非语词社交心理学:重构人际互动的存在感与影响力系统 Big Think 2026-06-05

第一印象的底层架构:亲和力与胜任力的双重公式

我是行为研究员兼畅销书作家瓦妮莎·范·爱德华兹(Vanessa Van Edwards)。我的著作《吸引力》(Captivate)和《暗示》(Cues)向人们传授了97种具备魅力的信号。我也在哈佛大学教授沟通课程,并为希望学习社交技能的聪明人提供在线课程。今天在Big Think,我将探讨如何塑造完美的第一印象,如何建立令人难忘的存在感,以及如何进行有影响力的沟通。

首先我们来探讨第一印象的塑造。第一印象对每一次人际互动都至关重要,它是良好互动的基石。如果你能在最初的几秒钟内成功锁定第一印象,互动中的一切都会变得更加顺利。反之,如果你留下了一个尴尬、糟糕或心不在焉的第一印象,建立连接的每一个环节都会变得异常艰难。在这最初的几秒钟里,你其实在试图建立两件核心要素:存在感和信任。你越能清晰地传达出一种令人难忘且卓有成效的存在感,你的互动就会越轻松。关于第一印象,有一个巨大的误解,即认为它发生在你开口说话的那一刻。我很不想带来坏消息,但你的第一印象其实发生在别人第一眼看到你的那一刻。这意味着你只有几秒钟,甚至不到一秒钟的时间,去构建整场互动所需的信任基础。

那么核心问题来了:什么是存在感(Presence)?苏珊·菲斯克博士(Dr. Susan Fisk)关于我们如何与他人建立连接的基础性研究指出,存在感包含两个不可或缺的元素:

  • 亲和力(Warmth):代表你的可信度、讨喜程度和开放性。
  • 胜任力(Competence):代表你的效能、能力和生产力,它与亲和力同等重要。

当我们初次结识某人时,我们的大脑会试图极其迅速地判断:你有多亲切?你有多能干?具体来说,作为人类,我们试图回答两个基本问题:“我能信任你吗?”(亲和力)以及“我能依赖你吗?”(胜任力)。那些拥有不可思议且令人难忘存在感的人,都在极快地试图回答这两个问题。对你而言,你越快地回答这两个问题——“你可以信任我”、“你可以依赖我”——你的存在感就越令人难忘、越有效。当我最初阅读这项研究,看到这个基本上是由亲和力与胜任力构成的惊艳公式时,研究中有一个部分让我陷入了深思,我们也必须在此提及:这里所指的并非你实际拥有的亲和力与胜任力,而是你被感知到的(Perceived)亲和力与胜任力。这意味着,即使你是房间里最聪明、最值得信赖的人,如果你没有清晰地释放出那种亲和力与胜任力的信号,人们也依然不会相信。

我认为这是存在感中最关键的层面。如果你在互动中展现出真实的值得信赖的特质(我希望你是这样的),并且精通你的专业领域,我们就必须用亲和力与胜任力的信号将其清晰地传递出来,好让人们相信我们的存在感。我们的目标绝不是伪装自信,而是要将你内在的真实意图与外在的表达完美对齐。

Original English Source

I'm Vanessa Van Edwards. I'm a behavioral researcher and best-selling author. My books, Captivate and Cues teach people the 97 signals to be charismatic. I also teach communication at Harvard University and have online courses for smart people who want to learn social skills. Today on Big Think, I'm going to be talking about how to make a great first impression, how to create a memorable presence, and how to communicate with influence.

Chapter one, how to make a great first impression. A first impression is so important for every interaction. It's the foundation for a good interaction. If you can nail your first impression in those first few seconds, everything in the interaction becomes easier. On the other hand, if you make an awkward or a bad or a disengaged first impression, everything about your connection becomes harder. Those first few seconds, you're trying to establish two things: presence and trust. The clearer you can signal your presence as memorable and effective, the easier your interaction will be. A big myth about first impressions is that your first impression happens the moment you start talking. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but your first impression happens the moment someone first sees you. That means you only have a few seconds, sometimes less than a second to form that foundation of trust that you need for an entire interaction. The big question is what is presence? There's foundational research from Dr. Susan Fisk that looks at how we connect with others. There are two essential elements for presence. First, warmth. This is your trust, your likability, your openness. But second, just as important, is your competence. That's your effectiveness, your capability, your productivity.

When we first meet someone, we're trying to very quickly decide how warm are you and how competent are you? Specifically, as humans, we're trying to answer two basic questions. Can I trust you? Warmth. And can I rely on you? Competence. People with an incredible presence, a memorable presence, are very quickly trying to answer those two questions. And for you, the faster you can answer those two questions, you can trust me, you can rely on me, the more memorable and effective your presence is. When I first read this research and saw this amazing, basically a formula for presence on warmth and competence, there was one part of the research that made me take pause and we have to mention it here. This is not your actual warmth and competence. It's your perceived warmth and competence. Meaning, you can be the smartest, most trustworthy person in the room, but if you're not clearly signaling that warmth and competence, people will not believe it. I think this is the most important aspect of presence. If you are showing up to your interactions authentically trustworthy, which I hope you are, and knowing your stuff, we have to clearly signal that with warmth and competence for people to believe in our presence. The goal is not to fake confidence. It's to align your inner intention with your outer expression.

信号博弈:非语词线索的四大通道与情绪闭环

那么问题在于,我们如何解读他人的亲和力与胜任力?一切都归结于我们的线索(Cues:人类在社交中向彼此发送的微妙且强大的信号)。实际上,线索分为四大通道:

  • 词语(Words):这是我们使用最频繁的通道。没错,词汇传达了我们的思想,但我们所使用的具体词语同样也在释放亲和力与胜任力的信号。
  • 非语词行为(Non-verbal):包括我们的肢体语言、面部表情和手势。它们同样在传递信任、亲和力、胜任力、可靠性或学识。
  • 声音与音调(Vocal Tonality):这涵盖了我们的音量、语速和节奏。我们表达词语的“方式”与我们所说的“内容”同等重要。
  • 装饰物(Ornaments):这是最微小的一个通道,包括我们穿着的颜色、佩戴的珠宝、背景环境、办公桌上的陈设、我们在头像中手持的道具等,这些也能传达亲和力与胜任力。

我倾向于将线索分为两类:正面线索与负面线索。正面线索能够激发连接与参与感,它们对塑造绝佳的第一印象至关重要。而负面线索则传递出冷漠、不适和焦虑的信号,它们往往是造成交流困难或充满摩擦的开端。关于线索,大多数人没有意识到的是,它们存在一个完整的循环系统

在社交场合中,我们通常会先去解码线索。比如,当我们走进一个会议室或房间时,我们会试图去“读懂”这个房间。我们会观察正在接收到什么样的线索:大家喜欢我们吗?这些是正面线索吗?还是人们不喜欢我们,释放了负面线索?接下来是循环的第二环:在解码之后,我们会将其内化(Internalize)。如果有人刚刚向我们发送了社交排斥的信号,我们的身体就会做出反应:“糟了,我不安全了。”紧接着,系统便进入循环的最后一环——编码(Encoding),即回传社交信号。

为了解释线索的运作机制,我想分享一项彻底改变了我对社交信号认知的实验。在这项研究中,参与者被带进实验室,并被要求走进一个满是演员的房间。演员们得到的指令是,向参与者发送一个社交排斥的线索。社交排斥的信号极其负面,可能是一个白眼,也可能是一声嗤笑,其目的是让我们感觉自己被排挤、不属于这里。研究发现,当参与者看到这个社交排斥的信号时,他们的视野范围竟然扩大了,瞳孔发生扩张,以便能看清周围更多的环境。这是为什么?因为这就是线索循环的实际运作。他们解码了一个负面线索,并将其内化(“糟了,我不安全”),然后他们开始编码并向外辐射出紧张和焦虑。

对于第一印象而言,最关键的是:你出场时必须编码正确的线索,发送亲和力与胜任力的社交信号。我们希望其他人能将其内化为“我可以依赖并信任这个人”,进而向我们回馈亲和力与胜任力的信号。这就是所有优质社交连接的基础,在职场中尤为如此。我们对那些发送正面线索的人非常敏感,这会让我们觉得:“啊,我被妥善对待了,我可以依赖这个人。”同时,我们也必须确保自己能精准捕捉到负面线索,以便及时解除或消除它们的威胁。

在此,我们还需要打破一个关于沟通的著名神话:阿尔伯特·梅拉比安(Albert Mehrabian)声称的“93%的沟通是非语词的”。那项研究被过度概括,且后续无法被重复验证。这意味着,尽管我们大部分的沟通确实是非语词的,但很难精确量化这个比例。甚至连梅拉比安本人也曾警告,不要在所有语境下过度滥用这项研究。不过我们可以确定的是,作为人类,我们常常通过非语词信号来判断真实性(Authenticity)。例如,如果我对你说“嘿,我很高兴见到你”,你很可能会更相信我的非语词表现,而不是我的言辞。因此,非语词占据了沟通中极其关键的分量,绝不容忽视。

每一次互动的最终目标,都是让我们的线索变得具有强烈的目的性。我们要发送那些能让人感到放松的信号,让他们觉得交托给了对的人,从而真正敞开心扉与你建立连接。此外,当我们能够刻意且有目的地使用线索时,我们就坐上了互动的驾驶位。这让我们感觉充满意图、掌控全局,而这正是通往自信的绝佳后门。

Original English Source

The question is, how do we read someone's warmth and competence? It all comes down to our cues. Q's are the subtle but powerful social signals humans send to each other. There are actually four channels of cues. First, our words. This is the channel we use the most. Yes, our words communicate our ideas, but actually the words we use also signal our warmth and competence. The second channel is our non-verbal. So our body language, our facial expressions, our gestures. These also signal trust, warmth and competence, reliability or knowledge. The third channel is voice or vocal tonality. This is our volume, our pace, our cadence. How we say our words matters just as much as what we say. And the last the smallest channel is our ornaments. So the colors we wear, the jewelry, what's behind us in our background, what's on our desk, the props we're holding in our profile photos. that also can signal warmth and competence. I like to split cues up into two buckets, positive and negative. Positive cues stimulate connection and engagement. They are crucial to a great first impression. The second bucket, negative cues. These signal disinterest, discomfort, anxiety. They begin to create difficult or frictionfilled interactions.

And what most people don't realize about cues is there's a cycle. In this way, we often decode cues in social settings. So we'll walk into a a meeting or walk into a room and we decode the room. We read the room. We want to see what cues are being sent to us. Do people like us? Are they positive cues or do people not like us? Are they negative cues? And this is the second part of the cycle. Now after we decode a cue, we internalize it. If someone just has sent us a cue of social rejection, our body goes, "Uh-oh, I'm not safe." And it begins to do the last part of the cycle, which is encoding. That's sending social signals back. To explain how cues work, I like to think of a study that changed the way that I think about social signals. In this study, they brought people into their lab and they had them walk into a room of actors. The actors were instructed to send the participant a cue of social rejection. A cue of social rejection is very negative. It could be an eye roll. It could be a scoff. It's something that's designed to make us feel like we don't belong. What they found was when the participant saw the cue of social rejection, their own field of vision increased. Their pupils dilated so they could see more of the environment. Why? This is the Q cycle in action. They decoded a negative Q. They internalized it. Uh-oh, I'm not safe. And then they began to encode back nervousness and anxiety.

What's critical to a first impression is showing up, encoding the right cues, sending social signals of warmth and competence which hopefully others will internalize as I can rely and trust this person and may send warmth and competence signals back to us. This is the basis of all great social connections especially at work. We are very attuned to people who are sending us positive cues, warmth and competence. So we can feel ah I'm in good hands. I can rely on this person. We also want to make sure that we are spotting the correct negative cues so we can disengage them or disarm them. Can we also debunk a myth here which is the Albert Mehrabian study that 93% of our communication is non-verbal. That study was overgeneralized and unable to be repeated. Which means that yes, a lot of our communication is non-verbal, but it's very hard to pinpoint exactly how much. Even Mehrabian himself cautioned against using this study too much and in every context. We do know that we often as humans look to non-verbal signals to see authenticity. So for example, if I were to say to you, hey, I'm so happy to see you. You are more likely to believe my non-verbal over my words. In this way, we know that non-verbal makes up a critical amount of our communication and it should not be ignored.

The goal in every interaction is to make our cues purposeful so that we are sending signals that put people at ease, that make them feel that they're in the right hand and they can actually open up to connect with you. Also, if we're purposeful and intentional with our cues, it puts us in the driver's seat. It makes us feel intentional and in control, which is the back door into confidence.

