AI 驱动的生产力提升与 GDP 悖论
本期 Markets Weekly 探讨了 AI 技术对经济的深远影响。尽管 AI 显著提升了生产力,但其对 GDP 的影响却并非直接正相关。演讲者指出,AI 驱动的效率提升,例如利用 AI 辅助编辑书籍、分析大量金融文档等,虽然降低了成本并提高了服务质量,但这些收益往往难以在 GDP 数据中体现,因为它们并未创造新的需求,反而可能导致劳动力市场的结构性调整。这种现象类似于智能手机的普及,虽然产品质量不断提升,但价格并未显著上涨,从而对 GDP 的贡献有限。
Original English
Hello my friends. Today is February 14thand this is Markets Weekly. So, this
past week was a very volatile week in
markets. As we've been discussing over
the recent weeks, it really seemed to me
that the market was losing momentum.
Now, this past week, we saw the S&P 500
lose the 50-day moving average. On
Friday, it came very close to losing the
100 day moving average as well. That
kind of reminded me of a wise person who
traded through the.com boom and bust
that during the dot a lot of people went
broke selling it and a few years later
even more people went broke buying it.
Now I'm getting the sense just a guess
that we we probably have to test the 200
day moving average around 6500. Um
because we really this trend doesn't
doesn't look that great. This past week
we got a lot of tier one data. We got
the non-farmms payroll spread. We got
retail sales and we also got CPI. So
first let's talk about the data and
secondly I started using cloud AI last
week. Of course we saw huge amounts of
selling and the SAS stocks and even some
wealth management stocks everyone uh
that all the stocks that were perceived
to be disrupted by AI. So I had to try
the latest AI myself and I'm beginning
to think that AI is going to be very
good for bonds. All right, starting with
the data.
数据解读:就业市场与通胀的微妙信号
本周公布的关键经济数据,包括非农就业、零售销售和 CPI,呈现出复杂的信号。非农就业数据好于预期,但年度修正却抹去了去年创造的就业岗位。市场对修正数据并不敏感,更关注月度数据,认为就业市场正在改善,但同时也降低了美联储降息的预期。零售销售数据低于预期,可能受到季节性调整的影响。CPI 数据虽然有所下降,但仍高于美联储的目标。
Original English
So we got a huge three huge prints lastweek. First of all, of course, the
non-formms per print. The January print
was delayed until last week and it was
much better than expected. However, it
also came with the annual benchmark
revisions and the benchmark revisions
basically erased 1 million jobs created
last year. So, as we've been discussing
before, the market really doesn't care
about revisions. It only cares about the
monthly prints. If the monthly prints
last year were accurate, we would have
had zero or negative monthly prints. Uh
but and that would have been very
upsetting to the markets. But um now
that we a year later we revised them all
away, the market really doesn't care.
What it does care about though is that
it seems like the job market is
improving. So the January report was
better than expected and maybe it will
be revised away a year from now but at
the moment it's better than expected and
the market is going to perceive that to
be good and that uh the economy is less
likely to go into recession but it also
of course reduces the odds of Fed rate
cuts.
AI 对行业的影响:以法律服务为例
演讲者分享了使用 AI 辅助工作的经验,例如利用 AI 查找联邦储备的讲话安排、编辑书籍以及生成书面材料。AI 在处理重复性任务方面表现出色,例如合同审查和修改,可以显著提高律师的工作效率。然而,AI 的应用也可能导致相关岗位的需求减少,从而对就业市场产生影响。
Original English
Now we also got the retail sales and CPIlast week but before we talk about that
we have to mention a little bit about
seasonal adjustments. So throughout the
year data is uneven because of seasonal
effects. For example, uh people you tend
to do a lot of shopping in November and
December. That's a big holiday season.
So retail sales there are going to be a
lot more. And in January, people tend to
reset their p to reset their prices. For
example, if you're a company and you
want to raise or lower prices on your
products or services, you tend to do
that in the beginning of the year. So
there is some seasonality to how these
this data is computed and to make data
more comparable monthtomonth uh
economists or statistitians tend to do
these seasonal adjustments. So keep that
in mind when thinking about the data. So
for retail sales the data was much lower
than expected. they were basically flat
monthtomonth and some people think that
could be due to aggressive seasonal
adjustments which are difficult to make
because of course the economy is
changing um behavioral changes and so
sometimes seasonal adjustments can be
overdone or underdone. Now moving on to
CPI data CPI was better than expected
but still at at the end of the day it's
still about you know 2 and a.5% above
the Fed's target. Uh, one thing to note
of course is that companies do raise
their prices in January and so these
seasonal adjustments make the January
print uh less accurate than than other
prints as well. So all in all though
this is I know data that is you know
kind of positive right you have better
than expected job growth and you have
inflation that's coming down but of
course the market didn't seem to really
care about this they were really more
cared about uh what seemed to be
happening in the AI world and that is
the AI is cannibalizing uh current
companies. So that brings us to our next
topic.
