瑞安航空CEO迈克尔·奥利里:低成本、高效运营与非传统营销的制胜之道 Norges Bank Investment Management 2026-05-07

开场与瑞安航空的独特文化

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 下一位演讲者带来了一种独特的文化方法。迈克尔·奥利里(Michael O'Leary)瑞安航空(Ryanair)的集团CEO,此前曾担任该航空公司的CEO。他通过低成本模式改造了一家陷入困境的航空公司。如今,瑞安航空是欧洲最大、最盈利的航空公司之一。他的方法是:不懈地专注于成本和执行。结果是:一种极端高效的文化,以及一家让数百万人得以负担旅行的航空公司。丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽(Daniel Balthazar),Active Strategies的联合首席投资官,将探讨他是如何做到的。请欢迎迈克尔和丹尼尔。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: Our next speaker brings a distinctive approach to culture. Michael O'Leary is the group CEO of Ryanair and previously served as CEO of the airline. He transformed a struggling airline through a low-cost model. Today, it is Europe's largest and one of the most profitable airlines. His approach: a relentless focus on cost and execution. The result: a culture of extreme efficiency and an airline that has made travel affordable for millions. Daniel Balthazar, co-chief investment officer of Active Strategies, will explore how he did this. Please welcome Michael and Daniel.

迈克尔·奥利里: 早上好。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Morning.

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 早上好。迈克尔,热烈欢迎您参加我们的会议。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: Morning. Michael, warm welcome to our conference.

迈克尔·奥利里: 非常感谢。非常荣幸来到这里。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Thank you very much. Great pleasure to be here.

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 我们几年前在这间办公室见过,当时是参加一个投资者会议。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: We met in this office a couple of years ago for an investor meeting.

迈克尔·奥利里: 是的。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: We did.

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 会后,我收到了您的一封感谢信,感谢我参加了会议,这让我感觉非常、非常特别。在我这25年的职业生涯中从未有过。这能说明您和瑞安航空的什么情况呢?

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: After that, I received a letter from you thanking me for the meeting, which made me feel really, really special. Never happened to me in my 25 years of doing this. What does that tell me about you and Ryanair?

迈克尔·奥利里: 嗯,首先,这说明您在那次会议后没有买够我们的股票,所以我才需要写那封后续邮件来鼓励您多买。嗯,而且,我们同样注重成本。我们喜欢低价买入。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Well, firstly, it tells me you didn't buy enough of our stock after that meeting, which is why I had to do the follow-up letter to encourage you to buy more. Um, and, and we have a cost focus as well. We like to buy low.

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 不,您看,从来没有比这更好的机会了。股票下跌了大约25%。

Original English

Daniel Balthazar: No, you there's never been a better opportunity. Stock is down about 25%.

迈克尔·奥利里: 只是别告诉任何人,因为我们目前正在尽可能快地买入,我不想和在场任何其他人竞争。

Original English

Michael O'Leary: Just don't tell anybody because we're buying it as fast as we can at the moment, and I don't want to be competing with anybody else in the room.

