预测市场与金钱激励
塔雷克: 我不同意在没有金钱的情况下,你能获得相同水平的准确性。当然,很多研究总是在非常受控的环境中进行,对吧?你只接触到一小部分人,测试特定的事情。但当你真正将它带入现实世界时,你谈论的是数百万人。激励机制确实很重要。这就是为什么当人们言出必行、真正用金钱支持他们的信念时,你会得到最好的预测,因为归根结底,人们被金钱激励着。如果你问某人他们认为谁会赢得选举,很多研究表明人们会说,“哦,当然是这个人,另一个人很蠢。这个人不会赢。”但当你问他们,“好吧,你愿意为此投入金钱吗?”然后他们会退缩,说:“嗯,我真的不确定,因为也许通货膨胀会让很多人投票给另一方,或者也许疫情会让人们改变。”
Original English
Tarek: I disagree that without money you can get the same level of accuracy. A lot of the research of course is always in very controlled environments, right? You're getting a very small set of people and you're testing specific things. But when you actually take this into the real world, you're talking about millions of people. Incentives really matter. And that's why when people are putting money where their mouth is, when they're actually putting money behind their convictions, that's why you get the best forecast because people at the end of the day are incentivized to make money. If you ask someone who they think they're going to win an election, there's a lot of research that says that people go, "Oh, of course this person like the the other person is stupid. This person not going to win." But when you ask them, okay, would you put money behind it? Then they take a step back and they're like, "Well, I'm not really sure because maybe inflation is going to make a lot of people vote this other side or maybe co is going to make people change."
卢安娜: 空谈无益。在预测市场中,你能够言出必行。我们真的希望预测市场能够存在。我们热爱市场。我们喜欢这种市场能够为我们许多最重要的问题带来更多真相和更客观对话的理念。我们真的希望它能够存在并走向主流,让人们看到它的力量并开始利用它。在最艰难的时期,这基本上就是指引我们的明灯,支撑我们继续前进和尝试。
Original English
Luana: Talk is cheap. On prediction markets, you're able to put your money where your mouth is." We really wanted prediction markets to exist. We love markets. We love this idea that markets can bring more truth and more objective conversation to a lot of our most important questions. We really want wanted this to to exist to go mainstream for people to see its power and start utilizing it. And this was essentially the guiding light that in the hardest times kept us going and kept us trying.
早期挑战与法律斗争
塔雷克: 最开始我们有一天打了大概60到65位律师的电话,然后当我们打完所有电话时,我们惊叹道,他们没有一个人说这是可能的。
Original English
Tarek: in the start a single day that we called I think 60 or 65 lawyers and then when we finished the list we were like wow none of them said this was possible.
卢安娜: 我们几乎和所有愿意与我们讨论此事的律师都谈过了,你知道,所有人都拒绝了我们。这种监管优先的方法让你无法展现进展。我们那一批的其他公司都在发布产品、获取新用户并每周都在增长,而我们却停滞不前。因此,作为一家公司,如果我们相信我们在法律上是正确的,如果我们相信这应该存在于社会中,我们唯一的选择就是起诉我们自己的监管机构,而我们正是这样做的。
Original English
Luana: We had talked to pretty much any lawyer that would talk to us about this and you know everybody rejected us. this regulatory first approach you cannot show progress. Other companies in our batch were shipping products, acquiring new users and growing every week whereas we had we were stagnating. So as a company the only choice we had if we believe that we were right on the law, if we believe that this should exist in society is to sue our own regulator which is what we did.
旁白: 忘了产品市场契合度吧,他根本没有监管市场契合度。起诉你的监管机构,这可能是最大胆、最雄心勃勃的举动了。我们赢了,然后我不记得之后发生了什么,但我记得办公室里所有人都尖叫着,椅子乱飞,我们庆祝了那一天。那真是太棒了。
Original English
Narrator: Forget product market fit. He doesn't have regulatory market fit. There's probably nothing more bold, more ambitious than suing your regulator. We won and then I don't remember what happened after that but I think everybody was screaming in the office and like there were chairs flying around and we celebrated that day. It was it was really great.
塔雷克: 太疯狂了。我们在大概两周内获得了超过200万客户,交易量超过20亿美元。我们当时仍然是一个非常小的团队,只有20到25个人。
Original English
Tarek: It was insane. It we got over 2 million customers in I think 2 weeks. Did over 2 billion in volume. We were still a very small team. We were 20 25 people.
旁白: 我们一夜之间规模扩大了100倍。所以预测市场初创公司Kalshi周四宣布完成了10亿美元的F轮融资,公司估值达到220亿美元。这比Kalshi在仅仅5个月前通过10亿美元的E轮融资获得的110亿美元估值翻了一番。
Original English
Narrator: We scaled 100x overnight. So prediction market startup Kelchi announced on Thursday a $1 billion series F round valuing the company at $22 billion. That's double the 11 billion valuation Kelchi nabbed just 5 months ago after raising a $1 billion series E.
个人成长与创业精神
塔雷克: 我很小的时候,大概两岁吧,就开始上芭蕾课了,那是我最初的热情所在,芭蕾。我越练越多,直到我成为一名专业舞者。我的日程非常满。我通常早上六点左右起床,吃点东西,然后去普通的技术学校,从七点到十二点半学习数学、科学和所有那些科目。然后我会开车去芭蕾学校,芭蕾课从一点开始,晚上九点结束。然后我九点半回家。接着我才开始为学校的考试或SAT等我需要完成的事情学习。所以,有三年时间,我每晚只睡四个小时。我父母至今还开玩笑说,他们不知道我怎么能长到正常身高,因为在巴西我们说,要长高就得多睡觉,他们就说你三年都没睡觉,那你是怎么长高的?从我小时候起,我就非常有纪律性,而且非常非常努力。我觉得努力工作给我带来了很多乐趣,它让我觉得我的人生正在做些有意义的事情。从我小时候起,我就记得,在纪律方面是这样,另一方面则是一种延迟满足的感受,对我来说,我喜欢做那些困难重重、在很多方面都充满痛苦的事情,因为我以为最终会有一个巨大的回报,或者是我真正期待的东西。这就是为什么芭蕾非常非常好的原因,因为你要排练一年,才能在舞台上表演一个小时,对吧?所以,在很多方面,我认为我的个性与我给自己设定的那种挑战相匹配。如果我有一个非常明确的目标,对我来说会容易得多。比如我想要在普通学校和芭蕾舞方面都表现出色,我想要做到这一点,我知道我大概有三年的时间。所以这有点像“目标明确”的感觉,但绝不是典型的青少年。我记得有几个周末,我心想,哇,下周没有考试,我可以睡八个小时了,而我的朋友们都在参加派对什么的,那绝对不是我。
Original English
Tarek: When I was very young, around two I think I started doing ballet classes and that's was like my first big passion was ballet and I I started doing it more and more and more and more up until I was doing it professionally. My days were very full. So, I would used to wake up at like maybe like 6:00 in the morning, eat a little bit, and then go to to normal like technical school, study, math and science and all those things from 7:00 to 12:30. And then I would drive to the ballet school, which started around 1:00 and ended at 9:00 p.m. Then I would go back home 9:30. And then I would actually start studying for whatever exams I had in school or SATs and all those things I had to do. So, it was like 3 years that I was sleeping, I think, for 4 hours a night. My parents do today make the joke that they don't know how I grew to be a normal height because you know in Brazil we say you have to sleep a lot to be able to grow and they're like you're not sleeping for three years. How did that how did that work out? Since I was very little I was always very disciplined and worked very very hard. I feel like I get a lot of like pleasure on working hard and it makes me feel like it's like I'm doing something with my life and that's always since I was very little I remember that on the discipline side and the other side is like kind of like this delayed gratification side that to me I liked doing things that were hard and and painful in a lot of ways because I thought there was going to be a big reward or something that I really was looking forward in the end and and that's why ballet is very very good cuz you rehearse for like a year to have one hour on stage right so those things in a lot of ways I think my personality matched the kind of challenge challenge I was I was setting myself up for it was it's a lot easier for me if I have a very clear goal. It was like I wanted to figure out how to both excel in normal school and in ballet and I wanted to do that and I know it was around 3 years I had so it was kind of like a eye on the target type of thing but definitely not typical teenager. I remember like multiple weekends that I'm like wow I don't have exams next week I can just sleep like 8 hours and my friends be going to parties and all that stuff and it was just definitely not me.
