---
author: New York Times Podcasts
date: '2026-04-29'
guest: ''
layout: post.njk
source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mtjb20QxZmI
speaker: New York Times Podcasts
tags:
  - ai-lawsuit
  - immigration-policy
  - tech-competition
  - legal-precedent
title: 科技巨头诉讼与最高法院移民案：一周要闻速览
summary: 本期《纽约时报》“头条”播报了多条重要新闻。最高法院审理了涉及临时保护身份（TPS）的移民案件，重点关注政府撤销庇护的法律依据及潜在的种族偏见。同时，埃隆·马斯克起诉OpenAI及其CEO萨姆·奥特曼，指控其背离初心，引发AI领域权力格局的担忧。此外，还涵盖了蒙特利尔诉讼、警方地理围栏技术引发的隐私争议、FCC对ABC的审查、詹姆斯·科米被起诉以及日本养老院通过招募健美运动员解决劳动力短缺的创新尝试。
insight: ''
draft: true
series: ''
category: ai-ml
area: tech-engineering
project: []
people: []
companies_orgs:
  - OpenAI
  - xAI
  - Monsanto Company
  - ABC
products_models:
  - GPT-4
  - Roundup
media_books: []
status: evergreen
---
### 最高法院审视移民庇护权

最高法院在周三迎来了本任期内最后一次口头辩论日，审理了两起被加速排期的案件。这两起案件的核心均围绕着**临时保护身份**（Temporary Protected Status, TPS），这是一项已存在数十年的法律保护措施，允许来自面临战争或其他**人道主义危机**国家的移民在美国居住和工作。然而，特朗普总统曾试图立即撤销对数十万海地和叙利亚公民的此类保护，并将其驱逐出境。

持有TPS身份的移民，包括学生、医生和工程师，已在法庭上进行反击，他们声称如果被迫返回，可能会面临生命危险。此次最高法院的辩论将聚焦于政府试图撤销其身份的方式和原因。根据法律规定，政府在做出决定前，必须审查相关国家的状况，并采取其他步骤。代表TPS持有者的律师认为，在这些案件中，政府并未遵循法定程序，并且在海地公民的案例中，政府的行为带有**种族偏见**。他们指出，特朗普曾发表关于海地人食用宠物以及他们来自一个“肮脏、恶心”国家的虚假指控。

另一方面，政府方面否认种族是决定因素，并表示终止TPS是基于**外交政策**和**国家安全**的考量。最高法院的裁决很可能也会对来自其他国家的超过一百万TPS持有者产生影响，他们的保护也正面临被政府终止的局面。

在处理完移民案件的激烈辩论后，我们将目光转向另一场可能重塑科技格局的法律诉讼。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
From
 The
 New
 York
 Times,
 it's


The
 Headlines.
 I'm
 Tracy
 Mumford.


Today's
 Wednesday,
 April
 29th.


Here's
 what
 we're
 covering.


Today
 is
 the
 last
 day
 of
 arguments
 this


term
 at
 the
 Supreme
 Court,
 and
 the


justices
 are
 set
 to
 consider
 a
 pair
 of


cases
 that
 they
 fast-tracked
 to
 get
 on


the
 schedule.


The
 cases
 both
 center
 on
 temporary


protected
 status,
 or
 TPS,
 a
 decades-old


legal
 protection
 that
 has
 allowed


migrants
 from
 countries
 facing
 war
 or


other
 humanitarian
 crises
 to
 live
 and


work
 in
 the
 US.


President
 Trump,
 though,
 has
 moved
 to


revoke
 those
 protections
 immediately
 for


hundreds
 of
 thousands
 of
 Haitians
 and


Syrians,
 and
 to
 expel
 them
 from
 the


country.


TPS
 holders,
 including
 students,


doctors,
 and
 engineers,
 have
 pushed
 back


in
 the
 courts,
 saying
 they
 could
 be


killed
 if
 they're
 forced
 to
 return.


