亲密关系破裂、修复与维系的科学研究 Big Think 2026-08-21

Julie Gottman: 我是朱莉·戈特曼(Julie Gottman)。

Original English

Julie Gottman: I'm Julie Gottman.

John Gottman: 而我是约翰·戈特曼(John Gottman)。我是戈特曼公司的资深科学家。我也是 Affective Software 的联合创始人。

Original English

John Gottman: >> And I'm John Gottman. I am a senior scientist at Gottman Incorporated. I'm a co-founder of Affective Software.

Julie Gottman: 我是戈特曼研究所(Gottman Institute)的联合创始人,同时也是 Affective Software 的联合创始人。约翰和我不仅在工作上是搭档,在生活中也是伴侣。今天在 Big Think 节目中,我们将要探讨亲密关系是如何破裂的,关系该如何进行自我修复,[音乐] 以及如何维系一段长久且充满爱的亲密关系。

Original English

Julie Gottman: >> I'm the co-founder of the Gottman Institute, also the co-founder of Affective Software. John and I work together as well as have relationship together. Today on Big Think, we're going to be talking about how relationships fall apart, how relationships repair themselves, [music] and how to sustain a long-lasting and loving relationship.

Big Think Announcer: 感谢您收看 Big Think。如果您想支持我们的工作,我们鼓励您加入我们的会员社区。作为会员,您将收到我们的季刊印刷版杂志,这是一本设计精美的合集,收录了最重要的新思想和深度访谈。Big Think [音乐] 是专为那些渴望深入探讨伟大思想的充满好奇心的人们而准备的。为了支持您希望在这个世界上看到的媒体内容,请访问 bigthink.com/membership。现在,让我们回到访谈。

Original English

Big Think Announcer: >> Thank you for watching Big Think. If you'd like to support our work, we encourage you to join our members community. As a member, you'll receive our quarterly print magazine, a beautifully designed collection of the ideas and interviews that matter most. Big Think is [music] for curious people who want to take deep dives into big ideas. To support the media you want to see in the world, go to bigthink.com/membership. And now, back to the interview.

第一章:亲密关系为何破裂 (Chapter 1: Why Relationships Fall Apart)

John Gottman: 随着时间的推移,说真的,绝大多数亲密关系的结束都是在悄无声息中消亡的,而不是轰轰烈烈的爆发。人们往往是在不知不觉中开始忽视这段关系。一个很好的例子是对双薪家庭(dual-career couples)进行的斯隆研究(Sloan study),在这项研究中,他们对这些夫妻进行了长期的追踪。这些夫妻都有年幼的孩子,研究人员非常惊讶地发现,在一个典型的夜晚,伴侣们待在同一个房间里的时间竟然不到整个晚上的10%。所以,随着时间的推移,这些夫妻因为这种情感的磨损,最终真的就演变成了对这段关系的完全忽视。他们的关系退化成了一份长长的待办事项清单,而不是继续在这段关系中保持玩乐、趣味、冒险和浪漫。这段关系就这样随着时间流逝渐渐被忽视了。人们变得越来越疏远。在我们的研究中,我们发现他们就像是在过着平行的生活。没错,就像两条平行的铁轨一样。

Original English

John Gottman: >> Over time, really, relationships end with a whimper, not a bang, for the most part. People kind of start ignoring the relationship. A good example is the Sloan study that was done of dual-career couples, where they followed couples over time. These couples had young children, and they were very surprised to find that in a typical evening, the partners spent less than 10% of the evening in the same room. And so, over time, these couples, for that erosion, they really wound up ignoring the relationship. Their relationships devolved into a long to-do list, rather than them really continuing play and fun and adventure and romance in the relationship. The relationship kind of got ignored over time. People became more distant. And in our research, we found that they kind of led parallel lives. Yeah, like two railroad tracks.

Julie Gottman: 所以,当一对夫妻来到我这里,他们说:“你知道吗,我们之间失去了一些东西,但我们不知道那到底是什么。” 那么,这可能意味着很多种情况。这可能意味着他们讨论问题的方式充满了严重的冲突。他们过去本来能够非常平静、温和地处理问题,达成妥协,但现在有些事情已经发生了改变。那么,到底是什么改变了呢?好吧,有可能是他们开始变得互相指责(criticism)。他们开始表达出蔑视(contempt)。他们变得更具防御性(defensiveness),甚至是陷入了我们所说的“情绪泛滥(getting flooded)”的状态,这意味着当他们在面对伴侣、倾听伴侣说话时,进入了一种“战斗或逃跑”的应激状态。这意味着他们将无法真正听进去伴侣到底在说什么,或者是走向了另一个极端,他们变得非常非常疏远,根本就不再谈论他们之间的问题。他们陷入了沉默。这其实就是我们所说的缺乏生命力的关系。它失去了原本的生命能量,失去了彼此的连结。当一对夫妻走进我的办公室时,他们的痛苦看起来是什么样的呢?嗯,那可能表现为几种不同的情况。首先,我的办公室里有一张长长的沙发。那么他们会坐在哪里呢?他们是坐在一起吗?肩并肩?还是他们分别坐在沙发的两端,紧紧贴着沙发的边缘?此外,人们在陷入痛苦时,是不会看着对方的。他们会看着我,他们心里期盼着我能充当一个裁判,来裁定该去惩罚谁,对吧?谁是那个完美无瑕、高高在上的人,而谁又是那个犯下了所有错误的另一半?但这绝不是心理治疗的运作方式。所以,在心理治疗的最初阶段,我要做的一部分工作,就是把目光从其中一方转移到另一方身上,有时如果其中一个人只是盯着我看,我也会看着他们,然后再看向另一个人,我希望通过这种方式引导那位伴侣和我一起去注视另一半。所以,我们在心理治疗中真正要做的是建立起更多的关系连结,让两位伴侣能互相交谈,同时也将我包含在他们的交流之中。

Original English

Julie Gottman: >> So, when a couple comes to me, and they say, "You know, we've lost something, but we don't know what." Well, that can mean a number of things. It can mean that the way they talk about problems is terribly conflicted. They used to be able to really work on their problems calmly and gently, reach compromises, but now something has changed. So, what's changed? Well, it could be that they've moved into criticism. They've moved into expressions of contempt. They've moved into much more defensiveness, or even what we call getting flooded, which means moving into fighter flight when they're addressing their partner and listening to their partner. That means they're not going to be able to hear what their partner is really saying, or the opposite, that they're very, very distant, and they don't talk about their problems at all. They're silent. This is really a what we call a devitalized relationship. It's lost its life energy. It's lost its connection. What does distress look like in a couple when they're walking into my office? Well, it can look like several things. One, I have a long couch in my office. So, where do they sit? Do they sit together? Shoulder to shoulder? Or are they sitting at the far ends, clinging to the end of the couch? Also, people will not look at each other when they're in distress. They'll look at me and they're hoping that I'll serve as a referee for who to nail, right? Who is the person who is vastly superior and who is the other one who's making all the mistakes? That's not how this therapy works. And so, part of what I'm doing in the very beginning of therapy is looking from one partner to the other partner and sometimes if one person is only looking at me, I'll look at them, then look at the other, which I hope will guide that partner to look at the other along with me. So, we're really building more of a relationship in the therapy where the two partners are talking to one another as well as including me.

John Gottman: 最初吸引我去研究亲密关系这个课题的原因,其实是我自己在处理关系方面的极度无能。我最好的朋友鲍勃·莱文森(Bob Levinson)和我都同样不擅长处理关系,于是我们决定建立一个实验室。鲍勃·莱文森和我发现的其中一件令人惊讶的事情是,所有冲突中有69%都是永久性的(perpetual)。通过每两年、三年或六年把这些夫妻请回来,了解他们争吵的原因,我们发现有69%的时间里,他们争论的都是这些永远不会消失的永久性问题。你要知道,这些问题大多数都与性格、生活方式或者他们价值观的差异有关,他们在这些问题上意见不合,并且会一次又一次地反复回到这些问题上。那些人际关系大师(masters of relationships)同样也会面临这些永久性的问题,但他们处理这些问题的方式截然不同。他们似乎能够传达出对伴侣性格的接纳,并对彼此的差异表现出一些幽默感,然后他们才开始着手解决问题,并达成暂时的妥协。而那些灾难性的夫妻(disaster couples)在处理这些永久性问题时则完全不同。他们在问题上真的是在原地打转、白费力气。他们最终变得更加疏远彼此。他们会在脑海中丑化对方,他们把这些问题视为完全是由另一半的缺陷所造成的,并尽可能地从问题中退缩和逃避。

Original English

John Gottman: >> What drew me to the topic of studying relationships was my complete incompetence at relationships. And my best friend Bob Levinson and I shared that incompetence and we decided to set up a lab. One of the surprising things that Bob Levinson and I discovered was that 69% of all conflicts are perpetual. By bringing couples in every 2 years or 3 years or 6 years and finding out what they thought about, we found that 69% of the time they're these perpetual problems that never go away. You know, most of them have to do with differences in personality or lifestyle or their values and they they disagree about these issues and they keep coming back to them over and over again. The masters of relationships have these perpetual problems as well, but they approach them in a different way. They kind of are able to communicate an acceptance of their partner's personality and some humor about the differences, and then they start working on them, and they arrive at temporary compromises. Disaster couples deal with these perpetual problems in a different way. They really spin their wheels on the problem. They wind up becoming more alienated. They vilify one another in their minds, and they see the problems as really the result of the other partner's defects, and withdraw from the problem as much as they can.

