系统化创意:用 EDGE 框架击穿 AI “同质化”迷局 Sandeep Swadia 2026-07-23

算法丰裕的陷阱:“合成同质化”与品味的消亡

许多人误以为创造力(creativity)是一种与生俱来的天赋,但事实并非如此——它需要一套系统。一旦掌握了这套系统,你就能源源不断地产生奇思妙想,洞察并联结他人所忽视的线索,建立起让自己脱颖而出的独特个人品味(personal taste)。在今天这个时代,品味的重要性远胜以往。当你在喝完一杯咖啡的时间里,AI 就能为你生成成千上万个创意选项。然而,选项的增加并不意味着原创性的提升。相反,如果使用不当,AI 会在你预测之前,以惊人的速度将你彻底“商品化”。创造力并非某种虚无缥缈的神秘力量,在人工智能时代,你所需要的竞争优势——即我们所说的 EDGE 框架——最终只取决于两件事:你的原创性(originality)和品味(taste)。这正是 AI 无法替你生成的两大核心资产。

为了理解这一点,我们可以看看 2025 年音乐界最奇特的一个案例。当时,一支名为 Velvet Sundown 的新乐队在短短一个月内就在 Spotify 上突破了百万听众,其单曲甚至席卷了英国、挪威、瑞典等国的病毒式传播榜单。他们拥有摇滚乐队所需的一切光鲜元素:帅气的外表、复古的穿搭、深情的唱腔,以及完美的 60 年代后期摇滚曲风。然而,这支乐队实际上根本不存在,其人声、器乐、成员肖像全部由 AI 生成。由于他们的音乐听起来极其熟悉且符合大众胃口,因此能够迅速走红,但这也意味着它完全是平庸和程式化的。这种现象被称为合成同质化(synthetic sameness: 指利用人工智能大批量生产出的无差别的平庸内容)。

合成同质化正以不可阻挡之势席卷所有创作领域。当创作的物理摩擦力降为零,廉价且无限的机器内容汇聚成漫天洪流,无差异的平庸便成了新的平庸。这便是 AI 时代的创造力悖论:技术让你能够以千百倍的速度进行创作,却也让你以同样的速度沦为泯然众人的大宗商品(commodity: 缺乏独特差异性、只能进行价格竞争的标准产品)。当所有人都能免费或极其廉价地获取同等生产力工具时,效率便不再是优势。要在这场洪流中避免“隐形”,你就必须学会如何在不丧失人性温度的前提下与 AI 协同创作。

Original English Source

Most people think creativity is a gift. It's not. It needs a system. And once you learn that system, you start generating great ideas yourself. You start seeing and connecting things other people miss. You build taste that helps you stand out. And today that matters more than ever. AI can generate thousands of options before you finish your cup of coffee. But more options don't mean you are more original. Used badly, AI will turn you into a commodity faster than you can think. Creativity is not some magical force. The edge you need comes from just two things: your originality and your taste. The two things AI can't generate for us. So today, I'll show you how to create with AI without losing your humanity, your edge. You'll learn how to think more creatively, sharpen your taste, and train your mind to create original ideas. So, let's get started with the story of the strangest band in recent years. AI has created a strange new problem. It can make you invisible faster than ever. In 2025, a new band called the Velvet Sundown became super popular for some reason. They crossed 1 million listeners on Spotify in just over a month. They released two albums and their song reached Spotify's viral 50 chart in Britain, in Norway, in Sweden. And they were the full rock band package: handsome guys, long hair, vintage look, the soulful singer, the whole late 60s rock sound, that vibe. But there was just one small problem: the band did not exist. It was all AI. The voices, the music, the band members were all generated using AI. But their music was so familiar and so generic that it felt like any other band. It was a perfectly acceptable rock band. And that was exactly why it worked. But it is completely generic. Everything looks and feels like everything else. I call that synthetic sameness. Now, synthetic sameness makes the work undifferentiated and inconsequential. Just another drop in the endless flood of frictionless content. And that's the paradox. AI can help you create more. It can help you create faster, but it can also make you completely undifferentiated faster than anything else. That's the very definition of commodity. If everyone has access to something for cheap or free, it stops being an advantage.

