重拾失控的野性与纯粹的乐趣:园艺、游戏与反思效率崇拜 TED 2026-09-22

重拾失控的野性与纯粹的乐趣:园艺、游戏与反思效率崇拜

关键字 productivity-culture playfulness loss-of-control digital-wellbeing rewilding
7 节

重新定义生产力:从产出崇拜到生命体验

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 对我们而言真正重要的事情,往往并不轻松。比如与朋友相聚,或者放手让孩子们在没有成年人看管的情况下一起玩耍。这些事情并不容易做到。真正容易的,是把大把大把的时间耗费在那些专门靠攫取你的时间来牟利的产品上。那么,凯瑟琳·普赖斯,人们对生产力究竟有什么误解?

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Things that are really important for us are not easy. Like getting together with friends, allowing your kids to go play together without adult supervision. Like these are not easy. What's easy is to spend a lot of time on products whose designers make money when you spend a lot of time on them. Okay, Katherine, what do people get wrong about productivity?

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我认为我们从根本上误解了“生产力”这一概念。在我看来,我们往往认为生产力必然与金钱挂钩——如果你把时间花在某件事上,却没有产生可量化的产出(在很多情况下就是经济收益),那么它就不值得做,你就被视作毫无生产力。因此,每当我思考这个问题时,我总在试图寻找其他衡量“富有成效地使用时间”的方式。比如,如果你只是和朋友待在一起,进行了一场非常棒的交谈,为什么这不能被视为富有成效呢?对吧?

我也很好奇你在园艺方面的看法:究竟什么是富有成效,什么又不是?如果我们要追根究底、像书呆子一样在一开场就搬出拉丁语,“生产力”(productive)的词根是 producere,意思是“向前引出”。但我真的受够了那种假设——即任何事情都必须具备某种形式的产出,才能被贴上“富有成效”的标签。你觉得你所从事的工作,以及你鼓励人们“纯粹为了园艺而园艺”的方式,与我们整个社会对生产力的病态执念之间,有什么关联?

英文原文

Catherine Price: I think we get the whole concept of productivity wrong. To me, I think we tend to think that productivity has to do with money, that if you use time on something and you don't have a quantifiable output, in many cases financial, then it's not worth it, that you weren't productive. And so when I think about it, I try to think of other ways that you can have a productive use of your time. For example, like if you're just hanging out with a friend and you have a great conversation, why is that not considered productive? Right? And I'm curious about your thoughts in terms of gardening, what is productive, what's not productive? Like the root of productive is to lead forth producco if I make it super dorky and go Latin right at the beginning of this conversation. But I also just get so tired of when there's the assumption that you need to have an output in or of any kind in order to have something be classified as productive. What do you see the connection being between the work that you do and the way that you encourage people to garden for the sake of gardening with our society's obsession with productivity?

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 我确实认为,看看大多数人园艺的方式就明白了。当然,有一部分讲求产出的园丁,他们执着于种出有史以来最庞大的南瓜。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: I do think the way that most people garden certainly there are some productive gardeners who are interested in growing like the most humongous uh pumpkins that have ever been grown.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 没错,永远都是比谁的南瓜大。

英文原文

Catherine Price: It's always pumpkins.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 是啊,哈哈。但我们绝大多数人之所以打理花园,其实是为了逃离那种生产力文化的规训。这是一种喘息,几乎是一种自我关怀的方式,甚至就像练习瑜伽或冥想一样。它是一种健康的方式,让我们重新与大地连接,与内在的自我连接,与周围所有其他生命有机体连接,并让人们能够在这个过度强调生产力的世界中生存并茁壮成长。我觉得你的工作也有异曲同工之妙——我们所有人似乎都陷入了一种难以摆脱的忙碌状态中,以至于我们常常忘记了……

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Yeah. Yeah. But most of us do it as a way to get away from that culture of productivity as a break as a almost a form of self-care or even a practice like yoga and meditation. And so it's just it's a healthy way to reconnect to the earth, to reconnect to ourselves, connect to all the other organisms that are around us, and allows people to survive and thrive in this overly productive world. I feel like your work is similar in that we're all sort of caught up in this busyness that is hard to escape and it can be hard to remember that we

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 忘记了我们需要拥有乐趣(Fun)。嗯,确实如此。

英文原文

Catherine Price: need to have fun. Mhm.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 那么,你会把自己的工作看作是在传播某种“反生产力”吗?

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: And so do you see your work as as spreading like anti-productivity?