文化的根源与对未来的看法

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 很好。那么,如果文化是由高层设定的,这如何转化为 25,000 名员工每天的行为呢?我对这些文化研讨会和“哒哒哒”感到非常紧张。我对所有关于“文化的东西”持怀疑态度。我尊重大卫(David),但您知道,我不想经营一家能生存 300 年、传承 55 代的公司。我们希望在未来 5 到 10 年内赚钱。如果做到了这一点,我们就有合理的希望生存 15 到 20 年。但归根结底,总会有人来革新。我个人认为诺基亚(Nokia)的失败不是因为管理层傲慢或存在“恐惧文化”,诺基亚的失败根本在于iPhone的出现彻底改变了技术,这影响了我们所有人。什么让我夜不能寐?《星际迷航》(Star Trek)。因为无论我的机票有多便宜,在欧洲飞行领域,没有人会打败瑞安航空。但总有一天,会有人发明出一种“传送”人们穿越欧洲的方式。当然,欧洲委员会(European Commission)可能会因为某种环保原因找到一种方式来对其征税。但最终,我们将获得这项技术,或者某种变革性的技术将会出现,而无论我们的文化有多好,成本基础有多扎实,我们都会被淘汰。直到那个时候。我们的文化是……我们不,我经常对每个人大喊大叫、发脾气。我们不感兴趣解释我们的文化。我们的文化是:我们希望提供最低廉的机票、最准时的航班,并将通过拥有业内最低的成本来实现这一目标,而且我们将不断改造我们的成本基础。我们引领着全球的航空业。我们是第一批淘汰旅行社的人。您知道,当互联网出现时,因为我们在一个利润率为 1% 的行业里,为分销支付了 15 年的 20% 的费用。为什么要为那些夫妻店式的旅行社支付 20% 的费用?互联网出现了,我们就立即行动,禁止了那些旅行社,它们就消失了。大约 15 年前,我们是第一批收取行李费的人。正如《圣经》所说,摩西从山上下来,第四条诫命是:你可以永远免费携带行李登机。但通过收取行李费,我们航班上携带行李的乘客比例从 80% 下降到今天的 20%,平均停留时间为 2.5 天。这意味着我们不仅大大减少了机场的劳动力。而且,我有点不同意大卫的看法。我确实想善待员工,但最终,我希望尽可能多地淘汰公司里的员工。而那些留下来的人,我会善待他们。例如,飞行员是极其昂贵的员工。根据法律,他们每年最多只能飞行 800 小时,也就是每周 18 小时,我认为这非常低效。为此,我支付他们大约 25 万美元的年薪。但是,技术总有一天会出现。您知道,如果美国军方能驾驶无人机或飞机,飞行员最终也会被系统淘汰。我希望善待我的飞行员,善待我的摄影团队,但在幕后,我也希望能找到一种技术来取代他们。这样,即使有欧盟(EU)的环境税和荒谬的监管,飞越欧洲的成本将变得比以往任何时候都更便宜。所以,我们的重点和文化就是:让它便宜,让它准时。之后,就走开吧。您别无所求。然后,我们要以极其偏执的专注去思考:如何让它更便宜,更便宜,更便宜?通过不断地革新系统根本性地改变客户行为。收取行李费是我们最伟大的举措之一。大家之所以对此着迷,不是因为“我们只想赚钱”。我乐意最终把钱都给股东,但如果我能摆脱最后 20% 的托运行李,我将毫不犹豫。我将不再需要值机人员,不再需要行李处理人员,也不再需要行李丢失处理人员。飞机可以轻载约 3%,这会减少我的燃油消耗。我的年燃油账单约为 50 亿美元。因此,摆脱托运行李的潜在好处是,我们消耗的燃油更少。而如今航空燃油每桶 157 美元,我能做的任何能降低成本的事情,我们都会去做。这就是为什么我们是世界上最盈利的航空公司。我们当然是世界上最大的国际航空公司。而且,我们计划在未来 8 年内,通过订购 300 架波音(Boeing)Max 10飞机,将去年的 2 亿乘客增长到 3 亿乘客。这些飞机比现有飞机座位数多 20%,但每座的燃油消耗却减少 20%。我将在未来 10 年内用这项新技术来改变我的经济效益。它们将由同样的两位飞行员、同样的四到五名机组人员驾驶。这将使我们的成本大幅降低,扩大我相对于欧洲其他所有航空公司的价格优势,我将击败它们,并拥有这个行业,直到某人,在某个地下室里,发明出一种将人们传送穿越欧洲的方式,到那时,我就完蛋了。

