狂潮涌动:开发者日密集发布与技术全景
今天我在旧金山参加了 OpenAI 开发者日(OpenAI DevDay: OpenAI 面向全球开发者的年度技术盛会),这一整天的经历非常过瘾。不仅因为现场的 Tibo 让我亲自为台下的大家按下了 Codex 重启按钮,更因为从开场主题演讲到闭幕,密集的新功能发布令人应接不暇。我为大家带来的既有好消息也有坏消息:好消息是 OpenAI 发布了海量令人震撼的新产品;而坏消息同样是 OpenAI 一口气发布了太多内容,几乎每隔两三分钟团队就会推出一项全新技术。
这次主题演讲涵盖了全方位的技术版图,从直接对标 GrokBot 和 Muse 的消费级常驻智能体,到开发者真正需要的高价值底层平台组件。因为我有幸提前测试了其中的部分产品,所以希望借此梳理出这次发布的全部核心亮点。本文将帮助大家明确在接下来的技术演进中应当重点关注哪些工具与能力,并分享我对几款经过深度实操体验的重点产品的早期研判。
英文原文
Today I spent the day in San Francisco at OpenAI's dev day and it was a fun one. Not just because Tibo let me smash the codeex reset button for you all. I was there from the keynote throughout the day and I have good news for you and bad news for you. The good news is OpenAI released a lot of stuff. The bad news is OpenAI released a lot of stuff. There was a lot jam-packed into the Devday keynote. um everything from OpenAI's answer to Grockbot and Muse to platform components that developers are really going to use felt like every two or three minutes the team was announcing something new. I was able to test some of it early. I want to share from you the highlights from the releases so you know what to pay attention to depending on what's important to you and also maybe three or four things that I've spent a little bit more time with and have come to an early opinion on so you can see what I think about all these new releases.
常驻代理 Dots:跨平台长程执行与交互范式重构
在上午的主题演讲中,首个登场的重磅炸弹就是 Dots(常驻长程代理: 具备独立计算环境、常驻云端且可跨多端主动协作的 AI 智能体)。这是一种始终在线的长程智能体,能够横跨 ChatGPT、Codex 运行,既可以在云端专属虚拟机中操作,也可以直接调用用户的本地电脑、手机,甚至深入集成进 Slack。无论通过文字指令还是实时语音通话,它都能全天候为你完成复杂任务。我非常早就拿到了测试资格,由于 OpenAI 团队几乎每小时都在高频迭代完善,因此目前很难给出一份盖棺定论的完整评测。但最核心的问题在于:在 GrokBot 极度流行、Muse 势头强劲、Instinct 仍活跃在短信场景的当下,Dots 究竟处于整个代理生态的什么位置?
从产品架构来看,Dots 就是你的个人代理。当我向团队询问用户能够拥有一个还是多个 Dots 时,团队确认目前每个用户仅分配一个专属 Dot。如果订购了 Pro、Business 或 Enterprise 等关键套餐,你现在就能在 ChatGPT 和 Codex 客户端中看到它。比如我的 Dot 叫作 Bae,形象是一个戴着眼镜、长着大眼睛的粉色小团子。Bae 拥有专属的云端计算机,里面预装了浏览器以及开发者常用的各种生产力工具;作为用户,你既可以让它独立运行,也可以随时接管该虚拟机的操作。此外,用户还能授权它访问本地计算机,形成真正的混合代理执行环境。在交互方式上,OpenAI 大力推进多渠道联动体验:除了桌面与移动端应用外,你甚至可以直接给 Dot 打电话。这并非普通的语音模式,而是真正的语音呼叫,它会响起铃声并接听,虽然在录音转写、实时语音与电话呼叫之间的逻辑串联仍有打磨空间,但整体交互模式非常新颖。而在企业场景中,你还可以直接将 Dot 安装到 Slack 中协同工作。
目前 Dots 最令用户困惑的地方在于其信息架构以及与其他界面的边界定义。OpenAI 将其定位为用户的数字分身与主权代理,类似于你的任务“主线程”。这个总管 Dot 负责承接所有日常工作,具备极强的主动性,不仅可以提醒日常事务、自主推进任务,还能按需派生并调度独立的 Codex 任务线程和对话线程。在实操效果方面,Dots 展现出的执行质量非常过硬:我让它帮我网购,它准确挑中了心仪的鞋子;我让它编写代码,它交付的代码质量非常出色;甚至在日常生活中它展现出了恰到好处的主动性——当我在规划孩子周末游泳课与其他安排是否冲突时,它今早主动提示我:“嘿,需要我为你查看 11 月的课程备选吗?这里有几个选项。”尽管在用户体验和概念区隔(如 Dot 线程、Chat 线程与 Codex 线程的边界)上仍有粗糙之处,但其核心骨架非常扎实。就个人习惯而言,我目前在日常工作中依然偏爱使用 GrokBot 针对具体垂直场景雇佣离散微代理,且 Muse 的消费级体验与拟人化形象也更具亲和力,但 Dots 凭借强大的底层模型与长程记忆,一旦结合主动触发能力,必将成为撬动工作流的核心中枢。
英文原文
Okay, so the big release of the morning, the big bang thing first thing up in the keynote is dots. Dots are an always on longunning agent that can work across chat GPT across codecs in its own computer on your computer on your phone whether through text or through call even in your Slack to get work done for you. And I was able to test dots pretty early. In fact, so early it's hard for me to give you all a full review because it's very clear that the OpenAI team is building and building and building on this every minute, every hour, making it better. I think what I want to get across to you is like where do bots sit in this ecosystem of like Grockbots's very popular, Muse is getting some traction, Instinct is still out there, you know, texting people. What are dots? What do I think of them and where do I think they're going? So again, dots are your agents and I asked the team, do I get one dot or many dots? And right now we are issued a single dot. So if you're on pro business enterprise, a couple of the key plans, you should have your dot in chat GPT in the codeex app right now. So this is my dot. Her name is Ba. She's a pink blob with glasses and googly eyes. And Bae has her own computer. So, as you can see here, there's a machine that your doc can use or you can take over and use it yourself. It's loaded with, of course, a browser, but also a bunch of apps, things that are probably pretty interesting to developers. In