社交媒体禁令为何救不了青少年:数据背后的成人精神健康危机 TED 2026-07-02

舆论恐慌与科学数据的巨大鸿沟

当代青少年展现出了令人惊叹的韧性与成就,然而成年人随着年龄增长,往往难以建立“青少年等同于优秀”的正向联结。我们总是倾向于用批判的眼光审视年轻一代的衣着与消磨时间的方式,甚至怀念自己充满冒险(如酒驾、撞车)的童年。作为一名发展心理学(Developmental Psychology: 研究人类从受精卵到死亡的整个生命周期中认知、生理和心理社会发展的科学)专家,Candice Odgers 在过去25年中专注于分析青少年心理健康趋势。自2008年起,其团队通过智能手机每日追踪数千名10至14岁青少年的情绪、活动与社交圈,并结合学校记录、睡眠数据和线上足迹进行系统性研究。

令人深思的是,数据得出的结论与媒体日复一日宣传的“惊悚故事”——即社交媒体和智能手机彻底摧毁了年轻一代的大脑——存在着巨大的事实鸿沟。大众传播深谙“恐惧能带来销量”的规律,家长们在面对孩子青春期的剧烈变化及失控感时,极易陷入过度警觉的焦虑中。然而,真实数据表明,当代青少年在关键指标上取得了显著进步,其实际状况远比舆论渲染的要乐观得多。在建立这种认知共识后,我们需要深入剖析真正影响青少年心理的关键因素。

Original English

Teenagers today are amazing. You didn't think I was going to use that word, because as we age, our adult brains have a harder time making this teenager-equals-amazing connection. I've always worried that I'd reach the age where I'd look back and immediately judge the youth of today for what they wear or how they spend their time, lament the loss of my free-range childhood, and wish that they would spend more of their time doing things that we did, like, crash our cars and excessively drink. Right? But I'm beginning to think that I'm immune from judging teenagers in this way, and I think it's because I now know too much about them.

So let me explain. I'm a developmental psychologist, and for the past 25 years -- that's a long time -- I've been analyzing trends in teen mental health. Since 2008, we’ve been working with thousands of 10 to 14-year-olds getting information every day from their phones on how they're feeling, how they spend their time, who they're with. With their consent, we look at their school records, we track their sleep data, we look at their step count, and we see what they're doing online. Importantly, we listen to them about what upsets them and what they need to be well. It has been a really incredible and at times, a wild ride. It's also been an illuminating one because one of the most consistent things we have found is that the stories that you and I are told repeatedly, every day about teenagers today -- that they are lost, that they are worse off than ever, that somehow smartphones and social media have destroyed them and their brains. It doesn't match the data. And it doesn't match what they tell us. There is a massive gap.

And as I've tried to make sense of this gap, I keep coming back to a simple truth that we all know: scary stories sell. They always have. And the more often you hear something, the more likely you are to believe that it's true. I'm going to say it again. The more often you hear something, the more likely you are to believe that it's true. And scary stories are really easy to sell to parents. We are an anxious lot. The hypervigilance -- it hits us. When we hold that tiny baby in our arms, our entire world changes. It hits again when they hit puberty, and they begin to change in these dramatic and rapid ways. When our sense of control over them and what comes next begins to feel less certain. My 15-year-old is six-foot-four. My 12-year-old is embracing independence like she's leaving for college next week. But the good news is, is that the real story about teens today is far more positive and far less frightening than the stories we all read. They have made remarkable progress on metrics that really matter. And we know a lot about how to keep them happy, safe, and well.

