泡沫经济中的致富之道:富人的策略
萨姆·奥尔特曼(Sam Altman)刚刚为他的“星际之门计划”(Project Stargate: OpenAI的一个雄心勃勃的AI项目,旨在实现通用人工智能)筹集了5000亿美元,他追求AGI(Artificial General Intelligence: 人工通用智能,指能够理解、学习或应用任何人类智力任务的AI)的理由是:AGI将解决一切问题,因此无论投资多大都是合理的。与此同时,中国竞争对手DeepSeek(一家中国AI公司)仅用600万美元就取得了类似成果。英伟达(Nvidia: 一家领先的图形处理器和AI芯片制造商)的股价在几天内暴跌近20%,许多人认为AI泡沫已经开始破裂。但有趣的是,即使数百亿美元的市场价值蒸发,主要参与者仍可能比以往任何时候都更富有。事实证明,这是资产泡沫中的常见模式:如果他们知道自己在做什么,即使泡沫破裂,人们仍然会变得富有。因此,让我们探讨富人如何利用这些泡沫,从最重要也是最关键的第一步开始:在其他人之前发现下一场革命。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
Sam Altman just raised $500 billion for Project Stargate, his quest for artificial general intelligence. The pitch: AGI will solve everything, so any investment, no matter how large, is justified. Meanwhile, a Chinese competitor, DeepSeek, achieved similar results for just $6 million. Nvidia's stock plummeted nearly 20% in a few days, and what many believe is the AI bubble has started to burst. But here's the interesting part: even as hundreds of billions in market value evaporate, the major players will likely walk away richer than ever. Turns out this is a common pattern in asset bubbles. If they know what they're doing, people still get rich even when the bubble bursts. So, let's explore how the wealthy exploit these bubbles, starting with the first and most crucial step: spotting the next revolution before everyone else does.
第一步:发现下一场革命
在资产泡沫中致富始于一个简单的真理:在所有人都知道它将成为下一个大事件之前,找到它。这意味着要在潜在的革命性技术或市场尚未成熟、大多数人仍持怀疑态度、技术本身可能还粗糙不堪时就识别出来。历史向我们展示了这一切是如何发生的:在互联网泡沫(dot-com bubble: 20世纪90年代末,互联网公司股价飙升后迅速崩盘的经济现象)期间,杰夫·贝佐斯(Jeff Bezos)和皮埃尔·奥米迪亚(Pierre Omidyar)看到了大多数人错过的东西——互联网不仅仅是一种发送电子邮件的奇特方式,它将改变我们买卖一切的方式。他们的公司亚马逊(Amazon: 杰夫·贝佐斯创立的全球电商巨头)和eBay(eBay: 皮埃尔·奥米迪亚创立的在线拍卖和购物网站)最初并不盈利。亚马逊早期的昵称是“amazon.bomb”,这可不是什么信任票。但他们明白,彻底改变零售业的价值远超眼前的利润。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
Getting rich during asset bubbles starts with a simple truth: find the next big thing before everyone knows it's the Next Big Thing. This means identifying potentially revolutionary technologies or markets when they're still unproven, when most people are still skeptical, and the technology itself might be rough around the edges. History shows us how this plays out. During the dot-com bubble, Jeff Bezos and Pierre Omidyar saw something most people missed: the internet wasn't just a fancy way to send emails, it was going to transform how we buy and sell everything. Their companies, Amazon and eBay, weren't profitable at first. Amazon's early nickname was "amazon.bomb"—talk about a vote of confidence. But they understood that revolutionizing retail was worth more than immediate profits.
这种模式在加密货币领域不断重演。维塔利克·布特林(Vitalik Buterin)和中本聪(Satoshi Nakamoto)提出了一个激进的想法:如果我们能拥有没有银行的货币和金融系统呢?在AI领域,像英伟达这样的公司早在人们要求ChatGPT(由OpenAI开发的大型语言模型)撰写辞职信的几年前,就大力押注生产专用芯片。甚至房地产泡沫也遵循了这条规则:抵押贷款支持证券(Mortgage-backed Securities: 一种将抵押贷款打包成可在市场上交易的金融产品)的早期投资者认为他们发现了一种新的、万无一失的住房投资方式。剧透一下:金融领域没有什么万无一失的东西。但关键在于,在每种情况下,早期投资者并非押注这些技术当时能做什么,而是押注它们承诺会变成什么。技术不需要完美,它只需要足够革命性,让人相信它能改变一切。这便引出了泡沫策略的下一步:一旦你找到了革命性的想法,如何说服其他人它将改变世界?
