廉价航空的兴衰:Spirit Airlines陨落对航空业未来的启示 New York Times Podcasts 2026-05-07

Spirit Airlines的陨落及其深远影响

来自《纽约时报》的蕾切尔·艾布拉姆斯报道,Spirit Airlines在周末的停运,标志着一家曾以其超低成本(Ultra-Low-Cost: 极力削减运营成本以提供廉价机票的商业模式)策略彻底改变美国航空旅行的公司画上了句号。今天,我们与同事尼拉吉·查克希探讨了所谓的“Spirit效应”对航空旅行的深远影响、其瓦解的原因,以及导致Spirit倒闭的问题是否会蔓延至其他航空公司。同时,同事林赛·加里森采访了一位Spirit的空乘人员,了解Spirit所代表的意义。

Spirit Airlines曾是美国经济型旅行(Affordable Travel: 价格实惠,使得更广泛人群能够负担的旅行方式)的象征,它让过去无法承担旅行的人们有机会出行。对于相当一部分人而言,搭乘Spirit是他们唯一能够飞往各地的途径。然而,公司最终的终结来得猝不及防。在上周末,Spirit管理层决定逐步停止运营,并于周六早上正式关闭。这一突发事件导致17,000名直接或间接雇员失业,数万名持有机票的乘客行程被取消,并在航空市场留下了巨大的空白。

Original English Source

From the New York Times, I'm Rachel Abrams and this is the Daily. When Spirit Airlines shut down over the weekend, it brought an end to a company that had revolutionized air travel in the United States with an ultra-lowcost approach. So today I talked to my colleague Niraj Chakshi about the so-called spirit effect on air travel, why it unraveled, and whether the problems that doomed spirit could spread to other airlines. And my colleague Lindseay Garrison talks to a Spirit flight attendant about what Spirit represented. It's Thursday, May 7th.

Yeah. I mean Spirit Airlines was this symbol of affordable travel in America. It allowed people to take trips that they couldn't otherwise afford for a large segment of the population. and it was the only way for them to be able to fly to places. And the end came really suddenly. They decided late last week it was time to wind down. And by Saturday morning, they shut down. That left 17,000 people who are directly employed or indirectly employed by Spirit out of work. Tens of thousands of people who had tickets, no longer had flights, and it left a gaping hole in the airline market.

颠覆性商业模式的崛起:超低成本策略与“拆分服务”

Spirit Airlines的起源可以追溯到上世纪60年代,最初是一家卡车运输公司(Trucking Company: 专门从事货物陆路运输的企业)。随后,公司业务逐渐扩展到旅行和包机服务,并于1992年正式更名为Spirit Airlines。然而,直到21世纪中期,Spirit才真正采用了其闻名全球的商业模式——超低成本航空旅行(Ultra-Low-Cost Air Travel: 一种航空公司的运营模式,通过削减各项成本并对额外服务收费来提供极低票价)。

这种模式的核心理念非常简单:尽可能地削减成本(Cut Costs: 减少开支以提高效率或降低价格),并将节省下来的费用以廉价机票的形式回馈给乘客。这种模式在欧洲由Ryanair(瑞安航空)成功推广并沿用至今,Spirit Airlines坚信他们也能在美国市场取得成功。

Spirit的核心策略是服务拆分(Unbundling: 将传统捆绑销售的服务拆开,单独收费)。其首席执行官本·贝尔丹扎(Ben Beldanza)认为,既然只有部分乘客在飞机上需要饮食,那么为什么要让所有乘客的票价因此上涨?这种方式赋予了顾客更多的选择权。因此,Spirit开始对几乎所有额外服务进行单独收费:座位分配、托运行李、随身行李,甚至饮用水和打印登机牌。唯一的例外是飞行本身。如果你不需要这些附加服务,就能买到极其便宜的机票。这种“除了飞行其他都收费”的模式,将一切非核心服务视为奢侈品,以最大限度地降低基础票价。

