AI 时代的下一个瓶颈:为什么我们即将面临铜矿与电力的全面短缺 All-In Podcast 2026-06-10

经济奇迹与去工业化的反噬

主持人: 我们今天请到了 Dan Dreyfus 上节目。他就职于 Fortnite Capital

Original English

Host: We've got Dan Drifus on the show. He's with Fortnite Capital.

Dan Dreyfus: 我们将通过人类消耗多少电力来衡量人类进步的程度。对于半导体行业,我将其视为一种工业或基础设施公司。我的意思是,它实际上就是一个工厂。我们试图弄清楚世界未来的发展方向,然后试图弄清楚实现这个目标我们需要什么。在接下来的 10 分钟里,我将尝试向大家讲解关于关键矿产、大宗商品,以及我们美国国内极其脆弱的基础设施。如果我们想要实现我们的技术目标、制造业回流目标、重新工业化目标,以及我们的国家安全和军事目标,这些基础设施将需要数万亿甚至数万亿美元的投资。但在进入正题之前,我们先回顾一点历史。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: We're going to be measuring human progress by how much electricity we consume. The semiconductor industry, I view that as an industrial or infrastructure company. I mean, it's effectively a factory. We try to figure out where the world is going and then we try to figure out what we're going to need to get there. In the next 10 minutes, I am going to try to teach you about critical minerals, commodities, our incredibly fragile infrastructure here in the US that is going to require trillions and trillions of dollars of investment if we want to achieve our technological objectives, our reshoring, re-industrialization objectives, and our national security and military objectives. news. But first, a little bit of history.

Dan Dreyfus: 我们现在正处于美国经济增长及其未来面貌的一个非常重要的转折点。实际上,从 2000 年代初到几年前,美国经历了我认为实质上是一个经济奇迹的时期。在这个时期,我们创造了如此多的增长、如此多的市值、如此多的价值,却几乎不需要投入任何资本。我的意思是,想想那些在没有资本的情况下创建的所有公司。我们有提供搜索引擎的 Google。我们有做社交媒体的 Meta。他们以 300 亿美元收购了只有 12 名员工的 WhatsApp,你知道的,这根本不需要什么资本投入。我们有各种流媒体平台。我们有各种外卖平台。我们有 Apple 电脑,它也是一种轻资产模式,却创造了数万亿的市值。我们还有软件即服务(SaaS)。创造所有这些价值绝对不需要资本。然而,在我们创建这些公司的同时,我们在做那件事的同时,我们实际上正在拆除我们所有的关键基础设施,并将它们转移到海外,转移到中国。所以我们实际上是在这种“轻资产”心态上加倍下注。但是随后,这有点开始反噬我们了,对吧?我们经历了 COVID,我们经历了俄乌冲突,我们经历了关税战,现在我们又面临伊朗的冲突。而每次我们遇到这些地缘政治爆发事件时,通货膨胀就会像火箭一样飙升。你需要用望远镜才能看清通胀到底涨得有多高。而且它再也没有降下来过。导致这种情况的原因是,我们让我们的供应链变得太过于脆弱,太过于薄弱。供应链中毫无韧性可言。而现在我们正处于这个转折点,我们希望将我们曾经拆除并转移到中国的所有东西重新转移回国内。我们想要重新工业化。我们正处于一场技术性的计算革命之中,这场革命对基础设施的密集程度要求,比过去几代人的计算革命要高出无限多倍。这就为基础设施所需的关键矿产和大宗商品创造了一种极其疯狂的需求冲击。而与此同时,又存在着供应冲击,因为我们太久太久没有在这些东西上进行投资了。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: We are at a very significant inflection point right now in US economic growth and what it's going to look like. really from the early 2000s until just a few years ago, the US went through effectively what I think was an economic miracle where we created so much growth, so much market cap, so much value without really having to invest any capital at all. I mean, think of all the companies that were created with no capital. You had Google with the search engine. You had Meta with social media. They bought WhatsApp for $30 billion with 12 employees, you know, no capital whatsoever. You had the streaming platforms. You had the food delivery platforms. You had Apple computer which was Capital Light created trillions of market cap. You had software as a service. Absolutely no capital required to create all that value. And at the same time we were creating these companies, at the same time we were doing that, we were literally tearing down all of our critical infrastructure and moving it overseas to China. So we were really doubling down on that capital light mentality. But then it sort of started to come back to bite us, right? We had COVID, we had the Russia Ukraine conflict, we had the tariffs, now we have the Iranian conflict. And every time we had one of these geopolitical flare-ups, inflation spiked like a rocket. You need a telescope to see how high inflation went. And it never came down. And the reason for that is we let our supply chains get way too fragile and way too weak. And there's no resiliency in the supply chains. And now we're at this inflection point where we want to reshore everything that we tore down and moved to China. We want to re-industrialize. We have this technological compute revolution that is infinitely more infrastructure intensive than compute was in the last generations. And this is creating this really wild demand shock for infrastructural critical minerals commodities at the same time where there's a supply shock because we just haven't invested in this stuff for so long now.