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 好的,我的意思是,这同样取决于我们如何定义生产力。但我确实将乐趣视为对抗这种生产力痴迷的暂歇之所。然而我也目睹了一种内在冲突:人们最初可能是为了好玩去做某件事,但由于对生产力的需求扎根太深,他们很快就会把它变成一门副业(side hustle)。

举个我个人的例子——弹奏音乐。我根本不在乎给观众表演,我只是单纯发自内心地热爱演奏乐器。但现在想要召集成年人纯粹为了玩乐而聚在一起合奏是极其困难的,大家总会忍不住问:“好吧,最终的产出是什么?目标是什么?我们要制作出什么东西吗?”即便那东西根本算不上什么实质性的实物,比如仅仅是一场公开演出。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Well, I mean again I think it depends what we think of the definition of productivity being but I do see fun as a respit from this obsession with productivity but I also see this conflict where people will start doing something for fun and then this need for productivity is so deeply ingrained they'll turn it into a side hustle or like as a personal example playing music. Like I don't care about performing music for an audience. I just really love playing music, but it's very hard to get adults to just get together to play instead of saying, "Okay, what's going to be the end product?" Like, "What's the goal? Are we going to produce something?" Even if it's something as, you know, not actually tangible, like a show.


打破效率的惯性:日常仪式与找回乐趣的勇气

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 你对如何改变这种状况有什么建议吗?我的意思是,我简直无法想象给我的朋友们打电话说:“今晚来玩宾果游戏(bingo)吧”,诸如此类的话。但这真的像听上去那么容易做到吗?

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Do you have suggestions for how to do that? I mean, I can't imagine calling my friends and being like, "It's bingo night or or something." But is that really as easy as it as it sounds?

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我并不觉得这很容易,因为我们每个人的日程都被塞得太满了,而且当面对所谓的“生产力”驱动时,我们内心都有非常深层的纠结。

正因如此,认识到乐趣实际上可以助推你实现生活中其他更严肃的目标,是非常有益的。不过,我也认为它往往比我们预想的要更简单——只要你开始将乐趣视为一件有价值的事,那么迈出促成它的步骤也就会变得更容易。

我记得有一次我做完演讲后,一位年轻女士走过来对我说:“你知道吗,我和朋友们多年来一直保持着‘周二塔可之夜’(Taco Tuesday)的聚会。我一直很喜欢这个活动,但我以前从未真正意识到它有多么宝贵。我以前没意识到,这几乎成了我和朋友之间一种神圣的仪式。正是在这段时间里,我们卸下了所有防备,真正与彼此产生连接,倾心长谈。‘周二塔可之夜’听起来确实是个挺傻的概念,但事实上,它是我整周中最喜欢的时刻之一。它让我从强加给自己的所有压力中解脱出来,成为我和我在乎的人建立连接的时刻。”

所以我想说,这其实没有那么难。你可以建立一些本身并不复杂、门槛不高的仪式,而它们随后会承载起这种非凡的意义。

但我也坚信,鉴于我们当下文化对生产力、效率等等的病态痴迷,我们确实需要主动后退一步,坚定地说:我要特意为这件事情留出时间。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Well, I I don't think it's easy because I think we all are overscheduled and we have pretty deep issues when it comes to this like drive for quote productivity. And that is why it can be useful to recognize that fun can help you with these other more serious goals that you may have in your life. But I do think it is easier than we often assume and that if you start to think of fun as valuable then it becomes also easier to take the steps to make it happen. And I remember, for example, like when I gave a talk once, a young woman coming up to me after my talk and she was saying, "You know, I've had this taco Tuesday night with my friends for years." And I knew I loved it, but I didn't really realize how valuable it was. I didn't really realize it was almost like a sacred ritual that I have with my friends because it's the time where we let down our guard and we actually connect with each other and we really catch up. And it's kind of a silly concept, you know, taco Tuesdays, but actually it's one of my favorite moments of the whole week. And it's a break from all the pressure I put myself under and it's a time to connect with the people I care about. So I think that it's not as hard as you can have these rituals that aren't that hard to establish that then take on this greater meaning. But I do think that given our cultural obsession with productivity and efficiency and all that like we do need to step back and say I'm going to carve out time for this.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 好吧,如果让人们引入一件事情来过上更健康、更快乐的生活,那应该是什么?

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: All right. What's one thing people should incorporate to have a healthier and happier life?

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 嗯,我想每个人都应该种西红柿和马利筋(Milkweed)。每一个人。

英文原文

Catherine Price: H I mean I think everybody everyone should grow tomatoes and milkweed. Everybody. Um

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 展开讲讲?

