown.
 Uh
 and


uh
 Scott
 had
 been
 elected
 as
 a


progressive
 conservative
 MPP
 when
 the


charges
 were
 announced.
 Uh
 he
 was


expelled
 from
 the
 PC
 caucus.
 Uh
 he
 has


uh
 continued
 to
 sit
 as
 an
 independent
 uh


despite
 some
 pressure
 from
 uh
 the
 NDP


and
 uh
 local
 unions
 uh
 demanding
 that
 he


resign
 and
 uh
 that
 that
 the
 government


call
 a
 bi-election.
 Uh
 he
 uh
 remains


sitting
 as
 an
 MPP.
 Uh
 the
 government
 has


said
 he
 will
 not
 be
 welcomed
 back
 into


the
 PC
 caucus.
 Government
 House
 Leader


Steve
 Clark
 saying
 that
 this
 week.
 I


know
 it
 was
 his
 hope
 that
 if
 the
 charges


were
 dropped,
 he
 would
 be
 welcomed
 back


into
 the
 party
 caucus.
 Not
 the
 case.
</details>

**>>**: 是的，我想Clark的原话是“我们对党员有更高的标准要求”。所以在这个案例中，这不仅仅是刑事责任的问题。据称还有涉及不忠的指控，姑且这么说吧。显然这对他及其家人而言是一个非常敏感且令人沮丧的话题。但政府没有义务在议员离开后必须欢迎他或任何人重新归队。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> No,
 I
 I
 believe
 the
 quote
 from
 Clark
 was


that
 uh
 you
 know,
 we
 hold
 our
 uh
 members


to
 a
 higher
 standard.
 So,
 it's
 it's
 not


just
 a
 a
 question
 of
 criminal
 liability


in
 this
 case.
 There
 also
 is
 allegation


that
 he
 committed
 adultery,
 I
 guess,
 for


lack
 of
 a
 better
 word.
 And
 um
 you
 know


obviously
 this
 is
 a
 very
 uh
 touchy
 and


upsetting
 uh
 topic
 for
 him
 and
 his


family.
 Um
 but
 the
 government
 is
 not


obligated
 to
 welcome
 him
 or
 any
 other


MPP
 back
 in
 uh
 once
 they
 are
 gone
</details>

### 专栏分享：省府与市政新格局、密西沙加世纪冷门

**>>**: 完全正确。好的，进入“你的专栏，我的专栏”环节。又到了我们的常规栏目“你的专栏，我的专栏”，我和JMM将在此聊聊过去一周我们在TVO网站（tvo.org）上撰写的专栏文章。欢迎大家访问该网站阅读全文。JMM，本周你打算给我们分享什么？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> quite
 so.
 All right
 moving
 on
 to
 your


column
 my
 column.


Time
 now
 for
 our
 regular
 feature
 your


column
 my
 column
 in
 which
 JMM
 and
 I
 have


a
 little
 chitchat
 here
 about
 the
 columns


we
 wrote
 for
 the
 TVO
 website
 tvO.org.


over
 the
 past
 week.
 Go
 to
 the
 site,


click
 on
 the
 articles,
 you
 can
 read
 all


about
 it.
 JMM,
 what
 are
 you
 going to


favor
 us
 with
 this
 week?
</details>

**>>**: 我们刚才已经梳理了在本周市政选举中大批落选的现任者，尤其是多座城市的市长席位。我特别想指出的是，这给省长以及市政事务厅长Rob Flack带来了多么巨大的工作量。坦率地说，这位省长——相较于他的前任尤甚——在处理全省市政事务时非常倚重私人关系。看看他对邹至蕙与Bradford之间的竞选态度就知道了，那种近乎背书邹至蕙的姿态：如果单把两人的政治立场落在纸面上，你肯定会以为他会支持Bradford。但对这位省长而言，私人关系以及他与这些人的相处融洽度至关重要。

而如今，包括我之前提到的温莎市的Drew Dilkens在内，大批私人关系必须与完全陌生的新面孔重新建立。这甚至还没考虑某些新市长是打着明确反对省府政策的施政纲领当选的。例如在奥克维尔，新市长当选时的承诺就是要撤销该社区的部长级分区命令（MZO）。因此，尽管这些社区经历的是充满变革的选举，并带来各种我们坐在央街夹埃格林顿（Yonge and Eglinton）不便妄加评论的本地深远影响，但从省政层面来看，确实有大量全新的关系亟待建立，这也对整个安省未来的运转方式产生重大影响。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> So,
 we've
 already
 gone
 over
 the
 the
 wave