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
This pattern keeps repeating. In crypto, Vitalik Buterin and Satoshi Nakamoto pitched a radical idea: what if we could have money and financial systems without banks? With AI, companies like Nvidia bet big on producing specialized chips years before anyone was asking ChatGPT to write their resignation letters. Even the real estate bubble followed this rule: early investors in mortgage-backed securities thought they discovered a new foolproof way to invest in housing. Spoiler alert: nothing in finance is foolproof. But here's the crucial point: in each case, early investors weren't betting on what these technologies could do at the time; they were betting on what these technologies promised to become. The technology doesn't need to be perfect; it just needs to be revolutionary enough to make people believe it could change everything. And that leads us to our next step in the bubble playbook: once you've found your revolutionary idea, how do you convince everyone else it's going to change the world?
第二步:推销梦想
一旦你发现了可能改变世界的科技,下一步可以说是最关键的:推销梦想。仅仅拥有一个革命性的想法是不够的,你需要说服其他人,这场革命是不可避免的。在资产泡沫的世界里,这意味着描绘一个如此引人入胜的乌托邦未来,以至于当前的局限性看起来只是通往天堂之路上的小障碍。想想互联网泡沫是如何将每个网站都变成了潜在的亚马逊的。Pets.com(一家在互联网泡沫时期失败的在线宠物用品零售商)不仅仅是在网上销售宠物食品,他们还在为数字时代革新宠物护理。别管以亏损价格运输50磅狗粮并非可持续的商业模式,一键下单、送货上门的愿景太诱人,让人无法抗拒。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
Once you've spotted your potentially world-changing technology, the next step is arguably the most crucial: selling the dream. It's not enough to have a revolutionary idea; you need to convince everyone else that this revolution is inevitable. In the world of asset bubbles, this means painting a picture of a utopian future so compelling that it makes current limitations seem like mere speed bumps on the road to paradise. Consider how the dot-com bubble turned every website into a potential Amazon. Pets.com wasn't just selling pet food online; they were revolutionizing pet care for the digital age. Never mind that shipping 50 lb bags of dog food at a loss wasn't exactly a sustainable business model. The vision of clicking a button and having everything delivered to your door was too seductive to resist.
加密泡沫掌握了这种叙事艺术。以太坊(Ethereum: 一个基于区块链的开源平台,支持智能合约)不仅仅是一种新技术,它代表着摆脱银行、政府和所有那些收取佣金的烦人中间商的自由。大多数人购买加密货币纯粹是为了以后以更高的传统货币价格出售,但这显然不是重点。现在,我们看到AI也出现了同样的模式。公司不仅仅是在开发算法,它们承诺解决从癌症到气候变化的一切问题。谷歌(Google: 一家全球领先的科技公司)和微软(Microsoft: 一家全球领先的科技公司)不仅仅是在销售软件更新,它们还在销售一个AI处理所有繁琐工作、人类专注于更高追求的未来。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original Original English
The crypto bubble mastered this art of narrative. Ethereum wasn't merely a new technology; it was freedom from banks, governments, and all those pesky middlemen taking their cut. The fact that most people were buying crypto purely to sell it for more traditional money later was apparently beside the point. Now we're seeing the same pattern with AI. Companies aren't just developing algorithms; they're promising to solve everything from cancer to climate change. Google and Microsoft aren't selling software updates; they're selling a future where AI handles all the grunt work while humans focus on higher pursuits.
这些愿景的关键在于它们不一定是谎言。互联网确实彻底改变了商业,加密货币正在改变金融,AI也将改变各行各业。缺陷不在于愿景本身,而在于实现路径过于简化。真正的变革需要重写社会契约并改变根深蒂固的行为——这些小细节不适合作为出色的销售说辞。但推销梦想只是等式的一部分。要真正从泡沫中获利,你需要更具体的东西。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
Here's the key thing about these visions: they aren't necessarily lies. The internet did revolutionize commerce. Cryptocurrency is changing finance. AI will transform industries. The flaw isn't in the vision itself, but in the oversimplified path to getting there. Real transformation requires rewriting social contracts and changing ingrained behaviors – minor details that don't make for great sales pitches. But selling the dream is only part of the equation. To really profit from a bubble, you need something more concrete.