Original English

How does that translate into how 25,000 people behave every single day? I get very nervous at these culture simulacra meetings and da da da. I am skeptical when we do all the cultural stuff. I respect David but you know I don't want to be running a company that survives 300 years and for 55 generations. We want to make money for the next 5-10 years. Uh and if we do that there's a reasonable prospect we'll survive 15-20 years. But ultimately somebody's going to come along and reinvent the wheel. I don't think Nokia failed by the way because you know the man the management were arrogant or there was a culture of fear in Nokia. Nokia failed because fundamentally the iPhone came along and totally transformed the technology and that beevils all of us. What keeps me awake at night? Star Trek. Uh because it doesn't matter how bloody cheap my fairs are going to be. And when it comes to flying in Europe, no one's going to beat Ryan Price ever. But somebody sometime is going to invent some way of beaming people across Europe. Uh although the European Commission will probably find some way to tax it uh for some environmental cause but ultimately we will get uh the technology or some sort of transform of technology will come along and it doesn't matter how good our culture was or how good our cost base was. We're going to get blown out of the water until that time comes. Our culture is uh we kind of we do not and I I kind of shout and rant and rave at everybody. We're not interested in explaining our culture. Our culture is we want to deliver the lowest fair most on time flights and we'll do it by having the lowest cost bar nobody in the industry and we will keep transforming our cost base. We lead the airline industry across the world. We were the first people to uh buy get rid of travel agents. You know, when the internet came along because we'd been paying 20% for distribution for, you know, 15 years in an industry that had a 1% margin. Why the hell were you paying 20% to mom and pop travel agents? Internet came along, we were out the door, banned the travel agents that were gone. Um, we were the first people 15 years ago to charge for bags. And as you know, as it says in the good Bible, Moses came down from the mountaintop and the fourth commandment is thou shalt be entitled to bring free bags on board aircraft forever more. Um, but by charging for bags, we went from 80% of passengers on our flights uh bringing a bag on a a stay duration of one and a of 2.5 days to 20% of passengers today now bring a bag in which means not alone have we gotten rid of huge amounts of labor at our airports. And again, I slightly disagree with David. I want to treat people well, but ultimately I want to get rid of as many people as I can within the business. Uh, but and the ones who remain I'll treat well. Um, pilots, for example, you know, are egregiously expensive employees. By law, they can't fly more than 800 hours a year, which is 18 hours a week, which I think is ridiculously unproductive. And for that, I pay them about a quarter million uh each. So, but technology will in time come along. you know, if the US military can fly drones or fly you know aircraft across pilots will ultimately get competed out of the system. I want to treat my pilots very well. I want to treat my camera crew very well, but at the back I also want to find some way of finding a technology that'll replace them all. And then the cost of flying across Europe, even with the European eur EU's environmental taxes and ridiculous regulation will become even cheaper than it ever has before. So our focus and our culture is all about make it cheap, make it on time. After that, go away. You're not getting anything else. And then be viciously obsessively focused on how do we make it cheaper, cheaper, cheaper by constantly reinvesting the reinventing the system and fundamentally changing customer behavior. Charging for bags was one of the greatest initiatives we've ever come up with. And not because and everybody's obsessed with, oh, I we just want the money. I would happily give away the money ultimately to shareholders, but give away the money if I can get rid of the last 20% of bags. I would have no uh check-in staff. I'd have no baggage handling staff. I'd have no lost baggage staff. The aircraft fly about 3% lighter, which reduces my fuel consumption. My fuel bills about 5 billion a year. Uh, so the hidden benefits of getting rid of checked in bloody bags is that we're consuming less fuel. And with jet oil today at about $157 a barrel, anything I can do to get out that kind of those kind of costs, we will do. And that's why we are the most profitable airline in the world. We are certainly the biggest international airline in the world. And yet we plan to grow in size from 200 million passengers last year to 300 million passengers in the next 8 years by ordering 300 by order taking delivery of 300 new aircraft which from Boeing the Max 10 aircraft which are 20% bigger in terms of seats but they burn 20% less fuel per seat. I am going to transform my economics for the next uh 10 years with this new technology. Uh, and but and they'll be flown by the same two pilots, the same four or five cabin crew. Uh, which should make us hugely lower cost, widen the price advantage I have over every other airline in Europe, and I'm going to blow them all up and own the industry until somebody in a back bedroom somewhere invents some way of beaming people across Europe, and then I'm screwed.

行业竞争与成本主导策略

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 太棒了。您在一个高度竞争的行业中运营。

Original English

Excellent. You operate in a hypercompetitive industry.

迈克尔·奥利里: 是竞争性行业吗?高度竞争?是欧洲吗?不,他们都太没用了。政府拥有,受政府严格监管,巨额政府补贴。目前所有老牌航空公司都在四处奔波寻求救助。上帝保佑美国(United States)的共和党人。他们现在正要救助两家最破产的航空公司:SpiritJetBlue,它们早该破产倒闭了。所以,不,这不是一个高度竞争的行业。这是一个监管不善的行业。它是政府拥有的,这就是为什么它在欧洲如此低效、昂贵且效率低下。所以我只需要稍有竞争力,就能比欧洲的竞争对手做得更好,但这并没有设定很高的门槛。

Original English

Are you competitive industry? Hyper competitive? Is it Europe? No, they're all useless. Government-owned, heavily regulated, hugely government subsidized. All the legacies are running around at the moment trying to get bailouts. God bless the Republicans in the United States. They're now about to bail out two of the most bankrupt airlines, Spirit and JetBlue, who should have been allowed to go to the wall many years ago. So, no, it's not a hyperco competitive industry. It's a very badly regulated industry. uh it is government-owned which is why it it is inefficient uh hugely expensive and inefficient in Europe. So all I have to be is modestly competitive to be better than the rest of the competition in Europe but that's not setting the bar very high.