重构 EDGE 框架:攀登商品化深渊的四维阶梯

为了在这场由算法主导的红海中确立个人优势,我们需要引入 EDGE 框架。这个框架的四个字母分别代表了创作者借由机器超越平庸的四大核心维度:

  • E - 严苛标准(Exacting Standards): 你是否对产出持有极高标准?是否无情地删减掉所有听起来平庸且陈词滥调的机器默认内容?
  • D - 差异定位(Differentiated Perspective): 你的作品是否主动背离了 AI 常见的默认套路,融入了你独特的个人视角与不可替代的观点?
  • G - 现实锚定(Grounded Reality): 你的内容是否扎根于坚实的数据与真实的事实,并经过严密的交叉验证,而非机器凭空捏造的幻觉?
  • E - 情感共鸣(Emotional Resonance): 它能否引发受众内心深处最真实的情感波动?这种源自人类真情实感的力量,是 AI 永远无法单纯通过统计学模拟并精准传递的。

正如导演克里斯托弗·诺兰在拍摄电影《黑暗骑士》时,坚持在芝加哥街头实景翻滚一辆巨大的卡车,而不是使用当时已非常成熟的计算机特效。这种对物理真实感和感官冲击力的严苛追求、差异化的实拍手段、对现实重力环境的彻底锚定,共同构建了令全球观众屏息的终极情感共鸣。

而将这一框架落地到 AI 工作流中,首要解决的便是 E —— 严苛标准。AI 创作最危险也最迷人的一点在于,它拥有近乎无限的“变体生成能力”。它不是只会给出唯一正确答案的计算器,而是一个基于词元(Tokens: 文本切分后的最小语义单位)概率预测的概率机器。在“Once upon a”之后,AI 极大概率会预测并匹配“time”,因为它在训练数据中见过这个短语无数次。

这种基于统计概率的机制使 AI 能够像一个在深夜酒吧即兴演奏的爵士乐手一样,不断给你带来意料之外的灵感惊喜。然而,无限的生成能力也伴随着无穷的“机器噪声”——即如今广受诟病的AI 垃圾内容(AI slop: 指机器大批量自动生成的无价值、无深度内容)。因此,创作者必须扮演一位极其残酷的编辑者(editor)。你必须在 AI 生成的一千个选项中无情地杀掉 999 个,只留下那一个真正能引起你共鸣的灵魂切片。这极大地考验着创作者的审美与品味。

在 2026 年的戛纳电影市场展映上,有一部名为《Hellgrind》的 95 分钟 AI 辅助电影。该片由 15 人的团队利用 Hicksfield 的 AI 视频生成平台,在短短 14 天内以 50 万美元的预算完成。为了制作该片的前 25 分钟,团队在机器生成的素材海洋中疯狂筛选了超过 16,000 个视频片段,但最终仅采用了其中的 253 个。这就是“严苛标准”的具象化体现。

在实际商业应用中,这种严苛的漏斗模型同样威力巨大。例如,一个独立咖啡馆老板如果想拍摄广告,可以通过内置的连接器(connectors: 软件系统间的数据通道)在 30 秒内将 Claude 与 Hicksfield 进行连接。随后,直接用日常语言指挥 AI,便能在一下午获得数十个不同维度的视觉创意:从温暖的晨光、带颗粒感的复古滤镜、再到高端的商务质感或顾客欢笑的互动场景。这在十年前需要耗费昂贵的摄制组和长达数周的后期剪辑,而今天,AI 极大地降低了门槛,让预算微薄的个体创作者能够与全球顶级广告公司同台竞技。

