AI驱动的联络中心革新:从杂乱音频到结构化洞察 AI Engineer 2026-04-08

联络中心困境:高压工作流与低效沟通

欢迎来到 AI Engineer 2026 在线论坛。我是 Deep Singh,在富士通北美地区领导新兴数据技术与 AI 架构的各项计划。今天,我将带大家深入探讨一个我们近期在联络中心遇到的,具体而极具影响力的工程挑战——如何从嘈杂的音频流中进行低延迟的智能信息提取。当我们在讨论生成式AI(Generative AI: 一种能够生成新内容(如文本、图像、音频等)的AI技术)时,我们常常聚焦于清晰的文本输入。然而,在现实世界,尤其是在客户服务或联络中心领域,数据并非一开始就是整洁的文本。它往往是杂乱的、重叠的,有时带有强烈的情感色彩,甚至可能包含多通道的音频流。今天,我们将探索构建一个能够捕获音频、以超低延迟进行处理,并利用生成式AI从中提取结构化、可操作的业务洞察所需的技术架构。

本次分享的路线图包括:首先,我们将阐述当前面临的挑战;理解现代联络中心的运营现实和集约化人力瓶颈,从而明白这项工程的重要性。其次,我们将深入分析解决方案和我们构建的高层架构,将其分解为四个关键组件,详细说明如何通过高级摘要工作流(Summarization Workflows: 利用AI技术自动为长文本或对话生成简短、概括性内容的过程)将原始音频转化为结构化 JSON 数据。第三,我们将审视这些技术实现如何转化为实际的投资回报(ROI)和运营影响。最后,我们将讨论未来的发展蓝图,坦诚当前面临的技术工程瓶颈,以及我们计划如何推动这项技术发展。

为了构建一个出色的解决方案,我们首先需要深刻理解问题本身。让我们审视联络中心运营的现状。联络中心是客户体验的第一线,但从结构上看,它们正承受着巨大的压力。行业数据显示,超过50%的联络中心将招聘、培训和生产力视为其最关键的障碍。这是因为这项工作极其困难。当我们分析员工选择离开的原因时,高压力是首要因素。操作员不仅要处理复杂客户的情绪,还要熟练导航多个客户数据平台或CRM系统,并同时完美记录所有信息。这导致了巨大的员工流失问题。我们陷入了一个负面循环:人员不足导致剩余操作员压力增大,进而导致高离职率,最终又加剧了人员不足。要打破这个循环,我们不能仅仅招聘更多人,而是必须从根本上通过工程手段消除工作流中的压力。

在这个工作流中,最明显且效率低下的环节是所谓的“通话后工作”(After Call Work, ACW),也就是我们即将讨论的内容。根据我们的基线研究,一次典型的联络中心通话平均时长约为6.5分钟。然而,平均的通话后处理时间,包括操作员记录笔记、总结通话内容和选择处理代码,却需要将近6.3分钟。这意味着,我们花费了几乎与通话本身同等长的时间进行管理性数据录入。此外,由于摘要(Summarization: 指提炼信息核心要点的过程)高度依赖于操作员的个人记忆和写作技巧,数据质量极不稳定。

我们核心的工程使命非常明确:利用AI来解决ACW问题。如果我们能够实现摘要和数据提取的自动化,理论上我们可以将通话后处理时间减少约50%甚至更多。这将促使企业将重心从仅仅处理呼叫转移到真正分析客户的“客户之声”(Voice of the Customer: 指企业收集和分析客户反馈、意见和行为,以了解客户需求和满意度的过程)来促进业务增长。

Original English

Right. Hello everyone. Welcome to the AI

engineer 2026 online track. Um good

morning, good afternoon, good evening

depending upon your time zone. My name

is Deep Singh and I lead the initiatives

in the emerging data technologies and AI

architecture at Fujitsu North America.

