---
area: "society-thinking"
category: culture
companies_orgs: []
date: '2025-06-07'
draft: true
guest: ''
insight: ''
layout: post.njk
media_books:
- Yu Shu
- Chuan Xi Lu
- Song of Poverty and Pleasure
- The Cultural Revolution is Good
- The Courage to Be Disliked
people:
- Wang Yangming
- Plato
- Thomas Aquinas
- Ichiro Kishimi
products_models: []
project: []
series: ''
source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hERfp45iVAI
speaker: Anthony看世界
status: evergreen
summary: 本文深入探讨了王阳明心学的本质及其在中国文化发展中的地位。作者认为，阳明心学是唐宋以来文化危机背景下，士大夫阶层为应对心理困境而发展出的一种“精神胜利法”，它通过将天理内化于心，实现自我麻痹和心理慰藉。文章对比了阳明心学与程朱理学的异同，并将其与西方哲学中信仰与理性的发展路径进行对照，指出阳明心学表面上的自由实则是一种内在的桎梏，甚至与文革时期的某些意识形态逻辑存在隐秘的连接。
tags:
- cultural-revolution
- neo-confucianism
- philosophy
- self
- spiritual-victory
title: 王阳明心学：精神胜利法与文化回光返照的深层解析
---
### 导言：阳明心学的本质与文化危机

大家好，我是Anthony，欢迎来到我的频道。
今天我们继续上一期视频的内容，来聊聊**阳明心学**（Yangming's philosophy of mind: 中国明代思想家王阳明创立的儒家学派，强调“心即理”和“知行合一”）的本质。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Hello everyone, I am Anthony
Welcome to my channel
Today we continue with the content of the previous video
Let’s talk about the essence of Yangming’s philosophy of mind</p>
</details>

在之前的视频中，我们详细分析了唐宋时期中国文化所面临的深层危机，以及哲学家们是如何应对这场危机的。
具体来说，他们通过**格物致知**（seeking knowledge through investigation of things: 儒家思想中通过探究事物来获取知识和理解天理的方法），通过对自然景色的审美理解和感知，在主观体验中实现自我与天道的合一。
因此，哲学家们表面上赞美天理的无所不包和天地万物创造的和谐之美，但其真正的目的，是通过这种审美体验来忘却自我，否定自我，从而忘却个人的苦难与耻辱，以一种微妙的方式适应实际的皇权体制。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">In the previous video
We have analyzed in detail the Chinese culture during the Tang and Song dynasties.
The deep crisis we face
And how did the philosophers respond to this crisis?
Specifically
It is through the means of seeking knowledge through investigation of things.
Through the aesthetic understanding and perception of natural scenery
In subjective experience, the self and the Way of Heaven become one
Therefore, philosophers
On the surface, I am praising the omnipresence of Heaven's principles.
And the harmonious beauty of the creation of all things by heaven and earth
But the real purpose
Is to forget oneself through this aesthetic experience
Denial of self
Thus forgetting personal suffering and shame
Able to adapt to the actual imperial system in a subtle way</p>
</details>

正是因为如此，**程朱理学**（Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism: 宋代程颢、程颐和朱熹等人创立的儒家学派，强调“理”是宇宙万物的本源和法则）的麻痹是必然的。
因为它一方面强调天理无所不包、无处不在，但它感知世界的方式却是僵化、封闭和单一的，没有发展出任何理解世界的新工具。
结果，它只能让人一遍又一遍地重复圣人的话，闭目塞听。
在这种状态下，从程朱理学到阳明心学，可以说是一种必然。
与前者相比，阳明心学似乎更激进，更充满幻想和神秘色彩，但它实际上只是中国文化走向终结的一次**回光返照**（flashback: 比喻事物在消亡前短暂的兴盛或活跃）。
那么，本期视频就让我们来揭示这个过程。
视频开始前，我想说，如果你有任何想与我讨论和咨询的话题，可以通过我的邮箱联系我预约。
那么，让我们回到今天的话题。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">It is precisely because of this
The paralysis of Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism is inevitable
Because on the one hand it emphasizes that the principles of heaven are all-encompassing,
Ubiquitous
But the way it perceives the world
But it is rigid, closed and single
It has not developed any new
Tools for understanding the world
turn out
It can only make people repeat the words of the saints over and over again
Close your eyes and ears
In this state
From Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism to Yangming's School of Mind
It can be said to be inevitable
Compared with the former
Yangming's philosophy of mind seems more radical
More full of fantasy and mysterious colors
But it actually
It is just that Chinese culture is heading towards its end.
A flashback
Then this video
Let’s uncover the process.
Before the video starts, let me say
If you have anything you want to discuss with me
And consulting topics
You can contact my email to make an appointment
So let's get back to today's topic. </p>
</details>

