---
author: TVO Today
date: '2026-04-16'
guest: ''
layout: post.njk
source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msaLIuRCGWc
speaker: TVO Today
tags:
  - internet-impact
  - music-industry
  - digital-transformation
  - consumer-behavior
  - future-of-music
title: 互联网如何改变加拿大音乐产业：从早期探索到AI时代
summary: 本次访谈深入探讨了互联网对加拿大音乐产业的革命性影响。从早期互联网作为概念的模糊阶段，到粉丝社区（如Slonet）的兴起，再到唱片公司和独立厂牌如何适应数字浪潮。访谈回顾了CD销售的衰落、Napster和iPod的短暂辉煌，以及MP3和流媒体如何重塑了音乐消费模式。内容还触及了音乐博客（Chrome Waves, Said the Gramophone）和聚合器（Hype Machine）的关键作用，以及MySpace等平台的兴衰。最后，访谈展望了AI时代对音乐产业和艺术家品牌的潜在颠覆性影响，强调了技术快速迭代下内容的“易逝性”和“数字腐朽”等议题。
insight: ''
draft: true
series: ''
category: tech-trends
area: tech-engineering
project: []
people: []
companies_orgs: []
products_models: []
media_books: []
status: evergreen
---
### 为何撰写这本书：历史的记录与研究的起点

**金·戈登**: 为什么这段历史值得写成一本书？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Why
 was
 this
 history
 worth
 writing
 a


book
 about?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 我认为它值得写成书，因为它之前从未真正被完整地写过，至少没有以单一的叙事形式呈现。我认为这本书是典型的加拿大历史著作，因为它在很大程度上是对现有故事的“策展”。很多故事都存在于那些不再在线的网站、零散的文章，或者我在多伦多参考图书馆发现的一些资料中。这些故事零散地存在于各个地方，但从未有一个完整的故事讲述互联网如何影响了加拿大音乐。所以，当我几年前构思这本书时，这真是一个灵光乍现的时刻。我想，如果我不写，也需要有人来写，因为它是一个非常重要的故事，需要被记录下来留给后代。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: I
 think
 it
 was
 worth
 writing
 about


because
 it's
 never
 really
 been
 written


about
 before.
 Not
 all
 all
 in
 a
 singular


narrative
 at
 least.
 I
 mean,


I
 think
 this
 book
 is
 a
 quintessential


like
 Canadian
 history
 book
 because
 it's


really
 really
 putting
 it
 together
 was
 an


act
 of
 curation.
 A
 lot
 of
 these
 stories


lived
 in,
 you
 know,


websites
 that
 aren't
 online
 anymore
 or


the
 odd
 article
 here
 or
 maybe
 something


I
 found
 at,
 you
 know,
 the
 Toronto


Reference
 Library
 and
 whatnot.
 So,
 it


lived
 in
 all
 these
 bits
 and
 pieces,
 but


there
 never
 was
 like
 a
 fullsome
 story


about
 all
 the
 ways
 that
 the
 internet


impacted
 Canadian
 music.
 So,
 when
 I
 came


up
 with
 the
 book
 idea,
 you
 know,
 several


years
 ago,


it
 was
 a
 real
 light
 bulb
 moment.
 It's


like,
 if
 it's
 not
 me,
 someone
 needs
 to


write
 this,
 too,
 cuz
 I
 think
 it's
 a


really
 important
 story
 and
 something


that
 needs
 to
 be
 documented
 for
 future


generations.

</details>

**采访者**: 在研究方面，你从哪里开始？因为互联网是一个很大的地方。你的起点是什么？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: Where
 do
 you
 sort
 of
 begin


researching
 because,
 I
 mean,
 the


internet's
 a
 big
 place.
 Like,
 what's


your
 starting
 point?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 起点是我自己使用这些服务和访问这些网站的记忆。当我开始整理这本书时，我做的第一件事就是勾画出故事的不同部分。我知道**聊天室**和**论坛**是其中重要的一部分，但也意识到人们过去获取音乐的各种途径，比如**Sam the Record Man**和**HMV**。互联网对这些商店有什么影响？显然，影响是它们基本上倒闭了，因为商业和人们对实体音乐的关系发生了变化。**博客**也是故事的重要组成部分。当然，在加拿大，像**MuchMusic**和**CBC**以及所有不同的媒体组织都扮演了重要角色。书中还有很大一部分内容，是关于那些似乎已经消失在历史中的加拿大音乐初创公司。比如**PureTracks**，它被誉为加拿大的**iTunes**版本，虽然它比那更复杂。还有**Maple Music**，这是一个非常有趣的混合电子商务/唱片公司，他们也销售商品。这是一种阻止“守门人”阻碍加拿大音乐人与粉丝联系的方式。所以，这其中有很多历史。当时已有记载，但随着网站的消失、出版物的倒闭以及时间的流逝，我真的想把这些记录下来，变成一个单一的历史，重现那个关键的时期，以及互联网和更广泛的消费技术如何改变了我们与音乐的关系。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Really,
 the


starting
 point
 was
 like
 my
 memories
 of


using
 all
 of
 these
 services
 and
 visiting


all
 these
 websites.
 So,
 when
 I
 started


putting
 together
 the
 book,
 the
 very


first
 thing
 I
 did
 is
 I
 started
 to
 just


sketch
 out,
 well,
 what
 are
 all
 the


different
 parts
 of
 the
 story?
 I
 knew


things
 like
 chat
 rooms
 and
 message


boards
 were
 a
 big
 part
 of
 it,
 but
 then
 I


knew
 also
 was,
 well,
 but
 there's
 all
 the


places
 people
 used
 to
 get
 music,
 whether


it's
 like
 Sam
 the
 Record
 Man
 and
 HMV.


What
 what
 you
 know,
 what
 was
 the
 impact


on
 the
 internet
 with
 those
 sorts
 of
 like


stores?
 And
 obviously,
 the
 impact
 was


they
 basically
 went
 out
 business


because,
 you
 know,
 commerce
 and
 people's


relationship
 to
 physical
 music
 changed.


And
 yeah,
 like
 blogs
 were
 a
 big
 part
 of


the
 story.
 Obviously,
 here
 in
 Canada,


you
 know,
 MuchMusic
 and
 CBC
 and
 all
 the


different
 like
 media
 organizations
 were


a
 big
 part
 of
 it,
 but
 then
 there
 was


also
 a
 big
 part
 of
 the
 book,
 too,
 is


there
 were
 all
 these
 like
 Canadian
 music


startups


that
 really
 seem
 like
 they've
 been
 lost


to
 history.
 So,
 names
 like
 PureTracks,


which
 was
 the
 Canadian
 version
 of


iTunes.
 I
 mean,
 you
 could
 call
 it
 that.


It
 was
 more
 than
 that.
 There
 was
 stuff


like
 Maple
 Music,
 which
 was
 a
 really


interesting
 like
 hybrid
 like
 e-commerce


/
 label,
 but
 they
 did
 merchandise.
 A


real
 way
 to
 like
 really
 stop
 the


gatekeepers
 of
 keeping
 Canadian


musicians
 from
 their
 fans.
 So,
 again,


there
 was
 a
 lot
 of
 history.
 It
 was


written
 about
 at
 the
 time,
 but
 as


websites
 go
 away
 and
 publications
 go
 out


of
 business
 and
 time
 passes,
 I
 really


want
 to
 document
 this,
 you
 know,
 into
 a


singular
 history
 and
 really
 document


this
 really
 significant
 time
 again
 in


all
 the
 ways
 that,
 you
 know,
 the


internet
 and
 and
 more
 broadly
 like


consumer
 technology
 change
 our


relationship
 with
 music.

