AI 智能体时代的变革
主持人: 如果你正在收听我们的节目,并且你正在从事工程开发,或者是在本地开展你的日常工作,你真的需要睁大双眼看看这个世界了。我认为未来的趋势几乎是百分之百的云端智能体。 Ryan,你甚至已经完全全身心地投入其中了。你在这上面投入了大量的资金,比如曾经在一个月里为 Devin 支付了高达 5,000 美元的费用,甚至在某个月达到了 20,000 美元。我知道,今天你想传达的一个核心信息就是,我们所有人都必须升级自己管理智能体的能力。这已经是我们现在的工作了。你该如何高效地管理 10 个、20 个、100 个甚至 500 个员工?这就是为什么过去的企业组织架构会被构建成金字塔形状的原因——人类自身的管理精力是无法直接横向扩展并同时管理上千个直接汇报对象的。
Original English
Host: If you're out there listening and you are doing engineering, you're doing your work locally, you really need to open your eyes. I think the future is pretty much 100% cloud agents. Ryan, you went all in. So much so, I think you spent $5,000 on Devon and then you went up to $20,000 one month. You know, I think one of my big messages for today is that all of us have to uplevel our ability to manage agents. Like that is our job. How do you effectively manage 10 20 100 500 employees? This is the whole reason that organizations were built as pyramids like humans can't scale and have a thousand directs.
主持人: 你现在的技术栈里都有些什么?你是如何整理和构建这些工具来让自己取得成功并高效地构建产品的?
Original English
Host: What is in your stack right now and how have you structured stuff to make you successful and build things effectively?
Ryan Carson: 我目前正在做的事情,就是摸索如何去管理那一大群智能体。在 Devin 里面,你所看到的是文件夹。你会注意到,P0 文件夹代表的是最重大的任务,这些是推动整个业务向前发展所必需的最核心工作,比如新功能开发。然后是 P1 和 P2 文件夹。在优先级为零(P0)的分类里,我放的是各种 Bug,我会直接让智能体去处理它们。通常我只需要给它们设定一个目标。我们现在所生活的世界,真的是一个疯狂且完全不同的崭新世界。
Original English
Ryan Carson: So what I'm doing is figure out how to manage you know throngs of agents and in Devon what what you're seeing is uh is folders and you'll notice P 0 is the big stuff. the these are the the main things I need to move forward as the business. New features, P1, P2. So at priority zero, I've got bugs. Let them work. Usually give them a goal. And it's just such a crazy different world we live in now.
云端智能体的爆发
主持人: 欢迎回到《How I AI》节目。我们今天请来了一位超级特别的嘉宾 Ryan Carson。他是我们《How I AI》最早期几期节目中的嘉宾之一。今天他来到这里,是要向我们展示在过去的 12 个月中,在编码智能体时代,到底发生了什么样的巨变。我们将一起尽情探讨我们最喜欢的小 AI 实习生 Devin,谈谈你可能在哪些方面低估并未充分利用你的编码智能体。同时,这也许会成为《How I AI》中最“反 AI”的一期节目——因为我们也会聊聊哪些是 AI 无法帮你解决的问题,为什么你必须走出办公室并切实地与真实的人交谈,以及为什么传统的纸和笔在 Ryan 的技术栈中依然占有一席之地。让我们马上进入正题。本期节目由 WorkOS 赞助播出。AI 已经彻底改变了我们的工作方式。各种工具正在帮助团队编写更好的代码,分析客户数据,甚至自动处理支持工单。但这里面有一个关键问题:这些工具只有在能够深度访问公司系统时才能发挥最佳效果。你的 AI 副驾驶需要查看你的整个代码库,你的聊天机器人需要搜索内部文档。而对于企业买家来说,这引发了极大的安全担忧。这就是为什么这些应用从第一天起就面临着极其严格的 IT 审查。为了通过审查,它们需要安全认证、访问控制、审计日志等全套企业级功能。从头开始构建这些功能是一项巨大的工程。这就是 WorkOS 的用武之地。WorkOS 为你提供开箱即用的企业级功能 API,以便你的应用能够快速具备企业级服务能力,并更迅速地拓展高端市场。你可以把它想象成企业级功能的 Stripe。OpenAI、Perplexity 和 Cursor 都已经在利用 WorkOS 来加速开发并满足企业客户的需求。欢迎在 workos.com 上加入他们以及数百个其他行业领军者的行列,今天就开始构建吧。Ryan Carson,我们早期的第一期嘉宾,再次回到节目中。我的朋友,真的非常高兴能在这里与你重逢。
Original English
Host: Welcome back to How I AI. I have a super special guest, Ryan Carson, one of our earliest How I AI episodes who is here to show us what has changed in the last 12 months in the age of coding agents. We're going to wax poetic about our favorite little AI intern, Devon. Talk about all the ways you're underutilizing your coding agents, and give maybe the most anti- AI episode of How I AI, where we talk about where AI can't solve your problems, how you need to get out in front and actually talk to people, and how pen and paper still have a place in his stack. Let's get to it. This episode is brought to you by WorkOS. AI has already changed how we work. Tools are helping teams write better code, analyze customer data, and even handle support tickets automatically. But there's a catch. These tools only work well when they have deep access to company systems. Your co-pilot needs to see your entire codebase. Your chatbot needs to search across internal docs. And for enterprise buyers, that raises serious security concerns. That's why these apps face intense IT scrutiny from day one. To pass, they need secure authentication, access controls, audit logs, the whole suite of enterprise features. Building all that from scratch, it's a massive lift. That's where work OS comes in. Work OS gives you drop-in APIs for enterprise features so your app can become enterprise ready and scale up market faster. Think of it like Stripe for enterprise features. OpenAI, Perplexity, and Cursor are already using WorkOS to move faster and meet enterprise demands. Join them and hundreds of other industry leaders at workos.com. Start building today. Ryan Carson, number one episode of How I AI from our early early days, is back again. I am so happy to have you here, my friend.
Ryan Carson: 噢,这真的太棒了,重新联系上的感觉非常开心。而且,这个节目之所以这么棒,完全是因为你。对于所有正在收听的观众,我并不是在这里拍马屁。我和我遇到的每一个人都说,如果你因为跟不上 AI 的步伐而感到焦虑和压力,只需听 Claire 的节目就足够了。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Oh, this is it's so fun to reconnect. Um, and the reason why the show is good is because of you. And, uh, just everybody listening, I'm not just kissing ass here. Uh, everybody that I meet, I say there's one show. If you're stressed about keeping up on AI, just listen to Claire's show.
主持人: 噢,太谢谢你了。其实我自己为了跟上 AI 的发展也感到压力山大。所以,我愿意代表广大听众承担起所有的这些压力,然后把我知道的知识传递下去。让我倍感兴奋的是,我们在一年前甚至更早的时候做了第一期节目,而现在的景象和当时已经完全不同了。
Original English
Host: Oh, thank you. Well, I'm stressed keeping up with AI. So, I um will take all that stress on behalf of the audience and pass on what I know. What I also am so excited about this conversation is, you know, we did we did our first episode a year ago or even a little more than a year ago and like it's so different now.
Ryan Carson: 我的天啊,当时我们就像是什么都不懂的婴儿。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Oh my god, we were such babies.
主持人: 我知道。回想当时我们聊的内容,再对比今天我们要聊的东西,真的非常有趣;而且我相信一年后我们再看今天聊的内容,也同样会觉得很有意思,对吧?
Original English
Host: I know. It's it's it's kind of funny like what we chatted about now and it'll be funny what we chat about now in a year, right?
Ryan Carson: 是的,完全没错。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Yes. Totally.