第三步:成为“卖铲人”
当梦想家们兜售乌托邦的愿景时,泡沫中的真正财富往往来自于出售构建乌托邦的工具。这些人就是“卖铲人”——那些创造必要基础设施以帮助投机泡沫膨胀的公司和个人。把他们想象成在淘金热中通过卖镐致富的聪明商人。当大多数淘金者在寻找黄金时破产时,像Akamai Technologies(一家提供内容分发网络和云计算服务的公司)这样的公司是泡沫中的无声赢家。当亚马逊烧钱试图革新零售业时,Akamai正在盈利地构建内容分发网络,使互联网真正可用。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
While dreamers sell visions of Utopia, the real money in bubbles often comes from selling the tools to build that Utopia. These are the shovel makers – the companies and individuals who create the essential infrastructure that helps a speculative bubble grow. Think of them as the clever merchants who got rich selling pickaxes during the Gold Rush. While most prospectors went broke hunting for gold, in the bubble, companies like Akamai Technologies were the quiet winners. While Amazon was burning cash trying to revolutionize retail, Akamai was profitably building the content delivery networks that made the internet actually usable.
如今在加密货币领域,与之对应的就是Coinbase(一家美国加密货币交易所)和币安(Binance: 全球最大的加密货币交易所之一)等交易所,无论比特币(Bitcoin: 一种去中心化的数字加密货币)是暴涨还是暴跌,它们都能赚钱。它们从每个方向的每笔交易中获利。英伟达在AI热潮中完善了这一策略。当所有人都在争论AI是否会获得意识时,英伟达却坐享其成,出售为所有主要AI模型提供动力的芯片。他们的GPU(Graphics Processing Unit: 图形处理器,在AI计算中至关重要)是现代的镐,他们正以高价卖给城里的每一个“淘金者”。甚至房地产泡沫也有其基础设施参与者:抵押贷款经纪人、评估师和房地产经纪人通过促成交易赚取了巨额财富,而不管标的房产是否真的值其虚高的价格。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
Today's equivalent in crypto would be Coinbase and Binance – exchanges that make money regardless of whether Bitcoin goes to the moon or crashes back to Earth. They profit from every trade in both directions. Nvidia perfected this strategy in the AI boom. While everyone debates whether AI will achieve consciousness, Nvidia sits back and sells the chips that power every major AI model. Their GPUs are the modern-day pickaxes, and they're selling them at a premium to every prospector in town. Even the housing bubble had its infrastructure players: mortgage brokers, appraisers, and real estate agents made fortunes by facilitating deals, regardless of whether the underlying properties were actually worth their inflated prices.
“卖铲策略”的妙处在于,虽然它可能不如押注下一个亚马逊或比特币那样令人兴奋,但它通常更可靠。毕竟,在淘金热中,你不需要自己找到黄金,你只需要其他人继续相信他们可能会找到黄金。但要真正放大这些收益,你需要更大的参与者进入游戏。这就是机构投资者发挥作用的地方。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
Here's the beauty of the shovel strategy: while it might seem less exciting than betting on the next Amazon or Bitcoin, it's often more reliable. After all, in a gold rush, you don't need to find gold yourself; you just need others to keep believing they might find it. But to really amplify these gains, you need bigger players to enter the game. That's where institutional investors come in.
第四步:引入机构投资者
一旦你拥有了革命性的技术、引人入胜的叙事以及支持它的基础设施,就该请出“大人物”了——机构投资者。他们不是在Robinhood(一家美国免佣金股票交易平台)上购买股票的普通散户投资者,而是拥有数十亿美元可供部署的重量级公司。他们的进入会做两件事:它使你的泡沫合法化,更重要的是,将估值推高到天文数字。还记得高盛(Goldman Sachs: 一家全球领先的投资银行和金融服务公司)和德意志银行(Deutsche Bank: 一家德国的全球性银行)向互联网公司IPO(Initial Public Offering: 首次公开募股)投入数十亿美元的时候吗?突然间,像Webvan(一家在互联网泡沫时期失败的在线杂货配送公司)和Pets.com这样的公司不再只是雄心勃勃的初创公司,它们变成了纸面上价值数十亿美元的变革性企业。别管它们烧钱的速度比撒哈拉沙漠中的比特币矿机还快。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
Once you have your revolutionary technology, a compelling narrative, and the infrastructure to support it, it's time to bring in the big guns: institutional investors. These aren't your regular retail investors buying stocks on Robinhood; these are the heavyweight firms with billions to deploy. Their entry does two things: it legitimizes your bubble and, more importantly, inflates valuations to astronomical levels. Remember when Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank poured billions into dot-com IPOs? Suddenly, companies like Webvan and Pets.com weren't just ambitious startups; they were transformative enterprises worth billions on paper. Never mind that they were burning cash faster than a Bitcoin mining rig in the Sahara.
