AI 与美国品牌的跌落
斯科特·加洛韦: 我认为在过去的 18 个月里,品牌价值受损最严重的是两个:美国在海外的品牌,以及 AI。就美国而言,特朗普被说服相信这是他的决定性时刻——作为一个解放中东的总统被载入史册。但我认为特朗普政府将因犯罪腐败和无能而闻名,这种无能正在浮出水面。
第二个巨大的跌落是 AI,还有已经走向暗黑面的 Sam Altman。我是一个 AI 乐观主义者。但我们未能理解的是:这些科技巨头,他们并没有把我们的最佳利益放在心上。
Original English
Scott Galloway: I think the greatest brand destruction over the last 18 months is the US brand abroad and AI. So with America, Trump has been convinced that this was his defining moment of being known as the president that liberated the Middle East. But I think the Trump administration will be known for criminal corruption and incompetence. And that incompetence is bubbling up. And then the second greatest fall is AI. And also Sam Altman who's gone to the dark side. And I'm an AI optimist. But here's what we fail to understand. These techs, they do not have our best interests at heart.
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 斯科特,我经常找你来帮我形成对世界上一些最重大问题的看法。当我看到这些 AI 公司 CEO 的言论时,比如 埃隆·马斯克 说:“AI 和机器人将取代所有工作。”你对此怎么看?
Original English
Stephen Bartlett: Scott, I often come to you to help myself form my opinions on some of the most sort of consequential issues going on in the world. And when I look at some of the quotes from the CEOs of these AI companies, I've got one here from Elon that says, "AI and robots will replace all jobs." What's your view here?
斯科特·加洛韦: 我认为这大多是灾难化叙事(catastrophizing),无非是想以此掩盖其真实目的:即宣称“我的技术极具颠覆性,它将改变社会,所以你应该以疯狂的估值来投资”。
数据并未反映出就业市场将迎来某种巨大的“地外陨石”冲击。我相信 AI 创造的工作将多于它摧毁的工作。但真正让我害怕的是,由于 AI 和人们在网上进行的这些无摩擦关系,很多年轻人正在失去忍受被拒绝(rejection)的能力。但我认为,就改变世界和创造股东价值而言,一项更重要的技术并不是 AI,而是……
Original English
Scott Galloway: I think it's mostly the catastrophizing is nothing more than thinly veiled attempt to say my technology is so devastating that it's going to shift society and you should invest at this crazy valuation. And the data doesn't reflect that there's some big exogenous meteor coming for the employment market. But I believe it's actually going to create more jobs than it destroys. But the scary thing for me is that because of AI and because of these frictionless relationships that people are engaging in online. I think a lot of young people are losing the ability to endure rejection. But I think a more important technology in terms of how it's going to change the world and what will create more shareholder value is not AI. It's really...
AI 的品牌侵蚀与“虚假”的末日
斯科特·加洛韦: (接上文)过去 18 个月,美国品牌在海外的声誉降到了历史冰点。第一次,觉得中国是世界正义力量的人比觉得美国是的人还要多。
而关于 AI,你的看法直接取决于你的财富。唯一对 AI 持积极态度的群体是年收入超过 20 万美元的人。因为富人看到 AI 在推动他们的投资组合,提高标普 500 指数;但普通中产阶级看到的是电费上涨,而且他们根本没机会投资这些公司。Sam Altman 甚至说:“别再抱怨能源成本了,想想养大一个孩子需要多少能量。”他们没把品牌经营好。18 个月前,AI 是那种带点惊悚但令人乐观的创富工具;现在,它成了极少数富人的创富工具,对其他人来说则非常恐怖。
Original English
Scott Galloway: There have been few brands that have fallen further faster in the last 18 months than two brands. The United States brand abroad... For the first time in history more people feel that China is a force of good in the world than the US. The second greatest fall is AI. Your view of AI is directly correlated to your wealth. The only cohort that has a positive rating of AI is people making over $200,000... But if you're an average middle class person, what you may see is that your electricity bills have gone up and you don't even have access to invest in these companies. And you see some statements from people Sam Altman saying, "Stop complaining about energy costs. Think about the amount of energy it takes to raise a child." So they haven't really managed the brand well.