主持人: 对于那些还没翻看我们过往节目的听众,我们之前做过一期非常受欢迎的节目,主题是关于如何管理你的智能体。当时甚至还没有“技能(skills)”的概念。它就像是一个三步走的 Markdown 文件,你完全是从第一性原理出发自己发明了技能体系。当时我们还在 IDE 里操作,而我已经有好几个月没有打开过本地 IDE 了。当时我们还在 IDE 里面,你对你的智能体有着非常具体和指令性的要求,极其小心地手把手牵着它们往前走。而现在,至少对我自己来说,智能体具体在做什么,我已经完全不过问了。
Original English
Host: And for those who have not gone in the archives, uh we did a really really popular episode about how to manage your agents with like it was like pre-sklls even. It was like three-step mark like you invented skills from first principles. It was like three-step markdown file. We were in an IDE which I haven't opened an IDE in like months. Um, we're in an IDE and and we were really you were very uh prescriptive and directive of your agents. You were very handy very handholdy. And now, you know, I don't know about you, I'll speak for myself. What the agents are doing is none of my business.
Ryan Carson: 没错,随它们去忙吧。我通常只给它们一个明确的目标,然后就放手。现在的世界真的发生了疯狂的变化,但这也太令人兴奋了。
Original English
Ryan Carson: No, let them let them work. I usually give them a goal and yeah, it's just such a crazy different world we live in now. It's so exciting.
从 Untangle 的 Pivot 谈起
主持人: 那么,快跟我们分享一下你这一年来的最新进展吧,因为在过去这一年里,你那边也发生了特别多的变化。你最近在忙些什么?这些经历又是如何影响你如今对 AI 的看法和与 AI 共事的方式的?
Original English
Host: Well, catch us up um because there's also been a lot of changes on your side in the last year. So, what are you up to and how has it, you know, impacted how you think about and work with AI these days?
Ryan Carson: 好的。我最初是萌生了一个想法,想要让离婚这件事情的体验变得更好。我有三个非常棒的姐姐,我们关系极好,就像是彼此最好的朋友。我甚至还有一个很难展示出来的兄弟姐妹纹身,就在这儿。我们每周都通电话。后来,她们中的两个开始经历相当痛苦和棘手的离婚过程,而且我的父母当年也离婚了。所以,我当时就在想,为什么在 AI 的讨论中,似乎从来没有人把离婚和 AI 结合起来呢?于是我开始着手做这个项目。在这个过程中,我当然得到了像雷神之锤一样的利器——也就是大语言模型的力量加持。我开始构建它,这就是我们上次聊天时的情况。正如你所说,当时我还在 Cursor 里面,手把手地指挥智能体。但从那以后,这个项目极其幸运地迎来了爆发式的发展。我基本上摸索出了它的产品与市场契合度(Product-Market Fit, PMF)。收听我们节目的观众里,可能有很多创业公司的创始人,大家都在努力寻找产品与市场的契合度,都在快速地进行方向调整(Pivot)。我也做了所有创始人都会做的事:我推出了 Untangle(我们产品的名字)的一个版本,原本以为它是面向普通消费者的(C端),但推向市场后发现根本没人买单。事实证明,没有人想在离婚这件事上使用 AI,他们想要的是律师,是真实的人。我必须坦白这一点。于是我意识到这没有达到产品与市场的契合度。我都这个年纪了,很清楚不要在一件事情上死缠烂打,而是要迅速转型。我当时心想:“好吧,我要去约见一位律师,看看他们对这个东西怎么看。”然后我遇到了一位非常了不起的律师 Renee Bower。我问她:“你喜欢这个东西吗?还是讨厌它?这对你来说是敌人还是朋友?”她说:“我简直太爱它了。现在面临着非常严重的初级法律助理(Paralegal)短缺。在离婚案中,证据开示(Discovery)阶段简直就是一场噩梦。我太喜欢这个系统了,我愿意为它付费。”我接着问:“那你愿意付多少钱?”她说了一个非常不错的数字。于是我们立刻转向了 B2B 模式,现在我们把产品卖给家庭律师事务所。业务正在迎来爆发式增长。所以我一直在试图坚持做我的独立创始人,想要一个人搞定一切,但这真的让我感到彻底分身乏术。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Yeah. So, um I basically had this idea to make divorce better. So, I have uh three amazing sisters. We're like best friends. I have a sibling tattoo that's hard to show. It's right there. You know, we talk every week and then uh two of them started to go through pretty gnarly divorce. Um and my parents got divorced, too. So you know I was like divorce h like no one seems to be talking about divorce and AI what why like and so I just started working on that um and was of course empowered by Thor's hammer you know which is the large language models and and I started to build it um and this is when we chatted last you know I was in cursor you know like you said really handh holdy on the agent and since then thankfully it's just blown up um I basically figured out product market fit and everyone who's listening There's probably a ton of startup founders out there. You know, you're trying to find product market fit. You're pivoting fast. You're And I did what all founders do, right? You know, launched a a version of Untangle, um, which is the product, thought it was for consumers, went out, nobody, Turns out, nobody wants to use AI for divorce. They they want lawyers, people. Just I'm just going to say it. Um, and then I basically thought, okay, not PMF. I I'm old enough to know like and not hang on to things, just pivot. And uh I was like, "Okay, I'm going to get a meeting with a lawyer and just see what they think of this thing." And she I met with this amazing lawyer named Renee Bower and I was like, "Do you love this? Do you hate it? Is this like an enemy? Is it a friend?" And she said, "I love it. You know, I I there's a parallegal shortage. There's this discovery thing we do in divorce is a nightmare. I I I love it and I want to pay for it." And I was like, "Oh, you how much would you pay?" And she said, "A great number." and now we're we're B2B and we sell to family law firms. Um, and it's just exploding. So, I've been trying to hang on to this solo founder. I'm going to do it all myself thing and I'm completely overwhelmed.
主持人: 你我都是如此。对于那些急于想知道结局的人来说,结局就是:Ryan Carson 和 Claire 都是著名的独立创始人,总觉得自己可以搞定一切,除了 AI 以外不需要任何朋友。但在我们录制节目之前的非正式聊天里,我们都在谈论自己不得不马上开始招聘人类员工的“痛苦”决定。
Original English
Host: You and me both. And for folks that can't wait for the punchline, the punch line is Ryan Carson and Clairvo, famous solo founder. I can do it all myself. I need no friends other than AI. did our pre-show conversation talking about our regretful and imminent hiring of a bunch of hum of humans.
Ryan Carson: 我必须要雇用人类了。如果有任何我正在接触并考虑雇用的人听到了这一段:我爱你们,我非常期待与你们共事。但在此之前,使用 AI 确实让我被宠坏了。你想想,你一小时内可以给 AI 提出 45 次具体的反馈,这在人类身上是完全无法想象的。但无论如何,我确实准备招几个人来扩大 Untangle 团队,这非常令人兴奋。不过,目前你还没有真正把人招进来。
Original English
Ryan Carson: I'm gonna have to hire humans. And if any of those humans I'm talking to are listening, I love you and I'm excited about working with you now. But but the AI Yeah, it's you get spoiled hiring AIs. I mean, you know, you give them 45 pieces of feedback an hour. Um, you know, you're you anyway. So, yeah, going to hire some humans and grow the Untangle team. Very excited. But you haven't yet.
管理智能体就如同管理团队
主持人: 那么也就是说,这个故事的美妙之处在于,你能够完全依靠自己和我们的共同实习生——Devon 先生,实现极速迭代、开发大量原型并最终找到产品与市场的契合度。
Original English
Host: And so I mean the the the good the good end part of the story is you were able to get to rapid iteration, lots of prototypes, product market fit with you and our mutual intern, Mr. Devon.
Ryan Carson: 是的,Devon 先生。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Mr. Devon.
主持人: 当你最开始起步的时候,你还是自己在写代码,用 AI 写需求文档,扮演着一个深度参与其中的“人机协同(Human in the loop)”角色。而在过去这一年里,我看着你慢慢蜕变成了一个每天晚上都在后台运行智能体的“AI Bro”。所以快告诉我们,你现在的技术栈里都有些什么?这与我们一年前聊的有什么不同?你又是如何组织这一切来确保高效开发并获得成功的?
