引言:金融远见者Marc Rowan与Apollo的崛起
大家好,我是挪威银行投资管理公司(Norges Bank Investment Management: 挪威主权财富基金)的首席执行官Nicola Tangen。今天我们有幸邀请到金融界的真正远见者Marc Rowan,他是全球最具影响力的另类资产管理公司之一——Apollo Global Management(阿波罗全球管理公司)的联合创始人。我们很荣幸持有阿波罗略低于2%的股份,价值近15亿美元。Marc,很高兴您能来这里。
View/Hide Original English
Hi everyone, I'm Nicola Tangen, the CEO of Norges Bank Investment Management, the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund. And today we are joined by a true visionary in the world of finance, Marc Rowan, who co-founded Apollo Global Management, which is one of the most influential alternative asset management firms in the world. Now, we are the lucky owner of just under 2% of Apollo, which works out at just under one and a half billion dollars. Marc, thrill to be here. Great, thanks, thanks for coming, and hopefully you're a happy shareholder.
Nicola Tangen: Marc,在1984年,您曾说:“天哪,我来得太晚了,所有的钱都已经被赚走了。”那时您刚从商学院毕业。然而几年后,阿波罗的AUM(Assets Under Management: 资产管理规模)达到了6800亿美元,市值超过800亿美元。所以我想我们可以说,那句话并不十分准确。
View/Hide Original English
Mark, in um 1984, you said, "God, I'm just too late, all the money has been made." You came out of business school. Now, a few years later, uh, you have assets under management at Apollo of 680 billion and the market cap is more than 80 billion. So I think we can say that was a not a very accurate statement.
业务的演变:从“太晚了”到顺应变革
Marc Rowan: 嗯,我认为那句话是准确的,因为它反映了当时的市场状况。因为我不仅在84年说过,90年也说过,2001年又说了一次。我的意思是,在某些方面,对于当时已经完成的业务来说,我确实来得太晚了。但这份工作有趣的部分在于它不断变化。2008年,我们的AUM是400亿美元,事实上,我们行业中几乎所有其他大型公司当时规模都差不多。然而13、14年后,我们的AUM已超过7000亿美元,这说明情况发生了变化。这显然不仅仅是我们自身技能和天赋的结果,我们必须顺应主流。当然,技能和天赋确实有所帮助,我们的技能和天赋在于确保我们通过正确的方式定位业务,从而获得Tailwinds(顺风: 指对业务发展有利的宏观趋势或外部条件)的推动。但最终,根本性的变革才是推动我们业务发展的动力。
View/Hide Original English
Well, I, I think it was accurate because it reflected the business at the time. 'Cause not only did I say it in '84, I said it in '90, and I said it again in 2001. And the point being, in some ways, I was too late for the business that had been done. But the interesting thing, part of the interesting part of the job, is it keeps changing. I mean, you've 2008, we were 40 billion of AUM. In fact, almost every other large firm in our industry today was roughly the same size. And then 13, 14 years later, we're now up to over 700 billion of AUM. Something changed. It's clearly not as a result of our skill and talent. We had to be in the mainstream. Well, skill and talent helps, right? Well, look, the skill and talent is to make sure we're positioned with Tailwinds behind us by positioning the business the right way, but fundamental change is ultimately what powered our business.
Marc Rowan: 创立公司需要什么?需要一点运气。从84年到90年的六年里,我一直在磨练我的技艺,所以显然我对商业有所了解。但人必须保持谦逊,并接受运气成分的存在,因为当时我在Drexel Burnham(德崇证券: 一家曾在美国金融界有重要影响力的投资银行)工作得很开心。从某种意义上说,我经历过的最好的事情就是被迫做出改变。
View/Hide Original English
What does it take to start the firm? It, it takes a little bit of luck. Look, I had spent the prior six years from '84 until '90 mastering my craft, so clearly I knew something about business. But one has to be humble and actually accept that there's a fair degree of luck, because I was actually quite happy doing what I was doing at Drexel Burnham. In some ways, the single best thing that ever happened to me was to be forced to make a change.
私募信贷与银行:被误解的竞争
Nicola Tangen: Marc,现在很多人关注你们如何通过与公司直接交易来取代银行。你们正在以何种方式从银行手中“夺走”业务,或者说,正在做哪些原本由银行完成的业务?
View/Hide Original English
Mark, there's been a lot of focus on how you are replacing banks through direct deals with uh, with companies. Now, what kind of um, business are you uh, in a way taking away from them or uh, doing instead of them?