addition to their computer, you can give your dot access to your local computer. So again, sort of this like always on in the cloud anywhere bot that can work locally or it can work in its own machine. Some interesting things that they're pushing with dots is the kind of like multi-channel experience of a dot. So you can of course use your dot in the chatbt desktop or mobile app, but you can also call your dot. So they they've actually made this not voice mode with your dot. really calling it call your dot. It rings. It picks up. I'm curious. It's like an interesting unique interaction user experience pattern. I'm not sure that I quite get all the interactions between transcribing voice, live voice, and then calling, but you know, you do you bae. And then of course, because we're all enterprises, we're all teams, and we're all on Slack, the ability to install your dot in Slack. Now, one of the things that I find most confusing about dots is just like where does it sit in the ecosystem of all the other chatbt surfaces um and all the codec surfaces. So, you know, dot can do work. They position it as a sort of like replica or delegate of you. So, it's sort of like your main thread. Um, and so you have like kind of like one master dot that is responsible for all your work, can be proactive towards you, can remind you of things, can do work on its own, but it can also kick off codeex threads, um, and I think chat threads. They're kind of like one and the same. Um, and do work on your behalf. And so, you know, I think they still have to figure out the information architecture. I want to do a full dot review, but I want to do it when it's baked and I know that it's really going to work. But it is worth paying attention to. I will say that early takes are the work itself that these dots do is good. Like I had it go shopping for me. It found the right shoes. I had it code something for me. It coded it well. It's proactive in exactly the right way, which is I was trying to figure out my kids's weekend schedule and whether their swim classes conflicted with another thing we were trying to do with them. And then this morning it said, "Hey, do you want me to look for November ones? Here's your option." So I I I say the bones of your dot, which is a very weird thing to say, are good. There are a bunch of rough edges around the user experience. I think there's a bunch of rough edges around dots position in all the primitives that you have going on with chat and codeex. I think it's very confusing to understand what's a dot thread, what's a chat thread, what's a codeex thread. But I think the surface area is moving quite fast and I think people are going to have to decide what they think about using their dot. Where do I think I'm going to use it? I'm probably going to respond to its productivity. So, dot is going to be able to pull me in if it is proactive and suggests using my chatter codeex memories useful things it can do for me. I think that's how an openi agent gets my attention is it pushes interesting things to me and I start to engage with it a lot more. I will say right now early take and again I'm not doing a full dot review. I'm still sitting and using my Grock bots for work. I just like defining microaggents for work just like I would hire someone. I like to hire an agent for a job. So, I'm not really a one one agent to rule them all person. And then I think the user experience of Muse is just a little more consumer friendly, a little bit more approachable. Um, the avatar is super cute. So, I'm going to give it a whirl, but I'm not going to give you all a full review until I really feel like I understand the differentiating features of this, and I can tell you exactly where I think it fits in your stack. So, it's like early innings. It's got all the makings of something that's good. The actual work it does because it's powered by these OpenAI models is really good, and it's pretty smart with memory. I'm just not 100% sure uh yet. So, we're going to hold off a couple weeks. I'm going to come back to a review here.