成人危机映射下的心理症结

在探寻青少年心理健康的真实成因时,我们不得不直面一个被忽视的底层真相:成人精神健康危机(Adult Mental Health Crisis: 照料者与成年人群体中普遍存在的心理健康失衡与药滥状态)才是预测青少年心理状态的最核心指标。在过去二十年中,尽管美国青少年的暴力行为、酗酒率和怀孕率已降至历史最低,但自2008年以来,青年自杀风险确有上升。然而这并非孤立现象,因为自1999年以来,美国成人的自杀率同样在急剧攀升,且在2011至2021年间,父母因药物滥用导致药物过量的比例增加了一倍以上。当舆论不断追问“除了社交媒体,这期间还发生了什么”时,真实的答案是成人群体正处于深度痛苦中,而父母的心理创伤直接投射在孩子身上。

与此同时,学术界对社交媒体(Social Media: 允许人们撰写、分享、交流内容并建立虚拟社区的在线平台)的纵向研究进一步打破了妖魔化叙事。包括美国国家科学、工程和医学院(National Academies of Sciences: 美国最高水平的荣誉性学术机构之一,提供客观的科学决策咨询)在内的权威机构均指出,社交媒体在预测青少年心理健康问题上属于“影响力最小的因素”之一。纵向追踪表明,男孩的心理健康与社交媒体使用无显著关联;而对于女孩,则是先出现抑郁情绪才导致后续社交媒体使用量的增加,而非社交媒体引发了抑郁。因此,将复杂的心理健康问题简单归因于手机屏幕,显然偏离了科学规律。

Original English

OK, the bad news. The bad news is: we are in the middle of an adult mental health crisis. And caregiver mental health is the most important predictor of teen mental health by far. So if we are concerned about teens today, we need to invest in real and meaningful ways in the adults around them. Many of them are simply not OK. So I'll come back to that. But first, I want to share with you a few science-based facts about kids today. And I'm going to focus on American teens because that's where a lot of the stories that you and I are hearing come from.

So in the past 20 years, we've had some major wins. Rates of teen violence, alcohol use, pregnancy have plummeted to historic lows. You are looking at the most educated generation ever in terms of high school graduation. Young people are inventors. They’re activists. They’re leaders. They’re amazing singers. They’re Olympians. They're amazing. But they’re also telling us that they’re sadder, and they’e more worried about the world that they’re growing up in. So they report increased concerns about safety at school, climate change, racism, their future. In our studies, what we find is the most frequently reported stressors are conflict in their home and pressure to do well at school. And those are also the things that predict their mental health day to day.

Now, since 2008, we've seen an uptick in youth suicide risk. But perhaps this shouldn't be surprising, because adult suicide has been increasing dramatically in the United States since 1999. Remember when I said that adult mental health and caregiver mental health is the most important predictor of child mental health? Well, with that in mind, I want to take a look at this slide. This graph here shows you that between 2011 and 2021, the rate of overdoses due to drug use among parents more than doubled. People ask me all the time: what could have happened during this period other than social media coming online? The answer is that adults were in distress and parents were dying.

OK, let's go back to that elephant in the room. Social media and smartphones also increased during this period. But here's the weird thing. In our longitudinal studies, social media does not emerge as a major predictor of teen mental health. Many others find the same, concluding, and I'm going to quote, that social media is one of the “least influential factors” in predicting teen mental health. For most adolescents, like boys, there's no association. And for girls, what we find is that girls that are depressed go on to use social media more -- but not the other way around. Social media does not meaningfully predict future mental health problems. Now, despite this, adults are quickly converging on banning social media for under-16s as a simple and singular solution to solving the youth mental health crisis. And here is the crazy part: there’s not one single study to date that has actually tested whether shutting it off impacts their mental health. And when we do this among adults, we find on average impacts that are close to or indistinguishable from zero. I know, there's a big distance between the story we're told and the data. The National Academies of Sciences, one of the most well-respected organizations in the world, convened an expert panel, and they came to this conclusion also.

