欢迎 Brad Gerstner 回归与国情咨文轶事
Jason: 好的,各位。欢迎回到全球排名第一的播客。Friedberg 正在外面拯救世界,可能在培育新的土豆、藜麦,或者是布鲁塞尔豆芽,我也不确定他现在具体在忙什么。坐在他位子上的是他最喜欢的“好基友”——他总是说如果我不在,就要让 Brad Gerstner 来。欢迎回来。自从你在**国情咨文(State of the Union)**中被点名后,我们就没在节目里见过你了。给我们讲讲幕后故事吧,Brad,被美国总统在国情咨文中点名是什么感觉?你提前知道吗?是事先排练好的吗?还是比较随兴?
Original English
Jason: All right, everybody. Welcome back to the number one podcast in the world. Freeberg's out saving the world, creating new potatoes or I don't know, quinoa, maybe some Brussels sprouts. I'm not sure what he's working on at this point. In his place, his personal favorite bestie. He always says that when I'm not here, I want Brad Gerstner in the seat. Welcome back. We haven't seen you on the pod since your shout out at the State of the Union. Take us behind the scenes for a brief moment here, Brad, of what it's like to get a shout out from POTUS at the state of Did you know it was coming? Did you choreograph to this thing? Did you Did you choreograph that or was that more spontaneous?
Brad: 说实话,我完全不知道。事实上,我是事后才知道那句话原本不在演讲稿里,是总统临时加进去的。所以我想,哪怕是在演讲前几天,这事儿都没定。但我们收到了国情咨文的邀请,你知道,这是一种制度,在这个国家已经延续了 250 年。我以前从未去过。我知道他会谈论 “特朗普账户”(Trump accounts),所以我心想,如果我这辈子非要去一次,那就是现在了。我必须说,我非常痴迷于民主制度和传统。那是一个非凡的夜晚,撇开那些关于民主党或共和党做了什么的头条新闻不谈,无论总统是谁,这种活动每年都会举行。你必须去亲眼见证,所以那是一个特殊的夜晚。
Original English
Brad: I honestly had no idea it was coming. And in fact, I I found out after the fact that it wasn't in the speech and the president added it to the speech. So, I don't even think it was, you know, few days ago few days before going to happen. But we got an invite to the State of the Union and you know, listen, it's an institution. And this has happened every year for 250 years in the country. I've never been. I thought I did know he was going to talk about Trump accounts. So I figured if I'm ever going to go, that's the time to go. And I have to say, you know, I'm just a sucker for Democratic institutions and Democratic traditions. It it was an extraordinary night. Set aside, you know, the headlines about what Democrats did or Republicans did. Just the whether it's a Democrat president or Republican president that this happens every year. You have to go report on the State of the Union. So it was a it was a special night.
特朗普账户与 Invest America 的进展
Brad: Jason,还有最后一件事。我们现在每天有超过 10 万名孩子注册这些“特朗普账户”。太棒了。已经有数百万孩子领取了他们的账户。全美有近 3000 万孩子有资格获得至少 250 美元的初始资金,只要去领取即可。这些账户将在 7 月 4 日正式上线。我认为国情咨文之后,全国的参与度都在加速,因为总统坚信这是让每个普通美国人都参与到资本主义博弈中的一种方式,让他们直接拥有美国伟大的公司。所以,从这个角度来看,那次点名对我意义重大,它突显了该计划的重要性。
Original English
Brad: One final thing on it, Jason. You know, we're signing up over a 100,000 kids a day to these Trump accounts. Fantastic. We have millions of kids who've already claimed their account. We have nearly 30 million kids in America who are eligible for at least $250 if they just go claim their account. These things are going to go live on July 4th. And what it really showed, I think, the country, it accelerated after the State of the Union because the president, you know, really believes this is a way to get everybody main street America into the game of capitalism and get them all directly owning, you know, the great companies in America. So, it meant a lot to me in that regard that it highlights the importance of the program. So, I was deeply grateful to the president for not only making sure this happens, but the shout out is pretty cool.
