投资大会2026:企业致胜文化探讨 Norges Bank Investment Management 2026-04-28

开场致辞:文化是核心竞争力

旁白: 是什么让一家公司世代相传?不是它们的战略,而是人们日复一日的行动。当事情变得艰难时,是人,而不是计划,让公司渡过难关。我们在所有投资的公司中都看到了这一点。文化将优秀与卓越区分开来。那么问题来了,什么是卓越的文化?对我来说,它是你如何做决策,如何争论,如何辩论,如何纠正错误,以及在没有所有答案时如何行动。战略固然重要,但你总可以制定新的战略。所以问题是,对你来说,什么是致胜文化?

Original English

旁白: What makes a company last for generations? It's not their strategy. It's what people do day in day out. When things get tough, it's the people that pull through, not the plan. And we see this in all the companies that we invest in. Culture separates the great from the good. And so the question becomes, what is great culture? To me, it's how you make decisions, how you argue, how you debate, how you fix your mistakes, how you act when you don't have all the answers. Strategy is important, of course, but you can always write a new one. So the question becomes, what is a winning culture to you?

Patrick Duplacy: 欢迎来到2026年投资大会。我是Patrick Duplacy

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: Welcome to the investment conference 2026. I am Patrick Duplacy.

Shelpi Nanda: 我是Shelpi Nanda。我们将是今天的主持人。

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: and I'm Shelpi Nanda. We'll be your hosts for today.

Patrick Duplacy: 今年大会的主题是“什么是致胜文化”。在一个竞争战略可以被复制、人才可以被挖走、技术可以被模仿的时代,文化是唯一真正的竞争优势。

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: The topic of this year's conference is what's a winning culture. In an age where you can copy a competitive strategy, poach their talent, replicate their technology, culture is the only true competitive advantage.

Shelpi Nanda: 也是最难建立的优势。

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: and show the hardest to build.

Patrick Duplacy: 说得对,Shelpi。这就是为什么本次大会汇聚了那些曾为文化问题苦苦思索的领导者。你如何建立、转变和扩展它,同时又不失其独特之处?也许最紧迫的是,随着AI重塑组织,你的文化是会跟上步伐,还是会阻碍你?

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: That's right, Patrick. Which is why this conference brings together leaders that have wrestled with the hardest questions about culture. How do you build it, transform it, scale it without losing what makes it special? And perhaps most urgently, as AI reshapes organizations, will your culture keep pace or hold you back?

Shelpi Nanda: 这就是我们今天齐聚一堂的原因。所以,热烈欢迎在座的各位。

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: And that's what brings us together today. So, a very warm welcome to everyone present in the room here.

Patrick Duplacy: 也欢迎来自世界各地通过直播加入我们的朋友,很高兴有你们的参与。

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: And to those of you joining us via live stream from around the world, we're happy to have you with us.

Shelpi Nanda: 我们今天的阵容非常强大,每位嘉宾都将对“什么是致胜文化”给出不同的答案。

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: We have quite the lineup today, each bringing a different answer to what makes a winning culture.

Patrick Duplacy: 今天日程安排如下:前面有四个环节。在第一部分,我们将探讨基本面:什么是致胜文化?它为何重要?

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: And here's how the day unfolds. Four sessions ahead. In part one, we look at the fundamentals. What's a winning culture? Why does it matter?

Shelpi Nanda: 第二部分将探讨转型:如何在成熟组织中实现文化转型?

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: Part two tackles transformation. How do you transform culture in established organizations?

Patrick Duplacy: 在第三部分,我们将探讨AI时代的高绩效文化。

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: In part three, we look at high performance cultures in the age of AI.

Shelpi Nanda: 第四部分将以一个特别环节结束,与Jamie Diamond进行现场播客。

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: And part four closes with something special, a live podcast with Jamie Diamond.

Patrick Duplacy: 还有什么比与良师益友共度时光更好的结束方式呢?

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: What better way to end than in good company?

Shelpi Nanda: 确实如此。现在,为了拉开序幕,我想邀请Nikolai来分享为什么文化在当下比以往任何时候都更重要。

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: Absolutely. Now to set the stage, I'd like to invite Nikolai to share why culture matters now more than ever.

Patrick Duplacy: 请欢迎Nikolai

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: Please welcome Nikolai.

文化:企业未来发展的指南针

Nikolai: 嗯,我得承认一件事,因为我年轻的时候,我喜欢财报电话会议。我喜欢第一季度、第二季度电话会议,喜欢营收、利润、现金流。你知道,我会在床上读资产负债表,有点像你们读诗歌一样,或者你们读诗歌吗?但后来我意识到,还有更重要的事情,因为这些数字从何而来?是什么让它们发生变化?那时我才意识到,我需要花更多时间在文化上,因为数字告诉你一家公司过去在哪里,而文化告诉你它将走向何方。

Original English

Nikolai: Well, I have a confession to make because when I was a bit younger, I loved earnings calls. I loved first quarter calls, second quarter calls, revenue, margin, cash flow. You know, I read balance sheets in bed a bit like you guys read poetry or do you read poetry. But then I realized that there was something else which was much more important because where did the numbers come from and what made them change and that's when I realized I needed to spend more time on culture because numbers they tell you where a company has been, culture tells you where it's going.

Nikolai: 所以在基金中,我们投资了200亿挪威克朗,投资了全球7000家公司,我们的投资期限是几十年。所以当我们看谁成功谁失败时,我们不看季度报告,我们看很多年,几十年。我确信这一切都与文化有关,因为很多公司看起来一模一样,比如同样的运动鞋,同样的电梯,同样的银行产品,但其中一些最终赢了,另一些却破产了。我们随处可见,当然,在银行领域尤为极端。有些能存活数百年,有些则消失了。这无关资产负债表,而是关于企业文化。你雇佣谁?你解雇谁?你做决策的速度有多快?你对老板说真话有多担心?这些都是文化。它关乎速度创新风险承担

Original English

Nikolai: So in the fund we invest 20,000 billion Norwegian burner, we are invested in 7,000 companies across the world and when we invest we have an investment horizon of decades. So when we look at who are successful and who fail, we don't look at quarters. We look at many years, many tens of years. And I've been convinced that it's all about culture because companies which in many cases look exactly the same, you know, same sneakers, same elevators, same banking products, some of them end up winning and some of them end up bankrupt. And we see it everywhere. But of course, no more extreme than in the banking sector. Some end up staying for hundreds of years. Others are gone. And it's not about the balance sheet. It's about the corporate culture. Who do you hire? Who do you fire? How fast do you make decisions? How worried are you about telling the truth to your boss? That's all culture. It's about speed, innovation, risk-taking.

Nikolai: 现在,我们想想2007年的芬兰。诺基亚曾掌控全球一半的手机市场,一半的市场份额。然后iPhone发布了。中层管理者第二天就意识到这对业务构成了真正的威胁,但他们不敢告诉高层管理,因为害怕失败。六年之后,诺基亚消失了,原因就是恐惧文化

Original English

Nikolai: Now, let's think about 2007 for instance in Finland. Nokia, they controlled half the world market for mobile phones. Half the world market. Then the iPhone was launched. The mid managers saw the next day that this was a real threat to the business. didn't dare to tell the top management because of fear of failure. Six years later, Nokia gone because of a culture of fear.

Nikolai: 那么文化从何而来?它来自高层。我目前在“好公司”播客中采访了200家公司。现在,我妻子说200家公司还不足以让我成为一个好的倾听者,但我正在努力。所以,我坐下来与Jivona的负责人交谈,我问他:“你们的文化是什么?”他说:“你知道吗?它关乎绩效,关乎承担适度的风险,关乎同理心。”然后我说:“嗯,你这不是在描述你自己吗?”他开始大笑,说:“嗯,这正是它奏效的原因。”所以,基本上,文化源于CEO的特质,并传递给整个公司。它不是你写在墙上的东西,而是你每天的行动。

Original English

Nikolai: So where does culture come from? Well, it comes from the top. I have now in the good company podcast spoken to 200 companies. Now, according to my wife, 200 companies is not enough to become a good listener. But I'm trying hard. So, I sit down with the head of Jivona and I ask him, "What is your culture?" And he says, "You know what? It's about performance. It's about taking the right amount of risk. it's about empathy." And then I said, "Well, but you're just describing yourself, aren't you?" And he starts laughing and he says, "Well, and that's exactly why it's working." So, basically, culture is coming from the characteristics of a CEO and it's being transmitted to the corporation. It's not what you write on the wall, it's what you do every day.

Nikolai: 现在,世界变化的速度比以往任何时候都快,AI正在重塑所有组织。所以问题不是我们是否应该采用AI,而是我们能多快地采用它,以及组织中有什么阻碍我们这样做。那些做得好的公司,是员工能够立即发挥作用、速度比层级更重要的公司。而那些做得不好的公司,其文化建立在恐惧之上,或者秉持“我们一直都是这样做的”文化。这些公司很快就会消失。

Original English

Nikolai: Now, the world is changing faster than any time before. And AI is reshaping all the organization all the organizations. So it's not a matter of should we adopt AI it's just a matter of how fast can we adopt it and what is it that prevents us from do it from doing it in the organization. The companies getting it right they are the companies where people can make a difference straight away where speed matters more than hierarchy. And the ones getting it wrong have cultures built on fair and cultures where it's about this is the way we've always done it. These companies will be gone soon.

Nikolai: 但有一个我喜欢的新词,叫做高能动性人才high agency people)。高能动性人才是指那些能快速、有力地做原创事情的人。今天我们请来了很多这样的人与你们交流。所以你们会看到来自不同方向、不同国家和不同行业的文化。但这些公司都有一个共同点,那就是高绩效文化世界领先的雄心。顺便说一句,这远远超出了我们在这个国家通常看到的雄心,因为在这里,极端的雄心意味着在周日滑雪道上击败你的邻居。但雄心确实很重要,因为如果你有远大的雄心,即使失败了,你也能取得伟大的成就。如果你雄心勃勃,即使成功了,也一无所获。

Original English

Nikolai: But then there is a new term which I love and that is called high agency people. High agency people is people who do original things with speed and with force. And we have a lot of them here today to talk to you. So you will see cultures from many different directions, different countries and different industries. But what all these companies have in common is high performance culture and a level of ambition that is worldleading. By the way, way beyond the type of ambitions we typically see in this country because here extreme ambition means beating your neighbor to the ski tracks on the Sunday. But ambitions really matter because if you have high ambitions, you achieve great things even if you fail. If you have low ambitions, you achieve nothing even if you succeed.

Nikolai: 所以我们今天会见的公司都拥有非凡的增长、市场份额的提升和资本回报,而且这种情况已经持续了几十年。今天我们将向他们学习。他们就是我们石油基金所说的“超赞公司”(kickass companies)。还有什么比从David Rubenstein开始更好的方式呢?他共同创立了世界上最成功的投资公司之一。他是一位采访大师,曾与数百位CEO和政治家进行过对话。他清楚地知道是什么将赢家与其他人区分开来。请大家和我一起欢迎我的朋友David Rubenstein

Original English

Nikolai: So the companies we are meeting today have extraordinary growth, market share gains, return on capital and it's been going on over decades and today we are going to learn from them. They are what we in the oil fund called kickass companies. And what better way to start than with David Rubenstein. He co-founded one of the most successful investment companies in the world. He's a master interviewer who has sat down with hundreds of CEOs and politicians. He knows exactly what separates winners from the rest. Please help me welcoming my friend David Rubenstein.

企业文化:改变世界的力量

David Rubenstein: 谢谢你,Nikolai,非常感谢。我很高兴来到奥斯陆。我来这里不是为了争取诺贝尔和平奖,所以如果有人想给我一个,我很乐意接受。但是,如果诺贝尔先生今天还活着,我有机会见到他,我会对他说,既然你要设立和平奖,那是个好主意,但为什么不也设立一个企业文化奖呢?因为那些伟大并创造良好文化的公司,就像伟大的和平缔造者一样,可以改变世界。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Thank you, Nikolai, very much. I'm happy to be in Oslo. I didn't come here to lobby for a Nobel Peace Prize, so if anybody wants to give me one, I'd be happy to take it. But if Mr. Nobel were still alive today and I had a chance to meet with him, I would say to him, well, if you're going to have a peace prize, that's a good idea. But why don't you also have a peace prize or a prize for corporate culture? Because companies that are great and create good cultures can change the world just the way great peacemakers can.

David Rubenstein: 想想看,之前提到的iPhoneiPhone也许是史上最成功的消费产品之一,它改变了世界,就像所有智能手机一样,以我认为造福我们所有人的方式。所以,当你有一家伟大的公司,生产出伟大的产品或服务时,它就能帮助世界,就像伟大的和平缔造者能帮助世界一样。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Think about it. the iPhone that was referenced earlier. The iPhone was maybe one of the most successful consumer products ever and it has changed the world as have all smartphones as well in ways that I think benefit all of us. And so when you have a great company that produces a great product or great service, it can help the world just the way great peacemaking can help the world.

David Rubenstein: 我小时候在马里兰州巴尔的摩长大时,老实说,我的榜样并不是一位伟大的企业领袖。我当时专注于棒球、体育或其他事情。我那个年代的小男孩都想长大成为体育英雄。而今天,青少年可能不像以前那样想成为体育英雄,他们更想成为企业领袖企业家。这改变了世界的文化。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Now when I was a little boy in Baltimore, Maryland, growing up, I can't honestly say that my role model was a great corporate leader. I was focused on baseball or sports or other things. And little boys in my era wanted to grow up to be sports heroes. Today, younger people in their teenage years probably don't want to be sports heroes as much as they want to be corporate leaders and entrepreneurs. And that has changed the culture of the world.

David Rubenstein: 想想看,每年大约有5000万到6000万家新公司成立。全球有5000万到6000万家新公司成立。美国每年大约有600万到700万家,欧洲大约800万家,亚洲和世界其他地区可能有2000万到2500万家。所以,5000万家新公司成立后,一年后大约一半会消失,再过两年又有一半会消失,再过一年又有一半会消失。那么,哪些公司能真正存活五年、十年或十五年呢?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Think about this. In any given year, there'll be roughly 50 to 60 million new companies started. 50 to 60 million new companies started around the world. about six to seven or million a year in the United States about 8 million a year or so in Europe and maybe 20 to 25 million in Asia and other parts of the world as well. So 50 some million new companies started after one year about half of those won't be around and after another two years another half won't be around and after another year about half more won't be around. What companies actually get to be there for five years or 10 years or 15 years?

David Rubenstein: 嗯,有些公司拥有魅力型领导者。通常,一家公司可能由一到两甚至三位魅力型领导者创立,他们对要做的事情有愿景。其次,他们有兴趣向人们销售的产品或服务,并说服人们他们的生活会因该产品或服务而变得更好。他们不那么关注赚钱,而更关注让人们认同他们的愿景,即该产品或服务将改善人们的生活。他们还愿意努力工作以实现目标,并愿意确保他们的产品和服务能在全球获得公平的听证。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Well, there are companies that have charismatic leaders. Typically, typically it starts a company might start with one or two or even three charismatic leaders that have a vision of what they want to do. Second, they have a product or a service that they're interested in selling to people and convincing people their lives will be better with that product or service. And they are not as focused on making money as they are on getting people to buy into their vision that this product or this service will make people's lives better. They also have a willingness to try to work hard to get to their end and their willingness to make certain that their product and their service will get a fair hearing from around the world.

David Rubenstein: 但那些能存活5年、10年、15年甚至20年的公司,不仅仅拥有魅力型领导者和优秀的产品或服务。它们拥有令人难以置信的文化,正是这种文化使公司能够从一代传到下一代。众所周知,一家伟大的公司很少能在创始人去世后继续生存。但这种情况确实发生过,史蒂夫·乔布斯Steve Jobs)就是一个完美的例子。

Original English

David Rubenstein: But the companies that survive for 5 years and 10 years and 15 years and 20 years are companies that have more than a charismatic leader and a good product or good service. They have an incredible culture and it's culture that enables companies to go from one generation to the next generation. As we all know, very rarely do you see a great company survive the founders's demise. It happens and Steve Jobs is a perfect example of it happening.

David Rubenstein: 史蒂夫·乔布斯在1970年代末创立了苹果公司Apple),他曾被公司开除,离开公司大约14年,之后才被请回。然后,他通过苹果开发的一系列产品和服务改变了世界。当他去世时,许多人认为公司无法在没有创始人的情况下生存。但由于它拥有令人难以置信的文化,公司实现了巨大的增长。史蒂夫去世时,公司的市值约为3500亿美元。今天,它约为3.5万亿美元。所以它增长了大约10倍。蒂姆·库克Tim Cook)领导下的公司是如何达到如此惊人的世界地位的呢?嗯,这是因为史蒂夫·乔布斯建立的文化被蒂姆·库克扩展了,最终这种文化渗透到整个员工基础和公司的客户基础中。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Steve Jobs started the company in the late 1970s and he was actually thrown out of the company, thrown out of his own company and he was out of the company for about 14 years before he was brought back. And then he changed the world by a number of products that and services that Apple developed. And then when he passed away, he was leaving behind a company many people thought couldn't survive without the founder. But because it had an incredible culture, the company dramatically grew. When Steve died, the market capitalization of the company was about $350 billion. Today, it's about three and a half trillion. So it's up about 10 times. How did the company go under Tim Cook's leadership to such a incredible place in the world? Well, it's because the culture that Steve Jobs had built was expanded by Tim Cook and ultimately that culture permeated the entire employee base and entire customer base of the company.

David Rubenstein: 所以有时你会看到一些魅力型领导者建立了一家公司。他们有时能让公司传承到下一代,有时则不能。在创始人离开后,让公司变得更好是非常困难的,非常困难。这种情况时有发生。我们不知道,例如,伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司Berkshire Hathaway)会发生什么。伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司是由一位魅力非凡、才华横溢的投资者建立的,他使其成为世界上最有价值的公司之一。现在正处于转型期,时间会告诉我们它是否奏效。但总的来说,如果你拥有良好的文化,良好的文化将使公司得以生存。

Original English

David Rubenstein: And so what you have sometimes is you have a number of charismatic leaders who build a company. They sometimes can make it go to the next generation. Sometimes they cannot. It's very difficult, very difficult to make a company go much better after the founders are gone. It happens from time to time. We don't know for example what will happen to Bergkshire Hathaway. Bergkshire Hathaway was built by one charismatic brilliant investor and he made it one of the most valuable companies in the world. Now there's a transition and time will tell whether it works or not. But generally if you have a good culture, a good culture will enable a company to survive.

David Rubenstein: 那么,什么是良好的文化呢?良好的文化是公司所拥有的,它能让公司不仅存活5年、10年或15年,而是20年、25年甚至更久。它关注的是确保客户至上,确保员工受到公平对待,确保每个人都有机会成功并被倾听,并确保你生产的产品或服务是人们真正需要的,并且对社会真正有用。

Original English

David Rubenstein: And what is a good culture? It's a good culture that a company has and enables it to survive not more than five or 10 or 15 years but 20 or 25 years or beyond is it's a it's a concern about making certain that the customer comes first. Making certain that the employees are treated fairly. Making certain that everybody has a chance to succeed and has be listened to and make certain that you're producing a product or a service that really people want and really does something useful for society.

David Rubenstein: 创造这样的文化就像你自己的DNA。在座的每个人都有来自父母的DNA。你的DNA在某种程度上塑造了你。在某种程度上,你可以改进父母所做的事情。在某些情况下,你可能无法改进父母给你的东西。但许多公司可以通过利用创始人给予的DNA来改进创始人给予他们的东西,甚至超越它。所以,当你审视企业文化时,你必须审视创始人创造了什么,但创始人的文化能否在创始人离开后继续发展?那些就是伟大的公司。

Original English

David Rubenstein: And producing a culture like that is like your own DNA. Everybody here has the DNA from their parents. And your DNA is really what shapes you to some extent. To some extent, you can improve upon what your parents did. Some cases maybe you won't improve upon what your parents gave you. But many companies can improve upon what the founders gave them by using the DNA that the founders gave them. And they can even go beyond that. And so when you're looking at corporate culture, what you have to do is look at what the founders created, but can that founders culture beyond go beyond when the founders leave the scene? And those are the great companies.

David Rubenstein: 那些能存活25年、30年、40年甚至更久的公司,是人们永远会效仿并希望作为榜样的公司,因为它们拥有令人钦佩的文化。它们是客户至上的公司,是员工至上的公司,是供应商至上的公司。在企业文化中,最重要的是你关心他人胜过关心自己。在企业文化中,那些存活最久、真正繁荣的公司,不是那些CEO赚最多钱或担心自己赚多少钱的公司。你关心他人,这才是公司得以生存并做得如此出色的原因。

Original English

David Rubenstein: The companies that survive for 25 years and 30 years and 40 years and beyond are the companies that people will always emulate and want to have as role models because they're the ones that have a culture that people admire. They're the ones that put customers first. They're the ones that put employees first. They're the ones that put the people that provide services to the company, the suppliers first. Making certain that you worry about other people more than yourself is the most important thing in corporate culture. And in corporate culture, the companies that survive the most and that really prosper are not the ones where the CEO is making the most amount of money or is worried about the amount of money he or she is making. You worry about worrying about other people is what makes companies survive and do so well.

David Rubenstein: 所以,当我们今天审视和讨论企业文化时,请思考这一点:最终,我们都想作为榜样的公司,我们都想建立或投资的公司,我们都希望我们的孩子也能建立的公司,如果他们创办自己的公司,那将是那些拥有客户至上员工受到良好对待、对社会有愿景、能让公司成功并让世界变得稍微更好的企业文化的公司。对赚钱的关注通常不是让公司一开始就繁荣的原因。当然,你需要一种能真正驱动每个人、让每个人齐心协力的文化。

Original English

David Rubenstein: So as we look at corporate culture and we talk about it today, just think about this. In the end, the companies that we all want to have as role models, the companies that we all would like to build or invest in, the companies we all think that we'd like to have our children build as well if they start their own companies would be ones that have a corporate culture that puts the customer first, that makes sure the employees are treated well, that has a vision of what they want to do for society to make the company succeed and make the world a slightly better place. the concern about making money is not the generally the thing that makes a company prosper at the beginning. Certainly, you need to have a culture that really drives everybody and having everybody pull together.

David Rubenstein: 当我投资公司时,我寻找的是那些拥有员工渴望工作、喜欢在那里工作、认为自己在为社会做有益事情的文化的公司。赚钱是衡量成功的一个很好的标准,但它不是衡量一家公司全部意义的主要标准。所以,当你思考企业文化,并通过今天的大会时,请思考这些你将听到的公司是否拥有你希望投资的文化。它们是你愿意工作的公司,你会为你孩子在那里工作而感到骄傲,也是你希望自己曾创办的那种公司,因为我认为这些公司是我们都希望拥有在我们的投资组合中,也是我们都希望拥有的,那些努力让世界变得更美好的公司。公司拥有良好而永恒的企业文化,它将真正超越创始人而存在,并最终让每个人都认为他们正在生产一种让世界变得更美好的产品或服务。非常感谢。

Original English

David Rubenstein: And that's what when I'm investing in companies, what I'm looking for is companies that have a culture where people want to come to work. They like working there. They think they're doing something useful for society. And making money is nice measure of success, but it's not the main measure of what a company's all about. And so as you think about corporate culture and through this conference today, just think about whether these companies that you're going to hear about are companies that have a culture that you want to have as you want to invest with. They're companies you'd like to work at, you'd be proud to have your children work at it, and the kind of companies you wish you had started because those are the kind of companies I think that we all want to have in our portfolio and all the kind of companies we want to have as as as companies that are trying to make the world a better place. companies have a good and everlasting corporate culture that really will survive the founders and that will ultimately make everybody think they're producing a product or service that makes the world a better place. Thank you very much.

Citadel的致胜文化:速度、赋能与人才培养

Malin Nurbach: 谢谢你,David。我们的下一位演讲者于1986年在哈佛大学宿舍开始投资,毕业仅一年后就创立了世界领先的另类投资公司之一。Kenneth GriffinCitadel的创始人兼CEO,该公司管理着超过600亿美元的资本。在Citadel致胜是核心。他们雇佣顶尖的1%人才,并创造一个让这1%人才互相促进、变得更优秀的环境。你如何建立一种让最优秀人才愿意留下并竞争的文化?市场策略首席投资官Malin Nurbach将与他一起探讨。请欢迎KennethMalin

Original English

Malin Nurbach: Thank you, David. Our next speaker started investing from his Harvard dorm room in 1986 and founded one of the world's leading alternative investment firms just a year after graduating. Kenneth Griffin is the founder and CEO of Citadel, which manages over $60 billion in capital. At Citadel, winning is core. They hire the top 1% and create an environment where that top 1% push each other to be even better. How do you build a culture where the best want to stay and compete? Marlon Nurbach, the chief investment officer for market strategies, joins him to find out. Please welcome Kenneth and Malin.