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 马斯克说工作将变成可选的,就像自己种菜而不是去超市买;Sam Altman 说到 2028 年,人类的大部分智力将存在于数据中心内部。我在招聘时也发现,初级职位的筛选标准已经发生了巨大变化。
Original English
Stephen Bartlett: When I look at some of the quotes... Elon that says, "AI and robots will replace all jobs. Working will be optional..." And Sam Altman said, "By the end of 2028, more of the world's intellectual capacity could reside inside data centers than outside them." ...when I'm sifting through these CVs, yeah, I thought, "Oh, maybe things are going to change."
斯科特·加洛韦: 历史上的每一项技术都会经历类似的弧线:先是灾难化叙事,接着是一些工作流失,然后生产力的提高带来额外的利润、新的业务机会和就业增长。我不认为 AI 会有什么不同。
这种灾难化叙事其实是在为这些公司要求的高额投资辩解。为了支撑现在的估值,未来五年内美国要么需要增加一万亿美元的 AI 授权收入,要么需要通过 AI 实现大规模的降本增效。现在,大公司很难说出 AI 带来了多少增量收入。所以 CEO 们必须说:AI 将带来巨大的效率提升。
而且,当你宣称“这项技术正在改变世界,而我们不知道如何控制它”时,会让你听起来更深刻。坦率地说,有些 AI 创始人在搞“灾难化”的同时,又拿着套现的钱去地中海度假,这有点恶心。就像弗兰肯斯坦博士说“我创造了一个怪物但我不知道怎么处理,所以我先去圣特罗佩玩了”,这毫无帮助。
Original English
Scott Galloway: I think it's mostly [ __ ] and catastrophizing and a means of fundraising. Every technology in history goes through a similar arc... And I think that catastrophizing and talking about this massive destruction in jobs is a way of saying or justifying the massive investments these companies want enterprises to make in their companies... Either these companies' valuations need to be cut by 50 or 70%. Or you need a massive destruction in the labor market that creates tons of efficiencies... And quite frankly, I find it a little bit obnoxious that some of the founders and key figures in AI catastrophize just about the time they take a secondary and peace out to the Cote d'Azur. That's not helpful. I'm Dr. Frankenstein and I've created this monster, but I don't know how to deal with it. So, I'm going to go peace out to Saint-Tropez.
数据中的真相:就业并未崩盘
斯科特·加洛韦: 让我们看看数据。美国失业率是 4.5%,年轻人的失业率是 8.8%,这略低于历史平均水平。过去 10 年,人均创业许可数量翻了一番。Meta 昨天宣布裁员 1 万人,但从 2019 年到 2025 年,他们的人数从 1.6 万激增到了 8 万。就算回到 6 万人,也只是回到了 24 个月前的水平。
我相信中长期来看,AI 创造的工作会多于它摧毁的。只有当失业率达到 20% 时,才会引发严重的社会动荡(像法国大革命或魏玛共和国那样)。但如果你不看那些专家预测的“就业启示录”,只看数据,你根本看不出发生了什么。数据并没有反映出就业市场有陨石撞击。
Original English
Scott Galloway: Let's look at the data. The unemployment rate in the US is 4 and a half%. Among youth, it's 8.8%. That is slightly below the historical average. The number of new business permits or new businesses started per capita in the United States has doubled in the last 10 years... I don't doubt that there'll be a real dip or a severe V down in certain industries, customer service, probably the legal field. But I believe over the medium and the long term it's actually going to create more jobs than it destroys.
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 可是 AI 的分发速度是光速,不像工业革命需要建设物理基础设施。这种速度难道不会让这次转型与以往不同吗?
Original English
Stephen Bartlett: Is there a case that because of the speed of this technology and the proliferation of it that it will be unlike the revolutions of the past?
斯科特·加洛韦: 这确实是人们担心的“V 型”下跌太猛烈,导致我们没有时间恢复。但我搬到伦敦这几年,看到你(史蒂芬)在这里像 Google Plex 一样疯狂招人。你是媒体界最懂技术的人之一,但你招的是实实在在的人。旧媒体会丢掉工作,但你在创造工作。你过去 24 个月招了多少人?
