关于放弃的哲学与克服阻力的工具 The Diary Of A CEO 2026-08-10

开场:关于“何时该放弃”的对话

主持人: 我怎么知道什么时候该放弃某件事?

Original English

Host: How do I know when to quit something?

嘉宾: 没关系。你是可以放弃一些事情的。

Original English

Guest: It's okay. You can quit things.

主持人: 等一下。今天早上去健身房的时候,我看到墙上挂着迈克尔·乔丹的名言。

Original English

Host: Hang on a minute. When I went to the gym this morning, there was the Michael Jordan quote.

嘉宾: “如果你放弃一次,它就会变成一种习惯。永远不要放弃。” 他错了。而且很明显他错了。我失败过的次数比大多数正在听这个节目的人都要多。而关于放弃的力量,一个简单的秘诀就在于“低谷期”(the dip)。低谷期描述的是一种世界上没人谈论的现象。所以,我努力去做的事情之一,就是帮助人们理解它。因为我整个职业生涯都在思考如何帮助人们做得更好,找到他们被困住的原因,意识到是什么在阻碍他们,然后去解决问题。因为问题就是机会。我相信所有问题都是可以解决的。但我们现在正在挣扎的是,人们感到害怕。人们感到孤独。人们感到彼此失联。他们是各种媒体和商业体系的受害者。而我们已经被灌输了一种观念,以至于对此视而不见。

Original English

Guest: "If you quit once, it becomes a habit. Never quit." He's wrong. And it's very clear that he's wrong. And I've failed more times than most people are listening to this. And the simple secret for the power of quitting is the dip. And the dip describes something in the world that no one talks about. And so, one of the things I try to do is help people understand it. Because my whole career is about how can I help people do better, find why they're stuck, realize what's holding them back, go solve the problem. Because problems are opportunity. And I believe all problems can be solved. But what we're wrestling now with is people are afraid. People are lonely. People are disconnected. They're victims of all sorts of media and commercial systems. And we've been indoctrinated to not notice it.

主持人: 所以我真的很想聚焦在那些此刻感到被困住的人身上。

Original English

Host: So I really want to just focus in on people who feel stuck right now.

嘉宾: 所以有一个哲学,它是解开我们困境的关键。那头驴被困在水和胡萝卜之间。驴又渴又饿,但它不愿意离开它想要的任何一样东西。所以,它饿死了,也渴死了。我们所有人都会这样做,而且我们用一个简单的词来做这件事:“但是”。我想跑马拉松,但是我不想累。我想要一份让我有成就感的工作,但是我也喜欢这辆车和这栋房子。所以,我可以给你一些工具,帮助你克服阻力。我也可以给你一些方法,让你成为未来的自己会感谢的那个人。

Original English

Guest: So there's this philosophy which is the key to figuring out our stuckness. The donkey is trapped halfway between the water and the carrot. The donkey is thirsty and hungry, but he's unwilling to move away from either of the things he wants. So, he starves to death and he dies of thirst. And all of us do this and we do it with one simple word, "but". I want to run the marathon, but I don't want to get tired. I want to have a job that fulfills me, but I also like this car and this house. And so, I can give you tools that can help you overcome resistance. And also I can give you the mechanics to become the person your future self thanks you for.

主持人: 那么,克服羞耻感或尴尬感的技巧,可能是当今现代世界最重要的技能之一。我怎样才能更好地处理这个问题呢?

Original English

Host: And then the skill of overcoming shame or embarrassment might be one of the most important skills in the modern world today. How do I get better at dealing with that?

嘉宾: 让我试着把它变得非常简单。

Original English

Guest: So let me try to make it really simple.

主持人: 请讲。

Original English

Host: The floor is yours.

主持人的订阅请求

主持人: 这对我来说非常有趣。我的团队给了我这份报告,让我看看有多少观看这个节目的观众订阅了频道。根据这份报告,你们中的一些人告诉我们,你们是随机取消订阅频道的。所以,我想请求大家,请你们现在检查一下是否已经按下了订阅按钮,如果你是这个节目的常客并且喜欢我们在这里做的事情。我们在这个节目上即将达到一个非常重要的里程碑,那就是订阅人数。所以,如果有一件简单且免费的事情可以帮助我们,帮助我的团队,帮助这里的每个人,让这个节目保持免费,让它年复一年、周复一周地不断进步,那就是按下那个订阅按钮,并仔细检查你是否已经按下了它。这是我唯一会请求你们做的事情,我们成交吗?如果你们这么做了,我会告诉你们我会做什么。我会确保每一周、每一个月,我们都越来越努力,为你们带来你们想听的嘉宾和对话。从“Diario”节目一开始,我就一直信守这个承诺,我不会让你们失望的。请帮助我们。非常感谢。让我们开始今天的节目吧。

Original English

Host: So this is super interesting to me. My team given me this report to show me how many of you that watch this show subscribe. And some of you have told us according to this that you are unsubscribed from the channel randomly. So, favor to ask all of you, please could you check right now if you've hit the subscribe button, if you are a regular viewer of the show and you like what we do here. We're approaching quite a significant landmark on this show in terms of a subscriber number. So, if there was one simple free thing that you could do to help us, my team, everyone here to keep this show free, to keep it improving year over year and week over week, it is just to hit that subscribe button and to double check if you've hit it. Only thing I'll ever ask of you, do we have a deal? If you do it, I'll tell you what I'll do. I'll make sure every single week, every single month, we fight harder and harder and harder and harder to bring you the guests and conversations that you want to hear. I've stayed true to that promise since the very beginning of the D ofio and I will not let you down. Please help us. Really appreciate it. Let's get on with the show.

对话开始:赛斯·戈丁的来访

主持人: 赛斯·戈丁,对于刚刚点开这段对话的观众,我想问你的问题是,当这段对话结束时,你希望他们带走什么?他们生活中的哪些问题会得到答案?

Original English

Host: Seth Golden, for my audience who have just clicked on this conversation, my question to you is by the time this conversation is done, what do you hope that they're going to come away with? What questions in their life are they going to have answers to?

嘉宾: 你的一些最好的嘉宾是世界专家,他们出现然后说:“我做了研究。我做了计算。照做吧,因为我告诉你了。” 我从来没有这样做过。我出现,然后试着为人们描绘一幅图画,告诉他们这些词意味着什么,这些系统是什么样的,然后鼓励你去做事情,是因为你自己告诉自己去做。所以,我认为我们现在正在挣扎的是,人们感到害怕。人们感到孤独。人们感到彼此失联。他们是各种媒体和商业体系的受害者。而我们已经被灌输了一种观念,以至于对此视而不见。我们周围到处都是问题。如果我们能解决问题,我们就能让事情变得更好。所以,我想帮助人们做的是,找到词语来谈论他们的问题,意识到是什么在阻碍他们,然后去解决问题。因为当我们解决问题时,我们是在为自己和他人让事情变得更好。所以,问题不是要避免的东西。问题就是机会。我相信所有问题都可以解决。有些事情不是问题。它们是情境,你不得不与之共处。但如果它是一个问题,那就意味着有一个解决方案。我想帮助人们找到愿景和词语,看到他们被困在哪里,为什么被困,以及这是一个问题还是一个情境。如果这是一个问题,并且有人会从你解决它中受益,我希望我能给你方法、工具和词汇,让你朝着更好的方向前进。

Original English

Guest: Some of your best guests are world experts and they show up and they say, "I did the research. I did the math. Do this because I told you to." And I've never done that. I show up and I try to paint a picture for people of what the words mean and what the systems are like and then encourage you to do things because you told. And so what I think we're wrestling now with is people are afraid. People are lonely. People are disconnected. They're victims of all sorts of media and commercial systems. And we've been indoctrinated to not notice it. And there are problems all around us. And if we can solve problems, we can make things better. So what I want to help people do is find the words to talk about their problem, realize what's holding them back, go solve the problem. Because when we solve problems, we make things better for ourselves and for other people. So problems aren't something to be avoided. Problems are opportunity. And I believe all problems can be solved. Some things aren't problems. They're situations and you have to live with them. But if it's a problem, it means there's a solution. And I would like to help people find the vision and the words to see where they're stuck, why they're stuck, and whether it's a problem or a situation. If it's a problem and someone's going to benefit from you solving it, I hope I can give you the mechanics, the tools, the vocabulary to go move forward toward better.

主持人: 那么,在你的工作中,以及在你刚刚写的那本新书《The Not》里,你具体尝试为人们解决哪类问题?

Original English

Host: And what kind of problems specifically do you try and solve for people in your work, but also in this more recent book that you've just written called The Not?

嘉宾: 我不为人们解决问题,是他们自己为自己解决问题。当有人向你指出问题在哪里时,你现在就可以做出一个新的决定,对吧?所以,如果有人正在申请大学,当你17岁时,很容易纠结于“我即将被评判。他们怎么知道真实的我?如果我被拒绝了怎么办?我是个失败者吗?我浪费了我的一生吗?” 但是,一旦你看清了大学工业综合体,一旦你理解了招生办公室的议程,一旦你意识到人们在看什么以及为什么,你会说:“哦,这是一个游戏。这是一个像《卡坦岛拓荒者》或《大富翁》一样的游戏。如果我赢了这场游戏,不是因为我是一个好人,而是因为我玩得更好。如果我输了这场游戏,也是一样。” 一旦你看到了这一点,申请大学的所有戏剧性和纠葛就都靠边站了。你会说:“招生官看到我想展示给他们的那个人,对他们有什么好处?因为如果我能解决他们的问题,我就能去我想去的学校。” 嗯,这在我们生活的很多方面都是如此。我们与一个系统、一个人、一个老板、一个同事或配偶互动,我们认为自己是对的。我们脑子里有所有这些噪音。我们认为每个人都能听到我们脑子里的噪音。他们听不到。我们认为每个人都想要我们想要的东西。他们不想要。所以我们出现时说:“轮到我了。我需要得到这个。” 现在我们有了一个问题。我们有问题是因为另一个人认为他们和我们认为自己正确一样正确。而他们有一个不同的问题。所以我们在碰撞。但是,如果我们能看到所有这些都是家庭系统、公司系统、商业系统内部的动态,我们就能理解哪些力量在起作用。现在我们看到了它们,我们就可以利用它们去我们想去的地方。

Original English

Guest: So, I don't solve problems for people, they solve problems for themselves. And when someone points out to you where the problem is, you can now make a new decision. Right? So if someone's applying for college, it's super easy if you're 17 years old to get all hung up on I'm about to be judged. How are they going to know the real me? What if I get rejected? Am I a loser? Have I wasted my whole life? But once you see the college industrial complex, once you understand the agenda of the admissions office, once you realize what people are looking at and why, you say, "Oh, this is a game. This is a game like Settlers of Katan or Monopoly. And if I win this game, it's not because I'm a good person. It's because I played the game better. If I lose the game, same thing." Once you see that, all the drama and entanglement of applying for college moves to the side. You say, "What's in it for the admissions officer to see the person I want to present to them? Because if I can solve their problem, I'm going to go to the school I want to go to." Well, that's true in so many parts of our lives. We engage with a system or a person or a boss or a co-worker or spouse and we think we're right. We've got all this noise in our head. We think everyone can hear the noise in our head. They can't. We think everyone wants what we want. They don't. And so we show up saying, "It's my turn. I need to get this." And now we have a problem. And the reason we have a problem is because that other person thinks they're as right as we think we're right. And they have a different problem. So we're colliding. But if we can see that all of this is a dynamic within family systems, corporate systems, commercial systems, we can understand what are the forces at work. Now that we see them, we can use them to get to where we want to go.

主持人: 你知道,这很有趣,因为我走出去,我坐出租车,我走在街上,人们会走到我面前,我大概能了解到观众的一些形象。因为我经常坐出租车,我和出租车司机有很多对话。所以,他们是我脑海中的一种形象。然后,你知道,另一种可能是像一位带着一两个孩子的母亲,她试图在职业生涯后期做出改变。对于那些人,对于现在正在听的平均听众来说,他们想去哪里?我不是指具体的工作。他们想去哪里,而他们现在又在哪里?

Original English

Host: You know, it's funny because I go out into the world and I sit in taxis and I walk down the street and people come up to me and I get sort of an idea of the personas of people watching. And because I get in a lot of taxis, I have a lot of conversations with taxi drivers. So, they're one persona in my head. And then, you know, the other is maybe like a mother with a kid or two who's trying to make a change in their sort of later career. For those people, the average person listening right now, where is it that they want to go to? And I don't mean specifically, I don't mean job. Where is it that they want to go to and where are they?

嘉宾: 对吧?我认为我们遇到的大多数人都希望被看见,如果消失了会被想念,被理解,并且有用处。对吧?这是跨越国界和文化的共同点。然而,我们最终却成了系统中的一个齿轮。优步司机拼命奔波,做着他们通常不会做的事情,因为系统在迫使他们偷工减料。或者那位母亲在挣扎,因为她所处的金融体系正在把她推离她想要做的工作或育儿方式。其中许多事情是不公正的,有些是无法由个人修复的。我们可以把这些当作情境来接受。你不可能改变优步。优步就会是那个样子。

Original English

Guest: Right? I think most people we meet would like to be seen, missed if they are gone, understood, and of use. Right? That's something that's crosses borders and cultures. And yet we end up being a cog in a system. The Uber driver racing around doing things they wouldn't ordinarily do because the system is pushing them to cut every corner. Or the mom who's struggling because the financial system that she's stuck in is pushing her away from the kind of work or parenting she wants to do. And many of those things are injustices and some of those things cannot be fixed by an individual. We can accept those as situations. You're not going to change Uber. Uber is going to be the way

选择的自由与“但是”的陷阱

主讲人:优步(Uber)就是这样的。如果你选择成为一名优步司机,优步的规则就会随之而来。但其他事情,则是我们可以做出选择的事情。我想说清楚,我并不是说任何人理应遭受不公,也不是说任何人理应停留在现在的位置。但是,基于你是谁,基于你在哪里,你实际拥有的选择是什么?我们如何摆脱那种“同时想要两件无法兼得之事”的困局?因为正是当我们同时想要两件无法共存的事情时,我们才会感到被困住。而这种被困住的感觉,剥夺了我们发挥价值的机会,剥夺了我们抵达内心深处想去之地的机会。

所以我用“目的”这个词,我的意思并不是说你生来就有一个目的,因为我不这么认为。但你可以有意识地为你明天要做的事情选择一个目的。那个目的可能是“我需要拿到报酬”,可能是“我需要完成这个项目”,也可能是“我需要把一些能改变一千人生活的东西放到互联网上”。当你把目的说出口——“这项工作的目的是如此这般”——然后我会回问你第一个关键问题:这是为谁做的?是为所有人,还是为12个人,或是一千个人?你来到这里要带来什么改变,又是为谁而改变?

如果我们无法弄清楚“为谁”这个问题,我们就会觉得有一张无形的、沉重的、可怕的毯子压在我们身上,把我们困住。但如果你能找到五个你可以为他们解决问题的人,或者25个会想念你的人,事情就开始运转起来了。

让我给你讲个小故事,帮你理解这个类比。你是一名脱口秀演员,你非常努力地排练。然后你的经纪人打电话说:“我帮你接了个好演出。”于是你去了,现场有100个人,你演砸了。整整10分钟,没有一声笑。你走下舞台。然后你发现那是一个来自意大利的旅行团,房间里没有一个人会说英语。那么,是谁演砸了?对吧?是你的经纪人把你放错了房间。你的笑话没有任何问题。那是不匹配,因为观众听不懂英语。所以,你有权说:“这不是为你准备的。”

当我们出现在某个并不适合我们的人面前时,如果我们去读评论、读评价,有人给一本好书打了一星差评,那条一星评价说的其实只是:“这本书不适合我。”他们只需要写这一句就够了。评价里其他内容都没有帮助,因为另一个人觉得这是本五星好书。所以作者什么也没学到。因此,我们要选择它是为谁准备的。我们的意图是什么?我要帮助这个人,我要和这个人交易,我要和这个人互动,我要向这个人销售,或者其他什么。具体是谁?他们相信什么?他们想要什么?他们害怕什么?如果我能解决他们的问题,他们就会愿意互动。我就能发挥价值。然后我可以再做一次,再做一次。

Original English

Speaker: Uber is going to be. And if you choose to be an Uber driver, the rules of Uber come with it. But other things are things where we get to make a choice. And I'm not saying I want to be really clear. I'm not saying anyone deserves an injustice. Anyone deserves where they're are right now. But given who you are, given where you are, what are the choices you do have? And how do we get out of the not the stuckness of wanting two things that we can't have at the same time? Because it's when we want two things at the same time that cannot coexist that we feel stuck. And that feeling of stuckness robs us from the chance to be of use. It robs us from the chance to get to that place that deep down we want to go.

So I use the word purpose and what I mean by that is not you're born with a purpose because I don't think you were. But you can choose with intent the purpose of whatever you're going to do tomorrow. That purpose might be I need to get paid. That purpose might be I need to get this date. That purpose might be I need to put something on the internet that changes the lives of a thousand people. When you say your purpose out loud, the purpose of this work is so and so. Then I say back to you the very first question which is the key. Who who is this for? Is it for everyone or is it for 12 people or a thousand people? What change are you here to make and for who?

And if we can't figure out who the who is, then we feel like there's just this amorphous horrible heavy blanket on us trapping us. But if you can find the five people you can solve a problem for or the 25 people who would miss you, it starts to work. So, let me give you a quick story to help you understand the analogy. You're a stand-up comic. You've been working really hard. Um, and your agent calls, I got a great gig. So, you go and there's 100 people there and you bomb. Not one laugh for 10 minutes. And you leave the stage. Then you find out it's a tour group from Italy and no one in the room speaks English. So, who bombed? Right? It's your agent who put you in the wrong room. There was nothing wrong with your jokes. It was a mismatch because the audience didn't speak English. So, you're allowed to say, "It's not for you." When we show up to try to engage with someone it's not for, if we read the comments, if we read the reviews, and someone gives a great book a one-star review, all that one star review says is, "This book wasn't for me." That's all they needed to write. Nothing else in the review is helpful because someone else thought it was five-star book. So the author has learned nothing. So we pick who it's for. What is our intent? This person I'm going to help. I'm going to trade with. I'm going to engage. I'm going to sell to or whatever. Who exactly? What do they believe? What do they want? What are they afraid of? If I can solve their problem, they're going to want to engage. And I can be of use. And then I can do it again. and then I can do it again.

营销的本质与优步司机的出路

采访者:这是否是关于如何在当前处境中摆脱困局的观点?是不是要回到你想服务的人是谁、他们的形象、他们的需求是什么,然后专注于那一点?因为我再次想到那个优步司机,他觉得自己在生活中有些无力。他觉得自己必须出卖时间来赚这么多钱,但他不满足,也没有成就感。那么,你刚才说的这些如何与那个人的生活相契合呢?

主讲人:人们有时称我为营销人员,而我很幸运,我的职业生涯开始时正值电视走向消亡。在那之前,营销意味着大公司购买广告、打断人们、催促他们等等。然后它转变了。所以我得以把营销定义为我想要的任何东西。我把营销定义为:以能帮助正确的人到达他们想去之处的方式,向正确的人讲述一个真实的故事,而这些人会把这件事告诉他们的朋友。如果你做到了这些步骤,你就没有做任何令人反感的部分。你是在提供服务。而且你不需要有预算才能做到这一点。我们每个人都在做营销。当你穿着破旧的牛仔裤走进一家投资银行的面试时,你刚刚通过你的衣着营销了你自己,对吧?那是你选择发出的一个信号,而他们会接收或不接收。

所以当我们思考能动性、我们每个人拥有的自由时,我们有自由决定我们为谁出现,以及其中蕴含的故事是什么。回到那个优步司机,如果你想通过开车和遇见有趣的人来谋生,你可以做的一件事是放弃你所有的自由给优步,让他们为你找到乘客。但另一件你可以做的事是意识到,在你所在城镇的这个郊区,有75个人需要可靠且安全地到达某个地方,他们会很高兴有你做他们的司机。当你把正确的名片递给正确的人,明确你做什么和不做什么、你为谁做和不为什么人做,那么拥有15个固定客户并不是遥不可及的。

Original English

Interviewer: Is this a point about getting unstuck in your current situation? Is it come right back to who you want to serve, their persona, what their needs are, and then focusing on that? Cuz I'm thinking again about this Uber driver who feels somewhat powerless in their life. They they they think I've got to sell my time to make this much money, but I'm not satisfied and I'm not fulfilled. So, how does what you've just said sort of dovetail into that person's life?

Speaker: So people sometimes call me a marketer and I had the luxury of starting my career right when television was dying. So before that marketing meant big companies buying ads, interrupting people, hustling them etc. And then it shifted. So I got to define marketing as anything I wanted. And I have defined marketing as telling a true story to the right people in a way that helps them get where they want that they will tell their friends about. If you do those steps, you're not doing any of the icky part. You're being of service. And you don't have to have a budget to do this. We are all marketing. When you walk in in tatty jeans to a job interview at an investment bank, you've just marketed yourself by your clothing, right? There's a signal that you chose to send and that they will receive or not receive. So when we think about the agency, the freedom that each of us have, we have the freedom to decide who we're going to show up for and what's the story that's built in. So back to this Uber driver, if you want to make a living driving a car and meeting interesting people, one thing you could do is give up all of your freedom to Uber and let them find you, the passengers. But the other thing you could do is realize that there are 75 people who live in this suburb of your town who need to get somewhere reliably and safely and would be delighted to have you be their driver. And when you hand out the right cards to the right people, making it clear what you do and don't do and who you do it for and don't do it for, getting to 15 regular customers is not out of reach.

采访者:作为私人司机。

主讲人:是的。那条路比他明天只是被某个社交媒体公司或拼车服务公司压榨,能更好地利用他的时间。

Original English

Interviewer: as a private chauffeur.

Speaker: Yeah. that path is a better use of his tomorrow.

Interviewer: than [clears throat] simply being ground out by some social media company or or ride sharing service.

亚历山大的绳结:看清困住我们的东西

采访者:回到这里的这根绳子,因为我真的很想聚焦在那些此刻感到被困住的人身上。这场对话我想去的核心是,我想对那些目前感到被困住、但他们知道自己有能力做更多事情的人说话。他们知道自己可以拥有另一种生活,但他们在实践层面不理解,我想说,无论是心理、系统、机制,还是他们能控制什么,才能从他们所在之处移动到他们想去之处。

主讲人:对。

采访者:这里有一根绳子。

主讲人:是的。

采访者:它作为一个有点意思的类比,我想说的是关于被困住以及拉错了东西。

主讲人:是的。你听起来像个魔术师。好吧。

采访者:我的意思是,你知道这个类比吗?因为我不知道。

主讲人:是的,我知道。2500年前,一个叫亚历山大的家伙——那时他还没有姓氏——出现在土耳其的一个小村庄外。那里有一个来自迈达斯国王的传说。那里有一辆马车,上面系着一个复杂的绳结。传说谁能解开这个绳结,谁就能成为欧洲大片地区的统治者。亚历山大当时21岁,他没有用刀,没有剪断任何东西。但他看着这个系在马车上的绳结,做了一件在他之前没有人做过的事。他意识到绳结中心有一根杆子,绳结是绕着它系的,他取出了那根杆子,然后通过非常仔细地观察,他看清了整个绳结是如何被固定在一起的,于是他毫不费力地解开了它。

然后他成为了亚历山大大帝,因为那个秘密——那个简单的秘密——就是我们之所以被困住,是因为我们看不到是什么把我们固定在那里。如果把我们固定在那里的东西是我们无法改变的,比如重力把我们固定在地球上。重力不是问题,重力是一个现实。去月球并不否认重力,它是与重力存在这一事实合作。但我们在处理问题,我们却感到困惑,因为我们想要两样东西。那么,我能给你演示一下我的意思吗?

Original English

Interviewer: Bringing it back to this this rope thing over here because I really want to just focus in on people who feel stuck right now. The essence of where I'm trying to go to this conversation is I want to speak to people that currently feel stuck but they know that they're capable of more. They know that they could have another life, but they practically don't understand, I guess, both the psychology, the systems, the mechanisms, and I guess what they can control in order to move from where they are to where they want to be.

Speaker: Right.

Interviewer: There's a rope here. Yeah.

Speaker: And it serves as a somewhat interesting analogy for I guess being stuck and pulling on the wrong thing.

Interviewer: Yeah. You sound like a magician. Yeah. Okay.

Speaker: I mean, do you know the analogy? Because I don't.