John Gottman: 是什么把一个永久性的问题变成了一个双方都不愿谈论的严重冲突呢?通常情况下,是因为其中一方使用了指责(criticism)的方式来描述这个问题本身。我们以做家务为例。所以,其中一方可能会说:“你知道吗?你真是个邋遢鬼。你到底是怎么回事?你从来都不打扫任何东西。我简直不敢相信这个厨房竟然乱成这样。” 好的。那么,这句话里最关键的词就是“邋遢鬼(slob)”,对吧?这是一种他们归咎于另一半的性格缺陷。这时候另一半很有可能会立刻产生防御心理,然后反击说:“哦,是吗?那你还从来没按时交过账单呢。” 或者,他们可能会采取一种带有抱怨性质的防御姿态,他们可能会说:“我明明就打扫了厨房。它挺好的啊。你有什么毛病?” 诸如此类的话。所以,指责是毫无出路的。随着时间的推移,鲍勃·莱文森和我发现,我们可以准确地预测一段关系是否正在走向灾难,我们可以预测一对夫妻最终是会离婚还是会继续在一起,如果他们继续在一起,从长远来看他们的婚姻会有多幸福。我们会计算他们表达积极情绪的时间(秒数),然后除以他们表现出愤怒、失望、充满敌意、好斗或悲伤的时间(秒数)。我们发现,对于那些最终被我们称为亲密关系大师的夫妻,也就是那些婚姻非常幸福并且一直在一起的夫妻,在这些大师之中,积极情绪与消极情绪的比例平均达到了五比一,而在那些灾难性夫妻中,这个比例大约只有零点八。因此,我们非常好奇,是否某些消极因素比其他因素更具腐蚀性和破坏力,最终我们基本上锁定了四种行为,它们确实是亲密关系走向灭亡的最佳预测指标。第一是“指责(criticism)”,也就是把关系中出现的问题说成是对方性格上的缺陷;第二是“防御(defensiveness)”,即在回应伴侣时拒绝承担任何责任,进行反击,或者表现得像个无辜的受害者;第三是“蔑视(contempt)”,这是指责的一种升级形式,涉及在任何维度上对伴侣表达出某种高高在上的优越感;然后是第四种“筑墙(stonewalling,冷暴力)”,这涉及到倾听者没有给出通常表明他或她正在听说话者讲话的信号。你知道,通常情况下,倾听者会通过保持眼神交流、像我现在这样点头,或者发出一些简短的语气词,比如“嗯”、“啊哈”、“哦,是啊”、“可能吧”来进行回应。而那个筑墙的人则是完全封闭了自己。没有眼神交流,没有面部表情,没有简短的语气词,就像是在对着一堵石墙回应一样。所以,这四点就是最好的预测指标,而“蔑视”则是亲密关系走向破灭绝对的最强预测因素。

Original English

John Gottman: >> What turns a perpetual problem into a terrible conflict that neither person wants to talk about is typically when criticism is used to describe the problem itself. Let's take housework, for example. So, one partner might be saying, "You know what? You are such a slob. What is the matter with you? You never clean anything. I can't believe what a mess this kitchen is." Okay. So, the operative word in there was slob, right? Which is a personality flaw they're attributing to the other partner. It's very likely that the other partner is going to be defensive and say, "Oh, yeah? Well, you never pay the bills on time." Or, they may take the defensiveness of somebody who's whining, and they may say, "I do too clean the kitchen. It's fine. What's your problem?" Something like that. So, criticism goes nowhere. What Bob Levinson and I discovered over time was that we could accurately predict whether a relationship was heading toward disaster, predict if a couple was going to divorce or stay together and if they stay together how happily married they would be over time. We would count the number of seconds for the amount of positive emotion that they expressed divided by the number of seconds that they were angry or disappointed or hostile or belligerent or sad. We found for the couples that we wound up calling the masters of relationships, couples who really were happily married and stayed together, that the ratio of positive to negative averaged five to one among the masters and about point eight for the disasters. And we're very curious about whether some negatives were much more corrosive than others and we basically identified four things that really were the best predictors of relationship demise. Criticism, which is stating a problem in the relationship as a flaw of the other person's personality, defensiveness, responding to your partner by denying responsibility for anything, counter attacking, acting like an innocent victim, contempt, which was an escalation of criticism that involved some kind of expression of superiority over the partner on any dimension, and then stonewalling, the fourth one, which involved the listener not giving the usual signals that he or she was listening to the speaker. You know, usually um listeners respond by maintaining eye contact, nodding their heads like I'm doing, uttering these brief vocalizations like, "Mhm, uh-huh, oh, yeah, could be." And the stonewaller just kind of shut down. No eye contact, no facial movement, no brief vocalizations, just kind of like a stonewall responding. So, those are the four best predictors, and contempt was the absolute best predictor of relationship demise.

Julie Gottman: 蔑视(Contempt)是亲密关系破裂的头号预测指标。蔑视和指责有点相似,但它的表现形式是这样的:“你压根连想都没想过要打扫厨房,对吧?没想过。你根本就不会去想。你太自私了。” 所以,这中间是有区别的。说话的人表现得比对方非常有优越感,就像是在道德上高人一等,用一种居高临下的态度看着他们的伴侣,并且他们在说这些话时带着一种轻蔑、带着一种不尊重,一种非常可怕的不尊重。而另一个人是能感受到这一点的,然后你猜怎么着?受到蔑视的倾听者不仅会感到自己的自尊心被狠狠地打压,感觉……

Original English

Julie Gottman: >> Contempt is the number one predictor of relationships falling apart. Contempt is similar to criticism, except here's what it looks like. You wouldn't even think to clean the kitchen, would you? No. You wouldn't even think of it. You're too selfish. So, there's a difference there. The person who's speaking is acting very superior to the other, like morally superior, looking down their nose at their partner, and they're saying their words with some scorn, with some disrespect, horrible disrespect. And the other person is going to feel that, and guess what? The listener of contempt not only shrinks down in their self-esteem and feels

永久性问题与生理影响

Speaker A: ……对自己感觉糟糕,这真的很破坏关系,但是轻蔑,在冲突对话中表达轻蔑的次数,预示着倾听的一方在接下来的 4 年里会患多少次传染病。换句话说,轻蔑不仅是关系的硫酸,它也是免疫系统的硫酸,会损害免疫系统,因此倾听的那个人会更经常生病。所以,轻蔑是我们真的想要消除的东西。所以,这四件事就是让永久性问题变得如此困难的原因。所以,当一对伴侣不知道除批评、防御、轻蔑,也许还有筑墙、封闭自己、变成一堵沉默的高墙之外的任何替代方法时,伴侣会有什么感觉?很多时候,这会让他们感到反胃。这会让他们感觉糟透了。每次他们卡住的特定话题浮出水面时。很多时候,伴侣们干脆完全回避它。他们不会谈论它。但是,你可以感觉到它在房间里的存在。就像,你知道,藏在地毯下的一头大象坐在那里说:“哟呼,你要注意到我吗?”而伴侣并不想理会。他们害怕提起这件事,因为最终的结果是他们陷入了这些极具破坏性的模式,而且他们不知道如何摆脱这些模式。所以,他们会有几种感觉。他们经常会感到愤怒。他们会感到恐惧。他们经常会感到非常悲伤:“天哪,我们如此疏远。为什么我们不能一起解决这个问题呢?”他们可能也会感到无望、绝望、一种无力感,因为他们做的任何事都不起作用。所以,面对那个永久性的问题,他们真的瘫痪了。

Original English

Speaker A: terrible about themselves, which really ruins the relationship, but contempt, the number of times contempt is expressed in a conflict conversation, predicts how many infectious illnesses that listening partner is going to have in the coming 4 years. In other words, contempt is not only sulfuric acid for the relationship, it's also sulfuric acid for the immune system, damaging the immune system so the individual listening is going to be sick more often. So, contempt is something we really want to eliminate. So, those four things are what make perpetual problems so difficult. So, when a couple doesn't know any alternative to criticism, defensiveness, contempt, maybe stonewalling, shutting down, becoming a big silent wall, what does it feel like to the couple? It makes them sick to their stomach a lot of times. It makes them feel terrible. Every time particular topic that they're stuck on comes to the surface. A lot of times couples will just avoid it altogether. They won't talk about it. But, you can feel its presence in the room. It's like, you know, an elephant under the rug that's sitting there saying, "Yoo-hoo, you going to pay attention to me?" And the couple doesn't want to. They're terrified of bringing it up because what ends up happening is they get locked into these very destructive patterns and they don't know how to get out of them. So, there are several feelings they're going to have. They're going to have anger often. They're going to have fear. They're going to have often times a lot of grief at, "God, we're so distant. Why can't we work on this together?" They may have also just hopelessness, despair, a feeling of powerlessness because nothing they do is working. And so, they're really paralyzed facing that perpetual problem.