Original English
Host: Mr. Devon. And so, you know, when when you were starting out again, you were like really coding, doing requirements, documents, all of that with AI, but you were very human in the loop. And as I've watched you over the past year, I've seen you slowly turn into AI bro who runs agents overnight. Um, so tell us about like what is in your stack right now? What is like very different from what we talked about a year ago? And how have you structured stuff to to make make you successful and build things effectively?
Ryan Carson: 没问题。我常说我目前正处于 SpaceX 粉丝所说的“最大动压(Max Q)”状态。这意味着我目前面临着必须雇人的极限压力,因为所有的活都是我一个人在干。那么,我每天实际上都在做什么呢?我来跟你们分享一下。最开始,我是从一些具体的、需要一直守在电脑前的本地智能体工具入手的,比如 Cursor 或类似的集成开发环境。但随后我看到了云端智能体的发展,我意识到,如果在本地开发,我就会被束缚在电脑前。但我有大量的需求是希望能随时处理的,比如快速合并一个 PR 修复 Bug,或者处理某项数据。我当时就想,为什么不能直接在云端做这些事呢?我开始关注 Devin,他们做云端智能体已经很久了。虽然在最开始的时候它的体验比较糟糕,但也许现在已经变得很棒了。于是我尝试了它,结果让我非常惊喜。它的成熟度真的超乎想象。对于那些正在收听节目但依然在本地进行工程开发的人,你们真的需要开阔一下眼界了。未来的趋势几乎是百分之百的云端智能体。当然本地开发依然会有一席之地,但我现在已经完全转向云端了。甚至可以说我整天都“住在” Devin 里面。Devin 就在我的屏幕上,我同时开着大约 10 到 15 个任务线程。我会把它们分门别类放在不同的文件夹里。我记得在你的某期节目中,你或者你的嘉宾提到过,人类同时能跟进的并发任务上限也就是 4 到 5 个。我深表赞同。所以,为了保持条理,我使用了文件夹管理法。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Totally. Um I like to say I'm in max Q right now for those of you that are are um you know SpaceX fans. It's like it the maximum pressure that I need to hire somebody. I'm doing all the work. And so yeah, what am I actually doing dayto-day? So I'll walk you through it. Um, I started off, you know, in uh a more specific agent like a cursor, um, like an AMP. Um, and and then I I I saw cloud happening. I'm like, "Okay, I'm really limited cuz I have to be at my machine and there's a lot of things I need to, you know, quick PRs like here's a bug, need to sort it out or what about this piece of data, need to, you know, and I was like, why why isn't cloud like I feel like I should be working on the cloud?" And I thought, what about Devon? Like Devon, you know, they've been doing cloud for like years now. It was kind of crap in the beginning, right? But maybe it's good now. And I tried it and I was like, "Wow, this this thing's really good. This is not good. It's really good." And you know, and I I thought, "Okay, I'm going to try it." And it was just blown away by how mature the cloud agent was. And and if you're out there listening and you know, you are doing engineering, you're doing your work locally, you really need to open your eyes. Like I I think the future is pretty much 100%, you know, cloud agents. there there's going to be some local dev. But so I started looking at that and was really impressed. So now I went all in. So much so I spent at one point I was like spending $5,000 on dev and then it went up to $20,000 one month and I'm like whoa wait a minute I have a big Twitter account. I'm going to go talk to the cognition guys and tell them to give me free credits and they did. So anyway, I you know get 20 grand of credits per month in Devon. Great. But the point is I live in Devon. I live in the cloud, right? So all of my engineering almost I and it's Devon's right here on my screen. I've got probably, you know, 10 probably 10 15 threads and I bucket them in folders cuz I remember one of your shows, you know, it was either you or your guest was saying it's sort of like four or five concurrent tasks you can actually keep track of. And I agree with that. So what I use is folders.
用纸笔对抗数字化信息过载
主持人: 能展示给我们看看吗?
Original English
Host: Is there a way to show it?
Ryan Carson: 我可以展示。但首先我要向你展示一样东西,就是这张纸。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Um, I can show it. I'll show you one thing, which is this piece of paper.
主持人: 完美。
Original English
Host: Perfect.
Ryan Carson: 这就是为什么我们说我们准备雇人,而且今天会向你展示我们在纸上乱涂乱画的东西。我是有原因的。我使用文件夹来整理智能体线程,并且配合使用这张纸,是因为当你要管理海量的智能体时,你需要极强的组织管理能力。这已经成为了我目前的核心工作。为了在脑海中保持清晰的思路,你必须把这些任务分桶。我有一个桶是专门用来处理日常业务的核心内容的。
Original English
Ryan Carson: And this is the reason we're doing where we say we're going to hire humans and we're just going to show you pieces of paper we scribble. Okay. The re but there's a there's a I'm doing this for a reason. Okay. So, the reason why I have folders for threads and the reason why I have a piece of paper is because it the skill is managing throngs of agents. like that is what I do now. And to to keep it straight in your head, you basically have to bucket these things. And so I have uh one bucket um uh that I'll I'll try to show this to you. Let let's see how let's see how dangerous this is going to become everybody. Okay. So everybody, this is Devon. This is my real setup that I'm literally working on today. And you know I think one of my big messages for today is that all of us have to uplevel our ability to manage agents like that is our job right and so how do you do that? How do you do that? How do you effectively manage 10, 20, 100, 500 employees basically? Um, this is the whole reason that organizations were built as pyramids, right? Like humans can't scale and have a thousand directs unless you're like Jensen Huang, then you can. But so what I'm doing is figuring out how to manage, you know, throngs of agents. And in Devon, what what you're seeing is um is folders. And you'll notice um I've got bugs, right? I've got P 0, P1, P2. So, it's a priority zero. What What are the things that I I really need to move forward no matter how distracted I get today. And so, I'm going to show you again my piece of paper. Tada. Okay. So, I I have two methods um for this. Don't laugh. It works. Um uh so the way I stay focused is number one, have a P 0 folder, but then you know I've got a Dell 52 here. I've got eight screens concurrently open, right? And so the way I stay focused is by also having this piece of paper which has weekly priorities on it.
主持人: 噢,好的。
Original English
Host: Oh, okay.
Ryan Carson: 所以关键在于本周最重要的事情是什么。我会时不时低头看一眼这个非常漂亮的 Ugmonk 纸质待办系统(我没有收他们的钱,这只是一个很有趣的纸质待办工具),它能让我保持专注。让我们深入聊聊。Bug 文件夹里放的是正在发生的各种问题,我需要快速解决它们,但这不一定是 P0 级别的任务。我们可以看看其中的几个。比如这一个:调查红色报错重试。Devin 正在全力处理它。当然还有其他几个 Bug 在里面。P0 是最重要的任务,我不会在屏幕上展示它,但它代表了业务向前发展最核心的新功能。P1 是那些也相当重要但可以稍后处理的任务,优先级以此类推。顺便分享一个秘诀:如果你目前还没有使用智能体来帮你撰写投资人更新(Investor Updates)或者帮助你跟进整体业务进度,那你一定要试试。但关键在于,你要针对性地为智能体构建相应的技能(skill)。在 Devin 中我非常喜欢的一点是,它支持“剧本(playbooks)”的概念。这算是一种把技能和标准作业程序融合在一起的独特方式。我建立了一个专门的投资人更新剧本,它帮了我大忙。
Original English
Ryan Carson: So, it's all about weekly what is important and and I'll and I'll cast my eye down here um at this beautiful UG Monk uh system I have, which I'm not being paid to say that. It's a fun little to-do system and that just keeps me grounded. Okay, so let's dig into this a little bit. Bugs is like, okay, there's some stuff going on. I want to get it pretty fast. It's not necessarily P 0. Um, you know, let's look at a couple of those. You know, that's the one we're looking at here. Investigate red error retries. Yep. Right. So, Devon's cranking on that. Um, there's a couple other bugs in there. P 0 is the big stuff. I'm not going to show you that, but that's just like these are the these are the the main things I need to move forward as the business. New features. Um, usually P1 is like ah stuff that's important. Anyway, it goes down. Um, investors, by the way, tip. Oh my god. Like, if you're not using an agent to help draft your investor updates and help you keep track of the business, like clearly do that. But here's the key. Build a skill to do it. And this is probably obvious to everybody. But another thing I love about Devon is this idea has playbooks. and playbooks are are are sort of there's this weird mix of skills playbooks you know sort of uh thing going on but I've built an investor update skill basically which does a lot so this is most of where I do work and then you'll find like then that means I do a lot of work here like I'll be on my phone and this is the other reality is like unfortunately that means I can work like 21 hours a day
AI 时代的决策疲劳与过度生产
主持人: 你确实是这样。那你该如何应对这种决策疲劳呢?
