AI 代理与营销效率
Jacob Bank: 我们都应该拥有几十甚至几百个代理为我们工作。所以随着时间的推移,我建立了一个由40个AI营销代理组成的团队与我一起工作。我是 Related App 唯一的营销人员。我有一个AI教练,每周一次告诉我:“以下是你一直在做的、效果很好的主题或风格。多做这些,少做那些。” 这也是为什么我在 LinkedIn 上发布了一些非常成功的帖子。例如,一篇帖子是“这是我actually在用的40个营销代理”。这篇帖子迄今为止已有150万次展示,以及LinkedIn帖子最多的评论。要知道,我持续在LinkedIn发帖一年都没有什么效果。然后突然之间,我意识到,哇。如果你的工作是初级内容营销人员,负责将YouTube视频改编成博客文章,那么这份工作将不复存在了。
Original English
Jacob Bank: We should all be having dozens or hundreds of agents working for us. So over time, I built up this team of 40 AI marketing agents to work with me. I'm the only marketing person at Related App. I have an AI coach that once a week tells me, "Here are the themes that seem to be really working well or the styles that are working really well for you. Do more of this, do less of that." That's why I've had a few very successful posts on LinkedIn. So for example, the post was here are the 40 marketing agents that I actually use. And that post so far has 1.5 million impressions and the most comments ever on a LinkedIn post. You know, I've been posting consistently on LinkedIn for a year with no results. And then all of a sudden, I was like, wo. If your job is as a junior content marketer to take a YouTube video and write a blog post based on that YouTube video, that job won't exist anymore.
Jacob Bank: 一位高质量的营销承包商,假设我有四个人,每人每月工资12,500美元。那将是每月50,000美元。而我的AI账单是每月500美元。构建AI代理是未来30年内定义每个专业人士职业生涯的基本技能。这是必需的。就像过去40年使用Microsoft Excel这样的电子表格是必需的一样,未来40年掌握如何构建AI代理也将是必需的。我们现在对AI的使用,可能只发挥了其应有功能的1%。我想说的是:AI被严重低估了。
Original English
Jacob Bank: A high quality marketing contractor, let's say I had four people at $12,500 per month each. That would be $50,000 a month. And my AI bill is $500 a month. Building AI agents is the fundamental skill that will define every professional's career for the next 30 years. It's a requirement. In the same way that knowing how to use spreadsheets like Microsoft Excel was a requirement for the last 40 years, knowing how to build AI agents is a requirement for the next 40 years. We are all using it for probably 1% of what we should be using it for. Here's what I'll say. AI is way underhyped.
Jacob Bank: 我叫Jacob Bank,是Relay.app的创始人兼CEO。Relay.app是一个用于构建AI代理和工作流的平台,它们可以代表你完成工作。目前,我们是一个九人团队。我们有五名工程师、两名设计师、一名产品人员和我自己。如果没有AI,我们可能需要一个15人的团队才能达到我们现在所取得的成就。曾几何时,我是一名AI研究员,然后是一家创业公司的创始人,之后是Google的长期产品负责人。我从2021年开始就在开发relay.app。所以,我近距离见证了过去三年里整个AI的爆炸式增长。
Original English
Jacob Bank: My name is Jacob Bank. I'm the founder and CEO of Relay.app. Relay.app is a platform to build AI agents and workflows that get work done on your behalf. So, right now, we're a nineperson team. We have five engineers, two designers, a product person, and myself. If we did not have AI, we would probably need to be a 15 person team to achieve the same level of accomplishment that we have now. Once upon a time, I was an AI researcher, then a startup founder, and then a longtime product lead at Google. And I've been working on relay.app since 2021. So, I've seen the whole AI boom over the last 3 years from a very close vantage point.
AI 的思维模型:超越实习生
Interviewer: 我对AI的看法是,它就像一个实习生。 Interviewer: 它只做你告诉它做的事情。 Interviewer: 它就是那个实习生。 Jacob Bank: 这件事我改变了想法。实际上,一年前,我说:“嘿,把AI想象成你的实习生。” 然后我意识到,那是错误的思维模式。
Original English
Interviewer: My take on AI is [music] it's like an intern. Interviewer: It's just an intern. It does exactly what you tell it to do. Interviewer: It's the intern. Jacob Bank: This is something I've changed my mind on. Actually, a year ago, I said, "Hey, think of an AI as your intern." [music] And then I realized that that was the wrong mental model.