Malin Nurbach: 谢谢你,Ken,今天来到奥斯陆与我们交流。我想不出比你更适合谈论致胜文化的人了。所以,致胜Citadel的核心价值观之一,与诚信学习精英管理卓越同事并列,但致胜是其中最突出的。那么,为什么是致胜呢?

Original English

Malin Nurbach: Thank you, Ken, for joining us here in Oslo today. I cannot think of a better person to talk to about winning culture. So, winning is one of Citadel's core values alongside integrity, learning, meritocracy, and extraordinary colleagues, but winning is the one that stands out there. So, why winning?

Kenneth Griffin: 首先,今天能来到这里真是太棒了。非常感谢邀请我参加这次精彩的大会。其中一个非常真实的事情是,这个团队在管理国家主权财富方面做得非常出色,他们一直专注于为挪威人民服务。你们拥有一支致胜团队,为你们国家的人民做出了深远的贡献。让我明确一点,我们为什么将致胜列为我们的核心价值观之一?因为遗憾的是,在美国,我们经历了一段时间,致胜似乎不再流行。我们在迷失中失去了方向。而伟大的公司都专注于致胜。正如David Rubenstein所说,你是否能创造出消费者会重视、会付费、并会因此奖励你的产品?那些致胜公司正是这样做的。而那些创造劣质产品的公司则会失败。我们担心的是,在一个“参与奖”变得无处不在的文化中,我们作为一个国家,以及我们如何致胜,都迷失了方向。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: So, first, it's just wonderful to be here today. Thank you so much for having me participate in this wonderful conference. And one of the things that is very true is that this team which has done such an extraordinary job of managing the sovereign wealth of the nation has been focused on delivering for the people of Norway. You have had a winning team which has really delivered in a profound way for the people of your of your country. Let me let me be clear. Why do we actually enumerate winning as one of our core values? Because regretfully in the United States, we went through a period of time in which winning seemed to be out of vogue. We lost our way in the wilderness. And great firms are focused on winning. As as David Rubenstein put it, can you create a product that the consumer will value, the consumer will pay for, and what the consumer will reward you for creating and for building? Firms that are winning firms do just that. And firms that that create inferior products are firms that fail. And what worried us is in a culture where participation trophies were becoming ubiquitous, we lost our way as a country and what it took to win.

Kenneth Griffin: 而我们Citadel确实相信为客户致胜的重要性。这是我们业务的核心。而且,你知道,我一直在思考David关于公司和产品所说的话。有一点要记住的是,在Citadel,赚钱并不羞耻。我们创造财富。我们的客户给我们资本,只有一个目标:我们能否用这些资本创造更多的财富?

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: And we at Citadel really do believe in the importance of winning for our clients. That's core to our business. And I, you know, I was thinking about what David had to say in terms of of companies and products. One thing to keep in mind is at Citadel there's no shame in making money. We manufacture money. Our clients give us capital with one goal in mind. Can we manufacture more money with that capital?

Malin Nurbach: 你们确实以非常令人印象深刻的方式创造财富。嗯,谈到致胜文化Nikolai刚才提到了速度是致胜文化的支柱之一,你的同事刚才告诉我,Citadel最让他惊讶的一点是,即使你们有数千名员工,仍然能以初创公司的速度运作。那么,你们是如何做到的呢?

Original English

Malin Nurbach: You certainly manufacture money in a very impressive way. So when it comes to a winning culture, Nicolai just mentioned speed as one of the pillars to a winning culture and your colleague here just told me that one thing that amazes him with Citadel is that you can still move at the speed of a startup even though you are thousands of employees. So how do you do that?

Kenneth Griffin: 我希望我们能做到。我希望我们能做到。但是,随着业务在复杂性上增长,在利益相关者上增长,例如在监管足迹上增长,拥有更多的流程、更多的官僚机构来确保你所做的事情是正确的,实际上是必要的。所以初创公司比成熟公司拥有更大的灵活性,但成熟公司拥有更深厚的深度和资源。你必须非常专注于控制官僚机构的规模,你必须持续关注快速决策的能力,并且当决策做出后,要快速执行该决策。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: So I wish we could. I wish we could. But as you grow, as a business grows in complexity and grows in stakeholders, grows in regulatory footprint for example, it actually becomes necessary to have more process, more bureaucracy to make sure that what you do is in the is on the right side of the road. So startups have have greater flexibility than your established firms but your established firms have far greater depth and resources. What you have to be very focused on is that you are controlling the size of the bureaucratic state that you keep a constant focus on the ability to rapidly make decisions and when a decision is made to rapidly execute upon that decision.

Kenneth Griffin: 但由于你们的足迹更大,你们仍然需要比小型初创公司多走几步。但凭借更多的资源,以及在更强大的竞争环境中与其他全球参与者互动的能力,我们能够相当迅速地行动。然而,在决策方面,大型公司确实容易迷失方向。你知道,我总是告诉我的同事,他们把一些东西放到我的桌上寻求我的意见。我会给他们一个日期。我会在72小时、48小时、96小时内回复你。如果你没有收到我的回复,我就是同意了。这是你的决定。不要让管理层成为你下属决策的障碍。在某种意义上,这种负面同意negative consent)向前推进的方式非常强大,因为它告诉人们他们拥有能动性,他们可以做出决定。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: But because you have a bigger footprint, you're still going to have to go through a few more steps than that smaller startup might have to go through. But with more resources, with the ability to to interact with other global players on a on a far more stronger playing field, we're able to move quite quickly. On on decision-m though, you know, this is one where where large firms do tend to find themselves lost in the wilderness. You know, I'll tell my colleagues all the time. They they put something to my desk for input from me. I'll give them a date. I'll be back to you in 72 hours, 48 hours, 96 hours. If you don't hear from me, I gave you an a yes. It's your call. Like, don't let yourself in management be an impediment to decision-m by those who are junior to you. And in some sense, in some negative consent to move forward is really powerful because it tells people that they have agency that they can make a decision.

Kenneth Griffin: 你知道,我们一个关键的内部原则是:最年轻的、最接近信息的人,才是最应该尽可能频繁地做出决策的人。他们会犯错吗?当然会。但他们在被赋予能动性来做决策的文化中会成长得更快。他们会从成功中学习,也会从失败中学习。但最重要的是,他们正在快速学习,这就是我们培养领导者的方式。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: You know, one of our one of our key internal principles is the most junior person who is closest to the information. That's the person who optimally should make the decision as often or as frequently as possible. Now, will they make mistakes? Of course they will. But they will grow much faster in a culture where they're empowered with agency to make decisions. They will learn from their successes and they will learn from their failures. But most importantly, they are rapidly learning and that's how we create leaders.

Malin Nurbach: 这是一个很好的观点,谈到人才培养。《华尔街日报》报道说,你每年会花好几周时间审查数千名员工的绩效评估。那么,你为什么选择把时间花在这上面?这说明了Citadel的文化什么?

Original English

Malin Nurbach: So it's a good point and talking about developing people. So the Wall Street Journal reported that you spend several weeks every year reviewing the performance assessments for thousands of employees. So how why is that where you choose to spend your time and what does it say about the culture at Citadel?

Kenneth Griffin: 嗯,首先,我认为这说明我非常关心我的同事们在职业生涯中的发展。我正在寻找的是,我们在哪些方面没有足够强大和积极地培养人才的模式。那么,在业务中,我们最新的员工,无论是大学毕业生、博士生,还是从其他全球投资银行或全球投资管理公司挖来的员工,哪些人没有蓬勃发展?我正在努力理解我们公司需要做什么?我们需要做哪些不同的事情?无论是职业发展,还是人们的经验,还是我们对新员工的信任,我们需要做哪些不同的事情才能让人们发挥更大的作用?

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Well, first of all, I think it says that I deeply care about how my colleagues are advancing in their careers. And what I'm looking for is I'm looking for patterns of where we are not developing talent strongly enough and aggressively enough. So where in the business are are our newest hires, whether they're out of college, out of a PhD program, a lateral hire from another global investment bank or global investment management firm, where are people not flourishing? And I'm trying to understand what do we need to do as a firm? What do we need to do differently? Whether it's whether it's professional development, whether it's the experience that people have, whether it's the trust that are placed in our in our newer hires, what do we need to do differently to get more out of people?

Kenneth Griffin: 你知道,在Citadel,我最引以为豪的事情之一就是我们在35年里培养了数量惊人的人力资本。今天,那些运营着世界上最成功的对冲基金之一、运营着世界上最成功的证券交易商之一的人,以及坦率地说,无数运营着世界各地许多金融机构的人,他们的根源都可以追溯到Citadel。我认为这些都证明了我们始终如一地专注于培养人才,让他们发挥出最好的一面。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: You know, one of the things I'm most proud of at Citadel is the extraordinary amount of human capital that we've developed over 35 years. people who run today one of the world's most successful hedge funds who run one of the most successful securities dealers in the world and bluntly countless people who run most of the many of the financial institutions around the world whose roots trace back to Citadel. I think these are all a testament to our consistent focus on developing people to be the best that they can be.

Malin Nurbach: 所以,Citadel量化投资领域的先驱,你们使用机器学习的时间比我们大多数人知道那是什么要早得多。那么,有了这个领先优势,在今天的AI浪潮中领先了10年,你们如何确保自己保持领先?

Original English

Malin Nurbach: So, Citadel was a pioneer in quantitative investing and you've been using machine learning for well longer than most of us knew what that was. So, how do you with that head start? So, 10 years of head starts on on the AI movement today. How do you make sure you stay ahead?

Kenneth Griffin: 嗯,我认为这实际上是一个关于我们想成为什么样的公司的精彩故事。我记得当TensorFlow发布时,我的五位同事在它发布的那天就来到我的办公室,他们真的说TensorFlow,也就是谷歌机器学习工具包,将彻底改变世界,带着完全的信念。我说好。他们基本上是说,我们想花接下来的几周时间,真正投入到这套知识体系的意义以及我们如何将其应用于证券市场交易中。我说:“嗯,当然,去吧。”

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Well, I think that's actually a wonderful story about the kind of firm we want to be. I remember when TensorFlow was released and five of my colleagues came to my office like the day it came out and they literally said TensorFlow which was Google's machine learning toolkit was going to revolutionize the world like with with complete conviction and I said okay and they they were basically saying we want to go spend the next couple of weeks really engrossed in what this body of knowledge means and how we can apply it in in marketmaking in securities. And I said, "Well, I mean, of course, like go for it."

Kenneth Griffin: 实际上,这次会议的重点不是获得许可,而是他们对这项变革性技术的兴奋之情。他们想让我了解机器学习对我们业务意味着什么。我记得大约四周后给其中一位同事打电话,问:“好吧,你们初步的发现是什么?到目前为止,你们从使用TensorFlow中获得了什么?”他说:“嗯,它已经在生产中了。”我问:“什么?你什么意思,它已经在生产中了?”他说:“我们用它来为美国股票投资组合报价。我们过去两周一直在这样做。”我说:“距离会议已经四周了。”他说:“不,不,我们一群人几乎每天工作12到14小时,因为这是我们做过的最酷的事情之一,它将改变世界,我们已经在生产中使用了它。”这就是致胜文化

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: And and really the point of the meeting was not permission. It was their excitement over this transformative technology. Like they wanted to bring me behind the curtain to think about what machine learning was going to mean for our business. And I remember calling one of those colleagues about four weeks later and saying, "Okay, so what what are your initial findings? Like what have you gleaned so far from using TensorFlow? He goes, "Well, it's it's it's in production." And I'm like, "What? What do you mean it's in production?" He goes, "We use it to quote the US equity portfolio. We've been doing that for the last two weeks." And I'm like, "It's been four weeks since the meeting." He goes, "No, no, like a group of us work pretty much every single day, 12 to 14 hours a day, because this is one of the coolest things we've ever worked on, and this is going to transform the world, and and we're already using it in production. That's a winning culture.

Malin Nurbach: 这就是致胜文化。围绕技术,生成式AI技术不仅适用于技术人员,也适用于所有人。那么,你们是否改变了公司内部围绕技术采纳的文化?

Original English

Malin Nurbach: That's a winning culture. And around technology, so with Genai technology is not only for the technologies but for everyone. So have you changed the culture around how you manage well the culture around technology adoption in the firm?

Kenneth Griffin: 所以,我认为记住一点很重要,Citadel大约三分之一的人是软件工程师。所以公司在技术上投入非常非常深,它是我们工作的核心。我认为在讨论这个话题时,记住这一点很重要。所以对我们来说,对于生成式AI,坦率地说,我认为最大的问题之一是,一开始可能对拥抱生成式AI过于热情。早期的大型语言模型对人们来说确实非常引人入胜,因为机器学习第一次没有创造出零和一的向量,而是创造了书面文字。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: So so I think it's important to remember that that about one in three people at Citadel are a software engineer. So the firm is very very deeply invested invested in technology like it's it's core to what we do. I think it's just important to keep that in the back of your mind when you when you touch on this topic. So for us with with generative AI, I think I think frankly one of the biggest problems out of the gate was there was perhaps too much enthusiasm for embracing GenAI that the the early generation large language models were really really fascinating to people because for the first time machine learning didn't create a vector of zeros and ones. It created written word.

Kenneth Griffin: 它可以写诗,可以写歌,可以写故事,可以写叙事。我的意思是,它以一种技术很少与个人互动的方式与人互动,这让人们非常着迷,思考如何利用它来改变他们在工作中做的事情。我与一位同事进行的一次更艰难的对话是,我说:“好吧,我想要一份Citadel所有基于生成式AI的项目的清单。”他带回了200个项目。我说:“不,不,五个。我们只做五个。”他说:“那剩下的195个怎么办?”我说:“我们把它们都砍掉。我们只做五个。我们将真正努力推进它们。我们将看看哪些有效,哪些无效。”

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: It could write a poem. It could write a song. Could write a story. It could write a narrative. I mean, it interacted with people in a way that technology has rarely interacted with with individuals and it was incredibly alluring to people to how do I use this to change what I was doing at work. Um, one of the tougher conversations I have with a colleague is I said, "All right, I want I want a list of all the GenAI based projects that we have at Citadel." And he came back with 200 projects. I said, "No, no, five. We're going to do five." And he's like, "Well, what about the other 195?" He said, "We're going to kill all those. We're going to do five. We're going to actually push them really hard. We're going to see what works and what doesn't work.

Kenneth Griffin: 但我们不能让每个人都去追求随机的临时项目。那样太昂贵了,也太分散注意力了。现在,在我们追求的五个项目中,有一半多一点取得了真正的成功。值得注意的是,生成式AI模型已经显著改进。我认为我们砍掉195个项目没有产生任何成本。我相信在过去的六个月里,随着OpenAIClaude的推出,正在发生一场变革性的巨变。今天,与两年前相比,有更多实际、可实施、有意义的用例。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: But we can't afford to let everybody be pursuing random ad hoc projects. like it's just it's just too expensive. It's too much of a distraction. Now, of the five that we pursued, we had a real success with just over half. Now, of note, the Gen models have gotten marketkedly better. I don't think we incurred any cost of killing 195 projects. And I do believe that over the course of the last six months with the introduction of of OpenAI uh 50 with with cloud 4647 I think you have a transformative sea change taking place you've got many more use cases today that are practical that are implementable that are meaningful in impact than you did two years ago.

Kenneth Griffin: 所以我认为,企业面临的关键挑战之一始终是在前沿bleeding edge)和领先leading edge)之间做出选择的困境。我认为优秀的公司会非常认真地思考在哪里值得站在前沿TensorFlow就是如此。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: So I think one of the one of the key challenges for a business is always that dilemma be between being on the bleeding edge and being on the leading edge. And I think good companies think very long and hard about where's it worth being on the bleeding edge. So it was with TensorFlow.

Kenneth Griffin: 你想在哪里处于领先地位?你想在哪里成为快速追随者?你想在哪里让别人为你铺平道路,然后你可以迅速跟进并利用他们的经验?我认为在经营大企业时,思考何时站在前沿,何时站在领先地位,并有意识地选择这条道路,而不是让它随机发生,这非常重要。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: And where do you want to be on the leading edge? Where do you want to be a fast follower? Where do you want others to sort of pave the way in front of you and you can follow quickly and capitalize on their learnings? I think it's very important in running a big business to think about when do you want to be in the bleeding edge when do you want to be in the leading edge and pick that path with valition don't let that come down to random happen stance.

Malin Nurbach: 你们在领先地位的一个方面是招聘顶尖人才。你们每年收到数十万份申请,你说Citadel招聘的是生活中的赢家,而不仅仅是商业上的赢家。假设我正在申请Citadel的工作,并且正在和你进行面试。那么,你会问我什么问题来判断我是否适合Citadel的文化?

Original English

Malin Nurbach: so one of the places where you're in the leading edge is hiring the top people you have thous hundreds of thousands of applications every year and you said Citadel hires winners in life and not just winners in business so say I'm applying for a job at Citadel and I'm sitting next to you for for a job interview. So, what's the one question you would ask me to see if I was the right cultural fit for Citadel?

Kenneth Griffin: 哦,我希望一个问题就能解决问题。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Oh, I I wish one question would do the trick.

Malin Nurbach: 最关键的问题是什么?

Original English

Malin Nurbach: What's the most essential question?

Kenneth Griffin: 我不认为只有一个问题。它是一个马赛克。我们都是人,我们都很复杂。你想了解的是这个人的马赛克是什么,以及它如何整体地融入我们的团队以及他们将成为其中一部分的团队。所以,有几件事我非常感兴趣,想了解你。Nikolai,你谈到了抱负

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Look, I I don't think there's it's not one. It's a mosaic. Okay, we're all we're all people. We're complicated. And what you want to understand is is what is the mosaic of this person and how does that fit into our team holistically and the team they're going to be a part of. So there there are a few things that I'm I'm deeply interested in in in learning about you. Nikolai, you spoke about ambition.

Kenneth Griffin: 好吧。我实际上更喜欢“志向”(aspiration)这个词而不是“抱负”(ambition),因为我认为它更直接地触及我们内心深处的意义。我们在这个世界上渴望做什么?我们渴望创造什么或改变什么?我想知道你的抱负志向。我想知道成功对你来说意味着什么?

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Okay. Um I actually prefer the word aspiration over ambition because I think I think it it it appeals to our deeper inner meaning more directly. What do we aspire to do in this world? What do we aspire to create or to change? I want to know your ambitions or aspirations. I want to know what does success look like to you?

Kenneth Griffin: 你知道,多年前我有一个来自哈佛的年轻人,我问他,这会直接切中要害:如果你赚了1000万美元,你会怎么做?他说,我会辞职,然后去攀登世界各地最高的山峰。我说,好吧。我说:“我不认为这里适合你。”他说:“嗯,你已经给我发了offer了。”我说:“那太好了。我强烈建议你不要接受它。”

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: You know, I I had a young man from Harvard with me years ago and I I asked him, you know, this is going to this is going to be right to the point. If you made $10 million, what would you do? And he goes, I would quit and I would climb the highest peaks around the world. I said, okay. I said, "I don't think this is the right firm for you." And he goes, "Well, you've already made an offer to me." I said, "That's wonderful. I strongly urge you not to accept it.

Kenneth Griffin: 因为我不想听到一个22岁的人说,有一个数字代表他们的“魔法数字”。如果他们赚了那么多钱,他们就会去攀登世界各地的山峰。我希望听到他们将如何在Citadel攀登下一座山峰,他们将如何为我们发展业务,他们将如何改变公司,他们如何想领导我们的亚洲业务,或者,你看,如果我赚了1000万美元,我希望那是因为我在某方面非常成功,并且我在这里有更大的责任,能对公司产生更大的影响。这就是我想听到的,对吧?所以,我寻找的是人们的志向。我寻找他们作为赢家的过往记录。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: because I don't want to hear from somebody who's 22 years old that like there's some number that represents their magic number. If they made that much money, they're going to climb mountains out around the world. I want to hear how they're going to climb the next mountain at Citadel, how they're going to grow a business for us, how they're going to change the firm, how they want to lead our Asian business, or like look, if I made $10 million, I'd like to think it was done because I was very successful at X and that I'd have more responsibility here to have a bigger impact on the firm. That's what I want to hear, right? So, I look for I look for people's aspirations. I look for their track record of being a winner.

Kenneth Griffin: 你知道,我喜欢那些在高中和大学参加过竞技体育的人。他们不会为Citadel的网球队打网球,但他们每天起床去训练的意愿,他们全力以赴,在这种情况下,在球场上,无论是赢还是输,都说明了他们的韧性毅力。这些都是在竞技体育中学习到的非常重要的生活技能。事实上,选择在任何领域竞争,无论是演讲和辩论,还是作为音乐家,在任何领域竞争都告诉我,你愿意也愿意。这是一种非常重要的生活技能。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: You know, I I love people who competed in competitive sports in high school and college. They're not going to play tennis for Citadel's tennis team, but their willingness to get up every single day and go to practice. Their willingness to put it all out, in this case, on the court and to win or to be beaten says a lot about their resiliency and their perseverance. And those are really important life skills that you learn in playing competitive sports. In fact, in choosing to compete in any arena, speech and debate as a musician, competing in any arena tells me that you are willing to win and to lose. And that is such an important life skill.

Kenneth Griffin: 你知道,人们忘记了我的股票投资组合经理平均来说,他们的选股正确率约为53%。好吧。你能想象一下,你去见你的外科医生,他说:“是的,我的病人大约53%能活下来,对吧?”多么令人谦卑的工作。你大约53%的时候是正确的。如果你在53%的时候是正确的,并且有正确的上涨下跌比率,那么你作为投资组合经理实际上是非常出色的。但这意味你很多时候会带着错误的、非常谦卑的心情回家。你是否有足够的心理韧性,第二天回到工作岗位,重新投入工作?

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: You know, people forget that my average equity portfolio manager is right in about 53% of their stock picks. Okay. Could you imagine like you're going to your surgeon, he goes, "Yeah, about 53% of my patients live, right?" What a humbling job. You're right about 53% of the time. If you're right about 53% of the time with the right upside downside ratio, you're actually extraordinarily good as a portfolio manager. But that means you go home a lot of days really wrong and really humbled. Do you have the mental fortitude to come back to work the next day and get right back at it?

Malin Nurbach: 嗯,我认为这些都是关于致胜文化的一些很棒的建议和见解,我认为这是一个很好的结束语。非常感谢你,Ken。这次谈话非常有启发性。

Original English

Malin Nurbach: Well, I think those are some great advice and insights to a winning culture and I think that's a good note to end on. So, thank you so much, Ken. This has been very insightful.

Ryanair的成本效率文化:颠覆与创新

Daniel Balthazar: 谢谢KennethMalin。我们的下一位演讲者对文化采取了独特的方法。Michael O'LearyRyanair的集团CEO,此前曾担任该航空公司的CEO。他通过低成本模式改造了一家陷入困境的航空公司。如今,它是欧洲最大、最盈利的航空公司之一。他的方法是:不懈地关注成本和执行力。结果是,一种极致效率的文化,以及一家让数百万人负担得起旅行的航空公司。Active Strategies联合首席投资官Daniel Balthazar将探讨他是如何做到的。请欢迎MichaelDaniel

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: Thank you, Kenneth and Maron. Our next speaker brings a distinctive approach to culture. Michael O'Leary is the group CEO of Ryan Air and previously served as CEO of the airline. He transformed a struggling airline through a lowcost model. Today, it is Europe's largest and one of the most profitable airlines. His approach, a relentless focus on cost and execution. The result, a culture of extreme efficiency and an airline that has made travel affordable for millions. Daniel Balthazar, co-chief investment officer of Active Strategies, will explore how he did this. Please welcome Michael and Daniel.

Daniel Balthazar: Daniel,早上好。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: Daniel, good morning.

Michael O'Leary: 早上好。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Morning,

Daniel Balthazar: Michael。热烈欢迎来到我们的大会。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: Michael. Warm welcome to our conference.

Michael O'Leary: 非常感谢。很高兴来到这里。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Thank you very much. Great pleasure to be here.