为了推广这一模式,Spirit Airlines采用了大胆且具争议性(Racy and Provocative: 带有性暗示或挑战社会规范的营销方式)的广告策略。例如,他们曾推出名为“Mil Sale”的营销活动,这个名称巧妙地利用了一个来自电影《美国派》中略显粗俗的俚语,但Spirit将其解读为“Many Islands, Low Fares”(多岛屿,低票价)。他们甚至会用69美元这样的数字来销售机票,这些都成功地引发了病毒式传播和媒体的广泛关注,使得Spirit迅速提高了知名度。

Original English Source

Yeah, so Spirit's origin actually dates all the way back to the 60s. It started as a trucking company. They got into travel. They got into charter flights. They renamed to Spirit Airlines in '92, but most people didn't really know who they were. It wasn't until the mid 2000s that Spirit adopted the business model that we all know it for, and that's the ultra-lowcost air travel model. The idea is simple. You just cut costs as much as you can and you pass that along to passengers in the form of cheap bears. It was popularized in Europe by Ryionaire which is still going strong today and they thought that they could bring it to the US with success.

Yeah, they they did a lot. The key thing that they did which we all know them for uh is unbundling. Why should we have to raise everybody's ticket price when only some people want to eat or drink on board? We don't think that's fair. We think it gives customers more choice. And the real champion of this idea was Spirit's chief executive at the time, Ben Beldanza. Customers are welcome to bring water on the plane with them. We're not stopping that, but we sell what we sell. They started to separate everything out so that seat assignments cost extra money. even water. You're paying for carryons, having them print your boarding pass, but the seat itself could be really cheap. So, if you didn't need some of those things, you could actually buy a really dirt cheap ticket.

I didn't realize this that they literally charge you to print your boarding pass. It's like they're charging for everything except flying. Like everything else is considered a luxury just to keep the ticket as cheap as possible, right? And the idea is that, you know, some people don't need it. They're happy to pull it up on their phones or they're they don't need customer service, so why would they pay the extra fee for it? I recognize our airlines not for everyone. If you want to be coddled in the airport, if you want an enormous amount of leg room, if you want a free coke, we're not your airline and we're not built to be that airline. But if you want to save $150 round trip, we're a great deal. Come fly us.

And they publicized this all with these racy, provocative ads. One of them was what they call the mil sale. That's an acronym that some people may know. It's kind of a runchy meaning. Yep. From American pie, I believe. Yeah. Exactly. Right. But for spirit, you know, it means many islands, low affairs. A gross expression taken from the movie American Pie was adopted by Spirit Airlines. I mean, you know, and they go viral, right? I mean, they're not only getting a lot of attention on their own, but, you know, news organizations start to cover them. Spirit Airlines has a $69 campaign that, you know, if you don't understand the 69 reference, then Google it. They start selling tickets for numbers that, you know, have other meanings for, you know, let's say $69. I didn't know any of this. I am horrified. Social media is buzzing about this. On our Fox 29 Facebook page, Lori wrote, "How about grow up?" Victoria wrote, "I read the ad and kept waiting to be shocked. So much hoopla over that." And spirit starts to get a lot of attention. people start to kind of get to know this airline, right?

“Spirit效应”:市场颠覆者与普惠飞行的实践

尽管Spirit Airlines的商业模式在初期受到了消费者和投资者(Consumers and Investors: 购买商品和服务的个体与对公司进行资本投入的实体)的广泛质疑,被认为是“斤斤计较”(Nickel and Dime: 通过收取小额附加费来增加收入,给人一种小气或不公的感觉),甚至成为深夜脱口秀的笑柄,但Spirit却坚定地拥抱了这些批评。他们明确表示:“我们致力于让旅行变得平价,这就是我们的宗旨,爱坐不坐。”

这种策略最初进展缓慢,但随后越来越多的乘客开始选择Spirit。到2011年公司上市时,其业务已大幅增长。次年,Spirit的载客量达到约1000万人次,到2016年更是翻倍至2000万人次。这种增长的背后,不仅仅是吸引了其他航空公司的旅客,更重要的是,它将那些通常不会飞行的人们拉入市场(Bring People In Off the Sidelines: 吸引原本不参与某项活动或消费某类产品的人群加入)。对于许多人来说,便宜的机票使得飞行不再是奢侈品,而是与叫外卖等日常消费品处于同一竞争层面。本·贝尔丹扎曾表示,Spirit不仅与航空业竞争,更是在与各种消费支出竞争。