情绪劫持的防御与标点化习惯的识别

我们需要回答的下一个问题是:如果有人向我们发送负面线索,我们该怎么办?如何阻止它劫持我们的情绪?如何确保我们在内化它时,不会因此而自乱阵脚?

幸运的是,加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)的马修·利伯曼博士(Dr. Matthew Lieberman)在这方面做出了令人惊叹的研究。他设计了一个非常有趣的实验:他将人们带进实验室,让他们进入功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)机器扫描大脑,然后向他们展示充满恐惧和愤怒的面孔照片。他发现,当人们在扫描仪中看到恐惧或愤怒的面孔时,他们实际上“感染”了这种情绪,他们大脑中高度与恐惧相关的杏仁核区域也亮了起来。由此可见,情绪具有极强的传染性。如果我们看到别人对我们露出愤怒或害怕的表情,我们就会感染到那种愤怒或恐惧。

但最精彩的部分在于:当他教导这些参与者将这些情绪“说出来”或“贴上标签”(比如识别出这是愤怒、那是恐惧)时,这一动作直接解除了杏仁核的激活状态,使得参与者不再感到愤怒和害怕。因此,学习如何为线索贴标签是一项赋予力量的强大技能,这也是我们能够阻断这种情绪劫持过程的唯一方法。

在建立这种心理防线后,我想教给你们的第一个线索概念叫做标点符号(Punctuator)。所谓“标点符号”,是指某人习惯性使用的固有线索。例如,你可能会遇到有人习惯用惊讶的微表情来做“标点”——即睁大眼睛并张开嘴巴。对他们来说,这可能只代表他们感到好奇或高兴,而并不意味着他们处于持续的惊吓状态。你生活中的每个人大概都有自己出于习惯使用的“标点符号”,你可能也有。

在教你识别所有线索的具体含义之前,首先弄清楚你自己的“标点符号”是什么至关重要。一个非常简单的自查方法是,静音观看一段你自己的视频(可能是一次过往的会议录像)。仔细观察:你习惯性地用面部、手部或身体在做哪些非语词线索动作?对于你一起工作或生活中遇到的人,这个方法同样适用。他们是用什么在做“标点”的?对他们而言,那就是他们根深蒂固的非语词习惯。

Original English Source

The next question that we have to answer is, what do we do if someone sends us a negative cue? How do we stop it from hijacking our emotions? How do we make sure that we're internalizing it and not letting us throw us off our game? Luckily, there is amazing research from Dr. Matthew Lieberman at UCLA. He devised a very interesting experiment. He brought people into his lab and he put them in fMRIs, scanned their brain, and he showed them pictures of fearful and angry faces. What he found is that when people were in the scanner and they saw the picture of a fearful or angry face, they in fact caught the emotion, that part of their amygdala that is very fear-based also lit up. In this way, emotions are contagious. If we see someone show us an angry face or a scared face, we catch that anger or fear. But here's the best part. When he taught them to say or label anger fear, it disengaged the amygdala. It made it so that those participants no longer felt angry and afraid. In this way, learning how to label cues is super empowering. It's the only way that we can stop that hijacking process.

The first cue I want to teach you is called a punctuator. So, a punctuator is a habitual cue that someone uses. For example, you might have someone who punctuates with a surprise micro-expression. That's when someone widens their eyes and opens their mouth. For them, they might be when they're curious, when they're happy. That would not mean they are constantly surprised. Everyone in your life probably has a punctuator they use out of habit. You probably have one as well. Before I teach you what all the cues mean, it's important to understand first what your punctuator is. A really easy way to do this is to watch a video of yourself, maybe a previous meeting recording, and watch yourself on silent. What non-verbal cue are you doing with your face or your hands or your body that you do out of habit? Same thing with the people you work with or the people in your life. What are they punctuating with? For them, that is their non-verbal habit.

高效建立亲和力与胜任力的实操清单

首先,让我们谈谈在第一印象中我最喜欢的几组亲和力线索。当你初次见到某人时,通常会发生什么?你一般会伸出手去握手、贴面吻、击拳、击掌、拥抱或侧抱,不管形式是什么,这都是人类之间渴望接触的本能。在世界各地,肢体接触有着截然不同的含义,但有一点是可以确定的:当人类之间发生物理接触时,我们会分泌一种叫做催产素(Oxytocin)的微量化学物质。催产素在人体内有很多功能,但在社交层面上,它被称为“连接的化学物质”。当你们肌肤相亲的那一刻,这种让你产生联结感、融洽感和信任感的物质便应运而生。这就是为什么我们在初次见面时想要去触碰对方的原因——我们正试图精准生成构建亲和力所需的化学元素。

在初识时,你有多种接触方式可以选择,我强烈建议你挑选在自己的文化中最舒适的那一种。如果选择握手,面对新人时我们通常喜欢上下摇动一到三次。你也可以选择贴面吻或击掌,只要对方给予回应,这些都是极好的方式。请记住:接触的面积越大,催产素的分泌就越多。拥抱产生的催产素多于握手,而握手产生的催产素多于击掌,你可以自行定夺。

除了肢体语言,音调也同样关键。人们在塑造第一印象时常犯的最大错误,就是憋气说话。这会导致他们的“你好”听起来飘在半空中,甚至带有一点极其干涩的声带摩擦音(Vocal fry)。当我们屏住呼吸,特别是在说出第一个词时,会让我们听起来非常焦虑,呈现出极低的胜任力。我希望大家练习一种我称之为“快乐问候”(Happy Hello)的技巧:即在呼气时说出你好。如果你真的因为见到对方而感到高兴,不妨带上微笑。紧张的“你好”和快乐的“你好”听起来截然不同,虽然都是我的声音,但后者更贴近我自然真实的音区。我强烈建议:在接电话前、在加入视频会议前、在走进办公室或房间前、在约会碰面前,一定要在呼气时说出第一句问候。这能立刻放松你的声带,确保你不会意外飙到音域的最高端。

那么,如何在短短几秒内发出胜任力的信号?这实际上更多地关乎如何解除他人的防备。当我们能看到别人的手掌时,我们潜意识就知道他们没有对我们隐藏任何东西。这在字面上展现了一种意图:“我对你是开放的,我可以伸出手与你相握,我可以接纳你。”所以,当你走上舞台、打开视频、步入房间时,我希望你做一个展示手掌(Palm flash)的动作。挥手说“早上好,很高兴见到大家”,或者招手说“嘿,过来和我一起坐”。我们喜欢看到手掌,可能是因为追溯到穴居人时代,这能让我们确信对方没有暗藏杀机。你可以试想一下,如果我整段视频都把手背在身后,你的大脑很快就会因为看不见我的手而分心。这是因为,一旦我们看不见别人的手,就会开始担忧他们的意图:“她的手在后面干什么?”而当我把手重新拿出来的那一瞬间,你会觉得:“啊,我又可以信任她了。”所以,在别人第一眼看到你的那一刻,务必让你的双手可见。避开那些舒服的口袋,不要把手藏在钱包里,也不要挡在电脑或夹纸板后面。

接下来是一个我绝对偏爱的、同时兼具亲和力与胜任力的绝佳线索:凝视(Gaze)。目光接触的比例因文化而异,但可以肯定的是,当人类进行眼神交流时,也会分泌催产素。因此,假设你无法与某人握手,或者你身处一个不习惯肢体接触的文化中,进行眼神交流同样是激发连接化学物质的绝佳途径。在西方文化中,我们倾向于保持大约60%到70%的目光接触时间。这意味着你不应该保持100%死盯的眼神。在思考、处理信息时,看向别处、环视房间或移开视线都是极其自然的。关键在于:当你在阐述重要观点时,你要看着对方;当对方在强调核心问题时,你也要注视他们。请尽可能去命中这个60%到70%的甜蜜点。

现在让我们梳理一下互动进展到目前的逻辑流:你进入房间或开启视频,他们看到了你。你展示了手掌(很好,他们可以信任你),你进行了适当的目光接触,也许你们还通过击掌、握手或拥抱产生了物理连接。接下来你需要留意的线索是正面朝向(Fronting)。正面朝向是指将你的躯干、脚尖和头部直接对准与你交谈的人。我们非常渴望感受到与他人处于“平行线”上。因此,在互动时,即使是在人群中,如果你的身体能稍微转向正在说话的人,这就形成了一种非语词的尊重信号。它实质上在表明:“在物理层面上,我与你同频共振”,从而加深彼此的联结。

现在,我必须教你一个足以扼杀所有气场、魅力、亲和力与胜任力的毁灭性线索:阻挡(Blocking)。我知道双手交叉抱胸非常舒服,但当我交叉双臂的那一刻,我传递给你的信号很可能是一种“封闭和拒绝”。研究甚至表明,我交叉双臂的时间越长,我自己的思维也会变得越封闭。因此,反阻挡(Anti-blocking)——即敞开躯干,确保不阻挡身体的任何部分——是一种明确的信号,表示“我真的想对你敞开心扉”。这同时也有助于你自身思维的开阔。除非觉得冷,否则请尽可能保持躯干敞开、双臂舒展。不要在胸前抱紧书本、咖啡杯、电脑或文件夹,保持躯干的开放性,就是在向他们展示你的接纳度。

我们花一分钟来聊聊紧张感。听着,我是一个“正在康复中的尴尬症患者”,而且我往往是个社交过度思考者,所以我的神经肯定也会有紧绷的时候。我想让你们记住两点。首先,你展现出亲切与干练、释放出清晰的信任与效能信号,这些都是具有传染性的,它真的能帮助其他人也感受到这种亲和力与胜任力。所以,为什么不把注意力集中在“让别人感到自在”上呢?这反而能缓解你自身的紧张。其次,这根本不是为了追求一个完美的、无懈可击的第一印象(世界上根本没有这回事),也不是为了成为一个完美散发魅力的人(这同样不存在)。我们真正要展现的,是我们是真实的、有血有肉的人。脆弱感本身就是亲和力的一种体现。如果你感到紧张、焦虑或害怕,你完全可以说出来。这就是为什么我在进行自我介绍的初印象时(这其实也是我那本书的开场白),我会坦陈“我是一个正在康复中的尴尬症患者”。如果你感到脆弱或不在最佳状态,说出来是完全可以的,这是亲和力不可分割的一部分。

Original English Source

First, let's talk about my favorite warmth cues in a first impression. What happens when you first see someone? You typically reach out for a handshake, a cheek kiss, a fist bump, a high five, a hug, a side hug, but not those. This is your human to human instinct to reach out and touch. Now, touch has a lot of different meanings around the world, but what we do know is when one human touches another, we produce a little chemical called oxytocin. Oxytocin does a lot of things in our body, but for our social purposes, it's the chemical of connection. The moment you skin-to-skin touch with someone, you produce this chemical that is the feeling of connection. It makes you feel rapport. It makes you feel trust. The reason when we first meet someone, we want to touch is we're trying to generate the exact chemical we need for warmth. So, you have a few options when you first meet someone, and I highly recommend picking the one that you are most comfortable with that works in your culture. If you can reach out for a handshake, we typically like one to three pumps with a new person. You also might reach out for a cheek kiss or a high five. Those are also great as long as they're reciprocated. And know that the amount of touch increases the amount of oxytocin. A hug produces more oxytocin than a handshake. A handshake produces more oxytocin than a high five. You pick.

We talked about the body language. We also have to talk about the tonality. Here is the biggest mistake people make in a first impression. They hold their breath and their hello sounds like this. Hello. all the way up here. Little bit of vocal fry. When we hold our breath, especially on that first word, it makes us sound anxious. Low competence. I want you to practice what I call a happy hello. This is saying hello on the out-breath. And if you genuinely feel happy to see someone with a smile. So, here's the difference. Nervous hello. This is the one I don't want you to do. Hello. Here's the happy hello. Hello. Notice how both sound like me, but one is more in my natural voice tone. I highly recommend before you answer the phone, before you hop on a video call, before you walk into the office, before you walk into a room, before you walk on a date, you say hello on the out-breath. That immediately relaxes your vocal cords and make sure you're not accidentally hitting that highest end of your range.

How do we signal competence in just a few seconds? This is actually more about disarming someone. When we can see someone's palm, we know they're not hiding anything from us. It literally shows the intention of I'm open to you. I could reach out and shake your hands. I could acknowledge you. So when you walk on stage, hop on video, walk into a room. I want you to do a palm flash. Morning. Good to see everyone. Hi everyone. Or come on over. Hey, good to see you. Sit with me. We love a palm because I think from back from our caveman days, it made us feel like someone wasn't hiding something from us. See what happens when I put my hands behind my back. Imagine if I were to teach this entire video not showing my hands. Your brain would begin to get distracted with the fact that you couldn't see my hands. And that's because when we can't see someone's hands, we worry about their intention. You're like, "What are her hands doing back there?" And the moment I bring them back out, you're like, "Ah, I can trust her again." You want to have your hands visible the moment someone can first see you. So, avoid those pockets. I know they're comfy. Avoid hiding them in a purse or behind a computer or a clipboard. Make sure your hands are visible, especially in those first few seconds.