### 程朱理学的困境：僵化与自我麻痹

为什么说理学注定会走向麻痹呢？
这需要从理学的基本方法，也就是**格物致知**说起。
在理学看来，格物致知就是自觉地将自己融入到**天理**（principles of Heaven: 儒家思想中指宇宙万物的根本法则和道德规范）之中，在这个无所不在的宇宙中无限放大自己的内心。
但是，这实际上需要相对较高的审美能力。
理学要求个体在普通的自然景色中，也要感受到自然法则的运行。
这种感受不是基于理性的推演和分析，而是一种极其微妙、敏感而深刻的审美体验。
例如，看到“一痕春水一缕烟”，我们必须领悟到宇宙的生化流转、天道的寂然运行，忘却自我的存在。
看着草木的荣枯、日月星辰的运转，你必须领悟到万事万物变化之中不变的本质奥秘。
这是一种情感、一种感知，一种完全沉浸在宇宙秩序中的深层审美。
宋代理学家的许多诗歌，都有一种特殊的宁静、淡泊、内敛和虚无的气质。
他们的诗歌更接近道家和佛家的精神。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Why do we say that science is bound to become paralyzed?
This requires the basic method of science
That is to say, the study of things leads to knowledge
In the view of science
Studying Things to Gain Knowledge
It is to consciously integrate oneself into the principles of heaven.
In this omnipresent universe
Infinitely enlarge your heart
but
This actually requires a relatively high level of aesthetic ability.
Physics requires individuals to be in the ordinary natural scenery
We must also feel the operation of the law of nature
This feeling
It is not based on rational deduction and analysis
It is an extremely subtle, sensitive and profound aesthetic experience.
for example
Seeing "a trace of spring water and a piece of smoke"
We must realize the biochemical flow of the universe
The Silent Movement of Heaven
Forgetting the existence of self
Watching the vegetation flourish and wither, the sun and moon move
You have to realize that everything changes.
The secret of the unchanging essence
This is a kind of emotion, perception
A deep aesthetic of complete immersion in the cosmic order
Many poems by Neo-Confucianists of the Song Dynasty
There is a special kind of tranquility, indifference,
Introverted and nihilistic temperament
Their poems
Closer to the spirit of Taoism and Buddhism</p>
</details>

这里我只是想多说几句。
我小时候背诵了许多宋词，直到现在，我仍然觉得许多宋词的意境非常优美。
而且我从小阅读这些内容，并没有让我变得更加虚无或消极。
这实际上取决于每个人所处的环境，有着直接的关系。
不同的时代、不同的文化语境，会让人们对同一部作品产生完全不同的体验和解读。
所以，没有人需要因为我在视频中批评某些东西，就否定自己的情感。
正如我们在这期视频中反复提到的，真正重要的是每个人都能阅读和解读，唤起自己独特的体验。
如果你能从一首诗、一个古老的哲学概念中，联想到一些关于自己的深层感受，那么即使你的感受与作者的初衷相去甚远，也完全没有关系。
例如，你可以用西方哲学的视角，重新定义“格物致知”这个概念。
这种个性化的解读，仍然值得尊重。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">That's it.
I just want to say a few more words
I memorized many Song poems when I was a child.
Until now
I think the artistic conception of many Song poems is very beautiful.
And I read these contents since I was a child
It didn't make me more nihilistic or negative.
This actually depends on the environment that each person is in.
There is a direct relationship
Different eras
Different cultural contexts
Will make people the same work
There may be completely different experiences and interpretations
so
No one needs
Because I criticize something in my video
Just deny your own emotions.
As we mentioned repeatedly in this video
What really matters
Can everyone read and interpret
Evoke your own unique experience
If you can learn from a poem,
In an ancient philosophical concept
Linked to some deep feelings about myself
Then even if your feelings and
The author's original intention is far from
It doesn't matter at all.
For example, you can use the perspective of Western philosophy
Redefining the concept of "studying things to gain knowledge"
This personalized interpretation and
Still worthy of respect</p>
</details>

让我们回到今天的话题。
我们说，理学虽然看起来相当优美和富有诗意，但它更多的是一种让人忘却自我、维持精神认同的心理按摩方式。
这种方法实际上代价非常高昂。
在党争频繁、政治腐败的环境中，要求一个人还能从普通的自然景色中，领悟到稳定、秩序、和谐的自然天理，这是一件非常困难的事情。
更重要的是，这种理学理论本身存在着巨大的矛盾。
理学要求一个人消除自己的人欲，融入到宇宙之中。
这看起来是一种巨大的自我膨胀，也是一种自我消解。
因为这个过程要消除所有个体的欲望和特殊性，让自己的心成为一面完全透明的镜子，只能映照天理的光辉。
然而，人的个性，或者说自私，无论如何都不可能被真正消除。
即使个体主观上想消除自己的自私，但这种消除自私的欲望，仍然是一种自私。
结果就是，个体越是努力消除自私，反而会产生更多的自私。
于是人们进入了一个无休止的内耗循环。
他发现自己总是不够肮脏，不够纯洁。
因此，需要时刻在灵魂深处进行革命。
那么，这个人就会感到持续的焦虑、羞耻和自责。
这与文革时期的意识形态是完全相通的。
由于理学本身的不一致性，儒家学者在天道面前，仍然无法避免那种深层的恐惧。
他们并没有主观上融入到天理之中，真正超越了普通人的所有苦难。
相反，他们陷入了更深的自我贬低和自我否定。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Let's get back to our topic.
We say
Although science seems quite beautiful and poetic
But it is more of a way to make people forget themselves
Psychological massage to maintain spiritual identity
This method is actually very costly.
In an environment of frequent party struggles and political decay
It is required that a person can also learn from ordinary natural scenery.
Realize the natural principles of stability, order, and harmony
It's a very difficult thing
More importantly
This theory of physics
There is a huge contradiction in itself
Neo-Confucianism requires a person to eliminate his own human desires
Integrate into the universe
This seems like a huge self-aggrandizement.
It's a kind of self-dissolution
Because this process
To eliminate all individual desires and particularities
Let your heart become a completely transparent mirror
Can only reflect the glory of heaven
However
Human personality
Or selfishness
It is impossible to be truly eliminated no matter what.
Even if individuals subjectively want to eliminate their own selfishness
But this desire to eliminate selfishness
It is still a kind of selfishness
The result is that the more individuals try to eliminate selfishness,
Instead, it will produce more selfishness
So people enter an endless cycle of internal friction.
He found himself always dirty
It's not pure enough
Therefore, we need to always make revolution in the depths of our souls
then
The person will feel constant anxiety,
Shame and self-blame
This is different from the ideology of the Cultural Revolution.
It is completely connected
Due to the inconsistency of the science itself
Therefore, Confucian scholars in front of the way of heaven
Still can't avoid that deep fear
They did not subjectively integrate into the principles of heaven.
It truly transcends all the sufferings of ordinary people.
Instead they fell into deeper self-deprecation.
and self-denial</p>
</details>