塔雷克: 我后来才决定来美国学习。我最终选择了麻省理工学院(MIT),因为我认为那所学校最能让我走出舒适区。但这首先是一个非常艰难的过渡,因为我以前每天都进行大量训练,这在我心中是非常重要的事情。当我上学后,我在MIT的第一个周六,我记得我去了波士顿芭蕾舞团,尝试上了一节课,我照着镜子,心想“天哪,我的体形正在变差,我的手臂看起来很糟糕”等等。我觉得不如完全停止,这样我就能记住自己曾经非常优秀的样子。所以,从每天训练八小时到完全不训练,这非常艰难,尽管我认为那是一个正确的决定。
Original English
Tarek: I only decided I wanted to come study in the US. I ended up picking MIT because I thought it was the school that was going to take me most out of my comfort zone. But it was very hard transition first of all because I used to train a lot every day and it was a very important thing in my head. When I went to school the first Saturday I was there to when I went to MIT I remember going to the Boston Ballet and try to take one class and I looked at myself in the mirror and I was like oh my god I'm losing my form my arm looks bad and all those things and I thought it was better to just completely stop it so I could remember myself being very good. So that was very hard to like go from eight hours a day doing something to not even though I think it was the right decision.
卢安娜: 我是个数学迷。我从小就热爱数学,那是我最大的热情。我认为,当你在一个像黎巴嫩这样的国家长大时,很多类似的国家都有类似的问题,那就是一切都非常动态。任何事情都可能在任何一天发生变化。你必须适应。你基本上变得非常适应,因为有一天有战争,有一天有内战,有一天有炸弹,有一天国家状况良好。黎巴嫩人总体上非常适应。他们可以很快改变自己的整个生活,以适应突如其来的新事物。其次,他们总是对生活微笑。他们已经习惯了坏事发生,所以他们不会太当真。所以,可能白天发生了爆炸,然后黎巴嫩人晚上还会去参加派对。他们不会取消社交计划或类似的事情,这我觉得很酷。但我认为,这绝对伴随了我的创业之旅,那就是你会被狠狠打击,并且作为一名企业家,总会有新的事情每周、每月都向你袭来。你必须适应,然后不要抱怨太多。不要太当真。你只需要改变你处理事情的方式,然后希望在很长一段时间内,如果你做正确的事情,它就会成功。
Original English
Luana: So I'm I'm a big math nerd. I grew up loving math. That was my biggest passion. And I think one of the things that happens when you grow up in a in a country like Lebanon, there's a lot of similar countries that have similar issues is that everything is very dynamic. Anything could change at any given day. You have to adapt. You become very adaptable basically because one day there's war, one day there's civil war, one day there's bombs, one day the country is doing okay. Lebanese people in general, they're very adaptable. They can change their entire life pretty quickly to adapt to something new that gets thrown at them. And then two, they they always smile at life. Like they got so used to h bad things happening that like they don't take them too seriously. So you could have a bomb happened during the day and then Lebanese part people would party at night. They would not cancel their social plans or anything like that, which is which is I think very cool. But I think that that definitely has come with me in founder journey, which is you're going to get hit hard and there's going to be new things as an entrepreneur. There's always new things that get thrown at you every week, every month. and you're going to have to adapt and then not complain too much about it. Don't take it too too seriously. You're just going to have to change the way you're approaching things and then hope that over a long period of time if you're doing the right thing it's going to work out.
Kalshi的诞生与监管困境
塔雷克: 2016年,我在高盛(Goldman Sachs)实习,当时我还很年轻。我当时正在探索金融市场,学习它们是如何运作的。那年夏天有两件事让我非常惊讶。第一件事是机构和投资者真正关心的,不是股票的价格,也不是国债或其他复杂资产的价格。他们真正关心的是英国脱欧是否会发生,或者特朗普是否会赢得2016年的大选。因此,当时并没有一种非常好的方式让他们获得这种敞口。所以,举例来说,当人们想要对冲特朗普赢得2016年大选时,华尔街买了很多被称为“特朗普交易”的东西。它基本上是在选举周做空标普500指数(S&P)。那是一笔非常糟糕的交易,因为人们对他们的预测是正确的。特朗普赢了,但他们却亏了钱。这确实是让我们思考“也许有更好的方法”的时刻之一。也许你可以建立一个金融市场,它能够本质上回答这些关于重要事件是否会发生的“是”或“否”问题。因为如果你能建立这样的市场,它将是人们获得他们真正想要的敞口——即事件是否会发生——的更精确和直接的方式。你知道,我想说,那是我们公司的最初想法。
Original English
Tarek: I was an intern at Goldman Sachs in 2016 and I was very young at the time. I was discovering financial markets and learning about how they work. Two things really surprised me that summer. The first thing was institutions and investors. What they really cared about was not what is the price of a stock or the price of treasury bonds or other complicated assets. they really cared about whether Brexit was going to happen or not, whether Trump was going to win the 2016 election or not. And so, at the time, there wasn't a very good way for them to get that exposure. And so, for example, when people wanted to hedge against Trump winning the 2016 election, there was this thing called the Trump trade that Wall Street bought a lot of. And it was basically shorting the S&P on the week of the election. And that was a really bad trade because people were right about their predictions. So, Trump won, but then they lost money. This was really one of those moments where that made us think maybe there is a better way. Maybe you could build a financial market that essentially answers these yes or no questions about whether important events are going to happen or not. Because if you could build that market, it would be a much more precise and direct way for people to get the exposure that they really wanted, which is whether an event was going to happen. And you know, I would say that was the initial idea for the company.