信任的侵蚀与背叛

Speaker B: 悄悄摧毁爱情的是信任的侵蚀。我们对亲密关系中背叛的理解实际上来自一位名叫卡里尔·拉斯布尔特(Caryl Rusbult)的社会心理学家的一项史无前例的研究。卡里尔·拉斯布尔特实际上帮助我们以一种新的方式理解背叛。拉斯布尔特发现,背叛是一个渐进的过程。在这个过程中,人们不再珍惜他们所拥有的,开始寻找他们没有的,并为关系中缺失的东西而感到自怜。卡里尔·拉斯布尔特发现,在那些走向背叛的关系中,伴侣在争吵之后会认为自己可以找到更好的。而且他们真的认为存在一段真实或想象的关系,在那种关系里他们可以过得更好。所以,他们倾向于贬低自己的伴侣,而不是和伴侣谈论问题并表达抱怨。拉斯布尔特发现,他们会去找其他人谈论他们的伴侣。不仅如此,他们还允许自己越界。所以,渐渐地,当他们抱怨自己的伴侣时,他们找到了一个对他们的抱怨非常同情和有共鸣的人。当他们越界做这些事时,感到自怜,允许自己越界,背叛就成了一个自然而然的结果。

Original English

Speaker B: What quietly destroys love is the erosion of trust. Our understanding of betrayal in relationships really comes from the unprecedented research of a social psychologist named Caryl Rusbult. And Caryl Rusbult actually helped us understand betrayal in a new way. What Rusbult found was that betrayal is a gradual process. It's a process where people stop cherishing what they have and start looking for what they don't have and really feeling sorry for themselves for what's missing in the relationship. Caryl Rusbult found after an argument in relationships that are headed for betrayal, people think they can do better. And they actually think there's some real or imagined relationship in which they can do better. So, they kind of trash their partner rather than talking to their partner about the problem and giving voice to the complaints. Rusbult discovered that they go talk to somebody else about their partner. And not only that, they give themselves permission to cross boundaries. So, gradually as they complain about their partner, they find somebody very sympathetic and empathetic to their complaints. And when they cross boundaries doing that, feeling sorry for themselves, giving themselves permission to cross boundaries, betrayal is a natural consequence.

Speaker C: 当一段关系中的信任被打破时,很多事情都可能破坏这种信任。可能是,你知道,最大的事情通常是婚外情或关系外的外遇,因为对于受到伤害的人来说,他们的整个世界都崩溃了。想一想。你在一段承诺的关系上建立了自己的世界,而你认为你们共享的价值观却崩溃了。你们认为共同拥有的梦想崩溃了。你们的联系、团队合作、陪伴、爱、性、亲密感,全都爆炸成了碎片。信任被背叛的感觉就像玻璃碎片一样。因此,即使是那些微小的背叛,也很难去修复信任。

Original English

Speaker C: When trust is broken in a relationship, many things can break that trust. It can be uh you know, the biggest thing, which is typically an extramarital affair or extrarelationship affair, because to the individual who has been hurt, their entire world has blown up. Think about it for a minute. You've built your world on a committed relationship where the values you think you share are blown up. The dreams that you thought you had together are blown up. The connection, the teamwork, the companionship, the love, the sex, the intimacy exploded into fragments everywhere. Shards of glass is what betrayal can feel like. Therefore, it's very, very difficult to work on trust even with those small betrayals.

寻求连接的请求

Speaker A: 当我们在“爱情实验室”里开着摄像机时,控制室里的人发现,当一个人试图引起伴侣的注意或兴趣时,他们会切换三个摄像机中的一个,来观察伴侣的反应。我的学生珍妮·德赖弗(Jenny Driver)发现,这是一个非常关键的时刻。伴侣要么做出了回应,我们称之为“转身靠近”(turning toward)。或者他们没有回应。就好像什么都没发生一样。我们称之为“转身离开”(turning away)。或者他们做出了烦躁的回应:“你能安静点吗?我正在看书。”我们称之为“转身对抗”(turning against)。我们发现,有时候他们的伴侣会走出来,然后回来重复这种请求,但这只发生在22%的时间里。大多数时候,你知道,接近80%的时间,当请求被转身离开时,最初提出请求的伴侣会感到有点挫败。当珍妮随着时间的推移观察这个问题时,她发现,对于17对在6年后离婚的伴侣,当她回顾6年前的数据时,他们对伴侣的请求做出“转身靠近”反应的平均比例是33%。当她观察那些仍然处于婚姻状态的人,并回顾他们六年前的数据时,他们“转身靠近”的平均比例是86%。所以,你知道,在六年的时间里,这些大师级伴侣做出的所有“转身靠近”的瞬间足以写满一本俄罗斯小说。我们意识到这些请求真的很重要。

Original English

Speaker A: When we had cameras rolling in the love lab, the people in the control room found that when one person tried to get the partner's attention or interest, they would switch one of the three cameras over and see the response of the partner. And my student Jenny Driver discovered this was really a critical moment. The partner either responded and we call that turning toward. Or they they didn't respond. Kind of like it was a non-event. And we call that turning away. Or they responded irritably. Will you be quiet? I'm trying to read. We call that turning against. We found that some of the time their partner would come out come back and repeat the bid, but it only happened 22% of the time. Most of the time, you know, close to 80% of the time, when the bid was turned away from, the original partner who made the bid would kind of crumple a little bit. When Jenny looked at this over time, she found that the 17 couples who divorced after 6 years, when she looked back 6 years earlier, their average proportion of turning toward their partner's bids was 33%. When she looked at the people who were still married and looked back six years earlier, their average was 86% turning toward. So, you know, over six years you could fill a Russian novel with all the moments of turning toward that these master couples had done. And we realized that bids were really important.

Speaker C: 所以,寻求连接的请求在一段关系中是如此重要,因为它在对另一个人说:“我信任你会回应。我相信你是一个值得信赖的人。”举个例子,你通过表达需求来发出寻求连接的请求。你可以对另一个人说:“你知道,我真的筋疲力尽了,或者我真的很累了。你介意今晚洗碗吗?”通过这样问,你是在信任对方会关心你、爱你。这意味着你认为伴侣是一个充满关爱的人,对吗?谁不想这样看待自己呢,对吗?所以,发出寻求连接的请求是一种在说:“你是个好人。你是一个有价值的人。你甚至是一个值得信赖的人。而且你是一个充满关爱的人。所以,我信任你,在这一刻我要向你,并且只向你,发出寻求连接的请求。”

Original English

Speaker C: So, a bid for connection is so important in a relationship because it's saying to the other person, "I trust you to respond. I believe in you as a trustworthy person." Let's take for example, you're expressing a bid for connection by expressing a need. You can say to the other person, "You know, I'm really exhausted or I'm really tired. Would you mind doing the dishes tonight?" Well, by asking that, you are trusting the other person to be caring of you, to be loving. And what that means is you perceive that partner as being a caring, loving person, right? Who doesn't want to think that about themselves, right? So, making a bid for connection is a way of saying, "You're a good person. You're a worthy person. You're a trustworthy person, even. And you're a caring person. So, I trust you, and I'm going to make a bid for connection with you and only you in this moment."

孤独的生理代价与感情的修复

Speaker A: 当其中一个伴侣开始真正脱离这段关系并从所有冲突中退缩时,嗯,从那个伴侣那里退缩,他们就开始感到孤独。而这种孤独在生理上是非常惩罚性的。事实上,我们发现,感到孤独的伴侣,以及当关系中发生退缩时,他们的心脏实际上在每一次跳动时都泵血更吃力。血液从心脏流到耳朵所需的时间被长期缩短了。在每一次心跳中,他们的血液流得更快。心脏工作得更辛苦。即使他们只是在看报纸或散步,如果他们内心感到孤独,他们的心脏实际上也在更加费力地运作。这些人由于这种孤独往往死得更早。这就是我们在鲍勃(Bob)对夫妻进行的20年纵向研究中发现的情况,当我们试图重新联系这些人并以为他们已经退出研究时,发现发生的事情是其中一位伴侣已经去世了。而那种更快的血流速度预示着那种死亡,那种早逝。是否有一个不归路,让你无法真正修复一段关系?坦白说,我们不知道。海伦·费雪(Helen Fisher)告诉我们,你可以永远处于恋爱中。爱情没有保质期。在她的研究之前,我们认为相爱只能持续大约2年,然后就会消失。没有人能维持相爱状态。这不是真的。可能根本没有所谓的不归路。嗯,我们甚至见过离婚的夫妻,然后讨厌离婚的状态,又重新在一起并重建了关系。但我们倾向于认为,当关系成为一种虐待的来源时,并且它真的不再受到双方的支持,当人们变成敌人时,当爱不再是我们可以扇成熊熊大火的余烬,当这些都消失了,当喜爱和钦佩系统死亡时,这段关系最好还是结束。所以,人们最好还是分开。

Original English

Speaker A: When one partner starts really checking of the relationship and withdrawing from all of the conflict, uh withdrawing from that partner, they start getting lonely. And that loneliness is very punishing physiologically. In fact, we discovered that couples who are lonely and and when the withdrawal takes place from the relationship, their heart is actually pumping harder at every beat. And the time it takes for the bolus of blood to go from the heart to the ear is chronically reduced. Their blood is flowing faster at every heartbeat. The heart is working harder. Even when they're just reading a newspaper or taking a walk, if they have that loneliness inside them, their heart is actually laboring harder. And those people tend to die younger as a result of that loneliness. That's kind of what we discovered in Bob's longitudinal 20-year study of couples, that we tried to recontact these people and we thought they'd dropped out of the study, but what had happened is one of the partners had died. And that faster blood flow was predictive of that death, that early death. Is there a point of no return when you can't really heal a relationship? And frankly, we don't know. Helen Fisher taught us that you can stay in love forever. There's no shelf life for love. Before her research, we thought being in love lasts about 2 years and then it goes away. Nobody can sustain being in love. Not true. There may not be any point of no return. Uh we've even seen couples divorce and then hate the divorce and get back together and rebuild the relationship. But we kind of believe that when the relationship becomes a source of abuse, and and it's really no longer really on the side of both people, when people become enemies, when love is no longer just a dying ember that we can fan into a roaring fire, when that's gone, when the fondness and admiration system dies, the relationship is better off dead. And so, people are better off separated.