原生协作 Spaces 与 Sites:打破企业数据与内部工具孤岛
在本次发布中,我认为被外界严重低估的一个重大突破是 ChatGPT Spaces(原生 AI 协同空间: 支持人类与多智能体共同编辑文档、演示文稿及动态页面的统一工作区)。企业长期以来都在渴求一个真正原生集成 AI、具备完善权限管控与数据治理能力的协同平台。当年我在构建 ChatPRD 时就意识到,人类与 AI 智能体迫切需要在同一份活文档上协同作业,而 OpenAI 现已将这种能力做成了底层标准。通过 Spaces,你可以自由创建页面、文档与幻灯片,随时在文本中 @mention 你的 Dot 或 ChatGPT 来直接更新内容。以往 AI 工具虽然善于从零生成幻灯片,但在后续的多人在线编辑与精细调整上一直存在巨大短板,Spaces 的出现彻底补齐了这一痛点。
最令我惊喜的细节是,我的 Dot 在 Spaces 中为我创建了一个名为“个人便签本”(Personal Scratch Pad)的协作空间。我个人处理待办事项的习惯比较随性,从不强求自己使用高度结构化的 Notion 表格,而是偏好意识流式的列表与勾选项。几周前我还专门编写了一个名为 Claire's Notebook 的工具,以便让 Codex、Grok、Muse 和我一起协作管理任务;而现在,Dots 在 Spaces 中完美实现了这一模式。无论是日常备忘、演讲筹备大纲,还是《How I AI》的录制排期,我都能与智能体在同一个活文档内无缝打磨。这种直指企业协同痛点的布局,可以说是向动作迟缓的 Google 正面开炮——拥有深厚技术积累的传统巨头正眼睁睁看着 AI 原生办公的机遇被夺走。
与 Spaces 紧密联动的另一项重大更新在于 Sites(OpenAI 应用构建与托管服务: 允许用户基于对话与提示词直接生成并公开发布交互式 Web 产品的内置工具)。Sites 现已深度整合进 Spaces 的权限体系中,更关键的是它支持打包集成外部连接器与插件。举例来说,若你想基于企业 Snowflake 仓库快速搭建定制分析看板,以往通过个人 ChatGPT 绑定的插件数据无法在分发后保留合规权限。而现在,你在 Sites 中绑定的插件会遵循企业级鉴权:同事访问该看板时必须通过自身账号认证,仅在具备相应数据权限时方可查阅报表,否则自动受控拦截。当前企业界充斥着大量依靠快速生成(vibe-coded)出来的内部工具、原型与临时报表,企业最头疼的问题就是“如何安全有效地管理这些资产”。Sites 结合插件连接器给出了强有力的工程解法,正面迎战 Claude Artifacts 等竞争对手。
英文原文
All right. So, dots big review. What else is big in? I think one that's underhyped and I said this on X is chat GBT space. Space is a place in chat GBT where you can work on documents, artifacts, slides with humans and with agents. And I think this is what companies have been waiting for. We have been waiting for an AI native document slide HTML collaboration platform with all the right sharing built in with all the right data controls built in with all the like agent native kind of aspects of this built in. I mean honestly I built this at chat PRD early on because I knew that people and agents wanted to collaborate on the same document and so the openi team has built spaces into that same concept. So if you see what spaces can do, it can create pages and create documents by which you can collaborate with both your human friends and your dot your agent friends. Slides again another surface area for businesses where a lot of collaboration happens and I know that you know chat GPT these other AI tools are really great at creating slides but not really great at editing and collaborating with slides and so this is a big win and then all the like good stuff around sharing permissions etc. One of the things I love that my dot did one moment of delight that I didn't touch on in the overview before is it made a space for me called your personal scratch pad and it just created a space where my dot and I could just collaborate via dot on things we have to do and I don't know if they read my mind. I have a very um loosey goosey approach to my to-do list. I'm never going to be like an organized table notion boy. Um I just want a stream of consciousness list of bullet points and comments I can make on things I need to do that I can check off with me and my agents. And I actually built this um it's called Claire's notebook. Let me pull it up really quickly. Uh so what's really funny is I actually built this for myself a couple weeks ago. I built this collaborative um document where me and all my agents codeex grom muse could all collaborate on our to-do list because I was working across a bunch of agents. So I did invent this invented here um this collaborative doc. But a good example of a space again is this place where you and your agent can just keep a running list