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: tell me more.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我觉得这是一个微不足道的举动,但它真的能改变人们的生活。自己种西红柿,你在市场上根本买不到像自己亲手种出来那样美味的西红柿,那滋味简直令人惊艳。所以种西红柿是你为自己、为家人、为朋友所做的事情。

而种植马利筋则是一种馈赠,是回馈你周围众多正陷入生存挣扎的生命体的一种方式。每当我纵观当下整个人类群体时,人们确实显得极其孤独隔绝,甚至对自然界产生了疏离感。而这种姿态——为自然界奉上一份微小礼物的姿态——能够成为一种充满希望、极其温和的行动主义,让人们去共同塑造他们未来渴望看到的那个世界。能够亲眼见证生命的生长,能够品尝甘甜的西红柿,能够静观有哪些昆虫造访马利筋的花朵,这体验绝对妙不可言。

英文原文

Catherine Price: I think it is such a small gesture. Um but it really can change people's lives. Uh growing tomatoes, you can't buy tomatoes as good as you can grow them. They're just absolutely amazing. And so you really grow them for yourself, for your family, for your friends. And growing milkweed is an offering and a way to give back to the many organisms around you who are struggling really. And so I think that process right now when I look at humanity in general, it really does seem like people feel isolated and uh even sometimes alienated from the natural world. And that sort of gesture, it's a very small gesture of providing a gift back to that natural world um can be just a very hopeful, very gentle even form of activism for people to uh help create the world that they want to see for the future. It's really and then and then to be able to watch that, to be able to eat those tomatoes, to be able to see who visits those milkeed flowers is really just absolutely incredible.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 这真令人鼓舞。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: That's inspiring.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 确实如此。我偶尔会在车尾贴纸上看到一句话:“播种花园,即是相信明天”(Planting a garden means believing in tomorrow)。虽然听起来有点老套,但它非常温馨,而且无比真实。它包含了一种力量:你在身体力行地帮助未来的后代培育他们渴望的未来,你在字面意义上一寸寸培育出那个未来。我认为,在当下这样一个许多人甚至难以想象未来、未来显得如此不确定且令人恐惧的时代,能够站出来说“我要亲手创造这一切,我要走出去亲力亲为”,本身就是一种极具颠覆性的先锋举动。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Absolutely. There's this bumper sticker that I see sometimes that says, "Planting a garden means believing in tomorrow." And it's so cheesy, but also very sweet and very true. There's this element of you're helping cultivate the future that you want to create for future generations. You're helping to literally grow that future. And I think at a time where so many pe people are having trouble even imagining the future and the future is very uncertain and scary, it can be a pretty radical act to say, I'm going to create this myself. I'm going to go out and do it myself.


真正的乐趣:玩乐心态、真实连接与心流的交汇

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 我很好奇,你会如何鼓励人们变得更快乐、更健康?

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: I'm curious about how you would encourage people to be happier and healthier.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 从很多方面来说,我都非常推崇园艺的理念。但我也认为,应当将乐趣置于优先地位。我们常常认为乐趣是轻浮的、浪费时间的,或者觉得生活在这个充满严肃危机的疯狂世界里,把乐趣排在前面是不负责任的。

然而,如果你正在体验真正的乐趣,你其实是在为自己注入充沛的能量。你会变得更有韧性去应对自己生活中的艰难险阻,同时你也会成为照亮他人的一股能量源泉。它赋予你改变外部广阔世界的充沛精力。试想一下,如果你只是整天瘫在沙发上一味刷着令人沮丧的新闻资讯(doom scrolling),你甚至连建个小花园的力气都没有,你绝不会去种下那株马利筋,因为你脑子里塞满了令人窒息的信息过载。

固然有人会辩解说保持知情权很重要,但究竟到了哪一步,这种知情就越界变成了病态的执念,变成了不断把那些你根本无法掌控的事物强行塞进大脑?因此,我认为必须做出自觉的努力,与这类内容划清界限,问问自己:“什么能滋养我?什么能重新点亮我的内心?”因为我们越是滋养好自己,我们越能回馈他人,我们也越能享受自己的人生——而享受人生本就是我们的正当权利。

英文原文

Catherine Price: I think in many ways I love the gardening idea. I also think just prioritizing fun and that we often think that fun is frivolous or a waste of time or we think it's irresponsible to prioritize fun in this crazy world that we're living in with so many serious problems. But if you are having fun then you're filling yourself up with energy. You become much more equipped to deal with hard things in your own life and you also become a source of energy for other people and it gives you energy to do stuff to help the world at large. You know, if you're sitting on the couch just doom scrolling the news, like you actually can't even plant a garden. You're not going to play that milkweed because all you're doing is filling your mind with really overwhelming information. And you can make an argument that it's important to stay informed, but at what point does just cross the line to being obsessed and putting stuff that you have no control over into your head? So, I think making a conscious effort to create better boundaries with content like that and say, "What would fill me up, you know, what would light me up?" Because the more we nourish ourselves, the more we can give to others and also the more we'll enjoy our own lives, which we're allowed to do.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 你是把乐趣看作一种独立的具体活动——比如专门出门去干一件好玩的事——还是说你认为更重要的是在人们既有的日常行动中去创造乐趣?抑或是两者兼而有之?

