关税战、油价冲击与公众预期:加拿大经济如何在不确定性中突围? TVO Today 2026-09-30

关税战、油价冲击与公众预期:加拿大经济如何在不确定性中突围?

关键字 trade-war tariff-policy inflation-pressure labor-market consumer-confidence
9 节

美加关税交锋与宏观经济承压

Jen Jeganathan: 就在今天,美国对加拿大生产的奶酪及其他乳制品、含酒精饮料以及部分型号的摩托车正式实施了新一轮的进口禁令。这无疑是今年动荡多变局势中的最新一次重创。面对这接踵而至的冲击,我们国家的经济目前究竟表现如何?根据加拿大统计局(Statistics Canada)今天同步公布的最新数据,加拿大在经历了连续三个月的增长之后,7月份的实际国内生产总值(GDP)环比基本持平。但这对于我们国家长期的财务健康状况究竟意味着什么?安大略省的居民对未来又是如何看待的?今天我们将深入探讨当前经济的真实状况,以及如果美加双边经贸关系无法重回正轨,未来可能会演变成怎样的局面。我是 Jen Jeganathan,这里是《The Rundown》。Don Desjardins、Pedro Antunes,非常欢迎两位做客节目。我知道今天是一个非常忙碌的日子,宏观数据刚刚出炉。正如大家所知,加拿大统计局今早公布了最新的 GDP 数据。不过我们都清楚,GDP 往往只是反映过去的一张静态快照。Don,您作为德勤加拿大(Deloitte Canada)的首席经济学家,刚刚发布了最新的经济展望更新报告。在您看来,当前的经济运行情况到底怎么样?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Today, new US bans kicked in on Canadian made cheese and other dairy products, alcoholic beverages and some motorcycles. It's the latest knock in what has been a chaotic year. So given all the chaos, how's the economy doing? Well, according to STATCAN data also released today, real gross domestic product was basically unchanged in July after three months of growth. But what does that mean for the country's financial health, and how are Ontarians feeling about the future? Well, we dig into the state of our economy right now and how it could look going forward if our relationship with the US doesn't get back to normal. I'm Jen Jeganathan. This is The Rundown. Don Desjardins, Pedro Antunes, great to have you on the rundown. I know it is a busy day. The numbers have been released. So as we know, STATCAN released GDP data this morning. But we know GDP is just a snapshot of the past. Don, you are the chief economist at Deloitte Canada and released a new economic update. How is the economy doing?

Don Desjardins: 坦率地说,目前的运行态势还算可以,但我们坚信未来的道路将会相当崎岖。眼下加征的全新关税、彼此之间的报复性关税以及商品贸易禁令,毫无疑问会给广大加拿大企业带来严峻的经营挑战。在我们看来,随着今年剩下时间的推移,我们很可能会观察到整体经济活动出现明显的放缓迹象。

英文原文

Don Desjardins: Well, it's doing okay at the moment, but we do think there's going to be some rough road ahead. Certainly the new tariffs and retaliatory tariffs and bans and are going to create challenges for Canadian businesses. And we think we're probably going to see slowing in economic activity as we go through the remainder of this year.

Jen Jeganathan: 好的。Pedro,从您作为 Signal 49 Research 首席经济学家的专业视角来看,站在9月底这个关键节点上,您是如何研判加拿大当下的经济基本盘的?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: All right, Pedro, from your vantage point as chief economist at signal 49 research, what do you make of Canada's economy right now? As we look at the end of September?

Pedro Antunes: 是的。过去这一两年确实是一段艰难的颠簸旅程,尤其是自从美国本届政府对加拿大挑起这场全面的贸易战以来,这已经成为我们面临的巨大考验。然而挑战远不止于此,即便在我们承受更多关税压力与贸易壁垒的同时,全球经济目前正在承受的这一轮原油价格冲击,也正对广大消费者产生极其广泛而深刻的连锁影响,在我们国家尤其如此。诚然,从资源出口的角度来看,国际高油价确实能为我们的能源产业带来可观的收益,但从宏观整体而言,这对广大的终端消费者构成了巨大的生活压力。而回顾过去这段艰难的岁月,恰恰是消费者群体的支出支撑着整个经济没有彻底跌落。因此放眼未来,鉴于我们目前所面临的这一系列外部严峻挑战,存在着非常多的深层隐忧。

英文原文

Pedro Antunes: Yeah. Well, it's been a rough ride, certainly the last couple of years, ever since the US administration has put on, you know, this trade war with Canada. That's been a big challenge. But there's other challenges even. And even as we face more tariffs and more tariff pressure, the the pressure around this oil price shock that the global economy is suffering through this is, you know, a, you know, having all sorts of implications for consumers, especially in this country. But, you know, I do know that on the resource side, we benefit from higher oil prices. But overall, it's a challenge for consumers. And consumers are what have been holding up really the economy thus far through this rough ride. So a lot of concern going forward. I think with respect to, to, to the challenge, the external challenges that we're facing.

通胀中枢韧性与利率预期反转

Jen Jeganathan: Don,请帮我理清其中的逻辑。正如 Pedro 所提到的,受高油价等因素的推波助澜,目前的通胀率运行在大约 3% 的水平,其实距离加拿大央行(Bank of Canada)设定的 2% 基准目标区间并不算太遥远。既然我们正处在激烈的贸易战漩涡中,为什么眼下的通胀表现却相对受到压制、没有彻底失控失衡呢?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Don, help me understand this. Inflation is running at around 3% because of those higher oil prices that Pedro has mentioned, not far from the Bank of Canada's benchmark of 2%. We've got the trade war here. Why is inflation relatively subdued?

Don Desjardins: 原因在于,正如 Pedro 刚才所分析的,我们实际上刚刚经历了一段增长相对温和甚至乏力的周期。因此,从经济底层运行逻辑来看,整个经济体内目前依然存在着相当一部分闲置产能(excess capacity)。这种产能富余在客观上有效抑制了我们在经济其他领域所见到的价格上涨动力。

但话虽如此,眼下一个极大的担忧在于,这些居高不下的能源成本已经开始渗透并传导至经济的各个其他层面。我们开始看到,那些自身正面临高昂经营成本的企业,正逐步上调其终端产品与服务的售价。与此同时,我们当然也非常担忧消费者的预期心理,因为尽管 3% 的通胀率仍位于加拿大央行 1% 至 3% 目标调控区间的上限边缘,但普通消费者正在切身感受到价格上涨的重压。即便当前物价主要是由能源价格驱动的,大家依然能实实在在感受到各项生活成本的大幅上升。因此我认为最令人担忧的是:我们是否会看到消费者开始形成通胀将长期持续走高的固化心理预期?一旦形成,那局面将会变得极为棘手。

英文原文

Don Desjardins: Well, because, as Pedro said, we've gone through a period of relatively modest growth. So underneath the hood, you know, we still have excess capacity in the economy. So that's restraining the price increases we're seeing in other parts of the economy. Now, having said that, I think one of the big concerns is that these higher energy costs start to verbal through to other parts of the economy, and that we start to see businesses who are facing higher costs themselves, increase their prices. Also worried, of course, that consumers might expect increases because even though the three 3% is at the upper end of the Bank of Canada's target band, as we know, and consumers are feeling that, you know, even if it's driven by energy, they're still feeling the fact that these costs are up. And so I think worries are do we see consumers start to expect inflation to continue to rise? And that could be problematic.