伊朗战争与油价冲击
Jason: 好了,让我们谈谈伊朗战争。显然,生命、死亡和伊朗人民的自由远比财务问题重要。但我想我们具有独特的资格来谈论经济影响和连锁效应。过去五个交易日出现了剧烈波动。以**布伦特原油(Brent crude)**为例:战争第七天(周五)飙升至 84 美元,周一(第十天)达到 119 美元,随后跌回 84 美元。周三三艘商船在海峡遇袭后,又回升至 100 美元。目前录制节目时,价格在 99 美元左右。这是第二张图表,显示了历史上的价格飙升。我还记得 1978 年的石油危机,大家得根据车牌号在加油站排队一两个小时。
Original English
Jason: All right, let's talk about the war in Iran. Obviously, there are much more important issues than financial ones. Life, death, the freedom of the people of Iran, but we're uniquely qualified, I think, to talk about the economic fallout, second order effects, first order effects. And there has been massive volatility over the last five trading days. Just talking about Brent crude oil and we'll we'll key the discussion off of that type of oil. It spiked to $84 on Friday. That was day seven of the war, 119 on Monday, day 10 dropped back down to 84. Jump backed up to 100 after three commercial ships were hit in the straight on Wednesday. Brent crude currently at 99 when we're taping this. But it's uh quite a spike. And here's a second chart. This shows you the spikes over time. I was old enough to remember the oil shock of 1978.
Jason: 今天的最新消息是,伊朗新任最高领袖 Mojtaba 表示他将保持海峡关闭,以此作为向敌人施压的工具。《华尔街日报》周四引用智库专家的观点称,重新开放海峡可能需要地面部队。Polymarket 预测美军在 3 月底前进入伊朗的概率为 27%,到年底则高达 57%。Brad,当油价达到这个水平且充满不确定性时,你有什么看法?
Original English
Jason: And breaking news today, Iran's new Supreme Leader Mojtaba says he's keeping the straight closed as a tool to pressure the enemy. Wall Street Journal on Thursday quoted a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute saying that reopening the strait will require ground troops. Poly market 27% chance that US forces enter Iran by the end of March and 57% by the end of the year. So the sharps over at poly market believe we will have boots on the ground. Let me stop there. Brad, your thoughts on what happens when oil hits this kind of number and we have this uncertainty.
Brad: 首先,油价上涨带来了巨大的直接成本,油是许多消费品和企业产品的组成部分。它还伤害了消费者和企业的信心。**高盛(Goldman Sachs)**今天发布了一些分析,更新了经济连锁反应:他们将全年的 PCE 通胀预测从 2.1% 上调至 2.9%。即便剔除直接油价,核心 PCE 也从 2.2% 上调至 2.4%。他们还下调了 30 个基点的 GDP 预测,并预计失业率会上升。
Original English
Brad: Right. So first is obviously there are huge direct costs as oil prices go up right oil is a component of a lot of consumer you know and enterprise products and it also hurts consumer confidence enterprise confidence Goldman Sachs is out today with some analysis where they updated kind of the economic knock-on effects right so they raised their PCE inflation forecast from 2.1 to 2.9 right for the year. core PCE which excludes oil, okay, is they forecasted up uh from 2.2 to 2.4. They lowered their GDP forecast by 30 basis points for the year. And they also expect higher unemployment as a result of this for the year.
Brad: 所有这些都在拖累市场情绪。但我认为市场可能有点误解了。我认为“特朗普主义”比“新保守主义(Neocon)”学说要务实得多。特朗普的目标非常有限:他想摧毁和削弱对美国国家安全利益的威胁,他不想输出民主。所以我怀疑这些影响是短期持续的,但目前市场正处于某种“创伤后应激障碍”的闪回中,想起了阿富汗和伊拉克,担心我们会陷入泥潭。
Original English
Brad: All of that is weighing on the sentiment of the market. But I think the market may be getting it a little bit wrong. Right? The Trump doctrine, I think the Trump doctrine is far more pragmatic than the neocon doctrine. Right? I think Trump has a very limited set of goals. He wants to destroy and degrade threats to America's national security interests. He doesn't want to spread democracy. So my suspicion is that these impacts are shorter duration, but right now the market's having a little bit of post-traumatic stress flashbacks to Afghanistan and Iraq and wondering if we might be wandering into a quagmire.
特朗普与中国:寻找停火的“大交易”
Chamath: 本周我看到最重要的事情是,总统被问及战争时,他说战争很快就会结束。市场对此有什么反应?市场几乎在瞬间将油价从 120 美元拉回到了 90 美元。这反映了大家的真实想法:大多数专业人士相信并没有持续冲突的路径。由于伊朗人需要保面子,他们会有很多虚张声势,但我认为这是一个“试探气球”。我相信这会是短期的。
Original English
Chamath: I think the most important thing that I saw this week was I think President Trump was asked about the war and he said the war would be over very soon. What did the market do? The market literally took oil from 120 a barrel to 90 a barrel almost in you know a nancond. I think that that sort of tells you what everybody thinks. So the fact that there was this reflexive move, I think is a belief by a lot of the sharps that there is no path to a sustained conflict. my perspective is that was a trial balloon. I think it validated what everybody thought which is that this is going to be a shortrun thing.