卢安娜: 我们第一次真正全面讨论这件事,是当我们都在Five Rings这家自营交易公司工作时,我们当时在那里一起实习。那里有一个做市游戏,你基本上整天都在上面做市。你会说,“市场在做什么?”我们开始将许多不同的想法和我们在这次实习以及之前的实习中看到的不同事物联系起来。我当时就想,我在Bridgewater的时候,那个事件就发生了,而在Five Rings,这件事也发生了。我们就是从那里开始把所有这些我们看到的、各种各样的Kalshi行为点点滴滴地联系起来,并思考:在美国竟然没有一个合法化、大规模、流动性强、可以交易一切的预测市场,这简直太疯狂了。那是我们第一次真正思考这个问题,大概是2017年或2018年的冬天,我们把所有东西都整合起来,形成了真正的Kalshi理念。最初,我们有一天打了大约60到65位律师的电话,我们当时只用了一个电子表格,心想“好吧,看看律师们能不能给我们一些明确的说法”。我们有一个60位律师的名单,我们像“Tar,Lana,谁给谁打电话?”我们给每个人都打了电话,然后当我们打完名单上的所有人时,我们心想,“哇,他们没有一个人说这是可能的。”
Original English
Luana: The first time we actually fully talked about it was when we were both working at this prop shop called Five Rings and we were interning there together and there was this market making game that you basically made markets on it all day. You'd be like, "What's the market on?" we started connecting a lot of different ideas and different things we've seen at this internship but also previous ones and I was like well when I was at Bridgewwater this was happening with with this other event and the five rings this was happening there and that's kind of where we started connecting the dots of all these different kind of like cow shei koshi behavior we were seeing and thinking about it's insane that there isn't a legalized great big prediction market in the US that's liquid and you can trade on everything and that's really the first time that we thought about it was a winter of um maybe 2017 or 2018 that we're put everything together um into kind of really the the couch idea. In the start there was um a single day that we called I think 60 or 65 lawyers and we just had a spreadsheet and we're like well let's see let's see maybe the lawyers will will add some clarity here. We had a list of 60 lawyers and we were like tar Lana ta Lana who's going to call who and we called everyone and then when we finished the list we were like wow none of them said this was possible.
塔雷克: 后来Lana通过多个联系人找到了Jeff。我们和Jeff第一次通话时,他没有直接拒绝,但他提出了所有可能导致失败的原因,以及获得受监管交易所和受监管清算所的困难,以及我们未来将面临的所有挑战。然后他还解释说,有规则。有23条核心原则你必须证明你满足,才能成为一个受监管的交易所,它们非常难做到,而且需要很长时间。我们采纳了这些规则,当时并没有太多背景知识,但那是一个周四晚上,到周一我们就有了一个完整的分析。卢安娜和我,我们俩自己,完成了关于如何创建一个符合这23条规则的完整系统的分析。我想当Jeff看到这个时,他意识到我们对此非常认真。他当时想:“这些人,是的,他们想构建产品并全身心投入,但他们明白他们将面临漫长的监管之旅,而且他们可能能够平衡这两件事。”所以他很高兴能加入并帮助我们实现这一切。我认为那是我们早期的一个非常大的胜利。
Original English
Tarek: Then Lana through multiple contacts got to Jeff. The first call we had with Jeff, he didn't say no, but he said all the reasons why this wouldn't work and how hard it is to get a regulated exchange and then a regulated clearing house and all the difficulties that will be ahead of us. And then he also explained that there is rules. There are 23 core principles that you have to uh prove that you are satisfying to become a regulated exchange and they're very hard to do and it takes a long time. We took those rules and we didn't have much context but it was a Thursday night and then by Monday we had a full analysis. Luan and I did it, the two of us by ourselves on how we would create this entire system that would abide by those 23 rules. And I think when Jeff got that, he realized we were very serious about this. He was like, "These people, yes, they want to build product and commit committed to it, but they understand that there's a long regulatory journey they're going to have to take and they're probably going to be able to balance those two things together." And so he got excited about, you know, joining and helping us make make this happen. And I think that was a very big early win for us.
卢安娜: 我们当时开始更多地讨论我们是否真的应该尝试这样做?我们是否真的应该建立这家公司?那是在夏天,当时我们都在Citadel工作,我们做的第一件事就是,我们为什么不尝试参加这个Y Combinator黑客马拉松呢?你知道,像Airbnb这样的大公司都从那里起步,所以我们尝试了。我们做了展示,我们有一个非常简陋的演示,当时是稳定的Coinbase,你必须像它一样能把东西从A地移动到B地,但它只有这个,还有一个非常简单的用户界面。他说出的第一句话是“这是非法的”,然后我们就像“好吧,但也许我们可以解决这个问题”,然后他说“那为什么其他人没有做呢?”我们对此没有任何好的答案。
Original English
Luana: we were started talking more about should we actually try to do this? Should we actually build this company? It was in the summer when we were both working at Citadel and one of our first things was well why don't we just try to go to this Y cominator hackathon you know it's like where these massive companies like Airbnb and whatever they all go there so let's try we presented and we had kind of like this very janky demo that kind of it was stable Coinbase at the time and you had to like it did move place A to place B but it was kind of only this and a very simple user interface and the first thing he said was that's illegal and then we're like well but maybe we can figure this out and and he's like well then why haven't other people done And we didn't really have a good answer for any of that.
塔雷克: 是的,我确实记得那一刻,以及我们第一次真正决定是否要创办一家公司以及如何创办它的时候。这个时刻非常具有奠基性,因为正是这个时候,作为一家公司,我们决定定义公司最重要的原则之一,那就是我们将把监管放在首位。我们不会上线,不会营销,不会开发产品,不会做任何事情,直到我们弄清楚公司存在的最重要的事情,那就是我们如何使这项业务合法化并进行监管,以及我们如何创建一个对客户来说安全透明的生态系统。这影响了我们Kalshi直到今天所做的一切。
Original English
Tarek: Yeah, I definitely remember the moment and when we were first really deciding whether to start a company and and and how to start it. This moment was very foundational because this was the time when as a company we decided to define one of the most important principles of the company which is we're going to do everything regulatory first. We're not going to launch. We're not going to market. We're not going to build product. We're not going to do anything up until we figure out the most important thing for the company to exist, which is how do we legalize and regulate this and how do we create an ecosystem that is safe and transparent for customers. And that has informed everything we have done at Koshi till today.
卢安娜: 我觉得Y Combinator的Michael Sabo今天还在说,他觉得这听起来很疯狂,但这两个来自麻省理工学院的孩子听起来确实很有动力,我们应该给他们一个机会。当我们在YC时,我们那一批的其他小组每周都有指标增长,他们会说:“嗯,我们增长了20%。我们有这么多收入。我们有新用户,并且正在构建这个产品。”而我们整个过程就是:我们和这些律师谈了,下周又和那些律师谈了,再下周就是我们提交了这份文件等等。所以,这绝对是一次非常不同的YC经历。
Original English
Luana: And I think that YC kind of Michael Sabo actually says this to today that he's like this sounds insane, but these two kids from MIT sound really motivated and we should give them a try. When we were in YC, every other group in our batch had week overweek like metric growth where they were like, "Well, we grew 20%. We're making this amount in revenue. We're we're new users and building this product." And our entire journey was we talked to these lawyers and the next week like we talked to these other lawyers and the other week is like we filed this document and all of that. So, it was a very different YC experience for sure.
