纪录片背景与嘉宾介绍
主持人: 《Nekai Walks》是 TVO 推出的一部全新纪录片,记录了十六岁少年内凯·福斯特(Nekai Foster)的经历。他在多伦多西北部的简和芬奇社区(Jane and Finch)打篮球时遭遇了一场随机枪击事件。这部影片追溯了其伤痛带来的深远影响,并审视了导致此类暴力事件屡见不鲜的系统性症结。今天就这一议题来到我们节目的嘉宾是大卫·科夫医生(Dr. David Koff)。他是麦克马斯特大学(McMaster University)荣休教授、前放射科主任,同时也是加拿大医生支持枪支管制组织(Canadian Doctors for Protection from Guns,简称 CDPG)的成员。他今天在安大略省汉密尔顿与我们连线。科夫医生,非常高兴您能参与我们的节目。今天好吗?Comment allez-vous aujourd'hui?
英文原文
Host: Nekai Walks is a new documentary from TVO that features the journey of sixteen-year-old Nekai Foster, who was the victim of a random shooting while playing basketball in the Jane and Finch community in Northwest Toronto. The film traces the fallout of his injury and looks at the systemic issues that make this type of violence all too common. Speaking to us now on this issue, Dr. David Koff. He is a Professor Emeritus at McMaster University, past Chief and Chair of the Department of Radiology, and a member of the Canadian Doctors for Protection from Guns. He joins us in Hamilton, Ontario. Dr. Koff, it's great to have you with us. Comment allez-vous aujourd'hui?
大卫·科夫医生: 谢谢!非常荣幸能与你们连线,也十分感谢你们的邀请,我非常乐意同大家分享我的一些思考。
英文原文
Dr. David Koff: Merci! It's a pleasure to be with you and I thank you very much for the invitation and I'd be really happy to share some thoughts with you.
主持人: 太好了。JMM,请提问。
英文原文
Host: Excellent. JMM, after you.
加入控枪组织的初衷与法医放射线视角
联合主持人: 非常感谢您接受我们的访谈。在我们深入讨论之前,您能否向我们简要介绍一下,您当初为何会选择加入这个组织?
英文原文
Co-Host: Uh, thank you so much for joining us. Before we get started, could you give us a little background on why you got involved with this group?
大卫·科夫医生: 我们搬到北美之后,我目睹了美国发生的那一场场骇人听闻的大规模枪击事件。而从这些悲剧中产生的所谓唯一行动方案——我一次又一次、一遍又一遍地看到的——仅仅是“祈祷与慰问”(thoughts and prayers)。作为一个相当务实的人,倒不是说我不信这个,但我实在不认为“祈祷与慰问”有多大的实际效果,而且绝对有更好的办法来防止这类可怕事件重演。
后来多伦多的丹佛斯街(Danforth)发生了枪击案,随后 CDPG 成立了。当我看到这群医生——他们有的作为外科医生或精神科医生在手术中直接接触过枪伤创伤,已经亲历过此类创痛——团结在一起试图采取实质行动时,我心想:“也许我也应该加入进去,看看能帮上什么忙。”我很庆幸自己加入了。我认为我们需要更多的社会能见度,让公众更加深刻地理解我们在这方面所面临的严峻挑战。
英文原文
Dr. David Koff: Well, we moved to North America and I've seen this horrendous mass shooting in the States and the only action plan which was coming out of that, and I saw that again and again and again, is thoughts and prayers. And, you know, being pretty practical, I, not that I don't believe that, but I don't think that thoughts and prayers is really very effective and there are certainly better ways to prevent these kinds of horrific incidents to happen, so that's then there was a shooting on the Danforth and then CDPG came out after that, and when I saw this group of doctors who were already kind of already exposed to through surgery and being surgeons, psychiatrists, and really exposed to this kind of things, getting together and trying to do something, I thought, "Well, maybe I should join and see how I can help with that," and I'm very happy I did and I believe we need, we need to more... have more visibility and people to understand more the problem that we're facing with that.