加密世界也看到了同样的模式,当MicroStrategy(一家商业智能公司,以大量持有比特币而闻名)、特斯拉(Tesla: 一家美国电动汽车和清洁能源公司)和主要投资公司开始购买比特币时,他们的参与不仅仅是投资,更是验证。每一次公告都使价格飙升,创造了FOMO(Fear Of Missing Out: 错失恐惧症,指害怕错过投资机会的心理)和投机的反馈循环。现在看看AI。微软对OpenAI(一家人工智能研究和部署公司)的数十亿美元投资,不仅让萨姆·奥尔特曼的公司获得了天价估值,还向所有其他机构投资者发出了信号:AI是下一个淘金热。结果是:前所未有的资本涌入任何在其商业计划书中提及AI的公司。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
The crypto world saw the same pattern when MicroStrategy, Tesla, and major investment firms started buying Bitcoin. Their involvement wasn't just about investment; it was about validation. Each announcement sent prices soaring, creating a feedback loop of FOMO and speculation. Now look at AI. Microsoft's multi-billion dollar investment in OpenAI didn't just give Sam Altman's company a sky-high valuation; it signaled to every other institutional investor that AI was the next Gold Rush. The result: an unprecedented flood of capital into anything with AI in its pitch deck.
机构投资之所以如此强大,是因为它的自我实现性质。当大玩家投资时,他们有动力维持或增加其投资的价值。他们拥有资源和影响力来维持泡沫膨胀,至少直到他们能够为盈利退出做好准备。这便引出了泡沫驾驭中最关键的技能:知道何时退出。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
What makes institutional investment so powerful is its self-fulfilling nature. When big players invest, they're incentivized to maintain or increase the value of their investments. They have the resources and influence to keep the bubble inflating, at least until they can position themselves for a profitable exit. And that's where we get to the most crucial skill in bubble riding: knowing when to get out.
第五步:把握退出时机
把握退出时机是成为马克·库班(Mark Cuban)和成为在崩盘前买入Broadcast.com(一家在互联网泡沫时期被雅虎收购的流媒体公司)股票的人之间的区别。库班在1999年,也就是互联网泡沫破裂前几个月,以57亿美元的价格将他的公司卖给了雅虎(Yahoo: 一家互联网服务公司)。当其他人看着自己的投资组合蒸发时,库班正从他新买的场边座位上观看达拉斯小牛队的比赛。这才是泡沫驾驭的真正艺术。诀窍不仅仅是识别估值何时变得荒谬——它们通常从一开始就荒谬。而是识别驱动泡沫的叙事何时开始破裂。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
Timing your exit is the difference between being Mark Cuban and being the person who bought Broadcast.com stock right before the crash. Cuban sold his company to Yahoo for $5.7 billion in 1999, just months before the dot-com bubble burst. While everyone else was watching their portfolios evaporate, Cuban was watching the Dallas Mavericks from his newly purchased courtside seats. This is where the true art of bubble riding comes in. The trick isn't just recognizing when valuations have become absurd – they're usually absurd from the start. It's recognizing when the narrative that's been driving the bubble starts to crack.
这是关于注意到革命性科技头条何时开始被“它真的值这么多钱吗?”的文章所取代。在加密泡沫期间,那些在2017年峰值或2021年反弹期间出售的早期比特币投资者获得了改变人生的收益。与此同时,那些坚信“数字黄金”而持有的人,眼睁睁看着自己的投资组合下跌了70%以上。在房地产领域,那些在2006年,当其他人还在买房时,出售房产的投资者,保护自己免受了2008年导致数万亿美元房屋净值蒸发的崩盘。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
It's about noticing when revolutionary technology headlines start getting replaced with "is it really worth this much?" articles. During the crypto bubble, early Bitcoin investors who sold during the 2017 peak or the 2021 rally walked away with life-changing gains. Meanwhile, those who held on, believing in digital gold, watched their portfolios drop by over 70%. In real estate, investors who sold their properties in 2006, when everyone else was still buying, protected themselves from the 2008 crash that wiped out trillions in home equity.