### 宋明士大夫的自我贬低与精神慰藉

宋代名臣**司马光**（Sima Guang: 北宋政治家、史学家，主持编纂《资治通鉴》）曾是许多哲学家的榜样。
然而，他自称“迂叟”，一个迂腐平庸之人。
他将迂腐和平庸视为自己理想的人格。
在他的文集《语说》中，他曾说：
有人说我的话很平庸，没有什么新意，我承认。
但古今的天地有什么不同呢？
既然天地日月都没有改变，万物的本性也没有改变，那么我们为什么需要改变自己的心态呢？
孝、仁、忠这些东西自古以来就在谈论，直到现在，我只怕自己不能平庸。
平庸有什么不好呢？
因此，学者应该以顺从的态度侍奉上天，与人交往时要谨慎。
上天是万物的父亲，儿子不能违抗父亲的命令。
君主的命令臣子不能违抗。
如果上天让你陷入困境，你却要改变；或者上天让你愚蠢，你却要变得聪明，就会受到惩罚。
实际上，像司马光这样自我贬低的学者还有很多。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">Sima Guang, a famous official in the Song Dynasty
He was once a role model for many philosophers.
However, he calls himself a "old man"
A pedantic and mediocre person
He regards being pedantic and mediocre as his ideal personality
In his collection of essays, Yu Shu
He once said:
Some people say my words are very mediocre
Nothing new
I admit it
But is there any difference between the heaven and earth in ancient times and today?
Since the heaven and earth, the sun and the moon, have not changed
The nature of all things does not change.
So why do we need to change our mindset?
Filial piety, benevolence, loyalty
These things have been talked about since ancient times.
Until now, I am only afraid that I cannot be mediocre.
What's wrong with mediocrity?
Therefore, scholars should serve God with a submissive attitude.
Be cautious when interacting with others
God is the father of all things
The son cannot disobey the father's orders
The king's orders cannot be disobeyed by the subjects
If God puts you in trouble
You have to change
Or God made you stupid
But you have to become wise
will be punished
Actually
A self-deprecating scholar like Sima Guang
And many more</p>
</details>

例如，南宋理学家**张载**（Zhang Zai: 北宋理学家，关学创始人）曾说：“扩之则天地之化，草木之长，亦吾心之性也。”
这似乎是说我的心可以扩展到世间万物。
然而，张载却将自己的家命名为“困斋”，自称“困斋老人”。
他认为无论是顺境还是逆境，都是外在之物，天理在我的心中。
所以无论外部环境如何，都不要忘记天理。
君子身处困境，不怨天尤人。
所以处境越是艰难，越能磨砺自己的品德。
宋代学者频繁用“拙”、“困”、“迂”来形容自己。
平庸、卑微、笨拙、困苦是美好的，甚至认为这是一种至高无上的智慧。
这并不是一种正常的心态，它只是反映了士大夫阶层在多舛的官场中，维持心理稳定变得越来越困难。
于是，他们崇拜困难、苦难和平庸，从辱骂和屈辱中找到一种道德上的优越感。
这暂时压制了内心的犹豫和怀疑，但不可能带来突破、探索和反思。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">For example
Zhang Zai, a Neo-Confucianist in the Southern Song Dynasty, once said:
"Expanding to the transformation of heaven and earth, the growth of plants and trees,
It is also the nature of my heart.”
It seems that my heart can expand to everything in the world
However, Zhang Zai named his home "Kun Zhai"
Calling himself a "trapped old man"
He argued that no matter good times or bad times
They are all external things
The law of nature is in my heart
So no matter what the external circumstances are
Don't forget the principles of heaven
A gentleman is always in trouble.
Don't blame others
So the more difficult the situation is
The more you hone your moral character
Scholars in the Song Dynasty frequently used "clumsy", "difficult" and "mediocre" to describe themselves.
Mediocrity, humbleness, clumsiness, and hardship are beautiful
Even think that this is a kind of supreme wisdom
This is not a normal mentality.
It just reflects the scholar-official class
In the ill-fated officialdom
It is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain psychological stability
So I worship difficulties, suffering and mediocrity
From abuse and humiliation
Finding a sense of moral superiority
This temporarily suppressed the inner hesitation and doubt
It is unlikely to lead to breakthroughs, exploration and reflection</p>
</details>

到了明代，由于皇权专制恶性膨胀，达到了一个新的高峰，儒家士大夫的处境更加卑微和危险。
因此，他们的自我贬低和人格危机进一步加深。
我们来看明代大儒**陈献章**（Chen Xianzhang: 明代思想家，岭南学派创始人）的一首诗：
“一痕春水一缕烟，天然世界。
七尺之躯非我物，两间寒暑任推迁。”
可以看到，连水和空气这样普通而无形的东西，都能让儒家士大夫否定自己的人格。
甚至连自己七尺之躯的存在，都必须否定。
这反映了对自我的更彻底的剥离和消解。
“两间寒暑任推迁”的意思是，无论世间天道如何变幻莫测，我都任由它变化，完全顺从，不去试图改变。
所以叫做**任推迁**（Ren Tui Qian: 顺应自然变化，不加干预）。
陈献章曾赞扬他的弟子说：“忘己之功最大，无欲之功最极。”
这种对忘我的反复强调，当然也反映了明代诗人的精神危机比前代更强。
只有更深地融入自然，才能避免痛苦。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">In the Ming Dynasty
Due to the vicious expansion of imperial autocracy
Reached a new peak
The situation of Confucian scholars is even more humble and dangerous
thus
Their self-deprecation and personality crisis
It further deepens
Let's look at a poem by Chen Xianzhang, a great scholar in the Ming Dynasty:
A trace of spring water and a wisp of smoke,
The natural world
The seven-foot body is not mine
Two rooms, cold and hot, can be moved
You can see
Even water and air
Something so ordinary and invisible
can make Confucian scholars deny their own personality
Even the existence of one's own seven-foot body
All must be denied
This reflects
A more thorough stripping and dissolution of the self
"Two cold and hot seasons are allowed to move" means
No matter how unpredictable the nature of the world is
I let it change
Complete obedience
Don't try to change
So it is called "Ren Tui Qian"
Chen Xianzhang once praised his disciples
"The greatest achievement is to forget oneself, the ultimate achievement is to have no desires"
This repeated emphasis on self-forgetfulness
Of course, it also reflects the spiritual crisis of Ming Dynasty poets
Stronger than the previous generation
Only by integrating more deeply into nature
To avoid pain</p>
</details>