of
 incumbents
 who
 lost
 uh
 particularly


the
 the
 mayor's
 offices
 uh
 in
 this


week's
 municipal
 elections.
 And
 one


thing
 I
 wanted
 to
 really
 point
 out
 is


how
 much
 work
 this
 now
 makes
 for
 uh
 the


premier
 and
 for
 the
 minister
 of


municipal
 affairs,
 Rob
 Flack.
 Right.
 the


premier,
 this
 premier
 specifically,
 um,


frankly,
 I
 mean,
 certainly
 more
 than
 his


immediate
 predecessor,
 uh,
 really
 relies


on
 personal
 relationships,
 uh,
 in
 terms


of,
 uh,
 you
 know,
 his
 his
 managing
 of
 of


municipal
 affairs
 around
 the
 province,


right?
 Uh,
 I
 mean,
 just
 look
 at,
 you


know,
 him
 kind
 of
 sort
 of
 mostly
 not


quite
 endorsing
 Olivia
 Chow
 over


Bradford.
 Like
 if
 you
 just
 put
 their


respective
 political
 stances
 on
 paper,


you
 would
 have
 assumed
 he
 would
 endorse


Brad
 Bradford.
 But
 no,
 this
 this
 is
 uh


for
 this
 premier
 at
 least
 uh
 it
 is
 as


much
 about
 personal
 relationships
 and


how
 he
 gets
 along
 with
 these
 people.
 And


a
 whole
 bunch
 of
 those
 personal


relationships
 now
 uh
 I
 mentioned
 Drew


Dilson's
 in
 in
 Windsor.
 Uh
 those


personal
 relationships
 now
 have
 to
 be


restarted
 with
 entirely
 new
 faces
 and


entirely
 new
 people.
 Uh
 and
 that's
 not


even
 getting
 to
 the
 issue
 that
 some
 of


these
 new
 mayors
 have
 been
 elected
 on


platforms
 specifically
 opposed
 to


provincial
 policies
 in
 their


communities,
 right?
 Uh
 in
 Oakville,
 the


new
 mayor
 uh
 has
 been
 uh
 elected
 with
 a


promise
 to
 get
 uh
 ministerial
 zoning


orders
 reversed
 in
 his
 community.
 Uh
 so


as
 much
 as
 these
 are
 uh
 change
 elections


in
 these
 communities
 and
 and
 you
 know


there's
 all
 sorts
 of
 local
 ramifications


there
 that
 you
 know
 I'm
 not
 even
 going


to
 pretend
 to
 comment
 on
 from
 you
 know


the
 distance
 where
 you
 know
 we're


sitting
 here
 at
 Young
 at
 Egllandon
 but


from
 a
 provincial
 affairs
 standpoint
 uh


yeah
 there's
 a
 lot
 of
 new
 relationships


that
 need
 to
 be
 built.
 There's
 a
 lot
 of


uh
 implications
 for
 how
 the
 province
 is


going
 to
 run.
</details>

**>>**: 我能就此追问一个问题吗？过去一周有某位善意的记者向道格·福特提问：“省长，你刚失去了许多关系密切、被视为你盟友的人，他们现在都下台了。你是否由此推断下一个就轮到你了？”他显然不想接这个话茬。但这确实是一个有趣的政治理论：如果你动不了国王，就先对付国王的门徒，伺机再去动国王。

我这篇专栏是以今年八月在渥太华举行的安省市政协会（AMO）年会上的一桩趣事开篇的。当时有人把我拉到一旁闲聊即将到来的市政选举，他们说：“我觉得今年会有一大批市长落选。”这是当时对方提出的理论，早在八月，那人就分析道：在省选和联邦大选中，显然有很多人对现任者感到不满，但受制于唐纳德·特朗普的局势以及需要维护稳定的心态，选民最终还是投票给了现任者——在联邦层面投给了自由党（尽管换了新领袖），在安省投给了道格·福特。那人指出，对现状的挫败感并未消散，因而这种情绪将被转嫁并发泄到一大批现任市长身上。虽然从政治学角度我无法科学证实这个假说，但它深深印在了我的脑海里。周一晚上当我开始看到开票结果涌入时，我坐在舒适的家中，忍不住爆了一两句粗口。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Can
 I
 ask
 a
 follow-up
 question
 on
 that?


In
 as
 much
 as
 some
 I'm
 sure


well-intentioned
 journalist
 put
 the


question
 to
 Doug
 Ford
 this
 past
 week


that
 Premier,
 you've
 just
 lost
 a
 lot
 of


people
 that
 you
 had
 good
 close


relationships
 with
 who
 were
 considered


allies
 of
 yours
 and
 they're
 all
 gone


now.
 Do
 you
 infer
 from
 that
 that
 you're


next?
 And
 he
 certainly
 did
 not
 want
 to


go
 there
 with
 that.
 But
 I
 mean
 it
 is
 an


interesting
 political
 theory
 that
 you


know
 if
 you
 can't
 get
 the
 king,
 you're


going
 to
 get
 the
 king's
 disciples
 and


wait
 for
 your
 chance
 to
 get
 the
 king


after
 that.
 I
 opened
 this
 column
 with
 uh


an
 anecdote
 from
 uh
 this
 year's
 uh
 AMO


conference
 in
 Ottawa
 in
 August
 where


somebody
 pulled
 me
 aside
 and
 we
 were


chatting
 about
 the
 coming
 municipal


elections
 and
 they
 said,
 you
 know,
 I


think
 there's
 going
 to
 be
 a
 bunch
 of


mayors
 who
 lose
 this
 year
 because
 this


was
 the
 theory
 that
 was
 posed
 to
 me.


