为什么中产阶级的生活越来越难以负担?数据与感知的真相 Money & Macro 2026-10-20

为什么中产阶级的生活越来越难以负担?数据与感知的真相

4 节

数据与感知的巨大撕裂:中产阶级真的越来越穷吗?

在欧美各大都市,生活成本居高不下的抱怨声不绝于耳。近期调查显示,欧洲有 75% 到 91% 的受访者表示商店物价涨幅超过其收入增长;而在美国,这一比例更是高达惊人的 90%。表面上看,中产阶级的生活显然变得越来越难以负担。流行的解释通常聚焦于日益扩大的贫富差距、高涨的住房、大学教育与医疗费用,以及疫情后飙升的能源与食品价格。这些解释看似极具说服力,然而一旦深挖客观经济数据,整个叙事便遭遇了重大悖论。

从纸面统计来看,大众的悲观体感与事实存在脱节。经通胀调整后,欧美当前的中位数工资(Median Wage: 排除极高或极低收入极端值影响的中位数劳动报酬)相比 2000 年实际上增长了 20% 到 30%。这意味着少数超级富豪并未扭曲这一整体趋势。不可否认,大学学费、托儿育儿等部分服务确实大幅涨价,但昔日中产阶级所追求的典型耐用品——例如汽车、衣物、儿童玩具乃至大屏电视——其制造成本均已大幅下降,在统计模型中与服务类支出的上涨相互对冲。为什么民众普遍感觉正身处停滞性通货膨胀(Stagflation: 经济停滞与物价飞涨并存的状态)之中,而官方数据却坚称经济基本面健康?这背后只有两种可能:要么是大众陷入了非理性的认知盲区,要么是官方统计模型遗漏了现实经济的关键维度。

英文原文

LA is just like, I don't even know how people live here. It's insane. It is impossible to live in Ontario. Everything is so expensive. London I don't know what type of limited edition Oliver Twist lifestyle you're selling to us, but we can't hack it. It's too much. In a recent survey, between 75% and 91% of Europeans reported that prices in shops are rising faster than their incomes. And in America, the number is a whopping 90%. So middle class life is clearly getting less and less affordable. But why? The most popular explanations emphasize rising inequality, the skyrocketing cost of housing, college and health care, as well as rapidly rising energy and food prices after the pandemic. And yeah, this all sounded pretty plausible. But when we dug into the data, we ran into a pretty serious problem with the entire idea that middle class life is getting less and less affordable. Sure, most people report it, but on paper they are wrong, both in the US and Europe. Median wages, adjusted for inflation, are up 20 to 30% compared to the year 2000. And remember, that's the median wage, not the average. So a handful of billionaires are not ruling the trend here. Sure, some stuff has clearly gotten much more expensive, like college childcare and those kind of things. But because what used to be true middle class luxuries like a car, clothing, toys for kids, or a massive TV, these have all gotten so much cheaper that it kind of balances out on paper. So what's going on? Why do people feel like they are living in a time of stagflation? That is the cost of living rising faster than income. While the data says we are actually in a pretty healthy economy, there are really only two possible answers. Either people are missing something and being irrationally pessimistic, or the official data is missing something. Instead, behavioral economists tell us that human psychology is full of blind spots. We do suffer from extreme nostalgia, for example, and we fall for doing gloom news, and we may even misinterpret basic facts. Like, for example, surveys show us all the time that Americans tend to believe that inflation is rising even when it was already falling. But at the same time, I do know that the way that inflation is calculated has changed over time and that it's far from perfect. For example, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the institution in charge of measuring U.S. inflation, claims that housing prices have increased below average wages. And come on that that can't be right. Anyone who has recently tried to buy a home knows that this cannot be true. So in this video, we're going to go in-depth on three theories that can explain why middle class life is just getting less and less affordable, or why it feels that way, even if it's technically not true. These theories are number one, the theory of the vibecession. Number two, Baumol’s cost disease, which is very interesting. It states that actually middle class staples like education and medical care may be getting more expensive precisely because your TV got so cheap. And finally, the theory that inflation statistics are missing what's really going on today. And of course, at the end, I'll give you my take on which of these theories the evidence actually supports.