Interviewer: Yes, I do. So, 2,500 years ago, this guy named Alexander. who didn't have a last name yet, showed up outside of a small village in Turkey and there was a legend from King Midas. There was a wagon there and it was tied with a complicated knot. And the legend was whoever could untie this knot would become the ruler of huge parts of Europe. And Alexander was 21 years old and he did not use a knife. He did not cut anything. But he looked at this knot that was tied to the wagon and he did one thing that no one before him had ever done. He realized that there was a pole in the center of it that it was tied around and he removed the pole and then he could see by looking very carefully how the whole knot was held together and he could untie it with no trouble whatsoever. And then he became Alexander the Great because the secret the simple secret was we are stuck because we can't see what's holding us there. If what's holding us there we cannot change like gravity is holding us to earth. Gravity is not a problem. Gravity is a situation. Going to the moon doesn't deny gravity. It works with the fact that it exists. But we are working with problems, but we're confused because we want two things. So, can I show you what I mean?

布利丹的驴:想要两件事的困境

采访者:好的。

主讲人:好。这里有一根真正的胡萝卜,这里是真的水。这不是真的驴,但我们假装这是一头驴。好吧。在几百年前布利丹的哲学实验中,这头驴又饿又渴。它有完全的自由,它可以移动。它站在一堆胡萝卜和一桶水的正中间。它被困住了,因为每次它走向水,它就远离胡萝卜。它不能那样做,因为它饿了。每次它走向胡萝卜,它就远离水。它不能那样做,因为它渴了。所以在实验中,因为我们被困住了,我们最终会死于饥饿和干渴。

我们所有人都会这样做。我们用两个简单的字来做这件事:“但是”。我想要这个,但是我也想要那个。对吧?我想要有创造性的生活,但是我永远不想被拒绝。我想跑马拉松,但是我不想累。而我们隐藏了那个“但是”。我们不说——

Original English

Interviewer: Yeah.

Speaker: Okay. So, here's an actual carrot and here is actual water. This is not actually a dunkey, but let's pretend this is a dunkey. Okay. In Burden's philosophy experiment from a couple hundred years ago, the dunkey is hungry and thirsty. He has complete freedom. He can move. And he's halfway between a pile of carrots and a bucket of water. And he's trapped because every time he moves toward the water, he's moving away from the carrot. Can't do that cuz he's hungry. And every time he moves toward the carrot, he's moving away from the water. Can't do that because he's thirsty. And so in the experiment, because we're trapped, we end up dying of hunger and thirst. And all of us do this. And we do it with one simple word which is but. I want this but I also want that. Right? I want to have a creative life but I never want to get rejected. I want to run the marathon but I don't want to get tired. And we hide the butt. We don't say

杰克逊·波洛克的故事:当“但是”变成障碍

主讲人: 我最喜欢的故事,我在书里也讲过,是杰克逊·波洛克的故事。杰克逊·波洛克是1940年代美国最著名的画家,那大约是80年前的事了。他登上了《生活》杂志的封面。他有三年时间做什么都不会错。他的画作被抢购一空。大家都把他看作某种英雄。艺术家在世时就被视为英雄,这是非常罕见的。后来他的妻子李·克拉斯纳说,他觉得在这个艺术周期里,他已经做完了自己能做的一切。而大多数人在那种情况下会怎么做呢?会变成一支“杰克逊·波洛克翻唱乐队”——画更多他旧画作的变体,把钱赚了,你已经赢了。但他想成为一个杰出的创造者,他想站在前沿。所以他不再画杰克逊·波洛克式的画。他去了工作室,创造了一种全新的风格——不同尺寸的画布,不同的手法。看起来不像杰克逊·波洛克的作品。他把这些画带到了那个大型展览上,结果全世界都打了个哈欠。一幅都没卖出去。直到今天,如果你去博物馆,很可能看不到第二周期的杰克逊·波洛克作品。这件事让他更加沉溺于药物滥用,最终导致他死于一场悲惨的车祸,那场车祸还夺走了另一个人的生命。因为杰克逊·波洛克想要两样东西:他想活在前沿,做站在刀刃上的创造性艺术家;但他也想成为那个能卖掉自己所有作品、被视作天才的名人。他忘了第一个杰克逊·波洛克花了多少年才做到那一点。而因为第二个杰克逊·波洛克没有成功,那个“但是”在他脑子里变得非常响亮。如果这两件事截然对立,你不可能同时拥有。我们需要找到那个“但是”在哪里。我想要这个“但是”,我也想要那个。它通常伪装成一个“和”字,但一旦我们看见它,一旦我们说:“哦,这就是让我无法给我想要服务的人他们需要的东西的原因。这就是为什么我没有到达我需要去的地方。”我们就可以移开那根杆子,看清那些纠缠,看清我们衡量错了什么,原谅它们,做出新的决定,然后问题就消失了。

Original English

Speaker: So my favorite story which I talk about in the book is Jackson Pollock. So Jackson Pollock was the most famous painter in America in the 1940s about 80 years ago. He was on the cover of Life magazine. He had three years where he could do no wrong. His paintings were snapped up. Everyone saw him as a little bit of a hero. It's very unusual for an artist to be a hero in their own lifetime. And his wife Lee Kraner later said that he felt like he had done everything he could do with this cycle of art. And what most people in that situation would have done is become a Jackson Pollock cover band. Paint more versions of his old paintings. Take the money. You've won. He wanted to be a brilliant creator. He wanted to be on the frontier. So he stopped painting Jackson Pollock paintings. He went to a studio and came up with a whole new style. Different size canvas, different approach. It didn't look like Jackson Pollock had done it. and he brought it to this big show and the world yawned. Not one piece sold. And to this day, if you go to a museum, you will probably not see a second cycle Jackson Pollock. This led him to become even more of a substance abuser, which led to him dying in a tragic car crash that killed somebody else as well. Because Jackson Pollock wanted two things. He wanted to live on the frontier and be the creative artist on the cutting edge, but he also wanted to be the celebrity who could sell everything he made and was seen as a genius. He forgot how many years it took the first Jackson Pollock to accomplish that. And because the second Jackson Pollock didn't hit, the butt became really loud in his head. You can't have two of these things if they are diametrically opposed. We need to find where is the butt. I want this butt. I want that. It's usually hiding as an and but once we see it, once we say, "Oh, that is what is keeping me from giving the people I'm trying to serve what they need. That's why I'm not getting where I need to go." We can remove the pole, see the entanglements, see what we're measuring wrong, forgive them, make a new decision, and the problem goes away.

主持人: 而且你可以把“但是”换成“和”,你是这个意思吧。“和”是那个强调它的东西。我想成为一个有创造力的人,而且我渴望被拒绝,而且暂时没人能理解我的梗,而且我得住在我的货车后面,因为那才是创意人该过的日子。那是其中的一部分。我明白。我想在社交媒体上受欢迎。而且那意味着我不能诚实、不能真实、不能保持一致,因为我得不断追逐X、Y或Z。当我们看看那些持续获得巨大流量的人,他们就是这么做的。他们不是在说“这就是我”。他们是在追逐下一个东西。如果你对此不满意,那就别做。但“和”放大了工作,却也削弱了它。这里下方应该有个按钮。如果它显示“已订阅”,那说明你已经订阅了。如果它显示“订阅”,那说明你还没订阅。如果你还没订阅,能帮我们个忙点一下那个按钮吗?它对节目的帮助超乎你的想象。而且根据算法的判断,你是那种看我们节目的人,但你还没点那个按钮。非常感谢。

Original English

主持人: And you can substitute and, you're saying, instead of but. The and is the thing that emphasizes it. I want to be a creative person and I'm eager to be rejected and not people have people get the joke for a while and have to live in the back of my van because that's what creative people do. That's part of it. I get that. I want to be popular on social media. And that means I can't be honest and authentic and consistent because I got to keep chasing X, Y, or Z. And when we look at the people who consistently get big clicks, that's what they're doing. They're not saying, "This is who I am." They're going to chase the next thing. If you're not happy with that, please don't do it. But the and amplifies the work, but undercuts it. There should be a button just down below here. And if it says subscribed, you're already subscribed. If it says subscriber, that means you're not yet. And if you're not subscribed, please could you do us a favor and hit that button? It helps the show more than you know. And according to the algorithm, you're someone that watches our show, but you haven't yet hit that button. Thank you so much.

兄弟的困境:当父亲身份与创业野心冲突

主持人: 现在正在收听的人里,有些可能家里有三个七岁以下的孩子。我想到了我弟弟。他就有三个七岁以下的孩子。

Original English

Speaker: There's people listening right now that are maybe they got three kids under the age of seven. I'm thinking about my brother. He's got three kids under the age of seven.

主持人: 而且他们还想创办一家公司,对吧?他们可能会觉得这两件事之间存在张力,因为一方面他们想成为世界上最好的爸爸,就像我弟弟想做到的那样,但同时他们又真的很想启动那个AI初创公司。

Original English

Speaker: And they also want to launch a company, right? And they they might feel that there's a tension between those two things because they on one hand want to be the best dad on earth like my brother wants to be but at the same time they really want to launch that AI startup.

主讲人: 是的。

Original English

Speaker: Yeah.

主持人: 现在这两件事在互相拉扯。

Original English

Speaker: Now these two things are tugging at each other.

主讲人: 没错。

Original English

Speaker: Correct.

主持人: 他们该怎么办?

Original English

Speaker: What do they do?

主讲人: 嗯,他们做的第一件事非常重要。他们给它命了名。

Original English

Speaker: Well, the first thing they did was really important. They named it.

主持人: 好的。

Original English

Speaker: Okay.

主讲人: 好的。第二件事是,你不能同时做两件事,但你可以在一段时间内做很多事。那意味着他此刻对三个小人做出了承诺。他要去工作,但他不能每周工作100小时。所以他需要选择一个项目,一个他拥有的时间足够把项目做好的项目。他不能去开一个开放AI的竞争对手。那是不可能的,因为他所承诺的事情与那无法共存。

Original English

Speaker: Okay. Second thing can't do two things at the same time, but you can do many things over time. And what that means is he made a commitment to three small humans in this moment. He's going to go to work, but he can't go to work for 100 hours a week. So he needs to pick a project where the amount of time he has is enough time to do the project really well. He cannot start an open AI competitor. It is off the table. That is impossible because the thing he's committed to cannot coexist with that.

主持人: 这很难承认,对吧?但它打开了通往我们能做什么的大门。如果他能想清楚如何建立一个他不躲藏、真正站出来对一群人负责的实体,说:“我比你们更懂AI,我要用这个工具来做X”,然后他们为此付钱给他。那么,在40小时工作周结束时,他就可以适当地去尽一个父亲的责任,对吧?那是一个为人们创造价值的企业,它会让你比OpenAI去年赚的利润还多,对吧?所以我要说的是,媒体不断出现并告诉你,你应该做的是成为卡戴珊。你应该做的是成为山姆·奥特曼。不,那不是你应该做的。你应该做的是向最小的受众做出承诺并兑现它们。那就足够了。你不能同时最大化两件使用同一空间的事情。

Original English

Speaker: That's hard to admit, right? But it unlocks the door to what we can do. If he can figure out how to build an entity where he's not hiding, where he's actually showing up on the hook to a group of people and say, "I know more about AI than you, and I'm going to use this tool to do X, and they pay him for it." Now, at the end of a 40-hour week, he appropriately goes and does the work of a dad, right? That's a business that's creating value for people that will make you more profit than OpenAI made last year, right? So the point I'm making is media keeps showing up and saying what you're supposed to do is be a Kardashian. What you're supposed to do is be Sam Alman. No, that's not what you're supposed to do. You're supposed to make promises and keep them for the smallest audience. That's enough. You can't maximize two things that use the same space.

如何辨别目标是否真实

主持人: 你觉得有没有可能知道,你拥有的一个动机、一个目标、一个梦想或一个抱负,是不是真实的?我说的“真实”是指,我是不是只是从Instagram或我的家庭那里继承了这些期望,或者因为我姐夫很有钱,我想跟他竞争一下。有没有办法知道我所说的那个目标是不是一个真实的目标?

Original English

Speaker: Do you think it's possible to know if a motivation or a goal or a dream you have or an ambition you have is real or not? And when I say real, I mean like did I just inherit this from expectations from Instagram or from my family or because my brother-in-law is rich and I want to kind of compete. Is there a way to know if my my the goal I say I want is a real one?

主讲人: 是的,我喜欢这个问题。这很精彩。这回到了“目的”这个概念。你打算用你下一个周期的努力去做出什么改变?不是你在地球上的目的,而是你即将要做的那项工作的目的。你是想让马克·扎克伯格高兴吗?你是想让一个匿名评论者高兴吗?你是想给网络喷子一个教训吗?因为当你把这话说出来,你会意识到那是一个荒谬的目的,是一个陷阱。

Original English

Speaker: Yeah, I love this. This is brilliant. This gets back to the idea of purpose. What is the change you seek to make with the next cycle of your effort? Not your purpose on earth, but the purpose of the work you're about to do. Are you trying to make Mark Zuckerberg happy? Are you trying to make an anonymous commenter happy? Are you trying to teach troll a lesson? Because when you say that out loud, you realize that's a ridiculous purpose and a trap.

主持人: 如果我们能弄清楚,这对我有什么好处?如果我投入这些时间,我会得到什么回报?比如说,我的公司有75个人,我该不该把它发展到250人?那么,做一个250人的CEO而不是75人的CEO,对我有什么好处呢?

Original English

Speaker: If we can be clear, what's in it for me? If I put this time in, what will I get in return? So my company has 75 people, let's say, and should I grow to have 250 people? Well, what would be in it for me to be a CEO of 250 people instead of 75 people?

主讲人: 你会有更大的头疼问题。理论上你会有更多的钱。

Original English

Speaker: You're going to have a bigger headache. You're going to have more money theoretically.

主持人: 理论上是,但你真正得到的是一种不同的地位。你必须决定,那种“更多人的老板”的地位,那种我在鸡尾酒会上能说的话,那种之后可能发生什么的地位,是否值得你为此付出的代价。所以我们一直在做这些关于“这项工作的目的是什么”的选择。这就引出了史蒂夫·普莱斯菲尔德的关键概念——阻力。阻力是任何让我们无法去做慷慨的、生成性的、创造性的工作的感觉,无论是什么工作。比如,写作障碍就是阻力。比如,你要出去约会,你换了六次衣服。阻力出现在我们做的很多事情里。而我们周围的系统给我们洗脑,因为它们想让我们成为系统中的齿轮。它们想让我们说:“嗯,我怎么才能拿A?我怎么才能得到做X、Y或Z的许可?我不会主动发起任何事。”

Original English

Speaker: Theoretically, but what you're really going to earn is a different kind of status. You have to decide if that status boss of more people that status what I get to say at the cocktail party that status of what could happen after that is worth the price you're going to pay to do this or not. And so we keep making these choices about what is the purpose of this work. And that leads to the key from Steve Presfield which is resistance. And resistance is any feeling we have that keeps us from doing generous generative creative work of any kind. So for example, writer's block is resistance. For example, you're going out on a date and you change your outfit six times. Resistance shows up in so many of the things we do. And the systems around us indoctrinate us because they want us to be cogs in the system. They want us to say, "Well, how do I get an A? How do I get permission to do X, Y, or Z? I'm not going to initiate anything.

主讲人: 所以,对你弟弟来说,用说“我被困住了”来应对他脑子里的阻力,比他说“我这个周末改变了17个人的生活”要容易得多。而如果我们继续深挖“你的目的是什么”,我想他会说:“是的,改变人们的生活对我来说比让《商业周刊》杂志高兴更重要,因为我建了某家公司。”

Original English

Speaker: So, it's easier for your brother to deal with the resistance in his head by saying, "I'm stuck." than it is for him to say, "I changed the lives of 17 people this weekend." Whereas, if we kept drilling into what's your purpose, I think he would say, "Yeah, changing the lives of people is more important to me than making Business Week magazine happy because I built some company."

主持人: 试着给阻力命名以便克服它,这有用吗?

Original English

Speaker: Is it useful to try and name the resistance in order to overcome it?

主讲人: 你永远无法让阻力消失。你可以和它跳舞。你可以邀请它进来喝杯茶。你可以给它命名。你可以说,我犹豫做这件事的原因是阻力。你可以说:“我不想做。我得先去做那件别的事。我不想办一个小型聚会。”这就是阻力。我的朋友丽莎搬到了全国各地,就为了……

Original English

Speaker: You can't make resistance go away ever. You can dance with it. You can invite it in for tea. You can name it. You can say the reason I'm hesitating to do this is resistance. You can say, "I don't feel like it. I got to go do this other thing instead. I don't want to host a small party." Resistance. My friend Lisa moved across the country to be

从抗拒到行动:拆解最小的价值单元

主讲人:她和伴侣一路搬到了洛杉矶。她在整个城市只认识三个人。她说:“我不想在洛杉矶过孤独的生活。我要每周五办一次百乐餐。我先邀请我认识的那三个人。每周,只要你带一个新朋友来,你就可以再来。”50周后,她拥有了一个400人的朋友圈,全是好朋友。任何人都能做到这一点。但没有人去做。因为抗拒。万一我邀请别人,人家拒绝怎么办?万一我邀请了一个我不喜欢的人怎么办?万一我邀请的人不喜欢我怎么办?抗拒,抗拒,抗拒。说出包袱的名字。放下包袱。去做。一旦你能说出包袱的名字,你就能说,这就是我感到卡住的原因。如果我能放下这件别的事,我就能走向那根胡萝卜,因为我能原谅水。

Original English

Speaker: ...with her partner all the way to Los Angeles. She knew three people in the whole city. She says, "I don't want to live a lonely life in Los Angeles. I'm going to have a potluck dinner every Friday. I'm going to start by inviting the three people I know. And every week, you can come back if you bring a new person." 50 weeks later, she has a network of 400 people, all good friends. Anyone could have done that. No one does. Resistance. What if I invite someone and they say no? What if I invite someone I don't like them? What if I invite someone and they don't like me? Resistance, resistance, resistance. Name the baggage. Drop the baggage. Do it. Once you can name the baggage, you can say this is why I am feeling stuck. If I can let go of this other thing, I can move toward the carrot because I can forgive the water.

主持人:我刚才在脑子里过了一遍我认识的不同的人,试着想想听众们的不同形象。我意识到的一件事是,每个人在这里的起点都非常不同,对吧?

Original English

Host: I was sort of running through different people in my head that I'm that I know. Again, trying to think about the personas of the people listening. And one of the things I realized is that everybody's starting from a very different place here, right?

主持人:那这是为什么呢?为什么有些人在处理抗拒方面相当擅长?他们可以邀请陌生人,而另一些人却活在恐惧中。他们几乎从不冒险。

Original English

Host: And why is that? Why is it that some people are quite good at dealing with resistance? They can invite around strangers and then other people are living in fear. They're almost Yeah. They never take a risk.

主讲人:是的。嗯,很大一部分是特权。是不公正。是生活在一个从不给你怀疑空间的文化里。但即使我在一群拥有相同特权的人中间看,仍然会有人在集市上帮助陌生人找路。仍然会有人——你知道,我有一个世交朋友上了常春藤名校。他想当演员,去申请即兴表演团的试镜,他们选了10个人,他排在第11位。他打电话给我,非常沮丧。我说:“你为什么不自己组一个即兴表演团呢?你不需要任何设备。你不需要许可证。你只需要四个人就能做即兴表演。自己组一个即兴表演团吧。”讽刺的是——这也是我记得这个故事的原因——他做不到。我的意思是,那不就是即兴表演的意义吗?自己组一个即兴表演团。所以,你知道,我运营一个叫Purple.space的在线社区。在Purple上,我们有成千上万的人在互相指导。它和社交网络正好相反。没有骗局。没有推销。没有人向别人卖任何东西。只是“我帮你梳理我的问题,你帮我梳理你的问题。让我们互相监督。”嗯,总得有人先迈出第一步。每个人都想被邀请加入这样的约定,但很少有人想主动发起一个,因为你害怕被拒绝,因为那感觉离死亡只差一步。所以,当我们能说出这一点,意识到它其实和死亡毫无关系——这不是向某人推销、凑到他们脸上卖东西。这是主动提出解决他们的问题,同时你也解决自己的问题,方法是说出那件事,弄清楚我们能在哪里创造价值。

Original English

Speaker: Yeah. Well, a big part of it is privilege. It's injustice. It's living in a culture that never gives you the benefit of the doubt. But even if I look among a group of people who all have the same amount of privilege, there's still somebody who is at the marketplace helping strangers find where they're going. There's still somebody who, you know, I have a family friend went to an Ivy League school. He wanted to be an actor and he went to apply to the improv troop for auditions and they picked 10 people and he came in 11th and he called me up. He was very upset and I said, "Why don't you start your own improv troop? You don't need any equipment. You don't need a permit. You just need four people to do improv with. Start your own improv troop." And the irony, the reason I remember the story is he couldn't do it. I mean, isn't that what improv is? Start your own improv troop. And so, you know, I run a online community called Purple.space. And on Purple, we got thousands of people who are coaching each other. And it's the opposite of a social network. There's no scams. There's no hustle. Nobody sells anything to anybody else. It's just I'll talk you through my not you talk me through yours. Let's hold each other accountable. Well, someone needs to go first. Everyone wants to be invited to an engagement like that, but few people want to start one because you're afraid of being rejected because it's one step short of dying. So, when we can name this and realize it's actually not at all related to dying, this isn't about hustling someone and getting in their face to sell them something. This is about offering to solve their problem as you solve your problem by naming the thing and figuring out where we can be of value.

播客案例:把大抗拒拆成最小步骤

主持人:我作为播客主持人体会到的一件事是,很多人在街上走到我面前,告诉我他们酝酿了四年的播客创意。

Original English

Host: One of the things that I've experienced as a podcaster is a lot of people come up to me in the street and they'll tell me about the podcast idea that they've had for four years.

主持人:我觉得观察这件事挺有意思的,因为表面上看起来他们很认真,但他们琢磨了好几年这件事本身,就意味着那里可能存在着某种抗拒。

Original English

Host: And I it's quite a curious thing to observe because it appears on the surface that they are serious, but the very nature that they've been mulling it for a couple of years means that there's probably some kind of resistance there.

主讲人:没错。完全正确。所以我和我的朋友亚历克斯·迪帕尔一起运营了几年的播客奖学金项目。成千上万的人参加了这个工作坊来开始做播客。播客之所以是个绝佳的例子,是因为每个人都知道播客是什么,而且开始做播客的成本不到一美元。那你为什么还没有一个呢,对吧?好。那么,我们开始这个循环的方式是:把你想不到播客的所有理由都告诉我。其中一个常见的理由是:“我觉得我请不到好的嘉宾。”

Original English

Speaker: Correct. Exactly. So I for a couple years my friend uh Alex Depal and I ran the podcasting fellowship. So thousands of people went through this workshop to start a podcast and the reason podcasts are such a great example is everyone knows what a podcast is and the cost of starting a podcast is less than a dollar. So why don't you have one, right? Okay. Well, so we start the cycle by give me all the reasons you can't have a podcast. And one of the ones that comes up is well I don't think I could get good guests.

主讲人:然后我们会说:“好,你能请到的最好的嘉宾会是谁?”令人惊讶的是,米歇尔·奥巴马的名字会出现。米歇尔·奥巴马不会上你的播客,但你需要请到谁作为嘉宾,才能让米歇尔·奥巴马更有可能答应?那再往前一位嘉宾是谁?再往前一位呢?让我们一路倒推回你的隔壁邻居。你能让你的隔壁邻居上你的播客当嘉宾吗?能。那就去做那个播客,就放给这个圈子里那20个人听。到了那一步,一半的人做不到了。没有任何技术上的原因。只是太难开口对你的隔壁邻居说:“我能采访你20分钟吗?”然后放给别人看,因为抗拒。

Original English

Speaker: And then we would say, "Okay, who would be the best guest you could ever get?" And amazingly, Michelle Obama's name comes up. Michelle Obama is not going to be on your podcast, but who would you need to have on your podcast as the guest before Michelle Obama that would lead her more likely to say yes? And who would be the guest before that and the guest before that? And let's go all the way back to your next door neighbor. Can you get your next door neighbor to be a guest on your podcast? Yes. So go make that podcast and just play it for the 20 people who are in this circle. And at that point, half the people can't do it. There's no technical reason why. It's just too hard to say to your next door neighbor, can I interview you for 20 minutes? And then show it to somebody else because resistance.