Jacob Bank: AI确实能做一类任务,那是那种可以节省时间、原本会交给实习生的任务。但AI还能进行战略分析、竞争分析和内容创作,这些是实习生绝对做不到的。举个例子,我不擅长销售电话。我没有销售背景。这对我来说不自然。但事实证明,销售电话中有一些技巧非常宝贵。所以我有一个AI教练,它会审阅我会议的所有记录,并说:“哦,你本可以把这一点说得更好。你本可以更清晰地阐述这个价值,或者你太急于进行演示了。你应该多问一些探索性问题。” 如果你出去找一位销售教练,一位好的销售教练每月要花10,000美元,每周一次会议。你可以自己构建一个相当不错的AI销售教练,加上一点点、你知道的,记录训练,每周运行成本只需大约五美元。
Original English
Jacob Bank: There are certainly a class of tasks that AI can do. Those are the time-saving kind of tasks that you would give otherwise to an intern. But AI can also do these strategy analyses and competitive analyses and content creation tasks that an intern definitely could not do. So for example, I am not good at sales calls. I do not have a background in sales. It does not come naturally. But it turns out there are some techniques that are pretty valuable in sales calls. So, I have an AI coach that reviews all the transcripts of my meetings and says, "Oh, you could have talked about this better. You could have articulated this value or you were too easy to eager to jump into a demo there. You should have asked some more discovery questions." If you go out and hire a sales coach, a good sales coach is like $10,000 a month for one meeting a week. You can build a pretty good AI sales coach by yourself and a little bit of, you know, transcript training and it'll cost you like five bucks a week to run.
未来工作模式:超级个体贡献者 (Super ICs)
Jacob Bank: 当有一个新的角色或职能我没有经验或感觉自己不是专家时,我该如何找到正确的指导关系,以便我能将我所做事情的原始数据提供给我的教练,然后让它以正确的节奏(例如,每次通话后、每天一次总结或每周一次总结)给我反馈?这就是为什么我现在意识到,将AI视为实习生是如此错误。 回到我在Google工作的时候,有一个叫做技术主管(tech lead manager)的职位,这是一个混合角色,你既要是了解整个代码库、能审查技术设计并解决最棘手问题的技术专家,同时你也是一个管理者,负责协调团队中的其他人。这是一个非常困难的角色,同时做好技术工作和管理工作很难。但我认为这就是我们所有人的未来。我们都需要成为“超级个体贡献者”(Super ICs)。让我解释一下为什么。如果你的工作是初级内容营销人员,负责将YouTube视频改编成博客文章,那么这份工作将不复存在了。你无法仅仅通过执行单个内容再利用任务来建立一份工作。如果你的工作是在一家大公司工作并管理一个千人团队,我不想说这份工作会消失,但我认为这份工作会变得越来越不重要,因为公司会变得更小。我们会拥有更多精简、小型化的公司。所以,管理千人团队的技能将变得不那么重要。每个人都会像我一样,大约三分之二的时间用于个人贡献者工作。我做事情:制作YouTube视频、编辑博客文章、发布内容、与客户交流。然后我三分之一的时间用于协调我的AI代理团队,它们在我做这些事情时提供帮助。这个“超级个体贡献者”的未来令人兴奋的一点是,这是我们大多数人热爱的工作。我接触过的很多处于初级职位的人士都会说:“嗯,我真希望我不是只写被告知要写的博客文章,而是能在我们做什么以及为什么这样做上拥有更多的战略影响力。” 我认识的每个人,包括我在Google时,担任纯粹组织管理角色的人,都曾说过:“啊,我真希望我能更接近实际工作。我真希望我能回到产品岗位。我真希望我能离客户和用户更近。” 所以现在,我认为未来的每个角色都将结合这两种世界的优势。我们都需要有足够的战略眼光和资深经验来决定什么需要做,并能看到什么是好的,以便我们给出正确的指导。但同时,我们还需要足够地动手能力强,能够实际编辑博客文章、编辑推文、自己制作视频。这就是未来工作场所的形态。
Original English
Jacob Bank: when there's a new role or function I'm taking on that I don't have experience in or I don't feel like I'm an expert at, how can I figure out the right coaching relationship where I can give my coach the raw data of what I'm doing and then have it give feedback to me on the right cadence whether it's after every call or once a day with a summary or once a week with a summary. That's why I'm now realizing that thinking about AI as an intern was so wrong. So back when I was at Google, there was a role called tech lead manager and that was a hybrid role where you were both supposed to be the technical expert who knew the entire codebase and could review technical designs and solve the hardest problems. But you were also a manager. You were also responsible for coordinating the other people on the team. And it's a very hard role. It's hard to do both technical work and management work at the same time. But I think that's what the future holds for all of us. We all need to become super IC's. Let me explain why. If your job is as a junior content marketer to [music] take a YouTube video and write a blog post based on that YouTube video, that job won't exist anymore. You cannot build a job just doing single individual content repurposing tasks like that. If your job is to work at a large corporation and manage a team of a thousand people, I don't want to say that job is going to go away, but I think that job is going to become less and less important because companies are going to be smaller. We're going to have many more leaner, smaller companies. So that skill set of managing a thousand people, that's going to be less and less important. Everyone is going to look like me where about twothirds of your day is individual contributor work. I'm doing stuff. I'm making YouTube videos. I'm editing blog posts. I'm publishing content. I'm talking to customers. And then oneird of my day is coordinating my team of AI agents that helps me with those things. The thing that's so exciting about this super IC [music] future is that that's the work most of us love. Most people that I talk to who are in very junior roles are like, "Uh, I wish instead of just writing this blog post I was told to write, I had a bit more strategic influence on what we were doing and why." And everyone I know, including myself when I was at Google, who was in a complete organizational management role was, "Ah, I wish I could be closer to the work. I wish I could get back into product. I wish I could be closer to the customer and the user." And so now, I think every role in the future will combine the best of both worlds. We will all need to be strategic enough and senior [music] enough to decide what needs to be done and to be able to see what good looks like so we can give the right coaching, but and we need to be still hands-on enough that we can actually edit the blog post and edit the tweet and make the video ourselves.
AI 代理的构建与迭代
Jacob Bank: 是的,一次看到40个代理会有点不知所措,但如果你点进任何一个单独的代理,它们都非常简单,并且都有非常具体的工作。例如,每次我们创建一个新的YouTube视频,它会自动生成一篇LinkedIn帖子。每次我们创建一个新的YouTube视频,它会自动生成一条推文。每当我们的一个竞争对手的CEO在Twitter或LinkedIn上发帖时,它就会告诉我他们在谈论什么。每周,它都会去查看我们的竞争对手的定价,并告诉我是否有任何重要变化。所以,我一个接一个地建立了这个AI代理团队来帮助我。我尝试构建一个能同时做25件事情的单一代理,但运气不太好。这可能与人类员工的一个区别是:当你雇佣一位社交媒体营销人员时,你希望他负责所有的社交媒体营销,尤其是如果你是初学者。从简单开始。创建一个能做一件事的代理,再创建一个能做第二件事的代理,再创建一个能做第三件事的代理,然后可能再有一个代理居于它们之上,在需要时帮助调用它们。然后随着时间的推移逐步构建。不要一开始就设计一个拥有40个代理的组织结构图。从一个开始。有一件非常重要的事情需要牢记:AI代理不是“设置好就不用管了”的那种东西。你不能 just 构建一个AI代理然后说“哦,这个东西会永远为我工作。” 我在不断地修改我的AI代理。例如,我与新客户进行评估电话,我们会花30分钟与他们交流,并找出他们业务中AI的应用机会。我想,如果他们能在电话后收到我发给他们的个性化Google文档,里面包含我们谈论的内容、五个具体用例和模板链接,那不是很酷吗?我觉得这个想法太棒了。于是我构建了一个AI代理来帮助我。我对它说:“AI代理,你的工作是获取会议记录,并将其转换为一份格式精美的Google文档发送给客户。” 在这样做了10次之后,我心想:“这个格式不对。客户根本不看Google文档,我应该直接把它放在邮件里。” 于是我解雇了那个代理,我说:“嗯,我们实际上不再需要这项工作了。” 我实际上是把那个代理重新利用了,我说:“你能把那个总结直接放到跟进邮件里吗?” 有时你就是不再需要某个功能了。比如,一年前我们非常专注于SEO。然后我们意识到,目前它对我们来说并不是最重要的渠道。它只占我们新用户的一小部分,而且需要相对较高的努力。所以我们不再专注于SEO了。于是我告诉我的AI SEO代理们,你们现在可以停下来了。将来我还会找你们,但现在你们可以停止你们正在做的事情。就像你会告诉一家SEO公司一样,我们目前暂时不需要SEO了。将来我们会再次与你们合作。最棒的是,没有情感负担。没有分歧。没有协调成本。我只是有一个想法。‘嘿,AI代理,你能帮我实现这个想法吗?’ 它们会说:“是的,当然。我们来做吧。” 嗯,所以我不希望我们把它看作是取代人。我希望把它看作是赋予我超能力。我希望有时间做所有这些营销活动,因为我喜欢做它们,它们对公司非常有价值。现在我可以做到了。我们都想在工作中做得更多。我们都是有抱负的人。我们都是有动力的人。我们都希望自己能做得更多,而现在我们拥有了实现这一目标的工具。
Original English