但更典型的是**李渔**（Li Yu: 明末清初文学家、戏曲家）的《贫乐歌》。
我们来看看李渔是如何回应生活的屈辱和荒凉的。
他说：穷人享受的秘诀没有别的，就是退一步想。
我觉得自己很穷，世上还有比我更穷的人。
我觉得自己的处境很低，世上还有比我处境更低的人。
我觉得妻儿是我的负担，世上还有许多孤苦无依、求而不得的人。
李渔还举了一个例子：
有一个人睡在外面，被蚊子咬了很多，但他看起来却很开心。
别人不理解，他说他曾被诬陷下狱，每天手脚都被锁住，不能动弹。
那时被蚊子咬得比现在更多。
与那时相比，现在的生活是多么幸福啊。
所以，如果一个人学会了这样看问题，那么“苦海”就会变成“乐土”。
李渔的这种思维方式，实际上是中国社会一种常见的精神胜利法。
通过不断地比较和降级，改变客观标准，从而坚定地维持一种“我赢了”的态度。
这种自我安慰的思维，比程朱理学虚幻了无数倍。
当理学消解自我时，至少还需要一个宏大的外部秩序，也就是天理、宇宙、自然，作为自我消解的场域。
他们仍然试图将个体生命融入到一个看似恒常而普遍的法则之中。
李渔连这一点都放弃了，而是直接转向了自我催眠、自我慰藉的状态。
而这一点，与**王阳明**（Wang Yangming: 中国明代思想家、哲学家，心学集大成者）的心学是相似的。
虽然阳明心学看起来更精致、更巧妙。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">But the more typical one is Li Yu's "Song of Poverty and Pleasure"
Let’s see how Li Yu responded
The humiliation and desolation of life
He said:
There is no secret to the way poor people enjoy themselves
Just take a step back
I thought I was poor
There are people in the world who are poorer than me.
I think my situation is low.
There are people in the world who are lower than me.
I think my wife and children are a burden.
There are still many lonely people in the world who cannot get what they want.
Li Yu also gave an example
There was a man sleeping outside
Lots of mosquito bites
But he looks pretty happy.
Others don't understand
He said he was framed.
Imprisonment
Locked hands and feet every day
Cannot move
There were more mosquitoes biting me then than now.
Compared with that time
Life is so happy now.
so
If a person learns to look at things this way
Then the "sea of ​​suffering" will become "a land of happiness"
Li Yu's way of thinking
actually
It is a common method of spiritual victory in Chinese society.
By constantly comparing and downgrading,
Changing objective standards
So as to firmly maintain a
The "I won" attitude
This kind of self-comforting thinking
It is countless times more illusory than Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism.
When Logic Dissolves the Self
At least a grand external order is needed
That is to say, the principles of heaven, the universe, and nature
As a Field of Dissolution of the Self
They are still trying to put individual life
Integrate into a seemingly constant and universal law
Li Yu gave up even this point
Instead, they turned directly to self-hypnosis,
The state of self-soothing
And this point
It is similar to Wang Yangming's philosophy of mind.
Although Yangming's philosophy of mind seems more refined and ingenious</p>
</details>

### 王阳明心学的激进转向：心即理

我们说程朱理学强调格物致知，通过对外在自然秩序的关照和理解，才能实现个体心灵与自然天理的和谐。
这毕竟还是一个粗糙的外部标准：天理在万物之中，人需要在万物中反思和内省。
到了王阳明这里，他直接将所有外在的自然秩序、客观世界的基础，收回到人的内心之中。
这看起来极大地促进了人的思维主动性和自主性。
我们来看王阳明的两句名言。
他说：“人是天地万物之心；心是天地万物之主。心即天，言心则天地万物皆备于我。”
王阳明直接将人的内心，提升到了宇宙的中心。
他没有说人心是天地的产物，而是认为世间万物都只是我心的展开。
这是一种非常夸张的自我膨胀。
例如，王阳明说：“学者只一静字，便可医治百病。静之境，大如**六合**（Liuhe: 指天地四方，即整个宇宙），内空寂然，一无所有。问他时，应有尽有。”
也就是说，只要你静下心来，你的心就如同宇宙般浩瀚。
所有的真理、所有的真相，都在你的心中，无需外求。
与宋代理学的宁静、恬淡气质相比，阳明心学充满了幻想、激烈，甚至是一种战斗性的表述。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</p>
<p class="english-text">We say that Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism emphasizes the pursuit of knowledge through the investigation of things.
Through the care and understanding of the external natural order
Only in this way can we achieve harmony between the individual mind and the principles of nature.
After all, this is still a rough external standard
Heavenly principles are in all things
People need to reflect and introspect in all things
When it comes to Wang Yangming
He directly put all external natural order
The basis of the objective world
Take it back into people’s hearts
This looks like
Greatly promotes people's initiative in thinking
and autonomy
Let’s look at two famous quotes from Wang Yangming.
He said:
“Man is the heart of heaven, earth, and all things;
The heart is the master of heaven, earth and all things.
The heart is heaven, and when we talk about the heart, all things in heaven and earth are contained in it."
Wang Yangming directly put people's hearts
Ascend to the center of the universe
He didn't say that the human heart is a product of heaven.
But think
Everything in the world is just the unfolding of my heart
This is a very exaggerated self-aggrandizement.
For example, Wang Yangming said:
"A scholar can cure all diseases with just one word: tranquility."
The state of stillness,
As big as Liuhe
It's empty and quiet inside.
No one thing
When I asked him, he had everything he needed.
That is to say, as long as you calm down
Your heart is as vast as the universe.
All truth, all truth
It's all in your heart
No need to seek outside
Compared with the tranquility and tranquility of Song Dynasty Neo-Confucianism,
Compared with the quiet and indifferent temperament
Yangming's philosophy of mind is full of fantasy, intense
Even a combative statement</p>
</details>