但关于泡沫退出,有一个令人不安的真相:内部人士、风险投资家、机构投资者和早期采用者通常拥有显著优势。他们拥有更好的信息、更大的影响力,并且通常能够协调他们的退出。当普通投资者意识到泡沫正在破裂时,聪明钱已经离开了。然而,创造和驾驭泡沫不仅仅是尽早进入并在崩盘前出售,还有一个更关键的要素让整个机器运转:制造FOMO。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
But here's the uncomfortable truth about bubble exits: the insiders – VCs, institutional investors, and early adopters – usually have a significant advantage. They have better information, more influence, and often the ability to coordinate their exits. By the time the average investor realizes the bubble is bursting, the smart money has already left the building. However, creating and riding bubbles isn't just about getting in early and selling before the crash; there's one more crucial element that keeps the whole machine running: manufacturing FOMO.
第六步:制造“错失恐惧症”(FOMO)
任何成功泡沫的最后一个要素是纯粹的心理战:制造和维持“错失恐惧症”(FOMO)。FOMO不仅仅是一个流行词,它是推动资产泡沫达到令人眩晕高度的火箭燃料。泡沫驾驭的真正高手不仅仅是参与这种心理,他们还在积极地设计它。在互联网时代,每一个关于大学辍学生成为百万富翁的新闻故事,都创造了一波又一波害怕错过下一个微软的投资者。在加密货币领域,像埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)这样的影响者和科技梦想家可以通过一条推文撼动市场,制造出下一波大涨即将到来的持续恐惧。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
The final ingredient in any successful bubble is pure psychological warfare: creating and maintaining fear of missing out (FOMO). FOMO isn't just a buzzword; it's the rocket fuel that propels asset bubbles to their dizzying heights. And the true masters of bubble riding aren't just participating in this psychology; they're actively engineering it. During the dot-com era, every new story about a college dropout becoming a millionaire created a new wave of investors afraid of missing the next Microsoft. In crypto, influencers and tech visionaries like Elon Musk could move markets with a single tweet, creating a constant fear that the next big pump was just around the corner.
现在,在AI领域,我们看到公司竞相宣布他们的AI计划,每个公司都声称自己处于一场不可避免且迫在眉睫的革命的最前沿。这种人为制造的FOMO创造了一个强大的反馈循环:随着价格上涨,媒体报道加剧;随着报道加剧,更多投资者涌入;随着更多投资者涌入,价格进一步上涨。这个循环持续下去,直到现实最终追上叙事。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
Now, in AI, we see companies racing to announce their AI initiatives, each claiming to be at the forefront of a revolution that's inevitable and imminent. This manufactured FOMO creates a powerful feedback loop: as prices rise, media coverage intensifies; as coverage intensifies, more investors pile in; as more investors pile in, prices rise further. The cycle continues until reality finally catches up with the narrative.
这便引出了关于在资产泡沫中致富的基本真相:这无关乎相信技术的长期潜力,而是关于理解和利用市场狂热的可预测心理。同样的模式会重复出现,因为人性不会改变。无论是1637年的郁金香,还是2024年的AI,泡沫都建立在相同的早期采用、引人注目的叙事、基础设施投资、机构验证和精心制造的FOMO基础之上。是的,这些革命性技术中的大多数最终确实改变了世界。互联网确实改变了商业,区块链正在重塑金融,AI很可能将彻底改变无数行业。但泡沫期间创造的财富很少来自于等待这些长期变革。它们来自于理解这个框架,识别我们处于周期的哪个阶段,以及最重要的是,知道何时停止玩这场游戏。
查看/隐藏英文原文 / View/Hide Original English
And this brings us to the fundamental truth about getting rich in asset bubbles: it's not about believing in the long-term potential of the technology; it's about understanding and exploiting the predictable psychology of market manias. The same patterns repeat because human nature doesn't change. Whether it's tulips in 1637 or AI in 2024, bubbles are built on the same foundation of early adoption, compelling narratives, infrastructure plays, institutional validation, and carefully manufactured FOMO. Yes, most of these revolutionary technologies do end up changing the world. The internet did transform commerce. Blockchain is reshaping finance. AI will likely revolutionize countless industries. But the fortunes made during bubbles rarely come from waiting for these long-term transformations. They come from understanding this framework, recognizing where we are in the cycle, and most importantly, knowing when to stop playing the game.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
人物: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Cuban, Sam Altman, Satoshi Nakamoto, Vitalik Buterin, adam-s-axiom
公司/组织: Amazon, Binance, Coinbase, DeepSeek, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, MicroStrategy, Microsoft, Nvidia, OpenAI, Pets.com, Tesla, Yahoo, eBay