The
 arguments
 the
 justices
 will
 hear


today
 will
 focus
 on
 how
 and
 why
 the


administration
 tried
 to
 revoke
 their


status.


By
 law,
 the
 government
 must
 review


conditions
 in
 the
 countries
 in
 question


before
 making
 a
 decision,
 among
 other


steps.
 Lawyers
 representing
 the
 TPS


holders
 say
 that
 didn't
 happen
 here,
 and


they
 argue
 that
 in
 the
 case
 of
 the


Haitians,
 specifically,
 the


administration
 acted
 with
 racial
 bias.


They've
 pointed
 to
 Trump's
 false


accusations
 about
 Haitians
 eating


people's
 pets
 and
 being
 undesirable


because
 they
 come
 from
 what
 Trump
 called


a
 filthy,
 disgusting
 country.


On
 the
 administration's
 part,
 it
 has


denied
 that
 race
 is
 a
 factor,
 and
 said


the
 terminations
 are
 based
 on
 foreign


policy
 and
 national
 security


considerations.


The
 justices'
 ruling
 will
 likely
 also


have
 implications
 for
 more
 than
 a


million
 other
 TPS
 holders
 from
 other


countries,
 whose
 protections
 the


administration
 is
 also
 trying
 to


terminate.
</summary>
</details>

### AI巨头恩怨：马斯克诉奥特曼案

2015年，**萨姆·奥特曼**（Sam Altman）向**埃隆·马斯克**（Elon Musk）发送了一封电子邮件，提出了一个构想：建立一个硅谷研究实验室，以非营利组织的形式构建强大的AI系统。不久之后，这个非营利组织便成立了，主要资金来源于马斯克的捐赠，并命名为**OpenAI**，旨在引领科技行业进入人工智能的新时代。然而，在接下来的十年里，两人的关系逐渐破裂。马斯克退出了OpenAI，两人从合作者变成了竞争对手。如今，他们之间持续的争斗已经白热化，马斯克起诉奥特曼，一场重磅级的审判在本周拉开帷幕。

硅谷人士普遍预计将出现高潮迭起的戏剧性场面，但这场审判的意义远不止于此。据《纽约时报》记者**Cade Metz**报道，马斯克声称奥特曼拿了他的钱，欺骗了他，并背弃了OpenAI最初的人道主义使命，反而将公司打造成了一个价值约7000亿美元的科技巨头。在昨天的开庭陈述中，OpenAI的律师则将这些指控斥为“吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸”（sour grapes），并试图说服陪审团不要偏袒马斯克。如果埃隆·马斯克胜诉，这场官司可能会改变AI竞赛中的力量平衡。

马斯克寻求数十亿美元的赔偿，但他更希望解散OpenAI。他要求将萨姆·奥特曼从OpenAI董事会移除，并希望瓦解负责**ChatGPT**及众多其他AI技术的公司。最终，这将使OpenAI的众多竞争对手受益，包括由埃隆·马斯克本人领导的人工智能公司**xAI**。

从人工智能领域的尖端竞争，我们转向了科技行业内部的另一场重要审判，以及一些更具社会性的新闻。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
Back
 in
 2015,
 Sam
 Altman
 sent
 an
 email


to
 Elon
 Musk.
 He
 pitched
 an
 idea,
 a


Silicon
 Valley
 research
 lab
 that
 would


build
 powerful
 AI
 systems
 as
 part
 of


what
 he
 called
 some
 sort
 of
 nonprofit.


Soon,
 that
 nonprofit
 was
 founded,


largely
 with
 donations
 from
 Musk.
 It
 was


called
 OpenAI,
 and
 would
 go
 on
 to
 lead


the
 tech
 industry
 into
 a
 new
 era
 of


artificial
 intelligence.


But
 over
 the
 course
 of
 the
 next
 decade,


that
 relationship
 fractured.
 Musk
 quit


OpenAI,
 and
 he
 and
 Altman
 went
 from


being
 collaborators
 to
 competitors.