One of my absolute favorite sweet spot cues, it's both warm and competent, is gaze. Now, the amount of gaze you make varies from culture to culture. But what we do know is that when humans make eye contact, we also produce oxytocin. So, let's say that you can't shake hands with someone or you are in a culture that doesn't touch. Making eye contact is also a great way to produce that chemical of connection. Now, in Western cultures, we like to have eye contact about 60 to 70% of the time. And that means you shouldn't be making 100% eye contact. It's very natural to think and look away or look around the room or glance away if you're processing something. The key here is that you are making eye contact when you are making an important point and you're making eye contact when they are making an important point. Try to hit that 60 to 70% sweet spot if you can.

So, let's break down where we are in the interaction so far. You've entered into a room or hopped on video. They see you. You do a palm flash. Great. They can trust you. You're making gaze. Maybe you reach out and touch, high five, handshake, hug. The next thing you want to be aware of is fronting. Fronting is angling your torso, your toes, your head towards the person you're speaking with. We really like to feel like we're on parallel lines with someone. So, when you're interacting, even if you're in a group, if you can angle your body towards the person that's speaking, it's like a nonverbal sign of respect. It's literally showing, I am physically on the same page as you, and therefore, we can connect more deeply.

Now, let me teach you the cue that kills any momentum, any charisma, any warmth, any competence. It's blocking. Oh, I know. I know. Crossing our arms is so comfortable, but the moment I crossed my arms, I probably came across as more close-minded to you. Research even shows that the longer I close my arms, the more closed-minded my own thinking becomes. Anti-blocking or opening up your torso, making sure you're not blocking any part of your torso, is a way of signaling, I literally want to open up to you. It also helps your own thinking. So, try as much as you can, unless it's cold, to make sure that you have your torso open, your arms uncrossed. Don't hold a book or a coffee mug or a computer or a clipboard in front of your body. You want to have your torso open because it signals openness to them.

Let's talk for a minute about nervousness. Look, I'm a recovering awkward person and I tend to be a social overthinker. So, my nerves can definitely get the best of me. And here's what I want you to keep in mind. One, you showing up as warm and competent with clear signals of trust and effectiveness is contagious. It actually helps other people feel warm and competent too. So first, why don't you focus on putting others at ease? That can help your own nervousness. But second, this is not about having a perfect first impression. There is no such thing. This is not about being perfectly charismatic. Again, there is no such thing. What we actually want to show is that we are real. We are human. An aspect of warmth is vulnerability. If you're feeling nervous or anxious or afraid, you can say that. It's one of the reasons why I say in my first impression, it's literally the opening line of my book, I'm a recovering awkward person. So, if you're feeling vulnerable or not your best, it's okay to say that. That's an aspect of warmth.

刻意练习:建立社交线索的肌肉记忆

听着,我不希望你在这些线索上过度思考。事实上,你可以一次只从一个开始练起。最佳的启动场景其实是在电话里。我知道这听起来有些疯狂,但在通电话时,你唯一拥有的武器只有声音和词汇。所以,先从你的“快乐问候”开始练习吧。试着在接电话时使用呼气的“你好”,而不是紧绷的“你好”。接着,你可以逐步过渡到视频会议。在视频中,肢体接触是不可能的,所以我们要加入凝视(注视着摄像头)。没错,研究显示,即使是通过网络摄像头,我们也能产生催产素。同时,你还可以在视频中加入“展示手掌”。现在你已经掌握了三个线索:快乐问候、展示手掌和凝视。

下一步是进入真实的面对面场景,但要从低压环境开始,比如面对你最好的朋友或家人。和他们练习拥抱,体会那种感觉;让他们对你的握手给出反馈;在他们讲话时练习保持正面朝向。这样,我们就建立了一个从电话、视频到熟人线下的低压递进模型。起初,使用其中一些线索可能会让你感到有些不舒服,这就像是在重新训练你的肌肉记忆。但好消息是:当你尝试过几次某个线索,并因为展现出开放姿态而获得了别人向你敞开心扉的正面反馈时,它就会开始变成一种习惯。经过几次磨合后,你很快就不会再刻意去想如何反阻挡、如何握手、如何凝视了。请务必咬牙度过最初几次尝试新线索、激活肌肉记忆时的不适期,因为它们最终会变得极度自然。

有如此众多的线索可供选择,但我给你们的这些是启动线索。它们是性价比最高、能产生最大杠杆效应的工具,并且在尝试几次后,有望让你感觉非常自然。但请注意:如果你尝试了一个线索五到十次,依然觉得它很不自然,那就果断放弃它。我绝不希望你感到自己是虚伪的。我真正想要的是,让你去使用那些能赋予你力量的线索,让你惊呼:“是的,我终于感觉到了那个最自信的自己。”如果反复尝试后依然觉得别扭,那这个线索就真的不适合你。

Original English Source

Look, I don't want you to overthink these cues. In fact, you can start with one at a time. And the best way to do this is actually on the phone first. I know this sounds crazy, but on the phone, all you have is your voice and your words. So, start with just your happy hello, right? Practice answering the phone, not hello, just hello. Then move your way to video. Video touch isn't an option. So, we add gaze. Gaze with a camera. And yes, research shows that we can even produce oxytocin even through a webcam. You can also start with a palm flash. So, now you have three cues. Your happy hello, your palm flash, and your gaze. Then go to inerson and start low pressure. Your best friends, your family. Practice that hug with them. See how it feels. Get feedback on your handshake. Practice fronting with them as they're speaking. That way, we're starting off in low pressure settings from phone, video, in person, friends first.

At first, some of these cues might feel a little uncomfortable. It's kind of like retraining your muscle memory. But here's the good news is after you've tried a queue a few times and you get the positive feedback of someone opening up to you when you show openness, it will begin to feel like habit. Soon after a couple of times of trying, it will not feel like you even have to think about anti-blocking or think about handshake or think about gaze. Go through those first few times of discomfort of retrying on a queue and trying to activate that muscle memory because it will become natural. Now, there are so many cues to choose from, but these are starter cues. They're the ones that have the biggest bang for their buck and hopefully will feel natural after you've tried them a couple of times. But note, if you try a Q five, 10 times and it still doesn't feel natural to you, don't do it. I never want you to feel inauthentic. In fact, I want you to use cues that feel empowering, where you're like, "Yes, I finally feel like my most confident self. If it doesn't feel good to use it after a few tries, it's not for you."

洞察力的系统性框架:环境、文化与行为簇的协同分析

第二部分,我们将探讨如何理解和解读他人。我想教授你一种极其强大的社交技能:观察力(Observation)。这是一种需要刻意学习的技能,绝非被动接收。观察力意味着你要主动地“读懂房间”,精准解码向你发送的情感信号。我认为,学会出色地观察就像是获得了一种隐秘的社交超能力。它能帮你发现被隐藏的情绪,让你得以识别并解开这些情绪的心结;同时它还能让你洞穿语言背后的隐藏意图。无论是在社交、商业还是浪漫场景中,这都是压倒性的优势,是你技能包中不可或缺的利器。

谈到观察力,我们必须引入我的**“3C法则”:环境(Context)、文化(Culture)与行为簇(Clusters)**。

首先是环境(Context)。同一个线索在不同的设定下可能会有截然不同的含义。之所以强调这一点,是因为你永远需要给对方保留“基于环境因素的无罪推定”。例如,假设某人看起来极其疲惫、心不在焉、完全脱节,你开始忧心忡忡:“是我搞砸了吗?是我说了什么不当的话吗?”然后你得知,他们刚下红眼航班。这就是你必须掌握的环境信息。那种不适感和抽离感,仅仅是因为他们太累了,与你毫无关系。此时他们真正需要的是你的亲和力与包容。因此,当你开始运用观察力时,第一步必须是纳入环境因素:你们身处何方?他们刚经历了什么?他们的情绪基调是什么?在你们互动之前和进行中发生了什么?如果你察觉到了一个负面线索,是否存在某种理由证明这实际上并非针对你?你又该如何提供帮助?

其次是文化(Culture)。我们正在学习的许多线索是具有普适性的。比如,眼神接触会产生催产素,但适宜的目光接触比例却因文化而异;或者肢体接触,互相触碰能产生催产素,但接触的方式也是因文化而异。这意味着在观察力训练中,你需要做的第二件事是评估你所处文化环境的运作方式。这可能关乎你的企业文化——团队里通常被接受的问候方式是什么;这也关乎更广泛的社会文化。我个人喜欢“镜像匹配”我所处的文化。所以,我环顾房间(不管是在公司还是某个特定场所),然后问自己:“其他人都在做什么?我能否舒服地融入他们当前的模式?”进而通过镜像去匹配他们的文化。

观察力中最重要、也是第三环的核心是行为簇(Clusters)。这是一种安全保险机制。你永远不应该孤立地去解读单一线索。举个例子,假设你看到某人摸了一下鼻子。一些研究确实表明,摸鼻子可能意味着在撒谎(研究证实说谎者倾向于更频繁地摸鼻子)。现在,你在会议上看到有人摸鼻子,你绝对不能仅凭这一个动作就下定论,因为如果他们恰好今天严重过敏呢?然而,如果你看到摸鼻子的动作,同时还伴随着其他谎言探测线索——比如一些羞耻感、一些肢体阻挡——那么你可能确实遇到了一个危险信号(Red flag)。在此类场景中,我倾向于寻找三到五个线索组成的行为簇,以确保证实我所看到的确实是我认为的那样。永远不要抓着单一线索不放,永远要去寻找与之伴随的其他动作。

需要澄清的是,我们的目标绝对不是制造那些“抓包时刻”——像侦探一样指着别人说:“哈,抓到你了,我看到你摸鼻子了!哈,我看到你打扑克时扯了一下左耳!”我们真正的目标是,审视这一整个行为聚簇,并试图挖掘其背后的情绪或意图。我们在寻找的是行为模式。某人是否展示出了整体的正面线索、亲和力与开放性?很好,你大概率可以信任他们。某人是否正在发送整体的负面线索,伴随着负面行为簇、缺乏亲和力与胜任力?那么你可能需要谨慎行事,可能需要后退一步,可能需要进行更多的调研。观察的终极目标是为了计算出你的下一步行动,而不是为了享受抓包的快感。

Original English Source

Chapter 2, how to understand and read people. I want to teach you one of the most powerful social skills, observation. This is an intentional learn skill and it's not passive. Observation is about actively reading the room and decoding emotional signals that are being sent to you. I think learning how to observe and observe well is like a secret social superpower. It helps you see hidden emotions which then you can spot and untangle, but it also helps you see hidden intention, maybe what something means behind the words. That is such an advantage in social situations, business situations, romantic situations. It's a tool that you want to have in your tool belt.

If we're going to talk about observation, we have to talk about my three C's. Context, culture, and clusters. First, context. Cues can mean different things in different settings. And the reason why this is important is you always want to give someone the benefit of the context doubt. For example, let's say that someone seems very tired, very disengaged, very disconnected, and you're worried. Is it me? Is it something that I said? And then you learn that they just got off a redeye flight. That is context you need to know. That discomfort, that disengagement, they're just tired. It has nothing to do with you. And what they need is warmth. So, the first thing you have to do when you're thinking about observation is take in your context. Where are you both? Where have they been? What's their emotional setting? What's happened before your interaction? What's happening during your interaction? If you see a negative cue, is there any reason why that negative cue could not be about you? And how can you help?

Second Culture. Many of the cues that we are learning are universal. For example, when humans make eye contact, they produce oxytocin. However, the amount of appropriate eye contact varies culture to culture. Or touch. When we mutually touch, we produce oxytocin. But the kind of touch varies culture to culture. This means the second thing you should do in observation is take in what your culture is doing. This could be your corporate culture. What's the typical accepted greeting in your room, but also your broader culture. I like to mirror and match the culture I'm in. So, I look around the room, whether that's a company or a place, and I try to say, "What is everyone else doing? Do I feel comfortable meeting them where they're at? Mirroring and matching their culture.

The third most important part of observation is clusters. This is insurance. You never want to interpret one cue alone. For example, let's say that you see someone do a nose touch. Now, some research shows that a nose touch can signal lying. Yes, they've actually researched this that liars tend to touch their nose more often. So, you're in a meeting and you see someone nose touch. You would not want to take that cue alone because what if they're just having a bad allergy day. Now, if you see that nose touch along with other lie detection cues, some shame, some blocking, then you might have a red flag. But you would never want to take that cue alone. In this way, I like to look for clusters of cues, three to five cues to make sure that what you think you're seeing is what you're actually seeing. Never take one Q alone. Always look for the cues around it.