联合主持人: 科夫医生,我想顺着这个话题继续追问。作为一名医生,特别是一位放射科专家,在您的专业视野中,枪支暴力究竟呈现出怎样具体的面貌?
英文原文
Co-Host: Let me follow up on that, Dr. Koff. As not just a doctor, but as a radiologist in particular, what does gun violence look like for you?
大卫·科夫医生: 对我而言,我长期专注于法医放射学(forensic radiology)。好些年里,汉密尔顿设有验尸官服务站,我在汉密尔顿总医院(Hamilton General Hospital)工作,当时我们接手过大量的枪支暴力受害者以及枪击致死案例。不得不说,谈论这些确实令人不适,请原谅我展开讲这些细节:我们是在尸体袋里直接对逝者进行 X 光扫描成像的。我亲眼看到人们用大型霰弹枪自杀后造成的毁损冲击,X 光片上除了下颌骨外,整个颅面部其他部分荡然无存。
那太恐怖了,是一种极其沉重、极具压力的心理经历,我实在不希望再有人走上这条路。枪击是无法逆转的绝路。我看过太多这样的遗体,更不用提那些被高速杀伤性武器和重型军用级别枪支射伤的伤者了,骨骼在体内被彻底击碎打烂。人们听到枪伤往往以为“噢,他们只是受伤了”,可当你真正看到肢体被破坏成什么惨状时,你会觉得:“绝不可以,绝不能容忍这种事情一再发生。”这就是我所亲历的场景。虽然我们现在已经不再承担法医验尸业务,但当年确实见过太多这样的惨状。
英文原文
Dr. David Koff: So, for me, I had vested interest in forensic radiology and for a number of years, the coroner services where we had coroner services based in Hamilton and working at the Hamilton General Hospital, we used to have a lot of gun violence victims and a lot of shootings, and I must say I'm sorry for going into these kind of things, but we X-rayed our deceased patients in the bag and I could see the impact and effect of people taking their own lives with a big shotgun and all you see on the X-ray just the mandible and nothing left otherwise. It's horrible. It's a very, very stressful experience and I don't want people to do that. It's a one-way thing, so I've seen so many of those not even talking about the people wounded by high-velocity weaponries and heavy military-grade guns where the bones are shattered. You think, "Oh, they're just wounded," but when you see how the limbs look like, you think, "No way. It cannot happen." So, that's how I've been exposed. We don't have the coroner service anymore, but I've seen a lot of those.
行动对抗创伤与省政府在控枪中的角色
联合主持人: 紧接着追问一句:我知道您具备高度的专业职业素养,但在目睹了如此多的苦难与惨状后,您是如何避免罹患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的?您靠什么在面对这些苦难时保持内心的理智与清醒?
英文原文
Co-Host: In a quick follow-up, I know you're a professional, but how have you not suffered from PTSD or how do you keep your sanity in the face of seeing so much misery?
大卫·科夫医生: 答案就是采取行动。这也是我加入 CDPG 的核心原因之一。如果你心想“我什么也做不了,我们对此无能为力”,那么是的,你一定会得 PTSD,会陷入极度抑郁,觉得周围全是一片绝望与苦难。但只要你坚信,一定有某些办法能够减少枪击事件与暴力伤害,这种信念就会赋予你使命感,给你继续战斗、挺直腰杆坚持下去的理由。
英文原文
Dr. David Koff: Well, by taking action and that's one of the reasons why I joined the CDPG. If you think there is nothing I can do and there is no way we can act on that, then yes, you get PTSD. We get awfully depressed. You think it's just misery. But if you think there's something which can be done to reduce the amount of violence and shooting, then I think that gives you a purpose and it gives you a reason to fight and stay up.
主持人: 通常我们习惯把枪支管制看作联邦层面的事务,属于联邦刑法的范畴。但显然,公民生活在一个个具体的城市和省份中。我很想请您向我们的观众阐释一下,在您看来,省级政府在枪支管制中应承担怎样的角色?