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 所有公司加起来大约 220 人。
斯科特·加洛韦: 而且都是高薪职位。所以 BBC 或《每日邮报》在裁员,但我怀疑他们裁员的速度还没你招人的速度快。
Original English
Scott Galloway: Right, that's the fear that the V is so severe and so vicious that we don't have time to recover... But so far the V doesn't seem to be decelerating or diving as quickly as people had predicted... You're the example. Old media is going to lose jobs, but you're creating. How many people have you hired in the last 24 months? Stephen Bartlett: About I'd say about 220.
劳动力市场的重塑与“被宠坏”的代际
斯科特·加洛韦: 劳动力市场正在重塑。过去 30-40 年,大学毕业生的失业率一直低于非大学生。今年反转了。因为蓝领职业(职校生)的繁荣,其失业率现在低于大学生。
数据中心需要木工、焊工、水管工。说实话,你们这一代有点被宠坏了。1992 年我从伯克利毕业时,只有 40% 的人在毕业当天有工作。那时候全班只有两个人创业,其中一个还是我的合伙人。现在的 Stern 商学院,估计 40% 的人都在创业,甚至有人读到研二就退学去拿 1000 万美元的 A 轮融资了。
我对此很兴奋。生产力在提高,利润在增长。当然,有些人会站错队。我们需要更好的转岗培训,美国在这方面做得很差,只花了 GDP 的 0.2%,而丹麦花了 2%。
Original English
Scott Galloway: The labor market's absolutely reshaping. But when I graduated from business school, a lot of it, quite frankly, is your generation is spoiled... When I graduated from Berkeley in 1992, 40% of us had a job on graduation day. Meaning 60% did not... I would bet there's going to be 30 to 50 businesses that are started on graduation day. There's kids dropping out of their second year of business school to start businesses because they just raised $10 million in a series A.
机器人与“茶水”之争
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 那马斯克的 Optimus 机器人呢?他预测以后连外科医生都不需要了。如果你把智能和物理力量结合,人类的技能还剩下什么?
Original English
Stephen Bartlett: What do you think about what Elon's doing with Optimus? ...he's predicting that you won't need to be a surgeon because there'll be so many Optimus robots that are more advanced than any surgeon on earth.
斯科特·加洛韦: 在手术背景下,机器人将是补充(supplement)而非替代(replacement)。优秀的神经外科医生可以利用机器人进行更精准、更高效的手术,以前一天一台,现在可以做两台。
我 2026 年最看好的科技股是 Amazon。因为 Amazon 拥有 100 万台工业机器人,是全国其他公司总和的 2.5 倍。但我绝对不相信会有机器人在家给我端茶倒水,那是鬼扯([ __ ])。机器人与 AI 的结合在先进制造领域会有巨大优势,Amazon 计划到 2032 年在不增加人手的情况下让零售业务翻倍。真正让我害怕的是武器化的工业机器人,那会走向一些很诡异的方向。
Original English
Scott Galloway: I think the robot in the context of surgery will be not a replacement but a supplement... My big tech stock pick for '26 is Amazon because I think where robotics really hit the rubber meets the road in terms of shareholder value is the collision of AI and industrialized robots... But the notion that we're going to have someone in our house bringing our tea, a robot, I don't buy that at all... Oh, that's [ __ ]. The scary thing for me that I'd want to know more about is weaponized industrialized robots as warriors.
马斯克的“魔术”与特斯拉的估值
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 但马斯克以前确实实现过很多看似不可能的奇迹,比如用“筷子”夹住回收的火箭。
Original English
Stephen Bartlett: ...when I watched this, the space rockets come down and be caught with the chopsticks. Incredible.
斯科特·加洛韦: 马斯克是我们这一代的爱迪生。特斯拉是划时代的产品,他激发了全球电动车竞赛。但现实是,大家已经追上来了。比亚迪(BYD)能以 40% 的价格提供特斯拉 80% 甚至 100% 的性能。如果没有关税战,比亚迪将是美国第一。
马斯克现在的工作就是“超前承诺,滞后交付”,创造愿景来吸引廉价资本。特斯拉的市盈率是 155 倍,而其他车企是 10-15 倍。他必须不断讲故事:机器人、太空、AI、自动驾驶……好让投资者“看这里,看这里”,从而掩盖难以自圆其说的估值。
当 SpaceX 上市时,目前在特斯拉里的很多散户资金会流向 SpaceX。人们终于意识到特斯拉只是一家伟大的汽车公司,它的估值应该是现在的五分之一。
Original English
Scott Galloway: The key attribute of an innovator right now is storytelling. And that is to make sure the promise is way ahead of the performance such that you can access cheap capital and pull the future forward... Tesla's a great auto company. It should be trading at about a fifth of the valuation it is.