Jacob Bank: Yes, it's a bit overwhelming to see 40 of them all at once, but if you click into any [music] individual agent, they're very simple and they all have very specific jobs. One, every time we create a new YouTube video, it creates a LinkedIn post automatically. Every time we create a new YouTube video, it creates a tweet automatically. Every time the CEO of one of our competitors posts on Twitter or LinkedIn, it lets me know what they're talking about. Every week, it goes and looks at our competitor pricing and it lets me know if anything important has changed. So, one by one, I built up this team of AI agents to help me. I have not had good luck with trying to build a single agent to try to do 25 things at once. That is one difference maybe with human employees where when you hire a social media marketer, you want them to own all of social media marketing, especially if you're a beginner. Start simple. Create one agent that can do one thing, create a second agent that can do a second thing, create a third agent that can do a third thing, and then maybe have one agent that sits above them and helps invoke them when necessary. And then build up over time. Do not start with a 40 agent or chart. Start with one. One very important thing to keep in mind is that AI agents are not a set it and forget it kind of thing. You can't just build an AI agent and say, "Oh, this thing is just going to work for me forever." I'm constantly modifying my AI agents. For example, I do assessment calls with new customers where I'll spend 30 minutes with them and we'll identify opportunities for AI in their business. And I thought, wouldn't it be cool if they got a personalized Google Doc from me after the call with what we had talked about with five specific use cases and links to templates? And I thought this was so cool. So I built an AI agent to help me with it. I said, "AI agent, your job is to take this transcript of the meeting and turn it into a really nicely formatted Google doc to send to the customer." And after doing that 10 times, I was like, "This is not the right format. The customers aren't reading the Google doc. I should have just included in the email." So I I fired that agent and I said, "Uh, we don't actually need that job to be done anymore." I actually repurposed that agent and said, "Can you just take that summary and put it directly into the follow-up?" Sometimes [music] you just don't need that function to be done anymore. Like we were very focused on SEO a year ago. And then we realized that it's just not the important channel for us right now. It's such a small percentage of our new users and it's relatively high effort. So we're not going to focus on SEO anymore. So I told my AI SEO agents, you guys can stop for now. Like I'll come back to you in the future, but for now you can stop doing what you're doing. In the same way that you would tell an SEO agency, we don't need SEO at the moment right now. We'll come work with you again in the future. And the really cool thing is there's no emotional baggage. There's no disagreements. There's no coordination costs. I just have an idea. Hey AI agent, can you help me with this idea? And they say, "Yeah, absolutely. Let's do it." Um, and so I don't want us to think about it as replacing people. I want to think about it as giving me superpowers. I wish I had the time to do all these marketing activities cuz I love doing them. They're very valuable to the company. And now I can do that. We all want to do more at our jobs. We're all ambitious people. We're all motivated people. We all wish we could do more and now we have the tools to do so.
