设计如何降低大城市生活成本? TVO Today 2026-03-24

城市生活成本与整体设计

Jan: 很多人觉得多伦多和其他大城市的生活成本太高,被排除在外。那么,我们能否重新设计城市,让生活更负担得起? Antonio Gomez Palaciodialogue 公司的合伙人兼主席,这是一家跨学科的设计实践公司,他今天来到演播室。您好,先生!

Original English

Jan: A lot of people feel priced out of Toronto and other big cities. So can we redesign cities to make life more affordable? Antonio Gomez Palacio is a partner and chair at dialogue, a multidisciplinary design practice, and he joins us in studio. How are you doing, sir?

Antonio Gomez Palacio: 我很好,Jan。

Original English

Antonio Gomez Palacio: I'm doing very well. Jan.

Jan: 很高兴您能来。现在我想谈谈可负担性,以及它应该如何被解决。您认为应该采取整体性(holistically)的方法。您能为我们详细解释一下吗?为什么您这么认为?

Original English

Jan: It's great to have you. Now I want to talk about affordability and how it should be addressed. You believe it should be done holistically. I'll break that down for us. Why do you think that is?

Antonio Gomez Palacio: 当然。你看,我甚至从我太太和我这辈子做决定的方式来看,以及现在大多数家庭在餐桌上讨论的方式来看。我们不会孤立地看待问题,对吧?你试图让一系列账单,你知道,到头来能够收支平衡。所以你要支付房租或抵押贷款。你要支付交通、食物以及所有这些其他方面的费用,而且是把它们放在一起考虑的。因此,尽管我们绝对需要关注住房的可负担性,但同时我们也面临着交通的危机。我们在许多不同的层面上都面临着可负担性危机。所以理想情况下,作为政策制定者、城市建设者、政府,我们应该打破这些孤立的(silos)思维,开始思考影响家庭可负担性的所有不同方面。

Original English

Antonio Gomez Palacio: Sure. You know, I look at it even in the way that my wife and I made decisions over the course of our lives and certainly in the way that most families and kitchen tables are having the discussion. We don't look at it in silos, right? You're trying to make a whole series of bills, you know, ends meet at the end of the day. So you're trying to pay the rent or the mortgage. You're trying to pay for transportation for food and all of these other aspects all together. So whereas absolutely, we need to be looking at affordability of housing, we're also simultaneously have affordable transportation crisis. We have in a crisis on affordability on a number of different fronts. So ideally, we're as policymakers, as city builders, as governments, we actually break out of those silos and start to think about all of the different aspects that affect affordability in the household.

设计实践的实际影响

Jan: 那么,请您详细解释一下。让我们用实际的例子来说,那会是什么样子?

Original English

Jan: So break that down for me. And let's talk in practical terms, what does that look like?

Antonio Gomez Palacio: 平均而言,加拿大人在其一生中,会将其可支配收入的 29% 花在住房上。在某些时候,当你有抵押贷款时,这可能高达 60%、70%,但你知道,不同时期不同。他们还花费 19% 在汽车上,花费 11% 用于水电费以及房屋的运行。所以,如果我作为一名建筑师或城市建设者,能够设计一个地方,让人们不需要拥有一辆车,或者不需要拥有的第二辆车,并且水电费可以降低,那么我就能直接影响家庭收入。突然之间,原本可能负担不起的房子就变得可以负担了。所以,正如我所说,家庭做决定时不是孤立的。那么,我们作为城市建设者,为什么还要割裂我们的思维方式呢?

Original English

Antonio Gomez Palacio: So the average Canadian over their entire lifespan spends 29% of their entire disposable income on their house. At a certain point, that could be 60, 70% when you have a mortgage, but you know, different at different times, but they spend 19% on their car, they spend 11% on just the utilities and running, running the house. So if I, as an architect or as a city builder, can design a place where somebody doesn't need to own a car or own the second car, right? And the utility bills can be diminished. I will have a very direct impact on household income. And all of a sudden, what might have been unaffordable house becomes affordable. So families, as I say, aren't making decisions in silos. So why would we as city builders, start fracturing all the ways in which we think.

从历史中汲取城市建设经验

Jan: 帮助我们了解城市过去是如何建造的,这对我们如何在此基础上更好地建造城市有什么启示?

Original English

Jan: Help us use sort of how cities have been built before, help us inform how we can sort of build better in this case.