塔雷克: 我们当时停滞不前,没有真正的进展,因为我们只是在和监管机构对话,撰写法律文件,制定政策和程序,所有这些企业家通常不想处理的事情。这有点像是创业过程中“不性感”的部分。更难的是,我们的一些竞争对手在没有许可证、没有我们所寻求的这种监管结构的情况下,在海外推出了产品。我想说那是我们道路上最艰难的部分。这不一定是指时间段本身或工作本身。只是你无法取得真正的、有形的进展。但我们对此非常坚定。除非获得100%监管,否则我们不想推出产品。这又回到了我们如何创办公司的问题。我们不一定是在寻找创业的想法。我们因为这个想法而创办了公司。我们有点不同。有时有些团队会开始,然后他们会转型,寻找一堆不同的想法来决定哪一个是最好的。我们从一开始就坚定这个想法。所以我的回答是,我们真的希望预测市场能够存在。我们热爱市场。我们喜欢这种市场能够为我们许多最重要的问题带来更多真相和更客观对话的理念,我们真的希望它能够存在并走向主流,让人们看到它的力量并开始利用它,在最艰难的时期,这基本上就是指引我们的明灯,支撑我们继续前进和尝试。
Original English
Tarek: We were stagnating. there was no real progress because we were just talking to regulators and writing legal documents and figuring out policies and procedures, all the stuff that entrepreneurs usually don't want to deal with. It's kind of the unsexy parts of of building a company. And it was even more hard because our some of our competitors launched and did it offshore without the license without really this regulatory structure that we were seeking. And I would say that was the hardest part of the path. It's not necessarily the period of time or the work itself. It's just the fact that you cannot make real tangible progress. But we were very committed to it. We did not want to launch unless this was 100% regulated. It goes back to how we started the company. We we were not necessarily looking for ideas to start a company. We we started the company because of this idea. We were a bit different. So there are sometimes teams that start and they they pivot and they look for a bunch of different ideas to decide which one is the best one to to work on. We were committed to this idea from the start. And so my answer here is that we really wanted prediction markets to exist. We love markets. We love this idea that markets can bring more truth and more objective conversation to a lot of our most important questions and we really want wanted this to to exist to go mainstream for people to see its power and start utilizing it and this was essentially the guiding light that in the hardest times kept us going and kept us trying.
预测市场作为真实信息来源
卢安娜: 如今,很难找到关于世界上真正发生的事情的良好可靠数据来源。很难知道我在推特(Twitter)上看到的是真实作者还是机器人,或者这是谁写的?预测市场的作用是它们能够消除噪音,你可以真正地看到一个来自数百万人投入金钱、言出必行的预测,真正地看到“我相信这会发生”。它汇集了所有这些信念,以预见未来。所以即使人们不在市场中交易,实际上这些市场最重要的部分是来自这些市场的一个数据点——价格,它可以让任何人受益。我认为这最重要。如果人们只知道预测市场的一件事,我真的希望他们知道,如果他们想了解未来,这是获得正确、无偏预测的最佳方式。
Original English
Luana: Nowadays it's very hard to find very good and reliable data sources for what's actually true and happening in the world. It's very hard to know if what I'm seeing on Twitter is it writer is it bots or who is writing this? What prediction markets do is that they kind of like take away the noise and you can really look at a like forecast that's come from millions of people putting money on the line and putting money where their mouth is to really see I believe this is going to happen. I'm have a lot of conviction and and kind of aggregating all of that to see to see the future. So even if people are not trading in the markets actually the most important part of these markets is the single point of data the price that comes from these markets which can benefit anyone and I think that's the most important. If there's one thing people know about prediction markets, I really hope they they know that if they want to know anything about the future, it is the best way to get a correct unbiased forecast.
旁白: 我每年参加数百次会议。我与塔雷克(Tar)的第一次会议真的非常突出。我们在纽约市的利里亚咖啡馆(Cafe Liria)见面,那是一家时髦的咖啡馆。当时非常拥挤,我们几乎找不到座位。我们周围都是人。我心想,我们周围没有人对这场谈话感兴趣。我第一次见到塔雷克。忘了产品市场契合度吧,他根本没有监管市场契合度。那次会议之所以如此突出,部分原因是他告诉我他正在起诉他的监管机构的故事。我们喜欢支持有抱负的创始人,大胆的创始人。起诉你的监管机构,这可能是最大胆、最雄心勃勃的举动了。
Original English
Narrator: I take hundreds of meetings a year. My first meeting with Tar really stands out. We were in Cafe Liria, which is this hipster coffee shop in New York City. It was really crowded. We could barely get a seat. We were surrounded by people. I'm thinking to myself, no one around us has any interest in this conversation. I meet Taric for the first time. Forget product market fit. He doesn't have regulatory market fit. Part of the reason that meeting stood out so much was he's telling me the story of how he's suing his regulator. We love to back ambitious founders, bold founders. There's probably nothing more bold, more ambitious suing your regulator.
起诉监管机构:艰难的抉择与胜利
塔雷克: 他们阻挠了很多次。所以我们尝试了两年多时间,按照我们针对新市场的常规流程与他们接触,我们和他们讨论了这个市场的用例。我们实际上有一个公众意见征询期,有超过200人,包括经济顾问委员会的负责人等非常重要的学者,都写信表示这些市场非常重要。你们应该允许这些市场在这里运营,只需对其进行监管以确保安全。然后我们意识到,与监管机构合作或试图说服他们是行不通的。但我们没有像竞争对手那样选择上线。我们始终坚持监管优先的原则。因此,作为一家公司,如果我们相信我们在法律上是正确的,如果我们相信这应该存在于社会中,我们唯一的选择就是起诉我们自己的监管机构,而我们正是这样做的。这是一个非常艰难的决定。对于一家公司,尤其是一家初创公司,一家小公司来说,起诉政府中监管你的部门是非常困难的,因为他们对你拥有所有的权力。但我们决定无论如何都要做出这个决定,因为我们真的相信这些市场应该存在。
Original English
Tarek: They blocked it a lot of a lot of times. So we try to engage with them for over two years on like the usual process that we have for new markets and we talked to them about the use case of this market. We actually had a public comment period that over 200 people including very very big academics like head of the council of economic advisors all of these folks wrote in saying these markets are very important. You should allow these markets to operate here and just regulate them so that they're safe. And then we realized that I think working with the regulators or trying to convince them wasn't going to work. But we didn't decide to list it like competitors. We stayed committed to the regulatory first principle. So as a company, the only choice we had if we believe that we were right on the law, if we believe that this should exist in society is to sue our own regulator, which is what we did. It was a very difficult decision. It's very hard for a company, especially a startup, a small company, to sue the part of the government that oversees you because they have all the power over you. But we decided to make this decision regardless because we really believe that these market should exist.
卢安娜: 这是一个非常艰难的决定,因为我们花了四年时间才获得监管,而我们通过起诉他们,在某种程度上是在危及这一切,因为我们基本上是在说,我们正在非常正式地在法庭上对抗。但有两件事对我们来说非常重要。第一,这些市场是预测市场的圣杯。它们应该是合法的,应该受到监管,应该在美国存在。它们非常重要。另一方面,我们知道我们在法律上是正确的。我们最终赢了。实际上,所有审理我们案件的法官都在地区法院和上诉法院中做出了有利于我们的判决。
Original English
Luana: And it was a very hard decision because four years for us to get regulated and we were kind of putting that in jeopardy in a way by suing them because we're basically saying like we're we're trying to really like okay we're we're fighting I very officially fighting uh in court um at that time and but it was two things that really mattered to us. One these markets are the holy grail of prediction markets. They should be legal. They should be regulated. They should be in the US. They're very important. and the other sides. We knew we were right on the law. We ended up winning. Actually, every judge that looked into our case ruled in our favor on the district court and then the appeals court.