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 令人惊叹。

Original English

Amazing.

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 然而,大多数人,大多数员工,他们不喜欢过度关注成本。您如何保持他们的积极性?

Original English

Most people though most employees they don't like an over focus on cost. How do you keep them motivated?

迈克尔·奥利里: 恐惧,惊吓,深夜在走廊里徘徊。嗯,我们不……我的意思是,您知道,瑞安航空最棒的一点是我们已经这样做了 30 年。所以,您知道,我们每年招聘大约 50 名应届毕业生。嗯,我们招聘那些想努力工作的人。我们努力在那里树立榜样。这是一种非常精简的管理模式。在我与一线员工之间,只有三层管理人员。因此,我们保持非常扁平化的结构。但我们的优势在于,我们是一个单一的……我们是一个“一杆子到底”的运营模式。这只是一家航空公司。我们唯一要卖的就是一个座位。所以我们不需要复杂性。我们避免并购。我们不涉及,您知道,购买酒店或购买机场或购买其他任何东西。我们购买飞机,希望是在波音或**空客(Airbus)**需要订单的困境时期,然后我们整天所做的就是卖座位。所以我们不需要复杂的管理。但我们做得很好,因为我认为我们有一个非常扁平化的管理结构。我们非常擅长抓住新出现的举措。而瑞安航空的伟大优势在于,我们并不那么受欢迎。我们在几乎所有乘客调查中都排名最后。我们从未获奖……在爱尔兰有一个奖项,是爱尔兰旅行社协会颁发的……那里只有两家航空公司。**爱尔兰航空(Aer Lingus)**赢得了这些奖项,那就是前国有航空公司。爱尔兰航空已经连续 30 年赢得“年度旅行社航空公司”奖。我曾承诺,如果我们 ever 赢得那个奖,我就会辞职。嗯,但是……抱歉,我只是……不被过度关注我的声誉、我们的形象或受欢迎程度的优势是,我们极其低成本,这给了我们巨大的自由去追求那种节省成本的措施,或者去革新我们……我们推动航空公司的方式。最终,所有其他傻瓜都会跟在我们后面。我的意思是,美国航空公司在 15 年后才发现收取行李费,而我们早就开始这么做了。现在他们正试图以此作为一种创收方式,而我们这样做不是为了创收,而是为了消除成本。

Original English

Fear, terror, stalking the corridors late at night. Um we don't I mean you know the great thing about Rhiner is we've been doing it this way for 30 years. So you know we hire about 50 graduates every year. Um we hire people who want to work hard. We try to set an example there. It is a very slim kind of man. There is only three layers of management between somebody on the front line and me. Um and therefore we keep it very flat. But the advantage we have is we're a single you know we're a one goof kind of operation. It's only an airline. All we have to sell is a seat. So we don't need complexity. We avoid M&A. We don't get involved in, you know, buying hotels or buying airports or buying whatever else it is. We buy aircraft hopefully at times of distress when Boeing or Airbus needs orders and then all we do is sell seats all day long. So we don't need a lot of complicated management and then but we are very good because I think we have a very flat management structure. We're very good at pouncing on new initiatives as they come along. And the great advantage of being the great strength of Ryan Air is we're not very much beloved. We finished last in almost every passenger survey. We have never won there's a there's an award in Ireland for the Irish Travel Agents Association uh which there's only two airlines in Ireland. Airlingers have won those awards which is the ex state airline. He lingers have won the travel agent airline of the year award for 30 years in a row. I have promised that we will I will quit if we ever win that award. Um, so, but the advantage of this, sorry I just the advantage of not being overly sensitive about my reputation or our image or being culturally popular is we're ruthlessly low cost and that gives us huge freedom to chase those kind of costsaving measures or to reinvent the way we uh the way we drive the airlines and then ultimately all the other morons will follow us along. I mean, the American airlines have just discovered charging for bags 15-20 years after we started doing it. Now they're trying to make it do it as a way of gen gaining revenue whereas we did it not as a way of generating revenue but as a way of eliminating cost.

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 这很有趣,因为我们采访的大多数 CEO 都谈论“以客户为中心”,把客户放在一切的中心。而您却在做相反的事情,但却赢了。

Original English

It's fascinating because most of the CEOs we talk to they talk about more customer centricity keep the customer heck put the customer in the center of everything. Yet you're doing the opposite but win.