AI 时代的投资策略:拥抱债券
演讲者认为,AI 带来的生产力提升和潜在的经济下行风险,将推动资金流向避险资产。AI 可能会导致失业率上升、经济增长放缓,从而促使美联储采取更宽松的货币政策,降低利率。因此,AI 时代最值得关注的投资机会可能在于债券市场。
Original English
So, I've talked about AI before. Istarted trying to use AI to help me with
my workload. And in the beginning, it
was very disappointing. So, I asked AI
to do basic things like, yo, tell me
when are speaking. And it really
couldn't do that. It was amazing to me
that I asked it to go on the Federal
Reserve's website to look up who's going
to be speaking this week, and it could
not do that. So, that was very
disappointing. But last week we had the
release of the latest cloud model and we
also had carnage in a lot of software as
a service companies. The market or at
least people who follow this was
thinking that the latest AI is really
going to be very destructive to the
value of these companies. Maybe there's
more competition. Uh maybe uh consumers
are going to u move to bespoke AI
created vibecoded platforms and so
forth. We even saw some wealth
management companies like Schwabs go up
aggressively because maybe AI can uh
provide tax efficient strategies in
place of wealth advisors. So again I had
to try this for myself. So I signed up
for the cloud max plan. So that's like
$100 a month and got to use it. So what
did I use it for? Well as you guys know
I am writing the second edition to my
book central banking 101. Uh the last
one was 5 years ago and so between then
and now a lot of things happened. So
I've updated all the data, added a whole
bunch of new sections about, you know,
the Silicon Valley bust, uh, Silicon
Valley bank bust, you know, Treasury
buybacks, QT, all that stuff. So I
basically updated everything and I felt
like I was basically done with the
manuscript. So usually what I would do
is I would hire an editor, a freelancer,
and pay him a few thousand to go through
this. And I would also hire some artists
to make a new book cover for for a few
hundred. And these are people that I
would source through upwork.com.
basically sites that post for
freelancers.
But this time I decided I would give AI
a try since that's what all the cool
kids are doing right now. So I uploaded
everything into cloud and asked him to
kind of you know be my editor and
proofread it. It said he said that it
would take 6 hours and so uh I waited
for 6 hours and what I got back was you
know
I guess he gave me like a few
suggestions updated some data points and
things like that some very general
stuff. I thought it was actually pretty
uh you know just meh not not that
special but you know maybe it's my
fault. Maybe I'm not prompting cloud
correctly.
So uh this is what I did. I prompted him
in a more precise way. I said could you
look at the reviews that I that are
posted on good readads on Amazon and
there are a lot of reviews and can you
bearing bring bearing that feedback in
mind can you go through the manuscript
and you can you give me some suggestions
and also just you know broad suggestions
as to what where I could do better and
so forth like that so this time it only
took you know a few minutes maybe was
it's already in his me memory or
something like that and he came back
with actually something that was pretty
helpful gave me a list of suggestions
gave me a separate word document
detailing
And you know looking through it some of
them were not that great stylistic of
course some of them were pretty good.
One of them for example was that in your
reviews people suggest you having a
glossery glossery so that they can look
back look up these acronyms QT FOMC uh
stuff like that. That was pretty good
suggestion. And some of them also
suggested that hey maybe you could have
summary chapter bullet points. you know,
kind of like a textbook, at the end of
the textbook, you kind of give you a
summary as to what you should be what
you should have learned from this
chapter. I thought that was a pretty
good suggestion as well. And so I asked
Cloud, could you do that for me? And
like just like that, they created
wonderfully made glossery, wonderfully
made bullet points, and I thought that
was that was pretty cool.
I'm guessing that it could do more to
help me with my manuscript, but I'm
probably not prompting it well enough.
It did tell me though that it was very
good and well written and so I think
it's just part of its job. Um, like any
employee,
um, when I went to ask it about helping
me create a new cover for my updated
version, I gave it my prior cover and,
you know, gave it some ideas and it
immediately basically like Grock gave me
a number of ideas and ways to pursue and
that's actually exactly what my like a
real human cover designer would have
done. he would have given me a few
design choices and then I would have,
you know, decided which one to go and
and how to advance it. So, I'm probably
just going to use cloud as an editor. I
think it's really good enough and
honestly I I don't know some of the
human it's hard for me to know if the
human editors that I hire are good or
not until after the fact. But for the
artistic stuff, I think I'm still going
to hire a real designer. I think having
that human artistic touch is something
that I'm not really sure that Cloud can
fully do right now. The covers he's
shown me is are very good. Um, but I
guess I'm just not confident enough in
my own judgment and prefer someone who
who I a proper artist to do that. But
that immediately got me thinking as to
just what the implications of this are.