Daniel Balthazar: 几年前我们在这个办公室见过面,进行了一次投资者会议。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: We met in this office a couple of years ago for an investor meeting.

Michael O'Leary: 是的。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: We did.

Daniel Balthazar: 之后我收到了你的一封信,感谢我的到来,这让我感觉非常非常特别。在我从事这个行业25年里从未发生过。这说明了你和Ryanair什么?

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: After that, I received a letter from you thanking me for the meeting, which made me really feel really, really special. Never happened to me in my 25 years of doing this. What does that tell me about you and Ryan?

Michael O'Leary: 嗯,首先,它告诉我你在那次会议后没有买足够的我们的股票,这就是为什么我不得不写后续信件来鼓励你买更多。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Well, firstly, it tells me you didn't buy enough our stock after that meeting, which is why I had to do the follow-up letter to encourage you to buy more. Um, and and

Daniel Balthazar: 我们也注重成本。我们喜欢低价买入。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: we we have a cost focus as well. We like to buy low.

Michael O'Leary: 哦,现在是最好的机会。股票下跌了大约25%。只是别告诉任何人,因为我们正在以最快的速度买入,我不想和房间里的任何人竞争。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Oh, you there's never been a better opportunity. Stock is down about 25%. Just don't tell anybody because we're buying it as fast as we can at the moment and I don't want to be competing with anybody else in the room.

Daniel Balthazar: 很好。那么,如果文化是由高层设定的,那如何转化为25000名员工每天的行为呢?

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: Very good. So if the culture is set at the top, how does that translate into how 25,000 people behave every single day?

Michael O'Leary: 我对这些文化会议感到非常紧张,我对此持怀疑态度。我尊重David,但你知道,我不想经营一家能存活300年、55代的公司。我们想在未来5到10年内赚钱。如果能做到这一点,我们有合理的希望存活15到20年,但最终会有人来重新发明reinvent the wheel)。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: I get very nervous at these culture meetings, skeptical when we do all the cultural stuff. I respect David, but you know, I don't want to be running a company that survives 300 years and for 55 generations. We want to make money for the next 5 10 years. and if we do that there's a reasonable prospect we'll survive 15 20 years but ultimately somebody's going to come along and reinvent the wheel.

Michael O'Leary: 顺便说一句,我不认为诺基亚的失败是因为管理层傲慢,或者诺基亚存在恐惧文化诺基亚失败的根本原因是iPhone的出现,它彻底改变了技术,这困扰着我们所有人。什么让我夜不能寐?《星际迷航》。因为我的票价再便宜也没用。当涉及到欧洲航班时,没有人能在价格上击败Ryanair,永远不会。但总有一天会有人发明某种方法,能将人们传送到欧洲各地。尽管欧盟委员会可能会想办法以某种环境原因对其征税,但最终,技术或某种变革性技术将会出现,那时无论我们的文化有多好,或者我们的成本基础有多好,我们都会被淘汰。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: I don't think Nokia failed by the way because you know the management were arrogant or there was a culture of fear in Nokia. Nokia failed because fundamentally the iPhone came along and totally transformed the technology and that bevils all of us. What keeps me awake at night? Star Trek. because it doesn't matter how bloody cheap my fairs are going to be. And when it comes to flying in Europe, no one's going to beat Ryan on price ever, but somebody sometime is going to invent some way of beaming people across Europe. Although the European Commission will probably find some way to tax it for some environmental cause, but ultimately we will get the technology or some sort of transform of technology will come along and it doesn't matter how good our culture was or how good our cost base was, we're going to get blown out of the water.

Michael O'Leary: 在那之前,我们的文化是,我们不感兴趣解释我们的文化。我们的文化是,我们希望提供最低票价、最准时的航班,我们将通过拥有业内最低的成本来实现这一点,我们将不断改造我们的成本基础。我们引领着全球航空业。我们是第一批取消旅行社的人。你知道,当互联网出现时,因为我们已经为分销支付了20%的费用,在一个利润率只有1%的行业中支付了15年。我们为什么要向那些小旅行社支付20%的费用?互联网来了,我们立刻取消了旅行社,他们就消失了。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Until that time comes, our culture is we kind of we do not and I I kind of shout and rant and rave at everybody. We're not interested in explaining our culture. Our culture is we want to deliver the lowest fair most on time flights and we'll do it by having the lowest cost bar nobody in the industry and we will keep transforming our cost base. We lead the aeron industry across the world. We were the first people to buy get rid of travel agents. You know when the internet came along because we've been paying 20% for distribution for you know 15 years in an industry that had a 1% margin. Why the hell we paying 20% to mom and pop travel agents? internet came along, we were out the door, banned the travel agents and were gone.

Michael O'Leary: 15年前,我们是第一批对行李收费的公司。你知道,正如《圣经》所说,摩西从山顶下来,第四条诫命是“你将永远有权免费携带行李登机”。但是通过对行李收费,我们航班上携带行李的乘客比例从80%(平均停留2.5天)降至今天的20%。这意味着我们不仅在机场减少了大量的劳动力,而且我有点不同意David的观点,我希望善待员工,但最终我希望在业务中尽可能多地裁减人员,而留下的人我会善待。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Um, we were the first people 15 years ago to charge for bags. And as you know, as it says in the good Bible, Moses came down from the mountaintop and the fourth commandment is thou shalt be entitled to bring free bags on board aircraft forever more. Um but by charging for bags we went from 80% of passengers on our flights bringing a bag on a a stay duration of one and a of 2.5 days to 20% of passengers today now bring a bag in which means not alone have we gotten rid of huge amounts of labor at our airports and again I slightly disagree with David I want to treat people well but ultimately I want to get rid of as many people as I can within the business but and the ones who remain I'll treat well.

Michael O'Leary: 例如,飞行员是极其昂贵的员工。根据法律,他们每年不能飞行超过800小时,也就是每周18小时,我认为这效率低得离谱。为此,我每人支付他们大约25万美元。所以,但技术终将到来。你知道,如果美国军方能驾驶无人机或飞机,飞行员最终会被系统淘汰。我希望善待我的飞行员,我希望善待我的摄像团队,但同时我也想找到一种技术来取代他们所有人。然后,即使有欧盟的环境税和荒谬的法规,飞越欧洲的成本也会比以往任何时候都便宜。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Um, pilots, for example, you know, are egregiously expensive employees. By law, they can't fly more than 800 hours a year, which is 18 hours a week, which I think is ridiculously unproductive. And for that, I paid them about a quarter million each. So, but technology will in time come along. You know, if the US military can fly drones or fly, you know, aircraft across, pilots will ultimately get competed out of the system. I want to treat my pilots very well. I want to treat my camera crew very well, but at the back I also want to find some way of finding a technology that'll replace them all. And then the cost of flying across Europe, even with the European EU EU's environmental taxes and ridiculous regulation, will become even cheaper than it ever has before.

Michael O'Leary: 所以我们的重点和文化就是:让它便宜,让它准时。除此之外,什么都没有。然后,凶猛地、痴迷地专注于如何通过不断地重塑系统和从根本上改变客户行为来使其更便宜、更便宜、更便宜。对行李收费是我们有史以来最伟大的举措之一,不是因为每个人都痴迷于“哦,我们只是想要钱”。我最终会很高兴地把钱分给股东,但如果我能摆脱最后20%的行李,我也会很高兴地把钱分掉。我将不再需要值机人员,不再需要行李处理人员,不再需要丢失行李处理人员。飞机将轻约3%,这减少了我的燃油消耗。我的燃油费每年大约50亿美元。所以,摆脱那些该死的托运行李的隐藏好处是,我们消耗的燃油更少。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: So our focus and our culture is all about make it cheap, make it on time. After that, go away, you're not getting anything else. and then be viciously obsessively focused on how do we make it cheaper, cheaper, cheaper by constantly reinvesting the reinventing the system and fundamentally changing customer behavior. Charging for bags was one of the greatest initiatives we've ever come up with in not because and everybody's obsessed with oh I we just want the money. I would happily give away the money ultimately to shareholders but give away the money if I can get rid of the last 20% of bags. I would have no check-in staff. I'd have no baggage handling staff. I'd have no lost baggage staff. The aircraft fly about 3% lighter, which reduces my fuel consumption. My fuel bills about 5 billion a year.

Michael O'Leary: 今天的航空燃油价格约为每桶157美元,任何能降低这类成本的措施,我们都会去做。这就是为什么我们是世界上最盈利的航空公司。我们当然是世界上最大的国际航空公司。然而,我们计划在未来8年内,通过订购300架波音Max 10新飞机,将规模从去年的2亿乘客增加到3亿乘客。这些飞机座位数增加20%,但每座位燃油消耗减少20%。我将在未来10年内通过这项新技术彻底改变我的经济状况。而且,它们将由同样的两位飞行员、同样四五名机组人员驾驶。这将使我们的成本大大降低,扩大我在欧洲所有其他航空公司面前的价格优势。我将把它们全部击垮,独占整个行业,直到某个地方的某个卧室里有人发明了某种能将人们传送到欧洲各地的方法,那时我就完蛋了。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: So the hidden benefits of getting rid of checked in bloody bags is that we're consuming less fuel. And with jet oil today at about $157 a barrel, anything I can do to get out that kind of those kind of costs, we will do. And that's why we are the most profitable airline in the world. We are certainly the biggest international airline in the world. And yet we plan to grow in size from 200 million passengers last year to 300 million passengers in the next 8 years by ordering 300 by order taking delivery of 300 new aircraft which from Boeing the Max 10 aircraft which are 20% bigger in terms of seats but they burn 20% less fuel per seat. I am going to transform my economics for the next 10 years with this new technology. And but and they'll be flown by the same two pilots, the same four or five cabin crew. Which should make us hugely lower cost, widen the price advantage I have over every other airline in Europe. And I'm going to blow them all up and own the industry until somebody in a back bedroom somewhere invents some way of beaming people across Europe and then I'm screwed.

Daniel Balthazar: 太棒了。你所在的行业竞争异常激烈。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: Excellent. You operate in a hyperco competitive industry.

Michael O'Leary: 竞争激烈吗?欧洲竞争激烈吗?不,他们都一无是处。政府拥有,受到严格监管,获得巨额政府补贴。所有那些老牌航空公司现在都在四处奔走,试图获得救助。上帝保佑美国的共和党人。他们现在正要救助两家最濒临破产的航空公司,SpiritJetBlue,它们本应在多年前就破产。所以,不,这不是一个竞争异常激烈的行业。这是一个监管非常糟糕的行业。它是政府拥有的,这就是为什么它在欧洲效率低下,极其昂贵且效率低下。所以我只需要适度竞争,就能比欧洲其他竞争对手做得更好,但这并没有把标准定得很高。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Are you competitive industry? Hyper competitive is Europe? No, they're all useless. Government owned, heavily regulated, hugely government subsidized. All the legacies are running around at the moment trying to get bailouts. God bless the Republicans in the United States. They're now about to bail out two of the most bankrupt airlines, Spirit and JetBlue, who should have been allowed to go to the wall many years ago. So, no, it's not a hyperco competitive industry. It's a very badly regulated industry. it is governmentowned which is why it it is inefficient hugely expensive and inefficient in Europe. So all I have to be is modestly competitive to be better than the rest of the competition in Europe but that's not setting the bar very high.

Daniel Balthazar: 太惊人了。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: Amazing.

Michael O'Leary: 大多数员工不喜欢过度关注成本。你如何保持他们的积极性?

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Most people though most employees they don't like an over focus on cost. How do you keep them motivated?

Michael O'Leary: 恐惧恐吓,深夜在走廊里徘徊。嗯,我们没有。我的意思是,你知道Ryanair的伟大之处在于我们这样做已经30年了。所以,我们每年招聘大约50名毕业生。我们招聘那些愿意努力工作的人。我们努力树立榜样。这是一个非常精简的管理层。从一线员工到我之间只有三层管理。因此,我们保持非常扁平化的结构。但我们的优势是,我们是一个单一的运营模式。它只是一家航空公司。我们只销售座位。所以我们不需要复杂性。我们避免并购。我们不参与购买酒店、机场或任何其他东西。我们购买飞机,希望是在波音空客需要订单的困难时期,然后我们整天只销售座位。所以我们不需要很多复杂的管理,但我们做得很好,因为我认为我们有一个非常扁平的管理结构。我们非常擅长抓住新举措。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Fear, terror, stalking the corridors late at night. Um we don't I mean you know the great thing about Rhiner is we've been doing it this way for 30 years. So you know we hire about 50 graduates every year. We hire people who want to work hard. We try to set an example there. It is a very slim kind of man. There is only three layers of management between somebody on the front line and me. And therefore we keep it very flat. But the advantage we have is we're a single you know we're a one goof kind of operation. It's only an airline. All we have to sell is a seat. So we don't need complexity. We avoid M&A. We don't get involved in, you know, buying hotels or buying airports or buying whatever else it is. We buy aircraft hopefully at times of distress when Boeing or Airbus needs orders and then all we do is sell seats all day long. So we don't need a lot of complicated management and then but we are very good because I think we have a very flat management structure. We're very good at pouncing on new initiatives as they come along.

Michael O'Leary: Ryanair最大的优势在于我们不太受欢迎。我们在几乎所有乘客调查中都垫底。我们从未赢过。爱尔兰有一个爱尔兰旅行社协会的奖项,爱尔兰只有两家航空公司。爱尔兰航空Airlingus)赢得了这些奖项,它是那家优秀的航空公司。爱尔্যান্ড航空连续30年赢得了年度旅行社航空公司奖。我曾承诺,如果我们赢得那个奖项,我就会辞职。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: And the great advantage of being the great strength of Ryan Air is we're not very much beloved. We finished last in almost every passenger survey. We have never won. There's a there's an award in Ireland for the Irish Travel Agents Association which there's only two airlines in Ireland. Airlingers have won those awards which is the exate airline. He lingers have won the travel agent airline of the year award for 30 years in a row. I have promised that we will I will quit if we ever win that award.

Michael O'Leary: 嗯,所以,但好处是,抱歉,我只是打断一下,好处是,不那么在意我的声誉或形象,或者在文化上受欢迎,这让我们能够无情地保持低成本,这给了我们巨大的自由去追求那些成本节约措施,或者重塑我们运营航空公司的方式,然后最终所有其他傻瓜都会跟着我们。我的意思是,美国航空公司在我们开始这样做15到20年后才发现对行李收费。现在他们试图将其作为增加收入的方式,而我们这样做不是为了增加收入,而是为了消除成本

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Um, so but the advantage of sorry I just cut the advantage of not being overly sensitive about my reputation or our image or being culturally popular is we're ruthlessly low cost and that gives us huge freedom to chase those kind of costsaving measures or to reinvent the way we the way we drive the airlines and then ultimately all the other morons will follow us along. I mean the American airlines have just discovered charging for bags 15 20 years after we started doing it. Now they're trying to make it do it as a way of gaining revenue whereas we did it not as a way of generating revenue but as a way of eliminating cost.

Daniel Balthazar: 这很有趣,因为我们采访的大多数CEO都谈论更多以客户为中心,把客户放在一切的中心。然而你却反其道而行之,但却赢了。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: It's fascinating because most of the CEOs we talked to they talk about more customer centricity keep the customer heck put the customer in the center of everything. Yet you're doing the opposite but win.

Michael O'Leary: 但那是因为我们对所有其他公司都有巨大的价格优势。客户最终在每次调查中都会说:“哦,我希望他们能更友善。我想要退款,但这是不可退款的。你为什么不明白‘不可退款’的意思?我不在乎你奶奶去世了,或者你的猫病了,你当天不能旅行。这是一张不可退款的机票。”现在我希望你飞行,因为我可以在我的飞机上向你销售大约6欧元的辅助收入。但我们有2.16亿乘客,我们偶尔也会出现失误。我们偶尔会处理不当。我们会得到大量的负面宣传,我注意到每次我们得到大量负面宣传时,预订量都会上升。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: But that's because we have an enormous price advantage over everybody else. customers ultimately in every survey. Oh, I wish they were nicer. I want a refund of a non-refund. What part of no refund don't you understand? I don't care if your granny died or you know your cat was ill and you couldn't travel on the day. It was a non-refundable fair. Now I want you to fly because I can sell you about 6 of ancillary revenues on board my aircraft. But I'm 216 million and we appear occasionally we it happens even to us. We occasionally mismanage situations. We get a huge amount of adverse publicity and what I notice every time we get a lot of adverse publicity is bookings go up.

Michael O'Leary: 埃隆·马斯克Elon Musk),我从未见过他,也从未与他有过任何互动。今年年初,我们曾试图在飞机上安装Wi-Fi。我认为飞机上免费Wi-Fi即将到来。目前的问题是技术尚不存在。我们必须在飞机外部安装几个小凹槽。这将导致大约2%的燃油阻力,而我的燃油费每年是50亿美元。2%的燃油阻力大约是1亿美元,我不会花1亿美元为我的乘客提供免费Wi-Fi星链Starlink)是一项了不起的技术。我对星链技术没有任何异议。星链认为乘客会支付12欧元,然后它就能收回成本。显然,他们从未见过Ryanair的乘客。因为当我们穿梭于客舱销售茶、咖啡、刮刮卡以及我们能想到的任何其他东西时,我们没有时间跑来跑去进行1欧元的交易。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Elon Musk who I have never met never had any interaction with it. We had this issue we were trying to put Wi-Fi on board our aircraft at the start of the year. I think Wi-Fi free Wi-Fi on board aircraft is coming. The problem at the moment is the technology doesn't yet exist. We have to put couple of dimples on the outside of the aircraft. It would be about a 2% fuel drag and my fuel bill is 5 billion a year. 2% fuel drag is something of the order about a hundred million and I'm not paying 100 million to put free Wi-Fi on board for my passengers. Starlink which is a terrific technology. I have no issue with the starting technology. Starling believe passengers will pay you €12 you know and it'll pay for itself. Clearly they've never met any round air passengers. Um because that by the time we've gone up and down the cabin selling them teas, coffee, scratch cards and anything else we can kind of think to sell them. we don't have time to be running up and down taking one euro transactions any so

Michael O'Leary: 我碰巧说,星链很棒,但系统不起作用,我们不会承担每年1亿美元的燃油损失,因为那相当于每张机票50美分。然后有人告诉埃隆·马斯克我贬低了星链,所以他在他的互联网动态上发了一条消息,说“Ryanair的这个蠢货是谁?这个Ryanair的傻瓜显然是个白痴,他对飞行一无所知。”所以我回击说:“Twitter上那个经营Twitter这个粪坑的蠢货是谁?他竟然敢来批评我?”我是对的,它确实有燃油阻力,他说它没有燃油阻力,然后他说我对航空电子设备一无所知,这可能是真的,我对航空电子设备知之甚少,但他对运营低成本航空公司也一无所知。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: I happen to say look Starink is great but you know the system doesn't work we're not taking a fuel penalty of 100 million a year because that would be you know 50 cents on every ticket and he someone told Elon Musk that I'd slagged off Starling so he popped up something on his internet feed going who is this wanker in Ryionaire who's this Ryanire gobshite he's clearly an idiot he knows nothing about flying so I pop back who is this Egypt in Twitter running that cesspace that is Twitter having a pop off me I'm correct it does have a fuel drag he says it doesn't have a fuel drag and then he says I know nothing about avionics which is probably true I know very little about avionics but he knows nothing about flying lowcost airlines either.

Michael O'Leary: 然后他在他的Twitter上发起了一项民意调查,我顺便说一句,我没有Twitter账户,谢天谢地,我有更好的事情要做。但他发起了一项民意调查,问他的1.5亿粉丝“我应该收购Ryanair吗?”我们礼貌地指出:“你是美国人,所以你不能收购Ryanair。我们是欧洲公司,你必须拥有超过50%的股份,你不会的。”接下来,在1月的第二周,欧洲预订量最清淡的一周,我们的预订量却猛增。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: he then ran a poll on his Twitter ex I don't have a Twitter site by the way thankfully I have better things to do with my life but he ran a poll at his 1.5 should I buy Ryan we politely pointed out you're American therefore You can't buy a Ryan Air. We're European and you have to be more than 50%. You won't. And next thing it exploded during the second week of January, which is one of the quietest weeks for bookings in Europe. And my bookings just took off.

Michael O'Leary: 接下来我们手忙脚乱,如何操作?所以,我们进行了一次“大傻瓜座位促销”。我们让AI制作了一些广告,内容是我用东西砸他头,他掐我脖子。哒哒哒。我们制造了大约3000万美元的免费宣传。我1月份在都柏林举行了一次新闻发布会,做我通常的夏季路线发布,我们将开通25条航线。他们将新闻发布会直播到Sky CBC,直播到都柏林的这个蠢货,拼命想制造一些关于埃隆·马斯克是错的新闻。我们因此获得了大约3000万美元的免费宣传,并且在接下来的6周内,预订量增加了大约3个百分点。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Next thing we're running around, how do we manif how do we manif? So, we ran a big idiot seat sale. We got AI to come up with some ads of me smacking him over the head with some and him choking me. Da da da. And we manufactured about $30 million of free publicity. I was holding a press conference in Dublin back in January to do my kind of usual this summer. We'll do 25 do roots. They took the press conference live on Sky CBC went live to this Egypt in Dublin talking desperately trying to make some news about how Elon Musk is wrong. We got about 30 million free publicity out of it and bookings for about 6 weeks went up by about 3 percentage points.

Daniel Balthazar: 你给他发了感谢信吗?

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: Did you send him a thank you letter?

Michael O'Leary: 什么?

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Pardon me.

Daniel Balthazar: 你给埃隆·马斯克发了感谢信吗?

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: Did you send Elon Musk a thank you?

Michael O'Leary: 不,实际上我们给他寄了一张免费的Ryanair机票代金券,往返都柏林的Twitter办公室。还拍了一张我递交免费Ryanair代金券的照片。他还没兑换,但我希望他在不久的将来某个时候会兑换。所以,我们做的另一件事是,我们会抓住任何廉价的宣传机会,因为在我们的业务中,拥有如此大的价格优势,廉价宣传会带来巨大的销售额和预订量。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: No, actually we sent him a free voucher for a free Ryan flight round to the Twitter Twitter offices in Dublin. and got a photograph of me handing in the free radier voucher. He hasn't claimed it yet, but I hope he will at some point in time in the not too distant future. So, one of the other things we do is we will jump on any bit of cheap publicity we can because cheap publicity in our business where you have such a price advantage drives enormous sales and enormous bookings.

Michael O'Leary: 所以只要不涉及安全问题,你知道,我记得特朗普第一次当选时说,即使他在第五大道谋杀了某人,他仍然会当选。我们当时在想,嗯,也许如果我们在第五大道谋杀了某人,Ryanair的预订量会上升吗?我们觉得,不,那可能有点过火了。但除此之外,只要不涉及安全,我们愿意接受任何廉价宣传。好的,总结一下,成本导向免费营销令人难以置信的幽默感无疑创造了致胜文化。非常感谢你,Michael。请大家和我一起表示感谢。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: And so as long as it doesn't revolve around safety, if you know, and I remember Trump getting elected the first time said if he murdered somebody on Fifth Avenue that he'd still get elected. And we were thinking, well, maybe if we murdered somebody on Fifth Avenue, would it drive bookings up on Ryan Air? We thought, no, that was probably pushing the envelope a little bit too far. But other than that, if it doesn't involve safety, we're up for any bit of cheap publicity we can get. Okay, so to summarize, a cost focus, free marketing and an incredible sense of humor definitely created a winning culture. Thank you very much, Michael. Please join me with a show. Thank you very much.

领导力与文化传承:挑战与机遇

Patrick Duplacy: MichaelDanielMichael,我能请你留在座位上参加小组讨论吗?好的。

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: Michael and Daniel, Michael, could I ask you, Michael, could I ask you to remain seated for a panel discussion? Okay. So far,

Michael O'Leary: 不。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: by no.

Patrick Duplacy: 太棒了。到目前为止,我们听到了几种截然不同的构建致胜文化的方法。现在,让我们把这些观点汇集起来。DavidKenneth将加入这个小组,与他们一起的还有Man GroupCEO Robin Group,这是一家管理着超过2000亿美元资产的全球另类投资公司。她将从另一个角度审视高绩效文化David将主持本次会议。请大家欢迎他们上台。

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: Fantastic. So far, we've heard some very different approaches to building winning cultures. Now, let's bring those perspectives together. David and Kenneth will be joining this panel, and joining them is Robin Group, the CEO of MAN Group, a global alternative investment firm with over $200 billion in assets. She brings another lens to high performance culture. David will moderate this session. Please help me welcome them to the stage.