迈克尔·奥利里: 但那是因为我们相对于其他所有航空公司都有巨大的价格优势。客户最终,在每一次调查中。哦,我希望他们能更友善。我想要退款,但这是非退款票。您不理解“非退款”是什么意思吗?我不在乎您的祖母是否去世,或者您的猫是否生病而您无法当天出行。那是一张非退款机票。现在,我希望您飞行,因为我可以在飞机上向您出售约 6 欧元的附加服务收入。但我是 2.16 亿……(此处略有中断)。偶尔,我们也会出现失误。我们偶尔会 mismanagement 情况。我们会遇到大量的负面宣传。我注意到每次出现大量负面宣传时,预订量就会上升。埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk),我从未见过他,也从未与他有过任何互动。我们遇到了这个问题。我们在年初时试图在飞机上安装 Wi-Fi。我认为飞机上的免费 Wi-Fi 正在到来。目前的问题是技术尚不存在。我们必须在飞机外部安装几个“酒窝”(dimples)。这会造成大约 2% 的燃油阻力,而我的年燃油账单是 50 亿美元。2% 的燃油阻力大约是 1 亿美元。我不会花 1 亿美元为乘客提供免费 Wi-Fi。Starlink,这是一项了不起的技术。我对 Starling 技术没有意见。Starling 相信乘客会支付……您知道,这会自己带来回报。显然,他们从未见过瑞安航空的乘客。因为当我们忙于在机舱里向他们推销茶、咖啡、刮刮卡以及任何我们能想到的东西时,我们没有时间进行每次只收一欧元交易的买卖。所以我碰巧说:“听着,Starling 很棒,但您知道,这个系统就行不通。我们不会一年支付 1 亿美元的燃油罚款,因为这相当于每张机票 50 美分。”然后,有人告诉埃隆·马斯克我批评了 Starling,所以他在互联网上发布了一些东西,说:“瑞安航空那个混蛋是谁?这个瑞安航空的蠢货,他显然是个白痴,他对飞行一无所知。”所以我回击道:“是那个在Twitter(现名X)上运营那个垃圾场的人吗?在跟我找茬?”我说得对。它确实有燃油阻力。他说它没有燃油阻力。然后他说:“我对航空电子学一无所知”,这可能是真的。我对航空电子学知之甚少,但他对低成本航空公司也一无所知。然后他在他的 Twitter(现名X)上发起了一个投票……我没有 Twitter 账号,顺便说一句。谢天谢地,我生活中还有更重要的事情要做。但他发起了一个投票:“我应该买瑞安航空吗?”我们礼貌地指出:“您是美国人,所以您不能购买瑞安航空。我们是欧洲公司,您必须持股超过 50%。您做不到。”然后,在 1 月的第二周,这是欧洲预订量最安静的几周之一,我们的预订量就爆炸了。我们正四处奔波,如何……我们发起了一个大型的“白痴座位促销”活动。我们让AI制作了一些广告,内容是我用东西打他,他掐我脖子,等等。我们制造了大约 3000 万美元的免费宣传。我当时在都柏林举行新闻发布会,是为了我通常的……今年夏天,我们将执飞 25 个航线。他们将新闻发布会直播到 Sky CBC,并直播给了在都柏林的那个人,他拼命地想制造新闻,说埃隆·马斯克是错的。我们从中获得了大约 3000 万美元的免费宣传,并且在接下来大约 6 周的预订量增加了约 3 个百分点。