</details>

### 早期互联网与乐队的兴趣

**金·戈登**: 我们回到 90 年代初。那时候互联网上没有多少网站，1993 年大概只有 623 个。为什么那个时候的乐队会想使用互联网？这对他们有什么好处？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: I
 want
 to
 go


back
 to
 the
 early
 '90s.
 Uh,
 the


internet,
 there
 was
 not
 that
 many


websites.
 There
 was
 maybe
 623,
 I
 think,


in
 1993.


Why
 would
 a
 band
 at
 that
 time
 be


interested
 in
 using
 the
 internet?
 What


would
 be
 in
 it
 for
 them?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 回想那个时期，尤其是 90 年代大部分时间里，互联网似乎更多的是一个“概念”而不是“现实”。人们会听到它的消息，但它更多地是**学者**、**计算机俱乐部**甚至**“书呆子”**的领域。而且，即使是接入互联网也非常困难，你需要合适的电脑、调制解调器，以及某种形式的网络连接。对我来说，上高中最后几年我用过 **America Online (AOL)**，但大学期间（90年代末），我主要是在**麦克马斯特大学**的计算机实验室上网。它几乎是一个共享的实体。所以，书中有一个重要主题，就是我们对互联网的访问方式是如何发生变化的。比如，我们从每月 5 小时的 AOL 上网，变成了“无限畅享”的互联网；或者 Wi-Fi 变得普及，你可以随处携带笔记本电脑。还有一个巨大的变化，虽然几乎超出了本书的范围，那就是**智能手机**的普及。在本书描写的 1990 年到 2010 年这个时代，**iPhone** 只是出现在末期，而**黑莓手机**则处于鼎盛时期。但就在本书范围之外，智能手机和社交媒体接管了一切，那是另一个章节了。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: When
 you
 think


back
 of
 really,
 certainly
 during
 those


times
 and
 really
 throughout
 like
 a
 lot


of
 the
 1990s,
 the
 internet
 seemed
 to
 be


almost
 more


a
 concept
 than
 a
 reality.
 So,
 people


would
 hear
 about
 it,
 you
 know,
 it
 used


to
 be
 the
 more
 the
 domain
 of
 like


academics
 and,
 you
 know,
 just
 like
 the


computer
 club
 down
 the
 street
 and
 and


frankly
 like
 nerds.
 Like
 nerds
 would
 use


it.
 But
 even
 to
 get
 on
 the
 internet
 was


really
 challenging
 cuz
 you
 needed
 the


right
 type
 of
 computer,
 you
 needed
 like


a
 modem,
 you
 needed
 some
 sort
 of


internet
 connection.
 So,
 I
 know
 for
 me


like,
 sure,
 like
 we
 had
 America
 Online


for
 my
 last
 couple
 years
 of
 high
 school,


but
 through
 university
 in
 the
 late
 '90s,


I
 primarily
 used
 the
 internet
 cuz
 I'd
 go


to
 the
 computer
 lab
 at
 McMaster


University.
 It
 was
 almost
 this


shared
 entity.
 So,
 that
 that's
 a
 big


part
 of
 like
 the
 theme
 in
 the
 book,
 too,


where
 where
 were
 those
 like
 really


foundational
 elements
 of
 like
 when
 our


almost
 like
 access
 to
 the
 internet


changed.
 So,
 when
 we
 went
 from
 like
 5


hours
 through
 AOL
 to
 like
 all
 you
 can


eat
 internet
 or
 when
 Wi-Fi
 became,
 you


know,
 really
 mainstream
 where
 all
 of
 a


sudden
 you
 could
 take
 your
 laptop
 to
 any


room
 of
 the
 house.
 And
 then
 like
 the
 big


one,
 and
 this
 is
 almost
 right
 outside


the
 scope
 of
 the
 book,
 is
 really
 when


smartphones
 became
 like
 fully


mainstream.
 So,
 you
 know,
 when
 you
 think


of
 the
 era
 of
 the
 book,
 1990
 to
 2010,


the
 iPhone
 was
 around
 towards
 the
 tail


end
 and
 it
 it's
 almost
 like
 the
 heyday


of
 the
 BlackBerry.


But
 then
 like
 right
 outside
 the
 scope
 of


the
 book,
 both
 smartphones
 took
 over
 and


social
 media
 took
 over,
 and
 that's
 a


whole
 other
 chapter.

</details>

**金·戈登**: 在互联网早期，如果你是一个乐队，你就知道这是一种与世界各地的人建立联系的方式，但当时你甚至不知道这意味着什么。你会想，好吧，我会有几个丹麦的朋友，几个加州的朋友，但这有什么意义呢？但很快，这一切就加速了，它改变了一切，正如我们所见。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: So,
 when
 you
 look
 back
 to
 like
 those


early
 days
 of
 the
 internet,
 um,
 you


know,
 if
 you
 were
 a
 band,
 you
 sort
 of


knew
 that
 it
 was
 a
 way
 to
 connect
 to


people
 around
 the
 world,
 but


you
 didn't
 really
 know
 even
 what
 that


meant
 at
 this
 point.
 It's
 like,
 okay,
 so


I'm
 going
 to
 get
 a
 couple
 people
 in


Denmark
 and
 a
 couple
 people
 in


California,
 but
 what
 does
 that
 even


mean?
 Um,
 but
 very
 very
 quickly
 this


accelerated
 and
 it
 just
 it
 changed


everything
 as
 we
 saw.

</details>

**采访者**: 书中提到的一些乐队，他们当时在使用邮件列表，对吗？其中有一个叫做 Slonet。你能给我们讲讲那是什么吗？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: Well,
 some
 of
 the


bands


that
 you
 talk
 about
 in
 the
 book,
 I
 mean,


they
 were
 using
 mailing
 lists.
 Yeah.
 And


there
 was
 one
 called
 Slonet.
 You
 want
 to


tell
 us
 what
 that
 was?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 是的，绝对。书中一个重要的主题是**粉丝社区**和**爱好者**。他们早期做了很多基础工作，而 Slonet 就是一个完美的例子。Slonet 曾有几种不同的形式：它是一个邮件列表，后来我认为它变成了一个 **Yahoo! 群组**。但本质上，它是一个为**Sloan**乐队——一支 90 年代至今的伟大东海岸独立摇滚乐队——的粉丝们建立的社区。它只是一个让 Sloan 粉丝们在线交流的地方，采用经典的邮件列表格式，持续进行对话。粉丝们通常通过电子邮件接收信息，讨论典型的话题，比如“我听说他们正在录制新专辑”或者“我正在找那张 7 英寸的唱片”，或者“嘿，我看到……”它也是一个发现与 Sloan 乐队相关的其他乐队的好途径，比如东海岸的艺术家，像是来自纽芬兰的**Hardship Post**，或者来自新不伦瑞克的**Eric's Trip**。所以，这确实是一个深入、沉浸式地讨论你最喜欢的乐队的机会。据我所知，Sloan 的成员并没有直接参与 Slonet，但很快他们就开始提供一些小小的支持。比如，邀请粉丝去他们的唱片公司办公室，或者给他们一些小零碎的信息。这一切都是由粉丝社区建立的。但值得称赞的是，他们的管理团队和乐队周围的人很快就意识到：“我们应该利用这一点，因为这些人很关心，而且他们也是我们的好支持者。” 同样，当时上网的人不多，但那些在网上的人，他们是乐队的“大使”。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Yeah,
 absolutely.