多重资本周期叠加与基础设施瓶颈

Dan Dreyfus: 现在有太多的资本周期在同时进行。在我的职业生涯中,我从未见过这么多周期在同一时间发生。我们有航空航天周期。Boeing(波音)和 Airbus(空客)在未来 10 年内有高达一万亿美元的积压订单。现在再把太空经济算进去,太空经济将要竞争的正是波音和空客试图采购的完全相同的材料和产能。我们有电网问题,只要德克萨斯州稍微冷一点,德州电网(ERCOT)——它没有连接到美国其他地区的电网——只要稍微冷一点,那个电网就会关闭,人们只能在黑暗中挨冻。然后我们还有,你知道的,在加利福尼亚州这里,加州天堂镇(Paradise),那条起火并导致 300 人死亡的电源线。你知道那条电源线已经有超过 106 年的历史了吗?这个国家部分地区的电网已经超过 106 年了。而在加州这里,如果有一半的人购买电动汽车,或者有了无人驾驶出租车(robo taxis),当我们所有人都在下午 6 点下班后回家插上电源充电,并把空调开大时,我们就会直接摧毁电网。砰的一声。我们就会摧毁它。我们所有人都只能坐在黑暗中。因此,电网目前勉强能满足我们现有的需求。而我们甚至还没有开始谈论 AI 将带来的海量需求,那种海啸般的电力需求。还有发电问题。你知道,我们已经让中国去建设了比我们这里多出好几倍的发电能力。这是一个超过万亿美元的资本周期。在未来的 30 年里,这可能意味着每 10 年就需要投入一万亿美元。数据中心,现在每年都需要一万亿美元。每年!所有的基础设施,所有的大宗商品。然后还有半导体晶圆厂(semifabs)。中央处理器(CPU)正在强势复苏。CPU 密集度正像火箭一样飙升。我敢打赌这个数字绝对被严重低估了——7500 亿美元。我敢打赌,那将会以数万亿美元来衡量。然后还有国防,对吧?每个人,你知道的,台湾已经变成了一只“豪猪”(porcupine)。日本正在增加他们的国防预算。欧洲正在增加他们的国防预算。美国也在增加国防预算。所有这些终端市场的共同点在于,如果没有关键矿产,它们都无法运转。 没有任何一个能运转。所有这些都不可能发生。所以问题就出在这里。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: There are so many capital cycles going on at the same time. I've never seen this many going on at the same time in my career. We have the aerospace cycle. Boing and Airbus have a trillion dollars of backlog over the next 10 years. Now throw in the space economy which is going to compete for the exact same materials and backlog that Boeing and Airbus are trying to source. We have the grid right anytime it gets a little bit cold in Texas. The Eurot the Texas grid's not connected not connected to the rest of the US grid. Every time it gets a little bit cold that grid shuts down and they're freezing in the dark. Then we've got, you know, here in California, Paradise, California, that power line that caught on fire and killed 300 people. Did you know that that power line was over 106 years old? There's parts of the grid in this country that are over 106 years old. And here in California, if half the people buy electric cars or there's robo taxis and we all go and plug them in at 6:00 p.m. after work and turn up the air conditioning, we're just going to kill the grid. Boom. We're going to kill it. We're all going to be sitting in the dark. So, the grid barely works for what we need it for right now. And we haven't even started talking about the tsunami of demand, electricity demand that AI is going to bring. And there's power generation. You know, we've let China go and build multiples more power generation than what we have here. And this is a trillion dollar plus capital cycle. That's probably going to be a trillion dollars every 10 years for the next 30 years. data centers. This is now a trillion dollars per year. Per year, all infrastructure, all all commodities. Then there's semifabs. Um the CPU is making a huge resurgence. CPU intensity is is going up like a rocket. And and I I bet you this number is way too low. $750 billion. I bet you that's going to be measured in the trillions. And then there's defense, right? Everybody, you know, Taiwan's turned into a porcupine. Japan's raising their defense budgets. Europe's raising their defense budgets, the US raising their defense budgets. What the similarity is amongst all of these end markets is none of them will work without critical minerals. None of it. None of this can happen. And so here's the problem.