David Rubenstein: 很高兴再次见到你,我的朋友。我得接替这个节目,这会很艰难。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Good to see you again, my friend. I get to follow that act. That's going to be tough.

Robin Group: 对。

Original English

Robin Group: Right.

David Rubenstein: 那么,Robin,你是Man GroupCEO,对吗?

Original English

David Rubenstein: So, um, Robin, you are the CEO of Mand Group, right?

Robin Group: 正确。

Original English

Robin Group: Correct.

David Rubenstein: 你不是男人,对吗?

Original English

David Rubenstein: And you're not a man, right?

Robin Group: 我,嗯,自从我上次看,是的。

Original English

Robin Group: I So I Well, since I last looked. Yeah.

David Rubenstein: 你是Man Group250年来第一位女性CEO,或者类似的情况。

Original English

David Rubenstein: And you're the first woman to be the CEO of Man Group in 250 years or something like that.

Robin Group: 差不多吧。是的。那么,你是如何得到这份工作的?

Original English

Robin Group: Something like that. Yeah. So, how did you get to that job?

Robin Group: 是的,决心。嗯,我怎么得到这份工作的?第一,我在那里工作了相当长的时间。第二,我担任过很多不同的职位。我有很多“战争创伤”可以证明。嗯,当职位空缺时,我是最适合这份工作的人。

Original English

Robin Group: Yeah, determination. Um, how did I get to that job? One, I worked there for a decent amount of time. Two, I've held lots of different roles. And I've got lots of war wounds to show for it. Um, and I was the best person for the job when it came open.

David Rubenstein: 好的。最适合这份工作的人总是能得到这份工作。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Okay. And the best person for the job always gets the job.

Robin Group: 我喜欢这样想。

Original English

Robin Group: I like to think so.

David Rubenstein: 好的。Ken,你的公司在它所涉足的一切领域都取得了非凡的成功。但在2007-2008年的大衰退中,你差点就没有那么成功了。你是否曾担心在2007-2008年期间无法生存?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Okay. And Ken your firm has been extraordinarily successful in everything it's touched. But in the great recession of 0708, you came very close to not being that successful. Were you ever worried that you weren't going to survive in the 0708 period?

Kenneth Griffin: 2007年,不,2007年对我们来说实际上是 phenomenal 的一年。但2008年有一天,我记得我在家搭电梯时,真的在想,我希望我回来时我们还在经营。CNBC有一辆面包车停在我们四面墙外,试图拍摄破产的画面。所以,2008年是艰难的16周。现在,好消息是历史是由胜利者书写的。自2008年以来,我们取得了巨大的成功,那个时刻在我们的历史上很大程度上成为了一个脚注,但我永远不会忘记。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: So 07 no 07 was actually phenomenal year for us. But there was a there was a day 08 I remember getting the elevator at home and saying like literally I I hope when I come back we're still in business. and CNBC had a van parked outside of our four walls trying to get that bankruptcy footage. So, it was a it was a tough 16 weeks in 2008. Now, the good news is history's written by the winners. We've had a great run since 2008 and that moment's largely become a footnote in our history, but one that I'll never forget.

David Rubenstein: Michael,你长期以来被认为是RyanairCEO,但你并不是Ryanair的创始人。Ryan先生创立了它。如果你没有为他工作,你认为你最终会担任现在这样的职位吗?因为你现在的个性是这样的个性吗?你以前就有这种个性,还是在你经营这家航空公司时逐渐形成的?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Michael, um you're identified as the CEO for a long time of Ryan Air, but you didn't start Ryionaire. Mr. Ryan started it. Had you not been working for him, do you think you would ever have wound up in some capacity like your job you have now? Because did you the personality you have now is a personality? Did you have that personality before or did you grow it as you kind of were running this airline?

Michael O'Leary: 我一直都有扭曲的个性吗?可能吧。我受过基督教兄弟会耶稣会士的教育。所以,我能活下来简直是个奇迹。我会进入航空业吗?不会。我希望能在一个运作正常的行业找到一份工作,在那里你可以像Kenny一样赚钱。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Was did I always have a deformed personality? Probably. I was educated by Christian Brothers and then Jesuits. So it was a miracle I survived that. Would I be in the airline industry? No. I would hopefully have gotten a job in a proper functioning industry where you could make money like Kenny.

Michael O'Leary: 嗯,但与Robin不同的是,在我的案例中,我得到Ryanair的工作是因为没有人想要它。Ryan家族在1987年欧盟解除管制之初创办了Ryanair。他们想在爱尔兰和英国航线上与爱尔兰航空竞争,结果三年内亏损了2000万,公司濒临破产。我当时是一个刚毕业的聪明年轻人,拥有会计学位。我实际上非常安静、内向。我从不想要宣传。最终,他们用完了CEO。没有人愿意经营这个该死的地方了。所以我被派去止损。随便你做什么。我的第一个建议是关闭这个烂摊子。它永远不会赚钱。它注定会失败。这个行业不适合人类。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Um, but the unlike Robin in my case, I got the job in Raire because nobody else wanted it. The Ryans had set Brian Air to be at the start of EU deregulation back in 1987. They wanted to kind of compete with their lingus on the Irish UK roots and they lost 20 million in three years and the thing was going bust. I was this bright young guy coming out of college had my accountancy degree. I was actually very quiet reticent. I don't want to be a never wanted the publicity. And eventually they ran out of chief executives. There was nobody left to run the bloody place. So I was sent in to just staunch the losses. Do whatever you want and go whatever you want to do. My first recommendation was close this turkey. It's never going to make money. It's doomed to bloody fail. This industry is for the birds.

Michael O'Leary: 幸运的是,Tony派我去美国见西南航空Southwest),当时赫伯·凯莱赫Herb Keller)在德克萨斯州奥斯汀做得非常出色。他是一个传奇人物,是他创造了低票价行业。我被派去见他。我与赫伯·凯莱赫有过一次传奇般的晚餐。你还记得和赫伯·凯莱赫的晚餐吗?

Original English

Michael O'Leary: And Tony thankfully sent me off to see Southwest in the States at the time when Herb Keller was doing what he did so well in Austin in Texas. He was a legend and he was the guy who kind of created the lowfare industry. And I was sent off to see him. And I have this legendary dinner with Herb Keller. What do you I mean what do you remember at the dinner with Herb Keller?

Michael O'Leary: 绝对什么都不记得。他当时大约65岁,我大约26岁。在开胃菜还没上之前,他就把我喝倒了。但我看到了西南航空。我们来自欧洲。哦,一切都很慢。一架飞机开进来,一个小时十五分钟后才掉头,因为飞行员要抽烟,机组人员要抱怨,每个人都要打电话给工会,看看他们是否愿意参加当天的下一班航班。而西南航空的飞机一到,就像F1赛车的维修站一样。飞机进来,所有人上机。飞机出去,走了。很明显,如果你能在15或20分钟内让飞机掉头,而不是一个小时十五分钟,那么每架飞机每天就能多飞两到三班免费航班。所以这一切都源于此。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Absolutely bloody nothing. He was at the time about 65. I was about 26. He drank me under the table before the starters had even got there. But I saw a southwest I we I come from Europe. Oh, everything was slow. A plane would drive in and an hour and 15 minutes later turn around cuz the pilots had to have a smoke and the camera crew had to have a winge and everybody had to call their union to see whether they were feeling like going out in the next fight of the day. This thing arrived. It was like a Formula 1 pit stop. Aircraft in everybody on it. Aircraft out gone. And it was pretty clear if you could turn planes around in 15 or 20 minutes instead of an hour and 15 minutes, you get two more, three more free flights per day per aircraft. So that's where it all came from.

Michael O'Leary: 所以,这是Tony Ryan愚蠢地创办航空公司,但赫伯·凯莱赫有远见,他说你实际上可以运营一家非常高效的航空公司,这是Ryanair成功的关键。现在,你之前几次提到安全是某些事情的例外,但有时人们会说,如果是一家低成本航空公司,他们可能会在安全上偷工减料。你如何向人们保证你没有在安全上偷工减料?

Original English

Michael O'Leary: So it was the combination of Tony Ryan's stupidity in setting up an airline, but Herb Keller's vision in say you can actually run a very efficient airline, which is the key to Ryan Air success. Now, earlier you mentioned a couple times safety as being an exception to some things, but sometimes people would say, well, if it's a lowcost airline, maybe they're going to scrimp on safety. How can you assure people you're not scrimping on safety?

Michael O'Leary: 嗯,你不能。但最终,我们现在已经这样做了大约35年。我们拥有欧洲最年轻、最新的飞机机队。我们拥有300架波音737,总共650架。我们都是从新飞机购买的。我们拥有它们。它们不属于某个该死的租赁公司。所以,我们拥有它们。只有折旧费。我们的资产负债表上没有债务。我们培训自己的所有飞行员。我们有16个模拟器中心。我们所有的飞机维护都在内部进行,我们还准备将发动机维护也内部化。所以你能做的最好的事情就是指出你35年来的记录。当然,在我们最初的15或20年里,确实有点便宜,你知道,他们不做维护。我认为那种说法已经消失了。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Uh, you can't. Uh, but ultimately, we've now been doing this for about 35 years. We have the youngest, newest fleet of aircraft in Europe. We have a fleet of 300, 650 Boeing 737s. We bought them all from new. We own them all. They're not owned by some bloody leasing company. So, you know, we own them all. depreciation only charge. We have no debt on the balance sheet. We train all our own pilots. We have 16 simulator centers. We do all our own aircraft maintenance in aircraft maintenance in-house and we're about to take the engine maintenance in-house as well. So the best you can do is you point to your record over 35 years and certainly in our first 15 or 20 years it was a bit cheap and you know they don't do the maintenance. I think that's kind of disappeared.

Michael O'Leary: 但你只取决于今天。我们每天飞行3500班次。今天将运载70万人。今天我们必须安全地做一切事情。明天我们必须安全地做一切事情。我总是担心,从统计学上讲,我们变得越来越大,我总是担心从统计学上讲,你很可能会在某个地方出差错。但到目前为止,35年来我们设法避免了。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: But you're only as good as today. We do three and a half thousand flights a day. will carry 700,000 people today. Today we have to do everything safely. Tomorrow we have to do everything safely. And I it always makes me worry statistically the bigger and bigger and bigger we get. I always worry statistically you're likely to have a screw up somewhere along the way. But so far for 35 years we've managed to avoid it.

David Rubenstein: 好的。Ken,很多人没有意识到你经营着两家大公司。一家是史上最赚钱的对冲基金Citadel,但你还有一家独立的公司,Citadel SecuritiesCitadel Securities是什么?当你已经拥有一家非常赚钱的对冲基金时,你为什么要创办那家公司?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Okay. Ken, many people don't realize you operate two big businesses. One is the most profitable hedge fund ever, um, Citadel, but you have a separate business, uh, Citadel Securities. What is Citadel Securities and why did you start that business when you already had a very profitable hedge fund?

Kenneth Griffin: Citadel Securities是世界上最大的做市商之一。事实上,我们每天交易大约25%的美国股票成交量。在过去的几周里,我们平均每天的成交量约为1万亿美元。所以,它是一家处于全球流动性中心的公司。它由世界一流的技术、出色的预测分析和一支非常非常出色的管理团队提供支持。所以,它与对冲基金部门拥有许多相同的DNA。优秀的人才、优秀的技术、优秀的分析。它在文化和精神方面与我们在对冲基金中所做的事情非常相似,但我们的商业意图非常不同。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: So, Sil Securities is one of the largest market makers in the world. In fact, we we trade about 25% of the US equity turnover every day. And over the course of the last couple weeks, we've averaged about a trillion dollars a day in turnover. So, it is a a firm that is at the center point of liquidity around the world. It is powered by world-class technology, great predictive analytics, and a really, really brilliant management team. So, it shares much of the same DNA as the as the hedge fund side of the house. Great people, great technology, great analytics. It's it's very much similar to what we do in the hedge fund in terms of the the culture and ethos, but we do it with a very different commercial intent.

David Rubenstein: 现在,有一个故事可能是杜撰的。许多关于名人的故事都有杜撰的背景。其中一个关于你的杜撰背景故事是,你在大学时让哈佛大学允许你安装一个可以接收股票报价的天线。所以作为一名学生,你可以交易股票。这是真的吗?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Now, there's a story that might be apocryphal. Many stories about people who are famous have apocryphal background stories. One of the apocryphal background stories about you is that when you were in college, you got Harvard University to allow you to set up a antenna that would receive stock quotes. So as a student, you could trade stock. Is that true?

Kenneth Griffin: 实际上那是一个卫星天线。是的。我当时正在和我的儿子一起更新我的Xbox,他大约13岁。他现在18岁了。他看着我说:“爸爸,你在互联网出现之前就活过来了。”在80年代,没有互联网。没有股票报价,实际上很难获得。所以,我在宿舍楼顶安装了一个卫星天线。电缆实际上穿过四楼的窗户,沿着一个废弃的电梯井进入我的房间。这让我能够实时获取纽约证券交易所的报价。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: So it was a satellite dish actually. Yeah. I was I was updating my Xbox with my son next to me and he was about 13. He's he's 18 now. He looks at me goes, "Dad, you were alive before the internet." And and back in the 80s, there was no internet. There was no like stock quotes were actually hard to get. So, I had a satellite dish on top of the dorm room. the cable actually came through a fourth floor window down an unused elevator shaft and into my room. And that gave me access to real-time prices from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

David Rubenstein: 它奏效了。

Original English

David Rubenstein: And it worked.

Kenneth Griffin: 它奏效了。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: It worked.

David Rubenstein: 如果你没有那样做,或者你早期的交易没有成功,你会做一些更重要的事情吗,比如成为一名律师?

Original English

David Rubenstein: And if you hadn't done that or if your early trades had worked, would you be doing something more important like being a lawyer or something?

Kenneth Griffin: 我会做私募股权David

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: I'd be doing private equity, David.

David Rubenstein: 好的。嗯,当然,没有什么比私募股权更崇高的职业了。我当时在大学宿舍里追女孩。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Right. Okay. Well, there's no higher calling than private equity. Of course, I'm chasing girls around the college dorm.

Michael O'Leary: 满足感,Michael

Original English

Michael O'Leary: gratification, Michael.

David Rubenstein: 嗯,Robin,你是一家上市公司的对冲基金。

Original English

David Rubenstein: So, Robin, um, you're a publicly traded hedge fund.

Robin Group: 是的。

Original English

Robin Group: Yeah.

David Rubenstein: 大多数对冲基金都是私人所有的。你为什么是上市公司?在对冲基金世界中,成为上市公司有什么优势?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Most hedge funds are privately owned. Why are you publicly owned? And what's the advantage of being publicly owned in the hedge fund world?

Robin Group: 嗯,顺便说一句,这不是我的选择。所以,我没有坐在那个位置上。大约35年的上市历史。所以优势是,每个人都知道Man Group发生了什么。没有什么可隐瞒的。所以,在我们做的那些季度更新中,Michael非常期待,我们是完全透明的。客户喜欢这种制度,如果你在一个人们看着你并说“等一下,这些人是我想合作的吗?”的空间里,有时不得不每季度告诉所有人公司发生了什么,这是一种优势。

Original English

Robin Group: Well, not my choice, by the way. So, I haven't sat in that seat. So, 35 years roughly of listing. So advantages, everybody knows what's going on at Mang Group. There is nothing to hide. And so in those quarterly updates that we do that Michael looks so forward to doing, um, we are completely transparent. And clients like that institutionally, if you're going to be in a space where people are looking at you and saying, "Hang on a second. Are these people who want to do business with?" Sometimes there's an advantage to having to tell everybody what's going on in your firm every quarter. So that's an advantage.

David Rubenstein: 好的。你主要以律师和合规官的身份来到这家公司。是的。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Right. You came to this firm largely as a lawyer and as a compliance officer. Yeah.

David Rubenstein: 通常合规官是告诉你“你不能做这个,你不能做那个”的人。你是如何从这种角色转变为CEO的?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Usually compliance officers are people tell you you can't do this, you can't do that. How did you go from

Robin Group: 我没说我是一个好的合规官。

Original English

Robin Group: Didn't say I was a good compliance officer. Um

David Rubenstein: 人们告诉你“你不能做这个,你不能做那个”。你通常不会晋升为CEO。那么你是不是一个不太好的合规官?

Original English

David Rubenstein: people are telling you you can't you can't do this, you can't do that. You usually don't rise up to be the CEO. So were you a not that good compliance officer?

Robin Group: 我相信有时最能理解风险的人,也是那些愿意承担风险的人。如果你让我坐在我的执行团队中,他们可能会坐下来告诉你,也许组织中风险承受能力最高的人是我。这可能是我从小培养起来的,因为我曾是一名诉讼律师,如果回到英国,就是一名大律师。所以我是一名辩护律师。我理解风险。我在风险中成长。当明智的人们逃离风险时,我却迎向风险。这使得我对风险管理的理解,也就是我们每天所做、每天所交付的,变得非常敏锐。所以,不,这不寻常。我是一个糟糕的合规官吗?我不会说我糟糕,但我理解风险。

Original English

Robin Group: That um I believe that sometimes the best people to understand risk are the people who want to take the risk as well. If you sit me in in my executive team, they'll probably sit down and tell you um perhaps the person with the highest risk tolerance in the organization is me. And that's something that either I've grown up on because I've I was a sort of a litigator I guess in American terms or a barrister if you go back into the UK. So I'm an advocate. I understand risk. I've grown up in risk. I've run towards risks when sensible people have run away from them. And that makes my understanding of risk management, which is what we do all day, what we deliver all day, um, quite acute. So, no, it's not usual. Was I a terrible compliance officer? I'm not going I don't think I was terrible, but I understand risk.

David Rubenstein: 好的,Michael。不久前,你说你想对飞机上使用洗手间的人收费。这个计划成功了吗?为什么人们对此如此不满?因为如果他们不想付费,难道他们不能忍45分钟不上洗手间吗?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Okay, Michael. Not long ago, you said that you wanted to charge people to go to the bathroom in your planes. Did that plan ever work or and why were so people so upset about that? Because couldn't they go for 45 minutes without going to the bathroom if they didn't want to pay?

Michael O'Leary: 这是那些不断被提及的精彩免费故事之一。大约25年前,我接受了一些BBC新闻记者的采访。我们当时在谈论其他事情。我想是关于拆除座位,在客舱里放沙子,你知道,就像伦敦地铁一样,他们会抓住扶手。她说:“接下来你要对厕所收费吗?”我说:“是的,我们目前有一个团队正在研究这个问题。”你知道,如果我们能拆掉后面的两个厕所,我们就能多放六个座位,六个座位就能让票价降低4%。而这个问题每25年就会被提出来一次。你就是那个想在飞机上对厕所收费的人。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: This is one of the great free stories that keeps on giving about I did an interview with some BBC news journalists about 25 years ago. I don't but we were on about something else. I I think taking seats out and putting sand in cabins and you know like the tube in London they'd be hanging on to the rails and she said what's next you going to charge for toilets? And I Yeah, we have a team working on that at the moment. And you know, if we could take out the two toilets at the back, we could put in six seats and six seats, we'd put 4% lower fairs that are and it still comes back every 25. You're the guy who wants to charge for toilets on board planes.

Michael O'Leary: 实际上,我们不会这样做,但这里有一个理论。实际上,如果你能拆掉两个厕所,只剩下一个厕所,并对飞机收费。你看看人们对不支付我们行李费的痴迷程度。人们在浴室里打包和称重。我才不会为行李支付该死的费用。他们也会对飞机上的厕所做同样的事情,我们可以在飞机上增加额外的座位,有了额外的座位,我们就能收取更低的票价,但我们不会这样做。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: There is actually we won't do it, but there is a theory in it. Actually, if you could take out two of the LS only have one toilet left and charge for the planes. You look at the extent to which people obsess about not paying for our baggage fees on board. You people packing up and weighing their scales in their bathrooms. I'm not going to pay bloody rare for the bag. They do the same thing with the toilet as well on board and we could put extra seats on the plane and with extra seats we'd be able to charge lower airfares but we're not going to do it.

David Rubenstein: 你曾经谈到过对超重的人额外收费。

Original English

David Rubenstein: You talked about once about charging extra for people overweight.

Michael O'Leary: 不,不,我们做得很好。我们实际上从未这样做过,因为它不会产生。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: No, no, we were very good. We that that we actually never did that one because it wouldn't make

David Rubenstein: 别给他出主意。算了。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Don't give him ideas. Never mind. That

Michael O'Leary: 那实际上是来自美国。我认为我们对很多身体有障碍的人,嗯,欧洲人稍微苗条一些,尽管你因为我们在这里支付了如此多的愚蠢环境税。不,我们从未计划过。飞机重量是根据成人和儿童的平均重量计算的。所以无论如何都不会有区别。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: was actually that that came out of the states. I think we're with respect uh quite a lot of physically challenged people. Uh the Europeans are a bit slimmer although you because we're paying so much environ stupid environmental taxation over here. Uh no we've never planned to aircraft weights are done on average weights for adults and children. So it would make no difference anyway.

David Rubenstein: 你在欧洲的业务做得很好。你为什么不把业务带到美国呢?你为什么不去美国?

Original English

David Rubenstein: You have a good business in Europe. Why don't you just take that business to the United States? Why don't you go to the United States?

Michael O'Leary: 因为那正是文化开始出错的地方。你相信自己的。我们在欧洲做得很好,因为我们在欧洲的竞争对手相当无能。汉莎航空法国航空荷兰皇家航空以及这些由无能的欧洲政府拥有的航空公司。美国航空公司则更具侵略性。它们更强大,根基更深。而一旦我们和我们的管理团队说:“这在欧洲做得很好,让我们都去美国、加利福尼亚或佛罗里达,我们可以在那里经营一家航空公司。”他们都会跑去阳光明媚的地方。我的意思是,如果你在爱尔兰度过任何一个冬天,每个人都想逃离那个地方。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Because that is where the culture starts to go wrong. You believe in your own This we work this very well in Europe because we have pretty much incompetent competition in Europe. Lufanza, Air France, KLM and these guys run by incompetent European government owned airlines. The US airlines are a bit more aggressive. You they are much stronger and much more well embedded. And the minute we and our management team says this has worked great in Europe, let's go all go off to America, California or Florida and we can run an airline over there, they'll all be out the door to go to the sunshine. I mean, if you've spent any winter in Ireland, everybody wants to get the hell out of the place.

David Rubenstein: 所以,那会分散注意力。我的意思是,我认为KennyCitadel多年来已经证明了这一点。狂热地专注于你的业务。不要分心。我不想去欧洲,欧洲是一个放松管制的市场。欧洲唯一的好处是,它是一个放松管制的航空旅行市场。所以,谢天谢地,我很少受到政府干预。一旦我离开欧洲,去中东、亚洲、美国,它就会受到政府的严格监管。而美国已经是一个运作良好,尽管相当昂贵的市场。它不会奏效,因为它会削弱Ryanair,因为我们都会分心。

Original English

David Rubenstein: So, that would be distraction. The other I mean, I think Kenny's demonstrated over many years in Citadel. Zealous focus on your business. Do not get distracted. And I don't want to go to Europe is a deregulated market. The only good thing about Europe is it is a deregulated market for air travel. So, thankfully, I get very little government interference. The minute I go outside of Europe to the Middle East, to Asia, to the US, it is hugely government regulated. and the states is already a reasonably well-run a although it's quite expensive. It wouldn't work because and it would undermine Ryder because we'd all get distracted.

David Rubenstein: 现在,你受过会计师培训,但我认识的会计师通常都是低调、非常无聊的人。你作为一名会计师,是如何形成这种个性的?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Now, you were trained as an accountant, but usually the accountants I know are usually low-key people, very boring people. How did you get this personality as an accountant?