AI 不会取代你,但懂 AI 的人会
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 哪些工作最先受到冲击?
斯科特·加洛韦: 长途卡车司机。这是美国最大的非大学学历男性的雇佣行业,十年内会基本消失。还有客户服务。
但在我的世界里,AI 是这样摧毁工作的:以前我审阅合同,哪怕找最便宜的律师,每份也要 400 到 2000 美元。现在我让员工把需求描述给 Claude 或 ChatGPT,让它扮演时薪 1200 美元的律师进行修订,然后在另一个 LLM 上跑一遍。恭喜你,你现在是律所的高级合伙人了。我每年能省下三分之一的法律费用。
记住:AI 不会取代你的工作,懂 AI 的人会取代你的工作。 我告诉大家,一定要有“第二屏幕”,上面永远开着 AI。
Original English
Scott Galloway: I'd hate to be a truck driver. To me, a long haul truck driver is the first place... I probably spend a hundred or $300,000 a year on legal fees across my organization. I think I'll cut that easily by a third this year... AI is not going to take your job. Someone who understands AI is going to take your job. So, what I tell people is have a second screen... that has nothing but AI on it.
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 这很有趣。懂 AI 的人取代的可能不止一个工作。我的基金以前打算雇 5 个分析师,现在只需要 Molly 一个。因为她有两台 Mac Mini 跑着 AI Agent,自动筛选项目并打分。她一个人干了五个人的活。执行助理也是,以前要 10 个,现在 3 个就够了(一个管行程,一个管排期,一个领位)。
Original English
Stephen Bartlett: Someone with AI will take your job but they won't just take one job they'll take five of those jobs... we've got Molly downstairs analyst for my investment fund... Molly enabled by AI, she's probably taken out five jobs.
未来的终极技能:叙事与建立关系
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 父母该让孩子学什么技能?
斯科特·加洛韦: 十年前大家觉得是计算机科学和普通话,现在看并不一定。我认为最持久的技能是讲故事(storytelling)——即观察数据、提炼叙事并进行有力沟通的能力。伟大的 CEO 都是讲故事的高手。
技术最终会走向均质化,AI 模型也会趋同。最终的差异化点在于关系。我想跟这个人合作吗?我了解他的孩子吗?我喜欢他吗?在法律服务或 CRM 软件都差不多的情况下,我会选关系最好的那个。
还有一个被严重低估的技能:忍受拒绝的能力(the ability to endure rejection)。由于 AI 和网上的无摩擦互动,现在的年轻人,尤其是年轻男性,正在失去韧性和主动性。我指导年轻人时,第一个任务就是让他们去搭讪陌生人,目标是听到“NO”。你会发现,被拒绝后你还好好的,对方也好好的。我成功的秘密就是被拒绝:高中选班长输了三次,决定去选学生会主席,结果又输了。我难过一会儿,然后继续。所有白手起家的创业者都有一个共同点:他们能够哀悼失败,然后迅速翻篇。
Original English
Scott Galloway: I would say that the enduring skill is storytelling... and then to communicate that story in a compelling way... The skill that is the biggest threat that people are young people are losing especially young men... is the ability to endure rejection... The secret to my success is rejection. I ran for sophomore, junior, and senior class president of my high school. I lost all three times... and based on my track record, I decided to run for student body president where I went on to lose. Never bothered me.
“看涨自己”与定价的信号
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 很多时候我们都在低估自己。我们把自己看作一个固定状态,而不是一条指数曲线。
斯科特·加洛韦: 没错。我建议写提案时,把定价再提高 30% 到 50%。因为定价是一种信号。你可以降价,对方也总会要求降价。
白人男性往往更擅长想象一个不切实际的自我。查理·芒格曾说,有些人的愿景疯狂到令人讨厌,但千万不要赌他会输,因为偶尔他们是对的。如果你一定要犯错,就往高处犯,市场自然会把你拉回现实。
Original English
Stephen Bartlett: ...some of the game in life and success is what I now call selling yourself long and most of us go through our lives selling ourselves short. Scott Galloway: I think pricing is a signal... increase the pricing 30 or 50% more because pricing is a signal... If you're going to err, err to the upside because the market will bring you back on its own.
