2026年加强区域治理法案:权力版图的重组
[主持人]: 安大略省政府的**《2026年加强区域治理法案》**(Better Regional Governance Act 2026)将彻底改变安省的决策方式以及决策者的人选。那么,这项法案的具体内容是什么?它又旨在实现什么目标呢?今天我们邀请到了 TVO Today 的专栏作家、OnPoli 播客的联合主持人 John Michael McGrath 来到演播室。你好,近来可好?
Original English
[Host]: The Government's Better Regional Governance Act 2026 will shake up how decisions are made in Ontario and who makes them. So what's in it and what is it supposed to accomplish? John Michael McGrath is a columnist for TVO Today and co-host of the OnPoli podcast, and he joins us in studio. How are you doing, sir?
[John Michael McGrath]: 很好,你呢?
Original English
[John Michael McGrath]: Good. How are you doing?
[主持人]: 我也很好。让我们聊聊 100号法案(Bill 100)。这项《区域治理法案》将如何改变安大略省部分辖区的治理方式?
Original English
[Host]: I'm doing well. Let's talk about Bill 100. How will the Regional Governance Act change the way some jurisdictions will govern in Ontario?
[John Michael McGrath]: 好的。这项法案专门针对安大略省区域性市政政府(Regional Municipal Governments)的改革,这些政府全部位于安省南部,特别是我们所说的大金马蹄地区(Greater Golden Horseshoe)。包括多伦多周边的市镇,延伸至尼亚加拉地区,北至锡姆科县(Simcoe County)。在这些地区,存在一个高级别的区域政府,负责为下设的许多小型基层市政政府做决策。
这项法案(以及之前的相关法案)带来的两个重大变化是:首先,这些区域议会的区域主席(Regional Chairs)现在将由委任产生,而不是通过直接或间接选举产生。他们将由皇后公园(Queen's Park,即安省议会)、由市政事务与住房部部长直接任命。其次,区域主席还将获得类似于多伦多或渥太华等城市市长已拥有的**“强力市长”职权**(Strong Mayor Powers)。此外,锡姆科和尼亚加拉区域议会的规模也将有所调整。
Original English
[John Michael McGrath]: Right. So this is specifically looking at reforming the regional municipal governments in Ontario, most of which all of which are in southern Ontario. And specifically, these are the regional governments that are mostly in what we would call the greater Golden Horseshoe. So municipalities around Toronto, but into Niagara region as well, up to Simcoe County. And these are municipalities where there is one big overarching level of municipal government that also makes decisions for many smaller, lower level municipal governments. And two big changes that this bill does well, this bill and previous bills do is it will now make the regional chairs of these municipal councils appointed as opposed to elected, either directly or indirectly. So they will be appointed from Queen's Park, from the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, and separately, the Regional Chair will also be given powers analogous to the strong mayor powers, that mayors of other municipalities like Otto and other municipalities have received. And then on top of that, there's also some changes to the size of the regional councils in both Simcoe and Niagara.
委任制 vs. 选举制:程序的倒退?
[主持人]: 明白。关于这些权力的含义,我稍后想深入探讨,但这里需要澄清一点:关于任命本身,目前某些地区确实不是由皇后公园任命,而是由地区内部任命,而有些则是在市政选举期间选出的,对吗?
Original English
[Host]: Okay. I want to get to that. The latter point of the sort of what those powers might mean, but should get a point of clarification here in terms of the appointments themselves, some regions actually do appoint not from Queen's Park, but they do appoint within the region where some are elected during municipal elections. Correct.
[John Michael McGrath]: 没错,过去一直有多种方式并存。2018 年福特领导的保守党(Ford Tories)首次当选时,上一届自由党政府刚刚出台法律,规定在 2018 年市政选举中,所有区域主席都将由选民直接选举产生。福特政府上台后的首要行动之一就是废除了该法律。此后,有些是直接选举产生的,有些则是由区域议会内部选出的。例如,你可能是一位地方市长,然后被选为区域主席。最著名的例子是 Jim Bradley,他曾是长期担任圣凯瑟琳斯选区的省议员,后来被选为尼亚加拉地区的主席。
Original English
[John Michael McGrath]: Right. So there's been a mix of methods. Back in 2018, when the Ford Tories were first elected, the previous Liberal government had just brought in a law saying that for that 2018 municipal election, all regional chairs would be directly elected by voters. The Ford government, one of their first acts, was to repeal that. Since then, some have been elected directly, some have been elected by the regional councils themselves. So you might be a local mayor who gets elected chair famously. Jim Bradley, former MPP and longtime Saint Catherine's MPP, was elected chair of Niagara Region.