这种新颖的策略开始影响整个航空业,催生了著名的“Spirit效应”(Spirit Effect: 指当Spirit Airlines进入某个机场市场后,其他航空公司的票价也会随之下降的现象)。当Spirit进入一个新的机场时,该地的机票价格往往会下降,迫使其他航空公司也降低票价以保持竞争力。一位Spirit的空乘人员分享了她亲身经历的一个故事:一位蓝领父亲能够定期带着儿子飞行,看到不同的地方。这位父亲对飞行感到恐惧,但为了能和儿子一起旅行,他克服了恐惧。这个故事让空乘人员深刻体会到Spirit为许多初次飞行者(First-Time Flyers: 第一次乘坐飞机的旅客)和家庭带来了旅行的机会,使得他们能够以49美元的往返票价,体验到从A点到B点安全飞行的乐趣,而无需为豪华座位或零食额外付费。Spirit让原本无法负担旅行的人们得以连接,实现了飞行的普及化(Democratize Air Travel: 让更多人有机会体验和使用航空旅行服务)。

Original English Source

yeah, there was a lot of skepticism. Consumers saw it as nickel and dimin them. investors had doubts that people would really want to fly on an airline like this or that the model could work. And they were the butt of a lot of jokes. This is pretty crazy here. Spirit Airlines is considering a new fee to talk with a human face to face during check-in. Yeah. Which explains the company's new slogan, Spirit Airlines. Why are you flying Spirit Airlines? Weird. I mean, on late night shows, the idea that like you would have to pay for a water bottle while flying or a printed boarding pass, I mean, it just is outrageous. The CEO of Spirit Airlines said people shouldn't come to Spirit if they want lots of leg room. He said, "We call it Spirit Airlines because there's only enough room for your Spirit." And if I'm being honest, even that's going to get a little crushed. But, you know, they embraced it. And when they got criticism, they would push back and say, "Look, we're here to make travel affordable. That's what this is about. And take it or leave it." And it was slow at first, but then people start to fly on Spirit and it starts to pick up. And they go public in 2011. And by the next year, they're flying about 10 million passengers. They're doing really well. And by 2016, they're up to 20 million passengers. And what was behind all that growth? I can't imagine it was just the racy mil ads.

Yeah. I mean, they are stealing travelers from other airlines, but there's also this idea that they're bringing people in off the sidelines. So, people who normally wouldn't be flying, but they see an opportunity because the flights are cheap enough. It might be making that choice instead of ordering takeout. And this is something that Ben Beldons himself says is he's like, we're not necessarily competing just with other airlines. We're competing with other forms of spending. M and this new approach that Spirit has is starting to affect the wider industry where when Spirit enters an airport for the first time, you see fairs drop. Other airlines have to compete and so they have to reduce their fairs. It actually becomes the subject of academic study. It's called the the spirit effect.

Did you feel like Spirit was different than other airlines? Oh yeah. I mean, we were the market disruptor. We did cause the fairs to be lower. They called it the spirit effect. The first time this really resonated with me was when I was flying back from Fort Lauderdale and I did not have my lanyard on. I was out of uniform and I sat next to this gentleman and his son and we had a little bit of turbulence and then you could hear the hydraulics and that's always something that either freaks people out or you know it sounds kind of like a dog. it sounds like something and it's normal. It's completely normal on the Airbuses. And I could see him getting panicked. I was like, "Yes, it's normal. It's just a hydraulics. It's okay." And so we're sitting there and we're, you know, I'm just kind of talking to him and he like has a moment and he's like, "Wait, how did you know that was okay? How did you know that sound was? Are you just telling me that?" And I like laughed again and I was like I was like, "I'm not wearing my lanyard. I'm actually a spirit attendant." I was like, "I promise it's normal." And he was like, "Oh, okay." Well, then he started talking to me and I remember this gentleman being like, "You guys make it so affordable for me to take my son on these trips every once in a while." You know, it sounded like he shared custody with his son, so this was something very special that he liked to do with him when he had him. He was a blueco collar worker. He was like, "I'm terrified of flying, but I really love being able to do this and love being able to try taking my son to see different places." And that was a moment for me that I was just like I not that I didn't already have pride, but I really started to have pride in spirit and our brand and what we did and the accessibility that we brought because we did we had so many first we had so many first-time flyers, so many families, so many people that never would have gotten the opportunity to fly if it wasn't for us. And I really loved that we had a carrier that was able to offer that to people that you got your seat and like you were able to fly the $49 roundtrip ticket and hop on a flight for the weekend to see your family that you normally wouldn't have been able to do because all you cared about was getting from point A to point B safely. You didn't need the super fancy seats. You didn't need the pretzel snacks. You didn't need the single pore of Coca-Cola. Like it was about getting there and it was about the journey that you were going to have once you got there. We were able to connect people that otherwise wouldn't have been able to afford to be connected.