Um and today I will be uh giving you or

maybe provide you a deep dive into a

very specific but a very highly

impactful engineering challenge uh which

we have encountered in our uh contact

center. So with that, let me just quickly

share my screen and get this going.

Right. So um

um this is the topic of the discussion

voice opsy low latency intelligence

extraction from uh messy audio streams.

Uh when we talk about you know

generative AI we often you know focus on

uh clean text inputs. But if you go into

the real world specifically in the

customer service or or maybe contact

centers specifically um the data does

not start as a clean text right it

starts as messy quite overlapping

um sometimes emotionally charged and and

it it may have multi- channelannel audio

streams also within that right and and

today we will explore the technical

architecture which is required ired to

capture that audio, process it with

ultra low latency and use the generative

AI to extract structured actionable uh

business intelligence out of it. So with

that, let's get started with this.

So here is our road map for the next 25

minutes. Um first we will stage the um

um stage with what the current

challenges are. Uh we have to understand

the operational realities and the

intense human bottlenecks in in the

modern contact centers to understand why

this engineering matters. Uh second we

will walk through the solution which is

provided. I will break down our

highlevel architecture into four key

components.

um detailing, how we move from raw audio

to a structured JSON using advanced

summarization workflows.

Thirdly, we will look at the key

outcomes specifically, like how these

technical implementations they translate

into hard ROI and operational impacts.

And finally, we will discuss the um road

map ahead and and being transparent

about the current tech uh engineering

constraints which we face uh now and

then and where we are taking this

technology and the road map ahead.

So to engineer a great solution, we first

need to deeply understand the problem.

So let's look at the current state of

the contact center operations.

So contact centers they are the front

lines of the customer experiences but

structurally they are breaking under the

pressure. If we look at the industry

data um over 50% of the contact centers

they identify

uh hiring, training and productivity as

their most critical barriers. Why?

because the job is incredibly difficult.

When we analyze the reasons why the

operators they leave for the other

professions, high stress is the number

one factor as part of it. Now, operators

are expected to handle complex customer

emotions, navigate the um multiple uh

customer data platforms or the CRM

systems involved into it and and also

document everything perfectly. So if you

think about this, this leads to a

massive retention problem, right? uh we

are caught in a negative spiral um where

understaffing leads to higher stress for

the remaining operators

um which leads to a high turnover and uh

that ultimately implies to more

understaffing, right? So to break this

cycle, we just

um cannot hire more people. We have to

fundamentally engineer the stress out of

the workflow.

And the most glaring inefficiency in

this workflow is something called um

after call workflow or ACW,

uh which we are going to discuss as part

of this slide. Um according to our

baseline studies, the average contact

center call, it typically last about like

6.5 minutes. However, the average

post-processing time where the operator

types up the nodes, summarizes the call

and selects the disposition codes, it it

takes like almost 6.3 minutes. So, this

is nearly like 1 is to 1 ratio we are

talking about. Um and and this also

implies operators are spending almost as

much time doing administrative data

entry as they are actually talking to

the customers. Um furthermore, because

the summarization relies on an

individual operator's memory and the

writing skills, the data quality is

highly inconsistent.

Um our core engineering mission here was

clear, like use AI to target the after

call work, which is ACW. Um if we can

mechanize the summarization and the data

extraction, uh theoretically, we can

reduce the post processing time um

almost by 50% or even more. And and this

shifts the enterprise, you know, focus

from merely just handling the calls to

actually, you know, analyzing the voice

of the customers for the business growth

which we are looking out every now and

then.