“强力市长”权力的具体内涵与争议
[主持人]: 好的。那么,“强力职权”对这些区域主席意味着什么?
Original English
[Host]: All right. Okay. So what do strong powers mean for these regional chairs?
[John Michael McGrath]: 让我们先从权力本身说起,大家可能需要温习一下。法律术语称其为**“议会首脑”(Head of Council)。它允许议会首脑在符合省级优先事项**(Provincial Priorities)的情况下推进某些措施。例如,加快建设公共交通或建造更多住房。任何涉及这些领域或其他省级优先事项的事务,他们可以在没有议会多数支持的情况下推动通过。他们还拥有否决权,且这种否决权只能由议会的绝对多数(Super Majority)才能推翻。
这在一些城市已经引发了争议,因为这不符合安大略省传统的市政民主运作方式。这是一种变革,因此备受争议。但至少在之前的案例中,这些权力是由民选市长行使的。而新法案将同样的权力交给了非民选、由委任产生的区域主席。我认为这是另一个极具争议的元素。目前的保守党政府任命的一些人,比如尼亚加拉地区最近的主席 Bob Gale,他曾是进步保守党的候选人。他在地方政界确实有资历,我不想否认这一点,但可以肯定地说,他被任命是因为他曾是省级的候选人。选民在省级选举中曾有机会投票给他,但选民却在该选区重新选出了一名新民主党人。他在竞选中失利了,却被任命为区域主席。所以你可以看到,法案生效后,这种模式可能会重演:选民投票拒绝的人,现在却获得了高于民选官员的权力。
Original English
[John Michael McGrath]: So it's let me just start with the powers themselves. Just people might need a refresher. It will allow the head of council. And that's the language in the law. It will allow the head of council to move forward certain measures that meet provincial priorities. So we think about building transit more quickly or building more housing. Anything that that intersects with those areas and other provincial priorities, they can move measures like that forward without a support of the majority of council. They can also veto measures, and those vetoes can only be overridden with a super majority of council. So this is already this has been controversial in some cities because you know it. It's not how we have traditionally done municipal democracy in Ontario. And so it's a change. And that's been controversial. But at least in those cases, until now, those powers were held by elected mayors. This new bill gives those same powers to unelected, appointed regional chairs. This is another, I think, likely to be controversial element of this, where some of the people who have been appointed by the current PC government, you know, can go back to the recent chair of Niagara Region, Bob Gale, who was a former PC candidate. He had a substantial career in local politics. I don't want to deny that he had a substantial resume there, but he was. I think it's uncontroversial to say that he was appointed because he was a former Progressive Conservative candidate. At the provincial level, voters had had an opportunity to vote for him at the provincial level. They re-elected a New Democrat in the riding. He contested instead, and then he was made this regional chair, you know, so you very well could see a position after this bill becomes law where, you know, this this kind of pattern could repeat where somebody who the voters had, in fact rejected is now given a powers superior to those of elected officials.
地方民主的危机:微观管理下的自治权
[主持人]: 好的。让我们接着聊。显然有人认为这并不民主。你在 TVO.org 最新的专栏中也表达了这一观点。为什么不民主呢?请为我们详细解释一下你提到的那些内容。
Original English
[Host]: All right. Well, let's pick up on that. There's obviously some argument that this isn't necessarily democratic. You share that view in your latest column on TVO.org. Why wouldn't it be? Walk us through a little bit of some of the stuff that you had mentioned, but there's more to that.
[John Michael McGrath]: 是的。将这些权力交给民选市长是一回事。无论你是否同意,我先陈述一下这种做法最强有力的理由:以多伦多为例,多伦多既有市长,也有由各选区选出的议员。支持赋予 Olivia Chow(多伦多市长)或 Mark Sutcliffe(渥太华市长)“强力市长”职权的理由很简单:他们是整个议会中仅有的由全市选民选出的人,他们在全市范围内拥有民意授权,可以制定全局性的政策。你可以不认同这个逻辑,但这至少是一个在民主语境下可以辩论的、站得住脚的论点。
但是,如果该职位变成由皇后公园任命,这个论点就不复存在了,完全站不住脚。这确实从根本上削弱了地方民主的理念。如果我们只是要让皇后公园以一种超强的微观管理方式来下达政策——不仅是由皇后公园制定大规则和总体优先事项,还要对市政当局说:“你不仅必须这样做,我们还要任命一个人来确保你做到位。” 那么这就产生了一个问题:我们最初为什么要设立地方民主呢?