情绪性衰退假说:心理归因偏差与通胀剥夺感

解释这种脱节的第一种理论被称为情绪性衰退(Vibecession: 宏观经济指标向好但公众情绪普遍悲观的社会现象)。客观而言,尽管近几年通胀率明显高于过去,但欧美两大洲的失业率长期处于历史低位。疫情后各国政府出台的大规模财政刺激催生了巨额储蓄与报复性消费,并在 2021 年引爆了一场用工荒与所谓的大辞职潮(The Great Resignation: 劳动力市场极端紧俏、劳动者纷纷跳槽追求高薪的时期)。在紧俏的就业市场中,大量职员获得了前所未有的薪资跃升,中位数工资强劲增长。尽管 2022 年的高通胀侵蚀了部分涨幅,但随后中位数名义工资的增长速度重新反超了官方通胀率。

既然薪酬客观上跑赢了通胀,为何消费者信心却发生雪崩?哈佛大学经济学家 Stefanie Stantcheva 的调研揭示了人类大脑对待财富的深层心理机制。我们在经历加薪与物价上涨时存在显著的不对称归因偏差:

  • 当劳动者获得加薪时,往往全额归功于自身的勤奋努力或专业才能;
  • 当超市日常账单激增时,人们却无法将其理解为高压经济运转下的宏观副产物,反而将其视作贪婪企业或无能政客施加的非自愿降薪。

公众享受着大辞职潮带来的溢价红利,却将 2022 年的价格飙升单纯归咎于外部剥削。这种心理剥夺感解释了公众信心的急转直下。然而,情绪波动仅能解释疫情后的短期现象;早在特朗普 2016 年当选总统前,中产阶级生活日益沉重的焦虑就已普遍存在,这说明背后必然存在更为深层的长期结构性动因。

英文原文

So without further ado, let's start with the first theory. The theory of the vibe session. Because while inflation has undeniably been higher than we were used to for the longest time, unemployment honestly looks really good compared to historical standards on both sides of the Atlantic. And that's very important, because while we were all focusing on rapidly rising prices, driven especially by energy and food, something remarkable was happening in the labor market right after Covid, thanks to big government stimulus during lockdowns and then everyone going outside to spend all of that money. There was actually a massive hiring explosion in 2021, which enabled which came to be known as the Great Resignation. That is, the labor market was so hot that for the first time ever, many people who already had a job were able to find a better one. Unemployment fell dramatically and median wages jumped up massively. Sure, it's true that inflation hit hard in 2022, and that almost entirely eroded this impressive wage growth. But if we look at the graph, median wages have been growing ever since, even faster than inflation. So then why was consumer sentiment collapsing? Some economists pointed to the fact that during the post-Covid period, media framing of economic news became increasingly sensationalist. Negative. But in a recent massive survey, Harvard economist Stephanie Stern Java uncovered a deeper psychological bias in how human brains process money. You see, we experience pay rises and price hikes completely differently. Inflation usually raises both wages and prices at the same time. But when people get a raise, they tend to credit their own hard work or talent. Well, if prices in supermarkets soar, they do not connect that these two things together. They do not see them as part of the same high pressure economy. Instead, inflation feels like an arbitrary pay cut forced upon you by greedy corporations or inept politicians. So while few linked the Great resignation of 2021 directly to inflation, the 2022 price surge was widely felt and largely blamed on bad politicians and greedy corporations and this frustration could explain why consumer sentiment dropped so sharply, even though on paper wages had gone up faster. Although, as you can see here, they did go up slower than before the pandemic. But while it's clear that vibes played a role after Covid, it cannot fully explain the trend. Why middle class life feels less and less affordable because this is a much longer trend. Already before Covid inflation, there was a widespread feeling. For example, when Trump was elected in 2016 that middle class life was getting less and less affordable. So to explain that longer trend, we need a second theory. Perhaps one of the biggest ideas that can explain why, despite cheaper TVs and other goods, middle class life staples like a home, good health care and education seem to have gotten less and less affordable. But first, if you are one of those people who also likes to think about the big ideas you'll enjoy, today's sponsor the book The Ultimate Guide to Rebuilding Civilization by Hungry Minds. You see the real reason why we have amazing and cheap TVs and electric vehicles today is because of a long chain of inventions, each building on the last, and that's made producing things dramatically more efficient. This book tells that story. It's an illustrated encyclopedia of humanity's greatest inventions and discoveries, with 880 topics across 400 plus pages, from agriculture and metallurgy to electricity and computing. And it's not just interesting. It also looks the part. I personally love how it mixes engineering drawings with medieval art and even the hardcover. It's pretty cool. It's honestly the perfect coffee table book that draws the attention of guests and in my case, my kids right away. And to me, that is really cool, because I'd love to pass my fascination for the inner workings of human civilization on to the next generation. And what better way to spark the imagination of kids and through gorgeous drawings like this? This is why I think the Ultimate Guide to Rebuilding civilization may be the perfect gift. And clearly, I'm not alone, because the book has raised over $2.3 million on Kickstarter and Indiegogo, and it became a bestseller in 2023. There's even a hidden puzzle inside which I will not spoil. So if you are looking for the perfect coffee table book or a gift, a curious friend, check out The Ultimate Guide to Rebuilding Civilization using the link in the description, and use Code Money ten for 10% off. Now back to our current civilization.