Brad: 我认为这最终关乎中国。在本月底,特朗普将与习近平在中国进行为期三天的关键会晤。这将是运行世界的两个超级大国之间一次绝对具有历史意义的会晤。我敢打赌,习近平有巨大的动力在那三天内协商出一项**“大交易”(Grand Bargain)**,为自己创造一些具有历史意义的成就。如果总统认为这能产生杠杆作用,他就会利用这一点。
Original English
Brad: I think as I explained last week I think this is about China China. And you have to remember at the end of this month he has a pivotal 3 days with Xi Jinping in China. This is going to be an absolutely historic convening of the two superpowers that run the world. And I would bet dollars to donuts that there is going to be an enormous incentive for Xi to negotiate a grand bargain in those three days and do something historic for himself. And I think that the president will use that if he thinks that it creates leverage.
Brad: 谁受的伤最重?是中国。如果你分析这个博弈论,他(习近平)现在甚至比以前更需要这次峰会。如果我是习近平,我会想:我该如何协助找到停火的“下坡路”?中国现在的年轻人失业率高达 25%,如果五个月没有石油,这个数字会变成多少?
Original English
Brad: So, at the end of the day, who is going to be hurting the most? It is China. And so if you play this game theory out, the reason he kept it is because now he needs a summit even more. So the fact that it's still on the books, if I was Xi, I'd be like, how do I negotiate and help find the off-ramp? All right, remember you have 25% unemployment of young men inside of China. 25% today. What do you think it goes to in five months with no oil?
AI 的营收爆炸:真实增长还是实验性支出?
Jason: 好了,回到我们的擅长领域:AI 和科技。OpenAI 和 Anthropic 正在以商业史上前所未见的速度扩张收入。上个月,Anthropic 的年化营收达到了 140 亿美元,这意味着他们在 14 个月内将营收从 10 亿做到了 140 亿,同比增长了 12 倍。OpenAI 2025 年底的年化营收达到了 200 亿。Brad,你是这两家公司的投资人,是什么在推动这种增长?是 Token 使用量?还是 Claude 的订阅费?
Original English
Jason: But back to our zone of excellence, AI and tech, OpenAI and Anthropic are scaling revenue and costs faster than we've ever seen in the history of well business the world. Brad Anthropic hit a $14 billion run rate last month, February. That means they have grown revenue from 1 billion uh to 14 billion in 14 months. Openai ended 2025 at 20 billion annualized run rate. Brad, you're invested in these two companies. What is driving that? Is it token use? Is it clawed subscriptions?
Brad: 我们跨越了 Opus 4.6 和 GPT-5.4 的门槛,模型和其上的 Agent 不再仅仅是与 IT 预算竞争,它们正在增强劳动力,甚至与劳动力预算竞争。通过取代 IT 预算是不可能实现单月 60 亿美元营收的。全美数百万家公司都在说:“我的天,让我们启动这些 Agent 来帮我们做事吧,我们愿意为此付费。” 现在的模型就像凯文·凯利说的,是它们这辈子最笨的时候。
Original English
Brad: We crossed a threshold with Opus 4.6, right? And we saw it again with chat GBT 5.4 before where the models and the agents on top of them they're no longer competing with IT budgets they're now augmenting labor they're competing with labor budgets you could not possibly have a $6 billion month it is impossible to do that by displacing IT budgets millions of other companies across America say oh my god let's spin up these agents and have them do things for us and we're willing to pay for it.
Chamath: 这里的关键问题是:如果你看 Snowflake 或 Databricks,使用这些软件的公司产生了巨大的营收和利润,这些产品处于支撑营收的关键生产工作流中。但 AI 目前并非如此。我们都在实验。为什么?因为我们知道它很重要,但还不完全知道该怎么用。你不能直接把它塞进医疗或金融的核心工作流中,因为一旦模型出错,你会被起诉或坐牢。目前的营收质量还没能从“很有趣、实验性”转化为“核心生产力”。
Original English
Chamath: The real question is the following. If you look at the companies that use that software, those companies generate enormous revenues and enormous margins and these products are in critical production workflows. That is just not true with AI today. Why are we experimenting? Because we know it's important, but we don't yet really know what to do. None of these things have transitioned from it's interesting, it's experimental to it's the core critical operational workflow.