技术解决方案:低延迟AI管道

我们如何实现这种转变?让我们深入研究我们为解决此问题而构建的技术解决方案和架构。我们设计了一个四阶段的低延迟管道,可在最少的人工干预下,将对话音频转化为结构化的业务智能。

这个过程始于语音捕获(Voice Capture: 捕获原始音频数据的过程),即接入电话系统以提取原始、高保真的音频流。接着,音频流进入我们的语音转文本引擎(Speech-to-Text Engine, STT),该引擎负责高精度的转录。然后是系统的核心——生成式AI引擎,这是我们进行意图识别和摘要处理等繁重工作的关键部分。最后是客户数据同步层,它将AI洞察转化为API调用,自动更新客户数据或CRM数据。

让我们详细了解这些组件的底层工程实现。

语音捕获:数据纯净是基石

在AI领域,一条基本法则便是“垃圾进,垃圾出”(Garbage in, garbage out)。如果音频输入存在缺陷,LLM(Large Language Model: 大型语言模型,一类能够理解和生成人类语言的AI模型)后续就可能产生“幻觉”(Hallucination: AI模型生成不准确或虚假信息的现象)。我们进行实时音频输入,通过应用降噪滤波器(Noise Filters: 用于去除音频信号中不希望存在的噪声的算法或技术)来过滤掉背景杂谈或任何会产生衰减的干扰。音频电平的归一化(Normalization: 将音频信号的幅度调整到特定范围内的过程)对我们至关重要。

至关重要的是,我们必须执行声道映射(Channel Mapping: 将多声道音频(如立体声)分离成独立声道并分配给特定发言者(如客服代表或客户)的过程)。我们必须将立体声音频分割开,将客服代表隔离在一个声道(例如左声道),将客户隔离在另一个声道(例如右声道)。如果我们将其混合成单个单声道音轨,相互重叠,AI将难以辨别谁说了什么,从而破坏整个下游摘要的准确性。因此,确保声道映射的完整性,并区分谁在说什么至关重要。最后,我们应用了一个安全层,因为有时音频流可能包含信用卡号、密码或其他任何个人身份信息(Personally Identifiable Information, PII)。我们采用缓冲区管理(Buffer Management: 管理数据在内存中的存储和流动)和早期PII屏蔽技术(PII Masking: 在数据进入处理流程的早期阶段,对敏感个人信息进行匿名化或移除的技术),以确保敏感数据在数据流向后续处理阶段(如LLM内存)时,绝不会触及其内存库。

语音转文本:追求高精度转录

接下来,音频进入语音转文本引擎,供生成式AI或LLM进行有效的数据摘要或响应生成。我们发现,语音转文本(STT)的准确率必须高于90%。我们利用先进的声学模型(Acoustic Modeling: 语音识别中,将声学信号映射到语音单元(如音素)的模型)来匹配音素(Phonemes: 语言中最小的语音单位)并过滤掉任何区域性方言。然后,我们利用特定领域的词典来应用语言逻辑。例如,如果处理的是一位保险代理人的通话,STT引擎需要区分“term life”(定期寿险)和“turn”(回合/轮次)。这两个词发音非常接近,但它们之间必须有明确的区别。最后,后处理(Post-processing: 对STT结果进行进一步优化,如添加标点、纠正格式等)同样至关重要。我们使用逆文本标准化(Inverse Text Normalization, ITN)和自动标点(Auto-punctuation)。例如,如果客户说“五千美元”($5,000),STT引擎必须将其输出为数字形式。这种数值格式极大地提高了LLM在后续阶段提取实体的能力。

生成式AI核心:结构化与可信赖的智能提取

现在我们到达了生成式AI核心。我们并非简单地将原始转录稿丢给LLM,而是要求它进行摘要。我们采用了一种高度协同的方法(Orchestrated Approach: 指通过精心设计和协调多个AI模型或组件来完成复杂任务的方法)。在我们的编排层(Orchestration Layer: 负责协调和管理AI模型之间交互的组件),我们使用特定的提示模板(Prompt Templates: 预先设计的文本结构,用于指导LLM生成特定格式或内容的输出)。我们的设置表明,如果仅仅要求LLM总结一次通话,它会输出一个杂乱的叙述段落。因此,我们使用少样本学习(Few-shot Learning: 一种机器学习方法,模型仅需少量示例即可学习新任务)的技巧来指导LLM输出分离的要点列表(Bullet Points: 用于表示列表项的符号),一个列表用于客户咨询,另一个列表用于操作员的操作。