成功后的困境:成本上升与竞争加剧

Spirit Airlines的成功使其成为了自身成功的受害者(Victim of Its Own Success: 指由于自身的成就或受欢迎程度而反受其害的现象)。它再也无法被市场忽视,开始在大航空公司也飞行的航线上运营。因此,大型航空公司如United Airlines、American Airlines和Delta Air Lines推出了名为“基础经济舱”(Basic Economy: 一种限制较多的廉价机票类型,通常不包含免费托运、选座等服务)的产品,本质上是与Spirit的票价竞争。基础经济舱虽然附带许多限制(如不包含托运或手提行李,通常不能选座),但乘客可以像Spirit一样支付额外费用来购买这些服务。

问题在于,这些大型航空公司拥有更丰富的资源(Abundant Resources: 拥有大量的资金、飞机、航线和客户服务支持等),例如,如果乘客在United和Spirit之间面临同样票价的选择,他们很可能会选择大型航空公司。Spirit可能每天在某条航线上飞行两次,而United可能飞行八次。如果航班取消,大型航空公司通常有更多备用方案(Backup Options: 应对突发情况的替代计划或资源)。此外,大型航空公司在客户服务等方面也有更多优势。这给Spirit带来了巨大挑战,因为他们几乎无法再进一步降低票价。为了与大型航空公司竞争,Spirit不得不开始提升服务质量(Improve Quality: 提高产品或服务的标准和表现),例如提高准点率和改善客户服务,而这些都需要投入大量资金。这给Spirit的商业模式带来了巨大压力。同时,大型航空公司在飞机前舱拥有更高利润的座位(More Profitable Seats: 例如商务舱或头等舱,其票价远高于经济舱,为航空公司带来更多收入),可以通过这些收入补贴基础经济舱,而Spirit则不具备这种优势。

疫情的爆发也对所有航空公司造成了冲击,但随后市场复苏的速度超出了预期,导致了激烈的市场竞争(Market Competition: 市场上不同公司为争夺顾客和资源而进行的较量),这使得Spirit很难盈利。与此同时,疫情期间大量飞行员退休,导致之后航空公司不得不支付更高的薪水以吸引和留住飞行员。劳动力成本的急剧上升,尤其是飞行员薪资,对Spirit的成本优势(Cost Edge: 指企业在成本控制方面相对于竞争对手所具备的优势)造成了致命打击。当Spirit的运营成本开始趋近大型航空公司时,其核心竞争力便不复存在。

Original English Source

Well, a few things start to happen. The first big thing is that Spirit becomes a victim of its own success. They can't be ignored anymore and they're flying in a lot of places where the big airlines are flying too. And so the big airlines introduced something called basic economy which is basically a a spirit competing fair. It comes with a lot of restrictions. It doesn't include a check bag or carry-on bag. You often can't pick your own seat, but you can pay for those, right? Just like Spirit. M but the problem is that these bigger airlines, they also have a lot of resources. So, right, because if you have a choice between United and Spirit and they cost the same, you're probably going to go with the bigger airline, right? Spirit may be flying on a route twice a day and United might fly the same route eight times. If your flight gets canceled, there's a backup. There's also customer service. There's all these other benefits for flying with the big airlines. And so, if you're looking at the same cost, you might be inclined to choose them. And that poses a really big problem for Spirit. They can't really lower fairs much more than they already have. And so to compete with the big airlines, they have to start to improve quality. They have to get you to where you're going on time more often. They have to have better customer service. And that's expensive. And that puts a lot of pressure on Spirit's business model. And keep in mind also the big guys, they have more profitable seats at the front of the plane. So they can subsidize basically economy seats. Spirit doesn't have that. Right. Spirit does not have a $2,000 business class seat. Exactly. Yeah.

