美债历史警戒线与债务认知的盲区
美国的债务占GDP比例(Debt-to-GDP Ratio: 国债总额与国内生产总值的比率)目前已经逼近二战刚结束时的历史高点。随着特朗普时期的减税政策、外交政策开支以及将美国国防预算翻倍的提案,这一比例预计将被推得更高。面对这一趋势,人们很自然会担忧美国是否正在走向一场债务危机。
然而,关于美债危机的警告已经持续了数十年。早在1992年的美国电视节目中,人们就将国债称为笼罩美国未来的“巨大风暴”;2006年巴拉克·奥巴马(Barack Obama)提出了警告;2011年保罗·瑞安(Paul Ryan)再次重申;甚至在现任政府上台前,财政部长斯科特·贝森特(Scott Bessent)也公开表示当前的债务轨迹在根本上是不可持续的,并声称控制债务是他接受这份工作的原因。但上任后,他却主持了庞大的开支增长,以至于美国国会预算办公室(CBO)目前预测美国的债务占GDP比例将超过打完一场真正世界大战后的水平。
这就带来了一个核心问题:政府债务的临界点究竟在哪里? 事实上,我们很难单纯从债务占GDP的比例中找到规律。俄罗斯在1998年爆发危机的临界点是75%,阿根廷在2001年是65%,而如今日本即使达到250%也依然运行良好。这表明,传统的债务比率指标并不能准确预警危机。
Original English Source
U.S. debt to GDP is almost as high now as just after the Second World War. And now Trump's tax cuts, foreign policy adventures and proposal to double the US defense budget are projected to push it way higher. So is the US heading towards a debt crisis? You'd think so. But there's one big problem. People have been warning about US debt for literally decades now. The national debt. It is a massive storm that is clouding America's future. Yes, that was a US TV spot from 1992, but also in 2006, Barack Obama warned us. Paul Ryan again did the same in 2011 and before coming into office, Trump Treasury Secretary Scott Bassett openly stated that current US debt is fundamentally unsustainable and that taming it is why he took the job. But coming into office, Bassett is currently overseeing such a massive big spending increase that the US Congressional Budget Office now predicts US debt to GDP will go even higher than. After fighting a literal world war. So when can we expect something will break? When will the US enter the dreaded debt death spiral that hit Greece in 2012 at 172% debt to GDP? Venezuela in 2017 at 160%, debt DB and Sri Lanka in 2022 at 114% to GDP. Well, this graph probably will not tell us. You see, there's a big problem with how we typically look at government debt. That is we do not know how much is too much. There isn't even a clear pattern. You see, for Russia in 1998, 75% of GDP was its breaking point for Argentina. In 2001, it was about 65% of GDP and 40%. Today, 250% of GDP seems just fine. So what does it tell us about this alarming trajectory of you as debt? When will it genuinely be too high?
违约的真实诱因:真实利率与债务死亡螺旋
为了探寻债务的可持续性,我们必须深入研究过去十年中最具代表性的五次政府违约案例(希腊、委内瑞拉、斯里兰卡、俄罗斯和阿根廷)。数据表明,这些国家的共同点并非高额的债务占GDP比例——希腊、委内瑞拉和斯里兰卡的债务比例在当时确实很高,但俄罗斯和阿根廷在崩溃前的债务比例按今天的标准来看其实相当低。
这些案例真正的共同特征是:在崩溃前夕,它们都面临着极高的真实利率。这里的真实利率(Real Interest Rate: 名义利率减去通货膨胀率)是经通胀调整后的实际资金成本。在危机爆发前,这些国家的真实利率通常飙升至20%以上。通胀因素在这里至关重要,因为高通胀通常会伴随着价格上涨而迅速带来财政税收的增长,从而使偿还债务变得相对容易。而在阿根廷(经历了-1.7%的通货紧缩)和希腊(通胀率为1.5%)等案例中,低通胀甚至通缩反而加剧了实际债务压力。
这些国家之所以违约,并不是因为他们完全无法借到资金,而是因为他们只能以不断攀升的惩罚性利率借款。最终,他们不得不为了偿还旧债利息而借入更多的高息新债,从而陷入了债务死亡螺旋(Debt Death Spiral: 利率上升导致债务增加,债务增加又促使投资者索要更高利率,最终导致债务体系崩溃的恶性循环)。这种自我实现的精神压力和市场恐慌,会在极短的时间内摧毁一个原本看似稳健的经济体。
Original English Source
To answer that question, we have to go beyond what you usually hear in the media and find out when do governments actually go bust? If we look at the five most high profile government defaults of the last decade, we can see that they all had two things in common, but it was not high debt to GDP. That is, while Greece, Venezuela and Sri Lankan depths were absolutely considered very high by today's standards, Russian and Argentinean debts right before their collapse would be considered fairly low, fairly responsible. Instead, what all these cases had in common was that they had very, very high real interest rates just before they collapsed. That is here, you see interest rates minus inflation. That is real interest rates just before the collapse. And while they vary quite a bit, I think it's fair to say that any interest rate above 20% would be considered really, really high. And remember that is interest rates corrected for inflation, which is very important because if there is a lot of inflation, tax revenue tends to go up quickly along with rising prices, which could make repaying debt easy. So in practice, interest rates would often have been way higher than inflation. These are indeed interest rates minus inflation. And while inflation is often associated with too much government spending, as you can see here, inflation in Venezuela and Sri Lanka was indeed extremely high just before they collapsed. But in Russia it was actually still at a manageable 6%. And Argentina had deflation at -1.7% and Greece at 1.5%. In this cases, inflation would not have predicted a crash. So just to be clear, Russia, Argentina, Greece, Venezuela and Sri Lanka defaulted on their debts not because they could not borrow anymore, but rather because