Speaker C: 你知道,很多伴侣可能认为他们已经走到了尽头。没有回头路,是时候离开这段关系了。他们已经走到了这段关系的尽头。过早有这种想法的问题在于,当也许,你知道,是冲突,你被冲突弄得筋疲力尽了,或者你觉得和你的伴侣如此疏远,以至于,你知道,那火花……

Original English

Speaker C: You know, a lot of couples may believe that they've reached the end of the road. There is no turning back, and it's time to leave the relationship. They've reached the end of that relationship. The problem with thinking that too early, when perhaps, you know, the conflict, you're exhausted by the conflict, or you feel so distant from your partner that, you know, the spark

绝境中的希望与重建信任

Speaker A:……在最初是缺失的,当人们认为他们已经走到了尽头时,通常情况下,他们可能是错的。他们之所以错了,是因为他们没有学会用其他的方式与对方交谈,重新建立联系,也许还有重新建立彼此之间的信任。你知道,我可以说,几乎每一对来到我办公室的伴侣,那些最痛苦的伴侣,通常其中一方会认为一切都结束了。他们觉得自己已经走到了这段关系的尽头。但我为他们抱有希望,因为我知道,他们甚至愿意走进我的办公室,这个事实就表明那里仍然存留着一丝微小的余烬,那是对爱情的希望,希望这段关系能够再次成长为对他们来说更健康、更有回报的东西。然而,也有些伴侣真的已经走到了尽头,我倾向于认为,你知道,那是由于做得太少、太迟了。换句话说,我也许会遇到这样一对伴侣,他们来到这里,距离他们开始变得非常非常不快乐已经过去了 25 年。以至于他们在平行的轨道上生活,就像没有交集的铁轨一样,年复一年。那么,当他们最终来到这里时,所有这些余烬都已经化为了灰烬。无论关系中的事情如何改变,都没有任何爱留下了。在那种情况下,好吧,可能真的结束了。但在很多时候,其实并非如此。在灰烬之下,可能埋藏着一点点希望的火花。而这就是我将与这对伴侣一起努力的方向,去试着吹亮那微小的余烬,给伴侣们提供不同的方式来与彼此建立联系,那些他们以前从未意识到的、全新的联系方式。然后,事情开始非常、非常缓慢地建立起来,就像小草的叶片一样,对吧?脆弱,娇嫩,但尽管如此,它正在重建。

Original English

Speaker A: ... is missing that was there in the beginning, when people believe that they've reached the end of the rope, often times, they can be wrong. The reason they're wrong is that they haven't learned alternative ways of speaking with one another, reconnecting with one another, and perhaps rebuilding trust with one another. You know, I would say probably every couple that comes into my office, the most distressed ones, often one of them will believe that that's it. They're at the end of the road. I hold the hope for them because I know the fact that they've even come into my office suggests there's a little tiny ember there that still remains of the love of hope that the relationship can grow again into something that's much healthier and much more rewarding for them. However, there are couples where they truly have reached the end of the road and I like to think, you know, that results from too little, too late. In other words, I may have a couple who comes in and 25 years have passed since they became really, really unhappy. So, that they've lived on parallel tracks, kind of like railroad tracks with no connection for years and years and years. Well, by the time they finally come in, all those embers have turned into ash. And there's no love left, no matter how things change in the relationship. In that case, okay, it may be over. But so many times, it actually isn't. Buried under the ash can be just a little spark of hope. And that's what I will work on with the couple to kind of blow on that little ember, give the partners different ways of connecting with one another, brand new ways of connecting that they hadn't been aware of before. And then, things begin to build very, very slowly, kind of like blades of grass, right? Fragile, delicate, but rebuilding nonetheless.

如何成功修复关系

Announcer:第二章,伴侣如何成功修复一段关系。

Original English

Announcer: Chapter two, how couples successfully repair a relationship.

Speaker A:你知道,很多人认为一段健康的关系中不应该有冲突。就应该是没有冲突的。如果出现了冲突,那就说明出了很大的问题。好吧,让我告诉你,在一段关系中,冲突是完全正常且健康的。所以,想一想。你生活在这个特定的身体、皮肤、头脑、心灵和思维中。而另一个人生活在一个完全不同的身体、皮肤等等之中。它们总能保持同步吗?不。我们在研究中发现,冲突真的可以成为理解彼此的一种方式。特别是如果冲突是关于一个相当重要的话题,比如,比方说,育儿,或者我们应该去度什么样的假?我们应该有什么样的冒险?我们应该与姻亲保持什么样的关系?我们该如何庆祝节日?我们应该如何在晚上互道晚安,又在第二天早晨互道早安?伴侣在关系中可以经历如此多不同的差异。所以,冲突是存在的。举个例子,假设,John 和我可能会吵架。我们中的一个人在指责,另一个人在防御。然后我们就有机会说,“你还敢自称是婚姻治疗师?”我们也不是完美的。所以,一段健康的关系并不是完美的,但它是能够被修复的。这就是健康关系与不健康关系之间的重大区别之一。

Original English

Speaker A: You know, a lot of people think that a healthy relationship should have no conflict in it. Just be conflict-free. And if there is a conflict, then there's something really wrong. Well, let me tell you, conflict is completely normal and healthy in a relationship. So, think about it for a minute. You live in this particular body, skin, head, heart, thinking. The other person in a totally different body, skin, etc. And are those always in sync? No. What we found in our research is that conflict can really be a way of understanding one another. Especially if the conflict is about a fairly important topic, like, let's say, parenting, or what kind of vacation should we have? What kind of adventure should we have? What kind of relationship should we have with our in-laws? How should we celebrate holidays? How should we say good night to one another and good morning the next morning? There's so many differences that couples can experience between in the relationship. So, there's conflict. For example, let's say, John and I can get into a fight. One of us is being critical, the other one's being defensive. And we get the opportunity to say, "You call yourself a marriage therapist?" We're not perfect, either. So, a healthy relationship isn't perfect, but it is capable of repair. And that is one of the big differences between a healthy relationship and a unhealthy one.

Speaker B:当我们研究 130 对新婚夫妇时,就在婚礼后几个月,我们发现有些夫妇真的在建立信任。他们在测试这段关系,看看这种信任是否存在。我们所说的信任,其实来自于我们运用博弈论来理解关系,利用博弈论的数学原理。答案非常简单。信任意味着每个伴侣都在为两个人着想。他们不仅仅是试图在关系中实现自身利益的最大化。他们是试图实现自身利益和伴侣利益总和的最大化。所以,当你开始真正地像关心什么对你好一样,同样关心什么对你的伴侣好时,你就建立了那种信任,而这就是我们信任指标的基础。我们许多人都会有这样的时候,你知道,我们做了一些真正背叛伴侣对我们信任的事情,当我们伤害了伴侣的感情,你知道,当我们让伴侣失望时,当我们做了一些在某种程度上真正背叛了我们伴侣的事情,一些小事。而在那些运作良好的关系中,人们会停下来并修复这些事情。那很重要,那种信任的丧失,或是那种承诺正在滑坡的感觉。他们注意到了它,他们谈论它,然后他们修复那些对他们信任的损伤。他们对彼此重新作出承诺。他们以一种对双方都非常有意义的方式重新建立信任。

Original English

Speaker B: When we studied 130 newlyweds, just a couple of months after the wedding, we found that some couples really were building trust. And they were testing the relationship to see whether that trust existed. And what we mean by trust really comes from our using game theory to understand the relationship, using the mathematics of game theory. And the answer is very simple. Trust means that each partner is thinking for two. They're not just trying to maximize their own benefits in the relationship. They're trying to maximize the sum of their benefit and their partner's benefit. So, that when you start really caring as much about what what's good for your partner as what's good for you, you build that trust, and that's the basis of our trust metric. And many of us have times when, you know, we do something that really betrays our partner's trust in us, when we hurt our partner's feelings, you know, when we have disappointed our partner, when we've done something uh to really betray our partner in some way, some small way. And in relationships that work, people stop and repair those things. That's important, that loss of trust or that sense of slipping commitment. They notice it, and they talk about it, and they repair those losses of their trust. They recommit to one another. They reestablish trust in a way that is very meaningful for both of them.