中国出口禁令与政府紧急干预

Dan Dreyfus: 去年四月,中国宣布将切断对美国某些关键材料的出口。钐(Samarium)、钆(Gadolinium)、铽(Terbium)、镝(Dysprosium)、镥(Lutetium)、钪(Scandium)、钇(Yttrium)、铒(Erbium)、银(Silver),直接切断。由于我们非常接近许多大型工业供应链。在切断钐钴磁铁(Samarium cobalt magnets)的供应后,我们了解到,Ford Motor Company(福特汽车公司)距离他们整条生产线关闭只有几天的时间,字面意思上的几天时间,整个福特汽车公司差点停摆。顺便说一句,**麦道公司(McDonnell Douglas)**也面临同样的遭遇。这让战争部(美国国防部)和能源部的人陷入了恐慌。但值得赞扬的是,他们正在采取一些非常激进且非常重要的事情。他们现在正走访美国各地以及加拿大的小型资源拥有者,他们敲开那些在过去 20 年里被遗弃等死的公司的门,并说这有三张纸。第一张纸是一张股权支票,我们要投资你们的公司,这样你们就可以开始将你们的资源转化为矿山。然后公司会说,“哦,太棒了。哇,这真令人震惊。但你知道,问题是我等许可证已经等了 20 年了。没有人愿意给我发许可证。”他们就会说,“哦,看看第二张纸。这是你的许可证。现在就去开始建设吧。”然后他们向公司展示第三张纸,公司问,“这是什么?”他们回答说,“这是一个承购协议(offtake agreement)。照付不议(Take or pay),带有最低底价,这将保证你的项目能获得非常高的内部收益率(IRR),同时你可以保留高于最低价格的所有上涨收益。这里有一个最低价格,你可以利用它去筹集大量资金,让这个项目快速推进并运转起来。”现在,中国掌握着绝对的控制权。对于所有这些关键矿产,这种控制是绝对的。我们至少需要 10 年,甚至可能 20 年才能赶上。但我们总得有个开始,因为我们不能让中国一直领先于我们,并在每次我们做了一些他们不喜欢的事情时,就捏住我们的命脉说,“我们要切断对你们的出口。我们要切断对你们关键矿产的出口,而你们将在黑暗中挨冻。”因此,我对本届政府这样做的举措给予高度评价。说真的,你知道,我做大宗商品已经 25 年了,我从来没有见过这样的事情发生。这真的是我所说的“似曾不相识”(vuja de)时刻,这是一种强烈的、这一切都前所未有的感觉。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: Last April, China announced that they were going to cut off exports of some critical materials to the US. Samarium, Gandelinium, Turbium, Dprosium, Lutium, Scandium, Yitriium, herbium, silver, just cut it off. And we're close to a lot of big industrial supply chains. and the cut off of Samrium cobalt magnets, we learned that the Ford Motor Company was within days, literally days of their entire production line shutting down, the whole Ford Motor Company. And same with McDonald Douglas, too, by the way. And this put people in the Department of War, Department of Energy into a panic. And to their credit, they're doing something really aggressive and really important. They are now going around to small resource owners across the US and into Canada and they're knocking on the doors of these companies that were left for dead in the last 20 years and they're saying here is three pieces of paper. The first piece of paper is an equity check that we're investing into your company so that you can go and start converting your resource into a mine. And then the company says, "Oh, that's great. Wow, that's that's that's a shock. But you know, the problem is I've been waiting on my permit for the last 20 years. Nobody wants to give me a permit. They say, "Oh, look at the second piece of paper. There's your permit. Go and start building right now." And then they show them a third piece of paper and then the company says, "What's this?" And they say, "This is an offtake agreement. Take or pay with a minimum floor price that's going to guarantee you a very high internal rate of return on your project where you can keep all the upside above the minimum price. But here's a minimum price that you can go out and raise a bunch of capital to get this thing fasttracked and up and running." Now, China has an absolute grip. It's absolute on all of these critical minerals. And it's going to take at least 10 years, probably 20 to catch up. But we got to start somewhere because we just can't have China leading over us and squeezing our testicles every time that we don't do something that they don't like and say, "We're going to cut off your exports. So, we're going to cough our exports of critical minerals and you guys are going to freeze in the dark." So, I give a lot of credit to the administration for doing this. And really, you know, I've done commodities now for 25 years and I've never seen something like this happen before. It's truly what I call a vuja day moment, which is the overwhelming feeling that none of this has ever happened before.

铜:金属之王与下一个巨大瓶颈

Dan Dreyfus: 那么,我们来看看。这是金属之王。这只是一个例子。我们做任何事情都需要铜。你知道,如果我们想要清洁能源,每兆瓦太阳能发电所需的铜,是典型的基载 CCGT(燃气轮机联合循环)燃气轮机的五倍。风能也一样,需要七倍的铜。至于一个 1 吉瓦(GW)的 AI 数据中心,你每吉瓦需要 50,000 吨铜。而我们打算开始每年建造 15 吉瓦这样的设施。每年!所以每吉瓦 50,000 吨,加上 15 吉瓦,就意味着我们需要为这些设施准备 750,000 吨铜。你知道去年的铜供应量是多少吗?它只增长了 500,000 吨。而这仅仅是满足数据中心的需求!然后还有电动汽车,你知道,如果我们要让无人驾驶出租车遍布各地,一辆电动汽车消耗的铜是传统内燃机的五到六倍。另外还有军事领域。在俄乌冲突中,你知道我们使用的炸药比整个二战期间还要多吗?你知道吗?而这些炸药的炮弹,猜猜它们是用什么做的?其中一种被称为“铜头蛇”(copper head)。这是以一种毒蛇非常巧妙地命名的。它们都是用铜制成的。你认为我们会进入战场去回收那些铜吗?不。那些铜已经消失了。所以,我们做的每一件事都需要这些金属。那么,我们能从哪里获得它呢?追溯人类历史一直到摩亨佐-达罗(Mohenjo Daro)文明,在过去的 10,000 年里,我们总共开采了 7 亿吨铜。现在,这 7 亿吨铜中的 80%,如果我们愿意,我们也许能把它全部回收,但我们要付出的代价是必须拆毁这栋大楼。我们必须把电网连根拔起。我们必须拆毁欧洲、日本、中国的建筑物。这样我们就能把所有的铜都收回来。当然可以。那我们就会在一个帐篷里举行这次会议了。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: So, here's copper. This is the king of metals. This is just one example. We need copper for everything. You know, if we want clean energy, you know, solar power per megawatt takes five amounts five times the amount of copper than a typical base load CCGT gas fired turbine. Same with wind, seven times the copper uh data centers for a 1 gawatt AI factory. Now, you need 50,000 tons of copper per gawatt. And we're going to start building 15 gawatts of these things per year. Per year. So 50,000 tons per gigawatt and 15 gawatt is 750,000 tons of copper that we're going to need for these things. Do you know what the copper supply was last year? It grew only 500,000 tons. And this is just the data centers. Then electric cars, you know, if we're going to have robo taxis everywhere, an electric car consumes five or six times the copper than a traditional internal combustion engine. And then there's the military. In the Ukraine Russia conflict, did you know that we used more explosives than in all of World War II? Did you know that? And the artillery shells of these explosives, guess what they're made of? One of them's called the copper head. Very cleverly named after a poisonous snake. They're all made of copper. Do you think we go into the battlefield and recycle that copper? No. That copper's gone. So, we need this these metals for everything that we do. Now, where are we going to get it? Going back in human history to Mohenjo Daro, we have mined 700 million tons of copper. 700 million tons of copper over the past 10,000 years. Now, 80% of that copper, we could probably get it all back if we wanted, but what we'd have to do is we'd have to tear down this building. We'd have to rip up the grid. We'd have to tear down the buildings in Europe, in Japan, in China. And we could get all that copper back. Sure. Then we'd be doing this conference in a tent.