I
 mean,
 one
 of
 the
 big
 themes
 in
 the


book
 is
 it's
 really
 the
 fan
 communities


and
 the
 enthusiasts.
 They
 they
 did
 a
 lot


of
 the
 legwork
 early
 on
 and
 Slonet's


perfect
 example
 of
 that.
 So,
 what
 Slonet


was
 was
 it
 was
 it
 actually
 took
 a
 few


different
 forms.
 It
 was
 an
 emailing
 list


and
 then
 it
 was
 it
 I
 believe
 it
 changed


into
 like
 a
 Yahoo
 group
 at
 some
 point,


but
 really
 it
 was
 a
 fan-built
 community


for
 fans
 of
 Sloan,
 you
 know,
 the
 great


East
 Coast
 indie
 rock
 sensation
 of
 the


'90s
 until
 this
 present
 day.
 It
 was
 just


a
 place
 like
 Sloan
 fans
 could
 connect


online.
 And,
 you
 know,
 it
 the
 classic


mailing
 list
 format.
 It
 was
 just
 it
 was


an
 ongoing
 dialogue.
 You
 know,
 some


people
 were
 generally
 receiving
 by
 email


and,
 you
 know,
 it's
 typical
 stuff
 fans


talk
 about.
 It's
 like,
 oh,
 I
 heard
 they


were
 recording
 a
 new
 album
 or
 I'm


looking
 for
 this
 7-in
 or
 hey,
 I
 saw,
 you


know,
 it
 was
 a
 great
 way
 to
 to
 also


discover
 like
 other
 bands
 sort
 of


adjacent
 to
 Sloan
 like
 other
 East
 Coast


artists
 like
 the
 people
 talk
 about
 like


Hardship
 Post
 out
 of
 Newfoundland
 or
 you


got
 Eric's
 Trip
 from
 New
 Brunswick.
 So,


it
 was
 really
 an
 opportunity
 to
 have


these
 like
 deep
 immersive
 conversations


about
 your
 favorite
 band
 and
 um,
 I
 know


with
 Slonet,
 I
 the
 guys
 from
 Sloan
 were


not
 directly
 involved,
 but
 really


quickly
 they
 started
 to
 give
 little
 bits


of
 access.
 You
 know,
 they'd
 invite
 them


down
 to
 their
 label
 office
 or,
 you
 know,


there'd
 be
 other
 little
 things
 that


they'd
 sort
 of
 slip
 them
 little
 nuggets


and
 whatnot.
 And
 again,
 it
 was
 all
 built


by
 the
 fan
 communities,
 but
 to
 their


credit
 like
 their
 management
 and
 the


people
 around
 the
 band


very
 quickly
 saw,
 you
 know,
 we
 should
 we


should
 tap
 into
 this
 cuz
 these
 people


care
 and
 these
 are
 like
 good
 advocates


for
 us,
 too.
 And
 again,
 yeah,
 there


wasn't
 a
 lot
 of
 people
 online,
 but
 the


people
 who
 were
 there
 were,
 you
 know,


they
 they
 were
 like
 ambassadors
 for
 the


band.

</details>

**采访者**: 我想问一下，他们能追踪像唱片销量增长或人气上升这样的数据，是因为这些邮件列表吗？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: >> Could
 they
 I
 guess
 track
 like
 record


sales
 like
 increasing
 or
 like
 their


popularity
 on
 the
 on
 the
 rise
 because
 of


of
 this
 these
 mailing
 sites?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 我不知道，感觉那是在后来才出现的。在 2000 年代，随着**电子商务平台**的发展，这开始变得可能。营销方面的一个问题是：如何追踪？你有一个人在论坛上讨论，有人在 Facebook 上谈论你，或者有人在 TikTok 上发帖。这是否会转化为更多的专辑销量？我不知道。但是，有一些指标，至少在某种“虚幻”的意义上，可以作为人气的衡量标准。如今，我们看到**流媒体播放量**等类似的东西，更不用说**网站流量**和其他指标了。但在当时，我感觉你只能凭直觉去判断。你会觉得，“嗯，好像很多人关注”，“似乎有些事情正在发生”。我不确定具体是什么，但我们会继续下去，因为我觉得“这有点意思”。我认为这反映了很多互联网早期的状况。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: >> I
 I
 I
 I
 don't
 know
 about
 that
 cuz
 that


came
 I
 feel
 like
 that
 came
 like
 much


much
 later.
 I
 mean,
 even,
 you
 know,
 into


the
 2000s
 when
 like
 e-commerce
 platforms


it
 was
 one
 of
 the
 things
 about
 like
 the


early
 internet
 and
 it's
 even
 kind
 of
 a


thing
 more
 broadly
 about
 marketing
 is


how
 do
 you
 track,
 okay,
 so
 you've
 got,


you
 know,
 this
 person
 on
 message
 board,


you
 have
 this
 person
 talking
 about
 you


on
 Facebook
 or
 this
 person
 did
 a
 TikTok.


Does
 that
 translate
 to
 more
 album
 sales?


I
 don't
 know,
 but,
 you
 know,
 there
 are


certain
 metrics
 that
 at
 least
 in
 like
 in


ethereal
 sense,
 you
 know,
 can
 be
 gauges


of,
 you
 know,
 popularity.
 And,
 you
 know,


today
 we
 see
 versions
 of
 this
 sort
 of


thing
 with
 like
 stream
 counts
 and


whatnot,
 to
 say
 nothing
 of,
 um,


you
 know,
 like
 web
 traffic
 and
 other


like
 metrics,
 too.
 But
 like
 back
 then,


I
 feel
 like
 you
 would
 sort
 of
 just
 look


at
 it
 and
 then
 it's
 like
 a
 gut
 feeling.


It's
 like,


seems
 like
 a
 lot
 of
 people,
 you
 know,
 it


seems
 like
 there's
 something
 happening


here.
 I'm
 not
 exactly
 sure
 what
 it
 was,


but
 let's
 let's
 keep
 going
 with
 this
 cuz


this
 I'm
 not
 sure
 what
 it
 is,
 but
 it's


something.
 And
 I
 feel
 like
 that
 that's
 a


story
 of
 like
 a
 lot
 of
 internet.

</details>

### 唱片公司的角色与数字时代的挑战

**采访者**: 你提到了唱片公司。它们具体做了什么？它们是如何利用互联网的？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: You
 mentioned
 record
 labels.
 Like,
 what
 what


what
 did
 they
 do
 exactly?
 How
 did
 they


sort
 of
 take
 advantage
 of
 this?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 是的。在加拿大，一家真正的先驱是来自温哥华的**Network Records**。据我所知，他们早在 1993 年就拥有了一个 **BBS（电子公告板）**，一个在线消息板，可以说是非常原始的。我通过**Internet Archive**找到并挖掘出了他们最早的 BBS 消息。这几乎是一种“宗旨宣言”。他们写着：“我们是 Network Records，来自温哥华。我们的一些艺人包括 **Skinny Puppy** 和 **Sarah McLachlan**。”他们只是在宣告：“我们拥抱科技，我们要尝试新事物。” 然后会提供一些关于他们艺人的信息，比如 Skinny Puppy 要去巡演了，Sarah McLachlan 有了新专辑。他们说：“嘿，我们这里有**The Grapes of Wrath**乐队，他们刚改名叫 **Ginger**，并且很快会出一张 CD-ROM。”他们只是发布一些信息片段。这是一家独立唱片公司。我们也看到，**主流唱片公司**也加入了进来。像 **Sony** 和 **Universal** 都有自己的经验。90 年代的主流唱片公司也很有意思，因为当时也经历了一个**大规模整合期**。我采访过的一位 Pete Watson，他曾是 **MCA Records** 的早期网络专家，在那里他负责将公司接入互联网，然后公司合并或成为了 Universal 的一部分。所以，他们合并到了 Universal，并做了同样的事情。与此同时，他还在运营所有这些互联网项目。那是一个非常有趣的时期，行业内部发生了巨大的企业变革。同时，有了一个叫做“互联网”的东西，然后两年后，出现了“**Napster**”，再后来，有了“**iPod**”。你觉得互联网是个大事件？你还没见过真正的风暴呢。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Yeah.