英文原文
Host: We normally think of gun control as a federal matter. You know in terms of federal criminal law, but of course, people live in cities and they live in provinces. and I'm wondering if you could explain to our audience what you see as the provincial role in gun control.
大卫·科夫医生: 是的,这里面包含两个层面。正如你所说,许多人居住在偏远边远地区,因此这大部分枪支暴力问题——我想在所有枪击死亡事件中,有高达 69% 的比例其实是自杀。这类自杀绝大多数发生在相对闭塞孤立的北部地区。当事人多数是老年男性,不敢说全是老人,但往往在五十岁以上。他们往往遭受心理疾患的折磨,深陷孤独,感到生活毫无希望、没有未来,最终选择自寻短见。
使用枪支自杀是不可挽回的单行道。你不可能在扣动扳机后产生悔意反思“噢,我刚才为什么要想不开”,然后再拨打911求救并被抢救回来——而在绝大多数其他自杀方式中,往往还有抢救生还的余地。这其实构成了我们所面临的枪支暴力的更大比重。
在这方面,省级政府毫无疑问应当承担起关键职责:提供更多的社会支持、精神心理援助、拓宽公共医疗服务渠道以及普及相关教育。我明白联邦层面的核心职责在于法律法规的制定以及推动枪支的收缴管制,但省级层面应当更加聚焦于医疗健康支持与枪支暴力预防。这正是我们最能有所作为的地方,我坚信我们完全可以通过这些举措切实帮助到有需要的人。
英文原文
Dr. David Koff: Right. So, there are two aspects. As you say, people live remote areas, so most of this gun violence, as you say, I think it's 69% of deaths by guns is suicide. Mostly in the north where people are isolated. It's mostly men, elder, I wouldn't say all, but more than 50, um, and they take their lives. They suffer from mental issues, isolation, the feeling that there is no hope, no future, and they kill themselves. And killing with a gun is a one-way thing. You cannot just get back second thoughts and think, "Oh, why did I do that?" and call 911 and be saved, which is the case with most other ways of taking your life. So, that's probably more of the violence that we see and definitely the provincial role in that should be to provide more support, psychiatric help, access to services, education. I understand that the federal level is mostly legislation and trying to take away the guns, but the provincial level should emphasize on healthcare and gun prevention. That's really what we could do best I'm sure we can we can help people with that.
城乡差异、枪支安全存储与公共卫生视角
主持人: 这确实很有意思。当媒体报道这类枪击新闻时——事实上包括您刚才在前面回答时,举出的第一个具体案例也是多伦多的丹佛斯枪击案——我们往往会将关注点聚焦在那些可能发生公共恶性事件的城市中心区域。然而,如果我们仔细梳理统计数据就会发现,实际上在安大略省的农村和北部地区,按人均计算,此类枪支暴力事件的发生率反而更高。在农村和北部社区,枪支在很大程度上已经融入了人们日常生活的社会肌理,这种现象与大城市截然不同。面对这种情况,我们究竟该如何打开局面、有所作为?
英文原文
Host: You know, what's interesting. When media cover these stories, and in fact, when you gave an earlier answer, the first example you gave was the Danforth in Toronto, we do tend to focus on the urban areas where these things can take place. And yet, I think if you look at the statistics, it's actually in more rural and northern parts of Ontario that on a per capita basis, more of this takes place. Um, you know, how do we make a dent in this kind of phenomenon where guns in rural and northern areas are much more a part of the fabric of everyday life than they are in big cities?