下面这段话更是神奇：
在《传习录》中，王阳明说：我的精神，是天地鬼神的主宰。
天若没有我的明觉，谁来仰望它的高深？
地若没有我的智慧，谁来俯察它的幽深？
鬼神若没有我的智慧灵明，谁能辨别它的吉凶？
天地鬼神万物离了我的灵明，就没有天地鬼神万物。
我的灵明离了天地鬼神万物，也没有我的智慧。
这段话的意思非常直白，就是说天地的深奥，都取决于我的心去理解和赋予意义。
没有“我的灵明”，天地鬼神就失去了意义，甚至不再存在。
在中国文化这种以克制、谦卑、宁静为主导的文化中，王阳明这种充满激情、兴奋和炽热的表达，显得如此不寻常。
这也是阳明心学能够在当代被重新发现的重要原因。
因为表面上，王阳明说所有的真理都包含在你的心中。
这很容易让我们联想到**柏拉图**（Plato: 古希腊哲学家）的“回忆说”。
当他反复强调人的智慧无所不在时，这也让我们联想到“我思故我在”，或者“人给自然立法”等西方思想。
因此，很多人自然而然地认为，阳明心学代表着一种自我觉醒、个人独立的浪潮。
甚至认为这反映了明代存在着一些资本主义社会的萌芽。
但这实际上是一个巨大的误解。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">The following passage is even more magical:
In the quotations
Wang Yangming said: My spiritual
He is the ruler of heaven, earth, ghosts and gods
The sky is not as bright as mine.
Who will look up to him?
The earth has no wisdom from me,
Who will look down upon his depths?
Ghosts and gods do not have my wisdom and intelligence.
Who can tell whether it is good or bad luck?
The gods, ghosts, and everything in the world have left my spiritual wisdom
There would be no heaven, earth, ghosts, gods, and all things.
My spiritual enlightenment is away from the heaven, earth, ghosts, gods, and all things
There is no my wisdom
The meaning of this passage is very straightforward.
It means the depth of heaven and earth
It's all up to my mind to understand and give meaning,
No “My Spiritual Wisdom”
The gods and ghosts of heaven and earth have lost their meaning
It doesn't even exist anymore.
In Chinese culture, which is dominated by self-control, humility and tranquility,
Wang Yangming's passionate, excited and fervent expression
Looks so unusual
This is also why Yangming's philosophy of mind can be used in the contemporary world.
The important reason for the rediscovery
Because on the surface
Wang Yangming said that all truths are contained in your heart
This easily reminds us of Plato's theory of recollection.
When he repeatedly emphasized that human intelligence is omnipresent
This also reminds us of "I think, therefore I am"
Or Western ideas like "man-made laws for nature"
Therefore, many people naturally think that
Yangming's philosophy of mind represents a kind of self-awakening
The wave of personal independence
Even think
This reflects the Ming Dynasty
There are some seeds of a capitalist society.
But this is actually a huge misunderstanding</p>
</details>