Michael O'Leary: 我的意思是,首先,很多人质疑我是否受过训练,甚至是否可训练。嗯,我通过了考试,但只是勉强通过。你知道,我在农场长大。所以我是个农家子弟。我们学会了努力工作。我总是,如果我从事会计工作,我不想,我想非常安静和退休。我不喜欢宣传。但我意识到,当我进入Ryanair时,我们没有钱做广告。所以必须做些什么。当时布兰森Branson)到处跑,你知道,做各种廉价宣传。赫伯在美国也做得很好。所以显而易见的事情就是,好吧,如果你想在这里成功,就不能做一个像老鼠一样安静的会计师。所以,让我们现在重塑。记住,爱尔兰人通常擅长夸夸其谈。所以,我们每个人体内都有一个基因,我们只是说很多废话,而且我们非常擅长说很多废话。事实上,我们已经建立了一代人。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: I mean, well, firstly, I mean, a lot of people question whether I was trained or even trainable. Um, I did pass the exams, but only barely. Um, you know, I grew up on a farm. I so I'm a farm boy. We we learned how to work hard. I was always I if I came through accountancy I didn't I I wanted to be very kind of quiet and retired. I don't like the publicity. But I recognized when I got into Ryan we had no money for advertising. So it had to do something. Branson at the time was running around getting you know getting do all the cheap publicity. Herb was very good at in the states as well. So it was the obvious thing to do was okay you can't be successful here if you're going to be a kind of quiet as a mouse accountant. So, let's reinvent now. And remember, the Irish are generally good at being brash bullshitters. So, there is a gene in all of us, where we just talk a lot of rubbish and we're very good at talking lots of rubbish. In fact, we've built generation.

David Rubenstein: 你会雇佣一个和你一样个性的会计师吗?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Would you hire an accountant with your personality?

Michael O'Leary: 嗯,我会雇佣一个会计师吗?嗯,谢天谢地,我有比我更明智的人来招聘会计师。你不会那样做。我会雇佣人。我的意思是,我看看简历。所以,Kenny看看简历。他从哈佛招募这些小精英。我想要那些在农场长大的人,他们可以直接进来。我寻找的不是你的学位是什么,而是你在学校和大学假期期间做了什么暑期工作。如果你努力工作,并且出去打过零工。这些人就是我希望在Ryanair工作的人。我想要那些努力工作的人。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Um, would I hire an accountant? Well, thankfully that I have much more sensible people hiring accountants than the likes of me. You're not doing that. I would hire people. I mean, I I look at CVS. So, Kenny looks at CVS. He gets these Small Lotus out of Harvard. I want people if they grew up on a farm, they're in the door straight away. And I the thing I look for is not what your degree was, is what summer jobs did you do you know during your holidays from school and from college. And if you worked hard and you went out, you know, to be you got part-time jobs. Those are the people I want working in RER. I want people who work hard.

Michael O'Leary: 智力。这是航空业。我们不需要很多智力,我们也不需要非常聪明的互联网,因为这本来就是一个愚蠢的行业。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Brains. It's the airline industry. We don't need a lot of brains and we don't need very bright internets cuz it's a stupid industry anyway.

David Rubenstein: Ken,最近纽约市长指出你在纽约买了一套公寓,他希望你支付所谓的“皮埃塔恐怖税”(Pieta terror tax),尽管你在纽约雇佣了数千人。你在纽约建造新大楼。你为纽约贡献了大量的税收。这让你感到不安吗?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Ken K can recently the mayor of New York pointed out that you had bought an apartment in New York and he wanted you to pay a so-called Pieta terror tax even though you have employed thousands of people in New York. You're building a new building in New York. You're contributing a lot of tax money to New York. Did that upset you?

Kenneth Griffin: 让我不安的是实际的人身攻击。就像我们,你周六参加了白宫记者晚宴,他们试图刺杀总统。离我住在纽约的地方不远,就是联合健康集团United HealthcareCEO被刺杀的地方。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Uh what upset me was the actual the the personal attack. Like we're you you were at the White House correspondence dinner on Saturday where they tried to assassinate the president and not too far from where I live in New York is where they assassinated the CEO of United Healthcare.

Kenneth Griffin: 所以我认为纽约市长愿意将此变成一场政策辩论,一场人身攻击,这仅仅表明他严重缺乏判断力。仅仅是严重缺乏判断力。我理解纽约有账单要付。你愿意为我们管理纽约几年吗?

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: So I think the willingness of the mayor of New York to make this a policy debate, a personal attack, just demonstrated a profound lack of judgment. Just a profound lack of judgment. And I I understand that New York has bills to pay. Would you like to run New York for us for a couple years?

Michael O'Leary: 我无法当选,Kenny。没有人会投票给我。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: I'm unelectable, Kenny. Nobody would vote for me.

Kenneth Griffin: 是的,但你实际上会分散注意力。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Yes, but like you actually be a distraction from running.

David Rubenstein: 你会继续在纽约建造你的大楼吗,Ken

Original English

David Rubenstein: Are you going to Ken? You're going to go ahead with your building in New York?

Kenneth Griffin: 嗯,你知道,我周四会见州长。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Well, you know, I'm meeting with the governor um Thursday.

David Rubenstein: 好的,你会解决的。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Okay, you'll figure it out.

Kenneth Griffin: 我们会讨论我们在纽约的未来方向。真正的问题是,纽约是否会把财政秩序整理好,并以一个支持商业的强大政府的姿态来管理自己,还是他们想玩弄?为什么美国人认为我们可以搞社会主义?我们的DNA中没有这些,我们只会把它搞砸。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: And we'll we'll talk about our future direction in New York. Here's the real question. Is New York going to put their fiscal house to order and run itself from a position of a strong government that's pro business or are they looking to play like like why do the Americans think we can do socialism? Like we have none of that in our DNA and we're just going to screw it up.

David Rubenstein: 现在,Ken,你是美国最大的政治捐助者之一,你见过许多政治候选人。你可能比他们都聪明。你为什么不自己竞选总统呢?你有没有想过?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Now Ken, you are a very large maybe the largest donor in the United States of various political candidates and you've met many of these political candidates. Uh you're probably smarter than all of them. Why don't you just run for president yourself? Have you ever thought of that?

Kenneth Griffin: 你不是刚说我比他们都聪明吗?

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Didn't you just say I was smarter than all of them?

Kenneth Griffin: 我的意思是,David,这些人从事的这份工作多么可怕啊。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: I mean, David, like what what a nightmarish job these people sign up for.

David Rubenstein: 成为美国总统,你不会想做那份工作。

Original English

David Rubenstein: To be the president of United States, you wouldn't want to do that job.

Kenneth Griffin: 好的,如果你能弹指一挥间就进入椭圆形办公室,我当然很乐意做那份工作。那会是,我喜欢解决问题。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Okay, if you could snap your fingers and be in the Oval Office, of course, I'd love to do that job. That would be like such I I love solving problems,

Kenneth Griffin: 但没那么简单。你必须经历一个竞选周期,那简直是美国社会中最屈辱、最堕落的过程。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: but it's not that simple. You've got to go through a a campaign cycle, which is just the most humiliating, and degrading process in the American American society.

David Rubenstein: 那么,你也是许多慈善事业的慷慨捐助者。你如何处理那些每时每刻都来寻求慈善捐款的人?

Original English

David Rubenstein: So, uh, you're also a very large donor to lots of charitable causes. How do you deal with people coming to you every hour on the hour for charitable contributions?

Kenneth Griffin: KaseJulia

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Uh, Kase and Julia,

David Rubenstein: 你有人帮你处理这些事。

Original English

David Rubenstein: you have somebody that takes care of it for you.

Kenneth Griffin: 是的,我有两位出色的员工负责处理这些事。你知道,我的工作,我的工作是创造财富。我们很早就谈到了这一点。我有我的投资团队。我尽可能地专注于业务。我身边有优秀的人才,他们参与我们的慈善工作,参与我们的政治工作。他们了解对我来说重要的价值观。他们了解我们试图实现的关键目标。比如,我们如何教育美国儿童成为自由世界的未来领导者,但我每天的工作是为我们的股东带来回报。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: I do. I've got two outstanding people that take care of it. You know, my job, my job is to manufacture money. We spoke with that early on. I've got my investment team. I focus on the business as much as I possibly can. I've got great people around me who are involved in our philanthropic efforts, who are involved in our political efforts. They know the values that are important to me. They know the key objectives that we're trying to, you know, obtain. Like, how do we educate American children to be the future leaders of the free world, but my day in and day out, it's about driving the returns for our shareholders.

David Rubenstein: 美国已经有十多年没有经历过衰退了,技术上来说,不是技术性衰退。嗯,通常每七年左右就会有一次。你是否担心会发生衰退,部分原因是伊朗战争或其他任何可能影响美国的事情?

Original English

David Rubenstein: The US hasn't had a recession for more than 10 years, a technical, more than a technical recession. Um, usually have them every seven years or so. Are you worried about a recession in part because of the war in Iran or anything else coming to the United States?

Kenneth Griffin: 我的意思是,你看,商业周期已经被禁止了。我们都知道这一点。你都知道。我们都知道。这个房间里的每个人都知道这一点。商业周期并没有被禁止。在可预见的未来,世界某个时候会发生衰退。让我担心的是,不是我们会发生衰退这个事实。而是我们正在失去财政空间,无法进行逆周期支出,以使经济保持尽可能强劲的基础。坦率地说,如果全球主要主权债务的信用质量出现恐慌,就像美国在英国发生的那样,大约18个月前,那是利兹·特拉斯Liz Trust)的时刻吗?

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: I mean, look, the business cycle has been banned. We We both know this. You know this. We all know this. Everybody in this room knows this. The business cycle has not been banned. We're going to have a recession around the world at some point here in the in the foreseeable future. What worries me is not the fact that we're going to have a recession. It's that we're losing the fiscal space to engage in counteryclical spending to keep the economy on the strongest possible footing. And and frankly if there were a panic in the credit quality of the of the leading sovereign debts around the world the US happened in the UK just what about 18 months ago now was it Liz Trust's moment

David Rubenstein: 10天。

Original English

David Rubenstein: 10 days

Kenneth Griffin: 10天的兴奋。是的。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: 10 days of excitement. Yep.

Kenneth Griffin: 我的意思是,作为风险经理,这难道不可怕吗?

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: I mean terrifying is it not as a risk manager.

David Rubenstein: 是的。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Yeah.

Kenneth Griffin: 对。所以关键是西方世界必须把财政秩序整理好。这样我们在下一次经济衰退时才能有更大的灵活性和能力,以保持就业,保持我们的企业运转,并在经济困难时保持我们的经济尽可能强劲。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Right. So the key is the western world has to put its fiscal house in order. so that we have more flexibility and more capacity in the next downturn to keep people employed, to keep our businesses going, to keep our economies as strong as possible when they're under duress.

David Rubenstein: 好的,Robin,本周在美国,英国国王正在访问总统。你是英国公民。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Okay, Robin, this week in the United States, the the king of England is visiting the president. You're a British citizen.

Robin Group: 我是。

Original English

Robin Group: I am.

David Rubenstein: 你希望国王从这些会议中得到什么?许多英国人关注这一点,为什么派国王而不是首相去会见美国总统?

Original English

David Rubenstein: What do you want to have the king get out of those meetings? many people in England focused on on that and why send the king why not send the prime minister to meet with the president of the United States.

Robin Group: 当你被问到国王为什么要做某事时,这很棒。所以我在社交媒体上看到了那件事,采访美国普通民众,问他们是否知道国王和王后要来了,很多人说不太清楚,也不确定为什么。当被问到他们应该做什么时,社交媒体上的这些美国民众推荐了一些他们可以去参观的汉堡店,我觉得这很有用。嗯,在英国,当被问到时,至少有五次采访中人们为国王不得不进行这次访问而感到遗憾,因为他们能做什么呢?那次谈话会有多可预测或不可预测?它会有多大意义?我不得不说,我没有花太多时间思考国王应该做什么。我有点像你,我专注于我们每天应该做的事情,那就是为客户创造价值。

Original English

Robin Group: There's it's great when you're asked to speak about why the king is doing something anyway. So I I saw on social media I do that thing interviews with the American general population about did you know the king and the queen is coming and a lot of them said not really and I'm not sure why. And when asked what they should do, the American population, these folks on social media said they recommended certain burger joints that they could go and visit, which I thought was very useful. Um, in the UK, when asked, there were at least five interviews where people felt sorry for the king having to do this visit because what were they going to do? And how predictable or unpredictable is that conversation? How meaningful is it going to be? I have to say I haven't spent much time thinking about what I think the king should be doing. I I strangely I'm a little like you. I'm kind of focused on what we're supposed to be doing every day which is returning value to clients.

Robin Group: 尽管如此,现在是困难时期,我们需要理智稳定,我们需要某种方式来寻找解决方案。如果国王能为这场辩论添砖加瓦,那就太棒了。但我认为我不会抱太大希望。假设我有一些钱,我想投资Man Group,我说我对投资不太了解,但我会给你10万美元。嗯,如果我投资一个合理安全但有望盈利的投资,我能期望得到什么样的回报率?

Original English

Robin Group: Nevertheless, these are difficult times and what we need is sense and stability and what we need is some version of how we find solutions and things. And if the king can add to that debate, terrific. But I don't think I'd be holding my breath. Let's suppose I have some money and I want to invest the man group and I say I don't really know much about investing but I'm going to give you I don't know $100,000 or $100,000. Uh what kind of rate of return could I expect to get if I went into a reasonably safe but hopefully profitable investment that you would get to buy from me?

Robin Group: 所以第一,让我解释一下,Man Group与机构打交道,我们不直接与财富和散户打交道。所以,我只是提醒一下,以免有人在会议结束后打电话。嗯,第二,这取决于你目前追求什么。我认为如果我们现在真正思考财富投资组合,让我担心或我经常思考的是,财富和散户是否能获得他们应该拥有的多元化投资组合,以应对我们目前在市场中看到的这些波动。所以,对于10万美元,这取决于你的风险承受能力。这取决于你的年龄。这取决于你想承担多少风险。这取决于你是否想在欧洲投资,或者你是否想多元化投资。这取决于你是否想在一段时间内锁定你的资金。所以,我认为这取决于中间的一系列问题。

Original English

Robin Group: So number one let me just explain man Group deals with institutions and we don't deal directly with wealth and retail. So, I'm just being mindful that somebody doesn't ring up the phone at the end of this. Um, number two, it depends what you're after at the moment. And I think if we really think about wealth portfolios right now, what worries me or what I think about a lot is whether wealth and retail are having the access to diversified portfolios that they should have to try and weather the storms of these volatility that we're seeing in markets. So, with 100,000, it depends on where your risk profile is. It sort of depends on how old you are. sort of depends on how much risk you want to take. Sort of depends about whether you want to be in Europe or whether you want to be diversified. Sort of depends whether you want to lock your money up or not for a period of time. So I think it depends on a bunch of questions in the middle of that.

Robin Group: 但让我担心的事情,或者我认为我们与在座各位经常讨论的事情是,当你目前面临如此大的波动性分散性时,你如何驾驭市场?如果你想投资一些相对平稳和相对安全的东西。

Original English

Robin Group: But the thing that worries me or the things that I think we talk about a lot with the people in this room about how do you navigate markets at the moment when you have such volatility and such dispersion? if you want to go into something relatively flat and relatively safe.

David Rubenstein: 在对冲基金世界中,似乎男性经营对冲基金的人数远多于女性。你认为这是为什么?这种情况在我们有生之年会有所改变吗?

Original English

David Rubenstein: In the u in the hedge fund world, there seem to be many more men running hedge funds than women. Why do you think that is and is that going to change anytime in in our lifetime?

Robin Group: 嗯,这是一个有趣的问题,关于那些进入这些职业的人的历史群体是否正确。这确实有一定的性别偏向。多年前当我们开始研究这个问题时,我们开始思考,等一下,我们从哪里招聘?人才库中是否存在某种偏见?然后我们查看了人才库,然后查看了大学,我们查看了我们招聘的课程的选课者,他们主要是男性。这种情况正在改变,但改变得很慢。你不会看到我们弹指一挥间就找到不同性别构成的人群。我们希望最优秀的人来管理资金,最终,这其中确实存在一点偏见,或者说人才库中存在一点性别偏向。我希望看到它改变吗?当然。

Original English

Robin Group: Um it's an interesting question about whether the the the historical bunch of people who have gone into these careers are right. There's a certain gendered to nature to this. When we started looking at this years ago, we started to look at hang on a second, what are we recruiting from? And is there some bias in the pool or and then we looked at the pool and then we looked at universities and we looked at who was taking the courses from whom we were hiring from and they were predominantly being populated by men. That is changing, but it's changing slowly. And what you're not going to do is find us clicking our fingers and finding different populations of gender makeup. We want the very best people to run money and ultimately there is a little bit of bias in that or a little bit of gendered nature in the in the pool of people. Would I like to see it change? For sure.

David Rubenstein: Michael,假设你想去欧洲以外的地方度假,你会乘坐其他航空公司吗?你是否会乘坐其他航空公司来发现他们的错误?你认为除了Ryanair,哪家航空公司最好?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Michael, let's suppose you want to go on a vacation outside of Europe and would you fly another airline and do you fly other airlines to find out what mistakes they're making? And what airline do you think is the best next to Ryan Air?

Michael O'Leary: 我偶尔需要去美国参加投资者路演,David,向像你这样的投资者解释,不要把10万美元投入Man Group,而是投入Ryanair的股票,今年以来有22%的折扣。我的意思是,我乘坐大西洋上最便宜的航空公司。那是我唯一的选择。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: I occasionally have to go to the states on investor road shows David to explain to investors like you don't put the hundred grand into man put it into Raire shares at a 22% discount year to date. Um I mean I fly whoever's cheapest going across the Atlantic. That's my only other kind of uh

David Rubenstein: 你度假时和家人一起飞行,你不会乘坐其他航空公司的头等舱。你总是想坐经济舱。

Original English

David Rubenstein: you don't when you fly for you're going on vacation with your family. You don't fly first class on some other airline. You always want to be in the coach.

Michael O'Leary: 你知道,我希望乘坐Ryanair。我希望被看到乘坐Ryanair。乘坐Ryanair的另一个好处是,我不能飞,我必须坐在第三、第四或第五排,因为如果我坐在前排,我们就会做一些VIP之类的无聊事情。是的。所以,它的另一个巨大优势是,当我乘坐Ryanair时,我会去登机口拉登机牌。不可避免地,我会收到大约25张Facebook照片,我出现在所有这些人面前。所以,天哪,你们的领导者在那里做着尖端的一线工作,回到车间工作。不,实际上我和你乘坐同一航班,但这对于廉价公关很有好处。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: You know I I want to be on Ryan Air. I want to be seen on Ryer. The great thing of flying on Rhiner 2 is I can't fly I have to fly in rows three, four or five because if I'm up in the front row of seats everything's we're doing some VIP kind of nonsense that Yeah. So and the great advantage of it too is when I'm flying with RER I'll go up and pull the boarding cards at the boarding gate. inevitably I get about 25 Facebook pictures and I appear on the all these people. So God your man is up there doing cutting edge front line back to the shop floor kind of stuff. No actually I'm going on the same flight as you but it's good for cheap PR.

David Rubenstein: 你有抱怨吗?你会当场告诉他们吗?

Original English

David Rubenstein: You ever have you have complaints? Do you tell them right then and there or do you

Michael O'Leary: 我有很多抱怨,通常是我拉登机牌太慢,或者我是航班延误的原因,但我也会回复。我负责我们的投诉部门,我们有一个非常迅速的政策,在24小时内回复所有投诉,通常是礼貌地拒绝。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: I have lots of complaints usually that I'm pulling the boarding care passes too slowly or I'm the reason the flight is going to get go delayed but I'm also respond I I run our complaints department where we have a very prompt policy of responding to all complaints within 24 hours usually with a polite no.

David Rubenstein: 对于大多数乘客来说,最重要的是什么?价格、安全还是准时到达?嗯,安全是,但我的意思是假设安全是理所当然的,因为没有安全你就一无所有。99.999%的乘客在预订时想要的是什么?到XYZ最便宜的票价是什么?它不可用,同样,它不是我说的目的地,显然是航线频率,但99.99%的乘客想要的是最便宜的票价,这就是为什么互联网改变了航空旅行,而机器学习,我们曾拥有它,他们可能没有花足够的时间在机器学习上,它将在未来10或20年再次改变它。

Original English

David Rubenstein: For most for most passengers what's the most important thing price safety or getting there on time? uh safety is but but I mean assume that safety is a given because without safety you have nothing 99.999% of passengers want making a booking what's the cheapest fair to XY Z it is not available same it is not I destination obviously route frequency but 99.99% which is why the internet has transformed air travel and a machine learning uh which we had they probably didn't spend enough time machine learning is going to transform it again for the next 10 or 20 years.

David Rubenstein: 好的。Ken,当你招聘员工时,你想要高智商、勤奋、优秀的运动员吗?我的意思是,有人出现在你面前,他们是哈佛的尖子生,但他们有点书呆子气,不太会说话。你会雇佣他们吗?还是你宁愿雇佣一个看起来很棒的全美运动员?你想要雇佣什么样的人?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Okay. Ken, when you're hiring people, do you want people that are high IQ, are hard workers, good athletes? I mean, somebody comes in front of you, but they're first in their class at Harvard, but they're kind of nerdy and they don't really talk very well. Uh do you hire them or you rather have an all-American athlete who looks great? What kind of people do you want to hire?

Kenneth Griffin: 所以,我两者都需要。我两者都需要。我需要那些拥有魅力领导力智慧的全美运动员,因为我需要那些拥有与此相伴的天生领导技能的人。但我也需要一些非常聪明,通常有点内向的人,因为我们有需要解决的难题,他们知道如何解决这些难题。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: So, I I need both. I need both. I need I need people who are that all-American athlete with with a lot of charisma, a lot of leadership and a lot of intellect because I need people who have like the innate leadership skills that go with that. But I also need some of the people who are just wickedly smart, often a bit introverted, but we've got tough problems that need to be solved and they know how to solve them.

David Rubenstein: 最后一个问题。你认为世界上最好的主权财富基金是哪个?

Original English

David Rubenstein: Final question. What is the best sovereign wealth fund in the world in your view?

Michael O'Leary: 我不得不说是挪威的,除了他们对Ryanair的投资不够。但我们正在努力。这就是为什么我一次又一次地回到奥斯陆,试图说服他们增加投资。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: I would have to say Nor except they don't have enough exposure to Ryan Air. But we're getting there. That's why I'm back up in Oslo again and again and again trying to persuade them to upweight their investments.

David Rubenstein: 好的,Ken,你对最好的主权财富基金有什么看法?你们有许多基金投资于你们。

Original English

David Rubenstein: All right, Ken, you have the same view on the best sovereign wealth fund. You have many of them invest with you.

Kenneth Griffin: 这对我来说绝对是一个没有赢家的问题。好吧。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: This this is an absolute no-win question for me. Okay,

Kenneth Griffin: 但我要说的是。我要说的是,这个联邦基金的领导团队如此致力于挪威人民的福祉,这实际上非常感人。我认为每个人都应该为Nikolai和他的团队对将最优秀、最聪明的人才带到这个组织,以及始终如一地专注于如何为挪威人民服务的承诺,报以热烈的掌声。这确实非常了不起。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: but I will say this. I will say that the fact that the leadership team of this Commonwealth fund is so committed to the betterment of the people of Norway is actually really touching. And I I think everyone should give a huge round of applause to Nikolai and his team for their commitment to bringing the best and brightest to this organization and the consistent focus on how to deliver for the people of Norway. It's really quite remarkable.

David Rubenstein: Robin,我想你会有同样的看法。你投资的或你今天合作的最好的主权财富基金

Original English

David Rubenstein: Robin, I assume you would have the you would have the same view. The best sovereign wealth fund that you invest with or that you're with today.

Robin Group: 他说的,再加上这个。因为为什么当别人已经说得如此雄辩时,还要再说一遍呢?再加上这个。当我们与世界上最聪明的人合作时,我们所有人,在金融服务方面,都会变得更好。所以,没有什么比与一个团队、一个投资者、一个主权财富基金合作更好的了,他们能让我们在工作中做得更好,这就是这个团队所做的。

Original English

Robin Group: What he said plus because it why why say something when something's been said so eloquently plus this. We all get better all of us on the financial provision side when we work with the smartest people in the world. And so that there is nothing better than working with a team, an investor, a sovereign wealth with no who make us better at what we do and that's what this team does.

David Rubenstein: 非常感谢大家。

Original English

David Rubenstein: Thank you all very much.

Kenneth Griffin: 谢谢。

Original English

Kenneth Griffin: Thank you.

Robin Group: 谢谢。

Original English

Robin Group: Thank you.