Jen Jeganathan: Pedro,您的看法呢?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Pedro.

Pedro Antunes: 是的,我想我们可以先把视线拉回几年前。回顾 2022 年俄乌冲突爆发之初,全球遭遇了一场严重的大宗商品价格冲击,波及的范围远不止石油,但高企的原油价格绝对是其中举足轻重的一环,那场冲击引发了全面的通货膨胀海啸。各主要央行为了与之抗衡付出了漫长而艰苦的努力,本质上,我们硬生生熬过了一段极高利率环境下的阵痛期。

然而,就在我们似乎终于看到隧道尽头的曙光、绝大多数国家的通胀率都已回落至既定政策目标区间,而市场各方也普遍翘首以盼全球开启降息大门的关键时刻,我们却迎头撞上了新一轮的石油危机冲击。美国政府让自己深陷于一种目前根本找不到解题出口的国际政治地缘泥潭,导致霍尔木兹海峡及相关航道面临着巨大风险,原油价格大概率将持续维持在高位震荡。今年到目前为止,国际油价平均徘徊在每桶 84 到 85 美元左右,而当下更是逼近了每桶 100 美元的心理大关。因此,这种严峻的通胀压力仍在持续发酵。

现在摆在所有人面前的核心问题,不仅仅是通胀压力的本身,更是各家主要央行接下来将采取何种货币政策动作。就在此前全世界都满心期待步入降息周期之际,现实却是各大经济体的利率风向再度生变。我们已经看到美联储的政策转向,在日本央行与欧盟央行那里,利率甚至都在悄然爬升。虽然加拿大央行表面上维持了政策基准利率的基本平稳,但那并不是实体经济中消费者和企业真正承担的融资借贷成本。真正决定市场痛感的是债券市场的动态,也就是国债收益率的走势。债券市场实际上已经全面推高了加拿大本土的真实市场利率,导致我们的全社会借贷成本出现显著上扬。因此,不仅上游各项物价成本压力在发挥破坏性作用,眼下融资利率上升带来的收紧压力同样在对经济造成双重挤压。

英文原文

Pedro Antunes: Yeah, I mean, let's go back a few years. Back in 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, we had a commodity price shock. It was broader than just oil prices. But oil prices were a big part of that. And that led to all of this inflationary pressure. And it took a long time for central banks to fight back. Essentially, we had we suffered through a period of very high interest rates. And just as we were seeing, you know, the light at the end of the tunnel, inflation had gone back down to for most countries to within the target bands. And we were expecting now interest rates to come down, you know, we end up with, you know, a new oil price shock. The US administration gets itself into a situation where now they don't know how to get out of. And so we have this challenge in the straight and oil prices that are likely to stay elevated. Certainly they were you know, they've averaged about 84 or $85 a barrel, I think, so far this year. They're currently running very close to $100 a barrel. So this inflationary pressure continues. The big question is not just the inflationary pressure, but what are central banks going to do. And so as we were expecting the world to lower interest rates, now we're expecting the world. And we've already seen the case of the fed. In case of Japan, the case of the European Union, interest rates kind of inching up. And while the central bank in Canada has kept rates stable, that's not really what consumers and businesses pay. It's what happens in the bond market. And that is essentially yields on treasuries. And the bond market is essentially upped. Interest rates for Canadians. And our borrowing costs are now up significantly. So the cost pressures are playing a role. And now the interest rate pressures are going to be playing a role as well.

移民政策急刹车与劳动力市场错配

Jen Jeganathan: 好的。稍后我们还会深入探讨未来的央行利率决议,以及这对加拿大央行究竟意味着什么,因为这是公众普遍极其关切的问题。现在我想把话题转换一下,聊一聊移民政策。在过去的这一两年里,加拿大的移民吸纳规模出现了戏剧性的急剧下调。这一巨变对国家经济究竟造成了怎样的影响?在就业岗位的充裕度以及工资增长水平上,我们目前观察到了怎样的现实格局?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: All right. We'll come back sort of about future rate decisions and what that will all mean for Bank of Canada, because a lot of people are curious about that. I want to change gears. I want to talk immigration. Canada's immigration rate has fallen dramatically over the last couple of years. What impact has that had on the economy? We're talking about job availability, wages. What are we seeing?

Don Desjardins: 从数据表面来看,我们确实看到全社会仍在创造新增就业岗位。如果查阅截至今年8月份的统计数据,整个经济体新增了超过 20 万个工作岗位。但是,当我提到这些新增岗位时,必须指出它们几乎全部分布在第三产业服务业,并且绝大多数集中在医疗卫生领域。因此,我们面对的劳动力市场现状是:整体就业人数虽然在纸面上保持增长,但由于移民政策的急剧收紧,全社会的劳动年龄人口并没有呈现出显著扩张。结果就是,在过去四五个月时间里,我们的整体失业率反而逆势微跌了约 0.5 个百分点,目前维持在 6.4% 左右。

那么当我们在思考这到底会对国家经济造成何种实质性影响时,答案显而易见:如果未来经济希望加速扩张,如果各行各业需要释放对劳动力的强劲需求,劳动力供给的匮乏将会成为刚性瓶颈。我们最近专门对此开展了一项专题研究。这项研究并不是为了危言耸听,而是试图理性测算:假如联邦政府全面落实其提振经济的所有宏观规划——例如大规模建造保障性住房、翻新国家级基础设施、撬动私人部门资本进行实体投资——在这样的繁荣情景下,整个劳动力市场的供需天平会演变成什么形态?

我们的模型测算结果显示,届时全社会将创造出约 50 万个新增岗位,而我们本土根本没有足够的劳动者去填补这些空缺。更进一步来看,如果老龄化带来的退休潮持续加速——而这几乎是必然会发生的历史事实——劳动力缺口甚至可能迅速放大到 75 万人以上。因此,每当我们谈论移民配额缩减的影响时,它往往不是瞬时全盘暴露的,虽然某些细分指标已经初现端倪;但从长远维度考量,我们必须深思:未来究竟该如何构建起支撑经济长远发展所必需的坚实劳动力队伍?

英文原文

Don Desjardins: Well, I mean, certainly what we've seen is that jobs have been created. And you look if you look at the year to August, over 200,000 jobs. Now, when I say that it's all in the services sector and largely in the health care. So so we're looking at a labour market where we have employment growing, but we don't necessarily see labour force growth significantly because of the immigration story. And so our unemployment rate has fallen about a half a percentage point over the past 4 or 5 months to 6.4%. So when we're thinking about what's it doing to our economy, well, there is the potential if we grow and if we need to see demand for labour, that can be constrained. We did look at we did a study. It's sort of interesting. It's not to be alarmist, but it's just to say we looked at, okay, what happens if the government implements all of its, you know, pro-growth plans with respect to building houses, infrastructure, getting capital, private capital to actually be investing. How would that shape up? What kind of labour demand and what we determined was about half a million jobs would be created that we didn't necessarily have workers for. And furthermore, if we see continued retirements, which is likely, you know, that could get up to two, three, 750, 000 people. So, you know, when we're talking about immigration and the impact, sometimes it's not right immediate, sometimes it does show up in certain indicators. But at the other side, we've got to think about the future and how are we going to build up this labour force we're going to need?