This
 was
 back
 in
 August.
 As
 person
 said,


um,
 we
 had
 provincial
 and
 federal


elections
 where
 clearly
 there
 were
 a
 lot


of
 people
 who
 were
 frustrated
 with
 the


incumbents,
 but
 because
 of
 the


circumstances
 of
 Donald
 Trump
 and
 a


feeling
 that
 they
 needed
 to
 sort
 of


protect
 stability,
 uh,
 they
 ended
 up


voting
 for
 the
 incumbents.
 They
 voted


for
 the
 Liberal
 Party
 federally,
 even


though
 it
 was
 a
 different
 leader,
 of


course,
 and
 they
 voted
 for
 uh,
 Doug
 Ford


in
 Ontario.
 And
 uh
 this
 person
 suggested


that
 that
 frustration
 uh
 with
 the
 status


quo
 had
 not
 gone
 anywhere
 and
 so
 it
 was


going
 to
 get
 displaced
 onto
 a
 bunch
 of


incumbent
 mayors.
 Um
 and
 uh
 it's
 not


provable.
 It
 is
 like
 it's
 as
 a


scientific
 hypothesis.
 I
 could
 never,


you
 know,
 prove
 this
 in
 a
 in
 a
 political


science
 sort
 of
 way,
 but
 it
 stuck
 in
 my


mind.
 And
 then
 when
 I
 started
 seeing


those
 returns
 come
 in
 on
 Monday
 night,
 I


was
 like
 I
 well
 I
 was
 in
 the
 comfort
 of


my
 own
 home
 and
 I
 don't
 mind
 telling


you.
 I
 uh
 uttered
 an
 obsity
 or
 two.
</details>

**>>**: 不是因为你在意具体某场竞选的结果，而是因为那个人的预言惊人地言中了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Not
 because
 you
 cared
 about
 the
 outcome


of
 those
 particular
 races,
 but
 because


the
 guy's
 theory
 came
 through
 pretty


loud
 and
 clear.
</details>

**>>**: 没错，而且绝不仅发生在一两个地方。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah.
 Yeah.
 No.
 And
 and
 I
 mean
 not
 just


in
 one
 or
 two
 places,
 right?
</details>

**>>**: 看到密西沙加的选举结果时我倒是没爆粗口。现在回到我的T恤话题上，聊聊Hazel McCallion留下的老城，以及她在那里至今扮演的角色。但必须承认，看到密西沙加开票结果的那一刻，我整个人惊呆了。这堪称我报道生涯中见过的最不可思议的冷门，大概是自1962年Donald Somerville击败Nathan Phillips成为多伦多市长以来未曾有过的——先声明一下我可没报道过1962年那场大选。

密西沙加的选战原本被认为是怎样的？精明的筹码全押在现任市长Carolyn Parrish对决前市长Bonnie Crombie上，她们吸引了所有的眼球，吸光了几乎所有相关新闻报道的关注度。她们有很多共同点：都曾担任联邦自由党国会议员，都曾在密西沙加市议会任职，都当过密西沙加市长。Crombie辞去市长职务担任安省自由党领袖，2025年输给道格·福特后，心想“那我再杀回市政厅试试”。而Carolyn Parrish才刚当了两年的市长。Parrish原以为只要Crombie不参选，自己有极大机会连任。当Crombie重返战局时，一切都变了。这场竞选被两人之间的敌意彻底笼罩，局面很不体面，辩论甚至演变成了对骂。有一段著名的现场视频镜头：在一场全候选人辩论中，两名女性唇枪舌剑激烈互掐，台下一位年轻女性双手抱头无奈地摇头，因为现场吵得根本什么都听不清，观感实在太差了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Well,
 okay.
 I
 did
 not
 utter
 any


obscenities
 when
 I
 saw
 the
 results
 of


the
 election
 in
 Missaga.
 And
 we're
 going


to
 get
 back
 to
 my
 t-shirt
 here.
 Yes.