Antonio Gomez Palacio: 当然。这方面我们确实有一些很好的例子。坦白说,我们祖父母和曾祖父母以前来到的那些城市,它们都是步行可达的。他们可以步行去学校。今天有多少孩子步行去学校?他们去杂货店,生活在非常紧凑、精炼的生活模式中。而在第二次世界大战后的城市,我们发明了机器,有了汽车,开始修建道路。当时有一种观念,认为我们可以积累财富,对吧?我们可以通过物质积累来创造各种非常奢华的生活方式。毫不奇怪,这导致了不可持续的城市。我们无法支撑那种水平的基础设施。对家庭来说,这也变得难以负担。所以,我们需要让发展的钟摆回到更紧凑、更多元化、更步行可达的方向,这样我们才能拥有高品质的生活,而无需建造如此多的基础设施,也无需积累如此多的物质。

Original English

Antonio Gomez Palacio: Absolutely. And here is where we actually have some great examples. Frankly, most of the cities where our grandparents and great grandparents came from, right, were walkable. They were able to walk to school. How many kids today walk to school? Right? They went to the groceries and they lived in, in very compact and succinct life forms. Right. And in cities after the Second World War, we invented machines and we had cars and we started to build roads. And, and there was this sense that we could accumulate stuff, right? And we could build our way into all kinds of very luxurious lifestyles. Not surprisingly, that has resulted in unsustainable cities, right? We can't sustain that level of infrastructure. And for households, it's become unaffordable. So we need to bring the pendulum back to more compact, more mixed use, more walkable so that we can have great quality of life and great lifestyles without the need to build so much infrastructure and without the need to accumulate so much stuff.

多伦多案例与个人经验

Jan: 在这个国家或这个省,现在有没有哪个城市,您觉得做得对,正在以您希望城市采取的那种方式来发展?

Original English

Jan: Is there a city right now in this country or in this province that you look at that is doing it right, that is doing it like how you are wanting cities to approach things?

Antonio Gomez Palacio: 当然。而且其中许多城市都有良好的基础。就拿多伦多来说,目前多伦多有很多很好的基础。28年前,我和我太太刚来这里时,身无分文。所以我们不得不做出很多人正在做出的艰难决定。几年后,我的儿子,你知道,我们正期待着我儿子的到来。我们发现,要想在我们想住的地方买得起房子,唯一的办法就是承诺十年内不买车。我们已经无车家庭(car free household)28年了。你知道我们省了多少钱。但这需要一个平衡。不同的家庭一直在做出不同的决定。我们在多伦多过上了很不错的生活,我们选择在哪里居住,并享受那样的生活方式。不同的人会做出不同的选择。而城市,这是城市的一大优点,就是能够为人们提供选择。问题是,在城市的其他地方,人们并没有选择。公共交通真的不是一个选项,对吧?能够步行送孩子上学也不是一个真正的选项。所以,这座城市里有一些很棒的角落,也有一些我们可以肯定需要改进的区域。

Original English

Antonio Gomez Palacio: Absolutely. And many of them have the good bones. Toronto, where in Toronto right now, and there's some great bones in there. And when my wife and I arrived here at 28 years ago, we didn't have two pennies to rub together. So we were having to make the tough decisions that many people are making. And after a few years, my son, you know, we were expecting my son is coming along. And, and we discovered that the only way in which we could afford the house where we wanted to live, was if we committed not to owning a car for ten years. And we've been a car free household for 28 years. And you know how much money we have saved. But that was a balancing act. And different families are making different decisions all the time. And we were able to make a great life in Toronto, and we picked where we lived and in these aspects, to be able to have that lifestyle, different people will make different choices. And the city, and this is a great thing about cities can afford to create options for people. The trick is in other parts of the city as well, people don't have options. Public transit is not really an option, right? Being able to walk your kid to school is not really an option. So there's great corners in the city and there's areas that we could definitely improve upon.

政府在城市规划中的失误

Jan: 我想更好地理解,政府多年来在哪些方面做错了。当我们谈到城市扩张(urban sprawl)和建造更好的城市时,在过去几年里,我们听到了很多关于绿化带(greenbelt)以及想要开发这些地方的讨论。我们知道,从头开始建设基础设施会非常昂贵。但在您看来,政府多年来在哪些方面做得不对?

Original English

Jan: I want to have a better understanding of what have governments gotten wrong over the years. When we talk about sort of, you know, urban sprawl and building better cities, you know, over the past couple of years, we've heard a lot about, you know, the green belt and wanting to develop those places. Those can be costly, as we know, with sort of having to build the infrastructure from the ground up. But what have governments gotten wrong over the years from your view?

