---
author: a16z
date: '2026-09-03'
guest: ''
layout: post.njk
source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3pegsM5drk
speaker: a16z
tags:
  - payment-system
  - agentic-commerce
  - consumer-behavior
  - financial-technology
title: 支付交互演进与代理式商业的发展探讨
summary: 对话讨论了卡片支付界面的历史优势、EMV与移动支付终端的普及，以及从早期无卡信用信任到当前代理式商业的发展。参与者认为杂货采购已具备代理式雏形，但AI完全代管复杂消费决策的普及仍可能面临较长摸索期。
insight: ''
draft: true
series: ''
category: business-entrepreneurship
area: finance-wealth
project: []
people: []
companies_orgs:
  - Visa
  - Mastercard
  - Apple
  - Google
  - PayPal
products_models:
  - Apple Pay
  - Google Pay
media_books: []
status: evergreen
---
<!-- chunk 1/8 -->

### 支付交互与底层生态的演进

卡片支付界面是有史以来创造出的最优秀的单一用户界面。无论怎么想象，它都是全世界最大的市场。而且在支付领域，根本不存在规模小于一千亿美元的利基市场。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
The card payment [music] interface is the singular best user interface ever created. It is the world's largest market [music] by any stretch of imagination. And there are no niches and payments that are smaller than hund00 billion.
</details>

>> 一旦你把规模做得极大，数字反而变小了，这很奇怪。交易体量非常大，但支付领域大体量的收入机会往往来自于较小的美元金额。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Once you go really big, the numbers get small, which is strange. [music] There's a lot of volume, but the large volume revenue opportunities and payments tend to be the smaller dollar amounts.
</details>

>> 随着你想要发送的总金额不断降低，永远有机会通过使用另一种形式的支付交付载体来满足基本需求，便利性就是胜过一切。有史以来被创造出的最好的用户界面就是信用卡。这在眼下可能终于迎来了被重新审视的时刻，因为人工智能已经就位了。只不过你还没有信任自己的代理能做得像你一样好。还有别的事情让你惊讶于它居然还没有发生。我曾经去参加过某个与密码学相关的会议，在会上提出了一种数字支付的新想法，结果简直是被轰下了台，因为这套方案显然不是匿名的。而 PayPal 当年的重大创新就在于——如果我们根本不在乎匿名性会怎样？从这个意义上来说，嗯……

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> There's always an opportunity to use another form of payment delivery device to satisfy a basic need. convenience just trumps as the total amount you're trying to send goes down. The best user interface ever created is the credit card. This may [music] actually be finally up for renegotiation because AI is already there. It's just that you haven't yet trusted your agent to do as good a job as you would. There is something else that you're surprised has not happened yet. I went to some cryptography related conference and presented a new idea in digital payments and was literally booed off stage because it was certainly not anonymous and the the big innovation of PayPal was what if we don't care about anonymity at all and in [music] that sense um
</details>

你们两位渊源颇深，不仅联合创立了一家公司，而且在那之前很久就认识了。你们是金融科技领域的先驱，二十多年、二十五年、甚至可能更长的时间里，你们一直在思考这个领域，试图理解当下，并思考未来的走向。我很好奇，自你们最初进入这个领域以来已经过去了这么长时间，对于已经发生的事、尚未发生的事，以及你们在 2000 年代初期对这个领域会如何发展的预期，最让你们感到惊讶的是什么？也许 Alex，不如由你先开始？

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
so you guys go way back having co-ounded a firm and and met well before then you guys are pioneers in in fintech you've been thinking about the space trying to make sense of the present you know think about where the future is going for 20 plus years, 25 years, maybe even more. And I'm curious, you know, given so much time has passed since you first got into the space, what has most surprised you about what has happened, what hasn't happened, what did you expect to happen in the early 2000s of how how this space would would play out? Maybe Alex, why don't you start?
</details>

我认为是 Apple Pay 和 Google Pay 的崛起，以及它们真正渗透的程度。因为总的来说，要改变消费者的行为是非常困难的。这是一连串可以说匪夷所思的巧合：当时出现了一种商户责任转移，因为磁条太容易复制了，你大概不久前也注意到过，你的新卡上带有一个小芯片，你得把芯片插进去，然后机器就会显示诸如“请勿拔卡，请勿拔卡”，对吧？那是因为芯片正在被重写，它比磁条安全得多，基本上就是 Visa 和万事达卡。呃，还有 Euro Pay，这就是那个“E”代表的意思。呃，但是“EU”代表什么？EMV。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
I think the rise of Apple Pay and Google Pay and to the extent the the extent to which they've really penetrated because it's very hard to change consumer behavior in general and it was a bizarre set of accidents if you will where there is this merchant liability shift because magst stripes were so easy to replicate that uh you probably noticed a while ago you your new cards had a little chip on them and you had to dip the chip and then the machine would be like you know don't remove don't remove right that's because the chip was being rewritten it was much more secure than a magstripe and basically Visa and Mastercard. Um, and then the Euro Pay that's what the E is for. Uh, but what is EU for? EMV.
</details>

>> Europe card。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Europe card.
</details>

>> Euro card。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Euro card.
</details>

>> 我不知道。欧洲人不知怎么的总有话语权，因为他们一向如此。他们插入他们的——不是电子的。那是……

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I don't know. The Europeans somehow got their say because they always do. They they insert their not electronic. That's
</details>

>> 是的，那是 Euro 某某、万事达卡、Visa。所以当时被称为 EMV 切换。因此，所有这些机器——如果你不想承担责任的话。嗯，比如我可以去百思买买一台电视，然后回到家，用着我的电视，然后说：“没有，我从来没买过这台电视。”如果我当时用的是磁条，而百思买没有换上新机器，那么百思买就只能自认倒霉：“噢糟了，那台电视的钱我们全赔进去了，而 Alex 白得了一台电视。”我稍微夸张了一点来强调效果。所以，人人都必须换一台新机器。接着事实表明，那些新机器带有一个非接触式的小装置，你知道的，你不需要插芯片或者刷卡，直接碰一下就行。那些机器刚出来的时候根本没人在用碰卡支付，而现在它已经无处不在了。所以，总的来说改变消费者行为确实很难，但我觉得在 COVID 疫情、所有这些商户必须各自独立更换机器这一事实，以及……我是说，我当年可猜不到……我是说，你显然猜到了，因为 Confinity 当时就是用 PalmPilot 来转账。所以你走在了整个掌上电脑浪潮的前面，但我当时绝不会猜到这三件事会汇聚成行为转变。就像是消费者行为的改变、无处不在的全新商户支付终端，再加上无处不在的移动电话，这绝对是一件极大改变了世界的事情。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah, it's it's euro something Mastercard Visa. So, it was it was called the EMV switch. So, all of these machines, if you did not want to be liable, um, like I could go to Best Buy, buy a TV, and then get home, use my TV, and say, "Nope, never bought the TV." And if I was using my magstripe and Best Buy didn't have the the machine switch over, then Best Buy would be like, "Oh, shoot. We lost all the money on that TV, and Alex gets the free TV." I'm exaggerating slightly for a fact. So, everybody had to get a new machine. And then it turned out that those new machines had a little contactless, you know, thing where you didn't have to dip the chip or swipe the card. You could just tap. Nobody was using taps when those machines came out and now it's ubiquitous. So that's that's something where I mean generally speaking it's hard to change consumer behavior but I feel like between COVID and the fact that all these merchants independently had to switch over their machines and the fact that I mean I wouldn't have guessed in I mean you obviously did because the uh confinity was was Palm Pilot sending money. So you you're ahead of the whole PDA wave but I wouldn't have guessed that those three things would have come behavior. It's like change of of consumer behavior, ubiquitous new merchant payment terminal plus ubiquitous uh mobile telefan and that's that's certainly one thing that has changed the world a lot.
</details>

>> 你呢，Max？你很久以前就在构想未来的货币会是什么样子。对于发生的事情或没有发生的事情，你感到意外吗？

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> How about you Max? You you were dreaming about you know what what the future of money would look like a long time ago. Would it have surprised you about what has happened or what hasn't happened?
</details>

如果你身在其中熬煮了过去大约三十年上下，就很难跳脱出来看清全貌。我想，为了进一步阐明 Alex 的观点，关于 Apple Pay / Google Pay 及其与 Visa、万事达卡网络的交互，真正令人惊叹且微妙的一点是，Visa 和万事达卡对于网络、发卡行、商户以及收单行之间的交互有着两秒半的硬性时限。因此，整件事必须在十秒之内完成，否则交易就会被重试，或者可能直接被取消，这确实给任何聪明的创新留下了极小的空间。在线上你可以玩出各种花样。如果你在做电子商务，你可以说：好吧，我们确实要把你的卡提交给 Visa，但首先我们要运行一些反欺诈检查，还要做些其他事情来降低责任风险。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
It's very hard to uh step back from the soup if you're cooking in it uh for the last plus or minus 30 odd years. Uh, I think the to sort of further illustrate Alex's point, one of the things that's really amazing and subtle about Apple Pay/Google Pay and its interaction with the Visa Mastercard networks is Visa and Mastercard have a hard 2 and a half second limit on interaction between the network, the issuing bank and the merchant and the acquiring bank. And so the whole thing has to happen in 10 seconds where the transaction gets retrieded or maybe just canceled out and really leaves very little room for any kind of clever innovation. And online you can play games. If you're doing e-commerce you're like well yes we're going to submit your card to Visa but first we're going to run some anti- fraud checks and we're going to do some other things to like reduce liability.
</details>

但在线下，一旦出示了你的卡，两秒半就是你的全部时间。Google 和 Apple Pay 独辟蹊径地把整件事进行了时间转移：他们在芯片内部打造了安全区，并表明“我已经知道你的卡了，在真正必须与 Visa 或万事达卡通信之前，我可以做各种各样的事情”。也许令人震惊的是，Visa 和万事达卡至今还没有出台某些新标准声明：“其实根本不需要非得是两秒半，完全可以是十五秒，在此期间我们去找一堆发卡机构来为你竞价争取更好的信用质量条款”，或者任何其他类型的创新。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
But offline like once your card is presented two and a half seconds that's all you got. And Google and Apple Pay have singularly timeshifted the whole thing by creating secure enclaves inside their chips and saying I already know your card. I can do all kinds of things before I actually have to talk to Visa Mastercard. And maybe the shocking thing is that Visa Mastercard have not yet introduced some new standards saying actually it doesn't have to be two and a half seconds at all. It could be 15 seconds while we know go and get a bunch of issuers to bid on a better credit quality terms for you or any other type of innovation.
</details>

Dee Hock 时代的那些白纸黑字的规则或多或少原封未动，那可不是三十年，那是六十年左右了。所以我觉得这或许是对所发生之事的一种批判性或更具审视意味的视角，嗯……

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
the sort of hardwritten rules of dehawk era are more or less intact and that's not 30 years that's like more you know 60 years and so I think that's probably a critical or more criticizing take on what happened um
</details>

但支付领域令人震惊的地方在于，无论怎么看，它都是全世界最大的市场。任何你可能想到的、经过某种拆解并作为最利基的小切入点去探索和创新的领域，最终都总是达到一千亿美元。在支付行业，根本不存在规模小于一千亿美元的利基市场。所以这可能是我见过的最令人惊讶的事情。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
but the shocking thing about payments is that it is the world's largest market by any stretch of imagination and anything and everything you could have possibly thought of being sort of deconstructed and being the nichiest little thing to poke around and innovate in always turns out to be a hundred billion dollar. There are no niches and payments that are smaller than hundred billion. And so that's probably the most surprising thing I've seen.
</details>

>> 是的。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah.
</details>

>> 不过有意思的是，一旦你把规模做得极大，数字反而变小了，这很奇怪，对吧？就像如果我电汇一万亿美元，对吧？美国刚宣布我们的债务达到了四十万亿美元，对吧？假设埃隆的火星殖民地价值四十万亿美元，Ro Khanna 决定向他征税四十万亿美元，而他需要发一笔电汇，那笔电汇的利息收益并不会非常……虽然交易体量很大，但支付领域大体量的收入机会往往来自于较小的美元金额，嗯，这挺让人惊讶的，对吧？因为事实证明，比如所有快餐店，那里的支付机会极其巨大，这就是为什么星巴克发明了 Starbucks Pay，因为他们想停止不断支付——就像这些预付卡，他们只需要支付一次。你在星巴克账户里充了五十美元，他们只需要向 Visa、万事达卡和其他所有人付一次费用，而不是之后的每一次都付。所以，支付领域曲线下的面积令人惊讶之处在于，金额越大，抽成比例反而越小。我想这也是合理的，因为你不可能从那笔四十万亿美元的支付中拿走百分之二。但是人人都盯上 B2B 支付，每个人对于 B2B 支付都有个聪明的想法，而这可能是唯一的例外。我当时试图找——它已经湮没在时间里了——我们两人之间最初的邮件，我觉得关于我们究竟是怎么认识的，我们两人的起源故事版本可能略有不同。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Although it's interesting like once you go really big, the numbers get small, which is strange, right? Like if I send a $1 trillion wire, right? The United States just announced we we are $40 trillion in debt, right? Let's just say that like, you know, Elon's Mars colony is worth $40 trillion. and you know Roana decides to tax him $40 trillion and he needs to send a wire that wire is not going to be very pro like there there's a lot of volume but the large volume revenue opportunities and payments tend to be the smaller dollar amounts um which is surprising right because it turns out I mean like all of the QSR the quickserve restaurant the payment opportunity there that's massive that's why Starbucks invented Starbucks pay because they wanted to stop having to pay it's like these prepaid they only have to pay one time. You char you put $50 on your Starbucks account. Well, they only have to pay Visa, Mastercard, and everybody else one time as opposed to every successive time. So, a lot like what's surprising about payment uh area under the curve, if you will, is that like the bigger the dollars, like the smaller the rake, which I guess makes sense because you're not going to get 2% of that $40 trillion payment, but everybody goes after B2B payments. Everybody has a clever idea for B2B payments and like that's the only one that is probably the exception to the rule. I was trying to find so it's lost in time the original email between the two of us which I think we have slightly different origin stories of how we actually met
</details>

>> 但我当时试图找到我们两人最初的邮件，我们在信中开始提及最终演变成一家公司的雏形，那封邮件的时间标注为 2011 年 4 月，在里面我想我问你的是：“跟我多讲讲这个 Bill Me Later 的事情”，因为当时你在关注 PayPal 收购……而我正在做别的事。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> but I was trying to find the original email between the two of us where we start mentioning what becomes a firm eventually and it's dated April 2011 and uh in it I think I ask you like tell me more about this bill me later thing because I was working on something else while you were watching PayPal buying
</details>