Yeah,
 well,
 I
 mean,
 you
 know,
 here
 in


Canada
 like
 one
 of
 the
 real
 frontrunners


was
 a
 Network
 Records
 out
 of
 Vancouver.


Um,
 I
 know
 that
 they
 had
 like
 a
 BBS,


like
 a
 online
 like
 message
 board,
 like
 a


real
 primordial
 one
 as
 early
 as
 1993.
 I


was
 actually
 able
 to
 dig
 up
 their
 very


first
 BBS
 message,


um,
 via
 the
 Internet
 Archive.
 And
 it
 was


it
 was
 almost
 like
 a
 statement
 of


purpose.
 They're
 like,
 you
 know,
 we're


Network
 Records,
 we're
 out
 of
 Vancouver.


Some
 of
 our
 artists
 are
 Skinny
 Puppy
 and


Sarah
 McLachlan
 and,
 you
 know,
 we're


kind
 of
 they're
 just
 saying
 we're
 into


technology.
 We're
 going
 to
 try
 some


stuff.


Um,
 here's
 a
 bit
 of
 information
 about


our
 artist.
 Skinny
 Puppy's
 going
 on


tour.
 Sarah
 McLachlan
 has
 this
 new
 album


out.
 Hey,
 we're
 going
 to,
 you
 know,
 with


the
 Grapes
 of
 Wrath
 have
 just,
 you
 know,


changed
 their
 name
 to
 Ginger
 and
 they're


going
 to
 have
 a
 CD-ROM
 coming
 out.
 And


they're
 just
 putting
 out
 like
 bits
 of


information.
 So,
 I
 mean,
 that's
 kind
 of


at
 the
 indie
 label,
 but
 we
 did
 see
 as


well
 like
 the
 major
 labels
 they
 they
 did


jump
 on
 this.
 And
 again,
 they
 did
 their


own
 experience
 like
 Sony
 and
 Universal.


It
 was
 interesting
 for
 the
 major
 labels


of
 the
 1990s,
 too,
 cuz
 there
 was
 also
 a


period
 of
 like
 a
 lot
 of
 consolidation.


Too,
 um,
 someone
 I
 spoke
 to
 for
 the


book,
 Pete
 Watson,
 he
 was
 like
 a
 real


um,
 an
 early
 like
 web
 guy
 for
 MCA


Records
 and
 he
 was
 there
 getting
 them


onto
 the
 internet
 and
 then
 it
 merged
 or


it
 became
 part
 of
 Universal.
 So,
 they


went
 over
 to
 Universal
 and
 did
 the
 exact


same
 thing.
 And
 meanwhile,
 he's
 running


all
 these
 internet
 experiences.


So,
 like
 a
 a
 really
 like
 interesting


time,
 too,
 where
 there
 was
 so
 much


change
 happening
 in
 the
 industry
 almost


corporately.
 Meanwhile,
 there's
 this


thing
 called
 internet
 and
 then
 2
 years


down
 the
 line,
 there's
 this
 thing
 called


Napster
 and
 then
 a
 bit
 later,
 there's


this
 thing
 called
 the
 iPod.
 Yeah.
 It's


like,
 you
 thought
 the
 internet
 was
 a
 big


deal.


You
 haven't
 seen
 anything
 yet.

</details>

**采访者**: 变化的速度令人着迷，因为我确实是 Napster 的早期使用者之一，然后接着是 iTunes。我们不再购买 CD，然后又开始流媒体。这变化的速度怎么能这么快？人们是如何适应这些变化的？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: Yeah,
 the


pace
 of
 change
 is
 really
 fascinating
 cuz


I
 mean,
 I
 mean,
 I
 was
 one
 of
 those
 early


adopters
 of
 Napster
 and
 then
 and
 then
 it


became
 and
 then
 there
 was
 iTunes
 and


then
 uh,
 yeah,
 it's
 like
 you're
 no


longer
 buying
 CDs
 anymore
 and
 then


you're
 streaming.
 It's
 like,
 how
 do
 you


even
 like


like
 I
 mean,
 how
 do
 you
 go
 how
 do
 how


does
 it
 go
 like
 so
 fast?
 Like
 what
 how


do
 you
 I
 guess
 keep
 track
 of
 like
 how


And
 how
 did
 these
 people
 who
 are
 working


on
 in
 the
 in
 this
 field,
 how
 did
 they


like
 adapt
 to
 those
 changes
 like
 so
 so


fast?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 一些人适应了，一些人没有。想想零售商，比如**Sam the Record Man**，我们最著名的加拿大本土唱片店，它们没有撑过去。尽管他们尽力了，比如他们推出了 Sam CD，在线销售 CD，甚至雇佣记者为他们的网站撰稿。他们尝试了很多，但最终还是失败了。人们与实体音乐的整个关系确实改变了，尤其是在 Napster 出现之后。你可以在 Sam the Record Man、HMV 或 Music World 花钱买一张 12 首歌的 CD，或者你可以去 Napster，基本上花 0 美元就能拥有所有音乐。对很多乐迷来说，这是一个简单的决定。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: >> Well,
 I
 mean,
 that's
 the
 thing.
 Some


people
 did
 adapt
 to
 the
 changes,
 some


people
 did
 not.
 So,
 I
 mean,
 you
 know,
 we


go
 back
 to
 the
 retailers.


Um,
 you
 know,
 Sam
 the
 Record
 Man


probably
 our
 most
 famous,
 you
 know,


Canadian
 born
 and
 bred
 record
 store.


They
 They
 didn't
 survive
 it.
 I
 mean,


they
 tried
 it
 to
 their
 credit.
 They


tried
 a
 lot
 of
 things.
 You
 know,
 they


had
 a
 Sam
 CD.
 They
 were
 selling
 CDs


online.


They
 were
 even
 hiring
 like
 journalists


to
 write
 for
 their
 website,
 too.
 So,


they
 gave
 it
 a
 shot,
 but
 I
 mean,
 you


know,
 people's
 entire
 relationship
 with


physical
 music
 changed
 certainly
 when


Napster
 came
 in
 and
 all
 of
 a
 sudden,


well,
 you
 could
 go
 to
 Sam
 the
 Record
 Man


or
 HMV
 or
 Music
 World
 and
 buy
 a
 CD


um
 you
 know,
 12
 tracks
 or
 you
 can
 go
 to


Napster
 and


for
 cheaper,
 basically
 $0,
 you
 can
 have


all
 the
 music.

</details>

**采访者**: 是的。你知道，对很多乐迷来说，这真是一个令人难过的简单决定。但他们后来意识到，Napster 和 iPod、iTunes 带来的巨大转变，实际上持续的时间都很短。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: >> Yeah.
 You
 know,
 for
 a
 lot
 of
 music
 fans


um
 sadly
 it
 was
 an
 easy
 decision,
 but


one
 of
 the
 things
 they
 realized
 is
 then


it
 really
 like
 hit
 home
 writing
 the
 book


is


you
 have
 these
 like
 really
 huge
 shifts


caused
 by
 Napster
 and
 the
 iPod
 and


iTunes
 and
 whatnot,
 but
 they
 were
 all


like
 really
 short-lived
 at
 the
 same


time.

</details>

**金·戈登**: 嗯。我写这本书之前，从未真正思考过 iPod 的生命周期有多短。它的全盛时期可能只有 6 到 7 年。而且它也经历了不同的变化，有 iPod、Nano、iTouch，各种不同类型的 iPod。但确实，它没有持续太久。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Mhm.
 Um
 I
 don't
 think
 I'd
 really


thought
 about
 how
 short-lived
 the
 iPod


was
 until
 I
 started
 writing
 this.
 It
 was


like


its
 heyday
 was
 maybe
 6
 or
 7
 years
 for


like
 a
 device.
 I
 mean,
 it
 it's
 And
 went


through
 different
 changes,
 too,
 right?
 I


mean,
 there
 was
 the
 iPod,
 there
 was
 the


Nano,
 there
 was
 the
 iTouch.
 Like
 it
 was


all
 these
 different
 like
 types
 of
 iPod.