of to-dos, decisions, notes. It also created documents for me. I'm prepping for a talk. Um, I have how I AI recording plan. So, what's coming up next? And again, what's nice about this is it's not just a doc. It is um you you have the ability to appmentntion your doc at mention chat GBT and get updates to the doc. And then you can just imagine this across slides and other artifacts. So, this is really like a little bit of shots fired on Google, which again is just watching this AI opportunity go by. They have all the goodies and yet OpenAI meta have all beat them to the punch. We got to figure this out. But I do think spaces are one of those things that enterprises really want. So I'll really be watching to see who actually adopts spaces. Will you see companies move more and more to these OpenAI hosted documents or not? and how kind of the push and pull between some of these source of truth um business collaboration platforms like Slack, Google Drive, Dropbox, etc. play with spaces. The other thing that is related to spaces that I think is really interesting is the updates announced to sites. Sites, in case you don't know, is sort of like OpenAI's builtin website app builder that can be deployed. um you can sign in through chatbt and then anybody can access your web app. It's sort of like bridging that gap between deploying something locally and something you can share. You know, they pulled sites into space so it has nice sharing and permissions. But the one thing that they added to sites which I think is really really really smart is you can now bundle connectors and plugins into your site. So let me just give you an example. Let's say that you want to create a dashboard, a custom dashboard pulling data from your Snowflake. You have a Snowflake plugin through your Chad GPT app and you want to just use that same data in your shared reporting. Well, you can now use that plugin to power the data in your site. And then what's really interesting about this is if you share it to somebody on your team, they can log in and they can use their connector. So if they have access to the same data, great, they see the report. But if they don't have access to the data, then those controls come in and they can't view the same thing that you can. This is truly the number one problem I hear from enterprises that we work with trying to figure out what to do with all these vibecoded internal tools. What to do with all these vibecoded platform? What to do with all these vibcoded prototypes? What to do with all these vibecoded reports? Everybody's like, what do I do with this information? And I think this sites plus plugins is OpenAI's answer to this. I am really curious again. I think there's this competition between like clawed artifacts, OpenAI sites, where is the enterprise source of truth going to be? And I think you really have to compete on the things that matter to companies which are like easy access to data, governance and controls, permissions, you know, ease of sharing and then quality of these artifacts. So, I think this is really interesting. Um, coming up next week, we actually recorded it at the event. I did a live episode with Kath, the product lead on sites where she's going to show us all the like magic in sites. But this is something that I think you should if you are an enterprise considering chatbt as your platform for collaboration that I think is quite nice.