摆脱禁令误区以重建支持体系

面对危机,成年人往往倾向于通过立法或学校行政手段来实施社交媒体禁令(Social Media Ban: 禁止特定年龄以下群体使用社交网络平台的一刀切政策),试图用物理手段隔离网络,但这实际上是在惩罚受害者。青少年早已被驱逐出线下的公共物理空间,甚至生活在枪支暴力成为儿童首要死因的社会环境中,如今成年人却连他们虚拟聚集、建立同伴支持的最后空间也要剥夺。单纯的禁令不仅无法规范大型科技公司的算法与监管漏洞,反而会把青少年推向更隐蔽、更不受监管的灰色网络空间。

要想真正改善青少年的生存处境,必须实施切实有力的系统性干预(Systemic Intervention: 从社会结构、资源配置及制度层面入手的综合治理方案):

  • 加大师资与心理辅导投入: 目前美国初中辅导员与学生的配比高达 1 比 500。我们必须把购买锁手机袋等无效举措的资金,转移到聘用并高薪留住教师和专业咨询师上;
  • 建设线上与线下的安全空间: 如同心理学者 Stephen Schueller 所做的工作,我们应在社区建立青少年活动中心,并为偏远地区开发数字心理健康服务,在他们焦虑沮丧时提供线上专业支撑;
  • 实施针对科技巨头的税收调节: 我们应通过对科技巨头征税来支持上述公共服务建设,同时在学校推广数字素养教育。

实践证明,高期望与强支持相结合的教育和管教方法在科技时代依然有效,我们如果只盯着孩子的屏幕,就无法看清他们对现实支持的迫切需求。

Original English

OK. So before you start throwing stuff at me, I want to clarify a few things. I'm not saying there are no harms online. I'm not saying big tech does not require massive overhaul. Both things can be true. We need to clean up the online world for everyone and especially our children -- and social media is not the major driver of teen mental health problems for most adolescents today. But instead of cleaning up the online world and prosecuting perpetrators of online harm, regardless of the office or the position in society that they hold, we are punishing victims. We're kicking them out of the spaces they go to be with friends, to consume youth culture, and yes, sadly, many times to escape people that are harming them offline. We've already kicked teenagers out of public spaces. In the US, we've created a society where firearms are the number one killer of our children, and now we're telling our kids that we're going to take away the spaces that they're going to virtually gather and create community, because adults broke that, too? Yeah, I'm saying adults broke the internet and they're trying to fix it by kicking kids off.

So a social media ban might feel good for the adults in the room, but teens tell me, and I believe them -- it's not going to work. It'll push them into less safe and less regulated spaces, and it will prevent us from doing what we really need to help them be well.

So if a social media ban might make things worse, what would make things better?

So first, we need to invest in the adults around children. Did you know that the ratio of counselors to students in US middle schools is 1 to 500? Spending millions of dollars on yonder pouches to lock up kids' phones is not going to solve that. We need to take that money. We need to hire teachers. We need to hire counselors. And we need to pay them well. Building a healthy human requires investment in children and the adults around them. Full stop.

Second, we need to build spaces that are welcoming and safe for all teens, to build the skills they need for the future. So my colleague Stephen Schueller spends his days designing digital mental health services for rural communities and opening up youth drop-in centers across the state of California for young people who need it. We know young people are more likely to go online when they're anxious and depressed. We need to be there to build the services and supports that they need, instead of just focusing on taking things away.

And three, please do not believe everything that you hear about young people today. A favorite pastime of adults has been shaming young people. But this generation is not lost or destroyed. They are resilient. They are resilient because they are succeeding despite the suffering of adults around them. And if we want to help them to continue to succeed, we set high expectations and then we need to support them in getting them there. This is the magic combination that has always worked in teaching, in coaching, in parenting. It still works with teens today. Tech has not changed that.

And finally, just so you believe me, I'm going to say it again. Big tech does not get a pass. This cannot fall to parents and teachers. We require more regulation, but bans don’t do that. They let companies off the hook. Instead, we need to fund teachers. We need to build communities and spaces for children and teenagers to play and to learn. And we need to deliver effective digital mental health services and digital literacy programs to young people where and when they need them. And we're going to pay for all of this with a big old tax on tech. Right? Did I mention that I'm Canadian and I do not mind taxing the rich? But if our goal is to support young people, and I assume that we all share that, then we will fail if all we do is focus on tech and taking things away. If all we see when we look at our kids is their phone, we’re going to fail to see what they really need from us. Thank you.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

关键字: teen-mental-health social-media caregiver-distress policy-analysis