效率至上与建筑记忆的消亡
如果我们居住的空间能够真正反映我们是谁,而不仅仅是追求建造的最高速度或最低成本,世界将会怎样?这并不意味着每个人都要亲自设计自己的房子,而是要重新思考住宅最初的建造方式。我们都见过这样的场景:成排的房屋千篇一律,你只能通过外面停放的汽车颜色来区分它们。这并非 AI 生成的图像,而是迪拜某个社区的真实照片,离我住的地方不远。它的设计初衷是追求效率,而非体现身份认同。
现实情况是,当今的大多数住宅都是开发商为了迎合市场而设计的,并不是为了未来居住在里面的人。这些由模板驱动的系统几乎没有给创新留下任何空间,也无暇顾及形式或功能。然而,为了理解这种困境的根源,我们需要了解对标准化的依赖并非新鲜事。从历史上看,模块化系统(Modular Systems: 基于标准化组件的建筑预制技术)最初并非为了实现利润最大化。二战后,当欧洲各地的整个城市被夷为平地时,我们需要一种方法让人们迅速回到屋檐下:预制件、套件组合、临时住房。在世界各地,模块化成为了紧急重建的工具。它见效快,但代价往往是牺牲了建筑原有的特征。
令人遗憾的是,在今天的加沙、苏丹和乌克兰等地,建筑与文化遗产正在再次被抹去。消失的不仅是人民和建筑,更是记忆、归属感和文化。我在这里并没有提供一个简单的解决方案。我想表达的是,我们必须重建,但在重建的过程中,我们必须将身份认同铭记在心。
Original English
What if the places we lived in could truly reflect who we are and not just what's fastest or cheapest to build? This isn't about everyone designing their own house. It's about rethinking how homes are created in the first place. We've all seen this. Rows of homes so alike you can only tell them apart by the color of the car parked outside. This is not an AI image. It’s a real photo of a neighborhood in Dubai not far from where I live. And it's designed for efficiency, not identity. Truth is, most homes today are designed by developers for the market and not for the people that will live in them. These template-driven systems leave little room to innovate or think about form or function.
But this reliance on standardization isn't new. Historically, modular systems were not designed to maximize profit. After World War II, when entire cities across Europe were flattened, there was a way to get people back under roofs quickly: prefabs, kits-of-parts, temporary housing. Across the world, modularity became a tool for urgent rebuilding. And it worked fast but often at the cost of character. Sadly, today, once again, architecture and heritage are being erased. In places like Gaza, in Sudan, in Ukraine, what disappears isn't just people and buildings, it's memory, belonging, culture. I'm not here with a simple fix. What I'm saying is we must rebuild, but we need to rebuild with identity in mind.
科技与传统的共生
我是里亚德·朱卡(Riyad Joucka),一名常驻迪拜的建筑师。我经营着一家名为 MEAN(中东建筑网络)的建筑事务所。最令我兴奋的是寻找将新兴科技与当地故事融合的方法,有时这意味着利用 3D打印(3D Printing: 基于数字模型逐层制造物理实体的技术)和机器人技术进行实验。而在其他时候,它意味着重新解读一种传统,并赋予其现代的形式。从单件物品到文化建筑,在不同的尺度上,我们的项目都在探索如何通过技术让当地的材料和工艺焕发新生。我们在不同的地方都有过项目经验,但初衷始终如一:每个项目都试图在保持前瞻性的同时,扎根于它所在的特定空间。这正是住宅项目最令我兴奋的地方。在这里,科技与归属感实现了最直接的交汇。因为我们的家不应该仅仅是避风港,它们更应该是我们内心世界的镜像。
为了进一步说明,这是我长大的房子,由我的父亲设计。我在一个充满艺术、文化和空间讨论的家庭氛围中长大。这正是我今天看待设计的方式:它不是一个冰冷的模板,而是深深植根于家庭、故事和地点的事物。你看,这所房子真实地反映了该地区的传统,正如1994年《Al-Bina》杂志的这篇报道所展示的那样。自然光透过天窗被引入室内,外墙覆盖着天然石材,墙壁内直接用混凝土浇筑了一个 Majlis(阿拉伯传统会客室)。我父亲将其描述为“后传统建筑”,因为后现代主义从未真正适应我们的语境。这座房子确实是我们传统的反映,只不过是以一种现代的形式呈现。
我总是不断回归到这种传统的智慧中。用于聚会的 Majlis,用于招待客人的 Diwans,这些空间超越了它们原有的功能性,将人们紧密地联系在一起。庭院在阴影中带来清凉;被称为 Barjeel(风塔)的结构让空气在房屋中自然流动;被称为 Mashrabiya(阿拉伯木雕窗花)的屏风过滤着光线并创造隐私。这些设计不仅塑造了结构,更塑造了氛围。在 MEAN 事务所,我们在设计中使用了类似的设计语言。在 House 00 中,我们围绕着一个庭院进行布局,外部由水体环绕降温,外墙包裹着波纹状石材以呼应周围群山的地形语言。在 Cosmos House 项目中,我们与艺术家茱莉亚·伊比尼(Julia Ibbini)合作,利用算法(Algorithms)和分形几何学设计了 Mashrabiya 屏风。这座房子被设计为使用周围环境中的沙子进行3D打印。沙漠建筑的古老智慧通过数字工具得到了重新诠释。此外,我们还在扎耶德大学领导了“适应性 Majlis”研究项目,探索3D打印的模块化系统如何帮助我们在今天重新诠释这些传统。
Original English