But
 yeah,
 you're
 right.
 It
 wasn't
 that

</details>

**采访者**: 是的，它很快就被淘汰了。我认为自从第一代 iPhone 问世后，情况就改变了。因为突然之间，你有了另一个设备。它不仅在外观和功能上像 iPod，同时也是你的手机。从那时起，iPod 和 MP3 播放器的时代就宣告结束了。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: >> That's
 right.
 Yeah,
 like
 it
 didn't
 I
 I


think
 really,
 you
 know,
 that
 changed
 as


soon
 as
 like
 the
 first
 iPhone
 came
 out


cuz
 all
 of
 a
 sudden
 you've
 got
 this


other
 device.
 Not
 only
 does
 it
 kind
 of


look
 like
 and
 function
 like
 an
 iPod,


it's
 also
 your
 phone,
 too.
 And
 from


there,
 I
 mean,
 you
 know,
 that
 was
 that


was
 the
 signal
 of
 like
 the
 beginning
 of


the
 end
 for
 iPods
 and
 MP3
 players,
 too.

</details>

**金·戈登**: 我知道微软推出了 **Zune**，你可能还记得，到了最后，它就像一个**U盘**，上面有一个耳机插孔，就是一个 MP3 播放器。而且，人们的习惯，或者至少是他们与音乐的联系，也发生了变化，对吧？因为我认为曾有一种强烈的“**所有权**”感。你想要拥有歌曲，首先是在专辑形式上，然后是下载。但现在，只是**流媒体**，你不再需要真正拥有这首歌了。我觉得这种变化也很有趣。你怎么看？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: I
 mean,
 I
 know
 Microsoft
 came
 out
 with


the
 Zune
 and
 you
 know,
 you
 you
 might


recall
 at
 the
 end
 you
 would
 just
 have


like
 almost
 like
 a
 thumb
 drive
 and
 it


would
 have
 like
 a
 little
 port
 for
 head


phones
 and


it's
 an
 MP3
 player.


But
 and
 also
 I
 guess
 people's
 habits
 and


or
 at
 least
 their
 connection
 to
 music


kind
 of
 changed,
 too,
 right?
 Because
 I


think
 there
 was
 like
 a
 real
 sense
 of


like
 ownership.
 You
 wanted
 to
 own
 the


songs
 like
 first
 on
 an
 album
 form
 and


then
 like
 downloading
 it,
 but
 now
 it's


just
 streaming
 and
 you
 don't
 have
 to


actually
 own
 the
 song
 anymore.
 I
 I


thought
 I
 find
 that
 change
 to
 be


interesting
 as
 well.
 Like
 what
 what
 do


you
 think
 of
 that?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 是的，绝对。我们可以称之为 **MP3 时代**。同样，这是 **iTunes** 和 **MP3 博客**以及博客聚合器，比如**Hype Machine**的时代，还有**Pitchfork Media**这样的影响力媒体。这是一个有趣的中间地带，因为 MP3 在技术上仍然是你拥有的东西。你无法像 CD 那样握在手里，但它们存储在你的硬盘上。你可以在 iTunes 上购买它们，或者从 Napster 上试听一些（我想时效性已经过了，你承认你用过）。或者，MP3 博客的一个很棒之处在于，其中一些（比如**Chrome Waves**和**Said the Gramophone**）是加拿大制造的。你会得到几首 MP3，它们都存储在你的硬盘上，然后你在 iTunes 里进行整理。所以，仍然有一种所有权的感觉，因为我为它付了钱，或者我付出了努力去获取它。而现在，很多人根本不拥有任何音乐。即使他们曾经有 CD 和唱片、磁带，现在可能都扔掉了，因为一切都在 Spotify 上了。那么，这又说明了什么关于我们与音乐的关系呢？对我来说，作为一个经历过所有这些变化的人，感觉**音乐变得更加短暂易逝**了。这不仅仅是音乐，也包括摄影。我们过去会冲洗照片，现在每个人都有成千上万的照片。虽然这在某种程度上很棒，但当你拥有成千上万张照片时，它们都变得有些空洞、没有意义了。音乐也是如此，它如此短暂易逝。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Yeah,
 absolutely.
 And


I
 mean,
 call
 it
 the
 MP3
 era.
 And
 again,


this
 is
 a
 time
 of
 iTunes
 and
 MP3
 blogs


and
 blog
 aggregators
 like


you
 know,
 Hype
 Machine
 and
 then
 the


influence
 machine
 of
 uh
 you
 know,


Pitchfork
 Media
 and
 whatnot.


It
 was
 an
 interesting
 middle
 ground


because
 MP3s
 still
 technically
 were


something
 you
 owned.
 You
 They
 couldn't


hold
 in
 your
 hand
 like
 you
 would
 a
 a
 CD,


but
 they
 lived
 on
 your
 hard
 drive.
 You


know,
 you
 would
 buy
 them
 on
 iTunes
 or


you
 would
 perhaps
 sample
 a
 few
 from
 uh


Napster.
 I
 think
 statute
 of
 limitations


is
 off
 on
 that.
 You
 admitted
 that
 you


used
 it,
 too.
 Or,
 you
 know,
 it
 was
 one


of
 the
 great
 things
 about
 MP3
 blogs
 and


some
 of
 them
 were
 like
 made
 in
 Canada,


too,
 like
 Chrome
 Waves
 and
 Said
 the


Gramophone.
 You
 know,
 you
 get
 a
 few
 MP3s


here,
 but
 they
 all
 live
 on
 your
 hard


drive
 and
 then,
 you
 know,
 you're


curating
 in
 iTunes.
 So,
 it's
 still


there's
 still
 a
 sense
 of
 ownership
 cuz


either
 I
 paid
 for
 this
 or


I
 made
 the
 effort
 to
 get
 it
 perhaps


through
 some
 other
 means.


And
 now
 like


a
 lot
 of
 people
 don't
 own
 any
 music,
 you


know,
 even
 if
 they
 had
 CDs
 and
 records


and
 cassettes,
 perhaps
 they've
 like


gotten
 rid
 of
 those
 cuz
 it's
 all
 on


Spotify
 now.
 So,


you
 know,
 what
 does
 that
 say
 for
 our


relationship
 with
 music?
 I
 mean,


to
 me
 and
 again,
 as
 someone
 who's
 been,


you
 know,
 been
 through
 like
 all
 these


different
 changes,
 it
 to
 me
 it
 seems
 a


lot
 more
 fleeting.
 Mhm.


And
 that's
 not
 that's
 not
 just
 music.


That's
 also
 like
 photography,
 for


example.
 You
 know,
 we
 used
 to
 print
 out


photos
 and
 now,
 you
 know,
 everybody's


got


thousands
 and
 thousands
 and
 thousands
 of


photos.
 So,
 while
 that's
 amazing
 on
 some


in
 some
 ways,
 you
 know,
 when
 otherwise


they're
 when
 you
 have
 a
 thousand
 like


they're
 all
 kind
 of
 meaningless.
 And
 and


that's
 kind
 of
 like
 one
 of
 the
 worries


about
 music,
 too,
 is
 the
 fact
 that
 it's


so
 fleeting


um
 and
 it
 can
 all
 just
 like
 go
 away


like,
 you
 know,
 this
 idea
 of
 like
 uh


tech
 rot
 and
 like
 digital
 decay
 is
 like


a
 big
 theme
 in
 the
 book,
 too.
 And
 even


though
 this,
 you
 know,
 a
 platform
 like


Spotify
 seems
 like,


you
 know,
 untouchable
 um


I
 personally,
 you
 know,
 if
 it
 went
 away


in
 10
 years
 or
 5
 years,
 it
 wouldn't


shock
 me.
 I
 mean,
 a
 lot
 of
 things


change.
 We've
 seen
 this.
 I
 mean,
 pretty


much
 everything
 I
 wrote
 in
 the
 book
 is


gone.