Dan Dreyfus: 那么我们该如何获得它呢?目前,铜的年需求量是 3000 万吨。其中约 400 万吨的供应来自回收铜。剩下的 2600 万吨是开采出来的。如果我们仅仅按照 GDP 的增速来增长,也就是暂不考虑数据中心带来的增量,不考虑绿色能源、太阳能带来的增量,仅仅像过去那样随着 GDP 增长。现在请仔细听。这意味着在接下来的 18 年里,我们将需要 7 亿吨铜。在接下来的 18 年里,我们将需要和我们过去 10,000 年开采总量一样多的铜。 这意味着我们每年都需要有五个世界级的大型一级(tier one)矿山投产。你可以去 Grok 或者 ChatGPT 上查一下。你可以用一只手就能数得过来,甚至还有多余的手指,从现在到本年代末(2030 年底)即将投产的一级矿山的数量。所以我不知道他们打算怎么做,因为建立一座铜矿需要 7 到 12 年的时间。现有的铜矿正在消亡。你知道,智利的那些大矿山已经有 100 多年的历史了。矿石品位正在枯竭。因此,这将是一个重大且严峻的挑战,也是今天即将面临的瓶颈。现在的狂热都集中在内存上,HBM(高带宽内存)和 NAND 闪存的价格正在垂直飙升,因为那就是当下的瓶颈。现在,如果你想转个弯看看即将到来的下一个瓶颈,我强烈建议你们关注一下。所以,我们现在面临的情况是:供应冲击遇到了需求冲击。大宗商品周期通常持续 15 年。而且会有数百个百分点的上涨空间。我们目前才处于这个周期的头几年。这一切才刚刚真正开始。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: So how are we going to get it? Well, right now copper demand is 30 million tons per year. About 4 million of that supply comes from recycled copper. Copper the rest of it is 26 million tons is mined. And if we just grow in line with GDP, so forgetting about data center upside, forgetting about green energy, solar upside, just growing at GDP like we used to. Now listen carefully. That means over the next 18 years, we're going to need 700 million tons of copper. Over the next 18 years, we're going to need as much copper as we mined in the last 10,000 years. That means we're going to need five worldclass mega tier one mines coming online every single year. And you can go and gro this or chat GPT this. You can count on one hand and have some fingers left over uh the number of tier one mines that are coming on between now and the end of the decade. So I don't know what they're going to do because it takes 7 to 12 years to build a copper mine. The existing copper mines are dying. You know, the big mines in Chile over a hundred years old. The grades are depleting. And um this is going to be a major major challenge and an upcoming bottleneck right today. All the rage is in memory and HBM and NAND prices are going vertical because that's the bottleneck. Now if you want to look around the corner and see the next bottleneck coming, I strongly urge you to look at copper. And so um here we are. A supply shock meets a demand shock. Commodity cycles typically last 15 years. and have multiple hundreds% of upside. We're only a few years into this. This is just really getting started.

债务膨胀与资产保护

Dan Dreyfus: 我还想再说一件事,对吧?我们谈到了需求。我们正经历着这场需求冲击。我们谈到了供应。但是我们还没有谈到的是,我们是如何摧毁美元的价值的。自从新冠疫情以来,我们已经彻底摧毁了我们法定货币的价值。今天,我们拥有 40 万亿美元的政府债务,而且正以每年 2.5 万亿美元的速度增长。除此之外,我们还有折现后价值高达一百万亿美元的未来社会负债。比如医疗保险(Medicare)、医疗救助(Medicaid)、社会保障(Social Security)和养老金,这部分负债同样也以每年 2.5 万亿美元的速度增长。所以你面临着联邦债务增长的两点五万亿,社会负债增长的 2.5 万亿。而美国政府每年只有 5.5 万亿美元的税收收入。那么下一次我们遭遇经济衰退,当税收收入下降而支出又必须增加时,会发生什么呢?我们要去印天量的美元。在 1970 年代,我们也遇到了这个问题。而我们当时应对的方式,就是通过一些通货膨胀,通过一些增长来贬值货币。结果货币失去了 70% 的购买力。在那种环境下,大宗商品、硬资产和基础设施将保护你的购买力。去查一下 1970 年代的历史吧。遥遥领先、表现最好的资产类别是什么?那是留给你们的家庭作业。那么,说到这里,谢谢大家,很期待与你们交流。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: And I want to say one more thing, right? We spoke about demand. We're having this demand shock. We spoke about supply. But what we haven't spoken about is how we're destroying the value of the US dollar. Since co we have absolutely destroyed the value of our fiat currencies. Today we have $40 trillion of government debt that's growing at $2 and a half trillion dollars every year. On top of that we have a hundred trillion dollars of discounted present value of the future social liabilities. So Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, pensions that's also growing by $2.5 trillion a year. So you have two half trillion of growth on the federal debt, $2.5 trillion of growth on the social liabilities. The US government only has $5.5 trillion of tax receipts every year. And so what's going to happen the next time we have a recession where tax receipts go down and spending has to go up, we're going to print giga dollars. And in the 1970s, we had this problem as well. And the way we did it is we just debased the currency through some inflation, through some growth. And the currency lost 70% of its purchasing power. And commodities and hard assets and infrastructure will protect your purchasing power in that kind of environment. Go and look it up in the 1970s. What was the best performing asset class by a mile? That's your homework. So with that, uh, thank you and, uh, look forward to chatting with you guys.