大卫·科夫医生: 确实如此。首先必须讲清楚,CDPG 的主张和宗旨绝不是要收缴所有人的枪支。我们绝不是要剥夺猎人和农场主拥有枪支的权利。他们合法拥有其地产上的枪支是完全合情合理的,农场主需要保护家畜牲畜免受捕食野生动物的侵害。有人常常利用这种普遍的误解来抹黑 CDPG,叫嚣什么“你们是在剥夺我们的自由”、“我们拥有合法权利”、“我们是遵纪守法的公民”。这种“守法公民”的论调我们听得太多了,在某种程度上简直荒谬透顶。正是这些所谓的守法公民,在深陷绝境看不到任何出路时,用自己的枪结束了生命。
因此,我们的目的不是没收他们的枪支,而是希望这些人确保枪支以极其规范安全的方式储存:枪支必须锁入专用保险柜内,弹药决不能与枪支存放在同一地点。如果你在获取枪支的过程中人为增加几个安全防范步骤,拉长门槛,本身就能有效延缓冲动行凶或轻生的过程。但最核心的,是我们必须打破社交孤立,提供社会心理支持,及时筛查识别精神心理问题,确保在事态演变升级为自杀或暴力惨剧之前,当事人能够得到有效干预和治疗。
正如我一直坚持的例子:枪支暴力本质上是一场公共卫生危机。从我的专业立场来看,它完完全全就是一个公共卫生议题,必须以公共卫生策略来应对解决。比如我的一位邻居,曾突发过一次驾驶中的意识丧失(absence seizure),随后去看医生,在事故调查和医学诊断期间,他的机动车驾驶执照被依法暂扣了。在排除全部神经系统隐患、做完核磁共振(MRI)全面检查确认健康前,他不得上路驾驶。
同样的严格逻辑为什么不能应用在枪支上?我们绝不能允许一个正处于严重心理危机或精神疾患状态的人去操控杀伤性武器,从而给自身或社区公众带来致命风险。因此,我们必须建立起健全的机制,提早发现并治疗精神心理疾患,坚决阻断存在精神疾病隐患的人群轻易获取枪支的途径。所以,预防机制与心理支持是我们最应当率先推进的防线。
英文原文
Dr. David Koff: Right. So, the idea and the role of CDPG is not to take away guns from people. We're not here to prevent hunters and farmers to have guns. They need to have guns on their property. They need to be able to defend their cattle against predators, so the idea that, that's a common misunderstanding that people have been using a lot to try to discredit the CDPG. We're taking your freedom away. We are, we are, we have the right. We are law-abiding citizens. And this law-abiding thing, we've heard it so much that at some point it's just ridiculous. These law-abiding citizens who are taking their own lives because they don't see any way out. So, we won't take these guns away, but we want these people to make sure that they are stored in an appropriate way. They are locked in a cabinet. The ammunitions are not in the same location. So, if you put more steps to kind of limit the access to the gun, already, you can slow down the process, but mainly, we have to fight against isolation, you have to provide support, we have to detect mental issues and be sure that we can treat that before it ends up in a suicide or in violence. You know, the example I had because gun violence is a public health issue. It's for me, from my standpoint, it's nothing other than that and it has to be addressed the same way, but one of my neighbours, for instance, had an episode of absence driving went to see a doctor and his driver's license was taken away for the time of the investigation. He couldn't drive as long as he was not cleared and he had all the examination he needed, the MRI and everything. Uh. Same thing should apply to guns. You cannot let someone who has mental issues just manipulate heavy weaponry and be a risk for himself or for the community, so we have to make sure that we have ways to identify mental issues and treat them and not let people with mental issues to have access to guns, so that's probably one of the first things we can do is prevention and mental support.
公共卫生法案与OHIP心理健康覆盖
主持人: 2022年时任省议员米齐·亨特(Mitzie Hunter)曾提出过一项议员个人法案(Private Member's Bill),试图通过修订《安全与健康社区法》(Safe and Healthy Communities Act),正式将枪支暴力确立为公共卫生问题。尽管该法案最终未能立法生效,但你们组织当时对该法案给予了坚定支持。您能谈谈该法案的核心内容是什么,以及你们为何支持它吗?
英文原文
Host: There was a private members' bill in 2022 that was introduced by then MPP Mitzie Hunter that would have amended the Safe and Healthy Communities Act to make gun violence a public health issue. It didn't make it into law, but your group supported the bill. Can you explain what that bill would have done and why you supported it?