about
 Hazel
 Mall's
 uh
 old
 Berg
 and
 how


much
 she
 still
 has
 a
 role
 to
 play
 in


what
 goes
 on
 there.
 Uh
 but
 I
 but
 I
 will


say
 you
 could
 have
 knocked
 me
 over
 with


a
 feather
 when
 I
 saw
 the
 return
 starting


to
 come
 in
 for
 Missaga
 because
 it


literally
 was
 I
 think
 the
 most


astonishing
 upset
 I've
 ever
 seen.
 Uh
 oh,


probably
 since
 1962
 when
 Donald


Somerville
 defeated
 Nathan
 Phillips
 to


become
 the
 mayor
 of
 Toronto.
 And
 no,
 I


did
 not
 cover
 that
 race
 just
 in
 case
 you


were
 wondering.
 This
 Missaga
 race
 was


supposed
 to
 be,
 right?
 Like
 all
 the


smart
 money
 was
 on
 Carolyn
 Parish
 versus


Bonnie
 Crombi,
 the
 current
 mayor
 versus


the
 former
 mayor.
 And
 they
 got
 all
 the


attention
 and
 you
 know,
 truly
 they


sucked
 up
 all
 the
 oxygen
 of
 every
 news


story
 that
 seemed
 to
 be
 done
 on
 that.


They
 had
 a
 lot
 in
 common.
 They
 were
 both


liberal
 members
 of
 parliament.
 They
 both


served
 a
 stint
 on
 Missaga
 Council.
 They


were
 both
 mayors
 of
 Missaga.
 Crombi,
 of


course,
 left
 to
 become
 the
 Ontario


Liberal
 leader
 for
 a
 little
 while.
 Lost


to
 Doug
 Ford
 in
 2025.
 thought,
 "Well,


I'll
 give
 it
 another
 shot."
 Back
 at
 city


hall,
 Carolyn
 Parish
 has
 only
 been
 the


mayor
 for
 a
 couple
 of
 years.
 Carolyn


Parish
 herself
 thought
 she
 had
 a
 great


shot
 to
 be
 reelected,
 provided
 Crombie


stay
 out
 of
 the
 race.
 That
 all
 changed


when
 she
 got
 back
 into
 the
 race.
 This


race
 was
 just
 overwhelmed
 by
 the
 enmity


between
 those
 two
 candidates.
 It
 wasn't


good.
 The
 debates
 became
 shouting


matches.
 There
 is
 that
 famous
 video
 of


the
 of
 the
 the
 shot
 of
 a
 young
 woman
 in


the
 audience
 at
 an
 all
 candidates
 debate


where
 the
 two
 women
 are
 going
 at
 each


other
 hammer
 and
 tongue
 and
 this
 young


woman
 just
 has
 her
 her
 you
 know
 her


hands
 in
 her
 face
 shaking
 her
 head


because
 you
 can't
 hear
 anything.
 It
 just


it
 just
 wasn't
 good.
</details>

**>>**: 比你年轻的Alvin Tedjo则埋头苦干，专心谈政策，始终保持积极正面的态度。在两位女性吸走大量目光的情况下，许多人忽视了竞选后期的突变：他的支持率从竞选初期的4%一路飙升至投票日的39%，崛起势头令人惊叹。Parrish最终只拿下27%，Crombie获得23%。这充满了讽刺意味：Parrish原本担心自己能否战胜Crombie，她确实赢了Crombie，
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Alvin
 Tedjo,
 younger
 than
 you,
 he
 kept


his
 head
 down.
 He
 kept
 talking
 policy.


He
 kept
 being
 positive
 with
 so
 much


attention
 on
 the
 two
 women.
 I
 think
 a


lot
 of
 people
 missed
 the
 late
 breaking


story
 in
 the
 campaign
 which
 was
 his
 move


from
 as
 I
 suggested
 earlier
 4%
 when
 the


campaign
 began
 to
 39%
 on
 election
 day.


It
 was
 just
 an
 astonishing
 rise.
 Parish


ended
 up
 at
 27%.
 Crombi
 got
 23%.


There
 are
 some
 ironies
 here.
 I
 mean


Parish
 was
 worried
 about
 being
 able
 to


beat
 Crombi.
 She
 did
 beat
 Crombi.
 Yeah,
</details>

**>>**: 但她没能赢下另一个人。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> it's
 the
 other
 guy
 she
 didn't
 beat.
</details>

**>>**: 事实证明Crombie并不是那个更具威胁的对手。必须承认的是，当投票日前公布的每份民调都显示你会赢时，要发表败选演讲是极其艰难的。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
uh
 he
 was
 turns
 out
 she
 was
 not
 the
 more


dangerous
 opponent.
 You've
 got
 to
 give


credit
 where
 it's
 due.