职业风险重塑:拥抱不确定性与成长
Jacob Bank: 思考“风险职业”与“安全职业”的观念随着时间推移发生了怎样的变化,这确实很有趣。在我父母那一代,一份安全的工作意味着在一家大型财富500强公司工作40年,然后在退休时或工作50年后拿到那块手表。而一份风险职业则是自己创业或每隔几年换一次工作。我认为现在情况已经完全颠倒了。最风险的职业是你的技能过度依赖于某个特定公司的环境,而这个环境可能会随时间而改变。而最稳健的职业则是那些创业并拥有丰富生活经历的人。我举个例子,我们团队的很多人都是我从Google招募来的,因为我们都在Google一起工作过,现在我们一起创办这家初创公司。如果你问10个人,什么风险更大:留在Google还是加入一家初创公司?大多数人会说留在Google更安全,加入初创公司风险更大。从你未来一年的现金补偿来看,是的,这是真的。Google在未来一年支付给你的现金可能比大多数初创公司多。但如果你从长远职业角度来看,它关于你建立了多广泛的网络,学习了多少新技能?你如何挑战自己去获得新经历?那么,留在Google这样的公司比加入初创公司或创办初创公司要风险大得多。面对当前的AI代理热潮,你有两种反应方式。你可以说:“我持怀疑态度。我不相信它。我要把头埋在沙子里。我将继续按老样子工作。” 这是其一。第二种方式是:“哇,这是一个很酷的工具,将彻底改变工作的开展方式。我想站在使用它的最前沿。” 请选择第二种人。这会让你受益匪浅。我绝不想传达你应该承担更多风险。这不是我讨论问题的方式。不是说你应该承担更多风险。我讨论问题的方式是:你应该为个人成长和学习新技能来优化你的职业生涯。而通常,实现个人成长和学习新技能的方式是进入更新、更不确定的环境,在那里你将承担更多责任,对未来的不确定性也更大。我不认为这是风险。我认为最危险的事情是停滞不前。所以对我来说,关键在于重新定义关于‘风险’的讨论。风险就是停滞。进步意味着学习、成长和挑战自己。因此,我希望人们始终为进步、成长和挑战自己而优化。我没有营销背景。我非常不擅长营销。直到一年前,我甚至不使用任何社交媒体平台。我讨厌在公开场合分享关于自己的事情。作为负责营销的人,这对我来说非常不舒服。我意识到,有机社交媒体和在LinkedIn上进行营销是我们公司成功的最佳渠道。但我为此努力了一年,学习并掌握了它。现在我热爱它。所以,这可能会让我觉得,哦,在这个我们从未尝试过的营销策略上投入这么多精力风险太大了。不,这是一个机会,可以利用不确定性在一个新的方向上学习和成长。
Original English
Jacob Bank: It's fascinating to think about how perspectives on what a risky career is versus [music] what a safe career is have changed over the years. In my parents' generation, a safe career was working at one large Fortune 500 company [music] for 40 years. You know, getting your watch when you retire or after 50 years. And a risky career was starting your own company or moving between companies every couple of years. I think that has completely flipped. The riskiest career is if your skills are too tied to the environment of one particular company that could change over time. And the most robust careers are people who are starting their own companies and who are having lots of different life experience. I'll give you an example. Much of our team I've recruited from Google because we all work together at Google and now we're working on this startup. And if you ask 10 people what's riskier, staying at Google or joining a startup, most of them will say it's safer to stay at Google and it's riskier to join a startup. And in terms of your cash compensation for the next year, yeah, that's true. Like Google is going to pay you more in cash for the next year than most startups will. But if you think through the long-term lens of your career where it's about how broad of a network have you built, how many new skills have you built? How have you pushed yourself to develop new experiences? It is way riskier to stay at a company like Google than it is to join a startup or start a startup. There's two ways you can react to the current AI agent craze. You can say, "I'm skeptical. I don't believe it. I'm going to put my head in the sand. I'm going to keep working the way I've always worked." That's one way to react. The second way to act is like, whoa, this is a cool tool that's going to completely change the way that work is done. And I want to be on the cutting edge of how I'm using it. Please be person number two. That's going to serve you much better. I never want to communicate you should take more risk. That's not the way I frame the discussion. It's not you should take more risk. [music] The way I frame the discussion is you should optimize your career for personal growth and learning new skills. And often the way to create personal growth and learn new skills is to go into newer and more uncertain environments