Original English
Host: I do. And then you know and how do you deal with this? How do you deal with like the the the decision fatigue?
Ryan Carson: 我马上回答这个问题。但在回答之前,我想先为听众总结一下我从我们两人身上看到的不同之处,因为我们其实是两种截然不同的 AI 管理者。每次你上节目,我都觉得你非常有条理,这让我印象深刻。你有着非常清晰的智能体管理步骤,而我则是那种“漂浮在 Token 的海洋里,看看另一端会产出什么”的人。你有着按优先级分类的 Devin 文件夹,而我通常只是在 Slack 里给 Devin 发个消息,比如发一个 Sentry 报错链接,写上一句“这是怎么回事,赶紧修一下”,然后它就去干活了。这在我的工作流中非常有效。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Yeah. So I want to reflect. I'm going to answer that question in just a second, but I want to reflect for folks what I'm seeing here because you and I are different AI managers and every time you come on I'm like no. I'm like, what an organized what an organized individual. I am so impressed by you. You're like, here's my three steps to man my managing my agents. And I'm like, you don't just like float in the tokens, see what comes out the other side. You're like, here are my like prioritized triaged folders for Devon. And I'm like, I just slack Devon. Like he belongs to me. I just like a sentry link. WTF question fix and that works. I mean there's nothing wrong.
主持人: 没错,这完全行得通。虽然我们的管理风格不同,但我们刚才都提到了一点,那就是:现在的核心工作就是学习如何管理这些智能体。这也是为什么虽然我们两个都正值青春、精力无限,但具有丰富传统管理经验的人在 AI 时代反而能“如鱼得水”的原因。因为你过去在职业生涯中培养的所有管理技能——如何搭建架构、如何组建团队、如何区分优先级、如何授权,在管理智能体时依然完全适用。当你手下管理着“500 个”智能体时,你如何确保自己依然紧紧盯着最重要的三件事?在哪些地方你需要细节管理(Micromanage),在哪些地方你可以完全放手?这些传统的管理直觉都会给你带来巨大的回报。
Original English
Host: Yeah, it totally works. We're we're so different. But I do think you know something you said earlier I want people to hear which is like the job right now is to figure out how to manage agents. And the reason why I know both you and I are 27. So of course we're we're young. We're spring chicken infinite energy. The reason why I think folks of a certain level of experience are like ready to cook right now with AI is all those management skills that you have developed over your career, oh my god, can be applied right here, right now. How do you structure? How do you team? How do you prioritize? How do you delegate? When you have a team of 500, how do you still stay anchored on like the three things that are most important for you to do? Yes. Where do you micromanage? Where do you let go? Like all that stuff still pays off.
Ryan Carson: 没错,这会带来成倍的回报。关于这一点,我想分享一个非常实用的智能体技能,我把它叫做“看门狗(Watchdog)”。随着我们的家庭法律事务所客户越来越多,案件量也极其庞大,而我一个人要同时兼顾客户成功、技术工程以及销售。天啊,你怎么可能跟得过来?你怎么知道这些案件里究竟在发生什么?客户在哪些地方遇到了体验 Bug?这让我非常焦虑。所以,我开发了“看门狗”这个剧本。每当我感到焦虑、不知道业务运行状况如何时,我就会启动这个“看门狗”线程。它会依次登录每一个客户账户,帮我抓取自上一次运行以来发生的所有活动,查找所有的 Sentry 报错。但你不能只要一堆未经过滤的原始数据,你希望智能体能帮你进行分类、排序和过滤。因此,它最终会向我汇报当前最严重的三大问题。同时,它还会帮我核实:这些 Bug 是否已经有正在修复的 PR?还是已经自动发布了?或者有一个被遗忘的 PR 一直没有合并?它会把整个上下文整理好呈现给我,然后我就可以针对性地在线程里和它对话,解决这些问题。这就是我管理混乱局面的方式。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Yeah. And it pays off. Yep. I I think in multiples like um so another practical tip I want to talk about is I have um it's a playbook, but it could be a skill if you're not using Devon. It's called Watchdog. and and you know, we're starting to pick up a lot of family law firms now and they have a lot of cases, right? And and I'm literally doing customer success and engineering and sales, right? And so it's like, whoa, how do you keep track of actually what's going on in these cases? You know, where where are clients hitting UX bugs? Like where what oh my god, how do you keep track of it? So watchdog, what it does, and I this is multiple iterations, everybody. So what you want is like when that moment where you feel like I need to know what's going in the business right now. I feel stressed. I don't know what's happening. Uh this is when I run watchdog and and what it does is it basically it it has a skill for that that's repeated for each firm. So think of these as customers, right? Uh it and it goes into each account and says what's going on with this account like what was the activity since we last did watchdog? Where are the errors? Where are the sentry uh uh um errors? You know, where does all this happen? But then but then you don't want just data. You want it to be transposed and filtered and sorted for you. So then it comes up with the top three things that are going wrong. And then either like, well, wait, have they been fixed? because we're shipping a lot of PRs. Like I'm shipping probably 40 PRs a day now. So, did it get fixed or is it currently being fixed or is there an open PR that never got merged? Right. And it just gives me all that and then I talk to that thread about okay, let's dig in a little bit. And that's how I manage the chaos.
主持人: 这非常棒。你刚才问我如何应对决策疲劳。我的方法非常不同,我更倾向于“时间分桶(Time Bucketing)”,而不是“任务分桶”。在一天中,我会划定一段非常具体的时间,专门和 AI 一起协同开发;而在另一段时间里,我则完全不做开发,只用来启动智能体任务或检查它们的产出。作为独立创始人,我必须严格管控自己的精力分配。此外,我也会把“决策疲劳”本身当作一个优先级评估的指标。如果某一个功能我因为感到决策疲劳而把它搁置了,那这通常说明这个功能并不是我真正关心或真正重要的东西。有些人可能会觉得,既然我们可以让智能体 24 小时不间断运行并发布海量的代码,那我们就应该疯狂地不断生产软件。但我其实会刻意克制自己的产出,不是克制质量,而是克制功能的数量。因为我不认为产出数量的翻倍能带来产品质量和商业价值的等比例提升。
Original English
Host: Yeah. I you know, you asked me how do I manage the the the decision fatigue? And I feel like I start a business for every child I have. So like three kids, three businesses. I have a lot of decision fatigue. There's there's a couple things that that I do. I approach it very differently, which is I think about bucketing my time more than I think about bucketing the tasks, which is like there's time in the day that I do like very very specific tasks where I'm co-piloting with AI. There's other time where I'm just like I dedicate to spinning off everything or checking in. So I have to buck as a solo founder, I have to bucket my own time on things. The other thing that I use is I use decision fatigue as a priority prioritization heristic which is functionally if there is a feature that I'm working on that I let die on the vine. That is my that's your symbol. That's my symbol for maybe this one is not the one I really care or believe in. And so um I I sometimes think that people, you know, don't don't tell anybody. I know I'm a token maxer and you should let your agents run 24 hours a day and ship as much code as humanly possible and software everywhere. And I really don't ship more than I think the market wants like I really try to res like constrain my output not quality not on bugs but like because I don't I don't think I get multiples of quality off of multiples of output.