Now,
 their
 simmering
 feud
 has
 come
 to
 a


head
 with
 Musk
 suing
 Altman
 in
 a


blockbuster
 trial
 that
 kicked
 off
 this


week.
 People
 in
 Silicon
 Valley
 are


expecting
 high
 drama.
 But
 the


implications
 of
 this
 trial
 are
 much


larger
 than
 that.
 Cade
 Metz
 has
 been


reporting
 for
 The
 Times
 from
 the


California
 courthouse
 where
 Musk's


testimony
 is
 expected
 to
 continue
 this


morning,
 and
 where
 Altman
 is
 also
 slated


to
 take
 the
 stand.
 Cade
 says
 Musk
 is


claiming
 that
 Altman
 took
 his
 money,


deceived
 him,
 and
 abandoned
 OpenAI's


original
 humanitarian
 mission,
 instead


building
 the
 company
 into
 a
 roughly
 $700


billion
 tech
 juggernaut.
 In
 opening


arguments
 yesterday,
 OpenAI's
 lawyers


said
 those
 claims
 are
 basically
 all


just,
 quote,
 "sour
 grapes,"
 as
 they


worked
 to
 convince
 the
 jury
 not
 to
 take


Musk's
 side.
 If
 Elon
 Musk
 wins
 his
 case,


it
 could
 shift
 the
 balance
 of
 power
 in


the
 AI
 race.


Musk
 seeks
 tens
 of
 billions
 of
 dollars


in
 damages,
 but
 he
 also
 wants
 to


OpenAI.


He
 wants
 to
 remove
 Sam
 Altman
 from
 the


OpenAI
 board
 of
 directors,


and
 he
 wants
 to
 unravel
 the
 company
 that


oversees
 ChatGPT


and
 so
 many
 other
 AI
 technologies.


And
 in
 the
 end,
 that
 benefits
 the


company's
 many
 rivals,
 including


xAI,
 the
 artificial
 intelligence
 company


run
 by
 Elon
 Musk.
</summary>
</details>

### 多领域焦点：法律、隐私与社会创新

除了上述重大案件，本周还有其他几项值得关注的动态。最高法院还审理了一起涉及**蒙特利尔公司**（Monsanto Company）的案件，该案与除草剂**Roundup**有关。此前有广泛的指控称该产品会导致癌症，法院的最终裁决可能决定数千起针对该公司的诉讼是否能够继续进行。

在隐私领域，法院本周还就警方在调查中能够收集多少个人手机数据的问题展开了辩论。一些执法部门正在使用一种名为**地理围栏**（Geofencing）的技术，允许他们收集犯罪现场附近所有手机用户的定位数据。这有助于追踪嫌疑人，但批评者认为此举侵犯了普通美国人的隐私，是不合宪法的。

在华盛顿，联邦监管机构因**吉米·坎摩尔**（Jimmy Kimmel）与白宫之间的争执，下令对ABC的广播许可证进行前所未有的审查。此前，坎摩尔在一次脱口秀中对第一夫人梅拉尼娅·特朗普发表了不当评论，引发了白宫的愤怒。

前FBI局长**詹姆斯·科米**（James Comey）再次被起诉。新起诉书声称科米在网上发布的一张包含数字“8647”的贝壳图片，是对总统生命的威胁，其中“86”是俚语“摆脱某物”的缩写，“47”则指代特朗普作为第47任总统。

最后，在日本，一个独特的解决方案正在应对养老院工作人员短缺的问题。一些公司正积极招募**健美运动员**、MMA拳击手和相扑选手，为老年人提供护理服务。这些运动员因其体能、耐力和与人打交道的能力，被认为非常适合这份工作，并且这种跨界招聘也有助于改变人们对护理行业从业者的传统认知。