大卫·科夫医生: 是的,我想你指的应该是当时的第9号法案(Bill 9)。该法案的核心要旨,是为遭受枪支暴力创伤影响的群体提供全方位的心理健康支持服务,给予他们切实的制度性关怀。法案最后之所以未能通过,说实话,我不是政客,没有深陷于政坛角力之中,但据我了解,当时在程序上存在某种立法重叠的混淆,有人争论相关条款是否已被涵盖在另一项法案——第60号法案(Bill 60)之中,议员们最终认定“我们不需要单独设立这一部法案”。
但我坚信,我们必须在制度中确立这一保障,必须让这类心理创伤照护纳入安大略省健康保险计划(OHIP)的报销覆盖范围,让所有普通民众都能无门槛地获得专业救助。应当有人重新认真梳理当初这项法案受阻的具体原委,适时重新提出该提案,切实保障受害者与高危人群能够获得急需的心理医疗援助。
英文原文
Dr. David Koff: So, I think the role, I believe you mentioned here, um, Bill Number Nine and the idea was that the bill would have provided support for people who have been exposed to gun violence and it's mental health and really had support for that and it didn't go through because I don't know. I'm not a politician and I'm not too much involved in these kind of things, but I understand that it was some kind of confusion. If it was not already included in another bill, in Bill 60, and people at the end of the day said, "Well, we don't need that, this one," but I strongly believe that we need to include that and we need to have this kind of mental care covered by OHIP and made available to people, so someone needs to look a little bit what happened with this bill and we should resubmit and make sure that people who have access to the support they need.
教育普及与严格法规的双轨并进
主持人: 科夫医生,请允许我问您最后一个问题。改善当前这种严峻局面,社会大致可以采取两种不同的治理路径。在您之前的回答中,您提到公众个人自身可以做很多事,例如提高枪支安全存放意识、加深对危害的理解和接受安全教育;而正如您刚才阐述的,另一方面也有立法与规制层面的政策方案。在您看来,未来的侧重点究竟应该落在哪里?是侧重教育普及,还是倾向于制定更为严苛的法律?
英文原文
Host: Dr. Koff, let me ask you one last question, which is to say, you know, there are two different avenues, I guess, that society can do down in order to make this situation better. You, in one of your previous answers, suggested people themselves can do a lot in terms of better gun safety, better understanding, better education, and then, of course, as you just described, there are also legislative solutions to this as well. Where do you think the accent should lie? More education or tougher laws?
大卫·科夫医生: 在我看来,强化普及教育大概率是极其关键的根本出路。这让我联想到许多年以前社会经历过的一场变革:当时我年纪尚轻,政府刚开始在汽车普及强制系安全带的规定。那时社会上到处有人高声抗议:“你们侵犯了我们的个人自由!我们应该有不系安全带的权利,凭什么罚款?”然而,看看后来单单凭借系好安全带这一项举措挽救了多少鲜活生命,减少了多少残疾重伤,又为全社会削减了多少巨额医疗成本负担!大家就会恍然大悟:“这原本就是显而易见的常识。”现在,你坐进车里的第一动作就是顺手系上安全带,甚至根本不需要经过大脑思考。
我们在吸烟烟草的问题上也走过完全相同的治理轨迹。烟草引发肺癌,更会导致慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、肺气肿等致命呼吸衰竭疾病,夺走无数人命。即便当年烟草游说财团的势力极为庞大,随着医学认知深入,公众开始逐步理解吸烟的致命危害,并主动采取措施戒烟防癌,整个社会风气由此扭转。看一看现在的改变,立法无疑起到了极大的推动作用——立法明令禁止在公共场所、写字楼办公室和餐馆酒吧吸烟。因此,我们必须将严谨立法与全民教育两手抓、紧密结合。
但我坚信,只要我们持之以恒地投入宣导教育,让每个人深刻理解必须对枪支保持敬畏与慎重,就能够达成显著的成效。更何况,普通人到底为什么非要持有军用级别的杀伤性武器不可?这根本没有任何正当理由。难道我会开着一辆坦克开上安大略省的 401 号高速公路吗?不可能,法律也绝不允许我这么做。军用级别的武器只属于前线士兵和军队,完全没有理由存在于民间街头和普通家庭之中。
因此我坚信,我们必须双轨并重:在学校和青少年层面尽早开展深入的科普宣导,让年轻学生从一开始就清醒认识到接触枪支的巨大风险与危险隐患;与此同时,必须配以坚实强力的法律监管与严格法律制度。归根结底,两方面相辅相成、缺一不可。但作为医务工作者,我们能够全力助力的阵地正是教育与预防。预防永远是解决问题的生命线。
英文原文