Ryan Carson: 我非常赞同。我宁愿把宝贵的创造性精力留给其他更重要的事情,或者让想法在脑海中再沉淀一段时间。所以我现在很少在夜间让智能体去开发新功能,夜间我只让它们跑 Bug 修复和自动分类。我也会和另一位人类工程师进行“乒乓式”的夜间协作。我不再盲目追求通过智能体无休止地寻找新点子并上线它们,因为这不仅会给我带来巨大的管理压力,而且对产品并没有实际的价值。
Original English
Ryan Carson: I totally agree. And so I would rather reserve that creative energy for something else or at least keep it inside till there is something there. And so I do um I run less overnight. I run like bugs and triage and all that kind of stuff. I also work with an engineer so we kind of pingpong overnight but I don't I don't do the sort of like seek out ideas, solve them and always ship them because I just don't one it it puts too much on me and two I don't think it actually adds value.
产品与市场契合度无法被自动生成
主持人: 完全赞同。我们距离任何一个前沿模型能够拥有独立判断“应该上线什么产品功能”的智慧,还差着十万八千里。我们都曾幻想过能有一个全自动的“自我改进产品迭代环路”,但这种想法在真实的产品开发中根本行不通。
Original English
Host: I agree. I I actually think we're nowhere near any frontier model having the intelligence to know what to ship. It's it's like a million miles. I mean So yeah, I think you know I think we all wanted these sort of like automatic improvement loops to and they just don't work with product. They're kind of a joke.
Ryan Carson: 没错,这在实际中就是一个笑话。而且 AI 产出代码能力的暴增,并不会凭空创造出原本不存在的消费市场。除了 AI 基础设施本身的狂热之外,现实中并没有那么多嗷嗷待哺的买家会突然为了 AI 自动生成的垃圾功能去买单。所以在“海量的代码产出”与“能成功商业化的产品”之间,存在着一道巨大的鸿沟。
Original English
Ryan Carson: And and I and I tell people it's also because all of this intelligence has not magically created markets where there were none before other than AI markets, right? It's like it's not like all of a sudden there are these like buyers that have shown up for solutions that somebody Yeah. for stuff. And so I do think there's this like mismatch between the quantity of output of code and like commercializable product.
主持人: 确实如此。我想就这一点展开聊聊。我认为现在很多开发者犯的错误在于,他们没有花足够的时间走出办公室,去和真实的、活生生的人进行面对面交流。你之所以能为 Untangle 找到产品与市场的契合度,正是因为你亲自发了一封开发信,约了潜在客户做 Google Meet 会议,面对面地倾听了他们的痛点。当你签下了第一家客户后,你甚至主动提出:“我可以去你们的办公室坐坐,和你们聊聊吗?”这些虽然都是极其传统的经典产品开发手段,但在我们能够以极低的成本利用 AI 生产大量数字产品的今天,大家反而把这些最根本的沟通给忽略了。
Original English
Host: Amen. So I want to double click on that. I think what what what is happening is people are not getting out of their chair enough and actually talking to real people. So, so you know the way I figured out PMF for Untangle was, you know, I went outbound with an email, I did a a Google meet with a potential customer and I talked to them. Boom. That was step one. But then step two is like as soon as we landed them as a customer, I was like, "Can I come to your office?" And I just want to sit and I want to talk and I want to and this is all like obvious product stuff, but I think because we can ship so much and build so much digital product, we're we're not getting out of our chairs enough. Go talk to humans for real. Talk to humans. Yep. And build something neat.
AI 时代的工作流整合
主持人: 本期节目由 Atlassian 出品的 Jira 赞助。Jira 中的团队协作图谱(Teamwork Graph)可以让智能体的开发准确度提升 44%,同时减少 48% 的 Token 消耗。当你使用像 Claude、Cursor、Codex 或 Copilot 这样的 AI 编码智能体时,这会带来极大的差别。利用 AI 进行软件开发,最难的往往不是编写代码,而是让智能体获取正确的上下文——比如正确的工单、规格书写了什么、团队在 Slack 里讨论并做出了什么决策。Jira 的团队协作图谱可以将这些分散在 Jira、Confluence、GitHub 等整个技术栈中的上下文进行打通,并在智能体编写第一行代码前直接喂给它们。你只需要指派任务,智能体就能获得所需的一切,并在开发完成后自动生成一个 PR。无需繁琐的上下文切换,保障开发心流不被打断。同样的团队,更聪明的智能体。欢迎在 jira.dev 免费试用。
刚才你提到了一个被大家忽略的重点,那就是我们不能仅仅把这些云端智能体当作“写代码的工具”,其实它们完全可以承担更多的业务运营工作。在你的公司中,Devin 甚至在帮你运行 Deal Desk(交易审批台),自动处理定制化的客户报价。
Original English
Host: This episode is brought to you by Jira by Atlassian. The teamwork graph in Jira delivers 44% more accurate agent results with 48% less token usage. That's a huge difference when working with AI coding agents like Claude, Cursor, Codeex, or Copilot. The hardest part of shipping with AI isn't the code, it's the context. What's the right ticket? What did the spec say? What got decided in Slack? The teamwork graph pulls all of that from across your entire stack from Jira and Confluence to GitHub and feeds it directly to your agents before they write a single line. You assign the work, the agent gets everything it needs and a PR surfaces when it's ready. No digging, no context switching, no broken flow. Same team, smarter agents. Try them free at jira.dev. That's J I R A.dev. The other thing I want to touch on because I think you breezed past it, but it has been a gamecher for me in terms of using background agents and in particular Devon, which is I think people have still bucketed these cloud coding agents as coding agents, which is like their only job is to write code for a product or software product. And in fact, Devon runs Deal Desk for me. So Devon's doing quoting, custom quoting for me.
Ryan Carson: 没错,它还可以做业务流程配置、文档整理、客户工单的自动分类等。我总是会思考一个问题:如果有一个人既非常了解你的代码库,又能够通过写代码来解决你业务中的任何运营难题,你会怎么使用他?这就是我使用这些后台智能体的方式。我认为大家对智能体能力的压榨还远远不够,尤其是那些非常擅长编码的智能体。Cursor 昨天刚刚推出了 Grockbot 或者是类似的聊天助手,我对此一点也不意外。我们在最早期节目中就讨论过,Cursor 的聊天体验作为辅助是非常出色的,因此这些编码工具平台自然会向更通用的业务流程智能体演进。不仅是工程师,非技术人员也应该开始深度使用云端智能体,因为它们已经可以极其独立地为你分担大量的业务运营工作了。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Yeah. Like setting out operations, um, documentation, customer triage, like I I always think, you know, what would you do with somebody who both knew your code base and could write code to solve anything in your business? That's how I use these these background agents. And I do think that um people really don't ask enough of their back background agents and especially of ones that are very good at coding. I think this is why it's so interesting. Cursor just yesterday came out or cursor or Grock whoever who whoever they are at these came out with Grockbot and I was like you know what the cursor chat experience as a as a as a background agent was a great one. It was like one of our first first episodes. And so I'm not surprised to see these like coding platforms start to generalize into business agents in general. And I also feel like more than engineers need to get hands-on with with background agents and cloud cloud agents because there's so much that they can do for your business pretty autonomously.
本地智能体与自动发布流
主持人: 确实如此。不过,我们目前依然在某些场景下保留了本地智能体的使用。比如我目前在本地运行着 Codeex。我发现利用本地智能体低延迟的特性,配合我本地的浏览器进行前端 UI 调试,再配合 OpenAI 的无限 Token 额度,体验极其出色。当你需要开发一个包含大量前端交互的新功能,并且需要你实时守在屏幕前微调时,Codex 的心流体验是无可比拟的。
Original English
Host: 100%. Um but let's talk about though why probably both of us are still using local agents uh for some things. So it's so right now as well I have codeex running um and I have and I have it using goal and I find that in particular like the low latency plus the browser on my machine pairing like plus like basically infinite tokens you know from from from OpenAI. Um yeah cool. I'll take the subsidy. Um, that, you know, plus goal really, really is good for when you have this kind of I've got a feature, it's a lot of front-end UI. Yep. I just need you to grind for a lot and I need to be here and kind of hold your hand. Y, I find Codex unmatched for that.