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Do you differentiate between fun as this sort of distinct activity where you're going and doing a fun thing or do you think that it's more important or perhaps both that people should try to create fun in the actions that they're already having?

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我会说是两者兼备。但我总是喜欢强调并指出:乐趣是一种内在感受,而不是某项具体的活动。

我对真正乐趣的定义是三重要素的交汇:玩乐心态(Playfulness)、真实连接(Connection)与心流状态(Flow)。这三者各自独立存在时对我们都大有裨益,但当三者融为一体时,就会迸发出乐趣这种神奇的状态。

我认为你可以通过两种途径来创造它: 第一种途径是找出你的“乐趣磁铁”(fun magnets)——梳理出究竟哪些活动、哪些环境或哪些人最有可能为你带来那种乐趣的感觉,然后在你繁忙的日程中挤出时间优先安排它们。 另一种途径是让自己向更多自发的即兴乐趣敞开大门。比如问问自己:“此时此刻,我做点什么能让自己感受到更多的连接?或者怎样才能让我更沉浸入心流?或者如何为眼前的情境增添一丝玩乐与愉悦?”

将乐趣定义为“带着玩心的连接与心流”(Playful connected flow),其美妙之处正是你刚才提到的:一旦你心中有了这个框架,你就能把这种心态带入任何现存的环境中。即使是一次职场对话,甚至是一个无聊的 Zoom 视频会议,你依然能够为之注入一些轻松诙谐的氛围,或者与同伴建立起更真实的连接。

所以这其实是两者的结合。我认为很多人之所以体会不到快乐,是因为我们把目光过分窄化在“必须是一项特定活动”上,结果就掉进了“必须花大钱才能买到快乐”的消费陷阱,而没有意识到乐趣的契机每时每刻都漂浮在我们周围。

每当想到这里,我脑海中总会浮现出一个故事:有个人曾向我分享过一段关于极致乐趣的亲身经历。他说他和他的小侄子坐在公园的长椅上整整度过了四十五分钟,体验到了巨大的乐趣——而他们所做的一切,不过是比赛去抓从树上飘落下来的树叶。

英文原文

Catherine Price: I think that I would say both, but I always like to distinguish or point out that I think that fun is a feeling. It's not a particular activity. So my definition of fun is that it's the confluence of three different factors. Playfulness, connection, and flow. And each of those is wonderful for us on their own, but when all three are together, it's this magical state of fun. And I think that you can create it in two ways. One is to actually figure out your fun magnets, I call them. So figure out what the activities or the settings or the people the people are who are most likely to generate that feeling of fun for you and then carve out time in your busy schedule to prioritize those. Another way to approach it is to open yourself up to more spontaneous opportunities for fun where you're like, what could I do to make myself feel a little more connected right now or a little more in flow or add a bit of playfulness or delight to the situation? And another thing I like about defining fun as playful connected flow is what you're getting at, which is that if you have that definition in mind, you can bring a bit of that attitude to pre-existing situations. Even a work conversation, like even a Zoom call, you can still bring a little bit more levity or a little bit more connection with people. So, I think it's kind of a combination of things, but I think we focus a bit too much on the idea that it is a specific activity because that's when you get into the whole you have to spend a lot of money to have fun instead of recognizing there's opportunities around us all the time. And the story that I I always have in my mind when I think about that is a anecdote someone told me about his own memory of a moment that was really fun. This guy told me he spent 45 minutes sitting on a park bench with his nephew having a ton of fun simply trying to catch leaves as they fell off of a tree.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 噢,太美好了。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Oh, how lovely.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 是啊!当时我对他说:“天哪,你把我的比喻在物理层面上彻底具象化了!”因为我总在说,乐趣的机会就像空气中的落叶一样飘浮在我们周围,我们只需要伸手去抓住它。而你竟然真的从空气中去抓树叶、抓取乐趣!我真该好好感谢那位先生。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Yeah. And I said to him, I was like, "Oh my goodness, you just made this very literal." Because I always say that, you know, there's opportunities for fun floating around us in the air. We just need to reach out and grab them. And here you are literally grabbing leaves and fun out of out of the air. Yeah. Um, so I was grateful to that man.