<!-- chunk 2/8 -->

### “晚点向我请款”与应收账款融资

……建立……而你发给我这些非常冗长详尽的邮件，大意就是“这到底是个什么东西”，以及围绕它提出的所有想法，接着我们就在往来邮件里就针对企业端的“晚点向我请款”（bill me later for business）展开了乒乓球式的讨论，最终得出结论：这其实是一门很蠢的生意，那里根本没有机会。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
build

 me

 and

you

 send

 me

 these

 really

 long

 elaborate

sort

 of

 here's

 exactly

 what

 it

 is

 and

all

 these

 ideas

 around

 it

 and

 we

 then

veer

 off

 into

 this

 ping

 pong

 of

 emails

around

 bill

 me

 later

 for

 business

 and

conclude

 that

 it's

 actually

 a

 dumb

business

 where

 there's

 there

 isn't

 an

opportunity
</details>

>> 哎，其实有意思的是，你提到了这个，我买了 pay me sooner（早点付我钱）这个域名。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> well

 and

 that's

 actually

 it's

 funny

 you

mentioned

 I

 bought

 the

 domain

 pay

 me

sooner
</details>

>> 结果就是，就好像“啊，‘晚点向我请款’是个好主意，‘早点付我钱’会是个更好的主意”。其实那里的想法现在依然不算糟糕，因为它不是支付，而是借贷。所以这么想吧：想象一下，大公司总是为了获得更好的付款条件而欺负小公司。对他们来说是更好的付款条件，对吧？就像如果我是通用电气（GE），你是埃里克·托伦伯格（Eric Torrenberg），你是个小角色，而我是庞大的 GE。我说，我要做 Net 90（90 天后付款）。所以你给我开发票，我 90 天后付你钱。现在你得给你的员工发工资了。所以你去找银行，去找别的人。你说：“嘿，我是埃里克。呃，我做这门生意。我的大部分钱来自 GE。他们是一家极好的公司。他们会在 90 天内付我钱。”银行根本不在乎，对吧？他们只会说：“对啊，我们要收你 15% 的利息。”与此同时，GE 发行债券的利率大概是，你知道的，不管是什么 SOFR 加 10 个基点之类的。比如 GE 支付 5% 的信贷成本。你支付 15% 的信贷成本，但这有点讲不通，因为你的信用其实就是 GE 的信用，如果你能理解的话。现在，有一种叫作保理（factoring）的东西，你可以把发票卖掉。你其实可以把应收账款卖掉。那在某种程度上是高利贷式的。呃，那非常非常……其实它不算高利贷，因为信贷法不适用，因为你卖的是应收账款。但我一直觉得“早点付我钱”是个有趣的想法，因为整个经济运行所依赖的现实就是，比如我的企业在等你的付款，比如我不得不借钱的原因就是因为你没有早点付我钱，呃，或者反过来，抱歉，是我没有早点付你钱。是的，所以但是的，我们没有去推进那个项目。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> as

 a

 result

 so

 it's

 like

 ah

 bill

 me

later

 was

 a

 good

 idea

 pay

 me

 sooner

would

 be

 an

 even

 better

 idea

 actually

the

 idea

 there

 it

 still

 is

 it's

 not

 it's

not

 terrible

 because

 it's

 not

 payments

it's

 lending

 so

 think

 of

 it

 this

 way

Imagine

 that.

 Like

 big

 companies

 beat

 up

small

 companies

 all

 the

 time

 to

 get

better

 payment

 terms.

 Better

 payment

terms

 for

 them,

 right?

 It's

 like

 so

 if

I'm

 GE

 and

 you're

 Eric

 Torrenberg

 and

you're

 a

 little

 guy,

 I'm

 big

 GE.

 I'm

like,

 I'm

 going

 to

 pay

 you

 net

 90.

 So

you

 invoice

 me

 and

 I

 pay

 you

 90

 days

later.

 Now

 you

 have

 to

 pay

 your

employees.

 So

 you

 go

 to

 a

 bank,

 you

 go

to

 somebody

 else.

 You're

 like,

 hey,

 I'm

Eric.

 Uh,

 I

 run

 this

 business.

 Most

 of

my

 money

 comes

 from

 GE.

 They're

 an

awesome

 company.

 They're

 going

 to

 pay

 me

in

 90

 days.

 bank

 doesn't

 care,

 right?

They're

 just

 like,

 "Yeah,

 we're

 going

 to

charge

 you

 15%."

 Meanwhile,

 GE

 can

 issue

bonds

 at

 like,

 you

 know,

 whatever

 sofur

plus

 10

 basis

 points

 or

 something.

 Like

GE

 is

 paying

 5%

 for

 credit.

 You're

paying

 15%

 for

 credit,

 but

 it

 kind

 of

doesn't

 make

 sense

 because

 your

 credit

is

 G's

 credit,

 if

 that

 makes

 sense.

 Now,

there's

 something

 called

 factoring

 where

you

 can

 sell

 the

 invoice.

 You

 can

actually

 sell

 the

 receivable.

 That's

somewhat

 usurious.

 um

 that

 that's

 very

very

 actually

 it's

 not

 usurious

 because

it

 doesn't

 like

 credit

 laws

 don't

 apply

because

 you're

 selling

 a

 receivable

 but

I

 always

 thought

 that

 pay

 me

 sooner

 was

an

 interesting

 idea

 because

 the

 whole

economy

 runs

 on

 the

 fact

 that

 like

 my

business

 is

 waiting

 on

 payments

 from

 you

like

 the

 reason

 why

 I

 have

 to

 borrow

money

 is

 because

 you

 don't

 pay

 me

 sooner

uh

 or

 other

 way

 around

 sorry

 I

 don't

 pay

you

 sooner

 and

 yeah

 so

 but

 yes

 we

 didn't

we

 didn't

 pursue

 that
</details>

>> 如今在应付账款融资和应收账款融资领域都有一些发展不错的企业，所以这……这不是个坏主意，但是尽管身处不受监管的借贷领域，其收入机会表面上看来比消费领域的要低，因为便利性这个因素是每一个参与者都明白的，并且有大量的玩家会给你提供稍微便宜一点的费率，这同样也是为什么向卢旺达电汇 40 万亿美元无论由谁来处理，都将是一门……

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> there

 there's

 some

 healthy

 businesses

these

 days

 in

 both

 accounts

 payable

financing

 and

 accounts

 receivable

financing

 so

 it's

This

 is

 it's

 not

 a

 bad

 idea,

 but

 the

revenue

 opportunity

 despite

 being

 an

unregulated

 lending

 space

 is

 seemingly

lower

 than

 the

 one

 in

 consumer

 because

the

 convenience

 factor

 is

 something

 that

every

 participant

 understands

 and

 there

are

 plenty

 of

 players

 that'll

 offer

 you

a

 slightly

 cheaper

 chart

 which

 is

 also

the

 root

 origin

 of

 why

 a

 $40

 trillion

wire

 to

 Roana

 is

 going

 to

 be

 uh
</details>

>> 不怎么赚钱的生意。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> not

 very

 profitable

 business

 whoever

processes

 it.
</details>

### 支付创新与生物识别认证

>> 是的。还有什么别的想法让你感到惊讶——呃，它居然至今还不存在，而你在某个时期曾认为“嘿，世界显然应该这样运转”？这里，你知道，存在一个显而易见的机会，但因为不管什么、你知道的，种种混合在一起的原因，就是还没有发生；或者借用，呃，你知道的，马克的话，“没有坏想法，只有过早的想法”。有没有什么别的让你惊讶至今尚未发生的事情？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.

 What

 what's

 what's

 another

 idea

that

 you're

 surprised

 uh

 does

 not

 exist

yet

 that

 you

 were

 thinking

 at

 some

point,

 hey,

 the

 world

 obviously

 should

work

 this

 way?

 There's,

 you

 know,

 an

obvious

 opportunity

 here

 and

 for

whatever,

 you

 know,

 conflation

 of

reasons

 just

 hasn't

 happened

 yet

 or

 or

to

 use

 uh

 you

 know,

 Mark's

 quote,

 there

are

 no

 bad

 ideas,

 only

 early

 ideas.

 Is

is

 there

 something

 else

 that

 you're

surprised

 has

 not

 happened

 yet?
</details>

你知道，我们一直在寻找极佳的生物识别支付方式，而它更多地体现在电影里，人们的大拇指和眼球被取下来用于认证。然而，我们现在依然在使用芯片卡支付。顺便说一句，刷卡支付界面是有史以来创造出的单一最好的用户界面。而且人们并不是没有尝试过去做得更好。记得甚至在 PayPal 之前，就存在过这种感应棒，我想是万事达卡和一家汽油、呃、加油站网络合作制造的，你可以像这样在加油站旁边挥动这个感应棒，支付就完成了，你就可以给汽车加油。当我看到它时，我想：“天哪，这显然会取代信用卡。”但它并没有。而这里面其实包含着一个关于整个支付创新非常有趣的教训。存在某种先验上不明显但在后验中显而易见的临界规模版本，如果你达不到它，你就会失败。就像在支付领域里并没有真正所谓的“还算可以”的结果。你要么达成目标，每个人都必须拥有你的小部件，或者你的网络，或者你的无论什么东西；要么它就直接归入历史的长河。这是一个其实非常合理的极好例子。比如，你当然想在车钥匙上挂一个这样的小感应棒，只要挥一下就能加满油，但它只是比你装在口袋里的信用卡快了一点点，并没有快很多。而信用卡本身就能很好地工作。因此，我一直在等待某种完全不同的将付款人向设备进行认证的方式，而除了手机之外，我们还没有做出更好的东西。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
You

 know,

 we're

 forever

 in

 search

 of

 the

great

 way

 to

 pay

 biometrically,

 and

 it

manifests

 itself

 more

 in

 movies

 where

people's

 thumbs

 and

 eyeballs

 get

 removed

for

 authentication

 purposes.

And

 yet,

 like,

 we're

 still

 paying

 with

chips.

 By

 the way,

 the

 card

 payment

interface

 is

 the

 singular

 best

 user

interface

 ever

 created.

 And

 it

 it's

 not

something

 that

 people

 haven't

 tried

 to

do

 better.

 remember

 even

 before

 PayPal,

there

 was

 this

 wand

 that

 I

 think

Mastercard

 and

 one

 of

 the

 gas

 um

uh

 refueling

 station

 networks

 produced

this

 thing

 where

 you

 could

 like

 wave

this

 wand

 next

 to

 a

 gas

 station

 and

payment

 is

 secured

 and

 you

 can

 fuel

 your

car.

 And

 when

 I

 saw

 it,

 I'm

 like,

 "Oh

 my

god,

 this

 is

 obviously

 going

 to

 take

over

 credit

 cards."

 And

 it

 didn't.

 And

there

 actually

 therein

 lies

 a

 really

interesting

 lesson

 in

 payments

innovation

 in

 general.

 There's

 some

unobvious

 a

 priority

 but

 clear

opposeriori

 version

 of

 critical

 mass

 and

if

 you

 don't

 reach

 it

 you're

 going

 to

fail

 like

 there's

 not

 really

 a

 okay

outcomes

 in

 payments.

 You

 either

 get

there

 and

 everyone

 needs

 to

 have

 your

widget

 or

 your

 network

 or

 your

 whatever

or

 it

's

 just

 going

 to

 go

 into

 the

 uh

 the

time.

 And

 this

 is

 a

 fine

 example

 of

 a

thing

 that

 actually

 made

 a

 lot

 of

 sense.

Like

 of

 course

 you

 want

 to

 have

 a

 little

wand

 on

 your

 car

 keys

 to

 just

 sort

 of

wave

 and

 get

 refueled,

 but

 it's

 just

 a

little

 bit

 faster,

 not

 a

 lot

 faster

 than

the

 credit

 card

 you

 have

 in

 your

 pocket.

And

 that

 just

 works.

 And

 so

 I

 I

 keep

 on

waiting

 for

 some

 completely

 different

way

 of

 authenticating

 the

 payer

 to

 the

device

 and

 like

 other

 than

 the

 mobile

phone,

 we

 haven't

 done

 better.
</details>

>> 亚马逊最近其实刚在全食超市停用了那个大拇指支付。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> Amazon

 actually

 just

 discontinued

 the

whole

 thumb

 payment

 at

 Whole

 Foods.
</details>

>> 他们其实……那不是大拇指支付。那是掌纹。手掌。是的。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> They

 actually

 It's

 not

 a

 thumb

 payment.

It's

 like

 it's

 the

 palm.

 The

 palm.

 Yeah.
</details>

>> 我挺喜欢的。我不管住在哪家酒店旁边，真的都会去旁边的全食超市。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> I

 loved

 it.

 I

 I

 would

 literally

 go

 to

Whole

 Foods

 next

 to

 whatever

 hotel

 I'd

be

 staying

 in.
</details>

>> 他们把它取消了我还挺难过的。我知道。我以前也用它。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> I

 was

 sad

 that

 they

 got

 rid

 of

 it.

 I

know.

 I

 used

 to

 use

 it,

 too.
</details>

>> 它其实甚至没有更快。只是好玩。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> It's

 actually

 not

 even

 faster.

 It's

 just

fun.
</details>

>> 我知道。它可能还更慢。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> I

 know.

 It's

 probably

 slower.
</details>

>> 确实更慢。就像是“给我算个命，顺便买下这些葡萄”。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> It

 is

 slower.

 It's

 like

 tell

 me

 my

fortune

 and

 these

 grapes.
</details>

>> 算出来的命就是你欠我钱。是的。那就是、那就是你能得到的唯一的运势。好吧，那是……我是说，我想我之所以呃、偶然把它叫成了大拇指，纯粹是因为那家公司的名字几乎就叫这个。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> The

 fortune

 is

 you

 owe

 me

 money.

 Yes.

That

 is

 that

 is

 the

 only

 fortune

 that

you

 ever

 get.