主讲人:所以我给人们的窍门是:用另一个名字开一个博客,用一个化名。没人会知道是你写的。连续做100天。如果你连续做100天,我打赌你会想把自己的真名放上去。但如果没有,至少你明白了,用别人的名字连续100天公开发布东西并不会致命。所以显然,写作障碍不在那里。它在抗拒里。两件事同时存在。我想做这件事。我想被认可,但我不想失败。我不想被轻视。我不想失去地位。这两件事让我们瘫痪。而系统就喜欢这样。

Original English

Speaker: And so the hack I give people is start a blog under another name, under an assumed name. No one will know you wrote it. Do it for 100 days in a row. If you do that for 100 days in a row, I'm betting you're going to want to put your real name on it. But if not, at least you understand there was nothing fatal about posting something in public for 100 days in a row with somebody else's name on it. So that's obviously not where the writer's block is. It's in resistance. Two things at once. I want to do this. I want to be recognized, but I don't want it to fail. I don't want to be disrespected. I don't want to lose status. And those two things keep us paralyzed. And the system likes it like that.

主持人:你刚才做的是,你拿起抗拒,试着把它拆成尽可能小的碎片。

Original English

Host: What you did there is you took the resistance and you tried to break it down into the smallest possible piece.

主讲人:没错。是的。

Original English

Speaker: Correct. Yes.

主持人:所以你拿起了一大块抗拒,也就是“我怎么才能让米歇尔·奥巴马上我的播客”。你把它拆成了“我需要去请我的隔壁邻居上我的播客”。

Original English

Host: So you took a big piece of resistance which is how do I get Michelle Obama on my podcast. You broke it down into I need to go ask my next door neighbor to come on my podcast.

主讲人:是的。

Original English

Speaker: Yeah.

主持人:然后你甚至把它拆得更小,变成“我要开一个匿名博客”。

Original English

Host: And then you broke it even smaller to I'm going to start an anonymous blog.

主讲人:是的。

Original English

Speaker: Yeah.

主持人:因为当我们自己揭穿自己的虚张声势时,那非常不舒服,但总比让别人揭穿她的虚张声势要好。这又回到了我的姿态:我解决不了你的问题,但也许我能给你一些工具,帮你说出你的问题,这样你就能在一个安全的地方和别人谈谈:抗拒在哪里?我为什么在这件事上纠结?我能为尽可能小的受众提供的最小的价值单元是什么,而且能对他们产生改变?鲍勃·莱茨写的是世界上最受欢迎的音乐博客。音乐行业里每个人都认识他。我向你保证,他刚开始的时候只有五个读者。我的博客有一百万读者。我刚开始的时候只有五个读者。它们都是这样开始的。你的播客也是这样开始的。五个听众。

Original English

Host: Cuz when we call our own bluff, it's very uncomfortable, but it's better than someone else calling her bluff. And this gets back to my posture of I can't solve your problem, but maybe I can give you tools that can help you name your problem so that in a safe place you can talk to somebody about where is the resistance? Why am I in my head about this? What's the smallest unit of value for the smallest possible audience that I could do that would make a difference for them? Bob Leitz writes the most popular music blog in the world. Everybody in the music industry knows him. I promise you when he started he had five readers. My blog has a million readers. When I started I had five readers. That's the way they all start. That's how your podcast started. Five listeners.

尴尬是入场费

主持人:当你刚才把它拆开,把它变成一个匿名博客时,我想你同时也在做的是,把尴尬拆成越来越小、越来越小、越来越小的碎片,对吧?但不管怎样,尴尬仍然存在。我听过一句话:“尴尬是入场费。”你同意这个总体观点吗——无论你做什么,你都必须经历尴尬。你必须把它作为入场费付掉,才能进入任何你当前环境和身份之外的事情。

Original English

Host: When you um you broke it down there and you turned it into an anonymous blog. What I I guess what you were also doing is you were breaking down the embarrassment into smaller and smaller and smaller and smaller pieces of embarrassment, right? But like irrespective there was still embarrassment. And I heard this phrase embarrassment is the cost of entry. Would you agree with the the general idea that irrespective of what you do, you're going to have to be embarrassed. You're going to have to like pay that as the the fee of entry to almost anything outside of your current context and identity.

主讲人:好。那我们来谈谈救生员和冒充者综合征。冒充者综合征是大约70年前由两位社会科学家命名的。冒充者综合征是那种感觉:当你在做一件重要或新鲜的事情时,你觉得自己有点像个假货或骗子,应该由别人来做这件事而不是你。所以,我讲的故事是关于当救生员的。在加拿大,你必须拿到铜牌勋章才能当救生员。想象你在卡努湖上值班。码头上有六个救生员,一个孩子就在你面前开始溺水。你脑子里冒出的第一个念头可能是:我刚刚勉强拿到铜牌勋章,那边两个码头外的那个家伙游泳比我好多了。这应该由别人来做。然后你意识到,不,不,他就在你面前。这是你的孩子。你跳进水里。你会为你的泳姿道歉吗?你会说“真的很抱歉,我——”

Original English

Speaker: All right. So let's talk about lifeguards and impostor syndrome. So imposter syndrome was named by two social scientists about 70 years ago. Imposter syndrome is that feeling when you're doing something important or new that you're a little bit of a fake or a fraud and that someone else ought to be doing this instead of you. So, the story I tell is about being a lifeguard. So, in Canada, you have to get your bronze medallion to be a lifeguard. And imagine you're on uh Canoe Lake on duty. There's six lifeguards on the dock and a kid starts drowning right in front of you. The first thing that might come to mind is I just barely got my bronze medallion and that guy two docks down is a much better swimmer than me. This is someone else should say it. And then you realize, no, no, it's right in front of you. This is your kid. You jump in the water. Do you apologize for your stroke? Do you say I'm really sorry I'm—

羞耻感与“为谁服务”的抉择

Speaker A: 为什么到不了那么快?你救了那个孩子。这就是救生员该做的事。那个孩子会感谢你,他们的父母也会感谢你。这就是救生员的工作。救生员之所以能克服阻力,是因为这件事非常具体、非常鲜活。那么,如果有人要给一个主动订阅邮件的人发电子通讯,而这封通讯可能帮助他们到达想去的地方,这到底有什么好尴尬的?羞耻是一种很有趣的情绪,因为我们必须“接收”它。它无时无刻不在被发送给我们,但你必须愿意接收,它才会起作用。

Original English

Speaker A: Why not getting there as fast? You save the kid. That's what lifeguards do. The kid is going to thank you and their parents are going to thank you. That's the work of a lifeguard. Lifeguards are able to overcome resistance because it's such a vivid thing. Well, if someone's going to send an email newsletter to someone who asked for it and that might help them get to where they're going, where's the embarrassment exactly? And shame is this interesting emotion because we must receive it. It's sent to us all the time, but you have to receive it for it to work.

Speaker A: 现在,我正走在离这儿不远的74街上,经过一个小型口袋游乐场,我听到里面一个四岁的小孩在嘲笑别人。这个小孩在取笑一个家伙,取笑他的衣服,取笑他秃头。然后我意识到,这孩子其实是在嘲笑我——因为对他来说,这样做很安全,他只是在对路人乱喊。重点是,这瞬间把我带回了三年级。瞬间让我重新体会了被霸凌是什么感觉。但是等等,首先,你在栅栏的另一边。我再也不会见到你。你无法把任何羞耻感加在我身上。它不会——它会从我身上弹开。当我们能为一小群受众做有意义的工作时,我们就可以对某个没听懂笑话的人说:“抱歉,这不是给你的。我原谅你。我不必接受你的羞耻。我不必接受你想给我的尴尬,因为我在这里是出于正确的理由。如果这不适合你,那我们都学到了点东西。”

Original English

Speaker A: Now, I'm walking on 74th Street, not far from here, past this little pocket playground, and I hear a four-year-old inside the playground taunting somebody else. And this kid is making fun of this guy, making fun of his clothes, making fun of the fact that he's bald. And then I realize the kid's taunting me because he was just, you know, it felt safe for him, and he was just yelling at bystanders. The point was, it instantly brought me back to third grade. Instantly brought me back to what does it feel like to be bullied? But I wait, first of all, you're on the other side of a fence. I'm never going to see you again. You cannot put any shame on me. It doesn't it bounces off of me. And when we can get to useful work for a small audience of people, we're allowed to say to someone who doesn't get the joke, "Sorry, it's not for you. I forgive you. I don't have to accept your shame. I don't have to accept the embarrassment you want to give me because I'm here for the right reason. And if it's not for you, we both learned something."

Speaker B: 我想这也是因为互联网。尴尬无处不在,羞耻也无处不在。人们——你在互联网上开始做任何事,总会有喷子告诉你这很糟糕。即使在我们开始做这个播客的时候,我的意思是,直到今天,还有很多人在告诉我们这很糟糕。

Original English

Speaker B: I guess because of the internet as well. Embarrassment is everywhere and shame is everywhere. People are you start anything on the internet, there's going to be some troll that tells you it's terrible. Even when we started this podcast, I mean, still today we get a lot of people telling us it's terrible.

Speaker B: 但是,嗯,因为它无处不在,你几乎可以说,克服它现在成了一种超能力,因为你知道,每个做任何事的人都会遇到它。而且你知道处理它有多痛苦,你也知道大多数人不会去处理。实际上,掌握克服羞耻、尴尬、批评性反馈或任何类似东西的技能,可能是当今现代世界最重要的技能之一,因为现在有太多负面反馈,太多羞耻或尴尬之类的东西。这正是我在听你说的时候想到的——我该如何更好地处理这些?

Original English

Speaker B: But um because it's everywhere, one could almost argue that um overcoming it is now a superpower because you know, everybody that does anything is going to encounter it. And you know how painful it is to deal with that and you also know that most people won't. That actually the skill of mastering like overcoming shame or embarrassment or critical feedback or whatever it might be might be one of the most important skills in the modern world today when there's so much negative feedback and so much shame or embarrassment or whatever. And just that's what you that's what I was thinking of when you're saying it's like how how do I get better at dealing with that?

Speaker A: 好吧,让我们稍微换个角度看这个问题,因为我觉得你说得非常好。但“实用同理心”说的是:“我不知道你所知道的。我没有经历过你的一天。我不想要你想要的。”这没关系。我可以原谅这一点,而且我不必把它个人化。我可以认真地对待它。这是两件不同的事。这里有一个有趣的、半商业化的例子。你去过Shake Shack吗?

Original English

Speaker A: Well, let's look at it slightly differently because I think that's a great point. But practical empathy says, "I don't know what you know. I didn't have the day you had. I don't want what you want." And that's okay. And I can forgive that and I don't have to take it personally. I can simply take it seriously. And those are different things. Here's an interesting semi-business example. You've been to Shake Shack?

Speaker B: 去过。

Original English

Speaker B: Yes.

Speaker A: 我的朋友丹尼·迈耶创办了Shake Shack。现在它是一家市值数十亿美元的公司。Shake Shack的基础是他小时候在密苏里州圣路易斯的经历。他是吃着波纹薯条长大的。波纹薯条是某种快餐汉堡店的秘诀。而纽约那些挑剔的餐厅评论家,比如《纽约时报》的埃德·莱文说:“你们在干什么?你们把一切都搞得那么隆重,说所有东西都是手工制作、新鲜出炉的。你们却在卖冷冻波纹薯条,那种我们在超市冰柜里就能买到的东西。你们得做真正的薯条。”丹尼的地位与美国最顶级的餐厅联系在一起。他和他的团队看到了这场攻击,他们因为菜单核心的薯条而受到羞辱。于是他们花了一年时间,投入数百万美元研究土豆,重新配置每一家餐厅,安装不同类型的炸锅。做现切薯条真的是一个巨大的挑战。而且,现切薯条是有生命的东西,五月份的土豆和十一月份的土豆是不一样的。所以,有时候现切薯条是你吃过的最好吃的薯条。有时候它又软塌塌的,不太好。他们之所以换成现切薯条,是因为他们想要纽约文化评论家带来的那种地位,评论家会说:“这些人很正宗。他们是货真价实的。”结果薯条变得不好吃了。整个互联网都炸了,说:“你们对Shake Shack做了什么?”员工们也讨厌做这些薯条,这简直一团糟,清洁方式也得改变。这次转变没有任何好处,除了让纽约市的少数人开心,因为那是他们选择听从的对象。有一天,丹尼看着这一切说:“Shake Shack的薯条存在的目的是什么?Shake Shack的薯条是为了让一个非C类顾客在丹尼·迈耶的餐厅吃饭时感觉良好,还是为了进一步讲述来到Shake Shack的故事?”然后他们把一切都拆了,换回了波纹薯条,全世界都欢欣鼓舞。利润上升了,生产力提高了,他们回到了最初想做的事情上——通过原谅和忽略那些坚持说“你们必须做现切薯条”的人。因为那是那些人代表的东西,但那不是这家企业存在的目的。

Original English

Speaker A: My friend Danny Meyer started Shake Shack. It's now a multi-billion dollar company. Shake Shack is based on his youth in St. Louis, Missouri. and he grew up with crinkle cut French fries. Crinkle cut French fries are the secret to a certain kind of fast food hamburger joint. And fancy New York restaurant critics, Ed Lavine, the New York Times said, "What are you doing? You're making this whole big deal out of everything is handmade and fresh. You're serving frozen crinkle cut French fries that we can buy in the freezer at the supermarket. You need to make real French fries." So Danny, his status is associated with the fanciest restaurants in the United States. And he and his team see this assault they're getting on being embarrassed about the French fries which are at the heart of their menu. So they spend millions of dollars over the course of a year researching potatoes, reconfiguring every single restaurant, putting in a different kind of fryer, making fresh cut French fries is a really big challenge. Also, fresh cut French fries are a living thing, and in May, the potatoes are different than they are in November. So, sometimes a fresh cut French fry is the best French fry you ever had. And sometimes it's limp and not very good. And they switched to fresh cut French fries because they wanted the status that came from New York cultural critics saying, "These are guys authentic. They're the real deal." And the French fries were no good. and the entire internet blew up and say, "What have you done to Shake Shack?" And the staff hated making them and it was a mess and you had to clean things differently. Nothing good came of this shift except making a couple people in New York City happy because that's who they decided to listen to. And one day, Danny looked at this and said, "What is the purpose of the French fries at Shake Shack? Do the French fries at Shake Shack exist to help a non-C customer feel good about eating at a Danny Meyer restaurant or do the French fries at Shake Shack exist to further the story of what it is to come to Shake Shack? And they ripped everything out and they went back to the crinkle cut fries and the world rejoiced. profits went up, productivity went up, and they got back to what they were trying to do in the first place by forgiving and ignoring the people who needed to say, "You need fresh cut French fries." Because that's what they stood for. But it wasn't what the business was for.

Speaker B: 这听起来像是一个商业故事,但实际上,听你说的时候,我意识到它适用于现在正在听的所有人,因为我们都在为某个特定的声音服务,对吧?然后我想到的另一件事是,我刚雇了一个人,叫阿拉达·佩玛,她来自亚马逊。她在那里负责产品,在AWS构建AI产品。她现在是我们Steven.com控股公司的首席创新与技术官。她告诉我关于亚马逊的一件事是,他们对客户有着令人难以置信的痴迷。他们从文化角度做的每一个决定,都是围绕着客户。她甚至告诉我,杰夫·贝索斯在他的会议里,直到今天亚马逊的会议里,每个会议都会放一把空椅子,代表客户,因为他们希望客户出现在每一个会议中。她告诉我,这如何让他们从产品角度做的所有决定,都锚定回他们服务的对象。我想这解决了我跟你说的那个“驴子”问题,因为他们不必在服务商家还是服务客户之间做选择。他们服务的是客户。她告诉我,有时候这会牺牲商家的利益,但你必须接受这一点。

Original English

Speaker B: This sounds like a business story, but actually, as you were saying it, I realized that it pertains to everybody's life listening right now because we're all serving a certain voice, right? And then the other thing that came to mind is I've just hired someone called Arada Pema who came from Amazon. She was leading products there, building AI products at AWS. She's now leading, she's our CIT, chief innovation and technology officer at Steven.com, my holding company. And one of the things she told me about Amazon is that they are just unbelievably obsessed in the customer. Every decision they make from a culture perspective is all about the customer. She even told me that Jeff Bezos in his meetings and still in the Amazon meetings today, they put an extra chair in every meeting that is empty to represent the customer because they want the customer to be in every meeting. And she told me how that anchors all of the decisions they make from a product perspective right back to the the person they're serving. I guess it kills the donkey thing you told me because they're not having to choose between serving the merchants or the customer. They are serving the customer. Sometimes she told me at the merchants's expense, but you have to be okay with that.

Speaker A: 这就是她对我说的。这确实让我印象深刻,因为现在我总是在想:谁是客户,谁是这个C?即使我做这个播客,你听到我谈论用户画像。我说的是出租车司机戴夫和妈妈杰伊。

Original English

Speaker A: That's what she said to me. And I actually really stayed with me cuz now I always think about like who's the customer, who's the C. Even when I do this podcast, you hear me talking about personas. I'm talking about Dave the taxi driver and Jay, the mum.

Speaker B: 没错。

Original English

Speaker B: Exactly.

Speaker A: 那就是我们在这里服务的人。

Original English

Speaker A: That's who we're serving here.

Speaker B: 是的。所以我只需要在这里放一个小回形针。在过去两年里,亚马逊在“为谁服务”这件事上迷失了方向。亚马逊去年通过销售广告赚了数十亿美元,而这些广告让亚马逊的搜索结果变得更差——给那些想打断你正在寻找的东西、把自己的东西放在最上面的人。那不是服务客户,那服务的是另一种股东。但是,是的,杰夫在那里建立的模式——从他们开会的方式(这绝对令人着迷)到他们选择为谁服务、不为谁服务——都始终如一地在说:这是我们要解决的问题。这是这次点击的目的。这是这个页面的目的。它是什么用途,毫无疑问。所以关于会议这件事,大多数听这个节目的人都要开会。很多白领工作者说会议是他们一天中最糟糕的部分。会议是干什么用的?典型的会议,如果我们诚实地说,是为了让老板觉得你在听他们说话,让老板点名,因为那本来可能只是一份备忘录。如果你不发备忘录而是开会,那我们就说清楚:这是为谁开的?是为了什么?它到底是为了什么?

Original English

Speaker B: Yeah. And so I just need to put a small paper clip here. In the last two years, Amazon has lost their way about who they're serving. And Amazon made billions and billions of dollars last year selling ads that make Amazon search worse to people who want to interrupt what you're looking for to put their thing up on top. That doesn't serve the customer that serves a different kind of shareholder. But yes, the model of what Jeff built there from the way they hold their meetings, which is absolutely fascinating to what they chose to do about who it was for and who it wasn't for, were consistent about saying this is the problem we are here to solve. This is the purpose of this click. This is the purpose of this page. There's no doubt about what it's for. And so the meeting thing, most people who are listening to this go to meetings. And many people who have white collar jobs say the meetings are the worst part of their day. What is the meeting for? The typical meeting, if we're going to be honest, is to make the boss feel like you are listening to them and let the boss take attendance because it could probably be a memo. And if you're not sending a memo and you're having a meeting, let's be clear. Who's this for? What's it for? What is

会议是组织状态的症状

Speaker A: 我们刚才和八个人一起做的这件事,目的到底是什么?他们全程只是在听?那为什么不直接发个视频,让他们用两倍速看呢?

Original English

Speaker A: The purpose of what we just did here with eight people just listening the whole time? Well, why didn't you just send them a video that they could watch at double speed?

Speaker A: 会议是一种症状。它们反映出组织是否纠缠不清、是否被那些关于“我们在这里该做什么”的潜规则所困住。我们放眼望去,到处都能看到这种现象。

Original English

Speaker A: Meetings are a symptom. They're a symptom of whether the organization is entangled and stuck with unspoken rules about what we do around here. And we can see them everywhere we look.

驱动人的三种力量:恐惧、归属感与地位

Speaker A: 当人们犹豫不决时,有三种东西在驱动他们:恐惧、归属感或亲和感,以及地位。而我们并不真正理解它们意味着什么。先说恐惧,我称之为“免于恐惧的自由”,这不一样。免于恐惧的自由是指:我不想做那些会让我紧张的事,我不想做那些我害怕的事。这阻止了人们去做很多事情。这就是阻力。

Original English

Speaker A: When in doubt, there are three things that drive people. Fear, belonging or affiliation and status, and we don't really understand what they mean. So first fear, I call it the freedom from fear, which is different. Freedom from fear is I don't want to do things that are going to make me feel nervous. I don't want to do things that I think I'm afraid of. That keeps people from doing a lot of things. That's resistance.

Speaker A: 归属感就是:你不会穿着燕尾服去参加葬礼,也不会穿着小丑服去。没人会那样做,所以你也不会。这就是融入。我左边是谁?我右边是谁?其他人在做什么?第三种,也是最被误解的,是地位。地位很简单:谁先吃午饭?当我们到达绿洲时,哪只动物先喝水?地位不是金钱,但它可能与金钱有关。地位就是谁在上、谁在下。

Original English

Speaker A: Affiliation is you don't wear a tuxedo to a funeral because or a clown suit. No one's going to do that, so you're not going to do that. Fitting in. Who's to my left? Who's to my right? What's everybody else doing? And the third one, which is really misunderstood, is status. Status is simple. Who eats lunch first? When we get to the oasis, which animal gets the water first? Status isn't money, but it could be related to money. Status is just who's up and who's down.

Speaker A: 这三样东西一直在相互作用,影响着人们如何选择穿什么样的外套——是买巴塔哥尼亚,还是买更便宜的仿制品?其中一种选择带来的归属感和地位,与另一种截然不同。但如果我们能留意这些,我们就能开始解码脑海中那个一直存在的“安静的声音”。把它说出来,对吧?我想买这辆车。为什么?因为它快。不,你不需要开快车。我想买这辆车,是因为高中食堂里那个说我永远不会有出息的孩子,他永远买不起这辆车。每次我坐进这辆车,我就能告诉自己一个故事:我不再是食堂里那个孩子了。这才是我想要这辆车的原因。好了,现在我们清楚你要解决的问题是什么了。去做吧。

Original English

Speaker A: These three things keep dancing with each other about how people choose what kind of coat. Or are they going to buy Patagonia or are they going to buy a cheaper knockoff? One of those things comes with a different kind of affiliation and status than another one. But if we can look for this, we can start to decode that quiet butt that's been going on in our head. Name it, right? I want to get this car. Why? Because it's fast. No, you don't need to go fast. I want to get this car because that kid at the high school lunch table who said I was never going to amount to something, he could never afford this car. And every time I get in this car, I'm going to be able to tell myself a story that I'm not that kid from the lunch table anymore. That's why I want to get this car. Okay, now we're clear about what problem you're here to solve. Go for it.

Speaker B: 真的吗?

Original English

Speaker B: Really?

Speaker A: 嗯,它对你有帮助吗?那是你想把资源投入的地方吗?如果它对你有帮助,那它就解决了问题。

Original English

Speaker A: Well, does it help you? Is that what you want to put your resources into? If that helps you, then it solved the problem.

Speaker B: 你觉得这是一个有价值的目标、有价值的理由吗?

Original English

Speaker B: Do you think it is a worthy goal, a worthy reason?

Speaker A: 嗯,这不是由我来决定的。高中在我们看待世界的方式上留下了各种各样的痕迹。我的高中英语老师在我的毕业纪念册上写道:“你是我存在的祸根,你永远不会有什么出息。”她说的有一部分是对的,但当我成为一名职业作家后,回想起这句话,真是令人感慨。我把我的第九本书献给了她,然后我就能放下这件事了,对吧?几年后,我和她吃了一顿很愉快的午餐。重点是,我们不能否认这些东西存在于我们的生活中。我们没有人过着那种完全优化、极致优化的人生。

Original English

Speaker A: Well, it's not for me to decide. That high school leaves all sorts of tracks all over how we look at the world. My high school English teacher wrote in my yearbook, "You are the bane of my existence and you will never amount to anything." And she was partially honest, but remembering that as I become a professional writer is fascinating. I dedicated like my ninth book to her and then I could let it go, right? And she and I had a wonderful lunch a couple years later. The point is we can't deny that these things are in our lives. None of us are living this optimized, fully optimized life.