### 表面自由与内在桎梏：阳明心学的真实意涵

事实上，许多理论表面上都使用一些非常自由和觉醒的概念，但当我们深入到它的概念体系中时，你会发现这实际上是一种虚假的自由。
所以我们不要被表面的言辞所迷惑，关键在于它如何证明这种自由。
那么王阳明是如何证明所有真理都在人心中的呢？
在《传习录》中，他与弟子的对话是这样的：
弟子问他：如果追求至善，只问自己的心，那么恐怕无法穷尽世间的真理。
王阳明不同意，他说：心就是理。
世间有事物在我们的心之外，难道是心之外的理吗？
也就是说，心与理是完全统一的，世间没有独立于心之外的事物和道理。
弟子又问：“孝于父，忠于君，信于朋友，仁于百姓，这其中仍然有许多道理需要不断领悟。”
王阳明说：这种说法太误导人了。
如果一个人不能忠、孝、仁、义，难道还要从别人那里寻求这个道理吗？
事实上，所有的道理都在你的心中。
这颗心不被私欲蒙蔽，你就能达到天理。
无需从外部增添任何知识和经验。
当一个人拥有这样一颗完全符合天理和天道的心时，侍奉父母就是孝，侍奉君主就是忠。
由此可见，王阳明的核心思想，其实与宋代理学“存天理，灭人欲”没有本质区别。
表面上，王阳明强调你只需要回到自己的本心去做事，你就会成功。
这颗心自然拥有所有的真理，无需向外验证、寻求。
然而，这颗心所包含的内容、**良知**（innate moral knowledge/conscience: 王阳明心学中指人与生俱来的道德自觉和判断力）的内容，以及成功的标准，并不是一个人自己发现的。
它早已被圣人和君王所确定，那就是忠、孝、仁、义。
你只能发挥自己的主动性和主观性，去实现这些价值观的自由。
但绝没有反驳、怀疑或解构它们的自由。
然而，这种只能实现既定价值观的自由，还能算是自由吗？
王阳明反复强调忠、孝、仁、义都在人心中，无需外求。
这恰恰说明他太害怕这些价值观经受不住真实逻辑的考验。
因此，只能将一切都建立在自己的主观感受上。
但这使得这套价值观更加虚幻、僵化和迂腐。
面对忠孝的危机，他们不认为这是价值观本身的问题，而是防线一退再退，最终退回到自己的主观体验中。
只要你感受到了，它就是真实的，完全拒绝现实检验，通过自言自语和自我催眠来维持信仰。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">In fact, many theories
On the surface
They all use some very free and awakening concepts
But when we delve into its conceptual system
You will find that this is actually a false freedom.
So let's not be fooled by superficial words.
The key is how it proves this freedom.
So how did Wang Yangming prove it?
Is all truth in the human heart?
In the "Chuan Xi Lu"
There is a conversation between him and his disciples that goes like this:
The disciples asked him:
If you pursue the best
Just ask your heart
Then I am afraid that it is impossible to exhaust the truth of the world.
Wang Yangming disagreed
He said: The mind is the reason.
There are things in the world that are beyond our hearts
Is it the principle outside of the mind?
that is
Heart and reason are completely unified
There is no thing or principle in the world that is independent of the mind.
The disciple asked again: "Being filial to your father and loyal to your ruler,
Be faithful to friends and be kind to the people
During this period
There are still many truths that need to be constantly understood.
Wang Yangming said: This statement is too misleading.
If a person cannot be loyal, filial, benevolent and righteous
Do I have to seek this truth from others?
In fact, all truths are in your heart.
This heart is not blinded by selfish desires.
You can reach the heavenly principle.
No need to add any knowledge and experience from outside
When a person
With such a heart that is completely in line with the principles of heaven and the way of heaven
Serving parents is filial piety
Serving the king is loyalty
It can be seen
Wang Yangming's core thinking
In fact, it is related to Song Dynasty Neo-Confucianism.
"Preserve the principles of heaven and eliminate human desires"
There is no essential difference
On the surface, Wang Yangming emphasized
You just need to go back to your original intention and do things
You will succeed
This heart naturally has all the truth.
No need to verify externally, seek
However
The content of this heart, the content of conscience
and the criteria for success
It is not something that one discovers on his own.
It was already determined by saints and kings.
That is loyalty, filial piety, benevolence and righteousness.
You can only exert your initiative and subjectivity
The freedom to implement these values
But there is absolutely no freedom to refute, doubt, or deconstruct them.
However
This kind of freedom can only implement established values
Can it still be considered freedom?
Wang Yangming repeatedly emphasized
Loyalty, filial piety, benevolence and righteousness are in people's hearts.
No need to seek outside
This just shows
He is too afraid of these values
Withstand the test of real logic
Therefore, we can only base everything on
They all rely on their own subjective feelings
But this makes this set of values ​​even more illusory.
Rigidity and pedantry
Facing the crisis of loyalty and filial piety
They don't think
The problem with this value itself
But the defense line is retreating more and more
Finally retreat into your own subjective experience
As long as you feel it, it's real
Complete rejection of reality testing
Maintaining faith through self-talk and self-hypnosis</p>
</details>

### 中西文化路径的异同：信仰与理性

这与基督教的历史发展是完全相反的。
我们知道，早期**神父哲学**（Church Fathers' philosophy: 早期基督教思想家，如奥古斯丁等，其哲学思想奠定了基督教神学基础）强调信仰，贬低理性。
教父们认为，上帝之子死了，后来又复活了，正因为它荒谬，所以你更应该相信。
这种观点后来被概括为“因为荒谬，所以我相信”。
到了**经院哲学**（Scholasticism: 中世纪欧洲的哲学思潮，试图用理性论证基督教信仰）时期，**安瑟伦**（Anselm of Canterbury: 中世纪经院哲学家，提出了上帝存在的本体论证明）反对用信仰排斥理性。
他主张理性论证对宗教信仰的重要性，于是提出了上帝存在的**本体论证明**（ontological proof: 一种哲学论证，试图通过对上帝概念的分析来证明上帝的存在）。
这个证明可以概括为这句话：上帝是至善至美的存在，不可能想象出比上帝更完美的存在。
正因为如此，上帝不仅存在于思想中，而且在事实上存在，否则他就不是完美的。
所以上帝存在。
这个证明，虽然你仔细思考，会发现它相当有问题，缺乏逻辑。
但他突破了教父哲学那种排斥经验和理性检验的传统，开启了理性证明的风潮。
十二世纪以后，**亚里士多德**（Aristotle: 古希腊哲学家）的哲学在欧洲复兴，基督教哲学开始发展，将希腊哲学融入到宗教信仰之中。
例如，**托马斯·阿奎那**（Thomas Aquinas: 中世纪经院哲学家，提出了上帝存在的“五路证明”）的上帝五路证明，就是从人人皆知的事实出发，通过理性推理来证明上帝的存在。
例如，第一路证明是：既然万物的运动总是被另一个事物推动的，那么就必然追溯到一个不动的存在，作为第一推动者，这就是上帝。
第二路证明是：既然世间万物，都有其之所以如此的原因，而不是那个原因，每个原因都有其自身的原因。
那么在这条因果链的尽头，必然有一个终极的原因，也就是自因，这个自因就是上帝。
托马斯·阿奎那的这种论证，看起来更具说服力，理论水平也更高。
更重要的是，他进一步确认了从理性角度证明信仰的可能性，理性与信仰不再是相互排斥，而是和解。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This is exactly the opposite of the history of Christianity.
We know
Early Christian philosophy emphasized faith.
Devaluing rationality
The Church Fathers believed that the Son of God was dead
Later resurrected
Because it's ridiculous
You should believe it anyway.
This view was later summarized as
“Because it’s ridiculous, I believe it”
Scholasticism
Anselm objected.
Using faith to exclude rationality
He advocated the importance of rational argument for religious belief
So he proposed an ontological proof of God's existence
This proof can be summarized as this sentence:
God is the most perfect being
It is impossible to imagine a being more perfect than God.
And because of this
God exists not only in the mind
And in fact there is
Otherwise he would not be perfect.
So God exists
This proof
Although if you think about it carefully, it is quite problematic.
Lack of logic
But he broke through the philosophy of the Godfather
A tradition that rejects empirical and rational testing
Started the trend of rational proof
After the twelfth century
Aristotle's philosophy is revived in Europe
Christian philosophy began to develop
Integrating Greek philosophy into religious beliefs
For example, Thomas Aquinas's five proofs of God
Starting from facts that everyone knows
Proving the existence of God through rational reasoning
For example, the first proof is
Since the movement of all things is always driven by another
Then it must be traced back to an immovable being
As the first mover
This is God
The second proof is
Since everything in the world
There is a reason why I am like this.
Not for that reason
Each reason has its own reason
Then at the end of this chain of cause and effect
There must be an ultimate reason
That is, self-causation
This self-cause is God
This argument of Thomas Aquinas
It looks more convincing
Higher theoretical level
More importantly
He further confirmed
Proving the possibility of faith from a rational perspective
Reason and faith are no longer mutually exclusive
But reconciliation</p>
</details>