Original English Source

You know, I get these two questions a lot. The first one is, am I real or am I AI generated? I am not going to answer that question because what if I said I was real, but I was actually an AI that was trained to say I was real? What a mystery box. Uh, just kidding. Of course I am real. The second question is about editing. Uh I work with this awesome team from an agency called Dragon Fruit Media. They were based in Los Angeles, now in New York. Our editors and our creative directors pour over every visual, every detail. And the other day we were talking about this same topic, creativity and AI. And they talked about this one tool they love, Hicksfield. It is an AI studio to help you make stunning visuals. And this video is sponsored by Hicksfield, which fits perfectly because that's the whole point. Our team genuinely loves the nexus of AI and creativity, and they love using Hicksfield with Claude, but the final choices and final decisions are always made by humans. So the question of standing apart from the crowd comes down to just one thing. Do you know how to push AI far enough that you can get something original out of it? That is where we need the edge framework. The middle is the commodity. Edge is how you climb out of it. E stands for exacting. Do you hold your work to a higher standard? Do you edit out everything that sounds generic and cliche? D stands for differentiated. Does your work move away from the obvious AI defaults? Do you bring your own unique perspective, your own unique point of view? G is grounded. Is it rooted in concrete reality, real world data? Is it verified or is it one of those AI hallucinations that we're so used to now? And the final E is emotional. Does it make someone feel something, something real? Does it come from your heart, from your human emotions? AI can't copy that. Now, let's make it concrete. For example, in one of my favorite movies, The Dark Knight, Christopher Nolan, who is the director of the movie, insisted on flipping an actual massive truck in the middle of the streets of Chicago. Now it would be trivial to fake it using CGI and computer effects and doing it in the real world would take so much extra work. Then why do it? Because Nolan wanted to have the same edge that you and I want. In fact, he was applying the same framework: exacting standards, differentiated approach, grounding it in reality, and all of that created a real emotional impact. And by the way, if you like ideas like these and you want to go deeper, you can subscribe to my newsletter. It's every Tuesday. Link is below. Totally free. So, let's walk through the framework edge one at a time. Starting with the first E, exacting standards. The most dangerous thing about AI creativity is also the most useful thing about it. AI never runs out of versions. If you ask a calculator, what is 8 * 7? You get 56 every time forever. But if you ask an AI to write an opening scene of a film that starts with a sunset over an ocean, it might pick a different scene every single time. Run it five times, you get five different openings. Now, that's not a glitch. That is the fundamental feature of AI. AI lives in the world of probabilities. When you send a prompt, here's what's happening underneath: AI breaks your words into small pieces, they're called tokens. And those tokens are then converted into numbers and they pass through this thing called a neural network, which is just a bunch of equations. And then it tries to understand what you're asking. And when AI responds to your prompt, it predicts what's likely to come next, one word at a time. So if the line was "Once upon a", the AI most likely will pick the word "time". "Once upon a time". Now, lots of other words would fit. "Once upon a rooftop", "once upon a spreadsheet", "once upon a parking lot", but "once upon a time" is more likely because AI has seen it more often and it believes that the probability of that word is higher because it's a very well-known phrase. Now, if you ask a random question, every time you ask, AI is going to pick a different answer because it's just picking from all likely words that can fit. And it's like a constant roll of dice and that's why it can surprise you. For the first time, there is a tool that doesn't just execute your ideas. It can expand them and take them in a direction that you had never imagined before. To me, AI feels like this amazing jazz musician who's playing in a swanky nightclub. You don't know what you're going to get. But here's the problem. A machine that generates endlessly also hands you endless noise. It's called AI slop nowadays. And that's why you need to be exacting because you have to be a ruthless editor. 999 of those thousand options need to be killed until you get that one thing that sings to you. And that is about your judgment, about your taste. Here's an example. A team made a 95-minute AI-generated film that was shown around the Cannes film market just this year in 2026. It was called Hellgrind. Now it was made using the Hicksfield video generation platform and the tools that Hicksfield gives you. It was a video made in 4K, which is sort of high definition, and it was made by 15 people. It took just 14 days and half a million dollars. But here's the thing. Just to make the first 25 minutes of that film, the team generated over 16,000 clips. A machine-generated mountain of material because that's what AI is really good for. But only 253 of those were selected. That's ruthless rejection in action. Let's make it practical. Let's say you are a small business owner who runs a coffee shop and you want to create an ad. Now you can connect a creative tool like Hicksfield to Claude, and you can set it up once. You can go to settings, choose connectors, paste the Hicksfield link and you're done in about 30 seconds. After that, you just talk to Claude in plain language just like you would prompt any AI, and Claude will work with Hicksfield for you. For instance, you can ask Claude to have as many variations of your ad as you want. One is in the warm morning light. Another is like a grainy nostalgic memory. Another has a sleek premium feel to it, and yet another focused on happy customers, you know, laughing, having a good time in your coffee shop. You can have as many variations as you want. Now, 10 years ago, each one of these variations would require a crew that comes into your shop and shoots the footage, and they go back into the editing room for a week, and it would take you thousands and thousands of dollars. Today, AI can give you 10 different directions in one afternoon. That's an incredible gift. A person with an idea and a very small budget can now compete with the largest agencies and studios in the world.