Jen Jeganathan: 明白了。Pedro,对于目前在加拿大从事全职工作的群体而言,实际薪资增长情况又是怎样的?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Okay, Pedro, how does wage growth look for Canadians who are employed full time right now?

Pedro Antunes: 是的,在回答薪资问题之前,如果可以的话,我想先对 Don 刚才关于移民问题所指出的关键判断表示高度赞同。这确实是极其核心的关节点。当前整个劳动力市场之所以呈现出严重的结构性紊乱,核心原因在于我们在移民政策上采取了一刀切式的急刹车。事实上,联邦政府一直在极力推行、并且实际上已经做到的一点,就是在 2025 年通过拒绝为境内约 46 万人续签工作许可来强行压缩非永久居民规模。

这部分受冲击的群体正是非永久居民,包括广大持临时工签的外国劳工以及国际留学生。在过去的疫情期间以及后疫情时代,各行各业的雇主其实都是在联邦政策的大力鼓励下去广泛雇佣这些劳动力的。如今政策风向逆转,导致雇主们在基础服务业和中低薪酬岗位上瞬间陷入了极度招工难的泥潭。但从另一端来看,经验极为丰富的婴儿潮一代(baby boomers)正在以创纪录的速度集中退休退出职场。关于这一点我完全认同 Don 的研判:如果我们真要落实“壮大加拿大”的蓝图、大举投资基础设施,我们不可或缺的是具有专业认证技能的技术工人群体,而现实中我们极度匮乏这批人才。因此当前的劳动力市场充斥着各维度的不确定性,更不用提人工智能技术(AI)正在带来的重塑冲击了。

转过来看薪资层面,大家一定还记得我们此前熬过的那段高通胀时期,即在 2022、2023 直至 2024 年的大部分时间里,名义工资一直在进行滞后性的补偿追赶,名义工资增速甚至一度持续徘徊在 5% 的高位,这令加拿大央行感到极为难受,因为 5% 的工资增速与 2% 的通胀锚定目标是根本无法兼容的。如今这种失衡态势总算有所平息,当前大部分雇主在制定薪酬时,更加注重让工资涨幅与实际通胀率以及全要素生产率的提升相匹配。然而,如果眼下这场 3% 的通胀拉锯战长期胶着下去,虽然 3% 谈不上灾难性,但绝非理想状态;一旦这种态势长期化,薪资很可能会再次被迫抬头,进而在加拿大经济中制造出更为顽固、更具普遍性的二次通胀反弹螺旋。

英文原文

Pedro Antunes: Yeah. If I could, I would like to just second a little bit of what Don said on immigration. That is a real crucial piece. I think there's so much dishevelment in the labour market right now, because what we've cut back on, on immigration side, in fact, we're trying to reduce the federal government is trying to reduce and has been successful at not not renewing work permits for essentially 460 000 people in the country in 2025. And that is the non permanent resident. This is temporary foreign workers, international students, and there's a lot of employers that really have been essentially encouraged through the pandemic, the post pandemic years to hire these folks. So they're struggling to find workers at the kind of, generally speaking, lower wage services segment. But on the other hand, there's very experienced baby boomers leaving. And I totally agree with Don on this. You know, Grow Canada, we want to invest in infrastructure. We need essentially skilled trades workers and we just don't have enough. So there's all sorts of uncertainty around the labour market, not to mention AI. Now, on the wage side, I do think we saw a period where wages were, you know, we talked about that very high inflationary period that we suffered 22, 23, 24 wages were catching up for a number of years, very uncomfortable for the Bank of Canada, because nominal wages were running at 5% even up until recently, and that is not aligned with a 2% inflation target. Right. So that is settled. I think when you talk to most employers, they're looking at wages aligning better with inflation and productivity gains. But you know, if this inflation period continues now 3%, it's not great, but it's not terrible. But if that continues, I think we are going to see wages kind of inching up perhaps, and pressuring, you know, just inflationary pressures more and more generally in Canada.

消费两极分化与生活成本危机

Jen Jeganathan: 既然我们深入探讨了工资收入的现状,那么自然应该转过来审视支出端的情况。Don,我们来聊聊加拿大的普通消费者以及当下社会的生活可负担性(affordability)。长期以来,生活成本居高不下一直是困扰全加拿大的头等大事。从整体资产负债表的角度来看,加拿大消费者目前的财务健康状况究竟怎样?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: For talking about wages. And I think it's appropriate that we talk about some spending here. Let's talk about the Canadian consumer Don affordability. Major concern here in Canada has been for a while. How healthy is the Canadian consumer right now?

Don Desjardins: 从整体汇总的宏观资产负债表来看,表面上似乎还过得去。然而一旦深入拆解,你会发现不同收入群体和不同代际之间的处境存在着天壤之别。相当一部分家庭目前依然承受着极其巨大的财务压力。正如我们前面所梳理的,一方面面临能源与生活账单上涨的持续预期,另一方面,在房贷续约和融资借贷时面对的是实打实的真实利率跳升。

因此观察消费者的底层行为特征,人们正在被迫大幅削减原有的储蓄积累,全社会的储蓄率(savings rate)出现了明显的向下回落。我们最新的核心预判是,在未来几个月内,消费者的开支行为会变得更加迟疑与谨慎。造成这种防御心理的核心根源,正是笼罩在宏观经济上空的浓厚不确定性阴霾——大家都在担忧未来的就业前景到底安不安全?我们的工农业商品未来究竟能卖向何方?这场危机究竟会如何演变?因此我们认为,广大家庭接下来很可能会放慢日常消费的节奏,开始在未来的动荡中尽力重建家庭应急储蓄缓冲垫。

英文原文

Don Desjardins: Well, you know, when you look at overall the balance sheet it's okay. But you're also looking at different cohorts in that. And some people continue to be under significant pressure. And as we've spoken about, you've got higher energy prices prospective. And in some cases, real interest rate increases in terms of funding, mortgages, etc. So when we think about the consumer, the consumer has been pulling back on savings. We've seen the savings rate go down. Now. Are expectation is that consumers are going to be a little bit more hesitant over the months ahead. And the reason really is just this pall of uncertainty that's over the economy, over job prospects. Where are we going to be selling our goods? How is this all going to evolve? And so we think that we're probably going to see consumers spend a little more slowly and start to rebuild some of their savings as we go forward.

Jen Jeganathan: 这么听起来,在即将到来的节日购物季与圣诞节面前,前景显得相当黯淡凄凉。Pedro,请帮助我们深入理解一下,面对这场旷日持久的生活可负担性危机,普通消费者正在被迫舍弃和推迟哪些消费支出?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Okay. This sounds like a very sad Christmas as we're heading into this, but Pedro, help me understand a little bit what are consumers leaving to the side as we as we are in this affordability crisis?