Patrick Duplacy: 谢谢DavidKennethMichaelRobin。我们现在休息30分钟。我们将在1:45恢复会议。请大家随意享用茶点,并向新朋友介绍自己。

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: Thank you, David, Kenneth, Michael, and Robin. We will now take a 30 minute break. We resume at 1:45. Please help yourself to refreshments and do introduce yourself to somebody new.

文化转型:领导力的印记

旁白: 挪威是一个小国,但我们培养出世界级的运动员。我花了20年时间研究在驾驶舱、足球场和投资团队中,是什么将优秀与卓越区分开来。答案很少是天赋或资源。文化转型是领导力的印记。它需要一种共同的主人翁意识。不仅要找出问题所在,还要指出哪些是有效的,并能够保护这些有效的部分。我们可以庆祝过去的成功,但我们永远不会比下一次表现更好。

Original English

旁白: Norway is a small country, yet we produce worldclass athletes. I've spent 20 years studying what separates good from exceptional in cockpits, on football pitches, and investment teams. The answer is rarely talent or resources. Transforming a culture is the footprint of leadership. It requires a shared sense of ownership. Not only identifying what's broken, but naming what works and being able to protect just that. We can celebrate past success, but we are never better than our next performance.

Patrick Duplacy: 欢迎回来。大会的第二部分将探讨商业中最困难的挑战之一:公司的文化转型

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: Welcome back. The second part of the conference explores one of the most difficult challenges in business. Cultural transformation in companies.

Shelpi Nanda: 从零开始建立文化很难。在现有组织中转型文化可能更难。

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: Building a culture from scratch is hard. Transforming the culture in an existing organization that might be harder.

Patrick Duplacy: 我们的第一位演讲者是世界银行集团行长Ajay Banga。他曾两次领导文化转型。一次是在万事达卡Mastercard)以非凡的方式,他担任了12年的CEO;现在是在世界银行

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: Our first speaker is Ajay Banga, the president of the World Bank Group. He's led cultural transformation twice. once in a phenomenal manner at Mastercard where he was the CEO for 12 years and now at the World Bank.

Shelpi Nanda: 私营部门往往行动更快。公共部门拥有数十年的历史,多个股东和利益相关者。

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: The private sector tends to move faster. The public sector has decades of history, multiple shareholders, stakeholders.

Patrick Duplacy: 当规则完全不同时,你如何推动文化转型

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: How do you drive cultural transformation when the rules are completely different?

Shelpi Nanda: 我们很想听听更多。

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: We'd love to hear more.

Patrick Duplacy: 请欢迎AJ

Original English

Patrick Duplacy: Please welcome AJ.

世界银行的文化转型:以人为本,目标清晰

Ajay Banga: 所以他们说文化总是胜过战略,双关语是有意的。所以我们将从这里开始。在座的每个人都建立或领导过组织。你们都做过类似的事情。你们塑造过团队。你们在压力下做过决策。你们亲身体验过文化并非抽象之物。毫无疑问,你们对它有自己来之不易的看法。但我来这里不是为了告诉你们我已经搞清楚了。我只是,正如你所说,有一个不寻常的视角。我有幸担任过一家上市公司,也就是万事达卡CEO。而现在在世界银行集团,情况截然不同。它有超过25000名员工,189个政府作为我的股东,25位常驻执行董事在我的大楼里,每人有20名顾问,这意味着很多人都想知道我在做什么。

Original English

Ajay Banga: So they say that culture trumps strategy every time and the pun is intended. So that's where we're going to start from. Everyone in this room has built or led organizations. You've all done something of that type. You've shaped teams. You've kind of made decisions under pressure. You have lived the reality that culture is not something abstract. You've got your own hard one views on it. No doubt. But I'm not here to tell you that I've figured it out. I just have an unusual vantage point as you said. I've had the chance to be the CEO of a of a public company. That's Mastercard. And and now at the World Bank Group, it's quite different. It's 25,000 plus people with 189 governments as my shareholders with 25 executive directors resident in my building with 20 advisers each, which means a lot of people who want to know what I'm doing.

Ajay Banga: 所以,我不能真的偷懒。所以,我们都知道,作为CEO,我认为文化决定了我们的成功。我认为文化是我们所有人都在努力的最重要的事情。谈论它很容易,但它到底是什么?我认为“它是什么”以及“你如何建立它”是我们大多数人必须回答的两个最重要的问题。所以,为了忠于Nicola,我实际上写了一篇关于文化的演讲稿,这很有趣。我以前从未这样做过,但我将把它读给你们听,这样我就不会遗漏一些事情。我花了很多时间在这上面。

Original English

Ajay Banga: So, so, so, so I can't really goof off either. So, what we all know there is that as a CEO, I think culture is what determines our success. I think culture is what is the single most important thing all of us work on. And and it's easy to talk about it, but what exactly is the darn thing? And I think what is it and how do you build it are the two most important questions that most of us have to answer. So, so in an effort to be faithful to Nicola, I I actually have written a speech down on culture, which is pretty interesting. I've never done that, but I'm going to read this out to you so I don't miss a few things. I spent a lot of time working on this one.

Ajay Banga: 我认为文化是什么取决于你的组织。我认为无论你的独特情况如何,文化绝对是粘合剂。它是人们如何做决策,如何承担风险,如何协同工作以实现你的使命。它是你如何驱动一个组织说“可以”而不是“不行”的方式。每个组织都有很多人被激励说“不行”。从来没有足够的人说“如果这样做,就可以”。找到那种文化很重要。文化不是一份价值观声明。它不是墙上的海报,也绝对不是CEO在全体会议上说的话。它不是。

Original English

Ajay Banga: I think what culture is depends on your organization. I think regardless of your unique circumstances, culture is the glue. It is absolutely the glue. how people make decisions, how they take a risk, how they work together to deliver whatever your mission is. It's how you drive an organization to say yes if rather than no. Every organization has plenty of people incented to say no. There are never enough people who say yes if you do it this way. Finding that culture is important. Culture is not a value statement. It is not a poster on the wall and definitely it is not what the CEO says at town halls. It's just not.

Ajay Banga: 所以最简单的文化就是衡量什么奖励什么容忍什么。但最重要的是,它是当你不在房间时发生的事情。这就是我所说的文化。我认为“当你不在房间时发生的事情”这个想法,使其成为一个倍增器。而“如何做”是文化生存或死亡的关键。因为虽然每个人的背景都不同,但公共部门和私营部门之间有一些共同点,也有一些非常大的差异。

Original English

Ajay Banga: So at the simplest culture is what gets measured, what gets rewarded, what gets tolerated. But most importantly, it's what happens when you're not in the room. And so that's the culture that I'm talking about. And I think the idea of it's what happens when you're not in the room is what makes it a force multiplier. And the how is where culture lives or dies. Because while everybody's context is different, there are some common things between the public and the private sector and there are some very big differences.

Ajay Banga: 所以首先我称之为体面商数decency quotient),简称DQ。我很快就了解到,在我成长过程中,智商IQ)和情商EQ)很重要。但我相信现在领导力需要的是体面商数。所以我只是这样命名它。我在一次全体会议上开玩笑,我刚听完沃伦·巴菲特Warren Buffett)谈论DQ。在他的案例中,那是Dairy Queen,冰淇淋。所以你可以看到我的思维方式。我当时正在寻找一些话题,告诉人们我的意思,并给我想向他们解释的文化一个词。然后就有了体面商数这个想法。但体面不是指友善。它实际上是指公平直接一致

Original English

Ajay Banga: So first what I call the decency quotient DQ. I learned very quickly that IQ and EQ were important while I was growing up. But I believe that now what you need in leadership is what's called the decency quotient. And so I I just named it that. I was making a joke in a town hall and I'd just come out of listening to Warren Buffett talk about DQ. In his case, that was Dairy Queen, the ice cream. And so you could see how my mind works. And I was looking for something to talk about to tell people what I meant and to give a word to what I was trying to explain to them about culture. And this idea of decency quotient came. But decency is not about being nice. It's actually about being fair, direct, and consistent.

Ajay Banga: 即使不舒服,也要对你的员工说实话。清晰地给出反馈。在困难时挺身而出。尊重他人。所有这些。它实际上不会减慢组织的速度。它恰恰相反,因为它让你能够更快地行动,因为人们信任这个系统。它改进了决策,因为人们愿意挑战并被挑战。所以如果你做得对,它实际上会以正确的方式运作。恐惧会在一段时间内驱动行为,但它不会建立判断力。它不会建立主人翁意识,也不会建立主动性。体面会。所以,领导力必须感觉像一只手放在你的背上,你必须推动人们前进,而不是用手指指着他们的脸。这就是体面商数的全部意义。这是第一件事。

Original English

Ajay Banga: Tell the truth to your people even when it's uncomfortable. Give that feedback with clarity. Speak up when it's difficult. Treat people with respect. All that. It doesn't actually slow the organization down. It does quite the opposite because it allows you to move faster because people trust the system. And it improves decisions because people are willing to challenge and to be challenged. And so it actually works in the right way if you do it the right way. Fear drives behavior for a while, but it doesn't build judgment. It doesn't build ownership, and it doesn't build initiative. Decency does. And so, leadership has to feel like a hand on your back. You got to push people forward, but not a finger in their face. And that's what decency quotient is all about. That's the first thing.

Ajay Banga: 第二个是目的的清晰性。在一个大型组织中,我认为最大的文化问题往往不是抵制James可以对此滔滔不绝。实际上,更多的是困惑而不是抵制。在他担任摩根士丹利Morgan Stanley)的案例中,他非常清楚地传达了一个信息,即他们将专注于财富管理,作为摩根士丹利的增长方式,对吗?这改变了一个拥有多种增长想法的组织,使其变得非常专注、非常简单、非常集中。我认为简单性是关键。而让事情变得简单实际上是最难做到的。所以人们认为在简单性中你失去了细节。实际上,用简单的术语进行交流,不使用行话,是作为领导者最难做到的事情。

Original English

Ajay Banga: The second one is clarity of purpose. In a large organization, I think the biggest cultural problem is often not resistance. And James can talk to this adnauseium. It's actually confusion more than resistance. Clarity in his case in Morgan Stanley, he very clearly delivered a message of what they were going to focus on which was wealth management as the way that Morgan Stanley would grow, right? In that changed an organization that had multiple ideas of how they would grow to very focused, very simple, very focused. And I think simplicity is the key. And making something simple is actually the hardest thing to do. So people think that in simplicity you've lost detail. Actually conversing in simple terms without jargon is the world's most difficult thing to do as a leader.

Ajay Banga: 在万事达卡,公司必须将自己从一个支付处理器重新定义为一个技术平台。我是如何简化它的?我让每个人都围绕一个使命团结起来,那就是“消灭现金”(kill cash)。只是消灭现金,而不是考虑其他一切。这包括技术、支付、分析、数据,以及你能做的任何事情。金融普惠,与弱势群体合作,将社会保障金送到他们手中,找出数字身份,所有这些都包含在“消灭现金”这个想法中。它给了他们一个非常清晰的方向感。

Original English

Ajay Banga: At Mastercard the company had to redefine itself from a payments processor to a technology platform. How did I simplify it? I united everybody around one set of mission and it said kill cash. just kill cash as compared to thinking about everything else. And that included technology, it included payments, included analytics, it included data, it included anything that you could do. Financial inclusion, working with the downtrodden, getting social security payments into their hands, figuring out digital identities all came inside the idea of killing cash. It gave them a very clear sense of direction.

Ajay Banga: 所以在世界银行,类似的问题是,你如何消灭贫困?我开始说,与其有许多不同的原因,不如让我们为气候做这件事,为性别平等做那件事,让我们建造一家医院,让我们建立一个技能中心,让我们办学校。归根结底,你试图消灭贫困所做的是给人们一份工作。不一定是为大公司或小公司工作,也不是作为企业家,或者只是留在他们的小农场,通过连接技术到合作社来满足于他们获得的生产力。我只是给你很多方法来做这件事。关键是,工作收入是激发人们希望和尊严的最佳方式

Original English

Ajay Banga: So at the World Bank, similar issue, how do you kill poverty? And I've got come around to saying instead of having many different causes, let's do this for climate, let's do that for gender, let's build a hospital, let's do a skilling center, let's do schools. At the end of the day, what you're trying to do to kill poverty is to give people a job. not necessarily working for a big company or a small company or as an entrepreneur or just staying in their small farm and being content with the productivity they get by connecting up to technology to a cooperative. I'm just giving you many ways to do this. The point is a job earning is the best way to drive people's hope and dignity.

Ajay Banga: 如果你仔细思考这一点,我的一位朋友曾说,贫困既是一种心态,也是一种存在状态。存在状态可以通过提供赠款、援助、捐赠、慈善捐款来解决。心态则无法通过这些解决。心态需要你每天早上感到有生产力,感到乐观,感到自己有未来。所以我认为最重要的是,工作为你提供了一种方法,既能战胜存在状态,也能战胜心态,从而将贫困彻底埋葬。

Original English

Ajay Banga: And if you sort of think about this carefully, a friend of mine once said that poverty is both a state of mind and a state of being. Being you can solve by giving grants, by giving aid, by giving donations, by writing philanthropic dollars. Mind doesn't get solved with that. Mind needs you to feel productive every morning, optimistic, feeling that you've got a future. So I think the most important thing is the job gives you both a way to defeat a state of being and a state of mind to drive a nail into the coffin of poverty.

Ajay Banga: 这就是已经确立的清晰性,我认为一旦你开始这样做,你就会得到人们在决策上的乘数效应。关于清晰性的最后一件事,就是永远不要厌倦讨论你已经决定好的非常简单的事情,因为领导者会厌倦重复同样的话。但组织不会厌倦听到它。我认为如果你想让某件事深入人心,你必须一遍又一遍地重复它,直到它体现在人们的决策方式中。所以这是第二个话题。第三个是衡量重要的事情调整你的激励机制。你们对此都很清楚。在万事达卡,我们有一些简单的指标。

Original English

Ajay Banga: That's the clarity that has settled in and I think once you start doing that you get this multiplier effect of people making decisions on it. The last thing about clarity, just never tire of discussing what you've decided is very simple because leaders get bored saying the same things. Organizations don't get bored hearing it. And I think if you want something to stick, you got to say it again and again and again and again until it shows up in how people make their decisions. So that's the that was the second topic. The third is measure what matters. Align your incentives. You guys are all pretty clear on that. At Mastercard, we had some simple metrics.

Ajay Banga: 在世界银行,我上任时有一份包含155个项目的公司记分卡。对于来自私营部门的各位,你们会喜欢这个。我上任时有一份包含155个项目的公司记分卡。我试图向我的董事会,那25个人解释,155个项目对于一份公司记分卡来说太多了,大约多了130个。因为有155个项目,我总能得到A+,因为我能完成30个。而你永远不会让我讨论另外125个。事情就是这样运作的。这花了很多时间。我们最终将项目减少到22个,现在所有22个项目都在我们的网站上。你可以点击它们,每月逐个项目跟踪我的进展。我一直告诉我们的董事会,阳光是最好的消毒剂

Original English

Ajay Banga: At the World Bank, I had a corporate scorecard. For those of you from the private sector, you will love this. I had a corporate scorecard of 155 items when I showed up. And I tried to explain to my board of those 25 people that 155 items is about 130 too many for a corporate scorecard. Because at 155 items, I will always get an A+ because I would have delivered on 30. and you'll never get me to discuss the other 125. That's how it works. It took a long time. We got ourselves down to 22 items and all 22 now on our website. You can go and click on them and you can track where I am every month project by project on delivering against that. And I keep telling our board, sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Ajay Banga: 所以,目标的透明化简化它们,减少数量,这就是我们正在努力做的。所以现在这一切都很美好,但这里是私营部门和公共部门之间的背景差异。在私营部门,压力来自市场、股东、利润动机、绩效、竞争、危机。你有明确的杠杆:薪酬、招聘、解雇、资本配置。在万事达卡,如果有什么不起作用,我可以使用所有这些杠杆,调整它们,快速修复它。在公共部门,挑战完全不同。我们有一个使命,但我们也有189个股东,每个股东都有不同的、细致入微的看法,基于他们的国内政治,他们每天都会把这些带到我的办公室。

Original English

Ajay Banga: And so transparency of your targets, simplifying them, fewer are what we're trying to do. So now all this is lovely but here's the context difference between the private sector and the public sector. In the private sector pressure comes from markets comes from shareholders comes from profit motive performance competition crisis. You got clear levers compensation hiring firing capital allocation. At Mastercard if something wasn't working I could use all those levers jiggle with them fix it quickly. In the public sector the challenge is completely different. We've got a mission, but we also have 189 shareholders, each with a different and nuanced way of looking based on their domestic politics, which they bring to my office every day.

Ajay Banga: 你有长期存在的流程。任期很长。风险规避非常真实。我们有点像一个试图完成实际工作的学术机构。所以你可以想象这有多复杂。你不能一夜之间重置那个系统。而且薪酬不是你私营部门拥有的那种杠杆。所以你利用你拥有的所有杠杆。你让团队围绕结果对齐。你简化你所说的话。简化结构。你明确什么会得到认可。你明确什么会得到资助。这需要更长的时间。但原则是完全相同的。如果你不对齐系统,文化就不会改变。而对齐来自简单专注,以及从你如何谈论你正在做的事情中从前线领导

Original English

Ajay Banga: You've got long-standing processes. Tenure is long. Risk aversion is very real. We're kind of like an academic institution trying to get real work done. So, you can imagine how complex that is. And you cannot reset that system overnight. And compensation is not a lever of the type that you have in the private sector. So you work all the levers you have. You align teams around the outcomes. You simplify what you say. Simplify structures. You become explicit in what gets recognized. You become explicit in what gets funded. It takes longer. But the principle is exactly the same. If you don't align the system, culture will not move. And alignment comes from simplicity and focus and leading from the front with how you speak about what you're doing.

Ajay Banga: 所以这只是我给你们的结束语。多年来我一直告诉所有与我共事的人,领导力不是一种特权。它不是你的与生俱来的权利。你不是天生就拥有它。它绝对是你必须赢得的。在你职业生涯的某个时刻,有人信任你,就像有人信任我一样,把对其他人的责任交给了你。从那时起,你的工作就永远改变了。

Original English

Ajay Banga: So it's just a closing thought for you. I have told everybody who worked with me over the years that leadership is not a privilege. It's not your birthright. You weren't born with it. It is absolutely what you have to earn. And at some point in your career, someone trusted you like someone trusted me with the responsibility for other people. And at that point, your job changes forever.

Ajay Banga: 所以,这不再仅仅是关于交付结果。它是关于创造条件,让为你工作的人能够感受到你的手放在他们的背上,推动他们前进。这就是文化的全部意义。因为实际上,你不可能一直都在那里把手放在他们的背上,但他们仍然必须感受到它。这就是文化。非常感谢。

Original English

Ajay Banga: And so it's not long about just delivering results. It's about creating the conditions where the people who work for you can feel your hand on their back pushing them forward. And that is what culture is all about. Because actually you're not going to be there to put your hand on their back all the time, but they have to feel it anyway. And that's culture. Thank you very much.

摩根士丹利的文化重塑:战略先行,赢者文化

Rula Kof: 谢谢你,AJ。我们继续探讨文化转型。下一站,华尔街。James Gorman在金融危机之后于2010年成为摩根士丹利CEO。在14年里,他不仅改变了公司的商业模式,还改变了文化本身。今天,他是摩根士丹利的名誉主席,迪士尼Disney)的主席,以及泛大西洋投资集团General Atlantic)的高级顾问。

Original English

Rula Kof: Thank you, AJ. We continue our exploration of cultural transformation. Next stop, Wall Street. James Gorman became CEO of Morgan Stanley in 2010 in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Over 14 years, he transformed the firm, not just the business model, but the culture itself. Today he is chairman emeritus of Morgan Stanley, chairman of Disney and a senior adviser to general Atlantic.

Rula Kof: 《金融时报》编辑Rula Kof将与他一起上台,探讨这段旅程。请欢迎JamesRula

Original English

Rula Kof: Joining him on stage to explore this journey is Ruler Kof, editor of the Financial Times. Please welcome James and Ruler.

Rula Kof: 大家好。嗯,James,好久不见。

Original English

Rula Kof: Hello everyone. Um, and hello James. I haven't seen you in a in a while. Uh,

James Gorman: 我退休了,所以。

Original English

James Gorman: I'm retired that's why.

Rula Kof: 是的。是的。嗯,回顾文化,我遇到了各种各样的说法,后来我发现它们实际上被称为“戈尔曼主义”(gormanisms)。所以我想我应该向你抛出一些你的“戈尔曼主义”。

Original English

Rula Kof: Yes. Yes. Uh, so looking back at um culture, I came across all sorts of statements that I then discovered were actually called gormanisms. And so I thought that I would throw at you a few of your gormanisms. And

James Gorman: 这可能会很危险。但无论如何。

Original English

James Gorman: this could be dangerous. But anyway,

Rula Kof: 嗯,只有一个。我认为其他的都很好。嗯,然后你可以和我们谈谈。

Original English

Rula Kof: well, only one of them. I think I think the rest are fine. Uh, so and then you can you can talk to us about it.

James Gorman: 是的。

Original English

James Gorman: Yeah.

Rula Kof: 第一个,“战略让你有资格谈论文化。”

Original English

Rula Kof: The first one, strategy earns you the right to talk about culture.

James Gorman: 嗯。

Original English

James Gorman: Mhm.

Rula Kof: 告诉我们关于这个。是的。嗯,如果业务不运作,就很难谈论文化

Original English

Rula Kof: Tell us about that. Yeah. Um it's very hard to talk about culture if the business isn't isn't working you know

Rula Kof: 这就是你进入摩根士丹利时发生的事情。

Original English

Rula Kof: which is what happened when you were when you came into more

James Gorman: 你可以去。我的意思是,这事是怎么发生的,董事会在巴克莱银行有了新主席和新COO后,他们进行了一次全球巡回,那是一次文化巡回,他们问我:“你为什么不做?”我说:“首先,我们还在摸索我们长大后会变成什么样。我不知道巴克莱长大后会变成什么样。如果你环游世界,告诉人们:‘这是我们的文化。这意味着什么。这些是我们的核心价值观。’一周后,你回来却说:‘不幸的是,你被解雇了。’但这仍然是一种伟大的文化。”所以,你必须有一个可行的战略,它能给人们未来的机会和希望,然后围绕它建立文化价值观。而这些价值观让你能够随着时间改变你的战略,因为它给你信心,它来自正确的地方。

Original English

James Gorman: you can go I mean how this came up the board of directors came to me when Barclay's bank had a new chairman new co and they did a global tour which was a culture tour and they said to me kind of why aren't you doing that I said because firstly we're still figuring out what we're going to be when we grow up. I don't know what Blay is going to be when they grow up. What do you do if you go around the world, you tell people, "This is our culture. This is what it means. These are our core values." A week later, you come back and say, "Unfortunately, you're fired." But it's still a great culture. So, you've got to have a strategy which is viable, which gives people an opportunity and promise for the future, and then build the cultural values around it. And those values is what let you change your strategy over time because it gives you the confidence it's coming from the right place.

James Gorman: 所以强大的公司,我认为它就像火车上的不同车厢。你有战略,然后是文化,然后是战略,然后是文化,然后是战略,这就是公司能存在几十年,甚至几个世纪的原因,它们愿意重塑。它们以对文化的信心所带来的强大骨骼进行重塑。但你也说过,没有什么比致胜更能驱动文化了。所以,人们必须在你能锻造真正的文化之前,感受到他们在致胜

Original English

James Gorman: So strong companies I think of it as it's it's like you know different cabins on a a a train. You've got the strategy then the culture then the strategy then the culture then the strategy and that's how companies stay around for decades you know centuries is they're prepared to reinvent. They reinvent with the strong bones that come from confidence in their culture. But you've al you've also said that nothing drives culture more than winning. So winning people have to feel that they're winning before you can forge a real culture.

James Gorman: 嗯,这与我今天同意Michael的观点一致。尽管我不得不说,我只是想说,我不是为了讨好你。我今天早上乘坐SAS航班来的。那是一次很棒的飞行。食物很棒。人们很友善。他们没有向我收取行李费。一切都很好。它提前50分钟到达。50分钟。我是第一个通过海关的人。我喜欢它。所以,我确定Ryanair很好。我只是没坐过。

Original English

James Gorman: Well, that's something I think I agree with with was it Michael today? Although I'd have to say I just want to say and I'm not saying this to pander to you. I flew in on SAS this morning. It was a fabulous flight. The food was great. The people were nice. They didn't charge me for my bags. everything. It arrived 50 minutes early. 50. I was the first person through customs. I loved it. So, I'm sure Ryan Air is good. I just haven't been on it. Um,

Michael O'Leary: 厕所免费吗?