Speaker A: 你之所以去吃那些营养补充剂,你之所以听这些关于某种生物捷径的东西,跟你真正分析所有保持健康的最佳方式毫无关系。它们关乎的是感受到自主权,关乎的是与你所在的人群产生某种归属感。这就是为什么医学界会有潮流周期。不是因为医学在真正的科学时尚中进进出出,而是因为文化改变了我们认为什么是美的,改变了我们认为需要做什么才能满足情感需求。

Original English

Speaker A: The reason you're going and taking those nutritional supplements, the reason you're listening to this thing about some shortcut of bio, whatever, has nothing to do with you doing an actual analysis of all the best ways for you to be healthy. They have to do with feeling agency. They have to do with feeling a certain kind of affiliation with the crowd you're in. That's why we have cycles in medicine. It's not because medicine goes in and out of actual science fashion. It's cuz culture changes what we think is beautiful. Changes what we think we need to do to get our emotional needs met.

赞助商环节:Whisper Flow 与 LinkedIn Ads

Speaker A: 我有60秒时间,我要向你们展示我能完成多少事,这要感谢我们的赞助商Whisper Flow。如果你还不知道它是什么,它是我投资的一家公司,它能把你的语音在任何应用或设备中转换成文字。我要在我们的Slack频道里发一条消息,奖励本周做了最多实验的团队成员。大家好,这是本周的实验之星。恭喜SEO预告片团队的负责人,他们是Aunt、Liv、Dom和Cam。你们赢了。好了,现在我要打开Gmail。这里是我们的一位创始人在一个邮件链里,我想让我的团队加入。我只需要说“添加我团队的邮箱”,Whisper就会精确地做到这一点。现在,给Juan发一条快速消息,他每周帮我安排日程。嘿,Juan,我能在周三下午2点录音吗?其实不,你知道吗?我们改到周三下午3点录吧。Whisper Flow比打字快四倍,而且非常容易使用。所以,如果你想试试,只需访问whisperflow.ai/stephven今天就下载。

Original English

Speaker A: I've got 60 seconds and I'm going to show you how much I can get done because of our sponsor called Whisper Flow. And for those of you that don't know what it is, it's a business I invested in that turns your speech into text in any app or device. I'm going to post into our Slack channel which rewards whichever team member conducted the most experiments this week. Hi everyone. Here is this week's experimenter of the week. Congratulations to the Dire of SEO trailer team, which is Aunt, Liv, Dom, and Cam. You guys have won. Okay, now I'm going to open Gmail. So, here is one of our founders on an email chain that I want to connect my team with. All I have to say is add my team's emails, and Whisper will do exactly that. Now, a quick message to Juan, who does my schedule every single week. Hey, Juan, can I record on Wednesday at 2? Actually, no. Do you know what? Let's record at 3 p.m. on Wednesday. Whisper Flow is four times faster than typing, and it is incredibly easy to use. So, if you want to give it a go, all you have to do is head to whisperflow.ai/stephven to download it today.

Speaker A: 过去十年,我一直在创办和投资公司。关于营销预算的讨论,往往遵循完全相同的模式。预算获批了,但结果却没有回来。大多数时候,创意提案和报价都没问题。问题出在受众身上。广告触达的是那些永远不会购买或推荐的人,他们也没有权力签批任何东西。这就是为什么那么多预算被浪费了。本播客的赞助商LinkedIn Ads,让你能够按职位、资历、公司规模、行业、技能等等来精准触达他们。你不再指望广告能触达正确的人,而是精确地定义谁能看到它。而且LinkedIn Ads在所有主要广告网络中,能带来最高的B2B广告支出回报。去linkedin.com/diary试试吧。如果你的第一个广告活动花费250美元,你就能在下一个活动中获得250美元的额度,只需访问linkedin.com/diary。这事你自己知道就好。条款和条件适用。

Original English

Speaker A: I've spent the last decade building and investing in companies. And so often the conversation around marketing budgets follows the exact same pattern. The budget gets approved, but then the results don't come back. And most of the time, the creative pitch and the offer is fine. The problem lies with the audience. Ads reach people who will never buy or refer, nor do they have the power to sign off anything at all. And this is why so much budget gets wasted. LinkedIn Ads, who are sponsor of this podcast, lets you reach them specifically by job title, seniority, company size, industry, the skills that they have, and much more. You're no longer hoping your ad reaches the right person. Instead, you're defining exactly who sees it. And LinkedIn Ads drives the highest B2B return on ad spend across all major ad networks. Give them a try at linkedin.com/diary. And if you spend $250 on your first campaign, you'll get a $250 credit for your next one just by going to linkedin.com/diary. Keep this to yourself. Terms and conditions apply.

选择服务哪个声音,原谅其他声音

Speaker B: 我想我也问过这个问题,因为是的,我可以满足我父母的期望,因为他们是移民,他们希望我成为医生、律师、科学家,随便什么。或者我可以服务我的孩子,他们希望我是一个好爸爸。或者我可以服务我童年操场上的创伤,它想让我回到那个说我永远不会成器的孩子面前。

Original English

Speaker B: I think I asked this as well because yes, you can serve my parents expectations because they're immigrants and they want me to be doctor, lawyer, scientist, whatever. Or I could serve my kids who want me to be a great dad. Or I could serve my playground trauma who wants to get the kid back who said I was never going to be anything.

Speaker A: 完全正确。

Original English

Speaker A: Exactly.

Speaker B: 这些声音中有哪一个比其他的更值得倾听吗?有没有一个特别的声音,我们应该真正围绕它来定位自己?而另一件我真正内化了的事情是,我将不得不对其他声音说不。是的。

Original English

Speaker B: Are any of these voices more worthy than the other? Is there a particular voice we should really orientate ourselves around? And the other thing I've really now sort of internalized is I'm going to have to say no to the other voices. Yeah.

Speaker A: 我不能同时服务所有声音,否则我就会变成那头夹在水和胡萝卜之间的驴。

Original English

Speaker A: I can't serve them all or else I'll be the donkey stuck in the middle of the water and the carrot.

Speaker B: 我喜欢这个说法。我真希望我把这句话写进书里。这完全正确——我们将不得不原谅其中一些声音。

Original English

Speaker B: I love this. I wish I put this in the book. This is exactly correct that we're going to have to forgive some of these voices.

三种纠缠:时间、社群与自我形象

Speaker A: 所以,有三种基本的东西会让我们卡住。第一种是时间纠缠:今天不是昨天,今天也不是明天,今天就是当下。第二种是社群纠缠:这个人会怎么看我?那个人会怎么看我?第三种是我们与自己形象愿景之间的纠缠:当我照镜子时,如果这件事成功了,我会怎么看待自己?如果这件事不成功,我会怎么看待自己?这三者都会阻碍我们宣布一个目标然后去解决那个问题,因为我们对自己说:嗯,我想去帮助穷人,但我进不了一家非常高级的非营利组织。如果我进了一家不那么高级的非营利组织,我父母会怎么想?哦,所有这些都在发生。我们必须承认这一点,对吧?

Original English

Speaker A: So there are three basic things that get us hung up. There are time entanglements which is today is not yesterday and today is not tomorrow. Today is right now. There are social community entanglements. What will this person think of me? What will that person think of me? And then there are the entanglements we have with our vision of ourselves. When I look in the mirror, if this works, what will I think of myself? If this doesn't work, what will I think of myself? And all three of them get in the way of announcing a purpose and then going to solve that problem because we say to ourselves, well, I want to work to help the poor, but I can't get a job at a really fancy nonprofit. And if I get a job at a less fancy nonprofit, then what will my parents think? Oh, all of that's going on. We have to acknowledge that, right?

Speaker A: 我们说:“我读了三年法学院。我不喜欢。我做了五年律师。我讨厌它。我是否想把余生40年都花在当律师上?因为我已经彻底试过了。”我们不能辞职,因为那样我们就得向过去的自己解释:他们为什么付出那么大的代价给我买来这份华丽的礼物,而我却要无视它?沉没成本让我们被困住。我们能做的是意识到,那是来自过去自己的礼物。就像所有礼物一样,你不必接受它。如果有人出现,送给你一只越南大肚猪让你照顾,你可以说:“不了,谢谢。我不想接受你的礼物。”那个法律学位就是一份礼物。但你现在不必接受它。既然你现在知道了你所知道的,你就可以对你的工作目标做出不同的决定。如果它不能帮助你实现工作的目标,你可以原谅它,说:“非常感谢,然后解开这个结。”

Original English

Speaker A: We say, "I went to law school for three years. I didn't like it. I practiced law for five years. I hated it. Do I want to spend the next 40 years of my life being a lawyer? Because I've tried it fully out." We can't quit because then we would have to explain to our former self, why did they pay this big price to get me this fancy gift and I'm ignoring it? Sunk costs keep us trapped. And what we can do is realize that's a gift from our former self. And like all gifts, you don't have to accept it. If someone shows up and offers you a Vietnamese pot belly pig to take care of, you can say, "No, thank you. I don't want to accept your gift." That law degree is a gift. But you don't have to accept it now. Now that you know what you know, you can make a different decision about the purpose of your work. And if it's not helping you achieve the purpose of your work, you can forgive it, say, "Thank you very much and untie the knot."

沉没成本:改变投资观的核心理念

Stephen: 我觉得“沉没成本”这一点非常重要,值得深入探讨。因为当我学到“沉没成本”这个概念时,它彻底改变了我作为投资者的思维方式。

Original English

Stephen: I think that point around sunk cost is an important one to really double click on, because when I learned about the idea of sunk cost, it completely changed me as an investor.

Speaker A: 其实是我哥哥——我哥哥在投资银行工作了大概15年,现在也在我的公司工作。在我职业生涯早期,有一天他跟我解释了这个道理。他说:“Stephen,那是我持有的一只股票。我是某只特定股票的投资者,那只股票表现非常糟糕。公司经营得很差,但我不想卖掉它。”

Original English

Speaker A: It was actually my brother. My brother's been working in like investment banking for like 15 years now, works in my company. And he explained to me one day early in my career. He goes, "Stephen, it was a stock I had. I was an investor in a particular stock and the stock was doing terribly. The company was doing terribly, but I didn't want to sell it."

Stephen: 对。

Original English

Stephen: Right.

Speaker A: 因为我在更高的价格买入的。

Original English

Speaker A: Because I had invested at a higher price.

Stephen: 没错。然后他给我寄了《金钱心理学》这本书,还有一些其他论文,他说这就是沉没成本偏差,如果你不意识到它是什么,它会毁掉你的人生。

Original English

Stephen: Correct. And then he sent me the Psychology of Money book and a few other papers and said this is what sunk cost bias is and it'll ruin your life if you don't realize what it is.

Speaker A: 是的,它存在于我们做的每一件事中。比如现在那些新的停车应用,让你可以提前找到目的地附近的停车场并预付费用。

Original English

Speaker A: Yeah. And it's in everything we do. So there's the new parking apps let you find a parking garage near where you're going and pay in advance.

Stephen: 所以我有时候进城就会用这个。我有一张35美元的停车票,五分钟后就要在这个停车场开始计费。我正开车过去,路上经过一个街边免费车位。我该停那里吗?

Original English

Stephen: So when I come into the city sometimes I'll do this. So I've got a $35 ticket to go park at this lot starting in five minutes. I'm driving in and I pass a free space on the street. Should I take it?

Speaker A: 所以,免费车位的优势当然是你可以想走就走,不用受限制,而且还能省下五到十分钟。但如果我停了免费车位,我就浪费了刚付的停车费。我脑子里还是会想,嗯,显然你应该停免费车位,因为你付的钱已经花出去了。

Original English

Speaker A: So, the advantage of the free space, of course, is you can leave when you want to leave and you don't have to engage and it saves you five or 10 minutes. But if I take the free space, I'm wasting the money I just paid for that parking garage and it still goes off in my head that well, yeah, obviously you take the free space because the money you paid is already gone.

Stephen: 那张票是你过去的自己送给你的礼物。以你现在的认知,你还会接受这份工作吗?以你现在的认知,你还会停这个车位吗?如果答案是肯定的,那你就可以原谅带你走到今天这一步的那些决定,因为服务过去的你——那个过去的你已经不在了。

Original English

Stephen: That's a ticket is a gift from your former self. Knowing what you know now, would you take this job? Knowing what you would know now, would you take this parking space? And if the answer is yes, then you can forgive what got you here because serving the old you, the old you's gone.

Speaker A: D,我也在想人际关系方面的例子。

Original English

Speaker A: D, I was thinking about relationships as well.

Stephen: 是的。如果你是那种每三周就结束一段关系的人,因为你忽略了某些成本,那你永远不会有长久的关系。重复这个过程本身对你也有成本,因为它会形成这些行为模式。这不是我说的那种沉没成本。但确实,当你遇到一个决定结束一段关系的人,对他们来说健康的方式是告诉自己:那段关系属于当时,我基于当时的我、当时的他们做出了所有正确的决定。但我们已经不再是那些人了。所以基于现在的我们,我们是否想重新投入这段关系,它未来会有回报吗?如果答案是否定的,它未来不会有回报,那你就已经回答了这个问题。这让我想起丹尼尔·科尔曼关于损失厌恶的研究。

Original English

Stephen: Yeah. Now, if you're the kind of person that leaves a relationship every 3 weeks because you're ignoring some cost, then you're never going to have a relationship. Repeating the process has costs to you because it develops these patterns. That's not the kind of sunk cost I'm talking about. But yes, when you meet somebody who has decided to end a relationship, the healthy thing for them to do is to say that relationship was then. I made all the right decisions based on who I was then, based on who they were then. But we are not those people anymore. So based on who we are now, do we want to recommit to this, will it pay off in the future? And if the answer is no, it will not pay off in the future, you've already answered the question. It reminds me of Daniel Coleman's work on loss aversion.

Speaker A: 嗯。

Original English

Speaker A: Mhm.

Stephen: 我觉得这是需要解释清楚的重要一点,因为当你意识到脑子里到底在发生什么,以及为什么人们不喜欢失去东西,你就能在它发生在自己身上时识别出来。

Original English

Stephen: And I think this is an important thing to explain because when you realize what's actually going on in your head and why people don't like to lose things, you can spot it when it's happening to you.

Speaker A: 对吧?

Original English

Speaker A: Right?

Stephen: 我读到一项研究,显示如果你在街上丢了10英镑,从口袋里掉出去了。如果我之后又找到10英镑,它并不能弥补我刚损失的10英镑。我得找到20英镑才能感受到与失去10英镑所经历的痛苦相当的愉悦感。

Original English

Stephen: I read this study that showed if you lose £10 in the street, falls out my pocket. If I then find 10 pounds, it doesn't make up for the 10 pounds I just lost. I'd have to find 20 pounds to feel the pleasure sufficient to the pain that I experienced from losing the 10.

Speaker A: 人类不喜欢失去东西。我记得我搜索过这背后的进化原因,得出的结论是,在我们进化史上的某个时期——当然这只是一个假说——当我们面前有一顿饭,而去追求另一顿饭会危及当前拥有的这一顿时,那是一个极其糟糕的决定。

Original English

Speaker A: Humans don't like to lose things. And when I remember searching what's like the evolutionary reason for this, and it came to say that once upon a time in our evolutionary past — again this is a hypothesis — when we had a meal in front of us, going in pursuit of another meal that would risk the one we currently have was a terrible decision to make.

Stephen: 所以实际上,我们天生就被设计成对已拥有的东西感到充分满足,而不是去追求多余的东西。

Original English

Stephen: So actually this whole — you know — we're designed to be sufficiently satisfied with what we have versus the pursuit of surplus.

Speaker A: 是的。

Original English

Speaker A: Yeah.

Stephen: 所以我们想要保护当前拥有的东西。那是一种生存优势。

Original English

Stephen: So we want to protect what we currently have. That was a survival advantage.

Speaker A: 没错,绝对如此。而且我们不需要看进化史。看看今天的野生动物就知道了。野生动物就是野生的。它们讨厌变化。变化从未帮助任何物种向前发展,因为它代表着威胁。而我们人类建立的是一个变化越来越快、越来越快的文化。等我们这段对话结束,某个AI公司就会发布一个新的前沿模型。砰。我们可以看着这一切说:“我能躲到哪里去?我怎么才能回到那种待在一个什么都不变的地方的野生动物状态?”或者我们可以决定回到本质问题:我们现在到底想做什么?忽略与它无关的东西。寻找能帮助我们实现所寻求的改变的东西,然后回去工作。所以,我们需要决定把注意力放在哪里,因为我们的注意力是永远无法收回的东西。

Original English

Speaker A: No, absolutely. And we don't have to look in evolution. We look at wild animals today. Wild animals are wild. They hate change. Change never helped a species move forward because it represents a threat. And what we built as humans is a culture where change is happening faster and faster and faster. By the time we're done with this conversation, some AI company will have launched a new frontier model. Boom. And we can look at this and say, "Where can I go hide? How can I get back to being a wild animal that's in this one place where nothing changes?" Or we can decide to get back to the purpose of what are we trying to do right now. Ignore the stuff that's not relevant to it. Seek out the stuff that helps us make the change we seek to make and get back to work. So, we need to decide where we're going to put our attention because our attention is something we can never get back.

系统与自我选择:门卫已经消失

Speaker B: 你还谈到了系统,那些把我们固定住的系统。我在你的作品中看到的一个理念是“选择你自己”,因为我想我们天生就倾向于相信仍然存在守门人,但这些守门人已经越来越消失了。我的意思是,我能开始这个播客并且有人听,我觉得这本身就证明了不再需要守门人了。你知道吗,有个我从没讲过的有趣故事——[笑声]——在我认真对待这个播客之前,我去LBC面试过,那是英国的一家广播电台。我去了那里,做了两小时的试播,坐在那把椅子上,工作人员假装打电话进来。那只是LBC的员工。

Original English

Speaker B: You talked as well about systems, the systems we're like held in place with. One of the things that I've seen in your work is this idea of picking yourself because I guess we're wired to believe that there are still gatekeepers, but those gatekeepers have increasingly vanished. I mean, the fact that I can start this podcast and people listen, I think is evidence of the fact that you no longer need gatekeepers. Do you know a funny story that I've never told is [laughter] I went for an interview with LBC, which is a UK radio station before I took this podcast seriously. I went there, I did my 2-hour audition, sat there in the chair, people pretended to phone in. It was just staff LBC.

Stephen: 对吧?

Original English

Stephen: Right?

Speaker B: 然后我离开了。我当时挺紧张的,等等。我觉得我做得不错,但我有点紧张,不确定他们会怎么说。然后我再也没收到回音。他们从没给我反馈。从没告诉我我到底行还是不行。所以,我在厨房里开始了这个播客——[笑声]——在YouTube上,因为我从没收到LBC的回音。这恰好证明了,你其实不需要某个大公司给你许可才能开始一个平台。在这个现代世界,你可以直接去做事情。这正好呼应了你“选择你自己”的理念。

Original English

Speaker B: And um I left. I was like quite nervous, etc. I thought I did a good job, but I was a little bit nervous, unsure about what they might say. And I never heard back. They never gave me feedback. They never told me if I was good or if I was bad. So, I started this podcast on YouTube in my kitchen [laughter] because I never heard back from LBC. And it just goes to show actually you don't need a massive company to give you permission to start a platform. You can just do things in this modern world. And this is kind of dovetails into your idea of picking yourself.

Speaker A: 是的。那我们先谈谈系统,然后再回到“选择你自己”这个话题。

Original English

Speaker A: Yeah. So, let's talk about systems first and then we'll come back to picking yourself.

Speaker B: 好的。

Original English

Speaker B: Okay.

Speaker A: 人们一听到“系统”这个词就会有点眼神发直。所以让我试着把它说得非常简单。

当你在这里上车,你在道路右侧行驶。当你回到英国,你在道路左侧行驶。为什么?因为和所有人保持在同一侧行驶要高效得多。我们有一个系统规定:如果你要在美国开车,就在道路右侧行驶。系统开始变得稍微复杂一些。大学产业综合体就是一个从一年级就开始的系统,它包含了SAT考试、贴纸、橄榄球队和宿舍。这是一个有400年历史的系统,我们之所以进入其中,是因为它有效。它对大多数人在大多数时候都有效。这是一种简单的方式:看一眼简历,看到一个词,就能决定是否要面试某人。所以,我们这代人在其中长大的系统是:你在高中尽可能表现好,然后一所大学会选中你。然后你在大学尽可能表现好,然后一家公司会选中你。然后你在公司尽可能表现好,然后他们会选中你,你得到晋升,然后你就死了。所以我们给全世界数十亿人洗了脑:请等待被选中。这里有所有规则,如果你遵守所有规则,你可能会被选中。结果发现这个游戏是被操纵的。有些人被不公平地选中了。但这就是我们被洗脑的内容。而且我们至今还在这样教我们的孩子。

Original English

Speaker A: People get a little glassy when you talk about systems. So, let me try to make it really simple.

When you get in a car here, you drive on the right side of the road. When you get back to the UK, you drive on the left side of the road. Why? Because it's way more efficient to drive on the same side of the road as everybody else. We have a system that says if you're going to drive in the United States, drive on the right side of the road. Systems start to get a little bit more complicated. The college industrial complex is a system that starts in first grade that includes things like the SATs and the stickers and the football teams and the dorms. And it's a 400-year-old system that we got into because it works. It works for most people most of the time. It's an easy way to look at a resume, see one word, and decide if you want to interview somebody or not. So, the system that people my age grew up in is you would do as well as you could in high school, and a college would pick you. And then you do as well as you could in college, and then a company would pick you. And you would do as well as you could at the company and then they would pick you and you get a promotion and then you would die. And so we indoctrinated billions of people around the world. Please wait to get picked. Here are all the rules and if you follow all the rules you might get picked. Turns out it was rigged. Some people got picked unfairly. But that's what we got brainwashed. And we still teach our kids this.

Speaker B: 然后突然间,你知道,从90年代开始,我们说:“给你一个麦克风。给你一台摄像机。给你一台打字机。选择你自己。”现在这个范围扩展到了:给你一个AI。你明天就能创办一家公司。你到周五就能建出一个复杂的网站。

等等,我在等有人告诉我应该去做那件事。没有人会打电话来的。一个月20美元。你大概还能在图书馆免费使用。你打算怎么办?当我们把自己置于风口浪尖时,这非常可怕,因为那是否意味着我要为卡努湖上每个需要救生员的孩子负责,我要为每个可能患上河盲症的孩子负责,而且我——

Original English

Speaker B: And then all of a sudden starting, you know, in the 90s we said, "Here's a microphone. Here's a video camera. Here's a typewriter. Pick yourself." And now it's extended to here's an AI. You can start a company by tomorrow. You could build a complicated website by Friday.

Wait, I'm waiting for someone to tell me I should go do that. No one's going to call. It's $20 a month. You can probably get it for free at your library. What are you going to do? And when we put ourselves on the hook, it's super scary because does that mean I'm responsible for every kid on Canoe Lake who needs a lifeguard and I'm responsible for every kid who might suffer from river blindness and I'm—

责任、自我选择与最小可行受众

Seth Godin: 谁该为此负责?

Stephen: 我该为没有人负责。我是个受害者。但我们有机会说,我选择自己来解决这个问题。我有责任帮助这些人。我要用我能用的一切工具,选择自己,去把一件事变得更好。事实证明,这就是“生成性”的。如果你在这方面稍微擅长一点,很多人就会请你再做一次。当你把功劳让出去、把责任揽过来,很多人就会请你再做一次。

有时候我们告诉自己,我们在等待被选中,因为那是一个很好的抵抗借口。

Original English

Seth Godin: Who's responsible for this?

Stephen: I'm responsible for nobody. I'm a victim. But we have the chance to say, I pick myself to solve this problem. I'm on the hook to help these people. I'm going to use whatever tools I can to pick myself to make a thing better. Turns out that's generative. If you get a little good at it, lots of people will ask you to do it again. When you give away credit and take responsibility, lots of people will ask you to do it again.

Sometimes we tell ourselves that we're waiting to be picked because it's a nice excuse for resistance.

Seth Godin: 嗯。

Stephen: 我们生活在一个寻求许可的状态里,因为它是一面好盾牌。

Seth Godin: 是的,是为了避开你刚才说的那种东西,也就是免于恐惧的自由。

Stephen: 是的。我的意思是,整个纽约市的图书出版业,都建立在这样一个基础上:作者可以说“是他们选了我来写这本书,然后我得去宣传这本书,因为我承诺过我会宣传它”。这本书之所以存在,不是因为我想让它存在,而是因为他们请我写这本书。而一旦你能自己出版自己的书,一旦你能开自己的YouTube频道,你就不能再说了:“好消息,YouTube打电话来了,他们想让我开始在YouTube上发东西。”而这正是为什么,你以为会去使用这个工具的人数,并没有达到它本可以达到的规模——因为再说一次,让一个青少年去玩TikTok是一回事,他们只是在自娱自乐,他们不把自己看作一个“TikToker”。

Original English

Seth Godin: Mhm.