模型矩阵迭代:高性价比主力 Sol 与具备视觉能力的 Decisions API
作为一名骨子里秉持工程师精神的开发者,底层模型与平台基础设施才是我最为关注的硬核领域。正如 Sam Altman 开场所言,社区最普遍的诉求始终是“模型更便宜、速度更快”。这次 OpenAI 正式推出了 GPT-6.1 Sol,其在保持接近顶尖 Astra 级智能水平的同时,兼具了 Sol 序列极高推理吞吐与极低调用成本。具体而言,其定价仅为输入每百万 Token 2 美元、输出每百万 Token 10 美元,远低于 Astra 的输入 10 美元与输出 50 美元。自 Sol 诞生以来它就是我日常工程编码的绝对主力劳模;除非需要极限推理能力并愿意承担高昂账单,否则极具成本效益的 Sol 绝对是绝大多数团队的性价比首选。
比常规模型迭代更激动人心的,是全新的 Decisions API(决策专用 API: 针对预定义选择项进行极低延迟高置信度分类决策的模型接口)。这被视为 OpenAI 对标 Jev(即引入约束机制的 Luna 智能)的关键产品,但它拥有一个降维打击的绝对优势:原生集成了视觉理解能力(Computer Vision)。为了验证其威力,我用一个实际痛点进行了测试:在录制时长约 40 分钟的技术播客后制作视频封面时,通常需要从长视频中抽帧并寻找嘉宾面部表情自然、不显尴尬的抓拍画面。以往若使用传统模型按 2 秒或 5 秒切片过滤,耗时冗长且准确率低下,而 Jev 缺乏视觉模态根本无法处理。我利用 Decisions API 对 100 帧画面进行自动化筛选,用时不到 10 秒就精准挑出了我和嘉宾均笑容灿烂、毫无死角的完美镜头。此外我还重现了经典的热狗识别(Hot Dog / Not Hot Dog)分类测试,该 API 在不到一秒内便以 100% 的置信度完成判定。这种将毫秒级决策速度、极低成本与视觉分析相结合的基语组件,正是当前现代 AI 架构中所欠缺的关键一环。
英文原文
Now I've covered two three big things which is dots agent space like collaborative workspace sites just like a nice little quality of life thing here let's talk about the things that I actually care about model models and platform that's what I care about your girl is a software engineer at heart I am excited about models I am excited about infrastructure and I'm excited about platform components so let's talk about what those releases were. It was actually really funny. One of the first things Sam Alman said is, "You know what? We constantly get feedback on, we just want faster, models, cheaper." And it's like, of course, we all want models faster and cheaper. And they did release GPT61 Soul. This is almost Astra intelligence at sole speed and really, really cheap cost. Um, so it's $2 per million input tokens, $10 per output token, which is much different than Astro, which is $10 per million input tokens, and 50 per output tokens. So, it's a lot less, and it's a good one. And I I love the Soul Models. I have loved the Soul Model since it came out. It's just a workhorse. It's sort of like my middle-of-the-line most engineering tasks um model that I work with. I do love Astra the very most. And so because I will pay for the tokens, I'm like happy to be an Astra. But if I were being more costconscious, I would definitely spend time with Soul. Soul is super awesome and I think is just going to be a welcome um addition. But I'm excited about two other things that I want to show you. You all know that it's dev week this week on how I AI and you know what? It's also OpenAI dev week and they announced a decisions API. So they announced their little Jeff competitor. This is basically Luna with constraints and so it's going to have Luna intelligence on a predefined set of answers and it can return decisions very fast. Now that sounds like a fast follow to Jev, but there's more. I was able to test a little bit of the decisions API and it has vision. It has vision. So we get the speed cost of like a decisions API a Jev style model with eyeballs with computer eyeballs and I want to show you an example of where I think this is super super useful. So I have an episode with our friend John Linquist on Jev that we recorded. It's about a 40-minute episode and we need to make thumbnails. And every time I make thumbnails, I have to scrub through the video and find when we're not making awkward faces. And I can do this with some models that are actually quite bad at it. But it takes a lot of time because we basically like clip every 2, 5, 10 seconds. We try to find places where our faces aren't awkward. And so I built this with the decision API. It took less than I don't 10 seconds. It was like very very fast. And it went through 100 frames and found all the ones where we were not looking awkward. Like look, we look so happy. It's really cute. It's really hard to find photos where two live guests do not look weird. And the decisions API did that for me. And this has actually been a real pain point for me. Something I couldn't solve with Jeff cuz Jeff doesn't have vision. Okay. Also very important with Jev I built hot dog not hot dogs. Okay. So if I select this picture of a hot dog and I it it is 100% confidence in less than a second that it is a hot dog. So again AGI is here decisions API. You all know how bullish I am on Jev. I think this is like the missing piece in a lot of our AI architecture. And so I'm really excited to see OpenAI announce this. They haven't released it yet. So, TBD on when it's fully released. I got a little bit of early access testing, but when it's released, I will definitely do a head-to-head eval decisions API versus Jev and tell you what I think. So, those are kind of like two models that we're very excited about, uh, Soul 61 decisions API,