Marc Rowan: 嗯,我认为这实际上有点用词不当。媒体喜欢报道银行和投资者争夺Private Credit(私募信贷: 指非银行机构直接向企业提供贷款)的说法。但我想我们必须从定义开始:什么是私募信贷?对大多数人来说,它意味着Levered Lending(杠杆贷款: 指向负债较高或信用评级较低的公司提供的贷款)或Direct Lending(直接贷款: 指非银行机构直接向企业提供贷款,而非通过公开市场发行债券),这是一种低于Investment Grade(投资级: 指信用评级较高的债券或贷款,违约风险较低)的活动。是的,过去绝大多数杠杆贷款都源于银行系统,现在则由银行系统和投资市场共同发起。我们确实参与了这项业务,但这只是我们业务中非常小的一部分。我认为,金融专家和其他市场参与者普遍错过了更大的趋势。对我而言,私募信贷几乎涵盖了银行资产负债表上的所有资产:给客户的贷款是私募的,给公司的贷款是私募的,给项目的贷款也是私募的,等等。而且绝大多数私募信贷都是投资级的。所以我们现在来看,我们是否在取代银行?通常情况下不是。当然,我们只在公开市场运作,进入私募市场不在我们的职责范围内。那么我们错过了什么?你错过了80%的可投资市场。
View/Hide Original English
Well, I think it's actually a bit of a misnomer. The press likes to report on this notion of banks and investors fighting over private credit. But I think we have to start with a definition: what is private credit? Well, for most people, it means levered lending or direct lending, which is a below investment grade activity. And yes, it is true that the vast majority of levered loans used to be originated in the banking system, and now they are split between being originated in the banking system and being originated in the investment marketplace. And yes, we are engaged in that business, but it is a very small part of our business. I think generally financial pundits and other market participants are missing the bigger trend. To me, private credit encompasses almost every asset on a bank balance sheet: a loan to a customer, private; a loan to a company, private; a loan to a project, private, and so on and so on. And the vast, vast majority of private credit is investment grade. So we look and now say, are we replacing the banks? Generally not. Absolutely. Now, we are only in the public market, right? It's not in our mandate to be in the private market. What are we losing out on? You're losing out on 80% of the investable market.
公开市场:价格发现的失效与被动投资的崛起
Marc Rowan: 如果你仔细想想,公开市场并非按照我们想象的方式运作,事实上,没有任何事物是按照我们想象的方式运作的。所以我今天审视公开市场时,会提出一些非常根本的问题,比如在美国这个最发达的资本市场中,短期内是否存在Price Discovery(价格发现: 市场通过买卖双方的互动来确定资产真实价值的过程)?我认为没有。想想美国市场发生了什么:80%的交易量集中在S&P 500(标普500指数: 衡量美国大型上市公司股票表现的指数)中,超过60%的市场是Passive Investing(被动投资: 投资策略,旨在复制市场指数的表现,而非主动选择股票)。标普500指数中,10只股票占了39%,而过去四年,基本上只有4只股票决定了盈利能力。是的,有一只股票的市值甚至超过了除日本以外的所有公开市场。这就是你正在进入的市场。
View/Hide Original English
And if you think about it, public markets do not work the way we think they work. In fact, nothing works the way we think it works. So I look at public markets today and I ask really fundamental questions like, in the US, which is the most developed of the capital markets, do we have price discovery in the short term? I don't think so. Think about what's happened in US markets: 80% of volume S&P 500, 60 plus% of the market passive, 10 stocks 39% of the S&P, four stocks have determined basically profitability for the last four years. Yeah, one stock is larger than every public market other than Japan. That's the universe you're going into.
Nicola Tangen: 所以您是说,公开市场风险很高?
View/Hide Original English
So you saying that um, the public market is very risky?
Marc Rowan: 我不是说它风险高,我是说它被指数化且高度相关,现在它关乎的是资本流动,而不是短期内单个证券的价格发现。
View/Hide Original English
I'm not saying it's risky, I'm saying it's indexed and correlated, and it is about cap Capital flows now. It is not about price discovery of an individual security in the short term.
Marc Rowan: 想想那些本应能够跑赢指数的人——Active Managers(主动型基金经理: 试图通过选择股票或时机来跑赢市场指数的基金经理)。主动型基金经理表现如何?过去20年里,他们基本上有90%以上的时间未能跑赢指数。他们变笨了吗?不,是我们的市场结构发生了变化。这不意味着不好,只是意味着市场被指数化且高度相关。因此,一个投资者,尤其是一位希望在美国市场表达自己观点的国际投资者,不再是买入一篮子证券,而是直接购买指数。
View/Hide Original English
Think about people who are supposed to be able to outperform the index, active managers. How have active managers done? Well, basically 90 plus perc of the time for the past 20 years, they have failed to beat the index. Did they get stupider? No, the structure of our Market has changed. It doesn't mean bad, it just means indexed and correlated. And so an investor, particularly an international investor who wants to express an opinion in the US, no longer comes in and buys a basket of Securities they buy the index.