Stephen: We live in a permission seeking state because it's a good shield.

Seth Godin: Yeah. To avoid this thing you were talking about, which is the freedom from fear.

Stephen: Yeah. I mean the entire New York City book publishing industry is based on the author gets to say well they picked me to write the book and then I got to go promote the book because I promised I would promote the book. The book isn't there because I wanted the book to be there. They asked me to write this book. And as soon as you can publish your own book, as soon as you can start your own YouTube channel, you don't get to say great news YouTube call. They want me to start putting things on YouTube. And that's why the number of people you would think would go ahead and use this tool isn't as big as it could be because again, it's one thing to ask a teenager to be on Tik Tok. They're just entertaining themselves. They don't see themselves as a Tik Tocker.

Seth Godin: 把自己看作一个“我选择了我自己”的人。我在说这些话,我为此负责。这很难。没有人教过我们这样做。

这有点像LBC那件事。我一直在等LBC选我。然后——

Stephen: 我觉得这个播客一出来,他们会给你打电话的,然后你面临一个大决定,因为那可是份稳定工作,Stephen。[笑声] 他们会给你上医疗保险什么的,全套的。

Seth Godin: 顺便说一句,我仍然爱LBC。我还在看LBC。但是,嗯,我现在可能太忙了,没法去做LBC。这里有一个相关的问题:我怎么知道我不是在妄想?

Original English

Seth Godin: To see yourself as somebody I picked myself. I am saying this and I'm responsible. That's hard. No one taught us to do that.

It's kind of like the LBC thing. I was waiting for LBC to pick me. And —

Stephen: I think once this podcast comes out, they're going to call you and you got a big decision to make cuz it's steady, Stephen. [laughter] They'll give you like health insurance, the whole thing.

Seth Godin: I still love LBC, by the way. I still watch LBC. So, but um I'm probably too busy now to do LBC. One of the sort of adjacent points here is how do I know if I'm delusional?

Stephen: 对吧?我一直在想这个,因为我们给人们关于“行动起来、开始做、追求他们想追求的事”的很多建议,并不总是带着那种细微差别——实际上,我确实不可能成为一名NBA球员。

Seth Godin: 没错。

Stephen: 但我怎么知道呢?因为所有的建议都是“放手去做,选择你自己”之类的。但是——

Seth Godin: 是啊,那不是我的——

Stephen: ——得有天赋才行。

Seth Godin: 我很高兴你提到这个。那不是我的建议。如果你选择的是一件超级好玩的事,它跳过了很多中间步骤,最后以你出名的大团圆结局收场,那你很可能就是在妄想。中那张彩票的几率非常非常低。所以人们来找我说:“我写了这本很棒的小说。你能帮我开启小说家的职业生涯吗?”答案超级简单。拿着你的小说。写出来对你来说很难,我理解。把它做成一个排版精美的PDF,不花你一分钱。把它发给20个人。如果他们转发给别人,它传播开了,就会有人打电话给你,雇你写下一本小说。如果它没有传播开,那就写一本更好的小说。

但不要到处跑着说:“我是小说家,我值得被选中,我值得一大笔预付款。”妄想之人的心碎之处在于,他们坚持认为世界欠他们的,因为他们在X、Y或Z上那么努力,或者他们发现了一份秘密的“抄本”,只要别人能理解它,一切就都会成真。好吧,如果人们不理解它,那是你的问题。所以,我们可以通过追求“最小可行受众”来超越妄想。什么是最小的那群人——如果我为他们带来了改变,那就足够了?

Original English

Stephen: Right? I always think this because a lot of the advice we give people around like getting going and starting and pursuing the thing they want to pursue doesn't necessarily always come with the nuance that actually like I can't actually be an NBA player.

Seth Godin: Correct.

Stephen: But how do I know because all the advice is just go for it, pick yourself, etc. But —

Seth Godin: yeah, that's not my —

Stephen: — have the talent.

Seth Godin: I'm so glad you brought this up. That's not my advice. You probably are delusional if you're picking something that's super fun that involves skipping lots of intermediate steps and it ends with a happy ending where you're famous. The chances of winning that lottery are very very low. So people come to me and say, "I got this great book. Will you help me get a career as a novelist?" And the answer is super easy. Take your novel. It was really hard for you to write. I get that. Make it into a nicely formatted PDF. Cost you nothing. email it to 20 people. If they send it to other people and it spreads, someone's going to call you and hire you to write your next novel. If it doesn't spread, write a better novel.

But don't start running around saying, "I'm a novelist and I deserve to get picked and have a big advance." The heartbreak of someone who is delusional is they insist that the world owes them because they worked so hard on X, Y, or Z or that they have found some secret transcript that if anyone else understood it, everyone would real. Well, if people don't understand it, that's on you. So, we can get past the delusion by going for the smallest viable audience. What's the smallest group of people that if I made a difference for them, it would be enough.

Stephen: 有意思的是,我想如果你对某些人说这个,他们会非常不喜欢这个答案。

Seth Godin: 人们讨厌我这么说。

Stephen: 为什么?

Seth Godin: 因为困在那个“结”里太舒服了。“我是个天才,我真的很努力,但世界上没有人理解我。”这样一来,问题就不在我身上了,因为我不必去担心那些伴随着责任而来的事情——比如把它放在错误的人面前之类的。说“要是……就好了,你知道,我得在家做这个,或者我遇到了那件事,所以我被困住了”要容易得多。在某种程度上,我们在那种挫败感中是安全的。

所以,我想用这个“结”做的是,帮助人们理解:这是可能的,但并不容易。这是可能的,但它不会给你你梦想中的那个东西。它只会找到一条路,通往“有可能到达”的地方。那是成年人必须承诺去做的事。

Original English

Stephen: What's interesting is I imagine if you said that to some people, they would really not like the answer.

Seth Godin: People hate it when I say this.

Stephen: Why?

Seth Godin: Because it's so comfortable to be stuck in that knot. I'm a genius and I'm really hardworking, but no one in the world understands me. So now my butt isn't the problem because I don't have to worry about any of the things that come with the responsibility of it being in front of the wrong people or whatever. It's so much easier to say, "If only and I, you know, I need to be home for this or I this thing happened to me. Therefore, I'm stuck." We're safe at some level in that frustration.

And so, what I'm trying to do with the knot is help people understand this is possible, but it is not easy. This is possible, but it will not give you the thing you are dreaming of. It will merely find a path to get to where it is possible to go. That's a grownup thing to have to commit to.

Stephen: 如果有人对你刚才给出的建议不满意,我想这也说明,也许他们的动机是错误的。这让我想起我开始做这个播客的时候,我有两个朋友,Oliver和Ash,来对我说这很好。下一期什么时候出?我总是说,如果他们没对我说那些话,这个播客很可能就不会继续下去了,因为我当时忙着做别的事情。但这两个我信任、而且会在我做的东西很糟糕时直言不讳告诉我的人——我经常这样——他们对我说那些话,给了我巨大的能量和动力。我继续发布,部分是为了他们,因为我知道Oliver每天从谢菲尔德通勤上班要花三个半小时——

Seth Godin: 嗯。

Stephen: ——而且我喜欢这个过程。我从这个特定的人那里得到了反馈。它就继续下去了。

但很多时候,实际上,我想很多人会对“把它发给20个人”这个建议不屑一顾,因为他们实际上迷恋的是那个领奖台。

Seth Godin: 对吧?

Stephen: 而你说的是,不,专注于旅程。

Seth Godin: 对吧?

Stephen: 但他们脑子里某个地方想的是:不,我要的是旅程,Seth。我想出名,我想要那一百万英镑,对吧?

Seth Godin: 而那不是你给他们的东西。但实际上,你给的正是那个。[笑声]

Original English

Stephen: If someone's not happy with the advice you just gave. I think it also illuminates that maybe their motives are wrong. It reminded me of when I started this podcast and I had these two friends, Oliver and Ash, come to me and say that was good. When's the next one? And I always say if they hadn't have said that to me, it probably wouldn't have continued because I was busy with other things. But those two people who I trusted and would tell me when something is terrible. I often do. um saying that to me just it gave me so much energy and motivation and I kept publishing in part for them because I knew Oliver had this like 3 and a half hour commute to work every day from Sheffield —

Seth Godin: Mhm.

Stephen: — and um I loved the process. I was getting this feedback from this particular person. It carried on going.

But a lot of the time, actually, I think a lot of people would bounce off this advice of just send it to 20 people because they're actually attached to the podium,

Seth Godin: right?

Stephen: And what you're saying is no, focus on the journey,

Seth Godin: right?

Stephen: But they want in their head somewhere, actually, no, I the journey, Seth. I want to be famous and I want the million pounds, right?

Seth Godin: And that's not what you're offering them. But actually, you are. [laughter]

Seth Godin: 嗯,总会有人中彩票的,Stephen,而且那个人很可能不是你。所以,就你的情况而言,我们之所以在这里谈话,是因为你中了播客彩票。有一百万个播客里,有100个和这个一样好,对吧?那已经很了不起了。

Stephen: 但还是有100个。

Seth Godin: 所以,你以一种能让你买更多彩票的方式出现在彩票站。你以“为人们增加价值”的方式出现,这样你就能继续下去。然后当有一张彩票时,你就有了机会,对吧?但一路走来,旅程说的是:我有机会说,看,我做了这个。“我做了这个”意味着它是给你的。这是我给你的礼物。如果你不接受这份礼物,我不能怪你。我只需要做一份更好的礼物。但如果人们开始接受你的礼物,你就有了牵引力。Steve Blank谈过客户牵引力。作为投资人,你知道这个。客户牵引力是判断一家初创公司能否成功的最好的单一指标,比任何其他指标都重要。如果你明天关门,有多少客户会想念你?

Original English

Seth Godin: Well, someone's going to win the lottery, Stephen, and it's probably not going to be you. And so in your case, we're talking because you won the podcast lottery. There are a 100 podcasts as good as this one out of a million, right? That's pretty amazing.

Stephen: But there's still a hundred of them.

Seth Godin: So you show up to buy lottery tickets in a way that lets you buy more lottery tickets. You show up to add value for people so you can keep going. And then when there's a lottery, you got a shot, right? But along the way, the journey says I have a chance to say here I made this. I made this means it's for you. It is a gift I'm giving you. If you don't accept the gift, I can't blame you. I just have to make a better gift. But if people start accepting your gifts, you have traction. And Steve Blank talks about customer traction. As an investor, you know this. Customer traction is the single best indicator of whether a startup is going to succeed more than any other metric. How many customers would miss you if you shut down tomorrow?

Stephen: 而对于一家披萨店来说,100个就够了。

Seth Godin: 是的,在产品开发中他们经常这么说。他们说,为你认识的一个特定的人做一件东西,为你认识的那个真的真的真的很喜欢它的人做,结果你会发现,有很多人像你认识的那个人。足够多的人。也许不是很多,但会足够。

Stephen: 所以我们谈到的这个循环——

Seth Godin: ——不是自我中心的。它是共情的。你必须让观众进入你的思考,否则你就是在想“这对我有什么好处”,而且只对我一个人有好处。那是自恋。那就是你在网上看到的所有那些“ hustle”文化——所有那些试图施压让人们给他们汇5美元的人,或者传销,所有那些东西。那不是可能实现的东西,也不是我们应该花时间去做的事。

但当我们能为对的人提供服务时,我们就有机会让事情变得更好。但我需要在这里插一个重要的题外话,那就是抵抗会再次袭来。推出新事物的唯一方法,是制造张力。不是缓解它,而是制造张力。慷慨的张力。那种“你可能会被落下”的张力。你不会被——

Original English

Stephen: And for a pizza place, 100 is enough.

Seth Godin: Yeah, they say that a lot in product development. They say just make a thing for one person you know and make it for one person you know that really really really loves it and it will turn out that there'll be lots of people like that person you know. enough people. Maybe it's not lots, but it'll be enough.

Stephen: And so this cycle we're talking about —

Seth Godin: — isn't self-focused. It's empathic. You have to let the audience in to your thinking or else you're thinking about what's in this for me and me alone. And that's narcissistic. And that is where you see all the internet hustle going on. All the people who are trying to pressure folks into sending them $5 or multi-level marketing, all that stuff. That isn't what's possible and it's not what we should be spending our time on.

But when we can be of service for the right people, we have a chance to make things better. But I need to put a big aside here, which is where resistance kicks back in. The only way to launch something new is to create tension. Not to relieve it, but to create tension. Generous tension. The tension of you might be left behind. You won't be in —

制造张力与“抛球”哲学

Speaker A: 在第一个循环里,我有一样东西要给你,但你还不知道它是什么。慷慨地给出的张力,是让人们产生前进动力的唯一方式。泰勒·斯威夫特要开演唱会,场馆能容纳一万五千人。她刚刚为四万人制造了张力,因为那些人正在跟爸妈说,我得赶在所有人之前买到票。如果她不愿意制造这种张力,她就没法巡演。

Original English

Speaker A: On the first cycle of it. I have this thing that's going to help you and you don't know what it is yet. Tension that's offered generously is the only way people create forward motion. So Taylor Swift is having a concert 15,000 people can fit in the arena. She just created tension for 40,000 people because they're saying to their moms and dads, I got to go get tickets before everybody else. If she's not willing to create the tension, she can't go on tour.

Speaker B: 所以是的,制造关注确实很尴尬。说“我在办这个活动,希望有你的位置”确实很尴尬。但这是我们能让别人决定向前迈进的唯一方式。

Original English

Speaker B: So yes, it's awkward to create attention. It's awkward to say, "I'm doing this event. I hope there's room for you." But it's the only way we can cause other people to decide to move forward.

Speaker A: 我当时在压力测试你那个泰勒·斯威夫特的类比。我的测试方式是:如果泰勒办一场演出,座位不限量呢?我想人们还是会去,因为张力在于她太优秀了。我可能会错过那个体验。就像你说的,FOMO本身就是张力。座位不限量,但夜晚是有限的。只有今晚。

Original English

Speaker A: I was stress testing that Taylor Swift analogy. And the way that I stress tested it was, well, what if Taylor did a gig and there was unlimited seats? People would still go, I guess, because the tension is that she's so good. I might miss the experience. As you said, there's FOMO itself is the tension. There's unlimited seats, but there's not unlimited nights. It's just tonight.

Speaker B: 对,没错。

Original English

Speaker B: Yeah. Okay. Yeah.

Speaker A: 这就是为什么现场活动会制造一种不同的张力。你知道,网上那些你还没看过的视频,我也没看过,我们不会为此焦虑,因为它们明天还在,对吧?但现场活动会开始改变我们在那个社群中参与的方式。

Original English

Speaker A: And that's why live events create a different sort of tension. You know, this videos on the internet you haven't seen, I haven't seen. And we're not stressed about that because they'll be there tomorrow, right? But the live event starts to change how we're going to engage with it among that community.

Speaker B: 还有什么跟“摆脱困境”这个想法相近的东西吗?因为我们真正在围绕的就是这个。就像那些让你卡住的事情,以及如何在不卡住的状态下采取可执行的步骤。我们还需要把什么收尾吗?

Original English

Speaker B: What else is sort of adjacent to this idea of getting unstuck? Because that's really what we're circling here. It's like the things that keep you stuck and how to take sort of actionable steps outside of being stuck. Is there anything else we need to close off on here?

Speaker A: 你刚才看到我那些杂技球了。杂技很迷人,因为当你在街上看到有人,如果你是个好人,看到有人在街上玩杂耍,你不会希望他们掉球,对吧?我们都希望那个杂耍者能接住球。所以当人们说“我要学杂耍”时,发生的是:他们扔一个球,能接住。再扔另一个球,但两三次之内,有一个球就飞到那边去了。于是他们扑过去接,因为杂耍的重点是接球。所以他们扑过去接,但这样一来就失去了位置,下一个球就要落地了。然后人们就放弃了。人们放弃是因为他们以为杂耍是关于接球的。不是的。杂耍是关于抛球的。如果你把抛球练好了,接球自然就水到渠成。所以我教杂耍的方式是:用一个球,扔,接,扔,接,直到你真的觉得无聊了。然后两个球,扔,扔,接,接。这并不难,但如果你练“扔扔接接”二十分钟,每个球都会精准地落在它该落的位置。然后杂耍就变得容易了。但我们迷恋的是什么——你去听任何一个自我提升的播客,全都在讲接球,对吧?这能帮我减肥吗?这能帮我交到朋友吗?这能帮我建立事业吗?这些都是“接球”。那“抛球”在哪里?我们怎么才能练好抛球?我们怎么才能练好“就算没人读我下一篇短篇小说,我也要把文字写到纸上”这件事?

Original English

Speaker A: So, you saw some of my juggling balls there. Juggling is fascinating because when you see someone on the street, if you're a good person, if you see someone on the street juggling, you're not rooting there for them to drop a ball, right? That we want the juggler to be able to juggle. So, when people say, "I'm going to learn how to juggle." What happens is they throw one ball and they can catch it. They throw the other ball, but within two or three throws, one of the balls goes over here. So, they lunge to catch it because the juggling is about catching. So, they lunge to catch it, but now they're out of position and the next one's going to hit the ground. And then people give up. People give up because they think juggling is about catching. It's not. It's about throwing. If you get good at throwing, the catches take care of themselves. So the way I teach juggling is with one ball, throw it, catch it, throw it, catch it till you're really bored. Then two balls, throw, throw, catch, catch. This is not hard, but if you do throw, throw, catch, catch for 20 minutes, every ball is landing exactly where it's supposed to. And now juggling is easy. But what we are hooked on, and listen to any self-improvement podcast, it's all about the catching, right? Does this help me lose weight? Does this help me find friends? Does this help me build my business? Those are all catches. Where's the throwing? How are we going to get good at throwing? How are we going to get good at realizing even if no one reads this next short story, I'm going to get good at putting words on the page?

Speaker B: 是过程。

Original English

Speaker B: The process.

Speaker A: 是过程。是练习。如果我们能培养一种练习,我们就不再执着于结果,因为结果不在我们控制之内。练习在我们控制之内。把抛球练好。把发现问题的能力练好,把发现受众在哪里的能力练好,把发现你可以在哪里慷慨的能力练好。当你擅长看到这些东西时,接球自然就水到渠成了。这是我为你们做的东西。我意识到Diario的观众都是想要有所成就的奋斗者。我学到的一件事是,当你瞄准一个非常大非常大的目标时,心理上会感到极其不适,因为那有点像站在珠穆朗玛峰脚下仰望山顶。实现目标的方法是把它们分解成微小的一小步。我们在团队里称之为“1%”。实际上,这个理念对我们在这里的许多成功负有重大责任。所以,为了让在家观看的你们能够实现任何大目标,我们做了这些1%日记本,去年发布的时候全部售罄了。所以我一次又一次地要求团队把日记本带回来,同时引入一些新颜色,并对日记本做一些小调整。所以现在我们为你们提供了更好的系列。如果你心里有一个大目标,需要一个框架、一个流程和一些动力,那我强烈建议你在它们再次售罄之前拿一本。你可以在thediary.com买到。如果你想要链接,链接在下面的描述里。

Original English

Speaker A: The process. The practice. If we can develop a practice, we're no longer attached to the outcome because the outcome's out of our control. The practice is under our control. Get good at throwing. Get good at seeing where problems lie, seeing where audiences are, seeing where you can be generous. When you get good at seeing those things, the catches take care of themselves. This is something that I've made for you. I realize that the Diario audience are strivers that we want to accomplish. And one of the things I've learned is that when you aim at the big big big goal, it can feel incredibly psychologically uncomfortable because it's kind of like being stood at the foot of Mount Everest and looking upwards. The way to accomplish your goals is by breaking them down into tiny small steps. And we call this in our team the 1%. And actually this philosophy is highly responsible for much of our success here. So, what we've done so that you at home can accomplish any big goal that you have is we've made these 1% diaries and we released these last year and they all sold out. So, I asked my team over and over again to bring the diaries back, but also to introduce some new colors and to make some minor tweaks to the diary. So, now we have a better range for you. So, if you have a big goal in mind and you need a framework and a process and some motivation, then I highly recommend you get one of these diaries before they all sell out once again. And you can get yours at the diary.com. And if you want the link, the link is in the description below.

Speaker B: 这再次不是一个人们会喜欢的故事,因为我们都想练好“接球”。对。奇怪的是,这跟另一个话题非常非常接近,几乎是毫无关联,但又有某种联系。嗯,我和Julian Treasure坐在这里聊过。他做了两个TED演讲。一个是关于说话的,对吧?四千万观看。一个是关于倾听的,

Original English

Speaker B: This again is not a narrative that people will love because we all want to get good at catching. Yeah. Weirdly, this is very very adjacent and almost unlin, but it's somewhat linked. Um, I sat here with Julian Treasure. He did two TED talks. One about speaking, right? 40 million views. One about listening,

Speaker A: 两百万观看。

Original English

Speaker A: two million views.

Speaker B: 我觉得这几乎有点像“接球”和“抛球”的关系。

Original English

Speaker B: I thought it's almost kind of similar to like the catching and the throwing.

Speaker A: 对。

Original English

Speaker A: Yeah.

Speaker B: 而且实际上,当我跟间谍坐在一起——我采访过一些世界顶级间谍——我问他们:“你是怎么让那些在异国他乡刚认识你的人,愿意做你让他们做的任何事,甚至交出他们的秘密?”他们说:倾听。

Original English

Speaker B: And and actually when I sit here with spies and I've interviewed some of the world's leading spies and I say, "How is it that you're able to get people to do whatever you want that have just met you in foreign lands and hand over their secrets? They say listening."

Speaker A: 对。

Original English

Speaker A: Yeah.

Speaker B: 一切都关于倾听。我坐上一辆出租车,听他们倾诉八周,因为他们一直在卸下负担,因为没人听他们说话。这让我想到,就像没人关注“抛球”一样。

Original English

Speaker B: It's all about the listening. I go in a taxi and I listen to them for eight weeks as they offload because no one listens. And it kind of got me thinking about this is like no one focuses on the throwing.

Speaker A: 对。

Original English

Speaker A: Yeah.

Speaker B: 而实际上,那反而成了巨大的竞争优势,对吧?

Original English

Speaker B: And actually that becomes the great competitive advantage,

Speaker A: 对,没错。就是练习。我喜欢“世界知名间谍”这个说法,因为你会觉得那是个矛盾修辞。我想象中世界上最伟大的间谍,我们根本不知道他们是谁。

Original English

Speaker A: right? Exactly. Yeah. The practice. I love the idea world famous spies because you would think that that's sort of an oxymoron. I would imagine the world's greatest spies. We have no idea who they are.

Speaker B: 嗯,他们现在会上播客了,所以他们就像……嗯,但这其中一部分跟你写的一本书有关,叫《The Dip》。我们在这里谈的是“错觉”,以及如何判断你是产生了错觉,还是只是在经历“低谷期”。我这里有几张图,但……好,听众怎么知道他们应该放弃某件事,还是说那只是你刚开始做、还很差劲时必然会经历的艰难阶段?

Original English

Speaker B: Well, they go on podcasts now, so they are like um but but part of it links to one of the books you wrote, which is called The Dip. We're talking about delusion here and how to know if you're delusional or if you're just going through the dip. So, I've got uh some images here, but okay. How does someone listening know if they should give up on something or if it's just the inevitable rough patch that you go through when you start and you're bad?

Speaker A: 好,所以《The Dip》描述的是世界上一个以前没有书讲过的东西,那就是“放弃”的力量。什么是低谷期?低谷期是介于开始和擅长之间那段艰难的部分。低谷期是有机化学,是你成为医生路上的那一段。你必须穿过它才能到达另一边。低谷期是三月份的健身房。如果你想要六块腹肌,你不能在二月份就放弃健身房——你是假期里才加入的。你必须熬过那段艰难的部分。所以我们做的绝大多数创造价值的事情,中间都有一个低谷期。我的论点是,你应该在开始之前就看到那个低谷。你应该说:“如果我要开车穿越戈壁沙漠,我不能在找不到加油站的时候抱怨。”戈壁沙漠里没有加油站。穿越沙漠有一个低谷期。带上你穿越低谷所需的东西,或者干脆别开始。

Original English

Speaker A: Okay, so the dip describes something in the world that no one had talked about in the book before, which is the power of quitting. What is the dip? The dip is the hard part in between starting and getting good at it. The dip is organic chemistry on your way to being a doctor. And you got to get through it to get to the other side. The dip is the gym in March. If you want six-pack abs, you can't quit the gym in February, which you joined during the holidays. You're going to have to get through the hard part. And so most of what we do that creates value has a dip in it. And my argument is you should a see the dip before you start. You should say, "If I'm going to drive this car across the Gobi Desert, I can't whine when I can't find a gas station." There are no gas stations in the Gobi Desert. There's a dip to get across the desert. Pack what you need to get through the dip or don't start.