Antonio Gomez Palacio: 是的,在某些情况下,权宜之计(expediency)妨碍了良好的长期规划。一个好的城市是基于 100 年或 1000 年的视野来规划的。为什么?因为 100 到 200 年前的人们做出的决定,我们今天还在承受其后果。例如,为了提供更多住房而蚕食绿化带,如果这还伴随着为这些地区提供住房而需要建造大量基础设施的话。这就会造成一种生活方式,人们需要长途开车才能到达。短期内,我们可能会制造出提供可负担住房的假象。但实际上,我们只是在扩大一种非常昂贵的城市建设模式和一种非常昂贵的生活方式。所以是的,许多政府在许多情况下都犯了很大的错误。我们现在也在围绕交通枢纽进行建设,在一些关键区域进行建设。所以,在所有错误之中,也有一些很好的事情正在发生。

Original English

Antonio Gomez Palacio: And yeah, in some instances, expediency has gotten in the way of good long term planning, right? Good cities are planned on 100 year or 1000 year type of horizons. Why? Because people made decisions 102 hundred years ago that we're living with the consequences of today. So, for example, carving out chunks of the greenbelt in order to supply more housing, if that comes along with the need to build a tremendous amount of infrastructure to supply that housing out in those areas. And then it creates a lifestyle where people need to drive long distances in order to get there. We may create the illusion of providing affordable housing in the short term. In reality, we're just expanding on a very expensive form of city building and a very expensive lifestyle for people. So yes, many governments have gotten it very wrong in many instances. We're also now building around transit centres. We're building in some key areas. So in the midst of all the wrong, there's also some great things that are taking place.

方法的即时影响

Jan: 显然,在这一切之中,我们确实面临住房危机。我们也有,你知道,生活成本危机。我想更好地理解。您的方法如何能立即产生影响?因为我认为,当你谈论一个长期计划时,人们确实想要眼前的结果。当然,事情不一定能立刻实现。但您的方法如何能立即影响人们的生活和财务?

Original English

Jan: Obviously, in the midst of all of this, we do have a housing crisis. We do have a, you know, a cost of living crisis. I want to have a better understanding. How could your approach have an immediate impact? Because I think that's, you know, when we talk about having this long term plan, but people do want results. Now, it doesn't happen necessarily like that. But how could your approach have an immediate impact on people's lives and finances?

Antonio Gomez Palacio: 是的。我们需要改变政策。我们需要改变我们思考城市的方式。我们需要以一种综合(comprehensive)的方式来思考。同时,我们需要帮助那些努力平衡所有这些事情的家庭。所以,如果我们致力于实现可负担住房——这是我们绝对需要做的——同时,我们还在建立一些可负担的交通方式,并创造获得可负担娱乐和服务的机会,等等。如果我们能在每个方面都取得 5% 甚至 10% 的进展,那么我们就能够从不同角度解决那些出现在餐桌上的账单问题。对于一个特定的家庭,我们可能无法解决住房问题,但如果我们解决了交通问题,或者提供了健康食品的途径,或者创造了其他方面,这意味着通过从多管齐下(multi-pronged)的角度来解决问题,我们就能极大地提高对家庭产生即时影响的能力。

Original English

Antonio Gomez Palacio: Yeah. So the we need to change the policy. We need to change the way in which we think about cities. We need to be thinking about it in a comprehensive way. And at the same time, we need to help families who are trying to balance all of these things out, right? So if we're trying to do affordable housing, which we absolutely need to do, and at the same time, we're building some affordable means of transportation and creating access to affordable recreation and services in these kinds of things. If we can just make a 5% dent in each one of those and a 10% dent, then we're tackling what those bills that show up at the kitchen table from a variety of different perspectives. So one particular family, we may not be able to tackle the housing, but if we've tackled the transportation or access to healthy food, right, or creating other aspects, it means that by approaching the problem from a multi-pronged perspective, we have a much greater ability to have an immediate effect on families.

Jan: Antonio,我们只能先聊到这里了。这不是您第一次来节目,也不会是最后一次。当然,您将在本季剩余时间里继续与我们一起,更深入地探讨设计能为我们这个省带来什么。

Original English

Jan: Antonio, we are going to have to leave it there. This is not the first time or the last time that we're going to have you on the program. Of course, you are going to be joining us throughout the rest of the season to talk a little bit more about what design can do for us in this province.

Antonio Gomez Palacio: Jan,很高兴,感谢您探讨如此紧迫的问题。

Original English

Antonio Gomez Palacio: Jan, it was a pleasure and thanks for tackling such an urgent issue.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

人物: Antonio Gomez Palacio

公司/组织: dialogue

关键字: city-affordability urban-planning holistic-design transportation-crisis housing-crisis