 Well,

 that

 that

 was

 I

 mean

I

 think

 I

 called

 it

 thumb

 by

 by

 uh

 by

accident

 just

 given

 the

 the

 almost

 uh

almost

 name

 of

 a

 firm.
</details>

>> 没错。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> That's

 right.
</details>

### 加密货币与 DigiCash 的启示

当加密货币行业开始流行起来，或者当你知道该领域的一些主要项目刚刚启动时，那里面有没有某些部分让你感到兴奋，或者觉得实现了你长期以来的某种梦想？还是觉得“嘿，这毫不相干”，或者只是觉得不太起眼……

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
when

 when

 sort

 of

 the

 crypto

 industry

was

 was

 becoming

 popular

 or

 when

 you

know

 some

 of

 the

 major

 projects

 uh

 were

were

 starting

 in

 in

 the

 space

 did

 that

were

 there

 parts

 of

 that

 that

 seemed

exciting

 to

 you

 or

 realization

 of

 a

 you

know

 long-held

 uh

 sort

 of

 dream

 or

 did

it

 feel

 hey

 orthogonal

 or

 just

 not

really
</details>

>> 这么说吧，我经常在趋势上慢半拍，比如对我接触的大多数事物而言，我都不是世界上最早的采用者。

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> so

 I

 I'm

 frequently

 late

 to

 trends

 like

I'm

 not

 the

 world's

 earliest

 adopture

 of

majority

 of

 things

 I

 encounter
</details>

>> 我觉得 PayPal 挺早的，对吧？

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
>> I

 feel

 like

 PayPal

 is

 pretty

 early

 right
</details>

>> 嗯，算是吧。呃，给你讲讲 PayPal 的完整背景，我当时其实非常想做一个非常具体且与 PayPal 大相径庭的东西，呃，它是在极低功耗的芯片上运行的。为了做到这一点，我需要弄清楚如何让密码学原语在一个非常非常低功耗的芯片上工作。我们做到了。然后我们立刻意识到，除了加密一些非常非常小的数据量之外，它其实干不了太多事情，而需要快速加密和解密的小数据量，某种程度上就会把你引向支付领域，这就是 PayPal 的由来。但在所有这些开始之前，我去参加了 DigiCash 的停运/破产派对，DigiCash 是所有数字支付的鼻祖。呃，那是一场略显凄凉的聚会。地点在斯坦福大学校园内，当时就像是，你知道的，倒着 40 盎司的麦芽酒，一群看上去非常伤感的赛博朋克相互诉说着数字支付的时代并没有降临在我们身上。呃，所以从这个意义上说，我们来得很晚。当时我听着这些想法被击碎的人交谈，那是盲签名技术，大卫·乔姆（David Chaum）在某个地方，他实际上并不在场，但他绝望地游荡在帕洛阿尔托的街头，因为他那绝妙的想法——确实是非常绝妙的想法——基本上被证明是没有产品市场契合度的。呃，很快在那之后我们创立了 PayPal，呃，我去参加了一个密码学相关的会议，展示了，你知道的，一个数字支付领域的新想法，结果字面上被嘘下了台，因为它远没有那么安全。它当然也谈不上匿名，而 PayPal 的重大创新在于：如果我们根本不在乎匿名性会怎样？事实上，人们确实不在乎。他们只需要付咖啡钱，或者买他们的，你知道的，网购物品。而在这种意义上，呃，我觉得我们在这场游戏里又来得非常晚。游戏已经结束了，所有的狂热者都离场了。呃，所以……

加密货币——不要和密码学混淆了——呃，当时所以我读了原版的比特币白皮书，觉得：“哇，这是解决拜占庭将军问题的一个非常聪明的方法。”我和所有数学和密码学极客一样，对这种方法印象深刻，但我哪怕一秒钟都没觉得它会成为一种货币或一种支付方式等等。而且我现在也不确信它是一种支付方式，而且……

<details>
<summary>Original English</summary>
Well,

sort

 of.

 Um,

 to

 give

 you

 full

 context

for

 PayPal,

 I

 really

 wanted

 to

 build

something

 very

 specific

 and

 quite

different

 from

 PayPal

 uh

 that

 operated

on

 very

 low

 power

 chips.

 And

 to

 do

 that,

I

 needed

 to

 work

 out

 how

 to

 make

cryptographic

 primitives

 work

 on

 a

 very,

very

 low

 power

 chip.

 And

 we

 did.

 And

then

 we

 promptly

 realized

 that

 it

 really

couldn't

 do

 very

 much

 other

 than

 encrypt

some

 very

 very

 small

 amounts

 of

 data

 and

small

 amounts

 of

 data

 that

 need

 to

 be

encrypted

 and

 decrypted

 quickly

 that

kind

 of

 leads

 you

 to

 payments

 which

 is

how

 PayPal

 came

 about.

 But

 right

 before

all

 of

 that

 began

 I

 went

 to

 the

windown/bank

 bankruptcy

 party

 for

DigiCash

 which

 was

 the

 original

granddaddy

 of

 all

 digital

 payments.

 And

uh

 it

 was

 sort

 of

 a

 somber

 affair.

 I

 was

on

 Stanford

 University

 grounds

 and

 there

was

 like

 you

 know

 pouring

 out

 of

 the

 40s

and

 a

 bunch

 of

 very

 sadl

 looking

 cyber

punks

 telling

 each

 other

 how

 the

 age

 of

digital

 payments

 is

 not

 upon

 us

 and

 uh

so

 in

 that

 sense

 we

 were

 very

 late

 when

sort

 of

 I

 was

 listening

 to

 these

 people

talk

 whose

 idea

 was

 crushed

 it

 was

 blind

signatures

 and

 David

 Ch

 was

 somewhere

 he

was

 actually

 not

 present

 but

 he

 was

roaming

 the

 uh

 streets

 of

 Palo

 Alto

despondent

 because

 his

 brilliant

 idea

and

 a

 truly

 brilliant

 one

 was

 you

 know

basically

 being

 proven

 to

 be

 not

 having

a

 a

 product

 market

 fit.

 Uh

 and

 then

 we

promptly

 soon

 thereafter

 started

 PayPal

and

 uh

 I

 went

 to

 some

 cryptography

related

 conference

 and

 presented

 you

know

 a

 new

 idea

 in

 digital

 payments

 and

was

 literally

 booed

 off

 stage

 because

 it

was

 not

 nearly

 as

 secure.

 It

 was

certainly

 not

 anonymous

 and

 the

 the

 big

innovation

 of

 PayPal

 was

 what

 if

 we

don't

 care

 about

 anonymity

 at

 all.

 In

fact,

 people

 don't.

 They

 just

 need

 to

pay

 for

 their

 coffees

 or

 their,

 you

know,

 online

 purchases.

 And

 um

 in

 in

that

 sense,

 um

 I

 feel

 like

 we

 were

 again

very

 late

 to

 that

 game.

 The

 game

 had

played

 out

 like

 all

 the

 enthusiasts

 had

left

 the

 building.

 Uh

 and

 so

cryptocurrency,

not

 to

 be

 confused

 with

 cryptography.

uh

 when

 so

 I

 I

 read

 the

 original

 Bitcoin

paper

 and

 thought,

 "Wow,

 that's

 a

 really

clever

 way

 of

 solving

 the

 Byzantine

general

 problem.

 I

 sort

 of

 as

 all

 the

 uh

math

 cryptography

 nerds

 was

 impressed

with

 the

 approach,

 but

 I

 not

 think

 for

 a

second

 it

 would

 become

 a

 currency

 or

 a

payment

 method

 and

 etc.

 And

 I'm

 not

convinced

 it's

 a

 payment

 method

 now

 and
</details>

<!-- chunk 3/8 -->

已经有相当长一段时间了，但作为货币、商品以及价值储存手段而言，它无疑被证明是非常成功的。”所以我觉得……随着我看着加密货币扩张并成为一种不可忽视的存在，而且越来越重要，应用场景现在正在浮现。我们，你知道，稳定币已经来到我们身边，这无疑是一套非常清晰的应用，但在我看来，还没有任何一种接近打破“我要用它来买一杯咖啡”的界限——我认为这可以说是旧支付形式最经典、最重要的应用场景。因此，作为货币，作为价值储存手段，它令人着迷。

你知道，你上一次把一枚比特币或一聪花在任何真正重要的东西上是什么时候？抛开那些专门为了证明这种说法是错的而特意花掉它的人不谈——

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
it's been quite some time, but as currency and commodity and a store of value goes, it's certainly proven to be extraordinarily successful." So I think the as I watched uh cryptocurrencies expand and and become a thing and more and more of a thing, the use cases are coming out now. We're, you know, stable coins are upon us and that's certainly a collection of very clear uses, but none have, in my opinion, come close to breaching the I'm going to use this to buy a cup of coffee, which is kind of that's the canonical and most important, I would argue, use case for old forms of payments. So, as currencies go, as store value goes, fascinating.

You know, when was the last time you spent a Bitcoin or a Satoshi on anything actually important? You know, putting aside people who make it a point of spending it just to sort of prove the point wrong
</details>

>> 而且买咖啡是最重要的指标，仅仅是因为它的体量，因为它的频次，它的实用性——

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> and and it's the most important um that buying coffee is the most important metric because of just the the volume of it because the frequency, the practical,
</details>

>> 总有机会使用另一种形式的支付交付工具来满足基本需求。所以，如果你在考虑一笔 40 万亿美元的转账，你会花很多时间去找出安全的方式、快速的方式、廉价的方式等等。如果你正路过附近的百吉饼店，需要一杯咖啡，要是你的加密货币钱包密码太长，你就会在口袋里找零钱。如果你没有零钱，你就会掏出借记卡或信用卡。因此，随着支付金额变小，用户界面会取代成本占据主导，取代一切。基本上，随着你想要发送的总金额下降，便利性就会压倒其他一切。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> there's always an opportunity to use another form of payment delivery device to satisfy a basic need. So, if you're sort of contemplating a $40 trillion transfer, you'll spend a lot of time figuring out the secure way, the the fast way, the cheap way, etc. If you're passing through your nearby bagel shop and you need a cup of coffee, if your cryptocurrency wallet passphrase is too long, you're going to look for change in your pocket. And if you don't have it, you'll pull out a debit card or credit card. So user interface as the payment amount diminishes it takes over cost takes over everything. Basically convenience just trumps everything else as the total amount you're trying to send goes down.
</details>

### Affirm 的创立与早期构想

>> 是的。

我想让你们两位带我们一起重温回忆之路。关于一家公司的开端，以及你们如何走过最终促成这家公司的“想法迷宫”。

嗯，从你这里开始吧。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah.

I I want you to take us both back to me memory lane. It's the beginning of a firm and how you guys navigated the idea maze of of what would eventually become a firm.

Um,

you go here.
</details>

>> 好吧，希望我们的说法对得上。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Well, hopefully our stories match.
</details>

>> 是啊，应该把我们分到……三个问题，比如分开的房间里。这就像囚徒困境，对吧？就像要求如果我们的说法对得上，我们就……我们就可以离开。如果对不上，那我们一整天都得待在这儿。嗯，根据我的回忆，嗯，我经营过这家叫 TrialPay 的公司，做的是数字商品的替代支付。也就是说，你不想为了扔一只羊或者在某些愚蠢的社交游戏上做点什么而付费——那些既不困难、没有价值也不好玩的事情。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah, we should put us in three questions for like no separate route. This this is like the prisoner's dilemma, right? It's just like ask if our stories match, we have to we get to leave. If they don't match, then we have to stay here all day. Um, so my recollection was um I ran this company Trial Pay, which did um alternative payments for digital goods. So, you don't want to pay for throwing a sheep or doing something on some silly social game, something that was not hard, valuable, or fun.
</details>

>> 谁会做这种事？

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Who would do such?
</details>

>> 谁会……谁会做这种事？但是，你知道，你在 FarmVille 里买金币，或者在做别的什么。你在买扑克筹码，虚拟扑克筹码。当然，你不想付钱；如果你注册了 Geico，就能免费得到它。这对 Geico 来说有很大的经济价值。你其实并不在乎是用 Progressive 还是 Geico。“哦，如果我换成 Geico，或者办张信用卡，或者注册 Netflix，我就能拿到 FarmVille 金币。”所以，我们当时做的就是这个。而且呃，我……我挺有说服力的，也很磨人。可能磨人多过有说服力。所以签下了除了一家叫 Slide 之外的所有其他社交游戏公司。呃，Max 骄傲地或不那么骄傲地经营着 Slide。然后呃，我去参加了 Allen & Company 的峰会，我差点就没去成，因为我妻子当时怀着孕，临盆在即。那是 2009 年 3 月，差不多是 3 月的第一周。我儿子是 2009 年 3 月 28 日出生的，但她的预产期是 3 月 16 日。所以我就想我不能去参加这个会议。然后呃，Allen & Company 的那几位就说：“这是个非常好的峰会。你真的应该去。”我说：“我妻子快要生了。”他说：“你应该去参会。要是她分娩了，我们派飞机送你回来。”我就说：“行吧，听起来不错。我去。”于是我就去了［抽鼻子］峰会。我想我们在那里短暂地见过一面。呃，成功地没能说服你。呃，不过后来我想我发了一封俄语便签跟进。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Who would who would do such a thing? But, you know, you're buying coins in Farmville or you're doing something. You're buying poker chips, virtual poker chips. Of course, you don't want to pay get it for free if you sign up for Geico. There's a lot of economic value to Geico. You don't really care if you use Progressive or Geico. Oo, I can get Farmville coins if I switch to Geico or get a credit card or sign up for Netflix. So, that's what we did. And uh I I was uh somewhat persuasive and annoying. Probably more annoying than persuasive. So signed up every other social gaming company. Um except for this one called Slide. And uh Max ran proudly or unproudly ran Slide. And uh I went to the Allen & Company conference which I almost didn't go to because my wife was very very pregnant. So this was in March of 2009. It's like the first week of March. My son was born March 28th, 2009, but her due date was March 16th. So like I'm not going to go to this conference. And then uh the the Allen guys were like, "This is a very good conference. You should really go." I was like, "My wife's very pregnant." He's like, "You should go to the conference. If she goes into labor, we'll fly you back." I was like, "All right, that sounds good. I'm going." So I went [snorts] to the conference. I think we met there briefly. Uh successfully did not persuade you. U but then I think I followed up with a note in Russian.
</details>

>> 是的。嗯，这在今天可能就起不到作用了，因为显而易见，我现在就会用 Gemini 或者你知道的 ChatGPT 来写这封大概充满语法错误的俄语便签——其实那大概反而会暴露它不是 ChatGPT 写的。它通不过……它能通过全字母句检测，但我高中和大学学过俄语，在那里工作过，也在那里住过一段时间。嗯，我想你当时大概是觉得：你为什么会说俄语？我想那应该就是当时的反应，但接着我们就成了朋友。呃，我想我……你把公司卖给了 Google，所以遗憾的是，我再也没能说服 Slide 成为 TrialPay 的客户。嗯，不过呃，我……我隐约记得你发过一条类似这样的推文：“我想找点事情做。有什么想法吗？”这就成了我去联系你的理由，然后我想我们……我们在 Google 的那座禁忌大楼里喝了咖啡。还记得 Google 有一栋大楼是绝对不允许任何访客进入的吗，但你根本不在乎。嗯，追诉时效已经过了［笑声］，所以他们不能怎么样了。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes. Um, and this wouldn't have worked today because now obviously I would have used Gemini or you know you know chat GBT to write this probably somewhat riddled with grammatical flaws Russian note actually that that probably would have given it away of not being chat GPT. It wouldn't have passed it would have passed panggram but I took Russian in in high school and college worked there lived there for a while um and I think you were like why do you speak Russian? I think that was the response but then we just became friendly. Uh I think I you you sold to Google so I could not ever convince slide to become a client of of trial pay sadly. Um but uh I I seem to recall you had like a tweet like I'm looking for something to do. Any idea? And that was like my reason to reach out and I think we we had coffee at the forbidden building at Google. Remember how like there was one Google building that no guests were allowed at but you just didn't care. Um statute of limitations were [laughter] so they can't.
</details>