Speaker A: 第二点,当低谷出现时,说声谢谢,因为那意味着你撞上了最难的部分。那意味着你开始走向另一边的起点。不要抱怨有机化学。你早知道有机化学会来。有机化学是成为医生过程的一部分。就像我朋友Gabe说的,它不是挡在路上的障碍,它是沿途的一部分,是一个路标,表明你正在路上。所以你的问题就是:我们该不该放弃?有没有人曾经穿过这个低谷?如果这是一个像有机化学那样的低谷,世界上每一个医生都穿过它,那你就知道了。你知道它会来,你知道如果你穿过去,你就能到达另一边。另一方面,据我所知,从来没有人靠抽烟熬过肺气肿。当……

Original English

Speaker A: And number two, when the dip shows up, say thank you because it means you hit the hard part. It means this is the beginning of getting to the other side. Don't complain about organic chemistry. You knew organic chemistry was coming. Organic chemistry is part of the process of becoming a doctor. As my friend Gabe says, it's not an obstacle in the way. It's something along the way and it's a signpost that you're on the way. So your question then is should we quit. Has anyone ever made it through this dip before? If this is a dip like organic chemistry where every single doctor in the world has made it through, now you know. you know this is coming and you know if you make it through you're going to get to the other side. On the other hand, no one that I know of has ever smoked their way through emphyma. That when

肺气肿与“死胡同”的代价

Seth: 肺气肿出现了,它不是一个低谷,而是一个死胡同。继续抽烟不会让你好转——正是抽烟让你变得更糟。那是一条死路,一个陷阱。所以当我们和人们谈论这段旅程、这种错觉、我们试图解决的这个问题时,我们要问的是:穿过这样一个低谷通常要付出什么代价?我有资源撑过去吗?还是我只是在把好时间和好钱继续扔进坏坑里?但如果你有一个生意,一直在亏钱、亏钱、亏钱、亏钱,而且没有任何证据表明再往里面投钱就能让你走到对岸,那这就是一个死胡同。原谅你自己吧。对那个当初启动了错误生意的旧日自我说声谢谢——谢谢你当初有那个洞察力,但它并不适合今天这个世界。我原谅你,我要去退出,然后去做别的事情。

Original English

Seth: Emphysema shows up, it's not a dip and continuing to smoke is not going to make you better. It's what made you worse. It's a cul-de-sac. It's a trap. And so what we look for when we're talking to people about this journey, this delusion, this problem we're trying to solve is what does it usually cost to get through a dip like this one? Do I have the resources to get through it or am I just throwing good time and good money after bad? But if you got a business that's losing money and losing money and losing money and losing money and there's no evidence that putting more money into your thing is going to get you to the other side, that's a cul-de-sac. Forgive yourself. The old self who started the wrong business, say thank you, thank you for having the right insight but it wasn't correct for this world today. I forgive you. I'm going to go quit and do something else.

主持人: 你刚才说的关键词是“证据”。

Original English

Host: Key word there you said is evidence.

Seth: 而且证据可以像你说的那样微小。

Original English

Seth: Yeah, and the evidence could be as you say small.

Seth: 所以,如果我们想想生意——如果你有一家零售店或一家餐厅,那些成功的店,95%的利润都进了房东的口袋。而那些失败的店,102%的利润进了房东的口袋。这就是这类生意中失败与不失败之间唯一的区别。房东的工作就是尽可能多地拿走你的利润,但又不能拿太多以至于你倒闭。所以,有人签了一份四年的租约,已经租了两年,付不起租金,每天都在亏钱。他们有一笔沉没成本,那就是接下来两年的店面租金,不管我是否在这里经营都得付。但你可以退出,因为你可以原谅那两年——你反正都得付。那是你两年前做的决定,那不是新的事情,那是旧的事情。你真的要用接下来两年的生命来惩罚自己,只因为你几年前做了一个决定、签了一份糟糕的租约、在一条错误的街上、在一个不支持你的体系里建了一个错误的生意吗?为什么?那两年你拿不回来了。但我们可以深吸一口气,说:“是的,我要让这个地方空着,去那边建一些真正有用的东西,比起死守那个旧决定,我会远远领先。”

Original English

Seth: So, if we think about the business, if you had a retail shop or a restaurant, the ones that succeed, 95% of their profit goes to the landlord. And the ones that fail, 102% of their profit goes to the landlord. That's the only difference between failing and not failing in one of those businesses. The landlord's job is to take as much as they can of your profit, but not too much that you go out of business. So, someone's got a four-year lease. They're two years into it. They're not making rent. They're losing money every single day. And they have a sunk cost, which is I got to pay for the next two years of this storefront, whether or not I'm in here. But you can quit because you can forgive that two years. You have to pay. You decided that two years ago. That's not a new thing. That's an old thing. Are you really going to spend the next two years of your life punishing yourself because you made a decision a few years ago and signed a bad lease and built the wrong business on the wrong street in a system that doesn't support you? Why? You can't get those two years back. But we can take a deep breath and say, "Yeah, I'm going to leave this place empty and go build something really useful over here and I'll come out way ahead compared to defending that old decision."

挑战“永不放弃”的名言

主持人: 但是等一下,Seth。今天早上去健身房的时候,墙上写着一些名言。就像这条。

Original English

Host: But hang on a minute, Seth. When I went to the gym this morning, there was quotes written on the wall. And the quotes are like this one here.

Seth: 你能帮我念出来吗?

Original English

Seth: Can you read that out for me?

主持人: “如果你放弃一次,它就会变成一种习惯。永不放弃。”

Original English

Host: If you quit once, it becomes a habit. Never quit.

Seth: 这是迈克尔·乔丹的名言。

Original English

Seth: It's a Michael Jordan quote.

主持人: 迈克尔·乔丹。是的。我永远不会和迈克尔·乔丹争论,但他错了。而且很明显他错了。他不再打职业棒球了。他不再打职业高尔夫,也不再打职业篮球了。因为人会老,他做过一件事,但后来他停止了做那件事,因为它不再有产出了。

Original English

Host: Michael Jordan. Yes. I'm never gonna have an argument with Michael Jordan, but he's wrong. And it's very clear that he's wrong. He doesn't play professional baseball anymore. He doesn't play professional golf, nor does he play professional basketball anymore. Because humans age and he did a thing, but then he stopped doing the thing because it wasn't productive anymore.

Seth: 当我们想想他的燃料——他作为运动员用了两样东西来驱动自己。一样是“怨气”。如果你听过他的名人堂演讲,那就是一长串他整个职业生涯都扛在肩上的“石头”。那是基于他是谁、他如何长大的燃料。那是他上场的动力。第二样就是“永不放弃”。所以,如果这两样燃料帮助你成为你这一代最伟大的篮球运动员,我不会和你争辩。如果那能把你带到你需要去的地方,那是你自己的事。但对大多数人来说,那是阻力,是陷阱。那是羞耻。那是被困在一个死结里。那是所有的“但是”。对吧?我想成为一个成功的商人,但我不能承认我错了。

Original English

Seth: And when we think about our fuel, he used as an athlete a couple things to fuel him. One thing he had was grievance. And if you listen to his Hall of Fame speech, it's just a long list of chips he's had on his shoulder for his whole career. That's fuel based on who he was and how he grew up. That's how he gets on the court. And the second one was never quit. So if those two pieces of fuel help you become the greatest basketball player of your generation, I'm not going to argue with you. If that's getting you where you need to go, it's up to you. But for most people, it's resistance and a trap. It's shame. It's getting stuck in a knot. It's all of the butts. Right? I want to be a successful business person, but I can't admit I was wrong.

主持人: 我关掉的生意比大多数听众都多。我失败的次数比大多数听众都多。如果我还在经营那家我在1987年创办的灯泡募捐公司,我今天就不会和你说话了。

Original English

Host: I've shut down more businesses than most people who are listening to this. I've failed more times than most people are listening to this. If I was still running the light bulb fundraising company I started in 1987, I wouldn't be talking to you today.

主持人: 这很有趣,因为有一个奇怪的悖论,对我们所有人来说都如此明显,但人们仍然相信“永不放弃”这个想法。我指出的悖论是:当一个人开始某件事——一家新公司、一份新工作、一段新关系——我们都会庆祝。但我们也直觉地知道,为了开始像新工作或新关系这样的东西,你必须在此之前做一件事,那就是退出另一件事。

Original English

Host: It's funny because there's this weird paradox that's so obvious to all of us but still people believe this idea of never quitting. And the paradox that I'm pointing at is the minute someone starts something—a new company, a new job, a new relationship—we celebrate. But we also intuitively know that in order to start something like a new job or a new relationship, you have to do something before that, which is quit the other thing.

Seth: 是啊。

Original English

Seth: Yeah.

主持人: “永不放弃”,但我们庆祝开始。理论上,我们应该像庆祝开始一样庆祝退出,因为它们在根本上是相互关联的。

Original English

Host: Never quit, but we celebrate starting. Theoretically, then we should celebrate the quitting just as much as we celebrate the starting because they are fundamentally inter.

Seth: 正确。但只有退出正确的东西。你不想庆祝一个在马拉松第25英里退出的人,因为他们在训练中没能做到的是成为那种知道如何安放疲惫的跑者——那些完成马拉松的人会找到把疲惫放在哪里。但这和为一个虐待狂老板工作不一样,因为你的老板永远不会停止虐待。所以你可以说,这不可能变好,我每天来这里让自己承受这种创伤,是在付出代价。它在强化一个我不相信的体系,而我可以把明天重新拿回来。

Original English

Seth: Correct. But only quitting the right stuff. You don't want to celebrate someone who quits the marathon at mile 25 because what they failed to do in their training was become the kind of runner that sees that the people who finish the marathon figure out where to put the tired. But that's not the same as working for an abusive boss because your boss is never going to stop being abusive. And so you can say this can't get better and every day I come here and subject myself to this trauma is costing me. It's reinforcing a system I don't believe in and I can get tomorrow back again.

一个关于何时退出的框架

主持人: 你刚才描述的听起来很像我在我上一本书里写的东西——那正是针对人们发现自己所处的这种情况的一个退出框架。因为我知道听众在说什么。他们都在说:“我怎么知道什么时候该退出某件事?”所以,我做了这个框架,我会把它放到屏幕上。实际上,我用的例子就是马拉松。

Original English

Host: What you've described there sounds a lot like something I wrote about in my last book, which was just a quitting framework for this exact situation people find themselves in. Because I know what people are saying that are listening. They're all saying, "How do I know when to quit something?" So, I made this framework which I'll throw up on the screen. And actually, the example I use is a marathon.

Seth: 我的意思是,这就是框架。你可以自己看,我就给你做个旁白。

Original English

Seth: I mean, this is the framework. You can see it for yourself and I'll just sort of give you the voice over.

主持人: 但如果你看左边,我指的是马拉松。我说的是:当某件事很难时,这本身不足以成为退出的理由。比如一场马拉松,在第23英里,你在为一个对你意义重大的慈善机构筹款。你应该退出的时候,是当你沿着右边走——当某件事很糟糕,就像你说的那个有毒的老板,而且关键的是,改变它所需付出的努力,不值得另一边的东西。

Original English

Host: But if you look down the left side, I'm referring to a marathon there. And what I'm saying is when something is hard, that is not reason enough to quit. Like a marathon in mile 23 when you're raising money for a charity that means a lot to you. When you should quit is when something—if you go down the right hand side—is when something sucks, like you've said about the toxic boss, and critically the effort it would take to change it is not worth the thing on the other side.

Seth: 完全正确。

Original English

Seth: Exactly right.

主持人: 因为人们会问:“我怎么知道什么时候该退出某件事?我怎么知道什么时候该辞职?”你知道的。

Original English

Host: Because people—that's what people will say—they'll say how do I know when to quit something, how do I know, you know, how do I know when to quit the job or to—

Seth: 对。你可以质疑自己的判断,因为如果你有因为短期内困难就退出的历史,而不是看它是否值得,你可以找一个教练或同伴来在这方面挑战你。

Original English

Seth: Right. And you can question your judgment because if you have a history of quitting because in the short run it was tough as opposed to looking at whether it was worth it, you can find a coach or peers who can challenge you on that.

从DVD制作人到原谅自己

主持人: 我当年是图书出版公司DVD的主要制作商之一,那是在他们短暂做这件事的时候。我和费雪牌合作,为家长做了一张DVD之类的。然后那一天到来了,情况变得非常清楚,图书出版商不会再做更多这种事了,因为互联网来了。他们会做得更少。所以每一天,我都在为我作为DVD制作人建立起来的东西辩护,而那完全是浪费。

Original English

Host: So I was one of the leading makers of DVDs for book publishing companies back in the brief moment when they're doing this. So I worked with Fisher Price and we made a DVD for parents and stuff. And then this day shows up and it becomes very clear that book publishers aren't going to do more of this because the internet's here. They're going to do less of this. So every day I would be defending what I had built as a DVD producer was completely wasted.

Seth: 所以,原谅你自己。我没有改变世界。别人改变了世界。但这不会变好了。这是一个死胡同,一条死路。谢谢你做了这件事。让我们开始做点别的吧。

Original English

Seth: So forgive yourself. I didn't change the world. Somebody else changed the world. But it's not going to get better. This is a cul-de-sac. It's a dead end. Thanks for doing this. Let's start something else.

主持人: 因为现在有很多三四十岁、五十岁的人,他们做着十年来都没有让他们感到满足的工作。

Original English

Host: Cuz there's a lot of people right now that are in their 30s, 40s, 50s that are in jobs that have not made them fulfilled for a decade.

Seth: 是啊。

Original English

Seth: Yeah.

主持人: 但他们已经干了20年了。他们爬上了梯子。他们是总监了。

Original English

Host: But they're 20 years in. They've climbed the ladder. They're director.

Seth: 所以他们有沉没成本,因为他们已经挣到了这个位置。但他们也有一大堆纠缠不清的东西,比如:我想要一份让我满足的工作,但我也喜欢这辆车和这栋房子。我想要一份让我满足的工作,但我也喜欢邻居们认为我是一个稳定、体面的人。我想要一份让我满足的工作,但我还有所有这些其他东西要付钱。好吧。但如果我们看看那些“但是”,我们就会意识到你刚刚做了选择,留在这份工作里。所以,你不需要再为此烦恼了。你已经接受了那个选择。另一种选择是搬到一个两居室的公寓,吃米饭和豆子,深吸一口气,重置所有这些事情,然后你现在可以找一份不同的工作,薪水只有原来一半,因为你放弃了那些“但是”,对吧?

Original English

Seth: So they have sunk costs because they've earned the spot. But they also have a whole bunch of entanglements like I want to have a job that fulfills me, but I also like this car and this house. I want to have a job that fulfills me, but I also like my neighbors thinking I'm this stable, respectable person. I want to have a job that fulfills me, but I have all this other stuff I have to pay for. All right. But if we look at those butts, we realize you just made the choice to stay in this job. So, you don't have to fret about it anymore. You've accepted that you made that choice. The alternative is move to a two-bedroom flat, eat rice and beans, take a deep breath, reset all these things, and now you can get a different job that's going to pay you half as much because you gave up the butts, right?

重新定义工作:从“不得不做”到“我选择做”

Seth: 一份能让我有成就感的工作,会让我和家人关系更好,会给我对未来的希望,会让我有机会让X、Y或Z在世界上发生。这很难,因为你不能什么都占着。你得放手。

Original English

Seth: A job that fulfills me will give me a better relationship with my family, will give me hope for the future, will give me a chance to make X, Y, or Z happen in the world. That's hard because you can't have the butts. You got to let them go.

Speaker A: 在那种情况下,你知道,好吧,我有车。我有名片,这让人印象深刻。我会被邀请去参加一些体面的活动,但我很痛苦。

Original English

Speaker A: In that scenario, you know, I okay, I have the car. I have the business card, which is impressive to people. I get invited to nice things, but I'm miserable.

Seth: 对吧?

Original English

Seth: Right?

Speaker A: 那么,我该怎么办?我围绕这个身份建立了一个社群,这个身份就印在这张名片上,但我很痛苦,Seth。

Original English

Speaker A: So, what do I do? I've got a community I've built around this identity that is on this business card, but I'm miserable, Seth.

Seth: 对吧?所以这个过程的神奇之处在于,如果你通过这个宣告:正因为所有这些其他东西对我如此重要,所以我不能换工作。突然之间,你的工作会变得好很多。

Original English

Seth: Right? So the magic of this process is if you announce through this that it's a situation that all these other things are so important to me that I cannot change my job. Suddenly your job gets a lot better.

Speaker A: 因为你不再跟它较劲了。你选择了它。

Original English

Speaker A: Because you're not bridling against it. You chose it.

Seth: 所以如果你跟人聊——我我我,我给一些殡葬行业的人做过几次演讲,就是殡仪馆从业者。我们大多数人在高中职业招聘会上是不会报名做那份工作的,对吧?但那些坚持做下来的人,他们不会坐在那里说:“这太可怕了。我讨厌跟死人待在一起。”他们会说:“我生活中得到的所有这些东西。这就是其中的一部分。它随之而来。就像跑马拉松会累一样,那也是随之而来的。如果我想拥有这样的生活——稳定的生活,不用到处搬家,成为社区的一员,现金流有保障——而在这个框架内我是一名殡仪从业者,那我怎样才能成为我能成为的最好的殡仪从业者?”而不是盼着迈克尔·乔丹打电话来让我管理他的金融帝国之类的,因为那不会发生。

Original English

Seth: So if you talk to people I I I've gave a couple talks for people who are in the funeral industry undertakers. Most of us would not sign up for that job as high school students at the career fair, right? But the people who stick with it, they're not sitting there saying, "This is horrible. I hate being around dead people." They're saying, "All the stuff that I get in my life. This is part of it. It comes with it. Just like getting tired in the marathon comes with it. If I want to have this life where it's stable, where I don't have to move around, where a member of the community, where the cash flow is assured and I get to be an undertaker within that structure, how do I be the best undertaker I could possibly be?" As opposed to wishing that I would get a call from Michael Jordan who wants me to run his financial empire or something because it's not going to happen.

Speaker A: 我明白了,你是在从情境中夺回控制权。你是在从受害者心态转向掌控感,对吧?

Original English

Speaker A: I get to be you're you're taking back control from the situation. You're shifting from victimhood to control, right?

Seth: 关于这种“感觉自己有掌控力”的想法,以及它如何改变你的人生结果,我读到过两个非常了不起的统计数据。第一个统计是,那些相信自己能掌控生活、能掌控自己幸福感的人,他们对自己整体生活满意度的平均评分是7.4分(满分10分),相比之下,那些觉得自己无法掌控自己处境的人,生活满意度评分是5.6分。

Original English

Seth: There's this remarkable couple of stats that I read about this idea of feeling like you have control and how it changes your outcomes in your life. Um the first stat is people who believe they are in control of their life and have control over their happiness rate their overall life satisfaction at an average of 7.4 out of 10 compared to those that don't feel like they have control over their situation who rate their life satisfaction at 5.6.

Speaker A: 是的。那些整体幸福感较低的人,认为自己个人处境完全不受自己控制的可能性是其他人的五倍。我的意思是,还有一个在养老院做的里程碑式研究。在1976年那项著名的研究中,被给予植物照料任务和一些可以自己做的小日常选择的老年居民,在18个月内的死亡率比那些生活完全由他人照料的居民低了50%。

Original English

Speaker A: Yep. People who report low overall happiness are five times more likely to feel like their own personal situation is entirely outside of their control. I mean, this one's was a landmark study they did in care homes. In a famous 1976 study, elderly residents given plant care and small daily choices that they could make were 50% less likely to die over an 18-month period compared to residents whose care was fully handled for them.

Seth: 是啊。

Original English

Seth: Yeah.

Speaker A: 疯狂,那种感觉自己掌控生活的力量。

Original English

Speaker A: Crazy the power of feeling like you have control in your life.

Seth: 对吧?而且,我不知道具体数据,但当你给临终关怀的病人控制自己止痛药的权利,而不是让他们必须等着别人来给药时,他们不一定真的会吃更多止痛药。关键是“知道他们可以这么做”。回到开会那个例子。如果你有一份工作,整天都要开会,你只能被动接受,那你就失去了对一天的控制。我在这里不是说换工作没有代价。换工作的代价巨大。这就是为什么你到现在都没换。但让我们把它说出来。比如说,重力之所以迷人,是因为它就在那里,但如果我待在一个没有重力或重力很低的星球上,我会想念这里的重力,因为我整个生活都是围绕着重力这个恒定不变的东西建立的。我能生活在一个有重力的星球上。我能成为那种会在100岁之前死去的生物。如果你用这种方式看世界——那是不可避免的,而我每天都要尽我所能去生活——你的人生会跟那些把所有时间都花在琢磨怎么长生不老的人截然不同。

Original English

Seth: Right? And also, I don't know the stats, but when they give uh people in hospice control over their painkillers as opposed to them having to wait for someone to give them a painkiller, they don't necessarily take more painkillers. It was knowing they can do it. Same thing back to the meetings thing. If you have a job where you're going to meetings all day where you just have to know this, you've lost control over your day. And I'm not here to say there's no cost to switching. There's huge cost to switching. That's why you chose not to switch until now. But let's name it. Let's say, you know, gravity is fascinating because it's here, but if I was on a planet that didn't have gravity or had low gravity, I would miss this gravity because I've built my whole life around gravity being this consistent thing. I get to live on a planet with gravity. I get to be the kind of organism that's going to die before he's 100. If you look at the world that way that that's inevitable and I get to inhabit each day the best I can, you're going to have a different life than if you're spending all your time trying to figure out how to live forever.

Speaker A: 我之前从没听说过那个止痛药研究,但你说的时候,我刚好把它调出来了。上面说这是关于“控制感如何改变你的生理和心理体验”的最著名的现实世界演示之一。当医院病人被给予一个按钮可以自行给药止痛时,会发生两件不可思议的事情。第一,他们消耗的止痛药量等于或更少。第二,他们报告的疼痛水平更低,满意度更高。身体上的疼痛本身并不会神奇地改变,但无助感的压力会放大疼痛。

Original English

Speaker A: I'd never heard that painkiller study before, but as you're speaking, I just pulled it up and it says it's one of the most famous real world demonstrations of how the perception of control alters your physical and psychological experience. When hospital patients are given a button to self-administer pain medication, two incredible things happen. Number one is they consume equal or less painkillers. Number two, they report lower pain levels and higher satisfaction. The physical pain itself doesn't magically change, but the stress of helplessness amplifies pain.

Seth: 对吧?

Original English

Seth: Right?

Speaker A: 无助感的压力。我的意思是,这正好回到了我们说的——在你那本新书里——我们很多人正生活在无助感的痛苦中,但有时候,不是总是,但有时候那种无助感在某种程度上是一个故事。

Original English

Speaker A: The stress of helplessness. I mean, it goes right back to what we're saying about the not in your new book, which is a lot of us are living with distress of helplessness, but sometimes, not always, but sometimes that helplessness is in part a story.

Seth: 我会说它总是一个故事,因为我们可以看着一个处于人身奴役中的人。我们可以看着一个经历过创伤的人,我们是在投射我们自己在那样的情境中会有的感受。世界上确实存在所有这些不公平的情境。但问题是,我们的叙事是什么?我们对自己“如何度过这一天”的叙事是什么?我们实际上能控制什么?我们选择坚持哪些情境,因为我们大多数人都有改变的自由,对吧?所以这是我们给自己讲的一个故事,它可能在短期内不会改变外部世界,但它所做的是给我们这种能动性的感觉,这种感觉又给我们一种责任感,进而放大为选择。而我整个职业生涯都在思考如何帮助人们做得更好。

Original English

Seth: I would say it's always a story because we can look at someone who is in human bondage. We can look at someone who's, you know, been through trauma and we are projecting what we would feel in that situation. There are all these unfair situations around there. But then the question is what is our narrative? What is our narrative of how are we living this day? What do we actually have control over? And what situations are we choosing to stick with because most of us have the freedom to shift, right? And so it's a story we tell ourselves that might not change the outside world in the short run, but what it does is it gives us this feeling of agency which then gives us a sense of responsibility which then amplifies into choice and my whole career is about how can I help people do better.