放下控制权:在宏大生态与400年古树前感受释怀

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 那么,你是如何放下控制权的?

英文原文

Catherine Price: How do you give up control?

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 我认为首先我们必须清醒地认识到:归根结底,我们并没有自己想象的那么举足轻重。我们只是一个更庞大的生态系统中的微小组成部分。

死抓着控制权不放,并不会真正帮到任何人,包括我们自己在内。所以,不断在心底提醒自己这一点是非常管用的。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: I think we need to recognize that ultimately we're not that important. We're part of this bigger ecosystem. Us trying to cling to control isn't really probably going to help anyone, including ourselves. So, I think constantly reminding myself of that is really useful. Um, and also t

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 确实。虽然这不完全是对那个问题的直接回答,但我注意到,在我生命中体验到最多乐趣的时刻,恰恰是那些我全然放弃了控制感的瞬间。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Yeah. And so this is not exactly an answer to that question, but I have noticed the times for me in which I have the most fun are the moments in which I've given up control.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 我不能更赞同了。我觉得控制欲在很大程度上真的会成为一种沉重的心理枷锁。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: I mean I I couldn't agree more. I feel like control can really be a burden.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 没错,对吧!这确实始于自我觉察——意识到放下控制时那种油然而生的释然。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Yeah. Right. And that that it really starts with recognizing that and and the relief that can come when you do uh not when you give up control.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 或者只是仰望参天巨树。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: or just giant trees.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我原以为你要往哪个方向讲,没想到是古树!好吧。

英文原文

Catherine Price: I didn't know where I thought you were going with that, but it wasn't with old trees. Okay.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 哈哈,我的话题永远都会绕回到树上,总是如此。在布朗克斯的一座墓园里,矗立着一棵树龄长达400年的白栎树(White Oak)。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: It's always always going towards trees. Yeah. Um but there is a 400y old white oak in a cemetery in the Bronx. Really?

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 真的吗?

英文原文

Catherine Price: Really?

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 那棵树极其庞大,体量宏伟无比。当你站在它面前时,谁才是那个更崇高、更具神圣性的存在,是一目了然的。站在它脚下,你甚至总想献上某种供品。那感觉简直令人彻底放松,就像在凝视一座高山、一片峡谷或无垠的天空。

去切身体会自己的渺小与微不足道,这本身就是一种巨大的解脱。我认为放下控制的过程,真的可以始于这种体验:将自己置于那些庞大、辽阔且永恒的事物面前。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: This tree is massive. is just humongous and it's really obvious when you visit this tree who the superior being is. It's like I always want to bring an offering or something like that and it is so relaxing. It is so just it's sort of like looking at a mountain or a canyon or the sky to feel that smallalness and that insignificantness and it's yeah it's just a relief and I think that process of giving up control can really start with just feeling that smallness in front of things that are large.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 没错,那种感觉真的太美妙了。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Yes, it feels really good.


游戏的本质:边界内的自由、大黄蜂与打闹

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 好的,对你来说,“游戏/玩耍”(Play)到底意味着什么?

英文原文

Catherine Price: Yeah. All right. What does play mean to you?

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 哎呀,这个问题太难回答了。我承认我一直在这个概念上挣扎。我有一个12岁的孩子,所以很多时候我都是通过观察我的孩子以及其他孩子来理解什么是玩耍。但说到成人之间的玩耍,我往往感到困惑。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Oh, such a tough one. Um, I uh struggle. I struggle with this. I have to admit. I uh I have a 12-year-old and so a lot of times I think about play as what I see my child doing and what I see other kids doing, but when it comes to adults playing, I struggle.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我非常理解,在这个问题上我和你完全感同身受。我认为要给游戏下定义确实很难,尤其是对成年人而言。

如果非要定义,我会说游戏就是:纯粹为了体验其本身的愉悦而去做令人开心的事,而不必强求一定要达成某种特定的结果。

我发现有一个切入点很有启发——这其实又绕回了“我们如何放手交出控制权”的问题:如果你思考很多能够带来乐趣的情境,比如参与某项运动、玩某种棋盘游戏,你之所以能在其中尽情玩乐,恰恰是因为你能稍稍放下控制;而你之所以敢于放下控制,是因为你清楚此时此刻该如何举止——换句话说,游戏是有明确规则的,每个人都知道什么能做、什么不能做。拥有这种结构边界,反而能让人们真正放松下来,不再过度防备,从而尽情体验乐趣。