they could only borrow at such high ever increasing interest rates that they'd have to borrow more and more just to keep paying these ever increasing interest rates. So at that point, they rather chose not to borrow anymore at all. And this is not just me cherry picking five examples that fit this narrative. Economic research also does not find evidence that there exists a certain debt to GDP ratio, after which governments and their economies collapse, perhaps even stranger. Even a bad economy does not predict a government debt default. On the other hand, what does predict whether a government will soon default on their debt is interest rates that are rising faster than government revenue, which forces governments in what you could call a self-fulfilling debt death spiral. And in such a spiral, higher interest rates, spending increases government debt. And then investors see government debt getting higher and higher and therefore ask, of course, a higher interest rate, which in turn increases government debt and so forth. And as you can see here for Greece, that self-fulfilling doom loop can actually explode really quickly after a period in which everything looked quite fine. Once a country enters this state, it will be extremely difficult to get out of because most governments cannot raise taxes fast enough without destroying the economy.
债务可持续性的核心公式:r 与 g 的博弈
经济学家评估债务可持续性的唯一切实可行的方法,是对比**真实利率(r)与真实经济增长率(g)**的相对关系。
- 当 r < g 时:如果真实利率低于经济增速,政府只需在扣除利息支出的预算中保持基本平衡,债务占GDP的比例就会随着经济总量的增长而自然快速下降。
- 当 r > g 时:当真实利率超过经济增速,利息的增长速度将超过税收的增长速度。此时,政府必须迅速且大幅度地削减开支,否则将不可避免地滑向债务死亡螺旋。
目前,美国正处于一场大规模的 AI投资繁荣 之中,其对宏观经济数据的生产率提振效应仍有待观察。在这种高技术迭代的背景下,诸如本视频赞助商——由 Ahrefs 开发的 Letaido 等AI营销工具应运而生。对于企业或内容运营者而言,传统的AI模型需要繁琐的提示词和数据输入,而 Letaido 作为专属的AI Agent平台,能够直接链接工具、理解数据并自主输出 backlink 分析报告或关键词优化方案,24小时不间断地执行具体工作。这种AI技术的普及,正是当前经济试图通过提高生产率来维持高增速的微观缩影。
Original English Source
And this brings us to the only real way that economists track debt sustainability. They simply compare. Interest rates corrected for inflation are to how fast the economy is growing, corrected for inflation. Gee. And interestingly, if real interest rates are lower than how fast the economy is growing, the government can even reduce the debt over time quite quickly, simply by running a balanced budget, excluding interest rates. But once interest rates are bigger than growth, they start rising faster than Texas can keep up. Then the government will really have to cut spending very quickly to avoid ending up in a death spiral. So can the US avoid such a dreaded debt death spiral? And how much longer can it keep spending like this? And this is currently even more difficult to assess than normal, because the US is in a massive AI spending boom right now, of which we still have to see the productivity effects in macroeconomic data. But there certainly have been a lot of super interesting tools coming out, such as that of our advertising sponsor Letaido by Ahrefs, a major SEO and marketing platform. Whether you run a business blog or have any other online presence, you know marketing is a lot of work. Tracking what's working, finding content ideas, keeping tabs on competitors, writing reports. Whereas regular AI models can do a lot in theory, in practice it's incredibly difficult and tedious to feed them all the right data and the perfect prompt. This is where Letaido comes in, which has unrestricted access to all Ahrefs data and, unlike standard agents, has been specifically trained to be a marketing rockstar. Letaido is a platform where AI agents actually do the work for you 24/7, not a chat bot that just answers questions. Agents that connect to your tools, understand your data, and ship finished results. For example, since my website was already connected to Ahrefs, I could simply ask Letaido to do an analysis on who links to my website, and Letaido immediately gave me a fully up to date backlink profile report explaining what's working well, what can be improved, and what I should do next. Finally, it gave follow up recommendations for analysis to do next, such as optimizing my organic keywords or discovering content gaps. So if you want to turbocharge your marketing, why not give Letaido a try and use the link in the description and top comment below to put an AI agent to work on your marketing. But first, let's get back to our core question. How can we know if us that is entering death spiral territory? It's actually not that difficult. We have to figure out first if interest rates correct it for inflation, are keeping up with economic growth corrected for inflation.