从背叛中恢复的阶段

Speaker A:当背叛被发现时,无论它是一次大背叛还是一次小背叛,伴侣们需要以一种非常具体的方式从那次背叛中恢复过来。以下是从背叛中恢复的几个阶段。首先,有赎罪(atonement)。那个撒了谎、欺骗了、背叛了的人,不变得具有防御性,不把背叛或说谎归咎于另一个人。相反,那个人对此承担全部责任,并对另一个人因为被背叛所受到的伤害、痛苦、有时甚至是极度痛苦或绝望表示共情。那个做出背叛行为的人还需要请求宽恕,或者至少表达他们的悔恨,表达他们对自己犯下的背叛行为感到非常非常糟糕。对于那个破坏了信任的人来说,如果他们的伴侣正在通过批评、或许是通过蔑视、通过给另一个人贴标签来表达伤害时,倾听他们的伴侣并与伴侣共情可能会非常困难。他们没有在描述自己,没有描述他们自己的感受。相反,他们在说:“你对我做了这个。你很坏。你做了这个。我不喜欢这样。”这与这样说非常不同:“我感到被摧毁了。当我发现撒了这个谎时,我感到如此受伤。我觉得自己整个人都瘫软在地了。我感觉糟透了。”下一个阶段与真正地致力于婚姻本身或这种承诺关系有关。我喜欢称之为建立“第二段婚姻”。第一段婚姻可能已经烧成了灰烬。然而,第二段婚姻可以通过学习与其他不同的交谈方式,学习如何建立我们称之为“仪式”或传统的东西来重建,在这些仪式或传统中,他们真正地在创造相互联系和保持透明的方式。超级重要。如果他们下班回家晚了,他们会给伴侣打电话,告诉他们自己会晚归,并且透明地说明他们迟到的原因。然后他们回家,而不是仅仅在留在家的那个伴侣心中留下一团疑云。最后一个阶段与再次建立依恋(attaching)有关。而依恋意味着对这段关系重新作出承诺。而且请记住,如果信任被破坏了,这种承诺也同样被破坏了,对吧?所以,重新承诺是从背叛中真正恢复的最后一步。

Original English

Speaker A: When a betrayal is discovered, there's a very specific way that couples need to recover from that betrayal, whether it's a big one or a small one. And here are the stages of that recovery from betrayal. First of all, there's atonement. The person who has lied, who has deceived, who has betrayed, doesn't get defensive, doesn't blame the betrayal or the lying on the other person. That individual instead takes on full responsibility for it and empathizes with the other person's pain, sometimes even anguish or despair, as a result of being hurt by the betrayal. The person who has done the betraying also needs to ask for uh forgiveness or at least express their remorse, that they feel really, really terrible that they have committed that betrayal. It may be very difficult for the person who's broken the trust to hear their partner and empathize with their partner if their partner is expressing the hurt through criticism, maybe through contempt, through labeling the other person. They're not describing themselves, their own feelings. Instead, they're saying, "You did this to me. You You are bad. You did this. I don't like it." That's very different than saying, "I felt devastated. I felt so hurt when I found out there was this lie that was told. I just felt sinking to the floor. I felt awful." The next stage has to do with really working on the marriage itself or the committed relationship. I like to call it building marriage number two. Marriage number one may have burned to the ground. However, marriage number two can be rebuilt by learning alternative ways of talking to one another, learning how to build what we call rituals or traditions in which they are really creating ways of connecting and being transparent. Super important. If they're late coming home from work, they call their partner, tell them that they're late, and they're transparent and say why they're late. Then they come home instead of just leaving a cloud of doubt in that other partner who's home. The final stage has to do with attaching again. And what attaching means is recommitting to the relationship. And remember, if trust has been broken, that commitment has also been broken, right? So, recommitment is the final step in really recovering from betrayal.

Speaker B:修复可能是在关系中区分大师(masters)和灾难(disasters)最重要的事情了。他们真的会去行动并解决问题。非常有趣的是,那些关系陷入麻烦的伴侣也同样会做出修复的尝试,但它并没有被伴侣视为一种修复尝试。它被感知为一种操纵,或者你知道,更多的敌意。而且,你知道,它没有被感知为,你知道,让我们一起努力把事情变得更好。而这种感知是非常重要的,对修复的感知。现在,我们花了大约 7 年的时间来研究修复尝试。我的两个学生实际执行了这项研究。这些学生发现,最强大的修复就是当一个人甚至愿意为问题的一部分承担起责任时。那太强大了。在异性恋关系中,如果是一位女性这样做,它的威力甚至更大。对一个男人来说,当一位女性说:“嘿,这不全都是你的错。我,你知道,我在我们的沟通不畅中也有一份责任,而我,我想承认那份责任。我,我搞砸了,你知道,在,你知道,在我们那次吵架里,或者在那个进行得不顺利的晚上。”这非常有效。当修复尝试进展顺利时,首先,它们会被识别为一种修复的尝试,而不是一种想要制造更多敌意或更多冲突的企图。其次,它们真的能把关系带到一个新的层次。当一次修复奏效时,对彼此就会产生一种新的理解。而我们已经尝试在我们……真正地将它结构化……

Original English

Speaker B: Repair is probably the most important thing that discriminates the masters from the disasters of relationship. They actually go and fix it. Interestingly enough, couples whose whose relationships are in trouble also do the repair attempts, but it's not perceived as a repair attempt by the partner. It's perceived as a manipulation or you know, more hostility. And, you know, it's not perceived as, you know, let's try to make things better together. And the perception is really important, the perception of repair. Now, we took us about 7 years to study repair attempts. Two of my students actually did it. And those students discovered that the most powerful repair of all is when a person takes responsibility for even a part of the problem. That is so powerful. It's even more powerful in heterosexual relationship if if a woman does that. Very powerful for a man when a woman says, "Hey, this isn't all your fault. I, you know, I've I've got a role in our miscommunications, and I I want to admit that role. I I messed up, you know, in in, you know, in the fight we had, or the evening that didn't go well." When repair attempts go well, first of all, they're recognized as an attempt to repair, rather than attempt at more hostility or more conflict. And secondly, they really do take the relationship to a new level. And there's a new understanding of one another when a repair works. And we've tried to really structure that in our

冲突后的修复与脆弱性表达

Speaker A: (治疗)通过创建这种针对遗憾事件后果的表格,让人们经历五个不同的步骤,充分利用修复的机会,真正深入地了解彼此,以及在沟通不畅时究竟哪里出了问题。

Original English

Speaker A: therapy by creating this aftermath of regrettable incident form that people go through five different steps that capitalizes on repair being going really deep in understanding one another and what went wrong in the miscommunication.

Speaker B: 这通常需要你展现出脆弱的一面。那么,展现脆弱究竟意味着什么呢?可以说,这意味着你要拉开拉链,敞开心扉,暴露你的感受、你的情绪、你的心,对吧?对于一些人来说,这可能是非常可怕的。有些人真的不想那样做。那真的,真的让人害怕。事实上,有些人甚至可能不知道自己的感受是什么。你知道,让我们以一个男人为例,他从小受到的教育是,除了愤怒之外,表达任何情绪都是不允许的。不能表达悲伤、内疚、羞耻、悲痛和恐惧。因此,对他们来说,接触到这些感受可能会很困难。一个人该怎么做呢?怎么才能触及那些感受?你可以通过你的身体来做到这一点。例如,当你和你的伴侣交谈时,注意你身体哪里存在紧张感。比如,下巴紧绷可能是因为沮丧,可能是因为愤怒,也可能是因为恐惧——恐惧让你紧闭双唇,这样你就不会说出真正冒犯对方的话。如果你的胸部感到紧绷,这意味着你的呼吸非常浅。那通常是恐惧的感觉,特别是当你的肩膀像这样圆缩着的时候。感觉胃部被踢了一脚,可能也是同样的情况。呃,可能会感到震惊,会感到惊吓,会感到意外,也可能会感到害怕。至于愤怒,你可能会在你的手臂、肩膀、拳头上感觉到它,对吧?所以,你可以解读你身体里正在发生的事情——这要容易联系得多——然后再去探究身体之下隐藏的情绪。然后,弄清楚那到底是什么情绪,并勇敢地把它说出来。

Original English

Speaker B: What that often requires is you being vulnerable. Well, what does being vulnerable actually mean? It means, in a manner of speaking, unzipping yourself and exposing your feelings, exposing your emotions, your heart, right? Well, that can be terrifying for some people. Some people really don't want to do that. It's really, really scary. And in fact, some people may not even know what they're feeling. You know, let's take a man for example who was taught that it was not okay to express any emotion whatsoever except anger. Couldn't express sadness, guilt, shame, grief, fear. So, it may be hard for them to access the feelings. How does a person do that? Get to those feelings. You can do it through your body. For example, if you're talking to your partner, pay attention to where is there tension in your body. For example, that tightness in your jaw can be frustration, can be anger, maybe fear that's keeping you keeping your mouth shut so that you don't say anything that really offends the other person. If you have tightness in your chest, that means you're breathing very shallowly. That typically is the feeling of fear, especially when your shoulders are rounded like this. Kicked in the gut can be the same thing. Uh can be blown away, can be shocked, can be surprised, can be also afraid. Anger, you feel it maybe in your arms, your shoulders, your fists, right? So, you can translate what's going on in your body, which is much easier to connect with, then your feelings beneath the body. And then, figure out what that feeling is and dare to name it.

当你沮丧时,世界为你停下

Speaker A: 经常有人问我:“你觉得必须要做的唯一一件事是什么?你能给那些想要改善关系的人提供的一条最好的建议是什么?”我的回答是,伟大的伴侣关系似乎都有一个座右铭。他们似乎在这样一个基本法则下运作:当你心烦意乱时,宝贝,世界为你停转,而我在这里倾听。我的后裤兜里经常揣着一个小本子,每当朱莉(Julie)说出那四个可怕的字——“我们需要谈谈(We need to talk)”时,我就会把它拿出来。我会非常缓慢地抽出本子,非常缓慢地拔出笔,好让我自己冷静下来。然后我翻到新的一页,说:“我在听。跟我说说吧。”冲突的目标是相互理解。它是有目的的。我认为,如果你意识到冲突的目的是相互理解,而不是去说服,不是去向你的伴侣证明你是对的而对方是错的,而是找到一种方法让你们共同正确,那么事情就能得到很好的解决。这是我的伟大发现。我认为这正是人们需要去做的。他们需要真正意识到,当他们的伴侣感到难过时,这是世界上最重要的事情。停下手头正在做的事。集中注意力。去倾听。认真对待这件事。传达尊重。传达爱意。

Original English

Speaker A: I've often asked, "What what's the one thing that you would do? What's one What's the best piece of advice you can give people to start working on their relationships?" And my answer is that great relationships seem to have a motto. They seem to operate under this basic rule that when you're upset, baby, the world stops and I listen. And I have a little notebook in my back pocket that I take out whenever Julie says the four terrible words, "We need to talk." I whip this out really slowly and I get my pen out really slowly so I can calm myself down and I open it up on a clean page and I say, "I'm listening. Talk to me." The goal of conflict is mutual understanding. It has a purpose. And I think if you realize the purpose is mutual understanding, not persuasion, not convincing your partner that you're right and your partner is wrong, but finding a way to be right together, then things can work out really well. That's my big invention. And that's what I think people need to do. They need to really realize that when their partner's upset, it's the most important thing in the world. Stop what you're doing. Pay attention. Listen. Take it seriously. Communicate respect. Communicate affection.