英文原文

Catherine Price: I am Yeah, I'm with you on that. I think it's really hard to define play and especially for adults. I think I would say it's doing things for the fun of it, doing enjoyable things for the sake of doing them without necessarily needing the outcome to be a particular way. I found it useful to think about this is actually kind of tying back to how do you let go of control? Actually, just putting together is that if you think about a lot of situations that generate fun, like playing a sport or playing a game, the reason that you can have fun is that you can kind of let go a little bit, but the reason you can let go is you know how you're supposed to behave, you know, like you there's rules to the game, so everyone knows what they can and can't do. And having that structure actually lets people relax and lower their guard and then have fun.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 是的。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Yeah.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我觉得这个机制深入思考起来非常有趣。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Um which I find interesting to think about.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 确实,这让我想到了肢体打闹(roughhousing)。看着孩子们摔跤扭打,有时动作相当激烈,起初这让我很担心,我心想:“天哪,千万别打伤了。”但后来我意识到,只要我们明确划定边界——比如“绝不能弄伤对方、必须相互尊重、随时可以叫停”——他们就会在这个框架内,以一种他们天然渴望的野性方式玩得无比痛快,对吧?

在学校和家庭的很多场合中,大人们是不允许他们那样肆意打闹的。但一旦我们设定了这些参数,他们反而能释放出成倍的快乐。而且他们心如明镜,一旦有人逾越了界限,那就不再是游戏,那就成了纯粹的粗暴伤害。孩子们内在其实是有这种默契边界的。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Yeah. It makes me think about roughousing. Watching these kids wrestle uh pretty aggressively sometimes worried me initially. I was like, "Oh no, don't get hurt." But then I realized that having boundaries around that play allows them to have. so much more fun in this really wild way that they're inclined towards, right? And um in many realms of school and home life, they're not allowed to behave like that. But once we set those parameters, they had so much more fun, right? And they would know if someone went too far. Like then it wouldn't be play, then it would be too rough. And like they kind of know that.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 也许游戏纯粹就是做那些感觉好玩的事。我在为我的书做调研时学到了一点:在整个动物界,科学家们在越来越多意想不到的生物身上观察到了玩耍行为。比如,大黄蜂(Bumblebees)就非常贪玩!

有一项非常棒的研究:研究人员把一群大黄蜂放在一个装置里,旁边放着小木球,还有一条通向糖水的通道。结果大黄蜂哪怕在没有任何食物奖励的情况下,也会主动跑去滚那些小球玩。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Maybe play is also just doing things because they feel fun. One thing I learned in my research for my book is that across the animal kingdom, scientists are observing play in a lot of creatures you might not expect. Bumblebees. Bumblebees are like so playful. There was a great study um where they like had all these little bumblebees and these little wooden balls and they had this path towards sugar water, and the bumblebees would just roll the balls for fun.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 纯粹为了好玩。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Just for fun.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我太喜欢这个发现了。

英文原文

Catherine Price: I love that.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 当你观察大黄蜂并将它们视为授粉昆虫时,你会发现它们极其聪明,而且热爱解谜。

花朵有泛化型(generalist)的,比如向日葵,花盘完全敞开,花粉和花蜜一目了然,任何昆虫都能轻易取食。但也有极其复杂的花,比如玄参科植物或豆科植物,它们的结构就像精巧的锁,昆虫必须钻进去、施加杠杆作用或者推开花瓣。

而大黄蜂在这方面表现卓越。它们甚至能从字面上拧开瓶盖!有一项科学实验表明,大黄蜂能够摸索出如何拧开瓶子以获取食物。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: When you look at bumblebees and you think about them as pollinators, they are unusually smart and they like puzzles. There's generalist flowers. If you think of a sunflower, right? It's really open and the pollen and the nectar are really accessible. You could be anyone and pollinate that. But then there are flowers that are really complex, like figworts or legumes that are like puzzles and you have to crawl in and you have to leverage something or open something up. And bumblebees are excellent at that. They can they can literally unscrew a bottle. There's a a research study showing that bumblebees can figure out how to unscrew a bottle to get to food.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 真的吗?我之前完全不知道!我现在脑海里已经浮现出为大黄蜂量身打造的微型“密室逃脱”游戏了。

英文原文

Catherine Price: right? Right. Yeah. No, I totally agree. I did not know that. I'm imagining little like escape rooms for bumblebees now.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 我想这足以开辟一个全新的科研领域了。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: I think that's like a whole field of research.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 各位听众,你们可是头一次在这里听说这个设想!

英文原文

Catherine Price: You heard it here first.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 是啊,哈哈。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Yeah. Okay.


主动引入摩擦力:抵抗数字产品对注意力的无痛掠夺

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 好吧。在一个竭尽全力把一切都设计得尽可能轻松、顺滑的世界里,为什么主动在生活中引入摩擦力(Friction)是一件至关重要的事情?