美国的现状与隐忧:不可持续的未来路径
回到核心问题:美国目前的真实利率与经济增速相比处于什么位置?
从现状来看,美国政府目前为其存量债务支付的平均名义利率约为3.8%。鉴于当前通胀率在3.5%左右,实际支付的平均真实利率仅为0.3%左右。与此同时,美国未来的真实经济增速预计在1.5%至2.5%之间。由于真实利率(0.3%)显著低于经济增速,短期内美国发生主权债务崩溃的可能性微乎其微。
然而,我们不能仅看眼前的快照。债务螺旋的形成往往具有隐蔽性。在2010年之前,希腊的利率也只是缓慢上升,一切看起来并无大碍,直到临界点来临后突然爆发。在美国,自2020年起,利率的长期下行趋势已经逆转并开始震荡上行。更为严峻的是,由于美债基数极其庞大,利息支出占美国经济的比例已经出现爆炸式增长,重新回到了上世纪90年代的警戒水平。
目前,美国政府每年在债务利息上的支出已经超过了其庞大的军费开支。利息开支占政府总支出的14%,这一比例超过了教育、基础设施、科学研究和行政管理支出的总和。虽然有人会以日本作为抗辩,但日本拥有大量海外金融资产,可以帮助其稳定债务账单,这与美国有着本质不同。根据美国联邦预算问责委员会(Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget)的测算,到2029年,美国的利息支出将超过医疗保险(Medicare)。正因如此,美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔(Jerome Powell)多次警告:“并非债务的绝对水平不可持续,而是债务增长的路径不可持续。”
目前,10年期通胀保值国债(TIPS: 经通胀调整后的国债收益率,反映市场对未来真实利率的预期)已升至2.15%左右,而市场预测的同期美国经济增速仅为2%左右。一旦未来真实利率(r)持续超越经济增速(g),美国将正式跨入债务死亡螺旋的警戒线。
Original English Source
So where is the US right now when it comes to real interest rates? If we look at the average interest rate the US government is currently paying there just around 3.8% on average on the debt they already have. And because inflation is around 3.5% pretty high, that means that real average interest rates that they are currently paying is really only about 0.3%. Okay, so what about economic growth corrected for inflation. Well, if we look at some of the latest projections then this is estimated to be between 1.5 to 2.5%. So real interest rates paid today are much lower than economic growth. Okay. We can breathe easy talking about US debt doom with current real interest rates around 0% looks almost like a joke. However, that's only looking at interest rates right before the collapse. But that's not how it doom loop works. Remember what happened to Greek government debt up to 2010? Everything was looking quite fine. Interest rates were just slowly going up. But of course, beneath the surface things were not fine. And then suddenly interest rates exploded. In the US, we're starting to see a similar trend. Sure, interest rates were going down and down and down, but ever since 2020, they have slowly been going up. The positive trend has reversed. But something else more worrying is going on now. Remember, US debt is now pretty high and therefore interest rate payments as a share of the economy have really exploded are now back up to the highs that they were in the 1990s. When that worrying clip was made that I showed you previously. In fact, the US government is now spending more on interest rate payments every year than it is spending on its massive military. 14% of spending. That's more than it spends on education, infrastructure and scientific research and administration combined. So debt to GDP matters. After all, it just does not matter on its own. It matters if you take it together with rising interest rates for yes. Now you may say, But what about Japan? Well, unlike the US, Japan has a lot of financial assets and these will help it keep its interest rate bill manageable. And while the US net debt, the gray bar, is lower than 100% of GDP, this does not change our analysis in this case because we have seen that what really matters is interest rate payments needed to service that debt. And there, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has calculated that either with current or with higher future interest rates, the interest rate cost trajectory is about to swallow more and more of the US budget. Even overtaking Medicare by 2029. And this is why outgoing Fed Chair Jerome Powell said that the level of our debt relative to the economy is not unsustainable. The path is unsustainable. And worryingly, investors seem to agree. Remember that if I compare current real interest rates to growth, everything looks fine. But if you look at ten year so-called Treasury inflation protected securities, we can deduce that investors believe that future interest