Yeah. So, you know, the pandemic obviously hurts all airlines equally, but then there's this faster than expected recovery. People really want to travel and so there's this fierce competition going on and that keeps fairs low, makes it hard for Spirit to earn a profit. At the same time, a lot of pilots end up retiring during the pandemic, but then, you know, in the years after, airlines really need them back, and so they end up paying a lot more to stay competitive. That starts with the big airlines, but then everybody else has to do their best to match because there just aren't that many pilots around. So, you know, Spirit starts to see that labor, one of their biggest costs is going up. And their edge is all about costs. And if their costs are starting to look a lot like the same costs that the big airlines have, then they've lost their edge. So they're in this position where costs are rising, competition is fierce, and there are all these other problems that they're just having to deal with. And so then they decide they need to do something to get back on track.

合并之路受阻:监管干预与破产危机

在多重压力下,Spirit Airlines试图通过合并(Merger: 两家或更多公司结合成一家更大的实体)来重振旗鼓。2022年,他们宣布计划与另一家廉价航空公司Frontier Airlines合并,旨在打造一个大型的全国性低成本航空公司,从而更好地与主要航空公司竞争。然而,JetBlue Airways随后提出了一个更具吸引力的收购要约,挤走了Frontier,并与Spirit达成了合并协议。

但这一合并计划却遭到了美国司法部(Justice Department: 负责执行法律和维护司法公正的政府部门)的反对。司法部认为,Spirit在航空业中扮演着保持低票价的重要角色,如果JetBlue收购Spirit,可能会改变其运营模式,进而导致票价上涨,损害消费者利益。司法部的核心论点是反垄断(Antitrust: 旨在防止垄断和维护市场竞争的法律和政策)。他们指出,JetBlue计划拆除Spirit飞机上部分座位,增加腿部空间,提高舒适度。然而,司法部认为这会导致Spirit的运营成本上升,最终不得不提高票价来弥补。而Spirit在机场的存在本身就能将票价降低10%,因此这一合并被视为反竞争行为(Anti-Competitive: 限制或扭曲市场竞争的行为)。

Spirit和JetBlue则反驳称,合并将赋予他们更大的市场影响力(Market Power: 公司在市场中影响价格和竞争的能力),能够更好地与大型航空公司竞争,从而最终为消费者提供更低的票价。然而,联邦法院法官最终裁定该合并具有反竞争性,并阻止了交易。

合并失败后,Spirit Airlines的处境愈发艰难。公司在2024年申请破产,2025年摆脱破产保护,但同年再次申请破产。进入2026年,伊朗战争(Iran War: 指中东地区发生的武装冲突,对全球能源市场产生影响)爆发,导致燃油价格飙升,彻底打乱了Spirit的重组计划。对于任何航空公司来说,应对突然飙升的燃油成本都是一项挑战,但对于刚刚经历两次破产、且一直努力保持低成本以维持竞争力的Spirit来说,这无疑是雪上加霜。在劳动力成本和燃油成本这两项最大的开支都大幅上涨的情况下,Spirit已无力回天。

面对Spirit可能倒闭的局面,时任特朗普政府曾考虑提供5亿美元的援助(Lifeline: 帮助陷入困境的组织或个人摆脱困境的支援),以挽救这家为工薪阶层服务的航空公司,并避免因战争导致其倒闭可能带来的负面政治影响。然而,政府希望获得优先债权人地位(Preferential Treatment: 在债务偿还或利益分配方面,享有优于其他方的待遇),但Spirit的现有债权人并不同意。经过一番谈判,双方未能达成协议。上周末,Spirit的债权人告知公司,是时候清盘了。由于航空公司运营成本高昂,无法提前数周宣布停运,否则乘客会流失。因此,Spirit在周五继续飞行,运送了5万名乘客。最后一趟航班在午夜后降落在达拉斯,周六凌晨2点,Spirit Airlines正式宣布停止运营。