D-差异化定位:对抗机器默认套路的叛逆实验

如果所有人都在以同样的方式操作同一种 AI,那么你该如何脱颖而出?AI 的职责从不是让你显得与众不同,这个责任只能由你自己承担。这就是 D —— 差异化定位。在 2025 年 NBA 总决赛期间,预测市场交易平台 Kalshi 急需制作一条用于国家电视台播放的广告。在传统片场给出了六至七位数美元天价预算以及数月制作周期的报价后,Kalshi 决定另辟蹊径,将项目交给了一个熟练掌握 AI 工具的独立创作者,并明确要求:“我们不要任何平庸、正常的东西。”

这位创作者最终利用 AI 制作了一条极度疯狂、甚至有些“离经叛道”的片子:喝啤酒的外星人、在满池鸡蛋中游泳的怪人、以及抱着吉娃娃的西部牛仔。他们通过不断修改提示词生成了 400 次尝试,最终精选出 15 个完美镜头。三天时间,仅仅花费了约 2,000 美元,Kalshi 就在总决赛期间投放了这条充满视觉震撼的广告,并斩获了超过 1,800 万次的曝光。Kalshi 本可以打一张温和安全的“安全牌”,但那样就没人会多看一眼。这种反常规的视觉差异化设计,正是击穿受众注意力心智的最锋利武器。

在这个机器让“创造”变得廉价的时代,差异化代表了真正的分水岭。AI 只能负责将平庸的初始概念渲染得精致华丽,而真正的核心竞争壁垒在于创作者独特的视角和敢于打破常规的胆识。 例如,当你试图为一款预防职场倦怠(burnout: 长期处于高压工作环境导致的生理与心理枯竭状态)的应用程序设计推广创意时,市面上至少有十个竞品在做同样的事,且他们的广告开头无一例外都是阳光、沙滩和海浪。此时,创作者应当主动抛弃这些已经被机器和行业用烂的“沙滩模版”,从另一个极具压迫感的视觉角度切入:在漆黑一片的庞大城市背景中,一架手机电量固死在 1% 的微光下垂死挣扎,周围的人群依然在面无表情地疯狂发着工作信息,直到最后那一点电量彻底耗尽,世界陷入死死寂。

同样的叙事,仅仅因为改变了切入视角,就能在 3 秒钟内紧紧抓住观众的视线并引发强烈的情感代入。在实践中,为了避免落入机器的“常识陷阱”,我们在让 AI 生成任何核心创意前,可以先对其发起 “反平庸三问”

  1. 这个主题在 AI 生成中最平庸、最符合直觉的默认版本是怎样的?
  2. 有哪些可以彻底背离这种默认套路、且互不相同的五个反向创意角度?
  3. 这五个新角度中,哪一个最能让路过的受众瞬间停下并仔细审视,其原因是什么?

通过强迫 AI 识别并跳出其概率分布的“峰值”(即最平庸的社会共识),你才能挖掘出真正具备视觉和逻辑张力的差异化视角。

Original English Source

Now we go to the next one: Differentiation. If you're using the same AI the same way everybody else does, how will you stand out? It's not AI's job to make you look different. It's yours. During the 2025 NBA finals, there is a prediction marketing company called Kalshi, and they needed to make an ad for national TV. Now they went to real studios and the studios quoted them six and seven figure budgets and months and months of work. So instead they handed it to one person with AI skills and told him they didn't want anything normal. So he built something completely unhinged: an alien drinking beer, someone swimming in eggs, and a cowboy holding a chihuahua. The company generated 400 trials to then find 15 usable shots. But in about three days and after roughly $2,000, Kalshi had an ad and they aired it during the finals and reached more than 18 million impressions. Now Kalshi could have made a safe bet, but then nobody would have cared. That's the power of differentiation. So differentiation is the real divide. Now AI makes creation easy, but the real competence is in your point of view, your ability to stand out, and that can't come from AI, that has to come from you. Let's make it practical again. Let's walk through an example. Say you are building an app to avoid burnout. Now there are 10 others who are making the same app. They're in the same market and every pitch is going to open with a scene on the beach. So throw out that beach and open on a different feeling instead. Maybe a phone stuck at 1% glowing in the dark. The city is dark. Everyone else is still texting and then the battery runs out. It all goes dark. Same story, but now the room is leaning in because you just didn't say burnout is real. You showed them something. You made them feel something in just 3 seconds. And by the way, that visual was generated with Hicksfield as well. And it was just as easy as writing a prompt. So, you can do this, too. When everyone is making the same point, what's the point of saying it louder? Show it from an angle they haven't seen before. Here's something actionable. Before asking AI to create anything that needs to stand out, ask it three questions: One, what would the most obvious version of this look like? Number two, what are five angles that move away from that default? And number three, which one of those five would make people stop and take notice, and why? That's how you create differentiation. AI can make the obvious version beautiful. Differentiation is finding the angle that others won't.