卢安娜: 持续了两周,然后当我们赢了,真是太棒了。第二天,政府就像是“我们要上诉,我们强烈反对,我认为这个决定是错误的”,然后所有的压力又回来了。好吧,所以我们现在必须经历整个上诉法院的程序。它能及时完成吗?因为那时距离大选只有两个月了。也许我们有机会会耗尽时间,即使我们赢了官司,也会失去2024年的选举。所以,接下来的一个月,我们上诉法院举行了这次大型听证会,待上诉。我记得当时我和塔雷克都在听法庭听证会,我们基本上只听这个法庭录音,并试图让公司继续运营和建设,以防我们赢了。但在我们心里,我们觉得这是有史以来最重要的事情。我们无法专注于其他任何事情,也无法睡觉、吃饭或类似的事情。但当我们赢了之后,我想那大概是下午一点,我们非常非常开心。当时就像是,“好吧,但第二天我们必须推出这个市场”,然后我们经历了有史以来最紧张的时期,因为我们有四周时间,要从一个不为人知的小众网站,将“什么是预测市场”这个概念,变成希望成为2024年大选中最重要的事情之一,以及最重要的数据来源之一。
Original English
Luana: for two weeks and then when we won it was amazing. The next day the government is like we're going to appeal this. We extremely against I think this decision is wrong and then the stress all came back up. Okay, so now we have to go through the entire appeals court and process. Is it going to be done in time? Cuz at that time we were like 2 months before the election. maybe there was a chance we're going to run out the clock and we would lose the 2024 elections even if we won the lawsuit. So then it was one month of like we had this one big hearing on the appeals court in the state um pending appeal. And I remember it was like both Tark and I we we listen to to the court hearing at at the time and we were just pretty much only listening to this one recording of of the court and and trying to like get the company to keep moving and building things and all of that in case we want. But in our heads we were like this is the most important thing ever. we weren't being able to focus on anything else or sleep or eat or or anything like that. But after we we won, I think it it was like at 1:00 p.m. and we were extremely happy. It was like, "Okay, but then next day we have to launch this market and then we're going through like the we're going to go through actually the most intense period ever because it's 4 weeks for us to go from a small niche website that not a lot of people know about, what are prediction markets to hopefully one of the most important things in the 2024 election and one of the most important data sources.
旁白: “我们赢了。我们赢了。我们赢了。我们赢了。”这些时刻很棒,因为这正是许多创业的意义所在。你一次又一次地遭受挫折、失望,但所有这些都通过这些短暂的时刻得到平衡,你获得了巨大的胜利,而这些巨大的胜利让整个经历完全值得,因为你知道你付出了如此多的努力,并且看到了成果。是的,我认为这些时刻很重要,要尝试庆祝它们,但对我们来说,同样重要的是我们不会庆祝太久。我们庆祝一会儿,然后就回去工作,因为接下来还有下一个里程碑。我们很幸运能获得这次胜利。我们现在必须让它发挥作用,我们必须弄清楚如何扩展产品,引入客户,让选举市场发挥作用,而我们只有一个月的时间来做这件事。所以我们庆祝了几个小时,然后就回去工作了。
Original English
Narrator: We won. We won. We won. We won." And these moments are great because it's part of what a lot of entrepreneurship is about. You get frustration after frustration and no and disappointment after disappointment. But then all of these are counterbalanced by these very short moments where you get big wins and those big wins make the whole experience totally worth it because you know you put so much effort and you see results. Yeah, those moments I think it's uh it's important to try to celebrate them but but it's also important for us at least we don't try to celebrate them for too long. We celebrate them for a bit and then we go back to work because then you have the next milestone. We're lucky enough that we got this win. we have to now make it count and we have to figure out how to scale the product, bring in the customers, make the election market count and we only had a month to do that. So we celebrated for a few hours and then we got back to work.
应对高速增长与清算所危机
塔雷克: 关于Kalshi,其中一个非常棘手的问题是,我们很多故事都与我们无法控制的外部因素息息相关,对吧?所以它涉及政府、诉讼、这个、那个。但这是第一次,实际上,规模能有多大,以及我们能否成功,完全掌握在我们手中。我们觉得我们已经努力奋斗了多年,才争取到做这些市场的机会。我们觉得这是我们的机会。我们不能搞砸这次机会。我们必须兑现。所以,我们决定,你知道,这整整一个月,我们整个团队,不只是我们两个人,而且我认为我们经常获得不相称的赞誉,因为很多真正的工作基本上都是团队完成的。是工程师、产品、市场、营销。每个人都在这四周里暂停了生活。在办公室里,包括周末,他们几乎是24/7全情投入,致力于让这件事成功。这真的很难,因为我们一夜之间规模扩大了100倍,这对系统来说并不容易维持,对团队来说也不容易维持,但我们,你知道,我们有一个非常小的团队做到了。太疯狂了。我们在大概两周内获得了超过200万客户,交易量超过20亿美元。太疯狂了。我们的一切,从工程角度来看,都在崩溃。我们公司多年来从未收到过这么多存款,一切都在崩溃。但是,是的,最终我们得到的数据和结果,实际上会增长更多。但问题是,由于涌入的人数太多,我们的存款流程和注册流程都崩溃了,我们不得不像是放慢速度。
Original English
Tarek: One of the very tricky things about Kawoshi is that a lot of our story is tied to very external factors that we don't have control over, right? So it's the government, it's a lawsuit, it's this, this and that. But it was one of the first times that actually it was fully in our hands how big it was going to be and if we were going to win or not. We felt like we had fought so hard, you know, for years to get to that to get the chance to be able to do these markets. We felt like it was our shot. We we cannot mess up that shot. We have to deliver. So, we decided like, you know, for this whole month, our entire team and it's not just one and I think we often times get disproportionate credit because a lot of the real work was basically the team. It was the engineers, products, markets, the marketing. Everyone was just like for 4 weeks put their life on pause. it will be close to 247 in the office in the weekends just completely committed to making this thing work. It was really hard because we scaled 100x overnight and that's not easy for systems to sustain and a team to sustain but we you know we had a very small team that made that happen. It was insane. It we got over 2 million customers in I think 2 weeks did over 2 billion in volume. It was crazy. We were having everything engineering wise was kind of breaking right. We've never gotten that many deposits like ever in the years of the company and everything was kind of breaking. But yeah, it was like the the the numbers the result that we got in the end, it was actually weaving would have grown a lot more. But the problem was that our deposit flows and signup flows were breaking because of the amount of people coming in that we had to kind of like almost like slow down.
卢安娜: 所以发生的最困难的事情是,当时运营金融市场有两个关键部分。一个是交易所,另一个是清算所。交易所是匹配买家和卖家的市场。清算所是处理所有资金流动的地方,比如你需要投入多少钱来支持这笔交易,钱去了哪里,如何保证它的安全。我们当时有Kalshi交易所,我们使用第三方清算所。我们刚刚获得了自己清算所的批准,所以可以停止使用第三方,但我们当时还没有准备好使用自己的清算所。问题是当我们赢了官司,这真的很不幸。第三方清算所决定阻止选举市场。他们不想让我们上市。所以我们不得不在那个周末做最艰难的事情,我们知道只剩下四周了,所以我们必须非常快地完成,基本上是将我们所有的业务从旧清算所转移到新清算所,通常这需要六个月的时间来完成。你需要计划它。有很多不同的事情会涉及到这个转移过程。它非常复杂。这是一个非常大的迁移。我们必须在一个周末内完成,否则我们就无法做选举市场。所以这是一个非常令人失望的情况,但我们最大限度地利用了它。老实说,工程师们在应对这件事上做得非常出色。但这绝对是那个月最艰难的部分。那真的非常非常困难。
Original English
Luana: So the hardest thing that happened is at the time there are two key pieces to running a financial market. There's the exchange and then the clearing house. The exchange is the marketplace that matches buyers and sellers. The clearing house is the place that handles all the money movement like how much money you have to put up to back this trade. Where does the money go? How do you keep it safe? We at the time had the cashi exchange and we were using a third party clearing house. We had just gotten approval for our own clearing house. So to stop using the third party, but we were not ready to use our own clearing house at the time. The issue is when we won the lawsuit and this was really unfortunate. The third party clearing house decided to block the election market. They did not want to let us list it. And so the hardest thing we had to do in that weekend, and we knew we had only four weeks left, so we had to do it really fast, is basically move all of our business from the old clearing house to the new clearing house, and usually you do this over the span of a of a six-month window. You plan it. There's a lot of different things that go into that movement. It's very complicated. It's a very big migration. And we had to do it over a weekend because otherwise we wouldn't be able to do the election market. So it was a very disappointing situation, but we made the most out of it. And honestly, the engineers had done an incredible job navigating that. But that was definitely the hardest part uh of the month. That was very very difficult.