where you'll have more responsibility and you're less sure of what's going to happen. And I don't think that's risky. I think the riskiest thing you can do is to stagnate. And so for me, it's all about reframing the conversation about what risk is. Risk is stagnation. Progress means learning and growing and pushing yourself. And so I always want people to optimize for progress and growth and pushing yourself. I have no marketing background. I am terrible at marketing. I was not even on any social media platforms until a year ago. I hate sharing stuff about myself in public. It was deeply uncomfortable for me to be the person responsible for marketing. I realized that organic social media and marketing on LinkedIn was the best channel for us to succeed as a company. But I worked really hard at it for a year to learn to get good at it. And now I love it. And so it could have felt, oh, it's so risky to put so much effort in this marketing strategy that we haven't tried. No, it's an opportunity to take advantage of an uncertainty to learn and grow in a in a new direction.
AI 与下一代:教育和技能展望
Jacob Bank: 我经常思考我的孩子们将生活在怎样的世界里。在某些技术领域,我直呼:“哇,太酷了。这显然更好。” 我给你举一个小例子。我们住在旧金山的Puro Hill,离Whimo和Zuks的主要测试区非常近。Zuks,我认为是Amazon的自动驾驶汽车部门。我送孩子们上学时,我的两个大女儿坐在我后面的货运自行车上,她们会说“Whimo Zuks Whimo Zuks”。对她们来说,看到一辆没有人在驾驶的汽车是如此平常。她们觉得很酷,因为车顶上有摄像头和激光,但汽车可以由人类驾驶这个想法对她们来说非常自然。因此,在自动驾驶汽车这个特定领域,我很高兴,我认为她们俩都不需要自己开车了,因为当所有这些汽车都是电动车时,会更安全、更方便,对环境也更好。在其他领域,我却有些矛盾的感受,比如我不希望她们整天只刷YouTube Shorts,即使那里有一个非常非常好的算法。我对这个问题的总体看法可能是双重的。第一,我尽量给她们尽可能多的现实世界挑战和经验。是的,你仍然需要学会骑自行车。骑自行车时你会擦伤膝盖。我总是对我女儿说,膝盖擦伤对孩子来说是好事,对吧?因为如果你擦伤了膝盖,就意味着你在现实世界中尝试了某事,冒了风险,并承担了后果。这是我在教孩子们游泳时发现的另一个重大突破。她们吞下一些水没关系,学习游泳时就会发生这种情况。偶尔吞水没关系,因为学会游泳需要这样。所以,我正试图让她们在现实世界中承担一些风险。我还没有想到的事情是,因为我的孩子们还太小,我不知道像CIABT这样的工具,或者我们现在讨论的AI代理,将如何影响她们的教育历程。但因为我一直在研究AI代理,我确实经常思考我的孩子们的职业生涯会是什么样子。我目前的看法是:第一,清晰地阐述什么重要、什么需要做,以及如何指导完成的能力。这永远是重要的,而且在未来只会更加重要,因为我们的工作将更多地是如何有效地指示AI去做它需要做的事情,而不是我们如何 all 自己完成。所以我花了很多时间,我真的很希望我的孩子们学习逻辑和哲学,因为我真的希望她们能够非常清晰地表达她们想要什么。然后第二,我希望她们能想到自己独特的个性和能力能够闪耀的领域,而AI无法做到这一点。所以,我录制我们自己的YouTube视频,因为它是我个性的表达,人们可以建立社会联系。这将是未来工作场所的两个基本技能:你有多擅长阐述你想要什么并告诉AI?然后,你有多擅长与他人建立社会联系?我认为这两者将是未来任何职业的持久技能。
Original English
Jacob Bank: And I think often about how different the world my kids are going to live in. There are certain areas of technology where I'm just like, "Wow, that's so cool. That's obviously better." I'll give you one small example. where we live on Puro Hill in San Francisco is very close to the main testing area for Whimo and Zuks. Zuks is I think it's Amazon's self-driving car division. And so I take my kids to school. My two older daughters are sitting behind me on a cargo bike and they're saying Whimo Zuks Whimo Zuks. And for them it is so normal to see a car with nobody driving it. They think it's cool because they have all like the cameras and lasers on top, but it is so natural to them the idea that a car can be driven by a human. And so in the particular area of self-driving cars, I am so happy that I think neither of them will ever need to drive a car by themselves [music] because it'll be so much safer and so much more convenient and so much better for the environment when all these cars are electric. There are other areas where I have more mixed feelings like I don't want them to be just scrolling YouTube shorts all the time even though there's a very very good algorithm. The general way I think about it is maybe twofold. One [music] is I try to