Original English Source

Yeah. Well, one thing they try to do is is they actually try to merge with one of their rivals, Frontier Airlines, which is another budget carrier. They announced this in 2022. And the thinking was that they're struggling. Things are hard, but if they could create this big national lowcost carrier that they might actually be able to to kind of make some moves, you know, they might be able to take on the bigger airlines in a better way. But then JetBlue Airways decides it actually wants to acquire Spirit and it makes a better offer and it ends up squeezing Frontier out and they go forward with a JetBlue Spirit merger. But then the Justice Department says, "Wait a second. We like Spirit. Spirit does good things in the airline industry. It keeps fairs low." And so they sue to stop the merger because they're afraid that if JetBlue takes Spirit in, they're going to change the way Spirit's planes work. They're going to change the business model and they're going to end up raising fairs. They're basically arguing that if these two airlines merge, it would be bad for consumers. It's basically an antitrust argument. Exactly. Exactly. One of the things that Dreloo said during the merger process is that we're going to take some seats out of Spirit's plane. Spirit packs in the seats really tightly to fit as many people as they can on a plane. JPloo says we're going to add a little leg room, make it a little more comfortable. But the Justice Department says, "Well, wait a second. That means that your costs are going to go up. you're going to have to charge more to cover them. And what was Spirit's counterargument to that? Yeah, you know, Spirit and JetBlue were saying, look, this is going to be good for consumers because we're going to have more market power. You know, JetBlue is a lowcost airline. It's not what Spirit is, but JetBlue does compete to keep fairs low and that together, you know, as as a national player operating in all these airports, we would be able to actually serve consumers better. Basically, they're saying if we can pull our resources together, we're going to be able to compete better with the big guys. and Argo, we're going to be able to give customers lower fairs, right? You know, with with enough scale, we have the resources to keep fairs low in a lot more places. But then the federal court judge decides that Spirit's presence at an airport can lower fairs by 10% and we need that in the market and this merger is anti-competitive.

Okay, so merger doesn't happen. Where does Spirit go from here? So they file for bankruptcy in 2024. They get out of bankruptcy in 2025, but then file for bankruptcy again in 2025. And then coming into this year, the Iran war starts and that sends fuel prices skyrocketing. And Spirit has a plan to get out of bankruptcy, but then it seems like with fuel prices this high, that plan is just not going to work. Right. That would be a challenge for any airline to suddenly have to shoulder these rising fuel costs, but especially a challenge for an airline that has just gone through two bankruptcies and is really trying to keep its costs low to stay competitive. Exactly. You know, labor costs have already gone up, fuel costs are now going up. Those are the two biggest costs of for any airline. And so, the Trump administration steps in and they say, you know, what can we do? These are a lot of jobs. This is an important airline to the economy. And on top of that, presumably the optics of this do not look great, right? Having an airline, specifically an airline that caters to workingclass people, go under because of a war started under the Trump administration. Exactly. And they float this idea of a $500 million lifeline. The government would step in and lend the company that money, but the government wants protection. You know, they don't want to lend money with no strings attached. They want to get preferential treatment over the other lenders that have lent Spirit money. and Spirit's existing lenders don't love that idea. So, they continue talking, but late last week, it becomes clear that there's not really a path forward. There's just not a deal to be done. And so, Spirit's lenders tell Spirit, you know, we think it's time for you to wind down. And, you know, they have to move quickly. Airlines are expensive. You can't announce that an airline's going to shut down weeks in advance because a lot of people are going to start to peel away. And so, on Friday, they continue flying. They fly 50,000 people. The last flight in lands in Dallas just after midnight and Saturday morning at just after 2 am they announce we're done. Spirit Airlines is shut down.