>> 你把我的秘密都抖出来了。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> You're revealing all my secrets.
</details>

>> 是的。没错。因为我知道你有多喜欢 Vic。嗯，所以，所以［笑声］所以我们……我们在那里喝了咖啡，然后就在那里……是的，我们后来谈到了 Bimley，但当时感觉就像是，你知道，在我的记忆中，在手机上买东西真的很难。手机正变得越来越普及。我们应该有一种方法来解决“睡衣问题”——你在楼上穿着睡衣，想买东西，你的信用卡在楼下，你怎么付钱？与此同时，不仅手机无处不在，社交网络也无处不在。也许有一种新的核保机制，有点像回到 19 世纪那种老杂货铺——就像你来到杂货铺，你没有现金，既是字面意义上的也是比喻意义上的。你身上没带钱，而且你家里甚至也没有。但你是开杂货铺的，你会说：“好的，Max，包在我身上。别担心。”但今天，你只是一段 Cookie 和一个 IP 地址，所以我并不知道你是谁。或者，如果你去线下的沃尔玛，就像，你知道，非常热情的迎宾员会跟你打招呼——我觉得他们现在好像没有迎宾员了，但就像热情迎宾员向你打招呼那样。他们根本不知道你是谁。你没法用杂货铺那一套。但如果你在 Facebook 上有 500 个好友——顺便说一句，这个想法后来被证明是错的——但如果你在 Facebook 上有 500 个好友，而且他们都有……你有上传的 1000 张照片，你大概率是一个低信用风险用户。而且如果你并没有在主动寻求贷款——这是最关键的一点。就像很多信贷提议都是主动发送的一样。比如你的 FICO 分数是 800 分。我知道由于某种原因，你的 Capital One 信用卡上有 14,000 美元的循环借款。那我就会给你寄一份定制邮件说：“你为什么不来找我美国银行做再融资呢？”但如果你去 Google 上搜类似：“我没钱了。需要钱，需要钱，贷款，贷款，贷款”，那你大概率就是一个高信用风险用户。所以，有点像是回到杂货铺的概念：针对那些并没有主动寻求贷款、手头可能没有带钱包的人，让他们像是回到 19 世纪那样，用自己的身份来付款。我记忆里差不多就是这样的。

对，我认为那……那确实对得上。呃，再补充一点细节。在 Google 的那一年绝对是一个挑战，在某种意义上说，我当时仍在慢慢接受这样一个事实：我经营了一家我根本不该去经营的社交媒体公司超过 5 年。尽管我非常努力地工作，给很多人带来了财务上非常积极的结果，但归根结底，它从未真正挠到我认为自己正在挠的那种创业之痒。所以在那一年里发生的一件事是，我花了大量时间进行内省：我的下半辈子到底该做些什么？我打算创办一家公司，但你知道，也许……也许我应该对我接下来要创办什么样的公司更加深思熟虑。而我那几乎总是正确的妻子说：“你知道，你工作最拼命、最快乐的日子是在 PayPal 做反欺诈的那段时光，就像你差点累死、或者我们差点死掉的那段日子——当时她也在那里。”嗯，那些日子里你虽然看起来精疲力竭，但你实际上显然……

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes. Exactly. Because I know how much you love Vic. Um, so, so, [laughter] so we we had coffee there and then that's where this Yeah, we were talking about Bimley later, but it was like, you know, my recollection was it's really hard to pay for something on a mobile phone. Mobile phones are becoming more ubiquitous. We should have a way of solving the pajama problem of you're upstairs in your pajamas, you want to buy something, your credit card is downstairs, how do you pay? Meanwhile, not just are mobile phones ubiquitous, but social networks are ubiquitous. And maybe there's a new underwriting mechanism of kind of going back to the old general store from like the 1800s of it's like you show up in the general store, you don't have cash, like both literally and figuratively. You don't have it on you, but you don't even have it, you know, back home. But you run the general store and you're like, "Okay, Max, I got you. Don't worry about it." But today, you're just like a cookie and an IP address, so I don't really know who you are. Or if you go to Walmart offline, it's like, you know, you get greeted by the very nice greeter. I don't think they have them anymore, but like you get greeted by the nice greet. they have no idea who you are. You can't do the general store thing. But if you have 500 friends on Facebook, this was wrong, by the way, but if you have 500 friends on Facebook and they all have, you have a thousand pictures that you've uploaded, you're probably a low credit risk. And if you're not looking for credit, this is the key thing. It's like a lot of credit offers are sent out proactively. So, you have an 800 FICO. I know that you have $14,000 that's revolving for some reason on your Capital One card. I'm going to send you a customized mailer saying, "Why don't you go refinance with me, Bank of America?" But if you go on Google and you say like, "I'm out of money. Need money, need money, credit, credit, credit," like you're probably a bad credit risk. So, kind of going back to the general store concept, people that aren't looking for credit that might not have their wallet with them, kind of make it like the 1800s and pay with your identity. That that was kind of how I remembered it.

Yeah, I think that that that matches. Uh the to add a little bit more color to it. So the year at Google was definitely a challenge in a sense that I was still coming to terms that I ran for like over 5 years a company in social media that I had no business running. Like I I worked very hard. had a financially very positive outcome for a lot of people, but ultimately it never sort of scratched the sort of entrepreneurial itch that I thought I was I was scratching. And so one of the things that happened during that year, I spent a lot of time soulsearching like what am I supposed to do next with my life? I was going to start a company, but you know, maybe maybe I should be more thoughtful about what company I'm going to start next. And my wife, who's pretty much always right, said, "You know, the hardest you've ever worked and the happiest you were was during the anti-fraud days at PayPal, like when you nearly died, or we nearly died. She was there as well." Um, those were the days when you looked exhausted, but you actually were obviously
</details>

<!-- chunk 4/8 -->

### 构想雏形与跨文化信用灵感

非常高兴。而且你知道，我……你知道，她当时对我说：“我知道你发誓再也不做金融服务了。我知道你绝不会再去碰支付了，但就这一次，给个机会吧。”这实际上对我后来的回应产生了一些影响，因为你当时在做一家支付公司。而我之前不太愿意去碰 TrialPay 的一部分原因就是，我觉得我再也应付不了另一家准支付公司了。就像我转去做社交媒体是有原因的，我不想和这玩意儿扯上任何关系。所以，当我慢慢又被拉回到支付领域时，

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
very happy. And you know, I you know, she was telling me, "I know you swore off doing financial services. I know you're never going to touch payments again, but just this once. Give give it a chance. And that that actually had some influence as to my responsiveness, too, because you're working on a payments company. And part of my reluctance to deal with trial pay was like, I can't handle another near payments company. Like I I went into social media for a reason. I don't want anything to do with this stuff. And so, as I was slowly getting reeled back into working on payments,
</details>

我们便开始探讨这个构想。某种社交版 BML 是我们在讨论它具体会是什么样时所用的简略说法之一。嗯，杂货铺的比喻很有意思，因为与此同时——我记不清我们俩是谁知道这事了，因为你也会讲日语，这可能是你告诉我的，但我记得读到过不同经济体中的社会信用。在以色列的杂货店里有一种“先赊着”或者“下次再给”的概念，这种现象在今天依然很普遍。如果你在以色列结账，显然在足够小的城镇里，如果忘了带钱，你只要给收银员看一眼你的袋子就行，他们会记住，下次再找你结。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
we started talking about this. The sort of a social BML was one of the sort of short hands we used. discussing what it would be. Um, the general store analogy was interesting because at the same time, I can't remember which one of us knew this cuz you also speak Japanese and this this could have been the thing you told me, but I remember reading about social credit in different economies. There's a notion of just pay me later or pay me next time in Israeli grocery stores, which is still common today. If you're checking out an Israel, apparently in a small enough town, you can just show your bag to the cashier. they'll remember and then they'll get you next time if you forgot your money.
</details>

在日本这甚至更加正规，直到不久之前，即使店主不认识你，你也可以递上你的名片。只要你有张名片，他们就会把你买的东西写在名片背面，那就是你的总账。而那种“直接记在我账上”的想法，你知道，显然是一个相当美式的概念等等。所以我们正向这个方向靠拢。呃，我当时正在和一家初创公司接触，作为一种去了解该行业的方式，那家公司正试图建立一种社交信用评分，有点像模仿中国的社会信用分，而后者显然被用于远不止信贷的诸多方面。所以我们一直在围绕着支付以及解决“我没带凭证，但我仍需要把这笔账结了”的想法打转。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
This is even more formalized in Japan where until very recently you would give your business card to the storekeeper even if they didn't know you. If you had a business card, they would write what you bought on the back of it and that was your total. And the notion of like you just put it on my tab is a thing that's you know obviously fairly American concept and so on. And so we were converging on this. Uh I was talking to a startup at the time. ascouch just learning about the industry that was trying to build a social credit score kind of modeling it on the Chinese social score which is used for a lot more than than credit obviously. So we were swirling around this idea of payments and solving the I don't have my credentials with me but I still need to get through this.
</details>

比如另一个类似的隐喻式场景是：我正在看电视。过去人们在电视节目之间还会插播广告的时候，曾有过这样一个非常酷的广告。呃，我真的很想要那个按承诺价格向我推销的东西，我可以用手机来买，但我绝对不想从床上爬起来。所以，如果能把这些交易在时间上拉得更近，显然以此来提升转化率，这其中是否就能捕捉到曲线下的某种面积？所以，这就是某种盘旋交织的起源故事。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
Like another sort of metaphorical version of this was I'm watching TV. did this really cool ad back in the day when people had advertisements in between things in TV. Uh, and I really want the thing that was promised to me at the price that it was promised to me, but I could do it on my phone, but I'm definitely not going to get off my bed. And so, like what if there's some area under the curve that you can capture by bringing these um transactions closer in time and improving conversion obviously. And so, that that's the kind of the the swirly origin story.
</details>

### 动机差异与 1-800-Flowers 的 PHP 演示

嗯，这里面很大一部分，我认为我们两个人对什么事情好玩有着略微不同的版本。我想作为支付行业出身的人，你当时想的大多是“咱们去做点支付相关的事吧”。而我作为一个刚刚摆脱了为社交媒体做大量机器学习的人——那当然挺好，但真不是我注定该做的事，我那时渴望回到用机器学习对抗欺诈的日子。我的行事方式是，我只想建立一个非常酷的信用评分，然后其他人去负责支付，比如借贷支付。我其实对这块一无所知。而且我做过支付了，没必要去做借贷。但如果能建一个非常酷的评分系统，那会非常棒，因为我记得我们当年在 PayPal 能够接触到的海量数据。我们或许能拿到一些数据，或许能买到一些数据，我们可以在 Facebook 上挖掘数据。我正试着联系马克·扎克伯格，看他是否愿意给我一些他的数据。所以，我脑子里盘旋的大多是这些，而你则是“我只想促成一些交易”。我觉得如果说动机上有什么差异的话，可能在于你更有动力去“找个商户”。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
Um, a lot of it I think the two of us had a slightly different version of what would be fun. So I think you as a payments guy you were mostly thinking like let's go do some payments stuff. As a person recovering from doing lots of machine learning in a service of social media which was you know good and well but wasn't really what I was meant to do and lusting for the days of doing machine learning to fight fraud. My mo was I just want to build a really cool credit score and then someone else will take care of payments like lending payments. Don't really know anything about it. And I've done payments. Don't need to do lending. But building a really cool score that would be amazing because I remember just the reams of data we had access to at PayPal. We could maybe get some data. Maybe we could buy some data. We could mine Facebook for data. I'm trying to get in touch with Mark Zuckerberg to see if he might give me some of his data. And so a lot of that was sort of in my head while you were like I just want to close some transactions. I think that that maybe if there's any difference between the motivations you were much more motivated by let's go find a merchant.
</details>

>> 嗯，但相似的动力是，你知道 TrialPay 当时我想我们正处于卖给 PayPal 的关头，但随后他们把我晾在了一边——不是你的那个 PayPal，是很多代之后的 PayPal。嗯，我当时心想我再也不想创业了，这太痛苦了。而且你当时也经历过那样的煎熬。所以，当时的想法也是“我们把这事做起来吧”。嗯，我们会雇其他人……不过，后来你把我介绍给了内森，呃，还有杰夫，嗯，我们算是正式注册成立了公司，但我——我也很……另一件我清楚记得的事——你会以非常负面的视角来看待这事，因为那是 PHP 写的，不过呃，我们开过一个会，我……我有点把起点看作是 2012 年的 Allen & Company 大会。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Well but the similar motivation was like you know trial pay I think we were in the throws of selling to PayPal but then they they left me at the altter not your PayPal the many many generations later PayPal. Um and I was like I never want to start a company again. This is so painful. I and then you you had been in that in the throws of that as well. So, it was also like let's get this thing going. Um, and we'll hire other Well, but then you introduced me to Nathan uh and Jeff um and we kind of formally incorporated, but I I also like the other thing that I distinctly remember and you'll you remember this in a very negative light because it's PHP, but uh we had a meeting this I I kind of think of the origin as being the Allen and Company conference in 2012.
</details>

>> 噢，对。我……我不觉得这是件负面的事。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Oh, yeah. I I don't I don't find it a negative thing.
</details>

>> 不，不，我知道。但这挺好玩的。所以，我们就开了这个会，呃，我们当时正在和呃……桑，还记得你以前的幕僚长吧？所以，我们正在过名单，然后发现，噢，我们俩都认识吉姆·麦卡恩，就是那个非常随和、以前常出现在 1-800-Flowers 所有广告里的人。还记得 1-800-Flowers 吗，你可以订花。“现在就给我订”或者不管那广告词是什么。所以，呃，我们联系了他，想约个早餐会。那是一个大约 200 人的会议，任何人都可以和任何人在一起，但我们就说，嘿，为什么不一起吃个早餐呢？然后我……我通宵用 PHP 做了这个演示 demo。是的，我基本上就是克隆了一下。这挺逗的，就像我现在 5 秒钟就能做出来，但我当时克隆了 1-800-Flowers 的网站，嗯，然后做了一个完整的“用身份支付”。所以你进行结账，比如加上一打玫瑰，用来为你做过的错事赔罪。寄给我妻子，点击支付。噢糟糕，我没带我的支付卡。我可以用 Facebook 支付。这会做什么呢？它调用了 Facebook Connect。它确保我有超过 500 个好友。其实 Facebook 当时有——我是说正如你所指出的，他们有很多有趣的数据。关于他们是否认为这个账号涉嫌欺诈，他们有自己的内部标记。而那时的欺诈更多是指刚创建的、不是真实账号那种。它不是一个真人，因为一个账号并不等于一个人，对吧？希望它们是一回事，但未必如此，因为一个人可以拥有多个账号。嗯，但如果是一对一的话。所以，那就是我们好玩的演示，然后我记得吉米当时说：“这太棒了。就这么干吧。”