接下来是推理层(Reasoning Layer: AI模型进行逻辑分析、判断和决策的部分)。在这里,我们提取意图。我们为LLM提供一个预定义的客户通话原因列表(Call Reasons: 如取消、新申请、索赔状态等),并指示它对转录稿进行分类,并说明选择该特定分类的原因。

最后是信任层(Trust Layer: 确保AI输出的准确性、可靠性和安全性)。在此层,我们应用令牌优化(Token Optimization: 优化输入给LLM的文本量,以降低成本和延迟)来保持低延迟,并运行自动化幻觉检查(Automated Hallucination Checks: 自动检测并纠正AI生成内容中不准确之处的机制),以确保生成的摘要严格基于转录稿。

客户数据同步:无缝对接业务系统

最后一个技术障碍是将这些优美的(结构化)数据反馈给业务部门。我们的API网关(API Gateway: 充当API的入口点,负责请求路由、协议转换、安全检查等)充当模式映射器(Schema Mapper: 将一种数据结构映射到另一种数据结构)。它接收LLM输出的JSON,并将诸如客户意图或解决状态等字段,直接映射到公司CRM系统或我们通过REST API布局的任何客户数据中的相应字段。

我们并未完全移除人工。我们在中间设置了一个验证步骤。操作员会看到AI生成的摘要自动填充在屏幕上。他们进行快速的视觉字段验证,根据需要进行一些小编辑,然后点击确认。同时,这些结构化数据会流入我们的业务智能模型(Business Intelligence Models: 用于分析和呈现业务数据的模型),汇总客户的“声音”数据用于管理仪表板,并自动标记新FAQ数据条目的候选。

Original English

So how do we engineer that shift? Let's

deep dive into the technical solution

and the architecture we built to solve

this. Um,

so we designed a four stage low latency

pipeline to transform the conversational

audio into a structured business

intelligence

um with minimal human intervention and

it starts with voice capture, which is

tapping into the telephon system to

extract raw, highfidelity audio streams

and that flows goes into our speechtoext

engine, ST, uh, which is responsible for

high accuracy transcription.

Um next is the brain of the system, the

generative AI core. This is where we do

the heavy lifting of the intent

recognition and summarization.

And finally, the customer data sync

layer, which translates those AI insights

into API calls to update the uh uh

customer data or CRM data automatically.

Um let's look at the engineering

under the hood for each of these components in

detail.

So the first component is the voice

capture in AI. Um the typical rule is

garbage in equals garbage out. So if

your audio intake is flawed, the LLM

will hallucinate later on. Um we do

realtime uh audio intake. So applying

noise filters to strip out the uh back

office chatter or um, you know, anything

of those sort which is creating an

attenuation

is important and normalize the audio

level is very, very, very important for

us. Crucially, if we perform these

channel mapping, uh, we absolutely must

split split the uh stereo audio to

isolate the agent on one channel, say on

the very left and the customer on the

other side, which is the very right.

Right? So if if you mix them into a

single monot track, um, like kind of

overlapping with each other, the AI will

struggle to figure out who said what and

and thereby, you know, ruining the entire

downstream summary. So um uh, it's

important that we have that channel

mapping intact and it separates which

who is what and who is saying what

right. Um finally, we apply a security

layer because sometimes the audio

streams can contain the credit card

numbers or maybe passwords or any

anything which is personally

identifiable information, PII. So we

utilize buffer management and early

stage PII masking technique uh so that

the sensitive data it never hits the LLM

memory banks whenever we are moving

ahead in the channel.