情感冲击与航空业的未来走向

Spirit Airlines的倒闭给员工带来了巨大的情感冲击(Emotional Impact: 指对个人情绪和心理状态造成的深远影响)。一位空乘人员在周五晚上11点被召集开会,当她看到工会主席莎拉·纳尔逊(Sarah Nelson)的表情时,就知道一切都结束了。得知公司即将关闭的消息后,所有人都崩溃大哭。对他们而言,这不仅仅是失去一份工作,更是失去了“家人”,因为Spirit是把他们聚在一起的催化剂。这种集体悲伤在员工之间广泛蔓延,许多人在家中聚集,共同哀悼这份失去。

Spirit的消失也引发了公众的广泛哀悼。许多依赖Spirit进行经济型旅行的乘客纷纷表达悲伤,因为它是他们能够负担得起假期的唯一选择。尼拉吉·查克希将Spirit的倒闭诊断为“千刀万剐而死”(Death by a Thousand Cuts: 指一系列小而持续的问题最终导致了失败),其商业模式几乎没有缓冲空间(Buffer: 应对意外或波动变化的储备或保护)。

关于美国司法部在2024年阻止合并的决策,引发了激烈的政治辩论(Political Debate: 关于政府政策或社会问题的公开讨论)。一些专家认为,如果合并成功,新航空公司可能得以生存,并继续提供低廉的票价。然而,也有许多专家对此持怀疑态度,指出航空公司合并通常困难重重,成本高昂,并不能保证成功。

Spirit的倒闭对航空旅行的未来意味着什么?虽然市场上仍有Frontier和Allegiant等其他廉价航空公司,但情况复杂。例如,Allegiant通过避开大型航空公司的竞争,75%的航线没有直接竞争对手,从而取得了成功。然而,Frontier却面临着与Spirit相似的问题。专家预测,机票价格(Fares: 航空公司收取的机票费用)将会上涨,部分原因是燃油成本的增加。大型航空公司正越来越注重高端旅客(Elite Traveler: 愿意为高级服务和体验支付更高费用的富裕乘客),通过投资休息室、常旅客计划、豪华座位和飞机翻新来获得高额利润。

“Spirit时代”曾以航空公司削减设施以提供廉价机票为特征,但现在,行业似乎正朝着相反的方向发展,提供越来越多的奢华设施(Luxury Amenities: 提供更舒适、便捷和高级的服务或设备,通常价格更高)。这预示着航空旅行中贫富差距的进一步扩大,以及社会其他层面中“有产者”和“无产者”之间日益加剧的分裂。甚至在Spirit倒闭之前,它也开始向高端旅客倾斜,计划增加高端座位并重新捆绑服务。这表明,即使没有外部干预,以低成本和低票价为核心的商业模式也已开始退潮(Retreat: 逐渐减少或放弃某种策略或立场)。未来,航空业可能不再专注于服务所有群体。

Original English Source

Um, so this might make me choke up, but um, at about 11 p.m. called into a meeting by our AFA International President Sarah Nelson and um, I just remember seeing Sarah's face. Sorry. And I knew it was over and she told us it was it was over and that we were shutting down. And um we all cried a lot. It's been a really crazy um 72ish hours for all of us um because we're losing our family. Are you hearing from colleagues and friends? I'm actually um I'm I'm at one of my friends house with about eight other flight attendants right now. Oh my gosh. And it it's like we're all grieving. We're all still here, but I think we're like grieving the loss because like spirit's the catalyst that like brought us all together and like that's gone now. And um after you've spent years dedicating this time to this company that you had so pride and you believed in and that you love and you love the people that you work with, it it just comes in waves. It comes in waves. You know, I kind of always thought like if something were to happen like I would walk away from aviation. And that last week I was like there's no way there's no way that I can walk away from aviation. Um it gets into your it gets into your bones aviation and I just like there's there's truly like thinking back on it and then like there isn't anything else that that I want to do. But there's just something about it. the, you know, the black and yellow in our blood that I, you know, it's going to be hard to ever find that again for us. It's never going to be the same.