My name is Riyad Joucka. I’m an architect based in Dubai where I run a practice called MEAN: the Middle East Architecture Network. What excites me is finding ways to fuse novel technologies with local stories, and sometimes that means experimenting with 3D printing and robotics. At other times, it's about rereading a tradition and giving it a contemporary form. Across different scales from a single object to a cultural building, our projects look at how local materials and craftsmanship could be given a new life through technology. We’ve worked in different places across the Middle East, Europe and the US, but the constant is this: every project tries to be forward-looking while remaining grounded in [its] space. And that's what excites me the most about housing. It's where technology and belonging meet most directly. Because our homes aren't just shelters, they should be mirrors of who we are.
And to further introduce myself, this is the house that I grew up in, designed by my father. You see, both of my parents are architects, [and] both of my grandparents were notable artists, so I grew up in a household surrounded by conversations about art, culture and space. And that's how I see design today. Not as a template, but as something truly rooted in family, stories and place. The house truly reflects the traditions of the region, as you can see in this scan from Al-Bina magazine, [which in] 1994 wrote about the house. I pulled these from my father's archives. You can see natural light being drawn through skylights, natural stone facade covering the exterior -- very typical of houses in the region. A majlis cast in concrete in the walls themselves. My father describes it as post-traditional architecture because postmodernism never really fit our context. One of the few things he and I agree on when it comes to work. No, but the house really is a reflection of our traditions, but in a contemporary form.
And I keep returning to this traditional wisdom. The majlis for gathering, diwans for hosting, spaces that extend beyond their functionality to bring people together. Courtyards that cool in shade. Spaces that make the outdoors livable. Barjeels or windcatchers that breathe air through a home. Passive design centuries before we use the word "sustainability." Screens that filter light and create privacy: mashrabiyas -- design that shapes atmosphere as much as structure. And we use a similar vocabulary for our house at MEAN. For House 00, the first house we designed, we designed the house around a courtyard with a water body cooling the exterior. The house is wrapped with this corrugated stone facade, echoing the language of the topography of the mountain surrounding it. The house sits atop Jebel Jais, and to me, it’s a real interpretation of traditional forms but in a contemporary home. Cosmos House, we collaborated with artist Julia Ibbini to design these mashrabiyas. We used algorithms and fractal geometry to filter light into speckled shadows. The house is designed to be 3D-printed using sand from the surrounding environment. The ancient wisdom of desert architecture reinterpreted using digital tools. Beyond practice, I also lead the Adaptive Majlis research project at Zayed University. We’re looking at ... how 3D-printed modular systems could help us reinterpret these traditions today. The Majlis, a unique typology of the region, is being rethought through the lens of modern technology, local craftsmanship and contemporary lifestyles.