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: All right. In a world designed to make everything as easy as possible, why is friction an important thing to incorporate into your life?

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我首先想对这个前提提出一点质疑。到底什么是“轻松”?就像我们刚才聊到的,真正滋养我们身心的事情绝非易事——比如与朋友线下相见,或者放手让孩子们脱离成人的监视共同玩耍,这些都需要耗费心力,绝不容易。

真正容易的,是把海量时间沉溺在那些靠榨取你的注意力来赚钱的商业产品上。刷社交媒体轻而易举,沉迷于耸人听闻的新闻资讯轻而易举。

所以,首先要厘清到底什么才是真正的“容易”。其次,摩擦力之所以如此重要,是因为很多我们真正珍视的生活体验都需要投入精力去克服初始阻力;但更为紧迫的是,我们如今身处一个极度失衡的生态中:体量庞大的跨国科技公司雇佣着世界上顶尖的神经科学家和软件工程师,其唯一目的就是消除数字体验中的一切阻力,让你毫无知觉地陷在屏幕里。

因此,如果你不主动在自己与手机之间设立物理层面的阻力和摩擦,你根本没有胜算。这完全是一场不对称的战争。

我总是建议人们:为你想要减少的行为增加摩擦,比如晚上把手机放到卧室外面充电,买一个老式的独立闹钟;同时,务必为你真正想做的事情消除摩擦——在你的床头柜上放一本你一直想读的好书,放上一把乐器,让你一伸手就能触碰美好。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Well, I think the first thing is to say, well, what what actually is easy? And then I would say the reason that friction is so important is because a lot of the things that are really important for us are not easy. Like getting together with friends or like allowing your kids to go play together without adult supervision. Like, these are not easy. What's easy is to spend a lot of time on products whose designers make money when you spend a lot of time on them. Mhm. It's very easy to scroll through social media. It's very easy to stay on the news, you know. So, I think that the first thing is to say, well, what what actually is easy? And then I would say the reason that friction is so important is because a lot of things that we really want to do have a high barrier to entry um but then I would also say that it's really important because right now we're in a very lopsided situation where you do have huge companies that are hiring the best behavioral scientists and designers in the world to make their products as addictive as possible and to reduce friction as much as possible. And so if you don't intentionally introduce friction between you and your devices, you don't stand a chance. It's just not an even fight. But also make sure that you put something on your bedside table that you want to do. Reduce friction for the things you want to spend time on and increase friction for the things you want to spend less time on.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 我现在真想冲动地把手机直接扔出卧室。不知道今晚能不能狠下心做到。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: I'm I'm inspired to throw my phone out of my bedroom. We'll see if that actually happens.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 去买个闹钟吧,就这么简单。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Just get an alarm clock.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 好的。不过每当我想起当下的世界,生活确实显得无比沉重。感觉现代生活充满了前所未有的阻碍与摩擦,哪怕仅仅是去超市买个菜,都要应对许多过去根本不存在的繁琐压力。所以我也想反驳那个前提——现代生活其实一点也不轻松,我们反而在被动承受太多坏的摩擦。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Okay. All right. I do think that when I think about the world right now, it really seems hard. Like it seems like there's more friction than um that we have to deal with just to go grocery shopping um that haven't been there in the past. So So yeah, I also would push back on the premise.


召回生活的野性:消灭草坪与打破孤独

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 对。那么,如果有人想要在自己的日常生活中找回一点野性(Wildness),应该从何处着手?

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Right. All right. Where should someone start if they want to bring a little more wildness into their life?

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我始终坚信人们应该动手种植物。每个人都应该种点植物。如果住在公寓室内,可以养室内绿植。这个过程同样是一种奉献与回馈,它关乎的不再仅仅是你自己,而是你给地球上其他生灵带去的滋养。你觉得呢?如果是你,你会给什么建议?

英文原文

Catherine Price: I mean, I I always think people should grow plants. Everyone Everyone should grow plants. If they live inside, you can grow house plants. They're amazing. And I think that process again, it's an offering, right? It's not so much about you as something that you are giving back to the other earthlings. How about you? What do you think?

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 如何把野性带回生活?每当我与人们探讨他们曾经经历过的乐趣时,我通常会说:去适度叛逆一下吧。

很多让我们感到充满生机和乐趣的事情,往往带有一丝叛逆色彩——做一些不循规蹈矩的事,走出既定的规训,重返真实的大自然。我认为这至关重要,它能瞬间唤醒我们的生命力。这与在城市中培育野生动植物栖息地本质上是一脉相承的。

我们这个时代弥漫着普遍的孤独与孤立感,而与自然界其他生命的深层连接,正是治愈这种孤独的核心解药。想象一下,置身于啁啾鸣叫的鸣禽环绕之中,它们彼此呼应交流,有时我们甚至能读懂它们的语言——比如我家窗外有一只鸟,它总是发出特定鸣叫来向同伴报警,通报附近有猛禽出没。

如果你拥有哪怕一小片草坪,如果你生活的地方有一块草坪,请铲掉其中一部分草坪,种上本土开花植物吧!