Senator Raj, we mentioned earlier in our conversation that there's been this outpouring of grief from people who travel, who took Spirit, who are so sad that it has gone away. Can you just describe for us what did that grief look like? What did it sound like since Spirit announced that it was going under on Saturday? Yeah, you know, I think the immediate reaction for some people was surprised. We heard from people at airports on Saturday who had no idea this was coming and showed up and you know very quickly had to figure out how they were going to get home. But I think you know as frustrated as people were at times with spirit I think people really started to understand its place and appreciated it for what it was. This is a sad day. Thousands of people that really depend on this lowcost airline to travel that may not have otherwise gone anywhere. Um, and I think seeing it gone is sad for a lot of people. Spirit was good for, you know, the working consumer who loves to travel, who knows how to pack light. I've taken Spirit a lot of places. And, you know, looking online, you see this outpouring of tributes to Spirit. This is kind of heartbreaking because whenever I wanted to get like a cheap last minute flight somewhere, I'd be like, "Let's check Spirit." And now I won't be able to do that. And there were a lot of travelers out there who were able to go on vacation because of airlines like Spirit. Spirit never did me wrong. Like, do you understand how much flights cost nowadays? Like on some real stuff, flights are super expensive. And so it really did have a place for people.

What is your diagnosis ultimately, Naj about what spirit's downfall was? like how much should we attribute to the rising costs associated with the war in Iran or other headwinds faced by budget airlines or the airline industry as a whole? It's definitely death by a thousand cuts. I mean, Spirit just had an unforgiving few years and they just could not catch a break. They couldn't get stable footing. But, you know, I think it also shows that this business model itself is really unforgiving. there's not a lot of buffer and so if one too many things go wrong it's hard to recover. Hindsight is obviously 2020 but how should we be thinking about the merger that the DOJ blocked in 2024 because at the time Spirit said we need this. The DOJ obviously didn't buy that argument and now here we are. Yeah. It's it's really set off this political debate. The Trump administration says, you know, look, the Biden administration interfered and now Spirit's going under. And some experts I've talked to agree. They say that, you know, had this merger gone forward, this new combined airline might have been able to survive and be vibrant and lower fairs across the country. But then a lot of experts aren't so sure. Airline mergers are notoriously difficult to pull off. They cost lots of money, and there's just no guarantee that it would have ended well for JetBlue and Spirit. I want to talk about what Spirit's demise means for the future of air travel more broadly. Like since they came on the scene, there have been other lowcost budget airlines like Frontier and Allegent. So what does the collapse of Spirit mean for those guys if anything? It's a mixed picture. So you mentioned Allegian and and they actually adopted this model around the same time as Spirit and they have actually done pretty well. They just actually are in the middle of acquiring another airline, Sunountry. And part of the reason for their success is unlike Spirit, Allegian was able to stay off the radar of the big airlines. So about 75% of their routes, they have zero competition. But you know, others not so much. Frontier like Spirit is facing a lot of the same problems. I do wonder also about the bigger airlines, the United Americans, etc. Like I do wonder whether the bigger guys will now have just that much less incentive to offer competitive lowcost fairs. Do you foresee that happening? Yeah, the experts that I talked to do think that fairs are going to rise and they say that to some extent that probably was going to happen anyway. Fuel costs have gone up. Airlines have to cover that. But for the big airlines, they're so much more focused on the elite traveler. They have really discovered that in the last few years that if they invest in those people who are willing to spend a lot of money, they can earn a lot of profit. And it's worked exceptionally well for airlines like Delta and United. They've invested in lounges. They've invested in their loyalty programs. They've invested in fancy seats and plane renovations. And it's really paying off. And so, will they still compete for basic economy travelers? Sure. And those are travelers that they see maybe someday upgrading to main economy and up to business class. But right now, those airlines are really focused on the front of the plane, those nice big fancy seats. It's interesting because the spirit era was really marked by these airlines stripping amenities out from what they offered so that they could offer lowbudget fairs. But what you are describing sounds like almost going in the opposite direction like more and more offering these luxury amenities. And it feels as though what you are describing is a real widening of the division that already exists in air travel and so many other facets of American life between the halves and the have nots. Yeah, you know, I mean, Spirit in its early years really democratized air travel, but even before it shut down, Spirit was embracing catering to the premium traveler. They last summer announced plans to add premium seats at the front of their planes. And they actually started to rebundle their fairs so that you could buy a single ticket that included a lot of the things that they once stripped out. So even before Spirit went under, we were already starting to see a retreat from that business model that was just sharply focused on low costs and low fairs. And so there's this sense that yeah, maybe the industry is headed in a direction where it's not as focused on serving everybody.

关键字: ultra-low-cost airline-industry business-model market-competition affordable-travel