Giving
 a
 concession
 speech
 when
 every


poll
 that
 had
 been
 published
 up
 until


election
 day
 showed
 you
 winning.
 Yeah.
</details>

**>>**: 这说的就是Crombie，那无疑无比难熬。但她表现得非常得体，风度翩翩，展现了高姿态，盛赞了Tedjo，表示为他加油并愿意提供协助等等。在发表败选演讲前，她或许考虑过输的可能性，但我敢肯定她绝未料到自己会沦为第三名，这在当时几乎不可想象。

最后留给大家一个关于密西沙加政治的冷知识：猜猜看密西沙加有多少年没选出过男性市长了？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And
 that's
 Crombi.
 That's
 got
 to
 be
 just


incredibly
 difficult.
 And
 she
 did
 a


great
 job
 of
 it.
 She
 got
 out
 there.
 She


was
 classy.
 She
 took
 the
 high
 road.
 She


gave
 Ted
 Joe
 props.
 Um
 said
 she's


rooting
 for
 him.
 Offered
 to
 be
 helpful,


etc.,
 etc.
 Uh,
 I'm
 sure
 the
 notion
 of


losing
 had
 occurred
 to
 her
 before
 she


gave
 that
 speech.
 I'm
 not
 sure
 the


notion
 of
 coming
 third
 had
 occurred
 to


her.
 That
 was
 almost
 unimaginable.
 And


let
 me
 leave
 you
 with
 a
 little
 final


oddity
 about
 Missaga
 politics.


Guess
 how
 many
 years
 it's
 been
 since


Missaga
 elected
 a
 man
 to
 be
 the
 mayor
 of


that
 city.
</details>

**>>**: 这个我碰巧知道，大概有50年了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I
 I
 happen
 to
 know
 this
 one.
 It
 has
 been


something
 like
 50
 years.
</details>

**>>**: 整整50年。上一次男性当选密西沙加市长——你肯定不知道那个人的名字吧？或者你可能知道？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> It's
 50
 years.
 The
 last
 time
 a
 man
 won


an
 election
 for
 mayor
 of
 Missaga,
 you


you're
 not
 going
 to
 know
 the
 guy's
 name,


are
 you?
 Or
 you
 might
 know
 his
 name.
</details>

**>>**: 我忘了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh,
 no,
 I
 have
 forgotten.
</details>

**>>**: 叫Ron Searle，他在1976年胜选。自那以后，历任市长是Hazel McCallion、
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Ron
 Surl
 was
 his
 name.
 He
 won
 the


election
 in
 76.
 And
 ever
 since
 then,


Hazel
 McCallion.
</details>

**>>**: 没错。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.
</details>

**>>**: Bonnie Crombie、Carolyn Parrish。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Bonnie
 Crombie,
 Carolyn
 Parish.
</details>

**>>**: 是的。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.
</details>

**>>**: 所以我想告诉收看节目的年轻小伙子们：只要好好表现，埋头苦干，你们也一样有希望。看节目的年轻小伙子们，总有一天你们也能当上密西沙加市长。对于觉得自己永无出头之日的年轻男生来说，这面玻璃天花板终于被打破了——开个玩笑而已，别给我写信抗议，大家知道我只是在逗乐，至少试图幽默一下。

好的，进入读者来信环节。如果您有迫切的问题或真知灼见，欢迎随时发送邮件至onpolitics@tvo.org。JMM，开读吧。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> So,
 I
 want
 to
 let
 you
 young
 boys
 who
 are


watching
 this
 know
 that
 if
 you
 play
 your


cards
 right,
 just
 keep
 your
 head
 down


and
 do
 your
 job.
 Yes.
 You,
 too.
 You


young
 lads
 watching
 this,
 you
 can
 be
 the


mayor
 of
 Missaga
 someday.
 A
 glass


ceiling
 has
 now
 been
 broken
 for
 you
 poor


young
 boys
 who
 think
 you'll
 never
 have
 a


chance
 to
 be
 I'm
 being
 facicious
 here.


Don't
 write
 me
 letters.
 You
 know
 I'm


being
 funny
 here,
 okay?
 Or
 trying
 to
 be


anyway.
 All
 right,
 let's
 go
 to
 the


mailbag.
 If
 you've
 got
 a
 burning


question
 or
 an
 insightful
 comment,
 we


always
 like
 to
 hear
 from
 you
 at
 the


email
 address
 on
 politics
 at
 tvo.org.


JMM
 fire
 away.
</details>

### 观众来信与法律释义、结语

**>>**: 这封邮件来自多伦多的听众Naman Sood，他写道：“您好，感谢制作这档节目。正如大家常做的那样，我正在安大略省e-Laws法律网站上阅读《合作社法》（Co-operative Corporations Act）……”
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
Uh,
 this
 is
 an
 email
 from


listener
 Naman
 Sud
 in
 Toronto
 who


writes,
 "Hello,
 thank
 you
 for
 the
 show.