Original English

Michael O'Leary: where the toilet's free?

James Gorman: 是的,厕所免费。很好。嗯,你知道,我认为如果人们会支持一种非致胜文化,但你会得到某种类型的人支持那种文化。如果你想要真正的行动者,那些愿意把自己置于火线、冲向危机的人,那么他们需要知道他们是致胜组织的一部分。魅力在你告诉人们冲上山头时效果很好,但当他们都被击毙时,他们会说:“嗯,这不是个好主意。”你说:“效果不太好,但再冲一次。”他们会说:“你还有别的办法吗?”你知道,就像,所以人们需要成为某种东西的一部分。如果它是致胜的,它就会具有感染力。如果它具有感染力,他们就会真正做出非凡的事情。所以,是的,作为领导者,你的工作是制定一个致胜战略,让每个人都能蓬勃发展。

Original English

James Gorman: It's Yeah, toilets for free. It was good. Um, you know, I I think if again people will people will support a a non-winning culture, but you'll get a certain type of people who support that. If you want real goers, people who are prepared to put themselves, you know, on the line of fire, run to where the drama is, then they need to know that they're part of a winning organization. Charisma works great once you tell people to, you know, charge up the hill and they get all shot out and they say, "Well, that's not a really good idea." You say, "It didn't work so well, but charge again." And they say, "Have you got another way of getting there?" You know, it's like, so people need to be part of something. And if it's winning, it's infectious. And if it's infectious, they truly do exceptional things. So, yeah, your job as a leader is to figure out a winning strategy that puts everybody in a position where they can thrive.

Rula Kof: 员工应该停止感觉自己是寻找下一个奖金的租户,而应该开始感觉自己是房东。告诉银行家不要考虑他们的下一个奖金是相当困难的。

Original English

Rula Kof: Employees should stop feeling like tenants looking for their next bonus and start feeling like landlords. It's it's quite difficult to tell bankers not to be thinking about their next bonus.

James Gorman: 嗯,我以最友善的方式说了。

Original English

James Gorman: Well, I said it in the nicest possible way.

James Gorman: 嗯,你知道,归根结底,你必须做出决定。这是我与董事会讨论的另一件事。我说,如果我有一个梦想,那就是找一个非常聪明的神经科学家,一个非常聪明的软件开发人员,一个计算机科学家,把他们放在一个房间里,让他们想出一种相机,这种相机可以拍摄人们大脑内部的图像。所以当他们早上上班时,他们站在大门前,就像那些翻板门一样,你不需要刷卡进入。如果它拍到你的头部照片并通过测试,大门就会打开。测试是,你的一半必须是为了你自己而来的。因为要应对逆境,要向前推进,你必须有自我自信,等等。但你的一半必须是为了机构而来的。

Original English

James Gorman: Um, you know, at the end of the day, uh, you've got to decide. This is another thing I had a discussion with the board. I said if I have a dream which is to get a really smart you know neuroscientist and really smart software developer and a computer scientist and put them in a room together and say come up with a camera and the camera has to take a picture of the inside of people's heads. So when they go to work in the morning they stand in front of the gates like you know the floppy gates whatever they are you don't pull out your card to get in. The gate opens if it takes a picture of your head and you've passed the test. And the test is half of you has to be coming in for yourself. Cuz to deal with adversity, to drive forward, you've got to have ego, confidence, whatever. But half of you has to be coming in for the institution.

James Gorman: 所以对银行家、交易员或任何人的号召是,你知道,只有我们所有人齐心协力才能成功。如果只是为了你自己的那一份,98%都是你。如果每个人都这样做,那将是一场消耗战,不会有好结果。顺便说一句,你得到的是股票报酬。如果一切顺利,股票就会上涨。所以你为什么不想让这一切都成功呢?这意味着你要把一部分自我放在一边,去做对机构有利的事情。幸运的是,我们的投资银行家做到了。他们在这方面表现出色。但直言不讳的语言,并表达出来,就像你说的,我不是为了James Gorman Securities而来的。我是为了摩根士丹利而来的。我尊重它的历史。我尊重在我之前领导它的人,我也尊重在我之后的人。你的工作是把船从一个港口开到另一个港口,而不是只为自己霸占这艘船。

Original English

James Gorman: So the the the rallying cry to the to the the bankers or the traders or anybody was, you know, it only works if we all make it work. And if it's just about you getting your piece, 98% is you. If everybody does that, that's a war of attrition that won't end well. And by the way, you're paid in the stock. And the stock is going to go up if it goes well. So why wouldn't you want this all to work? And that means putting a little bit of yourself aside to do what's right in the institutions. And happily, our investment bankers did. They were fantastic about it. But but blunt language and expressing it as you you know, I don't come in for James Gman Securities. I came in for Morgan Stanley. and I respected its history. I respected the people who'd led it before me and I respect the people after it. Your job is to take the ship from one port to another, not to take over the ship only for yourself.

Rula Kof: 在疫情期间,以及与年轻人打交道时,是否更困难?你经常听到现在年轻人想要体验。他们不一定在一个机构中寻求职业生涯。嗯,你知道,你有一些有争议的评论,比如,“如果你不开心,就离开。”

Original English

Rula Kof: Was it was it much harder particularly during the the um uh the co pandemic and with younger you often hear today that younger people want experiences. They're not necessarily looking for a career in in one uh in one uh institution. Um, and you know, you've had a few controversial comments like, uh, if you're not, if you're so unhappy, just leave- w

James Gorman: 就像我爸爸会对我说的。你知道,这是实话。

Original English

James Gorman: sort of thing my dad would say to me. You know, it's like it's the truth.

Rula Kof: 但你也说过,如果你在职业生涯中,你正在建立职业生活,这需要与其他人在一起,以捕捉微妙的线索。如果年轻人不在办公室,他们就是傻瓜。那才是指导发生的地方。

Original English

Rula Kof: But you've also said if you're in career land, you're building a professional life and that requires being around other human beings to pick up soft cues. Young people are nuts if they're not in the office. That's where mentoring happens.

James Gorman: 是的。你知道,在疫情期间,我作为CEO感受非常强烈,我因为我所说的话受到了很多人的批评,部分原因是我很早就得了新冠并康复了。所以他们的态度是,你这么说很容易。我当时说,我不知道它是否在你的清单上。如果你能去餐馆,你就能去办公室。

Original English

James Gorman: Yeah. I you know I felt very strongly as CO was going on and and I was criticized by a lot of people for what I said and partly was I'd had CO very early and got through it. So their attitude was it's easy for you to say what I said was I don't know if it's on your list. Um if you can go to a restaurant you can go to the office.

Rula Kof: 汉普顿有一个。

Original English

Rula Kof: There's one on the Hampton.

James Gorman: 发生的事情是,我在纽约一家餐馆取我的食物。我刚健完身。我在这家名叫Bond Street ST的日本小餐馆取我的食物,一个大个子走到我面前,搂着我的胳膊,他说:“很高兴见到你。”我说:“你是谁?”他说:“我在某某组织工作。”他说:“这太棒了,餐馆里人很多。”他说:“我们能和他的桌子一起自拍吗?我们大家一起自拍。每个人都在击掌。”我说:“嘿,回到办公室的感觉真好。”我不能去办公室。不安全。

Original English

James Gorman: What happened was I was at I was at a restaurant in New York picking up my food. I've been to the gym. I was picking up my food at this little Japanese restaurant called Bond Street ST and a big dude walks up to me, puts his arm around me, he says, "Great to see you." I said, "Who are you?" He said, "I work in the organization blah blah blah." And he said, "It's fantastic and crowded restaurant." And and he said, "Can we get a selfie with his table? We all do a selfie together. Everybody's high-fiving each other." And I said, "Hey, finding being back at the office." I couldn't go in the office. Not safe.

James Gorman: 怎么回事?那些孩子们呢?他是高级管理总监。那些年轻的孩子们呢?他们回到公寓,里面还有三个孩子。没有隐私。有狗在叫。你知道,邻居们在吵闹,他们本应该工作,他们想去办公室,但他们的老板不在那里。我说:“事情不是那样运作的。”我们得到了机会。我们得到了指导。我们得到了发展,因为有其他高级人员在身边。即使是像我年轻时作为律师,有一天一位高级合伙人说:“你愿意和我一起走吗?”那是去法院参加庭审,大约四个街区。我没有参与庭审,但他足够聪明,意识到仅仅在一起走四个街区就能改变我的一天,我想,改变我的一个月,我得以和他交谈,不,如果你通过了那种指导,你就有义务回馈。我对此感受非常强烈。

Original English

James Gorman: Like what? What about all the kids? He's the senior management director. What about the young kids who are coming back to an apartment with three other kids in them? There's no privacy. There's a dog barking. You know, the neighbors are yelling and they're supposed to be doing work and they want to go in the office and their bosses aren't there. I said, "It doesn't work that way." We got the opportunity. We were mentored. We were developed because other senior people were around. Even as simple as would you, when I was a young lawyer, one of the senior partners one day said, "Would you walk with me?" It was like four blocks to the court for a trial. had I wasn't involved in the trial, but he was smart enough to realize that just being together for four blocks would change my day, change my month, I think, and I got to talk to him and no, you've got an obligation if you've come through that mentoring to give back. I feel that very strongly.

Rula Kof: 你在摩根士丹利做过最重要的事情之一是管理继任计划,你已经成为平稳管理继任计划的专家,最近你又被委以在迪士尼做这件事。嗯,这到底需要什么?难道不只是向其他候选人砸钱吗,你也那样做了?

Original English

Rula Kof: One of the most important um uh things that you've done uh at Morgan Stanley was to manage the succession and you've become a bit of an expert in managing uh success succession smoothly and you've been charged with doing that more recently at Disney. Um, what does it really take? And isn't it just throwing money at the other candidates, which you also did?

James Gorman: 嗯,我们,我不知道我们是否,我们当然给了摩根士丹利几个人签约奖金。我们在迪士尼没有这样做。所以没有一个统一的模式。我的意思是,这可能是一个非常漫长的对话,但要点是透明度。是的,我们正在进行一个流程。董事会的继任委员会将做出决定。将有一个开始日期。将有一个过渡日期,并将有一个结束日期。在结束日期之后,旧CEO将离开。不会像以前那样徘徊。他们会离开。新CEO将上任,他们将担任非执行主席或执行主席一段时间。所以,流程的透明度完全的尊重,告诉人们好消息是,你正在被考虑。

Original English

James Gorman: Well, we um I don't know that we we certainly we gave sign on bon b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b bonuses to couple of people at Morgan Sunday. We did none of that at Disney. So there's not like one model. Um I mean this could be a very long conversation but the the cliffotes are um transparency. Yes, we're having a process. These people of the succession committee the board will decide. There will be a start date. There will be a transition date and there will be a finish date. And after the finish date, the C old CEO will be gone. There won't be like hanging around the hoop. They're gone. the new CEO will be put in place and they'll either have a non-executive chairman or an executive chairman for periods of time. So, transparency of process, total respect, tell people the great news is you're being considered.

James Gorman: 如果你真的对反复无常感到恼火,这里有一个选择:退出考虑。没有人这样做,对吧?所以,你被考虑了。我想给予你绝对的尊重,但我们的工作是为公司找到未来10年最合适的候选人。这意味着我们将严格。我们将问你问题。我们将让你,我让摩根士丹利的人写战略报告。我只给了他们两周时间。我说:“来我的办公室。提前发给我。我会读。我不需要任何纸质文件。我只会问你问题。”这样,如果有人替你写了,那就不好了,对吧?它必须是真实的。它必须是你自己的想法。我们做了健康检查。我们做了各种各样的事情。所以,流程的清晰度诚实透明度

Original English

James Gorman: If you're really ticked off about the twoing and throwing, there's an option here. Take yourself out of consideration. Nobody did that, right? So, you're considered. I want to give you absolute respect, but our job is to find the best candidate for this company for the next 10 years. And that means we're going to be rigorous. We're going to ask you questions. We're going to make you I had the Morgan Sandy people write strategy papers. Um I only gave them two weeks. I said, "Come to my office. Send it to me in advance. I'll read it. I don't want any paper. I'm just going to ask you questions." So that way if somebody wrote it for you, it's not going to be good, right? It's got to be real. It's what you think. We did health checks. We did all sorts of stuff. So clarity around the process, honesty, transparency.

James Gorman: 当国王去世时,新国王才能继位。所以国王必须离开。我离开了。我对董事会说,他们说:“留下来,你知道,你可以再待一会儿。”我说:“我们可以,但这对公司,对机构来说是正确的事情吗?你需要有人做10年。我能再多撑几年这个事实没有用。”所以所有这些都是要素,但它真正始于清晰度透明度意图性。会有结果的。你知道,迪士尼继任计划上搞砸了,我应该说,几十年来一直有问题。我们作为董事会绝对坚信,它会是干净利落的,鲍勃·艾格Bob Iger)值得称赞,他在过渡期间做得很好。我们有了一位出色的新CEO Josh Tamara

Original English

James Gorman: Uh when the when the the king the king has to be dead for the new king to succeed. So the king has to leave. And that's and I I left. I said to the board, they said, "Stay, you know, you could stay a little longer." I said, "We can, but is it the right thing for the company, for the institution? You need somebody to do it 10 years. The fact I can eek out another couple doesn't work." So all of those are the elements but it really starts with with clarity, transparency um and intentionality. There will be a result. You know Disney had messed up succession had problems I should say for some years going back many decades. And we were absolutely convicted as a board it was going to be clean and Bob Iger to his credit did a great job through the transition. We have a terrific new CEO Josh Tamara

Rula Kof: 但那是他的选择。什么?

Original English

Rula Kof: but he was his choice. What's that?

James Gorman: 他是鲍勃·艾格的选择,不是吗?

Original English

James Gorman: He was Baba Iger's choice, wasn't he?

James Gorman: 不,那是董事会的选择。不,那不是。

Original English

James Gorman: No, it's the board's choice. No, that's No,

Rula Kof: 但他对此很满意。

Original English

Rula Kof: but he was happy with it.

James Gorman: 是的。非常。嗯,CEO的工作是。

Original English

James Gorman: Yes. Very. Um, the job of a

Rula Kof: 我想他不会再回来了。

Original English

Rula Kof: think he won't he won't come back anymore.

James Gorman: 绝对不会。CEO的工作是提出合适的可行的候选人。董事会与继任委员会做了大量基础工作,其工作是确保公司内外所有选项都经过考虑,然后进行适当的测试并做出决定,这需要董事会投票。我们看了,我的意思是,有很多人给我推荐了他们认为可以运营迪士尼的人选。这简直是个笑话。我说:“你甚至知道内部人员是谁吗?”“不,我不认识他们,但我的那个人是合适的人选。”对吧?所以我说:“好吧。我会考虑任何事情。”我看了播客。我看了他们做的电视采访。我看了演讲。我对一大批外部人员进行了背景调查。我们决定内部的人是最好的,他们击败了所有竞争者,这是正确的答案。但这很重要。

Original English

James Gorman: Absolutely not. The job of a CEO is to present viable candidates fit for purpose. The job of the board with the succession committee doing a lot of the leg work is to ensure inside and outside the company you've considered all options and then properly test and arrive at decision and it requires a board vote. We looked at I I mean I had so many people giving me names of people they thought could run Disney. It was a joke. I said, "Do you even know who the internal people are?" "No, I don't know them, but my guy is the right person." Right? So I said, "Fine. I'll look at I'll look at anything." I went on looked at podcasts. I looked at TV interviews they did. I looked at speeches. I did reference checking on a whole bunch of outside people. We decided the best person was inside and they beat all comers and that's the right answer. But it's important.

Rula Kof: 你还设法留住了另一位没有获得提名的内部候选人。

Original English

Rula Kof: You managed you managed to also keep another internal candidate who didn't get.

James Gorman: 我们在迪士尼留住了三位内部候选人,在摩根士丹利留住了另外两位。他们都被留住了,每个人都说这不可能发生。我说:“我们拭目以待。”

Original English

James Gorman: We kept we kept three internal candidates at at Disney and we kept the two other alternatives at Morgan Stanley. All of them were kept and everybody said it wouldn't happen. and I said, "We'll see."

James Gorman: 嗯,尊重待人。这会产生真正的不同。

Original English

James Gorman: Um, treat people with respect. It makes a real difference.

Rula Kof: 你是否真的会联系美国所有新任CEO并分享你的建议?当你听说有人成为新任CEO时,你会怎么做?打电话给他们,然后你说什么?

Original English

Rula Kof: Is it true that you reach out to all to new CEOs in the US and share your advice? What do you do when you hear somebody's a new CEO? Call them up and you say, "What?"

James Gorman: 是的。我打电话了。我早期没有这样做,是后期才开始的。我在他们上任后大约一个月内,给每一位财富500强CEO打了电话。许多国际CEO也打了,欧洲的比亚洲的多,老实说。嗯,只是为了祝贺。我来这里不是为了向你推销任何东西。我只是想介绍一下自己。如果你有什么问题想谈谈,他们会立即开始谈论他们的董事长不愿离开。他们董事会里有一个激进的、功能失调的成员。他们的孩子对他们做这份工作不满意。他们正在经历离婚。我的意思是,突然间,就像哇。我不是那个意思。我以为我只是打个招呼,结果你陷入了一场漫长的心理治疗讨论。

Original English

James Gorman: Yeah. I called, I didn't do it in the early years, been late years. I called every Fortune 500 CEO within a month or so of getting their job. and many of the international cos European more than Asian to be honest. Um it was just say congratulations. Uh I'm not here to sell you anything. I just want to introduce myself. If you ever got issues you want to talk about and they immediately start talking about their chairman won't leave. They've got an activist dysfunctional member on the board. Their kids are unhappy about them doing the job. They're going through a divorce. I mean suddenly it was like whoa. I didn't mean that. thought I was just saying hi and you get into a long therapy discussion.

James Gorman: 嗯,只有一个家伙拒绝了我,一个法国人。我忘了他是谁了。嗯,他说:“我不和银行家说话。”我说:“嗯,那很好,因为我不是银行家。”但无论如何,就这样了。

Original English

James Gorman: Um there was only one guy turned me down, a French guy. I forget who he was. Um and he said, "I don't talk to bankers." I said, "Well, that's good because I'm not a banker." But anyway, there you go.

Rula Kof: 嗯,我们还剩下16秒。不,是的,实际上还剩下16秒。嗯,昨晚总统和第一夫人都要求ABC解雇Jimmy Kim

Original English

Rula Kof: Uh so we've got exactly 16 seconds. Uh no, yeah, 16 seconds actually left. Uh, last night the president and the first lady both demanded that ABC get rid of Jimmy Kim.

James Gorman: 啊,你说的那个记者在最后偷偷溜走了。

Original English

James Gorman: Ah, the journalist that you is sneaking out right at the end.

Rula Kof: 是的。是的。

Original English

Rula Kof: Yeah. Yeah.

James Gorman: 你打算怎么办?

Original English

James Gorman: What are you going to do?

Rula Kof: 你打算怎么办?关于他们的要求。

Original English

Rula Kof: What am I going to do about what? About their demand.

James Gorman: 是的。我还有12秒。董事会在任何重要问题上的角色是建议,而不是执行,原因在于做出决定的人要承担后果。

Original English

James Gorman: Yeah. I there I have I have 12 seconds. The ro the role of directors on any issue um of consequence is to advise not to do and the reason for that is the people who make the decisions live with the consequences.

Rula Kof: 你的建议会是什么?

Original English

Rula Kof: What would your advice be?

James Gorman: 我不会分享我的建议。那显然是董事会和CEO之间的事情。但这些,这类问题在大公司中时有发生,CEO及其团队的工作是找出正确的答案,他们会得到董事会的指导,但这就像任何事情一样,如果你把10到15个人聚在一起,他们可能有不同的看法,但我非常,我们有一位出色的新CEO Josh,他世界一流,所以我相信他会挺身而出,做正确的事情。

Original English

James Gorman: I'm not going to share my advice. That's that's obviously between the board and and the CEO. But these these are not these kinds of issues happen at time to time in large companies and um it's the job of the CEO with their team to figure out the right answer and they'll be guided you know by the board but it's like anything if you throw 10 15 people together they might have different views but I'm highly we have a terrific new CEO Josh um he's world class so I'm sure he'll rise to the occasion and do what the right thing is.

Rula Kof: 好的,你巧妙地避开了。谢谢你,James

Original English

Rula Kof: Okay, you wiggled out of it. Thank you, James.

Daimler Truck的文化重塑:化繁为简,提速增效

Shelpi Nanda: 谢谢JamesRula。我们的下一位演讲者面临着一种不同类型的转型挑战。Karen RadstromDaimler Truck的总裁兼CEO,这家公司在1896年发明了卡车。那是130年的工业遗产,这既是他们的优势,也是他们的挑战。随着行业自我重塑,你如何将一种建立在工程完美基础上的文化,转变为以当前所需的速度前进?请欢迎Karen

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: Thank you, James and Rula. Our next speaker faces a different kind of transformation challenge. Karen Rodstrom is the president and CEO of Danlier Truck, the company that invented the truck in 1896. That's 130 years of industrial heritage, which today is both their strength and their challenge. As the industry reinvents itself, how do you transform a culture built on engineering perfection to move at the speed this moment demands? Please welcome Karen.

Karen Radstrom: 所以,我两年前开始担任Daimler TruckCEO。嗯,实际上摩根士丹利没有给我打电话,但也许我还在等。嗯,我做的第一件事,我认为当你作为新CEO开始工作时,这是相当合理的,那就是制定战略。所以我当然和我的管理委员会、战略部门以及一些想给我们建议的顾问一起工作,自上而下,自下而上,引入人才,然后得出了我认为和整个董事会都认为是一个非常非常强大的战略。五个支柱,非常清晰的愿景、使命,我们知道该做什么。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: So, I started as the CEO of Daimler Truck two years ago. Um didn't get called actually by Morgan Stanley, but maybe I'm still waiting for that. Um one of the first things I did, which I think is quite reasonable when you start as a new CEO, working through the strategy. So I worked with my management board of course strategy department some consultants who wanted to give us advice um top down bottom up bringing in the talents and sort of coming out with um what I thought and the whole board thought was a really really strong strategy. five pillars, very clear vision, mission, we know what to do.

Karen Radstrom: 然后我们第一次展示战略是在我们的高层领导会议上,与公司的200位高层领导一起。就在几天前,出于好奇,我开始查看,你知道,我们过去在这些会议上说了些什么,前任CEO们谈论了些什么?然后我意识到,当我们翻阅旧幻灯片时,嗯,很多战略与我们,或者说我的前任们在过去15到20年里谈论的很多内容都是一样的。当然,有一些新元素,比如数字化AI服务化等等。但如果你看大部分内容,老实说,很多都非常相似。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: And then the first time we were going to present the strategy was in our top leadership meeting with the top 200 leaders of the company. And just a couple of days before actually just kind of out of curiosity, I started looking, you know, what have we said in the past in these conferences and what did the former CEOs talk about? And then I realized when we started flipping through the old slides, uh, a lot of the strategy was kind of the same as what we had been talking about for or not me but my predecessors for like the last 15 20 years. Uh, for sure there were new elements like digitalization, AI, servitization etc. But if you looked at the bulk of it really to be very honest a lot was quite similar.