科技巨头的“耶稣”崇拜与反派之路
斯科特·加洛韦: 两年前 Sam Altman 的品牌还很好,他在国会要求监管。但品牌崩塌得非常快。美国曾经的英雄是运动员、政府官员和演员。后来宗教机构衰落,人们需要神一样的权威。
现在最接近宗教的就是技术。我不懂手机怎么工作,但我信任它,这和祈祷很像。史蒂夫·乔布斯就像是 90 年代出生的新耶稣。这种对创新者的偶像崇拜已经疯狂。
但我们要明白:这些科技 CEO 并不关心我们的情感福祉。他们的任务是让每股收益每天增加一分钱。为了这个,他们可以忍受算法伤害青少年女孩。马克·扎克伯格、谢丽尔·桑德伯格,他们都在做自己的工作——法律范围内最大化股东价值。
每一个科技英雄的旅程都是一样的:起初我们觉得他是个好人,18 个月后,他成了达斯·维达。Sam Altman 就是最新的维达。错不在他们,而在我们——我们没有选出能监管他们的官员。香烟包装上有卡通人物时我们监管了,福特向河里排汞时我们监管了。我们不能指望 Sam Altman 自我监管。
Original English
Scott Galloway: The closest thing we have to religion is technology... The idolatry of innovators has absolutely gone crazy. And the new Jesus Christ, if you will, are these tech CEOs... They are not concerned with our emotional well-being... they will make incremental decisions that justify the harming and self harm of teen girls... The journey from Anakin Skywalker to Darth Vader gets shorter and shorter, but they all follow the same path.
虚无主义与“逃生包”
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 你觉得他们是虚无主义者吗?
斯科特·加洛韦: 科技圈里有一种很深的虚无主义脉络。很多亿万富翁都有“应急逃生计划”。如果世界末日、革命或瘟疫真的发生了,他们会直奔机场,跳上私人飞机飞往新西兰的地下掩体。据我保守估计,三分之一的亿万富翁都有这种计划。
我对其中一个亿万富翁说:“老板,咱们推演一下。如果真的乱了,人们开始四处搜刮食物,你觉得你的飞行员不会杀了你然后抢走你老婆吗?你觉得新西兰人不会去抢有钱人的东西吗?”
这说明前 0.1% 的人已经不再关心社会的整体健康了。他们不用排队安检,有私人医疗,孩子上 7.5 万美元一年的私校。他们与社会脱节了。这种虚无主义是非常不健康的。
Original English
Scott Galloway: I think there's a nihilist vein running through big tech where a lot of them have go bags... They fly to New Zealand to Auckland and they have a bunker built out... My point is, they are no longer invested in the well-being of America. They've totally dissociated from the investments required to make America a better place because they're sequestered from it.
中东战争:战略性的无能
斯科特·加洛韦: 关于中东,我认为特朗普是被内塔尼亚胡和安全顾问说服了,认为他能成为解放中东的英雄。委内瑞拉行动的成功让他沉迷于那种大男子主义。
但战争的问题在于敌人也有话语权。所有敌人只需要做一件事就能赢:生存下去。越战、阿富汗战争都是如此。目前的行动是“战术上的卓越,战略上的无能”。我们没有联合盟友,没有简报国会,也没有意识到如果伊朗封锁霍尔木兹海峡会发生什么。那会导致全球饥荒,比核武器还可怕。
现在我们陷入了僵局:撤军显得软弱,留下则面临无尽的导弹袭击。胡志明总结过这种战争:“他们会杀掉我们很多人,我们也会杀掉他们一些。最后他们会累,然后回家。”
Original English
Scott Galloway: I would describe the war as being operational excellence and strategic incompetence... And all the enemy needs to do whether it's the Vietcong or the Taliban or the IRGC, all they need to do is survive and they win... We're now in the definition of a quagmire. If we leave, we look weak.