Marc Rowan: 我认为投资者,包括像你们这样的机构,可能不直接拥有私募股权,但你们会拥有私有的股权。你们可能已经,而且许多机构确实如此,拥有Spotify、OpenAI以及许多其他仍保持私有状态的科技公司。那么,为什么只停留在这些公司呢?我认为未来会有100家甚至更多的私有公司,它们可以通过股权融资。也许这会成为主动管理的新形式——对公司的积极所有权,或者说是没有杠杆和基金的私募股权。不过,这还有很长的路要走。未来五年将主要围绕固定收益替代展开。
View/Hide Original English
I think investors including institutions like yours you may not own private Equity but you will own Equity that is private you you may or and many do already they own Spotify they own open AI they own any number of tech companies that have remained private well why should it stop there I think there'll be or 100 companies that are private for which Equity can be raised maybe that is the new form of active management active ownership of companies or PE without the leverage and without the fund that's that's a ways out still the next five years is going to be about fixed income replacement.
Apollo的投资哲学:“购买价格至关重要”
Nicola Tangen: 阿波罗有自己的投资哲学吗?
View/Hide Original English
Is there such a thing as an Apollo investment philosophy?
Marc Rowan: 有的,我一直强调,那就是“购买价格至关重要”。这意味着什么呢?有很多策略可以采用:有人是杰出的国际主义者,有人是宏观交易大师,有人擅长追逐增长。而我们擅长发现价值。有时,这种价值来自于在私募股权投资组合和资产管理中,用辛勤工作换取更好的购买价格。但如果将其应用到固定收益领域,那就是在每个风险单位上找到超额回报。所以,我们如何能从一家单一A级评级的公司获得比其在公开市场能获得的更高的回报呢?
View/Hide Original English
There is. It's, and I, I've said it, it's purchase price matters. So what does it mean? This is, so there are lots of strategies that one can employ. There's someone who's a great, great internationalist. There's someone who's a great macro trader. There's someone who's great at chasing growth. We are great at finding value. Sometimes that value comes from trading hard work for purchase price, as in our private equity portfolio and asset management. But if you translate it over to fixed income, it's finding excess return per unit of risk. So how do we get paid more for a single A-rated company from a single A-rated company than they could otherwise get in the public market marketplace?
Nicola Tangen: 坚持这种哲学是否曾遇到困难?
View/Hide Original English
Has it ever been difficult to stay true to the philosophy?
Marc Rowan: 哦,非常困难。尤其是在美国一段时间内印发8万亿美元,并且一些不知名的公司一夜之间就获得了数十亿美元估值的时候。那么,那时你怎么办?你得努力管理许多A型人格(Type A Personalities: 具有竞争性、时间紧迫感、易怒等特征的人格类型)的人,并说服他们无所作为才是最好的选择。
View/Hide Original English
Oh, it's been very difficult, uh, especially when the US is printing 8 trillion dollars over a period of time and random companies have multi-billion dollar valuations overnight. So what do you do now then? Uh, what do you do then? You, you try to manage a lot of Type A personalities and convince them that doing nothing is the best thing.
Nicola Tangen: 所以这是你们有所保留的时候?
View/Hide Original English
So this is the time where you're holding back a bit?
Marc Rowan: 我们肯定在投资方式上有所保留和调整。现在我们追求回报。如果我告诉你信贷市场的回报,向下触及Capital Structure(资本结构: 公司融资来源的构成,包括股权和各种债务)并承担更多Subordinated Risk(次级风险: 在公司破产清算时,偿还顺序低于其他债务的风险),这在今天看来是个非常糟糕的主意。而利用你的人力和资源,通过发起和构建交易来获得报酬,同时在资本结构中保持优先地位,这感觉是极好的时间利用方式,我们一直在这样做。
View/Hide Original English
We're definitely holding back in adjusting how we invest right now. We want returns. So if I give you the credit market return, reaching down the capital structure and taking more subordinated risk feels like a bad, bad idea today, right? Using your people and your resources to get paid for origination and structure, but being senior in the capital structure feels like a tremendously good use of time, right? And that's what we've been doing.
