重构民主的未来:从“消费者”到“公民”的主动构建
民主的本质重构:从被动享有到公民的主动构建
作为一名英国人,在美国独立宣言发表250周年的前夕探讨民主,这本身带有一种历史的幽默感。然而,我们今天面对的并不是如何倒退回旧有的权力结构,而是如何共同向前迈进。在过去十年中,我走访全球,为著作《公民》(Citizens)和播客节目收集了大量关于民主未来的故事。这些实践表明,一个充满活力、倡导参与的民主未来正在全球范围内悄然成型。这一变革的引领者并非传统的制度或政客,而是普通公民本身。民主(Democracy: 由全体人民参与的管理或决策系统)绝非一种我们静态占有、坐享其成的制度,而是一项需要所有人共同参与、动态构建的持续性事业。公民通过自发联结与协作创造出新的社会空间,从而推动政治体制向其靠拢和演进。
Original English Source
Let's get the obvious out of the way first, shall we? Yes, I'm British. And yes, I'm here talking to Americans about democracy on the eve of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence from Britain. I'm very tempted to chuck my talk out of the window and break into King George from "Hamilton." "You'll be back." But I'm not here to call you back. I'm here to call all of us forward, because I've spent the last ten years gathering stories from around the world of the future of democracy for my book "Citizens" and for the podcast I co-host, "How to Save Democracy." And what I've found are a couple of things. The first is that there is a bold, bright, beautiful future of democracy just wanting to take hold. It's emerging everywhere in institutions that are open and participatory, and in politicians who are desperate to put the power of citizens ahead of their own power. But what I want to focus on today is not so much that destination, as the journey to get there. Because what I've seen all over the world is that it's actually not institutions that are changing for us. It's not politicians who are leading us there. It's the people. It's citizens coming together and building the future, creating the space for the politics to move into. Because the line I want to leave you with at the end of all of this, democracy is not something we have. It's something we have to build.
协作式地方治理:墨尔本的“再生”实践与制度吸纳
在构建民主的具体实操中,澳大利亚墨尔本的实践提供了一个极佳的范式。2020年底,在新冠疫情封锁与山火引发的严重生态危机交织的背景下,数位市民因意识到现有的权力结构无法有效应对复杂挑战,开始在线上集思广益。这一行动迅速汇聚了成百上千的市民,并联合全球专家共同勾勒城市愿景,最终催生了**“再生墨尔本”**(Regen Melbourne: 一个由公民发起的、旨在推动城市生态与社会再生的组织)。该组织确立了三大极具雄心的目标:
- 实现雅拉河(Birrarung River)全线可游泳;
- 实现社区食品系统的本地化以消除营养匮乏;
- 在全市30万条街道上重建邻里联结与社区归属感。
随着项目的推进,公民的自发行动产生了强大的系统反馈:雅拉河不仅在音乐节中重新迎来了游泳者,更在法律上被赋予了生命实体及其法定权益。最关键的是,地方政府顺应了民意,正式采纳了这些由公民设定的目标,并开始倾注公共资源。这种“公民创造空间,政治随后跟进”的逻辑不仅盘活了地方治理,更引发了对制度化改革的探讨——例如建立由随机抽样的代表性公民组成的“常设公民议会”,作为选举民主的补充。此外,类似的公民运动已在爱尔兰等国成功帮助解决了极具争议的国家议题,显示出这一模式在全球范围内的普适性。
Original English Source
Now, my favorite story of this new democracy comes from Melbourne in Australia, and it starts at the end of 2020. In the context of COVID lockdowns and black summer bush fires raging across Victoria and clogging the city with smoke, Melburnians were confined to quarters for weeks on end. In that context, a few citizens started to gather online. They were motivated by the understanding that the existing power structures just weren't capable of responding to these challenges. And if they didn't want this to be the pattern of the summers for the rest of their lives, they were going to have to lean in and do something about it. Soon, those few citizens were joined by a few more, and then tens and eventually hundreds of people were attending these calls. They invited authors and experts from around the world to inform them, as they tried to create a vision for the future of the city that they wanted to hold. They got to this point where they were saying, we believe we can create a resilient, regenerative, beautiful city in a way that can be a template for others to follow. They birthed an organization called Regen Melbourne to act as a catalyst for citizen activity, and they aligned their work around three earthshot goals. The first was to make the River Birrarung swimmable for its entire course. The second to localize the city's food system so that every one of its neighborhoods would be a nourished neighborhood. And the third was to foster a sense of community on every one of the city's 300,000 streets, partly because if these situations were to repeat themselves, then that's what would be needed, but more because -- joy. Five years on, there's been amazing progress and in fascinating ways. Citizens are jumping into the Birrarung ever closer to the sea at river festivals. The river has status as a living entity. And rights. But most interestingly of all, on that goal, the City Council has come in behind and adopted the goal with the citizens. And now institutional resources are starting to flow. They've created the space for the politics to move into. There's been similar progress on the other goals, and now there are even conversations about even more ambitious projects that they could take on. There's talk of creating a standing citizens assembly as part of the city's governance structure. Randomly selected citizens, a representative sample of them, to debate and discuss the key issues facing the city as a complement to the existing elected systems. There are sister organizations springing up all over Australia. The momentum is building hugely and it all started with a few citizens coming together online, not staring into crisis but building out of it. Now look, there are so many stories I want to tell you. I want another hour. I want to tell you about Taiwan's crowdsourced COVID response that was rooted in a set of digital tools that a citizen movement came together and built. I want to tell you about Ireland, where there's a citizens assembly as part of the national governance structure that has helped them resolve some of the most polarizing issues of our time in a way that brought the nation together, and that the first iteration of that assembly citizens built it. I want to tell you about things that are happening all over the world and all over America as well, in Lexington, Kentucky, and Fort Collins, Colorado, and I don't have time. But what I can tell you is that there is something big going on.