</details>

**采访者**: 但是黑胶唱片正在回归。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: So,
 But
 vinyl's
 coming
 back.

</details>

**金·戈登**: 嗯，是的，但对很多人来说，它更像是一种**收藏品**。我们甚至在很多**复古技术**上看到了这种趋势。有些人说：“哦，黑莓手机又要回来了”，或者“翻盖手机”。但我认为这更多的是一种象征，或者说是一种“虚假的图腾”，而不是真正有实用性的东西，因为它无法与互联网的运作方式兼容。它有美学价值，也有怀旧价值，但科技变革的步伐从未停止。书中内容，即使听起来不像是很久以前的事情，但考虑到自本书写成以来发生了多少变化，很多技术感觉就像是一个世纪前的东西了。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Well,
 that
 I
 mean,
 that's
 yeah,
 but


that's
 yeah,
 that's
 like
 but
 that's


almost
 more
 like
 a
 for
 a
 lot
 of
 people


like
 a
 collectible.
 Yeah.
 Um
 we're


seeing
 this
 even
 with
 like
 a
 lot
 of


retro
 technology.
 There's
 been
 a
 lot


where
 you
 know,
 oh
 well,
 the


BlackBerry's
 coming
 back
 or
 the
 flip


phone,
 but


I
 think
 it's
 almost
 more
 like
 a
 symbol


or
 like
 a
 almost
 like
 a
 false
 icon
 of


something
 rather
 than
 something
 that's


like
 utility
 cuz
 it's
 just
 it
 doesn't


like
 function
 with,
 you
 know,
 the
 way


the
 internet
 works.
 It's,
 you
 know,
 I


think
 it's
 there's
 an
 aesthetic
 value


and
 there's
 a
 nostalgia
 value,
 but
 you


know,
 the
 pace
 of
 technological
 change


just
 does
 not
 stop.
 And
 like
 a
 lot
 of


the
 technology,
 even
 though
 this
 doesn't


seem
 that
 long
 ago,
 a
 lot
 of
 what's
 in


the
 book.
 I
 mean,
 this
 could
 have
 been


for
 all
 intents
 and
 purposes
 like


century
 ago
 given
 how
 much
 has
 changed


even
 since
 I
 wrote
 the
 book.

</details>

### 音乐博客与 Hype Machine 的时代

**采访者**: 你提到了 Chrome Waves。这是一个音乐博客，对吧？在 2000 年代中期，如果你是一个年轻人，想表达自己的声音，它似乎是这样的途径。我自己也和朋友一起办过一个叫 The Dashing Fellows 的博客，它现在已经不存在了。你能聊聊 Chrome Waves 是什么，以及那个时期音乐博客有多重要吗？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: Uh
 you
 mentioned
 Chrome
 Waves.
 This
 was


a
 music
 blog,
 right?


>> Yes.
 Um


that
 seemed
 like
 the
 way
 if
 you
 were
 a


young
 guy,
 young
 person
 in
 the


mid-aughts
 to
 get
 your
 voice
 out
 there.


I
 had
 one
 with
 some
 friends,
 The
 Dashing


Fellows.
 I'm
 going
 to
 shout
 them
 out.


Sure,
 yeah.
 It
 it
 now
 no
 longer
 exists.


Hey,
 shoot
 your
 shot.


>> Yeah,
 exactly.
 But
 uh
 what
 was
 Chrome


Waves
 and
 what
 and
 how
 important
 were


music
 blogs
 to
 that
 period?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 音乐博客非常重要。Chrome Waves 是由**Frank Yang**运营的，基本上是一个**一人工作室**。他是一个音乐爱好者，喜欢写作、看演出、摄影。他把这一切都放到了网上。我和 Frank 聊过，我问他，博客什么时候能与传统媒体达到同等地位？什么时候他开始收到音乐评论稿，或者获得演出采访证、在摄影区拍照的机会？这种情况发生得相当快。他讲述的故事，以及其他一些博主，他们会被邀请参加各种宣传活动，或者 Frank 会去芝加哥参加 Lollapalooza，或者去奥斯汀参加 South by Southwest。很快，不仅是他，还有一代又一代的音乐博主，比如 **Brooklyn Vegan**、**Pitchfork Media**、**Gorilla vs. Bear**，数不胜数。但 Chrome Waves 和**Sean Michaels**运营的 **Said the Gramophone** 的一个伟大之处在于，它们虽然植根于加拿大，却在全球范围内享有盛誉。**博客聚合器**的影响也不容小觑。我用过一个叫**Hype Machine**的。这就像是 RSS 订阅，又有点像**Twitter 时间线**，它能提供一个快照，展示最新的博客更新。Hype Machine 专注于 MP3，提供源源不断的免费下载 MP3。这些就像是新声音的小样本，你可以尝试一下。当时人们还在购买 CD，但又不像以前那样了，同时 iTunes 也已经存在。所以，我认为“博客年”这个时期很有趣，它发生在大约**社交媒体**全面接管之前。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Music
 blogs


were
 hugely
 important.
 So,
 Chrome
 Waves


was
 run
 by
 a
 guy
 named
 Frank
 Yang.
 It


was
 generally
 a
 one-person
 operation.
 It


was
 all
 Frank
 and
 he
 was,
 you
 know,
 he


was
 just
 a
 music
 fan
 who
 enjoyed


writing.
 He
 enjoyed
 going
 to
 shows.
 He


enjoyed
 photography.
 He's
 like,


I'm
 going
 to
 put
 this
 all
 online.
 And


and
 speaking
 to
 Frank
 for
 the
 book,


um
 one
 of
 the
 first
 things
 I
 found


really
 interesting
 talking
 to
 him
 at


what
 point
 did
 like
 blogs


go
 become
 on
 like
 an
 even
 footing
 with,


you
 know,
 traditional
 media
 outlets.
 So,


like
 at
 what
 point
 did
 he
 start
 getting


sent
 music
 to
 review
 or
 at
 what
 point


did
 he
 start
 getting
 access
 to,
 you


know,
 press
 passes
 or,
 you
 know,


something
 in
 the
 photo
 pit
 so
 he
 could


take
 photos
 and
 whatnot.
 And
 it
 did


happen


pretty
 quickly
 where
 all
 of
 a
 sudden,


you
 know,
 he
 told
 stories
 and
 and
 some


of
 the
 other
 bloggers,
 you
 know,
 they're


getting
 flown
 on
 junkets
 or,
 you
 know,


Frank
 was
 down
 at
 like
 Lollapalooza
 in


Chicago
 or
 he'd
 go
 down
 to
 South
 by


Southwest
 in
 Austin.


And
 very
 quickly,
 not
 just
 him,
 but
 a


generation
 of
 like
 all
 these
 different


music
 blogs.
 So,
 like
 the
 Brooklyn


Vegan,
 Pitchfork
 Media,


um
 Gorilla
 vs.
 Bear,
 they
 were
 there


there
 was
 a
 million
 of
 them.
 But
 one
 of


the
 great
 things
 about
 Chrome
 Waves
 and


also
 Said
 the
 Gramophone
 run
 by
 Sean


Michaels


um
 is
 that
 they
 were,
 you
 know,
 they


were
 based
 in
 Canada,
 but
 these
 were


these
 were
 like
 globally
 famous.
 Um
 it


it
 really
 can't
 be
 undersold
 also
 that


the
 impact
 of
 uh
 blog
 aggregators
 is


well.
 I
 know
 the
 one
 that
 I
 used
 was


something
 called
 the
 Hype
 Machine.