Astra Ultrafast 体验:8倍极速推理与实时生成式交互
在全场所有发布中,最让我真正触碰到未来脉搏、但也最为昂贵的技术,非 GPT-6 Astra Ultrafast 莫属。在 Codex 和底层 API 的调用档位中,除了标准模式与 2 倍提速的 Fast 模式外,全新的 Ultrafast 模式实现了高达 8 倍的推理提速;虽然其调用成本也飙升至标准版的 6 倍,但其赋予的近乎实时(near real-time)的顶级边沿智能彻底改变了交互范式。我没有选择用它去清理陈年代码仓库或进行超深度长程推理架构设计,而是选择探索当开发者将极速前沿模型注入产品栈时,究竟能创造出怎样前所未有的实时应用。
我用 Astra Ultrafast 构建了两款演示原型:第一款名为“另一支画笔”(The Other Pencil),是一个人类与 AI 实时协作的矢量画布。当我在画布上勾勒波浪线条时,Astra 几乎贴着我的笔触在后台飞速渲染出匹配的 SVG 矢量图;当我画出一个带笑脸的圆圈时,它转瞬间配合补全了一只可爱的小鸡,随后又随着交互生成了精巧的瓢虫。第二款名为“小星舰”(Little Starship)的 3D 游戏更是展现了实时代码渲染的魅力。游戏中包含 Pip、Momo 和 Sprout 三个角色,当我输入自然语言指令“给朋友们建一个浴室”时,Astra Ultrafast 在数秒内直接在 3D 场景中实时构建出带泡泡的浴缸和橡胶小鸭;当我输入“去热带岛屿度假”,整个游戏场景瞬间实时变换为椰子树、沙滩与碧海;输入“消除重力来场漂浮派对”,全局物理引擎参数瞬间被改写。昨晚我的孩子们沉浸其中玩了整整 20 分钟——尽管这短短半小时的实时体验消耗了我约 97 美元的 Token 成本,但这种在几秒内凭借前沿超高智能实时生成完整游戏资产与逻辑的交互体验,展现了极速前沿 AI 产品的无限想象力。
英文原文
but what's the one that I really want? I can't afford it, but I want it ultra fast. So ultra fast you know there was fast it is ultra fast now I don't know if you know this you can run your models in codecs on normal mode on fast mode which is two times as fast or on ultra fast which is eight times as fast now it cost six times as much it's expensive but GP6 Astra ultraast is available in work codecs and the API and I got to test this also a a little bit early. And this is the one that is making me feel the future. And you all think I would put Astra on like extra high reasoning and let it rip through my bug backlog, rearchitect something, build something new. No, I wanted to see what someone could do if they were using ultraast via API as part of their stack. So what I think is really interesting is if you get very high intelligence at almost real-time experience, you can build some AI things that I think you couldn't build before. and like a good podcaster, you can build games. And so I want to show you two games that I did with Astro Ultraast that I think are just really interesting. I think the latency is still like a little bit um slow for what would feel like a realtime app, but it's pretty magical and I hope this just kind of like opens up your mind to what 8x, 10x, 20x, whatever is coming soon at the highest frontier intelligence can do. This is called the other pencil. It's an AI human collaborative sketch pad. And so if I go in here and do some waves, um, then Astra's going to come behind me and draw SVGs that, uh, match what I do. And so, let's see if I put like a circle here with a smile. Oh, no. I made a little made a little chicken. It's very cute. It's like almost too fast for me. Let's see if I do a flower here. Maybe what it will do next. And I don't know if you remember this from my Astra review, but Astra is really good at drawing SVGs. And again, this is something that I just feel like you couldn't do real time before that is super cute and very fun. Oh, look, I got a little ladybug. But let's take it a step further. So, this was real time SVG drawing with Astra. I think it's super cool and something you can do before, but let's take it a little further. So, this is Little Starship. This is a 3D app that I built. Um, it has three characters. It's Pip, Momo, and Sprout. Now, this was 3D built by Astra pretty fast. I didn't do um Ultra Fast, but it was built pretty pretty quickly. So, Astra can definitely code an app like this. But here's where Astra ultraast comes into play. So, if I type in here and I want to use those other rooms and I say, "Let's build a bathroom for our friends." Then what happens is it uses Astra Ultraast to render these new 3D objects super fast real time here in the app. So it's done a really detailed job here. There's a little rubber ducky. There's