Pedro Antunes: 我完全赞同 Don 刚才的剖析。事实上,虽然去年全社会的整体消费支出在账面上维持住了韧性,但那完全是因为广大民众把全社会的总储蓄率整整消耗了大约一个百分点。通常而言,在加拿大如果个人消费支出年增速达到 2%,那属于常态年份;如果高于这个水平,就算是非常景气的繁荣年。然而去年我们虽然勉强维持了接近 2% 左右的增长,但其中足足有一半的拉动力是靠居民净透支家庭既有储蓄来生硬支撑的。

因此,当你作为一个宏观经济预测专家展望未来时,你不得不拷问自己:消费者未来究竟是有能力重新填补储蓄,还是只能继续透支老本?考虑到我们前面谈到的高利率借贷重压,我认为消费者要想继续维持以往那种开销节奏,已经触碰到了极限痛点。此外,我也完全认同当前家庭财富的剧烈结构性分化。低收入家庭以及背负高额负债的家庭正在苦苦挣扎,他们饱受昂贵的房贷利息和高不可攀的住房成本折磨;而与此形成鲜明对比的是,较年长的人群——主要是婴儿潮那一代人——普遍拥有全款自有住房,随着资产价格的大幅升值,特别是如果他们长期持有股票等金融资产,其财富净值反而大幅增厚。

这种显著的分化不仅发生在加拿大,在美国也同样表现得淋漓尽致:支撑起全社会宏观消费大盘的,几乎清一色是高收入的富裕阶层家庭。这就是全社会面临的巨大撕裂。在当下的生活成本危机中,普通大众不得不将更多的钱花在食品杂货等生活必需品上,因为这些刚性开支避无可避。这本身就是一个沉重的民生问题。综合来看,放眼接下来的几个季度,全社会必将步入一段相当普遍的开支紧缩与克制期。

英文原文

Pedro Antunes: Well, I agree with Don as well. We have seen, in fact, consumer spending held up last year, but it's because we reduced our aggregate savings by about a percent percentage point. So, you know, consumer spending in Canada, if it grows 2%, it's a normal year. If it grows above that, it's it's a good year. But essentially we grew 2% sort of in that range. But we drew down our savings to generate about half of that, that growth. So it's, you know, when you go, when you look forward now as a forecaster, I guess you have to say to yourself, you know, our consumer is going to going to, you know, build up their savings again, or are they going to continue to draw down, I think, with the interest rate challenge that we talked about earlier, I think it is going to be a pain point for consumers to be able to keep going at this pace. And I totally agree there's a divergence in terms of how households are being affected. We know that lower income households, those that are highly indebted, are having, are struggling with essentially the cost of financing, affordability issues with housing. Whereas, you know, the older cohort, that baby boom cohort, they own their homes, they got the, you know, the value of their assets have appreciated, especially if they're holding savings in the form of equities and things like this. So again, very divergent. It's not just in Canada, by the way. In the US it's very clear that it's the richer and more higher income households that are holding up consumer spending. Yeah. So I think just generally that's the big dichotomy. I think consumers are spending more on food and groceries because they have to. And that's a problem again. But generally speaking, you know, this is I think going forward, we're going to see a period of restraint here.

企业投资荒、内部壁垒与出路突围

Jen Jeganathan: Pedro,Don 在前文中也特别提及了企业层面的困境,让我们把焦点转向商业界。正如大家所看到的,来自美国的贸易摩擦正在给广大企业经营制造前所未有的不可控风险。面对前央行行长马克·卡尼(Mark Carney)近期为全力吸引外来资本投资加拿大所做出的诸多外交与政策努力,目前加拿大本土企业自身的生存状况究竟如何?企业的资本开支到底处于何种状态?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Pedro Don had mentioned businesses a little bit earlier. So let's talk about that. As we know, a trade war in the U.S. is going to create some uncertainty for businesses. How are they sort of faring? How are businesses spending right now in light of, you know, Mark Carney's efforts to bring investment here into the country as well?

Pedro Antunes: 坦白讲,由于这种漫无边际的政策不确定性,过去两三年里加拿大企业的表现堪称灾难性。企业普遍选择按兵不动、袖手旁观,无论是在员工招聘还是在投入具有实质生产力的资本——如厂房扩建、机械与重型设备采购、乃至矿山基础设施建设上,都是如此。虽然在上个季度的数据中,由于机械设备类投资出现微弱反弹而带来了一抹微弱的积极亮色,但从总体大格局来看,在针对机器设备、核心知识产权等高生产力资产的民间投资方面,加拿大不仅远远落后于世界主要经济体,尤其被美国甩在身后。

不过我确实认为,现任政府目前至少锁定了正确的政策发力靶向。我们正在寻求通过全力扶持和投资于我们得天独厚的自然资源禀赋来重新驱动整体经济增长。对加拿大而言,这无疑是正确的战略抓手:自然资源产业能直接带来巨额外汇收入、创造丰厚的商业利润,并通过纵深产业链对广大上下游关联产业产生强大的拉动和外溢效应。这是一个极好的破局起点,但要真正见到实效绝非一日之功。客观地说,我们在税收竞争力方面已经做出了一些优化调整,联邦层面也在极力精简重大项目的审批周期流程。我认为这两项制度改革是吸引投资背后极为关键的支柱。

英文原文

Pedro Antunes: Well, I think it's been a couple of years of disastrous, you know, mostly because of that uncertainty. Businesses are sitting on their hands. I think, with both with respect to hiring and new investment in productive capital, machinery and equipment or, you know, building mines, building structures. So our business investment, in fact, we've we've got a positive sign in the last quarter because machinery and equipment picked up a little bit. But generally speaking, we are very big laggards with respect to the rest of the world, especially with respect to the US in terms of private investment in what I would call productive assets like machinery and equipment, IP, etc. I do think that the government is aiming at the right targets here. We are looking essentially to grow our economy by essentially, first of all, investing in our resources. And I think that's a positive for Canada. It generates income, it generates all sorts of profits, and it generates all sorts of supply chain effects through other businesses. So it's a good place to start, but it's going to take time. I mean, you know, we've we've how should I say, we've improved on the on the tax competitiveness already. We are expediting the review process. I think these are two really important pieces behind that.

Jen Jeganathan: Pedro 强调这是一个良好的破局开端,但我猜想,要真正全面收获这些资本投资和贸易重塑协议所带来的红利,势必需要相当长的一段时间。Don,针对企业的实际处境,您在 Pedro 发言的基础上还有哪些补充?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: A good place to start is what Pedro says. I imagine this is going to take some time to really see the benefits of some of these investments and trade deals here, but what are we seeing here with businesses? Add on what Pedro had to say.

Don Desjardins: 我认为我们正在欣喜地看到,长期以来人为束缚加拿大企业投资活力的那些陈旧制度枷锁正在松动——首当其冲的就是长期存在的省际贸易壁垒(interprovincial trade barriers)。这个议题虽然大家经常挂在嘴边讨论,但如今各省之间确实出现了实质性的破冰动向:包括推动劳动力在全国范围内更加自由通畅地跨省流动、全面理顺并统一各地彼此割裂的生产安全法规,探索建立起一个真正全国通用的“同一个加拿大”(One Canada)统一市场监管体系。

长期以来,正是这些琐碎内耗的壁垒,充当了遏制跨区域投资扩张的无形阻力;因此看到这些体制性障碍开始出现积极突破,是极其振奋人心的。与此同时,正如 Pedro 所谈到的,大幅加速重大基础设施的行政审批许可周期至关重要。因为在全球产业资本的眼里,资本是具备极高流动性的。如果一家跨国企业在权衡全球投资布局时发现:“哎呀,在加拿大投资,单单走完立项和环评审批程序就得耗费五到七年的漫长光阴”,他们转头就会把资金投向其他国家。但如果我们能向国际资本证明:在加拿大的项目投产速度与资本回报周期能够与其他主要国家并驾齐驱甚至更快,这必将产生强大的招商引资磁吸效应。

英文原文

Don Desjardins: Well, I think we're also seeing some changes to policies that have kind of hampered Canadian business investment and those being interprovincial trade barriers. I think we often speak about this, but seeing some movement on that side, the ability of labour to move across the country easily, looking at different safety regulations, can we just make a One Canada regulation? So these types of things, I think, that have worked as a deterrent to slow investment across the country, seeing movement on that, I think is very positive. Again, the Permissioning getting things done a little more rapidly because when we think about global capital as an example, you know, it is very mobile. So if a business is looking at opportunities across the globe and they say, oh, but in Canada, it's going to take me five, seven years just to get this going. I'm probably going to go somewhere else. If we can tell them, no, no, that's not it. Your return on your your investment is going to be more rapid, more in line with other countries. I think that will be a good draw.