I
 was
 reading
 the
 Cooperative


Corporations
 Act
 on
 the
 Ontario
 E-Laws


website
 as
 one
 does."
</details>

**>>**: 天哪，他比你还硬核。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Oh
 my
 gosh,
 he's
 worse
 than
 you.
</details>

**>>**: 我正想说这显然是OnPoli的铁杆观众。他接着写道：“我发现了一个微小的排版错误。法条中使用了‘whatever’一词，而显然本意是指‘whatsoever’。我就此给我的省议员Chris Glover发了邮件，他选区办公室一位友善的工作人员将其转交给了e-Laws编辑团队，预计这个笔误会被修正。我的问题是：在什么情况下，修改被认定为足够微小和无关紧要，以至于官僚只需根据‘他们显然是指这个’就能直接修改，而在什么情况下必须通过立法程序来修正法律？这在任何地方有法律条文规定吗，还是纯粹视具体情况而定？感谢，来自多伦多的Naman。”
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Oh,
 I
 was
 going
 to
 say
 clearly
 an
 ony


viewer
 and
 I
 found
 a
 tiny
 typo.
 The
 word


whatever
 was
 used
 when
 clearly
 the
 word


whatsoever
 was
 intended.
 I
 emailed
 my


MPP
 Chris
 Glover
 about
 this
 and
 a
 nice


person
 in
 his
 consid
 office
 forwarded
 it


to
 the
 e-law's
 editorial
 team
 where


presumably
 the
 typo
 will
 be
 fixed.
 My


question
 to
 you
 is
 when
 is
 something


considered
 a
 small
 and
 insignificant


enough
 change
 that
 it
 can
 simply
 be


fixed
 by
 a
 bureaucrat
 going
 well
 they


obviously
 meant
 that
 versus
 requiring


legislation
 to
 amend
 the
 law
 is
 this


encoded
 anywhere
 at
 all
 or
 are
 we
 just


going
 off
 fibs
 I
 mean
 going
 on
 a


case-byase
 basis
 thanks
 Nan
 from
 Toronto


Ontario
</details>

**>>**: 我不敢确定，但这可能是我读过最具有John Michael McGrath风格的问题了，接力棒交给你了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I
 am
 not
 sure
 but
 this
 may
 be
 the
 most


John
 Michael
 McGrath
 question
 I've
 ever


read
 so
 I
 pass
 the
 baton
 to
 you
</details>

**>>**: 好的。我觉得Naman探讨的场景是：假设省议会通过的法律文本在录入网站时出现了真正的排版录入错误，那种情况下编辑团队当然可以直接更正错别字。但在他提到的具体法条中情况并非如此，因为在这个语境下，“whatever”实际上就是作为“whatsoever”的同义词使用的。在各种法律中都是这么用的，这既非打字错误也非笔误，而是法律术语中对“whatever”的规范用法。

不过法律中有时确实会出现错误，或者某些语言随着时代变迁变得古旧，我们现在的词汇用法发生了变化。当案件提交到法庭时，法官就必须思考：“等等，在现代语境下我该如何以合乎逻辑的方式解释这种表述？”对于Naman的问题，最明确的答案是：如果法律本身确实存在用词错误，唯一有权修改成文法的机构是安大略省议会。如果是议会制定了法律且行文有误，必须通过提出新法案来修正或修订法律，这是黑白分明的宪政法原则。

但有时语言变得古旧、晦涩，或者起草者在1950年代有其特定意图，而现代人的语言习惯变了，法官就不得不琢磨如何解释那些生僻古旧的表述。此时法院可以借助几项工具，我提其中两个：第一是《释义法》（Interpretation Act）。存在专门指导法官如何解释法律的成文法，我非常喜欢这部法。举个简单的例子：70年来安大略省的每部法律都是以女王伊丽莎白二世陛下的名义通过的，难道因为王位传给国王查尔斯三世陛下，这些法律就突然失效了吗？当然没有，因为《释义法》中有具体条款明确予以维持。

加拿大法院尤其在以英法双语公布法律的省份可以采用的另一项原则是：如果法律的英文文本中存在用词模糊不清之处，法院有权参考该法律的法文文本；如果法文表述更加精确，那么更精确的语言版本将成为具有约束力的司法解释。问问我怎么知道这些的，Steve。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> right
 so
 uh
 I
 think
 what
 Naman
 is


getting
 at
 here
 like
 you
 could
 imagine
 a


context
 in
 which
 there
 was
 a
 genuine
 um


error
 in
 uh
 there's
 like
 a
 text
 of
 the


law
 passed
 by
 the
 legislature
 that
 was


just
 typed
 into
 the
 website
 wrong
 and
 in


that
 case
 I'm
 sure
 the
 editorial
 team


can
 just
 uh
 fix
 a
 typo.
 But
 that's
 not


what
 is
 happening
 in
 this
 specific
 case


that
 he
 has
 cited
 because
 the
 word


whatever
 is
 used
 in
 this
 context
 as
 a


synonym
 for
 the
 word
 whatsoever.
 Uh
 and


it's
 it's
 used
 in
 that
 way
 in
 all
 sorts


of
 laws.
 It
 is
 not
 a
 a
 typo
 or
 an
 error.