The goal here is not to create gotcha moments where you're like, "Gotcha, I saw a nose touch. Gotcha. I saw that you pulled your left ear on that poker play." The goal here is to look at the cluster of behavior and try to find the emotion or the intention behind it. We are looking for behavior patterns. Is someone showing overall positive cues, cues of warmth and openness? Great. You can likely trust them. Is someone sending overall negative cues with negative clusters, a lack of warmth, a lack of competence? Maybe you want to be careful, maybe want to step back, maybe want to do more research. The goal in observation is to figure out what your next step is, not a gotcha moment.

高阶镜像反射与负面情绪信号的破解

接下来要引入观察行为中我最喜欢的高阶线索分析。当我们在互动中高度喜欢某人时,我们会在潜意识中毫无察觉地镜像反射(Mirroring)对方不同通道的沟通方式。研究甚至发现,在极致的共鸣下,我们会下意识地模仿对方的声调。因此,去观察对方是否在复制或模仿你的非语词线索,这是你们正在建立极佳连接的绝佳标志。镜像反射其实毫不虚伪,也不做作,这是一种最自然的人类本能。研究发现,最好的朋友甚至能同步他们的呼吸频率和心率。这是一种非常纯粹的生理性反馈,代表着极其渴望在生理上与另一个人同频。你也可以从“能量状态”的角度来理解:当你遇见一个讲话缓慢、低沉,表情不多,显得安静而温和的人时;或者遇见一个能量爆棚,运用大量面部表情、手势和高音量的人时,他们对你进行镜像或匹配,非语词地宣告了他们想要在你的频道里与你共振。

在观察过程中,另一个我极度偏爱的兴趣指标是挑眉(Eyebrow raise)。跨越不同文化,挑眉都被视为一种深度的兴趣展现。你可以这样理解:当你对某人或某事极其感兴趣时,你的眉毛会下意识地往上抬,从物理层面上“让开视线”,以便你能看得更多、更清晰。甚至连婴儿在观察带有挑眉动作的面孔时,都会投入更多的注意力。我认为这在商业和社交场景中都具有决定性意义。在商业提案时,如果你正向老板或客户汇报,而在某个特定时刻他们挑了挑眉,你就知道你刚刚成功吊起了他们的胃口——此时必须果断乘胜追击(Double down)。在社交或浪漫语境中,如果你说了某句话,对方突然挑起眉毛,那意味着你刚刚点燃了他们的好奇心。紧盯那些挑眉的瞬间,那说明你正走在绝对正确的轨道上。

那么,你该如何判断自己是否留下了糟糕的初印象,或者你的言辞是否让别人感到不安和焦虑?以下三大核心负面防御信号是你必须重点防御的雷区:

首当其冲的是羞耻感(Shame)。这个线索极其直观,它通常表现为:某人用手触摸额头的一侧(无论左右)。这实际上是一种深度的阻挡行为(Blocking behavior)。当我们对某事感到厌恶时,我们会本能地想要将其屏蔽在外。我们可以通过交叉双臂来实现身体上的阻挡,也可以通过捂住眼睛或脸部来实现,这被称为视觉阻挡(Eye blocking)。因此,当有人触摸额头侧面时,他们实际上在传递一个物理信号:“我不想看到这个,这让我感到极度不适。”在恶作剧节目中,你经常能看到人们大呼“哦,不!”然后捂住自己的脸,那是因为他们感到极度尴尬或羞愧。在对话中要时刻警惕这个线索,如果你刚刚的话让某人感到不适,他们可能会突然触发视觉阻挡。此时,必须立刻暂停原有的逻辑流,尝试重建融洽感。你可以问:“一切还好吗?都没问题吧?关于那一点有什么疑问吗?让我们退回上一步。”**察觉到羞耻感仅仅是第一步,对它做出妥善的回应才是终极目的。**当别人感到羞愧时,你能给他们的最好的礼物,就是赋予他们表达不适的许可,以便你能更深地理解他们。

第二个你需要严阵以待的负面线索是骤然疏离(Sudden distancing)。人类的底层逻辑是:当我们喜欢某物时,我们会本能地想要靠近它——我们会倾身去闻它的气味,去听得更清楚,去拉近物理距离。反之,当我们反感某事物时,我们的身体会自动拉开距离。这可能表现为突然向后倾斜、突然向后看,或者头部向后仰。如果对方站着,你会清楚地看到他们向后退了一步。这是身体的本能防御机制在发出警告:“我不喜欢这个,我想远离它,我不想和它有任何牵连,我要保护自己。”如果你说了一句话,对方突然向后缩或退后一步,你必须立刻警觉。你刚才说的话已经彻底破坏了对方的体验,你必须迅速查明原因。

我要你高度敏锐捕捉的最后一个负面线索,被称为疑问上扬语调(Question inflection)。这是指在陈述句的结尾,语调突然上扬,使得原本的陈述句听起来像是一个问句。确实,有些人习惯性地使用这种语调,这是他们根深蒂固的说话方式(尽管我们应该努力帮他们纠正)。但如果一个原本说话很平稳的人,突然在某个陈述句的结尾采用了疑问上扬的语调,仿佛自己都不太确信,那你必须保持高度警惕。疑问上扬往往是“无知”的暴露,有时甚至代表着欺骗(Deception)。其实在直觉层面,我们对这一点心知肚明。研究人员发现,当人类在陈述句中听到意外的疑问上扬语调时,大脑的运作模式会瞬间从“被动倾听”切换到“严格审视”。大脑似乎敏锐地捕捉到了:“等等,你自己都不确定,我是不是也该对此表示怀疑?”在销售培训中我屡见不鲜:当销售人员对某个数字缺乏底气时,他们往往会用提问的语气报出价格:“我们非常希望能承接您的业务,服务的费用是……5000美元?”如果你用提问的语气报出你的底线数字,你实际上是在祈求别人与你讨价还价。同样,如果你听到别人用提问的语调说出一个数字、设下一条边界或做出一个声明,去质疑它。去搞清楚:“为什么这个人要用这种语气对我说话?他们自己确信吗?”这是保护你自身利益的绝佳方式。

我们中的许多人其实本能地懂得这些线索。如果有人突然向后靠或离我们远去,我们的直觉会告诉我们对方已然脱离了当前的连接。理解这套体系的力量在于(这也是我为何如此高兴你们能在这里学习):它赋予了你迅速采取行动的许可,并让你做好了随时应对的准备。如果你清楚地知道,骤然的疏离、或是不合时宜的疑问语调可能预示着某些环节出了差错,你就会懂得坚定地相信自己的直觉。我们太容易怀疑自己的直觉,怀疑那些警报,怀疑脑海中响起的警钟。我希望你能做到:等等,我刚才看到了一个负面行为簇——疑问语调、向后倾斜以及羞耻防御。我现在必须果断暂停,接管控制权,去查明究竟发生了什么。

观察力就像是一块肌肉。在不断的重复练习中,你会越来越熟练,甚至无需刻意思考。最终,你的应对将极具控制力:即使你察觉到了一个负面线索,它也无法再让你惊慌失措。你心知肚明:“我能搞定,我知道该说什么,我清楚这意味着什么。”这让你牢牢握住互动的主导权。观察力最无与伦比的回报,就是它赐予了你无可撼动的社交自信。

Original English Source

A fun exercise you can try is watching a video on mute. Bonus points if you can find a meeting that was a little bit tense. See what cues you see in their face, in their gestures. Are you seeing the negative clusters? Then watch it again with the sound, tonality, word choice. Does the meaning of those cues change? As really excellent observers, we need to take in all of the context, all the clusters, and remember, keep in mind the culture that they're in.

When we really like someone, we subtly, without even realize it, mirror their different channels of communication. They've even found that when we really like someone, we mirror their vocal tone. So, see if they are copying or mimicking your non-verbal cues. That is a great sign that you're on to a great connection. Mirroring is actually not inauthentic or forced. It's a very natural human instinct. Research founds that best friends can even sync up their breathing rate, their heart rate. It's a natural human response to really wanting to get on the physiological same page as someone else. And you can also think about this in terms of energy. So, for example, you might have someone where you meet them and they speak a little slower, a little lower. They have less expressiveness. They're more quiet and warm. Or you might have someone who's very high energy and they use lots of expressionists and lots of hand gestures and high volume. Them mirroring or matching you shows them that they want to get on the same page as you non-verbbally.

One of my other favorite cues to look for when you're observing is an eyebrow raise. Now, an eyebrow raise across cultures is a show of interest. Think about it this way. When you're really interested in something or someone, your eyebrows raise up to literally get out of the way so you can see more and more clearly. They found that even infants pay attention to faces when they eyebrow raise. I think this is really important for both business and social settings. In business settings, if you're giving a presentation or you're pitching your boss and he or she raises their eyebrows at a certain point, you know you've just intrigued them. Double down on that. In social or romantic settings, if you say something and someone suddenly raises their eyebrows, that is something that just sparked their curiosity, sparked their interest. Watch for eyebrow raises, it means you're on the right track.

How do you know if you're having a negative first impression or you're making someone uncomfortable or anxious? These are the cues you want to observe. First, shame. The shame cue is a very interesting cue and it looks like this. When someone touches the side of their forehead, either side, it's actually a blocking behavior. When we don't like something, we want to block it out. We can do this with our body by crossing our arms. We can also do this by covering our eyes or our face. That's called eye blocking. So, when someone touches the side of their forehead, they're literally trying to say, "I don't want to see this. This is making me uncomfortable." On prank shows, you always see people go, "Oh, no." and cover their face. and that's because they're so embarrassed or ashamed. Watch out for this cue in conversation. If you just made someone uncomfortable, they might suddenly eyeblock. Pause right there and try to build rapport. Ask, "Everything okay? Are we good?" Any questions about that? Let me circle back. Noticing shame is part one, but responding to it is second. The best gift you can give someone if they're feeling shame is giving them permission to share what is making them feel uncomfortable so you can understand them better.

Another negative cue you want to watch out for is sudden distancing. So when we like something, we want to get closer to it. We lean in to smell something better, to hear something better, to get closer to it. The opposite happens when we don't like something. We distance oursel from it. This might happen with a sudden lean back. It also might happen with a sudden look back. It might happen with uh it might also be with a head tilt back. If someone's standing, you will literally see them take a physical step back. This is the body's innate reaction to I don't like this. I want to get away from it. I don't want to be associated with it. I want to protect myself from it. If you say something and someone suddenly scoots back, steps back, take note. Something you've said has just turned them off and you want to find out exactly what it is.

There's one more negative cue I want you to listen for and it's called the question inflection. The question inflection is when you go up at the end of your sentence. So instead of a sentence, it sounds like a question. Now there are some people who habitually question inflection. That's the way they speak. For them, that's their habit and we should try to get them out of it. But for someone who is speaking and then suddenly asks like they're not sure, pay attention. The question in reflection is often a giveaway of not knowing. and sometimes deception. And intuitively, we actually know this. Researchers found that when humans hear the question inflection accidentally used on a statement, our brain goes from listening to scrutinizing. It's as if the brain knows, "Wait, you're unsure of that. Should I be unsure of that, too?" In sales trainings, I hear this all the time, where someone asks a number they're unsure of. So, it sounds like this. We'd love to have your business. we'd love to work with you and the cost of the service is $5,000. If you ask your number, you are begging people to negotiate with you. And if you hear someone ask a number or ask a boundary or ask a statement, question it. Decide, why is someone asking me this? Are they sure about it? This is a great way to protect yourself.

A lot of us instinctively know some of these cues. We have an instinct that if someone leans back or steps away from us that they are suddenly disengaged. The power of this and why I'm so happy you're here is knowing it gives you permission to take quick action and to be prepared to take that action. If you know that sudden distancing or an oddly placed question and reflection could signal that something is off, you know to trust your gut. So often we doubt our instincts. We doubt the red flags that we hear. We doubt the alarm bells that are ringing in our head. I want you to know, wait, I just saw a cluster, a question, inflection, a lean back, and shame. I'm stopping and I'm taking control to find out what is actually going on. My goal with these cues is to listen to your instincts so you know exactly what to do when they happen.