2026-2027 经济预测模型与情景推演

Jen Jeganathan: 好的。现在我想调出一组图表数据供大家审视。这是德勤制作的展示 2025 年至 2026 年加拿大分季度实际 GDP 增长走势的图表,左侧的走势可以说是极其剧烈震荡,在 2026 年第二季度曾短暂冲高到接近 3% 的高点;而在右侧区域,我们看到 2026 年下半年的增速在 0.5% 到略高于 2% 之间起伏。放眼下一年,究竟依靠什么动力来托举加拿大的经济?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: All right. I want to pull up some data. This is a Deloitte chart showing 2025 and 2026 GDP by the quarter. And that's on the left right there. It's been volatile to say the least, with growth of about 3% in the second quarter of 2026. And on the right, you see growth in late 2026 of about 0.5% to a bit more than 2% over the year. What is carrying the Canadian economy next year?

Don Desjardins: 展望下一年,我们确实预计此前规划的一部分新增投资资金将开始实质性落地流入。在这些真金白银能够产生实效的范围内,它将有助于修复全社会的商业信心并重塑消费者底气。因此我们眼下已经步入了一个关键阶段——用通俗的话说就是“动真格的考验期”,核心在于落地的执行力:必须确保这些规划中的重大项目真正破土动工,并创造出与之相匹配的大量实体就业岗位。

当然,我们未来的预测环境也是建立在“我们将被迫长期与这些高额关税共存”的前提之下的。在我们德勤的基准预测模型中,我们选择维持现有关税水平不变,因为外界极难预测这些关税未来究竟会被取消还是会进一步加码,所以我们在模型标定时假设关税维持在既有水平。因此我们坚信,未来的破局必然伴随着供应链与贸易渠道的多元化重构。我们将目睹广大企业为了绕过封锁而被迫寻求供应链的多元布局,同时积极将本国出口产品开拓转售到美国以外的欧洲及全球其他市场。当然,要彻底建成为连接这些新兴市场所必需的港口、管道与交通基础设施,不可避免地需要较长时间的周期建设。

英文原文

Don Desjardins: Well, next year we do think that we're going to see some of these investment dollars flow. And to the extent that that helps, it restores confidence and restores consumer confidence. So to the extent that that may occur. So we're now at a stage. It's it's showtime, right? It's execution. Seeing some of these projects get off the ground and seeing some hiring associated with that. So it is the case that we're also in a world where we'll have lived with these tariffs. And in our forecast, we just leave them because we can't really very difficult to say that they're going to go or they're going to amp up. So we just sort of say, okay, as of September 9th, when we put, you know, put the model to work, okay, this is where we're staying. So we will, I think, see diversification. We will see businesses looking to diversify their supply chains saying, okay, we got to manoeuvre around this. Also looking to diversify some of their sales to other countries. Now they're, you know, all of the infrastructure bill that is required to get us to those markets is going to take some time.

Jen Jeganathan: 好的。Pedro,您认同这一判断吗?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: All right. Pedro, do you agree with that?

Pedro Antunes: 是的。不过在我们团队自己的预测模型中,我们设定了一项前提假设,即部分极端的关税威胁最终会得到缓解。大家都知道,唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)此前曾高调宣称,计划在年底前对包括汽车产业在内的核心领域加征高达 50% 的报复性关税。我们在基准模型中并没有生搬硬套这个极端假设,而是倾向于假定双方最终能够达成某种形式的经贸妥协框架。虽然外界很难彻底参透美国本届政府内部的深层战略算盘与真实政策意图,但有一点毋庸置疑:一旦真的对汽车整车及零部件加征 50% 的惩罚性关税,其毁灭性将是全方位的。

迄今为止,以安大略省为主导的汽车出口链条整体还能勉强抗住冲击,虽然情况谈不上乐观,但也绝不是全面溃败。这是因为北美汽车产业上下游的供应链分工结构早已深度绑定交织在一起,美国本土的整车制造业在诸多核心工序上离不开从加拿大源源不断输入零部件与中间产品。但如果这 50% 的极端关税真的全面落地,这一既有合作格局将被彻底摧毁。因此我们的预测基调是建立在关税壁垒出现部分松动、某种双边贸易新框架得以达成的前提之上,从而支撑我们在 2027 年的对外贸易能够取得一定起色。

另一个极其关键的模型变量假设,是关于霍尔木兹海峡的安全态势与国际油价走势。我们假设原油运力能够继续维持通过海峡的最底线运转,但油价中必然会被长期注入不可磨灭的“地缘政治风险溢价”。这意味着国际油价在明年不可能回落跌至每桶 60 美元的廉价水平,它将持续在高位运行,但也不会在现有价格基础上彻底脱轨狂飙。正是这些关键假设,为我们对明年的经济增长保持一份微弱希望提供了支撑。

英文原文

Pedro Antunes: Yeah. Well, I mean, I we do have in our own forecast assumptions that some of these things let up. We you know, Trump has announced 50% tariffs, for example, by year end on the auto sector. We have not built that into our forecast. We assume that we are going to get some sort of trade deal. It's very hard to know what's behind the eye. How should I say the the strategies and thinking in the US administration. But, you know, I think a 50% tariff on autos would be disastrous. And we're holding up okay. So far on auto exports for Ontario. You know, it's not great. It's been a not a good news story, obviously. But I think a lot of the the how should I say, the the supply chain is, is set in such a way that much of the auto sector for manufacturing needed to bring in the product from the from Canada. In any case. So but that's not that wouldn't be the case. I think if these tariffs do come into play. So anyhow, the point being that we are expecting some easing some sort of trade deal to allow our trade to do a little bit better in 2027. The other piece is that's really important, I think is on assumptions around the Strait of Hormuz and oil prices. And we are assuming that we are going to see some sort of movement of oil through the strait, but that there will be a risk premium that stays on the price of oil. So we don't get a decline back to, say, $60 oil next year. It stays elevated, but it doesn't ramp up from where it is today. Those are important assumptions to allow for hopefully some growth next year.

Jen Jeganathan: Don,请非常简要地谈谈:当前面对居高不下的国际油价、不断升级的美加贸易摩擦与高度的地缘紧张局势,而且这些困境看起来还将长期迁延下去,在这样的极端环境下,为整个国家把脉经济、进行宏观预测的工作究竟有多艰难?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Don, very quickly, you know there doesn't seem to be an end in sight with high oil prices. US trade wars and the tension there. How hard is your job to kind of forecast and give us an idea of what is happening in this economy, when these two issues seem to be dragging on and seem to be will be dragging on for quite a while.