Karen Radstrom: 然后我们意识到,我们公司实际上并没有战略问题。我们有执行问题。这真的很棘手,因为正如你在介绍中提到的,我们有130年的历史。嗯,卓越工程,始终是创新领导者。嗯,今天我们是世界上最大的卡车和巴士公司。所以显然我们做了很多正确的事情才走到今天。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: And then we realized that we actually don't really have a strategy problem in our company. We have an execution problem. And this is really tricky because as you mentioned in the introduction, we're 130 years old. Uh engineering excellence, always innovation leader. Um today we're the biggest truck and bus company in the world. Um so obviously we did a lot of things right to get to where we are today

Karen Radstrom: 但这并不能保证成功,甚至不能保证下一个季度,更不用说未来10年、20年甚至130年了。除此之外,正如我们多次谈到的,世界正在发生真正的变化。嗯,宏观层面或大规模层面正在发生的一切,包括AI技术地缘政治、世界力量平衡的转变。但除此之外,在我们的行业中,我们也面临着技术转型。嗯,我们过去100多年一直在开发柴油卡车。现在我们正在研究电气化氢能。我们有软件定义汽车。嗯,我们还在自动驾驶汽车方面做了大量工作。有新的商业模式。人们不再想拥有资产。所以我们的行业也在变化,除此之外,Daimler Truck也在变化。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: but that does not guarantee success not even the next quarter and definitely not for the next 10 20 or even 130 years and besides that as we talked about a lot uh the world is really changing um you have everything kind of macro or um on a large scale that's happening in the world with AI technology, geopolitics, the shift of power balance in the world. But besides that, in our industry, we also have the transformation of technology. Uh we've been developing diesel trucks for the last 100 plus years. Now we're looking at electrification, hydrogen. We have softwaredefined vehicles. Uh we also do a lot of work into self-driving vehicles. There's new business models. People don't want to own the assets anymore. So our industry is also changing and besides that Daimler truck is changing.

Karen Radstrom: 一方面我们有130年的历史。另一方面,实际上我们四年前才从这个大型戴姆勒集团中剥离出来。所以从很多方面来说,我们只是一家四岁的公司,正在学习如何成为一家上市公司,以及如何在那种环境中运作。所以,在不责怪过去的情况下,我们需要更多地关注如何推动未来的转型。然后我们想出了这三个简单的词:更简单更快更强。这是一种我们现在试图融入公司一切 Mindset。这听起来很容易。其他人也谈到过让事情变得更简单,但我的意思是,我们是一家德国公司。我会说我们是一家全球公司,但我们的总部在德国南部,我们为我们的传统和出身感到非常自豪。但为了建立我们强大历史的卓越工程,我们当然需要关注细节。我认为德国的成功确实建立在强大的结构、清晰的决策和强烈的方向感之上。所以这不容易改变。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: On the one hand we're 130 years old. On the other hand actually we were spun off out of this big Daimler conglomerate just four years ago. So in many ways we're just a fouryear-old company learning what it's like to be to be a listed company um and and to function in that environment. So without putting any blame on the past, we needed to focus a lot more on how do we drive transformation going forward. And then we came up with these um three kind of simple worlds, simpler, faster, stronger. And that's a mindset that we now try to bring into everything we do in the company. And it's sounds very easy. Someone else also talked about doing things simpler, but I mean we are a German company. I would say we're a global company, but our headquarters in South Germany and we're very proud of our heritage and what we come from. But for sure we had in order to build the engineering excellence that built our strong history, we needed to pay attention to detail. And I think German success is really built on strong structures, clear decisions, strong direction. So that's not so easy to change.

Karen Radstrom: 把“更简单更快更强”贴在墙上,并期望每个人都行动起来是不够的。但我在哪里看到了真正的积极之处?它实际上是公司中任何人质疑我们做事方式的许可。这也许不是德国公司在历史上擅长的地方,人们真正站起来问:“我们为什么要那样做?”但我现在从公司里的许多人那里听到,他们会说:“是的,有没有更简单、更快的方法可以做到这一点?”这种提问方式开启了一种不同的对话,而不是你被认为只是在抱怨你的老板。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: It's not enough to put simpler, faster, stronger on the wall and expect everyone to run. But where I see it really positive is it's actually a license for anyone in the company to question how we do things. And that's maybe also not the historical strength of German companies that people really stand up and ask why do we do it like that? But I've heard now from many people in the company it's like yeah is there a simpler faster way we can do this and that kind of opens a different kind of conversation than when you're just perceived like you're complaining about your boss potentially.

Karen Radstrom: 嗯,但我们想做得更具体一些。所以我们开始更广泛地审视文化以及文化是什么。我们在公司中定义的文化是公司中所有实践的总和,而实践可以是几种不同的事情。所以首先是价值观。它有点像墙上的文字,以及你写在年报中的内容,以及你所说的你所代表的。但实践也包括公司中所有的流程。关于你如何招聘人员、如何支付绩效、预算等等的正式流程。然后它也包括所有非正式流程,也就是你在公司中做事的方式,它实际上不是一个正式的流程,但每个人都知道我们一直都是这样做的,而且一直都是这样做的。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: Um but we wanted to do it even more let's say concrete. So we started looking more broadly on culture and what is culture and the way we defined it in our company is the culture is the sum of all the practices you have in the company and practices can be a couple of different things. So first of all it's the values. It's kind of the the words on the wall and and what you put in your uh annual reports and and what you say that you stand for. But practices is also all the processes that you have in the company. The formal processes on how you recruit people, how you um pay for performance, budgeting, whatever. And then it's also all the informal processes um which is the way you do things in a company which is actually not a formal process but everyone just kind of knows that's how we always do it here and that's how it always has been done.

Karen Radstrom: 我们开始审视所有这些实践,实际上我们找到了一种非常有结构化的方式,我们每个月选择三到四种我们想要改变的实践,我们审视它,我们描述我们今天如何做,以及我们未来想要如何做的理想状态,然后我们分批推出新的实践。所以每隔一到两个月我们就会有一波,有三到四种新的实践出现,我认为这是一种非常具体的方式来推动一家非常老旧的公司的文化变革,而且它可能是,你知道,其中一些听起来很基础,但即使是小事情也不容易。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: And we started looking at all these practices and actually we found a very structured way that we are picking three to four practices every month that we want to change and we look at it we describe how do we do it today and what's the desired state on how we want to do it in the future and then we're rolling out new practices in waves. So every one to two months we have a wave and there's three to four new practices coming and I think that's a very concrete way to drive a change of culture in a very old company and it can be you know some of it is like super well sounds basic but even the small things are not easy.

Karen Radstrom: 嗯,所以我们现在做的是,我们每次会议都从查看围坐在桌旁的人开始。你为什么在这里?你来这里是为了为讨论添砖加瓦吗?你想参与决策吗?你只是来收集信息的吗?还是你来这里是因为这个人正在做演示,我是他的老板,然后是老板的老板,然后是老板的老板。所以我必须在房间里,以确保所说的一切。通过这样做,我们意识到实际上我们可以让很多人离开房间,他们并不是真正来为结果做出贡献的。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: Um so what we do now is we start every meeting by looking at who's sitting around the table. Why are you here? Are you here because you want to add to the discussion? you want to be part of the decision making. Are you just here to gather information or are you here because this guy is presenting and I'm his boss and then the boss of the boss and then the boss of the boss. So I just have to be in the room to be sure what's being said. And by doing that we have realized actually we can walk a lot of people out of the room who are not there to really contribute to a to a result.

Karen Radstrom: 嗯,还有,当我加入戴姆勒时,我简直疯了。什么都有PowerPoint演示。所以每次会议我都会收到一个PowerPoint。大约有50页。我必须提前阅读。我进来了。嗯,所以我们没有完全禁止PowerPoint,但我们已经停止默认使用PowerPoint。嗯,我们看到它带来了完全不同质量的讨论,因为你真正专注于问题以及如何解决它,而不是有时花大量时间描述所有背景。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: Um also I got crazy when I joined Daimler. There's powerpoints for everything. So every meeting I get a PowerPoint. It's like 50 pages. I have to pre-eread. I come in. Um so that's we have not totally banned PowerPoints but we have stopped having powerpoints by default. Um and we see that it drives a completely different quality of discussion because you really focus on the problem and how to solve it instead of sometime spending a lot of time describing all the backgrounds.

Karen Radstrom: 嗯,所以这些是一些小的改变。然后还有一些大的改变。嗯,现在正在尝试取消预算流程。嗯,通常我们现在就已经开始计划2027年的预算了。嗯,你知道,它从总市场会是多少,宏观经济等等开始。然后我们自下而上地构建。这是一个巨大的流程,非常有结构。嗯,所以现在我们正在取消预算流程。嗯,我们直到10月、11月才开始,因为那时我们必须为董事会准备。这是一个非常有趣的改变。嗯,它在我们的公司中非常基础,因为它是一些人真正喜欢的核心流程之一。嗯,所以,是的,我不是。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: Um so those are some small ones. Then there's some bigger ones. uh trying to kill the budget process right now. Um normally we would already now actually start to plan the budget for 2027. Um it's you know starts with what's the total market going to be what's macro etc. And then we build from bottom up. It's a huge process very structured. Um so now we're killing the budget process. uh we will not start until October, November because then we have to prepare it for the board. That's a really interesting one. Um and it's very fundamental um in our company because it's it's one of the real core processes that that some people love. Um so yeah, not me.

Karen Radstrom: 嗯,所以也许这只是改变文化的一些实际方法,我认为我们才刚刚开始这段旅程。嗯,当人们现在已经开始感到沮丧时,我告诉他们,你知道,这不是一场运动,这确实是我们需要出去并专注于的事情,我认为我将在我的整个CEO任期内这样做,真正推动、推动、推动、推动,并一步一步地缓慢前进。嗯,但这就是在这些正在快速转型的老旧行业中工作如此有趣和引人入胜的原因。

Original English

Karen Radstrom: Um so maybe that's a little bit just the practical approach to to how to change culture and I think we're just getting started on this journey. Um when people already now start to get frustrated I tell them you know this is not a campaign this is really something we need to go out and focus on and I think I will do it for my whole CEO tenure to really push push push push and slowly move step by step by step by step. Um, but that's what makes it so fun and interesting to be in these old industries that are transforming very fast.

IKEA的文化韧性与可持续发展:从倾听到行动

Shelpi Nanda: 谢谢你,Karen。我们现在从工业工程转向零售业,讲述另一个转型故事。一家公司,其文化本身就是品牌。Jesper Brodin于2017年至2025年担任宜家集团IKEA Group)的CEO。作为CEO,他领导了重大转型,使宜家变得可持续数字化,为新一代客户做好了准备。但这里有一个悖论。宜家的文化使其成为宜家。瑞典价值观、平价设计、可及性。在不失去人们所爱的一切的情况下发展它,这绝非易事。请欢迎Jesper

Original English

Shelpi Nanda: Thank you Karen. We now move from industrial engineering to retail with another story of transformation. A company where the culture itself is the brand. Yes. Broaden served as CEO of IKEA Group from 2017 to 2025. As CEO, he led major transformation, making IKEA sustainable, digital, ready for a new generation of customers. But here's the paradox. IKEA's culture is what makes it IKEA. Swedish values, affordable design, accessibility. Evolving that without losing that which people love could not have been easy. Please welcome Yes.

Jesper Brodin: 非常感谢。谢谢。谢谢。谢谢。我感觉糟透了。我有一个PowerPoint。嗯,Cory,所以我现在不知道该怎么办。嗯,但听着,我想,嗯,我花点时间,嗯,实际上尝试给出几个关于文化的画面,嗯,张力和谐以及所有这些。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I feel terrible. I have a PowerPoint. Uh Cory, so I don't know what to do now. Uh but listen, I I think um for a couple of moments I would take the opportunity uh uh to actually try to give a couple of images of culture uh the tension, the harmony and all of it.

Jesper Brodin: 嗯,让我开始,嗯,八年担任CTO CEO,时间更长一点。嗯,我去年八月在宜家工作了30年,你知道发生了什么吗?我收到了一封来自我自己的邮件,祝贺我在宜家工作30年。现在,文化部分来了,它给了我三天额外的假期。现在我记不起之前在台上谈论成本意识的公司是谁了,但那为我们所有人设定了标准。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: Um let me start um eight years as a CTO CEO a little bit more. Uh I had 30 years in IKEA last uh August and you know what happened? I got an email from myself congratulating me to 30 years in IKEA. And here comes the culture part offering me three extra days of vacation. Now I I can't remember the the company who was on the stage before talking about cost consciousness but that sets the level I think for all of us.

Jesper Brodin: 现在,嗯,我想拍几张我自己的iPhone上的糟糕照片,但只是想分享文化实际上是什么样子。对我来说,有几件事我们可以谈论,但对我来说,它真正是这样一个概念:如果你是一个领导者,你必须践行文化,你必须成为文化。所以我带来的第一张照片是这张美丽的照片,我正在做,如果你看我们的文件,它说我们在宜家一线调整,因为我们认为真正重要的是我们要在现实中遵循我们的决策。我绝对不擅长销售厨房。我不知道这些年来我犯了多少错误。所以我的员工建议我洗碗。我洗得很好。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: Now um I wanted to take uh I wanted to bring a couple of bad pictures from my own iPhone as well but just to share how does actually culture look like and for me there are a couple of things we can talk about but for me it's really the notion of that if you're a leader you have to live the culture you have to be the culture. So the first picture I brought is this beautiful uh picture of me doing if you look at our uh files it says we're doing front tweaks in IKEA because we think it's genuinely important for us to follow our decisions in reality. I am absolutely crap at selling kitchens. I I don't know all the mistakes I've done over the years. So my people recommend I do the dishes. I do that quite well actually.

Jesper Brodin: 嗯,现在我给你们讲一个关于文化的故事。这实际上是我担任CEO的第一周。我正在环游世界,会见许多国家、客户、同事,并形成我对我们作为一个组织所处位置的看法。这确实发生了。所以,我当时在洗碗,这家店的餐厅经理走过来对我说:“你真的是经理吗?”他问我,我当时正忙着洗碗。我说:“是的,我不得不承认。”然后他没有认出我。然后他说:“你向瑞典国家经理汇报吗?”我当时正在洗碗,我说:“不,实际上是反过来的。”他看着我,歇斯底里地大笑起来。然后他给了我一个拥抱,说:“继续梦想吧。”所以这是给你的一个关键点。就这样。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: Um and now I tell you a story about culture. This is actually me on the first week of being CEO. I was on a trip around the world to meet a lot of countries, customers, co-workers, and get myself an opinion about where we were as an organization. And this actually happened. So, I was doing the dishes and the restaurant manager at this store, he came up to me and said, "Are you actually a manager?" He said to me and I was doing the dishes, very occupied. I said, "Yes, I have to admit." And then he didn't recognize me. And then he said, "Are you reporting to the Swedish country manager?" And I was doing the dishes and I said, "No, it's actually the other way around." And he looked at me and he bursted out in laughter hysterically. And then he gave me a hug and he said, "Keep on dreaming." So that's a key for you. There you go.

Jesper Brodin: 现在,嗯,有趣的是,这也是绝对的事实。我进行这次旅行是因为我觉得,我想我感到某种义务要出现并与人见面。我对我的角色有点紧张,我一度不想迷失在董事会和总部里。所以我出去了,当我回来时,我有一份报告,一份旅行报告,嗯,带给了我的管理团队,当我分享它时,嗯,实际上我的一位同事说那不是一份报告,那是一个战略。我说不,那是一份报告。他说:“不,那是一个战略。”但这次旅行的有趣之处在于,这份报告只倾听了客户和同事的意见,而我们在宜家拥有非常强大的文化,拥有其所有的好处和优势,嗯,多年来实际上已经停止了倾听。我认为我们的前窗变得更小,我们的后视镜变得更大。所以我们几乎错过了数字化转型在线化,因为那时我们完全是模拟化的。我稍后会快进到疫情期间发生的事情,因为实际上那次旅行和那个时刻,嗯,可能拯救了公司。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: Now, um, the interesting thing, this is also absolutely the truth. I went on this trip because I felt I think I felt some sort of obligation to show up and meet people. I I was a bit nervous in my role and I for once I didn't want to get lost into the boardrooms and in the head office. So I went out there when I came back I had a report a travel report uh brought to my management group and at the moment when I shared it uh actually one of my colleagues said that's not a report it's a strategy. I said no it's a report. He said, "No, it's a strategy." But the interesting thing with the trip was the report was only listening to customers and to co-workers and we having a very strong culture at IKEA with all its benefits and all its strength um had actually over the years stopped listening. I think our front window became smaller and our back uh review mirror became bigger. So we almost almost missed the digital transformation and the online because back then we were absolutely just analog and I will fast forward in a moment to what happened during the pandemic because actually that trip and that moment uh potentially saved the company.

Jesper Brodin: 嗯,我想谈谈这个人,你们中的一些人可能认识他,宜家的创始人。昨天有人问我宜家这个名字从何而来?实际上,他16岁时去注册公司。他的父亲必须和他在一起。他亲自给我讲了这个故事。然后注册员说:“那么公司叫什么名字?”他一无所知。所以他说:“你叫什么名字?Ingvar I Kamprad K。你来自哪里?”Elmtaryd Agunnaryd。所以这就是宜家的由来。嗯,他九年前去世了。我以前从未讲过这个故事,但我想它也说明了一些关于文化的事情。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: Um I wanted to talk about this man some of you might recognize him the founder of IKEA. Somebody asked me yesterday what is the name IKEA come from? And actually he was 16 years old when he went to the registrate to form his company. His father had to be with him. He told me this story himself. And then the register said, "So what is the company name going to be?" And he had no clue. So he said, "What's your name? Ingvar I Camprad K. Where do you come from?" El Aaron. That's a So that's IKEA how it was actually started. Um he passed away nine years ago. And I haven't told this story before, but I think it also says something about uh culture.

Jesper Brodin: 我最后一次见到他是在董事会会议室,当时我试图说服董事会进行数字化的历史性投资,而董事会在我们讨论时认为这是一个问题。然后Ingvar进来了。他几乎走不动路,91岁了。显然,所有人的注意力都从我身上转移到他身上。然后他停下来,说:“那么,你们在做什么?”他问,我想我有点恼火,我说:“我们正在努力解决一个问题。”然后他开始哭泣,说:“哦,有问题真是太好了。”然后他就离开了,那实际上是我最后一次见到他。是的。所以,嗯,这不属于我的工作描述,但这是这些年发生的事情,嗯,可能还有更多的事情,我们可以补充到,嗯,我认为今天所有领导者肩上的重担中。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: I was in the boardroom last time I met him uh trying to convince my board to actually make historic investments into digital and that was seen as a problem by the board at the discussion we were having and in came uh Ingval. He could hardly walk, 91 years old. And obviously all the attention went from me to him in the room. And then he stopped and he said, "So what are you doing?" He asked and I I think I was a bit annoyed and I said with trying to solve a problem in then he started crying and he said, "Oh, how wonderful to have a problem." And then he left and that's actually the last time I met him. Yeah. So um this was not part of my uh job description but this is what happened during the years uh and probably a couple of more things and we could add to the uh I think the weight on the shoulders that are on all leaders of today.

Jesper Brodin: 我认为过去10年担任不同职位的领导者可能比以往任何一代人都遇到了更多麻烦。所以我们当然也遇到了我们的挑战。在宜家,我们决定在所有这些挑战中,我们相信并乐于谈论气候变化将是最具戏剧性的,它基于伦理,如果你喜欢,一种我们作为领导者乐于主张的道德,但也基于我们大多数客户和同事都深感担忧并期望我们对此采取行动。第三,我想谈谈的是我们后来发现的经济效益,这是我们几年前承诺时不知道的。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: I think potentially the generation who's been leading in different positions the last 10 years has had more trouble than any of the generations before. So we certainly got our share of of challenges. At IKEA, we decided among all these challenges, we believe and we're happy to speak to it that climate change is going to be the most dramatic and it's based on ethics, if you like, a morality that we are happy to claim as leaders, but also that a majority of our customers and our co-workers are deeply concerned and expect us to take action on it. Third, which I want to talk about, is what we discovered down the road, the economic benefits, which we didn't know when we committed ourselves a few years ago.

Jesper Brodin: 所以我将跳到一些成就。我来这里不是为了吹嘘我们过去几年取得的数字,但在所有这些危机的背景下,宜家取得了令人难以置信的强劲增长。这背后有三个真正的原因,可能比我所知道的还要多。但第一个我想说是文化,因为在危机期间,宜家作为一个整体,我在疫情期间发现,文化的益处在于多年来一直投资于承认人们会犯错。我们没有经历瘫痪,实际上宜家各地的人们同时采取了行动。我们必须调整一些事情。我们当然需要协调,但我们有很大的意愿真正参与到危机中。所以我认为我们在这里看到的24%的增长主要归功于强大的文化。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: So I'm going to skip to some of the achievements and I'm not here to to brag about the numbers that we have produced the last years but in the backdrop of all these crisis IKEA has had an incredibly strong path of of growth. There are three real reasons behind it and probably more than I you know will ever know. But the first one I would claim is culture because during crisis IKEA as a constituency I found out during the pandemic the benefit of a culture that has invested years and years in acknowledging people to do mistakes. We didn't experience paralysis actually people all over IKEA took action simultaneously. We had to steer up some things. We have to coordinate of course but we had a lot of willingness to actually be part of the crisis. So I think the 24% growth we see here is mostly dedicated to a bloody strong culture.

Jesper Brodin: 其次,它来自于向在线化的转型。我们从一家完全模拟化的公司,发展到今天大约30%的业务在线上进行。在疫情期间,我们实现了100%在线化。请注意,在疫情开始时,宜家在14个市场中只有一个市场实现了在线运营。我们原本计划用两年半的时间扩展在线业务。由于我们所处的危机,只用了六周。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: Secondly, it comes from the transformation into online. We went from a fully analog company to today do about 30% thereabouts in online. During the pandemic, we had 100% online. Note that IKEA at the start of the pandemic had only one market out of 14 up and running on online. We had a plan of two and a half years to scale out online. It took six weeks due to the crisis that we were into.

Jesper Brodin: 但我想与你们分享的酷炫之处,因为我认为它鲜为人知,那就是在这些年里,我们实际上已经将公司的碳排放减少了30%。所以业务收入增长了24%,而绝对碳排放减少了30%。这不仅仅是范围一、二,我们购买或在公司内部做的事情。这是整个价值链,上游和下游,我已经把数字带给你们了。所以现在有人之前谈到过书呆子。现在我要在这里变得超级书呆子,与你们分享这个等式,因为我觉得它非常引人入胜。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: But the cool thing I wanted to share with you because I think it's less known is that during these years we have actually taken the company from a carbon perspective minus 30%. So plus 24 in business revenue minus 30% in absolute carbon and this is not scope one two only what we buy or what we do in the company. This is the full value chain upstream and downstream and I have brought the numbers to you. So now somebody talked about nerd nerds before. Now I'm going to get super nerdy here and share with you the equation about this because I find it fascinating.

Jesper Brodin: 首先,我们对我们的碳足迹有很多猜测,直到我们真正获得了数据。这是巴黎协定宜家碳足迹的近似数字。它包含几个非常有趣的元素。嗯,首先,大多数人会认为运输是最大的元素,但结果是客户运输或送货上门是效率低下的部分,如果你喜欢,但平板包装在全球范围内的运输,正如你在这里看到的数字,并不是最大的部分,原材料,请记住原材料,实际上是宜家阿喀琉斯之踵,如果你喜欢,无论是从碳排放的角度来看。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: To start with, we were um having all sorts of speculation about what our carbon footprint was until we actually got data. And this is the Paris agreement approximate numbers of IKEA's carbon footprint. It holds a couple of very interesting elements. Um first of all most people would think transport was a biggest uh element and it turns out that customers transport or home deliveries is the inefficient one if you like um but the transport of flat packs around the world as you can see on the number here is not the biggest one raw material and stay with that raw material is actually IKEA's achilles he seal if you like both from a carbon point of view.

Jesper Brodin: 现在,如果我将宜家价值链中零售和上游的成本元素进行转换,这些数字实际上会非常相似。我们今天大约36%的成本来自宜家生产中的原材料、运输、零售,大致相同。所以当我们看到这些数字时,我们意识到,如果我们触及碳排放,我们实际上可能会触及成本

Original English

Jesper Brodin: now would I transpose the uh cost elements of IKEA's value chain from retail and upstream the numbers will actually resonate quite similar. We have about 36% of our cost today sits in raw material in IKEA production, transport, retail approximately the same. So what we realized when we looked at these numbers is that if we touch carbon we might actually touch cost.

Jesper Brodin: 结果是,几年后,你看到宜家实际上成功地在旅程的每个环节都减少了碳排放。嗯,经过审计的报告数字表明,这导致了总碳排放减少了30%。过去两年,损益表中最大的财务贡献是成本降低。这要归功于气候智能。我认为在所有关于可持续性的神话环境中,讲述这个故事是值得的。我认为这简直是一个金矿。我们是如何做到的?没有一个单一的战略,但当然,对可再生能源的投资为我们节省了大量资金,顺便说一句,也使我们摆脱了今天我们看到的一些危机。电动出行材料循环中的创新。

Original English

Jesper Brodin: And it turns out when we uh go a few years down the line what you see is that IKEA has actually managed to reduce carbon