Speaker B: 当伴侣真正需要进行修复时,究竟是什么能让他们真正重新走到一起?那唯一的一件事是什么?你知道是什么吗?是倾听。是对另一半的深度倾听。你知道,你可能会想:“好吧,如果我道歉了,那一切就好了,事情就都解决了。”但事实并非如此。真正需要发生的是,认真倾听对方对已发生之事的看法,在倾听时设身处地为对方着想,这样你才能真正理解他们为什么会那样做、那样说。你知道,我们很多人认为,为了建立一段关系,你必须不断广播。你得说出你是谁。你得说出你的想法。你得说,你知道,你的感受是什么,你的信仰是什么等等,一直不停地描述自己。当然,所有这些事情也都很重要。但是,建立长久、充满爱的关系的最大礼物,是渴望去倾听和理解。这是关键所在。你将倾听的礼物送给对方,并且希望对方也将其送给你。这样,两个互相倾听的人在修复的过程中,就能对彼此达到更深层次的理解。

Original English

Speaker B: When partners really need to make a repair, what brings them really back together again? What's the one thing? You know what it is? It's listening. It's deep listening to the other person. You know, you might think, "Well, if I apologize, then everything is fine and it's all done." But, it isn't. What needs to happen is really listening to the other person's perspective on what happened and putting yourself in the other person's shoes when you're listening so that you can really understand the reasons why they acted or spoke the way they did. You know, so many of us think that to build a relationship, you've got to broadcast. You've got to say who you are. You've got to say what you think. You've got to say, you know, what you're feeling, what you believe, etc., etc., describing yourself all the time. And all those things are important, too. But, the greatest gift to create a long-lasting, loving relationship is the desire to listen and understand. That is key. The gift of listening that you're giving to the other person, and hopefully, that other person is also giving to you. So that both people listening to each other reach a much deeper understanding of one another in the process of repair.

柔和地开启对话

Speaker A: 所以,我们真正发现的起步方式,你知道,嗯,是通过审视20世纪50年代伯纳德·格尼(Bernard Guerney)强烈推荐的这种积极倾听。他的理念是,如果你善于倾听,你可以使用一个公式,即:“亲爱的伴侣,当你做 X 时,它让我感到 Y。”但结果证明,当人们使用这种积极倾听进行研究时,他们发现它完全无效。慕尼黑婚姻研究(Munich Marital Study)发现,这是他们尝试过的最糟糕的干预措施。它的效果最差,并且最容易让人们退回到不良沟通中。而我们决定的,朱莉和我决定的,是问题出在“你”字上。当你做了什么,这让我有这种感觉。这仍然是在把手指指向对方。所以,如果我们把手指指向自己会怎样呢?我们看了一下,发现那些婚姻大师们就是这么做的。他们采用了这种柔和的开启方式(soften startup)。他们会说:“这就是我对于我们面临的这个情况的感受。不是关于你,而是关于某个情况。这就是我所需要的。不是我不需要什么,而是我积极的需求。”而且他们有点,你知道,我们意识到他们有点在给伴侣一个为他们闪耀的机会。他们让伴侣更容易倾听他们的不快是什么,以及他们需要伴侣做些什么。所以,我认为在爱情和长期的伴侣关系中,最重要的是在关系中保持爱意和尊重,并在出现问题时去修复它。

Original English

Speaker A: So, often start up is something that, you know, we really discovered um by taking a look at this active listening that was recommended so strongly by Bernard Guerney in the 1950s. And his idea was that if you would listen well, you could use a formula that says, "Dear partner, when you do X, it makes me feel Y." And it turned out that when people did research with that active listening, they found it was completely ineffective. The Munich Marital Study found that it it was the worst intervention they tried. It had the least effectiveness and the most return to poor communication. And what we decided, what Julie and I decided, was that what was wrong was the you. When you do something, it makes me feel this way. It's still pointing the finger at the other person. So, what if we pointed the finger at ourselves? And we took a look and that's what the masters were doing. They were doing this soften startup. They were saying, "Here's how I feel about the situation that we've confronted. Not you, but about a situation. And here's what I need. Not here's what I don't need. Here's my positive need." And they were kind of, you know, we realized they were kind of giving their partner a way to shine for them. And they made it easier to listen to what their unhappiness was and what they needed from their partner. So, I think what matters most in love and long-term relationships are maintaining affection and respect in the relationship and fixing it when that goes wrong.

Speaker B: 我认为,在充满爱的长期关系中,最重要的一点——至少我们的研究显示如此——是修复的能力。我们必须记住,关系中的任何人都会犯错,无论这段关系有多么牢固。如果不去尝试修复,如果错误或受伤害的感受被扫到地毯下,那么它们往往会积累并恶化,对吧?直到因为他们没有对受到伤害的地方进行修复,而产生更多的情感距离。所以,非常非常重要的一点是,当你们每个人都表现出作为人类不完美的一面、犯了错误,甚至在想“天哪,我为什么要那样说”的时候,始终要去尝试,至少去尝试进行修复。回到伴侣身边,真正去修复已经发生的断裂。这就是维持一段持久的关系所需要的。

Original English

Speaker B: I think what matters the most, at least this is what our research shows, in loving long-term relationships is the ability to repair. We have to remember that anybody in a relationship is going to make a mistake, no matter how strong the relationship is. And if those repair attempts are not made, if the mistakes or the hurtful feelings are swept under the carpet, well, they tend to add up and fester, right? Until there's more emotional distance because they haven't created repair for whatever was hurtful. So, it's very, very important to always try, at least try, to make repairs when each of you is being human, imperfect, making mistakes, kind of going, "Oh God, why did I say that?" And going back to the partner to really repair the disconnect that's occurred. That's what it takes to have a sustained long relationship.

第三章:定义爱情与友谊的基础

Speaker A: 第三章,定义爱情。单靠爱足以建立一段幸福而持久的关系吗?这是一个开始。这是一个重要的开始。它非常有用。去感受爱、被爱、给予爱是一件非常美妙的事情。但是,要做的还远不止这些。友谊绝对是持久浪漫爱情的基础。研究表明,在所有正在约会的情侣中,近70%是从朋友做起的。你们并不需要那种浪漫的火花。如果有浪漫的火花当然很好。但这不是必须的,也不是必要的。友谊才是必要的。而且我们已经定义了友谊意味着什么。你知道,它是关于建立爱情地图(love maps),真正去了解这个人,展现脆弱,让对方了解你。它是关于共同建立喜爱与赞美、尊重与爱意。它实际上是关于对这段关系的一种态度,即它是特别的,并且你将把它当作特别的东西来对待。这些就是我们所确定的友谊的组成部分,而且它们似乎非常强大。它们就足够了。所以,我认为友谊在任何想要行之有效的关系中绝对是必不可少的。

Original English

Speaker A: Chapter 3, defining love. Is love enough to build a happy and lasting relationship? It's a start. It's an important start. It's very useful. It's a very wonderful thing to feel loved, to be loved, to give love. But there's a lot more required. Friendship absolutely is the foundation of lasting romantic love. Research shows that of all the couples who are dating, almost 70% of them started as friendships. You don't require that romantic spark. Romantic spark is great if it's there. Not required, not necessary. Friendship is necessary. And we've defined what friendship means. You know, it's about building love maps, really getting to know this person, being vulnerable, having the person know you. It's about building fondness and admiration, respect and affection together. It's about really an attitude toward the relationship that it's special and that you're going to treat it as special. Those are the components of friendship that we've identified and they seem to be pretty powerful. And they're enough. So, I think friendship is absolutely essential in any relationship that's going to be effective.

Speaker B: 当我遇到一对健康的情侣时,我会通过几个小信号知道他们确实很坚固。一是他们会笑对彼此的笑话。二是他们可能会有亲昵的举动。他们可能只是把手放在伴侣的膝盖上,或者握住对方的手片刻。他们通常不会在公共场合无视对方的意见并羞辱他们。当另一个人在滔滔不绝地谈论某事时,他们会倾听。他们也会说一些真正尊重你的话,或者在其他人在场时赞美对方。这也表明了一段非常坚固的关系。

Original English

Speaker B: When I've met a healthy couple, I know that they're truly strong by several little signals. One is that they laugh at each other's jokes. Two, they may be affectionate. They may just put their hand on their partner's knee or hold the other person's hand for a moment. They don't typically override the other person's opinion and humiliate them in public. They will listen to the other person when the other person is holding forth and talking about something. They are also going to say some things perhaps that are really respectful of you or complimentary to whoever else is there. That also shows a really strong relationship.