Dr. David Koff: Well, for me, I think more education is probably the way to go. You know, it reminds me, we've seen that years and years ago, I was too young at the time, but when safety belts were made mandatory in the cars and people had been screaming, "You're taking away our freedom. We should be allowed not to wear the seatbelt and fined." But if you look at the number of lives which have been saved just by wearing the seatbelt and decreasing the amount of injuries and the cost for the society of not wearing a seatbelt, you'd think, "Well, there is common sense," and now the first thing you do when you sit in your car is to fasten your seatbelt. It's not even, you don't even think about it. We've seen the same thing with smoking, tobacco, and slowly lung cancer, but it's also this horrible lung disease which kills. You know COPD, emphysema, and things like that, and people die from that. And slowly, people got to understand, even if the tobacco lobby was extremely powerful, they started to understand that smoking can be dangerous and they have to take the measures to reduce the risk of dying from cancer and they did it. Look now what the situation, so of course, um, legislation has been very helpful by preventing and forbidding people to smoke in public areas and offices and restaurants and all that and we should pair both. But I believe that with dedication, we can already achieve a lot by getting people to understand that they have to be careful. The other thing is why do people need to have a weapon, military-grade weapons? There is no justification. Do I drive a tank on the 401? No. And I wouldn't be allowed to do that, so, you know, military weapons are for soldiers and for military. They don't have-- That should be removed from the streets and from homes. Um. So, I believe that probably having both. Strong dedication starting in school and at the youngest level to explain to young students that the risk and dangers of having access to guns and this was having strong regulations and laws. We need both at the end of the day, but for us, as doctors, we can help with education and prevention. Prevention is key.
主持人: 太完美了。大卫·科夫医生,非常感谢您今天抽出时间参与我们的节目。
英文原文
Host: Parfait. Dr. David Koff, thank you so much for joining us today.
大卫·科夫医生: 我感到非常荣幸,先生。非常感谢。Un grand plaisir, monsieur. Merci beaucoup.
英文原文
Dr. David Koff: Un grand plaisir, monsieur. Merci beaucoup.
主持人: 不客气。谢谢您。You're welcome. Merci.
英文原文
Host: You're welcome. Merci.
大卫·科夫医生: 应该是我感谢二位。谢谢。C'est moi qui vous remercie. Merci.
英文原文
Dr. David Koff: C'est moi qui vous remercie. Merci.
主持人: 我们今天之所以邀请科夫医生接受访谈,当然是因为 TVO 正在热播的这部深度纪录片。观众朋友们现在就可以前去观看——纪录片的片名是《Nekai Walks》,该片已经在 TVO Docs 的 YouTube 频道全面上线,我们也会在当前视频的置顶简介区域附上完整播放链接,方便大家点击收看。再次非常感谢大家关注并收看本期节目!
英文原文
Host: Well, we're talking to Dr. Koff, of course, because of this documentary that we're playing on TVO right now and you can watch Nekai Walks. That's the name of the documentary and it's available on the TVO Docs YouTube channel and we will put a link in the description of the video, so you can check that out as well. Thanks so much for joining us.