I know observation takes some practice, and I know this better than anyone. I used to think that everyone all the time was mad at me. I was often misinterpreting neutral expressions as negative. So if this is you or you find that you're often misinterpreting, know that you can hone these skills. They found that there's a specific part of our brain, it's called the fusopform face area that is used to identify facial expressions. And the more you practice and activate it, the better that part of your brain becomes. So think of observation like a muscle. The more you practice this with the reps, the easier it will be where you don't even have to think about it and your response feels more in control where if you spot a negative cue, it doesn't rattle you. You know, I got this. I know what to say. I know what that meant. And it puts you more in control. And the best part of observation is it gives you social confidence.

战略性临在:深度倾听的物理机制与情绪共鸣

第三部分,我们将深入探讨如何在对话中展现临在感(Conversational presence)。成为一名积极的倾听者绝不仅仅是一个加分项,它是绝对的硬性要求。倾听是一种包含了物理动作与情绪反馈的积极行为,而非仅仅让声音滑过耳朵。我们的核心目标是为了理解而倾听,而不是仅仅为了回复而倾听。我有一种略显另类的倾听理念,我希望你能进行**“大声倾听”**(Listen loudly)。很多时候,仅仅维持躯体的在场,并不足以让对方感受到被深度倾听,也不足以激发他们继续敞开心扉。你必须确保他们能“听见”你正在倾听。这意味着你需要发送极为清晰的倾听信号,向他们宣示:“我在这里,我与你同在,我极度渴望深入理解你。”积极倾听的另一大优势是,它赋予了你更强的意图性。如果你带着真正倾听(而非假装倾听)的目的去开启对话,这种目的感会极大地提升你对谈话的卷入度。我在倾听时会下意识地捕捉线索,这不仅让我深度投入,也极大放大了我自己的存在感。我在脑海中经常玩一个小把戏:有时我会假装自己马上要登台去介绍这个人,这会迫使我进入“为了记忆而倾听”的模式。一方面,我需要记住关于这个人的关键事实;另一方面,它迫使我不断去追问和挖掘那些珍贵的闪光点,以便我日后能够用来夸耀并为他们喝彩。

如何建立一种“倾听的临在感”,即那种能让对方感到被真正理解的大声倾听?我首选的倾听线索是身体前倾(Leaning)。正如前文所述,我们喜欢某物时,就会想要靠近它。前倾就像是一个非语词的加粗特效或高光记号笔。当别人讲话时你向前倾斜身体,你实际上是在为他们的话语加上高光。你是在用肢体语言宣告:“我太喜欢这个内容了,我想离它再近一点。”你也可以在自己发言时使用前倾,以此来非语词地强调你的核心观点。所以,你可以通过观察前倾动作来解码对方的兴趣和参与度;你也可以主动展现前倾,向对方证明你已被深深吸引,以至于迫不及待地想要靠近他们。

在倾听状态下,头部的动作具有压倒性的重要意义。这是因为当我们进入深度倾听或深度讨论时,我们对对方的面部和头部微表情极其敏感。我想教大家一个技巧:缓慢的三连点头(Slow triple nod)。研究发现,当你使用缓慢的三连点头时,对方的讲话时间会不可思议地延长67%。它就像是非语词世界里的省略号“……”,它在诉说:“我深表赞同,请多说一点,继续对我敞开心扉。”(值得注意的是,在印度、保加利亚和巴基斯坦,点头的含义略有不同,但在这些文化圈之外,垂直点头普遍代表肯定。)然而,请务必克制,不要过度点头。过度点头会被称为“摇头娃娃效应”(Bobbleheading)。如果你在会议或约会中像个拨浪鼓一样永无休止地点头,那你的亲和力就超载了,这会严重反噬你的胜任力。你需要把点头当成一支高光笔来使用——你绝不能把整页文本都涂满高光,否则就没有任何重点可言。你必须仅在真正需要强调认同或强烈好奇心的节点上,才使用缓慢的三连点头。

针对点头,另一个极其隐秘的变数是速度。非语词线索就是如此微妙。缓慢的三连点头传达的是深度的卷入感;而快速的三连点头,则赤裸裸地暴露了急躁与不耐烦(仿佛在说:“好了好了我知道了,快点说下一个重点”)。除非你真的想让对方快点闭嘴,否则绝对不要使用快速点头。如果你觉得点头的频次已经够了,想要另一种展现倾听的姿态,我极力推荐头部倾斜(Head tilt)。跨越不同的文化,当我们想听得更真切时,我们都会微微偏头,暴露出耳朵,这个动作的潜台词是:“请再多告诉我一些。”我们也极度偏爱宠物做出这个动作,这会让我们觉得它们正在全神贯注地倾听我们。如果在视频会议中你正处于静音状态,或者你正在聆听别人讲话,你可以极其自然地将头偏向一侧,来展示你的深度参与。研究甚至表明,如果你要传递一个糟糕的消息,在开口时微微偏头,能够极大缓冲负面情绪的冲击。它从物理层面上展现了:“我知道这是一个坏消息,但我已经准备好承受并倾听你的反馈了。”请尽可能多地使用头部倾斜。同时,你必须极度警惕下巴前突(Chin jut)。下巴前突本质上是一种侵略性、侵犯性和愤怒的信号。如果你说了一句话,对方突然下巴前突并伴随着“嗯,我不太认同”,你很可能刚刚触发了他们的一丝怒火。立刻退后一步,重建融洽感,多问问题。另外,如果你戴眼镜,千万不要不小心做出我戏称为“法官判案”的动作——即从眼镜框上方低头俯视别人。这会意外地传递出强烈的批判感。你最好摘下眼镜看着对方,或者直视前方保持凝视。

在倾听的过程中,我们面临两大底层屏障。第一个屏障潜伏在我们的身体中,这一切都源于自我安抚动作(Self-soothing gestures),或者被学术界称为“平复性动作”(Pacification gestures)。这指的是我们试图通过摩擦、移动或焦虑的动作来使自己冷静或得到安抚。这其实是我们在婴儿时期遗留下来的本能机制。当我们还是感到不安的婴儿时,父母通常会给我们一个安抚奶嘴,于是我们吮吸奶嘴或手指;或者他们会摩擦我们的背部、抚摸我们的头来让我们平静。即使成年之后,一旦我们感到焦虑或紧张,我们仍可能下意识地摩擦自己的手臂、揉捏脖子后部或掰响指关节,仿佛在试图平息神经、安抚自己。然而,研究毫不留情地揭示了一个残酷的事实:这些舒适性动作往往根本无法让你平静下来,反而成了你倾听的致命屏障。它让你看起来焦虑不安,这不仅会严重分散对方的注意力,甚至会让对方感染到这种紧张。没错,自我安抚动作是具有高度传染性的。

关于自我安抚动作,我希望你建立双重视角。首先,如果你观察到别人正在焦虑地揉搓或搓手,请立刻意识到他们可能非常紧张,并主动去安抚他们。告诉他们一切都好,他们可以信任你,可以对你敞开心扉。通过强化融洽感来帮助他们重建安全感。其次,如果你察觉到自己正在做出这些动作,你可以尝试一种置换策略(Displacement tactic)。我一直极其反感别人让我“别乱动了”,因为单纯地停止小动作几乎是不可能的。相反,我要求你将焦虑感“转移”出去。置换策略是指你用一种“锚定行为”来替换原有的安抚动作。例如,你可以用力将拇指和食指捏在一起,这种肌肉激活能将你所有的焦虑能量集中到一点,而且它极其隐蔽,只有你能感知到。或者你可以握紧一个咖啡杯、一个遥控器或一支笔,试图将所有的焦虑转移到你手持的物品上。值得一提的是,环境因素(Context)在这里依旧扮演着关键角色。自我安抚动作通常代表紧张,但在浪漫语境中,它可能转变为调情的信号。例如,如果某人在做大型演讲时不停地拨弄头发或摸耳环,这可能与其他的焦虑线索形成了一个负面行为簇;但如果你在约会时,对方将头发别到耳后或把玩首饰,那可能是一个极具吸引力的调情姿态(自我触摸也是调情的标志之一)。永远要将环境和行为簇结合起来判断。

倾听的第二个屏障隐藏在我们的面孔中。我们的脸无时无刻不在辐射情感。其中,你必须高度警觉的,我称之为**“休息性烦躁脸”(Resting bothered face, RBF)。它指的是你在静静倾听时,面部自然呈现出的状态。我们中有些人在放松状态下的面部表情,看起来却充满了疲惫、悲伤或愤怒——即使他们内心完全没有这些情绪。比如,总有人在我不发一语听他们讲话时问我:“你还好吗?”这是因为我放松时嘴角天生向下撇,呈现出一个倒“U”形,而这正是悲伤微表情的一部分。这又回到了人类普适的面部表情法则(尽管学界对于面部表情在多大程度上具备普适性仍有争议,但某些情绪反应确实存在共性):当我们惊讶时,我们倾向于睁大眼睛、张开脸部;当我们愤怒时,我们会绷紧下眼睑,嘴唇紧闭成一条硬线;当我们恐惧时,我们会睁大眼睛并深吸一口气。如果你的脸在休息状态下不幸呈现出某种负面情绪的特征,人们就会无可挽回地认为你是带着这种负面情绪在倾听他们。你必须对自己的默认表情有清醒的认知。我强烈建议:下次视频通话时,仔细观察你放松下来的脸——你是否不自觉地激活了某些面部肌肉?你的嘴角是向下耷拉的吗?你是否意外地挤出了眉间的两道垂直皱纹?你是否睁大了带着一丝恐惧的眼睛在倾听?这就是你在倾听时意外流露出的情绪底色。要彻底改变默认面部表情极其困难,但我们可以做到保持觉察。比如,因为我知道人们总觉得我很悲伤,所以我在初次见面时会使用海量的语言亲和力线索:“哦,我真的太高兴能来这里了,我一直非常期待,能见到你真是太棒了。”这些语言层面的亲和力线索抵消了我面部表情的负面影响**,让他们确信我并不真的悲伤。

这些舒适性动作是我们干了一辈子的事,它们成了极难打破的习惯,我们根本没意识到它们正在抽干我们的魅力。给你几个额外的实战技巧:如果你是一个习惯走来走去的人,你可以试着身体前倾或后倾来锚定自己。有时我也会在讲台上踱步,所以我偶尔会要求一个高脚吧台或讲台,让我能把手肘撑在上面以固定自己。请在环境中寻找你的物理锚点。你能向前靠在桌子上吗?你能侧身靠在讲台或桌子上以锁死那些舒适性动作吗?千万别忘了,你也可以通过物理装配来为自己的成功铺路。穿搭那些不需要你去做安抚动作的衣服或首饰。例如,我会剪一个非常服帖的发型,因为我知道自己有摸头发的冲动。我在佩戴首饰和耳环时也极度谨慎,以确保它们不会发出噪音,我也就不会有去调整它们的诱惑。我还会刻意避免穿有口袋的衣服,因为我有把手插进口袋这种安抚行为的倾向。了解你穿戴的物品,精心布置你的配饰,确保你不会因为衣物而被诱惑去做安抚动作。

关于积极倾听,我认为有两个顶级的心理黑客技巧。第一个就是我们刚才剖析的非语词线索博弈:洞悉他们的线索,并用我们的线索进行防御和反击。第二个则是你的心智模式。你的终极心智必须是“与这个人建立连接”。如果你仅仅为了捕捉那些可以被再次提及的词汇线索而倾听,那你就是在“为了记忆而倾听”。我发现一旦我感到无聊或抽离,那往往意味着我并没有试图在为未来的对话进行记忆构建。当你在倾听某人时,你应该疯狂思考:下次我再和他们交谈时,提起什么能让他们瞬间眼神发亮?我能在短信或邮件中就哪个细节向他们确认?下次见面时我能问他们什么?任何能点燃他们、让他们展现出大量正面行为簇的东西,都是你下次互动的破冰利器。这种“为了记忆而倾听”的机制将迫使你成为一个极其活跃的倾听者。

我们都熟知那句古老的格言:你有一张嘴和两只耳朵,所以你倾听的时间应该比你说话的时间多一倍。但在互动中,也确实存在完美的发言契机,我认为这叫做**“资本化”**(Capitalization)。资本化是指你接住对方的话语,并将其放大。如果对方在分享一个充满希望的故事,而你恰好有能够让它变得更加宏大、更加美好的补充内容,大胆说出来;如果他们正在倾诉让他们悲伤或沮丧的事情,而你正好有能够治愈这种悲伤或沮丧的方法,毫不犹豫地说出来。**你的终极目的是要“资本化”他们试图向你传递的情绪。**这不仅向他们证明了你在倾听,更昭示了你渴望成为一种“增量”——你想让它变得更宏大、更美好。这是衡量你应该回馈多少话语的完美标尺。

倾听陷入彻底脱轨的最大危险信号是:对方不再向你抛出任何问题。如果你在讲述某事,而他们只是急着插进自己的话,或者他们根本没有提出任何后续问题,这可能意味着你们已经彻底错位了。此时,我会果断增加倾听的时间,试图重新调频,直到他们开始反问我为止。我最喜欢的试探性问题是:“你对此有什么看法?”如果他们开始主动询问你的观点,你就知道,轮到你掌控话语权了。然而,如果你在倾吐心声,而他们却连一个问题都不问(哪怕你已经展现了完美的积极倾听),这说明你碰到了一个“对话型自恋者”(Conversational narcissist)。这种人只沉醉于倾听自己宏伟的声音,根本不在乎你要说什么。这往往是一个决定性的信号:这个人,绝对不是你的同路人。

Original English Source

Chapter 3. How to be conversationally present. Learning how to become an active listener isn't a nice to have. It's a need to have. Listening is an active physical emotional behavior, not just hearing words. The goal is listening to understand, not just listening to reply. I have kind of a weird way to think about listening, which is I want you to listen loudly. A lot of the time, merely just being present isn't enough for someone to truly feel heard to feel like they can keep opening up. You have to make sure that they hear you're listening. This means sending clear signals of listening to show them I am here with you and I want to deeply understand you. The other benefit of active listening is it also gives you more intention. If we are going in with the intention to listen well, not fake listen. It gives you purpose which engages you more in the conversation. I listen for cues which makes me very engaged but also increases my own presence. Uh a trick that I play in my own head is sometimes I pretend that I'm about to introduce this person on stage because it makes me listen to remember. It makes me listen, one for facts that I want to keep in the back of my head about the person, but second, it makes me listen and ask questions that are seeking good nuggets, little tidbits that I will want to share to brag and cheer for them.

