资本流向的决定权:重塑基础设施融资与权力结构
当社区计划修建桥梁、公共交通系统、住房或可持续基础设施时,资金的来源至关重要。资金的流向与控制权,本质上决定了哪些项目能够落地、哪些能够存续,以及什么样的未来成为可能。改变资金的去向和掌控者,就能彻底改变未来的可能性。特里妮蒂·陈(Trinity Tran)正在加利福尼亚州及全美积极推动建立公共银行(Public Bank: 由政府代表公众持有并运营、以公共利益为导向的金融机构)。
目前,绝大多数城市缺乏一次性支付大型基础设施项目的初始资金,通常依赖发行市政债券(Municipal Bond: 地方政府为筹措基础设施建设资金而发行的长期债务凭证)。然而,这些债券本质上是由华尔街(Wall Street)私人银行设计并主导的长期贷款。私人贷款机构不仅收取高额的承销与结构化服务费,还迫使地方政府在工程本体造价之外,背负长达数十年、数额巨大的利息支出。往往每借入一美元,最终就要偿还一美元甚至更多的利息。在洛杉矶市,这一支出高达数亿美元;在加州全州层面,每年向私人银行支付的利息更是高达40亿美元。这些本应用于社区建设的财富,源源不断地外流至以股东利润为核心的私人金融体系中。
Original English Source
When a community wants to build a bridge or transit system, housing, sustainable infrastructure -- where does the money come from? Money ultimately decides what gets built. Money decides what survives. Money decides what future becomes possible. So change where money goes and who controls it -- then you change what becomes possible.
I'm Trinity Tran, I lead efforts to build public banks in California and beyond. Most of the time, our cities don’t have the money upfront to be able to pay for a project like a bridge or housing. And so they will issue a bond, which is essentially a long-term loan, provided and structured by Wall Street banks. A loan is money that is provided upfront and paid back over time with interest. Wall Street banks -- private lenders -- end up tacking on fees to structure and sell those bonds.
Then the reality is that our local governments are not only paying for the cost of the project, but decades of interest on top of that. So for every dollar that we're borrowing, we're paying another dollar in interest over time, sometimes more. And that's all money that's going out the door to private lenders. We're paying hundreds of millions of dollars in the city of Los Angeles. At the state level, in California, we’re paying $4 billion in interest annually. That's money flowing out of our communities rather than being invested locally. Private banks are owned by shareholders. They're investing in areas that make them a lot of money, and not necessarily what’s in the best interest of our communities.
公共银行机制:从利润导向到社区赋能与实证模型
面对私人金融的资本抽离,公共银行提出了一种全新的底层逻辑:如何在不增加税收的前提下,通过降低融资本身的成本,利用社区自身产生的税收做更多的事情?公共银行是通过市、地区或州等地方政府由公众共同所有的银行。居民日常消费产生的税收流入地方财政,公共银行则将这些本属于公众的资金直接用于公共投资。由于没有外部股东需要分红分润,贷款偿还后的本金与利息将全部回流至银行与公共金库,其核心使命完全服务于本地经济发展。以加州通过的《加利福尼亚州公共银行法案》(California Public Banking Act)为例,该法案为各城市与地方自治体成立自主银行提供了法律框架,使银行使命、放贷优先项、投资策略与资本化方案均可在地方层面量身定制。
全球实践与历史经验充分证明了公共银行模式的可行性。全球目前拥有900家公共银行,管理资产近50万亿美元;例如在德国,由400家市政银行组成的网络有力支撑了该国的可再生能源转型。在美国本土,成立于1919年的北达科他银行(Bank of North Dakota)已成功运营逾百年。该行最初由饱受纽约州外银行家高利贷盘剥的社会主义农场主创立。在大萧条(Great Depression: 1929年爆发的全球性严重经济危机)期间,近20万座农场面临被银行取消抵押品赎回权的危机;北达科他银行果断介入收购这些农场,并以象征性的1美元租借给受困家庭,待家庭经济稳定后再以可承受的价格回售给他们。一个世纪以来,北达科他银行在持续支持当地小微企业和基础设施建设的同时,保持了15%至18%的高净资产收益率(Return on Equity: 衡量资本利用效率的盈利能力指标),年复一年地向州财政普通基金回馈数亿美元。
在面对突发自然灾害等危机时,公共银行更展现出不可替代的敏捷性。以洛杉矶近期遭受的特大野火灾害为例,若有公共银行存在,便能立即发放低成本的救灾贷款,迅速响应社区重建需求,而无需被动等待流程繁复且充满不确定性的联邦援助。这种动员公共财政收益去服务公共战略优先项的模式,逻辑清晰且直观,正在全美多个城市和州迅速铺开。它并非脱离现实的空想,而是一套真正服务于人民、社区和生态环境的实证金融模型。
Original English Source
Public banking asks a different question: how do we do more with the dollars that our communities generate without raising taxes, but by lowering the cost of financing itself? A public bank is a bank owned by the people through their local government, either city or region or state. Every time you buy something, like a cup of coffee, a portion of that tax will go to your city and your state. So we're using the money that we already generate that belongs to us. They don't have shareholders to pay. So as loans are repaid, it comes back into a public bank. Its mission is to support the local economic development of the community it serves. That would be designed at a local level. So the law that we created -- the California Public Banking Act -- created the legal framework for cities and municipalities to be able to form their own banks. And so the mission of the bank, the mandates, the lending priorities, the investment priorities, the capitalization strategies, all the details of how this is going to work is going to be defined at a local level.
There are 900 public banks globally with nearly $50 trillion in assets. In Germany, a network of 400 municipal banks was able to support the country's renewable energy transition. In the United States, we have a successful model to emulate. The Bank of North Dakota is a 100-year-old public bank founded in 1919. It was started by socialist farmers who were being gouged by out-of-state New York bankers. During the Great Depression, nearly 200,000 farms were being foreclosed on. Because the state of North Dakota had a public bank, it was able to step in and buy the farms and lend it back to the families for a dollar. Once the families were able to stabilize, they sold it back at a price they could afford. For the last century, it has supported local economic development, supported small businesses, infrastructure while still returning very healthy return on equity, 15 to 18 percent. That means it's returning hundreds of millions of dollars back into the general fund year after year. So that's an example of how a public bank is able to step in and support and strengthen the community without focusing on just purely profit.
Los Angeles just dealt with a devastating wildfire. So if we had a public bank, it would have been able to step in to offer immediate, low-cost loans. It's able to be immediately responsive to the needs of the community without having to wait for federal aid, which can be unstable. We're moving towards building a system that mobilizes public revenue to support our public priorities. We've seen such an incredible amount of progress in such a short time, because even without a complex understanding of finance and banking, when you start explaining public banking, it makes sense on a logical, intuitive level. Multiple cities and states are working towards it. We have the ability to create a new system. This isn't a pie-in-the-sky idea. This is a model that works for the people, our communities and our environment.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
公司/组织: Bank of North Dakota