AI 的公关危机与监管捕获
Jason: AI 行业是否存在公关(PR)问题?调查显示,中国观众将 AI 视为“富足”和“拥抱未来的技术”,而美国人却感到恐惧。人们担心丢掉工作,担心贫富差距。这些大公司似乎没有进行任何协调一致的沟通。
Original English
Jason: Brad, does the industry have a PR problem? Obviously, comparing them to China where people see AI as abundance and like this incredible new technology they want to embrace. Here, people are scared. They don't seem to be communicating in any coordinated fashion and and they obviously are scaring the [ __ ] out of the public.
Sacks: 答案显然是肯定的。他们把公众吓坏了。这在很大程度上是美国特有的问题。斯坦福的一项研究显示,80% 的中国人认为 AI 利大于弊,而美国这一比例只有 30% 多。我认为这不仅仅是管理层沟通能力差,有些人甚至是故意的,为了实现监管捕获(Regulatory Capture)。
Original English
Sacks: Well look, I think the answer is clearly no. I think they are scaring the be Jesus out of the public. I think it's less about the reality of AI and more about our media environment and who influences it. I think others are actually doing it because they see a strategy there. You know, they're going for a regulatory capture.
Sacks: 他们想制造监管反弹,从而控制市场——建立许可制度或准入计划。此外,还有那些由亿万富翁(如 Dustin Moskovitz)资助的“末日论”智库(如 Future of Life Institute),他们拥有数十亿美元,对公共舆论产生了巨大影响。他们散布关于数据中心耗电、耗水的虚假恐惧(FUD)。事实上,现代数据中心使用的是循环水,并不消耗水资源。
Original English
Sacks: like they want to tap the stuff for fundraising, but also I think that some of it is to create a regulatory backlash that they can then control. You know, create a licensing scheme or permissioning scheme. And then you've kind of got these doomer groups who are just trying to stop AI however they can. They've been spreading a lot of the FUD around data centers. They've been spreading a lot of stories about water usage, which is just totally made up.
华盛顿州的“百万富翁税”与富豪外逃
Jason: 华盛顿州本周通过了“百万富翁税”。年收入超过 100 万美元的人将从 2029 年起额外缴纳 9.9% 的税。巧合的是,同一天,星巴克长期 CEO Howard Schultz 搬到了迈阿密。在此之前,贝索斯也在 2023 年 11 月离开了。
Original English
Jason: Washington's millionaire tax passed this week. People making more than $1 million a year will pay an extra 9.9% in tax starting in 2029. In a huge coincidence, on the same day the new tax was passed, Howard Schultz, the billionaire Starbucks founder, will be leaving Seattle after a 44 year run. Bezos obviously left back in November of 2023.
Chamath: 西海岸的州政府官员非常无能且不聪明。胡佛研究所(Hoover Institution)刚发布了一份关于加州亿万富翁税的报告,这完全是一份控诉书。报告显示,这项税收的 **NPV(净现值)**是负数。他们高估了亿万富翁的人数,低估了他们已经缴纳的税款。仅仅是因为这项税收的威胁,就导致了顶级税源的外逃,造成了 250 亿美元的预算黑洞。最终,这些缺口将由中产阶级来填补。
Original English
Chamath: I think that state politicians on the west coast are very ineffective and not very smart. The Hoover Institution just published something this morning and it's a complete indictment of of what the billionaire tax was trying to do. In 71% of those runs, it comes out with a negative NPV. The people that left pay, you know, $3 to 5 billion a year of taxes. It's going to create a $25 billion hole. You're going to have the middle class that's now going to have to foot this.
Sacks: 这就是社会主义。政府想拥有一切。如果不纠正这种趋势,到 2028 年,这种“全国财富税”将成为民主党的标准政纲。其实出路很简单:美国人想要什么?教育孩子、拥有住房、体面的医疗。AI 具有独特的地位来解决这些问题。如果我们被允许进入这些高度监管的行业,企业家可以大幅降低教育、住房和医疗的成本。
Original English
Sacks: Look, this is socialism. This is another way to get to the same end point, which is the government owns everything. There is a way out here from this socialist movement. It's a it's very simple if you think from first principles. AI is uniquely positioned to solve a lot of these problems. and entrepreneurs can come in and take these highly regulated industries if we're allowed to participate in them. Education, housing, healthcare.
📌 文中提及的人物和组织
人物: Brad Gerstner, Sam Altman, Howard Schultz, Donald Trump
公司/组织: OpenAI, Anthropic, Goldman Sachs, Starbucks