give them as many real world challenges and experience as possible. Yeah, you still got to learn how to ride a bike. You're going to skin your knees when you're riding your bike. This is what I always say to my daughter, skin knees are good for kids, right? Cuz if you're if you're skinning your knees, it means you're trying something and taking risk in the real world and dealing with the consequences. This is another big breakthrough when I was teaching my kids to swim. It's okay if they swallow some water. That's going to happen when you're learning how to swim. Like, it's okay if you swallow water from time to time cuz that's what it takes to learn how to swim. So, I'm trying to have them take, you know, some risk in the real world. The thing that I haven't thought about yet, cuz my kids are too young, I don't know how tools like CIABT or AI agents like we're talking about now, I haven't yet thought about how those are going to influence their educational journey. But because I'm working on AI agents, I do think a lot about what my kids careers are going to look like. And here's [music] my current perspective on that. Number one, the ability to clearly [music] articulate what is important, what needs to be done, and [music] give guidance on how to do it. That will always be important. That will only be more important in the future because our jobs will be more of how do we efficiently instruct AI on what it needs to do rather than how do we do it all ourselves. So, I'm spending a lot of time like I really want my kids to learn logic and philosophy because I really want them to be able to very clearly articulate what they want. And then number two, I want them to think about areas where their unique personality and abilities can shine through in an in a way that AI wouldn't. And so that's why I record our own YouTube videos because it's an expression of my personality and people build a social connection. Those are going to be the two fundamental skills for the future of the workplace. How good are you at articulating what you want and telling that to AI? And then how good are you building social connection with others? And those I think are going to be durable skills for the future of any career.
中美 AI 应用的差异与全球格局
Interviewer: 毫无疑问,美国在人工智能方面领先于中国,但在我看来,美国在技术领导力方面的优势非常狭窄。美国人将用AI做什么?也许是制作更多的PowerPoint,以及互相提起更多的诉讼。而中国人则更专注于制造业。所以,中国将利用AI制造更多的iPhone,制造更多的电动汽车电池,制造更多的无人机,以及制造更多的弹药。去年,美国建造了大约五艘船。中国建造了约1500艘船。我一生中有相当一部分时间在美国、中国和加拿大度过。目前看来,美国和中国都非常倾向于‘输’,而不是‘赢’。这两个国家都在犯非常大的错误。
Original English
Interviewer: There's no doubt that the US is ahead of China on artificial intelligence, but the claim to technological leadership for the United States appears to me to be pretty narrow. What are Americans going to be using AI for? Well, to make a lot more powerpoints perhaps and to file a lot more lawsuits against each other. Whereas the Chinese are much more manufacturing focused. So, China is going to use AI to make more iPhones, make more electric vehicle batteries, make more drones, and make more munitions. Last year, the uh United States built around [music] five ships. China built about 1,500 ships. I've spent about equal parts of my life between the US, uh, China, and Canada. Right now, it looks like the US and China are both very intent on losing, not on winning. Both of these countries making very big mistakes.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
人物: Jacob Bank