最高法院对上述案件以及关于出生公民权和投票权法案等其他关键问题的裁决，预计将从六月下旬开始陆续公布。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
The
 TPS
 arguments
 are
 just
 one
 of


several
 high-stakes
 cases
 the
 court
 took


on
 in
 its
 last
 week
 of
 the
 term.
 We'll


hear
 argument
 next
 in
 case
 24-1068,


Monsanto
 Company
 versus
 Darnell.
 One


case
 earlier
 this
 week
 involved
 the
 weed


killer
 Roundup.
 There
 have
 been


widespread
 claims
 that
 the
 product


causes
 cancer,
 and
 ultimately,


the
 court's
 decision
 could
 determine


whether
 thousands
 of
 lawsuits
 against


the
 company
 that
 makes
 it
 can
 go


forward.


And
 What's
 to
 prevent
 the
 government


from
 using
 this
 to
 find
 out
 the


identities
 of
 everybody
 at
 a
 particular


church,
 a
 particular
 political


organization?


The
 court
 also
 grappled
 this
 week
 with


the
 issue
 of
 just
 how
 much
 personal
 cell


phone
 data
 police
 can
 sweep
 up
 in
 an


investigation.


Some
 authorities
 have
 been
 using
 a


technique
 called
 geofencing,


which
 lets
 them
 gather
 location
 data


from
 all
 cell
 phone
 users
 near
 a
 crime


scene.


That's
 helped
 them
 track
 down
 suspects,


but
 critics
 of
 the
 practice
 argue
 that


it's
 unconstitutional
 and
 puts
 the


privacy
 of
 everyday
 Americans
 at
 risk.


Decisions
 from
 the
 court
 on
 all
 of
 these


cases,
 as
 well
 as
 other
 critical
 issues


like
 birthright
 citizenship
 and
 the


Voting
 Rights
 Act,
 are
 expected
 starting


in
 late
 June.


Now,
 two
 other
 updates
 from
 Washington.


You
 know
 how
 sometimes,
 uh,
 you
 wake
 up


in
 the
 morning
 and,
 uh,
 the
 first
 lady


puts
 out
 a
 statement
 demanding
 you
 be


fired
 from
 your
 job?


We've
 all
 been
 there,
 right?
 As
 the
 feud


between
 Jimmy
 Kimmel
 and
 the
 White
 House


has
 kicked
 back
 up
 recently,
 federal


regulators
 have
 ordered
 an
 unprecedented


review
 of
 ABC's
 broadcast
 licenses.
 Back


in
 the
 fall,
 Kimmel
 was
 briefly
 pulled


off
 the
 air
 by
 ABC,
 his
 home
 network,


after
 the
 Trump
 administration


criticized
 comments
 he'd
 made
 in
 the


wake
 of
 Charlie
 Kirk's
 assassination.


This
 past
 week,
 Kimmel
 drew
 the
 White


House's
 anger
 again
 after
 he
 joked
 that


First
 Lady
 Melania
 Trump
 had
 the
 glow
 of


a
 quote,
 "expectant
 widow."
 Just
 days


before
 an
 alleged
 assassination
 attempt


at
 the
 White
 House
 Correspondents


Dinner.


Now,
 the
 Federal
 Communications


Commission
 says
 it's
 reviewing
 all
 of


ABC's
 broadcast
 licenses,
 not
 because
 of


the
 joke,
 but
 as
 part
 of
 what
 it
 says
 is


an
 investigation
 into
 the
 network's
 DEI


policies.


The
 move
 all
 but
 guarantees
 a
 drawn-out


legal
 battle
 that
 will
 lock
 ABC
 in
 an


expensive
 running
 war
 with
 the
 federal


government.


And
 Well,
 they're
 back.


This
 time
 about
 a
 picture
 of
 seashells


on
 a
 North
 Carolina
 beach
 a
 year
 ago.


James
 Comey,
 the
 former
 director
 of
 the


FBI
 and
 frequent
 critic
 of
 President


Trump,
 has
 been
 indicted
 again.


Trump
 has
 been
 openly
 calling
 for
 the


Justice
 Department
 to
 prosecute
 people


he
 sees
 as
 his
 political
 enemies,
 like


Comey.