宏观风险与美国经济现状:财政刺激与长期赤字
Nicola Tangen: 这些市场的主要风险是什么?什么可能引发更严重的问题?
View/Hide Original English
What are the main risks in these markets and what, what could trigger something more, more serious?
Marc Rowan: 我审视今天的风险,我们面临的风险在某种程度上是显而易见的。地缘政治是其中一个最主要的风险,但甚至不仅仅是地缘政治,还有政治本身。我的意思是,现在在美国,我要告诉你们,情况感觉非常好。我们不仅有增长,失业率也非常低,还有大量尚未完全发挥作用的Fiscal Stimulus(财政刺激: 政府通过增加支出或减税来刺激经济增长的政策)积压。三年前,我们通过了近2万亿美元的Infrastructure Bill(基础设施法案: 政府为改善国家基础设施而通过的立法),它仍在建设中,但还没有任何东西建成。两年前,我们为Semiconductor Plants(半导体工厂: 生产半导体芯片的设施)投入了520亿美元,但还没有一家工厂投入运营。一年前,Inflation Reduction Act(通胀削减法案: 美国一项旨在通过投资清洁能源、降低医疗成本等方式减少通胀的立法)旨在鼓励EVs(Electric Vehicles: 电动汽车)及其他产品在本地制造,但还没有一家工厂开业。过去连续三年,我们一直是Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)(外国直接投资: 跨国公司在外国进行的投资)的最大接收国,并且我们正在提高Defense Production(国防生产: 制造军事装备和物资)。所有这些都是在没有Legal Immigration(合法移民: 通过法律途径进入并居住在一个国家的移民)背景下的财政刺激,这是一个相当不错的局面。我们已经加息了500个Basis Points(基点: 衡量利率或收益率变化的单位,1个基点等于0.01%),结果如何?房价上涨,股市上涨,资本市场流动性充足。这是一个相当不错的局面。哦,顺便说一句,我们在和平时期,在失业率4%的情况下,却有2万亿美元的赤字,这令人担忧。所以,人们可以关注地缘政治,也可以关注政治或治理。
View/Hide Original English
So I look at the risk today. Look, the, the risks in front of us in, in some way are obvious. We have geopolitics as one of the most overriding risk. But not even geopolitics, politics. I mean, we right now in the US, I will tell you, things feel great. Not only do we have growth and we have very low unemployment, we have a backlog of fiscal stimulus that hasn't even hit yet. Three years ago, we passed nearly two trillion in infrastructure bill. It's still being built. Nothing's built yet. Two years ago, $52 billion for semiconductor plants. Not a single plant is open yet. A year ago, Inflation Reduction Act to encourage manufacturing of EVs and other things here. Not a single plant open. Last three years in a row, we've been the largest recipient of foreign direct investment, and we're ramping defense production. All of those things are fiscally stimulative against a backdrop of no legal immigration. That is a pretty good setup. We've raised rates 500 basis points. What happened? Home prices went up, stocks went up, capital markets are fully liquid. This is a pretty good setup. Oh, by the way, we're, we're have a $2 trillion deficit in peace time with a 4% unemployment. That's a worry. So one can look at geopolitics, one can look at politics or governance as another.
Nicola Tangen: 那么,赤字有多令人担忧呢?
View/Hide Original English
And how, how big a worry is the deficit to me?
Marc Rowan: 对我来说,它不是一个短期担忧,但最终是一个长期担忧。
View/Hide Original English
Um, it doesn't, it's not a short-term worry, but it is ultimately a long-term worry.
应对压力:热爱工作,积极心态
Nicola Tangen: 您如何应对压力?
View/Hide Original English
How do you cope with stress?
Marc Rowan: 我不觉得这份工作压力特别大。我真心相信我们是世界上最幸运的人,能够从事这份工作。我们这里的口号是“我们有机会做这件事”。如果公司里有人告诉我他们不喜欢自己的工作,那么是时候让他们在阿波罗系统内换个岗位,或者另谋高就了。如果你经常来上班,却没有“我能做这件事”的想法,那么这份工作就不适合你。我能做这件事。
View/Hide Original English
I don't find the job tremendously stressful. I literally believe we are the luckiest people in the world to be able to do this. This, the slogan we have here is, "We get to do this." Anytime someone tells me in the firm they don't like what they're doing, it's time for them to have another job within the Apollo system or to find something else to do. If you come in pretty often and you don't think, "I get to do this," this is not the right job for you. "I get to do this."
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
人物: Nicola Tangen, Marc Rowan
公司/组织: Norges Bank Investment Management, Apollo Global Management
产品/模型: S&P 500