爱的选择

Speaker A: 最后,爱是你一次又一次不断做出的选择。现在,当我说这句话时,我指的并不是爱最开始的阶段,那时,你知道,仿佛满天星辰,闪闪发光,你是如此兴奋。简直不敢相信今晚就能见到那个人。我们把这称为“迷恋”(limerence),这有些不同。那更像是坠入爱河,我们所谓的坠入爱河,这与化学物质有关。但是一次又一次地选择爱,看起来却截然不同。总有那么几天,尤其是当你们对彼此许下承诺时,你会想:“天哪,你知道,我今天得和伴侣花整整一天的时间清理车库,而他们会一整天都在抱怨。我想和他们在一起吗?不,并不是很想。至少今天不想。”好吧,你有一个选择。你可以去想你的伴侣有什么缺点,以及他们今天会做错什么;或者你可以想,“哇,尽管他们讨厌做这件事,但他们还是愿意来帮我,这不是很棒吗?”听出这其中的选择了没?这里面存在着一个选择。所以,当我们的伴侣状态不佳时,选择去爱显得尤为重要。当某人热情、充满爱意、善于赞美,为你做很多事,并且能准时接孩子等等时,爱他们很容易。然而,当他们犯错、把事情搞砸、脾气暴躁、心情不好、回家晚了又没有告诉你时,你知道,在所有这些情况下,要去感受到爱就难得多了。没有人是完美的。那么,你能爱一个不完美的人吗?这就是你必须做出的选择。

Original English

Speaker A: And finally, love is a choice that you are making over and over and over again. Now, when I say that, I'm not talking about the very first stages of love where, you know, there's stars in the sky and things are twinkling and you're so excited. Can't believe you're going to be seeing that person tonight. That we call limerence and that's a little bit different. That's more falling in love, what we call falling in love, which has to do with chemicals. But choosing love over and over again looks really, really different. There's going to be days, especially when you're committed to one another, when you think, "Oh God, you know, I'm going to have to spend the whole day cleaning out the garage with my partner and they're going to complain about it all day long. Do I want to be with them? No, not really. Not today." Okay. You have a choice. You can either think about what's wrong with your partner and what they're going to do wrong during the day or you can think, "Wow, isn't it great that they're going to help me even though they hate doing this?" Hear the choice? There's a choice in there. So, choice to love is really particularly important when our partners are not at their best. It's easy to love somebody when they're warm and affectionate and complimentary and they're doing things for you and they pick up the kids on time, etc. However, harder to feel love when they make mistakes, when they get things wrong, when they're grumpy, when they're in a bad mood, when they come home late and they haven't told you, you know, all those things. Nobody's perfect. So, can you love somebody who's not perfect? That's the choice you have to make.

倾听与关注

Speaker B: 能够表明一段关系很坚固的最显著的模式是,人们真的对彼此感兴趣。他们倾听对方。他们向对方展示自己的关心。展示他们对这个人很着迷。即使在冲突期间,嗯,这种模式依然存在。你知道,这里有一种共识。有一种感觉就像在说:“是的,跟我说说吧。我想听听你要说什么。嗯,这很有趣。多告诉我一些。”你知道,比如“这让我很惊讶。帮我理解一下。我对此有点困惑。”你知道,“哦,那太吸引人了。那么这件事的渊源是什么?它是怎么产生的?”而且你知道,你会看到这样一种感觉:倾听者就像是说话者脑海风景中的游客。你知道,我们是游客。我们全身心充满着好奇。我们保持开放。我们吸收着这段经历。在运转良好的关系中,模式就是这样的。

Original English

Speaker B: The most glaring pattern that reveals that a relationship is strong is that people really are interested in one another. They're listening to one another. They're demonstrating to one another that they care. That they are fascinated by this person. And even during conflict um those patterns are there. You know, it's there's this agreement. There's this kind of like saying, "Yeah, talk to me. I want to hear what you have to say. Hmm, that's interesting. Tell me more." You know, so "That surprises me. What Help me understand that. I'm kind of confused by that." You know, "Oh, that's fascinating. So, what's the history of that? How did that emerge?" And you know, you see these this sense that the listener is a tourist in the landscape of the speaker's mind. You know, we're a tourist. We're just all curiosity. We're open. We're taking in the experience. And that's what the pattern is like in a relationship that's functioning well.

亲密关系与肢体接触

Speaker C: 因此,实际上有些人低估了亲密感和爱意在一段关系中有多么重要、多么具有基础性作用。所以,当我们首先说到爱意时,我们在谈论什么?爱意意味着接触。非性方面的接触,但仍然是接触。它可以是牵手、用手臂搂着某人,或者一个大大的拥抱。嗯,接触在一段关系中是极其重要的。不仅如此,它在创造亲密感以及创造美妙、充满激情的性生活方面也非常重要。有时候性生活很频繁,有时候则不然。这完全取决于这对伴侣。伴侣们喜欢的性生活频率有着巨大的差异。并没有什么“正常”的标准,不是说非得在周二和周四。那不是健康关系的一部分。关键在于双方都感到舒适,而这可能需要一些妥协。在性中,安全感是至关重要的。特别是对女性而言。你知道,我们有一次做了一个实验。天哪,那真的很惊人。我们在一个大型研讨会上。我们让人们举手。我们首先让女性举手:如果她们在地下车库里,她们会感到害怕吗?每个人都举手了。所有的女性都举手了。当问男性同样的问题时,只有两三个,也许五个人举手。仅此而已。所以,在异性恋关系中,有一点就是必须要有一种安全感。必须要有信任。必须要有情感连接。通常情况下,对于一段将会有身体亲密接触的关系中的女性或跨性别女性来说,必须同时存在情感连接和安全感。而现实是,无论是什么样的关系,通常那种情感上的亲密伴随着身体上的亲密,会创造出最深的连接、最强烈的愉悦感,甚至是最多的兴奋、最大的激情、最深的爱。

Original English

Speaker C: So, some people actually underestimate how important, how foundational intimacy and affection are in a relationship. So, what are we talking about when we say affection first? Affection means touch. Non-sexual touch, but touch nonetheless. It can be hand-holding, an arm around somebody, a big hug. Well, touch is incredibly important in a relationship. Not only that, but it's also really important in creating intimacy and creating a wonderful, passionate sexual life. Sometimes it has sex a lot, sometimes it doesn't. Really depends on the couple. There's a huge range of sexuality that couples prefer. There's not a normal, it's got to be on Tuesdays and Thursdays. That's not part of a healthy relationship. It's what both people are comfortable with, and that may involve some compromise. Safety is huge in sex. Especially for women. You know, we did an experiment one time. God, it was really amazing. We're in a big workshop. We asked people to raise their hands. We asked first the women to raise their hands. When they were in an underground garage, would they feel scared? Everybody raised their hands. All the women raised their hands. The men, asked the same question, two or three, maybe five. That was it. So, one of the things in a heterosexual relationship is that there has to be a sense of safety. There has to be trust. There has to be emotional connection. Typically, for a female or a transgender female in a relationship in which there's going to be physical intimacy, there has to be emotional connection and safety, too. And the reality is that no matter what the relationship is, typically that emotional intimacy along with physical intimacy creates the most connection, the most euphoria, even, the most excitement, the most passion, the most love.

维持亲密生活的秘诀

Speaker D: 是什么区分了那些在关系中亲密生活和性生活真正保持活力、继续存在的一对对伴侣,与那些性生活恶化的伴侣。我们真正发现的是,其基础在于对彼此的爱意和尊重。而且,你知道,我们对此感到惊讶。你知道,有些夫妇甚至在第一个孩子出生 3 年后就真正停止了彼此间的性生活。相比之下,那些在第一个孩子出生 3 年后性生活又恢复正常的夫妇,你知道,他们很浪漫。当这项在 24 个国家、有 70,000 人参与的精彩研究发现同样的事情时,我很高兴。绝佳性生活的基础是什么?那些自称性生活糟糕的人和那些自称性生活绝佳的人之间有什么区别?它是诸如每天说“我爱你”并且是发自内心地说;毫无理由地深情亲吻对方;拥抱,这是我的最爱。朱莉(Julie)和我有一张拥抱沙发,我们在那里拥抱着看英国人互相谋杀(译注:指看英国推理剧),我们喜欢拥抱。事实证明,拥抱真的非常重要。每周进行一次浪漫的约会,你知道,这太棒了。一起去度浪漫的假期。即使在公开场合也很亲密。这个清单上没有一件事与卧室里发生的事情有关。它与卧室里的性技巧无关。它关乎爱意、共同的尊重,以及持续的友谊,是在滋养这段关系中的那个部分。而且这似乎在地球上的任何地方都是适用的。当你很难与伴侣保持身体或情感上的亲密时,你该怎么办?我认为答案是去谈论它。你真的必须对你的伴侣说,就像卡罗尔·罗斯布尔特(Carol Rusbult)说的那样,你正把一切都投入到这段关系中。你需要和谁谈论这件事?你的伴侣。你必须说:“嘿,宝贝,你知道,我觉得事情和以前不一样了。我真的感到很孤独。我真的觉得……我不想和你产生身体上的联系。我感觉和你离得很远。这真的很糟糕,因为我想感受到与你的亲近。我真的希望我们能亲近。我希望我们亲密无间。我们能谈谈怎么做到这一点吗?”