Don Desjardins: 遇到这种情况,我们通常采取的方法是构建多套情景推演模型(scenario analysis):首先以我们今天所掌握的已知确定性事实构建一个基准情景,并将其代入宏观经济模型中。对于国际油价,我们的模型设定与 Pedro 类似,假定它不会重返 60 美元的低位,但会较当下的极端峰值出现一定程度的适度回落。

在此基础上,我们再去推演一系列其他的压力测试情景。例如:万一美国单方面悍然宣布彻底撕毁并退出**《美墨加协定》**(CUSMA),整个宏观经济在模型模拟下会呈现何种面貌?我必须直言不讳地说,模拟结果极其惨烈,这一点毫不令人意外。我们的量化测算表明,在此极端情形下,加拿大经济的潜在增速将比基准情形直接放缓整整 1.5 个百分点。这虽然未必像某些极端口径所称的那样是“灭顶之灾”,但也绝对极其严峻沉重。紧接着,我们再去推演应对情景:假如我们能够成功加速实现对外经贸与国内产业投资的全面多元化,模型便会清晰展现出经济企稳回升、重拾长期增长潜力的明朗曙光。

英文原文

Don Desjardins: I mean, what we do usually is try to develop scenarios to say, okay, this is a baseline with what we know today. How do we implement that into the forecast? And for oil prices, similar to Pedro, we have them coming down not, you know, going back to 60, but coming down from where they are today. So then we look at other cases. So what happens if the US says, oh, we don't want to be part of CUSMA anymore. What does that look like when we modelled that. I have to say it doesn't look good. No surprise. But so you know we saw that the economy would be grow about 1.5% slower than otherwise would be the case. So that you know that it isn't as the report says cataclysmic. But it's not good. And then we look at other scenarios. So what happens if we are able to diversify these types of things. And there you do see an increase and positive prospects for the economy.

Jen Jeganathan: Don、Pedro,非常感谢两位今天抽出宝贵时间做客节目。我知道今天各项重磅数据发布,两位都异常忙碌,再次衷心感谢你们来到《The Rundown》。

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Don Pedro, I want to thank you so much for taking the time. I know busy day for you guys both. Really appreciate you coming on The Rundown.

Don Desjardins: 谢谢你。

英文原文

Don Desjardins: Thank you.

Pedro Antunes: 非常荣幸,谢谢。

英文原文

Pedro Antunes: It's a pleasure. Thank you.

民意感知鸿沟:安省乐观情绪与美国的悲观逆转

Jen Jeganathan: 考虑到新关税的接踵而至以及宏观经济充斥的各种不确定性,民众情绪出现一定程度的悲观本是合情合理的,而且实际上有大批加拿大人确实在为国家的前途命运感到深深的忧虑。但为什么权威民调数据却显示,安大略省的居民对未来的经济展望反而呈现出更为乐观积极的姿态呢?Erin Kelly,非常高兴邀请到您做客《The Rundown》,您近来可好?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Given the tariffs and the general economic uncertainty, it makes sense for people to be a bit pessimistic. And a whole lot of Canadians are worried about the future. So why is data showing Ontarians having a more positive outlook? Erin Kelly, great to have you on The Rundown. How are you doing?

Erin Kelly: 很好,你怎么样?

英文原文

Erin Kelly: Great. How are you?

Jen Jeganathan: 我也很好。我想调出一张由您的系统生成的民意图表供观众参考。这是通过 Polly——由您主导开发的人工智能民意追踪系统——所汇总生成的数据,它记录的是公众对经济的主观“感知认知”(perception)而非冰冷的客观现实数据。图表数据显示,大约三分之二(近 67%)的美国受访者认为美国正在滑向完全错误的泥潭深渊;在全加拿大范围内,略超过半数的加拿大人同样对国家的走向持这种悲观论调;然而惊人的是,足足有 55% 的安大略省居民坚定认为加拿大目前正行驶在正确的轨道上。Erin,请帮我们解读这背后的秘密:首先请解释一下你们的研究采样方法,以及为什么安大略省居民对国家经济前途的乐观程度会显著超越全国其他省份的同胞?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: I'm doing well. I want to pull up some data. This is a chart compiled using poly, your artificial intelligence system that documents economic perception rather than reality. It shows that about two thirds of Americans think that the U.S. is going down the wrong path. A bit more than half of Canadians think the same thing about Canada, but 55% of Ontarians think that Canada is on the right track. All right, Erin, help me understand here. Explain the the method here and why Ontarians seem to be more optimistic about Canada's economic future than other Canadians.

Erin Kelly: 太好了,没问题。首先向大家交代一下我们是如何采集到这些底层数据的。Polly 系统所遵循的抽样方法论,在数学本质上与传统的高标准电话随机抽样完全一致,采用的是面向整体人口的严格随机双盲抽样,因此我们所倾听到的声音对各个区域的人口结构具备极高的统计代表性。

在这些数据中,真正最引人深思的其实是美国的数据剧变。如果我们在去年调取美国的这项民意感知数据,景象是截然不同的:当时的美国公众普遍要比现在乐观得多。而如今,代表悲观认知的红色比例出现了极度迅猛的暴增。反观加拿大,民众的情绪近期却出现了明显的乐观回暖,这主要是因为公众看到新上任的总理在公开讲话中极其坚定地阐述他将如何大刀阔斧地重建加拿大、重建国家对外贸易体系。此时此刻,公众感到备受鼓舞。当然,必须指出这些数据背后包含着大量复杂的群体细分差异,因为这只是宏观平均值;但不可否认的是,广大民众被他们所看到的国家行动所打动,而且普遍坚信我们这位新国家领导人所具备的资深专业背景与履历威望足以驾驭并打赢这场翻身仗。

英文原文

Erin Kelly: Great. Absolutely. So, first of all, how we got the data so poorly uses the same methodology as any phone survey sample. It's a randomised controlled sample of the population. So we're listening to people who are representative of each of those populations. Now the interesting thing really here is the United States, the United States, if we looked at this data last year, was very different. People were much more optimistic in the US than they are now. So very big growth in the red there. And Canadians have become more optimistic as they as we see the Prime Minister talking about how he's going to rebuild Canada and rebuild our trade, people at the moment. Now, there's a lot of nuance in this data because these are averages. But people are encouraged by what they see and they're encouraged by the credentials of our leader that he does have the he does have the creds to pull this off.

Jen Jeganathan: 那我们不妨深入剖析一下其中的群体细分特征。您能否为我们画像描摹一下这些抱持乐观态度的安省及全加居民究竟是怎样一个群体?比如他们的年龄跨度、就业形态、以及他们具体生活在省内的哪些区域?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Well, let's go into some of that nuance. Are you able to characterise who these Ontarians and Canadians are? Perhaps, you know, age, job status, where in the province they actually live?