鲍莫尔成本病与结构分化:当必需品日益昂贵而耐用品沦为白菜价

解开这种长期焦虑的核心理论是经济学上著名的鲍莫尔成本病(Baumol's Cost Disease: 由经济学家威廉·鲍莫尔提出,指由于不同行业生产率增速差异,导致低生产率服务行业成本与价格被迫持续攀升的现象)。回顾上世纪九十年代,一个教师家庭若是洗衣机或显像管电视损坏,往往需要存钱数月才能置换;但在今天,相同收入阶层的家庭给孩子买玩具、买高清电视变得十分轻松,而每月的托儿账单却令人咂舌。长期的物价走势图清晰印证了这一撕裂:服装、家电、玩具等实体工业品的价格相对大幅缩水,而高等教育、育儿托管、医疗服务等领域的价格却一路狂飙。

鲍莫尔在 1960 年代就论证了二者实为一枚硬币的两面。假设一个经济体只有农民和教师:

  • 生产率分化: 拖拉机与化肥等技术突破让农民每小时的产出暴增数倍,进而带动农民收入成倍上涨;
  • 成本转嫁机制: 教师无法像工业流水线那样借助机器成倍扩增学生规模,一名教师面对一间教室、三十个孩子的模式一个世纪未变。如果教师薪酬不随全社会工资水准同步提升,整个教育体系将彻底崩溃;
  • 相对价格重构: 经济体给教师涨薪不是因为教师生产率提升,而是因为其他实体工业部门生产率在提升。结果是,每斤面包的相对价格大幅缩减,而每个孩子受教育的相对成本却成倍攀升。

这一机制不仅推高了私立教育和医疗收费,也是欧洲国家税负不断加重、而公共服务并未明显改善的根本原因。欧洲政府提供的公共部门大量依赖人力,为了与高效运转的私营部门竞争人才,政府财政支出被迫水涨船高。由此引发了一个致命的心理与现实反差:在过去,家庭面临的高成本项多是“可选耐用消费品”;而在今天,真正昂贵的变成了“生活刚性必需品”。三十年前失去收入,家庭可以推迟更换洗衣机或购买新电脑;而在当下,一旦失去收入,家庭便面临断供住房、交不起托儿费导致无法外出求职的生存悬崖。中产阶级脆弱感的实质,正在于必需品与耐用品在家庭账单中的权重发生根本性置换。