Original English

Speaker D: What separates couples whose intimate and sexual lives really stay alive and vibrant in their relationship, continue to exist, versus couples whose sex life deteriorates. What we discovered really was that the basis was affection and respect for one another. And, you know, we were surprised by that. You know, couples who even 3 years after the first baby was born had really stopped having sex with one another. Compared to couples 3 years after the first baby was born that sex lives were back again, you know, they were they were romantic. And I was delighted when this wonderful study that was done in 24 countries with 70,000 people discovered the same thing. The basis of a great sex life. What's different about the people who say they have an awful sex life and the people who say they have a great sex life. And it's things like saying I love you every day and meaning it. Kissing one another passionately for no reason at all. Cuddling, my favorite. Julie and I have a cuddle couch where we cuddle and watch English people murder each other and we love cuddling. And cuddling came out to be really, really important. Having a weekly romantic date, you know, amazing. Taking romantic vacations together. Being affectionate even in public. It not a single thing on that list had to do what happened in the bedroom. It wasn't about sex techniques in the bedroom. It was about affection and shared respect and friendship continuing, nurturing that part of the relationship. And that seems to be true everywhere on the planet. What do you do when you're having a hard time being physically or emotionally intimate with your partner? I think the answer is you talk about it. You really have to say to your partner, just like Carol Rusbult said, you're you're investing everything in this relationship. Who's the person you need to talk to about this? Your partner. You've got to say, "Hey, baby, you know, I don't feel things are the same as they used to be. I'm really feeling lonely. I'm really feeling I'm not feeling like being physically connected with you. I'm feeling really distant from you. And that really sucks cuz I want to feel close to you. I really want us to be close. I want us to be intimate. Can we talk about how to make that happen?"

破除关于爱的常见误区

Speaker E: 关于爱和充满爱的关系,人们误解的主要事情之一是:除非你先爱自己,否则你无法拥有爱。大错特错。事实上,一段充满爱的关系可以帮助你更多地爱自己。有那么多人不会说他们爱自己。有时,他们可能喜欢自己,也可能不喜欢。他们可能会讨厌自己。嗯,这同样源于不快乐的童年。它可能来自于不快乐的童年。但是,很少有人能被治愈到如此彻底、如此开悟,以至于他们完全爱自己。不,并非如此。我们都是不完美的。我们都在不断成长。而现实是,实际上,在我们离开这个世界之前,我们并不想停止成长。我们将继续成长。所以,这包括在自爱方面的成长。你总不想等到 92 岁才去谈恋爱吧。你真的想那样吗?我不这么认为。所以,无论你是否被治愈、是否开悟,去谈恋爱吧。

Original English

Speaker E: One of the primary things that people misunderstand about love and a loving relationship is that you can't have love unless you love yourself first. Absolutely wrong. In fact, a loving relationship can help you to love yourself more. There are so many people who wouldn't say they love themselves. At times, they may like themselves or they may not. They may dislike themselves. Um again, that comes from unhappy childhoods. It can come from unhappy childhood. But, it's very rare that somebody is so healed and so enlightened that they completely love themselves. No, not really. We're all imperfect. We're all continuing to grow. And the reality is that actually, we don't really want to finish growing until we leave this Earth. We're going to keep growing. So, that includes growing in self-love. You don't want to wait until you're 92 years old to have a relationship. Do you really? I don't think so. So, have a relationship whether you're healed, enlightened, or not.

Audience: [笑声]

Original English

Audience: [laughter]

Speaker E: 没关系。那是一个很大的误解。还有一个,这简直让我抓狂。那就是:你们必须完全合得来。你们必须有相同的兴趣爱好。呃,你们也许必须来自相似的城镇或有相似的背景。你们必须是相似的种族或族裔。你们必须有过相同的学校经历。你们必须有相同的激情、相同的兴趣、对冒险有相同的渴望。不,不,绝对不是。这些全都不对。关于关系,或者说关于人,最奇妙的事情就是永远不可能完全契合。永远不会。所以,事实是,人们用他们的差异丰富了关系。一个喜欢冒险,另一个喜欢阅读。

Original English

Speaker E: It doesn't matter. That's one big misconception. Another one, this one just drives me crazy. You have to be completely compatible. You have to have the same interests. Uh you have to come maybe from a similar town or similar background. You have to be a similar race or ethnicity. You have to have had the same school experience. You have to have the same passions, same interests, same desire for adventure. No, no, and no. None of those are true. The wonderful thing about relationships or people are never completely compatible. Ever. So, the matter the fact of the matter is that people enrich the relationship with their differences. One loves adventure, the other one loves to read.

匹配度与价值观

Speaker A: 好的。因此,喜欢阅读的人会与喜欢冒险的人分享他们读到的内容,这让他们的关系变得更加丰富。同样地,发明家也会去冒险,回来后讲述他们的故事和经历。这也丰富了他们的关系。所以,你其实不必太过于担心彼此是否合适。我想,或许在价值观方面,如果一个人想要孩子,而另一个人不想要,那可能会是一个很大的问题。这可能是一段无法维持下去的关系,因为没有妥协的余地,对吧?你们不可能只要半个孩子。因此,在某些情况下,不合适意味着这段关系可能无法继续。但这种情况非常少见。所以,尽量不要太担心凡事都要合适。它远没有你想象的那么重要。

Original English

Speaker A: Okay. So, the reader shares with the adventurer what they've read, and the relationship is enriched by that. The inventor likewise goes on an adventure, comes back, tells the story, the experience. That enriches the relationship. So, you don't have to worry about compatibility, necessarily. I think maybe in terms of values, one wants a child and the other doesn't, then you may have a big problem. And that may not be a relationship that can work cuz there's no compromise, right? You're not going to have half a child. So, in some cases, incompatibility means the relationship probably won't work. But, those are far and few between. So, try not to worry too much about having everything be compatible. It's not nearly as important as you think.

不要放弃寻找真爱

Speaker B: 我认为,在我了解了关于人际关系的一切之后,人们不应该对寻找真正的一生挚爱感到愤世嫉俗。我母亲过去常说:“每个锅都有一个盖。” [笑声] 我觉得这在恋爱关系中也是成立的。我也看到过人们对感情变得非常愤世嫉俗,他们会想:“这有什么意义呢?我永远也遇不到合适的人。” 就像许多人正在做的那样,日本有40%的年轻人已经放弃了恋爱。还有一些人自称是“非自愿独身者”,你知道,他们最终变成了厌女症患者。这些男人选择了放弃,结果却变得仇视女性。这完全是错误的。世界上一定有那样一个人,他们爱你本来的样子,也会接受你原本的样子。不要放弃,也不要像许多仇女者那样陷入仇恨之中。要认真对待这件事。我就曾如此。在遇到朱莉之前,我相亲了60次。她是第61个。对我来说,她是一个与众不同的人,一个绝对特别的人。而你也会遇到那个属于你的特别之人。

Original English

Speaker B: I think uh after everything I've learned about relationships, people should not be cynical about finding a person who really is the love of your life. My mother used to say, "Every pot has a lid." And [laughter] I think it's true for relationships. And I've seen people become really cynical about relationships and think, "What's the point, you know? I'll never meet anybody." As so many people are doing, 40% of young people in Japan have given up on relationships. There are people who call themselves involuntarily celibate, you know, who wind up being misogynists. Men who give up and wind up hating women. That is so wrong. There's somebody out there for you who loves you the way you are and will accept you the way you are. Don't give up and don't turn to hatred the way many of these misogynists are doing. And take it seriously. I did. I went on 60 dates before I met Julie. She was number 61. She was an outlier, a clear outlier for me. And there's an outlier for you.

关系的惊人韧性

Speaker A: 你知道,在从事了数十年与伴侣相关的工作并研究了各种伴侣之后,关于爱和亲密关系,最让我感到惊讶的仍然是关系所能展现出的惊人韧性。我想,这就是让我感到无比震撼的地方。例如,我治疗过一些伴侣,他们经历过30次、40次外遇。在其中一些外遇中,他们坠入了爱河,但分开生活却让他们感到极度痛苦,对彼此的感受也十分糟糕。然而令人惊讶的是,他们还是会来寻求帮助。接着他们不断地努力、努力、再努力,天哪,他们真的建立起了一段新的关系,非常美好,爱也重新回到了他们身边。这是我在办公室里经常能看到的最动人的景象。这就是最大的惊喜——关系是如此坚韧,人们可以如此宽容,或者即使不宽容也能接受,尽管他们曾被关系中的某些经历所摧毁,人们依然可以如此充满同情心。对我来说,这不是什么魔法。这是伴侣们展现出的韧性,以及对成长和爱的渴望。这才是让我感到惊讶的地方,也是一幅美丽的景象。

Original English

Speaker A: You know, what still surprises me about love or about loving relationships after decades of working with couples and studying couples is the incredible resilience relationships can have. I think that's the thing that just blows my mind. For example, I have treated couples where they've had 30 affairs, 40 affairs. Some of those affairs they fell in love and they're absolutely miserable living separately, feeling horrible about the other person. And then they come in to get help, amazingly enough. And then they work and work and work and work and by golly they build a new relationship and it's beautiful and the love returns. That is the most gorgeous thing that I get to see in my office all the time. That's the big surprise, how resilient relationships are, how forgiving people can be or even not forgiving but accepting, how compassionate people can be despite being destroyed, you know, by some experiences they've had in the relationship. It's not magic for me. It's resilience and the desire to grow and love that couples show. That is what surprises me and is a beautiful thing to see.

Big Think 杂志

Narrator: 我们每年会出版四期值得你放下手机去阅读的杂志。Big Think 的高级实体杂志包含定制的艺术作品以及来自全球最伟大思想家的专业见解。没有人工智能生成的废话,没有煽动情绪的诱饵,只有为充满好奇心的人们准备的伟大思想。支持你想在这个世界上看到的媒体。请访问 bigthink.com/membership 加入我们。

Original English

Narrator: Four times a year, we print a magazine worth putting your phone down for. Big Think's premium print magazine is built with custom artwork and expert insight from the world's biggest thinkers. No AI slop, no rage bait, just big ideas for curious people. Support the media you want to see in the world. Go to bigthink.com/membership to join.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

关键字: relationship-dynamics conflict-resolution trust-repair self-love relationship-resilience