电力短缺与通货膨胀的真正源头

主持人: Chamath,我想在我们的预测节目里,嗯,你做的那个预测,我忘了是哪个类别了,但你当时明确提到过...

Original English

Host: Shabbat, I think on the prediction show you, um, did was your call I forget which category it was, but you definitely had

Chamath: 我当时认为表现最好的资产将会是铜。是的。

Original English

Chamath: I thought the best performing asset was going to be copper. Yeah.

主持人: 是的。非常...

Original English

Host: Yeah. Pretty

Chamath: 而那还是在我跟 Dan 交流之前。

Original English

Chamath: And that's before I talked to Dan.

主持人: 没错。

Original English

Host: That's right.

Dan Dreyfus: 这就很说明问题了。嗯,你知道,我认为从目前的位置来看,铜价轻易就能翻倍。我的意思是,我曾见过钼(molybdenum)的价格从每磅 1 美元涨到 33 美元。所以,翻个倍根本不算什么大事。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: Which is saying something. Well, you know, I think the copper price is easily going to double from here. I mean, I've seen I've seen malibdinum go from a dollar a pound to $33 a pound. So, a double is no big deal.

主持人: 是的。

Original English

Host: Yeah.

Dan Dreyfus: 所以,

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: And so,

主持人: 我们退一步来看。你在后台说了一些非常有趣的话,那就是,如果你审视一下我们现在正在做的所有事情,我们甚至几乎无法跟上人类自然的能源需求,对吧?就用你在后台构思的方式,向大家解释一下那个观点。

Original English

Host: take a take a step back. You said something really interesting backstage, which is if you look at everything that we're doing right now, we're barely going to keep up with just the natural energy demands of of humanity, right? just explain that thesis the way that you framed it in the back.

Dan Dreyfus: 那么,问题就在这里。自二战以后,我们就没有对升级、现代化和加固电网进行过投资。我们就这么任其发展。你知道,过去的历届政府——不管是两届、三届还是四届——都像在梦游一样,在加固这项基础设施方面什么也没做。现在,如果我们仅仅只是想要实现我们的目标:重新工业化、制造业回流、电气化——当我说电气化时,那只是意味着将这些建筑物里的旧燃气锅炉替换为热泵,这正是每座商业建筑都在做的事情。这意味着,你知道的,电动汽车的渗透率不断上升。意味着你更多地使用你的电子设备。这甚至还没有谈到 AI 呢。甚至完全没有谈到 AI。仅仅因为上述那些日常需求的增长,我们就会面临电力短缺。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: So, here's the issue. We have not invested in upgrading and modernizing and hardening the electric grid since post World War II. We just let it go. You know, the last two, three, four administrations were sleepwalking and haven't done anything to harden this infrastructure. Now, if we simply just want to achieve our objectives to re-industrialize, reshore, electrify, when I say electrify, that just means replacing your old gas boilers in these buildings with heat pumps, which every commercial building is doing. It means, you know, electric car penetration going up. It means using your your your electronic devices more. Not even talking about AI. Not even talking about AI. We're going to have shortfalls. just from that.

主持人: 仅仅是为了维持我们现在的生活。

Original English

Host: Just from living our life.

Dan Dreyfus: 仅仅是为了维持我们的生活。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: Just from living our lives.

主持人: 那么,会发生什么呢?全面停电、局部停电,

Original English

Host: So, what happens? Blackouts, brownouts,

Dan Dreyfus: 全面停电、局部停电,然后我们将不得不面临...

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: blackouts, brownouts, and we're going to have to

主持人: 电价不断上涨。

Original English

Host: rising electricity prices.

Dan Dreyfus: 电价不断上涨。但是,你知道,我觉得你在你的一期节目中提出了一个非常棒的观点。你在节目里谈到,那些公用事业公司确实在故意哄抬做每一件事的成本,以便他们能够向监管机构报告,并在更高的资本基础上赚取那份股本回报率(ROE)。我认为非常有趣、但也确实被严重低估的一点是,那里正是所有通货膨胀的源头。通胀来自于公用事业公司的输电和配电环节,因为在过去的 20 年里,即使经历了我们刚刚经历的这波价格上涨,电力价格实际上仍然是下降的。在扣除通胀的实际层面上,它们绝对是下降的。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: Rising electricity prices. But, you know, you brought up a really great point I thought on one of your shows where you were talking about how the utilities are just really gooseing up the cost to do everything so that they can report to their regulator and earn that ROE on the higher capital base. What's really interesting I think is really underappreciated is that's where all the inflation is coming from. It's from the transmission and distribution from the utility because power prices over the last 20 years, even after the rise we've just had, power prices are still down. They're definitely down in real terms,

主持人: 是的,即使在绝对价值上,它们也没有真正上涨多少。所以当你谈到价格上涨时,

Original English

Host: but they haven't really gone up much in absolute terms. And so when you're talking about going up,

Dan Dreyfus: 发电本身的成本依然很便宜。是输送电力的过程变得越来越昂贵。因为将电力输送给用户的环节中,你知道的,劳动力——特别是劳动力——从很大程度上来说是最大的瓶颈。技术劳动力(Craft labor),对吧?我们过去都教导我们的孩子去做什么?