从“做你爱的事”到“爱你做的事”

Speaker A: 我想再给你抛一句名言。这句是关于有意义的工作的。你能也读一下吗?

Original English

Speaker A: I wanted to throw another quote at you here. This one is about meaningful work. So, if you could read that as well.

Seth: 来自沃伦·巴菲特。“在商业世界里,最成功的人是那些做着自己热爱之事的人。”

Original English

Seth: From Warren Buffett. "In the world of business, the people who are most successful are those who are doing what they love."

Speaker A: 这句话我听过一百万遍了。“做你爱做的事。”

Original English

Speaker A: I've heard that a million times. Do what you love.

Seth: 是啊,这句话是反的。抱歉,沃伦。“最成功的人,热爱他们所做之事。”

Original English

Seth: Yeah, it's backwards. Sorry, Warren. "The people who are the most successful love what they do."

Speaker A: 有什么区别?

Original English

Speaker A: What's the difference?

Seth: 嗯,“做你爱做的事”意味着外面有一个游乐园,里面有所有我爱的美食和最好的奖品。我当然爱它。而另一句是一种选择。我选择做这份工作,因为我爱它。以前有个在市中心Dean and Duca咖啡馆工作的人,他有发育障碍,大概50岁了。他是这家Dean and Duca的“市长”。他是那个收拾桌子、把东西摆整齐的人。他热爱这份工作。

Original English

Seth: Well, doing what you love means there's an amusement park out there that has all the treats I love and all the best prizes. Of course, I love it. The other is a choice. I chose to do this work because I love it. There was a guy who worked at the Dean and Duca cafe in Midtown and he was developmentally challenged and he was probably 50 years old. He was the mayor of this Dean and Duca. He was the guy who cleared the tables and kept the things straight. He loved this job.

Speaker A: 你和我在这份工作上大概撑不过15分钟。他热爱这份工作,是因为他决定去热爱这份工作。

Original English

Speaker A: You and I would have lasted 15 minutes in this job. He loved this job because he decided to love this job.

Seth: 马丁·路德·金博士有一句关于清洁工的名言,他说:“如果你必须做一名街道清洁工,至少要在那种情况下、在可能的条件下,选择做最好的街道清洁工。”原因不是你想帮清洁公司。而是因为如果你那样做,你的一天会过得更顺利。我在想,他可能也意味着——虽然他没有明确说,但我的理解是——如果我成为最好的街道清洁工,并不是说那不重要,而是这也会增加我成为其他什么人的可能性,比如被提升,或者,容我说,被选中去做别的事情,或者开创我自己的街道清洁生意,或者你知道,我会和我的客户建立很好的关系,他们可能会……

Original English

Seth: The Reverend King had a great quote about street sweepers and he said, "If you have to be a street sweeper, at least choose to be the best street sweeper in that situation under these conditions that it's possible to be." And the reason is not because you want to help the street sweeping company. It's cuz your day is going to go better if you do that. I was thinking he also meant potentially although he you know I guess he didn't clarify but the way that I perceived it was that if I become the best street sweeper not to say that's that's not an important job it increases my possibility of becoming something else as well of being promoted being dare I say picked to be something else or to start my own street sweeping business or to you know I'm going to build a great relationship with my customers who might be

Speaker A: 而且我认为这两者相互呼应、相互共舞,它们并不矛盾。我们所有人都做过一份我们认为挺好的工作,而走廊那头做同样工作的人却讨厌它,或者反过来。

Original English

Speaker A: And I think they rhyme and dance with each other they don't contradict each other And so all of us have had a job where we thought it was a good job and someone doing the same job down the aisle hated it or vice versa.

Seth: 嗯。

Original English

Seth: Mhm.

Speaker A: 所以很明显,问题不在工作本身。问题在于:我们从哪里来?我们害怕什么?我们相信什么?我们要去哪里?这些才创造了那个为可能性打开大门的故事。

Original English

Speaker A: So clearly it's not the job. It's where did we come from? What are we afraid of? What do we believe? Where are we going? That creates the story that opens the door for possibility.

Seth: 嗯,我想接下来的一些名言也跟这个相关。我的意思是,它们说的都是同一件事,但我们来看看这句。这是马克·吐温的名言,大概每个人都听过。

Original English

Seth: Well, I guess some of these other quotes linked to it then. I mean, they kind of all say the same thing, but let's do this one. This is a famous Mark Twain quote that probably everybody's heard.

Speaker A: 如果你有机会,跟你最喜欢的AI聊聊马克·吐温的名言。

Original English

Speaker A: If you get a chance, talk to your AI favorite AI about Mark Twain quotes.

Seth: 大部分都是假的。

Original English

Seth: The most mostly fake.

Speaker A: 但这是一场很棒的对话。“你一生中最重要的两天,是你出生的那一天,和你找到答案的那一天。”

Original English

Speaker A: But it's it's a great conversation. "The two most important days of your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why."

关于选择、完美主义与真实性的讨论

Speaker A: 我也经常听到这种说法。

Original English

Speaker A: I've heard that a lot as well.

Speaker B: 而我的小小转变,不是在你发现原因的那一天,而是在你决定原因的那一天。因为这不是你与生俱来的东西,这是你选择的东西。如果你下定决心,就像我的朋友杰奎琳那样,说地球上有四亿人每天只赚三、四美元,我要把我生命中的一代人用来帮助他们。你可以去做那件事。但大多数人没有那样的先发优势。大多数人不是从马拉松的20英里处起跑的。有些人的起跑线在别人后面。但我们仍然可以根据我们是谁、我们知道什么、我们能接触到什么,来决定我们要解决哪些问题,以及谁将从我们解决这些问题中受益。我认为这就是吐温想要表达的意思。

Original English

Speaker B: And my small shift is not the day you find out why, it's the day you decide why. Because this isn't something you're born with. This is something you choose. And if you make the decision, like my friend Jacqueline, to say there are 400 million people on this earth who are making three or four dollars a day. I'm going to devote a generation of my life to helping them. You can go do that. And most people don't have the head start. Most people aren't starting at mile 20 of the marathon. Some people are starting behind others. But we still get to decide based on who we are, what we know, what we've got access to, which problems are we going to solve and who's going to benefit from us solving those problems. That is what I think Twain was trying to get at.

Speaker A: 我的最后一个,这个来自一位非常有名的人,我现在正在用他的设备。

Original English

Speaker A: And my last one, this one from a very famous guy whose device I'm using right now.

Speaker B: 唯一做出伟大工作的方式就是热爱你所做的事。没错。如果你还没找到,继续找。不要安于现状。

Original English

Speaker B: The only way to do great work is to love what you do. Bingo. If you haven't found it yet, keep looking. Don't settle.

Speaker A: 那是谁?那是史蒂夫·乔布斯。我觉得“继续找”这部分可能意味着向内看。不要向外看。为什么你现在不爱你所做的事?我们先解开这个。是因为你被不尊重吗?是因为外部对你正在经历的事情的叙述在削弱你希望成为的那个自己吗?如果我们能把这些弄清楚,找到下一件事就会容易得多。你不是在向那种“希望被下一个对的老板选中”的彩票式运气屈服。你可以主动去“雇佣”一个老板。当你雇对了老板,你的工作就会被彻底改变。

Original English

Speaker A: Who is that? That's Steve Jobs. And I think the keep looking part might mean look inside. Don't look over there. Why is it that you don't love what you do right now? Let's unknot that first. Is it because you're being disrespected? Is it because the external narrative of what's happening is undermining who you hope to be? If we can get clear about that, finding the next thing gets way easier. You're not giving in to this lottery of hoping you get picked by the next right boss. You can go hire a boss. And when you hire the right boss, your job is transformed.

完美主义与真实性的陷阱

Speaker A: 很多这些问题的核心,都指向一个词——完美主义。

Original English

Speaker A: At the heart of a lot of this is this word perfectionism.

Speaker B: 那是一个很大的结。你知道,当我想到前几天在苹果店里走到我面前的那位年轻女士,她告诉我她已经想了她的播客两年,也做了两年,但还没有发布。我在那里听到的是,完美主义也许是一种拖延的形式。完美主义每次都是一个陷阱。完美主义与质量毫无关系。“质量”这个词有一个非常具体的含义。它不意味着奢华,它意味着符合规格。所以,1998年丰田赛利卡的质量比1998年劳斯莱斯的质量更高,因为那些零件彼此配合得更好。它们符合规格,没有乱七八糟。如果你对质量不满意,那就把规格定得更好。但完美主义说,“完美”感觉像是一个值得追求的光荣目标,但完美是无法实现的。所以,如果我宣布我是一个完美主义者,我其实是在躲藏,因为我刚刚宣布的是,我永远不需要交付这个东西,因为它永远不会完美。

Original English

Speaker B: That's a big knot. You know, when I thinking about the young lady that came up to me in the Apple store the other day and told me that she's been thinking about her podcast for two years and she's been working on it for two years, but it's never been published yet. What I heard there is perfectionism maybe as a form of procrastination. Perfectionism is a trap every time. Perfectionism has nothing to do with quality. So the word quality has a very specific meaning. It doesn't mean luxury. It means meets spec. So, the quality of a 1998 Toyota Celica was higher than the quality of a Rolls-Royce in 1998 because the pieces fit together better. They met spec. It wasn't all over the place. If you're not happy with the quality, make the spec better. But perfectionism says perfect feels like an honorable thing to pursue, but perfect is unachievable. So, if I announce I'm a perfectionist, I'm hiding because what I've just announced is I'm never going to need to ship this because it's never going to be perfect.

Speaker A: 我觉得另一个也会把人绑成死结的词是“真实性”。

Original English

Speaker A: One of the other words that I think does tie people in knots as well is this word authenticity.

Speaker B: 是的。

Original English

Speaker B: Yeah.

Speaker A: 因为当你真正去想的时候,真实性是一个很可怕的概念。

Original English

Speaker A: Because authenticity is a terrifying concept when you really think about it.

Speaker B: 你怎么看这个观点?

Original English

Speaker B: What do you think of this idea?

Speaker A: 那是个陷阱。而且,真实性是给业余爱好者准备的。

Original English

Speaker A: It's a trap. And authenticity is for amateurs.

Speaker B: 你的朋友需要你真实。你的家人希望你真实。除此之外,没有别人了。专业人士不是“真实”的。专业人士是“一致”的。专业人士做出承诺,然后信守承诺。所以,如果你要做膝盖手术,你不会希望医生“真实地”心情不好然后搞砸了。你希望他们成为最好的自己,即使他们自己并不想那样。而基努·里维斯,他并不是“真实地”就是尼奥。他是个演员。他在假装自己是尼奥。如果他在电影里演的是基努·里维斯本人,那电影就不会好看。在社交媒体上,如果你要一次又一次地出现,除非你是个天后,那我们就看着你自我毁灭,那是我们付费想看的,就像艾米·怀恩豪斯那样。其他所有人,我们都希望他们保持一致。而一致意味着你对自己要做出的承诺做了一个选择,然后你一次又一次地信守这个承诺。所以,当我写博客的时候,我是在扮演“博主赛斯·戈丁”这个角色。那并不是我当时“真实地”的感受。那是我认为“博主赛斯·戈丁”今天会说的最好的版本。我们在一起待过,我很喜欢你,但我不了解你。那是留给你的朋友和伴侣的。所以,“真实性”作为一个流行词,是一种抵抗的形式。它是另一种躲藏的方式。我们说,“哦,我只是在做真实的自己。”不,你只是表现得像个混蛋,这就是我拒绝你的原因。因为你选择当个混蛋,而不是因为你真实。我们说,“我写不出下一本小说,因为那不会真实地反映我是谁。”嗯,是的,但你要为之写小说的人并不认识你。他们只是想读下一本佩里·梅森小说。写那个,否则就离开我们这个圈子,因为那是他们来的目的。

Original English

Speaker B: Your friends need you to be authentic. Your family wants you to be authentic. Nobody else. Professionals are not authentic. Professionals are consistent. Professionals make a promise and they keep it. So if you're having knee surgery, you don't want the doctor to authentically be in a bad mood and screw up. You want them to be the best version of themselves, even if they don't feel like it. And Keanu Reeves, he's not authentically Neo. He's an actor. He's pretending to be Neo. If he was playing Keanu Reeves in the movie, it wouldn't be any good. On social media if you're gonna show up and show up and show up. Unless you're a diva, then we're watching you self-destruct. That's what we're paying for. You know, like Amy Winehouse or something. Everybody else, we want them to be consistent. And consistent means you made a choice about the promise you're going to make and you keep the promise over and over again. So, when I'm writing my blog, I am playing the role of Seth Goden, the blogger. It is not authentically how I felt in that moment. It's my best version of what I think Seth Goden the blogger would say today. And we've spent time together. I like you a lot, but I don't know you. And that's for your friends and your partner. So authenticity as a buzzword is a version of resistance. It's one more way to hide. We say, "Oh, I was just being authentic." No, you were just being a jerk and that's why I rejected you. Because you chose to be a jerk, not because you were authentic. We say, "I can't write the next novel because it wouldn't authentically be who I am." Well, yeah, but the people you're writing the novel from don't know you. They just want to read the next Perry Mason novel. Write that or else get out of this circle we're in because that's what they came for.

一致性与真实自我的舞蹈

Speaker A: 在某种程度上,这两件事是相互交织的。所以,我在想,你知道,作为一个播客主持人,我知道如果我想实现我的目标并继续拥有这种生活,我将不得不做成千上万、成千上万、成千上万、成千上万、成千上万集节目。而我能做到这一点的方法之一,就是尽可能真实,因为我觉得,以那种方式不真实是非常累人的。一个非常实际的意思是,当我看我的团队发给我的嘉宾预约请求清单时,我往下看,看着所有人,我会想,“天哪,好吧,那个人有一亿粉丝,是个超级有名的人。我从来没看过他们的电影。我完全不知道他们是谁,因为我不怎么看电影。”但是,你知道,我想我可以“真实地”假装关心那件事。但这时我脑子里会冒出这个原则,那就是,那样的话,我就无法长期做这件事了。如果我不做那些,恕我直言,那些“真实”的决定,我就无法保持一致。对我来说,如果我坐在这里,试图在那些一小时又一小时又一小时,再乘以一万集的时间里成为别人,我就无法保持一致。

Original English

Speaker A: In some way, these two things are somewhat interlin. So, I was thinking, you know, as a podcaster, I know that I'm going to have to do if I want to sort of accomplish my goals and continue to have this life, I'm going to have to do thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of episodes. And one of the ways that I'm going to be able to do that is by being as authentic as I possibly can because it's very I find it to be very exhausting to be inauthentic in that way. One like very practical way that I mean that is when I look at my guest booking request list that my team sends me. I go down there and I look at all the people. I go, "Oh my god, okay, so that person's got 100 million followers and they're a super famous person. I've never watched their movies. I have no idea who they are cuz I don't really watch many movies." But, you know, I guess I could be authentic and pretend to care about that thing. But then this principle comes into my mind, which is, well, then I wouldn't be able to do this for a long time. I wouldn't be able to be consistent if I didn't make those, dare I say, authentic decisions. For me to sit here and try and be someone else in those hours and hours and hours times by 10,000 episodes, I wouldn't be able to be consistent.

Speaker B: 谢谢你指出这一点。你刚才说的和我说的并不矛盾。我们强调这一点非常重要。你不应该去报名做一件你无法愉快地保持一致的事情。所以,让我们想想一位老师。老师知道他们教的一切。学生对他们教的东西一无所知。所以,有同理心的解决方案,不是“真实地”谈论任何你感兴趣的东西,而是创造条件让你去教别人,这样他们就能开始接近你所处的位置。那是一种承诺,而不是一种“真实性”的东西。那是我要带来什么样的品味,以便我能始终如一地做出承诺并信守承诺。这需要与你如果把它当作爱好时会做的事情相呼应。但它不应该只是你的爱好。当你把你的爱好变成一门生意时,你把两者都毁了。

Original English

Speaker B: Thank you for calling this out. What you just said doesn't contradict what I said. It's really important we highlight this. You should not sign up for something where you cannot happily be consistent. And so let's think about a teacher. The teacher knows everything they're teaching. The students know nothing they're teaching. So the empathic solution is not to authentically talk about whatever is interesting to you. It's to create the conditions for you to teach people so that they can start to get closer to where you are. That's a commitment, not an authenticity thing. It's what kind of taste am I going to bring so I can consistently make a promise and keep it. That needs to rhyme with what you would do if it was your hobby. But it shouldn't be your hobby. When you turn your hobby into a business, you ruin both of them.

Speaker A: 那么,我是否可以得出结论,这就像是我和我的真实自我之间的一种舞蹈,以及我能做些什么来在这个目标上保持一致?这是一支舞蹈吗?

Original English

Speaker A: So, do I conclude then that it's this sort of dance between me and my authentic self and the thing that I can do to be consistent at this goal? Is it a dance?

Speaker B: 这是一支舞蹈,因为快乐的人会找到与他们整体真实自我相呼应的一致性。

Original English

Speaker B: It's a dance because people who are happy find consistency that rhymes with their overall authentic self.

Speaker A: 而他们整体的真实自我,事实证明,会随着他们做出的承诺而随时间改变。所以,如果你和华尔街的人混在一起,即使他们刚得到那份工作时并不是那种大声、短周期的人,他们也会“真实地”变成那样,因为他们周围都是那样的人。归属感、地位,我们会改变。我们不再是过去的我们。所以,我们可以选择这个弧线。从商学院毕业时,我付出了很大代价,选择成为一名创意行业里就业不足的创业者,而不是加入苹果或动视之类的公司。所以,有好几年,我在同龄人的地位阶梯上是落后的。那是对“真实地”成为我想成为的那种人这个漫长弧线的一种投资。但我对自己说,如果我必须向一家工程公司承诺,我每天都要扮演呆伯特,那在结束之前,我内心会一点点死去。我不想那样做。

Original English

Speaker A: And their overall authentic self, it turns out, changes over time based on the promises they made. So if you hang out with people on Wall Street, even if they weren't, you know, loud and short cycle kinds of people when they got the job, they authentically became like that because that's who they were surrounded by. Affiliation, status, we change. We're not who we were. And so, we get to pick this arc. It cost me a lot coming out of business school to be an underemployed entrepreneur in the creative business, not joining, you know, Apple or Activision or something like that. So, for years, I was behind on the status ladder of my peers. That's an investment on the long arc of quote authentically becoming the kind of person I want to be all day. But I said to myself, if I have to make a promise to an engineering company that I'm going to be Dilbert all day every day, I'm going to die a little bit inside until it's over. And I don't want to do that.

关于AI的提问

Speaker A: 所有行业都在变化。AI。你对这个从天而降的疯狂新技术有什么看法?

Original English

Speaker A: All industries are changing. AI. What are your thoughts on this crazy new technology that has come down from?

Speaker B: 所以,所以……

Original English

Speaker B: So, so……

从科幻到现实:AI 时代的两个核心观点

Speaker A: 我的背景是这样的——1983 年我在斯坦福读书时,选修了 Doug Lenat 的一门博士课程,他是人工智能的先驱之一。我的第一份正式工作还和 Isaac Azimov 以及 Arthur C. Clark 合作过。所以,我这一辈子都是个科幻爱好者,一直在思考 AI 这件事。

Original English

Speaker A: My background here is, uh, when I was at Stanford in 1983, I took a PhD course with Doug Lenat who was one of the fathers of AI. I worked with Isaac Azimov and Arthur C. Clark in my first real job. So, I've been a science fiction person thinking about AI my whole life.

Speaker A: 所以,当它终于出现的时候,我的反应是:“没错,它终于来了。”而且我已经写了好一阵子关于 AI 的东西了。我也做过一些和 AI 相关的产品。这里有两个我的核心观点。第一,这是自电力以来我们世界最大的变革。第二,要么你为 AI 工作,要么 AI 为你工作。

Original English

Speaker A: And so, when it finally showed up, I was like, "Yes, it's finally here." And I'd been writing about it for a while. While I did some AI related products. Here's my two big ideas. Number one, this is the biggest change in our world since electricity. And number two, either you work for AI or AI works for you.

Speaker A: 这两句话是什么意思呢?1890 年的时候,有些公司和工人说:“哎呀,我就等着电力消失吧。我就继续当我的铁匠或者别的什么。”结果怎么样?结果很不好。现在的情况和那时一样,但速度快得多得多。至于 AI 那一点——如果你为 AI 工作,它可不会善待你。这份工作不会稳定,也不会让你开心,因为老板们会不断驱使 AI 去做所有好的部分,而让你去当零工,做那些 AI 还做不了的部分。但如果你能说:我用 AI 来连接人类。我用 AI 来构建人际网络。我们不知道如何取代人际网络。AI 也永远不可能取代人际网络。如果你被信任、能连接他人、能领导他人,同时用上你想要的任何 AI 工具,你永远不会为生计发愁。所以你要说的是:好,既然我有这些工具,我该怎么用它们——不是去当 OpenAI 的低配版,而是像电影院用电那样去用它们,对吧?电力公司把电带给了很多企业,但只有电影院想出了怎么让你掏 5 美元看一场电影。

Original English

Speaker A: And what do I mean by those two things? There were companies and workers in 1890 who said, "Ah, I'll wait for electricity to go away. I'm just going to keep being a blacksmith or whatever it is." That did not work out very well. This is like that but much much faster. And then the AI thing is if you work for an AI, it's not going to treat you very well. It's not going to be secure and it's not going to make you happy because bosses are going to keep pushing the AI to do all the good parts and you to be a gig worker for all the parts that the AI can't do yet. But if you can say, I use AI to connect humans. I use AI to build a network of people. We don't know how to replace networks of people. And AI is never going to be able to replace networks of people. If you are trusted and connecting and leading using whatever AI tools you want, you're never going to have trouble making a living. And so that's what you say, okay, if I have these tools, how do I use them not to be a junior, smaller version of open AI, but use them the same way that the movie theater used electricity, right? That the electric company brought electricity to lots of businesses, but it took a movie theater to figure out how to get you to pay $5 to see the movie.

Speaker B: 你在回答里用了“people”和“humans”这两个词,这让我想到——也许在人工智能的世界里,最大的机会不是去当全世界最棒的会计师,因为也许 AI 在这方面会非常厉害,而是所有那些和人有关的事情。

Original English

Speaker B: You used the word people and humans within that answer and it made me made me sort of think that actually maybe the great opportunity in in a world of artificial intelligence is not to try and be the world's best accountant because maybe the intelligence is going to be great at that but all the human stuff.

Speaker A: 没错。

Original English

Speaker A: Correct.

Speaker B: 所有那些关于人和人际的事情。

Original English

Speaker B: All the human and the people stuff.

Speaker A: 是的,完全正确。好的品味。理解谁信任你,以及为什么信任你。很少有工作是——如果我能把你一天做的事写下来,我找不到一个 AI 能比你做得更快、更便宜。

Original English

Speaker A: Yes. Exactly right. Good taste. Understanding who trusts you and why. There are very few jobs where if I can write down what you do all day, I can't find an AI to do it faster and cheaper than you.

Speaker B: 有意思。

Original English

Speaker B: Interesting.

Speaker A: 所以,你要找的是那种我无法把你一天做的事写下来的工作(笑声),那样你就没问题了。

Original English

Speaker A: So, you want a job where I can't write down what you do all day [laughter] and then you'll be fine.

Speaker B: 嗯,那个“安静离职”的人……

Original English

Speaker B: Well, the quiet quitter is

Speaker A: 我的意思是,你想想簿记员是做什么的?我可以把簿记的所有规则写下来,明天就雇一个不同的簿记员,我的生意也不会垮。这种事 AI 会变得非常擅长,而且会非常快,因为一旦我们能写下规则,AI 就知道怎么遵守规则。另一方面,像你刚才说的——你对下一位嘉宾应该请谁有很好的品味。这个算法你写不出来。你对所处世界的感知。你读过那么多书,见过那么多人,和那么多听众聊过天。这些我没法全部写下来,再配上指令,让 Claude 替我做。

Original English

Speaker A: Well, I mean, so if you think about what does a bookkeeper do? I can write down all the rules of bookkeeping and hire a different bookkeeper tomorrow and my business isn't going to fail. That's something AI is going to get really good at. really fast because once we can write down rules, AI knows how to follow them. On the other hand, somebody the way you were talking about u your good taste about who the next guest should be. You can't write down the algorithm for how to do that. your awareness of the world you're in. The fact that you have read so many books, met so many people, talked to so many listeners. I can't write all that down with instructions to get Claude to do that for me.