Ryan Carson: 没错。如果我们对比一下我们两人的独立创始人 AI 设置,我会说我在进行结对编程或处理需要精细微调的复杂功能时(比如那些跨越前端和后端、需要连续重构并需要人工时不时介入的开发工作),我也会选择在本地工具里折腾。本地工具的超低延迟让这种实时互动非常舒服。而在夜间,我更倾向于让云端智能体去跑那些 Bug 修复。
同时,你在代码验证和测试上,是如何运用这些智能体的呢?
Original English
Ryan Carson: Yeah. So, if I were to because what we said we would do is compare and contrast our solo founder AI setup. So I would say I am personally spending my time in codecs when I'm pair programming or or managing a product. It's it falls into a couple categories. It's going to be like large feature initiatives that span front end and backend that both like again need like a lot of code written and you have to grind on it and needs that like intervention every now and then to narrow it to the experience that you want. um a lot of like long running refactors and hectets stuff like again I think the latency is unmatched it's goal is really really effective sub agents are really really effective um and then I use codeex a lot for ver I think it's very good at verification and so a combination of goal plus a CLI tool inside your codebase that can verify core flows or I use goal and browser use to do front-end verification a lot. So I say write user stories, use Chrome, pull up the preview branch in Chrome, go through it as a user, list which user stories pass, identify bugs, fix them until you're good. Those are kind of what I'm using codecs for. When I'm using background agents, it's a lot of like autofixes on bugs. um oneoff like when I'm on calls with with customers and they say, "Oh, do you have this MCP?" I'm like, "I do now." Um so oneoff things and then sort of um operations as you said, like I use a lot of agents for for operations and then you know I do have a couple like purpose-built agents in the stack. So, I use Bugbot a lot for PR review and then I just built this thing delightfully called Mergemmy that that does risk assessment on my PRs and auto approves lowrisk ones. Um, because I am also shipping a lot of PRs and so that's
主持人: 听上去很有意思。跟我聊聊这个 Merge Mommy,然后我也跟你分享一下我的“自动发布 PR”技能。我们来对比一下。
Original English
Host: and is that tell me about Mer tell me about merge mommy like that's and then I'll tell you about my land PR skill. I want to compare and contrast.
Ryan Carson: 好的。Merge Mommy 是我部署在 Vercel 上的一个智能体。每当有新的 PR 提交并成功通过了我们所有的 CI 静态检查(包括 Bugbot 检查)后,就会触发 Merge Mommy。她会从五个维度评估这个 PR 的发布风险,比如代码修改范围、安全隐患等。如果最终评估为低风险,Merge Mommy 就会直接盖章批准并自动合并,完全不需要人类介入。但如果是中高风险,她就会在 Slack 里向我或我的同事弹窗报警,要求人工介入审核,以确保我们符合 SOC 2 的合规审计要求。这极大地提高了我们处理 PR 的吞吐量。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Yeah, so I did an episode on this a week or two ago. It's an EVE agent, so it's deployed on Burcell. And whenever a PR is opened and then passes all its CI checks, including Bugbot, Merge Mommy gets triggered. And then what she looks at is she scores the PR on like five aspects of risk, like cool, how big a blast radius, security, whatever it is. And then if it um gets scored as a low, Merge Mommy stamps it with an approval and we can merge without a human approval. But if it's medium or high, then it pings us in Slack and says it pings um either my colleague or I or somebody else in Slack and says this one's ready for you to review because for our sock 2 compliance and all our controls, we require kind of like alternative review. Um and it just allows us to like get through our PRQ very effectively. Yeah. Yeah, first of all, annoyed I missed that episode. That sounds amazing. I'm going to go watch it. Um, but number two, interesting.
主持人: 这听起来太赞了。我的“自动发布 PR(Land PR)”技能在逻辑上很相似。当 Devin 完成代码开发并表示 PR 已经准备就绪时,我就会触发这个剧本。首先,它会启动一个新鲜的 Devin 实例来对这个 PR 进行自我审查(Review),自动修复所有发现的代码缺陷,确保所有的审查意见都被妥善解决。之后,最酷的一点是,它会在云端沙箱的浏览器里自动运行前端测试,并自动录制一段带配音和字幕的前端交互演示视频(Walkthrough Video)。视频会清晰展示它测试了哪些功能,哪些测试通过了。我甚至不需要打开预览链接,只需要在手机上看一眼这段 30 秒的演示视频,如果没问题,回复一句“视频已确认”,它就会在后台自动完成合并。
Original English
Host: So I have something called land PR where basically it's it's a playbook in Devon but you can think of it as a skill and it's bas usually it's when the agent comes back and says okay the PR is done you know and and then uh I trigger it and then what it does is it basically makes sure that number one it runs a fresh Devon review on the PR which and Devon review is like an actual product inside of Devon which is another reason why I think people should just pick I'll I'll sort rant about that later, but the code factory like it should have a good a good built-in review that is a real review product, right? So, it triggers a review and then it basically allows up to two loops on that, right? you know, okay, all right, find all the all the bugs, check that all the comments are are are resolved, and then and then there'll be some more that come up, do it again, does it twice, and then then the thing is is it records a a video walkthrough. Um, and and this I find Devon is just really good at like, so what it does is it records in the browser and it actually kind of narrates over it. It's got captions about it's doing and it's got this cool little little test, you know, list of tests it's doing and whether they're red or green and you get all this out of the box. Like I tried to build my own code factory and get all this stuff and I was like I don't have time to do this and so the land PR basically it has to show me that video and then I then I say video approved land it and then it will merge. Um so that really works for me. It's kind of that I think this is where CI/CD and DevOps like now you have to be even better at it like and really care about it and and we use merge cues and GitHub as well. I'm loving merge cues. Um so couple of the nitty-gritty this is what I'm actually doing stuff.
Ryan Carson: 噢,天啊,我之前尝试让 Devin 的视频录制功能跑起来,但它总是会耗尽我的 Token 额度然后中途崩溃。这大概率是我自己的配置问题。不过能自动生成演示视频真的太方便了。
另外,我注意到一个有趣的细节:你所有的这些智能体审批和通知,都是在 Slack 里面完成的?
Original English
Ryan Carson: Have you Okay, you all know this is how you know. Not not sponsored by Cognition, but you all are welcome. Um we love you. Yeah, come on. Um I can't get Devon video verification to work. I can occasionally get it to screenshot really and like on front end stuff it taps my um my credits for the session and then just falls over. I don't know if it's probably a problem. It's probably a mi problem. All AI things are probably a mi problem. No, but I have not been able but I actually I do want to show this for folks that um want to know exactly what it looks like because I found an example of it. So I'm claiming that it doesn't work but then I'm going to make it work. Hold on. Devon will actually go ahead and test it and record a little video of it using and you can see these little captions down here. Uh it's exposing it's its reasoning. It's super cool. It's very useful. I can just only get it to work so a couple interesting comments I have in that. Number one, interesting that you're in Slack. Um Oh, I I'm never in Devon UI. Never. Okay. So, interestingly, I'm never in Slack.