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> No, no, I know. But it was funny. So, so we have this meeting like so, uh, we're going through the the list with, uh, son, remember your your old chief of staff, right? So, we're going through the list and it's like, oh, we both know Jim McCann, who's this very friendly guy who used to be on all the commercials for 1800 Flowers. Remember 1800 Flowers, you can order flowers. Order it right now for me or whatever the commercial was. So, uh, we ping him to get a breakfast meeting. It was like 200 person conference. Anybody can be with anybody, but it's like, hey, why don't we have breakfast? And I I pulled like an allnighter making this demo um in PHP. Yeah, I basically like cloned. It's just funny like a I could do this in 5 seconds now, but I I I cloned 1800 Flowers site um and then made a whole like pay with your identity. So you do a checkout like add the dozen roses to, you know, make up for the bad stuff that I did. Sending it to my wife, click pay. Oh shoot, I don't have my my my payment card with me. I can pay with Facebook. What does that do? It does Facebook connect. It makes sure that I have over 500 friends. And actually Facebook had I mean to your point, they had a lot of interesting data. They had their own internal flags around did they think this account was fraudulent or not. And fraudulent for back then was more of like it was just created not as a real account. It wasn't a real person because an account is not a person, right? Hopefully they're the same thing, but not necessarily because one person can have multiple accounts. Um, but if there's one to one. So, so that was uh that was our fun demo and then I remember Jimmy was like, "This is great. Let's do it."
</details>

### 信任、驻军订花与商户费率

>> 是的。所以我还记得那次交谈中的另外两个生动细节。那是一顿很棒的早餐。进行到一半时，他突然说：“噢，对啊。我们以前经常遇到一模一样的事，当年军人打来电话说：‘给我妻子送点花。’然后说：‘不行啊，我身上没带信用卡。’我们就会说，噢，没关系的，谢谢你服兵役，我们下次再找你收。他就这样凭直觉透彻理解了这个概念：只要有足够的信任，你完全可以对一件东西进行后付款。而我们当时基本上是在那儿举手表示，如果他们不付款，责任由我们承担，没事的，这笔损失我们来扛。呃，所以他立马就被打动了。自那次早餐以来，他一直是我们产品的大力支持者，并且在我的职业生涯中一直是一个提供支持的人/形象。而且他完全没有任何理由相信我们，除了一定程度上他能感知到我们是什么样的人。就像‘你们这帮家伙太棒了，你们看起来真的精通自己在做的事’。他当时太兴奋了。我们完全不知道会这样。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah. So, I two other colorful points from that. So, it was a good breakfast. And then in the middle of it, he goes, "Oh, yeah. We used to do exactly this thing back in the day when the service members would call us and say, "Send me my wife some flowers." And uh, "No, I don't have my credit card with me." And like, oh, that that's fine. Like, you know, thank you for your service. We'll we'll just get you on the next one. And he like intuitively grocked this idea that like you can absolutely postpay a thing if you have enough trust. And we were basically there raising our hands saying we'll take the responsibility for, you know, if they don't pay you, it's okay. We're going to eat it. And uh so he was like instantly smitten. He he had been a great proponent of the product and like a supportive, you know, person slashpresence in my professional life ever since that breakfast. And he had absolutely no reason to trust us other than like he has some degree of sense who we were. And it was like you guys are great. You seem like you really know what you're doing. Like he was so excited. We have no idea.
</details>

>> 嗯，后来我们被交接给了……呃，他叫什么名字来着？他现在其实在经营一家成功的初创公司。呃……那个人是阿米特。对，阿米特·沙阿。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Well, then we got handed to uh this what was his name? He actually now runs a successful startup. The uh the guy that was Amit. Yes. Amit Sha.
</details>

>> 对。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yes.
</details>

>> 是的。于是阿米特接手了。我们落地推进，他非常非常兴奋。而且我记得我——我想我是用微软的 Word 还是 Excel 弄出来的——我说这是我们的报价单。我们需要一份报价单，我当时就说，我们为什么不收 7% 呢？[笑声] 嗯，所以在这些业务的消费金融中，有 MDR 和 APR 的概念。所谓商户扣率，是因为你正在贴现付给商户的款项，因为你现在就把现金垫付给了他们，而你要到以后才收得回来。所以不妨称之为 7% 的商户扣率，但我

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah. So, Amit took over. We implemented he was very very excited. But and I remember I I I came up in Microsoft I think I did this in Microsoft Word or Excel like here's our pricing sheet. We need a pricing sheet and I was like why don't we charge 7%. [laughter] um like so in in consumer finance for these things there's a concept of an MDR and an APR. So merchant discount rate because you're discounting what you pay the merchant because you're advancing in the cash right now. You're not collecting it until later. So call it a 7% merchant discount rate but I
</details>

<!-- chunk 5/8 -->

我想……当时好像有张表格。这完全是我随手编出来的。嗯，然后……然后上面有一个年利率（APR）。嗯，但是这里的年利率……当时并没有年利率，只有商户扣率（MDR）。嗯，但后来没人……我把它拿给某个人看。我想实际上是罗布·菲弗（Rob Feifer），嗯，在我们雇佣……

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
 think

 there was like some table. I just

 literally made this up. Um and then and

 then there was an APR. Um but the APR

 here there was no APR. It was just MDR.

 Um but then nobody like I I showed this

 to somebody. I think it was Rob Feifer

 actually uh before we hired
</details>

>> 你们有了一个真正的财务员工。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> you had like a real finance employee.
</details>

>> 嗯，对。所以，但我把它拿给他看了。他的反应就像是：免费送花，对吧？因为他的意思是你根本不用把钱还给我们。嗯，所以那上面的回报并不怎么理想。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh yeah. So but but I I showed him this.

He was like free flowers, right? Because

he's like you just didn't have to pay us

back. Um so the the returns were not

fantastic on that.
</details>

>> 太玩世不恭了。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> So cynical.
</details>

>> 嗯，不过，对，我想他当时原话就是说免费送花。就好像是，这真是个大好交易，免费送花。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Um but uh yeah, I think he literally

said free flowers. It's like this is

this is a great deal free flowers.
</details>

>> 这人总体上就是个非常聪明但也极度玩世不恭的家伙。所以我们可不会被一点冷嘲热讽给乱了阵脚。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> This is just a generally a very smart

but very cynical guy. So we were not

going to be perturbed by some cynicism.
</details>

>> 我喜欢罗布。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I love route.
</details>

>> 呃，他姐姐以前为我工作过。所以我记得，呃，在一家公司的背景下对他进行面试，尽管我想当时它还叫 Expedite。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh his sister used to work for me. So I

remember uh interviewing him in the

context of a firm although I think at

the time it was still Expedite.
</details>

>> 对。它以 Expedite 的名字简短地摸索折腾了一阵，然后我们最终给它重新起了名。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah. It briefly bumped around as

expedite and then we finally renamed it.
</details>

>> 当时叫什么来着？它……它注册成立时的名字是 Expedite Software Inc.。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> What was it? It was it was incorporated

as Expedite Software Inc.
</details>

>> 对，我想没错。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah, I think that's right.
</details>

>> 那么，随着你们从那时一路走来，这个想法是如何演进的？它是什么时候开始真正契合产品市场匹配度（product-market fit）的？或者说这个领域是如何以你所了解的那种方式展开的……

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> And so how did the idea evolve as you

you know went from there? When did it

start to really get get product market

fit or how did the space play out in the

way that you know
</details>

### 寻找产品市场匹配度与漏斗上游的突破

>> 每家创业公司都会经历一段“旷野里的四十年”，这就好比是必然存在的。如果它事后还值得拿来谈论的话。我的意思是，有些人就是过早放弃了，或者你知道，发生了什么事把它给毁了。但我从来没碰到过哪家公司，是人们创办了一家公司，然后就像是在 24 小时后就找到了产品市场匹配度，接着就顺风顺水地开卖，而且事事顺利。所以你总会经历这样一段时期，在某种程度上每天去上班似乎还说得过去，但你并不真正清楚这会不会以一场巨大的空空如也告终。而我们当时确实在这个巨大的虚无时期徘徊彷徨了相当一阵子。在 1-800-Flowers 之后，我们和赛义德·艾哈迈德（Said Ahmed）展开了一种不间断的互动，他从来就没有对转化率满意过，对用户界面也不满意，而且他基本上是对的。就像……他算是一个脾气暴躁、要求苛刻的人，但从产品和财务的角度来看，他很清楚自己在说什么，而且他绝对不会付 7% 的费用。呃，所以……呃，我们当时就像是在一瘸一拐地艰难支撑。我们产生了一点点交易量，但除其他问题之外，“嘿，你可以稍后付钱给我们”这个概念，是在你选好花之后才出现的。所以他就会说：“听着，你们在蚕食我的信用卡交易量。如果如果你们分文不收，我当然会给你们送去更多交易，但你们收费比信用卡还要高，所以这……这是个愚蠢的想法。就好像，我根本一点儿也不想为此付钱。你们知道吗，你们基本上应该为自己感到羞耻。”而我们当时一方面在试图说服其他商户，但我们手里这个商户基本上在说：“是啊，我是说，这帮人是挺好的，但这玩意儿几乎一文不值。”所以事情进展得非常不顺。接着我们有了另一位朋友，一个名叫尼尔斯（Nils）的人，他经营着一家名叫 Beautylish 的公司，这家公司现在好像还在，但当时他们是在网上卖化妆品和美妆产品的。而 Beautylish 在接入 Expedite 时所做的唯一不同之处——我想那时可能已经……我想那时名字已经改成 Affirm 了——就是他们在漏斗上游就告诉了购物者，基本上就是在他们挑选洗发水和香水的时候告诉他们：你可以分三期付款，或者 30 天后付款，或者不管我们当时在尝试推行的是什么。然后，转化率立刻获得了 30% 的提升，而那正是一个“噢，我们明白这是怎么回事了”的时刻。这不是一个替代方案，这实际上不是在解决穿着睡衣支付的痛点，它解决的是“我的预算只有这么点，但如果我可以分多个时间段付款，它就会大幅扩张”的问题。因此，我们一旦弄懂了这个概念最起初的苗头，就立刻把它转化成了一场销售活动，并非常迅速地找到了一批规模较小的品牌，主要是直接面向消费者（DTC）的品牌，他们根本不在乎我们收他们 1%、5% 还是 12%。因为他们正试图拉动顶线营收的增长，并告诉他们的购物者说：嘿，你可以分期付款，而不必现在就掏出现金。这是颠覆性的。因此，我当时真真切切地会收到商户 CEO 们寄来的这些感谢信，他们说——而且我现在依然和他们当中的很多人是朋友，比如那些早期采用者。这些人中的大多数现在要么把生意卖了，要么生意做垮了，要么已经转行去做别的事情了。但我现在依然会碰到一些人，比如有位名叫特蕾西（Tracy）的女士，来自 Tradesy。Tradzy.com 曾是一个……

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> every startup

has the 40 years in a desert like it's

just a a given like if it's worth

talking about expost I mean some some

people just like quit too early or you

know something happens to to destroy it

but I've never run into a company where

people start a company and they just

like hit product market fit and 24 hours

later they're just selling and you know

everything's going swimmingly. So you

always have this period where like kind

of still makes sense to show up to work,

but you don't really know if it's going

to end in like a great nothing. And we

were definitely meandering through the

great nothing period for a while. After

100 flowers, we had a sort of non-stop

interactions with said Ahmed, who was

never happy with the conversion rate,

with the user interface, and he was

mostly right. like he he was kind of a

grumpy demanding guy but he knew what he

was talking about from the product and

financials perspective and he was

definitely not going to pay 7%. Uh and

so uh we were sort of limping through

that. We're generating a little bit of

volume, but among other things, the

notion of, hey, you can pay us later

showed up after you selected the

flowers. And so he would say, "Look, you

guys are cannibalizing my credit card

volume. If I charge if I were charged

nothing for it, of course, I'd send you

more transactions, but you're charging

me more than credit cards, so it's it's

a dumb idea. like I don't want to pay

anything for it at all. You know, you

guys ought to be ashamed of yourself

basically. And we were sort of trying to

convince other merchants, but we had one

merchant that was essentially saying,

"Yeah, I mean, these guys are nice guys,

but it's kind of worthless." And so it

it was it was going nowhere fast. And

then we had another friend, somebody

named Nils, who ran a company called

Beautylish, which is kind of still

around, but they were selling online

cosmetics and beauty products. And the

only difference that Beautylish

did as they implemented expedite, I

think by then it may have already I

think it was named the firm by then was

that they told their shoppers upfunnel

basically as they were selecting their

shampoos and and perfumes that you could

pay

in three installments or 30 days later

or or whatever it is we were trying to

sort of do. then and that had an instant

30% increase in conversion and that was

the oh we know what this is this isn't

an alternative this isn't actually

solving the pajama problem it is solving

my budget is this but if I could pay

over multiple periods of time it would

expand a lot and so the second we sort

of understood the very beginnings of

that notion we turn it right around into

a sales campaign and very quickly found

a bunch of smallish brands primarily

direct to consumers who could not care

whether we charged them 1%, 5% or 12%.

Because they were trying to grow their

top line and telling their shoppers

that, hey, you could pay for this over

time instead of having to cough up the

cash right now. It was transformative.

And so I would literally get these love

letters from merchant CEOs saying, and

I'm still friends with a lot of them,

like early adopters. Most of these

people have now either sold their

businesses or the business has failed or

they've gone on to do something else.