AI 抛售与中国策略
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 市场似乎对这些战争毫无反应,美股还创了新高。
斯科特·加洛韦: 因为前 10% 的富人贡献了 50% 的消费,他们对油价上涨没感觉。而低收入家庭 22% 的收入都花在能源上。
关于 AI,现在估值已经疯了。OpenAI 融资了近 2000 亿来建数据中心,而年收入才几百亿。历史上,当基础设施支出超过 GDP 的 2-3% 时,几乎必然会发生崩盘。
如果我是中国的领导人,我会进行现代版的“钢铁倾销”,也就是 AI 倾销。我会向美国市场投放大量廉价的、开源的、轻量化的 AI 模型。一旦美国大公司宣布不再购买 OpenAI 或 Anthropic 数百万美元的授权,转而使用廉价的中国模型,美股就会崩盘。因为标普 500 指数中 40% 的权重都押在 AI 上。过去两年的 GDP 增长主要靠 AI 的资本支出,一旦这停下来,我们立刻进入衰退。
Original English
Scott Galloway: I think China is beginning to engage in what I'll call AI dumping... If I were Xi, I would just dump cheap AI into the US market. And the moment large corporations start announcing they're not engaging these multi-million dollar site licenses with Anthropic or OpenAI... I think the US market crashes because 40% of the S&P now is directly or tangentially related to this giant bet America is making on AI.
投资建议:慢慢变富
斯科特·加洛韦: 你们这一代还没见过真正的衰退。2008 年我在《纽约时报》董事会,60 天内收入跌了 70%。
但我告诉你:衰退在某种程度上是健康的。那是创业的最好时机,因为人力和各种资源都便宜。我也曾在 2009 年买入了 8 块钱的亚马逊和 12 块钱的 Netflix。
如果你有 1 万美元,我的建议是:多元化。我的净资产中,任何单一投资都不超过 3%。我正在把资金撤出美国市场,投向拉美和欧洲。对于年轻人,最好的 ROI 是投资自己,找一个你擅长的业务拼命干。
致富唯一的秘诀就是:慢慢来。通过纪律性地定投低成本指数基金。不要觉得自己能选出下一只英伟达,市场最终会跑赢你。复利的力量是惊人的。
Original English
Scott Galloway: How do you get rich? The only answer I have is slowly and that is figure out a way to make sure that money every month is invested in low-cost index funds... Diversify like crazy, and then to let time take over.
父职、复利与对母亲的怀念
斯科特·加洛韦: 我曾认为生活就是一场资本主义交易,想从每一段关系中榨取更多价值。但我后来意识到:人生的目的在于找到那些你无法获得正面回报的事情。
我永远无法从我的孩子身上获得正面的“回报”。他们花掉我无数钱,让我焦虑失眠,付出的爱永远不可能等量回收。但这正是重点——这就是目的感。退伍军人最忠诚,是因为国家永远无法补偿他们的牺牲,所以他们获得了无与伦比的目的感。
为人父母是我做过最值得的事情,也是我临终前最后会想到的事。
Original English
Scott Galloway: I saw everything as a transaction that I wanted to be on the right side of. And what I figured out is that finding your purpose is finding that thing that you can never get a real positive return on... Having kids for me has given me my purpose. Hands down the most rewarding thing I will ever do.
史蒂芬·巴特利特: 最后一个问题,你经历过最重大的挫折是什么?你学到了什么?
斯科特·加洛韦: 我母亲的去世。永远不要吝啬告诉父母你有多爱他们,要原谅他们。我是一个还没从母亲去世中走出来的中年男人。她靠一份秘书的薪水独自把我抚养大,给了我信心和一切。
我曾经把这种悲伤看作一个问题,现在我觉得它是一个功能(feature)而非漏洞(bug)。爱的收据就是悲伤(grief)和焦虑。我希望每个年轻人一生中都能有很多快乐,但也希望他们有一定程度的悲伤,因为那意味着他们曾经深爱过。
Original English
Scott Galloway: My mother dying and you can never tell your parents how much you love them too much. Forgive them... I think the recedes for love is grief. I don't I see it I used to see it as a problem... Now I see it as a not a bug but as a feature. The recedes for love are grief and anxiety.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
人物: Sam Altman, Elon Musk, Donald Trump, JD Vance
公司/组织: OpenAI, Tesla, SpaceX, Amazon, BYD, Meta
产品/模型: Optimus, Starlink, GLP-1
媒体/书籍: Notes on Being a Man