Original English
[John Michael McGrath]: Yeah. So it is one thing to say that we are giving these powers to elected mayors, and whether you necessarily agree with this argument, let me sort of give the strong version, I think, of this argument, which is that let's take a city like Toronto, right? The city of Toronto has both a mayor and it has councils, elected councillors elected at the ward level. And the argument to give strong mayor powers to a mayor like Olivia Chow or Mark Sutcliffe in Ottawa is pretty simple. These are the only people on the entire council who are elected by the city as a whole, and they have a mandate there, and to make policy for the city as a whole. Again, you don't have to agree with that argument, but I think it is at least a fair argument, a defensible argument that people could could, you know, genuinely debate in a democratic context. That argument disappears if the position is now appointed from Queen's Park, it's not really tenable. And it really does undermine the whole idea of local democracy in the first place. If we are just going to dictate policy from Queen's Park in a super sort of micro managerial way, where it's not just Queen's Park spelling out the the sort of the broad rules of the game and general priorities, but saying to municipalities, not only do you have to do this, but we are going to appoint somebody to make sure you do. Then it really raises the question of, why do we even have local democracy in the first place?
公众觉醒是否为时已晚?
[主持人]: 好的。安大略省选民今年晚些时候将有机会表达他们的意见,因为市政选举即将举行。然而,市政选举的投票率通常并不理想。我记得上次的数据好像是……
Original English
[Host]: All right, well, Ontarians will have their say because municipal elections are going to be happening later this year. However, municipal elections don't tend to do well. I think the last numbers, I think, were.
[John Michael McGrath]: 众所周知的低投票率。
Original English
[John Michael McGrath]: Famously low turnout.
[主持人]: 是的,只有 30% 左右。安大略省人会关心地方政府的这种变化吗?
Original English
[Host]: Yeah, about 30% or so. Yes. Will Ontarians care about this change to local government?
[John Michael McGrath]: 有可能他们现在还不关心。法案极有可能通过,目前正处于皇后公园的委员会阶段。我还没看到民间出现什么大规模的反对浪潮。如果在 10 月选举前人们还没感到愤怒,我想说的是,这些区域主席最终是要开始做决策的。
进行这些变革(任命制、强力市长职权)的原因,就是为了让他们做出一些有争议的选择和决策,而这些决策是地方民选官员自愿不会做出的。当这种情况开始发生时——我不知道哪个地区会首当其冲,但我敢肯定未来四年内一定会发生——到那时人们就会察觉了,对吧?他们会突然发现,一个由皇后公园任命的人正在做出违背他们所选出的地方议员和市长意愿的决策。到那时再想改变法律规定可能已经太晚了,但引发一场皇后公园不得不应对的争议,则永远不晚。
Original English
[John Michael McGrath]: It's possible that they won't in time. Right. You know, before those municipal elections, the bill is going to it's very likely to pass. It's currently at the committee stage at Queen's Park. I have not seen some great groundswell of opposition coming out of the woodworks here. If people do not discover outrage before the October elections, though, what I would say is eventually these regional chairs are going to have to start making decisions. And the reason you make these kinds of changes, the appointments the super mayor powers, is for them to make contentious choices, contentious decisions that the local elected officials would not necessarily make of their own accord. When that starts happening, I don't know which region it will happen in first, but I'm pretty certain it will happen sometime in the next four years. When that starts happening, people are going to notice, right? They are going to suddenly discover that somebody appointed from Queen's Park is making a decision, contrary to the local councillors and mayors that they voted for, and that's probably going to be too late in terms of affecting the legal change. But it will not be too late in terms of causing a controversy that Queen's Park will have to respond to.
[主持人]: 我们将继续关注这个故事。我觉得你已经为下次访谈埋下了伏笔,当然,到时候我们会再请你过来。
Original English
[Host]: A story that we will continue to follow. I feel like you planted the seeds for potentially your next visit on the show. Of course we'll have you for that time.
[John Michael McGrath]: 总是在埋下种子。
Original English
[John Michael McGrath]: It's always planting seeds.
[主持人]: 没错。John Michael,总是聊得很愉快。
Original English
[Host]: There we go. John Michael, always a pleasure.
[John Michael McGrath]: 非常感谢。
Original English
[John Michael McGrath]: Thank you so much.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
公司/组织: TVO Today, Government of Ontario
产品/模型: Better Regional Governance Act 2026
媒体/书籍: OnPoli podcast