This
 is
 a
 a
 a
 proper
 use
 of
 the
 word


whatever
 uh
 in
 uh
 legal
 ease
 if
 I
 can


put
 it
 that
 way.
 But
 there
 are
 sometimes


errors
 in
 law.
 Um
 or
 you
 know
 there
 are


times
 where
 like
 uh
 language
 is
 archaic.


uh
 we've
 moved
 on,
 we
 use
 uh
 words


differently
 now.
 And
 then
 something


comes
 before
 a
 court
 and
 the
 judge
 has


to
 say,
 "Wait
 a
 second.
 How
 am
 I


supposed
 to
 interpret
 this
 uh
 this


language
 in
 a
 way
 that
 makes
 sense
 in
 uh


the
 modern
 context?"
 The
 the
 clearest


answer
 to
 Nan's
 question
 is
 if
 there
 is


an
 error
 in
 the
 law,
 like
 we've
 just


actually
 used
 the
 wrong
 word
 in
 a
 law,


the
 only
 body
 that
 can
 change
 the
 law
 as


it
 is
 written
 is
 the
 legislature
 of


Ontario.
 uh
 if
 if
 they
 are
 the
 one
 who


wrote
 the
 law,
 if
 they
 wrote
 it
 badly,


it
 has
 to
 be
 a
 new
 bill
 to
 amend
 the
 law


or
 revise
 it.
 And
 that's
 like
 black
 and


white
 constitutional
 law.
 Um


but
 there
 are
 times
 when
 language


becomes
 archaic
 or
 it
 it
 was
 written


ambiguously
 or
 somebody
 had
 a
 clear
 idea


of
 what
 it
 meant
 back
 in
 1950
 or


whatever
 and
 now
 we
 use
 language


differently
 and
 a
 matter
 comes
 before
 a


court
 and
 a
 judge
 has
 to
 say,
 "Well,


wait
 a
 second.
 How
 am
 I
 supposed
 to


interpret
 this
 law?
 you're
 using
 this


weird
 old
 language,
 right?
 Um,
 and
 there


are
 a
 few
 different
 tools
 that,
 uh,


courts
 can
 rely
 on.
 I
 mention


two.
 Uh,
 one
 is
 the
 interpretation
 act.


There
 is
 a
 law
 that
 tells
 judges
 how
 to


interpret
 the
 law.
 I
 love
 this.


>> Um,
 just
 as
 an
 easy
 one
 here,
 right?
 For


70
 years
 in
 Ontario.
 Every
 single
 law


was
 passed
 in
 the
 name
 of
 Her
 Majesty


Queen
 Elizabeth
 II.
 Did
 those
 laws


suddenly
 become
 invalid
 because
 the


crown
 passed
 to
 his
 majesty
 King
 Charles


III?
 No,
 they
 did
 not
 because
 a
 section


of
 the
 interpretation
 act
 says
 so.
 Um,


another
 principle
 that
 Canadian
 courts


can
 use,
 particularly
 uh
 in
 uh
 provinces


where
 languages
 are
 are
 published
 in


both
 uh
 official
 languages
 in
 English


and
 French.
 Um
 there
 if
 there's
 an


imprecise
 word
 in
 the
 English
 text
 of


the
 law,
 the
 courts
 are
 also
 allowed
 to


consult
 the
 French
 text
 of
 the
 law.
 And


if
 that
 language
 is
 more
 precise,
 then


that
 more
 precise
 language
 becomes
 the


the
 the
 binding
 interpretation.
 Um
 now


ask
 me
 how
 I
 know
 that,
 Steve.
</details>

**Steve Paikin**: 我根本不需要问你怎么知道的，因为你可是John Michael McGrath，你脑子里天然装着这些东西。好吧，我配合你一下：你是怎么知道这一切的？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
I
 don't
 have
 to
 ask
 you
 how
 you
 know


that
 because
 you
 are
 John
 Michael
 effing


McGrath
 and
 you
 just
 know
 this
 stuff.


Oh,
 all
 right.
 I'll
 humor
 you.
 How
 do


you
 know
 all
 this?
</details>

**>>**: 因为当省长道格·福特的已故胞弟罗伯·福特最初被裁定违反《市政利益冲突法》时，这正是诉讼争议的关键法律事实。当时经历过那场官司的人都记得，有一段时间罗伯·福特看似要被逐出市长办公室并被迫重新参选。我不打算深入探讨该案复杂的法律细节，只说明一点：在提出上诉时，上诉的核心要点之一正是《市政利益冲突法》的法文文本比英文文本更为精确。对于单一主题，这解释得比任何正常人需要知道的都要多得多。但Naman，希望这对你有所启发。干得漂亮，Michael，John Michael McGrath，回答得很精彩。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Because
 this
 was
 actually
 a
 key
 uh
 legal