Let's talk about how to create a listening presence. This is listening loudly, listening in a way that makes the other person feel heard and understood. My first favorite listening cue is leaning. When we like something, we want to get closer to it. Leaning is kind of like a non-verbal bold or a non-verbal highlighter. When you lean in to someone else as they speak, you're like highlighting their words for them. You're saying, "I like this so much. I want to get closer to it." You can also lean as you speak to nonverbally bold or highlight your important point. So, you can watch for the lean to decode interest or engagement. You can also encode or show the lean to show someone that you are so interested you want to lean into them.

Next, head behavior is really important for listening. And that is because as we're deep listening, we're probably having a deep discussion and we're very attuned to someone's face and head movement. I want to teach you the slow triple nod. The slow triple nod looks like this. Mhm. Mhm. Research has found that when you do a slow triple nod, the other person speaks 67% longer. It's kind of like a non-verbal dot dot dot. It's saying, "I agree. Tell me more. open up. Now, there's a cultural note here. In India, Bulgaria, and Pakistan, nodding means something slightly different, but outside of those cultures, we like a vertical nod to show affirmation. Now, be careful. Please don't nod too much. Over nodding is called bobbleheading. And if you are in your meetings over and over again nodding, nodding or on your dates nodding too much, it is actually too high in warmth. It takes away from your competence. You want to use a nod like a highlighter. You wouldn't highlight the entire page of text, or else nothing stands out. Only use a slow triple nod when you actually want to emphasize agreement or curiosity. One other note on the nod is the speed of your nod. Ah, non-verbal cues are so nuanced. A slow triple nod shows engagement. Watch. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. A fast triple nod shows impatience. Mhm. Mhm. Mhm. So, be careful not to do a fast nod unless you want someone to speed up.

What if you nod too much or you want another option for showing listening? I love the head tilt. So, universally across cultures, when we want to hear something better, we tilt our head to expose our ear as if saying, "Tell me more." We also love when our pets do this. It makes us feel like they're listening to us. So, if you are on mute on a video call or you're listening to someone and you want to show you are actively listening, you can literally tilt your head to the side to show I'm actively engaged. Research has actually found that if you have bad news to deliver, if you deliver it with a head tilt, it softens the blow. It literally shows, I know this is bad news, but I'm here to listen to your feedback. Use the head tilt as often as you can. Beware of the chin jut. A chin jut is actually a sign of aggression, uh, invasiveness, sort of anger. So, be careful. If you say something and someone goes, "M, I don't think so." You might have just triggered a little bit of anger. Back up. Build some rapport. Ask questions. Also, be careful if you wear glasses. Don't accidentally do what I lovingly call the judge duty. That's peering over your glasses at someone. It can accidentally come across as judgmental. You're better off taking off your glasses to see someone or looking straight through with that gaze.

There are two big barriers we face with listening. First, our body. This all comes down to self soothing gestures or what the fancy scientists like to call pacification gestures. A comfort gesture or self soothing gesture is when we rub or move or have anxious movement to try to calm ourselves down or pacify ourselves or soo ourselves. It's actually a leftover from when we were babies. When we were babies, we were upset. Our parents often gave us a pacifier. So, we sucked on a pacifier or sucked on our thumb or they would rub our back or rub our head to calm us down. Still, as adults, if we are feeling anxious or nervous, we might rub our own arms or rub the back of our neck or crack our knuckles as if trying to calm ourselves down or pacify our nerves. Here's the problem. The research is very clear on this. Oftentimes those comfort gestures don't actually calm you down and they are a barrier to listening. It makes you look nervous which distracts the other person and also makes them catch the nervousness. Yes, self soothing gestures can be contagious.

So in this way I want you to think about self soothing gestures in two ways. One, if you see someone else self soothing or anxiously rubbing or ringing their hands, take a note that they might be nervous and try to soo them. Tell them they're good. They can trust you. They can open up to you. Go into more rapport building behavior to help them feel more comfortable. Second, if you notice yourself doing those comfort gestures, you might try a displacement tactic. I always hated when someone told me to stop fidgeting cuz it's almost impossible to just stop fidgeting. Instead, I want you to displace the anxiety. Displacement tactics are when you replace the comfort gesture with an anchoring behavior. So, this could be um pinching your thumb and your forefinger together. That kind of activation puts all of your anxious energy into that and that's not very visible, only you can feel it. Or it could be um having a coffee mug or a clicker or a pen that you hold and you grip it to try to displace that anxiety into the pen or the mug or whatever you're holding. Now, context is very important here. Self soothing gestures often mean nervousness, but in romantic settings, some self soothing gestures can be flirtation. For example, if someone is giving a big presentation and fiddling with their hair or touching their earring, that could be a cluster with other anxiety cues. But if you're on a date with someone and someone is tucking their hair behind their ear or playing with their jewelry, it could be a pining gesture. And pining self-touch is a sign of flirtation. Always look for context and clusters.

The second barrier to listening is in our face. Our face shows so much of our emotion. And one thing I want you to be aware of is what I call resting bothered face or RBF. Resting bothered face is what your face looks while you are listening. Some of us have facial expressions or a face at rest that looks tired or sad or angry. even when you don't feel tired or sad or angry. For example, people always ask me, "Are you okay?" even when I'm just listening. And that's because my mouth tends to have a downward inflection. So, if I have my mouth at rest, it actually is an upside down U. This is part of a microp expression of sadness. All this comes down to the universal facial expressions. Now, research is very interesting on universal facial expressions. The jury is still out on how much of our expressions are universal. But what we do know is that there are certain reactions we have different emotions. When we're surprised, we tend to widen and open our face. When we're angry, we tend to harden our lower lids and press our lips together into a hard line. When we're afraid, we tend to widen our eyes and take in a deep breath. If your face at rest looks like a negative emotion, people will assume that you are listening with that negative emotion. You want to be aware of what your face looks like at rest. So, what I highly recommend is next time you're on a video call, take a look at your face, relax it, and see, do you activate any part of your face? Are your corners of your mouth pointed down? Are you accidentally activating those two vertical lines between your eyebrow? Are you widening your eyes and listening with a little bit of fear eyes? This is what's accidentally coming across in your listening. It's very hard to fix our resting face, but we can be aware of it. For example, I know that people tend to think that I'm sad even when I'm not. So, I use extra warmth cues, especially in that first impression. I say, "Oh, I'm so happy to be here. I've been so looking forward to this. What a pleasure to finally meet you." Those verbal warmth cues counteract my resting face so they know that I'm not actually sad.

I know these comfort gestures can be very hard habits to break. We've literally been doing them our whole lives and we don't realize they're taking away from our charisma. So, a couple other tips for you. If you're a suer or a pacer, you can try to lean in to ground yourself or lean back. I also will sometimes pace the stage. So, sometimes I'll ask for a high bar table or a podium to lean my elbow on to anchor me. So, look for anchors in your environment. Can you lean in or lean forward to lean on a desk? Can you lean to the side on a podium or a table that can anchor your comfort gestures? And don't forget, you can set yourself up for success. Wear clothing or jewelry. Have hairstyles that don't require comfort gestures. For example, I have a haircut that stays pretty still because I have the tendency to touch my hair. I am also very careful with the jewelry and the earrings that I wear to make sure that they're not making noise and I'm not tempted to adjust them. I also try not to wear outfits with pockets because I had the tendency to use a comfort gesture of putting my hands in my pockets. Set yourself up for success with knowing what you're wearing and how you're accessorizing yourself to try to make sure you're not too tempted to comfort gesture with what you're wearing.

I think there are two mental hacks when it comes to active listening. The first, as we've been talking about, is our non-verbal cues. Watching theirs, responding with ours. But the second is your mindset. is your mindset to build a connection with this person. If you're listening for verbal cues, answers that you can bring up again, you're listening to remember. I find if I'm bored or if I'm disengaged, it means I'm not listening to try to remember for my future conversations. While you're listening to someone, think, what could I bring up that's going to light them up next time I talk to them? What could I check in with them about over text or over email? What could I ask them about next time we see each other? anything that's lighting them up where they have a lot of positive clusters, that's what you want to bring up next time. And that listening to remember will make you an active listener.

You know, I love the old adage, you have one mouth and two ears, you should listen twice as much as you talk. But there are good opportunities to talk. And I think those are called capitalization. Capitalization is when you take what someone else is saying and you capitalize it or make it bigger. So, if someone is sharing a story about hope and you have something to add to that to make it bigger or better and contribute to their story, say it. If they're talking about something that makes them sad or upset and you have something that could help them with that sadness or that upset, say it. Your goal is to capitalize on the emotion that they are trying to give you. That's showing them not only am I listening to you, I actually want to be additive. I want to make it bigger. I want to make it better. And that's the perfect way to gauge how much you should say back. The biggest warning sign that listening is going off track is if they are not asking you questions back. If you're saying something and they're trying to jump in with what they say or they aren't asking follow-up questions, it might mean that you're misaligned. I would take more time to listen and try to attune to what they are trying to say until they start asking you questions back. My favorite question is, "What do you think about that?" If they start asking for your opinion, you know it's your good turn to speak. Now, let's say you're talking and they never ask you a question back even though you are actively listening. This is called a conversational narcissist. It's someone who loves to hear themselves talk and doesn't care what you have to say. That's a sign that this might not be your person.