bubbles in the bath. Pip has gone over to the bath. So you can actually build this sort of like realtime game. My kids were doing this yesterday. They were doing so much stuff. So, let's say let's all go on vacation to a tropical island. Um, and it will completely change the scene of this little game. So, look, there's a little a little island it made with a coconut tree and um some sand and all my buddies are coming over to hang out on my tropical island. Now, you can also change the physics of the game. So, let's say remove gravity. It's time for a float party. and it will remove gravity. And like again, it's very, very fast. It's a couple seconds to do all these changes live. These are all rendered through Astra ultra fast. And my kids were playing this for like 20 minutes last night. Now, real talk, it cost me like $97 or something to run this for 30 minutes. So, it was not cheap. Um, this is a very expensive game. a little expensive demo for you all, but I just think how cool this is to be able to do these like real time code rendered games. Um, it has a keeps a big long log. These are all the changes that we made to um to the planet, all the changes we made to the ship. And again, like this is a a cute little example, but but I do think if you can start thinking about like what real time super intelligence would look like from a user experience perspective, there are some pretty cool things you can build. So from a model perspective, really excited about Soul 61 because it's fast and cheap. Really excited about vision in the decisions API. and really really really excited. My wallet is not excited about ultra fast.
底层基语扩充与全景演进脉络
除了上述重头戏,本次大会还公布了极其庞大的底层开发者基础设施更新。在智能体生态方面,OpenAI 全面开放了支持 电脑使用能力(Computer Use: 智能体通过视觉感知屏幕并自主操作鼠标与键盘的技术)的 Agents API,并将构建 Codex 的整套底层原语直接赋能给外部开发者。插件生态同样迎来了机制革新,甚至有传闻指出未来开发者将能直接通过插件调用实现商业化变现。针对订阅产品,OpenAI 调整了 ChatGPT 套餐矩阵并推出了全新的 Pro 500 方案。
回顾整场发布,若要在眼花缭乱的新品中提炼最关键的行动指引:
- 体验常驻代理: 建议大家亲自上手体验 Dots 的任务协作并反馈感受,后续我也会带来更为详尽的全面评测;
- 企业协同选型: 若团队正困扰于如何管理散落各处的 AI 原生原型工具与内部报表,务必重点关注并评估 Spaces 与集成了外部连接器的 Sites;
- 前沿工程开发: 务必高度重视带有视觉能力的 Decisions API 与 Astra Ultrafast,前者补齐了低成本快速结构化决策的拼图,后者则彻底刷新了高阶智能实时交互的技术上限。
本周《How I AI》还将上线在大会现场与 Sites 产品负责人 Kath 录制的深度访谈,欢迎大家在各大平台持续关注与交流。
英文原文
There were a lot of other things announced. I mean again there were just so much like agents platform computer use in the agents API all the codeex primitives enabled for developers. There were updates to how plugins work. Rumor has it that you can even monetize at some point your use of plugins. They announced some changes to the Chad GBT plans, including a new Pro 500 plan. There was a bunch of developer primitives released so that you can build with the same infrastructure and tools that Codeex is built on, including using the agents API with computer use. There was just so much announced today. But if I were to tell you to pay attention to a couple things, it would be give dots a world, tell me what you think, full review coming later. Um it would be if you're at a company and you're really struggling with collaboration on AI generated tools either with humans or agents to take a look at space and sites. And then the models the models are just so good and as a developer somebody who both builds with these models and builds on these models I am very excited about the decisions API with vision and very very excited about ultraast just because it makes me really imagine what the future of AI products can look like. This has been my very fast OpenAI dev day recap highlights for me of episode with Kath from the sites team coming this week and and I can't wait to hear what you've tried, what you're excited about, and what you think I should cover next. Thanks for joining. Thanks so much for watching. If you enjoyed this show, please like and subscribe here on YouTube or even better, leave us a comment with your thoughts. You can also find this podcast on Apple Podcast, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Please consider leaving us a rating and review which will help others find the show. You can see all our episodes and learn more about the show at howiaipod.com. See you next time.