rates corrected for inflation will likely be about 2.15%. Meanwhile, as you remember, most professional forecasters believe the US economy is likely to grow around 2% in the same period. So US debt is currently fine. But if we plug expected future rates into the main economic indicators for debt sustainability, we can see that there now strong signs that the US is heading towards a debt death spiral if it continues its current spending plans. So in conclusion, is the US heading towards a debt crisis? Yes. If it continues on its current spending path, then interest rate payments will start getting so high that the US government will either have to take drastic actions or face a debt spiral. But when will that debt spiral come? We cannot know for sure. In that way, it's really a bit like a bubble like Bitcoin in 2017 or the Chinese housing bubble in the 20 tens. In both cases, most economists agreed that this was unsustainable, that it was a bubble. However, they were unable to predict exactly when the bubble would pop. Similarly, today, if the massive AI spending is justified and the US economy will soon grow by even more, then the US may continue spending like this. And actually, debt to GDP will be fine. On the other hand, if it is a bubble and it pops, then US government spending will look even more unsustainable than it already looks today. Making a debt crisis come sooner.
美债危机的终局图景:通胀稀释与全球财富剥夺
如果危机终将到来,美国的债务危机会以何种形式呈现?
把美国与委内瑞拉、阿根廷或希腊进行简单类比是有误导性的。上述违约国通常是单一的资源型经济体,且高度依赖外币负债(或像希腊一样失去了本币控制权)。相反,美国拥有高度多元化的实体经济,且关键在于,美国发行的是全球储备货币。这意味着美国所有的国债都是以其自身发行的货币(美元)计价的。
因此,美国不会发生拉美式或希腊式的“硬违约”,而是更可能重复二战后英国的调整模式。彼时,英国通过实施金融压抑,强行将国内利率维持在低位,同时利用温和但持续的通货膨胀来逐步蚕食和稀释庞大的债务实际价值。
在这场博弈中,英国凭借其地缘政治影响力构建了“英镑区”,迫使其盟友和前殖民地共同分担债务稀释带来的阵痛。同理,若美债危机全面爆发,其终局将不会是戏剧性的财政崩溃,而是一个漫长且痛苦的高通胀时期。这种通胀虽然达不到恶性通胀的程度,但足以缓慢剥夺美元资产的实际购买力。最终,不仅美国本土公民的财富会被隐性侵蚀,全球所有将美元作为储备和投资货币的国家与机构,都将被迫为美国的债务危机买单。
Original English Source
But okay, let's address the elephant in the room. What will the debt crisis actually look like? Here I do think the Venezuela, Argentina, Russia, Greece comparisons are a bit misleading. You see, these are relatively simple economies that have historically either borrowed a lot in foreign currencies or had locked in their currency, like Greece, to the euro or Argentina to the dollar, or depended heavily on a single commodity for their income, like Russia in 1998 or Venezuela in 2017. Meanwhile, the US has a fairly well diversified economy with many companies that genuinely dominate the rest of the world. And of course, crucially, because the US issues the world's reserve currency, it's unlike Greece, Venezuela and Lanka has essentially just borrowed in its own currency. Therefore, I think if the US finds itself in this debt death spiral, it will more likely adjust similarly to how Britain did after the Second World War by forcing financial institutions to keep interest rates low, while fairly high inflation, but nothing like hyperinflation, erodes the debt. Notably, this meant that Britons did suffer, but due to its geopolitical heft. Britain had this thing called the sterling zone, and it essentially, for some allies and former colonies to share the pain. So if the US has to adjust, I think it's more likely not to be a spectacular Venezuela style blowup, but rather a painful period of much higher inflation, but not hyperinflation that will slowly erode much of US debt, making both US citizens and in this case, the world, who heavily uses the dollar as a reserve and investment Guernsey significantly poorer. But yeah, that's my take. What do you think? Let me know in the comments below. And finally, if you are heading a marketing team and if you are interested in putting an agent to work on your marketing, consider checking out our sponsor Lotito via the link below. It really helps out the channel if you use our link.