英文原文

Let's deep dive back into our second theory for why middle class life feels increasingly unaffordable. Bombs cost disease. Okay, let's go back to 1993. I was but a mere child. And yeah, I do remember that according to my middle class parents who were teachers, goods were considered pretty expensive. Whenever our washing machine broke. My parents, I remember, had to save months to replace it in big television with something that I, as a child of course, really wanted, but my parents told me they were outrageously expensive. Also toys for kids. But now, as an adult with an income similar to that, what my parents had honestly toys for my kids. They just feel really cheap, especially compared to our super high monthly daycare bill and actually, if you look at this graph, we can see that it's not just me imagining things. Inflation has not been just all prices going up. At the same time, the prices of services like college tuition and childcare have gone up by a lot, while simultaneously prices of goods like clothing, toys and TVs have gone down significantly in comparison, already in a famous 1960s paper, economist William Barmore theorized that this is no coincidence. These are two sides of the same coin. The logic is the following. Imagine that the economy only has teachers and farmers. Thanks to the invention of tractors and fertilizers, each farm is now able to produce and sell much more wheat and earn more money. However, the teacher cannot use the same technologies to teach more things to more students. One teacher, one classroom, 30 kids just like a century ago. But there's a problem if farmers are suddenly earning four times more because technology made them four times more productive, why would anyone stay teacher? To prevent a total collapse of the education system, schools have to raise the wages of teachers to keep up with those of farmers. Essentially, we are raising the weight of teachers not because they're more coming, more productive, but because productivity is growing in other sectors. And as a consequence, the relative cost of educating each child quadruples, while the cost of each loaf of bread limits. Now, of course, it's important to stress nobody in this economy is poorer. They are all richer. The farmer can make a lot more bread, and because his income rose as much as the teachers, he can still afford the same education for his kids as before. The teachers whose pay track the farmers can afford. Also those classes for their kids and they can afford much more bread. So what has changed is not just how rich they both are, but much more so. What things cost relative to each other. Bread now feels almost free, but well, we then might have expected that schools would get cheaper to the opposite actually happens. Schools now feel outrageously expensive. That is, bombs cost disease, TV production, toy production, clothing production. It all has become much more efficient. But college child care and medical care, they all still operate roughly similarly to how they did in 1993. So according to this theory, the graph is exactly what we would have expected to happen. Wages had to rise in universities, daycare centers and hospitals just to keep up with rising wages elsewhere. And because these services did not get more efficient, their price had to go up a lot as wages went up. At the same time, interestingly, because many of these services in Europe are done by the government, cause disease can also help explain why our taxes in Europe have gone up and up. Well, it doesn't feel like government services have gotten much better. Government costs have simply gotten higher and higher compared to the economy, as they had to keep raising wages in low productivity sectors to keep up with a much more productive private sector. Indeed, as you can see in this graph from Norway, this is exactly what happened. Private sector prices went up far slower than those in the government and defense, which relies heavily on machines, was somewhere in between. But what does the changing cost structure of services versus goods have to do with a feeling that middle class life keeps getting more expensive? Well, let's go back to the life of my parents in the 1990s. They worried about being able to afford the latest computer that I might need for school, or that they might need for their work. They worried about not having enough savings to replace a broken washing machine or a broken car, but their mortgage, that was pretty low. Their local taxes were pretty low, childcare was pretty cheap, and so was my education. Meanwhile, what worries me is my mortgage bill, a massive daycare bill. And since I live in Europe, the rising tax burden which of course indirectly funds my kid's education. Yet honestly, I was just ordering a massive TV the other day for my channel and I was surprised how cheap it was. Same for these super fancy toys for my kids. The cost of these toys is just almost nothing compared to the monthly daycare bill. So what if the reason that people feel like the middle class life is getting more fragile? Is that what used to be expensive were essentially luxury goods? Well, what is expensive today are essentials. That is, if one of my parents lost their income, they may have needed to buy a used washing machine rather than a new one. They may have had to work on an old computer longer, and we could not have the fancy TV the neighbors just got. But when I lose my income, I am at risk of losing my house. I'm at risk of not being able to afford daycare, making finding a new job even more difficult. So is by most cost disease, simply making middle class life feeling more fragile? I think this is part of the explanation, absolutely. But when I was looking at the graph, something strange stood out to me because I'm very sure my mortgage bill today is much larger compared to my income than that of my parents back in the 1990s, but according to this graph, that's not the case. So I still think we need our third theory as well.

通胀统计的失真盲区:居住成本低估与被隐匿的利息杠杆

鲍莫尔成本病解释了服务与商品的相对价格倒挂,但仍无法解释一个关键矛盾:为什么官方通胀数据显示住房成本涨幅居然低于平均工资涨幅?这与绝大多数近年来买房家庭的财务体感严重相悖。深入探究统计局衡量居住支出的算法,可以发现官方通胀统计存在四个维度的系统性失真:

  1. 业主等价租金的统计替代: 住房兼具自住消费与资产投资双重属性。对于没有贷款的纯房产业主,房价上涨在体感上属于资产增值而非生活成本增加。因此,美国统计部门通过业主等价租金(Owners' Equivalent Rent: 衡量自住业主若将房屋出租所能获得的租金水平)来折算住房通胀。然而自 2000 年以来,房价涨幅远远脱钩于租金涨幅,该指标完全遮蔽了新购房家庭承受的高额月供增量。
  2. 存量租金管制抹平成本脉冲: 官方抽样统计了大量处于租金管制(Rent Control)中多年未涨的长协租客,导致平均租金增幅看起来极其温和,却掩盖了新进入劳动力市场的年轻一代签约当期市场化租约时的租金暴击。
  3. 全国平均掩盖区域聚集效应: 就业与居住危机高度聚集于拥有优质高薪工作的高增长核心都会区。用俄亥俄州托莱多或德国哈雷平稳低廉的租金去算术平均纽约或法兰克福的飙升租金,严重稀释了中产家庭实际面临的居住压力。
  4. 剔除借贷利息成本: 1983 年之前,美国通胀统计指标中原本包含房贷利率成分,欧洲则始终未曾纳入。在过去十多年超低甚至零利率环境下,这项遗漏影响不大;但当各国央行在疫情后迅猛加息时,统计模型便产生了一个巨大的黑洞。