例如，我们在上一期视频中提到十七世纪欧洲的**自然神论**（Deism: 一种宗教哲学观点，认为上帝创造了宇宙及其自然法则，但此后不再干预世界事务）。
也就是上帝创造了宇宙，但创造之后，上帝就不再干预，而是让万事万物按照上帝所创造的自然法则运行。
人类可以通过学习、推理、演绎和实验，逐渐发现隐藏在自然中的规律和法则。
宗教信仰与理性精神融合之后，开启了近代欧洲在所有重要领域的革命。
而中国文化的发展轨迹，与上述过程恰恰相反。
例如，早期儒家虽然充满了那种世俗的功利主义，但它从实际效果出发，来证明其合法性。
程朱理学将**三纲五常**（Three Bonds and Five Constant Virtues: 儒家伦理的核心，指君臣、父子、夫妇之间的关系准则和仁、义、礼、智、信五种道德规范）提升为贯穿万事万物的自然天理，无需现实结果来证明或验证。
到了阳明心学，天理进一步收缩到人的内心之中。
你甚至无需去体悟宇宙，只需把握内在体验，完全拒绝外部的审视和挑战。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">For example
We mentioned in the previous video
Deism in 17th Century Europe
That is, God created the universe.
But after creation
God will no longer intervene
But let everything
Operate according to the natural laws created by God
Humans can learn, reason, deduce and experiment
Gradually discovered
The laws and rules hidden in nature
Religious beliefs after rational spiritual integration
The beginning of modern Europe
A revolution in all important areas
The development trajectory of Chinese culture
This is the exact opposite of the above process.
for example
Early Confucianism
Although full of that kind of secular utilitarianism
But starting from the actual effect
To prove the legitimacy
Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism
The Three Bonds and Five Constant Virtues were elevated to
The principle of nature that permeates all things
No need for real-world results to prove or verify
In Yangming's philosophy of mind
The principles of heaven are further contracted into the human heart.
You don't even need to comprehend the universe.
Just grasp the inner experience
Completely reject external scrutiny and challenges</p>
</details>