Now next, the audio it hits the um

speechtoext engine for generative AI or

the LLMs to summarize the um data

effectively or your response

effectively. We found that the speech to

text, the ST, um, accuracy must be above

90%.

uh we utilize advanced acostic modeling

to map the u phonemes and filter out any

regional dialects. We then apply the

language logic utilizing like domain

specific dictionaries. U just for

example, if it's an insurance agent, the

um speechtoext engine, ST needs to know

the difference between a term life and a

turn, right? Both of them are very close

to each other, but still there should be

a difference between them. Uh finally

post-processing is also vital. uh, we use

inverse text normalization and auto

punctuation. Uh for example, if if a

customer says $5,000, the speechtoext um

engine, it should must output that into

numerical fashion. And this numerical

formatting it it drastically improves

the LLM's ability to extract the

entities in later point in time.

Now we reach the generative AI core. We

are not just throwing a raw trans uh, raw

trans uh transcri script at a llm, but we

are also asking it to summarize it. like

we use a highly orchestrated approach in

this case. Um in our orchestration layer

we use specific prompt templates. Our

um setup showed that if if you just ask

an LLM to summarize a call, it outputs a

messy narrative paragraph. So instead we

use few short libraries to instruct the

LLM to output separate bullet points um

one list for customer inquiry, uh, and a

separate list for operators action. Uh

then comes the reasoning layer. In the

reasoning layer, we extract the intent.

We provide the LLM with a predefined

list of customer uh call reasons, like uh

cancellation or new application or any

kind of claim status, and instruct

it to classify the transcript and output the

reason why it choose that specific

classification.

And finally, the trust layer, where we

apply the token optimization to keep the

um latency low and runs the uh automated

hallucination checks to ensure the uh

generated summary is strict, um, and it is

grounded in the transcript.

Now the final technical hurdle is

getting this beautiful data back into

hands of the business. Our API gateway

acts as a schema mapper. It takes the

JSON output from the LLM, uh, and maps the

field like customer intent or resolution

status, and and directly to some

corresponding fields in the um, um, based

on the company's CRM system or any

customer data which we have laid out via

some rest APIs. So we don't remove the

human entirely in this. We use a

verification step in between. Uh, the

operator it sees the AI generated

summary autopop populated on their

screen. Uh, they do a quick visual field

validation, make some minor edits if

necessary, and then just click the

confirm. Uh simultaneously, this

structured data it flows into our

business intelligence models

um aggregating the voice of the customer

data for management dashboards and

automatically you know, flagging the

candidates for new FAQ

um data entries.

成果、挑战与未来展望

要将此架构整合到实际的联络中心环境中,会产生什么样的成果?让我们审视其运营影响。此次实施带来的运营影响立竿见影且极易衡量。

首先看ACW时间。在手动操作下,平均通话后工作时间为6.3分钟。通过我们的人工智能工作流,这一时间骤降至3.1分钟,处理时间缩减了近50%。若将此节省规模化至拥有500个坐席、日处理数千个电话的联络中心,将产生巨大的运营节约,相当于仅从效率角度就可收回数十个全职人力。

其次是数据录入质量。从高度主观且变化不定的状态,转变为高度标准化、统一化的输出。查询分类或通话原因标记,从依赖操作员主观判断和记忆,转变为严格的逻辑驱动,最终形成了一套高度一致的客户“声音”数据集供管理层分析。最终,通过消除输入笔记等重复性的行政负担,我们减轻了操作员的认知负荷,从而稳定了运营,并直接对抗了与员工流失相关的压力。这最终也降低了我们在讨论之初就识别出的高离职率。

尽管成果斐然,工程工作永无止境。让我们谈谈我们面临的约束(Constraints: 限制项目进展或性能的因素)以及未来的发展蓝图。

当前,我们正应对三个主要约束:

