特朗普撤诉与巨额基金的诞生
瑞秋·艾布拉姆斯: 在一个震惊两党议员的举动中,特朗普总统撤销了他针对国税局(IRS)的100亿美元诉讼。民主党人和其他各方对于其政府计划采取的替代方案表示强烈不满。司法部宣布了一项近20亿美元的纳税人资金基金,用以补偿政府声称遭受了所谓“武器化”和“战争”的受害者。在那些可能申请赔偿的人中,包括近1600名因1月6日国会大厦骚乱而被起诉的暴徒。
Original English
Rachel Abrams: In a move that shocked lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, President Trump is dropping his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. Democrats and others are crying foul over what his administration plans to do instead. Justice Department announced an almost $2 billion fund of taxpayer money to compensate people that the administration claims have been victims of quote "weaponization and warfare." Among those who could apply for payouts the nearly 1,600 rioters charged in connection with the January 6th Capitol insurrection.
安迪·杜兰: 这实际上是在补偿那些受到极糟糕对待的人。这是“反武器化”的举措。
Original English
Andy Duran: This is reimbursing people that were horribly treated, horribly treated. It's anti-weaponization they made.
瑞秋·艾布拉姆斯: 他正在为“骄傲男孩”(Proud Boys)、“誓言守卫者”(Oath Keepers)以及他的政治亲信和追随者设立一个17亿美元的政治“行贿基金”。我认为政府将不得不回答很多问题。
Original English
Rachel Abrams: He's setting up a $1.7 billion political slush fund for the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers and his political lieutenants and hangers-on. I think that there are a lot of questions that the administration is going to have to answer.
税务泄密案的背景
瑞秋·艾布拉姆斯: 安迪,你一直在报道这一切,我只想让你先解释一下,这笔基金究竟是从哪里来的?
Original English
Rachel Abrams: You, Andy, have been covering all of this and I just want to start with you explaining where did this fund even come from?
安迪·杜兰: 这个故事始于特朗普总统2016年首次竞选公职时。他当时作为总统候选人非常独特,因为他没有公开纳税申报表。总统候选人通常会公开部分税务信息以供了解其财务状况,而特朗普没有这样做。直到2020年,《纽约时报》发表了一系列报道,描述了特朗普在税务上的做法,并披露了他多年来缴纳的联邦所得税极少。后来ProPublica也开始发布关于全球首富税收策略的故事,最终揭示出IRS内部有一名泄密者。2023年秋天,承包商查尔斯·利特尔约翰(Charles Littlejohn)被捕,他承认向《纽约时报》和ProPublica提供了特朗普及其他富人的税务信息,并于2024年初被判刑。
Original English
Andy Duran: So, yeah, this story really starts the first time that President Trump ran for office in 2016. He was unique among presidential candidates at that time and this was something of a scandal in that he did not release his tax returns. It was standard practice for presidential candidates to put out some of their tax information as a way to understand their finances, and Trump didn't do that, and this was a topic of wide interest throughout his first term. There were various attempts to see his tax returns, and that didn't happen until the New York Times in 2020 published a series of stories describing what Trump had been doing on his taxes, and revealing that for many years Trump had been paying little in federal income taxes. Fast forward about 6 months to a year after that, and ProPublica, a separate news organization, they start releasing a series of stories about the tax strategies and tax situations of some of the world's wealthiest people. And so, at that point it became clear that given the tax information of so many different people, that somebody within the IRS and with access to internal IRS records must have been the source of these stories. Put another way, it became clear that the IRS had a leaker. Yes, that there was somebody in their systems who was providing this information to the press and in the fall of 2023, somebody was eventually caught, a man named Charles Littlejohn, a former IRS contractor and he played guilty to having provided this information about Trump and then all these other wealthy individuals to the Times and ProPublica and then he was sentenced to prison in the beginning of 2024.
诉讼中的利益冲突
瑞秋·艾布拉姆斯: 作为一个私民,他可以起诉国税局,但不同之处在于,他不仅仅是一个普通公民,他起诉的是他自己管理的政府。
Original English
Rachel Abrams: The difference here, though, is that he's not just a private citizen, he is suing a government that he oversees.
安迪·杜兰: 这是一个极其不寻常的情况,如果不是完全史无前例的话。总统不仅控制着他所起诉的IRS和财政部的负责人,还控制着作为IRS在该案中律师的司法部。司法部现在由托德·布兰奇(Todd Blanche)领导,他曾是特朗普的私人律师。当特朗普总统控制着为了发起诉讼而雇佣的私人律师,同时又控制着应当对该诉讼作出回应的联邦律师时,存在内在的利益冲突。
Original English
Andy Duran: Yes, I mean, this was and is an extremely unusual situation, if not unprecedented entirely. I mean, not only does the president control the leader of the Internal Revenue Service, the agency that he is suing, and the Treasury Department, which was also named in the suit, you know, he chooses many of the people who lead those agencies and is involved in their decision-making. He has also played an enormous role in reshaping the Justice Department and kind of molding it in his image in a variety of ways. And the Justice Department is supposed to be the IRS's lawyer in this case. But, you know, there have been all sorts of things that the Justice Department has done in Trump's second term that are far beyond what historically independent Justice Department would do. Exactly. And the idea that this Justice Department, which is now led by Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, who was also President Trump's personal lawyer before he returned to the White House, would be making decisions about how to defend a lawsuit that the president had brought immediately just raised all sorts of questions about the conflict of interest inherent in such a situation.
基金运作与影响
瑞秋·艾布拉姆斯: 安迪谈到了这个巨大的资金池,我们对它了解多少?它将如何运作?
Original English
Rachel Abrams: Okay, so Andy talked to us about this gigantic pot of money. What do we know about it? How is it supposed to work?
安迪·杜兰: 我们知道这将是17亿7600万美元(注:1776是美国建国年份)。这笔钱将从所谓的“判决基金”(Judgment Fund)中抽取,这是一个司法部用来解决针对美国政府的法律索赔的资金池。这笔钱将被存入一个由五名由司法部长任命的人员控制的独立账户,他们将审议那些自称受到联邦政府迫害的人提出的索赔,并对其进行赔偿。然而,我们仍然不知道这五个人是谁,也不知道“武器化”的具体定义。
Original English
Andy Duran: Yeah, so we don't know everything yet, but what we do know is that this will be $1 billion $776 million. 1776, year of our nation's founding. Exactly, which I do not think is a coincidence, obviously. But yeah, this is a huge amount of money that will be drawn from an account called the Judgment Fund, which is basically a pot of money that the Justice Department can use to settle legal claims against the United States. So anytime the government is sued and they want to settle, they can use money from this fund. It's not usually quite this much that's taken out of it at a time, but they will be withdrawing money from that account, depositing it in a separate account, which will be controlled by five people appointed by the Attorney General, and they will consider claims from people who say that they have been victimized by the federal government and pay them for it.