In
 the
 fall,


DOJ
 lawyers
 brought
 their
 first
 case


against
 him,
 though
 a
 judge
 dismissed


it.
 In
 the
 new
 indictment,


they're
 claiming
 that
 a
 picture
 Comey


posted
 online
 was
 a
 threat
 on
 the


president's
 life.
 It
 showed
 shells


arranged
 to
 say
 8647.


86
 being
 slang
 to
 get
 rid
 of
 something,


and
 47
 being
 a
 reference
 to
 Trump,
 the


47th
 president.
 The
 indictment
 claims
 a


reasonable
 person
 would
 interpret
 the


message,
 quote,
 "as
 a
 serious
 expression


of
 intent
 to
 do
 harm."


In
 a
 video
 released
 yesterday,
 Comey


vowed
 to
 fight
 the
 charges.
 I'm
 still


innocent.
 I'm
 still
 not
 afraid.
 And
 I


still
 believe
 in
 the
 independent
 federal


judiciary,
 so
 let's
 go.


And
 finally,
 in
 Japan,
 there
 is
 a


problem.
 Like
 in
 many
 countries,
 they're


short
 on
 nursing
 home
 staff
 to
 take
 care


of
 their
 aging
 population.
 But
 there's


also
 a
 potential
 solution
 that
 involves,


hear
 me
 out
 here,
 bodybuilders.
 I


visited
 a
 few
 centers
 in
 Japan,
 and
 it


was
 a
 really
 heartwarming
 scene.
 There


were
 these
 young
 bodybuilders,
 and
 they


were
 in
 their
 tank
 tops
 showing
 off


their
 muscles
 to
 this
 crowd
 of
 elderly


patients.


And
 they
 really
 brought
 a
 lot
 of
 joy
 and


excitement
 to
 the
 centers.
 You
 know,
 the


residents
 were
 smiling,
 they
 were
 like


punching
 their
 muscles
 and
 doing


exercises
 with
 them.
 Javier
 Hernandez
 is


The
 Times'
 Tokyo
 bureau
 chief.
 He
 says
 a


number
 of
 Japanese
 companies
 are


specifically
 trying
 to
 recruit
 not
 just


bodybuilders,
 but
 also
 MMA
 fighters
 and


sumo
 wrestlers
 to
 work
 in
 senior
 care


facilities.
 They're
 offering
 them,
 in


some
 cases,
 housing,
 plus
 gym


memberships,
 and
 even
 protein


supplements.
 It's
 a
 bit
 unconventional,


but
 it
 actually
 makes
 sense.
 A
 lot
 of


these
 athletes
 are
 looking
 for
 work.


They
 have
 shorter
 careers.
 Once
 they
 get


older,
 they
 don't
 have
 the
 opportunity


to
 win
 contests
 or
 enter
 any
 kind
 of


event,
 so
 they're
 struggling
 often
 for


jobs.


But
 in
 the
 care
 industry,
 there's


actually
 a
 huge
 demand
 for
 this
 kind
 of


skill
 set.
 They
 are
 physically
 strong,


they
 have
 stamina,
 they
 can
 work
 with


people,
 and
 so
 these
 jobs,
 in
 many
 ways,


make
 sense
 for
 elite
 athletes.
 Javier


says
 the
 recruiting
 push
 is
 also
 about


helping
 to
 change
 perceptions
 around
 who


is
 a
 caregiver.
 The
 field
 is
 often


dominated
 by
 women,
 and
 Japan
 is
 no


exception
 to
 that.
 One
 staffer
 who
 has


helped
 recruit
 men
 who
 are
 MMA
 athletes


said,
 quote,
 "There's
 a
 lot
 of


testosterone
 in
 the
 room,
 but
 when
 it


comes
 to
 taking
 care
 of
 the
 elderly,
 the


fighters
 are
 very
 tender
 and


very
 caring."
</summary>
</details>