  1. 语音转文本准确性:整个生成式AI摘要的准确性完全依赖于转录稿。如果STT引擎未能捕捉到重度口音或音频质量不佳,LLM将无从下手。因此,STT优化是我们持续的战斗。
  2. 初始设置成本:虽然长期投资回报率(Return on Investment, ROI: 衡量一项投资效益的指标)巨大,但API令牌的初始消耗,尤其是在对长达20分钟的转录稿运行复杂LLM推理时,成本可能很高。尤其在初始扩展阶段,这无疑是艰难的。我们正不断致力于令牌优化技术,以降低这一成本。
  3. 安全与合规:在音频流中处理PII或任何敏感信息极为复杂。确保数据在到达云端终点前进行严格的屏蔽是必要的。这也增加了延迟,并从架构角度带来了额外开销。我们仍在探索如何减少这些额外层级,使其在组件层面更加稳健。

为了应对这些约束并拓展可能性的边界,我们的发展蓝图目前分为三个阶段:

第一阶段:专注于可解释AI(Explainable AI, XAI: 旨在使AI决策过程透明化、易于理解的技术)。我们希望超越简单的通话摘要,真正做到辅导操作员。我们正在构建系统,以便在通话后分析音频,并为操作员提供即时的、私密的反馈,无论是关于他们的软技能、同理心水平,还是信息准确性。

第二阶段:目标是预测性人员配置(Predictive Staffing)。通过利用我们现在捕获的海量分类意图数据,我们可以将这些数据输入时间序列分析。这将使劳动力管理(Workforce Management, WFM: 优化联络中心人员配置、调度和管理效率的流程)能够准确预测基于特定主题的呼叫量峰值,从而优化排班。

第三阶段:或许对人类福祉最为重要——对抗客户骚扰。联络中心代理经常面临日益增多的言语侮辱。我们正在开发一种低延迟的情感和声学分析(Sentiment and Acoustic Analysis: 分析文本或语音中的情感倾向和声音特征),以检测客户何时变得具有攻击性。最终,系统可以触发警报通知主管,或将呼叫无缝转接给AI语音代理,以保护人类操作员在面对此类困难对话时的心理健康。

通过将这些严谨的工程技术应用于杂乱的音频数据,我们可以将联络中心从高压的成本中心,转变为高效且智能的信息收集引擎,从而保护其员工。这就是这一切的意义所在。感谢您的时间。我已附上我的二维码,将在稍后展示,以便您通过LinkedIn与我联系。如果您希望进一步讨论我们今天所讲的架构或任何提示工程(Prompt Engineering: 设计和优化输入给AI模型(如LLM)的文本指令,以获得期望输出的学科)策略,请随时联系。我很高兴能与您交流并共同探讨。再次感谢您的聆听,祝您一切顺利。再见。

Original English

Now to tie the architecture together,

this is the linear workflow logic of the

data pipeline. We take the raw

transcript complete um, with the time

indexing uh, confidence scoring and

dinoising. We passes, we pass it through

the speaker separation because we split

the stereo channels um, in the step one.

Um we can easily stitch the dialogue

together logically, like customer said x

agent said y. Uh then we move to the

context deduct deduction where the LLM

spots the entities like account numbers

um or product name or customer name, run

the sentiment analysis and recognizes

the intent and the final state is the

structured output. So instead of a wall

of text, uh, the system it outputs like

clear uh, and a clean JSON schema

matching some predefined uh, customer

data or maybe CRM templates which we

have in the enterprise, and then

categorized neatly into bullet points

and and this strict formatting is what

turns an unstructured conversation into

a database ready asset.

So what happens when we deploy this

architecture in a real contact center

environment? Let's look at the outcomes.