G-现实锚定与 E-情感归宿:赋予数字造物以真实的重力

EDGE 框架的最后两个基石,是 G —— 现实锚定E —— 情感共鸣。它们代表了数字虚拟与实体物理世界、理性智能与感性灵魂之间的最终缝合。

G —— 现实锚定直接针对的是 AI 当前面临的最大硬伤:幻觉(hallucination: 人工智能系统生成看似合理但实际上完全虚假或不符合事实的信息)。AI 总能以极度自信的口吻胡说八道。在一次日常测试中,向 Gemini 贴图并请求分析数据后,模型虽然给出了洞察,但在被追问“你是否真的能看懂图中的数字”时,它居然回答“对不起,我其实无法读取截图中的具体数字,刚才的内容是我胡编出来的”。这种双重嵌套的幻觉生动地说明了机器的局限:它只是一个信心满满的数据预测器,但有时候它的心智状态就像蹒跚学步的婴儿一样脆弱。

没有被现实锚定的 AI 生成物,就像没有重力的充气城堡,看起来色彩斑斓,实则毫无分量。克里斯托弗·诺兰在芝加哥拉萨尔街(Lasal Street)实景翻滚卡车,正是因为这种“物理重量”是无法单纯通过计算机的数字像素模拟出来的。当那辆几十吨重的实体钢铁巨兽在银幕上反转时,观众能够感受到真实的危机感与空气中紧绷的张力。

为了防止 AI 产出“飘在空中”的虚浮内容,创作者在工作流中必须采取三种现实锚定手段

  1. 源头追溯: 强制要求 AI 提供支持其观点的原始链接、真实数据、精确引言。如果它无法给出确凿出处,则直接判定为虚构。
  2. 多模模型互检: 引入多 Agent 交叉校验工作流。例如使用 Claude 检查 GPT-4 的逻辑漏洞,再调用 Gemini 审计 Claude 的数据准确性,通过竞争对抗提升事实准确度。
  3. 构建私有知识库: 借助 NotebookLM 等支持“源文本限制”的工具,只允许 AI 在你亲自上传的、经过验证的私有事实(ground-truth data)范围内进行推理与润色,彻底锁死幻觉发生的物理空间。

最后,也是最无可替代的关隘——E —— 情感共鸣。 同一个客观物体,在不同的语境(context)下会折射出截然不同的情感波长。以一根蜡烛为例:插在生日蛋糕上代表着“快乐与成长”;点燃在教堂里是一份“肃穆的祈祷”;在停电的客厅中是“家庭的温情”;在守夜仪式上代表着“悲恸的缅怀”;而在昏暗的餐桌旁,则是“浪漫与亲密”。蜡烛本身的物理结构并未改变,但人心投射在上面的情感却完全不同。

AI 可以在几毫秒内利用高超的图形渲染技术绘制出一根栩栩如生的蜡烛,配上逼真的炉火音效,但它不知道这束火光应该在何时点燃你灵魂深处的哪一种记忆。2024 年,可口可乐尝试完全使用 AI 重制其经典的圣诞红卡车广告,尽管卡车、雪景、音乐等所有视觉要素都高度精致且符合品牌一贯的调性,但发布后却被大量观众痛批“冷酷、毫无灵魂(soulless)”。因为机器只学会了节日视觉符号的堆砌,却不懂得人类心中真正的“圣诞精神”与“家庭羁绊”究竟有着怎样的温度。在 2025 年的迭代版本中,人类导演重新主导了情感层面的微调与把控,才让这条片子重新找回了温度。