fact
 in
 dispute
 when
 uh
 the
 late
 Rob


Ford,
 the
 the
 brother
 of
 the
 premier,


Doug
 Ford.
 Uh
 he
 was
 initially
 found
 to


have
 violated
 the
 Municipal
 Conflict
 of


Interest
 Act.
 And
 those
 of
 us
 who
 are


around
 remember
 that
 trial
 because
 for
 a


moment
 it
 looked
 like
 uh
 Rob
 Ford
 was


going
 to
 be
 kicked
 out
 of
 the
 mayor's


office
 and
 and
 forced
 to
 run
 for


election
 again.
 Um
 I'm
 not
 going
 to
 go


into
 the
 uh
 legal
 minutia
 of
 that
 case


except
 to
 say
 that
 when
 it
 was
 appealed


uh
 one
 key
 element
 of
 the
 appeal
 rested


on
 the
 fact
 that
 the
 French
 text
 of
 the


law
 was
 more
 precise
 than
 the
 English


text
 of
 the
 Municipal
 Conflict
 of


Interest
 Act.
 That
 is
 more
 about
 a


single
 subject
 than
 any
 normal
 person


needs
 to
 know.
 But
 Nean
 I
 hope
 you
 found


it
 all
 very
 helpful.
 Anyway,
 well
 done,


Michael.
 John
 Michael
 McGrath,
 well


done.
</details>

**>>**: 赶紧收尾吧，你把邮箱地址再报一下。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Why
 don't
 you
 give
 the
 email
 again
 on


Let's
 get
 out
 of
 here.
</details>

**>>**: 看看下周我们是否能收到稍微不那么冷门的邮件供我们跟进解答。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> On
 on
 the
 chance
 that
 maybe
 next
 week
 we


get
 a
 little
 bit
 of
 a
 less
 obscure
 email


that
 we
 can
 follow
 up
 on.
</details>

**>>**: 越冷门越好，越冷门越好。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> More
 obscure.
 More
 obscure.
</details>

**>>**: 再次提醒，如果您对节目内容有任何疑问，请发邮件至onpolitics@tvo.org。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Again,
 if
 you'd
 like
 to
 ask
 about


content
 on
 the
 show,
 please
 email
 us
 at


onpolitics
 at
 tvo.org.
</details>

**>>**: 以上就是2026年10月30日星期五的OnPoli播客。您可以在任何播客平台关注我们的节目，以便在新一期上线时收到通知；也可以在TVO Today的YouTube频道收看节目的视频版本。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And
 that
 is
 the
 OnP
 podcast
 for
 this


Friday,
 October
 30th,
 2026.
 You
 can


follow
 our
 show
 wherever
 you
 get
 your


podcasts
 so
 that
 you
 get
 notified
 each


time
 a
 new
 episode
 is
 available.
 And
 you


can
 see
 the
 video
 version
 of
 the
 podcast


on
 the
 TV
 today
 YouTube
 channel.
</details>

**>>**: 无论好评、批评还是建议，我们都非常乐意聆听。欢迎发送邮件至onpolitics@tvo.org，并请附上您的姓名和所在地。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Any
 feedback
 you
 have,
 we're
 always


happy
 to
 hear
 it,
 good,
 bad,
 or


indifferent.
 Write
 us
 an
 email
 at


onpolitics
 at
 tvO.org.
 Please
 include


your
 first
 and
 last
 name
 and
 where


you're
 from.
</details>

**>>**: 本周节目的制作人是Matthew O'Mara，剪辑为Colin Kish。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> This
 week's
 episode
 was
 produced
 by


Matthew
 Omera,
 editing
 by
 Colin
 Kish.
</details>

**>>**: 制作支持来自Jonathan Hallowell和TVO数字媒体服务团队。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Production
 support
 from
 Jonathan


Hallowell
 and
 TVO's
 digital
 media


services
 team.
</details>

**>>**: Laurie Few是数字执行制片人，Vanessa Case是媒体副总裁。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Lorie
 F
 is
 the
 executive
 producer
 of


digital.
 Vanessa
 Casease
 is
 vice


president
 media.
</details>

**>>**: 一如既往，特别感谢我们优秀的演播室团队，让播客的视频呈现如此出色。祝大家万圣节快乐！请记住明晚如果在外面开车，请格外留意路边的小朋友们。不给糖就捣蛋，祝大家万圣节快乐，我们下周五再见，拜拜！
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And
 as
 always,
 we'd
 like
 to
 give
 special


thanks
 to
 our
 wonderful
 studio
 crew
 here


for
 making
 the
 video
 part
 of
 the
 podcast


look
 so
 darn
 good.
 Have
 a
 great


Halloween,
 everybody.
 And
 remember,


tomorrow
 night,
 watch
 out
 for
 those


little
 kids
 if
 you're
 out
 driving
 in
 the


evening.
 Trick
 or
 treat,
 everybody.


Happy
 Halloween.
 And
 we'll
 see
 you
 again


next
 Friday.
 Bye-bye.
</details>

**>>**: 拜拜！
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Bye-bye.
</details>