But I still run into people who were

like there's this woman named Tracy from

Tradzy. Tradzy.com was a
</details>

>> 噢，对。我刚见过她。对。她……她人非常好。她是我们的早期支持者……

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Oh, yeah. I just saw her. Yeah. She

She's wonderful. And she was an early

advocate for us
</details>

>> 因为她的业务确实……

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> because her business literally
</details>

>> 我都把她给忘了。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I forgot about her.
</details>

>> 她会把她仪表板的截图发邮件给我，并说：“这就是 Affirm 效应。这是你们为我带来的 35% 的猛增。拜托多来点。”

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> She would email me screenshots of her

dashboards and say, "This is the affirm

effect. Here's a 35% pop you guys caused

for me. Like, please do more."
</details>

### 床垫品牌与高商户扣率行业

>> 嗯，睡衣问题有了解决办法。然后还有所有的床垫公司。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Well, there there was a solution to the

pajama problem. And then it was also all

the mattress companies.
</details>

>> 噢，是的。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Oh, yes.
</details>

>> 那……那……那是……

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> That that that was
</details>

>> 那是另一个，那是重头戏。我只记得当时就像是，你知道的，等等，有一家公司叫 Purple，还有一家公司叫 Casper。就好像他们不断地从各个角落冒出来，那具有颠覆性。而且我记得实际上我们当时在探讨这个问题，背景是：你怎么能收取很高的商户扣率（MDR）还能顺利推行？这听起来不太好。不是说蒙混过关，而是真正向商户展示出足够的价值。最高的 MDR 实际上是营利性教育机构。嗯。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> that was another that was the big one. I

just remember it's like, you know, wait,

there's a company called Purple and

there's a company called Casper. It's

just like they just kept coming out of

the woodwork and that was

transformative. And I remember actually

we were talking about this in the

context of like how can you charge a

high MDR and get away with it? That

sounds bad. Not get away with it, but

like actually show sufficient value to

the merchant. The highest MDRs are

actually for-profit education

institutions. Mhm.
</details>

>> 所以，它们当中有些是 50……就像，我是说我特别不喜欢这帮家伙，但比如凤凰城大学（University of Phoenix）。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> So, some of them are like 50 like I mean

I I don't like these guys in particular,

but like University of Phoenix.
</details>

>> 嗯，所以有私募股权投资公司阿波罗（Apollo），但也有这么一家包揽了所有这些营利性机构的控股公司，叫阿波罗集团（Apollo Group）或者阿波罗什么来着。我想凤凰城大学是其中最大的一所。他们干脆就认定大部分人是不会还钱的。而毛利率又是如此之高，因为那是线上课程。他们就会说：“行吧，你可以拿走 50%。”对吧？你在后端接盘了应收账款，这又回到了马克斯（Max）之前谈到的反欺诈上，因为床垫的毛利率……比如这些床垫，我不知道你买过没有。它挺酷的，因为他们实际上发给你的并不是看起来像这样的床垫。它是卷开的。所以，你会收到这样一个类似圆柱体的东西。它相当小。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Um, so there's the private equity firm

Apollo, but there's also like this

holding company of all these for-profit

institutions called Apollo Group or

Apollo something. And University of

Phoenix, I think, is the biggest one.

And they just assume that most people

aren't going to pay. And the the gross

margins are so high because it's an

online course. They're like, "Okay, you

could take 50%." Right? you're stuck

with the receivables on the back end,

which goes back to the fraud fighting

that Max was talking about before

because the gross margins of the

mattress, like these mattresses, I don't

know if you ever bought one. It's pretty

cool because they didn't actually ship

you a mattress that looks like this. It

rolls out. So, you get this like

cylinder. It's pretty small.
</details>

>> 有些是用箱子装的。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Some of them are boxes.
</details>

>> 有些是用箱子装的，但有些就是你一打开它，然后它就……就像以前那种你放进洗澡水里然后就会膨胀开来的老玩具似的。当时的床垫就是那个样子。所以他们的毛利率非常非常高。因此在 MDR 上也要灵活得多，而更重要的是，没人想要……比如你穿着睡衣躺在自己不舒服的床垫上。你不想花 1200 美元买一张床垫，但如果它是像 30……一旦你把它分期细化，转化率就出现了巨大的增长。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Some of them are boxes, but some of them

it's like you just open it and then it

just like it's like one of those old

like toys that you'd put in like your

bath and then it would expand or

something. It's that was like the

mattress. So they had very very high

gross margins. So therefore a lot more

flexible on the MDR and more importantly

nobody wants like you're in your pajamas

on your uncomfortable mattress. You

don't want to spend $1,200 on a mattress

but if it's like 30 like it once you

subdivided it just has a massive

increase of conversion rate.
</details>

>> 对。那个故事里可能还有两三件其他技术层面的事情值得探讨，但那……那……那是下一个大飞跃。所以，床垫是大举拓展到 DTC 品牌的先声，这一点我敢肯定我们稍后会谈到。但在我们讲到那儿之前，Affirm 曾短暂地涉足过给线上教育机构充当支付服务提供商，

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah. There's a couple of other sort of

technical things that are probably worth

tapping into in in that story but that

that that was the next big leap. So, the

mattresses was the precursor to the

great expansion into DDC brands, which

I'm sure we'll touch on. But before we

get there, a firm briefly flirted with

being a payment provider to the online

educational facilities,
</details>

>> 而我们后来大呼小叫着逃离了那个领域，因为他们之所以愿意支付这些极其高昂的 MDR，是因为教育质量普遍极其糟糕。对。所以，人们大多数时候不付钱，并不是因为他们觉得：“噢，我考虑过了。既然我现在已经拿到了编织篮子专业的硕士学位，我就是不想为此付钱了。”看吧，事实证明我的学位一文不值。就比如，我当初为什么要报名参加这个荒唐的玩意儿？所以，我们当时，如果你回头去看那些诸如……嗯，叫什么来着？General Assembly。是不是那一整类“我们会教你如何写代码”的机构？另一个 PEI（私人教育机构）噱头，比如学写代码。直接让 ChatGPT 帮你们写代码就行了嘛。不过，呃，在当年这依然很重要的时候

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> which we ran out of kicking and

screaming because the reason they're

willing to pay these enormous MDRs is

because the quality of education is

largely terrible. Yeah. So, the reason

people don't pay most of the time isn't

because they're like, "Oh, I thought

about it. Now that I have a master's

degree in basket weaving, I just don't

want to pay for it." See, it turns out

my degree is worth nothing. Like, why

did I sign up for this ridiculous thing?

And so, we were, if you go back to sort

of, you know, things like um what is it

called? General Assembly. Is that their

whole sort of class of these like we

will teach you how to code? Another PEI

thing like learn how to code. Just ask

Chad GPT to code for you. But uh back in

the day when it was still important
</details>

<!-- chunk 6/8 -->

想去学编程，但你其实不想专门为此去读大学。你只是想上一门六周的课程。当时有大量类似凤凰城大学的仿造机构，比如——
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
to learn how to code, but you didn't really want to go to college for it. You just want to take a six week course. There were plenty of the sort of University of Phoenix clones that
</details>

>> 学院（Academy）。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Academy.
</details>

>> 对。全都是这帮人。我们看到了那个趋势，心想：“我的天，这些人愿意补贴教育，这很酷，而且很符合我们的使命。”然而，由于消费者不满导致的亏损率太高了，我们在那个领域大概只撑了半年。不过，回到床垫的话题。DTC（直接面向消费者）真正强大的地方——或者你可以把它们看作垂直整合型企业。就是布鲁克林某处大概有一家工厂，天晓得在哪儿。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah. There's all the all these guys. And uh we saw that trend and thought, "Oh my god, like these people are willing to subsidize education, which is cool and on mission for us." And uh yet the loss rates to consumer dissatisfaction were so high we lasted like a half a year in that space. But back to mattresses. So the thing that's really powerful about direct to consumer or you can think of them as vertically integrated businesses. So there's some factory in Brooklyn presumably or who knows where.
</details>

>> 中国。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> China.
</details>

>> 中国。呃，我原以为那些做床垫的家伙是在本地制造的，因为——
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> China. Uh I thought the mattress guys manufactured locally because
</details>

>> 我不知道，但他们全都在犹他州。还记得吗？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I don't know but they were all in Utah. Remember that?
</details>

>> 记得。我感觉当时就好像有一个犹他床垫小镇什么的。不过我觉得他们只是都发源于那里。Casper 在纽约，或者是 Purple 在——我想是在——然后还有其他像 Purple 一样的公司在——
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah. I feel like it was like there was like a Utah mattress town or something. But I think they just all originated there. Casper is in New York or was it purple I think was in and then there were like other purples that were
</details>

>> 我觉得比较奇怪的事情之一是，制造业其实全部被整合了，所以归根结底，他们为这些大同小异的床垫付出的成本其实非常低。我的意思是，我不想泄露任何行业机密，但记忆棉就是记忆棉。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I think one of the weirder things the manufacturing was actually all consolidated so they ultimately sort of paid very little for these mattresses that were kind of all the same. I mean don't want to reveal any industry secrets but memory foam is memory foam.
</details>

### 床垫热潮与零利率分期

>> 呃，无论如何，所以他们的主要价值，或者说他们、他们的价值等式非常有趣。首先，他们买进这种装在盒子里、经过压缩的记忆棉，以一种很酷的效果寄送给你。那里的利润率是巨大的，因为你实际上就只是把石油变成泡沫。但另一件事是更换周期。这其实可以追溯到一篇我认为是在 Casper 成立前夕发表的《哈佛商业评论》文章。所有这帮人，所有这些极具创业精神的人都读了同一篇文章，文章的核心观点基本上是：人们每七年换一次床垫。如果你是卖那张床垫的公司，这就是世界上最重要的事情。如果你错过了，下一次机会就是七年之后。但是在泡沫以及其他一切出现之前，床垫的利润率就已经达到了 80% 或者某个令人瞠目结舌的数字。于是突然之间，有四五家公司从那篇文章中诞生，基本上都在说：“天哪，所以如果我们只要搞清楚如何营销一张床垫，让你要么缩短更换周期——比如比上一张提前 6 年而不是 7 年去买下一张床垫——要么让你就认定这张床垫是最好的、最酷的，或是能从盒子里弹出来的那个。”那简直就像是——你知道，这里面有太多钱可赚了。一方面，这显然导致了床垫行业的饱和；但更关键的是，它让“不惜一切代价促使你买床垫”拥有了巨大的溢价。所以告诉你“我给你提供一笔三年期完全零利息的贷款，当然由 Affirm 提供支持”，就像是一笔很小的代价，外加一次酷炫的营销活动，等等等等。所以 Affirm 历史上出现过多次类似这样的事件，我们看到了让商家大幅分担商户费率（MDR）的机会，这使我们得以消除年化利率（APR）。换句话说，消费者获得了一笔真正的 0% 贷款。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh anyway and so they their primary value or their their their value equation was really interesting. So, first of all, they bought this memory foam in a box and sort of compressed and shipped it to you with a cool effect. The margin there were gargantuan because you are in fact just sort of taking petroleum and turning it into foam. But the other thing is the replacement cycle. And this actually goes to a I think a Harvard Business Review article that came out right before Casper was founded. And all these guys, all these really entrepreneurial people read the same article which essentially said this, people replace mattresses once every seven years. If you're the company that sells that mattress, it is the most important thing in the world. And if you miss it, the next opportunity is seven years from now. But the margins on mattresses even before the sort of the foam and the everything else are like 80% or some some eyepopping number. And so suddenly four or five companies were born from that article basically saying like, "Oh my god, so if we just figure out how to market a mattress that you will either shorten your replacement cycle, so you you buy the next mattress 6 years instead of seven years from the last one or you just decide this mattress is the best mattress or the coolest one or the one that pops out of a box." that is like oh you know there's so much money in it and one it resulted in a saturation of mattress industry obviously but more to the point it created this enormous premium on I will just compel you to buy a mattress by any means necessary so telling you I will give you a three-year loan at no interest at all powered by a firm of course is like a small price to pay and a cool marketing campaign and and and and so that was there were multiple events like this in a firm's history where we saw an opportunity for the merchant to significantly contribute to the MDR which allowed us to eliminate the APR. In other words, consumer got a true 0% loan.
</details>

这背后的背景其实非常非常重要、需要去理解，也是我一直以来深恶痛绝的事情之一——而且我会继续反对下去，直到它被定为非法或者通过其他手段消除——那就是虚假的 0% 法律。如果你去过某个——随便填你最喜欢的百货商店——在某个地方立着一块牌子，如今不那么显眼了，上面写着办理某某品牌的联名信用卡，享受 0% 年化利率。在那个零旁边有一个星号，上面的意思大致是：假设你在接下来的 12 个月或 24 个月内进行了消费，只要你在还本金时少还了一分钱或晚还了一天，利息就会追溯到最开始的时候。基本上，在你拿到卡的那天，你刷了 1000 美元。两年后醒来，你欠了 3000 美元。所以，这被称为延期利息信用卡。我们正是直接从那种愤怒中捕捉到了一个巨大机会，这个想法就是：好吧，我们的 0% 必须是真正的零。当你去买充气床垫或盒装床垫时，你将获得一笔 0% 的贷款。即便你晚了一个月或晚了一年，我们也不会改变价格，因为我们实在受够了那些用带星号的零来欺骗你的可笑之人。Affirm 的零上面绝不会有星号。这就是我们不收取滞纳金、不做延期利息的起源故事。行业喜欢抛给人们的所有那些花招和陷阱，我们全都避开了，主要是出于这样一种立场：你知道吗，当你决定和我们一起做这三年的分期时，你绝不会被坑。你永远不会受到负面的惊吓。所以那是另一个重大的向上反弹点，接着每家床垫公司都心想：“哇，这帮人在这么做，我们也应该这么做。”
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
The backdrop to this that's actually really really important to understand and one of my sort of you know things that I rage against have and and will continue to until it's made illegal or eliminated by by other means is the fake 0% law. So if you ever have gone to a, you know, fill in your favorite department store, there is a sign somewhere these days somewhat less prominent that says get a branded credit card from fill in the blank 0% APR. There's an asterisk next to the zero which says something along the lines of assuming you make a purchase for the next 12 months or 24 months, if you're a penny short or a day late paying your principal, the interest acrru retroactively to the beginning of time. Basically, the day you got that card, you swiped it for $1,000. You wake up and you owe $3,000 two years later. So, this is called the deferred interest credit card. And a huge opportunity we tapped into directly from that rage was this idea, well, our 0% is going to be a real zero. When you go to buy the inflatable mattress or the mattress from a box, you're going to get a 0% loan. And even if you're a month late or a year late, we're not going to change the price because we are so sick and tired of these ridiculous people who are lying to you about zero with an asterisk. It will never be an asterisk on a firm zero. That that is the origin story of why we don't charge lead fees. We don't do deferred interest. all the sort of gimmicks and gotchas that the industry loves to throw at people. We we've run away from all of that primarily as a point of like you know what when you decide to do this for three years with us you will never get screwed. You will never be surprised to the negative and so that that was another sort of big bounce up point and then then every mattress company was like oh wow like these guys are doing it we should do the same thing.
</details>