赋予模块化系统以灵魂
基于传统智慧与现代科技的结合,这种思维方式帮助塑造了我们在 MEAN 开发的住宅模块化系统——可变装配(Permutable Assemblies)。我们问自己:如果模块化系统不再抹杀个性,而是帮助展示和表达它呢?如果它能在不增加任何额外成本的情况下,响应当地的语境、气候和文化呢?
马里的杰内大清真寺(Djenné Great Mosque)是世界上最大的土坯建筑。但它真正引人注目的不仅仅是建筑本身,更是那里的人民。每年,社区居民都会聚集在一起,修缮并重新粉刷清真寺的墙壁,将枯燥的维护工作变成一场盛大的节日。这座建筑之所以能够幸存下来,正是因为有社区在维护它。而在许多现代城市中,这种共同承担责任的意识已经渐渐流失。
为了重塑这种连结,我们的系统是这样运作的:建筑商、开发商或者任何一位普通用户,将他们围绕空间需求、环境背景和气候条件的参数输入到一个数字平台中。然后,系统会根据这些背景生成由特定模块组成的布局。这些部件随后在场外使用本地的低碳材料进行预制,生产过程精确且几乎没有浪费。最后,这些部件就像现代的组合套件或乐高积木一样,一块一块地被组装成一个家。
这个过程快速且高效,但与传统的预制建筑不同,它并不强求千篇一律。传统的模块化系统依赖于重复的模板,但借助3D打印技术,我们可以打破这种模具。这个系统可以从单栋房屋扩展到整个社区,在那里,每栋房屋都共享同一种底层逻辑,但却没有两栋是完全相同的。这就是带有性格的模块化,它将机械的重复转化为了富有韵律的节奏。
3D打印使得曲线、纹理和装饰在规模化生产中变得切实可行。灵感来源于当地图案的屏风、仿佛在诉说沙漠故事的墙壁——这些往往是传统预制建筑中会被省略掉的细节。你看,模块化并不一定意味着千篇一律。它可以意味着多样性、意图和能动性。设计不应该仅仅来自于一本产品目录,它应该与你共同成长,回应你的需求,并反映出真实的你。这才是建筑应有的样子。它不应是强加于人的,也不应是遥不可及的,而是应该深深扎根于我们的生活之中。我们可以邀请人们和社区共同塑造我们称之为家的空间,因为真正的设计,属于每一个人。
Original English
That same thinking helped shape permutable assemblies, a modular system we developed at MEAN for housing. We asked ourselves: we need to produce a modular system with a certain goal, and that goal is to design for a modular system that is personal, local and expressive. And we asked ourselves: instead of erasing character, what if modular systems helped showcase it and express it, responding to contexts, climate and culture without any added cost?
Djenné Great Mosque in Mali is the world's largest adobe building. But what's remarkable isn't just the architecture, it's the people. Every year, the community gathers to repair its walls and replaster them, turning maintenance into a festival. The building survives because of the community that maintains it. And that sense of shared responsibility is something that we've lost in many modern cities.
Here's how our system works. A builder, developer or simply any user enters parameters around their spatial needs, context, climate, into a digital platform. It then generates layouts composed of modules shaped by that context. These parts are then prefabricated off-site, using local low-carbon materials produced with precision and little waste. The parts are assembled piece by piece, almost like a modern kit-of-parts or a set of LEGOs, if you may, into a home. The process is fast and efficient, but unlike traditional prefab, it does not force sameness. See, traditional modular systems rely on repeated templates. With 3D printing, we can break that mold, designing for efficiency as well as belonging. The system scales up from house to neighborhood, where every home shares a logic, but no two are alike. It's modularity with character, turning repetition into rhythm.
3D printing makes curves, textures and ornaments practical at scale. Screens inspired by local patterns. Walls that read like the desert. Details prefab usually cuts out. You see, modularity doesn't have to mean sameness. It can mean variation, intention and agency. Design shouldn't come from a catalog. It should grow with you, respond to you and reflect you. And that's what architecture should be. Not imposed, not distant, but deeply rooted. We shouldn't keep repeating the same formulas. We can build differently. We can invite people and communities to shape the spaces we call home, because design, real design, belongs to everyone. Thank you. (Applause)