权力动态学:重塑沟通中的主导权与表达张力

第四部分,我们将进入更深层的权力与参与度心理学(The psychology of power and engagement)。人际连接中极为核心的一个维度,是如何在展现参与感的同时,呈现出不可抗拒的权力感(Power)。如果我们在传达信息时兼具权力与自信,并且懂得如何用这种能量去吸引别人,我们就掌握了终极的社交核武器。我的很多学生都极其聪明和极具天赋,但由于某些原因,他们总是被忽视、被低估或被打断。我给他们设定的终极目标是:夺回权力。他们本身对自己的想法抱有信心,只是不知道该如何对外投射。我的任务,就是教你如何用**“权力”**(Power)来展示和谈论你那真实的智慧与才华,从而迫使人们竖起耳朵;以及如何确保你能够深度卷入他人,让他们即使在你没有大声喧哗的情况下,也能对你的话语全神贯注。

这一切的底层逻辑是:我假设你拥有真实的胜任力(Authentic competence),你对自己所说的内容抱有绝对的信心。如果在学习这些线索时你在传递它们的过程中感到无比虚伪——也就是说,如果你对自己的核心素材并没有真正的底气,请立刻停止,先去把那份自信找回来!去广泛阅读,去拼命练习,去做好万全的准备,然后才能用这些线索将你的智慧输送出去。你不可能长期靠伪装自信活下去,人们早晚会把你彻底看穿。所以,第一步:确保你做好了准备,确保你拥有真金白银的、不含水分的自信。第二步:动用这些权力线索去投递你的信息。无论你是要分享一个伟大的想法、划定一条严厉的界限,还是要阐述一个全新的视角,我都要确保你是带着权力和自信完成交付的。无论你是需要提出建设性的尖锐批评、划定不可逾越的边界、为你的薪资进行残酷谈判、在面试中厮杀、向客户通报噩耗,还是向家里的孩子宣布一项新铁律。所有这些,都必须伴随着权力和胜任力来投递,否则它们将沦为空谷回音,永远无法被真正听见。

人类天生倾向于追随那些表达清晰且充满自信的强者。请牢记:自信是具有传染性的。我们之所以喜欢围绕在那些对自己的专业领域游刃有余的人身边,本质上是我们极度渴望感染他们身上的那份自信。因此,当你带着权力和真实感去投递信息时,你就在人们的脑海中植入了一个强烈的念头:“是的,这个人绝对值得我将信任和依赖托付给他们。”

我要教给你们我最推崇的几组权力线索。所谓权力线索,是指那些掌权者用来发出“你应该听我的”、“你应该听这个”的强制性指令的非语词、声音与音调信号。第一个你可能从未想过的权力线索,是我们的音量(Volume)。权力上位者对他们传递信息的方式拥有着绝对的控制权,而音量,正是这种掌控力的终极标志。当你对某件事极度沉迷或极度兴奋时,你完全可以飙高你的音量。我们极度迷恋那些用兴奋、极具爆发力的音量来演讲的人。然而,如果你要分享极其私密、极其个人化的事情,或者你想要人们迫不及待地向前倾听时,你可以瞬间将音量降至低谷。我们推崇的是一种充满张力的动态音量(Dynamic volume)。我们喜欢那些能在两者之间游刃有余地穿梭的人,因为有些时候我们需要激昂,有些时候我们必须将某些事情保持得更加隐秘和私人化。接管你音量的控制权,并让它充满侵略性的目的。当你要抛出一个极具杀伤力的想法、划定一条底线,或讲述一个故事时,仔细思考:在哪个节点我感到狂热和激情?用最高音量!在哪个节点我想把人们吸进来?在哪里我想保持一种近乎隐秘的氛围?果断降低你的音量!一切都在于你对自己投递方式的绝对控制。

那些充满权力与自信的人,看起来究竟是什么样子的?他们看起来就像是无可争议的赢家。不列颠哥伦比亚大学的研究人员跨越不同文化对运动员进行了深度研究,他们发现,在全世界范围内,那些摘得桂冠的运动员都会做出同一种姿态:他们疯狂地占据空间(Take up space)。他们通常会把头仰向天空,双臂和躯干之间留有巨大的空隙,并且通常会将肩膀向后、向下沉。这是一种极度渴望扩张地盘的狂妄信号。当我们感到极致的骄傲时,我们要宣示对空间的主权,我们要强行进入所有人的视野,我们对这个世界彻底敞开。我们将这定义为胜利者的姿态,一种极度扩张的姿态(Expansive posture)。

这里有几个极其诡异的物理间距需要你时刻警惕。首先是耳朵和肩膀之间的距离。我知道这听起来很诡异,但请看:如果我在这整段视频中,耳朵和肩膀之间的距离被压缩到了极致(比如缩着脖子),你瞬间就会觉得我软弱无力。在那种姿态下,我甚至连用正常音量说话都极其费力。而当我把肩膀沉下去的那一瞬间,我的自信感瞬间爆棚。这是因为我不再试图惊恐地保护我的脖子。我要求你疯狂地最大化你的耳朵和肩膀之间的间距,特别是在视频通话中,尤其是在别人只能看到你上半身的时候。顺便检查一下你的个人头像,确保你没有意外地做出缩脖子的防御动作,那是在向全世界宣告你的极度自卑。

第二个你需要死死盯住的距离,是你的躯干和手臂之间的距离。真正自信的人,会动用极其夸张的手势。他们肆无忌惮地使用大量空间,他们对占据地盘感到理所当然。如果我们将手臂紧紧夹在两侧,死死地贴紧身体,这等同于在说“我正在拼命保护我的躯干”,这是极其绝望的低自信信号。苏珊·戈尔丁-梅多(Susan Goldin-Meadow)的研究一针见血地指出,我们的手势能极大地提升理解力和流利度。这意味着,如果我在说话时辅以手势——比如当我在谈论一个极其庞大、足以颠覆一切的设想时,我用手比划出那个庞大——这不仅能帮你(倾听者)肉眼看到那个想法有多宏大,更能帮我(发言者)切身感受到它的宏大。手势创造了一个无坚不摧的权力闭环(Power loop)。如果你对自己的言辞有着绝对的掌控力,你就能在两条完全不同的轨道上疯狂输出。你可以用语言输出,同时也能用双手进行非语词的狂轰滥炸。因此,充满权力与胜任力的人其实在向外界宣示:“我对我的领域了如指掌,我不仅能用语言将它剖析得淋漓尽致,我甚至能用非语词的力量将它具象化。”注意,这里有一个致命的警告:我极度推崇“解释性手势”,但我绝对厌恶那种毫无意义的“解释性舞蹈”。把你的手势当作一个重音符号或加粗效果器来使用。如果那是个微不足道的小点子,就坦白说它很小;如果你有三个截然不同的论点要砸向观众,那就依次指向这三点。绝不要像跳舞一样给每一个无关紧要的词都配上动作。相反,要把手势当成一把锤子,去狠狠地砸进你想要别人死死记住的核心观点里。

最后一个权力线索,也是最难的一个(我自己就有罪,我做得并不完美),那就是停顿(Pausing)。当我们感到焦虑时,我们会像失控的火车一样疯狂加速语速。而充满权力的自信者,他们对停顿感到极其舒适。如果他们气喘吁吁,他们会毫不犹豫地在句子中间粗暴地停下来,深吸一口气。尝试在你的演讲中强行插入呼吸或停顿。当你感到紧张时,死死压住自己想要加速的冲动,尤其是在你正准备抛出一个极具杀伤力的核心观点时。你抛出的那个核心观点,可能对听众来说极难消化。你解释得越缓慢、越从容,他们就越容易吞下它。如果你发现自己开始用“呃”、“所以”、“你知道”之类的填充词,这往往是因为你的大脑需要争取一两秒钟来追赶它自己狂飙的思想。这就是你强行停顿的绝佳时机。用呼吸性停顿(Breathing pause)来粗暴地替换掉那些无用的填充词。我之所以强调“呼吸性”停顿,是因为如果你在停顿中屏住呼吸,只会让你看起来像一只受惊的兔子;相反,深吸一口短暂的空气,不仅能让你夺回能量,还能让你用更具统治力的声音力量继续输出。彻底消灭那些填充词,用呼吸性停顿取而代之!

仅仅具备攻击性(Assertive)是远远不够的。我们还必须具备深度的卷入能力(Engaging)。我们要彻底抗拒那种像机器人一样、单调乏味、机械背书的冲动。而这,正是无数绝顶聪明的人最容易坠入的陷阱。那些绝顶聪明的专家对自己的专业领域烂熟于心,他们已经说过成千上万遍,于是他们会用一种令人昏昏欲睡的单调语气来投递,仿佛他们已经被自己的内容彻底厌倦了(因为在他们看来这一切都太理所当然了)。这极其致命。即使你对你的东西倒背如流,即使你已经说过一百万次,你必须强行注入声音的动态感(Vocal dynamism)!我要求你具备一种声音魅力(Vocal charisma)。这意味着,你可以在某些时刻语速极快、充满狂热;而在另一些时刻,你变得极其缓慢,甚至带着一丝神秘。你甚至可以用截然不同的方式来甩出枯燥的数据。我可以说:“你需要知道的绝对最大的数字是……”我也可以换一种语气:“你需要知道的,绝对,最大的,数字,是……”每一次微小的改变,你都在为听觉体验注入令人兴奋的变数,而这对于任何正在倾听你的人来说,都是一种极具吸附力的卷入感。

卷入感的核心,在于创造极具意义的双向互动。我倾向于把这种卷入感看作是你作为发言者所承担的一种“负重”——你必须把你的信息、内容和核心思想打磨得极其容易被倾听。对于倾听者来说,你充满卷入感的表达,就是一份极其厚重的礼物。你其实是在对他们喊话:“我要把这个话题变得如此有趣、如此具有爆炸性,我将以最完美的姿态将它呈现给你,让你毫不费力地听进去、彻底接纳它,并将它死死地刻在脑子里。”作为人类,我们的雷达永远在搜寻自信的声音。我们绝对没有耐心去听那些连自己都不相信自己的人废话连篇。自信的缺失,在声音中暴露无遗,它听起来就像是声音的颤抖,或是令人极其烦躁的声带摩擦音(Vocal fry)。当我们对自己的想法缺乏底气、当我们感到焦虑时,我们会瞬间失去气息的支撑。我们失去了音量。紧接着,可怕的事情就发生了:我们的声音可能会变得颤抖、嘶哑,或者出现那种听起来像是在平底锅里煎培根的摩擦音。声带摩擦音的本质,仅仅是气道中缺乏足够的气流通过而已。因此,当你准备开口时,你必须确保你的气闸里充满了空气。气流赋予你具有统治力的音量。它能强行推开你的声带,让你以一种极其稳定、冷酷无情的方式完成投递。每当你听到自己的声音开始发飘、发颤时,立刻深吸一口气,并在呼气时狠狠地把话说出去。每当你听到自己陷入声带摩擦音时,立刻深吸一口气,并稍微提高你的音量!

我曾与无数TED演讲者并肩作战,这些TED演讲者都是极其聪明的天才。他们拥有颠覆性的伟大思想。他们获得了千载难逢的机会,得以在这个顶尖舞台上展示他们的毕生心血。然而,他们犯下的最具毁灭性的错误是:**他们在疯狂的彩排中,将所有的情感全部排练殆尽了!**他们写出了完美无瑕的逐字稿。他们掌握了那个伟大的想法。他们设计了极其炫酷的PPT。然后他们在镜子前一遍又一遍地疯狂排练,直到他们彻底忘记了当他们最初发现那个伟大想法时,那种汗毛倒竖的震撼感!他们忘记了当他们试图去拯救某人、去投递那个伟大想法时,内心深处的那种狂热!**绝不要把你想法中的情感给排练掉!**如果你对某件事感到极度狂热和兴奋,那就让你的声音和神态彻底爆发出那股狂热和兴奋。如果你对某件事感到极度悲痛或彻底崩溃,那就让全世界看到你究竟有多么悲痛和崩溃。千万别忘了,把你最初的那股原始情感强行加回去!情感是所有演讲的终极调味料。它们为冰冷的逻辑注入了灵魂和辛辣味。去分享那些能真实撕开你情感的深度故事吧,因为只有那些,才能让你的听众把你的名字和你的伟大思想,死死地刻进他们的灵魂里。

如果你说:“瓦妮莎,我真的好想让自己的声音听起来充满统治力,我真的好想释放那些情感,但我真的吓坏了。”我为你准备了一个极其暴力的解决方案:直接“通灵”附身于你心中最极具魅力的精神领袖(Channel your most charismatic role model)。这绝对不是玄学,研究人员真的在实验中让学生尝试过这个方法。他们要求学生在登台演讲时,在脑海中召唤一位极具魅力的演讲者并“附身”于他们。结果极度震撼:那些被要求“通灵”附身于他人的学生,竟然奇迹般地解锁了他们自身被封印的权力和自信。所以,立刻在脑海中锁定你所知道的最具魅力的那个人,你的终极偶像。如果是他们,他们会如何狂暴地砸出这个观点?他们会如何为你疯狂呐喊?完全没有问题,把他们的那股狂热,直接掠夺过来,当作你自己的武器!