哈佛大学学者 Marijn Bolhuis、Karl Schulz 以及 Larry Summers 在 2024 年的一篇重磅论文中,按照 1983 年以前的旧口径重构了通胀数据(将房贷、车贷及信用卡借贷利率纳入考量)。测算结果表明,美国在 2022 年底的真实通胀率根本不是官方公布的高位 9%,而是惊人的 18%。研究表明,借贷成本的剧增解释了公众感官与官方数据之间近四分之三的脱节。对于背负车贷、信用卡债务或刚刚办理高息房贷的中产家庭而言,中位数名义工资在真实借贷压力面前完全不堪一击。

英文原文

There is something wrong with inflation statistics. Why do official statistics say that housing costs went up more slowly than wages did? While that's clearly not the case, when we looked at the way inflation is calculated, we essentially found four reasons why rising house costs do not properly show up in inflation statistics. The first is that because a home is both seen as something that people live in and an investment, economists do not just look at house prices directly. After all, if I own a home with no mortgage and that house gets worth more, it, doesn't that feel like inflation to me, it feels like I'm getting richer. Therefore, in the US, economists instead calculate true housing inflation by looking at how much homeowners could have rented out their place for. But because house prices have gone up much faster than rents did since 2000, this completely misses that. People who recently bought a home have a far higher monthly mortgage payment now than what they used to have. And to make matters worse, since many renters are actually in rent controlled units where rent barely changes every year, average rent increases look much lower than they actually are for a young person or family. Signing a brand new lease today. And third, the official rent increase number is a nationwide average. But we all know that the real housing crisis is concentrated in growing economic hubs where the good jobs actually are. The cheap, stagnant rent in Toledo, Ohio or Hala Germany artificially offsets an expensive surging rent in New York or Frankfurt. And finally, what's especially relevant after Covid official inflation statistics do not take into account the costs of borrowing. That is, until 1983. U.S. inflation used include mortgage interest rates in Europe. They never counted this at all. All of this made little difference, though, when rates were falling or stayed near zero for an entire decade. But when interest rates started rising rapidly, inflation statistics suddenly missed a major part of people's expenses. How much? Well, a 2024 paper by Boaz Gummer Schultz and Larry Summers rebuilt inflation the old way with mortgage, car loan and credit card interest rates included. And by that measure, US inflation. In late 2022 was not 9%, which is very high. It was actually 18% instead. And to me, this closes the rest of the puzzle. After the Covid lockdowns, median wages increased a lot, even above the official inflation numbers. But once you add borrowing costs back to inflation, it makes sense that anyone with a car loan, credit card debt, or simply trying to buy an apartment with a mortgage genuinely felt like their wage was not keeping up with their costs. They were right. Specifically, the authors estimate that the cost of borrowing explains roughly three quarters of the gap between how bad people say things are and how good the statistics look. So in conclusion, why does middle class life keep getting more expensive? Or is it actually getting more expensive? To me, I think the best answer comes from the last two theories. Baumol's cost disease theory can explain why a lot of middle class life staples have gotten a lot more expensive, and how that makes middle class life feel much more fragile than it used to. It is due to increased productivity in goods that were essentially luxuries. The cost of many essential services have skyrocketed in advanced economies, and since it was much easier to give up buying a big TV than canceling your mortgage, the result is that middle class life feels a lot more fragile today than it did decades ago. That being said, while on paper the median wages have kept up with inflation, we have seen that inflation still feels really bad. And more importantly, in my opinion, if you are not in a rent controlled housing unit, or if you did not own a house already for years and years, then inflation was genuinely quite a lot higher than the official statistics suggest. Therefore, I think it's more important than ever to solve the housing crisis, to make housing more affordable again. And as it so happens, I made a lot of videos about that recently. So go check them out. And of course, also check out this cool book, The Ultimate Guide to Rebuilding Civilization. If you are looking for a gorgeous coffee table book or the perfect gift now with 10% off using the links in the description.

文中提及的人物和组织