Erin Kelly: 当然可以。从年龄画像来看,较年长的加拿大人明显比年轻一代显得更为乐观自信,这一代际特征在安大略省内部同样高度一致。当前有力推升公众乐观情绪的主导引擎,是人们频繁谈论的外资直接投资与新兴贸易合作项目。甚至连长期对联邦政策颇有怨言的阿尔伯塔省民众,眼下也破天荒地表示:我们几十年来头一回看到有大规模新增资本涌入传统石油与天然气领域,并带来了实打实的全球贸易出口新通道。

更为重要的是,联邦政府在政策宣示中向全社会明确承诺:一旦经济转型阵痛袭来,国家将动用一切资源坚决保护本土劳动者的福祉。这与我们在美国观察到的社会心态形成了极度鲜明的对比——在美国,公众普遍深感一旦宏观经济彻底垮塌,他们将得不到来自联邦与各州政府的实质性托底援助。因此加拿大的民众深受鼓舞,坚信国家未来会提供充足的过渡补偿与制度保障,帮助全社会平稳度过阵痛转型期。不过,我必须提醒大家:这在很大程度上属于短期维度的乐观心理。正如我刚才强调的,宏观平均值很容易掩盖局部危机;一旦你深入下沉到各地区的真实经济增速等微观现实中,你会看到恐惧与焦虑情绪依然在水面之下暗流涌动。因此我认为,未来 12 个月内政府必须拿出实实在在的硬核政绩结果,才能将这种得来不易的乐观情绪继续维系下去。

英文原文

Erin Kelly: Yeah. So now the older Canadians are more optimistic than younger Canadians. And that's the same thing in Ontario. What is driving the optimism at the moment is people are talking about the foreign trade investments. Even people in Alberta are saying for the first time, we're seeing investment in oil and gas and new trade opportunities. And also the government saying that if there are pains in the economy, they're going to protect workers. That's very different from what we see in the United States, where people feel that if the economy tanks, they're not going to have that support from their governments. So people are encouraged to think that there will be compensation, there will be the ability to to make this transition. Now, I think this is a short term optimism. We definitely see, like I said, these are average numbers. And when you start to drill down into economic growth and things like that, we start to see more fear in the economy. So I think we need to start to see results in the next 12 months to maintain this optimism.

乐观拐点预警与社会安全网的承重极限

Jen Jeganathan: 话虽如此,依据您多年从事民调分析的专业经验,这种社会乐观情绪通常在什么时候会遭遇由盛转衰的逆转拐点,导致安省居民和广大加拿大人重新滑向悲观深渊?举个例子:我们近期已经在各大新闻头条看到,位于汉密尔顿的知名钢铁巨头 Stelco 已经正式宣布解雇裁员 350 名工人;安大略省 8 月份的整体失业率更是已经逼近了 7% 的警戒红线。正如您刚才所言,眼下的乐观只是短期的。那么这个悲观翻转的临界拐点究竟何时会到来?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Well, with that being said, in your experience, when does that optimism begin to roll over and Ontarians and Canadians become a bit more pessimistic? For example, we've seen headlines steelmaker Stelco in Hamilton announcing layoffs of 350 workers. Ontario's unemployment rate almost 7% in August. So, as you mentioned, short term. But when does when does it roll over?

Erin Kelly: 我在研判这种群体民意流变时,会密切监测整体人群中特定核心群体的规模动态。在这个样本池中,存在着一批我称之为“负面舆论风向标”的核心群体(leaders in the negativity debate)。在当下这个时间点,这部分能够凭借扎实数据和清晰论理说服身边大众转向悲观认知的人群占比大约在 11.5% 左右。他们向公众不断展示各种严峻的统计数据,并且极其擅长将其通俗化解读;虽然内容充满了一定的数学推演门槛,但一旦你观察到这部分具有高动员力的负面风向标人群比例从 11.5% 进一步攀升到 15% 乃至 20% 时,全社会的公共舆论就会在瞬间发生雪崩式的全盘倒戈。

我们目前所处的民意水位仅仅比这个临界红线略低一点,如果未来迟迟无法看到实质性的利好现实,或者无法看到政府的救市方案产生实质性积极疗效,我们距离民意彻底逆转、滑向更强烈的全面悲观状态大概只有 6 个月左右的时间窗口。

英文原文

Erin Kelly: Well, I start to I look for in the population. So we would have what I would call sort of the leaders in in the negativity debate. Right now, they're at about 11.5% who are swaying people to their point of view. They're giving the statistics, but they're very good at explaining it. Still a bit mathy, but as you start to see that population grow from 11.5% to say 15 to 20%, that's when you get a wholesale change in public opinion. So we're just a little bit under that right now, probably about six months away from that tipping over into stronger pessimism. If we don't see some good news or a plan that's starting to take effect.

Jen Jeganathan: 加拿大当下展现出的这份民意乐观,究竟有多大比例是完全建立在对总理个人的高度信任之上的?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: How much of Canada's optimism is related to having faith in the Prime Minister?

Erin Kelly: 相当大,有极大一部分确实归功于对总理个人的高度信任。但除此之外,同样重要的是源于对加拿大核心价值观的深层认同——那就是我们守望相助的社会传统。我们在这个国家拥有强大健全的社会安全网(social safety net),这是一张非常优越的社会保护之网,与美国存在着本质的差异。在美国,公众普遍丧失了这种信任感:他们既不信任自己的国家领导人,对自身的制度体系也毫无信念,更缺乏加拿大这种强有力的社会托底安全机制。

然而我们所有人都心知肚明,如果国家缺乏强健的实体经济作为造血支柱,政府根本不可能有源源不断的财政资金去长期维系并投资这些昂贵的社会安全网。这些兜底机制在设计初衷上是用来应对危机的临时性保护盾牌,而绝非经济在正常平稳期运行的常态化依靠。因此,我们迫切需要一套成熟的宏观顶层规划,全力为国家引入更多产业资本投资,并为我们的出口商品开辟更多国际销售通道。与此同时,社会层面也充斥着深刻的疑虑,因为大家都清醒地意识到,对于加拿大而言,想要打入欧洲市场,其准入门槛和操作难度要远远高于历史上近在咫尺的美国市场。

英文原文

Erin Kelly: A lot, a lot faith in the Prime Minister. Also faith in Canadian values that we do help each other. We have a social safety net here, and it's a good social safety net, very different from in the United States, where they don't have that faith. They don't have the faith in their leader, and they don't have faith in their systems. They don't have a strong social safety system, as we do in Canada. But of course, we know that if you don't have a strong economy, you don't have the money to invest in those, in those social safety systems. So they're meant to be temporary. They're not meant to be how we operate in peacetime, if you will. So we we do need a plan to get more investment into the country, more of our exports to market. And there's a lot of fear there that, of course, Europe is a much more difficult market for us than the United States was historically.

外资引进、产业分化与政治红利的倒计时

Jen Jeganathan: 您刚才提到了开辟全新经贸合作纽带的挑战。请帮助我们理清现实的逻辑:大家都知道马克·卡尼总理正在全力以赴与世界其他国家建立全新的经贸同盟。我们看到就在本月,他还在加拿大本土高规格接待了多国国际投资考察团,极力争取他们投资加拿大境内的多项重大产业项目。随着这些招商引资的具体细节逐步浮出水面,公众的乐观情绪是否有可能因此得到进一步的实质性提振?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: You were talking about those trade ties. Help me understand. We know that Carney is trying to forge new trade ties with other countries. We've seen in this month, welcoming investors to Canada in an attempt to get them to invest in major projects here. Can we see that optimism grow with, perhaps, as we learn more details about what comes out of those?