彻底消除 Slack 文化
Ryan Carson: 我正在努力把 Slack 从 Untangle 的工作流和整个公司的生存方式中彻底剔除出去。我刚才看着你的屏幕,发现你有很多侧边栏红点通知和感叹号,我看着都觉得头大。我认为 Slack 的沟通机制并不是为了 AI 时代而设计的。随着我们的团队开始扩张,我准备禁止一切一对一私聊(DMs)。如果我们有任何需要沟通的事,直接打电话;而日常的所有工作流讨论,必须直接在 Devin 任务线程的上下文里公开进行。这样,智能体才能随时获得沟通的上下文,而不会让信息碎片化地分散在各种私聊、文档或 Slack 频道里。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Um, I am trying to cut Slack completely out of Untangle and and and and the way the company is going to exist. Um, and I was laughing because you have so many sidebar, you know, um, notifications and exclamation points and and we were saying, you know, you're seeing the Devon preview in Slack and and I have a a very kind of perfect experience with the video playback testing of Devon and that's cuz they use the web app. And so here's what I'm thinking, and again, this is probably going to change, but as we hire people, I'm actually going to require like multi-user uh interaction to happen through Devon. So, we talk in threads about what is going on. That's thing one cuz cuz then you're not trying to always figure out where's the context for this thing, you know? Is it in your agent? Is it in Slack? Is it in Google Docs? Like where is it? So, I'm going to try to do that. Now, obviously that doesn't work for DMs and channels and all that stuff, but I also think and Jack Dorsey, I think, was saying this, you know, they launched Buzz. It's kind of interesting. I think he banned DMs or somebody banned DMs in their company. Um, and I think, you know, as we scale, I'm going to do the same thing. Like, I don't want any one-on-one chats. Like, if we're having private conversations, I'll have to call you. Um, so that's why I I just think Slack is not built for the AI age.
主持人: 哈哈,这很有趣。但我必须告诉你我为什么离不开 Slack。首先,我喜欢把我的智能体给“人格化(Personification)”。作为一个独立创始人,在 Slack 里和智能体聊天,会让我觉得我的工作氛围更活泼、更有趣一点。虽然 Slack 界面其实只是网页端的一个镜像投射,但我觉得它至少能给我带来一点陪伴感。而且在之前我们部署智能体的时候,我发现把智能体的开发过程公开在 Slack 的公共频道里,是改变团队成员对 AI 认知最有效的方式。当大家亲眼看到智能体是如何一步步在 Slack 线程里写代码并解决问题时,他们才能切实理解 AI 的上限和人机协同的最佳姿势。当然,我们都不喜欢 Slack 泛滥的碎片化闲聊文化。在 AI 时代,我们应该确保每一次沟通都是为了产出实际的工作成果,而不是无意义的精力消耗。
Original English
Host: Well, let me let me tell you why I love Slack. Okay. I like to convince me. I like to person first. I like to personify my agents. I like to as a solo founder, I need my colleagues to be fun. Fair. Fair. I'm just boring and meme. Um, it's it's marginally more fun in Slack to use Dev than in the web app. Although I they're interchangeable actually. You're just seeing a reflection of the web app. The the reason why I think I had been so um committed to Devon in Slack is actually not because I think it's a better experience. It's that very early on deploying background agents inside companies. This is where we're going to agree to agree inside companies. So when I was at Launch Darkly and we were first deploying background agents in particular Devon, it was such an effective change agent move to put these background agents in public Slack threads. Interesting. And so like it was one of the places actually it was the only place I had experienced up to that point where you could do real time coding work in public. Cool. And I think that changes people's perception of oh what is AI capable of doing? How do I work with AI better? Um, and then I do think, you know, in particular, Devon is pretty good at multiplayer um chat. It's one of the few ones that like you don't trip over your colleagues when you're both both chatting in a thread in Slack. But I think it's yeah uh in both in Slack and in in in the web app. And I think um it's just I'm a creature of habit having told everybody to shove their Devon threads in public channels. Yeah. um that that's why I'm using it. Okay. You know, I'm
Ryan Carson: 是的,无意义的闲聊文化确实毫无用处。我之前在英特尔(Intel)工作过一段时间,在那段大厂员工的经历中,我发现大家每天花在讨论那些无关紧要、而且自己根本无权做出改变的事情上的时间实在是太多了。这毫无意义。所以,我更希望把讨论聚焦在有上下文的任务线程里。
Original English
Ryan Carson: I do think that chat's not going away because I think that's how humans like to work like communicate. So, it's hard to feel like chat's going away going away. But I do think more and more people if they don't want to get rid of Slack, want to get rid of Slack culture, which is like DM culture, private channel culture, like I don't want any of that crap. Needless needless conversation culture that doesn't result. It doesn't do anything. Yeah. And so almost like every thread in Slack should result in work. Yep. But it doesn't feels better. It doesn't. It devolves into just you know and I love humans, trust me. But I I don't listen, you know, I've I did a stint at Intel where I was an employee and I learned a lot about being what it's like to be an employee, you know, and I just realized you spend a lot of time talking about stuff that doesn't matter. you're not empowered to do anything and it's like, you know, what's the point of that? So, and and you're the agent is always going to need the context of whatever you're talking about. So, so have the have the conversation there. So, before we leave, I know you have a hard stop. Um, I do want to talk about the third plane uh that I have, which which is a little bit of cloud code. So, I I Yeah. So, I'm number one, it's like it feels like infinite tokens. Um, but I just can't get around how good claw design is. Now, I don't mean in coming up with new design. I think it's bad. But I think for carrying forward, you know, a design system, it it it does something magical that Codex is hilariously bad at. Devon is terrible at at design and so I always have to go back to claw design. So, am I missing something or do you do something magical design that's working for you?
UI 设计与前端代码生成
主持人: 在结束今天的话题前,我们来聊聊设计。你是怎么用 AI 帮你在前端 UI 设计上做突破的?我觉得 Claude 似乎有一种神奇的魔力,虽然让它从零设计一个全新的方案它可能做得一般,但在延续和扩充现有的设计系统上,它做得极其出色。而相比之下,Codex 和 Devin 在 UI 设计和前端美化上简直是灾难。在这方面你有什么独家秘诀吗?
Original English
Host: You know, this is a this is a great question. I was telling you before this, I'm launching a new business. We've got a new brand, new design, and so I went through this process very recently. So, I can tell you what I did. I think Claw Designs create a design system is like unmatched right now. Okay. It's it does it does a great job of decomposing either an example site or a Figma or something into relative non-slop. design tokens you can reuse across across um across a property. Now that being said, my most recent processes I went to cloud design. I created the the kind of like design and the the design file in in Claw Design. I downloaded that, gave it to Codeex and said, "Take this plus what's in the Figma and actually build me a technical design system." Oh. And it built all the shared components. It made this nice like interlinking in our mono repo. Oh wow. Um and then I I also tested with codeex using the Figma plugin to then go pull all those designs tokens back into Figma into components that I could use. Um so once you have the design MD imported it to imported it to codeex. Yeah, that's exactly exactly what I did.
Ryan Carson: 我非常同意。我最近也刚刚为我的新业务重塑了品牌和设计。我的做法是,利用 Claude 设计生成设计规范,下载下来之后直接喂给 Codeex,命令它:“结合这份设计规范以及 Figma 文件,为我构建一套完整的技术设计系统。”它表现得极其完美,帮我自动生成了所有的共享组件,并且在我们单体仓库(Monorepo)中做好了关联。随后我再利用 Figma 插件,将这些生成好的 Token 同步回 Figma 的组件中。这一整套闭环非常高效。
不过,每次看 Claude(特别是旧版本如 Opus 5)输出的大量废话,真的会让我血压飙升,特别痛苦。
Original English
Ryan Carson: I mean, my problem with Claude infinite tokens, very intelligent, my blood boils reading Claude output. It like actually raises my blood pressure. It makes me so. So, I the the one podcast I listened about the like the the the opinion on Opus 5 was yours cuz I I love your take and I couldn't agree more. I'm so sick of Opus 5. like it it's just so frustrating. It it's terrifying in one way cuz it's like oh my god it's way worse than we thought you know about everything and so you're like okay you know which is actually what's wrong here is and I so it's like super smart but s I really am sick of Opus 5. Yeah.
主持人: 哈哈,确实如此。虽然在处理深度的网络安全审计或者一些极其冷门的技术细节时它的表现是不可替代的,但对于日常的高效编码交互,Codex 确实要让人愉悦和省心得多。
那么,作为独立创始人的行政助理(EA)或者说日常管家,你目前使用的是哪一个智能体?