### 阳明心学与“文革”的隐秘连接

这让我们想起文革时期一首传遍大江南北的歌曲，叫做《文革就是好》。
歌词从头到尾，只是不断重复“就是好，就是好”的空洞口号。
这种反复自我催眠的逻辑，也是中国文化这种封闭式态度的巧妙隐喻。
我们再来看一个例子。
王阳明关于终极良知的论述。
他说：“知是心之体，心自然会知。”
也就是说，良知是心本身固有的，无需外求，心自然会知道。
这似乎是一种主体性的哲学。
但紧接着，王阳明又说：
“见父自然知孝，见兄自然知弟。见孺子入井，自然有恻隐之心。此良知也，不假外求。良知发生，更无私欲障碍。”
结果，这种良知并不是开放和空洞的，它不容许主体自己去探索。
而是一套早已预设好的道德指令和伦理规范。
接着王阳明又说：
“然凡人不能无私欲障碍，故须用格物致知之功，克去私欲，以复其正。即心之良知，愈无障碍，以充其流行。知致其诚。”
这意思是说，普通人总是有各种私欲障碍。
因此，必须通过格物致知来克服私欲，恢复正道。
那么你就能让自己的心清澈纯洁，让天理充满你的内心。
那么无论一个人做什么事，都会合乎伦理道德。
但问题来了，这样一个完全消除私欲的人，难道不会让我变成一个完全虚假的人吗？
你难道不是变成了一个傀儡和木偶吗？
王阳明虽然声称这种良知和天理是人人都有的，是自然的。
但如果这种良知真的如此自然，我们为什么还要不断地用功，反复地消除私欲呢？
这说明王阳明所说的本心和良知，既不纯粹也不自然。
相反，它依赖于持续的自我压制和规训来维持。
他对主体性的颂扬，最终还是在一个巨大的牢笼中，假装自由地舞蹈。
阳明心学，就像在你的心中植入了一个监控摄像头。
所有外在的伦理标准，都被强行说成是你的良知。
这就会消除你反抗的机会。
所以你只能每天盯着自己，不断地清理自己的内心，不断地自我审判。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">This reminds us of a poem from the Cultural Revolution period.
Songs that are popular all over the country
It's called "The Cultural Revolution is Good"
Lyrics from beginning to end
Just keep repeating
The empty slogan "It's good, it's good"
The logic of this repeated self-hypnosis
It is also a closed-off attitude towards Chinese culture.
A clever metaphor
Let’s look at another example
Wang Yangming's discussion on the ultimate conscience
He said:
Knowing is the essence of the mind, the mind will know naturally
that is
Conscience is inherent in the heart itself
No need to seek outside
The heart will know naturally
This seems to be a philosophy of subjectivity.
But then, Wang Yangming said:
Seeing your father, you will know filial piety.
When you see your brother, you know your younger brother.
Seeing a child fall into a well, one naturally feels compassion.
This is conscience, which requires no external help.
If conscience arises,
No more selfish barriers
turn out to be
This conscience is not open and empty.
It does not allow the subject to explore on its own.
But a set
Moral commands and ethical norms that have long been preset
Then Wang Yangming said:
However, ordinary people cannot be free from selfish obstacles.
Therefore, we must use the merits of seeking knowledge and investigating things to overcome selfishness and restore order.
That is, the conscience of the heart is more unobstructed,
To fill the popular
To know
Knowledge leads to sincerity
This means that
Ordinary people always have various selfish obstacles.
Therefore, we must overcome selfishness by studying things to gain knowledge.
Restoring the Law
Then you can keep your heart clean and pure
Let the principles of heaven fill your heart
So no matter how a person does things
It will be ethical
But here comes the problem
Such a person who completely eliminates selfish desires
Wouldn't that make me a completely fake person?
Have you become a puppet and a puppet?
Although Wang Yangming claimed that this kind of conscience and heavenly principles
Everyone has
Natural
But if this conscience is really so natural
Why do we have to continue to use force?
To repeatedly eliminate selfish desires?
This illustrates what Wang Yangming said about original heart and conscience.
It's neither pure nor natural.
Instead, it relies on continuous self-suppression and discipline.
To maintain
His celebration of subjectivity
In the end, it's still in a huge cage.
Pretend to dance freely
Yangming's philosophy of mind
It's like having a surveillance camera implanted in your heart
All external ethical standards
Forcibly saying that it is your conscience
This will eliminate your chances of resistance.
So you can only stare at yourself every day
Keep clearing your mind
Constant self-judgment</p>
</details>

我相信大家还记得，在我们关于《被讨厌的勇气》的视频中，**岸见一郎**（Ichiro Kishimi: 日本哲学家，阿德勒心理学研究者）将勇气置于其理论的核心。
他认为你不自由的原因，不是因为环境、历史、社会结构、心理创伤，而是因为你缺乏改变的勇气。
因此幸福不取决于外在，而取决于你此刻的选择。
世上没有人真正压制你，真正限制你的只有你自己。
因为你的心中有勇气。
人类最大的问题是，总是为自己的软弱和懦弱找借口，寻找外部原因。
这恰恰是王阳明所说的“山中贼易除，心贼难除”的翻版。
这实际上是一种更彻底、更隐蔽的规训形式。
但是，我们上面讨论的主要是修身的部分。
在待人接物和社会交往方面，阳明心学还有一些更危险的元素。
我们将在下期视频中进一步讨论。

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">I believe everyone still remembers
In our video about "The Courage to Be Disliked"
Ichiro Kishimi
Putting courage at the core of his theory
He believes that the reason you are not free
It is not because of the environment, history, social structure, psychological trauma
It's because you lack the courage to change.
Therefore happiness does not depend on external
It all depends on your choice at this moment
There is no one in the world who really suppresses you
The only thing that really limits you is yourself
Because you have courage in your heart
The biggest problem of human beings is
Always find excuses for your weakness and cowardice
Find external reasons
This is exactly what Wang Yangming said.
A replica of "It is easy to defeat a thief in the mountains, but difficult to defeat a thief in the heart"
This is actually a more thorough and hidden form of discipline.
but
What we discussed above is mainly the part of self-cultivation
In dealing with others and society
Yangming's philosophy of mind
There are some more dangerous elements
We will discuss this further in the next video</p>
</details>

### 结语与交流邀请

今天视频的内容就到这里。
如果你有任何困惑或问题，想与我交流，直接联系我的邮箱即可。
例如，你想与我讨论一篇文章或一段文字、一个视频、一个社会现象，或者你的日记。
请提前将相关文字发给我，我会在正式交流前阅读。
或者你想与我讨论你的人生经历、困惑和情感，都是可以的。
如果你对隐私、安全、支付和交流方式有任何疑问，也请及时告诉我。
如果你无法支付或加入会员，也请联系我，我将提供其他方式。
具体请参考这张图片。
我将把这个视频放到“历史与社会”这个列表中。
也推荐大家查看我这个列表中的其他视频。
感谢观看，再见！

<details>
<summary>View/Hide Original English</summary>
<p class="english-text">That's all for today's video
If you have any confusion or questions
Want to communicate with me
Just contact my email directly
for example
You want to discuss an article or a paragraph with me
A video, a social phenomenon
Or your diary
Please send me the relevant text in advance.
I will read it before the formal communication
Or you want to discuss your life experience with me
Confusion and emotion
All are possible
If you are concerned about privacy, security
Any questions about payment and communication methods
Please also tell me in time
If you are unable to pay or join the membership
Please contact me too
I will provide other ways
Please refer to this picture for details
I will post this video
Put it in the list of "History and Society"
Also recommend to everyone
Check out my other videos in this list
Thank you for watching, goodbye!</p>
</details>