草坪从根本上说就是关于极致控制的产物。它本质上就是给地球剃了一个规整的寸头(crew cut),反反复复地用割草机去修剪压制。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: How to bring wildness into your life. I think that rebelling a bit is what I would say to that when I talk to people about their past fun experiences. It's often something slightly rebellious. And I think that that is so important and it reminds us of what makes us alive. And I would say that it's a very similar thing as to cultivating habitat. Yeah. When I think that that connection to other creatures is really really central to a lot of the isolation and loneliness that people feel like we're the only living things on this earth. And to realize that we're actually surrounded by song birds who are saying things to each other. Sometimes we can even understand those things. Like there's a bird outside of my house that tells me every time that there's a raptor around, right? And so to have that communication is just wild. If you have a lawn and if you live in a place with a lawn, take a little bit of that lawn away and plant those flowers there. Lawns are so fundamentally about control. They are literally a crew cut, right? It's a crew cut that is happening um to the earth over and over in this very resource-intensive way.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 我太喜欢这个建议了!这绝对是践行“学会放下控制”最具体、最落地的行动:交出你的一部分草坪。

英文原文

Catherine Price: I love that as a concrete suggestion for how to let go of control. Let go of some of your lawn.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 是的,哪怕只是一个小角落。你可以从极小的尺度做起。现在有一场非常酷炫的朋克摇滚式的运动,就叫做“消灭草坪”(Kill Your Lawn)。我由衷支持它,因为整齐划一的草坪不该成为每一处景观理所当然的默认模板。

很多人之所以铺草坪,仅仅是因为他们不知道这块土地还能拿来干嘛,或者他们内心深处潜藏着对野性自然的非理性恐惧,害怕里面会钻出蛇来。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Yeah, just a little corner. You can start really small. There's this whole punk rock movement right now of kill your lawn and uh it's cool. I support it because it shouldn't just be the default of every single landscape. I think a lot of people have lawn because they don't know what else to do with land or they are scared that if they let it go, it's going to turn into snakes.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 真的吗?居然直接联想到蛇?

英文原文

Catherine Price: Really? Straight to the snakes. straight to snakes.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 是的,人们总是立刻脑补草丛里全都是蛇!

但这又让我联想到了草坪作为“游戏空间”的意义,就像我们之前讨论的:草坪本身其实是人们享受户外的场所,它是专属人类的“微型生境”。正如我常说的,更健康的视角是把草坪看作一块局部铺设的装饰地毯(area rug),而不是通铺满整个房间的满铺地毯(wall-to-wall carpet)。你只需要保留一小片满足家人活动游戏的空间,剩下的广阔土地,完全可以播种野花野草,奉献给野生动物。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: But that also makes me think of like the lawn as a play space like what we were talking about before where a lawn, you know, if you ask people what they use their lawn for, they're like, "Well, the kids play on it." And so, yeah, keep that space. Keep the space where you actually throw a frisbee or have a picnic. But all the rest of it that you're just mowing for the sake of mowing, get rid of it. Yeah. Yeah. It really is a space that people get to enjoy it. It's like the habitat for people, right? And so, as I said, it's much better to see lawn as an area rug rather than wall-to-wall carpet. It's just that little space that you need, and then you can seed the rest of that for wildlife.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 再说了,现在谁还会想要在家里通铺厚厚的地毯呢?那简直是上世纪70年代的老古董风格了。

英文原文

Catherine Price: And like, who wants wall-to-wall carpet these days? That's very 1970s.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 确实如此!

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: True.

凯瑟琳·普赖斯: 谢谢你,丽贝卡。这次对话真是太美妙了。我学到了很多,我也深受启发,下定决心要把手机赶出卧室,拥抱更多的乐趣。

英文原文

Catherine Price: Thank you, Catherine. That was so lovely. And I learned a lot, and I'm inspired to get rid of my phone and have more fun.

丽贝卡·麦克马克: 谢谢你,凯瑟琳。我也一定要亲手种下一株西红柿,还有几株马利筋。

英文原文

Rebecca McMackin: Thank you, Rebecca. I am going to plant a tomato and some milkweed.

文中提及的人物和组织