三重社会叙事模型:在危机与互助中践行公民主义
为了系统性地理解当前的时代变革,我们可以引入一个关于个体与社会关系的叙事框架。人类历史经历了三种主要叙事:
- 臣民故事(Subject Story: 将个体视为权力的附庸,信奉由少数精英主导社会管理,个体只需服从与接受分配);
- 消费者故事(Consumer Story: 鼓励个体追求自我利益,认为个体自利的加总即能自动实现集体利益,其对应的民主流于每隔几年在固定选项中进行选择)。然而,当今时代的孤独感、心理健康危机、系统性不平等以及生态危机,均无法在以自利为核心的消费者逻辑中获得解决。当“消费者故事”走向崩溃时,社会面临着两种抉择:一是退回威权主义者编造的“臣民故事”虚假安全感中,二是勇敢迈向第三种选择——公民故事(Citizen Story: 核心逻辑是主动参与、贡献想法与资源,深信集体智慧优于个人,并在此基础上构建理想社会)。
这种公民主义在危机时刻表现得尤为自然和强大。以美国加州阿尔塔迪纳(Altadena)的历史性有色人种社区遭遇火灾为例,面对家园付之一炬的绝境,居民们并未陷入孤立,而是通过自发成立的互助组织**“疗愈迪纳”(Dena Heals: 一个在灾后建立的互助市场与健康中心)紧密联结,帮助了超过7000名受灾群众。这种在危机中打破隔阂、共同满足彼此需求的行动,绝非单纯的慈善或善意,而是最纯粹的民主**实践。因此,民主的未来不应仅在危机到来时临时抱佛脚,而应从现在开始,通过在日常生活中寻找共同关注、汇聚力量来共同构建。
Original English Source
And I think the best way to understand it is through the lens of what I call stories of self and society. And this is a framework I want to offer you as a way of understanding the moment in time we're living in. Back in the days of the old country, we lived in what I call the subject story, as in subjects of the king. The right thing to do was keep your head down, do as you're told, get what you're given, on the basis that the God-given few knew best, and they would lead us to the best outcomes for society as a whole. You'll be back, remember? Coming out of the two world wars, America gave us the consumer story. The right thing to do now was to pursue self-interest on the basis that self-interest would add up to the collective interest, that that's how the best society would result. With that came a kind of democracy, a democracy where we could express our choice every few years, choose between a fixed set of options as to who to give our power to on the basis of self-interest. And it seemed to work. It was a liberating shift from what came before. But now we can't solve the challenges of our time from within that logic, you can't solve loneliness and mental ill-health from within a logic of self-interest. You can't solve pervasive inequality from within a logic of self-interest. And we can't solve ecological crises from within a logic of self-interest. As that story collapses, my way of understanding what is going on right now is that the subjects story is back in the uncertainty, with strong men leaders offering false certainties into that chaos. But there is another option. To step forward into what I call the citizen story. The logic here isn't keep your head down, do as you're told, nor is it pursue self-interest. It's get involved. Contribute your ideas and energy and resources. Come together with others and build it on the basis that all of us are smarter than any of us. And that's how the best society will result. And then there is Altadena, California. I get one more story. On January 25, the Eaton Fire tore through Altadena. Whole neighborhoods were destroyed. This historically significant Black and brown community burned to the ground. In that context, what happened was that the citizens of Altadena came together. Even though they had nothing, they came together to decide what to do with what little they had. Neighbors helping neighbors, giving and getting given. They created Dena Heals, a mutual-aid marketplace and wellness center that has since helped over 7,000 people from 1,500 families. And what I know from what I've seen around the world, is that this is what happens when crisis hits everywhere. Dena Heals is just a particularly beautiful example of what is a deeply human response to crisis. To let the barriers that have kept us apart burn rather than our relationships. We come together in that moment. And Dena Heals isn't charity. It isn't even kindness. It's actually democracy. People coming together to build what they need. This is what we will do in times of crisis. But it would be so much easier if we start building now. So here's what I want to leave you with. The first three words of the US Constitution really tell the whole story, written just a little way from here. We the people. Because democracy isn't something that is done for us by institutions or by politicians, it's something we do, something we have to build. In this moment in time, we all have agency. And it starts very simply, on a Monday morning when you get back to your places where you live and love, go for a walk, think about what you care about. Think about who else cares about it too. Think about how you might gather and what you might build. The future isn't going to be made tidy for us. We're going to live through dark and dangerous times. And it won't be delivered for us as consumers. But it doesn’t have to be done to us as subjects, either, if we come together and build as citizens. So let's build. Thank you.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
公司/组织: Regen Melbourne, Dena Heals