在人工智能让一切数字表达都陷入无穷丰裕的今天,表达本身的稀缺性已经转移了。当创作的门槛荡然无存,你所经历过的人生——你的喜怒哀乐、你的辉煌与低谷、你独特的思维轨迹与情绪记忆——反而成了最稀缺的硬通货。 机器可以不知疲倦地为你描绘烛火的斑斓,但唯有你,才能赋予这束火光以生命的意义。正如那句至理名言:“当一个创意看起来正确时,它还没有完成;只有当它感觉正确时,它才真正完工。” 你的温度,就是你在这个时代的终极护城河。

Original English Source

Now, let's go to the next step. G for grounded. This is where AI's biggest weakness lives. AI makes things up and is always confident about it. The other day I was using Gemini and I pasted a research screenshot and asked it to analyze the data. Now it gave me some insights but as I was interacting with it something felt off. So, I asked a simple follow-up question and I said, "Were you actually able to read the data in the screenshot?" And it said basically, "Sorry, I don't have the ability to read the data." And then I asked, "Okay, so how did you come up with all those insights?" And it said, "I'm sorry, I got ahead of myself and I completely fabricated them." Now, here's the irony. Of course, I know that Gemini does have the ability to read visual information from a screenshot, but suddenly when challenged, it was not just hallucinating facts, it was also confused about its own ability. So, it was like layers and layers of hallucination. And I have seen the same thing with chat GPT too. That is what we forget often about AI. We start treating it like some intelligent machine, some kind of a confident expert. But sometimes AI can slip and fall just like a toddler. That is why grounding matters because AI will often create work that feels weightless but smooth and fluent and impressive but it's not grounded. Nolan could have faked that truck flip in the Dark Knight too, right? And if you use AI to do the same thing right now, this is how it might look. But instead, the team executed a practical stunt with a giant truck on Lasal Street in Chicago. And that sequence works because when you watch it, you feel the physical weight of the real thing in the theater. The street is real. The truck is real. The danger feels real. It's all grounded in reality. So that's the actionable move. Never let AI have the last word on anything that has to be true. You can do three moves to ground it: First, make it show the sources. Ask for the real links, the real numbers, the real data, the real quotes behind it. If it cannot produce one, then that claim is a fiction. The second move is to feed one AI engine to the other, and I do it all the time. I constantly ask Claude to verify Chat GPT's work and ask Chat GPT to verify Gemini's work, and so on. And third, use apps like Google's NotebookLM and feed it the data that's your own. That's what grounds AI like that giant truck in Nolan's movie. The weight has to feel real. And now final E: emotional. The same object can evoke different emotions depending on context. Think about a candle. On a birthday cake it's all about joy. It's about celebration. At a church it's a prayer. During a blackout it's family fun time. But at a vigil it's about grief. And on a date night it's about romance and intimacy. Same flame but it burns a completely different emotion every time. That's the one thing AI cannot do for us. It can generate an image of a phenomenal candle and give it the situational context, even put appropriate music to it, but what emotions will get lit in you when you see that is entirely up to you. Coca-Cola remade their famous holiday ad in 2024 and they used AI, and it had the same feel, the same trucks, the snow, the holiday imagery, the same brand nostalgia and every frame was polished. And yet many people called it soulless. The images were familiar but somehow the emotions didn't land. Now they fixed it in 2025. AI knows how to give you the right images, but only you know what the spirit of Christmas actually feels like. And that's the ultimate takeaway from this whole video. AI today can make anything you want. It makes movies, it makes music, it makes ads, pitches, lessons, whatever you want. But every time something becomes abundant, something else becomes scarce. The parts that come from you having lived your life, your memories, your wins, your losses, the way you think, the way you feel. That's what makes you creative. In the world of AI, that's your edge: you. The machine can paint the candle flame. Only you can make it mean something. Your creation isn't done when it looks right. It's done when it feels right. Thank you and I love

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

公司/组织: Hicksfield, Spotify, Coca-Cola

产品/模型: Claude, Gemini, NotebookLM

媒体/书籍: The Dark Knight

关键字: content-commoditization taste-refinement creativity-system human-ai-collaboration