Original English

But that's because we have an enormous price advantage over everybody else. customers ultimately in every survey. Oh, I wish they were nicer. I want a refund of a non-refund. What part of no refund don't you understand? I don't care if your granny died or you know your cat was ill and you couldn't travel on the day. It was a non-refundable fair. Now I want you to fly because I can sell you about €6 of ancillary revenues on board my aircraft. But I'm 216 million and we appear occasionally we it happens even to us. We occasionally mismanage situations. We get a huge amount of adverse publicity and what I notice every time we get a lot of adverse publicity is bookings go up. Elon Musk who I have never met uh never had any interaction with it. We had this issue. We were trying to put Wi-Fi on board our aircraft uh at the start of the year. I think Wi-Fi free Wi-Fi on board aircraft is coming. The problem at the moment is technology doesn't yet exist. We have to put a couple of dimples on the outside of the aircraft. It would be about a 2% fuel drag and my fuel bill is 5 billion a year. or 2% fuel drag is something of the order about a hundred million and I'm not paying 100 million to put free Wi-Fi on board for my passengers. Uh Starlink which is a terrific technology. I have no issue with the staring technology. Starling believe passengers will pay you12 you know and it'll pay for itself. Uh clearly they've never met any ran air passengers. Um because that by the time we've gone up and down the cabin selling them teas, coffee, scratch cards and anything else we can kind of think to sell them. we don't have time to be running up and down taking one euro transactions any so I happen to say look Stern is great but you know the system doesn't work uh we're not taking a fuel penalty of 100 million a year because that would be you know 50 cents on every ticket and he uh someone told Elon Musk that I'd slagged off Starling so he popped up something on his internet feed going who is this wanker in Ryanire who's this Ryanire gobshite he's clearly an idiot he knows nothing about flying so I pop back who is this Egypt in uh Twitter running that cesspace that is Twitter having a pop off me. I'm correct. It does have a fuel drag. Uh he says it doesn't have a fuel drag. And then he says, "I know nothing about avionics," which is probably true. I know very little about avionics, but he knows nothing about flying lowcost airlines either. He then ran a poll on his Twitter ex I don't have a Twitter site, by the way. Thankfully, I have better things to do with my life, but he ran a poll at his 1.5. Should I buy Ryan Air? We politely pointed out you're American, therefore you can't buy a Ryionaire. We're European and you have to be more than 50%. You won't. And next thing it exploded during the second week of January, which is one of the quietest weeks for bookings in uh in Europe. And my bookings just took off. Next thing we're running around, how do we manif how do we manif? So, we ran a big idiot seat sale. We got AI to come up with some ads of me smacking him over the head with some and him choking me da da da. And we manufactured about $30 million of free publicity. I was holding a press conference in Dublin back in January to do my kind of usual this summer. We'll do 25 droos. They took the press conference live on Sky CBC went live to this Egypt in Dublin talking desperately trying to make some news about how Elon Musk is wrong. We got about 30 million free publicity out of it and bookings for about 6 weeks went up by about 3 percentage points.

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 您给他寄了感谢信吗?

Original English

Did you send him a thank you letter?

迈克尔·奥利里: 什么?

Original English

Pardon me.

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 您给埃隆·马斯克寄了感谢信吗?

Original English

Did you send Elon Musk a thank you?

迈克尔·奥利里: 不,实际上我们给了他一张免费的瑞安航空往返都柏林推特(Twitter)办公室的免费机票代金券,还有一张我递给他免费乘车券的照片。他还没有兑换,但我希望他能在不久的将来兑换。所以,我们做的另一件事是,我们会利用任何一点廉价的宣传,因为在我们这种拥有巨大价格优势的业务中,廉价的宣传会带来巨大的销售和预订量。因此,只要它不涉及安全问题,我记得**特朗普(Trump)**第一次当选时说,即使他在第五大道杀了人,他仍然会当选。我们当时在想,也许如果我们杀了人,瑞安航空的预订量会上升吗?我们觉得,不行,那可能有点太过了。但除此之外,如果它不涉及安全问题,我们愿意接受任何我们能获得的廉价宣传。

Original English

No, actually we sent him a free voucher for a free Ryan flight round to the Twitter the Twitter offices in Dublin. and got a photograph of me handing in the free ride voucher. He hasn't claimed it yet, but I hope he will at some point in time in the not too distant future. So, one of the other things we do is we will jump on any bit of cheap publicity we can uh because cheap publicity uh in our business where you have such a price advantage drives enormous sales and enormous bookings. And so as long as it doesn't revolve around safety, if you know, and I remember Trump getting elected the first time said if he murdered somebody on Fifth Avenue that he'd still get elected. And we were thinking, well, maybe if we murdered somebody on Fifth Avenue, would it drive bookings up on Ryan Air? We thought, no, that was probably pushing the envelope a little bit too far. But other than that, if it doesn't involve safety, we're up for any bit of cheap publicity we can get.

丹尼尔·巴尔萨泽: 好的,总结一下,成本专注、免费营销以及绝佳的幽默感,无疑创造了一种成功的文化。非常感谢您,迈克尔。请大家热烈鼓掌欢迎。非常感谢。

Original English

Okay, so to summarize, a cost focus, free marketing, and an incredible sense of humor definitely created a winning culture. Thank you very much, Michael. Please join me with a huge round. Thank you very much.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

人物: Michael O'Leary, Daniel Balthazar, Elon Musk

公司/组织: Ryanair, Twitter

产品/模型: iPhone, Starlink

关键字: low-cost-strategy cost-efficiency guerrilla-marketing airline-industry business-culture