预测市场的本质:区别于赌博
旁白: 如果你看看2024年大选,Kalshi能够在媒体之前公布结果,你可以在整个晚上看到实时概率。因此,早在主流媒体宣布唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)是2024年赢家之前很久,Kalshi就已经做到了。
Original English
Narrator: If you look at the 2024 election, Khi was able to call the results before the media, you were able to see live probabilities throughout the night. And so long before it was declared that Donald Trump was the 2024 winner on mainstream media,
塔雷克: 预测市场是赌博还是博彩的问题,与金融衍生品是赌博还是博彩的问题非常相似。这在金融市场历史上一直是一个问题。这个问题之所以存在,是因为金融市场存在投机。在某些情况下,投机看起来像是一种赌注。就像你投入金钱,是为了从你不控制的事情中赚取更多金钱。但存在关键区别。其一是,你是否参与了某种自然风险?它存在于现实世界中。它是具体的。你知道,人们关心它,而不是像掷骰子那样,那是一种为了赌博目的而创造的人工事物,没有任何意义。第二个核心支柱是市场结构。在赌博中,市场结构是你走进赌场或庄家,庄家的收入等于客户的损失。在商业模式中存在固有的利益冲突,因为公司在客户亏损时受益。预测市场,就像纽约证券交易所(New York Stock Exchange)或其他地方的传统金融市场一样,是的,基础资产不同。你交易的对象不同,但你交易或参与的方式是相同的。它是一个开放市场。它是公平的,人们彼此之间进行交易。所以市场是中立的。如果客户亏损,市场不会赚更多或更少的钱。它是一个更公平、更透明的场所,供人们参与。这就是为什么它成为一个金融市场,并使其以与传统赌博场所非常不同的方式构建或定位。
Original English
Tarek: the question of whether prediction markets are betting or gambling is very similar to the question of whether financial derivatives are gambling or betting. And that has always been a question uh historically that has happened in financial markets. And the reason this question exists is because there is speculation in financial market. And speculation can look in some cases like a bet. It's like you're putting money to make more money on something you don't control. But there are key differences. One is are you participating in something that is a natural risk? It exists in the real world. It is tangible. You know, people care about it versus like rolling a dice that has no, you know, it's an artificial thing that you're creating for the purpose of uh betting. The second core uh pillar of this, the market structure. In gambling, the market structure is you walk into a casino or a house, the house's revenue is equal to the customer losses. There's inherent conflict of interest in the business model because the company benefits when their customers lose. Prediction markets, just like traditional financial markets like the New York Stock Exchange or other places, yes, the underlying is different. Like what you're trading on is different, but how you're trading or how you're participating is the same. It's an open marketplace. It's fair and people are trading against each other. So, the market is neutral. The market doesn't make more or less money if their customers lose. It's more of a fair and transparent place for people to participate. And that's why it makes it, you know, a financial market and makes it kind of structured or or or placed in a in a very different way than traditional, you know, betting or gambling places.
卢安娜: 我不同意在没有金钱的情况下,你能获得相同水平的准确性。当然,我的背景是学术界。所以,很多研究总是在非常受控的环境中进行,对吧?你只接触到一小部分人,测试特定的事情,但当你真正将它带入现实世界时,你谈论的是数百万人。激励机制确实很重要。这就是为什么当人们言出必行、真正用金钱支持他们的信念时,你会得到最好的预测,因为归根结底,人们被金钱激励着赚钱。你会发现很多方面都像是两极分化的减少,对吧?如果你问某人他们认为谁会赢得选举,很多研究表明人们会说,“哦,当然是这个人,另一个人很蠢。这个人不会赢。”但当你问他们,“好吧,你愿意为此投入金钱吗?”然后他们会退缩,说:“嗯,我真的不确定,因为也许通货膨胀会让很多人投票给另一方,或者也许疫情会让人们改变。”所以,它在某种程度上减少了两极分化,但这就是关于金钱作为激励机制,为市场带来真相和信息的核心论点,如果没有金钱,你就无法拥有它。
Original English
Luana: I disagree that without money, you can get the same level of accuracy. A lot of the research, of course, I come my background is an academia. So, a lot of the research is always in very controlled environments, right? You're getting a very small set of people and you're testing specific things, but when you actually take this into the real world, you're talking about millions of people. Incentives really matter. And that's why when people are putting money where their mouth is, when they're actually putting money behind their convictions, that's why you get the best forecast because people at the end of the day are incentivized to make money. And you see a lot of it is like the decrease of polarization, right? If if you ask someone who they think they're going to win an election, there's a lot of research that says that people go, oh, of course, this person like the the other person is stupid. This person not going to win. But when you ask them, okay, would you put money behind it? Then they take a step back and they're like, well, I'm not really sure because maybe inflation is going to make a lot of people vote this other side or maybe co is going to make people change. So, it kind of decreases polarization, but it's a whole point about money being the incentive to bring truth and information to markets, which you can't have if if you don't have it.
旁白: 预测市场能够穿透噪音。它们是正在发生的事情的真实信号。如果你考虑社交媒体,它是定性意见。如果你考虑预测市场,它是定量信念。空谈无益。在预测市场中,你能够言出必行。
Original English
Narrator: Prediction markets cut through the noise. They're the true signal of what's happening. If you think about social media, it's qualitative opinion. If you think about prediction markets, it's quantitative conviction. Talk is cheap. On prediction markets, you're able to put your money where your mouth is.