You
 know,
 this
 was
 a
 version
 of
 it's


it's
 a
 big
 it's
 another
 big
 theme
 of
 the


book.
 Everything's
 a
 version
 of


everything
 else.
 So,
 you
 know,
 blog


aggregators
 they
 were
 kind
 of
 like
 an


RSS
 feed,
 but
 they
 were
 kind
 of
 almost


like
 a
 Twitter
 timeline
 and
 they
 would


be
 able
 to,
 you
 know,


here's
 like
 a
 just
 a
 snapshot.
 Here's


the
 latest
 blogs
 that
 have
 updated.
 And


and
 one
 of
 the
 great
 things
 about
 Hype


Machine,
 it
 was
 strictly
 focused
 on


MP3s,
 too.
 So,
 it
 would
 be
 the
 steady


stream
 of
 just,
 you
 know,
 free


downloadable
 MP3s.
 It
 would
 just
 be
 like


these
 little
 samples
 of
 all
 these
 new
 um


you
 know,
 all
 these
 new
 sounds.
 You


could
 just
 like
 have
 a
 bit
 of
 piece,
 you


know,
 a


give
 it
 a
 little
 try.
 And
 it
 was
 it
 was


also
 the
 time
 people
 still
 were
 kind
 of


buying
 CDs,
 but
 also
 not
 really,
 but


also
 like
 iTunes
 was
 around.
 So,


I
 think
 one
 of
 the
 interesting
 things


about,
 you
 know,
 that
 time
 in
 what
 we


call
 like
 the
 blog
 year
 is
 starting


really
 when
 Chrome
 Waves


um
 was
 really
 popping.
 It
 was
 also
 like


right
 before
 social
 media
 took
 over.
 So,


yes,
 Facebook
 and
 YouTube
 and
 Twitter,


they
 were
 around,
 but
 they
 were
 really


just
 figuring
 themselves
 out.
 Really


like
 the
 powerhouse
 at
 that
 point
 was


MySpace.

</details>

**采访者**: Frank 决定停止运营，对吗？他不想再做了？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: Um
 you
 talk
 about,
 you
 know,


another
 uh
 technology
 that
 had
 a
 very


short
 shelf
 life,
 but
 huge
 impact
 while


it
 was
 around.
 MySpace
 was
 huge
 and


really
 predicted
 what
 came
 later
 with,


you
 know,
 Facebook
 and
 TikTok
 and


Snapchat
 and
 all
 these
 other
 platforms.


He
 decided
 Frank
 decided
 to
 just
 pull


the
 plug,
 right?
 Like
 he
 just
 he
 didn't


want
 to
 do
 it
 anymore?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 是的，是的。大概在 2013 年，他觉得“世界已经改变了”。他认为，一方面，人们会成长，兴趣会转移。另一方面，**网站流量**发生了巨大变化。突然之间，所有人都涌入了 Facebook，那些原本可能在邮件列表、博客评论区或 Hype Machine 上进行的对话，都转移到了 Facebook 等平台。所以，他决定去做别的事情。从历史角度看，2013 年这个时间点似乎很对。他可能那时候就该收尾了。因为，互联网已经不同了。我从 2015 年开始在**Twitter**工作，我简直不敢相信这离本书的范围有多远，因为我看到了一些行为，从 Twitter 内部来看，人们与名人、粉丝社区和对话的关系，与我在 AOL 聊天室、Yahoo! 群组，甚至 Friendster 和 MySpace 上看到的非常相似。至今，互联网上的一切都像是某种事物的“版本”。但是，正如我所说，短短几年内可以发生巨大的变化，那些看似牢不可破的平台，可能一夜之间就消失了。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Yeah,
 yeah.
 Like


2013,
 he's
 like,
 you
 know,
 the
 the
 world


has
 changed.
 Um
 you
 know,
 he
 He
 said


partially
 it's
 just
 people
 grow
 up,
 they


get
 out
 of
 their
 interests.


Um
 but
 you
 know,
 there's
 also
 just
 like


web
 track
 traffic.
 All
 of
 a
 sudden


everyone's
 on
 Facebook
 and
 people
 those


conversations
 that
 might
 have
 been


happening,
 you
 know,
 on
 mailing
 lists
 or


in
 blog
 comment
 sections
 or,
 you
 know,


that
 traffic
 that
 might
 have
 come
 from


the
 Hype
 Machine,
 it's
 all
 shifted
 over


to
 Facebook
 and
 other
 platforms.
 Um
 so,


he's
 just
 like,
 I'm
 going
 to


go
 do
 something
 else
 for
 a
 while.
 And


it,
 you
 know,


it
 it's
 historically
 2013,
 that
 seems


about
 right.
 You
 know,
 he
 probably


should
 have
 wrapped
 it
 up
 then
 and
 cuz


again,
 the
 internet
 was


different.
 And,
 you
 know,
 I
 worked
 at


Twitter
 from
 starting
 in
 2015
 and
 I
 just


can't
 believe
 it's
 so
 far
 outside
 the


scope
 of
 the
 book
 cuz
 I
 was
 telling
 them


like
 the
 bit
 a
 lot
 of
 behaviors
 you
 saw


from
 the
 inside
 of
 Twitter
 in
 terms
 of


people's
 relationship
 with
 celebrity
 and


fan
 communities
 and
 conversation,
 it's


so
 similar
 to
 what
 I
 saw
 in
 like
 AOL


chat
 rooms
 or
 Yahoo
 Groups
 um
 or
 even


like
 Friendster
 and,
 you
 know,
 MySpace.


Everything
 is
 kind
 of
 a
 version
 of


everything
 else
 on
 the
 internet
 to
 this


day.


Um
 but
 again,
 like
 so
 much
 can
 change
 in


a
 few
 short
 years
 and
 the
 platforms
 that


seem,
 you
 know,
 untouchable
 one
 day
 are


gone
 the
 next.

</details>

**金·戈登**: 书中提到了很多音乐方面的内容，比如很多那时期的**VJ（视频音乐节目主持人）**，现在他们基本上都转向了 **YouTube**，就像是他们迁移过去了。我认为这很有趣，他们是怎么做到的。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: It
 actually
 yeah,
 I
 mean,


something
 I
 picked
 up
 in
 the
 book
 was


like
 and
 we
 haven't
 talked
 about
 much


music,
 but
 I
 mean,
 a
 lot
 of
 those
 kind


of
 personalities,
 the
 VJs
 we
 see
 it
 like


you
 mentioned
 in
 the
 book,
 they
 they


kind
 of
 are
 now
 YouTube.
 They
 just
 kind


of
 migrated.
 Like
 that
 I
 thought
 that


was
 really
 interesting
 like
 that
 kind
 of


how
 that
 happened.