在塑造你的魅力、存在感、权力和卷入度时,最后那点石成金的一笔,是你所佩戴的装饰物(Ornaments)——你办公桌上的陈设、你在头像中手持的物品、你背景中的那些元素。我要求你必须带着极具侵略性的目的去布置你的装饰物,并残酷地逼问自己:“当别人看到那个物件时,他们大脑中会闪过什么?”你几乎可以把它们看作是你搭建权力的道具。例如,如果你想发射出代表着绝对权力或压倒性胜任力的信号,你可以把你的学位证书挂在你背后的墙上,或者手里直接拿着你的文凭,再或者在头像里亮出你那张最具杀伤力的认证证书。如果你想展示出极度的亲和力和毫无攻击性的平易近人,你可以在桌子上摆放家人、挚友或宠物的照片。你可以在背景中放置你环游世界的纪念品,或者挂上温暖人心的至理名言。**我要求你对你正在发射的每一种信号都充满极度的目的性。**你拥有的每一个道具,都在疯狂地向外发射信号。你必须确保,那正是你想要发射的那一颗。

必须时刻铭记的是,我绝对不希望你像个疯子一样,在同一时间把所有这些线索全部引爆。那样你只会变成一个极其惊悚的“肢体语言科学怪人”(Body language Frankenstein)——手势乱舞、正面朝向、强行占据空间、狂乱点头、声音附身、强行释放魅力,那是一场灾难。我强烈建议你,一次只锁定一个线索,疯狂地死磕它,直到它化作你的本能。去挑选那个听起来最让你热血沸腾的线索,或者那个你已经隐隐具备、但迫切需要彻底引爆的线索。然后,一次只练一个!在你的手机里设下一个不可撤销的警报:每个星期的第一天,你都要强制自己尝试一个新的权力线索,或一个新的卷入度线索。请记住,这些线索是我送给你的顶级武器。它们将让你变成一个极具杀伤力的影响者,但同时,它们也是你献给倾听者的最高敬意。它们让你变成一个极具吸引力的互动对象、一个令人着迷的倾听目标、一个极度舒适的灵魂伴侣。你的信息越容易被吞噬、被消化,你在别人的生命中就越令人难以磨灭。

将你的生命投资于学习沟通这门艺术,它将在你生命的每一个维度中疯狂兑现那些惊人的红利。如果你成为一名极具毁灭性沟通能力的强者,人们将不得不倾听你、不得不极其严肃地对待你,你那被深深埋藏的潜能将被全世界看到。这一切宏伟的蓝图,都始于锁定一个完美的、散发着亲和力与胜任力的第一印象;然后,你必须蜕变成一个极其恐怖的倾听者,像雷达一样扫描他人的线索,精准无误地读懂每一个房间,用“大声倾听”来宣告你的在场,让所有人都感受到那种灵魂被深深击中的被倾听感。最后,我们还能通过极度卷入他人,向世界宣示我们掌控着绝对的真理,我们充满权力、胜任力和无坚摧的能力。我们证明了我们愿意为了传递信息而付出血汗,我们让自己变得无可抗拒。如果我们做到了所有这一切,我们将成为他人生命中极其渴望的存在。我们将建立起极其坚固的连接。我们能够在那些对我们极其重要的人群中(无论是刚刚闯入我们生命的新人,还是与我们在同一战壕厮杀的战友,是我们的挚友,还是我们疯狂爱着的人),建立起牢不可破的社群与羁绊。而所有这些,都将以千万倍的能量疯狂反哺我们自己。我坚信,懂得如何去缔结真实的连接并完成极其强悍的沟通,正是让这该死的生命变得绝对值得活下去的终极意义所在。

Original English Source

Chapter 4, the psychology of power and engagement. One of the most important aspects of connection is how to show up with power as well as engagement. If we have power and confidence in our message, but also we know how to engage someone with it, we have the ultimate social skill. All of my students are smart and talented, but for some reason they are overlooked or underestimated or interrupted. And my big goal for them is that they have power. They have confidence in their ideas. They're just not sure how to show it. And so my goal is to teach you how do you showcase and speak about your authentic smarts, your authentic talent with power so people listen, and how do you make sure you engage someone so they're hearing the words you say without you having to be loud.

I am assuming that you have authentic competence that you feel confident in what you're saying. If you learn these cues and you feel inauthentic as you deliver them, if you don't actually feel confident in your material, please go get confident first. Read up, practice, do your preparation, and then use these cues to deliver it. You cannot fake confidence for very long. People will find you out. So, step one, make sure you're prepared. Make sure you actually have genuine, authentic confidence. And two, use these cues to deliver your message. Anytime you're sharing your idea or a boundary or a perspective, I want to make sure you are delivering it with confidence and power. For example, maybe you have to deliver constructive criticism. Maybe you have to set a boundary. Maybe you have to negotiate for your salary. Maybe you're in an interview. Maybe you have to deliver bad news to a client. Maybe you have to tell your kids a new rule in the house. All of these should be delivered with power and competence. Otherwise, they will not be heard. We like to be around people who are clear and confident in their message. Remember, confidence is contagious. The reason we like to be around people who know their stuff is we want to catch their confidence. So, you delivering your message with power and authenticity makes people feel like, "Yes, I can trust and rely on this person."

I want to teach you my favorite power cues. So power cues are the non-verbal, vocal, and tonal signals that powerful people use to signal you should listen to me. You should listen to this. The first power cue you might not think about, but it's our volume. Powerful people are very in control of how they are delivering their message. And volume signals control. When you're into something or excited about something, you can use a higher volume. We love people who deliver in an excited, powerful volume. But if you're sharing something more private, more personal, if you want people to lean in, you can actually use a lower volume. We like a dynamic volume. We like people who vary between the two. Especially because sometimes we are excited about something, but sometimes we want to share something a little more private and personal. Get control of your volume and be purposeful with it. If you have a powerful idea or a boundary or you want to share a story, think about where am I excited and passionate? High volume. And where do I want to bring people in? Where do I want to keep something more covert, more private, lower your volume? You being in control of how you deliver.

What do powerful, confident people look like? They look like winners. Researchers from the University of British Columbia studied athletes across cultures and they found that around the world winning athletes make the same posture. They take up space. They typically tilt their head towards the sky. They have lots of space between their arms and their torso. They typically roll their shoulders down and back. This is a signal of wanting to take up space. When we feel pride, we want to claim our space. We want to be noticed. We are open to the world. We see this as winning posture, as expansive posture. And there are a couple of weird measurements I want you to think about here. First is the distance between your ear and your shoulder. I know it's a weird one, but watch this. If I were to deliver this entire video with very little space between my ears and my shoulder, you would see me as lacking confidence. It would even be hard for me to deliver my message with volume. And the moment I roll my shoulders down, the more confident I look. And that's because I'm not trying to protect my neck. I want you to try to maximize distance between your ear and your shoulder, especially on video calls, especially when someone can only see the top half of your body. Also, check your profile pictures. Make sure you're not accidentally doing this or this. It signals low confidence. The other distance I want you to think about is is the distance between your torso and your arm. People who are confident, they use a lot of gesture. They use a lot of space. they're okay claiming their space. If we tuck our arms to our sides and tightly pin them to our sides, it shows we're trying to protect our trunk and that signals low confidence.

Susan Goldin-Meadow also found that our gestures increase comprehension and fluency. Meaning, if I use gestures as I'm speaking, so let's say I'm talking about a very big idea and I show big, that helps you, the listener, see how big it is, but it also helps me, the speaker, feel how big it is. Gestures create a power loop. If you really know what you're saying, you can speak on two tracks. You can speak with your words. You can also speak with your hands. So powerful, competent people are showing, I know my stuff so well that I can explain it verbally, but I can also explain it non-verbally. Now, I have a note here. I love explanatory gestures, but I don't like interpretive dance. Use gestures like an emphasis or a bold. If you have a really small idea, it's no big deal. Say that it's small. If you have three different things you want to say, point to all three. Don't think of it like interpretive dance where every word has to have a gesture. Instead, think of your gestures as emphasizing an idea that you want someone to remember.

The last one is the hardest, and I'm guilty. I don't do it very well, which is pausing. When we're nervous, we tend to speed up our rate of speech. confident power people, they're okay pausing. If they're running out of breath, they'll pause mid-sentence and take a breath. Try adding breaths or pauses into your speech. Try not to speed up when you're nervous, especially when you're explaining an important point. Your important point might be hard for someone to digest. The slower you explain your point, the easier it is for someone to digest. If you find yourself using filler words like um so, you know, it's probably your brain's need to try to take a moment to catch up with its own thoughts. This is your opportunity to take a pause. Replace filler words with a breathing pause. I say a breathing pause because pausing and holding your breath is only going to make you look nervous versus pausing and taking a short breath actually gives you energy back and helps you speak with more vocal power. Replace those filler words with breathing pauses.

Being assertive is not enough. We also have to be engaging and the way we do this is fighting the desire to be robotic, monotone and automatic. And this is a mistake that smart people make. Smart people often know their stuff so well, they've said it so many times, they deliver it in a really monotone way as if they're bored with their own content because they've said it so many times that it just seems obvious. It is critical for you, even if you know your own stuff, even if you've said it a million times before, to add vocal dynamism. I want you to add vocal charisma. This is when you say some things really fast and excited, but some things a little slower, a little more mystery. You could even share data in different ways. I could say the single biggest number that you should know is, or I could say, the single biggest number that you need to know is. Each way, you're adding a little bit more interesting vocal variety to listening, and that is super engaging for anyone who's listening to you.

Engagement is all about creating meaningful two-way interactions. And I like to think of engagement as you are taking the burden as the speaker of making your information, your content, your idea easy to listen to. Being engaging is a gift to your listener. You're saying, "I'm going to make this so interesting. I'm going to deliver it so well that is easy for you to listen to it, adopt it, and remember it." As humans, we are always listening for confidence. We don't want to listen to people who don't feel confident in their own ideas. A lack of confidence can sound like vocal shakiness or vocal fry. When we are not confident in our ideas when we're anxious, we lose breath. We lose volume. And then what happens is our voice might get a little bit shaky or a little bit creaky or we have what's called vocal fry where it sounds like bacon sizzling in a pan. All vocal fry is is a lack of air moving through your airways. So when you are speaking, you want to make sure you have enough breath. Breath gives you volume. It helps push air through your vocal cords so you deliver it in a steady, constant way. Anytime you hear yourself go a little bit higher in that wavery voice, take a deep breath and speak on the outbreath. Anytime you hear yourself go into vocal fry, take a deep breath and speak just a little bit louder.

I've worked with a lot of TED speakers, and TED speakers are brilliant. They have great ideas. They've been offered the chance of a lifetime sharing their big idea on stage. And the number one mistake they make is they rehearse out all emotion. They've scripted the perfect talk. They have their big idea. They have their great slides. and they've practiced it over and over again in the mirror and they forget how they actually felt when they discovered that big idea. They forget how they feel when they're going to help someone or deliver their big idea. Don't rehearse emotion out of your ideas. If you're excited and happy about something, sound and look excited and happy. If you're sad or devastated about something, show how sad and devastated you are about that thing. Don't forget to add back your original emotion. Emotions are the condiment of speeches. They add flavor. They add spice. Share stories that authentically bring out your emotion because that's going to help your listener remember you and remember your idea.

What if you're nervous? What if you're like, "Vanessa, I really want to sound vocally confident. I really want to share emotion, but I'm afraid." I have an answer for you. Channel your most charismatic role model. They actually asked students to do this in a research experiment. They asked them to channel a charismatic speaker and get on stage and deliver a talk. They found that the students who were asked to channel someone else were able to tap into their own power, their own confidence. So think about the most charismatic person you know, your role model. How would they share this idea? How would they cheer you on? It's okay to channel their emotion as yours.

The last finishing touch on your charisma, on your presence, on your power, on your engagement are the ornaments you wear, the ornaments on your desk, the ornaments you hold in your profile pictures or in your backgrounds. I want you to be purposeful with your ornaments and think about what does someone think about when they see that ornament. You could almost think of them as props. So, for example, if you want to signal high power or high competence, you could show your degrees behind you or you could hold your diploma or you could have a profile picture showing your certification. If you want to come across as more warm, more approachable, you could have pictures on your desk of your family, of your friends, of your pets. You could have relics from your travels behind you. You could have heartwarming quotes behind you in your background. I want you to be purposeful with the kind of signals you're sending. Every prop you have is sending a signal. Make sure it's the one that you want.

Keep in mind, I don't want you to activate all these cues at once. You can end up like a body language Frankenstein. Gestures, fronting, broad, nodding, vocal channeling, charisma. I would rather you pick one Q at a time and work on it until it feels natural. Pick the queue that sounds the most exciting to you or that you already do naturally, but you just want to dial up. Then do one Q at a time. Set a reminder in your phone that the beginning of every week, you're going to try one new power cue or one no engagement cue. Remember, these cues are a gift for you. They make you more impactful, but they're also a gift for your listener. They make you a pleasure to interact with, a pleasure to listen to, easy to be with. The easier your message is to digest, the more memorable you become.

Investing in learning the art of communication pays off in every area of your life. If you're an incredible communicator, people listen to you. they take you seriously, your potential is seen. That starts with making a great first impression, showing up as warm and competent. Then it's about being an incredible listener and observing other people's cues, reading the room correctly, and showing your listening by listening loudly, by making people feel heard. And lastly, we can show that we know our stuff, that we're powerful and competent and capable by also being engaging by showing someone that we're willing to invest in our message, that we become easy to listen to. If we do all of these things, we become a pleasure to be with. We make better connections. We're able to build community and connection with people who matter to us, whether they're new in our life, whether we work with them, whether we're friends with them, whether we're in love with them. And that gives back so much to us. I think that knowing how to truly connect and communicate is what makes life worth living. Want to support the channel? Join the Big Think members community where you get access to videos early and free.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织