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: making it is still cheap. It's getting expensive. You're getting it to people because you know the labor the labor by far in a way is the biggest bottleneck. Craft labor, right? What do we tell all our kids to do

主持人: 你知道的,在过去的 10 或 15 年里,他们(去做了白领工作)...

Original English

Host: you know in in the last 10 or 15 years they liber

Dan Dreyfus: 去读文科了?是的。大错特错。所以我很好奇,嗯,在座各位观众,在你们自己家里,有多少人安装了太阳能,或者特斯拉的 Powerwall 储能系统?有多少人真正做过这件事?看来大约有一半的观众。第二个问题,有多少人计划在未来一两年内安装这些设备?好的。又有 20% 的人。这很明显,在座的显然都是富裕的群体。他们正在试图绕开公共电网。那么,能源独立的解决方案是否就在于...

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: the northeast? Yeah. Big mistake. And so I'm curious um from the audience in your homes how many people have put up solar andor power walls? How many people have actually done that? So that's about half the crowd. How many people, second question, are planning to do that in the next year or two. Okay. So that's another 20%. So it's pretty obvious this is obviously a fluent crowd. They are routing around the grid. Is the solution to this energy independence in the

主持人: 太棒了,你知道的,就是家庭和企业的自给自足?企业们并没有在等待政府出手。所以也许公共电网将会变成这种奇怪而古老的基础设施,而未来的能源解决方案将完全是一场自下而上的变革。

Original English

Host: great you know the home in the business? Businesses are not waiting for the government. So maybe the grid is going to be like this weird archaic infrastructure and it's just going to be a groundup solution.

Dan Dreyfus: 无论如何,对于工业用途来说,你还是离不开电网的。我的意思是,那始终是工业应用的基础。我是说我们哪怕只为了满足工业用途,必须要建设的规模也是极其庞大的。我给你提供一个很好的数据统计:一个 1 吉瓦的 AI 工厂,如果你想完全依靠太阳能来运作,对吧?要知道我可是太阳能的超级死忠粉,好吗?如果你想全用太阳能,因为太阳能的容量因子(capacity factor)只有 20%,因为太阳不可能一直照耀着。在容量因子仅为 20% 的情况下,一个 1 吉瓦的数据中心需要 5 吉瓦的太阳能发电设备。每吉瓦的太阳能发电场需要占用 7,000 英亩的土地。因此,5 吉瓦就需要 35,000 英亩。那面积比整个旧金山还要大。那么你打算去哪里找那么多的人手呢?你知道,你打算去哪里找... 顺便说一句,我们目前面临的最大的瓶颈正是技术劳动力。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: Well, you're going to need the grid no matter what for industrial use. I mean, that's that that's the foundation of industrial use. I mean, the scale of what we have to do just for industrial use. Here's a good stat for you. So, a 1 gawatt AI factory if you wanted to do all solar, right? And I'm a big solar bull, okay? If you want to do all solar, because solar's capacity factor is 20% because the sun doesn't shine all the time. With a capacity factor at 20%, a 1 gawatt data center needs 5 gawatts of solar. Each gawatt of solar takes up 7,000 acres. So at 5 gawatt, that's 35,000 acres. That's bigger than San Francisco. So where are you going to find the people? You know, where you going to find that's that's the biggest bottleneck we have, by the way, is craft labor.

稀缺与创新:技术颠覆与就业流转

提问者: 是的。那通常情况下“稀缺会催生创新”这个说法呢?之前一直有一些讨论,或者我看到过一些初创公司正在谈论能够用于获取矿产的新技术,我想,传统的稀土开采通常是他们的推销重点。但我们所需要的一切矿物,其实都在我们脚下的地球里,只不过我们一直只开采地表附近的那些东西。总体的假设是:你是否认为市场上即将出现一系列创新,最终能释放出比我们目前看到的还要高得多的生产力?因为我们现在仍在使用 100 年前的技术来把这些矿物从地下挖出来。

Original English

Interviewer: Yeah. What about generally scarcity breeds innovation? there's been a conversation or I've seen some startups that are talking about new technology and mining to access I think traditionally rare earth uh is kind of the pitch but everything we need is in the earth below us it's just that we only mine the stuff that's on the surface is the the general thesis is there a set of innovations that you think are coming to market that are going to ultimately unleash more productivity than we see because we're still using the same technology we did 100 years ago to get this stuff out of the ground

Dan Dreyfus: 对于某些特定的大宗商品来说,是的,会有创新。你提到了稀土(rare earths)。那么,从 14 世纪走出来,有一群人被称为炼金术士(alchemists)。还记得那时他们宣称自己可以点石成金,把铅变成金子吗。而当时他们认知中的元素周期表只有四种元素:水、火、空气和土。火,你很容易就能搞清楚它是什么。空气是很纯净的。水也是纯净的。但每次他们在泥土里看到一些他们不认识、不知道是什么的东西时,他们就把它称之为“稀土”(rare earth)。因此,稀土在地球上其实无处不在,而用于提取稀土的技术将使我们能够拥有极其丰富的稀土资源储备。但问题在于对它们进行加工。那才是真正的问题。中国掌握了所有的技术诀窍(know-how),能够将在地下开采出来的原料,转化、加工成我们可以实际使用的东西。所以你总是需要某种转化加工环节,比如像铜这样的金属。而铜的市场规模实在太庞大了,以至于你很难找到一种能在“一夜之间”彻底解决这个技术瓶颈的创新技术。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: for for some commodities. Yes. You you brought up rare earths. So So coming out of the 14th century, there were these guys called alchemists. Remember then they said they could turn lead into gold. And back then the periodic table was just four elements. There was water, there was fire, there was air, and there was earth. Now fire, you could figure out what it was. The air was pretty pure. The water was pure. But every time they saw something in the earth, they didn't know what it was. They called it a rare earth. And so rare earths are everywhere and the technology to extract rare earths is going to allow us to have a huge abundance of them. But the problem is processing them. That's the problem. The Chinese have all the technological knowhow to convert what you take out of the ground and convert it into something that we can use. And so there's always going to be, you know, some element of conversion that you're going to need with something like copper. the market is so big that it's really difficult to find a technology that could solve that problem overnight.