</details>

**金·戈登**: 是的。**MuchMusic**是一个有趣的例子，因为整个**Chum 帝国**，无论是 MuchMusic、The New Music，还是 CityTV 或 Fashion Television，都是**Moses Znaimer**旗下的产业。他们在媒体变革方面非常超前。他们也做了很多互联网上的事情，但同时，他们也属于**传统媒体**。他们拥有大量基础设施，有演播室，有很多员工，包括行政人员。而这就是与互联网相关的所有事情的一个挑战。好了，它在这里。你拥有“旧世界”的所有基础设施。但与此同时，有人在他的卧室或电脑房里，可以通过一台机器，在互联网上做同样的事情，而你则需要整个办公楼。最终，这变成了一个**规模经济**的问题。这就是为什么我们看到亚马逊、谷歌、Facebook 等公司崛起。所以，它的改变并不令人意外，关键在于哪些公司能够适应，哪些不能。有很多公司尝试过，但最终未能适应，因为他们过于沉迷于那个旧世界。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Yeah,
 yeah.
 And


MuchMusic
 is
 an
 interesting
 one
 because,


you
 know,
 the
 whole
 Chum
 empire,
 whether


it's
 MuchMusic
 or
 The
 New
 Music
 or


CityTV
 or
 Fashion
 Television,
 like
 take


your
 pick,
 all
 the
 Moses
 Znaimer
 um


properties,


they
 were
 so
 ahead
 of
 the
 curve
 in
 terms


of,
 you
 know,
 how
 media
 was
 changing,


but


and
 to
 their
 credit,
 they
 did
 a
 lot
 of


things
 on
 the
 internet,
 but
 at
 the
 same


time,
 they
 were
 part
 of
 the
 legacy


media.
 They
 had
 a
 lot
 of
 infrastructure,


you
 know,
 they
 had
 they
 had
 studios,


they
 had
 big,
 you
 know,
 they
 had
 a
 lot


of
 staff,
 they
 had
 administrative
 staff


and
 that's
 one
 of
 the
 challenges
 with


like
 all
 things
 to
 do
 with
 the
 internet.


So,
 okay,
 it's
 here.
 You've
 got
 all
 this


infrastructure
 of
 like,
 you
 know,
 the


world
 before.
 Meanwhile,
 there's
 someone


in
 their
 bedroom
 or
 someone
 in
 their


computer
 room,
 they
 can
 kind
 of
 do
 the


same
 thing
 on
 the
 internet
 through
 one


machine
 to
 what
 you
 can
 do
 with
 this


entire
 office
 building.


And
 at
 some
 point,
 you
 know,
 it
 just


becomes
 like
 an
 economy
 of
 scale
 and


that's
 why,
 you
 know,
 we
 saw
 the
 ascent


of
 all
 these
 other
 companies,
 Amazon
 and


Google
 and
 Facebook
 and
 take
 your
 pick,


too.
 So,
 like
 it's
 it's
 not
 surprising


it
 changed.
 It's
 just
 a
 matter
 of
 which


kind
 of
 companies
 could
 adapt
 and
 which


couldn't
 and
 there
 there
 were
 a
 lot


you
 know,
 they
 they
 tried
 but
 they
 could


not
 adapt
 cuz
 there
 was
 there
 was
 they


were
 they
 were
 too
 much
 stuck
 in
 that


old
 world.

</details>

### AI 时代与音乐的未来

**采访者**: 我们需要结束对话了，但我们现在身处**人工智能 (AI)** 的新时代，它正在颠覆互联网、音乐产业等等。我不知道你是否会做预测，但你对未来走向有什么看法吗？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: We
 have
 to
 wrap
 up
 our
 conversation,
 but


I
 guess
 as
 we're,
 you
 know,
 we're
 in


this
 new
 era
 now
 of
 artificial


intelligence,
 AI,
 and
 it's
 sort
 of


disrupting
 the


internet,
 music
 industry,
 what
 have
 you.


I
 don't
 know
 if
 you
 make
 predictions,


but
 do
 you
 have
 an
 a
 sense
 of
 as
 to


where
 this
 is
 going?

</details>

**金·戈登**: 天哪，我不知道。如果我知道，我可能会有另一份职业。我真的不认为有人知道它会走向何方。我认为我们或许能在细节和某些角落做出预测，但我不知道。有一件事我想说的是，一个**一切都将是完全自动化名人**的未来，不会让我感到惊讶。我们已经有了动画，我们一直有“假乐队”，比如**The Archies**，或者像 **Daft Punk** 或 **Gorillaz**，不一而足。这些都有先例。我认为还有其他一些线索，不一定与技术直接相关，但它们预示着我们与艺术家关系将如何改变。很多乐队在出售他们的**音乐版权**。不仅是老牌艺术家，还有像**Justin Bieber**和**Imagine Dragons**这样的年轻艺术家。同时，我也认为，一些老牌乐队从未像现在这样受欢迎。我总是想起**Queen**乐队。Queen 似乎从未如此受欢迎，而且他们已经有 30 年没有活跃了，因为他们有了传记电影、音乐剧和商品等等。所以，我认为“**艺术家即品牌**”将真正改变格局。然后，对于新艺术家来说，未来会是**人类与机器**争夺排行榜榜首吗？我认为我们会看到某种形式的出现。我不知道具体会是什么样子，也不知道什么时候会发生，但我确实认为不久的将来，某种形式的现实就会出现。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: I
 God,
 I
 I
 I
 would
 probably
 have
 a


different
 career
 if
 I
 did.
 I
 I
 don't
 I


don't
 honestly,
 I
 don't
 think
 anybody


knows
 where
 it's
 going.
 I
 think,
 you


know,
 we
 can
 probably
 predict
 like
 in


the
 margins
 and
 some
 corners,
 but
 I


don't
 know.
 Like
 one
 thing
 I
 would
 say


is,
 you
 know,


a
 future
 where
 everything
 is
 like
 a


completely
 automated
 form
 of
 celebrity


would
 not
 surprise
 me
 at
 all.
 Like,
 you


know,
 we've
 had
 animation
 for
 a
 long


time,
 you
 know,
 we've
 had


we've
 had
 like
 fake
 bands
 for
 forever,


you
 know,
 whether
 it's
 like
 The
 Archies


or
 even,
 you
 know,
 someone
 like
 Daft


Punk
 or,
 you
 know,
 Gorillaz,
 take
 your


pick.
 Mhm.
 There
 is
 some
 precedents
 for


this
 and
 I
 think
 also


there's
 other
 like
 little
 clues
 that


aren't
 necessarily
 about
 technology,
 but


I
 think
 speak
 to
 how
 our
 relationship


with
 artists
 is
 going
 to
 change.
 Like
 a


lot
 of
 bands
 selling
 off
 their
 back


catalogs.
 And
 not
 just
 like
 legacy


artists,
 like
 younger
 artists
 like


Justin
 Bieber
 and
 Imagine
 Dragons.


I
 also
 think,
 you
 know,
 there's
 but
 then


there's
 also
 these
 legacy
 bands
 have


never
 been
 more
 popular.
 I
 always
 think


of
 Queen.
 Like
 Queen
 seems
 like
 they've


never
 been
 more
 popular
 and
 have
 not


been
 active
 for
 30
 years
 because
 well,


but
 they've
 had
 biopics
 and
 they've
 had


musicals
 and
 they've
 had
 merchandise
 and


whatnot.


So,
 I
 think
 like
 artists
 as
 brands
 is


really
 going
 to
 change
 and
 then
 in
 terms


of
 new
 artists,
 is
 it
 going
 to
 be
 the


humans
 versus
 the
 machines
 to
 see
 who


can
 get
 to
 the
 top
 of
 the
 charts?
 I


think
 we
 will
 see
 a
 version
 of
 that.
 I


don't
 know
 exactly
 what
 it
 will
 look


like
 and
 when
 it
 will
 happen,
 but
 I
 do


think
 there's
 going
 to
 be
 a
 future
 soon


um
 where
 a
 version
 of
 that
 reality
 is


here.

</details>

**金·戈登**: 我觉得我们可能已经处在其中了。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: I
 feel
 like
 we
 may
 already
 be


here.

</details>

**采访者**: 这是一个很好的结束点。金·戈登，非常感谢你来到节目。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Interviewer**: That's
 a
 good
 place
 to
 leave
 it.


Kim
 Gordon,
 thank
 you
 so
 much
 for


joining
 us
 on
 the
 rundown.

</details>

**金·戈登**: 谢谢。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>

**Kim Gordon**: Thank
 you.

</details>