好的，稍稍快进一下，如今很多人听到 Affirm，立刻想到的事情就是先买后付。关于今天的这家公司，这有什么没能完全概括到的，或者忽略了什么？在它的全貌之中。我刚刚重温了 Affirm 起源时的往来邮件，其中有一点就是你的断言：广告和支付正在融合。那是 TrialPay 背后的论点，也是一堆不同事物背后的论点，其实也是 PayPal 内部一个名为 PayPal Shops 的失败项目背后的论点——我当时亲自尝试去构建这个东西，试图针对你刚买的东西进行二次营销。这种确认应该能让我们感知到下一步可能会买什么，诸如此类。顺便说一句，所有这些事情后来都被证明是真的。就像是，你知道的，比它们所处的时代早了 15、20、30 年。但今天的 Affirm 越来越成为商家不仅用于满足需求的手段。所以有人走进来说：“看，我想买这件东西，但我的预算只有这么大。我想要这双鞋，我也喜欢一个包，但我……”而 Affirm 就出现在那里说：“其实我们可以通过透明的条款帮你贷款。很多时候——三分之一的时候——呃，完全没有利息。你应该把包和鞋都拿下。这很安全。”那、那、那就是 Affirm 的品牌承诺，而且它运转得极其出色。你知道的，一年价值数百亿美元。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
Okay so fast forwarding a bit a lot of people hear a firm today and you know one quick thing they think is you know buy now pay later. What does this not fully encapsulate or what does this miss about the company today? It's in its entirety. One of the things in the email thread that I just reread in the origin origin of a firm was your claim that advertising and payments are converging which was the thesis behind trial pay thesis behind a bunch of different things actually a failed project within PayPal called PayPal shops where I was trying to personally I built this thing where was trying to remarket what you just bought. That affirmation should give us a sense for what we might buy next and you know all that. And all these things by the way have turned out to be true. Like there was just you know 15 20 30 years before their time. But a firm more and more today is means for merchants to not just satisfy demand. So somebody comes in and says look I'm going to buy this thing but my budget is this big. I won the shoes and I love a bag but I'm and a firm is there say actually we can help you finance this on transparent terms. a lot of times, a third of the time, uh, no interest at all. You should get the bag and the shoes. It's safe. That that that is the brand promise of a firm and it works tremendously well. You know, tens of billions of dollars a year worth.
</details>

如今这越来越演变为给商家打造一个平台，让他们去告诉自己的顾客：“嘿，我们要推出新东西了。我们有正在出售的这款诱人的新产品。”单在美国，我们就已经与大约 5000 多万人完成了交易，而且我们现在已在四个国家上线，增长相当迅速。因此，我们已经从仅仅满足需求，转向帮助商家创造或确保需求。支付与广告的融合正向我们走来。尽管比我预测的晚了 15 年——
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
That is now becoming more and more about creating a platform for merchants to tell their shoppers, hey, we are launching a new thing. We have this desirable new product we are selling. We've transacted with roughly 50 plus million Americans alone and we're now live in four countries and and growing pretty quickly. And so we have shifted to just satisfying demand to helping merchants create or guarantee demand. And the convergence of payments and advertising is upon us. Although 15 years later predicted it,
</details>

>> 你搞 TrialPay 操之过急了。我做 PayPal 显然也操之过急了。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> you're too early with travel pay. I'm certainly too early with PayPal.
</details>

>> 嗯，另一方面我记得——也许在那个邮件帖子里，也许不在。我应该去找找那封邮件。但大多数公司的获客成本都非常高。我现在作为一个风险投资人常开的一个玩笑就是，当我看到 90% 的消费类公司时，我宁愿去买谷歌的股票或 Facebook 的股票，因为所有客户都是从那里来的。我清晰地记得很多很多围绕“我们如何实现负 CAC（获客成本）”的对话，对吧？我觉得对我来说，Affirm 至今最酷的事情之一就是它拥有负的客户获取成本。我的意思是，它是被倒贴钱去获取客户的。有些公司你以为它们也是这样，但其实不然，因为它们基本上是在贴牌某些东西。但回到床垫上，呃，假设说你在其中一笔还款上逾期了。Casper——那家友好白鬼床垫公司，因为 Casper 是一只白鬼——不想去，或者猫之类的。我小时候家里养过一只叫 Casper 的猫。他们不想去——
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Well, the the other side I remember maybe it was in that thread or not. I should I should find that email. But most companies have very high customer acquisition cost. And like the joke that I make now as a VC is that when I see 90% of consumer companies, I'd kind of rather buy Google stock or Facebook stock because that's where all the customers come from. And I distinctly remember many many conversations around how do we have negative CAC, right? And like I think to me one of the coolest things about a firm to this day is it has negative customer acquisition cost. I mean, it is paid to acquire a customer. And there there are some companies that you would think they look like this, but they don't because they're basically white labeling something. But going back to the mattresses, um, let's just say that you're late on one of your payments. Casper, the friendly white ghost mattress company, because Casper is a white ghost, doesn't want to go or cat or something. We had a cat named Casper when I was growing up. They don't want to
</details>

<!-- chunk 7/8 -->

给你发催款通知，比如写着：“从我的床垫上滚下去。你还没还我钱呢。”他们希望由第三方来做这件事，而不像其他公司那样。是的，你知道这两者的区别是什么吗？B2B2C是一个非常有趣的品类。它是商业对商业对消费者（business-to-business-to-consumer）。我当年做TrialPay时就尝试过这么做，因为当时的情况就像是：好吧，你在玩一款Zynga游戏，如果你通过TrialPay注册Geico，就能获得免费游戏币。没人知道TrialPay到底是个什么鬼。所以我们当时尝试向消费者发送信息，就像你知道的，我想我们被我们的邮件服务商给封禁了，因为虽然我们实际上有权给这些客户发邮件，但他们完全不知道我们是谁。而如今，Affirm以负获客成本（negative CAC）与5000万人建立了实际的金融关系。我是说，真的，这不是在吹捧，但这确实不可思议，太难做到了，我们在风投界从未见过这样的事情，或者说你知道，因为确实有很多公司可以做到具有规模。我是说Casper做到了规模化，但付出了巨大的获客成本，大量的CAC，这就是为什么很多这类商业模式随着时间的推移往往会退化，因为所有的经济价值都流向了谷歌和Facebook。所以，如果你能拥有负CAC，然后你还可以推出其他产品，对吧？因为你真正拥有了这个客户，而且最重要的是，品牌方希望你拥有这个客户。这就是我当年在TrialPay没做对的地方，Zynga不希望我拥有他们的客户，Netflix也不希望我拥有他们的客户，我只是把这两者连接了起来。但是Affirm，商户希望你拥有这个客户。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
send you a dunning notice saying like, "Get off my mattress. You haven't paid me back." They want that to be a third party versus other companies where yes, you know what is the difference? What B2B TOC is a really interesting category. It's business to business to consumer. I tried doing this with trial pay because it's like all right, you're playing a Zinga game. Go get uh free coins if you sign up for Geico powered by trial pay. Nobody knew who the hell trial pay was. So we we actually tried sending messages to consumers like you know we got I think we got blocked by our email provider because nobody we we actually had a right to email these customers but they had no idea who we were whereas actually having a financial relationship with 50 million people with negative CAC. I mean it really is not to pet but it's incredible like it's so hard to do and we never see anything like this in the venture land or you know like because yeah there are lots of companies that can get to scale. I mean Casper got to scale but lots of CAC lots of CAC and that's why a lot of these business models they tend to degrade over time because all the economic value goes to Google and Facebook so if you can have negative CAC and then you can launch other products as well right because you actually own the customer and most important the brand wants you owning the customer like this is what I didn't get right at trial pit like Zinga didn't want me owning their customer Netflix didn't want me owning their customer I just connected the two but um a firm the the merchants She wants you to own the customer.
</details>

>> 很多时候你本身就已经承担了支持自己产品、处理不满客户或技术支持问题等一系列负担。一家公司针对你的长期贷款提醒你12次，或者如果是三年半的贷款提醒你39次，“嘿，你逾期了”或者“你得还款了”，所有这些来自贷款机构的沟通，对品牌来说就是另一种负担，他们会觉得：“你知道吗，Affirm，你们来处理这个正好。这太棒了。”因此，与客户的关系是Affirm根基的关键组成部分，而我们开发新产品的能力正是建立在此之上的。另一个非常酷的事情是，回到信用评分那件事。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> It's very you already have a burden of supporting your product and dealing with unsatisfied customers or technical support issues or whatever. A company that tells you 12 times for your long loan or 39 times, you know, if it's a three and a half year loan, hey, you're late or you got to got to make your payment or all the communications that come from your lender is just another type of burden that the brand is kind of like, you know what, a firm you guys can handle this. This would be great. And so the the relationship with the customer is a key component of the foundation of a firm and the our ability to develop new products is is really built on that. One of the other really sort of cool to sort of going all the way back to the credit scoring thing.
</details>

所以我们是业内唯一一家真正涉足长期贷款的公司——虽然有许多竞争对手在尝试，也取得了一定程度的成功，但大部分并没有真正做到——这里所说的长期，我不是指15年以上的房贷，但相对于平均周期大概只有6周的“先买后付”（BNPL）来说，三年半已经是一段相当长的时间了。要做到这一点，你必须进行核保。你不能走捷径，比如“我只看你的FICO信用分”，或者“我只要看看你的Facebook好友”，这些方法都不管用，你实际上必须进行真正非常复杂且高水平的机器学习工作。这其中有两点很酷：一是它很难做，所以在这一领域别人很难与我们竞争；但另一面是，这给了你39次或12次射门得分的机会（shots on goal），当你给消费者发送账单通知，以及在他们付款时与他们沟通时，你可以向他们追加销售新服务。因此，这些长期贷款虽然管理起来极其困难，而且极难保持合理的违约率和逾期率，但这正是你作为金融服务提供商，为了向消费者追加销售越来越多服务所付出的代价。我们的业务正是由这些长期产品所驱动的，尽管它们大概是支付领域里最具挑战性的部分。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
So we are the only company in the industry really there's plenty of competitors who are trying and some some degree of success but mostly not really who will go into these longerterm loans and by longer I don't mean mortgage for you know 15 plus years but like three and a half years is a fairly long period of time relative to the average bailator which is like 6 weeks and to do that you have to underwrite like you can't shortcut the I'll just look at your FICO score or I'll just sort of you know I'll look at your Facebook friends like none of that works you actually have to do a real very sophisticated degree of u machine learning work. There are two cool things about it. It's hard to do and so it's just hard to compete with us on that front. But the other side is it gives you 39 shots on gold or 12 shots on gold to tell this consumer as you send them billing notices and as you have conversations with them as they pay you to upsell them on a new service. And so these long-term loans, which are actually quite hard to manage and quite hard to maintain reasonable default rates and and delinquency rates on, is the price you pay as a provider of financing to upsell consumers on more and more services. And so our our business has been fueled by these long-term products, even though they are probably the the most challenging part of payments.
</details>

### PayPal帮的起源与真实面貌

>> 是的。你看，我们聊了挺多Affirm的历史。既然我们在做一期回顾历史的节目，我也想问一个关于PayPal历史的问题。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Yeah. You know, we've been covering some a firm history. While we're doing a historical episode, I also want to ask a question about PayPal history.
</details>

>> [嗤笑]

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> [snorts]
</details>

>> 我来让我们聚焦正题[笑声]，

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I'll keep us straight [laughter]
</details>

>> 而且你知道，最近出了一本书叫《创始人》（The Founders），有很多人在重新审视PayPal，既审视它作为支付和金融科技先驱所产生的影响，也审视从那里走出来的人，感觉那里走出的日后成就非凡事业的人才集中度最高、成功率最高。我今天唯一能想到的可类比的，甚至都不是一家公司，可能是泰尔奖学金（Thiel Fellowship）之类的东西。在当今时代，我想不出有什么公司能与PayPal相提并论。我很好奇你是否能想到。他们全都有着——或者很多人有着极其突出的优势，但同时也有着极其强烈的个性和同样明显的弱点。因此我很好奇，在如今讲述这段故事的过程中——包括它在行业中的影响力，在当时是多么超前，以及从那里走出来的人们——你是否觉得有什么被低估了，或者你认为没有被完全理解的地方？或者对于我们如何看待那个时期的那家公司，你有什么想补充的吗？

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
and >> you know um there's been you know a book came out founders recently there's been sort of a lot of uh you know revisiting of of of PayPal both in its impact as u you know pioneer in sort of uh you know payments and and and fintech but also in terms of the the people uh that came out of it and sort of the it it feels like the you know highest concentration of um highest hit rate of people who would go on to do incredible things. The only comparable thing I could think of today is it's not even a company is the deal fellowship or or something. I can't think of a comparable company to PayPal today. I'm curious if you you can um and you know all with uh or many with extremely strong strengths but also you know very strong personalities and some strong weaknesses as well. And so I'm curious if there's something you think that is goes as that story is being told of both of its impact in the industry, you know, how early was uh and and sort of the people that came out of it. if there's something that's underappreciated or you think not quite groed or any any additions you want to make to how we perceive that that company in that time period
</details>

>> 对于这个问题，我有一个老答案和一个新答案。你可能也能料到，我以前回答过一两次。我在一本书里给出的标准答案——顺便说一句，那本书非常棒，关于PayPal的历史已经耗费了大量笔墨，但《创始人》确实是一本非常优秀的书，部分原因在于它写得很好，但另一部分原因在于作者吉米（Jimmy）对故事中的每一个人物都进行了深度采访。他花了很多时间与我们所有人交谈，所以至少它是基于事实的。我为了他的调研所给出的回答是：我们在面试早期团队甚至后来的团队时，一直在筛选创业者。我们会问一些常规问题，比如我常问的一个问题是：“在离开PayPal之后你打算做什么？”而我最欢迎的回答是：“噢，这是我打的最后一份工，之后我要去自己创业。”所以当时的理念就是：如果你来这里是为了拿到你创业生涯的最终研究生学位，我们当然非常乐意录用你；如果你那么聪明、那么优秀而且那么有野心，欢迎加入我们。我认为这就是为什么从PayPal走出来的那么多人后来都去创立了公司，而且真的是在我们所有人散伙之后的瞬间，就涌现出了YouTube、Yelp、彼得的第一支大型基金以及LinkedIn。所以这绝非偶然，我们在设计上就是为了吸引创业者。

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> sort of an old answer and a new answer to this question which I've you might you might expect I've answered once or twice before u so the the canonical answer that I gave in a book which by the way is very good so there there have been many much ink spilled on the history of PayPal the founder is actually a very good book like and part of it is because it's well written but part of it is because Jimmy the guy who wrote it interviewed every single character in the story extensively. He spent a lot of time talking to all of us and so it's at the very least grounded in fact. Um so the the answer I gave for his research was as we were interviewing certainly the early team and even the later team we kept on selecting four entrepreneurs. We would ask like one of the stock questions I would ask so what are you going to do after PayPal? And the answer that I welcomed the most was oh this is the last one I'm going to start my own afterwards. So this notion like oh if you're coming in here to kind of get your final graduate degree in entrepreneurship of course we'd love to have you like you know if you're you're that smart you're that good and you're that ambitious you know please come along and so that's kind of the why I think so many people that came out of PayPal proceeded to start companies and like literally you know hot second after we all dispersed YouTube and Yelp and Peter's first major fund and LinkedIn and so that was not an accident we for attracting entrepreneurs by design.
</details>