主持人: 如果我们需要把我们在这个播客(pod)上不断讨论的几个话题串联起来:如果我们确实与中国存在这种竞争关系,而他们恰巧又是主要供应商,这构成了供应链中最脆弱、最易断裂的一环。这样我们就可以解决国内的就业岗位流失问题,而不是世界末日般的流离失所。那些渴望工作机会的美国人,这些即将诞生的将会是薪酬极高的工作。我们可以开始把晶圆厂(fabs)从台湾搬迁到这里,而这也正是我们正在做的。我们将把这些产业同时带到北美,而且据我从一位拥有自动化采矿系统的朋友那里了解,还有南美。我们会在这里创造出大量的就业岗位。所以,或许你能谈谈这个影响:我们一直在谈论美国落后了多少,但是如果我们停止从中国购买,中国会发生什么?

Original English

Host: And if we are having just to thread a couple of topics we've been talking about on the pod incessantly about if we do have uh this rivalry with China and they are the provider and that's the brittle part of the supply chain we can solve the problem of job displacement not apocalypse displacement. people in America who want jobs. These are going to be incredibly high-paying jobs. And we can start bringing the fabs from Taiwan here, which we're doing. And we're going to bring both to North America and I understand South America from a friend of mine who's got an automated um mining um system. Uh Adams Travis, we're going to be able to just create a large number of jobs here. So maybe you could talk a little bit about what impact we keep talking about how behind America is, but what happens to China if we stop buying

主持人: (如果)我们在这里开始(自己制造)...

Original English

Host: here and we start

Dan Dreyfus: 把你刚才说的建立起来,这对于整个关于就业的辩论来说非常重要。对于我们必须要建设的一切,我们所需要的技术劳动力几乎是无限的。确实没有其他绕开这条路的办法,对吧?你知道,在很多方面,看看 2000 年代发生了什么,对吧?我们拆除了所有的工厂,把它们搬到了中国。谁受到了致命的打击?是那些蓝领技术工人。这造成了各种各样意想不到的后果。比如芬太尼的泛滥,嗯,你知道的,还有巨大的贫富差距。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: building what you said is is is very important for this whole jobs debate. The craft labor that we're going to need is going to be almost limitless for what we have to build. And there's really no other way around it, right? The the you know, in many ways, like look what happened in the 2000s, right? We tore down all our factories and moved them to China. And who got killed by that? It was the blue collar craft labor. It created all kinds of unintended consequences. Fentanel, uh, you know, wealth gaps.

主持人: 比如宾夕法尼亚州的情况。

Original English

Host: Pennsylvania.

Dan Dreyfus: 你知道,沿海地区赚走了所有的钱,而美国中西部腹地的那些普通老百姓(the salt of the earth)却遭受了重创。今天具有讽刺意味的是,还是中部地区的那些曾经流离失所的人,现在却拿到了极高的入门级薪水。你知道,如果你去昆纳克大学(Quinnipiac University),而且你在班级里名列前茅,你一出高中校门起薪就能拿到 15 万美元。讽刺的是,他们现在正在做的这些蓝领工作,或许在某种程度上正在取代那些早期的、你知道的、低级别的白领劳动力。所以,局势已经彻底逆转了。所以你看,这就是一个有效的市场。就业岗位会流向资金所在的地方,而现在的资金正在大规模涌入这个实体工业领域。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: You know, the coasts were making all the money in the heart of the country. the salt of the earth was was getting killed. What's ironic today is that same part of the middle country, those people that got displaced are now getting entry level salaries. You know, if you go to Quana University and you're top of your class, you're starting out at 150 grand right out of high school. And the jobs that they're doing, ironically, are the jobs that may or may not be displacing some of the early, you know, lower level white collar labor. And so, so the tables the tables have totally turned. And so look, it's it's an it's an efficient market. The jobs are going to flow where the money is and the money right now is is really coming into this area.

如何在多元能源的丛林中分配资本

主持人: 我们能谈谈其他几个领域吗?你对其他形式的能源怎么看?比如不是天然气、煤炭、核能、碳氢化合物的那些。我的意思是,仅仅基于这个情况,能源需求池看起来非常庞大,也许最简化的结论就是我们需要“所有形式的能源”。但 Dan,你又如何区分呢?比如,你为什么会说你极其看好太阳能?你对核能又有什么看法?你是如何在这些不同来源的能源之间进行权衡和取舍的呢?

Original English

Host: Can we talk about a couple of other areas? What's your take on uh other forms of energy? Not gas, coal, nuclear, hydrocarbons. I mean the demand pool seem like if just based on this maybe the most reductive takeaway is everything. But then how do you Dan differentiate like why were you why did you say for example you're super bullish solar? What are your thoughts on nuclear? How do you trade all these off these different sources of energy?