The operational impacts out of the

implementation were quite immediate and

and highly measurable. Um look at the um

ACW time. um, under the manual operation

after average, after call work was 6.3

minutes uh, powered by our AI workflow

that dropped to like 3.1 minutes, which

is like almost 50% reduction in the

processing time. Um if you calculate

that across 500 seats handling thousands

of calls a day, you are looking at a

massive operational saving. The

equivalent of almost reclaiming dozens

of full-time headcounts purely from

efficiency standpoint. Um [snorts]

the next aspect is of data entry

quality. It it moved from a highly

subjective and a variable to highly

standardized and uniform output.

uh the inquiry categorization or the

call reason tagging uh, it moved from

being dependent on an operator mode or

memory um, to um, being a strictly logic

based, resulting in a highly consistent

voice of the customer data set for the

management and ultimately, by removing

these repetitive administrative burden

of typing out notes, we reduce the

cognitive load on the oper operators

thereby stabilizing the operations and

directly combating the stress which is

linked with the staff and and this

ultimately reduced the turnover we

identified um, at the very beginning of

our discussion.

While the results were fantastic, the

the engineering work is never done. Um

and and let's talk about the constraints

we face uh, and our road map for the

future.

Um

we are currently navigating three main

constraints. First is the um source to

source to text accuracy, ST accuracy.

the entire generative AI summary, it

relies on the transcript. So if the ST

engine uh, fails to pick up heavy accents

or poor audio quality, the LLM has

nothing to work with. So the ST

optimization is a continuous battle for

us. Uh second is the initial setup cost

while the long-term ROI is massive, the

initial consumption of the API tokens

especially running complex LLM

reasonings on long 20inut

uh transcripts can be costly, and uh

especially during the initial scaling

phases, those are tough ones, and and we

are constantly working on token

optimization techniques to bring this

number down. Uh the third is the

security and compliance. Um handling PII

uh per uh, any kind of sensitive

information in audio streams is very

complex. Um and ensuring robust masking

before the hit data hits the cloud

endpoint is a strict requirement. Um and

u because of this, we add some layers and

ultimately reduce, increases the latency

and also add some overhead from

architectural standpoint. So we are

still figuring it out how we can reduce

those extra layers and make it much more

robust component wise.

All right. So to address these

constraints um

and and push the boundaries of what's

possible, our road map is currently

broken down into three phases. Uh phase

one, it focuses on explainable AI. Um we

want to move beyond just summarizing

calls to actually, you know, coaching the

operators. We are engineering these

systems to analyze the audio post call

and provide operators with instant

private feedback on their uh, either soft

skills or empathy level, or any kind of

accuracy from a information standpoint.

The phase two, it targets the predictive

staffing. By taking the massive amount

of categorized intent data we are now

capturing, we can feed same, the same

exact data intent data into a time

series analytics. Um and and this will

allow the workforce management to

accurately forecast the call volumes

spikes based on those specific topics

and thereby optimizing the shiftuling.

Uh uh, the phase three is perhaps the

most important for human well-being. Uh

combating the customer harassment uh uh

contact center agents they mostly face

an increasingly amount of verbal abuse.

Um and we are developing uh, a low

latency sentiment and aostic analysis

that can detect um, when a customer

becomes abusive. Um ultimately, the

system can you know, trigger some

triggers uh, I mean, an alerts or

something which is important from

notification standpoint to a supervisor

or anyone who is there in the from the

management, upper management standpoint.

Um or or maybe seamlessly transfer the

call to an AI voice agent just to

protect the human operator uh, mental

health in, in case of these tough

conversations.

All right. Um so u by applying these

rigorous engineering uh, techniques to

the messy audio data, we can definitely

transform the contact centers from uh

cost centers of like high stress into a

highly efficient and intelligence

gathering engines. uh, that protect their

workforces. That's the whole idea of

having this right. Um thank you so much

for your time uh, and listening to me. Um

I have included my QR code which I will

just flash in here um, so that you can

grab me over LinkedIn. uh, and please

feel free to connect if if you would

like to discuss uh, the architecture or

any prompt engineering strategies

related to the discussion which we had

in here, and happy to connect and um, make

things uh, work things out between us and

we can have more conversations. So thank

you so much for listening to me, and have

a good one. Bye.

📌 文中提及的人物和组织

公司/组织: Fujitsu

关键字: voice-processing low-latency-ai generative-ai contact-center-ai audio-analytics