另一个我认为实际上没人谈论过、也许更为微妙、算是我自己独特视角的方面是：我们对房间里的每个人都知根知底。我们真的就是字面意义上通过在那些汗流浃背的房间里呆着、头脑风暴、互相大喊大叫、在白板前消磨大量时间并指责对方的想法极其愚蠢等等，建立了极其深厚的交情。我们了解那个人最真实的一面：极其——我不知道该怎么形容——无比讲求哲思的彼得·泰尔（Peter Thiel），每次都要孤注一掷的埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk），以及如今很有州长派头的大卫·萨克斯（David Sacks）。你知道，所有这些人，他们都有某种外在呈现层，然后还有他们在晚宴聚会上的样子，以及当他们压力极大、头疼欲裂、不知道该怎么办、而我们又必须解决眼前棘手难题时的真实模样。因此，如果你真正了解了我们所有人最本真的那一面，再看着这些人去追求真正宏大的目标——比如埃隆要带领人类去火星，这极其非凡，但他也是个普通人。我在公司茶水间见过他汗流浃背、疲惫不堪、脾气暴躁上千次；或者彼得在陷入怀疑时，从某个融资出差地给我打电话说“我觉得我们的钱可能要用光了”。他们不是神，他们是人。这会激励你产生这样的想法：“你知道吗，如果那个我花了很多时间相处的普通家伙——他就是个普通人——都能去追求如此宏大的想法，我也应该做

<details><summary>Original English</summary>
The other part that I think is actually not been talked about and maybe subtle and sort of my own cut of this, but we knew the people in the room intimately like we literally, you know, exchanged firm by hanging out in these sweaty rooms, brainstorming, screaming at each other and spending a lot of time as whiteboards and declaring the other person's ideas idiotic and and so on. we knew the the true version of that person, the sort of the extremely I don't know uh the the the ultra philosophical Peter Teal and the uh you know go all in every time Elon Musk and the these days uh gubernatorial uh David Sax, you know, all these people like they all have kind of the the present the presentation layer and then there's like the kind of what they are like in a dinner party and then like what are they when they're really stressed out and just like head hurts, don't know what to do, and we have a real problem we need to solve. So, if you know kind of the true base version of who we all are as you watch one of these people go for something really big like Elon taking humanity to Mars, which is extraordinary. And yet, you know, he's a human being. Like, I've seen him sweaty and tired and grumpy at the company kitchen a thousand times. or Peter when he is in his doubt and calls me from some fundraising trip saying, "I think we might run out of money." You know, they're not gods. You know, they're humans. And that inspires you to actually like, you know what, if that guy who's just a normal dude, I spent a lot of time with him, he's normal. And he's going for this big of an idea, I should do
</details>

<!-- chunk 8/8 -->

同样的道理。我……我也应该努力争取。所以，我认为结合起来看，这些人都是非常有抱负的人。我们都想成为创业者，但我们也都知道彼此在年轻且充满怀疑时的样子，而我认为现在很多人依然如此。呃，我认为这会在某种程度上给你一种信心，让你明白这一切并不全都是，你知道的，一帆风顺的花途。它是……它是……它是铺满了呃……颠簸路段的。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
 the same. I I should I should strive, too. And so, I think the combination of these are very ambitious people. We all wanted to be entrepreneurs, but we also knew each other when we were young and filled with doubt, which many I think still are. Uh I think that that sort of gives you a confidence that it's not all, you know, bed of roses. It's it's it's paved with uh with with with with bumpy parts.
</details>

>> 在我们结束前，还有什么我们没聊到、但你想确保聊聊的内容吗？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Is there anything we didn't get to that you want to make sure that we get to while we're here?
</details>

>> 我对代理式购物（agentic shopping）可能没那么乐观，但我对代理式支付（aentic payments）非常乐观。是的，
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I'm probably less optimistic about agentic shopping and I'm very optimistic about aentic payments. Yeah,
</details>

### 代理式购物与支付

>> 我认为“机器人会替我们买周五晚上的出门行头”这种想法是被误导了。在机器人把衣服送到你家门口之前很久，我们就想知道自己穿上会是什么样。但我认为摩擦力在于——有人说有史以来最棒的用户界面是信用卡。这可能终于要面临重新讨论了，因为智能体实际上比塑料卡片聪明得多，甚至比带有可重写芯片的塑料卡片还要聪明。所以我觉得呃，围绕代理式商业的大量讨论可能偏了20度，比如“我该怎么说服你放心地让机器人去买对的东西”。我并不想——就像我很喜欢买自行车配件，我会花很多很多时间对比两个略有不同的自行车配件，因为我就是想参与到购买过程中[叹气]，但是[吸鼻子]到了最后——比如“好吧，就买那个”，在这个终点，也就是现在的起点，你要掏出钱包或者……所以我认为我们即将看到支付用户界面上出现一些有趣的创新。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I think the the notion of robots will buy our Friday night outfits is misguided. We want to know what we look like long before the robot delivers it to your door. But I think the friction, this notion of so the best user interface ever created is the credit card. This may actually be finally up for renegotiation because agents are in fact smarter than pieces of plastic and even pieces of plastic with rewritable chips. And so I think that's uh a lot of conversation around aentic commerce is probably looking 20 degrees off where you know how can I convince you to just trust a robot to buy the right thing. I don't want to like I love buying bike parts and I spend way too much time looking at two slightly different bike parts because I just you know have to participate in the purchase [sighs] but [snorts] the part where like okay that one the end right now that one is the beginning where you pull out your wallet or you and so I think we we're we're about to see some interesting innovation in payments user interface.
</details>

>> 那我能就这点问个问题吗？所以，呃，我大部分同意，但我认为这取决于——比如存在这样一种情况：“我需要研究买什么”。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> So I can I ask a question on that? So, um I mostly agree, but I think it depends on there's like the I need to research what to buy.
</details>

>> 嗯。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Mh.
</details>

>> 在这种情况下，AI只是供你支配的又一个工具。就像你会问朋友，这就是我——如果是个自行车配件，我会问你。我也会问AI。我两个都问。但现在我已经有了想要的 SKU。而我其实并不在乎自己从19个不同渠道里的哪一个买到它。我对这个世界的看法有点像是：有些人更在乎金钱而不是时间；有些人更在乎时间而不是金钱。

我对代理式商业的理解方式是——同样，这一切目前都还没发生，所以尝试预测将会发生什么就是：这是UPC条形码，这是我真正想要的SKU。去帮我用最低的成本把它买下来。这其实就是那些时间远多于金钱的人目前已经在做的事。这也是为什么我总是拿 CamelCamelCamel 举例，这是我最喜欢的例子，因为它是全美排名前100的网站之一，但年收入超过10万美元的人可能从来没听说过它。但这是在表明一种态度：“我知道我想要什么。你不用帮忙。机器人不用告诉我该买哪个自行车配件，不用告诉我该买哪种苏打水。我知道。只要以最低的价格买给我就行。”但这太花时间了。有时候你只需观察某一群人已经将其视为基本标配的事物，然后把它移植给另一群人。我……我想问，你觉得这种形式的代理式商业——因为它实际上也与代理式支付相关。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Where AI is just yet another tool at your disposal. Like you ask your friends, that's what I'm if it's a bike part, I'm asking you. I'm also asking AI. I'm asking both of you. But now I have the skew that I want. And I don't actually care which one of the 19 different places that I get it from. And I kind of think about the world like you have people that care more about money than time. You have people that care more about time than money.

The way that I kind of think about ajected commerce, again, none of this is happening right now. So, it's trying to prognosticate what's going to happen is here is the the UPC. Here's the the skew that I actually want. Go buy it for me at the lowest cost. It's kind of the thing that people that have a lot more time than money do right now anyway. And like that's why I always point to Camel. Camel. Camel is like my favorite example of this because it's one of the top hundred websites in America that probably nobody with over $100,000 a year of income has ever heard of. But it's it's a way of saying I know what I want. You're not helping. The robot's not telling me what bike part to buy, what telling me what soda to buy. I know. Just give it to me at the lowest price. But it takes way too much time. And sometimes you can just observe one group of humans that already have something as table stakes and then porting that to another group of humans. I I guess do you think that that form of agentic commerce because it's actually related to edgentic payments as well.
</details>

>> 我有九张不同的卡。对于一笔500美元以下的非餐厅消费，我记不清摩根大通发行的亚马逊联名卡的具体条款，也记不清自己是否已经用过了我的某某额度。就像这是同一回事。那些更看重金钱而不是时间的人，他们会去弄清楚。那些更看重时间而不是金钱的人，可能就不会。我认为从大方向上讲这是讲得通的。我认为普及曲线可能会相当缓慢。预测这些事情的发展非常缓慢总是很容易的。常用的谚语是“起初很缓慢，但并不总是突然爆发”。我不……我不确定我能否准确评估这个几率。人们之所以不去——有很多人生活在这样一个有些模糊的世界里：有时候我有钱，有时候我有时间。这最主要取决于价格以及你所投入的关心程度。我是说，我并不总是只买自行车配件。有时候我也买牛奶，牛奶就是牛奶。而我的自行车配件在哪里呢？

我主要还是买配件。呃，但我……我认为对很多人来说，实际情况往往是这样：“好吧，我会……我会找到最便宜的价格，但我不知道该如何评估该商品在符合我期望的时间真正送到我家门口的概率。”即使我愿意从遥远的地方购买某个自行车配件，而且它有三家不同的零售商在售，

我也会选择信誉最好的那家，而不是向我承诺价格最便宜、或者有时候承诺速度最快的那家。因此，我认为我们可能还需要走几步，AI才能既理解这些偏好，又能评估这些偏好如何根据输入条件发生变化——事实上，也许AI已经达到这个水平了。只是你还没有信任你的智能体会做得和你自己一样好。比如你一眼扫过一个网站会觉得：“那看着像是在90年代制作的。我不太确定自己要不要花1000美元买个新飞轮，或者600美元，不管现在自行车飞轮、后轮组件要多少钱。”
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> I have nine different cards. I don't remember the Amazon Chase issued by Chase card terms for a nonrest purchase of something under $500. and if I've used my whatever. Like it's the same thing. Like people that care more about money than time, they will figure that out. People that care more about time than money, they probably won't. I think directionally that'll make sense. I think the adoption curve is probably going to be fairly slow. And these things are always sort of easy to predict to be very slow. And sort of the usual adage is well slowly at first, not always once. I'm I'm not I'm not sure I I can handicap that. Well, the reason people don't So, there's plenty of people who live in this somewhat murky world of sometimes I have money, sometimes I have time. And it has more to do than anything with the price and the degree of care you put into. I mean, I don't always just buy bike parts. Sometimes I buy milk and milk is built. Where are my bike parts?

I mostly buy parts. Um, but uh the I I think what really happens for a lot of people, it's just like, well, yeah, I'll I'll get the I'll find the cheapest price, but then I'm not sure how to handicap the probability of that item actually showing up at my door at the time of my desired outcome. Even if I'm okay buying a some bike part from some far away land and it's sold from three different retailers,

I'm going to go with the most reputable one versus the one that's got profit promising me the cheapest or sometimes the fastest. And so I think we're probably a few steps away from AI grasping both the preferences but also handicapping how these preferences would change based on the input which may in fact maybe AI is already there. is just that you haven't yet trusted your agent to do as good a job as you would. Like you can eyeball a side be like that looks like it was edited in the 90s. I'm just not quite sure that I'm going to spend $1,000 for a new cassette or $600, whatever the cassettes go for these days in bike cassettes, the rear assembly.
</details>

>> Bike Closet 就是我想到的那个网站，它看起来就像是1990年代做的，但能卖给你非常便宜的飞轮。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Well, Bike Closet is the site that I'm thinking about that looks like it was made in the 1990s that will sell you a very cheap cassette.
</details>

>> 呃，没错。但你知道它们是不是被某个人用过，你知道齿牙都被磨平之类的吗？
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh, exactly. But do you know if they were used by by someone you know true teeth rubbed off and all?
</details>

>> 呃对。所以我……我认为我们正处在那个大家仍在摸索的困难时期。另一件事，或许可以以积极的基调结束。真正存在且似乎目前还没人为此庆祝的事实是——杂货采购已经是100%代理式的了。比如任何使用 Instacart 的人，你告诉你的 Instacart 代购员“去帮我买牛奶”。当他们说：“哦，对了，你想要 Organic Valley 的全脂牛奶，但我找到了另一个品牌，给你拿了这个。”你不会多想。你会觉得：“哦，当然，这很合理。”代购员脑子里的AI在当下甚至可能还不如 Gemini 或 ChatGPT，但你就是会说：“你……你去 Trader Joe's 或者 Whole Foods 或者无论你去哪儿采购，你看着办就行”，东西送到了，而且99.9%的情况下它完全就是你想要的，甚至更好。所以我们已经习惯了让其中一些采购完全外包出去，包括支付、购物和其它一切。所以我们肯定会走到那一步。这只是一个时间问题：我们要多久才能解决掉这些小麻烦，比如“退掉这个买错的自行车配件”，或者“一直等不到它，完全不知道它怎么了，因为还在运输途中但我们不知道它具体在哪儿”。这可能会持续——比人们想象的更加旷日持久。
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> Uh yeah. So I I think I think we are in that difficult period where we're still figuring out. The other thing that you know just sort of maybe end on a positive note. The thing that's really true that no one seems to be celebrating just yet is grocery shopping is 100% agentic. Like for anyone who uses Instacart like you tell your Instacart shopper go bring me milk. you don't think twice when they say, "Oh, yeah, you wanted whole milk from Organic Valley, but I found some other brand and here it is." And you're like, "Oh, of course, like makes sense." Like, and so the AI inside that shopper's head is maybe not even as good as Gemini or ChadB is these days, but you just sort of say, "I you just you go through Trader Joe's or Whole Foods or whatever you're shopping and you figure it out and it shows up and 99.9% of the time it is exactly what you want it or better." And so we are already conditioned to allow some of these purchases to be fully outsourced, payments and shopping and everything else. And so we're definitely going to get there. It's just a question of how soon will we work through the quirks of like well returning of this wrongly purchased bike part or waiting for it forever and not really knowing what's going to happen to it because it's in transit but we don't know where it is. I that may be protracted more protracted people think.
</details>

>> 这是个很好的结尾切入点。我们将来某个时候得做个第二部分，届时我们再多聊聊未来。呃，Max、Alex，非常感谢……
<details><summary>Original English</summary>
>> That's a good note to end on. We'll have to uh get a part two uh at some point when we talk more about the future. Uh Max, Alex, thanks so much for
</details>