Original English
Host: Yeah. But I do think I the the applications in some like very specific deep spikes cyber security design like kind of unbeatable on the on the execution side still include but um I am I just the the harness experience of codeex is just a lot more effective and enjoyable for me. It's so good. So, last question I have before we go is like we can both answer, you go first. Like, what's your current actual um EA? Like, who's your actual sidekick that does all of your agent work as an executive assistant?
Ryan Carson: 我目前依然每天使用 OpenClaw。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Paulie the OpenClaw.
主持人: 噢,很有意思。你依然留在 OpenClaw。
Original English
Host: Interesting. Okay. You're on OpenClaw.
Ryan Carson: 是的,我非常喜欢 OpenClaw 团队和 Pete。但我最近也开始尝试在本地的 Mac Mini 上跑云端代码。因为我真的太爱 Codeex 的界面设计了,它的交互太流畅了。另外,Codex 现在在帮我接管我的 Gmail 邮箱。前几天它帮我自动读完了 2,000 多封未读邮件并进行了精准的分类和处理,这真的彻底改变了我的生活。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Still live in OpenClaw. Okay. Just committed there. Yeah. I love OpenClaw. I love Pete. I love the team. I love it. I just moved off. Um I was like, screw it. I'm just going to run cloud code um on my Mac Mini. Um and I actually want to switch to codecs cuz I just love love love the UI of codecs. It there's so it's the it's wonderful the whole thing. So yep. Yeah. No, I use I still poly the open claw is still still running but I do now have my emails constantly open in the browser in Codeex and Codex functionally runs my email. It it it it ran through 2,000 unread emails in my Gmail the other day and just changed my life.
颠覆传统的人类招聘流程
主持人: 这确实是一个极大的效率飞跃。那么既然我们都准备雇人,你目前是如何运行你的招聘流程的呢?
Original English
Host: This is this has been a game changer. Um so like you I've hired a lot of people in my life like hundreds and hundreds of people and let go lots of people and all this kind of stuff. So um I the way I'm running my hiring process right now really love it and we'll see if it works out. But but I think I think this is interesting. Um, so what I decided to do
Ryan Carson: 我在 X(Twitter)上发了一条招聘启事,说我们要招募第一位人类工程师。要求是这个人必须是极度“AI Forward(善用 AI 协同)”的开发者。并且,我不在乎你住在哪里。应聘的唯一要求是:录制一段你电脑桌面的完整录屏,向我展示你如何利用 AI 智能体,在 30 分钟内为一个已有的应用从零构建并发布一个新功能。我不要求看你的简历,我也不想和你开会面试,甚至不想知道我是不是喜欢你的性格。我只想通过视频,亲眼看一看你作为一个“智能体管理者(Agent Manager)”的水平究竟如何。
我收到的视频真的太有意思了,能非常直观地展现出我到底想不想和这个人共事。在第一轮筛选后,通过的人会进入第二轮。我会给他们提供 Devin 的访问权限,让他们去开发一个真实的业务功能,并同样录制操作视频。这不仅省去了中间多余的沟通步骤,而且通过录像回放,我能对他们的工作实力一目了然。这就是我准备用来管理人类团队的方式。
Original English
Ryan Carson: is I I basically on Twitter I was like, "Okay, we're hiring our first engineer. You got to be like super duper duper AI forward, you know, of course, and I don't really care where you live. And all I want you to do is record a video full screen, everything, your your whole desktop of you building a new feature for an app that already exists. And I just want to see the whole thing. Um, and I don't want to talk to you. I don't want to have a meeting with you. I don't want to get to know if I like you. I just want to see how good of an agent manager you are. And uh the videos I'm getting are fascinating and very revealing about whether I would want to work with this person. And I'm liking it. So, I've got, you know, a number of people that are probably going to move to phase two where then what I'm do is say, okay, give them access to Devon and actually build a real thing and then but record a video of that and then basically at the end I'll do some sort of quick, well, we should meet, you know, and chat and then I'm going to hire them and then I'm just going to watch their agent output and that's how I'm going to manage them. I mean, well, one other thing is if they work with Devon, you get the replay video anyway of how the Devon computer works. So, save you saved you a step.
主持人: 哈哈,你的面试逻辑非常有趣,你几乎是像筛选一个 AI 智能体一样去筛选一个人类。没有繁琐的社交废话,只有纯粹的“验证环路(Verification Loop)”。这其实比传统的面试方式要高效公平得多。
Original English
Host: Thank you. The one meta observation I have on this is you're almost hiring a human like you would hire an agent, which is like, I love you. Like, we'll get along, I'm sure, but like really, I just want to see how you do this. You're you're doing a verification loop is what you're saying and think about how much better this is in this insane way we used to hire. Yeah.
Ryan Carson: 确实如此。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Yeah.
主持人: 那么非常期待看到你这一套招聘方式的最终成果。让我们为今天的讨论做个总结:我们两个 timeline 上最被 AI 灌顶的人,今天却花了大量的时间在劝诫大家:过多的 AI 代码产出并不等于优秀的产品。如果你想成功,用你的肉身走出办公室,去和客户交谈。
Original English
Host: You like I like this person like you and then you're like we're going to kind of ask you to do some weird technical project and then so very excited to see this shake out. Okay. Well, um just to recap for everyone, the the two most AI pill on your timeline spent most of our time talking about how too much AI code doesn't really get you great product. [snorts] Amen.
Ryan Carson: 没错,并且把你的核心优先级写在实体的纸张上。
Original English
Ryan Carson: You should just go outside with your human body and talk to customers. Keep your priority on a piece of paper
主持人: 这真的非常有效。在技术开发上,搭建好你的后台智能体,并用你能够掌控的方式来为它们划分优先级。在这个时代,每个人都要学会成为一名优秀的“智能体管理者”。因为智能体不仅能帮你写代码,它们还能为你做更多的事情。
再次感谢 Ryan Carson 来到我们的节目,和你聊天总是非常愉快。
Original English
Host: on your list. It works. Um, it works. But, you know, on on the technical stuff, set up your background agents. Prioritize their work in a way that you can manage. Everybody's becoming agent managers. Your coding agent can do more for you than just code. And the new interview is just let them cook and and do a screen share. Um, and also to conclude, the solo founder AI agent managers are both hiring. So Ryan, where can we we I know we can find you online, but where can we find you and how can we be helpful? Who are you hiring for?
Ryan Carson: 谢谢你的邀请。我在 X 上非常活跃,直接搜 Ryan Carson 就能找到我,欢迎随时给我发私信。如果你也想和我们一起帮助更多人拥有更好的离婚体验(因为大家总是在经历离婚),欢迎访问 untangle.us 关注我们,并给我发送你结对编程的演示视频。我们很快就会招人,欢迎大家随时和我们打招呼。
Original English
Ryan Carson: Thank you. So I'm super active on X, so just Ryan Carson. Um, hit me up anytime. And then uh uh if you want to help people have better divorces because people are going to get divorced, okay? Um go to untangle. us, check us out, and then just shoot me a DM with a video of you working. Um and I think we're going to hire someone pretty fast. So So move fast and uh and and say hello.
主持人: 谢谢 Ryan。如果你喜欢我们的节目,请记得在 YouTube 上点赞和订阅,或者给我们留言。你也可以在 Apple Podcasts、Spotify 等你最喜欢的播客平台上找到我们。如果可以的话,请给我们一个好评,这能帮助更多人找到我们的节目。你可以在 howiipod.com 查看我们所有的往期节目并了解更多信息。我们下期再见。
Original English
Host: And I'll say if you impress Ryan with your video, you're probably going to be an upcoming guest of How I AI, where you will show us how you use your background agents. Awesome. Well, Ryan, thank you so much for joining. This has been a blast. Thank you. Thanks so much for watching. If you enjoyed this show, please like and subscribe here on YouTube, or even better, leave us a comment with your thoughts. You can also find this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Please consider leaving us a rating and review, which will help others find the show. You can see all our episodes and learn more about the show at howiipod.com. See you next time.