塔雷克: 监管意味着许多不同的事情,但我通常将其归类为两个主要部分。一个是市场完整性,这意味着公平性。市场是否公平?其次是客户保护,这意味着清晰度和透明度。如果我们发现有人做错了事,这与股票市场相同。我们可以处以罚款,或者我们可以将其移交给政府进行刑事起诉。如果有人在Kalshi上进行内幕交易,这与股票市场或其他地方的内幕交易相同。所有这些不同的规则都经过精心构建,以确保你获得一个公平的市场。至于客户保护部分,它实际上是关于确保你以相同的方式对待所有客户,确保一切都是透明的。所以,所有的交易,我们有义务将我们所有的交易和活动公开,以便每个人都能看到,并且我们向政府报告。我们不能有歧视性访问。我们必须给予所有人相同的权利和义务,这是金融市场或Kalshi非常独特的一点,例如你不能阻止赢家,然后推销输家,这样如果有人在你的平台上赢了,你会像一些赌博网站那样阻止他们,如果有人输了钱,你基本上会想办法让他们上钩。在受监管的交易所你不能做这些事情,因为它必须是中立的。
Original English
Tarek: Regulation means a lot of different things, but I usually bucket them into two main pieces. One is market integrity, which means fairness. Is the market fair? And then number two, customer protection, which means like clarity and transparency. And if we find that people did something wrong, it's the same as the stock market. We can do a fine or we can refer to the government for uh criminal prosecution. If someone commits insider trading on cash, it's the same as insider trading in in the stock market or other places. And this is all structured, all these different rules are structured so that you get like you get a marketplace that is fair. And then the customer protection piece, it's really all about making sure you're treating all your customers the same way that everything is transparent. So all of the trades, we have a duty to make all of our trades and activity publicly available so that everybody can see it and we report to the government. We cannot have discriminatory access. We have to give the same rights and same obligations to everybody else which is one other thing that's very unique about financial markets or Koshi where like you cannot for example block the winners and then promote the losers so that you know if somebody wins on your platform you you block them like some of the gambling sites do and if somebody loses money you basically figure out how to get them hooked. You cannot do these types of things on a regulated exchange because it has to be neutral.
预测市场的应用与用户案例
旁白: 关于预测市场最大的误解是它们只与体育有关。这一切都与体育有关,体育确实占据了预测市场的很大一部分,10倍之多,但如今非体育类每周交易量有3到4亿美元,年化来看达到150亿到200亿美元。虽然每个人都在谈论体育,而且它的增长速度如此之快,交易量如此之大,但如果你只看非体育类,它也增长得非常快,每年增长5倍。这些市场涵盖了经济学:利率走向何方?政治:谁将成为下一任总统,谁将成为美联储主席?文化:谁将赢得奥斯卡?甚至天气:下周纽约会下多少雪?但这些其他类别正在快速增长,未来几年将占据交易量的很大一部分。
Original English
Narrator: The biggest misconception about prediction markets is they're just around sports. It's all about sports and sports is a meaningful portion of prediction markets, 10x, but non-sports today has 300 to 400 million of weekly volume that translates to 15 to 20 billion annualized. And while everyone talks about sports and it's growing so fast and so much of the volume, if you were to just look at non-sports, it's growing really fast, too. It's growing 5x year-over-year. These markets cover economics. Where are interest rates going? Politics, who's going to be the next president, who's going to be the Fed chair, culture, who's going to win the Oscar, even the weather, how many interest is it going to snow in New York next week. But these other categories are growing really quickly and in the next few years are going to represent meaningful portions of the volume.
乔尔: 我叫乔尔。我是一名全职的预测市场交易员和内容创作者,不过才做了六个月。所以,对此我还很新。我交易各种市场,但我最出名的是**“提及市场”,也就是关于某人在演讲中会说什么的市场,其中又更专注于特朗普的演讲。作为一名会计师,我密切关注公司,喜欢阅读10K或10Q报告。我意识到我无法真正与股票市场竞争,对吧,在选择股票之类的方面,因为我的对手是谁?我面对的是谁?会是对冲基金**或者更老练的投资者。所以,看到预测市场对我来说是一个巨大的吸引力,因为我心想,好吧,这里有一些我认为目前非常低效的东西,这就是为什么它对我来说是一个自然的吸引力,我觉得我能获得优势。过去一年我通过交易赚了超过20万美元,但自从去年9月底全职投入以来,我在过去5个月左右赚了大约17万美元。我在交易时会进行大量的研究,比如对特朗普,我会查看他过去的所有演讲,试图从中找到他会说什么的线索。我非常关注政府的谈话要点,当有新消息爆出时,这会如何影响他在下一次演讲中要谈论的内容?我会观看特朗普、曼尼或鲍威尔的每一场演讲。所以,我对他在某一天会谈论什么建立了直觉,然后非常关注世界各地正在发生的事情,以及这会如何影响谈话要点。我有一个历史演讲数据库,我会用来交易任何我感兴趣的人。所以,我不会重看他过去的所有演讲,但只要他要进行现场演讲,我都会观看。一开始这是一种非常定量的研究,你会查看历史演讲等。后来它演变成更多基于直觉的东西,我现在知道我可以相信我对像特朗普这样的人的直觉,因为我看了他数百场演讲了。
Original English
Joel: So, uh, my name is Joel. I am a full-time prediction market trader and content creator only for the last six months. So, still very new to this. I trade a variety of markets, but I'm most wellknown for mentioned markets, which are markets on what someone will say in a speech and within that even more so focused on kind of Trump speeches. Being an accountant and following, you know, companies very closely, loving to read like a 10K or 10 Q. And I realized that like I can't really compete uh the equities market, right, in terms of like picking stocks or something like that because who is my counterparty? Who am I up against? It's going to be a hedge fund or just a much more sophisticated investor. So seeing prediction markets was a huge draw to me because I'm like okay here's something that I believe is very inefficient for the time being and that's why it was a natural draw is I felt like I could get an edge I guess made in the past year just over uh 200k trading but since going full-time back in end of September uh I've made about 170,000 in the last 5 months or so uh trading when I'm trading I'm doing heavy kind of research like for for Trump um I'm looking at you know as many historical speeches that he's given to kind of try to gain an edge of what is this guy going to say? I'm very very in tune to talking points of the administration as new news is breaking out. How is this going to impact what he's going to talk about in his next speech? I will watch every single one of Trump or Manny or Powell every single one of his speeches. So the intuition I've been able to build up over kind of what he's going to talk about in a given day and then staying very very in tune with what's happening around the world and how that's going to impact talking points. uh have uh a database that I use of historical speeches for for anyone that I'm I'm trading in. So, I'm not going to like rewatch all of his past speeches, but anytime he's going to go live for a speech, I'm always watching it. It started as a very kind of quantitative thing where you're looking at historical speeches, things like that. and it's evolved into a lot more intuition based where I just know I can trust my intuition when it comes to someone like Trump because I've watched hundreds of his speeches.
布兰登: 我是布兰登·芬德(Brandon Fiend),25岁,住在宾夕法尼亚州的巴克斯县,我是一名公立学校教师。我在一所小学教六年级,并指导学校的戏剧。我通过Kalshi赚了15万美元。我今天刚达到这个里程碑。我下楼去见我父母,我说:“爸爸妈妈,我刚赚了大约8000美元。”之前我一直对Kalshi保持沉默,因为我一直没有成功,自从我八年级以来。我研究了音乐排行榜。我过度分析了它们。我在手机的备忘录应用程序中追踪它们。特拉维斯·斯科特(Travis Scott)当时正在销售他的单曲4x4的CD。如果你复制HTML页面的源代码,并在代码中查看,你实际上可以看到库存量。我以非常低的赌注买入,最终获得了8000美元。这太疯狂了,仅仅通过查看一个对所有人公开的网站源代码。你只需点击查看源代码。它就在那里。我通过一次点击赚了8000美元。
Original English
Brandon: I'm Brandon Fiend. I'm a 25-year-old in Bucks County, Pennsylvania and I am a public school teacher. I teach sixth graders at an elementary school and direct the school plays. So, I have $150,000 um that I have made from Kouchi. I just hit that milestone today. I went downstairs to my parents and I said, "Mom, dad, I just made like $8,000." And I'd been very quiet about koshi like beforehand cuz I wasn't having success with it ever since I was in 8th grade. I've studied the music charts. I have overanalyzed them. I've tracked them in the little notes app on my phone. Travis Scott was selling CDs for his single 4x4. If you copied the HTML page source and you looked in the code of it, you could actually see the inventory for how much was stocked. I bought very low stakes, paid out $8,000. That was crazy that just looking at the source code of a website that's public to everyone. You can just hit source code. It's right there. I made $8,000 off one click.