Erin Kelly: 现实呈现出高度错综复杂的两极态势。在外商直接投资(FDI)方面,答案是肯定的,特别是在前沿高科技产业以及石油天然气能源等支柱赛道,社会各界确实洋溢着相当显著的乐观预期。然而在农业与农产品加工板块,弥漫的却是极其浓厚的悲观与焦虑情绪。业内人士普遍抱怨,想要把加拿大的农产品真正打入欧洲市场极其艰难。因此,哪怕我们在外交层面签署了极其完美的顶层合作框架,尽管我们与欧盟之间早就签署了全面自由贸易协定,但受制于欧盟内部极其严苛复杂的各类准入监管条例与非关税壁垒,你根本看不到有多少加拿大优质农产品能够真正大规模运往欧洲货架。

所以整体评估而言,社会的预期分化极为剧烈:目前在吸引外资直接投资、为科技行业输送资金、推动重工业基地复工运转以及重塑生物医药制造业等战略板块,公众充满了浓厚的投资兴趣与乐观预期;但在我们传统依赖的若干基础资源出口领域,社会各界依然笼罩在深层的不安之中,普遍担忧我们目前在国家层面依然缺乏清晰精准的突围战略。

英文原文

Erin Kelly: It's mixed. So with the foreign direct investment, yes. Especially in tech and things like that, oil and gas, there's a lot of optimism with the agricultural sector. For example, there's a lot of pessimism. People are saying it's very hard to sell agricultural products into Europe. So even if you have a great arrangement and we've had a free trade agreement with Europe for some time, but you don't see a lot of our ag product moving there because of the strict the restrictions in the EU. So so it's very mixed. I'd say more optimism right now on the foreign direct investment, investing in our tech, getting our industrial base back up and running pharma, you know, a lot of interest in that building out here. And but then fear in some of our resource sectors that we're not that we still don't have the right strategy.

Jen Jeganathan: 那么全社会给予新任总理马克·卡尼的这种政治“蜜月信任红利”,究竟会在什么时候消耗殆尽?他必须在执政过程中实现哪些至关重要的硬性里程碑,才能够守住公众对他的这份相对乐观期待?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: When does that goodwill for Prime Minister Mark Carney run out? What are some of those milestones that he needs to reach to sort of maintain that relative optimism?

Erin Kelly: 政府需要源源不断地发布实打实的重磅利好政绩,以此去正面硬抗并对冲接踵而至的负面冲击。打个比方:市场上每出现一次像 Stelco 钢铁厂裁员这样的沉重打击,政府就必须拿出对应的实质性对冲成果——比如明确宣布“我们刚刚在本地成功促成了一座大型新药制造基地的破土动工,并将直接创造出多少个高质量高薪就业岗位”。举办高大上的跨国投资招商峰会是一回事,但公众真正渴望看到的是细节落地:到底有谁真正签署了真金白银的投资支票?到底有哪些实体工厂要在哪座城市拔地而起?我们究竟要如何帮助企业跨越横亘在眼前的贸易大山?政府必须开始正视并系统性化解公众正在表达的实际恐惧——比如如果欧洲市场对我们而言确实门槛过高,我们到底要拿出何种针对性手段去逐一攻克?所有的焦点都在于这些具体问题的有效解决,而绝非仅仅停留在签署纸面协议或召开握手会议的表面文章上。这些真抓实干的节点,正是广大公众衡量国家领导层是否及格的核心里程碑。

英文原文

Erin Kelly: Well, we need the announcements that counter the negative announcements, right? Like for every stelco we need. Okay, we're opening up a new pharma plant here and it's going to create these jobs. It's, it's one thing to have, have a, have a meeting of foreign direct investment. But let's start. Okay, who's investing? What, what plants are opening? How are we going to get over? We have to start addressing the fears that people are expressing. Like if the EU is a difficult market for us, how are we going to overcome it? Are those things being addressed? Not just that we're signing agreements and having meetings. So those are the the milestone things that people are looking for our leaders to address.

Jen Jeganathan: 既然聊到了国家领导层,我想在节目尾声阶段快速谈一下美国。按照同样的逻辑来推导,当前美国公众所流露出的极度悲观情绪,是否纯粹是因为他们目前对特朗普总统彻底丧失了信任与信心?

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Speaking of leaders, I do want to talk about the U.S. very quickly. By the same token, do pessimistic Americans simply have less faith in President Trump right now?

Erin Kelly: 毫无疑问,确实如此。对比 2025 年与 2026 年美国公众心态的断崖式落差,其剧烈程度连我都感到难以置信。正如我之前所言,全社会普遍弥漫着一种“总统根本不知道自己在胡乱干什么”的强烈幻灭感。广大民众敏锐地察觉到,美国在伊朗的军事行动上毫无胜算可言;国内通胀再度剧烈飙升;白宫根本拿不出任何具有可行性的经济蓝图;此前高调宣称的委内瑞拉石油天然气巨大开发红利,如今也彻底沦为了全面暴雷的闹剧。

不仅如此,所有毗邻美加边境的美国各州,也都在实打实地承受着这场对加贸易战的反噬恶果。因此,如果你审视当下的美国社会,已经几乎找不到留给乐观情绪滋生的空间了。虽然特朗普目前正极力试图通过在艾奥瓦州重新重启某座钢铁制造厂,并在政治演说中大肆宣称“加拿大汉密尔顿的 Stelco 钢铁厂正是因为关税被迫搬迁到美国本土”,试图以此为自己的政绩强行贴金揽功;但从我们全方位的民调反馈来看,这一套政治说辞在广大美国选民心中根本无法激起任何实质性的共鸣与信任。

英文原文

Erin Kelly: Oh, yeah. He I couldn't believe the difference between 2025 and 2026. And like I said, there's I mean, there's a feeling that he doesn't know what he's doing, right? People are noticing that they're not winning the war in Iran. Inflation is going up. There doesn't seem to be a plan. Venezuela is, you know, they said was going to be the big oil and gas opportunity that's kind of imploding. So and and of course, states near the border are feeling the pinch of the war with Canada as well, the trade war. So there isn't room for there isn't a lot of space for optimism. If you're looking in the United States right now, he's trying to, you know, open up the steel plant in Iowa and say that Stelco is moving there, kind of make those links. But so far, that's not resonating.

Jen Jeganathan: Erin Kelly,能邀请您做客《The Rundown》总是令人受益匪浅。非常感谢您为我们带来如此深刻的独家数据洞察与深度对话,期待不久后再次与您交流。

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: Erin Kelly, it's always a pleasure to have you on the rundown. Thank you so much for this touchpoint. I look forward to chatting with you soon.

Erin Kelly: 非常感谢,太棒了。

英文原文

Erin Kelly: Great. Thank you.

Jen Jeganathan: 屏幕前的各位观众,面对当前的宏观经济风云变幻,您的真实感受又是怎样的?您是否相信未来一旦美国迎来新一届政府轮替,两国的经贸往来与现实生活就能重新回归平静与正轨?欢迎在下方评论区写下您的真知灼见,或者直接发送电子邮件至 rundown@tvo.org 与我们交流。感谢您的收看,我们明天同一时间再会。

英文原文

Jen Jeganathan: How are you feeling about the economy right now? And do you think things will go back to normal when there's a new administration in the US? Let us know in the comments, or send an email to rundown at TVO.org. Until then, I will see you tomorrow.

文中提及的人物和组织