Dan Dreyfus: 所以说,我们在这个国家实际上拥有取之不尽的天然气。我们也可以建设太阳能,呃,你知道,这本身并不是瓶颈;至于核能,你知道,我们实际上无法建造它。在这个国家,我们甚至连核反应堆的安全壳(containment vessels)都造不出来。韩国人能造,但我们在国内造不了。所以系统内总是会存在这些巨大的瓶颈。无论你谈论的是太阳能,无论你谈论的是天然气,还是铀,我们都可以获得原始的输入材料,比如我们从地下钻取的天然气。但是我们将会短缺的,是用来建造核电站的关键矿物。例如,我们将会短缺用来制造太阳能电池板的,特别是如果我们开始在太空中发射数据中心,对吧?这些都将消耗掉数量惊人的银。然而目前银的供需动态是:我们每年消耗 12 亿盎司,但我们每年只能供应 10 亿盎司。所以每年存在 2 亿盎司的赤字,而我们目前只剩下 6 亿盎司的地上库存了。所以,时间正在流逝,滴答作响。伙计们,我们只剩下三年时间了,三年后我们的库存就会彻底耗尽。然后太阳能行业面临的问题就会变成:你从哪里去寻找制造光伏电池(photovoltaic cells)所需的银?所以为了我们的孩子们,为了国家的下一代工具箱,对我们来说,在资产配置上,大家应该去获取一些对铜、银矿产的敞口;然后,在那个领域及其周边还有许多服务提供商,这些都是我们应该在明年去认真研究投资的对象。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: So we're we're swimming in natural gas in this country. We can build solar uh you know that's that's not the bottleneck and nuclear you know we we can't really build it. We can't even build the containment vessels in this country. The Koreans can do it but we can't do that here. So there's always going to be these big bottlenecks in the system. And whether you're talking about solar, whether you're talking about NAT gas, whether you're talking about uranium, we're going to have the raw inputs like the natural gas that we drill from the ground. But what we're going to be short of is the critical minerals to build the nuclear power plants. We're going to be short the silver, for example, to build these solar panels, especially if we start launching data centers in space, right? These are going to consume incredible amounts of silver. But right now the silver supply demand dynamic is we consume a billion2 ounces a year. We supply a billion ounces a year. So there's a 200 million ton deficit per year and we only have 600 million of above ground inventory left. So the clock's ticking. We got three years left guys before we just stock out. And then the solar story is where do you get the silver for the photovoltaic cells? So for our kids and for the country generation tool belt for us allocating get some exposure to copper silver minerals and then there's a bunch of service providers in and around that area that we should be investigating over the next year.

主持人: 别忘了劳动力服务提供商,那也是一个巨大的市场。

Original English

Host: Don't forget the labor the service providers that's a big one.

Chamath: 好的。那你如何进行资本配置呢?你处于拥有矿山和生产端的最前沿,但同时你也看终端使用案例。比如,你是如何决定哪些领域你不去参与的?因为对于这些领域中的许多事物,虽然它们看起来像是极具潜力的终端市场,但你也很容易遭受重创(get run over)。比如,如果你身处市场中错误的部分,就会遭遇供应冲击,会遭遇中国塑造的供应链竞争,还会遭遇倾销。即便一切趋势看起来都很明显,你依然可能会赚大钱,但你也可能会亏掉很多钱。

Original English

Chamath: Okay. How do you allocate capital? You're at the front end of owning what mines and production but then also the end use cases. Like how do you decide where to not play? Because a lot of these things, it looks like these are incredible end markets, but you can get run over. Like if you're in the wrong part of the market, there's supply shocks, there's supply shaping by China, there's price dumping. It can be all obvious and you could make you could lose a lot of money, too.

Dan Dreyfus: 是的。听着,你必须真正深入地理解供应链。我认为……我认为对于外面的很多人来说,供应链似乎是某种奇怪而神秘的概念。而且我仍然认为,许多居住在城市的美国人仍然觉得火腿三明治是从冰箱里长出来的。他们根本不会去思考,在芝加哥郊外,每个月有 3000 万头猪被屠宰。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: Yeah. Look, you really have to understand supply chains. And I think I think to a lot of people out there, the supply chains are this sort of weird mystical concept. And I still think a lot of urban Americans still think a ham sandwich comes from the refrigerator. and they don't think about the 30 million pigs every month that are getting slaughtered outside of Chicago.

主持人: 别让大卫·弗里德伯格(Freeberg)开始讲这个话题。

Original English

Host: Don't get free started.

Dan Dreyfus: 但是,你知道的,第一点,你必须要弄清楚供应链的瓶颈(pinch points)到底在哪里。第二点,我认为你必须真正确保你不会被技术创新所颠覆,因为人们可能会找到——你知道的,我想这正是呼应了弗里德伯格之前的观点——人们可能会找到能够替代供应链中那种紧缺状态的全新替代品。

Original English

Dan Dreyfus: But, you know, you got to understand where the pinch points are in the supply chain, number one. And number two, I think you have to really make sure that you're not going to get technologically disrupted where you can find, you know, I think this was to Freeberg's point where you can find something that's going to replace that tightness in the supply chain.

主持人: 把掌声送给 Dan。

Original English

Host: Give it up for Dan.

Chamath: 说得好。信息量非常非常大。谢了,兄弟。

Original English

Chamath: Well done. Very, very informative. Thanks, bro.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

人物: Dan Dreyfus

公司/组织: Ford Motor Company, Boeing, Airbus, OpenAI