香农: 我叫香农(Shannon),我在Kalshi的运营部门工作,我来自阿拉巴马州。我从2021年开始在Kalshi上交易。我学的是气象学,所以一些和我一起上学的朋友说:“你知道你可以交易高温吗?”我觉得那非常有趣。我的第一笔存款是50美元。从那时起,我就是抱着“看看会发生什么”的心态。嗯,我经历了2004年的伊万飓风,2005年的卡特里娜飓风,2018年的迈克尔飓风。我对热带风暴、热带气旋、飓风等有丰富的经验。我认为从气候学的角度来看,利用这些天气市场作为一种几乎像保险的方式非常重要。但当我住在墨西哥湾沿岸时,我的房主保险飓风免赔额超过1万美元。所以基本上,如果飓风正朝着我的房子袭来,我用来对冲风险的方式就是购买“飓风会袭击”的选项。假设那是10美元。我拿出1000美元押注“飓风会袭击”。所以如果我买了1万美元,我就会得到1万美元。也就是9000美元的回报。然后我就会用这笔钱来支付房主保险的免赔额,以弥补房子因飓风造成的损失。
Original English
Shannon: My name is Shannon. I work at Koshi in operations and I am originally from Alabama. I started trading on Kouchi back in 2021. I went to school for meteorology and so some friends that I went to school with had said, "Did you know that you can trade on high temperatures?" And I thought that was super interesting. My first deposit was $50. From there, I mean, it was just kind of like, "Let's see what happens with this." Uh, I wrote out Hurricane Ivan back in 2004, Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Hurricane Michael in 2018. I have a lot of experience with tropical storms, tropical cyclones, hurricanes, things of that nature. I think it's really important from a climatological perspective to utilize those weather markets in a way that is almost like insurance. But whenever I did live on the Gulf Coast, my homeowner's insurance deductible for a hurricane was over $10,000. So essentially it if a hurricane were headed to my house, the way I would hedge that is with buying yes that a hurricane would hit. So let's say that that's a 10. I take $1,000 and put that on yes that a hurricane is going to hit. So if I bought $10,000 I get $10,000. So a $9,000 return. I would then use that to pay the homeowner's insurance deductible to recover things, you know, from the loss from the hurricane at my house.
未来展望:主流化与机构用例
塔雷克: 嗯,我认为公司自从我们上次交谈以来已经发展了很多。我的意思是,我认为消费市场的运作方式是它们具有网络效应。它们会随着时间的推移而复合增长。这有点像指数增长。指数增长的事物会增长,但在它达到大数字之前你并不会真正注意到这种增长,然后指数基本上会非常快地变得非常大。我想这就是过去两年Kalshi发生的事情。我认为公司已经主流化了,我们规模增长了很多。现在有很大比例的美国人活跃在产品上,无论是积极交易还是获取关于预测的信息。他们把它当作新闻源来使用。我认为我们现在拥有一个全球公认的品牌。我们真正想投资的一个领域本质上是定义这个品牌的内涵,并向人们解释我们是谁,我们不是谁,我们想做什么,以及我们想实现什么。我认为在品牌方面还有很多工作要做。基本上是向人们解释这个品牌的含义。我们想走向国际化。我们想使我们的客户群多样化。而且,你知道,我们觉得人们积极使用预测市场仍处于非常非常早期的阶段。尽管数字增长了很多,但我认为它们可以真正显著增长更多。你知道,我们基本上进入了互联网的每一个角落。如果你有兴趣、有热情,或者你关心某件事,就会有一个你可以与之相关联、参与或从中获取信息的市场,因为这就是整个愿景。整个事情就是人们觉得华尔街被操纵了。大多数人与股票市场没有关联,也不理解期权或复杂的金融工具,但他们阅读新闻。他们关注趋势。他们在X平台(Twitter)上。他们关心政治。他们关心文化。他们关心体育。这是一个他们可以找到与他们有相同热情的人一起讨论他们热衷话题的市场。然后,你知道,就这些事情的观点进行辩论。所以我们还有很长的路要走。
Original English
Tarek: Well, I think the company has grown a lot since we last spoke. I mean, I think the the way that consumer marketplaces work is there's network effect aspect to them. They compound over time. It's a bit like an exponential. and the exponential things grow but you don't really notice that growth up until it starts getting to big numbers and all and then an exponential basically becomes big very big very quickly and I think that's what happened with Koshi in the last 2 years I think the company has gone mainstream we've grown a lot in size percentage of Americans now are active on the product whether they're trading actively or they're getting informed about the forecasts they use it a bit like a news feed and I think we now have a global recognizable brand one of the places that we really want to invest in is essentially defining ing what the brand stands for and explaining to people who we are, who we're not, what we want to do and what we want to achieve. And I think there's a lot of work to be put on the brand. Basically explaining to people what that brand means. We want to go international. We want to diversify our customer base. And you know, we feel like we're in a very very early inning of people using prediction markets actively. Even though the numbers have grown a lot, I think they could really grow significantly more. You know, we get into basically every corner of the internet. If you have an interest or a passion or you care about something, there will be a market that you can relate to or engage with or you can get informed about because that's whole the whole vision. The whole thing was people feel like Wall Street is rigged against them. Most people don't relate to the stock market or understand options or or complicated financial instruments, but they read the news. They follow trends. They are on X. They care about politics. They care about culture. They care about sports. And this is a market where they can find a place for topics that they're passionate about with other people that have the same similar passion. and then you know debate on the opinions about these things. So we we have a long way to go.
卢安娜: 我们真的想更多地进入机构用例。当我们创立公司时,就是出于我们最初如何遇到这种Kalshi行为的想法,那是在机构中,对吧?它不是在高盛、Bridgewater、Five Rings、Citadel。对我们来说,这是一种循环,我们实际上想真正实现的目标就是这些极具流动性的市场,从散户到大型机构银行的每个人都在上面交易。我认为在五年内,如果我们非常成功,预测市场将达到股票市场的规模。参与其中的用户类型也与此类似。它只是一个更成熟的市场。但是,是的,我只希望Kalshi能够发展得越来越好。
Original English
Luana: We really want to go more into the institutional use case. When we started the company it was the idea of causing how we how we first encountered this this type of couch behavior was in institutions right it wasn't a Goldman Sachs a Bridgewater five rings a citadel and for us it's kind of full circle we actually that is where we want to really land it's like these extremely liquid markets that everyone from retail to a massive institutional bank is trading on. And I think that in five years, if we're very successful, I think that prediction markets are the size of the stock market. The participation of like the types of users participating in it are similar to that. And it's just a very more a way more mature market. But yeah, I just hope Couch grows even even more.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
人物: Tarek Mansour, Luana Lopes, Jeff, Michael Sabo, Joel, Brandon Fiend, Shannon, Donald Trump
公司/组织: Kalshi, Goldman Sachs, Five Rings, Bridgewater, Citadel, Y Combinator, New York Stock Exchange, Wall Street, Boston Ballet
产品/模型: S&P