人际连接的价值:从 Bali Breath Work 说起

Speaker B: 我其实想到了我的未婚妻。她经营着一家叫 Bali Breath Work 的公司,她做的是带女性去参加为期七天的静修。我看到那些女性发来的反馈、推荐语和视频,她们都爱死这次体验了。

Original English

Speaker B: I was thinking about my fiance actually. She runs a business called Bali Breath Work and what she does is she takes women away on these retreats for seven days. And I see these these the the sort of feedback and the testimonials and the videos that these women send and they love it. Mhm.

Speaker A: 我总对她说,别担心她们从这次体验里得到的大部分东西——其实是彼此。

Original English

Speaker A: I always say to her, don't worry about most of what they got out of it is each other.

Speaker B: 是啊。

Original English

Speaker B: Yeah.

Speaker A: 当我们让计算机网络接管一切时,它不断把我们推离彼此。它假装我们在社交媒体上连接着,但人们比以往任何时候都更孤独。但当我们想明白如何把人与人连接起来时,我们就创造了价值。归根结底,如果你想谋生,你就必须创造价值。而那些现在正拼命削减成本的老板们,他们毫无想象力。他们说:“哦,这东西便宜,是超级离岸劳动力。它叫计算机。我可以裁掉 400 个客服代表。”

Original English

Speaker A: And when we let the computer networks take over, it keeps pushing us away from each other. It pretends we're connecting on social media, but people are more lonely than ever before. But when we figure out how to connect human to human, we create value. And ultimately, if you want to make a living, you're going to have to create value. And the bosses that are right now cost reducing as fast as they can have no imagination. They're saying, "Oh, this is cheap, super offshore labor. It's called a computer. I can get rid of 400 customer service reps."

Speaker B: 他们在竞相触底。有些人在竞相登顶。我怎样才能让这件事更有人情味?我怎样才能做到——既然我已经用这些 AI 工具增强了医生的能力,他们现在应该花更多时间在每位病人身上,而不是更少时间?

Original English

Speaker B: They're racing to the bottom. Some people are racing to the top. How can I make this more human? How can I make it so that now that I've augmented doctors with these AI tools, they're going to spend more time per patient, not less time per patient? Mhm.

Speaker A: 因为我们知道,那些医生花更多时间陪伴的病人,满意度更高。

Original English

Speaker A: Because we know that patients that have doctors that spend more time with them are more satisfied.

Speaker B: 所以那是一个商业优势,因为现在人们要么待在家里,和“谷歌医生”聊聊,搞清楚自己得了什么病,然后永远不去看医生;要么他们可以去看一个值得花钱的医生,因为那个医生有一个 AI 在为他工作。

Original English

Speaker B: So that's a business advantage because now someone can either stay home, talk to Dr. Google and figure out what's wrong with them and never go to the doctor or they can go to a doctor that's worth paying for because that doctor has an AI working for them.

Speaker A: 非常正确。

Original English

Speaker A: It's very true.

书的封面与 Dame Fina Cooper 的故事

Speaker B: 我们还有没有其他没聊到、但应该聊的话题?显然,我希望大家都去买这本书。嗯,我很喜欢你在这上面做的设计。我觉得这大概值得花一秒钟说说,但我的意思是,你懂那种感觉吗——当你看到一个想法,就希望它是你自己的?(笑声)这就是一个这样的例子。

Original English

Speaker B: Is there anything else in the knot that we haven't talked about that we should have talked about? Obviously, I want everyone to go and buy the book. Um, I I I love what you did on here. I think this is probably worth just spending a second on, but I mean, do you know when you see an idea and you just wish it was yours? [laughter] This is one such example.

Speaker A: 是啊,那是我网站上所有预购这本书的人的名字,然后我用了一个灰色调。所以如果你从合适的距离看过去,它会显示出“purpose”这个词——意思就是,你想做的项目是什么?

Original English

Speaker A: Yeah, that's the names of all the people who pre-ordered the book from my site and then I used a a gray tone. So if you look at it from a distance just right, it says the word purpose as in what is the project you're trying to do?

Speaker A: 让我用 Dame Fina Cooper 的故事来收尾吧。因为很多时候我们谈的是个人层面的事——这个优步司机应该怎么做?但有时候我们谈的是系统性的不公——我们都是受害者吗?Dame Cooper 是一位原住民,在新西兰长大。新西兰是英国殖民的最后几个主要国家之一,所以大量原住民土地被夺走,原住民在很多方面被剥夺了权利。想想这件事,真的很悲惨。Dame Cooper 在 78 岁左右的时候,决定利用她在所属部落中的地位和关系,来吸引整个国家的注意力,试图把原住民权利提上议程。你看看这个例子:这个女人,她不出名。她没有很多钱。她快 80 岁了。她能做什么呢?这是一个问题,或者说,这是一个局面。如果它是一个局面,我们该怎么办?就这么忍着?但如果它是一个问题,那我们就来找找看,有哪些环节可以推动进展。她组织了 50 个人。我们大多数人也能组织 50 个人。他们开始向国会大厦进军,并且提前做了宣传工作。日复一日,持续了一个多月,这群人一直向国会大厦走去。走到一半的时候,她已经登上了新西兰每一份报纸的头版。现在有 100 人、200 人、2000 人了。等他们到达首都时,有 4000 人耐心地并肩行进。他们向议会提交了他们的诉求、要求和建议。虽然为时已晚,力度也不够。但从一个非常大的意义上说,它改变了整个国家的文化,改变了土地分配的法律,带来了真正根本性的改变。她不是一个人做到的,但她明白自己有足够的能动性去连接其他人,去创造一种文化,去一次次地出现、出现、再出现,带着一种实践。所以,如果一个 80 岁的老妇人能改变整个国家,我们能做什么?对吧?我们没法开车去伦敦或华盛顿特区,改变一切。但我们能做的是找到其他人,编出我们能讲给自己和别人听的故事,建立一个新的常态。世界改变的唯一方式,就是几个人聚在一起,建立一种文化,然后一遍又一遍地重复它。

Original English

Speaker A: Let me close with the story of of Dame Fina Cooper because a lot of times we talk about, you know, the personal thing. What should this Uber driver do? But then there other times we talk about systemic injustice. Are we all victims? So Dame Cooper was uh an indigenous person growing up in New Zealand and New Zealand was the last major country to be colonized by the United Kingdom and so huge amounts of native lands were taken and the uh indigenous people were disenfranchised in a lot of ways. It's really tragic when you think about it. And Dame Cooper at the age of 78 or so decided that she would use her status and affiliation within the tribe she was part of to capture the attention of the entire nation and try to put indigenous people's rights on the agenda. So you look at this and say here's this woman, she doesn't she's not famous. She doesn't have a lot of money. She's almost 80 years old. What could she possibly do? this is a problem or it's a situation. If it's a situation, what are we gonna do? Just live with it. But if it's a problem, let's figure out where are the pieces to make progress happen. She organizes 50 people. Most of us could organize 50 people. And they start marching to the Capitol and they do the work to spread the the news in advance. And day after day after day for more than a month, this group of people is walking to the Capitol. She's on the front page of every newspaper in New Zealand by halfway through. Now there's a 100 people, 200 people, 2,000 people. By the time they get to the capital, there are 4,000 people patiently marching side by side. And they presented their demands, requirements, suggestions to the parliament. And too late, not enough. But in a very big way, it shifted the culture of the entire country, changed the laws about how land was allocated and made a really fundamental difference. She didn't do that by herself, but she understood she had enough agency to connect the others, to create a culture, to show up and show up and show up with a practice. So, if one 80-year-old woman can change an entire country, what can we do? Right? We can't drive to London or Washington DC and change everything. But what we can do is find the others, come up with the story we can tell ourselves and the others and establish a new normal. The only way the world has ever changed is when a few people come together, build a culture and repeat it over and over and over again.

Speaker B: 不知为什么,当你讲那个故事的时候——那是一个非常鼓舞人心的故事——“死亡”这个主题浮现在我的脑海里。因为我又一次进入了听众的世界,我想我问自己:你怎么制造那种紧迫感,让你今天就去做,而不是等到明天?

Original English

Speaker B: For some reason when you talked about that and it was it was a very um motivating thing to hear the the subject of death came into my mind because I again I've dropped into the world of the listener right now and I guess I asked myself how you create that tension to do it today and not tomorrow

Speaker A: 对。

Original English

Speaker A: right

Speaker B: 因为……

Original English

Speaker B: because

不完美的选择与行动的张力

主持人: 永远都不会有完美的时机。明天会不完美,下周也会不完美。那么,当你面对一大堆不完美的选项时,你如何制造足够的张力,让此刻正在听的人真的去行动?

Original English

Host: There's never going to be a perfect time. Tomorrow is going to be imperfect. Next week's going to be imperfect. So, when faced with like lots of imperfect options, how do you create enough tension to get whoever's listening right now to like go do it?

赛斯·戈丁: 是啊。当你梦想成为的那个人,遇见了你最终成为的那个人,那次会面会是什么样子?你如何成为那个未来的自己会感谢的人?因为我们大多数人都有遗憾。“我希望我在20岁、30岁或40岁的时候做了某件事。”那份遗憾是一种强大的燃料。你在我们开始录制之前跟我说过关于遗憾的事。

Original English

Seth Godin: Yeah. When the person you're dreaming of becoming meets the person you become, how's that meeting going to go? How do you become the person your future self thanks you for? Because most of us have regret. I wish I had done something when I was 20 or 30 or 40. Well, that regret's a powerful fuel. You said this to me before we started recording about regret.

主持人: 是的。

Original English

Host: Yeah.

主持人: 你说过,实际上关键不在于你想完成什么。我想你说的是,关键在于那些你希望自己当初做了的事情。

Original English

Host: And you said that it's actually not about what you want to accomplish. I think you said it's actually about some of the things that you wish you had done.

赛斯·戈丁: 是的。所以当我回想自己的错误时——

Original English

Seth Godin: Yeah. So when I think about my mistakes—

主持人: 嗯。

Original English

Host: Yeah.

赛斯·戈丁: ——我犯过太多错误了。我最遗憾的错误,是那些我没去做的事,而不是那些我尝试过却失败了的事。那个我没帮助的人,那堂我没教的课,那扇我没打开的门。因为忽略那些事情然后继续往前走,是很容易的。但我们的力量、我们的杠杆、我们的能动性,就在于能够说:“有一件我可以做的事。街角有个人需要帮助。我们如何创造一件未来的自己会感谢我们今天做了的事?”所以我花了两年时间组织《碳年鉴》,有1900位合著者,对我来说是全职的志愿工作。我们1900个人从彼此相见、彼此合作、意识到我们可以对自己的气候问题认知有所作为中,都得到了收获。然后它成了五六个国家的畅销书,为许多参与者打开了门,让他们获得更多杠杆,去做下一件事。但当我回想那一天,我说:“嗯,我可以发点东西看看谁会来。”当时说“算了,我们去看《星际迷航》吧”是超级容易的。但那个习惯、那个练习,说“好,这是下一件事”——那开启了一个正向的生成循环。而且它有传染性。这就是这种病毒式传播的魔力。如果“我能为谁打开一扇门”这个生成性的、有传染性的想法传播开来,那么你最终很可能生活在一个更接近你理想中的世界。

Original English

Seth Godin: Yeah. So when I think about my mistakes— Yeah. And I've had so many mistakes. The mistakes I regret the most are the things I didn't do, not the things I tried that failed. The person I didn't help, the lesson I didn't teach, the door I didn't open. Because it's easy to ignore those things and just move on. But that's our power, our leverage, our agency is to be able to say, "There's a thing I could do. There's someone on that street corner who needs a hand. How do we build a thing that our future self will thank us for doing today?" And so I spent two years organizing the carbon almanac with 1900 co-authors, full-time volunteer work for me. And the 1900 of us got something out of seeing each other, working with each other, realizing we could do something about our understanding of our climate problem. And then it became a bestseller in five or six countries and opened the door for many of the people who participated in it to have more leverage and to do the next thing. But when I think about that day when I said, "Well, I could post something about this and see who shows up." It would have been super easy to say, "Nah, let's just go see what's on Star Trek today." But the habit, the practice of saying, "Okay, this is the next thing." That begins this generative positive cycle. And it's contagious. And that's the magic of this sort of virus. If the generative contagious idea of who can I open a door for spreads, then you're probably going to end up living in a world that's more like the world you want to live in.

持续行动的动力

主持人: 你为什么继续做这些事?因为你写的书比我搬得动的还多。我的意思是,你知道,你到的时候我跟你说过,当我刚开始做营销这行的时候——你知道,那个失败的网站后来基本上变成了一家营销公司——然后每个人进入营销行业时都会给你这本书,就是你的书《这就是营销》,他们一直在用你的想法。我的意思是,有人会说,赛斯,你已经做得够多了。也许现在是时候好好享受了。他们可能会这么说。你为什么还继续?

Original English

Host: Why do you continue to do things? Because you've written more books here than I could bloody carry. I mean, you know, I was saying to you when you arrived that when I started my career as a marketeteer, which is, you know, that website that failed turned into a marketing business essentially and then I and then people everybody gives you this book when you get into marketing, which is your book, this is marketing, and they use your ideas all the time. I mean, one could say, Seth, you've done enough. Uh, maybe now is a good time to just enjoy it. they might say. Why do you keep going?

赛斯·戈丁: 你知道,很多年前当我发明电子邮件营销的时候,我需要靠它谋生、吃饭,看着一个行业从中成长起来,那种感觉很兴奋。但在那之后,写书不是一个好的谋生方式,但却是一个相当好的改变世界的方式。我说过,不要把你的爱好变成生意,因为你会把两者都毁掉。但有趣的是,想想把你的生意变成爱好,变成你热爱做的事。如果有人对我说“你不能再分享想法了”,我不太确定我该怎么度过我的日子。对我来说,当我听到有人说“我从某人那里学到了东西,那个人是从另一个人那里学到的,那个人又是从你那里学到的”——那太令人兴奋了。我唯一想做的就是为人们点亮一些灯,给他们一些尊严,创造下一个循环。如果你投身于这件事,我不确定你怎么能停下来。

Original English

Seth Godin: You know, when I invented email marketing all those years ago, I needed to do it to make a living, to eat, and it was thrilling to watch an industry grow up out of that. But after that, writing books is a lousy way to make a living, but it's a pretty good way to make a difference. And I said, don't turn your hobby into a business because you'll ruin both of them. But it's interesting to think about turning your business into a hobby, into the thing you love to do. And if someone said, "I can't share ideas anymore." I'm not exactly sure how I would spend my day. For me, when I hear from somebody who says, "I learned something from someone who learned it from someone who learned it from someone who learned it from you." That's thrilling. The only thing I'm trying to do is turn on some lights for people, offer them some dignity, and create the next cycle. And if you sign up for that, I'm not sure how you can stop.

给困在“结”中的人

主持人: 现在,也许,只是也许,听着,我不是那么迷信,但也许有一些人找到了这段对话,他们听到了这里,是出于某种原因。我想那是因为他们正处于——你知道,他们在某个地方有个“结”。所以,为了那些现在有点被困住的人收个尾,可能是工作、感情、暧昧关系,不管是什么。你对那些有点卡住、正处在可能迈出一步、向前一跃的悬崖边上,但他们有点被绑住了——就像这些结一样——的人,有什么总结性的话?

Original English

Host: Now, maybe, just maybe, listen, I'm not that superstitious, but maybe there's a couple of people that found this conversation and they got to this point in the conversation for some kind of reason. And I imagine it's because they are in, you know, they have their knot somewhere. So, just to close off for those people who currently are in a bit of a knot, it could be a job, a relationship, a situationship, whatever it might be. What is your sort of closing remarks to those people that are a bit stuck and that are on that precipice of maybe taking a leap, a step forward, but they're tied up a little bit like these knots are.

赛斯·戈丁: 是的。你并不孤单。我们都是。我们每一个人,尤其是我,我们都在某件事上卡住了。

Original English

Seth Godin: Yeah. You're not alone. We all are. Every single one of us, especially me, we're all stuck it with something.

主持人: 是的。

Original English

Host: Yeah.

赛斯·戈丁: 你可以原谅这一点,然后说:“好吧,今天我能为谁做贡献?我能向谁提供帮助,也许还能请求帮助?”这并不意味着你所在的位置是公平的,也不意味着你的感受不是真实的。它是真实的。唯一的问题是:我们下一步要做什么?

Original English

Seth Godin: And you can forgive that and then say, "Okay, who can I contribute to today? who can I offer help to and maybe ask for help? And it doesn't mean that where you are is fair and it doesn't mean that what you're feeling isn't real. It is real. The only question is what will we do next?

选择倾听哪个声音

主持人: 我也真的把之前我们谈到的那个想法铭记在心,就是搞清楚你到底在为哪个声音服务。

Original English

Host: I've really sort of taken to heart this idea as well that you we talked about earlier of um just being really clear on which voice you're serving.

赛斯·戈丁: 嗯。

Original English

Seth Godin: Mhm.

主持人: 因为每个人的生活越来越嘈杂。

Original English

Host: Because everyone's life is a noisy place increasingly.

赛斯·戈丁: 是的。你知道,我们在数字意义上如此紧密相连。我们与他人的生活如此紧密相连。即使没有人直接冲我们喊叫,告诉我们去做什么、成为谁,他们的生活本身也在喊叫。

Original English

Seth Godin: Yeah. You know, we're so connected in a digital sense. We're so connected to other people's lives. And even if someone isn't directly shouting at us and telling us what to go be and who to become, their life is.

主持人: 是的。

Original English

Host: Yeah.

赛斯·戈丁: 看到他们在夏威夷的海滩上喝着玛格丽塔,就是在冲我喊叫,告诉我我的生活很糟糕,我应该改变它,我应该更像他们。

Original English

Seth Godin: Seeing them in Hawaii on a beach having a margarita is shouting at me, telling me that my life sucks and that I should change it and that I should be more like them.

主持人: 在这样一个嘈杂的世界里,我想也许你留给我的一些最关键的忠告,就是这个核心想法:搞清楚在我生命中,我要听哪个声音。

Original English

Host: And in such a noisy world, I think maybe some of the most critical advice you've left me with is this central idea of like getting clear on which voice in my life I'm going to listen to.

赛斯·戈丁: 是的。

Original English

Seth Godin: Yeah.

主持人: 因为当我们试图服务所有声音时,我们就会失败,最终陷入一个结。

Original English

Host: Cuz we fail. We end up in a knot when we try and serve them all.

感谢与《结》的发布

赛斯·戈丁: 人们能拥有这个节目真的很幸运。你呈现的方式,你多年来一直在讲述这种旅程,你可能不常听到这句话,但这很重要,谢谢你做这件事。

Original English

Seth Godin: People are really lucky to have this show. The way you show up, you've been narrating this kind of journey for years now and you probably don't hear it often enough, but it's important and thank you for doing it.

主持人: 哦,这真是来自我个人偶像之一的难以置信的赞美。我非常感激。《结》这本书里的问题是可以解决的。九月出版。如果现在是九月,它已经上市了。如果不是,你可以预订。下面会有链接。但我想,你知道,再次强调,放在世界的背景下,我认为不幸的是,我们可能会发现自己陷入更多的结。所以,我认为这是一本很棒的书,可以买给你生活中可能自己也有点纠结的人。但如果你发现自己也身处其中,也买一本给自己。赛斯,我们播客有一个收尾传统,最后一位嘉宾会给下一位嘉宾留一个问题,不知道会留给谁。留给你的问题是:如果给你机会永生,你会接受吗?

Original English

Host: Oh, well that's a unbelievable compliment coming from one of my sort of personal icons. So, I appreciate that a lot. The knot problems can be solved. Comes out in September. If it's September, it's out now. If it's not, you can pre-order it. There'll be a link um below. But I think, you know, again, in the context of the world, I think unfortunately we might find ourselves in even more knots. So, this is a wonderful thing, I think, to buy for somebody in your life that might be in a little bit of a knot themselves. Um, but also to buy for yourself if you find yourself in one. Seth, we have a closing tradition on this podcast where the last guest leaves a question for the next, not knowing who they're leaving it for. And the question left for you, if you were given the opportunity to live forever, would you take it?

赛斯·戈丁: 不会。回答得很快吧。(笑声)我认为作为唯一一个永生的人行走在世界中,会是令人心碎的,而且会比你想的更快地耗尽你。如果每个人都永生,我想我们会作为一个星球遵循不同的规则,那会非常迷人。但问题不是那个。我想如果你读足够多的科幻小说,你会意识到选择性的永生是一个真正的诅咒。

Original English

Seth Godin: No. That was quick. [laughter] I think walking through the world as the only immortal person would be heartbreaking and innovating and wear you out much faster than you think. If everyone was immortal, I think we would play by different rules as a planet and that would be fascinating. But that wasn't the question. I think if you read enough science fiction, you realize that selective immortality is a real curse.

主持人: 为什么?因为你身边的每个人都在死去,而你没有。每一天,每个人都在一点点死去。而我们通过彼此的联系来定义我们的人性。

Original English

Host: Why? Because everyone around you is dying and you're not. Every single day, everyone's dying just a little bit more. And we define our humanity by our connections.

赛斯·戈丁: 而且我们都在这段旅程上。突然之间,你选择退出了这段旅程。你是船上唯一一个不去船要去的地方的人。短期内,我的肩膀不疼了,我的声音修好了,诸如此类的事情会很好,但那很快就会让人厌倦。

Original English

Seth Godin: And we're all on this journey together. And all of a sudden, you opted out of the journey. You're the only person on the boat that's not going where the boat's going. And in the short run, it would be nice that my shoulders didn't hurt and that my voice was fixed and things like that, but that would get old really fast.

主持人: 那个关于联系的观点太有趣了,因为它立刻让我想到我的朋友圈。我有五个最好的朋友,我们已经认识了15年,我们一起经历人生的各个阶段。比如,他们现在都开始有孩子了,而我目前也在努力要孩子,所以我们一起聊这个,一起为此建立联系。你知道,这让我想到——实际上,我的噩梦会是成为唯一一个……

Original English

Host: That point of connection is so interesting because it immediately made me think about my friendship circle. I've got these five best friends that I've had for the last 15 years and we're all progressing through the life stages together. Like they've all started having kids now and then I'm trying to have a kid at the moment and so we're like talking about that together and we're connecting about that together and it makes you know and actually my nightmare would be to be the only one…

收尾与告别

Speaker A: 那不在那个人生阶段里,对吧,现在。我觉得自己有些脱节。

Original English

Speaker A: That wasn't in that life phase, right now. I feel disconnected.

Speaker B: 是啊。

Original English

Speaker B: Yeah.

Speaker A: 天哪。如果我能永远活着,我会……是啊。不,我从来没有想过要永远活着。我觉得,人们需要思考生活中所有事情的权衡,尤其是关于长寿这个想法——拥抱当下,你就会失去那个(永恒)。

Original English

Speaker A: Gosh. If I lived forever, I would... Yeah. No, I've never wanted to live forever. I think it's people need to think about the trade-offs of everything in their life, but particularly this idea of longevity—embracing this moment, you lose that.

Speaker B: 在我们结束之前,我强烈建议大家也去读读你的博客。我会把链接放在下面。

Original English

Speaker B: I highly recommend just before we do wrap up, people go read your blog as well. I'm going to link that below.

Speaker A: 谢谢你,Seth。我们聊完了。

Original English

Speaker A: Thank you, Seth. We're done.

Speaker B: 真是一次享受。

Original English

Speaker B: What a treat.

结尾推荐

Speaker B: YouTube 现在有一种新的疯狂算法,它基于 AI 和你所有的观看行为,能准确知道你想看的下一个视频是什么。算法说这个视频对你来说就是完美的。现在每个人看到的都不一样。去看看这个视频吧,我打赌你可能会喜欢它。

Original English

Speaker B: YouTube have this new crazy algorithm where they know exactly what video you would like to watch next based on AI and all of your viewing behavior. And the algorithm says that this video is the perfect video for you. It's different for everybody looking right now. Check this video out and I bet you you might love it.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

关键字: problem-solving personal-growth mindset-shift overcoming-resistance